 sj |
||
|
||
BS: Putting lipstick on the whore
|
|
|
|||||||
|
BS: Putting lipstick on the whore |
Share Thread
|
||||||
|
Subject: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: michaelr Date: 16 Jun 06 - 07:56 PM Republicans are pushing through a new resolution applauding Bush for his successes in Iraq. I am speechless. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 16 Jun 06 - 08:23 PM Don't insult working girls by a comparison like that. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 16 Jun 06 - 08:33 PM What? And they didn't pass a resolution congratulating Bill Clinton for getting a blowjob? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Ebbie Date: 16 Jun 06 - 09:08 PM And if they can suss out a point where people wouldn't take to the streets in outraged protest, it is almost a given that he will be awarded a Peace Prize. A political party that can idolize Reagan has no limits on shame. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: GUEST,Desdemona Date: 16 Jun 06 - 09:29 PM 'Struth! The day after Ronnie shuffled off this mortal coil, I passed a massive electronic highway sign (and mind, I live in Massachusetts)reading: "Godspeed, President Reagan"...I nearly drove off the road! The instantaneous canonization of amoral warmongers by virtue of their advanced age and passing from this world in the natural order of things is a sociocultural trend I find particularly disturbing...but O, that we had the opportunity to try it out on GW! ~D |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Barry Finn Date: 16 Jun 06 - 11:29 PM He took the goods, royally fucked everyone & nobody's gonna get as much as a kiss goodbye when he's gone. I would have rather he stuck a gun up my ass & not asked politely for evey thing I had on me. The lipstick just made the hole experience messy. Barry |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: catspaw49 Date: 17 Jun 06 - 12:25 AM Like I keep saying, the Repubs have written new laws on sex making oral sex a mortal sin while at the same time lifting sodomy to a place equal to that of prayer. Bill Clinton was impeached for a blowjob but Dubya' has butt-fucked TWO nations and is being rewarded. Please pass the Vaseline. Spaw |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: number 6 Date: 17 Jun 06 - 12:32 AM Isn't vaseline a petroleum by-product? sIx |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: CarolC Date: 17 Jun 06 - 01:19 AM Three nations, at least, Spaw. Afghanistan, Iraq, and the United States of America. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: alanabit Date: 17 Jun 06 - 03:34 AM Is it too late to honour Caligula and Nero for bringing peace and stability to Rome? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: kendall Date: 17 Jun 06 - 07:07 AM Clinton was impeached for lying, not for "Getting a blow job." Interesting how we got from a very successful president to one of the worst! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: catspaw49 Date: 17 Jun 06 - 09:39 AM Yeah, I know Kendall, but Reagan lied, Bush Sr. lied, etc., etc.,.................But nobody got in a huge uproar over it. They were 'after" Clinton but they couldn't get any more mileage out of actual incidents no matter how trivial....like Whitewater. No, they went for the jugular on the blow job and it didn't matter much whether he lied or not. They had a real moral issue here! Why, the Commies or somebody might be able to get security issues from him!!! Personally, I will always believe the thing was about getting a swab on his knob. Spaw |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Amos Date: 17 Jun 06 - 11:09 AM Well, there is a lesson to be learned here. Making more than half of Congress intensely jealous is an unwise move. A |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: alanabit Date: 17 Jun 06 - 02:17 PM On the semantics you are right Kendall. However, the usual response I get when I ask someone intimate questions about things, which are none of my business, is something along the lines of, "Mind your own business or I'll flatten your nose." It's not the response of a good liberal, I know, but it does remind me to mind my manners. I couldn't give a bugger's if Tony Blair shags the royal corgis. It is none of my business and I would not ask. Why a US President should have to answer questions like that quite baffles me. How do you expect him to uphold your constitution if he has no civil rights himself? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Don Firth Date: 17 Jun 06 - 04:17 PM They were after Clinton (the Clintons) right from the start and they would have pounced on any viable excuse like a cougar on a rabbit. Assuming he was going to play around (and he was certainly not the only president to do so), Clinton's big mistake was that he wasn't cautious enough and—dare I say it?—screwed up. Monica should have kept her mouth shut on at least two occasions, first with Bill and then with her dear "friend" Linda Tripp. The fact that Bill lied about it later didn't help him, but that would have made no difference. Had it not been for the lie, they would have had to play the "moral turpitude" card, which would have less legal standing. The Repubs were out to get him, and if it hadn't been that, it would have been something else. Bill wasn't all that bad a president. At least he left the country with the first budget surplus in—how many decades? As far as budgets are concerned, Georgie has managed to blow the budget surplus he inherited from Bill and dig the deepest financial hole the country has ever been in. Now that was a blow job! Don Firth |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 17 Jun 06 - 05:56 PM I'd have thought that "Godspeed, President Reagan" is a pretty ambiguous message. As would be "Godspeed, President Bush" Read it one way and it's not a million miles from saying "good riddance"... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Greg F. Date: 17 Jun 06 - 06:34 PM ... it is almost a given that he will be awarded a Peace Prize. I'm not sure he qualifies- yet. The last real obscene butcher to get the Nobel Prize was the saintly Henry Kissenger and Dumbya hasn't killed nearly enough of his own countrymen to even approach Henry's score. Yet. [ PS: Shows you what the prize is worth ] |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: GUEST Date: 17 Jun 06 - 09:22 PM ...anyway, Clinton didn't lie. He "did not have sexual relations with that woman." He got a blowjob. Any teenager can confirm that is not sexual relations. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: GUEST Date: 17 Jun 06 - 09:25 PM Tell that to your wife or husband. Let us know how it turns out. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Don Firth Date: 17 Jun 06 - 10:06 PM Depends on your definition of "sexual relations," obviously. In any case, Hillary had ample reason to make him sleep on the couch. By the way, isn't this thread about Bush? Let's get back to our regular broadcast. Don Firth |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: michaelr Date: 18 Jun 06 - 12:08 AM This thread is about the unbelievable level of delusion and/or deception that congressional Republicans are displaying in creating and supporting this "resolution". The whore I refer to is the war itself. Cheers, Michael |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Putting lipstick on the whore From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 18 Jun 06 - 07:02 AM Surely the point is that a banker, or a lawyer, or a carpenter might lose his marriage for playing away from home, but he would emphatically NOT lose his livelihood. But if any of the three started murdering neighbours...........True or false? Don T. |
