Subject: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 14 Jan 02 - 12:03 PM Hey, Catters! I've written poetry nearly all my life -- well for the last 29 1/2 years, anyway. Now, I find myself at the "midpoint in my journey through life", my brain is itching for a new challenge, longing to stretch my skills into a new direction, and adding melodies to the words feels like it is the right step to take next. So: any pointers from those who have gone down this road before? Do you, as your own personal preference, generally start with the words, or the music, first? Is there a method to your madness, or is it just trial and error (or is that your method?) Do you have memories of the first song you ever wrote? Do you have emories of the first song you wrote that actually worked? ;-) Etc. I'm hoping this will turn into a fun discussion... |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Fortunato Date: 14 Jan 02 - 01:15 PM Here is an example of spare, minimalist song writing. The writer, Merle Haggard, although a 'country' song writer, transcends the genre. TODAY I STARTED LOVING YOU AGAIN Today I started loving you again, I'm right back where I've really always been, Now, I got over you just long enough to let my heartache mend, And today I started loving you again. What a fool I was to think I could get by, With only these few million tears I've cried Now I now the worst was yet to come And that crying time for me had just begun. The first lines is iambic pentameter. After that it is rather irregular. The lines don't 'scan', the phrasing of the singer supersedes or effects (not affects) the cadence of the lyrics. Without the music the Chorus and Verse are the bare minimum of the idea. With the music the song becomes an extremely effective lament, clear, concise and easliy processed, remembered, repeated, quoted. Some thoughts, good luck. Can you make up a melody you can whistle? regards, Fortunato |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Fortunato Date: 14 Jan 02 - 01:17 PM I ought to give some time to prufreeding, I guess... |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: The Shambles Date: 14 Jan 02 - 01:34 PM I find that even when I compose in my head before using any instruments, that there is a melody or if not quite that a beat or something, that is linked to the words. Interesting to see if having composed poetry for so long, the same thing happens to you? |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 14 Jan 02 - 02:04 PM As a poet, you undoubtably know that poetry has often been sung, and continues to be sung in some other cultures--Ezra Pound wrote music for some of his verse, inspired by the fact that much of the great corpus of English poetry had once been sung--I think he was particularly inspired Thomas Campion when he did this(though he was also thinking of the Provencal poets, and Dante)-- Ira Gershwin had studied "Vers Du Societe"--light verse, and his vision of what lyric writing should be is based heavily on what he found there. He,Cole Porter, Irving Berlin, and Larry Hart, shared the same ideas, and developed a kind of songwriting that was witty, poignant, and reflective, in a way that was connected more with poetic tradition than the tradition of popular songs-- My point(somewhat elusive, I am afraid) is just that you are not really going very far afield, depending of course, on what sort of verse you write, and what sort of songs you want to write. Do you write music? You don't need to compose music to write songs, and, in fact, most people who write in the "folk: idiom (and the contemporary pop idiom, for that matter) don't really so much write melodies, as they select a generic melody that fits their rhyme scheme and, consicously or unconsciously, change it a bit to fit their song and it's genre--nothing wrong with that at all-- |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 14 Jan 02 - 02:20 PM Fortunato -- As I can only whistle one or two notes reliably, any melody composed by that standard would be pretty monotonous (or duotonous [is that a word?]). I can hum, though... Whether you prufread, or proffread, or proofread, your message came through loud and clear ... So don't worry about it. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Bobert Date: 14 Jan 02 - 02:35 PM I have always written the song and then the music. Music is the easy part. Unlike poetry, most songs require a hook which is generally found in the last one or two lines of the chorus. This will be the verse or verses that the song is written around. Verses come a lot easier than hooks. A good hook will cover some average verses a lot more than the opposite. So work hard here. Strong hook, strong song! Also, subject matter. What are your interests and what are the interests of the folks fror whom you are writing. If it's coffee house then you'll generally do better with songs that tell stories and the "Oh, Baby, Baby" stuff isn't too well received. If you're playing a honkey tonk then the opposite is true. Also, the music style should fit the content. The "Oh, Baby, Baby" stuff does well with 3 and 4 basic primarily basic chords that are flatpicked or strummed. The more folkie story telling songs tend to work better with fingerpicking and use of more minor chords interspersed with majors. The minors give you an opportunity to relect on the emotion and introspection of the story. Now I realize that these are generalities but they do represent the opinions of this ol' song writer. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 14 Jan 02 - 02:42 PM Shambles, you wrote: ". . .there is a melody or if not quite that a beat or something, that is linked to the words. Interesting to see if having composed poetry for so long, the same thing happens to you?" It probably would, except that most of the poetry I've written has been in the form of free verse, where the meter is variable and the connections between words is based more on assonance and consonance. As an example, here is one small poem I wrote last year:
THE TIDES WITHIN Anyway, one reason I want to try my hand at writing melodies for my poems (or writing poems for my melodies) is that I will have to consider things like the rhythm and meter of the lines in a way I haven't done in many, many years -- hence, the brain-stretch. If I put melodies to the poems I'm most comfortable composing right now, they'd probably come out sounding like modern opera...
|
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 14 Jan 02 - 03:02 PM Bobart -- Thanks for your imput! Right now, I'm writing only for myself. All the performing I've done to date has been along the lines of spoken word pieces: poems like the one above, and original stories written in the "literary wondertale" genre (one such story is posted at the Mudcatters' Storytelling Page here ). If I stay along those lines, I'd probably write ballads based on wondertales, which often have "hooks" written into the telling ("Fee-Fi-Fo-Fum! I smell the blood of an Englishman!" etc.) So, what was the best hook you ever wrote? |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 14 Jan 02 - 03:25 PM Mr. Ted -- "As a poet, you undoubtably know that poetry has often been sung, and continues to be sung in some other cultures." Yes indeed. That's one reason I want to expand my poetic craft by adding music. Over the last year or so, I've become increasingly interested in aspects of oral culture and oral based memory -- getting away from my dependance on text. Songs are one of the strongest elements of oral culture, and the hardest to pin down to a two-dimensional page (yes, I know, you can write music into the form of a score, but the culturally speaking, more people learn music oral and aurally more than they do by learning to read music.) Also, music is one of the best ways (Even better than taking written notes) for aiding the memory...
|
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 14 Jan 02 - 03:44 PM I am not sure what you mean about songs--if you mean that you can put a written text on a page and have it stand alone, but a song must be performed in some way to stand on its own, I would agree-- Incidentally, musical phrases can vary in length, and it is possible to fit free verse to melodies without wandering all over the place--cantors do it all the time-- |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Bobert Date: 14 Jan 02 - 03:51 PM CapriUni, Just a few hooks that come to mind: Just like this train I'm stuck on this line I couldn't quit now Even if I tried From "Amtrac Blues" (1970) Now we ain't talkin' no trip to China No mansion on the hill Just 40 acres of Virginia soil and a little corn liquior still From "Arthur and Sally" (1985) ...though you're tearing up inside the clock says 6 oh 5 no, Jesus don't make housecalls anymore (1969) Those three come to mind though they involve multi lines to spin. One other thing I forgot to suggest which is real important. Learn to play an instrument if you don't allready and learn to sing other folks stuff while playing the instrument. Guitar is probably the easiest. Once you have that feel of performing songs it will be easier for you to write them. If you don't want to go thru that process, then find a musican with whom you can collaborate. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 14 Jan 02 - 04:13 PM Bobart -- I have cerebral palsy, and don't have the muscle coordination or strength needed to hold or play an instrument (especially guitar)! I can't even clap in time to "Bingo was his name-o!" I can hear the rhythm just fine, in my head, and I can reproduce the rhythm with my voice, but as soon as I try to get my hands to follow along, it all goes to pot. Maybe, I ought to try kazzoo, hmm? ;-) Cerebral palsy effects different parts of the brain depending on the person, and for me, the area effected most is muscle tone, followed closely by sense of balance... as it so happens, the part of the brain responsible for this is the same part of the brain that's responsible for rhythm and timing. I did download a computer program that turns my computer into a midi insturment, and am hoping that I can learn to "play" that reasonably well, as I eventually learned to type... |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 14 Jan 02 - 04:38 PM M. Ted: Now just holllld on a minute... Most songwriters pick a generic melody and then modify it slightly? I've run a lot of songwriter's workshops, and I think that it is very rare if someone sets out to pattern a song after a generic melody. All of us, songwriters or not, carry a wealth of melodies down in the furrows of our brain, and snatches of old melodies may surface from time to time. I think that every songwriter has realized with some embarassment that the tune to a song they've written bears a resemblance to another song they know. I realize that Dylan intentionally added new words to traditional songs when he first started writing, but I don't believe that he did that often once he gained experience writing. Once in awhile, the songwriters that I know will work within an existing chord progression and rhythm, consciously linking a new song to the old one. As for writing a song with an instrument in hand, even there, it's hard to make any generalities. A lot of songwriters do work with an instrument... maybe most. I don't. 95% of the songs I've written in my life have been when I haven't been near an instrument.. many of them while driving a car. Others start melody first and add lyrics. Whatever works. By all means, CapriUni, write songs. The most important instrument you need writing songs is your heart. Jerry |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Mark Cohen Date: 14 Jan 02 - 05:56 PM I know I'm going to be facing a hail of tomatoes when I say this, but I would actually take the suggestion about starting with a familiar melody one step further, and, AS AN EXERCISE, try writing a "parody". I put that in quotes because there are lots of negative reactions to the whole idea of parody. If you'd prefer, call it a "mimicry". Basically what I mean is to find a song you know well, and write new words to it, using some of the ideas of the original song if you can. There are some advantages to this. First, it gets you into the mindset of putting words to music, without worrying about whether the music is OK, or will support words. Second, it starts retraining your brain to create words with a stronger rhythm than the subtle pulse of free verse. Third, you can wind up with something that's fun! Check out some of Bob Blue's masterpieces, like THEIR WAY, or, if I may be so bold, THE BALLAD OF ERICA LEVINE or maybe THE EENSIE-WEENSIE SPIDER. I find that, since I'm a verbal kind of guy, I tend to start my songs with what I call a "dummy melody" (OK, wise guys, no comments necessary), just to get the rhythm and the "feel" of the song. I then modify the melody once the words are starting to come through, to make it more interesting or a better fit to the lyrics. But I have done it differently, and I expect I will try other methods as well. ...I'm just starting to write songs again after a 10-year hiatus. The most important thing, in my opinion, would be to TURN YOUR EDITOR OFF while you're writing, and, in the words of Natalie Goldberg, give yourself permission to write the worst junk in the world. As a poet you probably already know that...so just keep that feeling when you write songs, and you'll do fine. Oh, one more part to this rambling message, and probably the most important one: Listen! Listen to lots and lots of songs in the styles you like and want to use for your songs. I'd even suggest listening to some of the old traditional folk songs or kid's songs--they're simple, but they've held up over decades and centuries. ("Wee Sing Fun and Folk" is one of my favorites--and my daughter's, too!) Aloha, Mark |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Mark Cohen Date: 14 Jan 02 - 06:00 PM Oops, those links aren't going to work. Try For Just One Dime or Greenberg's. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Bobert Date: 14 Jan 02 - 07:16 PM Tell ya what, CapriUni, you get your meter and rhyme scheme down, put togather a couple songs, tell me how you hear them, what performers you like, and I'll take a crack at the music end of it if you don't have a musican to collaborate with. I don't write but will be glad to send you a tape and if you have the right puter program it will score it for you if you like what I come up with. Just send me a PM and we'll work out the rest. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Jim Dixon Date: 14 Jan 02 - 07:38 PM Merle Haggard's song may not scan well, but it scans a lot better that most modern poetry. Modern poetry has mostly abandoned the idea of regular rhythm, rhyme, and stanza structure. You've got to go back to Robert Frost or Emily Dickinson to find poems that sound like music. Or at least like folk music. A lot of modern songs (rock 'n' roll, rap, opera) have also abandoned regular structure, but folk music holds onto it. Since you brought this up in a folk music forum, I assume you intend to write songs that fit into the folk music genre, broadly defined. In my opinion (and I know others may disagree), nothing should be called "folk music" unless it has a regular and fairly simple metrical structure and rhyme scheme. I recommend you look at any hymnal that has a "Metrical Index of Tunes." Familiarize yourself with short meter (S.M.), common meter (C.M.), long meter (L. M.) and a few of the other more common forms. (And there are some forms peculiar to blues.) These pretty much set a limit to what you can get away with. I mean, you might become a successful songwriter without adhering to these structures, but then you shouldn't call your music "folk music." Besides meter, the other thing that folk music thrives on is the striking image. For some examples, see the thread, Best BLUES lines. There are links within that thread to other similar threads. One warning: don't try to cram too many striking images into one song. Coherence comes first. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: breezy Date: 14 Jan 02 - 08:52 PM Capri Uni, Hello I'm looking at poems that rhyme I do this from time to time Then I'll make up a tune And I'll hum strum or croon And it turns to a limerick chime. O.K. so that was not what I was after try again Tonight the rain fell for the first time, I went walking, I got wet I felt the cold ,dark hand of winter I heard the thunder of a jet. What I'm getting at is if it rhymes, and meters , then with me its got a better chance of becoming a song. I suppose you can write abstract , I tend to prefer hard fact. go for it, write it , sing it unacc., just keep to simple choruses, one liners repeated. Give us more samples 3/4/ 5 verses max 4 lines each, tell us something, comment on some thing,vent your spleen looking forward to future postings. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 14 Jan 02 - 10:03 PM Jerry, don't mean to impugn your originality, so I am a bit wary of saying too much more than I have said--but if anyone out there thinks that you are writing original melodies, you ought to think again-- You have to go quite a long way to find melodic ideas that haven't been used before, (that's why 12 tone music was invent)--after all, a melody can go up, down, or stay on the same note--and for folk and pop sorts of music, you can pretty much only go up and down either scalewise or chordwise, or you sound "wrong"--with more that 10,000 songs in the DT alone, don't you think your chances of coming up with something that is both unique, and still conventional enough to fit the genre are pretty remote? Fortunately, what the average ear hears is tempered a lot by reactions to the lyric, and even more by the unique emotional qualities in the voice of the singer--tempo, harmonies, and dynamics cloud things even more, so that generally, only the most astute listen will be able hear a song and recognize its relationship to another song-- |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 14 Jan 02 - 11:30 PM No Impugning taken, M. Ted. I would just things differently. From my perspective, everyone who loves music has a "vocabulary" that they've built over a lifetime. Mine is as much rhythm and blues as it is folk. What that means is that while none of my melodies are "unique" or even original, they flow out of the well of music I've loved all of my life. You had said that people knowingly start with a generic tune, and then consciously modify it. Sometimes I've done that... wrote a song with the melody to Will The Circle Be Unbroken with the title, We Are Walking In The Footsteps Of Those Who've Gone On Before. Rather a trite song, but the way, but I consciously wanted to honor a traditional melody line. My only disagreement is that I don't think that most songwriters start by consciously picking an existing melody. Many of the songs I've written have started in my sleep, when I certainly wasn't conscious. Anyway, the only thing that matters is if the song connects with the people who hear it. If it doesn't, it doesn't make any difference how the melody came into being. Maybe I'm just more unconscious than most. Besides, the real issue is whether a poet should be encouraged to write songs. ABSOLUTELY! One other point: Most of us "wrote parodies as a kid." One of my favorites was written by my nephews... Borned on a mountain top in Tennesee Ripped my pants on a Christmas Tree Patched them up with some bubble gum Along came a bear and he asked for some You know the chorus Slept on a table top in Joe's Cafe Greasiest place in the U.S.A. Ordered a griddley and that ain't all Next thing I new I was in City Hall When I asked them what a "griddley" was, they said they had no idea... just liked the word. Jerry |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Bert Date: 14 Jan 02 - 11:52 PM Well about half the songs I write start with a known melody, and I usually change it after it's written until the melody is not recognizable. The other half, I don't know where the melody comes from, it just seems to fit the mood, and I keep my fingers crossed that no one recognizes it. My most recent song started out with a melody similar to one of my previous songs, 'till my wife said that it would fit better to "Home on the Range" - It ended up about halfway between. Just do it and have fun and remember what Jerry said - "The most important instrument you need writing songs is your heart." |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 15 Jan 02 - 12:14 AM I hope people noticed that I said,"Nothing wrong with that"--folk melodies, traditional tunes--they belong to all of us--to use as we like--they don't "belong" to this lyric or that--some of the greatest compositions of the greatest composers are simply collections of folk melodies and dances that have been orchestrated(often called "Suites")-- And many symphonies have been developed from folk melodies--There are some people who call it stealing or some such thing, but that shows that they are so completely ignorant of the work of musicians and composers that their comments cannot be taken seriously-- |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: GUEST,mgarvey@pacifier.com Date: 15 Jan 02 - 01:17 AM I am one who really does not like new words tacked on to old tunes. I think they deserve a tune of their own and the regular tune and words need to stay linked together. I also do not like parodies..not for that particular reason...the mean reason is I think it takes something lovely and makes it into a joke, like drawing mustaches on nice pictures. But I don't mind hearing a joke once. I would either attempt a new tune, or collaborate with someone who produces tunes easily, or turn it over to someone who can fit the tune to the words. Of course, sometimes it just jumps on to a tune and then nothing can be done except to use it. But I wouldn't try it out on various tunes and say, "oh it works to that one.." Mathematically, it probably will about 13% or so of the time, but so???? mg |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 15 Jan 02 - 01:58 AM Read my post carefully, M-- |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 15 Jan 02 - 11:57 AM Thanks for all your replies, Gang-o-Catter's! It really is interesting to see and think about all the different approaches to songs -- extensions of language, they are, and language is the epression of self, and the wide variety of selves is what makes this world so wonderful. As for writing poems with a regular meter/rhyme scheme, I agree that is the place to start. And I'll probably start with iambic pentameter, since that is the rhythm that most closely matches natural conversation... maybe I'll try putting a Shakespeare sonnet to music, just as practice. If you're going to start somewhere, might as well start with the best! As for a collaborator, I wouldn't mind finding one, and not just for writing songs together, either (all these marraiges, and engagement announcements have put ideas in my head) ;-). But that's a major thread drift, so I'll drop it... |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: GUEST,JohnB Date: 15 Jan 02 - 12:29 PM Peter Bellamy set many pieces of the poetry of Rudyard Kipling to music. David Parry did the same thing with the poetry of Robert W Service. Both these people heard the music within the poetry of a writer. I can't remember any specific Peter Bellamy albumn titles off hand. The Man from Eldorado is the title of David Parry's. A lot of the liner notes on David's CD relate to where the "tunes" came from. I guess what I am getting around to is suggesting, looking up the poetry of these writers and possibly the musical settings of them, if you can find them. It will give you some clue as to how others have tackled a similar problem. There are of course many other people who do this, Loreena McKennitt just sprung to mind. Good Luck, JohnB |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Mr Red Date: 15 Jan 02 - 01:09 PM Well I found when making the switch I had to be involved more than a bit in music - I started singing and being a poet I soon wrote songs. But the tunes flowed because I had all those trad (& notso trad) songs well remembered. It is a process I call submersion. Having got started I just rode the tide but notating was a problem, I wrote BASIC programs to play the tune and print out, which sufficed. But even the program I wrote to anslyse (fourier) that allowed me to see the frequencies I was singing and the slides and pitch anomalies didn't tell me the important thing. I sort of knew it but an unaccompanied singer &/or poet doesn't always stick to true meter or scansion. One verse has a "syllable" "silence" the next "silence" "syllable" which is all very artistic and whats wrong with that? Er...... the musician who you ask to accomapany you wants identical music per verse or a prodigious memory. I'm pretty sure the poet/unaccompanied combination is the root cause because we wordsmiths want the words to count and in the end it is really the marriage of the words & music that takes it from poetry set to music to (or music set to poems) into song. so words then music? or music then words? In my experience it is far more likely to be the hook, the catch, the nugget, the joke, the punchline, the injustice, the (other as appropriate) that sets you down the slope and gives it all momentum. After that the song will tell you the way its going to happen. George Bernard Shaw once said (he said many thing) "The Golden Rule is that there are no Golden Rules" but sadly there are Golden Audiences. And wrong audiences - and that is a black art too!!!!! |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Fortunato Date: 15 Jan 02 - 01:27 PM CapriUni, Hello again if you're still around. I enjoyed thinking about your 'conversion' from poet to song writer. Thanks for an interesting thread. In my opinion, the exercises of setting poems to music or writing a poem to music are useful but somewhat removed from song writing. I suggest that you 'take the leap' and write a song. I suggest you let the song tell one story, make one point. Let it hang upon one metaphor, and let your chorus contain a summary of the point and the metaphor. You can call it a hook if you want, but personally I shy away fromn that word, hoping to avoid the cliches. Hum a melody as you write, record it if you can and let the song 'grow'. The cadence of the words and the melody will meld, you are the instrument and the emotional content is the catalyst. Regards, Fortunato |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 15 Jan 02 - 02:15 PM "Let it hang upon one metaphor, and let your chorus contain a summary of the point and the metaphor." Actually, I find that that approach also works best for stories and poems, as well. Put too many ideas (even if the ideas are closely related) and all you get is a muddy muddle. Maybe you can get away with it if you're writing an epic-length multi-volume novel, but even then, I'd start with only one idea at a time.
|
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 15 Jan 02 - 03:53 PM If I had an extra metaphor, I'd put it in my pocket and save it for a rainy day. |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 15 Jan 02 - 07:51 PM The neat thing about metaphors, M.Ted, is that you can store them anywhere you durn well please, pockets or no pockets. Actually, many writing self-help books suggest collecting metaphors in a notebook, and write down any similes and metaphors that come to mind, as you go through your day. Don't have to have anywhere to put 'em, just write 'em down... then, when you do want to write something, pull out your book o' metaphors, and take your pick... I prefer storing my metaphors in my head, though... they don't get soggy in the rain, that way ;-) |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 15 Jan 02 - 08:32 PM Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you take advice from a self-help book, you aren't really helping yourself-- Anyway, you don't need metaphors, you need melodies-- |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 15 Jan 02 - 10:39 PM From M.Ted: "Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you take advice from a self-help book, you aren't really helping yourself." Okay, I should have made it clear that the term "writing self-help book" was coined with tongue in cheek... That advice is also given out by many English professors who teach the craft of writing. Though perhaps it's true that if I take their advice, I'm not really helping myself, either. "Anyway, you don't need metaphors," that's very true. If I recall correctly, it was you who were musing about what to do with an extra metaphor, if you had one... I've got metaphors running amok all over the place. You wouldn't believe the mess they leave in their wake! You want to adopt a few? ;-) "you need melodies." That is also true. Which leads to my next question. In poetry, even in so-called "free verse" (if it were totally free, it wouldn't be "verse") the individual words are connected to each other in recognizible patterns of sound and rhythm (even if that sound does not involve end-rhymes, and even if the metrical feet do not remain consistant from line to line). Are there parallel structures in melodies, in the connections between the individual notes? As I noted above, I have the most trouble dealing with musical rhythm. Is there some general rule-of-thumb which I can use to gage whether a melody makes rhymical "sense" or not? Does this question make any sense? If, for example, I were to write a melody for a line of Iambic Pentameter, would I necessarily have to write it as: eighth note, quarter note, eigth, quarter ... and so on? Does a rest always go where a comma would go, were the lyrics to printed on the page? Or should I focus more on the meaning of the words in the lyric -- assigning a note of longer duration to words of greater importance, or emotional weight? In other words, should a melody (and here, I'm really stretching a definition) be onomatopoetic? Etc. I have Noteworthy Composer, which is a great help, as it makes it easy to experiment with these things. But, like a fourth grader trying to come up with an exhibit for a science fair, I could use some suggestions for a few experiments to try... Thanks again for all your help |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 15 Jan 02 - 10:41 PM Now, I know I turned off the italics in my post... I specifically made sure I put a / before the i inside the angle brackets. Wonder why it didn't take... |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: M.Ted Date: 16 Jan 02 - 02:09 PM Capri, I have had such a problem with metaphors that I have to keep all the flour, the grains, the pasta, and even the dried beans in airtight containers-- And you're right about "Free Verse" not being free! I bought fresh copy of CANTOS, and it cost more than $20, in paperback! Anyway, levity aside, I will try to answer your questions(I can see you are a real poet, since these are serious questions--the kind that you need a blue book and 25 minutes each to answer) First of all, for purposes of foundation, let me just mention that most all of the folk melodies correspond verse forms of one kind or another--This is because, up until roughly, the 17th century, the structure of musical compositions was strophic, and folk melodies-- (It is very helpful to note and keep a rough collection of folk melodies that fit different verse and metric forms--) It is also helpful to remember that the metric feet in poetry corresponded to dance steps, and therefore, the phrases in the music correspond to these feet as well-- Sloppy as people are, often times the lyrics or even the notes are shoehorned a bit, with the occasionally awkward added or delete beat-- Now, on to the questions-- First question--Yes,(as I mentioned above) the notes come in phrases, generally, a melody is just rhythmic phrase that repeats itself consecutively on a series of different notes, usually over two or four measures--(if this isn't clear think about a dactyl --Long Short Short-Da-DuhDuh--repeated over four measures--first on C, then on E,G,E,F,D, B and C--not a great melody, admittedly, but an example)-- In terms of making rhythmic sense, music generally comes in two or four measure phrases, that repeat, vary, or alternate with other two or four measure phrases, to fill 8, 12, 16, or 32 measures, depending on what type of song it is--if your basic rhythmic idea fits symmetrically into a measure, and can be repeated in a building block kind of way, then it will work-- As per the iambic pentameter--you have five metric feet--they won't fit into say, two measures, if you assign them equal note value, the won't fit, so you can stretch out the last syllable for a couple extra counts, or you can put a rest after the last syllable and start at the beginning of the next measure-- You can make any phrase, no matter how assymetrical it is, into a melody if you handle it as rubato. which is to say, with an irregular tempo--Field hollers are a good example of this--A lot of verse from the Middle East and Central Asia is sung this way as well-- As far as meaning and the poetic devices that you use to emphasize it, that is, as most of the rest, a matter that mostly relates to your taste-- A word of WARNING--I tried to respond to your questions, but my answers can not be taken as a total explanation of of the concepts--as a writer/composer you study these concepts, in a much more expanded form, and integrate them with scales and harmony, as well as the charateristic elements of whatever genre and forms you are working with--the more you understand, the better your results are going to be--
|
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 16 Jan 02 - 04:24 PM "the more you understand, the better your results are going to be" Heh. "This statement blends well with all aspects of life. Combine in varying amounts, and add a pinch of salt as desired." ;-) "(It is very helpful to note and keep a rough collection of folk melodies that fit different verse and metric forms--)" That's one reason I love da'Mudcat (the ability to download midis and store them, combined with NWC, which lets me see what the music looks like, the DT is a great help)! |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: Mr Red Date: 17 Jan 02 - 05:20 PM Thanks Fortunato on the same wavelength and all that. I agree, often less is more, but remember that Golden Rule. With a song you can let the music play on while the audience play catch-up. Actually one of my best songs (Knittershanty) has one simple idea of a shanty about knitting but is jam packed with puns and wordplay. AND is true to the shanty genre after that artifice is considered. We (it was a colaboration) had so much fun in two hours and got damn near every one of those laughs in. When people hear it they are still finding new jokes on third hearing. So less is not always more, in this case the concept was so simple we overdosed on puns and that is its strength. Its all about context and the music is inseparable with it. Colaboration is a whole subject in itself but can be made to work if you are prepared to subjugate your own ego and learn not to say NO! Write all ideas down instead and move on before the mini-arguments start. I personally, and hear a lot of others say: write it down. You never remember all those snippets and writing it frees the mindspace. But our poet will have travelled down that road many times already. So it is a tape recorder for the music you need CapriUni. I find that tunes change, and not always for the better. Get that riff on record so you can go back to it when you lose the formula (I do)- it was your first and most inspiring kick probably. And yes the first words and tune/ pattern will probably start together even if one side moves a lot faster or gets completely revamped. Until you are skilled at tunes I would advise to let the cadence of the words suggest things, develop with the musicality that is in there already. Go with the flow. Ride with the tide. Sail with the gale. Canter with the banter. Push with the gush. Run with the fun. Warrant with the torrent. Hand of sleight with the sound byte. Blurt with the spurt. Tomentum with the momentum. (Only joking but I was having fun with my SEOD CD ROM - it can do rhymes and contained rhymes &/or assonant type similarities but it only offered one spelling of - blirt !!!). CapriUni I think my comments on unaccompanied singers are at least in the right area for consideration. Best of luck old pal. I put singing messages on my answer machine - its a place to start. So is changing trad lyrics to your own. It sorta gives you a grounding by experience - using a tried and tested model. All's fair if you are honest about it. Golden rules? What golden rules? |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 17 Jan 02 - 05:45 PM From Mr. Red: "Golden rules? What golden rules?" Golden rules, purple rules, pink rules, heck! even green-with-orange-polkadot rules -- Take your pick, mix 'em, match em! Come up with your own recipe! Have fun! That's the deal! I don' have a tape recorder that's easy to use, but I do have Noteworthy Composer... I keep little snippets of tunes that way, ready to cut n' paste into a song, if a song comes into my head. For now, I think I'll browse through the DT, and make note of the metrical pattern of the lyrics, then download the midi, to see what goes with what. I was surfing the Web a while back, and I came across the following Irish proverb: "There are two versions of every story, and twelve arrangements to every song (and twenty exceptions to every rule of grammar!)" heh... |
Subject: RE: Lifelong poet, trying hand at songs From: CapriUni Date: 04 May 03 - 03:04 PM Well, it's been over a year since I started this thread, and I have indeed written several songs in the meantime. I'm reviving it now because a thought occurred to me this morning relating to the relationship between poems that were meant to be recited, and lyrics meant to be sung: First, that poems written in an iambic meter (such as Shakespeare's sonnets) all fit rather easily into the waltz form, with the unstressed syllables being given to eighth notes, and the stressed syllables being given to quarter notes. Second, that songs written in 3/4 time tend to evoke feelings of sweet sentiment and nostalgia, while rallying songs of patriotism or protest tend to be written as marches. Does this seem like a fair generalization to you folkies? And if so, what verse form should I look for as a model for a march/protest song (in the same way that a Shakespearian sonnet is the model for a waltz)? |
Share Thread: |
Subject: | Help |
From: | |
Preview Automatic Linebreaks Make a link ("blue clicky") |