 sj |
||
|
||
BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake
|
|
|
Subject: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake? From: Henry Krinkle Date: 16 Sep 12 - 06:30 AM If they're real, why is it ok for Amerika to have them and no one else? Why can't Iran have the A-Bomb if they desire it? Who is Amerika to say no? Why does Amerika have the right to globally enforce its laws? It makes my blood boil. I could just scream! (:-( ))= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Dead Horse Date: 16 Sep 12 - 06:41 AM Screaming while gargling with bleach has often proved efficacious in cases similar to yours. Failing that you could try pouring petroleum spirit all over your body paying particular attention to under-arms, behind ears etc. then lighting a small fire to warm by. If you decide on the latter please send pictures. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 16 Sep 12 - 06:51 AM Burning Man Festival Like this? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Rapparee Date: 16 Sep 12 - 07:00 AM I'm having serious doubts about why I created you. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 02:10 AM No one created me. I evolved. (:-( ))= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Dave Hanson Date: 17 Sep 12 - 03:57 AM Ya gotta admire Henry's sense of humour, ' I evolved ' what from ? he obviously doesn't even understand the basic facts of life, poor bugger. Dave H |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,CS Date: 17 Sep 12 - 04:54 AM He's right. I don't know why the US gets to be the arbiter of who else in the world (apart from them) is allowed to own nukes. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 05:51 AM Somewhere along the line Amerika decided that it has the right to engage in Amerikan law enforcement all over the world. Or wherever it thinks it can get away with it. (:-( 0)= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: kendall Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:22 AM I have asked myself the same question. If I had my way I would bring every one of our military home and stop messing with other countries business. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: beardedbruce Date: 17 Sep 12 - 09:18 AM Signatories to the UN treaty agree NOT to develop nuclear WEAPONS in exchange for technical assistance in developing nuclear POWER. Iran signed this treaty, and was given technical aid- and now violates the treaty. Israel NEVER signed the treaty, and if it had, could have been one of the nuclear weapon owning powers, since it had ( presumably) the weapon prior to the treaty being created. Israel would be like the US, USSR, China, France, and Great Britain. But I agree with Kendall- we SHOULD stop policing the world- and paying the bulk of the costs for the UN. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 09:38 AM We need to keep our technology to ourselves. They can develop their own. Maybe theirs can surpass ours. Good for them. (:-( ))= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Bobert Date: 17 Sep 12 - 09:50 AM I agree 100% with the Krinkx on this one... If I were the leader of Ira and I had so many countries out there making threatening statements it would be negligent to not look around for a big stick to defend myself... Iranians, in spite of the rhetoric, are not irrational people... They understand that if they lobbed a nuke at Israel that they would be wiped off the face of the Earth by the US... It's time to put down the sabers and quit threatening people... Obama could do this today... Netanyahu could pick up the phone today and call Ahmadinejad... B~ |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 17 Sep 12 - 10:46 AM We need to keep our technology to ourselves. They can develop their own. That'll work right up to the point where one of "our" guys discovers he can make lots more money selling "our" technology to "them" than he'd ever make by protecting it for "us". |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Jack the Sailor Date: 17 Sep 12 - 11:30 AM Keep in mind the number one foreign policy message of W. You got nukes. You can disagree and you don't get messed with. No nukes and you get blamed for attacks by Saudis and your ass gets invaded. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 11:38 AM They really are spineless. And they send other peoples children off to die. Just to make a buck. Selling technology to the enemy? Laws are supposed to take care of that. Laws take care of everything! (:-( O)= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Jack the Sailor Date: 17 Sep 12 - 11:42 AM Krinkle's outrage: Real or Fake? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 12:15 PM Very very real. As real as it gets, sweetcheeks. (:-( 0)= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Jack the Sailor Date: 17 Sep 12 - 12:58 PM Proven fake on previous post. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp Date: 17 Sep 12 - 01:10 PM We all evolve, Henry, only some evolve slower than others, that's all. Iran obviously NEEDS some nukes to survive, cos if they don't get some soon the USA and Israel will sooner or later attack them, as they continually threaten to do. The most sensible thing would be if the Russians simply openly GAVE the Iranians about 20 really big nukes, complete with advanced delivery systems, installed and ready, and they could then say to the USA and Israel..."There. They've got them now, and you can't attack them anymore without sufferin' a major retaliation that is far more than you'd want to deal with...so shut up, fuck off, and leave Iran alone from now on." That would do the trick nicely and there'd be no war with Iran. But it would have to be done fast...what you call a fete accompli in French...an accomplished fact. - Chongo |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker Date: 17 Sep 12 - 01:12 PM "Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake" The cheap 1 litre spray of Ant killer I buy from Tesco every spring seems real enough, inflicting swift genocide on the irritating bug populations nesting under our house.... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 03:02 PM Those jetliners smashing into the Twin Towers were real enough. And not sponsored by any government. Except maybe Bush's Inner Circle. (:-( 0)= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,CS Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:03 PM Nice to see posters from different political affiliations saying the same stuff regards US forigin policy. Did you all listen to Osama Bin Laden's stuff about the US's actions in the Middle-East That's not meant provocatively, just a query, because every American should know what Osama had to say. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,CS Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:04 PM Forigin? Oh well, near enough I suppose. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:11 PM What did he say? (:-( o)= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: gnu Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:32 PM Very real. Didn't find them? Of course not. Why not? Too valuable. The spoils of war, eh? Now, fact is, Iran got it's ass kicked fer bein uppity and they got their WMDs taken away from them... the uranium, the gas... and the tanks and lots of other shit that was blown to fuck. The "West" got all the good shit in the middle of the night. They had their SCUD missiles taken from them... oh... who sold them the SCUDs to deliver WMDs? Anyone who thinks Iran did not have WMDs is childish. Anyone who thinks the West didn't sell Iran those WMDs is childish. Anyone who thinks Bush was gonna "FIND" WMDs there? I would not use the term, "childish". That would be complimentary. WMDs? Weapons of Mindless Destruction I say. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,CS Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:39 PM That's sorted that out then.. So when you going to inform Israel Gnu? :-) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Henry Krinkle Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:45 PM Gnu, Iraq and Iran are two different countries. I think you have them mixed up. (:-( ))= |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Ed T Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:53 PM It seems that the USA WMDs are getting old, and need to be used or replaced. Could this be a reason why Iran is being focused on -use 'em or lose 'em? Shelf life of WMDs I have an alternative solution, like with your car, "trade up" the old and get new. Iran is expending alot of effort producing them, that seems to have everyone on edge-and could also impact the global ecomony (aka oil prices). So, why not give them the old ones and spread them around the middle east. That way Iran feels good that they have 'em and wont use 'em cause they know many other neighbours also have 'em. They will also be busy fixing them up to extend the "best before date", like with fixing a used car. If they screw up and happen to "set a few of 'em off - end of problem-everyone wins. Well, except for them, of course. But, as any used car salesman (or, a used British sub salesman) will attest, once you buy 'em, the problem is yours. Kinda a "curb to gutter" warranty - when it hits the curb "you gotter". |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: gnu Date: 17 Sep 12 - 06:57 PM Well, there it is. Hank got me. I think Hank has words of MD. Thanks for the correction, Hank. Unless.... you read history... say, didn't Iraq war upon Iran... where the WMDs were in the first place? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Jack the Sailor Date: 17 Sep 12 - 07:15 PM Gnu, The Iraqi SCUDS were Soviet design. But Reagan sold them nerve gas to use on the Iranians. So you are mostly correct. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: GUEST,999 Date: 18 Sep 12 - 12:24 PM "Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake" Just ask the survivors of Halabja, 1988. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Little Hawk Date: 18 Sep 12 - 12:27 PM Even George W. Bush had trouble telling Iran and Iraq apart and finding them on the map, so don't give gnu a hard time... ;-) When the USA accused Iraq of having WMDs, the clear implication was that Iraq posed a nuclear threat. You can't scare the American public into supporting a war by telling them that Saddam has tanks, bombs, SCUD missiles, poison gas or uranium ore...as none of those things pose a credible threat to the USA. Iraq is too far away for any of those things to pose a threat to the USA. But you can scare the American and English public by making them think Iraq or Iran poses a nuclear threat. So that is the standard scare tactic that is used every time. Saddam had no nuclear attack capability. If he had had it, they'd never have invaded Iraq. Iran likewise has no nuclear attack capability, but I think they'd better get some pretty soon or they will be the next place to get hit in a pre-emptive war. Remember Tony Blair? He bamboozled the British public into the notion that Saddam could launch an attack on the British Isles within forty-five minutes if he wanted to! Unbelievable...and total bullshit. These lies the West is telling to justify its wars of choice upon Third World nations are comparable to the grotesque lies that Hitler told his people about the Poles, the Jews, or whoever else he wanted to eliminate in order to enlarge the Third Reich. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: kendall Date: 18 Sep 12 - 01:25 PM In 7 years of inspections, no such weapons were found. Saddam led us to believe that he did have them but that was to scare away enemies. He would have used them had he had them. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: Little Hawk Date: 18 Sep 12 - 01:59 PM I bet he wished he had some when facing imminent threat of invasion. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Weapons of Mass Destruction:Real or Fake From: gnu Date: 18 Sep 12 - 02:32 PM I have always contended he did have them but they were spirited out of the country before the invasion in a deal he made with the Brits and the Libyans. The Brits did not live up to the deal... just ask Saddam and Quackdaffy. LH... the q and the n are next to each other on my keyboard. Well, they were last night. >;-) |
