View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Copland and the Seegers
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:50:32 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Folks:This morning's NY Times has a truly brilliant article by Allan Kozinn (Page B1) on the Bard Music festival this year devoted to the music of Aaron Copland.Program seven,  at  10 a.m. on August 20, features Peggy and Mike Seeger, with commentary by American musicologist, dealing with "Aaron Copland and the Folk Revival."Considering the close connections between the Seegers, Charles and Ruth; Marc Blitzstein;  Leonard Bernstein;  Herbert Haufrecht and Norman Cazden, not to mention Peoples Songs and the Popular Front, this should be an important event.For directions, etc., see Bard.edu/fishercenterEd

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City
From: Jane Keefer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:39:41 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(95 lines)


John -  my apologies; and thanks for replying.  I did hit my send button a
bit to soon.  So here is the context -  I have been following this
"Ballad-l" thread with much fascination.   And my own internal searches lead
me to several items which I have so far seen no mention of.   So I was
thinking of posting to the listserv or to you - but as you can see I hit the
send button to soon.My home database search led me to Allen's Slave Songs of the US which as I
understand it came out in 1867.  It has a title called We Will March Thru
the Valley (#95)
It's  1st verse is:
    We will march thro' the valley in peace  (2 times)
    If Jesus himself be our leader,
    We will march thro' the valley in peaceThis is from the Dover reprint.  and it has a melody  which some might hear
as perhaps a very very slight resemblence to the Red River Valley.   The
rest of the verses do not resemble the other verses that people were
listing.    Of course, musical resemblence is always for sure in the ear of
beholder, and so I think as an aging folk musician, I may tend to hear more
resemblence than others.I have very much enjoyed your research and commentary since I joined the
listserv a couple of years and must also confess that I am fascinated by by
your email domain which I interpret as Chemistry dept of U. Georgia, since
my first career was as a theoretical chemistAgain my thanks for all your commentary and great researchJane Keefer
Folk Music Index  (www.ibiblio.org/folkindex)----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Garst" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City> >>Words: Rev. Mr. Flamman
> >>Music: Dr. T. H. Peacock
> >>Copyright: 1874
> >>
> >>WE WILL WALK IN THE STREETS OF THE CITY
> >
> >The above is from copyright registration files and sheet music at
> >the Library of Congress.  According to Mary Louise VanDyke,
> >Dictionary of American Hymnology, Oberlin College Library, "When we
> >reach the golden city," the first line of Flamman's text, is indexed
> >for the book Goodly Pearls for the Sunday School
> >(Sweney and Hood, 1875) and for 8 other collections published
> >between 1876 and 1904, several of them also compiled by Sweney.  The
> >Dictionary also records "Soon we'll see the golden city," the text
> >that appears in Taylor, Revival Hymns and Plantation Melodies (1882)
> >and which is different from "When we reach the golden city," as
> >appearing in 4 Adventist hymnals, 1898-1952, but they have no record
> >of an occurrence before Taylor's publication.
> >
> >Anyhow, the appearance of WE WILL WALK IN THE STREETS OF THE CITY in
> >books immediately following its publication as sheet music supports
> >the notion that it got to be pretty widely known, supporting the
> >notion that "Red River Valley" took its tune from the chorus of
> >STREETS.
>
> I have now received from Mary Louise VanDyke a FAXed copy of p 51 of
> The Golden Sheaf, Enlarged Edition, Boston: Advent Christian
> Publication Society, 1902.  The song there is THE GOLDEN CITY, "Words
> arr. by Geo. J. French," "Geo. J. French, Arr." (of the music).  The
> stanzas are altered versions of the first four (of six) given by
> Marshall W. Taylor in 1882.  The words of the chorus are also altered
> from earlier publications:
>
> We will walk thro' the streets of the city,
> With the friends we have lov'd by our side,
> We shall sit by the banks of the river,
> In that land we shall ever abide.
>
> In "arranging" the tune, Geo. J. French removed the "ragginess" of
> the earlier Peacock version, presumably Peacock's composition,
> replacing a number of dotted-eighth-followed-by-sixteenth
> combinations with simple eighths-followed-by-eighths.  He also
> changed the incipit of the chorus from SOL-do-mi (as in "Red River
> Valley" and WE WILL WALK IN THE STREETS OF THE CITY) to do-re-mi, as
> New Orleans jazz bands play it.  It appears that French's arrangement
> is the source of the NO jazz tradition while Peacock's is the source
> of the "Red River Valley" tune.  At least, that's a reasonable
> speculation.
>
> This speculation further supported by the fact that French uses a
> version of the same tune for stanzas and chorus, whereas Peacock sets
> stanzas to a different tune.  My recollection is that NO jazz bands
> use only the music of the chorus.
>
>
> John

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:31:24 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


>John -  my apologies; and thanks for replying.  I did hit my send button a
>bit to soon.  So here is the context -  I have been following this
>"Ballad-l" thread with much fascination.   And my own internal searches lead
>me to several items which I have so far seen no mention of.   So I was
>thinking of posting to the listserv or to you - but as you can see I hit the
>send button to soon.
>
>My home database search led me to Allen's Slave Songs of the US which as I
>understand it came out in 1867.  It has a title called We Will March Thru
>the Valley (#95)
>It's  1st verse is:
>     We will march thro' the valley in peace  (2 times)
>     If Jesus himself be our leader,
>     We will march thro' the valley in peace
>
>This is from the Dover reprint.  and it has a melody  which some might hear
>as perhaps a very very slight resemblence to the Red River Valley.   The
>rest of the verses do not resemble the other verses that people were
>listing.    Of course, musical resemblence is always for sure in the ear of
>beholder, and so I think as an aging folk musician, I may tend to hear more
>resemblence than others...Thanks, Jane.To my "ears," the resemblance of that tune to Red River Valley is 
pretty slight.  The cadences follow a different implied harmony, for 
one thing, and there is no place in the Slave Songs tune where the 
fourth degree of the scale receives any emphasis, as at the end of 
the third phrase of Red River Valley.  The two tunes share, however, 
rising incipits, and their terminal phrases might be construed as 
bearing some resemblance (the terminal phrase of Red River Valley 
seems to vary more than the others).The words are a different matter.  "We will march through the valley 
in peace" could easily have inspired "We will walk in the streets of 
the city."  The Streets line sometimes occurs as "We shall march 
through the streets of the city."  Some such things may be 
commonplaces, it seems to me.Here is ABC for THE GOLDEN CITY.
(Translate to musical notation at
http://www.concertina.net/tunes_convert.html )X:5
T:THE GOLDEN CITY
S:The Golden Sheaf (enlarged edition, Boston, Advent Christian Pub. Soc., 1902)
N:This arrangement may date to 1898 (The Golden Sheaf).
C:Geo. J. French, Arr.  ("Words arr. by Geo. J. French)
Z:John Garst 29Jul2005
M:4/4
L:1/4
Q:100
K:G
%:Verse
G/ A/ | B B B A/B/ | A/ G2-G/ G/ B/ | d3/2 e/ d (B/ G/) | A3
B/ c/ | d (B/ A/) G (A/ B/) | c/ c2-c/ B/ A/ | G3/2 B/ B A | G3
%:Chorus
G/ A/ | B B/ B/ B A/ B/ | A/ G2-G/ G/ B/ | d d/ e/ d c/ B/ | A3
B/ c/ | d B/ A/ G A/ B/ | c/ c2-c/ B/ A/ | G G/ A/ B A/ A/ | G3 |]Compare this with WE WILL WALK IN THE STREETS OF THE CITY (1874) that 
I gave in a previous message.  Notice especially the incipit of the 
chorus, do-re-mi in GOLDEN CITY and Sol-do-mi, as in RED RIVER 
VALLEY, in STREETS.  As I noted before, my recollection is that NO 
jazz bands play do-re-mi, supporting the notion that their source is 
GOLDEN CITY, while that of RED RIVER VALLEY is STREETS.J

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:45:21 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jane Keefer" <[unmask]><<I have very much enjoyed your research and commentary since I joined the
listserv a couple of years and must also confess that I am fascinated by by
your email domain which I interpret as Chemistry dept of U. Georgia, since
my first career was as a theoretical chemist.>It would seem that chemists (Jane, John, and of course Norm Cohen) are
filling the same role in the current world of folk-song research that
parsons on bicycles did a century or so ago.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City
From: Larkin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:08:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


on 7/29/05 1:45 PM, Paul Stamler at [unmask] wrote:> t would seem that chemists (Jane, John, and of course Norm Cohen) are
> filling the same role in the current world of folk-song research that
> parsons on bicycles did a century or so ago.
> 
> Peace,
> PaulYou forgot Charles Brown, the pop-blues pianist.A. Cohen

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:17:18 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Hey, Jane! You gonna 'fess up about your PhD in
Physics, too?
     Sandy--- Larkin <[unmask]> wrote:> on 7/29/05 1:45 PM, Paul Stamler at
> [unmask] wrote:
> 
> > t would seem that chemists (Jane, John, and of
> course Norm Cohen) are
> > filling the same role in the current world of
> folk-song research that
> > parsons on bicycles did a century or so ago.
> > 
> > Peace,
> > Paul
> 
> You forgot Charles Brown, the pop-blues pianist.
> 
> A. Cohen
> 

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 7/29/05 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:47:00 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(88 lines)


Hi!	Here I am again! :-) Another week - another list. The songs &
ballads will probably be posted on Aug. 1. 	JOURNALS	4564335630 - Tennessee Folklore Society Bulletin, June 1974, $5 
(ends Jul-30-05 17:52:13 PDT)
	4564335642 - same, Sept. 1974 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:16 PDT)
	4564335663 - same, March 1973 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:23 PDT)
	4564335673 - same, June 1973 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:27 PDT)
	4564335680 - same, March 1970 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:30 PDT)
	4564335691 - same, Sept. 1970 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:34 PDT)
	4564335709 - same, Dec. 1970 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:41 PDT)
	4564335723 - same, June 1971 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:44 PDT)
	4564335730 - same, Dec. 1971 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:47 PDT)
	4564335741 - same, March 1972 $4 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:51 PDT)
	4564335756 - same, June 1972 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:55 PDT)
	4564335764 - same, Sept. 1972 $5 (ends Jul-30-05 17:52:59 PDT)
	4564335937 - same, March 1974 (ends Jul-30-05 17:53:59 PDT)	6549328001 - NORTHEAST FOLKLORE Journal, 1958-1972, $15 (ends 
Aug-03-05 11:26:33 PDT)	6549335143 - Hoosier Folklore Bulletin, 1942-45, $20 (ends 
Aug-03-05 11:57:03 PDT)	BOOKS 	8321270411 - Irish Fireside Folktales by Kennedy, 1969, $2 (ends 
Jul-30-05 11:35:14 PDT)	6548477894 - Kansas Folklore by Sackett & Koch, 1961, $6.99 
(ends Jul-30-05 19:42:08 PDT)	8321487827 - The Folklore of Sussex by Simpson, 1973, 3.50 GBP 
(ends Jul-31-05 10:27:20 PDT)	6549089230 - FOLKLORE FROM THE SCHOHARIE HILLS by Gardner, 1937, 
$25 (ends Aug-02-05 11:00:21 PDT)	4564911344 - American Folk Masters by Siporin, 1992, $12.98 (ends 
Aug-02-05 11:51:30 PDT)	6549114436 - FOLKLORE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE. A CRITICAL 
AND DESCRIPTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY by Ramsey, 1952, $10 (ends Aug-02-05 
12:41:13 PDT)	6549180952 - I BOUGHT ME A DOG AND OTHER FOLKTALES FROM THE 
SOUTHERN MOUNTAINS by Roberts, 1971 reprint, $5.99 (ends Aug-02-05 17:46:47 
PDT)	5222910522 - THE FOLKLORE OF EAST ANGLIA by Porter, 1974, 0.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-03-05 03:30:09 PDT)	6549320863 - 6 booklets on Ozark folklore by Randolph, 1943-44, 
$13 (ends Aug-03-05 10:57:44 PDT)	6549325530 - 11 PAMPHLETS ON WISCONSIN FOLKLORE by Brown, 1942-45, 
$10 (ends Aug-03-05 11:15:15 PDT)	6549329188 - Tall Tales by Blakley, 1936, $5 (ends Aug-03-05 
11:32:19 PDT)	7989769365 - GREASY GRIMY GOPHER GUTS by Sherman, 1995, $3.75 
(ends Aug-03-05 12:14:01 PDT)	6549411206 - A Stove-Up Cowboy's Story by McCauley, 1965 reprint, 
$9.99 (ends Aug-03-05 17:16:18 PDT)	4565168989 - Aunt Puss & Others - Old Days in the Piney Woods by 
Emery, 1969, $9.99 (ends Aug-03-05 19:47:13 PDT)	6549641755 - FOLKLORE OF LUNENBURG COUNTY, NOVA SCOTIA by 
Creighton, 1950, $10 (ends Aug-04-05 11:12:36 PDT)	8322829165 - Tales of the West of Ireland by Berry, 1988, $10 
(ends Aug-05-05 09:00:52 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Dolores' Find
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:28:39 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Folks:The doughty Ms. Nichols has turned up a scarce item, Emelyn Gardner's _Folklore from the Scholarie Hills [NY].  This volume is from the library of the mid-century folklorist Ernest Baughman.The beautifully printed volume (U of Michigan Press, 1937) contains tales, beliefs, songs, ballads, etc., etc.Less known than other regional collections, it is still one of the more comprehensive surveys of  the folklore in a specific community.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Field Recorders Collective
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Jul 2005 05:18:07 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(23 lines) , text/html(30 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bingo! Streets of the City
From: Jane Keefer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Jul 2005 09:43:47 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


My apologies to all for my recent broadcast, which I meant to be just to
John - so since it's all out there now, I will simply add that I agree with
John's comments pretty much -  in this particular song it seems to me that
the words are the most important component;And thanks to all for the knowledge and dedicated work that has produced it.Jane Keefer

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Pepys Ballads: online
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 03:45:04 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


While looking for something else this evening, I found something 
unexpected at the University of California: an online archive 
containing, so far as I can see, images of the entire Pepys collection 
of broadsides. Although I'm sure that many list members will know about 
it already, I don't recall it being mentioned; so I thought it might not 
be a bad idea to draw attention to it. The digital images have been made 
from negative microfilm provided by the Pepys Library; digitally 
enhanced, we are promised that they will be more easily legible than the 
reproductions published by Magdalene College in the 1980s. They are 
available in various sizes, in some cases with transcriptions into 
modern type.The indexing system is based on Helen Weinstein's, and there are a 
series of search options which I haven't fully explored yet. No contents 
listing as such, I think, so useful to have access also to existing 
print indexes such as Weinstein's. Various supporting materials are also 
included, with more planned as the project procedes.The archive can be seen at the website of the Early Modern Center, 
Department of English, University of California, Santa Barbara:http://emc.english.ucsb.edu/ballad_project/index.aspMalcolm Douglas

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pepys Ballads: online
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:17:48 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Malcolm:I went looking for the site you sent, but found only a notice that the site could not be found.  I will try various variations on the theme tomorrow night.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:45 pm
Subject: Pepys Ballads: online> While looking for something else this evening, I found something 
> unexpected at the University of California: an online archive 
> containing, so far as I can see, images of the entire Pepys 
> collection 
> of broadsides. Although I'm sure that many list members will know 
> about 
> it already, I don't recall it being mentioned; so I thought it 
> might not 
> be a bad idea to draw attention to it. The digital images have been 
> made 
> from negative microfilm provided by the Pepys Library; digitally 
> enhanced, we are promised that they will be more easily legible 
> than the 
> reproductions published by Magdalene College in the 1980s. They are 
> available in various sizes, in some cases with transcriptions into 
> modern type.
> 
> The indexing system is based on Helen Weinstein's, and there are a 
> series of search options which I haven't fully explored yet. No 
> contents 
> listing as such, I think, so useful to have access also to existing 
> print indexes such as Weinstein's. Various supporting materials are 
> also 
> included, with more planned as the project procedes.
> 
> The archive can be seen at the website of the Early Modern Center, 
> Department of English, University of California, Santa Barbara:
> 
> http://emc.english.ucsb.edu/ballad_project/index.asp
> 
> Malcolm Douglas
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pepys Ballads: online
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 04:27:44 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(19 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pepys Ballads: online
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 04:01:15 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Malcolm:My apologies.  The address did connect on a later, second try.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:45 pm
Subject: Pepys Ballads: online> While looking for something else this evening, I found something 
> unexpected at the University of California: an online archive 
> containing, so far as I can see, images of the entire Pepys 
> collection 
> of broadsides. Although I'm sure that many list members will know 
> about 
> it already, I don't recall it being mentioned; so I thought it 
> might not 
> be a bad idea to draw attention to it. The digital images have been 
> made 
> from negative microfilm provided by the Pepys Library; digitally 
> enhanced, we are promised that they will be more easily legible 
> than the 
> reproductions published by Magdalene College in the 1980s. They are 
> available in various sizes, in some cases with transcriptions into 
> modern type.
> 
> The indexing system is based on Helen Weinstein's, and there are a 
> series of search options which I haven't fully explored yet. No 
> contents 
> listing as such, I think, so useful to have access also to existing 
> print indexes such as Weinstein's. Various supporting materials are 
> also 
> included, with more planned as the project procedes.
> 
> The archive can be seen at the website of the Early Modern Center, 
> Department of English, University of California, Santa Barbara:
> 
> http://emc.english.ucsb.edu/ballad_project/index.asp
> 
> Malcolm Douglas
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rouse's Book
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 04:27:47 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(82 lines)


Folks:With a little urging, Andy Rouse <[unmask]> has furnished this description of his newly published book.I wonder if others on this list are interested in purchasing a copy.  Dick  of Camsco, are your services available?Andy's message follows:Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Ed,Oh, dear, I'd much rather someone else blew my trumpet. But since you ask:The Remunerated Vernacular Singer: from Medieval England to the Post-War
Revival. Peter Lang, 2005.
European University Studies, Series XIV, Anglo-Saxon Language and
Literature, Vol. 415.
Contents:
Introduction
Chapter One
An Embarkation
Chapter Two
?I saw her through a whummil bore? -soap operas of the Middle Ages?
Chapter Three
 From Minstrel to Ballad Singer: Social Change and the Vernacular Singer
in the 16th Century
Chapter Four
William Hogarth and the street Singer of the 18th Century
Chapter Five
Maritime and Military Matters
Chapter Six
The Factory Lass, the Serving Maid and the Farm Labourer
Chapter Seven
The Remains of the Revival: Postwar English Vernacular Singers and their
Politics
Conclusion
Bibliography, Discography
Appendix I
Appendix IIThe bumpf on the back goes like this:
"This volume studies trhe status and reception of the professional,
semi-professional and amateur singer in England from the earliest time
for which records are available, the later Midle Ages, up to the
present. Iy also offers a principled examination of their songs and why
particular songs were taken into singers' repertoires while others
remained printed street ballads without ever becoming part of the oral
tradition. The structure is broadly chronological, although the nature
of evidence from oral and ephemeral sources makes this impossible to
adhere to strictly."
The above has been condensed from the evaluation of one of the readers
at the work's Ph.D. stage.The book is not chronologically or sociologically exhaustive, and the
different chapters use different means of analysis. For instance, both
text analysis and criminal records are used for the medieval period,
while for the 18th century I lean heavily upon Hogarth's engravings and
in the final chapter exploit a questionnaire filled in by such singers
as Heather Wood, Chris Foster, John Faulkner, Frankie Armstrong, John
Copper....
Although not specifically addressed, examples from Hungary, where I have
been living for a quarter of a century, are interspersed, but I also
refer to other cultures (I was lucky to enter corerespondence with a
Gambian who send me a charming letter describing the present functions
of the griot). I might never have embarked on the research, were it not
for the fact that until fairly recently (when Hungary became a
multi-party republic at the end of the 'eighties) I had assumed (insofar
as I had given it much thought at all) that other countries 'used' their
folk music in the vague "leftish" way that most of us did back home. I
should have been warned by that scene in "Cabaret," but didn't
associate. Here folk music is used in very different ways, the worst
form of which is very below-the-belt nationalistic, exploiting a rich
culture for party political ends.My main focus, then, was aimed at the singer who got something for his
song. Hence the title. But the content spreads a wider net.Hope that will do you, Ed. And thanks for showing interest.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rouse's Book
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:38:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(97 lines)


I have tried to contact Peter Lang re. this book, with no success--It's 
not on their website. I'll call then and ask about it.dick greenhaus
CAMSCO Musicand a chemist for many, many years. (When asked what kind, my (now) 
ex-wife responded, "Physical. Of course.)edward cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>With a little urging, Andy Rouse <[unmask]> has furnished this description of his newly published book.
>
>I wonder if others on this list are interested in purchasing a copy.  Dick  of Camsco, are your services available?
>
>Andy's message follows:
>
>Ed
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dear Ed,
>
>Oh, dear, I'd much rather someone else blew my trumpet. But since you ask:
>
>The Remunerated Vernacular Singer: from Medieval England to the Post-War
>Revival. Peter Lang, 2005.
>European University Studies, Series XIV, Anglo-Saxon Language and
>Literature, Vol. 415.
>Contents:
>Introduction
>Chapter One
>An Embarkation
>Chapter Two
>?I saw her through a whummil bore? -soap operas of the Middle Ages?
>Chapter Three
> From Minstrel to Ballad Singer: Social Change and the Vernacular Singer
>in the 16th Century
>Chapter Four
>William Hogarth and the street Singer of the 18th Century
>Chapter Five
>Maritime and Military Matters
>Chapter Six
>The Factory Lass, the Serving Maid and the Farm Labourer
>Chapter Seven
>The Remains of the Revival: Postwar English Vernacular Singers and their
>Politics
>Conclusion
>Bibliography, Discography
>Appendix I
>Appendix II
>
>The bumpf on the back goes like this:
>"This volume studies trhe status and reception of the professional,
>semi-professional and amateur singer in England from the earliest time
>for which records are available, the later Midle Ages, up to the
>present. Iy also offers a principled examination of their songs and why
>particular songs were taken into singers' repertoires while others
>remained printed street ballads without ever becoming part of the oral
>tradition. The structure is broadly chronological, although the nature
>of evidence from oral and ephemeral sources makes this impossible to
>adhere to strictly."
>The above has been condensed from the evaluation of one of the readers
>at the work's Ph.D. stage.
>
>The book is not chronologically or sociologically exhaustive, and the
>different chapters use different means of analysis. For instance, both
>text analysis and criminal records are used for the medieval period,
>while for the 18th century I lean heavily upon Hogarth's engravings and
>in the final chapter exploit a questionnaire filled in by such singers
>as Heather Wood, Chris Foster, John Faulkner, Frankie Armstrong, John
>Copper....
>Although not specifically addressed, examples from Hungary, where I have
>been living for a quarter of a century, are interspersed, but I also
>refer to other cultures (I was lucky to enter corerespondence with a
>Gambian who send me a charming letter describing the present functions
>of the griot). I might never have embarked on the research, were it not
>for the fact that until fairly recently (when Hungary became a
>multi-party republic at the end of the 'eighties) I had assumed (insofar
>as I had given it much thought at all) that other countries 'used' their
>folk music in the vague "leftish" way that most of us did back home. I
>should have been warned by that scene in "Cabaret," but didn't
>associate. Here folk music is used in very different ways, the worst
>form of which is very below-the-belt nationalistic, exploiting a rich
>culture for party political ends.
>
>My main focus, then, was aimed at the singer who got something for his
>song. Hence the title. But the content spreads a wider net.
>
>Hope that will do you, Ed. And thanks for showing interest.
>
>Andy
>
>
>  
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rouse's Book
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:03:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


Hi-
Just managed to get the information from the publisher. It lists for 
$43.95 (US), ?25.50. If I can get a half-dozen or so orders, I can offer 
it at a 10% discount (the wholesale price than usual because it's 
imported from Switzerland.)
If you want a copy, E-mail me.dick greenhaus
CAMSCO Musicedward cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>With a little urging, Andy Rouse <[unmask]> has furnished this description of his newly published book.
>
>I wonder if others on this list are interested in purchasing a copy.  Dick  of Camsco, are your services available?
>
>Andy's message follows:
>
>Ed
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dear Ed,
>
>Oh, dear, I'd much rather someone else blew my trumpet. But since you ask:
>
>The Remunerated Vernacular Singer: from Medieval England to the Post-War
>Revival. Peter Lang, 2005.
>European University Studies, Series XIV, Anglo-Saxon Language and
>Literature, Vol. 415.
>Contents:
>Introduction
>Chapter One
>An Embarkation
>Chapter Two
>?I saw her through a whummil bore? -soap operas of the Middle Ages?
>Chapter Three
> From Minstrel to Ballad Singer: Social Change and the Vernacular Singer
>in the 16th Century
>Chapter Four
>William Hogarth and the street Singer of the 18th Century
>Chapter Five
>Maritime and Military Matters
>Chapter Six
>The Factory Lass, the Serving Maid and the Farm Labourer
>Chapter Seven
>The Remains of the Revival: Postwar English Vernacular Singers and their
>Politics
>Conclusion
>Bibliography, Discography
>Appendix I
>Appendix II
>
>The bumpf on the back goes like this:
>"This volume studies trhe status and reception of the professional,
>semi-professional and amateur singer in England from the earliest time
>for which records are available, the later Midle Ages, up to the
>present. Iy also offers a principled examination of their songs and why
>particular songs were taken into singers' repertoires while others
>remained printed street ballads without ever becoming part of the oral
>tradition. The structure is broadly chronological, although the nature
>of evidence from oral and ephemeral sources makes this impossible to
>adhere to strictly."
>The above has been condensed from the evaluation of one of the readers
>at the work's Ph.D. stage.
>
>The book is not chronologically or sociologically exhaustive, and the
>different chapters use different means of analysis. For instance, both
>text analysis and criminal records are used for the medieval period,
>while for the 18th century I lean heavily upon Hogarth's engravings and
>in the final chapter exploit a questionnaire filled in by such singers
>as Heather Wood, Chris Foster, John Faulkner, Frankie Armstrong, John
>Copper....
>Although not specifically addressed, examples from Hungary, where I have
>been living for a quarter of a century, are interspersed, but I also
>refer to other cultures (I was lucky to enter corerespondence with a
>Gambian who send me a charming letter describing the present functions
>of the griot). I might never have embarked on the research, were it not
>for the fact that until fairly recently (when Hungary became a
>multi-party republic at the end of the 'eighties) I had assumed (insofar
>as I had given it much thought at all) that other countries 'used' their
>folk music in the vague "leftish" way that most of us did back home. I
>should have been warned by that scene in "Cabaret," but didn't
>associate. Here folk music is used in very different ways, the worst
>form of which is very below-the-belt nationalistic, exploiting a rich
>culture for party political ends.
>
>My main focus, then, was aimed at the singer who got something for his
>song. Hence the title. But the content spreads a wider net.
>
>Hope that will do you, Ed. And thanks for showing interest.
>
>Andy
>
>
>  
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bad Lee Brown/Little Sadie
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:04:33 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


I've made little progress in tracking this ballad to historical 
events, but here is a remote possibility.*****
Birmingham, AL, December 25, 1891 (paraphrased news account):William Reese and Sadie Brown were to have been married on this date. 
As a Christmas present, she gave him a revolver on December 24.  On 
Christmas morning, when he came for the wedding, she backed out.  He 
shot and killed her with her present to him. He escaped.
*****This is, of course, not "Lee Brown," but it *is* Sadie Brown, and she 
is indeed killed by a man who, while not her husband, was her 
husband-to-be, who escapes.  One may presume that he is later hunted 
down.The crime doesn't fit the facts as "Bad Lee Brown"/"Little Sadie" 
usually tells them, but even so I think it possible that this could 
be the genesis of that ballad.John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:35:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill Hendricks, a 
granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood days. 
Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census could 
help.Bob, are you reading this?Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse, and 
that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over and 
over.When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
He sat on his father's knee,
An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
"Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have 
been no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child, 
then he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15 
in 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older 
than 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.
-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/1/05 (Songsters, Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:15:19 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(78 lines)


Hi!	As we start another month, here is another list. :-)	Note the item with the asterisk at beginning of the listing. I
am the seller. For list members, I will consider not enforcing my
restriction of sales to US & Canada only. If you are interested and
outside those countries, please contact me before bidding. Thanks!	SONGSTERS & BROADSIDES	7703484810 - General Tom Thumb (sketch inc. songster), 1874, $26 
(ends Aug-02-05 18:44:02 PDT)	6550327265 - PUT'S ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA SONGSTER, 1868, $125 (ends 
Aug-07-05 13:02:42 PDT)	MISCELLANEOUS	4752004479 - Pedlar's Pack JOHN DOHERTY OF DONEGAL, LP, 1964, 
24.95 GBP (ends Aug-06-05 00:48:58 PDT)	4565840423 - Farmhouse Fiddlers: Music & Dance Traditions in the 
Rural Midwest by Martin, 1994, $5.50 (ends Aug-07-05 08:01:41 PDT)*	4565967122 - Dance Music of Scotland by Surenne, 185?, $5 (ends 
Aug-07-05 19:05:22 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	4564950025 - The Ballad Tree by Wells, 1950, $5 (ends Aug-02-05 
14:57:41 PDT)	7703474038 - Negro Songs from Alabama by Courlander, 1962, $19.99
(ends Aug-02-05 17:37:51 PDT)	4564985628 - Songs and Ballads from Nova Scotia by Creighton, 1966
Dover edition, $9.99 (ends Aug-02-05 18:41:15 PDT)	6549332690 - FOLK-SONGS MAINLY FROM WEST VIRGINIA by Cox, 1939, 
$25 (ends Aug-03-05 11:46:57 PDT)	6549645867 - SONGS OF THE SAILOR AND LUMBERMAN by Doerflinger, 
1972, $7.50 (ends Aug-04-05 11:23:12 PDT)	6549172601 - Adventures of Robin Hood: A Collection of Poems, Songs, 
and Ballads by Ritson, 1884 edition, $9.50 (ends Aug-05-05 16:59:27 PDT)	7535014302 - Folk Songs of Australia by Meredith & Anderson, 1968, 
$15 AU (ends Aug-05-05 23:54:16 PDT)	7339576969 - Room for Company by Palmer, 1971, 4.25 GBP (ends 
Aug-06-05 01:50:07 PDT)	6970560574 - A Bundle of Ballads & Lays of the Scottish Cavaliers 
by Morley & Aytoun, 2 volumes, 1891, 9.99 GBP (ends Aug-07-05 10:35:00 PDT)	6550260298 - Irish Street Ballads by Lochlainn, 1960, $3.99 (ends 
Aug-07-05 18:30:00 PDT)	6550436602 - 8 volumes by Ritson, 1825-33, $25 (ends Aug-07-05 
21:10:28 PDT)	7340650150 - Wit and Mirth or Pills to Purge Melancholy, 1720, 
$49.99 (ends Aug-07-05 21:17:24 PDT)	6971125310 - The Painful Plough by Palmer, 1972, 4.50 GBP (ends 
Aug-08-05 04:48:42 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:04:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft 
registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on Bartow 
Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will, 
Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one 
electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a 
completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only cover the 
head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you hope for 
an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is reasonably 
comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.John Garst wrote:> The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill Hendricks, a 
> granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood days. 
> Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census could help.
>
> Bob, are you reading this?
>
> Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse, and 
> that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over and over.
>
> When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
> He sat on his father's knee,
> An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
> "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
>
> If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have been 
> no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child, then 
> he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15 in 
> 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older than 
> 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:22:46 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Gentlemen:One other easy shot: the Social Security Death Index on the web.  If  Willie were born in 1872, he would have been  63 or 64 when social security went into effect.  If he drew benefits, he presumably would be listed.Finally, there are state archives where death certificates are filed.  I do not know how  careful Georgia authorities were in the 1930s to record the deaths of  blacks, but it is worth a try.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Date: Monday, August 1, 2005 3:04 pm
Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"> Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft 
> registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on 
> Bartow 
> Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will, 
> Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one 
> electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a 
> completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only 
> cover the 
> head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you hope 
> for 
> an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is 
> reasonably 
> comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.
> 
> John Garst wrote:
> 
> > The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill 
> Hendricks, a 
> > granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood 
> days. 
> > Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census 
> could help.
> >
> > Bob, are you reading this?
> >
> > Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse, 
> and 
> > that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over 
> and over.
> >
> > When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
> > He sat on his father's knee,
> > An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
> > "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
> >
> > If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have 
> been 
> > no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child, 
> then 
> > he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15 
> in 
> > 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older 
> than 
> > 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:41:34 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(114 lines) , text/html(123 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bill Hendricks
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:57:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Sorry for the new subject line, somehow I lost the thread.Think I found your boy in the 1900 census. The only Bill Hendricks 
listed is in Webbsboro, Elbert Co. Born March 1873 with the occupation 
given as stonecutter. Oh yeah, he's white.Am off to dinner but will follow up later this evening.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: [Fwd: [78-l] Uncle Dave Macon's Tennessee Homestead For Sale!]
From: Thomas Stern <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:05:38 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(37 lines) , text/html(64 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 00:32:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Ok, think I have this.I find Bill HENDRICKS [b. March 1873 in GA] a 27y stone cutter in 
Webbsboro, Elbert Co GA [11 June 1900]. He and his wife Laura [22y b. 
Oct. 1877 in GA] have been married less than a year.I find William M HENDRIX a 38y stone cutter for a granite company in 
Atlanta, Fulton Co GA [18 April 1910]. He and his wife Laura E [30y] 
have been married for 10y. They were the parents of 4 children, the only 
survivor being Robert E. [9y b. GA].I can't find your boy in the 1917/1918 draft registration or in the 1920 
and 1930 census. I may have found Laura though the id is more 
speculation than confirmed. She is a widow [49y] in the household of her 
son Edward [29y]. The household includes Edward's sister Katherine [9y 
b. GA].

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:05:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(74 lines)


>Gentlemen:
>
>One other easy shot: the Social Security Death Index on the web.  If 
>Willie were born in 1872, he would have been  63 or 64 when social 
>security went into effect.  If he drew benefits, he presumably would 
>be listed.
>
>Finally, there are state archives where death certificates are 
>filed.  I do not know how  careful Georgia authorities were in the 
>1930s to record the deaths of  blacks, but it is worth a try.Ed,You may not be implying that Bill was black, but if you are, I have 
no evidence to that effect.John>
>Ed
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
>Date: Monday, August 1, 2005 3:04 pm
>Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
>
>>  Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft
>>  registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on
>>  Bartow
>>  Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will,
>>  Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one
>>  electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a
>>  completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only
>>  cover the
>>  head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you hope
>>  for
>>  an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is
>>  reasonably
>>  comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.
>>
>>  John Garst wrote:
>>
>>  > The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill
>>  Hendricks, a
>>  > granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood
>>  days.
>>  > Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census
>>  could help.
>>  >
>>  > Bob, are you reading this?
>>  >
>>  > Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse,
>>  and
>>  > that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over
>>  and over.
>>  >
>>  > When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
>>  > He sat on his father's knee,
>>  > An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
>>  > "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
>>  >
>>  > If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have
>>  been
>>  > no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child,
>>  then
>>  > he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15
>>  in
>>  > 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older
>>  than
>>  > 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.
>>-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 08:21:56 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(88 lines)


John:My presumption.  My misapprehension.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2005 8:05 am
Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"> >Gentlemen:
> >
> >One other easy shot: the Social Security Death Index on the web.  
> If 
> >Willie were born in 1872, he would have been  63 or 64 when social 
> >security went into effect.  If he drew benefits, he presumably 
> would 
> >be listed.
> >
> >Finally, there are state archives where death certificates are 
> >filed.  I do not know how  careful Georgia authorities were in the 
> >1930s to record the deaths of  blacks, but it is worth a try.
> 
> Ed,
> 
> You may not be implying that Bill was black, but if you are, I have 
> no evidence to that effect.
> 
> John
> 
> >
> >Ed
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
> >Date: Monday, August 1, 2005 3:04 pm
> >Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
> >
> >>  Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft
> >>  registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on
> >>  Bartow
> >>  Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will,
> >>  Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one
> >>  electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a
> >>  completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only
> >>  cover the
> >>  head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you 
> hope>>  for
> >>  an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is
> >>  reasonably
> >>  comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.
> >>
> >>  John Garst wrote:
> >>
> >>  > The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill
> >>  Hendricks, a
> >>  > granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood
> >>  days.
> >>  > Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census
> >>  could help.
> >>  >
> >>  > Bob, are you reading this?
> >>  >
> >>  > Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one 
> verse,>>  and
> >>  > that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over
> >>  and over.
> >>  >
> >>  > When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
> >>  > He sat on his father's knee,
> >>  > An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
> >>  > "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
> >>  >
> >>  > If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would 
> have>>  been
> >>  > no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child,
> >>  then
> >>  > he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15
> >>  in
> >>  > 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older
> >>  than
> >>  > 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this 
> scenario.>>
> 
> -- 
> john garst    [unmask]
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:23:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


>Ok, think I have this.
>
>I find Bill HENDRICKS [b. March 1873 in GA] a 27y stone cutter in
>Webbsboro, Elbert Co GA [11 June 1900]. He and his wife Laura [22y b.
>Oct. 1877 in GA] have been married less than a year.
>
>I find William M HENDRIX a 38y stone cutter for a granite company in
>Atlanta, Fulton Co GA [18 April 1910]. He and his wife Laura E [30y]
>have been married for 10y. They were the parents of 4 children, the only
>survivor being Robert E. [9y b. GA].
>
>I can't find your boy in the 1917/1918 draft registration or in the 1920
>and 1930 census. I may have found Laura though the id is more
>speculation than confirmed. She is a widow [49y] in the household of her
>son Edward [29y]. The household includes Edward's sister Katherine [9y
>b. GA].Wonderful, Cliff.Let me give you more information from the news article.In 1913, Bill Hendricks, granite cutter, lived at 588 Simpson Street, 
Atlanta.  He was "arraigned in police court...on complaint of Mrs. 
John Meggs, a neighbor."Mrs. Meggs complained that "on both Saturday and Sunday nights he 
neighbor had come home more or less intoxicated and had shouted and 
sung bad songs."  Bill replied that he had sung only one song, "John 
Henry," and that "no one had ever before taken offense at it."  To 
prove his point that it was not a "bad song," he was allowed to 
recite it in court.  He knew only one verse, and his also sister 
swore that that was all she had heard.Despite this, he was found guilty of disorderly conduct and was fined 
$15.75 in one case and $5.75 in the other.  "The defendant put the 
court on notice that it was a piece of malice on the part of the 
neighbors and not their objection to 'John Henry' that caused his 
arrest."If Bill was born in 1873, that makes him 40 in 1913.  If "John Henry" 
started life in 1887, then Bill was 14 then, and I think he could 
call that "childhood."  He just makes it under the wire for his 
statements and an 1887 genesis of "John Henry" to be consistent.John-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:53:27 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Thanks for the additional info. I'm looking in two directions, I'd like 
to find him in 1920 so as to hopefully confirm my 1930 assumption. Also 
trying to work my way through possible parents in the 1880 census. 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:03:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Well that worked out nicely. In the 1910 census the household 
immediately following that of William M HENDRIX is that of John W MEIGS 
and his wife Martha [the music hater I presume]. I found John and Martha 
in 1920 but "singing" Bill and his family seem to have moved on.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:04:03 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(22 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:33:48 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(32 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Camouflaged shanties Pt. 10 [I think]
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:09:47 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(38 lines) , text/html(33 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Quasi Semi-commecial announcememt
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:38:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


If anyone's been trying to reach me (CAMSCO Music) at 800/548-FOLK 
(3655), I apologize. I've moved, and Verizon crossed some wires on the 
new installation. It's all fixed, now.Sorry for any inconvenience.dick

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/3/05 Part 1 (Broadsides)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:27:35 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Hi!	Welcome to a special issue of the Ebay List. I am posted this
because of auction end dates and other issues. Part 2, the regular
general folklore list will be posted this evening. 	BROADSIDES	6550160760 - When Johnny Comes Marching Home, 186?, $15.50 (ends 
Aug-04-05 19:01:07 PDT)	7340731179 - Ladies Skreen, 1728?, $49.95 (ends Aug-08-05
09:16:05 PDT)	7340742088 - A New Ballad, 17??, $49.95 (ends Aug-08-05 10:09:59
PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/3/05 Part 2 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:25:37 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(70 lines)


Hi!	As promised, here is part 2. :-) 	JOURNALS	6550353896 - The Golden Log, Texas Folklore Society, 1962, $8.99 
(ends Aug-07-05 14:56:16 PDT)	BOOKS 	6550131223 - Buying the Wind Regional Folklore in the United States 
by Dorson, 1964, $5.99 (ends Aug-04-05 15:29:34 PDT)	8323140374 - 13 books on folklore and mythology, $7.25 (ends 
Aug-04-05 19:30:38 PDT)	8323141621 - 12 books on folklore and mythology, $8.99 (ends 
Aug-04-05 19:37:38 PDT)	8322930332 - The Best of Texas Folk and Folklore 1916 - 1954 by 
Boatright, Hudson & Maxwell, 1998, $9.95 (ends Aug-05-05 18:33:50 PDT)	6549771563 - Folklore of the Australian Pub by Wannan, 1972, 
$9.99 (ends Aug-05-05 19:00:00 PDT)	6550002015 - THE AUSTRALIAN YARN by Edwards, 1977, $0.99 AU (ends 
Aug-05-05 23:26:54 PDT)	4565722386 - Folklore of the Scottish Highlands by Ross, 1993, $5 
(ends Aug-06-05 10:26:08 PDT)	4565731113 - The British Folklorists by Dorson, 1968, $3.50 (ends 
Aug-06-05 11:24:29 PDT)	4566173808 - Never Try to Teach a Pig to Sing by Dundes, 1991, $4 
(ends Aug-08-05 18:03:17 PDT)	6971242736 - Putting Folklore to Use by Jones, 1994, $5 (ends 
Aug-08-05 22:05:06 PDT)	6971286482 - The Horn Book by Legman, 1970, 4.50 GBP (ends 
Aug-09-05 07:24:56 PDT)	4566338543 - NEW MEXICO PLACE NAMES: A GEOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY by
Pearce, 1965, $9.99 (ends Aug-09-05 18:05:00 PDT)	6550900275 - The Folklore of Maine by Beck, 1957, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-09-05 18:38:07 PDT)	6550915206 - Folk Beliefs of the Southern Negro by Puckett, 1926,
$49.99 (ends Aug-09-05 19:46:20 PDT)	8323292309 - Yorkshire Customs ? traditions and folklore of old 
Yorkshire by Crowther, 1977 reprint, 0.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 10:45:44 PDT)	8323548871 - A Collection of Highland Rites and Customs by 
Campbell, 2.99 GBP (ends Aug-11-05 10:32:37 PDT)	8324073278 - Vale of the Vikings by Simpson, 1991, 1.98 GBP (ends 
Aug-13-05 10:22:22 PD)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:13:33 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:04:03 -0500, John Mehlberg wrote:>Here is the jokebook with songs that I won on ebay (9MB):
>
>
>       http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
>
Good! Thank you, sir.  Any idea of its date?>Does anyone out there have a copy of Pills to Purge Melancholy?  Remember, there are quite a few items, editions & volumes with that title.
Basicly, Thomas D'Urfey,  "Wit and Mirth: or, or Pills to purge Melancholy"-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
	          I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
	                Boycott South Carolina!
	     http://www.naacp.org/news/2001/2001-01-12.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:27:06 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(9 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:34:36 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Hi,
Most of us probably have the 1959 New York reprint of the 1876 reprint of
the 1719-1720 edition, so an earlier edition(s) on-line would be preferable.
SteveG.
You could have borrowed my copy but shipping would be rather a lot from UK.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: And the Winner Is...
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:49:01 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Ron:I was tipped to this story from the magazine of the right-leaning Manhattan Institute naming Pete Seeger as America's most successful Communist.Pete would be proud.http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_urbanities-communist.htmlEd

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: And the Winner Is...
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:16:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "edward cray" <[unmask]><<I was tipped to this story from the magazine of the right-leaning
Manhattan Institute naming Pete Seeger as America's most successful
Communist.Pete would be proud.http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_urbanities-communist.html >>But as someone who, as a young man, considered a career as a journalist, he
would be appalled at the factual errors with which the article is riddled.
Never mind the ideological bias; that's expected. But they got an awful lot
of the who-what-when-where wrong.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bawdy Song Census
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:20:39 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


>...Thus "Daisy, Daisy" and "Red River Valley" are not folk songs, 
>any more than "The Star Spangled Banner" or Schubert's _Die Schone 
>Mullerin_ are folk songs.
>...
>EdFWIW, Art Rosenbaum just gave me a recently recorded CD of the Myers 
sisters.  They sing a find version of "Bright Brasstown Valley."J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bright Brasstown Valley
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:21:51 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>>...Thus "Daisy, Daisy" and "Red River Valley" are not folk songs, 
>>any more than "The Star Spangled Banner" or Schubert's _Die Schone 
>>Mullerin_ are folk songs.
>>...
>>Ed
>
>FWIW, Art Rosenbaum just gave me a recently recorded CD of the Myers 
>sisters.  They sing a find version of "Bright Brasstown Valley."Oops!  Make that "fine."J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bawdy Song Census
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:46:28 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


John and  anyone else who cares:My point is that the common form of "Red River Valley" is  more or less frozen.  There is a "correct" way to sing it and one risks reproval or hostile stares if one deviates from the "official" text.  Thus it is no longer a folk song, though derived from
a folk song.I imagine the same might be said of the Simon and Garfunkel version of "Scarborough Fair," etc.Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, August 4, 2005 10:20 am
Subject: Re: Bawdy Song Census> >...Thus "Daisy, Daisy" and "Red River Valley" are not folk songs, 
> >any more than "The Star Spangled Banner" or Schubert's _Die Schone 
> >Mullerin_ are folk songs.
> >...
> >Ed
> 
> FWIW, Art Rosenbaum just gave me a recently recorded CD of the 
> Myers 
> sisters.  They sing a find version of "Bright Brasstown Valley."
> 
> J
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:11:35 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(53 lines) , text/html(70 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tom Brown
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 05:12:17 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Well, the URL suggests "1840s" Very nice book, by the
way. Thanks for posting it.C.> http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
>     >
>     Good! Thank you, sir. Any idea of its date?
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 06:49:39 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(20 lines) , text/html(5 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 10:38:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Tom Brown's Jest Book:
or, Companion to the Cloister,
The Ne Plus Ultra of Every Thing Funny.
Containing All His Comical and Humorous Stories,
Curious Riddles,
Also, without any curtailment, the whole of his unique collection of
Amorous Tales and Songs,
Smutty Conundrums,
Queer Jokes,
Witty Sayings, &c., &c., &c.,London:
Edward Duncombe,
Middle Row, Holborn
[c. 1840]
&108 p.: illustrations; 15 cm. (6 inches). Yellow paper over boards, printed 
in black. Front cover is identical to title page, each with vignette of a 
couple undressing.Edward Duncombe and John Duncombe were publishers in London of of music and 
theater-related pieces, as well as the occasional piece of light pornography 
from about 1825 to about 1853. The Middle Row, Holborn, address was used 
from about 1835 to about 1848.----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jonathan Lighter
To: [unmask]
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Tom BrownFWIW, the Victorian bestseller, _Tom Brown's School Days_, by Thomas Hughes, 
was published in 1857.  This might argue for a date ca1859, unless there's 
evidence to the contrary.JLCliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:
Well, the URL suggests "1840s" Very nice book, by the
way. Thanks for posting it.C.> http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
> >
> Good! Thank you, sir. Any idea of its date?
>__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:59:25 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(104 lines)


Bob:It is good to make your acquaintance, if only by email, and to learn that there is yet another person out there interested in bawdy folklore. I simply cannot extend your knowledge of the prehistory.As you can see, I am posting your query to a listserv peopled by some of the most knowledgeable (frightening, even shaming at times) folksong and ballad students  in Christendom.  One or more of them might be able to track the geneaology of  "On the Road to Limerick."On the history of the limerick itself, I will presume you have seen Gershon Legman's  chapter in _The Horn Book,_
pp. 427-53.  This was originally intended to be the introduction to Legman's anonymously self-published collection, _The Limerick_ (Paris: Les Hautes Etudes, 1953), but not sent to press for economic reasons.  Legman's introduction to his second collection, _The New Limerick,_ has nothing of the history.  For a later account of the variety of limerick songs in oral tradition, see my _The Erotic Muse,_ 2nd edition, pp. 223 ff.Good luck, and do keep us posted on your research --Ed 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Turvey <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2005 3:31 am
Subject: A song of the nineteenth century.> Dear Professor Cray,
> 
> John Mehlberg?s Immortalia website describes your encyclopedic 
> knowledge of 
> the bawdy songs of yesteryear. I wonder, therefore, if you could 
> possibly 
> help me? I am trying to find any information whatsoever about a 
> song said to 
> have been popular around the 1860s.
> 
> All I know about the song is that the chorus is variously stated to 
> be :-
> 
> ?Oh, won?t you come up, won?t you come up,
> All the way from Limerick town??	Oxford newspapers of June 1881
> 
> or:-
> 
> Will you come up, come up?
> Will you come up to Limerick?
> Will you come up, come up?
> Will you come up to Limerick?	J H Murray, Notes & Queries, 1898
> 
> or:-
> 
> Won?t you come up, come up,
> Won?t you come up to Limerick town?
>                	C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918
> 
> 
> Two other references suggest that the song title might have been 
> ?All the 
> Way Up to Limerick?, or ?On the Road to Limerick.? It is said that 
> people 
> would sing this song at convivial gatherings, each person present 
> having to 
> sing a verse between the chorus on pain of a forfeit. The verses 
> sung were 
> five-liners, and these ?limericks? subsequently took their name 
> from the 
> chorus of the song to which they were sung.
> 
> I have been studying the history of limericks for many years and I 
> really 
> would like to know more about this song; for example when was it 
> first sung, 
> who composed it, what the words to it are, does it only exist as a 
> chorus, 
> what is the tune for the song, what is its title ..... etc..  My 
> ideal would 
> be to find a dated version with a few limericks given between the 
> chorus.
> However, all my efforts so far have drawn a complete and utter 
> blank. I have 
> tried Bristol University Music Department, Bristol Central Library 
> Music 
> Department, Cambridge University Library (Andersen Music Room), The 
> Royal 
> College of Music, the internet, various musical friends .... and so 
> on and 
> so forth. In the Bodleian library I have read many comic songbooks 
> from the 
> nineteenth century, but no song at all bears any resemblance to my 
> quarry.
> To put the matter succinctly; I know nothing about the song except 
> its 
> reputed chorus!
> 
> If you could suggest anywhere I could find some information about 
> this song 
> I would be extremely grateful.
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> 
> Dr Bob Turvey
> 11 Lyndale Avenue
> Stoke Bishop
> Bristol
> BS9 1BS
> England
> 
> 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:47:03 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(50 lines)


Jonathan and John:The 1840 date on the original just might be accurate."Tom Brown" seems to have been a popular term for  various things in the early 19th C.:   "Tommy Brown" was coarse brown bread  in the late 18th C., according to Francis Grose's _Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue._  Henley and Farmer have it as a gambling term  undated for "twelve in hand or crib."  (Partridge's slang dictionary credits the same source and dates it 1810-1860.)And then there is "The Card Playing Song," collected by Frank Kidson and published in his _Traditional Tunes,_ p. 159.  
Kidson dates it to as late as 1880, Lloyd to mid-century.  Ewan MacColl sings it on "Champions and Sporting Blades" (Riverside 12-652).  The first verse runs:Oh! the king will take the queen; but the queen will take the knave:  
And since we're all together, boys, we'll have a jolly stave.
      Here's to you, Tom Brown,
      Here's to you with all heart;
      We'll have another glass, my boys
      At least , before we part.
           Here's to you, Tom Brown.Etc.Lloyd's notes tantalize.  He states that in addition to Kidson's version "other less decorous versions have since come to light."Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2005 6:49 am
Subject: Re: Tom Brown> FWIW, the Victorian bestseller, _Tom Brown's School Days_, by 
> Thomas Hughes,  was published in 1857.  This might argue for a date 
> ca1859, unless there's evidence to the contrary.
> 
> JL
> 
> Cliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:
> Well, the URL suggests "1840s" Very nice book, by the
> way. Thanks for posting it.
> 
> C.
> 
> > http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
> > >
> > Good! Thank you, sir. Any idea of its date?
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:19:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "edward cray" <[unmask]>> Won't you come up, come up,
> Won't you come up to Limerick town?
>                C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918Harry Cox, of couse, sang the same as "Won't you come down to Yarmouth
town?".Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:43:24 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Paul Stamler wrote:> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "edward cray" <[unmask]>
> 
>>Won't you come up, come up,
>>Won't you come up to Limerick town?
>>               C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918
> 
> Harry Cox, of couse, sang the same as "Won't you come down to Yarmouth
> town?".Not Harry Cox, so far as I know. Peter Bellamy seems to be the only 
source; I believe he said he got it from a Norfolk man, Peter Bullen; 
but details are vague. Perhaps Heather Wood will be able to tell us more.There certainly is a similarity in the few words quoted, but I don't 
know that it's really enough to connect the two without a fair bit more 
information about both.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:13:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Malcolm Douglas" <[unmask]>>>Won't you come up, come up,
>>Won't you come up to Limerick town?
>>               C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918
>
> Harry Cox, of couse, sang the same as "Won't you come down to Yarmouth
> town?".<<Not Harry Cox, so far as I know. Peter Bellamy seems to be the only
source; I believe he said he got it from a Norfolk man, Peter Bullen;
but details are vague. Perhaps Heather Wood will be able to tell us more.>>You're right, of course -- I could've sworn it was on the Rounder
compilation, but it's not. Sorry, brain glitch.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:01:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi,
In 30 or so versions I have copies of 'Jack the Jolly Tar' (Yarmouth Town)
no chorus comes anywhere near Peter's and the place is invariably London.
The choruses are 'fol de rols', 'doo me ammers'or 'with a ----and a---'.
Personally I wouldn't trust for scholarly purposes any text that comes
solely from a revival singer, without a reliable source. this is far from
being a criticism of Peter or any other revival singer. We are all at
liberty to alter the songs, we all do it, it's part of the tradition,
keeping it alive.
Steve

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:05:35 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Hi Ed and all,
'Tom Brown (Card Song) goes back far beyond Kidson.
See 'Tom Brown's Delight' c1674-9, Bodleian website Wood e25(66).
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:19:11 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(130 lines) , text/html(27 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:25:57 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(65 lines) , text/html(11 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:39:01 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(14 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:38:13 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(85 lines) , text/html(70 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:27:32 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(81 lines) , text/html(26 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:01:41 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(118 lines)


Hi!	Here is some vacation reading for everyone. :-)	MISCELLANEOUS	4754745680 - 5 78 records of bothy ballads, 3.50 GBP (ends 
Aug-11-05 06:21:47 PDT)	4755047608 - Occupational Folksongs of the U.S. Air Force, CD, 
$0.99 (ends Aug-11-05 23:38:31 PDT)	6971474588 - JOURNAL OF THE SCHOOL OF SCOTTISH STUDIES, 1970, 3 
GBP (ends Aug-13-05 15:23:01 PDT)	6971475141 - JOURNAL OF THE SCHOOL OF SCOTTISH STUDIES, 1972, 
4.88 GBP (ends Aug-13-05 15:28:48 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	4566099198 - Songs the Whaleman Sang by Huntington, 1964, $20 
(ends Aug-08-05 12:13:50 PDT)	4566130985 - Some Ballad Folk by Burton, $2.99 (ends Aug-08-05 
14:42:37 PDT)	4566131023 - Collection Of Folklore:Folksongs by Burton & Manning,
1970, $2.99 (ends Aug-08-05 14:42:52 PDT)	4566131066 - Folksongs II by Burton & Manning, 1971, $2.99 (ends 
Aug-08-05 14:43:11 PDT)	8323706595 - Folk Song Today No. 2 by Wales, 1969, 0.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-09-05 01:37:09 PDT)	6971368057 - Scottish and Border,Battles and Ballads by Brander, 
1975, $4.99 (ends Aug-09-05 18:49:46 PDT)	6550907120 - SONG BALLADS AND OTHER SONGS of the PINE MOUNTAIN 
SETTLEMENT SCHOOL, 1923, $9 (ends Aug-09-05 19:08:56 PDT)	8323986673 - Scone Ceilidh Songbook Folk Songs Old & New, 1965, 
2.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 02:37:33 PDT)	8324026312 - The Penguin Book of English Folk Songs by Williams 
& Lloyd, 0.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 06:58:31 PDT)	6971765681 - Mormon Songs from the Rocky Mountains by Cheney, 
1968, $9.99 (ends Aug-10-05 22:12:22 PDT)	4566599646 - Singing Family of the Cumberlands by Ritchie, 1955, 
$3.95 (ends Aug-10-05 12:44:31 PDT)	6551102804 - Eighty English Folk Songs From Southern Appalachians 
by Sharp & Kapeles, 1968, $39.95 (ends Aug-10-05 16:52:08 PDT)	6971481637 - A Book of British Ballads by Brimley Johnson, 1952 
reprint, 1.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 17:01:30 PDT)	6551271950 - ANIMAL FOLKSONGS FOR CHILDREN by Seeger, 1950, 
$6.25 (ends Aug-11-05 12:21:13 PDT)	6551768024 - Ballads and Songs from Ohio by Eddy, 1939, $9.77 
(ends Aug-11-05 19:59:43 PDT)	4566959953 - Songs of the Gael Series Three by Breathnach, 1922, 
$25 (ends Aug-12-05 09:15:54 PDT)	4566965182 - The History of the Blues by Davis, 2003 reprint, $5 
(ends Aug-12-05 09:47:33 PDT)	7705332621 - The First Book of Irish Ballads by O'Keefe, 1979, 3
GBP (ends Aug-12-05 10:10:41 PDT)	7341647513 - book of handwritten music/songs, 1828, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-12-05 16:03:39 PDT)	6550900306 - Robin Hood Poems, Songs, and Ballads by Ritson 2 
volumes, 1887 reprint, $399.99 (ends Aug-12-05 18:38:15 PDT)	7341692693 - The Songs That Made Australia by Fahey, 1989, $16 AU 
(ends Aug-12-05 22:59:03 PDT)	6551659373 - 2 books by Lomax (The Folk Songs of North America in 
the English Language, 1960 and Best Loved American Folk Songs, 1947), $9.99
(ends Aug-13-05 09:39:44 PDT)	7341354919 - A Selection of collected FOLK-SONG by Sharp & 
Williams, volume 1, 4.95 GBP (ends Aug-14-05 08:26:37 PDT)	7341357385 - A Selection of Some Less Known FOLK-SONGS by Sharp &
Williams, 3.95 GBP (ends Aug-14-05 08:41:19 PDT)	8324523239 - Cerddi Portinllaen by Davies, 1954, 4.99 GBP (ends 
Aug-15-05 07:13:04 PDT)	5227395227 - The Restoration of Cock Robin: Nursery Rhymes and 
Carols restored to their Original Meanings by Iles, 1989, 1.99 GBP (ends 
Aug-15-05 07:25:23 PDT)	5227392446 - Folk Lore and Songs of the Black Country and the 
West Midlands by Raven, 1966, 4.99 GBP (ends Aug-15-05 07:13:59 PDT)	5227440158 - Ord's Bothy Songs and Ballads of Aberdeen, Banff and 
Moray, Angus and the Mearns, 1990 reprint, 7.50 GBP (ends Aug-15-05 
13:40:00 PDT)	5227442005 - A Scottish Ballad Book by Buchan, 1973, 7.50 GBP 
(ends Aug-15-05 15:48:00 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:08:54 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


I need this CD and will be bidding.> 4755047608 - Occupational Folksongs of the U.S. Air Force, 
> CD,
> $0.99 (ends Aug-11-05 23:38:31 PDT)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:01:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


I just got a new edition of Huntington from Dick Greenhaus for less, and substantially less than the "Buy-it-now" price.> 	4566099198 - Songs the Whaleman Sang by Huntington, 1964, $20 
> (ends Aug-08-05 12:13:50 PDT)BTW, a plethora of thanks  to Dolores for her kind posting of these auctions; I have recently been able to add a half dozen new tomes to my music library at far less than it would have cost elsewhere, including the finds on bookfinder.com  --  Tom> 	Tom Hall  --  Master Wordworker  
and Intellectual Handyman

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 04:49:33 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(40 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 05:03:23 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(31 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Stuff others may know all too well
From: Ewan McVicar <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:14:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(64 lines)


I often think I'm stirring old ashes when I comment on something here, but
in case it is news, here goes.I've always thought that the refrain shared by the Barnyards of Delgaty and
Rhynie ["I sheared my first hairst"] was more distinctive than most of the
bothy ballads, and tune rich. Ford titles the Rhynie song as Linten Lowrin,
and calls it an old Aberdeenshire song "which has seen little of the
printed page until gathered into Songs of the North", [Macleod and
Boulton]. In Scots Gems [Scots] - Drysdale, 1908 London. compiled by James Wood, I
found the following.Linton Lowrie
Words by James Ballantine
Music by Alexander MacKenzie 
[Sir Alexander Campbell Mackenzie perhaps? Or another?]
The volume distinguishes between 'music by' and 'music arranged by',
suggesting that MacKenzie composed the tune.
The air is close to the usual tune, though richer melodically, and familiar
to me in this version as close to one used for the Silkie of Sule Skerrie.
. Sorry I do not have a handy way of sharing it, I'd need to plug away for
more time than I've to hand. Anyway, this message is about the Barnyards
refrain.I tint my he'rt ae morn in May 
When birdies sang on ilka tree;
When dewdraps hung on ilka spray,
And lammies play'd on ilka lea.  O Linton Lowrie, Linton Lowrie
Aye sae fond ye trowed tae be,
I never wist sae bricht a monr
Sae dark a nicht wad bring to me.O Linton's words sae saftly fell,
Sae pure the glamour o' his e'e;
I hae never been mysel'
Sin' ere he spak' an' keek'd to me.O Linton Lowrie, Linton Lowrie,
Come dear Lowrie back to me,
An' siccan love I'se bear to you
E'en your forgettin' will forgi'e.His absence I'll nae langer bear,
My grief I can nae langer dree,
I'll gang a thousan' mile, and mair,
My Linton's comely face to seeO Linton Lowrie, Linton Lowrie,
Gin ye'll come to Loganlea,
I'll mak' ye lord o' Logan Ha',
And I your loving wife will be.As well as the Linton Lowrie phrase, the beginning lines of stanzas 3 and 5
echo bothy ballad verses.Whaddya think? Which came first?EwanEwan McVicar

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:54:29 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(7 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:02:41 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(11 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:49:22 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(14 lines) , text/html(15 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:02:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Hi again,
I'm getting something of a reputation as a sceptic and this won't help but
for me 'Yarmouth Town has Bert Lloyd written all over it, and I really go
for Jonathan's take on the name 'Peter Bullen'. Shades of the Kipper Family
and in true Norfolk tradition, or as they say 'Norfolk n'good'.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:41:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi again,
Just trawling Yarmouth Town on the net and Peter recorded it on the 1968
album 'Mainly Norfolk' but he also included it on a 1971 Argo album 'Won't
you go my way'.Heather, have you got it? and if so do the notes throw any
further light on the matter?
The various threads on Mudcat don't help at all. They seem to have come to
a dead end.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:56:13 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stuff others may know all too well
From: Murray Shoolbraid <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 19:28:23 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


The composer was the father:Mackenzie, Alexander (Born Montrose, 1819)A child prodigy who became a member of the Theatre Royal Orchestra in
Edinburgh in 1833, and arranged and published the Dance Music of Scotland
for piano and other Scots tunes for the violin. Composed the melodies of
"The Nameless Lassie" and "Bonnie Bonaly" by James Ballantine. He was the
father of the composer Dr. A. C. Mackenzie.I think you've got it, Ewan. Ballantine's dates are 1808-1877, which gives
enough time for it to generate a family.Murray Shoolbraid

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 05:25:00 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Fred McCormick wrote:> Three questions.
>  
> Do any other versions of the Bellamy/Bullen Yarmouth Town exist?Almost certainly not.> Do me amma and Yarmouth Town apart, are there any other traditonal  sources 
> for the string hanging out of the window motif?I suspect that it goes a fair way back. Chaucer is a possibility, but my 
memory of all that is a bit vague; or the Fabliaux. Or I might be 
completely wrong.> Does anybody know who Peter Bullen is/was?Evidently not. Makes you wonder.  > In a message dated 07/08/2005 20:27:51 GMT Standard Time,
> [unmask] writes:
> 
> It has always seemed to me that "Yarmouth Town" was one person's rewrite  of 
> Lloyd's rewrite of "Do Me Ama."
>  
> Is there any contrary evidence?Beyond Peter's word, no; and I find myself becoming increasingly cynical 
about the probity of so many of the great movers of the Revival. Rather 
sad. I wondered for a while if there might be some relationship with 
Dylan's 'Oxford Town', but I was probably conjuring a red herring for 
myself; though to my ear Peter's tune sounds more American than East 
Anglian.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 04:38:18 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(32 lines) , text/html(39 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:44:41 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(15 lines) , text/html(16 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stuff others may know all too well
From: Ewan McVicar <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:02:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Murray,Great, that tunes me in more.
Did what I should have done first, and looked at Greig Duncan Vol 3, 348
Jock O Rhynie, where the notes indicate 1830 to 1850 for the genesis of the
Rhynie song. 
It could have gone either way, couldn't it?
Or maybe there's an older root still?
Interestingly, Emmerson in Rantin Pipe and Tremblin String says of
Alexander Mackenzie that "his 'Linton Lowrie' has come into vogue among
folk-singers in the 1960s." Clearly Emmerson had not listened to the sung
lyrics at all!
As to locations in Linton Lowrie, Loganlee, Logan House and Logan Water are
all within three miles of Penicuik, which is eight miles south of
Edinburgh. Eight miles south west of Penicuik is West Linton.
More to be known yet.Ewan 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 7 Aug 2005 to 8 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-314)
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 05:32:36 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


"Shades of the Kipper Family and in true Norfolk
tradition, or as they say 'Norfolk n'good'."
SteveGWhich probably inspired the joke about an encounter
between a rustic and the the captain of a large
passenger ship cruise line.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:59:06 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(46 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:25:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Malcolm wrote
'I find myself becoming increasingly cynical about the probity of so many
of the great movers of the revival.'I am totally cynical when it comes to those who did set themselves up as
folksong scholars and then forged, spliced etc for whatever reason, from
Percy to the Scots collectors of the early 19thc--to Sharp/Baring Gould and
through to Bert. BUT the revival performers have none of their
responsibilities and have every right to do what they will with traditional
material and continue the living tradition.
Although Peter was very knowledgeable he did not set himself up as a
folksong scholar. He was scholarly when it came to Kipling.
Personally I think 'Yarmouth Town' is vastly better than 'Jack the Jolly
Tar'.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:49:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 8/9/05, Steve Gardham wrote:>Malcolm wrote
>'I find myself becoming increasingly cynical about the probity of so many
>of the great movers of the revival.'
>
>I am totally cynical when it comes to those who did set themselves up as
>folksong scholars and then forged, spliced etc for whatever reason, from
>Percy to the Scots collectors of the early 19thc--to Sharp/Baring Gould and
>through to Bert. BUT the revival performers have none of their
>responsibilities and have every right to do what they will with traditional
>material and continue the living tradition.
>Although Peter was very knowledgeable he did not set himself up as a
>folksong scholar. He was scholarly when it came to Kipling.
>Personally I think 'Yarmouth Town' is vastly better than 'Jack the Jolly
>Tar'.I must sort of disagree. That is, I agree that revival singers have
the right to fiddle with their songs -- in many cases, this is
*necessary*, because the songs are too messed up to sing in any
given traditional version. You can't just leave out a line the
informant can't remember, after all.But they still owe it to us to own to what they're doing. It costs
nothing, and lets us know when we have to check into a real version.
-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:35:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


<<Norfolk'ngood. Try saying that after a few pints. I must say  that neither
Yarmouth Town nor Fakenham Fair (the other Bullen song)  ring entirely true
in
my ears as traditional songs, and I wouldn't be surprised  to find that they
wer mak' ye ups, as Belle Stewart called her own  compositions.However, I doubt that Lloyd would be your man for YT. First of all, if he
were the author, there would be endless references to milk white thighs
etc.,
and he wouldn't have picked such a boisterous tune. Also, he would have used
more resources than just Bellamy to get it established in the folk revival.
My
guess is, that both songs were written by some local lad, perhaps Bullen
himself.>>Are British census records available online? That might be a path to
establishing Mr. Bullen's existence or lack of same.Re. Heather's note: Mushrooms in ketchup? Bert Lloyd was a creative man in
more ways than one.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:31:20 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(18 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:01:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Bob,
Who do you mean by 'us'?
Whilst I agree that we as students/scholars would like this to be the case,
as I see it it is certainly our duty to make available to ALL as many
resources as possible, but I don't see that revival singers owe anything to
us as scholars; to fieldworkers yes in preserving the material, but they
owe far more to original authors/composers and the tradition bearers; but
not to treat them as museum pieces (which is more or less what we do as
scholars) but to continue shaping the old and writing the new which is more
or less what happens.
If I put on my performer's hat for a moment, which doesn't happen often
enough nowadays, I doubt if there's one song out of the hundreds that is
exactly like I first heard it and that includes my own family songs.
Apologies if I've misread what you're saying.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:06:58 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(43 lines) , text/html(133 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:14:40 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


>...revival singers have
>the right to fiddle with their songs -- in many cases, this is
>*necessary*, because the songs are too messed up to sing in any
>given traditional version. You can't just leave out a line the
>informant can't remember, after all.
>
>But they still owe it to us to own to what they're doing. It costs
>nothing, and lets us know when we have to check into a real version.
>--
>Bob WaltzIt would be nice for them to "own to what they're doing."  However, I 
see no obligation on their part, and I don't see that their versions 
are any less "real" than the ones Bob refers to.  I see the revival 
singers as simply another part of long tradition.  That's not to say 
that I don't separate them, in my mind, from the old-timers with 
family/friend traditions.John
-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:17:10 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(16 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ketchup (was 'A song of the nineteenth century')
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:29:55 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(25 lines) , text/html(39 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:36:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 8/9/05, Steve Gardham wrote:>Bob,
>Who do you mean by 'us'?
>Whilst I agree that we as students/scholars would like this to be the case,
>as I see it it is certainly our duty to make available to ALL as many
>resources as possible, but I don't see that revival singers owe anything to
>us as scholars; to fieldworkers yes in preserving the material, but they
>owe far more to original authors/composers and the tradition bearers; but
>not to treat them as museum pieces (which is more or less what we do as
>scholars) but to continue shaping the old and writing the new which is more
>or less what happens.
>If I put on my performer's hat for a moment, which doesn't happen often
>enough nowadays, I doubt if there's one song out of the hundreds that is
>exactly like I first heard it and that includes my own family songs.
>Apologies if I've misread what you're saying.You have. :-)"Us" is the audience. The guys buying the tickets and the albums.
There are cases where I like versions *very* far removed from the
traditional (e.g. Connie Dover, before she decided she was a cowboy
singer). But I want -- as a *listener*, not as a folklorist -- to
know where it came from.-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:38:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Nice one, John.
BTW Mushroom ketchup historically preceded tomato, and ... there's
more...modern ketchup includes in its ingredients cinnamon!
I wonder if there's any herb robert in there.
The word ketchup seems to have been 'catsup' in America prior to its use in
Britain. Dickens refers to it as ketchup in Barnaby Rudge 1849.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Beth Brooks <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:44:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


If I may put on a foodie hat for a second, it makes sense that mushroom ketchup/catsup would come before tomato, as tomatos were considered poisonous in early American cookery. Probably something to so with them being closely related to belladonna/deadly night shade.Beth Brooks>>> [unmask] 08/09/05 2:38 PM >>>
Nice one, John.
BTW Mushroom ketchup historically preceded tomato, and ... there's
more...modern ketchup includes in its ingredients cinnamon!
I wonder if there's any herb robert in there.
The word ketchup seems to have been 'catsup' in America prior to its use in
Britain. Dickens refers to it as ketchup in Barnaby Rudge 1849.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:48:44 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


British census records are secret for 100 years, for reasons of 
confidentiality. The latest available at present is the 1901 census.----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Stamler" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century> <<Norfolk'ngood. Try saying that after a few pints. I must say  that 
> neither
> Yarmouth Town nor Fakenham Fair (the other Bullen song)  ring entirely 
> true
> in
> my ears as traditional songs, and I wouldn't be surprised  to find that 
> they
> wer mak' ye ups, as Belle Stewart called her own  compositions.
>
> However, I doubt that Lloyd would be your man for YT. First of all, if he
> were the author, there would be endless references to milk white thighs
> etc.,
> and he wouldn't have picked such a boisterous tune. Also, he would have 
> used
> more resources than just Bellamy to get it established in the folk 
> revival.
> My
> guess is, that both songs were written by some local lad, perhaps Bullen
> himself.>>
>
> Are British census records available online? That might be a path to
> establishing Mr. Bullen's existence or lack of same.
>
> Re. Heather's note: Mushrooms in ketchup? Bert Lloyd was a creative man in
> more ways than one.
>
> Peace,
> Paul
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/9/05 (Songsters & Broadsides)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:54:27 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


Hi!	Just a short specialized list today. :-) 	The general folklore list will be posted in a couple of days. 	SONGSTERS & BROADSIDES	6551195244 - Gus Williams' Songster, 1869, $4.99 (ends Aug-11-05 
06:34:40 PDT)	6551480391 - Broadside, Annie Lisle, 1850?, $8.50 (ends Aug-12-05 
11:18:44 PDT)	6551707726 - HANK WHITE'S BURNT CORK SONGSTER, 1868, $24.99 
w/reserve (ends Aug-13-05 13:13:10 PDT)	6551996180 - Broadside, The Last Rose of Summer, 1860?, $0.10 
(ends Aug-14-05 18:41:14 PDT)	6551998431 - Broadside, When the Boys Come Home, 1860?, $0.10
(ends Aug-14-05 18:49:23 PDT)	BOOKS	6971776954 - Modern Street Ballads by Ashton, 1968 reprint, 5 GBP 
(ends Aug-13-05 02:59:11 PDT)	8324968886 - The Story of Street Literature by Collison, 1973, 
0.99 GBP (ends Aug-17-05 09:04:57 PDT)-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:54:24 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(44 lines) , text/html(10 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:51:05 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:56:02 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(8 lines) , text/html(10 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Jean Lepley <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:03:21 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(5 lines)


I think this last item of Dolores's eBay list (5227442005 - A Scottish
Ballad Book by Buchan, 1973, 7.50 GBP) is the neat little book that
I left on a Scottish mountain and retrieved and then left at a Seattle
song circle and never retrieved.  That's the pathetic note (to discourage
competition).  Now to figure out the mechanics of bidding on the book...

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Mushrooms (nothing musical)
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:22:25 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


"Re.  Heather's note: Mushrooms in ketchup? Bert Lloyd
was a creative man in more  ways than one."Mushroom ketchup is a real food. It comes out like
kind of a thick Worcestershire Sauce.C.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mushrooms (nothing musical)
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:28:04 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(9 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mushrooms (nothing musical)
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:44:35 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(20 lines) , text/html(26 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:11:59 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(94 lines) , text/html(48 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:47:24 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(25 lines) , text/html(31 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:50:08 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(19 lines) , text/html(27 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Stage singers' alterations
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 06:51:01 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(11 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ebay List - 8/9/05 (Songsters & Broadsides)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:06:18 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(16 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:13:17 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(16 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:15:32 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(20 lines) , text/html(29 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:19:15 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(22 lines) , text/html(30 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:39:48 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(27 lines) , text/html(27 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:42:06 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(31 lines) , text/html(30 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Cal Lani Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:33:12 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hi John,
In my liner notes (to the recording In Harmonys Way, where I lead
the chorus in 'Clementine' -- how's that for subtlety!) I give 
Dudley Laufman 'credit' for that musical miscegenation, though I 
heard it elsewhere first!  Why the combination is a 'folk' thing.  
Just to keep the record straight.  -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * [unmask] (or: [unmask])
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:15:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On 8/10/05, Jonathan Lighter wrote:>One odd thing I've noticed about revival singers is that they rarely sing a trad song to other than the usual trad tune.  "Roots" singers often sang words to whatever tune they thought fit, either because they learned the words from a broadside or recitation, because they couldn't fully recall the tune they heard, because the range of the tune was too great for their voice, or simply because they preferred a different one.
> 
>Familiar tunes have become, if possible, even more sacred than familiar words.  The influence once again of a pop song mentality.I don't think this is true. Daithi Sproule set a tune for "Bloody
Waterloo" (and it's wonderful, and it's destroyed the real tune for
me). Connie Dover set a tune for "Somebody."This ignores cases like Ray Fisher setting a tune for "Willie's Lady,"
already cited. There was no tune, in that case, so she had to set one.
I don't think that counts.I think it's more a case of the fact that tunes tend to either be
preserved or not; no fragments. And if a tune is preserved, it's
usually good. Where it *isn't* all that good, as with "Bloody
Waterloo," revival singers have felt free to fiddle.And then there is Steeleye Span.... :-)-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Roberts Returns
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:31:49 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


John:Good to have you back.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 8:39 am
Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations> Well, I stole King Willie from Martin Carthy, But Ray Fisher 
> married the
> tune and text.
> 
> JR
> 
> 
> On 8/10/05 10:15 AM, "[unmask]" <[unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > Boy, I've heard revival singers using all sorts of grafted, 
> borrowed and often
> > inappropriate tunes.  John Roberts sings King Willie to a 
> wonderful Breton
> > tune. Barbara Allen seems to be a favorite target,  Frog Went a 
> Courting and
> > Two Sisters often get the treatment.  Many truly bizarre tunes 
> are out there
> > for Gypsy Davey.  All sorts of British things are set to hymns 
> (like the Dog's
> > Meeting and the Goldfish),  and even Clementine (just ask Lani).
> >  
> > Mark G
> >  
> > In a message dated 8/10/2005 8:51:23 AM Central Standard Time,
> > [unmask] writes:
> >> One odd thing I've noticed about revival singers is that they 
> rarely sing a
> >> trad song to other than the usual trad tune.
> >  
> > 
> 
> 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:56:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


>On 8/10/05, Jonathan Lighter wrote:
>
>>One odd thing I've noticed about revival singers is that they 
>>rarely sing a trad song to other than the usual trad tune.  "Roots" 
>>singers often sang words to whatever tune they thought fit, either 
>>because they learned the words from a broadside or recitation, 
>>because they couldn't fully recall the tune they heard, because the 
>>range of the tune was too great for their voice, or simply because 
>>they preferred a different one.
>>
>  >Familiar tunes have become, if possible, even more sacred than 
>familiar words.  The influence once again of a pop song mentality.I love the ballad, The Frozen Logger, attributed by Alan Lomax (The 
Folk Songs of North America, 1960) to one James Stephens and, 
according to
http://www.umsystem.edu/whmc/invent/3826aclist.html
"composed in 1930's by James Stephens, H.L. Davis, Stewart Halbrook." 
(I've no idea who these people are/were.)I don't like the tune given by Lomax, which I've also heard in folkie 
recordings.I sing it to the hymn-tune ORTONVILLE (attr Thomas Hastings, 1837). 
I think this text and tune are a wonderful fit, and ORTONVILLE 
provides for repeating the last line.  You can have the crowd join in 
that repeat, if you wish.I see that you are a logger
And not just a common bum,
For nobody but a logger
Stirs his coffee with his thumb,
Stirs his coffee with his thumb.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Frozen Logger
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:22:59 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


http://www3.clearlight.com/~acsa/introjs.htm?/~acsa/songfile/FROZENLO.HTMThere are numerous versions of the song. The nearest to an original 
version seems to be the following, from Bunk Shanty Ballads and Tales 
by James Stevens:As I set down one evening in a timber town cafe
A six foot-seven waitress, to me these words did say
"I see you are a logger and not a common bum
For no one but a logger stirs his coffee with his thumb"My lover was a logger, there's none like him today
If you'd sprinkle whisky on it, he'd eat a bale of hay
He never shaved the whiskers from off his horny hide
But he'd pound 'em in with a hammer, then bite 'em off inside"My lover came to see me one freezing winter day
He held me in a fond embrace that broke three vertebrae
He kissed me when we parted so hard it broke my jaw
And I could not speak to tell him he'd forgot his mackinaw"I watched my logger lover going through the snow
A-sauntering gaily homeward at forty eight below
The weather tried to freeze him, it tried it's level best
At a hundred degrees below zero, he buttoned up his vest"It froze clean down to China, it froze to the stars above
At one thousand degrees below zero it froze my logger love
They tried in vain to thaw him and if you'll believe me, sir
They made him into ax blades to chop the Douglas fir"That's how I lost my lover and to this caffay I come
And here I wait till someone stirs his coffee with his thumb
And then I tell my story of my love they could not thaw
Who kissed me when we parted so hard he broke my jaw"********
http://www.deaddisc.com/songs/Frozen_Logger.htmComposer: James Stevens / Ivar Haglund / Traditional
********Strangely, WorldCat contains no record of such a book.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:32:09 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


http://www.common-place.org/vol-05/no-04/school/"Frozen Logger," anon., lyrics found in James Stevens, Bunk Shanty 
Ballads and Tales (1949)J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:35:24 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


>http://www.common-place.org/vol-05/no-04/school/
>
>"Frozen Logger," anon., lyrics found in James Stevens, Bunk Shanty 
>Ballads and Tales (1949)It's not a book.  Now that I refresh my memory a little, I think I 
copied this once:http://oscar.ctc.edu/history/writers.htmStevens, James. "Bunk Shanty Ballads and Tales: The Annual Society 
Address." Oregon Historical Quarterly L (1949): 235-242.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:45:04 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


http://www.arts.wa.gov/progFA/woodworks/faWoodworks2.htmlIn 1926, James Stevens, a native of Bend, Oregon, wrote the 
best-known Northwest logging song of all, "The Frozen Logger," which 
is still often sung today at logging shows.  (See page inside back 
cover).  This song has become part of tradition, as it has numerous 
versions, as well as several parodies.
********Writ by Stevens or not, it is obviously now a folk song.I wonder where the "usual" tune came from.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:57:14 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


It may be of interest to know that the "Song Title Index" at the Northeast Archives of Folklore and Oral History here at UM, which has one of the best (if not the best) collection of woodmen's lore in the country, contains not a single reference for
the song.Cheers
JamieForum for ballad scholars <[unmask]> on Wednesday, August 10, 2005 at 2:45 PM -0500 wrote:
>http://www.arts.wa.gov/progFA/woodworks/faWoodworks2.html
>
>In 1926, James Stevens, a native of Bend, Oregon, wrote the 
>best-known Northwest logging song of all, "The Frozen Logger," which 
>is still often sung today at logging shows.  (See page inside back 
>cover).  This song has become part of tradition, as it has numerous 
>versions, as well as several parodies.
>********
>
>Writ by Stevens or not, it is obviously now a folk song.
>
>I wonder where the "usual" tune came from.
>
>J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:12:10 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


>It may be of interest to know that the "Song Title Index" at the 
>Northeast Archives of Folklore and Oral History here at UM, which 
>has one of the best (if not the best) collection of woodmen's lore 
>in the country, contains not a single reference for
>the song.
>
>Cheers
>JamieThe page cited below indicates that it has been widely sung for a 
long time in Oregon/Washington and that it has many variants.>
>
>Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]> on 
>Wednesday, August 10, 2005 at 2:45 PM -0500 wrote:
>>http://www.arts.wa.gov/progFA/woodworks/faWoodworks2.html
>>
>>In 1926, James Stevens, a native of Bend, Oregon, wrote the
>>best-known Northwest logging song of all, "The Frozen Logger," which
>>is still often sung today at logging shows.  (See page inside back
>>cover).  This song has become part of tradition, as it has numerous
>>versions, as well as several parodies.
>>********
>>
>>Writ by Stevens or not, it is obviously now a folk song.
>>
>>I wonder where the "usual" tune came from.
>>
>>J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Roy Berkeley <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:40:00 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(33 lines) , text/html(49 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:09:40 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


BALLAD-L automatic digest system <[unmask]>, in
the person of Mark G, writes:> Boy, I've heard revival singers using all sorts of grafted, borrowed
> and often inappropriate tunes.  John Roberts sings King Willie to a
> wonderful Breton tune. Barbara Allen seems to be a favorite target,
> Frog Went a Courting and Two Sisters often get the treatment.  Many
> truly bizarre tunes are out there for Gypsy Davey.  All sorts of
> British things are set to hymns (like the Dog's Meeting and the
> Goldfish), and even Clementine (just ask Lani).I am not a stage singer, but at swaps I have made bold to steal the
tune to "Queen Eleanor's Confession", as sung by MacColl & Seeger, for
Kipling's "Ballad of Minepit Shaw".  I propagated it for some years
before hearing another tune, on Roberts & Barrands tape.  It probably
has some small oral circulation in the Boston area.  However, I have
always mentioned where I got the tune, and I sometimes sing the
original song, which has a certain nasty charm (I especially like the
increasingly desperate "Amen, amen!").
-- 
---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Because of the market, what is overrated is overpriced.   :||
||:  Because of foolishness, what is overpriced is overrated.  :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:34:00 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(41 lines) , text/html(51 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Red River Valley again
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:48:55 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


I have now seen Edith Fowke, "The Red River Valley" Re-Examined, 
Western Folklore 23 (1964): 163-72.  To me, the case she makes for 
the association of the song with the Red River Rebellion in Canada 
seems pretty good.  One of her major points is that "Red River 
Valley" was sung in Canada well before the publication of "In the 
Bright Mohawk Valley" by James J. Kerrigan in 1896.She cites the latter publication as follows:****
"In the Bright Mohawk Valley."  Words and music by James J. Kerrigan 
(New York: Howley, Haviland & Co., copyright 1896), Sheet music.
****and she gives 4 stanzas and a chorus said to be from that publication."Q," who discusses this song on the Mudcat Forumhttp://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=63785and who may be a list member here, sees Kerrigan's publication as a 
phantom.  He/she has been unable to track it down.  I've tried a 
little WWW work on this with no success either.  Sandburg and Spaeth 
refer to this alleged sheet music without giving any details at all. 
 From the copious details given by Fowke, however, it appears that she 
*did* see it (or she was awfully good at faking it).  Meade, in his 
Country Music Sources, also refers to Kerrigan.  Further, it appears 
that the Library of Congress once had a catalog entry for Kerrigan, 
but for some reason it has disappeared or, at least, is not in the 
on-line catalog.Meade's notes suggest that he traced the text to "A Lady in Love," 
Wehman's Collection of Songs #24 (Oct. 1889), p 17 (NYC: Henry J. 
Wehman, 1884-94, 42 issues).Does anyone know "A Lady in Love" or have access to Wehman (or 
Delaney's Song Book #13)?Does anyone know anything about the mysterious Kerrigan sheet music?Thanks,John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Contact Jack Elliott
From: Roy Berkeley <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:58:51 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(3 lines) , text/html(16 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:07:51 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


John:Of one thing you may be sure: Edith Fowke never faked anything.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 1:48 pm
Subject: Red River Valley again> I have now seen Edith Fowke, "The Red River Valley" Re-Examined, 
> Western Folklore 23 (1964): 163-72.  To me, the case she makes for 
> the association of the song with the Red River Rebellion in Canada 
> seems pretty good.  One of her major points is that "Red River 
> Valley" was sung in Canada well before the publication of "In the 
> Bright Mohawk Valley" by James J. Kerrigan in 1896.
> 
> She cites the latter publication as follows:
> 
> ****
> "In the Bright Mohawk Valley."  Words and music by James J. 
> Kerrigan 
> (New York: Howley, Haviland & Co., copyright 1896), Sheet music.
> ****
> 
> and she gives 4 stanzas and a chorus said to be from that publication.
> 
> "Q," who discusses this song on the Mudcat Forum
> 
> http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=63785
> 
> and who may be a list member here, sees Kerrigan's publication as a 
> phantom.  He/she has been unable to track it down.  I've tried a 
> little WWW work on this with no success either.  Sandburg and 
> Spaeth 
> refer to this alleged sheet music without giving any details at 
> all. 
> From the copious details given by Fowke, however, it appears that 
> she 
> *did* see it (or she was awfully good at faking it).  Meade, in his 
> Country Music Sources, also refers to Kerrigan.  Further, it 
> appears 
> that the Library of Congress once had a catalog entry for Kerrigan, 
> but for some reason it has disappeared or, at least, is not in the 
> on-line catalog.
> 
> Meade's notes suggest that he traced the text to "A Lady in Love," 
> Wehman's Collection of Songs #24 (Oct. 1889), p 17 (NYC: Henry J. 
> Wehman, 1884-94, 42 issues).
> 
> Does anyone know "A Lady in Love" or have access to Wehman (or 
> Delaney's Song Book #13)?
> 
> Does anyone know anything about the mysterious Kerrigan sheet music?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: Steve Roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:52:05 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


Delaney's Song Book No.13 [Sep 1896] p.18 has a text of IN THE BRIGHT MOHAWK 
VALLEY, headed
'Words and music by James J, Kerrigan, copyright 1896 by Howley, Haviland & 
Co.'No sign of any song called A LADY IN LOVEI don't have the WehmanSteve Roud----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Garst" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:48 PM
Subject: Red River Valley again>I have now seen Edith Fowke, "The Red River Valley" Re-Examined, Western 
>Folklore 23 (1964): 163-72.  To me, the case she makes for the association 
>of the song with the Red River Rebellion in Canada seems pretty good.  One 
>of her major points is that "Red River Valley" was sung in Canada well 
>before the publication of "In the Bright Mohawk Valley" by James J. 
>Kerrigan in 1896.
>
> She cites the latter publication as follows:
>
> ****
> "In the Bright Mohawk Valley."  Words and music by James J. Kerrigan (New 
> York: Howley, Haviland & Co., copyright 1896), Sheet music.
> ****
>
> and she gives 4 stanzas and a chorus said to be from that publication.
>
> "Q," who discusses this song on the Mudcat Forum
>
> http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=63785
>
> and who may be a list member here, sees Kerrigan's publication as a 
> phantom.  He/she has been unable to track it down.  I've tried a little 
> WWW work on this with no success either.  Sandburg and Spaeth refer to 
> this alleged sheet music without giving any details at all. From the 
> copious details given by Fowke, however, it appears that she *did* see it 
> (or she was awfully good at faking it).  Meade, in his Country Music 
> Sources, also refers to Kerrigan.  Further, it appears that the Library of 
> Congress once had a catalog entry for Kerrigan, but for some reason it has 
> disappeared or, at least, is not in the on-line catalog.
>
> Meade's notes suggest that he traced the text to "A Lady in Love," 
> Wehman's Collection of Songs #24 (Oct. 1889), p 17 (NYC: Henry J. Wehman, 
> 1884-94, 42 issues).
>
> Does anyone know "A Lady in Love" or have access to Wehman (or Delaney's 
> Song Book #13)?
>
> Does anyone know anything about the mysterious Kerrigan sheet music?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:54:00 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(47 lines) , text/html(9 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:03:57 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:10:26 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(39 lines) , text/html(9 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:55:28 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(11 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:19:42 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Heather:Fear not.  Edith was a fine scholar, a gentle woman, and, Kenneth Goldstein avers, a helluva singer of bawdy songs.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 4:55 pm
Subject: Re: Red River Valley again> In a message dated 8/10/2005 5:08:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> [unmask] 
> writes:
> Of one thing you may be sure: Edith Fowke never faked anything.
> Ed, is your tongue firmly in your cheek??
> 
> I'd be interested in others' comments, because as a (relatively, 
> then -late 
> 1960s) young folkie I was told to distrust her scholarship.
> 
> Heather
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:22:23 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


I've always trusted her scholarship. She really did
her homework! 
     Sandy (in Connecticut)--- edward cray <[unmask]> wrote:> Heather:
> 
> Fear not.  Edith was a fine scholar, a gentle woman,
> and, Kenneth Goldstein avers, a helluva singer of
> bawdy songs.
> 
> Ed
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
> Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 4:55 pm
> Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
> 
> > In a message dated 8/10/2005 5:08:00 PM Eastern
> Standard Time, 
> > [unmask] 
> > writes:
> > Of one thing you may be sure: Edith Fowke never
> faked anything.
> > Ed, is your tongue firmly in your cheek??
> > 
> > I'd be interested in others' comments, because as
> a (relatively, 
> > then -late 
> > 1960s) young folkie I was told to distrust her
> scholarship.
> > 
> > Heather
> > 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: Adam Miller <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:43:13 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


Frank Hamilton told me that Earl Robinson composed the "usual" melody 
to this song.-Adam Miller
Woodside, CA
http://folksinging.orgOn Aug 10, 2005, at 3:12 PM, John Garst wrote:>> It may be of interest to know that the "Song Title Index" at the 
>> Northeast Archives of Folklore and Oral History here at UM, which has 
>> one of the best (if not the best) collection of woodmen's lore in the 
>> country, contains not a single reference for
>> the song.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jamie
>
> The page cited below indicates that it has been widely sung for a long 
> time in Oregon/Washington and that it has many variants.
>
>>
>>
>> Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]> on 
>> Wednesday, August 10, 2005 at 2:45 PM -0500 wrote:
>>> http://www.arts.wa.gov/progFA/woodworks/faWoodworks2.html
>>>
>>> In 1926, James Stevens, a native of Bend, Oregon, wrote the
>>> best-known Northwest logging song of all, "The Frozen Logger," which
>>> is still often sung today at logging shows.  (See page inside back
>>> cover).  This song has become part of tradition, as it has numerous
>>> versions, as well as several parodies.
>>> ********
>>>
>>> Writ by Stevens or not, it is obviously now a folk song.
>>>
>>> I wonder where the "usual" tune came from.
>>>
>>> J
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: The Lights of the City
From: Sammy Rich <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:16:02 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Hello all:It kind of drives me crazy to hear someone sing a song and then not be able to find the melody, lyrics and chords on a website.  Is there a good website for the old gospel hymns with the above information on it somewhere?  Please share with me if you would. "The Lights of the City "  is as followsJohn tell us of a city so high up above
There we'll meet  in a spirit of  love.
We'll meet over yonder in that heavenly place
There we'll see each other face to face. Chorus
I can almost see the lights of the city shining down on me.
I can almost see the lights of the city forever Lord I shall be free. Supposedly learned in a Catholic church in Epiphany, Ky. Thanks:SRich

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: The Lights of the City
From: Mike Luster <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:18:53 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(17 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:14:31 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(53 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:34:41 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


>Delaney's Song Book No.13 [Sep 1896] p.18 has a text of IN THE BRIGHT MOHAWK
>VALLEY, headed 'Words and music by James J, Kerrigan, copyright 1896 
>by Howley, Haviland & Co.'
>...
>Steve RoudSteve,Here is the info provided by Fowke in her 1964 paper in Western 
Folklore.  Do the words match Delaney's?In the Bright Mohawk Valley
Words and music by James J. Kerrigan
New York: Howley, Haviland & Co.
Copyright 1896
Sheet musicOh they say from this valley you're going,
We shall miss your sweet face and bright smile,
You will take with you all the sunshine
That has gladdened our hearts for awhile.I have waited a long time my darling,
For those words that your lips ne'er would say,
Now the hope from my heart has departed,
And I'm told you're going away.Chorus:
For the sake of the past, do not leave me,
Do not hasten to bid me adieu!
Oh, remain in this bright Mohawk valley,
With the fond heart that lives but for you.Do you think of the valley you're leaving?
Oh, how dreary 'twill be when you go,
Have you thought of the heart, so lonely,
That has loved you and cherished you so.Tell me not that our lives must be severed,
Give me back, love, the smile once so dear,
Oh! this valley would lost (sic) all its brightness,
If its fairest of flow'rs were not here.Thanks,John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:59:20 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


Earl may have thought so, but to my ear it is remarkably similar to "Nellie
Dare and Charlie Brooks," oft recorded in the '20s but probably from the
1890s.
Norm Cohen----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Miller" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: Frozen Logger> Frank Hamilton told me that Earl Robinson composed the "usual" melody
> to this song.
>
> -Adam Miller
> Woodside, CA
> http://folksinging.org
>
>
>
> On Aug 10, 2005, at 3:12 PM, John Garst wrote:
>
> >> It may be of interest to know that the "Song Title Index" at the
> >> Northeast Archives of Folklore and Oral History here at UM, which has
> >> one of the best (if not the best) collection of woodmen's lore in the
> >> country, contains not a single reference for
> >> the song.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Jamie
> >
> > The page cited below indicates that it has been widely sung for a long
> > time in Oregon/Washington and that it has many variants.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]> on
> >> Wednesday, August 10, 2005 at 2:45 PM -0500 wrote:
> >>> http://www.arts.wa.gov/progFA/woodworks/faWoodworks2.html
> >>>
> >>> In 1926, James Stevens, a native of Bend, Oregon, wrote the
> >>> best-known Northwest logging song of all, "The Frozen Logger," which
> >>> is still often sung today at logging shows.  (See page inside back
> >>> cover).  This song has become part of tradition, as it has numerous
> >>> versions, as well as several parodies.
> >>> ********
> >>>
> >>> Writ by Stevens or not, it is obviously now a folk song.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder where the "usual" tune came from.
> >>>
> >>> J
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:52:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Hi,
If my memory serves me correctly the last time I heard it sung was on the
TV in a Monty Python sketch, sung by Michael Palin, and the tune he used
was a relative of the 'Good Ship Venus'/'In and out the windows'/'so early
in the morning/Blue-tail Fly' tune.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley Again
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:58:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hi,
This may be a red herring but Owens in Texas Folk Songs 2000 reprint
states, 'In The Bright Mohawk Valley' was composed and published as sheet
music in the middle of the 19th century'. He gives a version titled 'The
Bright Sherman Valley. Brown NCF has 'Sherman Valley' and 'Laurel Valley'.
Has anyone checked Levy?
Steve

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:19:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hi'
Think I got the thread right this time.
Encyclopaedia of Music in Canada, 'Later research by EF INDICATES that it
was known in 5 Canadian provinces before 1896' Does anyone with access to
Edith's research papers know of the provenance of this statement? The
word 'indicates' doesn't sound very convincing.
Steve

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:22:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(135 lines)


>Hi'
>Think I got the thread right this time.
>Encyclopaedia of Music in Canada, 'Later research by EF INDICATES that it
>was known in 5 Canadian provinces before 1896' Does anyone with access to
>Edith's research papers know of the provenance of this statement? The
>word 'indicates' doesn't sound very convincing.
>SteveSteve,I have a copy of Fowke's paper."Since 1954 considerable evidence has come to light showing that 'The 
Red River Valley' was sung in Canada well before 1896, and it now 
seems practically certain that the song originally commemorated not 
the bright Mohawk Valley or the Red River Valley of Texas, but the 
Red River that flows into Lake Winnipeg.  There are several 
indications that the song was sung in Canada during the North-West 
Rebellion of 1869, commonly known as the Red River Rebellion, and 
that it then told of the love of a half-breed girl for one of the 
British soldiers who came west to suppress the rising.""'Here is my own testimony.  I left the Miramichi about 1894.  The 
song was well-known to me there.'"  From Lord Beaverbrook (Oct. 7, 
1955)."'I remember hearing this song as far back as 1891...I know my father 
was living then and he died in 1892.'"  From J. S. Wiggins, St. 
Vital, Manitoba (March 3, 1956)."Early in 1960 Hugh Dempsey, archivist of the Glenbow Foundation, a 
historical research organization in Calgary, came across a version of 
'The Red River Valley' in an undated clipping from the Calgary Herald 
among the papers of Col. Gilbert E. Sanders who had been a member of 
the North-West Mounted Police in 1885."  This version refers to the 
"half-breed who loved you so true," "your home by the ocean," "love 
for the boy who came west," and "the dark maiden's prayer for her 
love."  It is said to be typical of the earliest known versions. 
Similar texts are found in Missouri (Max Hunter Collection on line). 
Such texts are consistent with a romance between a soldier from the 
east (of Canada) and an Indian ("dark," "half-breed") woman who lives 
in the Red River Valley of the North."J. E. A. MacLeod...recalled that he heard the song in Cape Breton, 
Nova Scotia, before he left there in 1892 for the west, and that it 
was his understanding that it referred to a half-breed girl and a 
militia man.""Senator Gladstone of Cardston, Alberta, also remembered hearing the 
song during his school days in Pincher Creek, Alberta, in 1894.""Mrs. Jack Bullough...remembered having heard it 'at a medicine show 
in Finch, in the Ottawa valley' when she was seven years old..." 
(1891)."...Mrs. G. J. Buck of Regina wrote (Sept. 4, 1960)" that her mother 
remembered "The Red River Valley" being sung when her older brother 
was engaged to be married.  He was married in 1887."Mrs. Jessie M Bresnaham of Watino, Alberta wrote" that she had heard 
the song "many times in 1888 in Manitoba, 80 miles southwest of 
Winnipeg...""Mr. J. L. Williamson of Glen Lake, British Columbia, wrote (August 
6, 1962)...My first recollection of hearing that song would be about 
1887 but definitely not later than 1888...""...Mr. William Ferguson of Drumheller, Alberta, wrote (July 29, 
1962): 'I learned the Red River Valley song off by heart in the 
middle '90's when only 8 years old.  I was born in 1887 and I always 
thought it was written in Manitoba on the Red River."Fowke observes that many of these recollections are tied to life 
events that "make error unlikely.  It might be assumed that one or 
two such reports resulted from faulty memory, but the total is 
convincing."  She believes that "while the earlieest date mentioned 
is 1887, it is obvious that the song must have originated 
considerably before that date in order to have become so widely 
distributed at a time when transportation in Canada was comparatively 
primitive."  Actually, I don't find this argument convincing, and I'm 
anxious to see what Gus Meade turned up in Wehman's Collection of 
Songs, "A Lady in Love."Fowke considers it "significant that it does not appear in the 
comprehensive collection of cowboy songs published by John Lomax in 
1910, and when it was included in the revised edition, Cowboy Songs 
and Other Frontier Ballads, in 1938, it was drawn from two other 
songbooks published in 1932.  Only D. J. O'Malley places it in the 
American west as early as the 1880s.Fowke cites "a pencil manuscript in the Edwin Ford Piper collection 
at the University of Iowa which bears the notation at the bottom: 
'Namaha 1879, Harlow 1885.'"  The text is similar to early Canadian 
ones, so it is plausible that it came to Iowa from Canada.Fowke cites and summarizes various pieces of correspondence received 
by Robert W. Gordon, dating the song as far back as "about 1860," 
1869, 1883, 1888, 1891, etc."W. B. Rawson wrote: 'It is supposed to have been half-breed girl's 
farewell to her lover, a soldier in the Wolseley Red River Expedition 
in the 70's.""...R. B. Wallace: 'Some years ago a friend whose home was in 
Montreal told me that at one time a crack Canadian regiment had been 
stationed in the Red River Valley locality.  The officers were well 
thought of socially, but seem to have philandered among the Indian 
girls to some extent.  The white girls, of course, resented this, and 
at a farewell ball givven to the officers on the occasion of their 
transfer, the young lady who composed this song rose and sang it, 
much to the embarassment of the ones at whom it was aimed.'"Fowke cites other testimony dating RRV to 1868 in Canada.  Mrs. 
Ashley Lunham of Minden, Ontario, wrote...on May 24, 1960" that her 
great grandmother "had in her possession the original copy of this 
song as a poem and she was very fond of it in its musical setting." 
The poem had been written in the east by Jethro de la Roche, who was 
broken-hearted that his love, Amaryllis Milligan, would not marry him 
because she had come down with tuberculosis.  "Apparently it was 
composed as a poem in the east, set to music and had verses 
appropriate added in the west" (at the time of the Red River 
Rebellion), then brought back east.The evidence of a Canadian origin is highly circumstantial and 
testimonial.  It reminds me of "John Henry."I suspect that these accounts fail to consider properly published 
versions of relatives.John-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:14 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Are you confusing this with his performance of "I'm a Lumberjack and I'm
OK"? I don't recall him doing the Frozen Logger, but I haven't seen them all
- yet.JROn 8/11/05 2:52 PM, "Steve Gardham" <[unmask]> wrote:> Hi,
> If my memory serves me correctly the last time I heard it sung was on the
> TV in a Monty Python sketch, sung by Michael Palin, and the tune he used
> was a relative of the 'Good Ship Venus'/'In and out the windows'/'so early
> in the morning/Blue-tail Fly' tune.
> SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:43:32 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


John,
This is very likely. My confused recollection certainly includes 'I'm a 
lumberjack' but I thought Michael sang them both together using 'I'm a 
lumberjack' as the chorus or a sort of medley. If not then I must have heard 
it someplace else.
Steve>From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>To: [unmask]
>Subject: Re: Frozen Logger
>Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:31:14 -0400
>
>Are you confusing this with his performance of "I'm a Lumberjack and I'm
>OK"? I don't recall him doing the Frozen Logger, but I haven't seen them 
>all
>- yet.
>
>JR
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8/11/05 2:52 PM, "Steve Gardham" <[unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > If my memory serves me correctly the last time I heard it sung was on 
>the
> > TV in a Monty Python sketch, sung by Michael Palin, and the tune he used
> > was a relative of the 'Good Ship Venus'/'In and out the windows'/'so 
>early
> > in the morning/Blue-tail Fly' tune.
> > SteveG_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends 
http://messenger.msn.co.uk

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Edie Gale Hays <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:53:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/html
Parts/Attachments:

text/html(28 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/11/05 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:00:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(72 lines)


Hi!	I hope that everyone is staying cool! Here is some more summer
reading from Ebay. :-)	JOURNALS	6551649209 - Pennsylvania Folklife, Winter 1958, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-13-05 08:43:29 PDT)	6422581467 - A Sigh and a Wish: Helen Creighton's Maritimes, DVD,
2001, $20 (ends Aug-15-05 18:32:41 PDT)	8325795664 - Word-Lore the Folk Magazine, 2 issues, 1926, 10 GBP
(ends Aug-20-05 13:43:04 PDT)	8325799050 - Folklore - Journal of the Folklore Society, 11 issues,
1973-75, 25 GBP (ends Aug-20-05 13:59:34 PDT)	BOOKS 	4566986174 - Folk Tales from French Louisiana by Saucier, 1972, 
$9.99 (ends Aug-12-05 11:55:12 PDT)	8324983988 - The Folklore of the Cotwolds by Briggs, 1974, 4.99 
GBP (ends Aug-14-05 09:58:35 PDT)	8324336316 - The Folklore of Warwickshire by Palmer, 1976, 5 
GBP (ends Aug-14-05 11:14:23 PDT)	8325050847 - The Word on the Brazos by Brewer, 1953, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-14-05 13:22:44 PDT)	5227392474 - The Folklore of Cornwall by Deane & Shaw, 1975, 
3.99 GBP (ends Aug-15-05 07:14:05 PDT)	5227392523 - Guide to Traditional Customs of England by Shuel, 
1985, 3.99 GBP (ends Aug-15-05 07:14:12 PDT)	5227392836 - Superstition and Folklore by Williams, 1982, 1.99 
GBP (ends Aug-15-05 07:15:11 PDT)	4567985234 - The American Folk Scene by DeTurk & Poulin, 1967, 
$1.75 (ends Aug-15-05 11:58:59 PDT)	4567488199 - Folklore of the Sea by Beck, 1973, $7.99 (ends 
Aug-15-05 12:24:44 PDT)	6552260421 - Pirates, Pineapples, and People; A History, Tales and 
Legends of the Upper Florida Keys by Beare, 1969, $2.95 (ends 
Aug-15-05 18:36:30 PDT)	6552412722 - Always in Season: Folk Art and Traditional Culture in 
Vermont by Beck, 1982, $9.99 (ends Aug-16-05 12:25:54 PDT)	6971897277 - Legends & Folklore of Cornwall by Rutley, 1942, 3.99
(ends Aug-17-05 03:41:09 PDT)	6552712541 - Canal Water and Whiskey by Rapp, 1965, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-17-05 18:00:20 PDT)	5228868980 - The Folklore of Orkney & Shetland by Marwick, 1.99
GBP (ends Aug-19-05 11:26:23 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:34:05 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(13 lines) , text/html(13 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:21:17 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(17 lines) , text/html(27 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:24:36 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Sir:Excuse me, but there is no more appropriate tune for one of the most commonly found bawdy songs, the "The Fucking Machine," than the grand old hymn known as "Old Hundred."  Ed
 ----- Original Message -----
From: [unmask]
Date: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:21 pm
Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations> 
> Well, for one thing, mixing genres such as singing Barbara Allen to 
> a 50's  
> BeBop or Honky-Tonk Blues.  For another, some bawdy or scatalogical 
> parody  set 
> to a hymn tune.  Those are pretty gross examples, but there are 
> tons of  more 
> subtle ones.  For example, you can set "Amazing Grace" to 
> Sullivan's  "We 
> Sail the Ocean Blue".  "Inappropriate" isn't necessarily 
> perjorative,  it's just 
> a question of using a tune which has a very different  connotation.
> 
> In a message dated 8/11/2005 9:43:46 PM Central Standard Time,  
> [unmask] writes:
> 
> What makes a tune  "inappropriate?"
> 
> 
> 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:44:18 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(22 lines) , text/html(25 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Linn Schulz <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:02:03 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(57 lines)


I'm personally fond of "The Wild Colonial Boy" set to
"Ghost Riders In the Sky" -- "too ra lie-aye, too ra
lie-oh, the wild colonial boy."Linn--- edward cray <[unmask]> wrote:> Sir:
> 
> Excuse me, but there is no more appropriate tune for
> one of the most commonly found bawdy songs, the "The
> Fucking Machine," than the grand old hymn known as
> "Old Hundred."  
> 
> Ed
>  
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [unmask]
> Date: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:21 pm
> Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
> > > 
> > Well, for one thing, mixing genres such as singing
> Barbara Allen to   a 50's  
> > BeBop or Honky-Tonk Blues.  For another, some
> bawdy or scatalogical   parody  set 
> > to a hymn tune.  Those are pretty gross examples,
> but there are  tons of  more 
> > subtle ones.  For example, you can set "Amazing
> Grace" to  Sullivan's  "We 
> > Sail the Ocean Blue".  "Inappropriate" isn't
> necessarily   perjorative,  it's just 
> > a question of using a tune which has a very
> different  connotation.
> > 
> > In a message dated 8/11/2005 9:43:46 PM Centr
Standard Time,  
> > [unmask] writes:
> > 
> > What makes a tune  "inappropriate?"******************************************************************
Linn S. Schulz
Writing - Editing - Research - Print Design & Production
phone/fax 603-942-7604
62 Priest Road, Nottingham, NH 03290  USA******************************************************************		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Jean Lepley <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:03:06 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


Just "revival singers"?  I seem to recall Jean Ritchie (not in singing
Family of the Cumberlands -- I just checked -- it must have been on stage
in Mandel Hall) telling how her Uncle Jason,  on at least one old song,
kind of picking an appropriate tune "out of the air."  My impression was
that some songs, even "in the tradition," were much more strongly wedded
to a particular tune than others....

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:10:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


On 8/11/05, edward cray wrote:>Sir:
>
>Excuse me, but there is no more appropriate tune for one of the most commonly found bawdy songs, the "The Fucking Machine," than the grand old hymn known as "Old Hundred."But that's not bidirectional. Conceding the parodic aspect of setting
bawdy songs to hymn tunes, it doesn't really work the other way. I
doubt many people would feel comfortable to the idea of, say, "A
Mighty Fortress" sung to the tune of "Roll Me Over...."My other notion of "inappropriate" would be something that just
conveys the wrong feel -- e.g. "The Lyke-Wake Dirge" to "Turkey
in the Straw."(Note: I have not parsed the above examples to see if they're possible.
I'm just trying to give the idea.)-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Congrats are in order
From: Andy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:17:19 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


For Ed Cray, who is in line for an ARSC award on accounta his Woody Guthrie
book. He is competing with Tony Russell's long overdue discography of early
Country Music, and of course the ubiquitous Elijah Wald is up for Escaping
the Delta. If anybody's interested, I can forward the notice, which was forwarded from
another list that I'm on.A. Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:38:18 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


>Well, for one thing, mixing genres such as singing Barbara Allen to 
>a 50's BeBop or Honky-Tonk Blues.  For another, some bawdy or 
>scatalogical parody set to a hymn tune.  Those are pretty gross 
>examples, but there are tons of more subtle ones.  For example, you 
>can set "Amazing Grace" to Sullivan's "We Sail the Ocean Blue". 
>"Inappropriate" isn't necessarily perjorative, it's just a question 
>of using a tune which has a very different connotation.
>
>In a message dated 8/11/2005 9:43:46 PM Central Standard Time, 
>[unmask] writes:
>
>         What makes a tune "inappropriate?"Paraphrasing somebody, "Why should God have all the good tunes?"J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:41:46 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>Just "revival singers"?  I seem to recall Jean Ritchie (not in singing
>Family of the Cumberlands -- I just checked -- it must have been on stage
>in Mandel Hall) telling how her Uncle Jason,  on at least one old song,
>kind of picking an appropriate tune "out of the air."  My impression was
>that some songs, even "in the tradition," were much more strongly wedded
>to a particular tune than others....And, of course, until recently hymns had no set tunes.  There was a 
stock of tunes with various meters and a stock of hymns with various 
meters.  On any occasion you made a metrical match that was one among 
many possible ones.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: The Woodland Samplet 1987
From: Thomas Stern <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:42:07 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


If anyone has a copy of this tape of field recordings made for Camp Woodland
and is willing to make a cd-r or tape dub, please contact me off list. 
THANKS!
Best wishes, Thomas.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Congrats are in order
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:08:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Andy and all:As I understand it, the award is for the best research in recorded music.  There really is damn little "discography" in _Ramblin' Man._  So on that ground alone I would cede pride of place to my neighbor Elijah (who deserves congratulations for his pending marriage) or to Mr. Russell.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Andy <[unmask]>
Date: Friday, August 12, 2005 6:17 am
Subject: Congrats are in order> For Ed Cray, who is in line for an ARSC award on accounta his Woody 
> Guthriebook. He is competing with Tony Russell's long overdue 
> discography of early
> Country Music, and of course the ubiquitous Elijah Wald is up for 
> Escapingthe Delta. 
> 
> If anybody's interested, I can forward the notice, which was 
> forwarded from
> another list that I'm on.
> 
> A. Cohen
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:20:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Linn Schulz wrote:
> I'm personally fond of "The Wild Colonial Boy" set to
> "Ghost Riders In the Sky" -- "too ra lie-aye, too ra
> lie-oh, the wild colonial boy."Going beyond folk texts:  "Jabberwocky" to "Greensleeves"William Blake's "Tyger, Tyger" to "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star".It has been proven that anything can be sung to the tune of "A Bicycle 
Built For Two" -- whether it should be or not.-- 
Dan Goodman
Journal http://www.livejournal.com/users/dsgood/
Clutterers Anonymous unofficial community 
http://www.livejournal.com/community/clutterers_anon/
Decluttering http://decluttering.blogspot.com
Predictions and Politics http://dsgood.blogspot.com
All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:17:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


what sounds right is appropriate. Whatever worksdick greenhausEdie Gale Hays wrote:> Mark G  <[unmask]> wrote:
> >Boy, I've heard revival singers using all sorts of grafted,
> >borrowed and often inappropriate tunes. 
>
> What makes a tune "inappropriate?"
>
> Edie Gale Hays
> [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Larkin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:33:58 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


on 8/12/05 9:38 AM, John Garst at [unmask] wrote:> Paraphrasing somebody, "Why should God have all the good tunes?"
> 
> JThe somebody, if anybody here is interested, was Dr. Isaac Watts, and he
referred not to God but to the devil. he thougyht it was unfair that secular
music should sound great and religious music should be snore-death.A. Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:52:00 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


>on 8/12/05 9:38 AM, John Garst at [unmask] wrote:
>
>>  Paraphrasing somebody, "Why should God have all the good tunes?"
>>
>>  J
>
>The somebody, if anybody here is interested, was Dr. Isaac Watts, and he
>referred not to God but to the devil. he thougyht it was unfair that secular
>music should sound great and religious music should be snore-death.
>
>A. CohenI really doubt that it was Watts.  It has been attributed to Luther, 
as I recall, and I think also to Wesley, but I'm not sure that 
anybody knows who, if anyone, really wrote or said this.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:54:23 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


An internet site attributes the quote to Rowland Hill * English preacher (1744 - 1833).  "Why must the devil have all the best tunes?"  According to E.W. Broome's bio, Hill said this referring to Charles Wesley's defense of the practice of setting hymns to the music of popular songs.  Variations of the phrase also done by William Booth- Founder of the Salvation Army (1829-1912).   Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 8/12/2005 1:33:58 PM >>>
on 8/12/05 9:38 AM, John Garst at [unmask] wrote:> Paraphrasing somebody, "Why should God have all the good tunes?"
> 
> JThe somebody, if anybody here is interested, was Dr. Isaac Watts, and he
referred not to God but to the devil. he thougyht it was unfair that secular
music should sound great and religious music should be snore-death.A. Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:11:58 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(69 lines)


FWIW.  In favor of Fowke's position, it seems to me that the 
"Canadian" version of the text has been far more widespread than the 
"cowboy" version.  Looking in song books ca 1930, I still find more 
"Canadian" versions (though my sample is not all that large), even in 
cowboy song books.I have before me Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs, Compiled by 
Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John, n.p., n.d., but apparently ca 1930. 
(Through WorldCat I learned of 4 libraries with this book, and the 
catalog entry dates it "1930-1934?")  Anyhow, it gives a 10-verse 
version as follows.RED RIVER VALLEY From this valley they say you are going;
We will miss your bright eyes and sweet smile;
For they say you are taking the sunshine,
That brightens our pathway awhile.Come and sit by my side if you love me,
Do not hasten to bid me adieu.
But remember the Red River Valley,
And the girl who has loved you so true.For a long time I've waited, my darling,
For those words that you never would say.
But at last all my fond hopes have vanished,
For they say you are going away.Won't you think of the valley you're leaving,
Oh, how lonely, how sad it will be.
Oh, think of the fond heart you're breaking,
And the grief you have caused me to see. From this valley they say you are going,
When you go may your darling go too.
Would you leave her behind, unprotected,
When she loves no other but you?I have promised you, darling, that never
Would a word from my lips cause you pain,
And my life it will be yours forever,
If you will only love me again.Must the paths with its joys all be blighted,
By the future of sorrow and pain?
And the vows that were spoken be slighted?
Don't you think you could love me again?When you go to your home by the ocean,
May you never forget those sweet hours,
That we spent in the Red River Valley,
And the love we exchanged 'midst the flowers.Oh, there never should be such a longing,
In the heart of a pure maiden's breast,
That dwells in the heart you are breaking,
As I wait in my home in the west.And the dark maiden's prayer for her lover,
Is the spirit that moves o'er the world,
May his pathway be ever in sunshine,
Is the prayer of the Red River girl.This is far from the "cowboy" version that Ed thinks, I think, that 
everybody now sings.John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:48:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


Continuing to look through hillbilly and cowboy song books, I notice 
that Old Time Mountain Songs, Mountain Ballads, and Hill-Billy Tunes 
as sung by Jack Foy, "The Hill-Billy Boy," 1931? (Foy's version of 
WRECK OF OLD 97 is copyrighted 1931), contains both RED RIVER VALLEY 
and CAN I SLEEP IN YOUR BARN, with *different* tunes (though both are 
recognizable as RED RIVER VALLEY).RED RIVER VALLEY here is a short but very interesting version. 
First, the tune has some of the jerkiness of Dr. Peacock's 1874 tune, 
due to some dotted-eighth/sixteenth combinations.  Second, and even 
more interesting, the text seems to be a hybrid.Nothing unusual occurs before verse 3.  Here are verses 3-5.As you go to your home by the ocean
May you never forget those sweet hours
That we spent in the Red River Valley,
And the love we exchanged mid the flowers.Oh there never could be such a longing
In the heart of a pure maiden's breast,
That dwells in the heart you are breaking
As I wait in my home in the West.Come and sit by my side if you love me,
Do not hasten to bid me adieu,
But remember the Red River Valley
And the boy that has loved you so true.Verses 3-4 are standard in the "Canadian" version, but, strangely, 
verses 4-5 indicate different speakers.  In 4, the girl is the 
speaker - she waits in her "home in the West" - the implication is 
that the boy is leaving, as in "Canadian" versions.  In 5 the boy is 
the speaker, and he bids the girl, "Do not hasten to bid me adieu" - 
the girl is leaving, as in the "cowboy" version.In a sense this is what some anthropologists spend their lives 
looking for, a "missing link."  Or is it just an example of simple 
confusion or plain stupidity?John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:59:02 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


>Verses 3-4 are standard in the "Canadian" version, but, strangely, 
>verses 4-5 indicate different speakers.  In 4, the girl is the 
>speaker - she waits in her "home in the West" - the implication is 
>that the boy is leaving, as in "Canadian" versions.  In 5 the boy is 
>the speaker, and he bids the girl, "Do not hasten to bid me adieu" - 
>the girl is leaving, as in the "cowboy" version.
>
>In a sense this is what some anthropologists spend their lives 
>looking for, a "missing link."  Or is it just an example of simple 
>confusion or plain stupidity?Salt and Peanuts' song book, n.d., n.p., also contains RED RIVER 
VALLEY and CAN I SLEEP IN YOUR BARN TONIGHT, MISTER?  Again these 
have *different* RED-RIVER-VALLEY tunes, but they are also different 
from Jack Foy's.  Salt and Peanuts' RED RIVER VALLEY text, however, 
is essentially identical with Foy's except for the last line, where 
"girl" occurs in the place of Foy's "boy," making a consistent 
"Canadian" version.John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 11 Aug 2005 to 12 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-324)
From: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:36:09 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


BALLAD-L automatic digest system <[unmask]>, in
the person of Ed Cray, writes:> Excuse me, but there is no more appropriate tune for one of the most
> commonly found bawdy songs, the "The Fucking Machine," than the
> grand old hymn known as "Old Hundred."Amen!  That was the tune used at St Andrews University when I was
there in 1958-59.  And if, while we were marching to piss off the pier
after closing time, sufficiently distant respectable people thought we
were singing the Doxology, all the better.However, appropriateness may be less a matter of the tune itself than
of who got to it first.  W. V. O. Quine points out somewhere that "The
Lord High Executioner" would make a splendid wedding march if it had
had its start in a hymnbook instead of _The Mikado_.  One Christmas,
seated at a convivial table, I was delighted to discover how fine
"While Shepherds Watched Their Flocks by Night" sounded TTTO "Ilkley
Moor".  It turned out, of course, that "Ilkley Moor" had run off with
the Yorkshire tune to "While Shepherds Watched...".
-- 
---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  When I make water I make water, and when I make tea I make  :||
||:  tea.                                                        :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:46:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi John,
'is it just an example of simple confusion or plain stupidity?'
I think use of the word 'stupidity' a bit strong. Many songs in widespread
oral circulation exhibit similar inconsistencies, especially when they have
very little narrative to them. Casual singers we collect from are not
always stage performers and are not obliged to be consistent. Also when it
comes to cheap print versions such as those from songsters and broadsides
inconsistency is almost the norm, not to mention a whole catalogue of other
types of errors.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:01:12 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Dan Goodman wrote:>It has been proven that anything can be sung to the tune of "A Bicycle 
>Built For Two" -- whether it should be or not.I'm having trouble fitting "Red River Valley", not to mention "Yarmouth
Town" to it....Simon

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 11 Aug 2005 to 12 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-324)
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:55:22 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


Hi Joe,
Whilst 'Cranbrook' is indeed used by Sheffield (Yorkshire) carollers for 
'While shepherds watched' the tune is used by Methodists worldwide and was 
in fact made up by Thomas Clark of Canterbury pre 1805 when it was first 
published by him in his first set of Psalm & Hymn Tunes. There are lots of 
theories as to the origins of the words to 'Ilkla Moor' but those that 
appropriated 'Cranbrook' for its tune would have been well familiar with it 
as a hymn tune as well as its use for the carol.
SteveG in Yorkshire>From: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>To: [unmask]
>Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 11 Aug 2005 to 12 Aug 2005 - Special issue 
>(#2005-324)
>Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:36:09 -0400
>
>BALLAD-L automatic digest system <[unmask]>, in
>the person of Ed Cray, writes:
>
> > Excuse me, but there is no more appropriate tune for one of the most
> > commonly found bawdy songs, the "The Fucking Machine," than the
> > grand old hymn known as "Old Hundred."
>
>Amen!  That was the tune used at St Andrews University when I was
>there in 1958-59.  And if, while we were marching to piss off the pier
>after closing time, sufficiently distant respectable people thought we
>were singing the Doxology, all the better.
>
>However, appropriateness may be less a matter of the tune itself than
>of who got to it first.  W. V. O. Quine points out somewhere that "The
>Lord High Executioner" would make a splendid wedding march if it had
>had its start in a hymnbook instead of _The Mikado_.  One Christmas,
>seated at a convivial table, I was delighted to discover how fine
>"While Shepherds Watched Their Flocks by Night" sounded TTTO "Ilkley
>Moor".  It turned out, of course, that "Ilkley Moor" had run off with
>the Yorkshire tune to "While Shepherds Watched...".
>--
>---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]
>
>||:  When I make water I make water, and when I make tea I make  :||
>||:  tea.                                                        :||_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again (long)
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:03:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi John,
It may all be 'highly circumstancial and testimonial' but if only one of
these statements could be verified it would at least mean that the Canadian
version predated the Mohawk Valley published version and this would then be
discredited as the starting point. The sheer weight of all-be-it
circumstancial evidence should count for something. I have never seen
anything to suggest that any of EF's research was suspect. I'd like to see
Tradman's opinion on all of this, and other Canadian researchers.
Come on, Jon, chip in.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:02:47 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Simon Furey wrote:
> Dan Goodman wrote:
>  
>>It has been proven that anything can be sung to the tune of "A Bicycle 
>>Built For Two" -- whether it should be or not.
>  
> I'm having trouble fitting "Red River Valley", not to mention "Yarmouth
> Town" to it....That's where "whether it should be or not" comes in.  If the words don't 
  fit the tune, hammer them into submission.-- 
Dan Goodman
Journal http://www.livejournal.com/users/dsgood/
Clutterers Anonymous unofficial community 
http://www.livejournal.com/community/clutterers_anon/
Decluttering http://decluttering.blogspot.com
Predictions and Politics http://dsgood.blogspot.com
All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Alice's Restaurant
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:12:01 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(190 lines) , text/html(13 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:19:12 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Sitting around in a circle at a small folk festival in
the South, someone asked Almeda Riddle for "The Two
Sisters." She started to sing, hesitated, and said,
"Sorry, that's the wrong tune." She hunted around in
her memory a wee while, then said, "Oh well, it works
fine," and sang the ballad to the tune that had come
into her head. No problem. 
     Sandy--- Jean Lepley <[unmask]> wrote:> Just "revival singers"?  I seem to recall Jean
> Ritchie (not in singing
> Family of the Cumberlands -- I just checked -- it
> must have been on stage
> in Mandel Hall) telling how her Uncle Jason,  on at
> least one old song,
> kind of picking an appropriate tune "out of the
> air."  My impression was
> that some songs, even "in the tradition," were much
> more strongly wedded
> to a particular tune than others....
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:32:03 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


This may have been mentioned before, but if so I missed it: Tinsley,
"He Was Singing This Song" (University of Central Florida 1981) has a
two page history of Red River Valley (pp.210-211, with footnotes at
p.242). He makes a strong case for the Canadian origin and has evidence
that traces it back to at least the 1860's, and he discusses a bit about
its transformation to a cowboy song. If this hasn't been previously
mentioned, I can supply more info.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Edie Gale Hays <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 12 Aug 2005 23:27:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


>It has been proven that anything can be sung to the tune of "A Bicycle
>Built For Two" -- whether it should be or not.Tricia Alexander, of Chicago, likes to sing "Amazing Grace" with the
original tune, but in a blues style.Why sing a song of supposed celebration as a blues song?
Why not. Most people in church sing it as a dirge.Edie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 11 Aug 2005 to 12 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-324)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 05:32:14 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(37 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:26:30 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(39 lines) , text/html(46 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:45:04 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(29 lines) , text/html(36 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: "Cohen, Ronald" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:29:23 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


Hello: A brief response to Fred's query: The First Amendment covers "freedom of speech," which Pete used to argue that the government had no right to question or look into his beliefs, song lyrics,etc. The First Amendment covers the "right against self incrimination" (one of the due process rights), which meant that if someone took "The Fifth" in a congressional investigation they could not be charged with contempt of Congress, which was a criminal matter. But if one took the Fifth it was assumed they were obviously a Communist (this was the case until the Republicans began to take The Fifth during the Reagan years and since when they were asked to testify for their transgressions). But in taking the First Pete was not protected from being indicted and convicted for contempt of Congress. He (and others) took the latter position to make a point, that is that ideas should/could not be questioned or challenged by the government!
  I hope this helps.Ronald Cohen
 
Hi Folks,
 
I've only just got round to reading the Manhattan Journal on Pete Seeger,  
which Ed Cray kindly pointed out, and I was fair tickled by a couple of things  
which it said. First of all, there was Howard Husock's description of Woody  
Guthrie as "a middle-class Oklahoman with a calculated aw-shucks cowboy 
manner".  Took a lotta calculatin' did that manner o' Woody's.
 
Then there was the sentence which read:-
 
"It?s an irony that communists should seek to change the culture, of  course, 
since Marxism holds that culture is merely a reflection of underlying  
economic structures, whose transformation will bring about capitalism?s  inevitable 
collapse."
 
Well yes, but I can imagine what Marx would have said to that  one.
 
However, Husock repeats David Dunway's statement that, on being arraigned  
before the HUAC, Seeger pleaded the first amendment to the constitution, rather  
than the fifth. As neither author makes the difference clear, I'd be glad if  
anyone on this board could enlighten me.
 
Many thanks,
 
Fred McCormick.  

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:33:03 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(33 lines) , text/html(39 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist Oops
From: "Cohen, Ronald" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:37:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


Oops: I meant in the second sentence "The Fifth [not First] Amendment covers the "right against self incrimination" . . . " Sorry. Ron 
In a message dated 13/08/2005 15:29:36 GMT Standard Time, [unmask]  
writes:Hello: A  brief response to Fred's query: The First Amendment covers "freedom 
of  speech," which Pete used to argue that the government had no right to 
question  or look into his beliefs, song lyrics,etc. The First Amendment covers 
the  "right against self incrimination" (one of the due process rights), which  
meant that if someone took "The Fifth" in a congressional investigation they  
could not be charged with contempt of Congress, which was a criminal matter.  
But if one took the Fifth it was assumed they were obviously a Communist 
(this  was the case until the Republicans began to take The Fifth during the 
Reagan  years and since when they were asked to testify for their transgressions). 
But  in taking the First Pete was not protected from being indicted and 
convicted  for contempt of Congress. He (and others) took the latter position to make a  point, that is that ideas should/could not be questioned or challenged by the  government!
I hope this helps.Ronald  Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist Oops
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:39:21 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(45 lines) , text/html(43 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:07:58 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


The Fifth allows one to refrain from self-incrimination; the First 
guarantees the right of free speech
dick
Fred McCormick wrote:> Hi Folks,
>  
> I've only just got round to reading the Manhattan Journal on Pete 
> Seeger, which Ed Cray kindly pointed out, and I was fair tickled by a 
> couple of things which it said. First of all, there was Howard 
> Husock's description of Woody Guthrie as "a middle-class Oklahoman 
> with a calculated aw-shucks cowboy manner". Took a lotta calculatin' 
> did that manner o' Woody's.
>  
> Then there was the sentence which read:-
>  
> "It’s an irony that communists should seek to change the culture, of 
> course, since Marxism holds that culture is merely a reflection of 
> underlying economic structures, whose transformation will bring about 
> capitalism’s inevitable collapse."
>  
> Well yes, but I can imagine what Marx would have said to that one.
>  
> However, Husock repeats David Dunway's statement that, on being 
> arraigned before the HUAC, Seeger pleaded the first amendment to the 
> constitution, rather than the fifth. As neither author makes the 
> difference clear, I'd be glad if anyone on this board could enlighten me.
>  
> Many thanks,
>  
> Fred McCormick.  

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Jean Lepley <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:18:33 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(58 lines)


  Of course (in line with John Garst's comment on hymns and hymn tunes)
"Amazing Grace" itself has at least one other traditional tune that I
learned from the Folk Legacy LP of traditional singer Horton Barker(?);
besides being a great tune (not associated, to the best of my knowledge,
with any other hymn) it has the great advantage of a repeated chorus: "I
want to live a Christian life, I want to die a shouting, I want to feel
my Savior near, when soul and body's parting."  In fact, you begin with
the chorus, which one might choose to see as a different hymn, to which
"Amazing Grace" was grafted on (except that any such "grafting" occurred
well before the "Amazing Grace" became popular). I wonder if Jean Ritchie
can help us out here...
  And withoug going into all the Corpus Christi stuff, does anyone know
the history of "The Two Ravens" as sung to the tune of "Ye Banks and
Braes"?  It seems to be an expanded version -- of necessity, to fit an
extended melody line -- of the Scottish "Twa Corbies," which in turn is
sung to what I am told is an old Breton melody.  I love them both, and
they've obviously very close.  Any thoughts? On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Fred McCormick wrote:>
> You can say that again. Someone else might have a more precise figure, but
> as far as I recall, While Shepherds is sung in West Yorkshire alone to around
> 25  different tunes. One of them is reputed to be Ghost Riders in the Sky.
>
> The first time I went carolling in that part of the world (For anyone who
> doesn't know, the region to the west of Sheffield is home to a still thriving
> tradition of local carols. They are normally sung in local pubs in the six week
>  run up to Christmas.), I heard While Shepherds sung three times to three
> different tunes. I asked one of the locals how many tunes they'd got for that
> carol. He replied eleven. When I went back the following year, probably  1972,
> he told me that they'd now got twelve. I asked what the twelfth was. He
> replied, "Amazing Grace".
>
> Of course Judy Collins had a big hit with AG that year, and in Britain, its
> success was repeated by a pipe band instrumental version. Obviously,  someone
> had realised that the metre of AG fits the words of WS and it has been  staple
> part of that particular tradition ever since.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Fred McCormick. (Thinks. Only three and a bit months to go.)
>
>
> In a message dated 13/08/2005 13:32:36 GMT Standard Time,
> [unmask] writes:
>
> The novel _Winged Victory_ (1934), by V. M. Yeates, refers to a version  of
> "Our Goodman" being sung by British pilots to the tune of "While Shepherds
> Watched Their Flocks." The words seem to fit with difficulty.  Is  the carol
> actually sung to more than one tune ?
>
> JL
>
>
>
>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Red River Valley again
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:21:26 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


>This may have been mentioned before, but if so I missed it: Tinsley,
>"He Was Singing This Song" (University of Central Florida 1981) has a
>two page history of Red River Valley (pp.210-211, with footnotes at
>p.242). He makes a strong case for the Canadian origin and has evidence
>that traces it back to at least the 1860's, and he discusses a bit about
>its transformation to a cowboy song. If this hasn't been previously
>mentioned, I can supply more info.
>
>Lew BeckerI went to the library and took a quick look at this book.  The notes 
are a good summary of Fowke's work.  I didn't see anything original 
there.The 1860s dates are unreliable and, I suspect, wrong.  I've come to 
believe that the desire to believe that songs are older than they 
actually are must be genetic.John-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Andy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:26:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


on 8/13/05 8:45 AM, Fred McCormick at [unmask] wrote:> However, Husock repeats David Dunway's statement that, on being arraigned
> before the HUAC, Seeger pleaded the first amendment to the constitution,
> rather than the fifth. As neither author makes the difference clear, I'd be
> glad if anyone on this board could enlighten me.Fred,The first ten amendments to the Constitution are known as the Bill of
Rights. They are being skinnied up by this administration, but they are not
yet all gone away. The first amendmentrefers to freedom of speech, which the
Republicans insist, includes how much money you are allowed to spend for
political attack ads, political speech also being protected. The fifth
amendment is the right against self incrimination, or being forced to answer
a question that would incriminate oneself. The litany that you hear in old
movies, "I refuse on the advice of counsel to answer that question on the
grounds that it may tend to incriminate me" is how many people addressed the
question "Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party"
during the HUAC days.Andy Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Andy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:34:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


on 8/13/05 10:18 AM, Jean Lepley at [unmask] wrote:> "Amazing Grace" itself has at least one other traditional tune that I
> learned from the Folk Legacy LP of traditional singer Horton Barker(?);
> besides being a great tune (not associated, to the best of my knowledge,
> with any other hymn) it has the great advantage of a repeated chorus: "I
> want to live a Christian life, I want to die a shouting, I want to feel
> my Savior near, when soul and body's parting."I don't know about that one, but my old friend Jim Brewer, Maxwell Street's
best sight-challenged blues singer, used to sing Amazing Grace to the tune
of Floyd Kramer's 'Last Date'.  He said he learned it that way from his wife
Fanny's people down in West Virginia.Andy Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:53:34 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(54 lines) , text/html(62 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Tom Miller <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:55:45 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(57 lines) , text/html(62 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: CAMSCO
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:42:24 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


I'm sorry to say that deliveries on stuff people have ordered (including 
Rouse's book) won't be filled until early September. The reason (I'm 
happy to say) is that I'm leaving for England on the 15th, for Whiby 
Week and some visiting.Sorry for any inconvenience.dick greenhaus

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:23:06 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>   Of course (in line with John Garst's comment on hymns and hymn tunes)
>"Amazing Grace" itself has at least one other traditional tuneIndeed, one other tune was so consistently associated with "Amazing 
grace!" that G. P. Jackson considered it to be the "old" tune for 
that hymn.  The "new" tune was first published with that text in 
1835, as I recall.John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:29:54 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


--- Jean Lepley <[unmask]> wrote:>   Of course (in line with John Garst's comment on
> hymns and hymn tunes)
> "Amazing Grace" itself has at least one other
> traditional tune that I
> learned from the Folk Legacy LP of traditional
> singer Horton Barker(?);Unfortunately, my field recording of Horton Barker was
given to Folkways a few months before I started
Folk-Legacy (1961). If I owned the rights to it, it
would be on CD and readily available. Mr. Barker was a
real gem!
     Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: While Shepherds Watched
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:41:55 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(30 lines) , text/html(37 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:48:46 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(11 lines) , text/html(19 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:34:17 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


--- Fred McCormick <[unmask]> wrote:> My thanks to everyone who replied to my query about
> Pete and the American  
> constitution. Of course, in Britain, we do things so
> much better :-). Here we  
> have a constitutional monarchy, a constitutional
> House of Commons, a  
> constitutional House of Lords, and no constitution.
> And  our treason legislation goes 
> all the way back to 1351.
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> Fred McCormick. (Thinks. Go easy with that axe 
> lads.)
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:35:58 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Sorry, folks. Clumsy of me. Hit the wrong button.--- Sandy Paton <[unmask]> wrote:> --- Fred McCormick <[unmask]> wrote:
> 
> > My thanks to everyone who replied to my query
> about
> > Pete and the American  
> > constitution. Of course, in Britain, we do things
> so
> > much better :-). Here we  
> > have a constitutional monarchy, a constitutional
> > House of Commons, a  
> > constitutional House of Lords, and no
> constitution.
> > And  our treason legislation goes 
> > all the way back to 1351.
> >  
> > Cheers,
> >  
> > Fred McCormick. (Thinks. Go easy with that axe 
> > lads.)
> > 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Amazing Grace versions
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:03:37 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(27 lines) , text/html(38 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:15:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


Fred McCormick wrote:
> My thanks to everyone who replied to my query about Pete and the American  
> constitution. Of course, in Britain, we do things so much better :-). Here we  
> have a constitutional monarchy, a constitutional House of Commons, a  
> constitutional House of Lords, and no constitution. And  our treason legislation goes 
> all the way back to 1351.Britain _did_ have a written constitution, once.  But Cromwell found the 
Instrument of Government inconvenient.-- 
Dan Goodman
Journal http://www.livejournal.com/users/dsgood/
Clutterers Anonymous unofficial community 
http://www.livejournal.com/community/clutterers_anon/
Decluttering http://decluttering.blogspot.com
Predictions and Politics http://dsgood.blogspot.com
All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/13/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:46:17 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(65 lines)


Hi!	I think that many of the sellers are on vacation. The list is
short this week. 	MISCELLANEOUS	4756994888 - SONGS OF AN IRISH TINKER LADY by Barry, LP, 1955, 
$6.99 (ends Aug-17-05 18:14:00 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	7342029653 - The Lonely Mountaineer's Album Of Mountain Ballads And 
Cowboy Songs, 1930s, $9.99 (ends Aug-14-05 14:00:32 PDT)	7342047058 - Salty Sea Songs and Chanteys, 1943, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-14-05 15:31:57 PDT)	7342071972 - lot of 8 miscellaneous song books, $10.49 (ends 
Aug-14-05 17:42:01 PDT)	4568334587 & 4568333918 - Jane Hicks Gentry by Smith, 1998, $9.99
(ends Aug-14-05 19:05:35 PDT)	6552012176 - ENGLISH AND SCOTTISH BALLADS by Child, volume 7, 
1859, $14.99 (ends Aug-14-05 19:35:51 PDT)	6552251653 - Seventeenth Century Songs and Lyrics by Cutts, 1959, 
$14.99 (ends Aug-15-05 18:02:00 PDT)	4567638394 - Ballads and Sea Songs of Newfoundland, 1968 reprint, 
$30 (ends Aug-16-05 04:29:35 PDT)	5229296041 - Where is Saint George? Pagan Imagery In English 
Folksong by Stewart, 1977, 3.50 GBP (ends Aug-17-05 14:31:03 PDT)	4563344335 - Rise of the English Street Ballad 1550-1650 by 
Wurzbach, 1990, $168 (ends Aug-18-05 08:12:49 PDT)	7342199335 - A SELECTION OF COLLECTED FOLK SONGS by Sharp & 
Williams, volume 1, 1.50 GBP (ends Aug-18-05 09:27:43 PDT)	6552849191 - Songs of the Smokies by Graber, 1945, $19.99 (ends 
Aug-18-05 10:36:26 PDT)	 4568461790 - COWBOY JAMBOREE: WESTERN SONGS & LORE by Felton, 
1951, $9.99 (ends Aug-19-05 12:25:07 PDT)	8326033722 - The Overlander Songbook by Edwards, 1986 printing, 
9.99 GBP (ends Aug-21-05 13:04:57 PDT)	8326269762 - Fflat Huw Puw a cherddi erail by Davies, 1992, 4.99 
GBP (ends Aug-19-05 13:56:48 PDT)	8326019540 - Chapbooks of the Eighteenth Century by Ashton, 1990
reprint, 6 GBP (ends Aug-21-05 12:18:54 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Amazing Grace versions
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:48:58 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(16 lines) , text/html(17 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Amazing Grace versions
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:38:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


>I believe my second* husband was responsible for introducing the 
>standard Amazing Grace tune to a Scottish pipe band - he went out 
>with a pipe-major's daughter at one point.Glad to hear this.  Several people have told me, essentially, that I 
was an idiot for not accepting the notion that pipers have played 
this tune for centuries.John>Whether this is a Good Thing or a Bad Thing depends on your 
>tolerance for bagpipes.
>
>Heather
>
>
>* "how many husbands have you had?"
>     "two of my own."
>
>H

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:28:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


Hi folks:I think there needs to be a little clarification on Pete's First Amendment
defense. The House Coummittee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) was
conducting an inquiry on "Communism in the entertainment industry" and
subpoenaed Pete and fellow-member of the Weavers Lee Hays, both of whom had
been members of the Communist Party USA in years past. Pete had left the
party a few years earlier; I don't know when Lee left.The Committee's questions mostly bore on a single pair of issues: for what
groups, Communist-linked or otherwise, had Pete performed, and what people
had he known who were Communists. In other words, he was being asked to
"name names" to add further cannon fodder for the ongoing witch-hunt. He
told his lawyer that he was willing to admit his former membership in the
party -- he wasn't ashamed of it -- but he was unwilling to discuss other
people, or groups who had hired him. His grounds under the First Amendment
were subtle, because the amendment guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of
the press, freedom of religion (and freedom from a state-established
religion), and the freedom to assemble and petition for redress of
grievances. It does not specifically guarantee freedom of association or a
right of privacy, but those were central to Pete's position. He believed
(still believes) that he has the right to sing for whomever he chooses, and
that no govenmental agency has the legitimate power to demand that he say
for whom he has sung. Nor Pete asserted, do they have the legitimate power
to inquire into the political associations of anyone.As I said, freedom of association and a right of privacy are not explicitly
guaranteed, but the theory behind's Pete's beliefs was that they were
implicit in the explicitly declared rights, particularly those of speech and
petition.. As the Supreme Court put it in a much later, unrelated case, the
rights guaranteed under the First Amendment possess "penumbras", rights
which are implied by the Amendment without being explicitly stated. As usual
Pete was ahead of his time. (The case in which the idea was explicitly
stated by the Supreme Court was Griswold vs. Connecticut, in which the court
found that a state law against contraceptives violated a right of privacy
that existed as a penumbra to the First Amendment. Griswold, in turn, was
the major precedent cited in Roe vs. Wade, which found the laws then
regulating abortions in America unconstitutional.)Having refused to answer the committee's questions about his associations
without invoking the Fifth Amendment, which protects against
self-incrimination, Pete was cited for contempt of Congress, tried,
convicted, and sentenced to a year in prison. He got out on bail pending
appeal (after spending an afternoon in jail, during which he learned a
folksong from one of his fellow inmates); the conviction and sentence were
eventually voided on technical grounds.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Amazing Grace versions
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:01:38 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


John Garst wrote:> ...Several people have told me, essentially, that I was an idiot for
> not accepting the notion that pipers have played this tune for
> centuries.It just seems like it.-- 
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff, Scotland
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pete Seeger, The World's Most Incredible Communist
From: "Cohen, Ronald" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:50:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(52 lines)


One possible clarification about the issue concerning "naming names" before the HUAC or other govenment committees (state or federal) investigating "communism" in decades past. None of the names ever mentioned in all of the committees' hearings were new to the committees, since the FBI had infiltrated the CP for many decades and had membership lists, informers' testimony, and much else. So, when Paul notes that Pete's naming names would "add further cannon fodder for the ongoing witch-hunt" this is somewhat misleading. "Naming names" was designed NOT to get new names, but only to make those testifying grovel, abase themselves, rat on their old friends, that sort of thing. It was a ritual device to demonstrate power, and it certainly often served its purpose, but not with Pete or others who chose to challenge the witch hunt. They knew the ritual and refused to cooperate in order not only to protect old friends but, perhaps more importantly, to preserve their own integrity. Read Victor Navasky's NAMING NAMES or other studies to understand these issues. Ronald CohenHi folks:I think there needs to be a little clarification on Pete's First Amendment
defense. The House Coummittee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) was
conducting an inquiry on "Communism in the entertainment industry" and
subpoenaed Pete and fellow-member of the Weavers Lee Hays, both of whom had
been members of the Communist Party USA in years past. Pete had left the
party a few years earlier; I don't know when Lee left.The Committee's questions mostly bore on a single pair of issues: for what
groups, Communist-linked or otherwise, had Pete performed, and what people
had he known who were Communists. In other words, he was being asked to
"name names" to add further cannon fodder for the ongoing witch-hunt. He
told his lawyer that he was willing to admit his former membership in the
party -- he wasn't ashamed of it -- but he was unwilling to discuss other
people, or groups who had hired him. His grounds under the First Amendment
were subtle, because the amendment guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of
the press, freedom of religion (and freedom from a state-established
religion), and the freedom to assemble and petition for redress of
grievances. It does not specifically guarantee freedom of association or a
right of privacy, but those were central to Pete's position. He believed
(still believes) that he has the right to sing for whomever he chooses, and
that no govenmental agency has the legitimate power to demand that he say
for whom he has sung. Nor Pete asserted, do they have the legitimate power
to inquire into the political associations of anyone.As I said, freedom of association and a right of privacy are not explicitly
guaranteed, but the theory behind's Pete's beliefs was that they were
implicit in the explicitly declared rights, particularly those of speech and
petition.. As the Supreme Court put it in a much later, unrelated case, the
rights guaranteed under the First Amendment possess "penumbras", rights
which are implied by the Amendment without being explicitly stated. As usual
Pete was ahead of his time. (The case in which the idea was explicitly
stated by the Supreme Court was Griswold vs. Connecticut, in which the court
found that a state law against contraceptives violated a right of privacy
that existed as a penumbra to the First Amendment. Griswold, in turn, was
the major precedent cited in Roe vs. Wade, which found the laws then
regulating abortions in America unconstitutional.)Having refused to answer the committee's questions about his associations
without invoking the Fifth Amendment, which protects against
self-incrimination, Pete was cited for contempt of Congress, tried,
convicted, and sentenced to a year in prison. He got out on bail pending
appeal (after spending an afternoon in jail, during which he learned a
folksong from one of his fellow inmates); the conviction and sentence were
eventually voided on technical grounds.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:32:15 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(162 lines)


Some time in the middle of next year Ted Anthony's book on HORS will 
be published.  Till then, I've got some questions.ROUNDER'S LUCK
Callahan Brothers
(recorded in 1934, I think - JG)
(transcribed by "Arkie"
http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=8592 )The only thing that a rounder wants
Is a suitcase and a trunk.
And the only time he's satisfied
Is when he is on a drunk.He'll (loft) those glasses to the brim
Let the drinks go merrily round
We'll drink to the health of the rounder poor boy
Who hobos from town to town.My Mother she's a seamstress.
She cuts and sews them jeans.
My Daddy he's a gambling man.
He gambles in New Orleans.Oh Mama, mama how could you go
And treat that rounder so cold.
(For he's a rounder for all his strife)
And to wear your crown of gold.Theres a place down in New Orleans
That's called the Rising Sun.
Where many poor boy (to judgment have gone)
And me oh lord for one.O tell my youngest brother
Not to do what I have done
And to shun that place down in New Orleans
That's called the Rising Sun.I'm going back to New Orleans
My race is almost run.
Gonna spend the rest of my weekly pay
Beneath that Rising Sun.RISING SUN BLUES
("Tom" Ashley, 1960s)
(also recorded in 1934)
(transcribed by "Stewie", Mudcat link above)There is a house in New Orleans
They call the Rising Sun
Where many a poor boy to destruction has gone
And me, Oh God, I'm oneJust fill the glass up to the brim
Let the drinks go merrily round
We'll drink to the life of a rounder, poor boy
Who goes from town to townAll in this world does a rounder want
Is a suitcase and a trunk
The only time he's satisfied
Is when he's on the drunkNow, boys, don't you believe what a girl tells you
Let her eyes be blue or brown
Unless she's on some scaffold high
Saying, 'Boy's I can't come down'I'm going back - back to New Orleans
For my race is almost run
Gonna spend the rest of my wicked life
Beneath the Rising SunBoth of these are "boy" versions of the song.  To me, the evidence 
suggests that "boy" versions are older and more widespread than 
"girl" versions that are popular nowadays.  (This is not to deny that 
there are some older "girl" versions.)  In this post, I'm sticking to 
"boy" versions.I am struck by the dichotomy of the themes of the verses above.  Over 
half of the verses are about the hard times of a "rounder," with 
little or no link to the house of the rising sun, and one is about 
the no-goodness of women.  Among the "rising sun" verses, there is 
precious little detail, not even enough to establish for sure that 
the house of the rising sun is a bordello rather than, as Dave van 
Ronk suggested, a prison.The prison idea is forcibly dispelled by some verses in 
Randolph/Legman's publication of "unprintable Ozark folksongs."Beware the red light out in front
An' the pictures on the wall,
An' yellow gals dressed in purple shoes
Without no clothes at all.Shun the red light an' flowin' bowl,
Beware of too much drink,
Them whores will take an' lead you on
To hell's eternal brink.---There is a house in New Orleans,
They call it the Rising Sun,
An' when you want your pecker spoilt
That's where you get it done.They drink all day an' fuck all night
Until your money's gone;
They kick you ass out in the street
When the second shift comes on.That's much better, IMHO.  Using these verses we could put together 
quite a respectable song without using any of the "rounder" verses, 
and I imagine the possibility that that's how HORS started out in 
life, as both a celebration of and complaint about a bordello, 
perhaps a particular one.My candidate, as I've noted before, is Lulu White's place at 235 N. 
Basin Street, Mahogany Hall, or Hall of Mirrors, which has a rising 
sun pattern in the glass transom over the front door (illustrated in 
Al Rose's Storyville, New Orleans).  I think the song is likely to 
celebrate a famous place, and Lulu's certainly fits.We might not have to settle for that, however.  The first of the 
Randolph/Legman verses quoted above gives some particulars about the 
house.  Did Lulu White's place literally have a "red light out in 
front"?  (I don't know.)  Which New Orleans bordello, if any, 
featured "yellow gals dressed in purple shoes without no clothes at 
all"?  (I don't know, but perhaps some Storyville expert might!  Lulu 
White did feature "octoroons.")Another question:  Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually 
explicit verses of this song ever collected?  If not, where are 
others found, and what are they?And another:  What does it mean to have "your pecker spoilt"?  I 
think of three possibilities, (1) that "spoilt" refers to 
detumescence of the phallus following ejaculation, (2) that it refers 
to getting a disease, and (3) that it has a meaning like that in "to 
spoil a child," i.e., to cater to its every whim.  I think I lean 
toward the third meaning.Finally, I find the song one might put together using only the 
bordello verses above very satisfying, more than the usual bawdy 
song.  I suspect that the description of the operations of the New 
Orleans parlor houses given in the Randolph/Legman verses is 
essentially correct.  This stands in welcome contrast to the typical 
bawdy song full of exaggeration, impossibility, and rawness for its 
own sake.John-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:42:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


> Another question:  Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
> explicit verses of this song ever collected?  If not, where are others
> found, and what are they?From the Max Hunter Collection:         THE RISING SUN  Th whore house bells are ringing
  An' a man stood in th door
  All day long with a big hard on
  Tryin' to fuck a whore
  She had a dark an' rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew  Well, I rustled her, I tustled her
  Till I got her hearts content
  I slipped five dollars in her hand
  An' off t' bed we went
  She had a dark an' rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew  Well, I teased her, I tumbled her
  Till I got my hearts desire
  In about ten days, after that
  My ass was set on fire
  She had a dark an rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew  Well, now, when you go down to New Orleans
  Just stop at the Rising Sun
  There'll you'll see three pretty French whores
  An' that damn bitch is one
  She had a dark an' rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crewCat. #0504 (MFH #547) - As sung by Mr. Joe Walker, Berryville, Arkansas on 
February 9, 1960.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:22:17 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(57 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:43:34 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(15 lines) , text/html(38 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:16:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Garst" <[unmask]><<Some time in the middle of next year Ted Anthony's book on HORS will 
be published.  Till then, I've got some questions.ROUNDER'S LUCK
Callahan Brothers
(recorded in 1934, I think - JG)>>It's really a Homer Callahan solo, recorded 4/11/1935, issued Feb., 1936.<<RISING SUN BLUES
("Tom" Ashley, 1960s)
(also recorded in 1934)>>Actually 9/6/1933, probably released later that year.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:21:16 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Mehlberg" <[unmask]>> Another question:  Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
> explicit verses of this song ever collected?  If not, where are others
> found, and what are they?<<From the Max Hunter Collection:         THE RISING SUN  Th whore house bells are ringing
  An' a man stood in th door
  All day long with a big hard on
  Tryin' to fuck a whore
  She had a dark an' rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew  Well, I rustled her, I tustled her
  Till I got her hearts content
  I slipped five dollars in her hand
  An' off t' bed we went
  She had a dark an' rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew  Well, I teased her, I tumbled her
  Till I got my hearts desire
  In about ten days, after that
  My ass was set on fire
  She had a dark an rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew  Well, now, when you go down to New Orleans
  Just stop at the Rising Sun
  There'll you'll see three pretty French whores
  An' that damn bitch is one
  She had a dark an' rolling eye
  She belonged to th rougish crew>>I wouldn't class that as a version of "House of the Rising Sun", although it
may have been written about the same establishment. And despite the
beginning, it doesn't sound like "The Whorehouse Bells Were Ringing",
either.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/17/05 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:29:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(71 lines)


Hi!	Gosh - It's quiet around here. Where did everyone go? For anyone
reading this, here is the first of the weekly lists.	JOURNALS	6552929072 - Green Mountain Whittlin's, 1977-78, $3.99 (ends 
 Aug-18-05 16:10:06 PDT)	6200599179 - Ozark Folklore, 1951, $9.99 (ends Aug-18-05 19:38:12 
PDT)	8326445794 - Journal of the English Dance and Song Society, 1934, 
8 GBP (ends Aug-20-05 11:41:01 PDT)	6973213755 - Journal of American Folklore, 6 issues, 1991-92, $5 
(ends Aug-23-05 18:40:00 PDT)	BOOKS 	4568216413 - Folk Housing in Middle Virginia: A Structural Analysis
by Glassie, 1996 printing, $18.99 (ends Aug-18-05 08:52:05 PDT)	4568612639 - Gib Morgan by Boatright, 1965, $4.50 (ends Aug-18-05 
10:18:24 PDT)	7343169260 - LORE OF THE BIBLE by Gaer, 2 volumes, 1951, $12.50 
(ends Aug-19-05 18:40:51 PDT)	6553274223 - The Folklore of Maine by Beck, 1957, $2.99 (ends 
Aug-20-05 10:23:44 PDT)	6553279003 - Witch Stories of New Mexico by Delgado, 1994, $7.50 
(ends Aug-20-05 10:48:18 PDT)	4568724502 - Jelly-Roll...A Black Neighborhood in a Southern Mill 
Town by Thomas, 1986, $18.96 (ends Aug-21-05 04:21:48 PDT)	8326672189 - All Silver and No Brass An Irish Christmas Mumming by 
Glassie, 1983, 15 EUR (ends Aug-21-05 11:17:36 PDT)	8326825067 - American Negro Folktales by Dorson, 1968, $0.99 (ends 
Aug-21-05 22:47:35 PDT)	6972620622 - Country Moods and Tenses by Olivier, 1942 reprint, 
2.50 GBP (ends Aug-22-05 09:28:06 PDT)	6973109942 - THE FOLKLORE OF AMERICAN HOLIDAYS by Cohen & Coffin,
1998, $9.99 (ends Aug-22-05 20:11:11 PDT)	4569255343 - History of the Texas Folklore Society by Abernathy, 
volumes 2 & 3, 2000, $22.99 (ends Aug-23-05 12:46:09 PDT)	8327252493 - Ned Kelly by Meredith & Scott, 1980, $10 AU (ends 
Aug-23-05 16:42:10 PDT)	8326786966 - The Study of Folklore by Dundes, 1965, $4.50 (ends 
Aug-24-05 18:46:32 PDT)	5231135792 - DICTIONARY OF OMENS AND SUPERSTITIONS by Waring, 
0.20 GBP (ends Aug-25-05 13:38:54 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/18/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:54:34 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(89 lines)


Hi!	OK - This is it for this week. No songsters at the moment. :-(	MISCELLANEOUS	4757997059 - Shipshape & Bristol by Ilott, LP, 1973, 0.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-21-05 07:44:49 PDT)	4758570648 - THE WRECK OF THE SHENANDOAH AND THE LETTER EDGED IN 
BLACK by Dalhart, 78 RPM, $8.88 (ends Aug-22-05 18:31:28 PDT)	6424230026 - Ballad Of A Mountain Man, VHS, $1.99 (ends Aug-21-05 
18:37:39 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	6553464027 - DISCOVERING ENGLISH FOLKSONG by Pollard, 1982, $9.99 
(ends Aug-19-05 09:02:06 PDT)	8326407426 - Rowdy Rhymes & Bibulous Ballads gathered from many gay 
minstrels by Martin, 1952, $3 (ends Aug-20-05 08:38:49 PDT)	6553313641 - Songs of the Sea and Sailors' Chanteys by Frothingham,
 1924, $18 (ends Aug-20-05 13:42:41 PDT)	6553348617 - A BOOK of BRITISH BALLADS by Brimley Johnson, 1931, 
$0.99 (ends Aug-20-05 17:45:56 PDT)	7344481723 - GARNERS GAY by Hammer, 1967, 1 GBP (ends Aug-21-05 
14:48:04 PDT) 	6972935089 - A BOOK OF NURSERY RHYMES by Swabey, 1928, 0.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-21-05 15:05:36 PDT)	7343567897 - ELMORE VINCENT's LUMBER JACK SONGS, 1932, $5.45 (ends 
Aug-21-05 15:24:41 PDT)	4568227860 - Singing Family of the Cumberlands by Ritchie, 1988 
edition, $19.99 (ends Aug-21-05 16:00:00 PDT)	6199255504 - BALLADS OF BY-GONE DAYS Vol. 2, 1931, $5 (ends 
Aug-21-05 19:45:00 PDT)	6554095413 - The Original Mother Goose's Melody, 1892 reprint, 
$3.99 w/reserve (ends Aug-21-05 20:10:17 PDT)	6553722667 - THE BALLAD OF THE WIND, THE DEVIL AND LINCOLN MINSTER
by Frost, 1898, $3.99 (ends Aug-22-05 08:55:52 PDT)	6553785761 - SONGS of BRITAIN by Kidson & Shaw, 1913, $24.99 (ends 
Aug-22-05 17:49:04 PDT)	4758761820 - Eight Traditional British-American Ballads by 
Flanders, 1953, $4.99 (ends Aug-23-05 11:18:44 PDT)	4569274976 - Taboo Tunes: A History of Banned Bands and Censored 
Songs by Blecha, $12.50 (ends Aug-23-05 14:42:18 PDT)	6553870965 - SONGS OF THE SOLDIERS by Moore, 1864, $25.25 (ends 
Aug-23-05 15:26:18 PDT)	6554300973 - English Folk Song and Dance by Kidson & Neal, 1915, 
$5 (ends Aug-24-05 13:33:57 PDT)	7344323808 - Songs of the Hebrides by Kennedy-Fraser & MacLeod, 
Volume 2, 1917, $45 (ends Aug-24-05 23:04:08 PDT)	8327605810 - Folk Revival by Woods, 1979, 1.25 GBP (ends 
Aug-25-05 06:38:40 PDT)	7344373586 - The Scottish Folksinger by Buchan & Hall, 1978, 1.25
GBP (ends Aug-25-05 06:50:05 PDT)	8327466106 - THE BALLAD AND THE FOLK by Buchan, 1997 edition, 0.99 
GBP (ends Aug-27-05 13:44:49 PDT)	8327627828 - Discovering English Folksong by Pollard, 1982, 1.99 
GBP (ends Aug-28-05 08:37:40 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stage singers' alterations
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 10:29:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(69 lines)


On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:54:00 -0700, Jonathan Lighter wrote:>I always thought this was the James Stevens (1892-1971) who wrote the very successful kid's book _Paul Bunyan_(1925) and a few other books about the logging industry. He also wrote a pretty good World War I novel entitled _Mattock_ (1926).
> 
>But if the name is spelled "Stephens," it's a different guy.Just returned from Raleigh & getting caught up...I spent some time looking the guy up.  He was a favorite local newswriter in
Seattle.  Writer of many Paul Bunyan stories and he's generally credited
with "Frozen Logger" though I don't have specific earliest copyright info.James Stevens was born in Albia, Iowa, 15 Nov 1892 [SS #535-05-0909 from
Social Security Death Index -http://www.ancestry.com] and died in Seattle on
12/30/1971 [according to the the Seattle Times of 12/31/1971.][Info thanx Stephen Kiesow, librarian, Seattle Public Library & Don Firth
[unmask]] The ASCAP site gives:1.  FROZEN LOGGER THE      (Title Code: 060013312)  
  Writers:
   FASCINATO JACK 
   TAYLOR CATHERINE   Performers:
(none found)     !!!!  Variations:
  (none found)  Publishers/Administrators:
  GLENWOOD MUSIC CORPORATION 
    % EMI MUSIC PUBLISHING INC 
    ATTN: JENNIFER INSOGNA 
    810 SEVENTH AVENUE 
    NEW YORK , NY, 10019That "Writers: FASCINATO JACK"  needn't be considered too much, I think.  He
is also credited with the 23rd Psalm, ADESTE FIDELIS, etc. BMI gives:Songwriter/Composer Current Affiliation CAE/IPI # 
STEVENS JAMES NA 0 
Publishers 
FOLKWAYS MUSIC PUBLISHERS INC BMI 10456722 but continues with three othere writers as well.
====
As noted by TradManFL, there's been a consistant change in the first verse.
I am amused that the generally sung first verse is:	As I sat down one evening inside of a small cafe, 
	A forty year-old waitress to me these words did say: However, as revival singers, especially female ones, aged close to and past
that "ridiculously elderly" figure, many seemed to discover and change to
the originally published line:	As I sat down one evening within a small cafe,
	A 6-foot-seven waitress to me these words did say: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
	          I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
	                Boycott South Carolina!
	     http://www.naacp.org/news/2001/2001-01-12.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:33:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


I haven't yet listened to this, but from the text it seems pretty clear to
me that this is not the "same" song as "House of the Rising Sun.">> Another question:  Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
>> explicit verses of this song ever collected?  If not, where are others
>> found, and what are they?
>
> From the Max Hunter Collection:
>
>          THE RISING SUN
>
>   Th whore house bells are ringing
> ....

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:08:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


>I haven't yet listened to this, but from the text it seems pretty clear to
> me that this is not the "same" song as "House of the Rising Sun."Yes, this "The Rising Sun" song is not the "same" song but the evidence is
so spotty for bawdy songs that I wanted to point it out as it might be 
"related".>
>>> Another question:  Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
>>> explicit verses of this song ever collected?  If not, where are others
>>> found, and what are they?
>>
>> From the Max Hunter Collection:
>>
>>          THE RISING SUN
>>
>>   Th whore house bells are ringing
>> ....

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 14:48:45 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(29 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 17:57:58 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Curious.  The song was widely enough known to be recorded commercially and
to be collected a number of times, yet not widely enough known to be
obtained in raw form by more than one collector.  Strange!  What is the
explanation?J> So far as I know Randolph is the only collector to report bawdy verses in
> what is clearlythe undiluted "The House of the Rising Sun."
>
> JL
>
> John Mehlberg <[unmask]> wrote:
>>I haven't yet listened to this, but from the text it seems pretty clear
>> to
>> me that this is not the "same" song as "House of the Rising Sun."
>
> Yes, this "The Rising Sun" song is not the "same" song but the evidence is
> so spotty for bawdy songs that I wanted to point it out as it might be
> "related".
>
>
>>
>>>> Another question: Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
>>>> explicit verses of this song ever collected? If not, where are others
>>>> found, and what are they?
>>>
>>> From the Max Hunter Collection:
>>>
>>> THE RISING SUN
>>>
>>> Th whore house bells are ringing
>>> ....
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>  Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:32:13 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(60 lines) , text/html(18 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:46:59 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(76 lines)


Gentlemen:Let me add that I have two collections of some size gathered in the 1920s, as well as copies of the Gordon collections at  the Library of Congress and University of Oregon.  There is no trace of  "House of the Rising Sun" in these.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, August 20, 2005 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)> Actually, we've no way of knowing how many bawdy versions were in 
> circulation, since Randolph was one of the few collectors to 
> 
> a)  accept and record bawdy folk material, 
> 
> b) put the material into shape for publication, and
> 
> c) be lucky enough to find a competent editor, who
> 
> d) worked for years doing background on the material, and who
> 
> e) was able to find a publisher.
> 
> 
> JL
> 
> 
> [unmask] wrote:
> Curious. The song was widely enough known to be recorded 
> commercially and
> to be collected a number of times, yet not widely enough known to be
> obtained in raw form by more than one collector. Strange! What is the
> explanation?
> 
> J
> 
> > So far as I know Randolph is the only collector to report bawdy 
> verses in
> > what is clearlythe undiluted "The House of the Rising Sun."
> >
> > JL
> >
> > John Mehlberg wrote:
> >>I haven't yet listened to this, but from the text it seems pretty 
> clear>> to
> >> me that this is not the "same" song as "House of the Rising Sun."
> >
> > Yes, this "The Rising Sun" song is not the "same" song but the 
> evidence is
> > so spotty for bawdy songs that I wanted to point it out as it 
> might be
> > "related".
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>> Another question: Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
> >>>> explicit verses of this song ever collected? If not, where are 
> others>>>> found, and what are they?
> >>>
> >>> From the Max Hunter Collection:
> >>>
> >>> THE RISING SUN
> >>>
> >>> Th whore house bells are ringing
> >>> ....
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 18:18:53 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(87 lines) , text/html(8 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: The Scattering of the Rising Sun
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:35:09 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Gentlefolk:The "early" (ca. 1920-30) collections I have in my files were generated by advertisement (like Gordon did for Adventure magazine).  They are hardly representative of the entire corpus os Ameriocan folk song, nor would they prove that the absence of a particular song meant anything atall.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:25:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


>> Another question:  Does Randolph/Legman contain the only sexually
>> explicit verses of this song ever collected?  If not, where are others
>> found, and what are they?
>
> From the Max Hunter Collection:
>
>          THE RISING SUN
>   ...
>   Well, now, when you go down to New Orleans
>   Just stop at the Rising Sun
>   There'll you'll see three pretty French whores
>   An' that damn bitch is one
>   She had a dark an' rolling eye
>   She belonged to th rougish crew
>
>
> Cat. #0504 (MFH #547) - As sung by Mr. Joe Walker, Berryville, Arkansas on
> February 9, 1960This is much like the British song that mentions the Rising Sun, often
quoted in discussions.  Was it sung by Sam Larner?  Or someone else?The similarity suggests that this has an origin that is independent of
House of the Rising Sun.  The setting in New Orleans, however, suggests
perhaps that someone was aware of both the British song and House of the
Rising Sun.As for details, they conflict - the Ozark song has the House of the Rising
Sun populated by "yellow gals," presumably octoroons, while the song above
has "three pretty French whores."  I don't that that both octoroons and
whites would have been at the same bordello in New Orleans.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/21/05 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:05:55 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


Hi!	Here I sit in the heat waiting the air conditioner to be
repaired. Meanwhile, I present the first half of the weekly lists. The
second half will be posted tomorrow. 	MISCELLANEOUS	4760330594 - Maggi Peirce Live, cassette, 1982, $0.99 (ends 
Aug-28-05 18:58:17 PDT) *seller - Dolores Nichols :-)	JOURNALS	6201633155 - Pennsylvania Folklife, Summer 1958, $9.99 (ends
Aug-23-05 11:03:36 PDT)	6973533599 - 6 issues of NORTH CAROLINA FOLKLORE JOURNAL, 
1989-98, $12.50 (ends Aug-28-05 17:02:36 PDT)	BOOKS 	6973360669 - A Highland Chapbook by Cameron, 1928, 3 GBP (ends 
 Aug-22-05 13:22:48 PDT)	5229982488 - Highland Folk Ways by Grant, 1977, 3.50 GBP (ends 
22-Aug-05 21:57:00 BST)	7707596392 - THE FIRST LIAR NEVER HAS A CHANCE by Garry, 1994, 
$9.99 (ends Aug-24-05 13:42:28 PDT)	8327491717 - Stiff as a Poker by Randolph, 1993 reprint, $2.95 
(ends Aug-24-05 18:00:00 PDT)	4569526948 - The Miners of Wabana: The Story of the Iron Ore Miners 
of Bell Island by Weir, 1989, $9.95 (ends Aug-24-05 20:08:00 PDT)	8327707401 - Folk Lore of the Lake Counties by Findler, 1968, 
1.50 GBP (ends Aug-25-05 13:14:08 PDT)	4569684825 - PENNSYLVANIA DUTCH FOLKLORE, $1.99 (ends Aug-25-05 
17:31:30 PDT)	6554761718 - FOLKLORE OF LUNENBURG COUNTY, NOVA SCOTIA by 
Creighton, 1950, $9.99 (ends Aug-26-05 09:59:41 PDT)	8328052458 - The Folklore of Wiltshire by Whitlock, 1976, 1.99 
GBP (ends Aug-27-05 03:51:49 PDT)	6554285172 - The Regular Bang-Up Reciter, and curious Story Teller, 
1860?, $4.87 w/reserve (ends Aug-27-05 12:43:15 PDT)	4570119443 - Texas Play-Party by Munson, 1992, $9.95 (ends 
Aug-27-05 14:55:10 PDT)	5232613438 - Our Highland Folklore Heritage by Polson, 1926, 7.50
GBP (ends Aug-29-05 15:33:00 PDT)	8327953534 - The Road to the Isles by Macleod, 1933, 7.50 GBP 
(ends 29-Aug-05 23:51:00 BST)	5232613633 - Popular Tales of the West Highlands by Campbell, 4 
volumes, 1983, 20 GBP (ends 30-Aug-05 00:07:00 BST)	5232613727 - Shetland Folk-Lore by Spence, 1999 reprint, 4.50 GBP 
(ends 30-Aug-05 00:29:00 BST)	5232613759 - Tales of Galloway by Temperley, 1979, 4.50 GBP 
(ends 30-Aug-05 00:37:00 BST)	5232847230 - Folk Tales of the British Isles by Foss, 1977, 1.99 
GBP (ends Aug-30-05 08:39:28 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Colorado Newspapers
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:10:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


I know a few of you will find this interesting.Searchable. full text images of most Colorado newspapers from the turn 
of the century [the last one]. 825 hits for the word "ballad" including 
[13 Feb. 1905] a $100 prize for the best ballad on the subject of the 
"trail"; [22 March 1882] an "Anglo-American Romany Ballad" by Charles G 
Leland and [18 Sept. 1914] a "Plea for the Old Ballads" ["far superior 
to the Present Day Lyrics"]. "Put a volume of fine old ballads on the 
piano and begin you child's education not only in song but romance."http://host1.cdpheritage.org/newspapers/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/22/05 (Songsters & Broadsides)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:31:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


Hi!	While sitting by the malfunctioning air conditioner, I found the
following on Ebay.	SONGSTERS & BROADSIDES	7343919925 - HELLO CENTRAL, GIVE ME HEAVEN, $9.99 (ends Aug-23-05 
06:36:16 PDT)	7343919933 - Holding Hands, $9.99 (ends Aug-23-05 06:36:21 PDT)	7343919949 - Take Back Your Gold Songster, $9.99 (ends Aug-23-05 
06:36:32 PDT)	6554412416 - The Red White and Blue Songster, $5 (ends Aug-24-05 
23:25:51 PDT)	7345151298 - Sheet music advertising broadside, 1898?, $9.90 (ends 
Aug-28-05 16:44:02 PDT)	6554673782 - Broadside, Give Us Back Our Old Commander, 1862, 
$49.98 (ends Aug-29-05 17:57:00 PDT)	6555223815 - The Universal Songster or Museum of Mirth, volume 1,
1826?, $24.95 (ends Aug-28-05 15:45:00 PDT)	6555224488 - The Universal Songster or Museum of Mirth, volume 2, 
1826?, $24.95 (ends Aug-28-05 15:45:00 PDT)	7345169584 - Adam Forepaugh and Sells Bros. Clown Songster, 190?, 
$8 (ends Aug-28-05 18:02:40 PDT)	6554645697 - Broadside, Camp Song or One Day in Camp, 1863?, $9.95 
(ends Aug-31-05 20:22:00 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Camouflaged shanties Pt. 10 [I think]
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:32:21 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(9 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/23/05 (Songs and Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:03:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(89 lines)


Hi!	As summer winds down, here is other Ebay list. :-)	MISCELLANEOUS	6973750554 - SCOTTISH STUDIES, 1974, 3.88 GBP (ends Aug-27-05 
11:13:14 PDT)	6974084234 - Scottish Studies, 1976, 3 GBP (ends Aug-29-05 
14:00:34 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	6554465587 - Roll Me Over by Babad, 1972, $24.95 (ends Aug-25-05 
07:19:54 PDT)	4569869770 - The Tri Coloured Ribbon: Rebel Songs Of Ireland, 
1969, $7.50 (ends Aug-26-05 10:55:38 PDT)	6554787843 - The Festival of Love, or A Collection of Cytherean 
Poems, 1770, $73 w/reserve (ends Aug-26-05 11:53:05 PDT)	7344684901 - Cumbrian Songs & Ballads by Gregson, 1980, 1.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-26-05 12:58:22 PDT)	7344724438 - Barbershops, Bullets, and Ballads by Studwell & 
Schueneman, 1999, $9.99 (ends Aug-26-05 17:24:09 PDT)	6973749761 - Legendary Ballads of England and Scotland by Roberts,
1900?, 2.50 GBP (ends Aug-27-05 11:07:35 PDT)	7344872273 - Ozark Folksongs by Randolph, 1982, $7 (ends Aug-27-05 
13:07:12 PDT)	6554296723 - MERRY MUSES OF CALEDONIA by Burns, 1905, $1.25 (ends 
Aug-27-05 13:20:31 PDT)	8328217997 - The Overlander Songbook by Edwards, 1971, $2 AU (ends 
Aug-27-05 18:47:37 PDT)	6555101022 - Nursery Rhymes of England and POPULAR RHYMES AND 
NURSERY TALES OF ENGLAND by Halliwell, 2 volumes, 1970, $12.50 AU (ends 
Aug-28-05 00:30:45 PDT)	7344463581 - Northumbrian Minstrelsy by Collingwood Bruce & Stokoe,
1998 reprint, 5.61 GBP (ends Aug-28-05 13:16:06 PDT)	7344468939 - A Book of British Ballads by Palmer, 1998 reprint, 
1.99 GBP (ends Aug-28-05 13:39:00 PDT)	7344690816 - Joe Davis' "Songs of the Roaming Ranger", 1935, $5 
(ends Aug-28-05 17:00:00 PDT)	6555317498 - Keesler Field Song Book, 1943, $2.99 (ends Aug-28-05 
17:59:23 PDT)	4570377567 - Devil's Ditties by Thomas, 1931, $19 (ends Aug-28-05 
19:19:30 PDT)	6555348228 - Songs and Ballads from Nova Scotia by Creighton, 1966
Dover reprint, $13.99 (ends Aug-28-05 19:37:50 PDT)	6973989546 - Mountain Ballads & Old Time Songs No.13 by Kincaid, 
1936?, $3 (ends Aug-28-05 23:27:10 PDT)	7345433113 - English Folk Songs from the Southern Appalachians by 
Sharp, 2 volumes, 1932, $31 (ends Aug-29-05 19:48:18 PDT)	6973702788 - Traditional Nursery Rhymes by Foss, 1976, 2.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-30-05 03:58:32 PDT)	4547559965 - Warrior Women and Popular Balladry 1650-1850 by 
Dugaw, 1989, $74.95 (ends Aug-31-05 08:07:43 PDT)	6973851429 - Ballads, Songs & Poems of Robin Hood by Gutch &
Hicklin, 1866, 29.99 GBP (ends Aug-31-05 13:30:00 PDT)	6973851804 - Naval Songs and Ballads by Firth, 1908, 29.99 GBP (ends
Aug-31-05 13:55:00 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Camouflaged shanties Pt. 10 [I think]
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:17:13 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(23 lines) , text/html(20 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:42:54 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Does anyone know of a location for _Wehman's
Collection of Songs_ No. 42 (New York: Henry J.
Wehman, 1894)?stephen_r1937 at yahoo.com__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:39:29 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


Stephen:This question you must take to the acknowledged master, Norm Cohen.  Indeed, he may have a copy of the songster.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:42 pm
Subject: Wehman's Collection of Songs> Does anyone know of a location for _Wehman's
> Collection of Songs_ No. 42 (New York: Henry J.
> Wehman, 1894)?
> 
> stephen_r1937 at yahoo.com
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:54:14 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Library of Congress, Music Division.  There is a WWW site for 
something like the Music Reading Room, and at that site is a form 
through which you can request assistance.  In response to my request 
for an item in Wehman's Collection, I was told that they have it, 
that it is currently unavailable, and that I should make another 
request after the first of the year.John>Stephen:
>
>This question you must take to the acknowledged master, Norm Cohen. 
>Indeed, he may have a copy of the songster.
>
>Ed
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
>Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:42 pm
>Subject: Wehman's Collection of Songs
>
>>  Does anyone know of a location for _Wehman's
>>  Collection of Songs_ No. 42 (New York: Henry J.
>>  Wehman, 1894)?
>>
>>  stephen_r1937 at yahoo.com
>>
>>  __________________________________________________
>>  Do You Yahoo!?
>>  Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>  http://mail.yahoo.com
>>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: bull
From: Beth Brooks <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:07:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


While reading an article in The New Yorker last night about the "new" academic field of studying bullshit and its academic implications, I was reminded of my reaction to "Restoration of Cock Robin" by Norman Iles, in which he bulls his way through what he thinks might be the original meanings to carols and nursery rhymes, without any references to anyone's previous work.Any glaring instances of bullshit in the ballad world that we should steer clear of? Posting to this list aside, of course.Beth Brooks
Indianapolis, IN

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: bull
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:43:01 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(27 lines) , text/html(15 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Wehman's Collection
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:13:58 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


> Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of SongsI have gotten some very obscure, scarce material by
interlibrary loan through our regular public library.
Pretty fast too (usually about 7-10 days).Some items can't be checked out, at the request of the
lending institution. However, a librarian-to-librarian
telephone call will circumvent this restriction most
of the time.C.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Songs about the Railroad in Nevada
From: Adam Miller <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:09:06 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


A friend sent this interesting query:"...I have to write an article on the V & T [Virginia and Truckee] 
railroad.  Do you know of any songs to do with Nevada and railroads in 
the lyrics?"Any suggestions?-Adam Miller
Woodside, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Songs about the Railroad in Nevada
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:27:16 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Now it's my turn to invoke the name of Norm Cohen as
the master of the game.Stephen--- Adam Miller <[unmask]> wrote:> A friend sent this interesting query:
> 
> "...I have to write an article on the V & T
> [Virginia and Truckee] 
> railroad.  Do you know of any songs to do with
> Nevada and railroads in 
> the lyrics?"
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> -Adam Miller
> Woodside, CA
> __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Multnomah County Public Library does an admirable job
(bless you, Ann and Julie!) of getting things on
interlibrary loan. However, aside from the
circumstance that interlibrary borrowing is currently
suspended for a month while they install a new digital
catalog, they require a reference in WorldCat;
otherwise I would have to supply the location, and
that is just what I don't have!Stephen--- Cliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:> > Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
> 
> I have gotten some very obscure, scarce material by
> interlibrary loan through our regular public
> library.
> Pretty fast too (usually about 7-10 days).
> 
> Some items can't be checked out, at the request of
> the
> lending institution. However, a
> librarian-to-librarian
> telephone call will circumvent this restriction most
> of the time.
> 
> C.
> __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/26/05 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:10:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(90 lines)


Hi!	As I enjoy the return of air conditioning, here is another Ebay
list. :-)	JOURNALS	6973371656 - Scottish Studies, 1971, 2 issues, 4.88 GBP (ends 
Aug-27-05 14:42:32 PDT)	6974177093 - Scottish Studies, 1987, 3 GBP (ends Aug-30-05 
08:13:52 PDT)	5234885855 - Folklore, Spring 1964, 2.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 
11:05:05 PDT)	5234885944 - Folklore, Autumn 1965, 2.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 
11:05:13 PDT)	5234886004 - Folklore, Summer 1967, 2.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 
11:05:18 PDT)	5234887488 - Folklore, Autumn 1968, 2.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 
11:07:21 PDT)	5234887537 - Folklore, Summer 1968, 2.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 
11:07:26 PDT)	BOOKS 	4570621025 - Ozark Superstitions by Randolph, 1947, $5 (ends 
Aug-27-05 17:25:54 PDT)	8328480076 - Complete Book of Australian Folklore by Scott, 1976, 
$3.95 (ends Aug-28-05 17:22:39 PDT)	8329081543 - Who Blowed Up the Church House by Randolph, 1952, 
$4.99 (ends Aug-28-05 23:28:13 PDT)	8328661241 - Yellow, Gray, Green, Red & Crimson Fairy Books by Lang,
1966 Dover editions, $9.50 (ends Aug-29-05 10:40:32 PDT)	8328750593 - Folklore of the Scottish Highlands by Ross, 1993, 
$6.99 (ends Aug-29-05 16:58:42 PDT)	4570619740 - What They Say In New England & Other American Folklore 
by Johnson, 1963, $4.99 (ends Aug-29-05 17:17:36 PDT)	4570674372 - Pinelands Folklife by Williams, 1987, $3 (ends 
Aug-29-05 22:48:29 PDT)	4570749187 - Urban Myths by Brown & Flynn, 2003, $0.99 (ends 
Aug-30-05 09:05:56 PDT)	8329047957 - Florida Folktales by Reaver, 1987, $12.95 (ends 
Aug-30-05 19:10:02 PDT)	4571388835 - 2 books (ENGLISH CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS & DISCOVERING 
THE FOLKLORE OF BIRDS AND BEASTS), 1968 & 1971, 3 GBP (ends Sep-01-05 
12:03:09 PDT)	6556368790 - Folklore of Springfield, Vermont by Baker, 1922, 
$15.50 (ends Sep-01-05 13:35:24 PDT)	5234947060 - West Country Folklore by Radford, 1998, 1.25 GBP 
(ends Sep-04-05 12:24:55 PDT)	5234952513 - Folklore of Cornwall by Deane & Shaw, 2003, 3.99 GBP 
(ends Sep-04-05 12:32:13 PDT)	8329347213 - THE FOLKLORE OF HAMPSHIRE & THE ISLE OF WIGHT by 
Boase, 1976, 2.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 12:45:00 PDT)	8329597409 - FOLKLORE OF TAYSIDE by Gibson, 1960?, 1.70 GBP (ends 
Sep-04-05 13:13:54 PDT)	8329610889 - FOLKLORE OF GUERNSEY by DeGaris, 2.99 GBP (ends 
Sep-04-05 13:43:42 PDT)	4571432678 - The Folklore of the Welsh Border by Simpson, 1976, 
10 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 14:24:52 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Truman and Suzanne Price <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:04:34 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


This is all that WorldCat shows:Wehman's collection of songs].
          Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
          Publisher: New York : Henry J. Wehman, [ca. 1890]
          Subjects: Songsters.
University of Delaware
Newark,DE 19717 Wehman's collection of 102 songs.
          Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
          Publisher: New York : Wehman, ?1886.
Brown University
 Providence,RI 02912Microform 
The Latest and best collection of popular songs of
    the day as sung at this show
          Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
          Publisher: New York : H.J. Wehman, [1893?]
          Subjects: Songsters. | Popular music -- Texts. -- To 1901
Brown University
Providence,RI 02912Truman
-- 
Suzanne and Truman Price
Columbia Basin Books
7210 Helmick Road
Monmouth, OR 97361email [unmask]
phone 503-838-5452
abe URL: http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abep/il.dll?vci=3381Abe Heritage Seller

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 04:21:37 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(86 lines)


Thanks for looking this up for me. Multnomah County Library does have WorldCat--they
don't tie their e-mail system to it and then leave the
patron to find it as best he can--but no participating
library  reports the needed volume. Few libraries have
much of this sort of thing. It was probably printed on
something like newsprint and the value of this sort of
material has never been widely recognized. The bottom
line is, WorldCat has an exiguous listing of Wehman's
songsters, and the one I need is not among them.
Brown's collection is thin for the period when Wehman
flourished; it's strength is in the pre-Civil-War
period, for which it is excellent. And Brown's
special-collection librarians are most helpful. But
they are not able to provide much assistance with
Wehman's publications, and as far as I know no library
has systematically collected them, as Brown has done
for the earlier songsters. An internet search of book dealers turns up a few
Wehman publications, including instruction books on
dancing and the like, but nothing like the songster in
view here. A couple of Wehman songsters in library collections
other than Brown, and not included in WorldCat, can be
located on the internet, but not Collection of Songs
No. 42. Not even the Internet has everything.Stephen--- Truman and Suzanne Price
<[unmask]> wrote:> This is all that WorldCat shows:
> 
> Wehman's collection of songs].
>           Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
>           Publisher: New York : Henry J. Wehman,
> [ca. 1890]
>           Subjects: Songsters.
> University of Delaware
> Newark,DE 19717 
> 
> Wehman's collection of 102 songs.
>           Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
>           Publisher: New York : Wehman, ?1886.
> Brown University
>  Providence,RI 02912
> 
> Microform 
> The Latest and best collection of popular songs of
>     the day as sung at this show
>           Type: English : Book : Non-fiction
>           Publisher: New York : H.J. Wehman, [1893?]
>           Subjects: Songsters. | Popular music --
> Texts. -- To 1901
> Brown University
> Providence,RI 02912
> 
> Truman
> -- 
> Suzanne and Truman Price
> Columbia Basin Books
> 7210 Helmick Road
> Monmouth, OR 97361
> 
> email [unmask]
> phone 503-838-5452
> abe URL:
> http://dogbert.abebooks.com/abep/il.dll?vci=3381
> 
> Abe Heritage Seller
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:02:53 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


This just in from Steve Roud. I don't know. I'm
dependent on Cazden, Haufrecht, & Studer for the
reference; earlier (before 1982) writers were not
aware of 'Flying Cloud' in a Wehman songster (the next
discussion in print, as far as I know, was in the
_Boston Evening Transcript_ in 1916, twelve years
after the date assigned by C,,H,, & S, to the Wehman
collection, and the latter is not mentioned there).
__Notes & Sources for Folk Songs of the Catskills_ in
some ways sets new standards for folksong
bibliography, but at the same time it is too
compressed; for example, it fails to give the date of
the songster to which it assigns the number 42 in the
series of Wehman's Collecions of Songs. The date is
given in _Folk Songs of the Catskills_, to which
_Notes & Sources_ is a companion: "A songster text of
1894 was copyrighted by Henry J. Wehman . . ." (p.
429), but the title and other data of publication
appear only in _Notes & Sources_. A misprint anywhere
in the references could be seriously misleading. I don't have Norm Cohen's Bibliography, and as I
explained earlier I cannot even request an
interlibrary borrowing for a month, until the new
catalog is set up. It's this sort of thing, in fact, that led me to begin
putting together a bibliography; in addition to being
a bit out of date by now, the list in _Notes &
Sources_ does have some lacunae, and no other
bibliography on the song is as thorough as C, H, & S
are. But unless I can verify an earlier reference
there is no point in listing it at all. I'm still
trying to get to the bottom of some anomalies in
subsequent citations of the _Evening Transcript_ text.
I hope I can save others in the future the hassle of
trying to make sense of incomplete and contradictory
references.StephenDate:	 Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:39:48 +0100 (BST)
From:	"STEVE ROUD" <[unmask]>  
Subject:	Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
To:	[unmask]
Stephen
I'm away from home, and the list won't accept a direct
posting from my daughter's computer - so could you
forward this the List?
 
Does Wehman 42 exist anyway? If I remember rightly
meade says 'Wehman Nos. 1-42'  but Norm Cohen's
Songster Bibliography only lists up to No.41.
 
Steve Roud		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:39:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Title:         Wehman's collection of ... songs.
Published:     New York, Henry J. Wehman, 1886-1891.
LC Call No.:   M1628.W4C5>Library of Congress, Music Division.  There is a WWW site for 
>something like the Music Reading Room, and at that site is a form 
>through which you can request assistance.  In response to my request 
>for an item in Wehman's Collection, I was told that they have it, 
>that it is currently unavailable, and that I should make another 
>request after the first of the year.
>
>John
>
>>Stephen:
>>
>>This question you must take to the acknowledged master, Norm Cohen. 
>>Indeed, he may have a copy of the songster.
>>
>>Ed
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
>>Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:42 pm
>>Subject: Wehman's Collection of Songs
>>
>>>  Does anyone know of a location for _Wehman's
>>>  Collection of Songs_ No. 42 (New York: Henry J.
>>>  Wehman, 1894)?
>>>
>>>  stephen_r1937 at yahoo.com
-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:42:27 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


>Gentlemen:
>
>Let me add that I have two collections of some size gathered in the 
>1920s, as well as copies of the Gordon collections at  the Library 
>of Congress and University of Oregon.  There is no trace of  "House 
>of the Rising Sun" in these.
>
>EdGus Meade cites Gordon #925, Ed.  Do you have that one?Thanks.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:55:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


The notes for Old Homestead Records OHCD-4031, The Callahan Brothers, 
say that Homer C. "Bill" Callahan "and his family continue to reside 
in Dallas."  This CD is dated 2000, apparently, although this appears 
to be a CD reissue of a 1975 LP.  Bill Callahan was born March 27, 
1912, it says.  If he is still living, he would be 93 years old, not 
at all an unheard-of age.Let's hope.Does anyone know?Is there anyone living in Dallas who could visit him?The purpose would be to see if he remembers any verses of "House of 
the Rising Sun" that were not included in his 1935 recording entitled 
"Rounder's Luck."J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:09:04 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(79 lines) , text/html(13 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:30:27 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Can anyone understand Roscoe Holcomb's "House in New Orleans"?  My 
effort at transcription from Smithsonian Folkways SF CD 40079, Roscoe 
Holcomb: the high lonesome sound, follows.Away on down in-a New Orleans,
Tell all juh Rising Sun,                  (?)
(It's) A many poor boy has kicked his arm (?)
And-a me, Oh Lord, for one.(It's) I'll never listen what another girl says,
Let her eye be dark or brown
Saying, 'less she's on that ol' scaffold high,
Saying, "Oh, Boys, I (?) cain't come down."Go tell my youngest brother
Not to do as I have done,
Let him shun the house down in New Orleans,
That they call the Rising Sun.The only thing that a ramb-er-ler needs
Is a suitcase or a trunk,
But the only time that he's satisfied
Is when he's on a drunk.Look up, look down that lonesome road,
Hang down your head and cry,
(It's) If you love me as I did you,
(Lord) You'd go with me or die.J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:44:10 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


For HORS Gus Meade citesMcMurray, Vance
Home Songs
Oxford, OH: Vance McMurray
1937I don't find this "hillbilly song folio" in either the LOC catalog or WorldCat.Does anyone have it, or have a suggestion for locating a copy?J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:23:02 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(75 lines) , text/html(64 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:18:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Thanks, Jonathan!  This definitely goes into the
biblio!Stephen--- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:> Re: "The Flying Cloud"
>  
> In his 1913 autobiography, _John Barleycorn_, Jack
> London mentions having learned "The Flying Cloud"
> and other sea songs on the Oakland waterfront in
> 1890-91 :
>  
>
http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/London/Writings/JohnBarleycorn/chapter6.html
>  
> Unfortunately he gives no text of it. This is the
> earliest specifically recollected date for the song
> I know of.
>  
> JL
> __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:20:57 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


OK, John, LC looks like the best bet. I'll do this and
let you know what happened. Thanks.Stephen--- John Garst <[unmask]> wrote:> Title:         Wehman's collection of ... songs.
> Published:     New York, Henry J. Wehman, 1886-1891.
> LC Call No.:   M1628.W4C5
> 
> 
> >Library of Congress, Music Division.  There is a
> WWW site for 
> >something like the Music Reading Room, and at that
> site is a form 
> >through which you can request assistance.  In
> response to my request 
> >for an item in Wehman's Collection, I was told that
> they have it, 
> >that it is currently unavailable, and that I should
> make another 
> >request after the first of the year.
> >		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Wehman's Collection
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:37:59 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Stephen,That's interesting. I'm looking at the interlibrary
request form from our library. They ask for author,
title, publisher, year, call number, ISBN (though i've
gotten material with only the title or author), and
borrower's data. The reference librarian looked up
other needed data-- including a list of holding
institutions-- on the spot. Perhaps you should try a
different library.C.Date:    Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
From:    Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Wehman's CollectionMultnomah County Public Library does an admirable job
(bless you, Ann and Julie!) of getting things on
interlibrary loan. However, aside from the
circumstance that interlibrary borrowing is currently
suspended for a month while they install a new digital
catalog, they require a reference in WorldCat;
otherwise I would have to supply the location, and
that is just what I don't have!Stephen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:39:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Name:    Homer C. Callahan   SSN:    272-12-4470    Last Residence:    
75211  Dallas, Dallas, Texas, United States of America   Born:    27 Mar 
1912   Died:    12 Sep 2002   State (Year) SSN issued:    Ohio (Before 
1951 )John Garst wrote:> The notes for Old Homestead Records OHCD-4031, The Callahan Brothers, 
> say that Homer C. "Bill" Callahan "and his family continue to reside 
> in Dallas."  This CD is dated 2000, apparently, although this appears 
> to be a CD reissue of a 1975 LP.  Bill Callahan was born March 27, 
> 1912, it says.  If he is still living, he would be 93 years old, not 
> at all an unheard-of age.
>
> Let's hope.
>
> Does anyone know?
>
> Is there anyone living in Dallas who could visit him?
>
> The purpose would be to see if he remembers any verses of "House of 
> the Rising Sun" that were not included in his 1935 recording entitled 
> "Rounder's Luck."
>
> J
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:50:41 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(39 lines) , text/html(7 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:02:20 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(47 lines)


--- Cliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:> Stephen,
> 
> That's interesting. I'm looking at the interlibrary
> request form from our library. They ask for author,
> title, publisher, year, call number, ISBN (though
> i've
> gotten material with only the title or author), and
> borrower's data. The reference librarian looked up
> other needed data-- including a list of holding
> institutions-- on the spot. Hello, Cliff! Yes, but dollars to doughnuts he or she
looked it up in WorldCat! They will do that at
MultCoLib too, if you can't do it yourself, but I am
happy to do it myself because I always have a chance
of serendipitously finding something relevant that I
didn't know about. WorldCat replaces the old hard-copy National Union
Catalog. I might be able to find it in another union
catalog such as ARLN or whatever they call it now, but
the nearest library that subscribes to it (it's more
academically oriented and pretty pricey) is 100 miles
away and I just haven't got there yet. > Perhaps you should try a different library.Locally, I think MultCo is about as good as it gets
for this sort of thing. None of our local institutions
of higher education, as far as I know, subscribes to
one of the expensive specialized catalogs. I have been
in this area for six years now, and I haven't found
any library with superior catalog resources so far. 
> 
Thanks for the suggestion, though. I suppose it
wouldn't do any harm to vist the three or four best
colleges/universities in the area if LC doesn't come
through.Stephen__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:22:19 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


The ILL Librarian will have to check this anyhow;
depending on which library they decide to request it
from, the relevant call number may be Dewey Decimal or
Library of Congress, and they are entirely different
from one another.Stephen--- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:> Our ILL form doesn't even ask for a call number.  (A
> WorldCat Accession Number is suggested but not
> required.)
>  
>  
> JL
> 
> Cliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
> That's interesting. I'm looking at the interlibrary
> request form from our library. They ask for author,
> title, publisher, year, call number, ISBN (though
> i've
> gotten material with only the title or author), and
> borrower's data. The reference librarian looked up
> other needed data-- including a list of holding
> institutions-- on the spot. Perhaps you should try a
> different library.
> 
> C.
> __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/27/05 (Songsters, Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 27 Aug 2005 19:13:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(79 lines)


Hi!	Relevant to the current discussion, please note the songster
section of this list. :-)	SONGSTERS	6555862637 - Charles Diamond's Original Milanese Minstrel Songster, 
1880, $24.99 (ends Aug-30-05 19:02:10 PDT)	7345870527 - Wehman's Collection of 98 Songs No. 18, 1888, $5.99 
(ends Aug-31-05 18:30:08 PDT)	4552892243 - WEHMAN'S IRISH SONG BOOK NO 1, 1887, $39.75 (ends 
Sep-24-05 07:31:25 PDT)	4552892584 - WEHMAN'S IRISH SONG BOOK NO 3, 1893, $19.85 (ends 
Sep-24-05 07:32:07 PDT)	MISCELLANEOUS	4761786611 - Coppersongs, Copper Family, cassette, 1.99 GBP (ends 
Sep-04-05 10:58:38 PDT)
	
	SONGS & BALLADS	7344467078 - 2 books (Traditional Tunes by Kidson, 1999 reprint &
the Besom Maker and other Country Folk Songs by Sumner, 1998 reprint), 
6.01 GBP (ends Aug-28-05 13:30:14 PDT)	4571523893 - FOLKSONGS OF THE MARITIMES by Pottie & Ellis, 1982, 
$38 (ends Aug-28-05 21:30:23 PDT)	4570878136 - MORMON SONGS FROM THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS by Cheney, 1968,
$9.99 (ends Aug-30-05 20:21:46 PDT)	8329217385 - FOLK SONGS OF ABERDEENSHIRE by Duncan/SHULDHAM-SHAW, 
1967, 1.95 GBP (ends Aug-31-05 12:43:21 PDT)	6974354047 - THE MERRY MUSES by Burns, 1827 printing, 150 GBP 
(ends Aug-31-05 12:54:06 PDT)	4571178002 - WIT AND MIRTH OR PILLS TO PURGE MELANCHOLY by D'Urfey, 
6 volumes, 200? reprint, $175 (ends Aug-31-05 14:03:25 PDT)	4571487102 - Tall Ship Shanties by Davis, 1982, $4.99 (ends 
Sep-01-05 18:38:37 PDT)	4571595766 - Songs of the Sea by Hugill, 1977, $5 (ends Sep-02-05 
07:58:39 PDT)	6974178306 - THE SCOTS MUSICAL MUSEUM, 1787?, 50 GBP (ends 
Sep-02-05 11:00:00 PDT)	8329766182 - The Ballad Literature And Popular Music Of The Olden 
Time by Chappell, 2 volumes, 1965 Dover reprint, $9.99 (ends Sep-02-05 
04:16:00 PDT)	6554168073 - SINGING FAMILY OF THE CUMBERLANDS by Ritchie, 1955, 
$9.99 (ends Sep-03-05 10:30:00 PDT)	8329588435 - OLD ENGLISH DITTIES, 0.99 GBP (ends Sep-04-05 12:55:53 
PDT)	4567109839 - Pills To Purge Melancholy The Evolution of the 
English Ballett by Pike, 2004, $103.45 (ends Sep-05-05 08:13:08 PDT)	5235395830 - The Merry Muses of Caledonia by Burns, 1966 edition, 
3.50 GBP (ends Sep-05-05 15:24:00 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 06:05:02 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(99 lines) , text/html(33 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:34:07 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(142 lines)


I am writing this from memory, so please bear with me in the case of
obvious errors. Last night I went looking to see if I could find any
early printed version of the Flying Cloud but was unsuccesful. However,
an 1880's origin seems  late.  I recall that there was a discussion in
either Songs of the Catskills or the Frank and Anne Warren Collection
that discussed the song;  the opinion of some commentators (was it
Beck?) placed it as of  a much earlier date. It seems unlikely to me 
that a song would be widely prevalent in 1890 when it originated in some
isolated and obscure printed form in 1880. For a song to become
instantaneously well known  (instantaneous in the sense that it first
appeared in 1880 but was so well known by 1890 that both Jack London and
Gordon's informant heard it), wouldn't it have shown up in a lot of
songsters or broadsides, to reflect its popularity? I am thinking here
of The Rose of Allandale. This appeared in print about 1835 and is
attributed to a Charles Jefferys.  Whether or not it was written by him,
it became an instanteous hit and appeared in a lot of songsters.So I tend not to buy an 1880 origin and tend to think that an earlier
date is the way to go. I will look at what I have this evening.LewLewis Becker
Professor of Law
Villanova University School of Law
(610.519.7074)
(Fax - 610.519.5672)>>> [unmask] 8/28/2005 9:05:02 AM >>>
After R. W. Gordon printed a text of "TFC" in _Adventure_ magazine, he
received the following recollection from Frederic T. O. Wood of Chicago,
dated Oct. 13, 1926 :
 
". . .We had an old buck on my last ship, some thirty-five years ago
who sang this song [i.e., ca1890-91, at exactly the same time that Jack
London claimed he learned it], and his version of one verse was like
this :
 
          "Oh, the Flying Cloud was as fine a ship
           As ever swam the sea,
           Her topsails and her royals set
           So noble for to see.
           Her sails were white as the driven snow
           On them there was no speck.
           And twenty brass ten-pounder guns
           She carried on her deck.
           I have often seen that gallant ship
           With the wind abaft the beam,
           Her sheets all stiffened as she rolled,
           Decks water to our knees.
 
"His version of the song used the name Matthew Hollander who claimed to
hail from Waterford's fair town--another slight change to the published
version .. . .  "I thank you, boy. I sat here tonight and sang this old song over and
lived again the happy days that are gone, and now are only dreams. But
dreams are all we old fellows have left, and no one can take them
away...."  [Gordon Collection, L. of C., _Adventure_ Correspondence, No.
1938]
 
My impression is that the song very possibly originated in the 1880s or
a bit earlier, perhaps in a dime novel as no early broadside has ever
been discovered. The evocative name "Flying Cloud" may have been chosen
because the fame of the real ship had long been forgotten by the general
public.
 
Wood's last two quoted lines are unique so far as I know.
 
JL
 
 Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]> wrote:
This just in from Steve Roud. I don't know. I'm
dependent on Cazden, Haufrecht, & Studer for the
reference; earlier (before 1982) writers were not
aware of 'Flying Cloud' in a Wehman songster (the next
discussion in print, as far as I know, was in the
_Boston Evening Transcript_ in 1916, twelve years
after the date assigned by C,,H,, & S, to the Wehman
collection, and the latter is not mentioned there).
__Notes & Sources for Folk Songs of the Catskills_ in
some ways sets new standards for folksong
bibliography, but at the same time it is too
compressed; for example, it fails to give the date of
the songster to which it assigns the number 42 in the
series of Wehman's Collecions of Songs. The date is
given in _Folk Songs of the Catskills_, to which
_Notes & Sources_ is a companion: "A songster text of
1894 was copyrighted by Henry J. Wehman . . ." (p.
429), but the title and other data of publication
appear only in _Notes & Sources_. A misprint anywhere
in the references could be seriously misleading. I don't have Norm Cohen's Bibliography, and as I
explained earlier I cannot even request an
interlibrary borrowing for a month, until the new
catalog is set up. It's this sort of thing, in fact, that led me to begin
putting together a bibliography; in addition to being
a bit out of date by now, the list in _Notes &
Sources_ does have some lacunae, and no other
bibliography on the song is as thorough as C, H, & S
are. But unless I can verify an earlier reference
there is no point in listing it at all. I'm still
trying to get to the bottom of some anomalies in
subsequent citations of the _Evening Transcript_ text.
I hope I can save others in the future the hassle of
trying to make sense of incomplete and contradictory
references.StephenDate: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:39:48 +0100 (BST)
From: "STEVE ROUD" 
Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
To: [unmask] 
Stephen
I'm away from home, and the list won't accept a direct
posting from my daughter's computer - so could you
forward this the List?Does Wehman 42 exist anyway? If I remember rightly
meade says 'Wehman Nos. 1-42' but Norm Cohen's
Songster Bibliography only lists up to No.41.Steve Roud____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:34:22 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(162 lines) , text/html(22 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:51:28 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(56 lines) , text/html(64 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:19:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


>Here's a transcription of Holcomb's singing from the booklet of 
>Folkways LP 2363, which presumably is the same recording.
>...
>Away on down in a-New Orleans, towards the rising sun
>A many poor boy has stretched his arm, and me, Oh Lord, for one.
>
>Fred McCormickThanks, Fred.  I see that those transcribers had as much trouble as 
me - or does this make more sense to someone else than to me?J
-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (long)
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:21:48 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(20 lines) , text/html(28 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: House of the Rising Sun (short)
From: Andrew Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:05:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Homer Callahan died September 12, 2002.----------AB>From: John Garst <[unmask]>>The notes for Old Homestead Records OHCD-4031, The Callahan Brothers, say 
>that Homer C. "Bill" Callahan "and his family continue to reside in 
>Dallas."  This CD is dated 2000, apparently, although this appears to be a 
>CD reissue of a 1975 LP.  Bill Callahan was born March 27, 1912, it says.  
>If he is still living, he would be 93 years old, not at all an unheard-of 
>age.
>
>Let's hope.
>
>Does anyone know?
>
>Is there anyone living in Dallas who could visit him?
>
>The purpose would be to see if he remembers any verses of "House of the 
>Rising Sun" that were not included in his 1935 recording entitled 
>"Rounder's Luck."
>
>J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 14:19:02 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(206 lines)


1880 seems late to me too, but unfortunately the song
does *not* appear in broadsides and songsters, the
sole exception being the Wehman songster that was the
original topic of the thread. You can see why I am so
eager to locate a copy and confirm the ref. in Cazden,
Haufrecht, & Studer. 1894 is the earliest publication;
beyond that we have a few who learned the song
earlier, and not much else.Stephen--- Lewis Becker <[unmask]> wrote:> I am writing this from memory, so please bear with
> me in the case of
> obvious errors. Last night I went looking to see if
> I could find any
> early printed version of the Flying Cloud but was
> unsuccesful. However,
> an 1880's origin seems  late.  I recall that there
> was a discussion in
> either Songs of the Catskills or the Frank and Anne
> Warren Collection
> that discussed the song;  the opinion of some
> commentators (was it
> Beck?) placed it as of  a much earlier date. It
> seems unlikely to me 
> that a song would be widely prevalent in 1890 when
> it originated in some
> isolated and obscure printed form in 1880. For a
> song to become
> instantaneously well known  (instantaneous in the
> sense that it first
> appeared in 1880 but was so well known by 1890 that
> both Jack London and
> Gordon's informant heard it), wouldn't it have shown
> up in a lot of
> songsters or broadsides, to reflect its popularity?
> I am thinking here
> of The Rose of Allandale. This appeared in print
> about 1835 and is
> attributed to a Charles Jefferys.  Whether or not it
> was written by him,
> it became an instanteous hit and appeared in a lot
> of songsters.
> 
> So I tend not to buy an 1880 origin and tend to
> think that an earlier
> date is the way to go. I will look at what I have
> this evening.
> 
> Lew
> 
> Lewis Becker
> Professor of Law
> Villanova University School of Law
> (610.519.7074)
> (Fax - 610.519.5672)
> 
> >>> [unmask] 8/28/2005 9:05:02 AM >>>
> After R. W. Gordon printed a text of "TFC" in
> _Adventure_ magazine, he
> received the following recollection from Frederic T.
> O. Wood of Chicago,
> dated Oct. 13, 1926 :
>  
> ". . .We had an old buck on my last ship, some
> thirty-five years ago
> who sang this song [i.e., ca1890-91, at exactly the
> same time that Jack
> London claimed he learned it], and his version of
> one verse was like
> this :
>  
>           "Oh, the Flying Cloud was as fine a ship
>            As ever swam the sea,
>            Her topsails and her royals set
>            So noble for to see.
>            Her sails were white as the driven snow
>            On them there was no speck.
>            And twenty brass ten-pounder guns
>            She carried on her deck.
>            I have often seen that gallant ship
>            With the wind abaft the beam,
>            Her sheets all stiffened as she rolled,
>            Decks water to our knees.
>  
> "His version of the song used the name Matthew
> Hollander who claimed to
> hail from Waterford's fair town--another slight
> change to the published
> version .. . .  
> 
> "I thank you, boy. I sat here tonight and sang this
> old song over and
> lived again the happy days that are gone, and now
> are only dreams. But
> dreams are all we old fellows have left, and no one
> can take them
> away...."  [Gordon Collection, L. of C., _Adventure_
> Correspondence, No.
> 1938]
>  
> My impression is that the song very possibly
> originated in the 1880s or
> a bit earlier, perhaps in a dime novel as no early
> broadside has ever
> been discovered. The evocative name "Flying Cloud"
> may have been chosen
> because the fame of the real ship had long been
> forgotten by the general
> public.
>  
> Wood's last two quoted lines are unique so far as I
> know.
>  
> JL
>  
>  
> 
> 
> Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]> wrote:
> This just in from Steve Roud. I don't know. I'm
> dependent on Cazden, Haufrecht, & Studer for the
> reference; earlier (before 1982) writers were not
> aware of 'Flying Cloud' in a Wehman songster (the
> next
> discussion in print, as far as I know, was in the
> _Boston Evening Transcript_ in 1916, twelve years
> after the date assigned by C,,H,, & S, to the Wehman
> collection, and the latter is not mentioned there).
> __Notes & Sources for Folk Songs of the Catskills_
> in
> some ways sets new standards for folksong
> bibliography, but at the same time it is too
> compressed; for example, it fails to give the date
> of
> the songster to which it assigns the number 42 in
> the
> series of Wehman's Collecions of Songs. The date is
> given in _Folk Songs of the Catskills_, to which
> _Notes & Sources_ is a companion: "A songster text
> of
> 1894 was copyrighted by Henry J. Wehman . . ." (p.
> 429), but the title and other data of publication
> appear only in _Notes & Sources_. A misprint
> anywhere
> in the references could be seriously misleading. 
> 
> I don't have Norm Cohen's Bibliography, and as I
> explained earlier I cannot even request an
> interlibrary borrowing for a month, until the new
> catalog is set up. 
> 
> It's this sort of thing, in fact, that led me to
> begin
> putting together a bibliography; in addition to
> being
> a bit out of date by now, the list in _Notes &
> Sources_ does have some lacunae, and no other
> bibliography on the song is as thorough as C, H, & S
> are. But unless I can verify an earlier reference
> there is no point in listing it at all. I'm still
> trying to get to the bottom of some anomalies in
> subsequent citations of the _Evening Transcript_
> text.
> I hope I can save others in the future the hassle of
> trying to make sense of incomplete and contradictory
> references.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:39:48 +0100 (BST)
> From: "STEVE ROUD" 
> Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
> To: [unmask] 
> Stephen
> I'm away from home, and the list won't accept a
> direct
> posting from my daughter's computer - so could you
> forward this the List?
> 
> Does Wehman 42 exist anyway? If I remember rightly
> meade says 'Wehman Nos. 1-42' but Norm Cohen's
> Songster Bibliography only lists up to No.41.
> 
> Steve Roud
> 
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 15:58:35 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(181 lines)


MacColl's version does have some unusual features--'I
was born ten miles from Dublin town, down by the salt
sea strand'--so it would be nice to have a reliable
account of its origins. That Barney Hand is otherwise
unknown does not, of course, necessarily mean that
MacColl made up the version himself and passed it off
as from oral tradition. He might has misremembered the
singer's name, or forgotten it and made up a name. Who
knows? MacColl was a complex man and some of his
assertions, esp. autobiographical ones, are
unreliable, but that does not prove that the song is a
fake. At this point, we simply don't know where it
came from. And if the Wehman songster ever does turn
up, we almost certainly won't know where Wehman got
his version  either.The lack of information about the origins or early
history of the song has caused writers to squeeze what
there is, particularly the text of the song, for
information. Beck, in consultation with some top
experts on these things, observed that some aspects of
the ship's construction and armament seem to point to
the eighteenth century rather than the ninteenth.
However, if one looks at all the available variants it
appears that there are also some details that appear
to date from the nineteenth. Joanna Colcord thought it dated from the second or
third decade of the nineteenth century, when piracy
and the slave trade were both being suppressed. She
also notes that there was a British ship named Dunmore
that saw action in the War of 1812 (others have
_Dungeon_). Her version is from a Joseph McGinnis, who
as she writes 'imperfectly recalled' the name of the
vessel in the song--she printed is as _Dungeness_ in
1924 but as _Dunmore_ in 1938. Beck apparently tried
to get the log of the historical _Dunmore_ to see if
it ever captured a pirate ship, but without success,
and no one since has mentioned it. The historical _Flying Cloud_ (the famous clipper) has
nothing to do with the ballad except sharing its name
with the ship; and the _Ocean Queen_ (a notoriously
slow transatlantic packet) does not fit the song well
either. There are simply a lot of inconsistencies.
Doerflinger's suggestion that it was based on the
_Dying Declaration of Nicholas Fernandez_ has won
little support, most later writers seeing no more than
similar commonplaces of nineteenth-century literature
about the ills of piracy. Some versions make Capt. Moore's nemesis a British
man-o'-war, others assign her to Spain. In the former,
the pirates are taken to Newgate to be hanges; in the
latter, to Cuba; in the A. F. Nelson's version,
published by Belden, they are taken to Rulawarp, which
is no more to be identified than Barney Hand. Beck also found a historical Captain Moore, but unlike
the villainous character of the song he was an officer
of the Royal Navy who was a plague to pirates. Robert
Waltz suggest that the name might have originally been
a reference to a pirate who was a Moor (North Africa
was notorious for pirates in the earlier nineteenth
century). Charles Ives published a version from
Welcome Tilton of Martha's Vinyard in which the
villainous captain is "William Moore" (usually no
forename is provided); now, that is the name of the
gunner whom Captain Kidd killed in 1697, and who is
mentioned in the "Captain Kidd" goodnight song; could
the name "Moore" in TFC have come from "Captain Kidd"?
Of course, Captain Kidd was a William too, but the
song usually turns him into a Robert for some reason.
And the name in the Tilton version could equally have
been suggested by the Waterford cooper, William or
Willie Brown. In Greig's version, from James Ewen or
Ewing, the protagonist is William (in most versions
Edward).And that's the way it goes: plenty of fodder for
speculation, few facts. I would be delighted to turn
up some sort of hard evidence of the source of the
song and/or to a historical event, or several events,
to which it refers; but it isn't in the cards. We
don't know, and barring some serendipitous discovery
we are not likely to know.Stephen--- Fred McCormick <[unmask]> wrote:>  
> I don't wish to comment on the authenticity of
> MacColl's version, but I  once 
> met a man (name temporarily forgotten) from
> Waterford who knew The Flying  
> Cloud. When I asked him where he got it, he said
> that he had learned it from  
> someone in Belfast in the 1940s. I am almost certain
> that his source was  
> connected with shipbuilding, possibly a welder or a
> ship's engineer.
>  
> Could this be the Barney Hand of MacColl fame? 
>  
> Incidentally, I believe the Waterford sean nos
> singer, Nioclas Toibin, had  a 
> truncated version of The Flying Cloud which covered
> about half the story.  
> Unfortunately, I never heard Toibin sing it, but I
> have an idea that it skipped  
> the slavery episode.
>  
> I'll ruminate further in the recesses of my memory
> and see if I can come up  
> with any more detail.
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> Fred McCormick.
>  
> In a message dated 28/08/2005 17:34:38 GMT Standard
> Time,  
> [unmask] writes:
> 
> , Doerflinger and Horace Beck both argued for an
> origin before ca1820.  
> Doerflinger pointed to some verbal and plot
> similarities between TFC and an  early 
> 19thC. prose pamphlet called, I believe, "The Dying
> Declaration of  Nicholas 
> Fernandez."  My feeling is that the similarities re
> more than  likely generic 
> and coincidental.
>  
> Beck thought the song might have been even older, a
> conflation of two  
> different ballads.  His article in JAF did not
> persuade me.
>  
> Certainly the ballad may antedate 1880 or even 1870.
>  But we don't  know how 
> widely known it was in 1890.  Once it had caught on
> among  sailors, it could 
> have spread to both coasts (and even the Great
> Lakes)  relatively quickly. 
> Remember that no "collector" seems to have heard it
> till  1916 - a full generation 
> after a presumptive ' 80s origin.
>  
> The fact that TFC is almost always sung to a single
> tune, with close  
> variants, may point to a vaudeville/ music hall
> origin with a traveling  performer.
>  
> BTW, Ewan MacColl's version, now well-known among us
> folkies, has  been 
> impugned as some kind of fake because the song is
> rare in the British  Isles and no 
> one has traced his source, "Barney Hand of Belfast."
>  Big  deal.  MacColl's 
> version is entirely typical of  mainstream versions 
> in both text and tune, 
> though the text is a little on the short side.
>  
> My prime favorite, though, is Doerflinger's (from
> Patrick Tayluer, I  think), 
> with its uncommon come-all-ye stanza.
>  
> JL
> 
> 
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:15:55 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


I notice also the existence of a book, which I have not seen: Flying
Cloud and one hundred and fifty other Old Time Songs and Ballads of
Outdoor Men, Sailors, Lumber Jacks, soldiers, Men of the Great Lakes,
Railroadmen, Miners, etc. by M.C. Dean and published by The Quickprint
[1922]., Virginia, Minnesota. I don't know whether it sheds any light. 
A most puzzling question.Lew Becker  

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:57:52 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(22 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:56:23 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(199 lines) , text/html(19 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:17:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On 8/28/05, Jonathan Lighter wrote:>To my mind, there's nothing in the song itself that would indicate or preclude composition at virtually any time in the 19th C.  Personally, I find the language insufficiently flowery and far too concrete in detail to make a pre-1860 date at all likely, but I've been wrong before.This isn't decisive, but *why* would anyone write such a song after
1865? The setting is pretty clearly between 1807 (when importation
of slaves was outlawed) and 1865 (when it all became moot). Generally
speaking, enforcement was stiffer later on, so later in that period is
better than earlier, but historical folk songs are not a very common
entity -- they generally reflected current events.If the song is addressed to British trade, they effectively stopped
it even earlier than the Americans.And if it's a "pirate" song, well, piracy was dying in the late
nineteenth century; it's not really practical when you need to
refuel periodically.Note that I'm not expressing a real opinion; I'm hoping for good
stuff I can put in the Ballad Index. :-)
-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:33:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Trying to trace down the origin is especially difficult because the song
had a wide circulation. It was prevalent in Canada - it appears in
Mackenzie's Songs of Nova Scotia (1928) and Greenleaf  (Songs of
Newfoundland - 1933?) . And it also appears in the collection of Gavin
Greig, the Scottish collector, under the title, "William Hollander." It
appears, as number CXVIII, in the two volume edition of Folk Song of the
Northeast (Folklore Associates reprint). The original edition collected
articles from the Buchan Observer published by Grieg between December
1907 and June 1911, so Greig collected the song at some time prior to
that. The song, as published by Greig seems to adhere to the normal
model (except perhaps that the Ocean Queen is bound for "Balfrasur's
shore").  It also seems to end prematurely - the last verse printed is
that Captain Moore has gotten killed and a bombshell set our ship on
fire, with the last line being -  "And we'll have to surrender now." 
Greig's comment is: "William Hollander is a a specimen of the later
popular ballad, consisting of a personal narration. These
autobiographies are professed records either of crime or misfortune,
dished up by the ballad monger and set agoing by the ballad sheet. Our
version of William Hollander shows the effects of tradition and
imperfect recollection. I have a record of the tune as sung by Mr. James
Ewing. It bears some resemblance to The Banks of the Inverurie."" Volume 1 of the Grieg Duncan Folk Song Collection edited by Patrick
Shuldham Shaw and Emily Lyle contains William Hollander at page 93.The
notes in the back don't seem to add anything about the text or origin,
but they MAY - I really don't understand the abbreviations - indicate a
date of August 1906. They basically repeat Greig's comments. It is
interesting though that there is only the one version with simply a
variant verse from someone else.  It is also interesting to note that a
search for the song has to include the possibility of variant titlesd,
based on the variant names of the protagonist.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:36:27 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(40 lines) , text/html(10 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:48:46 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(44 lines) , text/html(7 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 04:15:23 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Lewis Becker wrote:> Volume 1 of the Grieg Duncan Folk Song Collection edited by Patrick
> Shuldham Shaw and Emily Lyle contains William Hollander at page 93.The
> notes in the back don't seem to add anything about the text or origin,
> but they MAY - I really don't understand the abbreviations - indicate a
> date of August 1906.The abbreviations are listed on pp xix-xx; the date is certainly 1906. 
The additional fragment from Annie Shirer is not dated, nor is any tune 
indicated; though the form of chorus attached to it might, perhaps, 
indicate something on the lines of 'Henry Hunt' ('The Nutting Girl'); or 
then again it might not.I haven't yet seen the final volume, whch may contain additional details 
concerning the singers; would James Ewen, I wonder, have been a former 
sailor or employed in an allied trade? The *very* small number of 
examples found in the British Isles might tend to suggest that the song 
was an import from the Americas rather than the other way around.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:19:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


This book is readily available through interlibrary
loan. It provides a text of the ballad without tune or
headnotes, probably from Dean's own repertory. See
Laurie Kay Sommers, ?Ivan H. Walton and American
Folklore?, introduction to Ivan H. Walton, _Songquest:
The Journals of Great Lakes Folklorist Ivan H.
Walton_, ed. Joe Grimm (Detroit: Wayne State
University Press, 2005), p. 5. Stephen--- Lewis Becker <[unmask]> wrote:> I notice also the existence of a book, which I have
> not seen: Flying
> Cloud and one hundred and fifty other Old Time Songs
> and Ballads of
> Outdoor Men, Sailors, Lumber Jacks, soldiers, Men of
> the Great Lakes,
> Railroadmen, Miners, etc. by M.C. Dean and published
> by The Quickprint
> [1922]., Virginia, Minnesota. I don't know whether
> it sheds any light. 
> A most puzzling question.
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:03:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


When was the importation of slaves to Cuba outlawed?Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:05:12 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


This is an exceptionally rare volume.  In six years of looking I have never found it offered.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, August 28, 2005 4:15 pm
Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"  (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)> I notice also the existence of a book, which I have not seen: Flying
> Cloud and one hundred and fifty other Old Time Songs and Ballads of
> Outdoor Men, Sailors, Lumber Jacks, soldiers, Men of the Great Lakes,
> Railroadmen, Miners, etc. by M.C. Dean and published by The Quickprint
> [1922]., Virginia, Minnesota. I don't know whether it sheds any 
> light. 
> A most puzzling question.
> 
> Lew Becker
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:01:43 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


edward cray wrote:>This is an exceptionally rare volume.  In six years of looking I have never found it offered.
>
>Ed
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
>Date: Sunday, August 28, 2005 4:15 pm
>Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"  (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
>
>  
>
>>I notice also the existence of a book, which I have not seen: Flying
>>Cloud and one hundred and fifty other Old Time Songs and Ballads of
>>Outdoor Men, Sailors, Lumber Jacks, soldiers, Men of the Great Lakes,
>>Railroadmen, Miners, etc. by M.C. Dean and published by The Quickprint
>>[1922]., Virginia, Minnesota. I don't know whether it sheds any 
>>light. 
>>A most puzzling question.
>>
>>Lew Becker
>>
>>
>>I see a copy of this book (Dean's presentation copy to Carl Sandburg) is for sale at $480 in Saint Paul MN (details on Abebooks).  I have myself seen and handled a copy but can't think where.  Wilgus in "Anglo-American Folksong Scholarship" refers to it as "a wretchedly printed pamphlet containing 163 texts of well-known popular songs of the turn of the century...." and I concur, though he also noted it was reprinted by Norwood Editions, Norwood, PA, 1973.  Jon Bartlett
>>    
>>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 05:17:16 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(127 lines) , text/html(105 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:11:41 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(60 lines) , text/html(49 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:29:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


On 8/28/05, edward cray wrote:>This is an exceptionally rare volume.  In six years of looking I have never found it offered.Never found it here in Minnesota, either, and believe me, I've looked!-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:32:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


On 8/29/05, Paul Stamler wrote:>When was the importation of slaves to Cuba outlawed?I'd have to look that up, but I don't think it's very relevant.
Nor Brazil. IIRC, they allowed importation until slavery was
banned altogether. It's pretty clear that Moore's behavior was
*smuggling* slaves, not legal importation; his brutal treatment
made sense only when the supply was limited. When importation was
legal, the slaves were (slightly) better treated.-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 06:46:21 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


It doesn't appear in the used book trade--probably the
print run was pretty small--but it is easily obtained
by interlibrary loan. A candidate for a reprint
edition?It's not as rare as Wehman's Collection of Songs No.
42!Stephen--- edward cray <[unmask]> wrote:> This is an exceptionally rare volume.  In six years
> of looking I have never found it offered.
> 
> Ed
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
> Date: Sunday, August 28, 2005 4:15 pm
> Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"  (Was Re: Wehman's
> Collection of Songs)
> 
> > I notice also the existence of a book, which I
> have not seen: Flying
> > Cloud and one hundred and fifty other Old Time
> Songs and Ballads of
> > Outdoor Men, Sailors, Lumber Jacks, soldiers, Men
> of the Great Lakes,
> > Railroadmen, Miners, etc. by M.C. Dean and
> published by The Quickprint
> > [1922]., Virginia, Minnesota. I don't know whether
> it sheds any 
> > light. 
> > A most puzzling question.
> > 
> > Lew Becker
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:28:27 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(244 lines)


--- Fred McCormick <[unmask]> wrote:>  
> Hi Stephen and everyone,
>  
> As you say, there's much fodder for speculation
> there, and I doubt there's  
> much you could rule in or out. Regarding the
> authenticity of MacColl's piece,  
> from what I remember, the opening lines apart, the
> text is not all that  
> different from other versions, which suggests to me
> that he really did learn it  
> from our Mr. Hand. However, I recall that MacColl
> was singing it a lot in  the 
> early '70s (possibly a little earlier), which
> suggests that he may have  
> dredged it from the depths of his memory around
> then, and filled in a few  missing 
> lines.Yes, I think this is quite possible; he may have
filled in the name of the singer, too, which would
explain why no one knows of him. >  
> Regarding my friend from Waterford, whose name still
> has not come back to  
> me, I am fairly certain that I recorded the song
> from him and still have it on  
> tape. Unfortunaely, my tape collection is in a hell
> of a mess at the moment  
> (otherwise known as rationalisation). If and when it
> comes to light, I'll  
> transcribe the text.Yes, please do!>  
> One textual bit I do remember though, the early
> phase of the ballad was  
> located either in Wicklow or Waterford, and the
> central character was  apprenticed 
> to a butcher named "Pearse of Stone Row". That
> puzzled my friend,  for he had 
> been unable to locate a Stone Row in whichever
> location the ballad it  was 
> that the ballad referred to.The majority reading here is the cooper, usually named
William Brown; as Beck notes, this would explain
Captain Moore's eagerness for Edward to sign on with
him; coopers were indispensible on board ship. The
alternative butcher reading is nice from a literary
perspective; Edward is still young and innocent at
this point, but the bloody apron foreshadows the
crimes in which he will participate. Stan Hugill's version: "My father he rose up one morn
an' wid him I did go, / He bound me as a butcher boy
to Kearney's of Wicklow; / I wore the bloody apron
there for three long years or more, / Then I shipped
aboard the _Erin's Queen_ the pride of ol' Tramore."MacColl's version: "My father he rose up one day and
with him I did go, / He bound me as a butcher bow to
Pearson of Wicklow; / I wore the bloody apron there
for three long years or more, / Till I shipped on
board of _The Ocean Queen_ belonging to Tramore."I think these are the only butcher texts that I have
so far, so I would be happy to have your
transcription. Beck did a deal of research, although
that did not help his hypotheses to find acceptance;
he found that the records of the pre-1820 jouneyman
cooper's guild in Waterford had been lost, and that
after 1820 there was a William Browner, but no William
Brown, working as a cooper in Waterford. (The
possibility of a pre-1820 William Brown was attractive
to Beck, who favored an early date for the song, but
purely hypothetical.) It might be worth looking into
the archives in Wicklow (possible also in Waterford)
for nineteenth or ever eighteenth century butchers
named Pearse, Pearson, or Kearney.In any case, if your singer has Pearse the butcher,
this confirms MacColl's version with Pearson as being
more than something MacColl hoked up; the names are
too close to appeal to coincidence, so there must have
been an oral tradition in Ireland including a butcher
named Pears(on). Stephen>  
> Finally, I'd have thought the 1880s was a bit late
> for contemporary  ballads 
> of piracy, and certainly very late for songs about
> slavery.  
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> Fred McCormick.
> In a message dated 28/08/2005 23:58:57 GMT Standard
> Time,  
> [unmask] writes:
> 
> MacColl's version does have some unusual
> features--'I
> was born ten  miles from Dublin town, down by the
> salt
> sea strand'--so it would be nice  to have a reliable
> account of its origins. That Barney Hand is 
> otherwise
> unknown does not, of course, necessarily mean that
> MacColl  made up the version himself and passed it
> off
> as from oral tradition. He  might has misremembered
> the
> singer's name, or forgotten it and made up a  name.
> Who
> knows? MacColl was a complex man and some of his
> assertions,  esp. autobiographical ones, are
> unreliable, but that does not prove that  the song
> is a
> fake. At this point, we simply don't know where it
> came  from. And if the Wehman songster ever does
> turn
> up, we almost certainly  won't know where Wehman got
> his version  either.
> 
> The lack of  information about the origins or early
> history of the song has caused  writers to squeeze
> what
> there is, particularly the text of the song,  for
> information. Beck, in consultation with some top
> experts on these  things, observed that some aspects
> of
> the ship's construction and armament  seem to point
> to
> the eighteenth century rather than the  ninteenth.
> However, if one looks at all the available variants 
> it
> appears that there are also some details that appear
> to date from the  nineteenth. 
> 
> Joanna Colcord thought it dated from the second  or
> third decade of the nineteenth century, when piracy
> and the slave  trade were both being suppressed. She
> also notes that there was a British  ship named
> Dunmore
> that saw action in the War of 1812 (others  have
> _Dungeon_). Her version is from a Joseph McGinnis,
> who
> as she  writes 'imperfectly recalled' the name of
> the
> vessel in the song--she  printed is as _Dungeness_
> in
> 1924 but as _Dunmore_ in 1938. Beck apparently 
> tried
> to get the log of the historical _Dunmore_ to see if
> it ever  captured a pirate ship, but without
> success,
> and no one since has mentioned  it. 
> 
> The historical _Flying Cloud_ (the famous clipper)
> has
> nothing  to do with the ballad except sharing its
> name
> with the ship; and the _Ocean  Queen_ (a notoriously
> slow transatlantic packet) does not fit the song 
> well
> either. There are simply a lot of inconsistencies.
> Doerflinger's  suggestion that it was based on the
> _Dying Declaration of Nicholas  Fernandez_ has won
> little support, most later writers seeing no more 
> than
> similar commonplaces of nineteenth-century
> literature
> about the  ills of piracy. 
> 
> Some versions make Capt. Moore's nemesis a  British
> man-o'-war, others assign her to Spain. In the
> former,
> the  pirates are taken to Newgate to be hanges; in
> the
> latter, to Cuba; in the  A. F. Nelson's version,
> published by Belden, they are taken to Rulawarp, 
> which
> is no more to be identified than Barney Hand. 
> 
> Beck also found  a historical Captain Moore, but
> unlike
> the villainous character of the song  he was an
> officer
> of the Royal Navy who was a plague to pirates. 
> Robert
> Waltz suggest that the name might have originally
> been
> a  reference to a pirate who was a Moor (North
> Africa
> was notorious for  pirates in the earlier nineteenth
> century). Charles Ives published a  version from
> Welcome Tilton of Martha's Vinyard in which the
> villainous  captain is "William Moore" (usually no
> forename is provided); now, that is  the name of the
> gunner whom Captain Kidd killed in 1697, and who  is
> mentioned in the "Captain Kidd" goodnight song;
> could
> the name  "Moore" in TFC have come from "Captain
> Kidd"?
> Of course, Captain Kidd was a  William too, but the
> song usually turns him into a Robert for some 
> reason.
> And the name in the Tilton version could equally
> have
> been  suggested by the Waterford cooper, William or
> Willie Brown. In Greig's  version, from James Ewen
> or
> Ewing, the protagonist is William (in most  versions
> Edward).
> 
> And that's the way it goes: plenty of fodder  for
> speculation, few facts. I would be delighted to turn
> up some sort of  hard evidence of the source of the
> song and/or to a historical event, or  several
> events,
> to which it refers; but it isn't in the cards. We
> don't  know, and barring some serendipitous
> discovery
> we are not likely to  know.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:16:00 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(126 lines) , text/html(38 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:38:11 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(260 lines) , text/html(19 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Aboard the Flying Cloud
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 09:00:49 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Folks:A hasty search by Google yielded this short history of the famous American vessel "The Flying Cloud."   While there may have been previous vessels given that name, the celebrated TFC was launched in 1851.  Perhaps an older ballad naming another vessel is the precursor of TFC, but it would have to be after 1851 and the TFC's record run to San Francisco that  the ballad was attached to its namesake.EdShips of the World: An Historical EncyclopediaFlying CloudClipper (3m). L/B/D: 235 ?40.8 ?21.3 (71.6m ?12.4m ?6.5m). Tons: 1,782 om. Hull: wood. Built: Donald McKay, East Boston, Mass.; 1851.Built for Enoch Train of Boston and sold to Grinnell, Minturn & Company, of New York, Flying Cloud was one of the fastest?if not the fastest?clipper ship ever launched. The largest merchant sailing ship afloat until the launch of Challenge shortly before her first voyage, great things were expected of her, as a New York paper reported five days before her first voyage:    We dined on board yesterday with as fine a "band of brothers" as any man could desire for companions in a Flying Cloud. Indeed, so familiar were the voices of many that we could not realize that we had mounted to the nebular regions. Yet all admitted that we actually were inside a Flying Cloud whose destination was California, and of which Captain Cressy, over whose keen eye and intelligent face there was assuredly no mist, had command; and we can only say that more table luxury, more tasteful and costly furniture, more ample ventilation and comfort of every kind, we never knew even in an earth-built packet ship or steamer.    The Flying Cloud is just the kind of vehicle, or whatever else it may be called, that a sensible man would choose for a ninety days voyage.Under command of the hard-driving Josiah P. Cressy, she departed New York on June 2, 1851, and arrived at San Francisco on August 31 after a record run of only 89 days, 21 hours. Only a handful of ships ever made the same passage in under 100 days; the average time for all clipper ships was more than 120 days, and for full-built merchant ships 150 days or more. It was quite remarkable, then, when three years later Flying Cloud bettered her own time on the same run by 13 hours. Her time of 89 days, 8 hours, anchor to anchor, stood as the record until 1860 when Andrew Jackson sailed the same course in 89 days, 4 hours. (The record of 89 days under sail stood until bettered by the high-performance racing sloop Thursday's Child in 1988-89.)Continuing her fourth voyage, Flying Cloud sailed for Hong Kong, as she had on her first two voyages, to load tea. A few days out from Whampoa on her homeward run, she grounded on a coral reef and began leaking at a rate of 11 inches an hour. With the pumps manned continuously, Flying Cloud arrived at New York on November 24 with her million-dollar cargo intact. On her next voyage, under Captain Reynard, the ship proved badly strained and put into Rio de Janeiro. After five weeks in port, during which her spars were cut down, she resumed her voyage and went on to post her best day's run?402 miles?and arrived at San Francisco on September 14, 1856, after 113 days at sea from New York.Laid up until the next January, she made her last Cape Horn passage in 1857 and then was laid up at New York for nearly three years. In December 1859, she sailed for England and loaded for Hong Kong. After three years in trade between England, Australia, and Hong Kong, Flying Cloud was sold to T. M. Mackay & Company, a partner in James Baines's Black Ball Line. Put in the immigrant trade, she plied between England and Queensland carrying as many as 515 passengers outbound, and returning with full cargoes of wool. In 1871, Flying Cloud was sold to Harry Smith Edwards of South Shields who put her in trade between Newcastle and St. Johns, New Brunswick, carrying coal and pig-iron out and timber back. In June 1874, she grounded on Beacon Island bar and was forced to return to St. Johns. With her back broken, the following year she was burned for her metal fastenings.Cutler, Greyhounds of the Sea. Howe & Matthews, American Clipper Ships. Stammers, Passage Makers.BORDER=0
Site Map | Partners | Press Releases | Company Home | Contact Us
Copyright Houghton Mifflin Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms and Conditions of Use, Privacy Statement, and Trademark Information
BORDER="0"

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
From: Steve Roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:40:38 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


Leslie Shepard, the English bibliographer and collector who died last year, 
had one the best collections of broadsides and chapbooks still in private 
hands, and we hoped that it would be deposited in a public repository such 
as the Vaughan Williams Memorial Library, but it was apparently not to be. A 
whole chunk of Leslie's material has been listed for auction at Bonhams in 
London
Sale No.11945, 20 Sep 2005, lots 72 onwards
The following link should get you there, but only look if you have serious 
money to spend:http://www.bonhams.com/cgi-bin/public.sh/pubweb/publicSite.r?sContinent=EUR&screen=catalogue&iSaleNo=11945Lot 73, for example is:
AMERICAN BROADSIDE BALLADS A collection of approximately 120 broadside 
ballads
Estimate: ?400 - 600and remember that's pounds, not dollars.Happy bidding, as Dolores says!Steve Roud 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:49:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


Just to add to the accumulation of information -I note from a Google
search the following publication by Professor J.H. Ingraham: The Steel
Mask; or, The Mystery of the Flying Cloud. A Romance of Sea and Shore.
May, 1899. Beadle's New York Dime Library 1024 [Appeared earlier as
DeWitt's Ten Cent Romances No. 93.] I don't know the content and it could be interesting to our discussion.
 One Google hit shows that the book  appears in an on line bibliography
devoted to piracy books:
http://larryvoyer.com/Piratical/pirate%20pages/dime_novels_pennys3.htm.The Northern Illinois University has an online site about the
publishing firm of Beadle and Adams. It also contains a biography of
Ingraham. Portions that I find interesting are:  Joseph Holt Ingraham
was born in Portland, Maine, January 26, 1809.  His grandfather, Joseph
Holt, was a ship builder and trader, and the grandson shipped on board
of one of his vessels as a sailor before he was seventeen and went to
Buenos Ayres. Ingraham died in 1860. Novel followed novel in rapid
succession. Ingraham told Longfellow, in 1846, "that he had written
eighty novels, and of these, twenty during the past year." Had he
written less, he would have been appreciated more. Many of these novels
appeared only in the weekly story papers, and luckily no collected
edition has ever been made. All of Joseph Holt Ingraham's novels
antedated the establishment of Beadle's publishing house, and the
various stories in the Dime and other libraries, are simply reprintsLew

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Keith Briggs' CD collection on eBay
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:08:29 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


I just came across these listings on eBay, auctioning the CD collection of
the late Keith Briggs. From the listing info:"We are pleased to have on offer CD's from the very private collection of a
renowned, now deceased, former reviews editor of the very popular Blues and
Rhythm magazine (from 1984 until his untimely death in March of this year).
This was none other than Keith Briggs who had amassed an enormous number of
CD's, many of which are original CDs, some remixed from the very early blues
artists, roots music, hillbilly, bluegrass, classical works, gospel and soul
music, and much more. These CD's will be offered singly and in groups. This
is a collection that transcends the ordinary, from a man passionate about
his music, whose depth of understanding made him a leading authority in the
B&R world. Here is your chance to own some of his private stock, keeping
alive the passion for such music, passing along this bit of history. All the
CDs appear to be in perfect condition, cared for by someone who took pride
in everything he did."http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQfrtsZ0QQfsooZ1QQfsopZ1QQsassZthosmawerThis should take you to the listings of Thos Mawer & Sons Ltd., auctioneers
- if for some reason it doesn't work an eBay search should get you there.
The items are listed in the UK, priced in GBP, but the ones I came across
seem to be in the US eBay site. They may also be listed on eBay UK.I thought this might be of considerable interest to many list members, (if
you can afford it after going wild on the Leslie Shepherd broadside
collection).John Roberts

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Aboard the Flying Cloud
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:25:04 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(44 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:34:45 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(40 lines) , text/html(9 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:29:01 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


This just in from Library of Congress. They may have
it but seem to have misplaced it.StephenLibrarian 1: Thank you for consulting the Reader 
Services Section of 
the Music Division at The Library of Congress.
Actually, someone from the Music Library List brought
this to the 
attention of one of my colleagues who was in the
process of tracking down 
this songster. We have a card catalog entry for the
1894 Wehman's 
Collection, but it is not anywhere on the shelf with
the other songsters. We 
are now trying to track down other possible places
where the volume may 
be found. 
We will get back to you as soon as we know something.
D.G.__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud" (Was Re: Wehman's Collection of Songs)
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:54:10 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(253 lines)


Well, I had just the same opinion of the MacColl/Lloyd
anthology of Child ballads--I loved it! And I still
admire MacColl's singing and all, (and I don't like
some of the abuse to which Lloyd has been
subjected--he badly misjudged some things, mostly
political things, but also contributed a lot to the
study of folk song). I have no objection if MacColl
forgot the exact wording he heard and filled in the
gap with something appropriate--as you say, this must
be a major factor in the rise of variants in oral
tradition. I think the appearance, in an unpublished
version of which MacColl can hardly have known, of
'Pearse' as the butcher's name, where MacColl has
'Pearson' and no one else, in published versions at
least, has any such thing, is a pretty good indication
that he got it from oral tradition. No use worrying
about whether he forgot a line or two and invented
something to replace it; it looks true bill to me. I don't know how much the authenticity of his version
has been discussed; all I have seen is a comment from
John Moulden to the effect that no one seems to have
heard of a singer named Barney Hand. This is
significant because, as far as I can see, John Moulden
knows everything knowable about Ulster folk song; so
it raises some question about where MacColl got the
song, but that is not at all the same thing as
accusing him of making it up and passing it off as
something it isn't. It could be just as he heard it
from a singer whose name he simply forgot, as most of
us forget names from time to time. MacColl, as I said in an earlier message, was a
complex man and apparently was sometimes a bit
tendentious about his own life history, but so what?
That doesn't mean we have to treat his repertory as
suspect. We have other versions of unknown provenance,
and don't make an issue of it--Dean's in _The Flying
Cloud_ is a good example. Stephen  --- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:> Not meaning at all to be invidious, but if MacColl
> "hoked up" a couple of lines and a name he
> imperfectly remembered, his version fits the
> definition of  a "traditional song" to a T !
>  
> To one who remembers the glory days of The Kingston
> Trio, The Limeliters, and so many others, MacColl's
> practices - even Lloyd's liberties - don't quite
> rise to the level of "hoked up." 
>  
> Maybe I'm touchy about MacColl's reputation as a
> singer / interpreter of traditional songs. 
> If so, it's only because his records knocked me for
> a loop as a callow teen, resulting in many
> thoroughly fruitless hours trying to get my friends
> to appreciate his style and repertoire.  Same for
> Lloyd.  (They thought Peter Paul & Mary were truly
> groovy, however.)
>  
> JL.
> 
> Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]> wrote:
> --- Fred McCormick wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi Stephen and everyone,
> > 
> > As you say, there's much fodder for speculation
> > there, and I doubt there's 
> > much you could rule in or out. Regarding the
> > authenticity of MacColl's piece, 
> > from what I remember, the opening lines apart, the
> > text is not all that 
> > different from other versions, which suggests to
> me
> > that he really did learn it 
> > from our Mr. Hand. However, I recall that MacColl
> > was singing it a lot in the 
> > early '70s (possibly a little earlier), which
> > suggests that he may have 
> > dredged it from the depths of his memory around
> > then, and filled in a few missing 
> > lines.
> 
> Yes, I think this is quite possible; he may have
> filled in the name of the singer, too, which would
> explain why no one knows of him. 
> 
> > 
> > Regarding my friend from Waterford, whose name
> still
> > has not come back to 
> > me, I am fairly certain that I recorded the song
> > from him and still have it on 
> > tape. Unfortunaely, my tape collection is in a
> hell
> > of a mess at the moment 
> > (otherwise known as rationalisation). If and when
> it
> > comes to light, I'll 
> > transcribe the text.
> 
> Yes, please do!
> 
> > 
> > One textual bit I do remember though, the early
> > phase of the ballad was 
> > located either in Wicklow or Waterford, and the
> > central character was apprenticed 
> > to a butcher named "Pearse of Stone Row". That
> > puzzled my friend, for he had 
> > been unable to locate a Stone Row in whichever
> > location the ballad it was 
> > that the ballad referred to.
> 
> The majority reading here is the cooper, usually
> named
> William Brown; as Beck notes, this would explain
> Captain Moore's eagerness for Edward to sign on with
> him; coopers were indispensible on board ship. The
> alternative butcher reading is nice from a literary
> perspective; Edward is still young and innocent at
> this point, but the bloody apron foreshadows the
> crimes in which he will participate. 
> 
> Stan Hugill's version: "My father he rose up one
> morn
> an' wid him I did go, / He bound me as a butcher boy
> to Kearney's of Wicklow; / I wore the bloody apron
> there for three long years or more, / Then I shipped
> aboard the _Erin's Queen_ the pride of ol' Tramore."
> 
> MacColl's version: "My father he rose up one day and
> with him I did go, / He bound me as a butcher bow to
> Pearson of Wicklow; / I wore the bloody apron there
> for three long years or more, / Till I shipped on
> board of _The Ocean Queen_ belonging to Tramore."
> 
> I think these are the only butcher texts that I have
> so far, so I would be happy to have your
> transcription. Beck did a deal of research, although
> that did not help his hypotheses to find acceptance;
> he found that the records of the pre-1820 jouneyman
> cooper's guild in Waterford had been lost, and that
> after 1820 there was a William Browner, but no
> William
> Brown, working as a cooper in Waterford. (The
> possibility of a pre-1820 William Brown was
> attractive
> to Beck, who favored an early date for the song, but
> purely hypothetical.) It might be worth looking into
> the archives in Wicklow (possible also in Waterford)
> for nineteenth or ever eighteenth century butchers
> named Pearse, Pearson, or Kearney.
> 
> In any case, if your singer has Pearse the butcher,
> this confirms MacColl's version with Pearson as
> being
> more than something MacColl hoked up; the names are
> too close to appeal to coincidence, so there must
> have
> been an oral tradition in Ireland including a
> butcher
> named Pears(on). 
> 
> Stephen
> 
> > 
> > Finally, I'd have thought the 1880s was a bit late
> > for contemporary ballads 
> > of piracy, and certainly very late for songs about
> > slavery. 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Fred McCormick.
> > In a message dated 28/08/2005 23:58:57 GMT
> Standard
> > Time, 
> > [unmask] writes:
> > 
> > MacColl's version does have some unusual
> > features--'I
> > was born ten miles from Dublin town, down by the
> > salt
> > sea strand'--so it would be nice to have a
> reliable
> > account of its origins. That Barney Hand is 
> > otherwise
> > unknown does not, of course, necessarily mean that
> > MacColl made up the version himself and passed it
> > off
> > as from oral tradition. He might has misremembered
> > the
> > singer's name, or forgotten it and made up a name.
> > Who
> > knows? MacColl was a complex man and some of his
> > assertions, esp. autobiographical ones, are
> > unreliable, but that does not prove that the song
> > is a
> > fake. At this point, we simply don't know where it
> > came from. And if the Wehman songster ever does
> > turn
> > up, we almost certainly won't know where Wehman
> got
> > his version either.
> > 
> > The lack of information about the origins or early
> > history of the song has caused writers to squeeze
> > what
> > there is, particularly the text of the song, for
> > information. Beck, in consultation with some top
> > experts on these things, observed that some
> aspects
> > of
> > the ship's construction and armament seem to point
> > to
> > the eighteenth century rather than the ninteenth.
> > However, if one looks at all the available
> variants 
> > it
> > appears that there are also some details that
> appear
> > to date from the nineteenth. 
> > 
> > Joanna Colcord thought it dated from the second or
> > third decade of the nineteenth century, when
> piracy
> > and the slave trade were both being suppressed.
> She
> > also notes that there was a British ship named
> > Dunmore
> > that saw action in the War of 1812 (others have
> > _Dungeon_). Her version is from a Joseph McGinnis,
> > who
> > as she writes 'imperfectly recalled' the name of
> > the
> > vessel in the song--she printed is as _Dungeness_
> > in
> > 1924 but as _Dunmore_ in 1938. Beck apparently 
> > tried
> 
=== message truncated ===__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:00:09 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(54 lines)


Well, I'll buy a lottery ticket. Steve, it must have been four years ago, maybe five,
when I got your CD, and I have made good use of it, I
think--I cite Roud numbers for songs I mention every
time, and have been able to trace variants more
efficiently and thoroughly than ever before--but it
seems like time to inquire about updates, because I
know you have not been on vacation in all the
intervening time.Stephen R.--- Steve Roud <[unmask]> wrote:> Leslie Shepard, the English bibliographer and
> collector who died last year, 
> had one the best collections of broadsides and
> chapbooks still in private 
> hands, and we hoped that it would be deposited in a
> public repository such 
> as the Vaughan Williams Memorial Library, but it was
> apparently not to be. A 
> whole chunk of Leslie's material has been listed for
> auction at Bonhams in 
> London
> Sale No.11945, 20 Sep 2005, lots 72 onwards
> The following link should get you there, but only
> look if you have serious 
> money to spend:
> 
>
http://www.bonhams.com/cgi-bin/public.sh/pubweb/publicSite.r?sContinent=EUR&screen=catalogue&iSaleNo=11945
> 
> Lot 73, for example is:
> AMERICAN BROADSIDE BALLADS A collection of
> approximately 120 broadside 
> ballads
> Estimate: ?400 - 600
> 
> and remember that's pounds, not dollars.
> 
> Happy bidding, as Dolores says!
> 
> Steve Roud 
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Aboard the Flying Cloud
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:17:41 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


According to Belden, _Ballads and Songs Collected by
the Missouri Folk-Lore Society_, p. 128, what Finger
published is a Michigan version received by the editor
of _Adventure_ in 1919. Belden does not name the
editor;  at that time it would have been Arthur
Sullivant Hoffman. Fingers version  is *not* that
published in _Adventure_ by Robert Winslow Gordon in
1926, although Hoffman remained the editor of the
magazine until June 1927, when he resigned, apparently
because of the publisher's efforts to turn it into an
upscale magazine. Gordon's column, 'Old Songs that Men
have Sung', was discontinued four months after Hoffman
resigned.Stephen--- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:<snip>
>  
> Another nugget of inconclusiveness.  Charles J.
> Finger's _Frontier Ballads_ (1927) includes a pretty
> typical version of TFC.  Finger (ca1867-1941) was a
> seaman only briefly, though he did manage to collect
> a few songs and shanties.  The year: 1890. 
>
(http://libinfo.uark.edu/specialcollections/findingaids/finger.html)
>  		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:23:37 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(79 lines)


If this "Stephen R." is who I suspect, he intends to
try to get Ingraham's great literary work, and an
apparent sequel, by interlibrary loan. Who knows, we
may find that Ingraham is the author of the ballad.
Conversely, if anyone has the quiddity to purchase
Shepherd's broadside collection, it could turn up
there in the only surviving copy of an Irish broadide
from 1827 . . . .Stephen who?--- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:> This Mudcat thread has some good info, much of the
> best from somebody with the impenetrable alias of
> "Stephen R."
>  
>
http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=54665#1273022
>  
> JL
> 
> Lewis Becker <[unmask]> wrote:
> Just to add to the accumulation of information -I
> note from a Google
> search the following publication by Professor J.H.
> Ingraham: The Steel
> Mask; or, The Mystery of the Flying Cloud. A Romance
> of Sea and Shore.
> May, 1899. Beadle's New York Dime Library 1024
> [Appeared earlier as
> DeWitt's Ten Cent Romances No. 93.] 
> 
> I don't know the content and it could be interesting
> to our discussion.
> One Google hit shows that the book appears in an on
> line bibliography
> devoted to piracy books:
>
http://larryvoyer.com/Piratical/pirate%20pages/dime_novels_pennys3.htm.
> 
> 
> The Northern Illinois University has an online site
> about the
> publishing firm of Beadle and Adams. It also
> contains a biography of
> Ingraham. Portions that I find interesting are:
> Joseph Holt Ingraham
> was born in Portland, Maine, January 26, 1809. His
> grandfather, Joseph
> Holt, was a ship builder and trader, and the
> grandson shipped on board
> of one of his vessels as a sailor before he was
> seventeen and went to
> Buenos Ayres. Ingraham died in 1860. Novel followed
> novel in rapid
> succession. Ingraham told Longfellow, in 1846, "that
> he had written
> eighty novels, and of these, twenty during the past
> year." Had he
> written less, he would have been appreciated more.
> Many of these novels
> appeared only in the weekly story papers, and
> luckily no collected
> edition has ever been made. All of Joseph Holt
> Ingraham's novels
> antedated the establishment of Beadle's publishing
> house, and the
> various stories in the Dime and other libraries, are
> simply reprints
> 		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:56:43 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(92 lines) , text/html(10 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:50:48 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(134 lines) , text/html(129 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "The Flying Cloud"
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:15:12 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(154 lines)


Oh boy! Thanks for this!  I intend to look at the
Gordon Coll. in Eugene, but haven't got there yet. Interesting that it was from British Columbia that
Gordon got two of his contributed versions. And the
wording from "Sheffield Apprentice" and "Ye Rambling
Boys" is interesting.  I don't recall seeing the
phrase about "walk[ing] the plank like sheep" before
either. Stephen--- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:> Some years ago I photocopied items that interested
> me in the Gordon collection at the Library of
> Congress.  My copies are somewhat disarrayed now,
> but I did find this text of TFC. It was sent to
> _Adventure_ on June 14, 1926, by C. E. Duffy, of
> Port Alice, B.C.  Duffy also sent a text of "Bold
> Jack Donahue."   If he enclosed any further
> information of interest, I neglected to note it.  In
> stz. 1, dig the echoes of "The Sheffield Apprentice"
> and "Ye Rambling Boys of Pleasure" !  
>  
>                            The Flying Cloud
>  
>                                   Verse 1
> My Name is Edward Holland, as you may understand
> I was born and raised in Waterford in Erin's happy
> land
> My parents loved me tenderly, they had no child but
> me
> And I being young and foolish with them could not
> aggree.
>  
>                                    V 2
> My father bound me to a trade in Waterfords fair
> town
> He bound me to a Cooper by the name of William Brown
> I served my master faithfully for 18 months & more
> Till I stepped on board of the Ocean Que[e]n
> Bound for Belle Fraziers shore.    
> And when we reached Belle Fraziers shore     V 3
> I met with Capt Moore
> The Commander of the Flying Cloud
> Coming down from Baltimore
> He asked me if Id sail with him
> On a slavery voyage to go
> To the burning plains of Africa
> Where the sugar cane does grow
> The Flying Cloud is a gallant ship as    V 4
> ever sailed the seas
> Or ever spread a maintopsail
> Before a lively breeze
> Her sails as white as the driven snow
> And on them was no specks
> There [were] 49 brass pivot guns
> all mounted on her deck
> We sailed along quite merrily     V 5
> Till we reached the African shore
> 500 of those noble youths
> From their natives homes we bore
> We made them walk our plank lik[e] sheep
> and we stowed them down below
> scarcely eighteen inches to a man
> was all they had to go
> And then we put to sea again     V 6
> With our cargo of slaves
> Twould been better far for those young youths
> Had they been in their graves
> For a plague and fever came on board
> Swept half of them away
> We dragged their dead bodies out on deck
> And heaved them in the sea
> We sailed along quite merrily       V 7
> Till we reached the Cuban shore
> We sold them to the planters
> To be slaves forever more
> To plant the coffee corn & rice
> Beneath the southern sun
> And to lead a hard and wretched life
> until their carreer was done.
> And when our money was all spent   V 8
> We put to sea again
> And Captain Moore he came on board
> and said unto his men
> There's gold and silver to be had
> If with me you'll remain
> We'll hoist a lofty pirate flag
> And scour the Spanish main
> We all consented but five young lads  V 9
> And they were rowed to land
> Two of them were Boston boys
> And two from Newfoundland
> Another was an Irish lad
> Who lately had came o'er
> I wished to God I'd joined those boys
> And gone with them on shore
> For we robbed and plundered many a ship  V 10
> Down on the Spanish Main
> Left many a widow and orphan child
> In sorrow to remain
> For we made them walk our plank like sheep
> Till they found a watery grave
> For the motto of our Captain was 
> a dead man tells no tales
> We were pursued by many a ship  V 11
> By liners & frigates too
> Till a Spanish ship a Man of War
> Her topsails hove in view
> Till a Spanish ship a Man of War
> Her cannons roar[e]d aloud
> Twas all in vain for us to try
> to save the Flying Cloud
> We prepared our deck for action  V 12
> As they hove up along side
> And soon across our quarter deck
> There flew a crimson tide
> We fought till Captain Moore was killed
> And eighty of his men
> When the bombshells set our ship on fire
> We were forced to surrender then
> Then I was taken to Waterford  V 13
> Bound down in iron chains
> For the robbing and plundering of hose ships
> down on the Spanish Main
> Drinking & gambling was the cause
> That made wreck of me
> So come all ye young fellows take advise
> and shun bad company
> So fare ye well ye shady groves  V 14
> And girls whom I adore
> Like wise the music soft & sweet
> That ne'er shall cheer me more
> I ne'er shall kiss your ruby lips
> Nor squeeze your lily white hand
> For I must die a scornful death
> All in some foreign land.
>  
>                  Finis
>                                       C E Duffy
>                                            Pt Alice
>                                                    B
> C
>  
>  
> JL__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Aboard the Flying Cloud
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:32:01 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(77 lines) , text/html(36 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:29:22 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(9 lines) , text/html(16 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Aboard the Flying Cloud
From: Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:53:20 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(155 lines)


Aha! the plot thickens! Yesterday the earliest
recollected date for the song was that given
independently by Jack London and by another of
Gordon's correspondents, Frederic Wood, both dating it
to ca 1890-91. Now comes Joseph McGinnis, who pushes
the date back to ca 1883. Colcord clearly changed the name of the FC's nemesis
from Dungeness, which McGinness gave her, to Dunmore
after she found a historical reference to a ship of
the latter name that could have been the one mentioned
in the song. She also took care in the earlier
publication  to put a question mark in parentheses
after Dungeness and tell her readers that McGinness
was not sure of the name--it was something like
Dungeness. It appears in other versions as Dungeon,
which has elicited the proposal that the ship was
really the Don Juan. Both McGinness and Colcord are
scrupulous about the uncertainty of the name. Now I
suppose if anyone wants to continue the search for a
historical event underlying the capture of the FC in
the song, there must be a search for a frigate
Diogenes. When I can once again use ILL, I will see if I can
find _Sea Stories_. In any event, I must get to Eugene
and look at the Gordon Collection, as I have been
meaning to do for months. By the way, Finger's version mentioned by Belden was
subsequently published by Frank Shay in _More Pious
Friends and Drunken Companions_ (1928, conveniently
reprinted with its predecessor volume as _My Pious
Friends and Drunken Companions and More Pious Friends
and Drunken Companions_ by Dover in 1961); and in
_American Sea Songs & Chanteys_ (1948, rp. 1969) Stephen--- Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]> wrote:> Stephen and all,
>  
> An earlier post in one of these "Flying Cloud"
> threads mentioned the name of Joseph F.McGinnis, who
> supplied the text of TFC  which Joanna Colcord
> published in _Roll and Go_ and again in _Songs of
> American Sailormen_.
>  
> McGinnis was a retired seaman, a resident of
> Brooklyn, N.Y. when he corresponded with Gordon
> beginning, it seems, on Oct. [or it may be Nov.: see
> below] 13, 1926.
>  
> That letter contains the following information :
>  
>       "The version of the song 'Flying Cloud'
> published in the Nov. 8 [sic] issue of Adventure has
> all the ear marks of a re-written version of the
> original song.
>  
>       "I learned (what I think is the original) song
> in the foc'sle in about 1883 from an old Liverpool
> Western Ocean sailor and it gives the name as Edward
> Hollander and it has a very tuneful melody to it.
>  
>       "I sent it in to 'The Log' in Sea Stories
> about Aug 1924 (words only) and they published it.
>  
>       "I gave Miss J. C. Colcord the words and music
> later on and she published it in her book 'Roll and
> Go.' , , ,
>  
>       "The name of the man-o-war I gave her was the
> 'Dungeness[' ] I thought at the time it was the
> wrong name. I have came to the conclusion since that
> it was the 'Diogenes'.  As I have reeled of[f] sixty
> years I am not always too positive about matters
> that happened years ago....
>  
>       "There is no dates given in the song and it is
> likely to have taken place any time between
> 1800-1850.
>  
>       "It was and is a popular song wherever sung
> and particularly with Sailors."
>  
> I tried about two tears ago to obtain, by ILL,
> issues of the old pulp magazine _Sea Stories_, only
> to discover that no library would admit to saving
> them.  Maybe that's changed.
>  
> McGinnis had a bit more to say about TFC :
>  
>        "I am going to put it in my collection along
> with a lot of old Sea Songs which have not appeared
> in any other Chantey Collection."
>  
> He corresponded with Gordon now and again, sending
> him a few songs and fragments, perhaps most notably
> the uncommon "Tiger Bay," in a version much like
> that recorded sixty years later by Stan Hugill. 
> McGinnis spoke several times of his sea song
> collection and his desire to see it published.  But
> after his sudden death, the songs, as usual,
> vanished without a trace. 
>  
> 
> JL
>  
> 
> Stephen Reynolds <[unmask]> wrote:
> According to Belden, _Ballads and Songs Collected by
> the Missouri Folk-Lore Society_, p. 128, what Finger
> published is a Michigan version received by the
> editor
> of _Adventure_ in 1919. Belden does not name the
> editor; at that time it would have been Arthur
> Sullivant Hoffman. Fingers version is *not* that
> published in _Adventure_ by Robert Winslow Gordon in
> 1926, although Hoffman remained the editor of the
> magazine until June 1927, when he resigned,
> apparently
> because of the publisher's efforts to turn it into
> an
> upscale magazine. Gordon's column, 'Old Songs that
> Men
> have Sung', was discontinued four months after
> Hoffman
> resigned.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> --- Jonathan Lighter wrote:
> 
> 
> > 
> > Another nugget of inconclusiveness. Charles J.
> > Finger's _Frontier Ballads_ (1927) includes a
> pretty
> > typical version of TFC. Finger (ca1867-1941) was a
> > seaman only briefly, though he did manage to
> collect
> > a few songs and shanties. The year: 1890. 
> >
>
(http://libinfo.uark.edu/specialcollections/findingaids/finger.html)
> > 
> __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Aboard the Flying Cloud
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:33:51 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(9 lines) , text/html(16 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:08:14 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


John,
I'm equally puzzled.
Quite a while ago I was at the VWML and I'm sure Malcolm said they had all 
of Lesley Shepard's material and were awaiting someone to index it all. 
Curiouser and curiouser!SteveG>From: [unmask]
>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>To: [unmask]
>Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
>Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:29:22 EDT
>
>I'm very puzzled. Leslie's Irish material has been deposited at ITMA and
>Nicholas Carolan had the co-operation of Lesie's family in checking his 
>house in
>Dublin for anything that remained. I had understood that the remainder (or
>was  it only the English material) was to be deposited in the VWML as a 
>result
>of  Leslie's bequest.
>
>John Moulden_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends 
http://messenger.msn.co.uk

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
From: Steve Roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:05:46 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(47 lines)


Can I put the record straight here.
Leslie's books (his folksong/folklore ones at least) were deposited in the 
VWML a couple of years ago, I helped him pack them up. But he wanted to hang 
onto his street literature material because he was working on a new book.
He made it clear to several of us that he wanted his broadsides to go to the 
VWML, but as he did not say so in his will,  his family are quite within 
their rights to do what they like with it. He may have said somrething about 
the Irish material in his will.
It is a shame, but nothing can be done.
Steve Roud----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Gardham" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides> John,
> I'm equally puzzled.
> Quite a while ago I was at the VWML and I'm sure Malcolm said they had all 
> of Lesley Shepard's material and were awaiting someone to index it all. 
> Curiouser and curiouser!
>
> SteveG
>
>
>>From: [unmask]
>>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>>To: [unmask]
>>Subject: Re: Leslie Shepard's Broadsides
>>Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:29:22 EDT
>>
>>I'm very puzzled. Leslie's Irish material has been deposited at ITMA and
>>Nicholas Carolan had the co-operation of Lesie's family in checking his 
>>house in
>>Dublin for anything that remained. I had understood that the remainder (or
>>was  it only the English material) was to be deposited in the VWML as a 
>>result
>>of  Leslie's bequest.
>>
>>John Moulden
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends 
> http://messenger.msn.co.uk
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:01:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Hello everyone.I just wanted to say that I will be bidding of the following item.  If I 
win, I will scan it and make it available for download.Yours,John Mehlberg
~
      Item name:                ****Tommys Tunes****F T Nettleingham****
      Price:                    GBP 9.99
      Bids:                     0
      End date:                 Sep-09-05 13:05:28 PDT
      View item:
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6975339375 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:54:52 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


John:It and its companion, _More Tommy's Tunes,_ are valuable, if expurgated.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:01 am
Subject: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay> Hello everyone.
> 
> I just wanted to say that I will be bidding of the following item.  
> If I 
> win, I will scan it and make it available for download.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> John Mehlberg
> ~
>      Item name:                ****Tommys Tunes****F T 
> Nettleingham****      Price:                    GBP 9.99
>      Bids:                     0
>      End date:                 Sep-09-05 13:05:28 PDT
>      View item:
>      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6975339375
> 
> 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:09:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(57 lines)


Hello everyone,My confusion.  I already *have* a copy of the 1st edition and the 2nd 
edition available for download.   See here:http://immortalia.com/html/categorized-by-type-of-informant/military-songs/fighter-pilot-songs.htmI am looking for the _More Tommy's Tunes_.    So feel free to bid on this 
book.Yours,John Mehlberg----- Original Message ----- 
From: "edward cray" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay> John:
>
> It and its companion, _More Tommy's Tunes,_ are valuable, if expurgated.
>
> Ed
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
> Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:01 am
> Subject: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay
>
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> I just wanted to say that I will be bidding of the following item.
>> If I
>> win, I will scan it and make it available for download.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> John Mehlberg
>> ~
>>      Item name:                ****Tommys Tunes****F T
>> Nettleingham****      Price:                    GBP 9.99
>>      Bids:                     0
>>      End date:                 Sep-09-05 13:05:28 PDT
>>      View item:
>>      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6975339375
>>
>>
>> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tommys Tunes 1st Edition on ebay
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:16:46 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(41 lines) , text/html(43 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Alan Lomax and John W. Work III
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:16:52 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Folks:The _New York Times_ of Monday, 8/29, had a lead story on the first arts page headlined: "Book Says Lomax Neglected Black Scholars."  The story by Marc Weingarten is essentially advance publicity of a new book edited by Robert Gordon (not THE Robert W. Gordon) and Bruce Nemerov, "Lost Delta Blues" (Vanderbilt University Press).The essential argument is that musicologist John W. Work III of Fisk University, Lewis W. Jones, a sociologist and a grad student, Samuel C. Adams, did the initial field work that turned up Muddy Waters (McKinley Morganfield) and other informants whom Lomax  later recorded in 1941 and 42.  The editors argue that Lomax gave them scant, even begrudging credit.That aside, the book does contain no fewer than 158 transcriptions of field recordings in the Mississippi Delta by Work, Jones and Adams.  That alone would make it valuable.  I do not know how many of the songs here are also in Work's two collections of black songs and spirituals.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Alan Lomax and John W. Work III
From: "Cohen, Ronald" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:22:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


PS: In addition to Ed's notice, I encourage folks to read the review of this book by Elijah Wald in the current issue of Sing Out!, which does not deal with the Work/Lomax issue but instead gets to the value of Work's original research. Very informative (and critical). The book has been out for a while and is getting a lot of attention, although unfortunately, I believe, because of the controversy over the Lomax connection, which Gordon first brought up in his biography of Muddy Waters of a few years ago. Ronald CohenCc:	
Subject:	Alan Lomax and John W. Work IIIFolks:The _New York Times_ of Monday, 8/29, had a lead story on the first arts page headlined: "Book Says Lomax Neglected Black Scholars."  The story by Marc Weingarten is essentially advance publicity of a new book edited by Robert Gordon (not THE Robert W. Gordon) and Bruce Nemerov, "Lost Delta Blues" (Vanderbilt University Press).The essential argument is that musicologist John W. Work III of Fisk University, Lewis W. Jones, a sociologist and a grad student, Samuel C. Adams, did the initial field work that turned up Muddy Waters (McKinley Morganfield) and other informants whom Lomax  later recorded in 1941 and 42.  The editors argue that Lomax gave them scant, even begrudging credit.That aside, the book does contain no fewer than 158 transcriptions of field recordings in the Mississippi Delta by Work, Jones and Adams.  That alone would make it valuable.  I do not know how many of the songs here are also in Work's two collections of black songs and spirituals.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Alan Lomax and John W. Work III
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:41:25 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(55 lines) , text/html(58 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Alan Lomax and John W. Work III
From: Paul Garon <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:30:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


This is really the most important point. My own feeling about the 
uncorrected errors is that not a lot of lay persons are going to buy this 
Vanderbilt University Press book anyway and little damage will be done. 
It's fascinating material and I'm glad it's finally in our hands.Paul GaronAt 01:41 PM 8/31/2005, you wrote:
>
>That lot said, though, I feel this is the most important book on the blues 
>to hit the bookshops in a very long time and I would thoroughly recommend 
>it to anyone seriously interested in the idiom.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Fred McCormick.
>Paul and Beth Garon
Beasley Books (ABAA)
1533 W. Oakdale
Chicago, IL 60657
(773) 472-4528
(773) 472-7857 FAX
http://www.beasleybooks.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Alan Lomax and John W. Work III
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:41:10 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(19 lines) , text/html(7 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Alan Lomax and John W. Work III
From: "Cohen, Ronald" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:14:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


I agree that this is an interesting and important book, despite the slurs regarding Lomax which detract from the book's value (but seem to have captured the bulk of the publicity), but I would recommend Elijah Wald's ESCAPING THE DELTA, which draws upon the Work study, as the best exploration of the Delta blues in some years. Ron CohenThis is really the most important point. My own feeling about the 
uncorrected errors is that not a lot of lay persons are going to buy this 
Vanderbilt University Press book anyway and little damage will be done. 
It's fascinating material and I'm glad it's finally in our hands.Paul GaronAt 01:41 PM 8/31/2005, you wrote:
>
>That lot said, though, I feel this is the most important book on the blues 
>to hit the bookshops in a very long time and I would thoroughly recommend 
>it to anyone seriously interested in the idiom.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Fred McCormick.
>Paul and Beth Garon
Beasley Books (ABAA)
1533 W. Oakdale
Chicago, IL 60657
(773) 472-4528
(773) 472-7857 FAX
http://www.beasleybooks.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pepys Ballads: online
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:17:48 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Malcolm:I went looking for the site you sent, but found only a notice that the site could not be found.  I will try various variations on the theme tomorrow night.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:45 pm
Subject: Pepys Ballads: online> While looking for something else this evening, I found something 
> unexpected at the University of California: an online archive 
> containing, so far as I can see, images of the entire Pepys 
> collection 
> of broadsides. Although I'm sure that many list members will know 
> about 
> it already, I don't recall it being mentioned; so I thought it 
> might not 
> be a bad idea to draw attention to it. The digital images have been 
> made 
> from negative microfilm provided by the Pepys Library; digitally 
> enhanced, we are promised that they will be more easily legible 
> than the 
> reproductions published by Magdalene College in the 1980s. They are 
> available in various sizes, in some cases with transcriptions into 
> modern type.
> 
> The indexing system is based on Helen Weinstein's, and there are a 
> series of search options which I haven't fully explored yet. No 
> contents 
> listing as such, I think, so useful to have access also to existing 
> print indexes such as Weinstein's. Various supporting materials are 
> also 
> included, with more planned as the project procedes.
> 
> The archive can be seen at the website of the Early Modern Center, 
> Department of English, University of California, Santa Barbara:
> 
> http://emc.english.ucsb.edu/ballad_project/index.asp
> 
> Malcolm Douglas
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pepys Ballads: online
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 04:27:44 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(19 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pepys Ballads: online
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 04:01:15 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Malcolm:My apologies.  The address did connect on a later, second try.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, July 31, 2005 7:45 pm
Subject: Pepys Ballads: online> While looking for something else this evening, I found something 
> unexpected at the University of California: an online archive 
> containing, so far as I can see, images of the entire Pepys 
> collection 
> of broadsides. Although I'm sure that many list members will know 
> about 
> it already, I don't recall it being mentioned; so I thought it 
> might not 
> be a bad idea to draw attention to it. The digital images have been 
> made 
> from negative microfilm provided by the Pepys Library; digitally 
> enhanced, we are promised that they will be more easily legible 
> than the 
> reproductions published by Magdalene College in the 1980s. They are 
> available in various sizes, in some cases with transcriptions into 
> modern type.
> 
> The indexing system is based on Helen Weinstein's, and there are a 
> series of search options which I haven't fully explored yet. No 
> contents 
> listing as such, I think, so useful to have access also to existing 
> print indexes such as Weinstein's. Various supporting materials are 
> also 
> included, with more planned as the project procedes.
> 
> The archive can be seen at the website of the Early Modern Center, 
> Department of English, University of California, Santa Barbara:
> 
> http://emc.english.ucsb.edu/ballad_project/index.asp
> 
> Malcolm Douglas
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rouse's Book
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 04:27:47 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(82 lines)


Folks:With a little urging, Andy Rouse <[unmask]> has furnished this description of his newly published book.I wonder if others on this list are interested in purchasing a copy.  Dick  of Camsco, are your services available?Andy's message follows:Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Ed,Oh, dear, I'd much rather someone else blew my trumpet. But since you ask:The Remunerated Vernacular Singer: from Medieval England to the Post-War
Revival. Peter Lang, 2005.
European University Studies, Series XIV, Anglo-Saxon Language and
Literature, Vol. 415.
Contents:
Introduction
Chapter One
An Embarkation
Chapter Two
?I saw her through a whummil bore? -soap operas of the Middle Ages?
Chapter Three
 From Minstrel to Ballad Singer: Social Change and the Vernacular Singer
in the 16th Century
Chapter Four
William Hogarth and the street Singer of the 18th Century
Chapter Five
Maritime and Military Matters
Chapter Six
The Factory Lass, the Serving Maid and the Farm Labourer
Chapter Seven
The Remains of the Revival: Postwar English Vernacular Singers and their
Politics
Conclusion
Bibliography, Discography
Appendix I
Appendix IIThe bumpf on the back goes like this:
"This volume studies trhe status and reception of the professional,
semi-professional and amateur singer in England from the earliest time
for which records are available, the later Midle Ages, up to the
present. Iy also offers a principled examination of their songs and why
particular songs were taken into singers' repertoires while others
remained printed street ballads without ever becoming part of the oral
tradition. The structure is broadly chronological, although the nature
of evidence from oral and ephemeral sources makes this impossible to
adhere to strictly."
The above has been condensed from the evaluation of one of the readers
at the work's Ph.D. stage.The book is not chronologically or sociologically exhaustive, and the
different chapters use different means of analysis. For instance, both
text analysis and criminal records are used for the medieval period,
while for the 18th century I lean heavily upon Hogarth's engravings and
in the final chapter exploit a questionnaire filled in by such singers
as Heather Wood, Chris Foster, John Faulkner, Frankie Armstrong, John
Copper....
Although not specifically addressed, examples from Hungary, where I have
been living for a quarter of a century, are interspersed, but I also
refer to other cultures (I was lucky to enter corerespondence with a
Gambian who send me a charming letter describing the present functions
of the griot). I might never have embarked on the research, were it not
for the fact that until fairly recently (when Hungary became a
multi-party republic at the end of the 'eighties) I had assumed (insofar
as I had given it much thought at all) that other countries 'used' their
folk music in the vague "leftish" way that most of us did back home. I
should have been warned by that scene in "Cabaret," but didn't
associate. Here folk music is used in very different ways, the worst
form of which is very below-the-belt nationalistic, exploiting a rich
culture for party political ends.My main focus, then, was aimed at the singer who got something for his
song. Hence the title. But the content spreads a wider net.Hope that will do you, Ed. And thanks for showing interest.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rouse's Book
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 09:38:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(97 lines)


I have tried to contact Peter Lang re. this book, with no success--It's 
not on their website. I'll call then and ask about it.dick greenhaus
CAMSCO Musicand a chemist for many, many years. (When asked what kind, my (now) 
ex-wife responded, "Physical. Of course.)edward cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>With a little urging, Andy Rouse <[unmask]> has furnished this description of his newly published book.
>
>I wonder if others on this list are interested in purchasing a copy.  Dick  of Camsco, are your services available?
>
>Andy's message follows:
>
>Ed
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dear Ed,
>
>Oh, dear, I'd much rather someone else blew my trumpet. But since you ask:
>
>The Remunerated Vernacular Singer: from Medieval England to the Post-War
>Revival. Peter Lang, 2005.
>European University Studies, Series XIV, Anglo-Saxon Language and
>Literature, Vol. 415.
>Contents:
>Introduction
>Chapter One
>An Embarkation
>Chapter Two
>?I saw her through a whummil bore? -soap operas of the Middle Ages?
>Chapter Three
> From Minstrel to Ballad Singer: Social Change and the Vernacular Singer
>in the 16th Century
>Chapter Four
>William Hogarth and the street Singer of the 18th Century
>Chapter Five
>Maritime and Military Matters
>Chapter Six
>The Factory Lass, the Serving Maid and the Farm Labourer
>Chapter Seven
>The Remains of the Revival: Postwar English Vernacular Singers and their
>Politics
>Conclusion
>Bibliography, Discography
>Appendix I
>Appendix II
>
>The bumpf on the back goes like this:
>"This volume studies trhe status and reception of the professional,
>semi-professional and amateur singer in England from the earliest time
>for which records are available, the later Midle Ages, up to the
>present. Iy also offers a principled examination of their songs and why
>particular songs were taken into singers' repertoires while others
>remained printed street ballads without ever becoming part of the oral
>tradition. The structure is broadly chronological, although the nature
>of evidence from oral and ephemeral sources makes this impossible to
>adhere to strictly."
>The above has been condensed from the evaluation of one of the readers
>at the work's Ph.D. stage.
>
>The book is not chronologically or sociologically exhaustive, and the
>different chapters use different means of analysis. For instance, both
>text analysis and criminal records are used for the medieval period,
>while for the 18th century I lean heavily upon Hogarth's engravings and
>in the final chapter exploit a questionnaire filled in by such singers
>as Heather Wood, Chris Foster, John Faulkner, Frankie Armstrong, John
>Copper....
>Although not specifically addressed, examples from Hungary, where I have
>been living for a quarter of a century, are interspersed, but I also
>refer to other cultures (I was lucky to enter corerespondence with a
>Gambian who send me a charming letter describing the present functions
>of the griot). I might never have embarked on the research, were it not
>for the fact that until fairly recently (when Hungary became a
>multi-party republic at the end of the 'eighties) I had assumed (insofar
>as I had given it much thought at all) that other countries 'used' their
>folk music in the vague "leftish" way that most of us did back home. I
>should have been warned by that scene in "Cabaret," but didn't
>associate. Here folk music is used in very different ways, the worst
>form of which is very below-the-belt nationalistic, exploiting a rich
>culture for party political ends.
>
>My main focus, then, was aimed at the singer who got something for his
>song. Hence the title. But the content spreads a wider net.
>
>Hope that will do you, Ed. And thanks for showing interest.
>
>Andy
>
>
>  
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rouse's Book
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 13:03:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


Hi-
Just managed to get the information from the publisher. It lists for 
$43.95 (US), ?25.50. If I can get a half-dozen or so orders, I can offer 
it at a 10% discount (the wholesale price than usual because it's 
imported from Switzerland.)
If you want a copy, E-mail me.dick greenhaus
CAMSCO Musicedward cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>With a little urging, Andy Rouse <[unmask]> has furnished this description of his newly published book.
>
>I wonder if others on this list are interested in purchasing a copy.  Dick  of Camsco, are your services available?
>
>Andy's message follows:
>
>Ed
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Dear Ed,
>
>Oh, dear, I'd much rather someone else blew my trumpet. But since you ask:
>
>The Remunerated Vernacular Singer: from Medieval England to the Post-War
>Revival. Peter Lang, 2005.
>European University Studies, Series XIV, Anglo-Saxon Language and
>Literature, Vol. 415.
>Contents:
>Introduction
>Chapter One
>An Embarkation
>Chapter Two
>?I saw her through a whummil bore? -soap operas of the Middle Ages?
>Chapter Three
> From Minstrel to Ballad Singer: Social Change and the Vernacular Singer
>in the 16th Century
>Chapter Four
>William Hogarth and the street Singer of the 18th Century
>Chapter Five
>Maritime and Military Matters
>Chapter Six
>The Factory Lass, the Serving Maid and the Farm Labourer
>Chapter Seven
>The Remains of the Revival: Postwar English Vernacular Singers and their
>Politics
>Conclusion
>Bibliography, Discography
>Appendix I
>Appendix II
>
>The bumpf on the back goes like this:
>"This volume studies trhe status and reception of the professional,
>semi-professional and amateur singer in England from the earliest time
>for which records are available, the later Midle Ages, up to the
>present. Iy also offers a principled examination of their songs and why
>particular songs were taken into singers' repertoires while others
>remained printed street ballads without ever becoming part of the oral
>tradition. The structure is broadly chronological, although the nature
>of evidence from oral and ephemeral sources makes this impossible to
>adhere to strictly."
>The above has been condensed from the evaluation of one of the readers
>at the work's Ph.D. stage.
>
>The book is not chronologically or sociologically exhaustive, and the
>different chapters use different means of analysis. For instance, both
>text analysis and criminal records are used for the medieval period,
>while for the 18th century I lean heavily upon Hogarth's engravings and
>in the final chapter exploit a questionnaire filled in by such singers
>as Heather Wood, Chris Foster, John Faulkner, Frankie Armstrong, John
>Copper....
>Although not specifically addressed, examples from Hungary, where I have
>been living for a quarter of a century, are interspersed, but I also
>refer to other cultures (I was lucky to enter corerespondence with a
>Gambian who send me a charming letter describing the present functions
>of the griot). I might never have embarked on the research, were it not
>for the fact that until fairly recently (when Hungary became a
>multi-party republic at the end of the 'eighties) I had assumed (insofar
>as I had given it much thought at all) that other countries 'used' their
>folk music in the vague "leftish" way that most of us did back home. I
>should have been warned by that scene in "Cabaret," but didn't
>associate. Here folk music is used in very different ways, the worst
>form of which is very below-the-belt nationalistic, exploiting a rich
>culture for party political ends.
>
>My main focus, then, was aimed at the singer who got something for his
>song. Hence the title. But the content spreads a wider net.
>
>Hope that will do you, Ed. And thanks for showing interest.
>
>Andy
>
>
>  
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bad Lee Brown/Little Sadie
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:04:33 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


I've made little progress in tracking this ballad to historical 
events, but here is a remote possibility.*****
Birmingham, AL, December 25, 1891 (paraphrased news account):William Reese and Sadie Brown were to have been married on this date. 
As a Christmas present, she gave him a revolver on December 24.  On 
Christmas morning, when he came for the wedding, she backed out.  He 
shot and killed her with her present to him. He escaped.
*****This is, of course, not "Lee Brown," but it *is* Sadie Brown, and she 
is indeed killed by a man who, while not her husband, was her 
husband-to-be, who escapes.  One may presume that he is later hunted 
down.The crime doesn't fit the facts as "Bad Lee Brown"/"Little Sadie" 
usually tells them, but even so I think it possible that this could 
be the genesis of that ballad.John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:35:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill Hendricks, a 
granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood days. 
Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census could 
help.Bob, are you reading this?Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse, and 
that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over and 
over.When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
He sat on his father's knee,
An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
"Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have 
been no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child, 
then he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15 
in 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older 
than 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.
-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/1/05 (Songsters, Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:15:19 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(78 lines)


Hi!	As we start another month, here is another list. :-)	Note the item with the asterisk at beginning of the listing. I
am the seller. For list members, I will consider not enforcing my
restriction of sales to US & Canada only. If you are interested and
outside those countries, please contact me before bidding. Thanks!	SONGSTERS & BROADSIDES	7703484810 - General Tom Thumb (sketch inc. songster), 1874, $26 
(ends Aug-02-05 18:44:02 PDT)	6550327265 - PUT'S ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA SONGSTER, 1868, $125 (ends 
Aug-07-05 13:02:42 PDT)	MISCELLANEOUS	4752004479 - Pedlar's Pack JOHN DOHERTY OF DONEGAL, LP, 1964, 
24.95 GBP (ends Aug-06-05 00:48:58 PDT)	4565840423 - Farmhouse Fiddlers: Music & Dance Traditions in the 
Rural Midwest by Martin, 1994, $5.50 (ends Aug-07-05 08:01:41 PDT)*	4565967122 - Dance Music of Scotland by Surenne, 185?, $5 (ends 
Aug-07-05 19:05:22 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	4564950025 - The Ballad Tree by Wells, 1950, $5 (ends Aug-02-05 
14:57:41 PDT)	7703474038 - Negro Songs from Alabama by Courlander, 1962, $19.99
(ends Aug-02-05 17:37:51 PDT)	4564985628 - Songs and Ballads from Nova Scotia by Creighton, 1966
Dover edition, $9.99 (ends Aug-02-05 18:41:15 PDT)	6549332690 - FOLK-SONGS MAINLY FROM WEST VIRGINIA by Cox, 1939, 
$25 (ends Aug-03-05 11:46:57 PDT)	6549645867 - SONGS OF THE SAILOR AND LUMBERMAN by Doerflinger, 
1972, $7.50 (ends Aug-04-05 11:23:12 PDT)	6549172601 - Adventures of Robin Hood: A Collection of Poems, Songs, 
and Ballads by Ritson, 1884 edition, $9.50 (ends Aug-05-05 16:59:27 PDT)	7535014302 - Folk Songs of Australia by Meredith & Anderson, 1968, 
$15 AU (ends Aug-05-05 23:54:16 PDT)	7339576969 - Room for Company by Palmer, 1971, 4.25 GBP (ends 
Aug-06-05 01:50:07 PDT)	6970560574 - A Bundle of Ballads & Lays of the Scottish Cavaliers 
by Morley & Aytoun, 2 volumes, 1891, 9.99 GBP (ends Aug-07-05 10:35:00 PDT)	6550260298 - Irish Street Ballads by Lochlainn, 1960, $3.99 (ends 
Aug-07-05 18:30:00 PDT)	6550436602 - 8 volumes by Ritson, 1825-33, $25 (ends Aug-07-05 
21:10:28 PDT)	7340650150 - Wit and Mirth or Pills to Purge Melancholy, 1720, 
$49.99 (ends Aug-07-05 21:17:24 PDT)	6971125310 - The Painful Plough by Palmer, 1972, 4.50 GBP (ends 
Aug-08-05 04:48:42 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 17:04:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft 
registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on Bartow 
Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will, 
Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one 
electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a 
completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only cover the 
head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you hope for 
an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is reasonably 
comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.John Garst wrote:> The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill Hendricks, a 
> granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood days. 
> Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census could help.
>
> Bob, are you reading this?
>
> Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse, and 
> that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over and over.
>
> When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
> He sat on his father's knee,
> An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
> "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
>
> If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have been 
> no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child, then 
> he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15 in 
> 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older than 
> 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:22:46 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Gentlemen:One other easy shot: the Social Security Death Index on the web.  If  Willie were born in 1872, he would have been  63 or 64 when social security went into effect.  If he drew benefits, he presumably would be listed.Finally, there are state archives where death certificates are filed.  I do not know how  careful Georgia authorities were in the 1930s to record the deaths of  blacks, but it is worth a try.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Date: Monday, August 1, 2005 3:04 pm
Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"> Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft 
> registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on 
> Bartow 
> Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will, 
> Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one 
> electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a 
> completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only 
> cover the 
> head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you hope 
> for 
> an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is 
> reasonably 
> comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.
> 
> John Garst wrote:
> 
> > The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill 
> Hendricks, a 
> > granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood 
> days. 
> > Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census 
> could help.
> >
> > Bob, are you reading this?
> >
> > Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse, 
> and 
> > that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over 
> and over.
> >
> > When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
> > He sat on his father's knee,
> > An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
> > "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
> >
> > If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have 
> been 
> > no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child, 
> then 
> > he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15 
> in 
> > 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older 
> than 
> > 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:41:34 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(114 lines) , text/html(123 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bill Hendricks
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:57:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Sorry for the new subject line, somehow I lost the thread.Think I found your boy in the 1900 census. The only Bill Hendricks 
listed is in Webbsboro, Elbert Co. Born March 1873 with the occupation 
given as stonecutter. Oh yeah, he's white.Am off to dinner but will follow up later this evening.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: [Fwd: [78-l] Uncle Dave Macon's Tennessee Homestead For Sale!]
From: Thomas Stern <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:05:38 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(37 lines) , text/html(64 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 00:32:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Ok, think I have this.I find Bill HENDRICKS [b. March 1873 in GA] a 27y stone cutter in 
Webbsboro, Elbert Co GA [11 June 1900]. He and his wife Laura [22y b. 
Oct. 1877 in GA] have been married less than a year.I find William M HENDRIX a 38y stone cutter for a granite company in 
Atlanta, Fulton Co GA [18 April 1910]. He and his wife Laura E [30y] 
have been married for 10y. They were the parents of 4 children, the only 
survivor being Robert E. [9y b. GA].I can't find your boy in the 1917/1918 draft registration or in the 1920 
and 1930 census. I may have found Laura though the id is more 
speculation than confirmed. She is a widow [49y] in the household of her 
son Edward [29y]. The household includes Edward's sister Katherine [9y 
b. GA].

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:05:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(74 lines)


>Gentlemen:
>
>One other easy shot: the Social Security Death Index on the web.  If 
>Willie were born in 1872, he would have been  63 or 64 when social 
>security went into effect.  If he drew benefits, he presumably would 
>be listed.
>
>Finally, there are state archives where death certificates are 
>filed.  I do not know how  careful Georgia authorities were in the 
>1930s to record the deaths of  blacks, but it is worth a try.Ed,You may not be implying that Bill was black, but if you are, I have 
no evidence to that effect.John>
>Ed
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
>Date: Monday, August 1, 2005 3:04 pm
>Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
>
>>  Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft
>>  registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on
>>  Bartow
>>  Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will,
>>  Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one
>>  electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a
>>  completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only
>>  cover the
>>  head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you hope
>>  for
>>  an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is
>>  reasonably
>>  comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.
>>
>>  John Garst wrote:
>>
>>  > The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill
>>  Hendricks, a
>>  > granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood
>>  days.
>>  > Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census
>>  could help.
>>  >
>>  > Bob, are you reading this?
>>  >
>>  > Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one verse,
>>  and
>>  > that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over
>>  and over.
>>  >
>>  > When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
>>  > He sat on his father's knee,
>>  > An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
>>  > "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
>>  >
>>  > If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would have
>>  been
>>  > no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child,
>>  then
>>  > he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15
>>  in
>>  > 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older
>>  than
>>  > 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this scenario.
>>-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 08:21:56 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(88 lines)


John:My presumption.  My misapprehension.Ed----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2005 8:05 am
Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"> >Gentlemen:
> >
> >One other easy shot: the Social Security Death Index on the web.  
> If 
> >Willie were born in 1872, he would have been  63 or 64 when social 
> >security went into effect.  If he drew benefits, he presumably 
> would 
> >be listed.
> >
> >Finally, there are state archives where death certificates are 
> >filed.  I do not know how  careful Georgia authorities were in the 
> >1930s to record the deaths of  blacks, but it is worth a try.
> 
> Ed,
> 
> You may not be implying that Bill was black, but if you are, I have 
> no evidence to that effect.
> 
> John
> 
> >
> >Ed
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
> >Date: Monday, August 1, 2005 3:04 pm
> >Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
> >
> >>  Ran through the 1910 and 1920 GA census as well as the GA draft
> >>  registrations. The closest I came was a Willie Young Hendricks on
> >>  Bartow
> >>  Co. who's occupation is given as "miner" in 1917. The other Will,
> >>  Willie, William, Bill, Billie's etc. were all farmers [save one
> >>  electrician and one roofer]. Willie Y. was born 2 Dec 1889. Not a
> >>  completely foolproof process as the online census indexes only
> >>  cover the
> >>  head of household [in 1910 and 1920]. On the other hand if you 
> hope>>  for
> >>  an individual under 41 in 1913 the the draft registration is
> >>  reasonably
> >>  comprehensive as it would only include males born after 1872.
> >>
> >>  John Garst wrote:
> >>
> >>  > The Atlanta Constitution of 02Sep1913 tells of one Bill
> >>  Hendricks, a
> >>  > granite cutter, who had sung "John Henry" "since his childhood
> >>  days.
> >>  > Unfortunately, no age is given for Bill.  Perhaps the census
> >>  could help.
> >>  >
> >>  > Bob, are you reading this?
> >>  >
> >>  > Both he and his sister insisted that the song had only one 
> verse,>>  and
> >>  > that if you wanted to make it longer, you sang that verse over
> >>  and over.
> >>  >
> >>  > When John Henry was er little bit o' boy
> >>  > He sat on his father's knee,
> >>  > An' he picked up a bit o' steel and says,
> >>  > "Dad, make er steel drivin' man out o' me."
> >>  >
> >>  > If this ballad was born ca 1887, as I suspect, then it would 
> have>>  been
> >>  > no more than 26 years old in 1913.  If Bill sang it as a child,
> >>  then
> >>  > he must have been no more than 15, say, in 1887.  If he were 15
> >>  in
> >>  > 1887, he would have been 41 in 1913.  If, in fact, he were older
> >>  than
> >>  > 41 in 1913, then there would be inconsistencies in this 
> scenario.>>
> 
> -- 
> john garst    [unmask]
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:23:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


>Ok, think I have this.
>
>I find Bill HENDRICKS [b. March 1873 in GA] a 27y stone cutter in
>Webbsboro, Elbert Co GA [11 June 1900]. He and his wife Laura [22y b.
>Oct. 1877 in GA] have been married less than a year.
>
>I find William M HENDRIX a 38y stone cutter for a granite company in
>Atlanta, Fulton Co GA [18 April 1910]. He and his wife Laura E [30y]
>have been married for 10y. They were the parents of 4 children, the only
>survivor being Robert E. [9y b. GA].
>
>I can't find your boy in the 1917/1918 draft registration or in the 1920
>and 1930 census. I may have found Laura though the id is more
>speculation than confirmed. She is a widow [49y] in the household of her
>son Edward [29y]. The household includes Edward's sister Katherine [9y
>b. GA].Wonderful, Cliff.Let me give you more information from the news article.In 1913, Bill Hendricks, granite cutter, lived at 588 Simpson Street, 
Atlanta.  He was "arraigned in police court...on complaint of Mrs. 
John Meggs, a neighbor."Mrs. Meggs complained that "on both Saturday and Sunday nights he 
neighbor had come home more or less intoxicated and had shouted and 
sung bad songs."  Bill replied that he had sung only one song, "John 
Henry," and that "no one had ever before taken offense at it."  To 
prove his point that it was not a "bad song," he was allowed to 
recite it in court.  He knew only one verse, and his also sister 
swore that that was all she had heard.Despite this, he was found guilty of disorderly conduct and was fined 
$15.75 in one case and $5.75 in the other.  "The defendant put the 
court on notice that it was a piece of malice on the part of the 
neighbors and not their objection to 'John Henry' that caused his 
arrest."If Bill was born in 1873, that makes him 40 in 1913.  If "John Henry" 
started life in 1887, then Bill was 14 then, and I think he could 
call that "childhood."  He just makes it under the wire for his 
statements and an 1887 genesis of "John Henry" to be consistent.John-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:53:27 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Thanks for the additional info. I'm looking in two directions, I'd like 
to find him in 1920 so as to hopefully confirm my 1930 assumption. Also 
trying to work my way through possible parents in the 1880 census. 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Early reference to "John Henry"
From: Clifford J OCHELTREE <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:03:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Well that worked out nicely. In the 1910 census the household 
immediately following that of William M HENDRIX is that of John W MEIGS 
and his wife Martha [the music hater I presume]. I found John and Martha 
in 1920 but "singing" Bill and his family seem to have moved on.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:04:03 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(22 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:33:48 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(32 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Camouflaged shanties Pt. 10 [I think]
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:09:47 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(38 lines) , text/html(33 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Quasi Semi-commecial announcememt
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Aug 2005 11:38:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


If anyone's been trying to reach me (CAMSCO Music) at 800/548-FOLK 
(3655), I apologize. I've moved, and Verizon crossed some wires on the 
new installation. It's all fixed, now.Sorry for any inconvenience.dick

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/3/05 Part 1 (Broadsides)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:27:35 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Hi!	Welcome to a special issue of the Ebay List. I am posted this
because of auction end dates and other issues. Part 2, the regular
general folklore list will be posted this evening. 	BROADSIDES	6550160760 - When Johnny Comes Marching Home, 186?, $15.50 (ends 
Aug-04-05 19:01:07 PDT)	7340731179 - Ladies Skreen, 1728?, $49.95 (ends Aug-08-05
09:16:05 PDT)	7340742088 - A New Ballad, 17??, $49.95 (ends Aug-08-05 10:09:59
PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/3/05 Part 2 (General Folklore)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:25:37 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(70 lines)


Hi!	As promised, here is part 2. :-) 	JOURNALS	6550353896 - The Golden Log, Texas Folklore Society, 1962, $8.99 
(ends Aug-07-05 14:56:16 PDT)	BOOKS 	6550131223 - Buying the Wind Regional Folklore in the United States 
by Dorson, 1964, $5.99 (ends Aug-04-05 15:29:34 PDT)	8323140374 - 13 books on folklore and mythology, $7.25 (ends 
Aug-04-05 19:30:38 PDT)	8323141621 - 12 books on folklore and mythology, $8.99 (ends 
Aug-04-05 19:37:38 PDT)	8322930332 - The Best of Texas Folk and Folklore 1916 - 1954 by 
Boatright, Hudson & Maxwell, 1998, $9.95 (ends Aug-05-05 18:33:50 PDT)	6549771563 - Folklore of the Australian Pub by Wannan, 1972, 
$9.99 (ends Aug-05-05 19:00:00 PDT)	6550002015 - THE AUSTRALIAN YARN by Edwards, 1977, $0.99 AU (ends 
Aug-05-05 23:26:54 PDT)	4565722386 - Folklore of the Scottish Highlands by Ross, 1993, $5 
(ends Aug-06-05 10:26:08 PDT)	4565731113 - The British Folklorists by Dorson, 1968, $3.50 (ends 
Aug-06-05 11:24:29 PDT)	4566173808 - Never Try to Teach a Pig to Sing by Dundes, 1991, $4 
(ends Aug-08-05 18:03:17 PDT)	6971242736 - Putting Folklore to Use by Jones, 1994, $5 (ends 
Aug-08-05 22:05:06 PDT)	6971286482 - The Horn Book by Legman, 1970, 4.50 GBP (ends 
Aug-09-05 07:24:56 PDT)	4566338543 - NEW MEXICO PLACE NAMES: A GEOGRAPHICAL DICTIONARY by
Pearce, 1965, $9.99 (ends Aug-09-05 18:05:00 PDT)	6550900275 - The Folklore of Maine by Beck, 1957, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-09-05 18:38:07 PDT)	6550915206 - Folk Beliefs of the Southern Negro by Puckett, 1926,
$49.99 (ends Aug-09-05 19:46:20 PDT)	8323292309 - Yorkshire Customs ? traditions and folklore of old 
Yorkshire by Crowther, 1977 reprint, 0.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 10:45:44 PDT)	8323548871 - A Collection of Highland Rites and Customs by 
Campbell, 2.99 GBP (ends Aug-11-05 10:32:37 PDT)	8324073278 - Vale of the Vikings by Simpson, 1991, 1.98 GBP (ends 
Aug-13-05 10:22:22 PD)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:13:33 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 17:04:03 -0500, John Mehlberg wrote:>Here is the jokebook with songs that I won on ebay (9MB):
>
>
>       http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
>
Good! Thank you, sir.  Any idea of its date?>Does anyone out there have a copy of Pills to Purge Melancholy?  Remember, there are quite a few items, editions & volumes with that title.
Basicly, Thomas D'Urfey,  "Wit and Mirth: or, or Pills to purge Melancholy"-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
	          I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
	                Boycott South Carolina!
	     http://www.naacp.org/news/2001/2001-01-12.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:27:06 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(9 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 10:34:36 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Hi,
Most of us probably have the 1959 New York reprint of the 1876 reprint of
the 1719-1720 edition, so an earlier edition(s) on-line would be preferable.
SteveG.
You could have borrowed my copy but shipping would be rather a lot from UK.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: And the Winner Is...
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:49:01 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Ron:I was tipped to this story from the magazine of the right-leaning Manhattan Institute naming Pete Seeger as America's most successful Communist.Pete would be proud.http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_urbanities-communist.htmlEd

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: And the Winner Is...
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:16:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "edward cray" <[unmask]><<I was tipped to this story from the magazine of the right-leaning
Manhattan Institute naming Pete Seeger as America's most successful
Communist.Pete would be proud.http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_3_urbanities-communist.html >>But as someone who, as a young man, considered a career as a journalist, he
would be appalled at the factual errors with which the article is riddled.
Never mind the ideological bias; that's expected. But they got an awful lot
of the who-what-when-where wrong.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bawdy Song Census
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:20:39 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


>...Thus "Daisy, Daisy" and "Red River Valley" are not folk songs, 
>any more than "The Star Spangled Banner" or Schubert's _Die Schone 
>Mullerin_ are folk songs.
>...
>EdFWIW, Art Rosenbaum just gave me a recently recorded CD of the Myers 
sisters.  They sing a find version of "Bright Brasstown Valley."J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bright Brasstown Valley
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:21:51 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>>...Thus "Daisy, Daisy" and "Red River Valley" are not folk songs, 
>>any more than "The Star Spangled Banner" or Schubert's _Die Schone 
>>Mullerin_ are folk songs.
>>...
>>Ed
>
>FWIW, Art Rosenbaum just gave me a recently recorded CD of the Myers 
>sisters.  They sing a find version of "Bright Brasstown Valley."Oops!  Make that "fine."J

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bawdy Song Census
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:46:28 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


John and  anyone else who cares:My point is that the common form of "Red River Valley" is  more or less frozen.  There is a "correct" way to sing it and one risks reproval or hostile stares if one deviates from the "official" text.  Thus it is no longer a folk song, though derived from
a folk song.I imagine the same might be said of the Simon and Garfunkel version of "Scarborough Fair," etc.Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, August 4, 2005 10:20 am
Subject: Re: Bawdy Song Census> >...Thus "Daisy, Daisy" and "Red River Valley" are not folk songs, 
> >any more than "The Star Spangled Banner" or Schubert's _Die Schone 
> >Mullerin_ are folk songs.
> >...
> >Ed
> 
> FWIW, Art Rosenbaum just gave me a recently recorded CD of the 
> Myers 
> sisters.  They sing a find version of "Bright Brasstown Valley."
> 
> J
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown's Jest Book w/Songs
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:11:35 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(53 lines) , text/html(70 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tom Brown
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 05:12:17 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Well, the URL suggests "1840s" Very nice book, by the
way. Thanks for posting it.C.> http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
>     >
>     Good! Thank you, sir. Any idea of its date?
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 06:49:39 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(20 lines) , text/html(5 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 10:38:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Tom Brown's Jest Book:
or, Companion to the Cloister,
The Ne Plus Ultra of Every Thing Funny.
Containing All His Comical and Humorous Stories,
Curious Riddles,
Also, without any curtailment, the whole of his unique collection of
Amorous Tales and Songs,
Smutty Conundrums,
Queer Jokes,
Witty Sayings, &c., &c., &c.,London:
Edward Duncombe,
Middle Row, Holborn
[c. 1840]
&108 p.: illustrations; 15 cm. (6 inches). Yellow paper over boards, printed 
in black. Front cover is identical to title page, each with vignette of a 
couple undressing.Edward Duncombe and John Duncombe were publishers in London of of music and 
theater-related pieces, as well as the occasional piece of light pornography 
from about 1825 to about 1853. The Middle Row, Holborn, address was used 
from about 1835 to about 1848.----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jonathan Lighter
To: [unmask]
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Tom BrownFWIW, the Victorian bestseller, _Tom Brown's School Days_, by Thomas Hughes, 
was published in 1857.  This might argue for a date ca1859, unless there's 
evidence to the contrary.JLCliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:
Well, the URL suggests "1840s" Very nice book, by the
way. Thanks for posting it.C.> http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
> >
> Good! Thank you, sir. Any idea of its date?
>__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:59:25 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(104 lines)


Bob:It is good to make your acquaintance, if only by email, and to learn that there is yet another person out there interested in bawdy folklore. I simply cannot extend your knowledge of the prehistory.As you can see, I am posting your query to a listserv peopled by some of the most knowledgeable (frightening, even shaming at times) folksong and ballad students  in Christendom.  One or more of them might be able to track the geneaology of  "On the Road to Limerick."On the history of the limerick itself, I will presume you have seen Gershon Legman's  chapter in _The Horn Book,_
pp. 427-53.  This was originally intended to be the introduction to Legman's anonymously self-published collection, _The Limerick_ (Paris: Les Hautes Etudes, 1953), but not sent to press for economic reasons.  Legman's introduction to his second collection, _The New Limerick,_ has nothing of the history.  For a later account of the variety of limerick songs in oral tradition, see my _The Erotic Muse,_ 2nd edition, pp. 223 ff.Good luck, and do keep us posted on your research --Ed 
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Turvey <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2005 3:31 am
Subject: A song of the nineteenth century.> Dear Professor Cray,
> 
> John Mehlberg?s Immortalia website describes your encyclopedic 
> knowledge of 
> the bawdy songs of yesteryear. I wonder, therefore, if you could 
> possibly 
> help me? I am trying to find any information whatsoever about a 
> song said to 
> have been popular around the 1860s.
> 
> All I know about the song is that the chorus is variously stated to 
> be :-
> 
> ?Oh, won?t you come up, won?t you come up,
> All the way from Limerick town??	Oxford newspapers of June 1881
> 
> or:-
> 
> Will you come up, come up?
> Will you come up to Limerick?
> Will you come up, come up?
> Will you come up to Limerick?	J H Murray, Notes & Queries, 1898
> 
> or:-
> 
> Won?t you come up, come up,
> Won?t you come up to Limerick town?
>                	C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918
> 
> 
> Two other references suggest that the song title might have been 
> ?All the 
> Way Up to Limerick?, or ?On the Road to Limerick.? It is said that 
> people 
> would sing this song at convivial gatherings, each person present 
> having to 
> sing a verse between the chorus on pain of a forfeit. The verses 
> sung were 
> five-liners, and these ?limericks? subsequently took their name 
> from the 
> chorus of the song to which they were sung.
> 
> I have been studying the history of limericks for many years and I 
> really 
> would like to know more about this song; for example when was it 
> first sung, 
> who composed it, what the words to it are, does it only exist as a 
> chorus, 
> what is the tune for the song, what is its title ..... etc..  My 
> ideal would 
> be to find a dated version with a few limericks given between the 
> chorus.
> However, all my efforts so far have drawn a complete and utter 
> blank. I have 
> tried Bristol University Music Department, Bristol Central Library 
> Music 
> Department, Cambridge University Library (Andersen Music Room), The 
> Royal 
> College of Music, the internet, various musical friends .... and so 
> on and 
> so forth. In the Bodleian library I have read many comic songbooks 
> from the 
> nineteenth century, but no song at all bears any resemblance to my 
> quarry.
> To put the matter succinctly; I know nothing about the song except 
> its 
> reputed chorus!
> 
> If you could suggest anywhere I could find some information about 
> this song 
> I would be extremely grateful.
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> 
> Dr Bob Turvey
> 11 Lyndale Avenue
> Stoke Bishop
> Bristol
> BS9 1BS
> England
> 
> 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: edward cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:47:03 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(50 lines)


Jonathan and John:The 1840 date on the original just might be accurate."Tom Brown" seems to have been a popular term for  various things in the early 19th C.:   "Tommy Brown" was coarse brown bread  in the late 18th C., according to Francis Grose's _Classical Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue._  Henley and Farmer have it as a gambling term  undated for "twelve in hand or crib."  (Partridge's slang dictionary credits the same source and dates it 1810-1860.)And then there is "The Card Playing Song," collected by Frank Kidson and published in his _Traditional Tunes,_ p. 159.  
Kidson dates it to as late as 1880, Lloyd to mid-century.  Ewan MacColl sings it on "Champions and Sporting Blades" (Riverside 12-652).  The first verse runs:Oh! the king will take the queen; but the queen will take the knave:  
And since we're all together, boys, we'll have a jolly stave.
      Here's to you, Tom Brown,
      Here's to you with all heart;
      We'll have another glass, my boys
      At least , before we part.
           Here's to you, Tom Brown.Etc.Lloyd's notes tantalize.  He states that in addition to Kidson's version "other less decorous versions have since come to light."Ed----- Original Message -----
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, August 6, 2005 6:49 am
Subject: Re: Tom Brown> FWIW, the Victorian bestseller, _Tom Brown's School Days_, by 
> Thomas Hughes,  was published in 1857.  This might argue for a date 
> ca1859, unless there's evidence to the contrary.
> 
> JL
> 
> Cliff Abrams <[unmask]> wrote:
> Well, the URL suggests "1840s" Very nice book, by the
> way. Thanks for posting it.
> 
> C.
> 
> > http://immortalia.com/1840s-tom-browns-jest-book.zip
> > >
> > Good! Thank you, sir. Any idea of its date?
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:19:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "edward cray" <[unmask]>> Won't you come up, come up,
> Won't you come up to Limerick town?
>                C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918Harry Cox, of couse, sang the same as "Won't you come down to Yarmouth
town?".Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:43:24 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Paul Stamler wrote:> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "edward cray" <[unmask]>
> 
>>Won't you come up, come up,
>>Won't you come up to Limerick town?
>>               C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918
> 
> Harry Cox, of couse, sang the same as "Won't you come down to Yarmouth
> town?".Not Harry Cox, so far as I know. Peter Bellamy seems to be the only 
source; I believe he said he got it from a Norfolk man, Peter Bullen; 
but details are vague. Perhaps Heather Wood will be able to tell us more.There certainly is a similarity in the few words quoted, but I don't 
know that it's really enough to connect the two without a fair bit more 
information about both.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 00:13:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Malcolm Douglas" <[unmask]>>>Won't you come up, come up,
>>Won't you come up to Limerick town?
>>               C L Graves, The Cornhill Magazine, 1918
>
> Harry Cox, of couse, sang the same as "Won't you come down to Yarmouth
> town?".<<Not Harry Cox, so far as I know. Peter Bellamy seems to be the only
source; I believe he said he got it from a Norfolk man, Peter Bullen;
but details are vague. Perhaps Heather Wood will be able to tell us more.>>You're right, of course -- I could've sworn it was on the Rounder
compilation, but it's not. Sorry, brain glitch.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:01:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi,
In 30 or so versions I have copies of 'Jack the Jolly Tar' (Yarmouth Town)
no chorus comes anywhere near Peter's and the place is invariably London.
The choruses are 'fol de rols', 'doo me ammers'or 'with a ----and a---'.
Personally I wouldn't trust for scholarly purposes any text that comes
solely from a revival singer, without a reliable source. this is far from
being a criticism of Peter or any other revival singer. We are all at
liberty to alter the songs, we all do it, it's part of the tradition,
keeping it alive.
Steve

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:05:35 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Hi Ed and all,
'Tom Brown (Card Song) goes back far beyond Kidson.
See 'Tom Brown's Delight' c1674-9, Bodleian website Wood e25(66).
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century.
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:19:11 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(130 lines) , text/html(27 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:25:57 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(65 lines) , text/html(11 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:39:01 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(14 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 13:38:13 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(85 lines) , text/html(70 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 12:27:32 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(81 lines) , text/html(26 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:01:41 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(118 lines)


Hi!	Here is some vacation reading for everyone. :-)	MISCELLANEOUS	4754745680 - 5 78 records of bothy ballads, 3.50 GBP (ends 
Aug-11-05 06:21:47 PDT)	4755047608 - Occupational Folksongs of the U.S. Air Force, CD, 
$0.99 (ends Aug-11-05 23:38:31 PDT)	6971474588 - JOURNAL OF THE SCHOOL OF SCOTTISH STUDIES, 1970, 3 
GBP (ends Aug-13-05 15:23:01 PDT)	6971475141 - JOURNAL OF THE SCHOOL OF SCOTTISH STUDIES, 1972, 
4.88 GBP (ends Aug-13-05 15:28:48 PDT)	SONGS & BALLADS	4566099198 - Songs the Whaleman Sang by Huntington, 1964, $20 
(ends Aug-08-05 12:13:50 PDT)	4566130985 - Some Ballad Folk by Burton, $2.99 (ends Aug-08-05 
14:42:37 PDT)	4566131023 - Collection Of Folklore:Folksongs by Burton & Manning,
1970, $2.99 (ends Aug-08-05 14:42:52 PDT)	4566131066 - Folksongs II by Burton & Manning, 1971, $2.99 (ends 
Aug-08-05 14:43:11 PDT)	8323706595 - Folk Song Today No. 2 by Wales, 1969, 0.99 GBP 
(ends Aug-09-05 01:37:09 PDT)	6971368057 - Scottish and Border,Battles and Ballads by Brander, 
1975, $4.99 (ends Aug-09-05 18:49:46 PDT)	6550907120 - SONG BALLADS AND OTHER SONGS of the PINE MOUNTAIN 
SETTLEMENT SCHOOL, 1923, $9 (ends Aug-09-05 19:08:56 PDT)	8323986673 - Scone Ceilidh Songbook Folk Songs Old & New, 1965, 
2.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 02:37:33 PDT)	8324026312 - The Penguin Book of English Folk Songs by Williams 
& Lloyd, 0.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 06:58:31 PDT)	6971765681 - Mormon Songs from the Rocky Mountains by Cheney, 
1968, $9.99 (ends Aug-10-05 22:12:22 PDT)	4566599646 - Singing Family of the Cumberlands by Ritchie, 1955, 
$3.95 (ends Aug-10-05 12:44:31 PDT)	6551102804 - Eighty English Folk Songs From Southern Appalachians 
by Sharp & Kapeles, 1968, $39.95 (ends Aug-10-05 16:52:08 PDT)	6971481637 - A Book of British Ballads by Brimley Johnson, 1952 
reprint, 1.99 GBP (ends Aug-10-05 17:01:30 PDT)	6551271950 - ANIMAL FOLKSONGS FOR CHILDREN by Seeger, 1950, 
$6.25 (ends Aug-11-05 12:21:13 PDT)	6551768024 - Ballads and Songs from Ohio by Eddy, 1939, $9.77 
(ends Aug-11-05 19:59:43 PDT)	4566959953 - Songs of the Gael Series Three by Breathnach, 1922, 
$25 (ends Aug-12-05 09:15:54 PDT)	4566965182 - The History of the Blues by Davis, 2003 reprint, $5 
(ends Aug-12-05 09:47:33 PDT)	7705332621 - The First Book of Irish Ballads by O'Keefe, 1979, 3
GBP (ends Aug-12-05 10:10:41 PDT)	7341647513 - book of handwritten music/songs, 1828, $9.99 (ends 
Aug-12-05 16:03:39 PDT)	6550900306 - Robin Hood Poems, Songs, and Ballads by Ritson 2 
volumes, 1887 reprint, $399.99 (ends Aug-12-05 18:38:15 PDT)	7341692693 - The Songs That Made Australia by Fahey, 1989, $16 AU 
(ends Aug-12-05 22:59:03 PDT)	6551659373 - 2 books by Lomax (The Folk Songs of North America in 
the English Language, 1960 and Best Loved American Folk Songs, 1947), $9.99
(ends Aug-13-05 09:39:44 PDT)	7341354919 - A Selection of collected FOLK-SONG by Sharp & 
Williams, volume 1, 4.95 GBP (ends Aug-14-05 08:26:37 PDT)	7341357385 - A Selection of Some Less Known FOLK-SONGS by Sharp &
Williams, 3.95 GBP (ends Aug-14-05 08:41:19 PDT)	8324523239 - Cerddi Portinllaen by Davies, 1954, 4.99 GBP (ends 
Aug-15-05 07:13:04 PDT)	5227395227 - The Restoration of Cock Robin: Nursery Rhymes and 
Carols restored to their Original Meanings by Iles, 1989, 1.99 GBP (ends 
Aug-15-05 07:25:23 PDT)	5227392446 - Folk Lore and Songs of the Black Country and the 
West Midlands by Raven, 1966, 4.99 GBP (ends Aug-15-05 07:13:59 PDT)	5227440158 - Ord's Bothy Songs and Ballads of Aberdeen, Banff and 
Moray, Angus and the Mearns, 1990 reprint, 7.50 GBP (ends Aug-15-05 
13:40:00 PDT)	5227442005 - A Scottish Ballad Book by Buchan, 1973, 7.50 GBP 
(ends Aug-15-05 15:48:00 PDT)				Happy Bidding!
				Dolores-- 
Dolores Nichols 		| 
D&D Data			| Voice :	(703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None	| Email:     <[unmask]>
	--- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: John Mehlberg <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:08:54 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


I need this CD and will be bidding.> 4755047608 - Occupational Folksongs of the U.S. Air Force, 
> CD,
> $0.99 (ends Aug-11-05 23:38:31 PDT)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ebay List - 8/7/05 (Songs & Ballads)
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 7 Aug 2005 17:01:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


I just got a new edition of Huntington from Dick Greenhaus for less, and substantially less than the "Buy-it-now" price.> 	4566099198 - Songs the Whaleman Sang by Huntington, 1964, $20 
> (ends Aug-08-05 12:13:50 PDT)BTW, a plethora of thanks  to Dolores for her kind posting of these auctions; I have recently been able to add a half dozen new tomes to my music library at far less than it would have cost elsewhere, including the finds on bookfinder.com  --  Tom> 	Tom Hall  --  Master Wordworker  
and Intellectual Handyman

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 04:49:33 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(40 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 05:03:23 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(31 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Stuff others may know all too well
From: Ewan McVicar <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:14:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(64 lines)


I often think I'm stirring old ashes when I comment on something here, but
in case it is news, here goes.I've always thought that the refrain shared by the Barnyards of Delgaty and
Rhynie ["I sheared my first hairst"] was more distinctive than most of the
bothy ballads, and tune rich. Ford titles the Rhynie song as Linten Lowrin,
and calls it an old Aberdeenshire song "which has seen little of the
printed page until gathered into Songs of the North", [Macleod and
Boulton]. In Scots Gems [Scots] - Drysdale, 1908 London. compiled by James Wood, I
found the following.Linton Lowrie
Words by James Ballantine
Music by Alexander MacKenzie 
[Sir Alexander Campbell Mackenzie perhaps? Or another?]
The volume distinguishes between 'music by' and 'music arranged by',
suggesting that MacKenzie composed the tune.
The air is close to the usual tune, though richer melodically, and familiar
to me in this version as close to one used for the Silkie of Sule Skerrie.
. Sorry I do not have a handy way of sharing it, I'd need to plug away for
more time than I've to hand. Anyway, this message is about the Barnyards
refrain.I tint my he'rt ae morn in May 
When birdies sang on ilka tree;
When dewdraps hung on ilka spray,
And lammies play'd on ilka lea.  O Linton Lowrie, Linton Lowrie
Aye sae fond ye trowed tae be,
I never wist sae bricht a monr
Sae dark a nicht wad bring to me.O Linton's words sae saftly fell,
Sae pure the glamour o' his e'e;
I hae never been mysel'
Sin' ere he spak' an' keek'd to me.O Linton Lowrie, Linton Lowrie,
Come dear Lowrie back to me,
An' siccan love I'se bear to you
E'en your forgettin' will forgi'e.His absence I'll nae langer bear,
My grief I can nae langer dree,
I'll gang a thousan' mile, and mair,
My Linton's comely face to seeO Linton Lowrie, Linton Lowrie,
Gin ye'll come to Loganlea,
I'll mak' ye lord o' Logan Ha',
And I your loving wife will be.As well as the Linton Lowrie phrase, the beginning lines of stanzas 3 and 5
echo bothy ballad verses.Whaddya think? Which came first?EwanEwan McVicar

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:54:29 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(7 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom Brown
From: Jonathan Lighter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:02:41 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(11 lines) , text/html(6 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:49:22 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(14 lines) , text/html(15 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:02:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Hi again,
I'm getting something of a reputation as a sceptic and this won't help but
for me 'Yarmouth Town has Bert Lloyd written all over it, and I really go
for Jonathan's take on the name 'Peter Bullen'. Shades of the Kipper Family
and in true Norfolk tradition, or as they say 'Norfolk n'good'.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:41:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi again,
Just trawling Yarmouth Town on the net and Peter recorded it on the 1968
album 'Mainly Norfolk' but he also included it on a 1971 Argo album 'Won't
you go my way'.Heather, have you got it? and if so do the notes throw any
further light on the matter?
The various threads on Mudcat don't help at all. They seem to have come to
a dead end.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:56:13 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stuff others may know all too well
From: Murray Shoolbraid <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 8 Aug 2005 19:28:23 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


The composer was the father:Mackenzie, Alexander (Born Montrose, 1819)A child prodigy who became a member of the Theatre Royal Orchestra in
Edinburgh in 1833, and arranged and published the Dance Music of Scotland
for piano and other Scots tunes for the violin. Composed the melodies of
"The Nameless Lassie" and "Bonnie Bonaly" by James Ballantine. He was the
father of the composer Dr. A. C. Mackenzie.I think you've got it, Ewan. Ballantine's dates are 1808-1877, which gives
enough time for it to generate a family.Murray Shoolbraid

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 05:25:00 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Fred McCormick wrote:> Three questions.
>  
> Do any other versions of the Bellamy/Bullen Yarmouth Town exist?Almost certainly not.> Do me amma and Yarmouth Town apart, are there any other traditonal  sources 
> for the string hanging out of the window motif?I suspect that it goes a fair way back. Chaucer is a possibility, but my 
memory of all that is a bit vague; or the Fabliaux. Or I might be 
completely wrong.> Does anybody know who Peter Bullen is/was?Evidently not. Makes you wonder.  > In a message dated 07/08/2005 20:27:51 GMT Standard Time,
> [unmask] writes:
> 
> It has always seemed to me that "Yarmouth Town" was one person's rewrite  of 
> Lloyd's rewrite of "Do Me Ama."
>  
> Is there any contrary evidence?Beyond Peter's word, no; and I find myself becoming increasingly cynical 
about the probity of so many of the great movers of the Revival. Rather 
sad. I wondered for a while if there might be some relationship with 
Dylan's 'Oxford Town', but I was probably conjuring a red herring for 
myself; though to my ear Peter's tune sounds more American than East 
Anglian.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 04:38:18 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(32 lines) , text/html(39 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Heather Wood <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:44:41 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(15 lines) , text/html(16 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Stuff others may know all too well
From: Ewan McVicar <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:02:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Murray,Great, that tunes me in more.
Did what I should have done first, and looked at Greig Duncan Vol 3, 348
Jock O Rhynie, where the notes indicate 1830 to 1850 for the genesis of the
Rhynie song. 
It could have gone either way, couldn't it?
Or maybe there's an older root still?
Interestingly, Emmerson in Rantin Pipe and Tremblin String says of
Alexander Mackenzie that "his 'Linton Lowrie' has come into vogue among
folk-singers in the 1960s." Clearly Emmerson had not listened to the sung
lyrics at all!
As to locations in Linton Lowrie, Loganlee, Logan House and Logan Water are
all within three miles of Penicuik, which is eight miles south of
Edinburgh. Eight miles south west of Penicuik is West Linton.
More to be known yet.Ewan 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 7 Aug 2005 to 8 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-314)
From: Cliff Abrams <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 05:32:36 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


"Shades of the Kipper Family and in true Norfolk
tradition, or as they say 'Norfolk n'good'."
SteveGWhich probably inspired the joke about an encounter
between a rustic and the the captain of a large
passenger ship cruise line.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:59:06 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(34 lines) , text/html(46 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:25:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Malcolm wrote
'I find myself becoming increasingly cynical about the probity of so many
of the great movers of the revival.'I am totally cynical when it comes to those who did set themselves up as
folksong scholars and then forged, spliced etc for whatever reason, from
Percy to the Scots collectors of the early 19thc--to Sharp/Baring Gould and
through to Bert. BUT the revival performers have none of their
responsibilities and have every right to do what they will with traditional
material and continue the living tradition.
Although Peter was very knowledgeable he did not set himself up as a
folksong scholar. He was scholarly when it came to Kipling.
Personally I think 'Yarmouth Town' is vastly better than 'Jack the Jolly
Tar'.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:49:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 8/9/05, Steve Gardham wrote:>Malcolm wrote
>'I find myself becoming increasingly cynical about the probity of so many
>of the great movers of the revival.'
>
>I am totally cynical when it comes to those who did set themselves up as
>folksong scholars and then forged, spliced etc for whatever reason, from
>Percy to the Scots collectors of the early 19thc--to Sharp/Baring Gould and
>through to Bert. BUT the revival performers have none of their
>responsibilities and have every right to do what they will with traditional
>material and continue the living tradition.
>Although Peter was very knowledgeable he did not set himself up as a
>folksong scholar. He was scholarly when it came to Kipling.
>Personally I think 'Yarmouth Town' is vastly better than 'Jack the Jolly
>Tar'.I must sort of disagree. That is, I agree that revival singers have
the right to fiddle with their songs -- in many cases, this is
*necessary*, because the songs are too messed up to sing in any
given traditional version. You can't just leave out a line the
informant can't remember, after all.But they still owe it to us to own to what they're doing. It costs
nothing, and lets us know when we have to check into a real version.
-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:35:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


<<Norfolk'ngood. Try saying that after a few pints. I must say  that neither
Yarmouth Town nor Fakenham Fair (the other Bullen song)  ring entirely true
in
my ears as traditional songs, and I wouldn't be surprised  to find that they
wer mak' ye ups, as Belle Stewart called her own  compositions.However, I doubt that Lloyd would be your man for YT. First of all, if he
were the author, there would be endless references to milk white thighs
etc.,
and he wouldn't have picked such a boisterous tune. Also, he would have used
more resources than just Bellamy to get it established in the folk revival.
My
guess is, that both songs were written by some local lad, perhaps Bullen
himself.>>Are British census records available online? That might be a path to
establishing Mr. Bullen's existence or lack of same.Re. Heather's note: Mushrooms in ketchup? Bert Lloyd was a creative man in
more ways than one.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Fred McCormick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:31:20 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(18 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:01:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Bob,
Who do you mean by 'us'?
Whilst I agree that we as students/scholars would like this to be the case,
as I see it it is certainly our duty to make available to ALL as many
resources as possible, but I don't see that revival singers owe anything to
us as scholars; to fieldworkers yes in preserving the material, but they
owe far more to original authors/composers and the tradition bearers; but
not to treat them as museum pieces (which is more or less what we do as
scholars) but to continue shaping the old and writing the new which is more
or less what happens.
If I put on my performer's hat for a moment, which doesn't happen often
enough nowadays, I doubt if there's one song out of the hundreds that is
exactly like I first heard it and that includes my own family songs.
Apologies if I've misread what you're saying.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:06:58 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(43 lines) , text/html(133 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:14:40 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


>...revival singers have
>the right to fiddle with their songs -- in many cases, this is
>*necessary*, because the songs are too messed up to sing in any
>given traditional version. You can't just leave out a line the
>informant can't remember, after all.
>
>But they still owe it to us to own to what they're doing. It costs
>nothing, and lets us know when we have to check into a real version.
>--
>Bob WaltzIt would be nice for them to "own to what they're doing."  However, I 
see no obligation on their part, and I don't see that their versions 
are any less "real" than the ones Bob refers to.  I see the revival 
singers as simply another part of long tradition.  That's not to say 
that I don't separate them, in my mind, from the old-timers with 
family/friend traditions.John
-- 
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:17:10 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(16 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ketchup (was 'A song of the nineteenth century')
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:29:55 EDT
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(25 lines) , text/html(39 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:36:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 8/9/05, Steve Gardham wrote:>Bob,
>Who do you mean by 'us'?
>Whilst I agree that we as students/scholars would like this to be the case,
>as I see it it is certainly our duty to make available to ALL as many
>resources as possible, but I don't see that revival singers owe anything to
>us as scholars; to fieldworkers yes in preserving the material, but they
>owe far more to original authors/composers and the tradition bearers; but
>not to treat them as museum pieces (which is more or less what we do as
>scholars) but to continue shaping the old and writing the new which is more
>or less what happens.
>If I put on my performer's hat for a moment, which doesn't happen often
>enough nowadays, I doubt if there's one song out of the hundreds that is
>exactly like I first heard it and that includes my own family songs.
>Apologies if I've misread what you're saying.You have. :-)"Us" is the audience. The guys buying the tickets and the albums.
There are cases where I like versions *very* far removed from the
traditional (e.g. Connie Dover, before she decided she was a cowboy
singer). But I want -- as a *listener*, not as a folklorist -- to
know where it came from.-- 
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Gardham <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:38:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Nice one, John.
BTW Mushroom ketchup historically preceded tomato, and ... there's
more...modern ketchup includes in its ingredients cinnamon!
I wonder if there's any herb robert in there.
The word ketchup seems to have been 'catsup' in America prior to its use in
Britain. Dickens refers to it as ketchup in Barnaby Rudge 1849.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Beth Brooks <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:44:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


If I may put on a foodie hat for a second, it makes sense that mushroom ketchup/catsup would come before tomato, as tomatos were considered poisonous in early American cookery. Probably something to so with them being closely related to belladonna/deadly night shade.Beth Brooks>>> [unmask] 08/09/05 2:38 PM >>>
Nice one, John.
BTW Mushroom ketchup historically preceded tomato, and ... there's
more...modern ketchup includes in its ingredients cinnamon!
I wonder if there's any herb robert in there.
The word ketchup seems to have been 'catsup' in America prior to its use in
Britain. Dickens refers to it as ketchup in Barnaby Rudge 1849.
SteveG

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century
From: Steve Roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:48:44 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


British census records are secret for 100 years, for reasons of 
confidentiality. The latest available at present is the 1901 census.----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Stamler" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: A song of the nineteenth century> <<Norfolk'ngood. Try saying that after a few pints. I must say  that 
> neither
> Yarmouth Town nor Fakenham Fair (the other Bullen song)  ring entirely 
> true
> in
> my ears as traditional songs, and I wouldn't be surprised  to find that 
> they
> wer mak' ye ups, as Belle Stewart called her own  compositions.
>
> However, I doubt that Lloyd would be your man for YT. First of all, if he
> were the author, there would be endless references to milk white thighs
> etc.,
> and he wouldn't have picked such a boisterous tune. Also, he would have 
> used
> more resources than just Bellamy to get it established in the folk 
> revival.
> My
> guess is, that both songs were written by some local lad, perhaps Bullen
> himself.>>
>
> Are British census records available online? That might be a path to
> establishing Mr. Bullen's existence or lack of same.
>
> Re. Heather's note: Mushrooms in ketchup? Bert Lloyd was a creative man in
> more ways than one.
>
> Peace,
> Paul
> 

Original Message:  

Permalink




--