 sj |
||
|
||
BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid?
|
|
|
|||||||
|
BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? |
Share Thread
|
||||||
|
Subject: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Jack the Sailor Date: 09 Oct 12 - 02:00 AM No adult men in Northern Kentucky? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Jack Campin Date: 09 Oct 12 - 08:16 AM That site is malicious. I had to force-quit Firefox to stop it repeatedly demanding to set cookies. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Jack the Sailor Date: 09 Oct 12 - 08:23 AM It is the National Football league site. They are no more malicious than this site. Is this one any better. http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/121008/sarah-jones-child-sex-underrage-cincinnati-bengals-cheerleaders-video http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/national_world&id=8840501 http://blacksportsonline.com/home/wp-content/gallery/sarah-jones-bengals-cheerleader/sarah-jones-bengals-cheerleader.jpg |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Jack Campin Date: 09 Oct 12 - 08:33 AM Googling the relevant words found me the story at a few other sites I know and can trust. I can't see why anybody bothered sending her to trial or reporting on it, though. And no the NFL site is NOT like Mudcat. I am not paying a repeat visit to a site that locks my browser up. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Q (Frank Staplin) Date: 09 Oct 12 - 12:49 PM Posts without a proper reference or explanation are always suspect. That is why I don't link sites any more, but post their website name. Then one can make a decision as to opening it. Youtube- If one is given the name of a song or a performer, there is no need for a link; go to youtube.com and insert the name in their search blank. This will pull up the song and others like it. Some of the lyrics sites lock the browser, a damn nuisance. Next time I get one of them, I will post their url (as I guess it's called). |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Bobert Date: 09 Oct 12 - 12:56 PM Who cares... 17??? 18??? Hey, it was consensual and the 17 year old must not have been some dummy if he had already graduated high school by age 17... Some people in their 20s or 30s might be more a child than this guy... More power to them... I mean, even the guys' parent's were okay with it... Plus, these two people had know each other for at least 3 years... People need to get real lives... No victim here... B~ |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Jack the Sailor Date: 09 Oct 12 - 01:07 PM If you don't trust me and don't want to open the thread. That is fine. If you want to start a thread on how to post links then by all means bugger off and start one. I don't need your advice. Jack did I say it was the same at the Mudcat? I said it wasn't any more malicious. NFL.com is not trying to steal your identity or put a virus on your computer Thank you. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Q (Frank Staplin) Date: 09 Oct 12 - 01:15 PM The top of your head needs to be anchored. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: A Bengal's cheerleader and a HS kid? From: Greg F. Date: 09 Oct 12 - 04:02 PM You don't get much more malicious than the National Football League. Much more so than the American Football League. |
