Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Sort Descending - Printer Friendly - Home


BS: Who Really Killed Buddy

GUEST,Claymore (with tongue in cheek) 11 Jan 02 - 12:32 PM
CarolC 11 Jan 02 - 12:37 PM
Grab 11 Jan 02 - 12:56 PM
Mrrzy 11 Jan 02 - 01:46 PM
53 11 Jan 02 - 06:34 PM
Sorcha 11 Jan 02 - 08:39 PM
GUEST 16 Jan 02 - 12:51 AM
DougR 16 Jan 02 - 02:44 PM
GUEST,Claymore (agast) 17 Jan 02 - 01:52 PM
JenEllen 17 Jan 02 - 02:09 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:





Subject: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: GUEST,Claymore (with tongue in cheek)
Date: 11 Jan 02 - 12:32 PM

I found the following, by Mickey Klaus of Slate, the on-line magazine of MSN, entitled, "Who really killed Buddy, What did the dog know, and when did he know it?" I thought that the article would supply the day's need for some form of conspiracy in our nation's political reporting.

"It was strictly an accident. The dog just darted out." That is what the media wants us to believe about the death of Buddy, Bill Clinton's 4-year-old Labrador retriever. (See "Who Is Buddy?" Wall Street Journal, Dec. 1997.) But is the truth about this—the latest Clinton casualty—that conveniently simple?

What do we really know about Buddy's death? Who stood to benefit? Consider the following:

 On Dec. 19, 2001 Clinton has a meeting in his Harlem office to discuss ways to repair his "battered" image. The meeting is described in the New York Times as having a "special urgency." An image-building speech on globalization at Yale has apparently not brought Clinton the expected public sympathy.  Democratic leaders, Clinton is reported to have said, had not spoken up sufficiently on his behalf. They could not be relied on.  Present at the meeting was Bruce Lindsey, Clinton's secretive consigliere and the man entrusted with the Clintons' most distasteful tasks.

Exactly two weeks later, Buddy was dead. As could have been predicted, Clinton benefited from a wave of public sympathy—sympathy he hadn't felt since at least Sept. 11. Clinton's office almost instantly issued a press statement saying the Clintons were "deeply saddened by Buddy's death." It's almost as if it had been planned all along.

A look at the actual circumstances of Buddy's demise does little to allay suspicions. As many as nine strange facts remain uninvestigated. Consider:

THE NINE SUSPICIOUS FACTS ABOUT BUDDY'S DEATH

1. With all the high-tech security available to an ex-president on the Chappaqua property, the Clintons had apparently somehow failed to install what a dog expert called "the one essential safety feature, an invisible fence." This system would have given Buddy a small shock as he neared the property line, warning him not to cross it. Unless, of course, it had been turned off.

2. We are told that on Jan. 2, the day of Buddy's mysterious, violent end, "neither Clinton nor his wife was at home." Is this really a coincidence? Would the former first couple pay $1.7 million for a suburban headquarters and then just happen to not be at home when their dog is killed? On the other hand, if you wanted to do away with your dog, you'd want no fingerprints. Wouldn't you arrange to be out of town that day? 3. Would the trained ex-presidential personnel entrusted with Buddy's care really unintentionally allow him to "bolt" through the "front door" chasing a "contractor"? Who were these handlers? Why haven't such key eyewitnesses been subpoenaed? 4. Who was the shadowy "contractor" and why did he leave in such a hurry? What was he installing at the Clintons' residence, which had been fully remodeled several years ago? Isn't it strange that he would leave the gate open, when any "contractor" worth his salt knows that an open gate plus a dog equals a lawsuit?

5. Buddy is said to have "scampered" fully "600 feet down the road," and then another 100 feet on heavily traveled Route 117 before he was hit. Have you ever "scampered" 600 feet, the length of two football fields? 6. The 17-year-old "high school senior" who allegedly ran over Buddy has been described in the press as a "pretty brunette"—the same description, practically, that was once applied to White House intern Monica Lewinsky. What, if any, was her connection with the ex-president? 7. It is illegal in Chappaqua to allow a dog to run outside your property without a leash unless the dog is "under the owner's voice or visual control." Was Buddy actually being controlled? If not, who decided, at what level, to break the law? Why did an employee of the town clerk's office in heavily Democratic Chappaqua tell the New York Post (Jan. 4) that the penalty for violating this regulation only applies if a dog is picked up by a dog catcher?

8. Celebrity dog trainer Bash Dibra has now come forward, in the Post (Jan. 4), to say that he strictly advised Clinton to always use a leash with Buddy outside the home. Why was this celebrity advice ignored? 9. Writing in the New York Times, a former Clinton aide, now a shadowy "communications consultant," discloses that when Clinton was in office—perhaps at the very height of the impeachment scandal—Buddy would "pad on down to the basement of the West Wing, poking his nose into the wastebaskets outside Sidney Blumenthal's office." Yes, that Sidney Blumenthal, the partisan conspiratorialist who is so often at the center of Clintonian machinations—the same Sidney Blumenthal who had seemingly eerily anticipated last week's deadly event by writing a play about a scandal involving the president's dog. Why Blumenthal's trash, and no one else's? What did the doomed Labrador find there? Had Buddy smelled too much? Connect the dots. It doesn't add up. No other conclusion seems even possible. Perhaps some subpoenas would help shake loose the real story. But who in Congress will step forward to do what is necessary?

Remember: When they say it's not about the leash, it's about the leash!

*********** LATE-BREAKING EVIDENCE OF COVERUP One who might know the answer to some of the questions surrounding Buddy is Trumper, Buddy's neighbor. (See "Who Is Trumper?" WSJ, Aug. 2001.) But, as if to silence this witness months before the event, Trumper, a Shih Tzu, was put down by its owner in October. Was Trumper ill—or simply another name on the growing list of Clinton victims? vvv


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: CarolC
Date: 11 Jan 02 - 12:37 PM

How's the tooth feeling there, Claymore? They got you on some good pain medication have they?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: Grab
Date: 11 Jan 02 - 12:56 PM

Tongue in cheek? I should say! :-)

Hey, Buddy was actually being controlled! By the aliens! The same ones who took JFK and Elvis!

Graham.

PS. Re Trumper, one less Shih-Tzu is a cause for celebration round here...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: Mrrzy
Date: 11 Jan 02 - 01:46 PM

LOL! Just what I did need to read! Note that nonetheless, I personally was saddened by the news. Guess this wouldn't be so funny if I hadn't been... but, yes, there should be lawsuits, against whoever let the dog out (or hired them) by the poor kid who'll no go through life as She That Killed The Best-Loved Clinton...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: 53
Date: 11 Jan 02 - 06:34 PM

I HAD A DOG NAMED BUDDY AND I DON'T KNOW WHO RAN OVER HIM, BUT IT MADE ME MADE. BOB


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: Sorcha
Date: 11 Jan 02 - 08:39 PM

Ya gotta love it! I did wonder how he came to be running loose, though. Serious handler error.......


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: GUEST
Date: 16 Jan 02 - 12:51 AM

He contained the DNA of Foster and the other Hillary cleanups, therefore, we was creamated.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: DougR
Date: 16 Jan 02 - 02:44 PM

A Buddy conspiracy. I love it!

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: GUEST,Claymore (agast)
Date: 17 Jan 02 - 01:52 PM

Folks, I had no idea how far reaching this story has been. Last night, while slumping along in a Food Lion checkout line, I looked over at the taloid newspaper rack, and there it was, like a voice from God, "Clinton Charged as Dog Killer" in some rag called the "Globe". The picture shows Clinton and Buddy in happier times, and in the time it took to check out the customers in front of me, I frantically located and read the story that some members of Chappaqua animal rights group are claiming that Clinton should be fined for letting his dog loose on an unsuspecting public...

While I'm no admirer of Clinton, and have my IMPEACH CLINTON! and an old JAIL TO THE CHIEF! button next to my POWELL IN 92! and POWELL in 96! buttons on the wall next to my bed, I think it's time Clinton turned one of his Secret Service sharpshooters loose on a few unsusecting dogs and their equally unsuspecting owners.

The Rules of Engagement would include any dog or human with more skin than body, like Shar-Pei's and Weight Watchers; dogs or humans that are just "Too Cute", like all Shih-Zu's, some babies and Katy Couric, anything that drools, like bull dogs, some more babies, and all bodhran players; and anything that howels at night, like uncastrated dogs, a few more babies, and any Elvis impersonater. You get the idea...

(You can tell that I just got done with a root canal at the Dentist.)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Who Really Killed Buddy
From: JenEllen
Date: 17 Jan 02 - 02:09 PM

Of course the Clintons killed Buddy. Any respectable owner would have had, at the very least, a fence. Dogs on leashes seldom end up under tires either, come to think of it....

Forget the fines, the jail time...what we need to do is put ol'Bill on one side of a busy freeway, and stand on the other, waving a BigMac or an intern or something...let him spend a few terrified minutes playing 'Frogger' and see if he offends again.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


This Thread Is Closed.


Mudcat time: 26 August 10:27 PM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.