In some instances I would suggest a local or regional historical
society. While I have never given much consideration to the status of my
music oriented materials after my departure I have given very specific
instructions as to the division of my genealogical files. In addition I
have already spoken to the folks at each of those bodies to insure their
interest. [All this and I would like to think I'm good for at least
another 30 years.]A smaller local group may not be the ideal choice but it's a bit like
the archaeologist who thinks it better for a site to be paved over now
so that it can be excavated later.Personal Disclaimer: I helped to found a non-profit local history
organization in PA some 20 years ago and served, in one capacity or
another, on the board ever since. As such I do have a personal bias,David G. Engle wrote:>> On 1/9/04, Paul Stamler wrote:
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: edward cray <[unmask]>
>>>
>>> <<Writing as a member of the Academy -- though probably disdained as not
>>> academic enough since I am a tenured professor of (horrors!)
>>> journalism -- I
>>> would suggest that institutions of higher education did folklore no
>>> favors.
>>> I would argue that those talented amateurs riding around on bicycles did
>>> pretty well, thank you. What academician amassed the collectanea of
>>> Gavin
>>> Greig and the Reverend Duncan? Or the Lomaxes? Or J.F. Campbell?
>>> Or Vance
>>> Randolph? Or Zora Neale Hurston? Or the WPA? What a great
>>> heritage these
>>> men and women saved for us.>>
>>>
>>> Oh, I'm not arguing that. And when I suggested that we would have to
>>> return
>>> to relying on talented amateurs, folk song societies and parsons on
>>> bicycles, I wasn't being facetious; indeed, with the academy seemingly
>>> retiring from the field, it's vital that we keep supporting alternative
>>> institutions such as the AFC, the Smithsonian, local societies, and of
>>> course internet creations such as this listserv and the Ballad Index. It
>>> looks like that's where the action'll be in the next generation.
>>
>>
>> It's more complicated than that, though. Amateurs can collect; for the
>> most part, they *have* collected.
>>
>> But where do the collections go?
>>
>> I think of this myself: Since starting the Ballad Index, my
>> library has gone from a casual repository with a few high-quality
>> books (Child, Randolph, Eddy) to probably one of the dozen or so
>> best in Minnesota. That's not to say that it's anything close to
>> what it should be -- but nobody local with whom I have contact has
>> better. (That, incidentally, owes a lot do Dolores Nichols and her
>> eBay lists, though I've also been picking and choosing estate
>> collections for some years.) If I died tomorrow, it would simply
>> be dispersed -- probably sold piecemeal for about a fifth of
>> its real value. Why? Because I have no one younger to whom to
>> leave it. The Index itself is dependent on David Engle's presence
>> at Fresno.
>>
>> We need archives as well as collectors and maintainers. We don't
>> need departments of folklore, but we do need an "in" with the
>> universities. The dissolution of the programs worries me about
>> the future of those archives.
>
>
> That is indeed a great concern: especially since more than one
> collection at a university has been disbursed when an administrator
> saw no more use in it...
>
>
>> --
>> Bob Waltz
>> [unmask]
>>
>> "The one thing we learn from history --
>> is that no one ever learns from history."
>
>
>
> --
>
> David G. Engle
>
> email: [unmask]
> web: http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore
> http://www.csufresno.edu/forlang
>
> The Traditional Ballad Index:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>
> ---
> |