View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ghost subscription
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:19:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:42:21PM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> I nominate Don Nichols as email gostmaster general of the United States.
>
> Positives: he gets to be called general.  No unwanted spores in email.  He
> sits in the President's cabinet.
>
> Negatives: He sits in the President's cabinet.        I think that the negative outweighs the positives, so I must
respectfully decline the post.        Thanks,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 09:21:49 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(13 lines) , text/html(11 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:18:33 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Dear All,I haven't been near a computer for 48 hours (joy and rapture) so I have
just had the opportunity to read all your wise saws about Celtoidity.Nice comments.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 21:01:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Mary Stafford wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, anyone have an idea of the value of the Bronson volumes? I have the full set, bought years back as they were being published, in excellent shape. Not that I'm thinking of selling them, but that I sort of want to have an idea of value as I leave them to my kids in my will! I also have the hardcover Child set published by Cooper Square Press, condition good (some covers a bit loose, all pages intact), and Sharp's English Folk Songs From the Southern Appalachians, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, London, 1932, also in good condition. Any guesses at value would be appreciated.
>To confirm what Ed said, a friend who specializes in folk-related books
told me in 1998 or early 1999 that he could get $500 for the set in
reasonably good condition.  In early 2000 I saw, I think, 2 volumes
only, listed for $250.  A local bookseller had one volume and was asking
$125, which I couldn't afford.  He asked what the e-price was; I told
him, and he said that indicated his price was in the ballpark.Since that time my bookdealer friend has told me that if I find a copy
at $125, he'll take it!  What seems to have happened is that the only
way most people can find the book is electronically, and someone is
willing to pay the price - so now more people are selling
electronically, and prices have gone up.I was astonished at what people were asking for the Dover Child set - I
was looking for a set for $50, which was the going price a few years
ago.  But the price has kept going up, and turnover is limited, so I
shrugged and bought a set for $350 recently.  All the other sets were
listed for $500 and up, and single volumes are going for $70-90 - I've
been told I got a bargain!!!  Go figure!Anyway, I'd feel comfortable saying your set is worth $1,000 - if I
manage to stay afloat in this economic environment for awhile longer,
I'd consider paying that myself, and of course yours doesn't have the
library defacement/wear.  But of course, that's last year's price... The
people who have them are keeping them, so when a full set finally shows
up on E-Bay, who knows how high a bidder will go?  And if someone
decides to reprint them (no candidates in sight), it could come down
with a crash...!!-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 23:08:32 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Thanks, John, I forgot to mention here that I did see that in the info
on the Folktrax web site. Obviously without consulting him I still can't
say for certain that Jeff got it directly from there, but it sure seems
likely!John Moulden wrote:
 >> The Virginia anthology has a lot of banjo, I
 >> suspect Jeff Davis (it was that Jeff) got "Pat Do This" from there. > "Pat do this" is recorded on Folktrax 908 "Cumberland Gap" A16
 > recorded from Florence Fitzgerald (Mrs Puckett) Afton, Nelson County
 > Va.~ Becky
--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music
[unmask]   *   www.tftm.org
             520-293-3783
P.O. Box 40654, Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson and Reprints
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:56:21 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Donald and Eavesdroppers:You note that the prices of various books (Bronson's four volumes/the
Dover reprint of Child) will fall, sometimes precipitously when reprint
editions are offered.Logic would suggest this is true, but my three year tracking of prices for
folklore and folk music books suggests the fall is not so severe as one
might think.  Kenneth Goldstein's reprints in the 1960s and 1970s of
various standard collections (White, Henry, Gardner and Chickering,
Morris, Eddy, et al), command prices in the $40-$50 range, while the first
editions go for $50-75.As it happens, there is a publisher, apparently knowledgable, willing to
reprint various folk song collections.  He has Bronson under
consideration.  If you have any further suggestions, send them along.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:26:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be that
messages will go to the list.Let me know how it works.     MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:10:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Marge Steiner wrote:
>
> Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be that
> messages will go to the list.
>
> Let me know how it works.
>
>      Marge
>
> E-mail: [unmask]Great! Thank you very much.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:43:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


<<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
that
messages will go to the list.Let me know how it works.>>I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
in the first place!)Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:30:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Well since it was I who replied to your message, I shall do so again.
And indeed it's going to the right place. Well done Marge.John Roberts.><<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
>that
>messages will go to the list.
>
>Let me know how it works.>>
>
>I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
>happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
>in the first place!)
>
>Peace,
>Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 07:35:08 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


On 11/13/01, John Roberts wrote:>Well since it was I who replied to your message, I shall do so again.
>And indeed it's going to the right place. Well done Marge.I have replied to all four messages so far (didn't send the first
one because my mail server was out last night). All four went back
to Ballad-L. Several were from people who have reply-to headers
in their mail.So, yes, I think you can declare it officially fixed.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:06:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:43:29AM -0600, Paul Stamler wrote:> Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>> <<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
> that
> messages will go to the list.
>
> Let me know how it works.>>
>
> I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
> happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
> in the first place!)        O.K.  I'll reply to it, but it isn't necessary, since I could
see the "Reply-To: " (which I've left quoted above from the headers.)        Thanks, Marge,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:42:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Paul Stamler wrote:
>
> <<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
> that
> messages will go to the list.
>
> Let me know how it works.>>
>
> I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
> happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
> in the first place!)
>
> Peace,
> PaulPaul,You did not bring it up in the first place.If you look at the messages with subject 'Reply-to:' in the Ballad-L
Archives for March of 1999, you will see that I raised the issue then,
but we were told the listserv server was configured 'correctly', with
the implication that nothing could be done to change it. After 2 1/2
years we now have the server configured the way I would call 'correct'.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:52:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
configuration here.Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to
Ballad-L as the listserv server is presently configured.  Is it
the email address from which the message was posted, or that
given in the 'Reply to' specified by the poster in his/her email
setup? I've put a fake 'Reply to' address, [unmask],
into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:01:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
> configuration here.
>
> Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
> see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to
> Ballad-L as the listserv server is presently configured.  Is it
> the email address from which the message was posted, or that
> given in the 'Reply to' specified by the poster in his/her email
> setup? I've put a fake 'Reply to' address, [unmask],
> into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
> it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
> I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.
>
> Bruce Olson
> --
> Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
> broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
> or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>
> Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.'From:' seems to be the address from which the message was posted, so I
don't know what you can do if you want off-list replies to go to a
different email address than the one you posted from.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:46:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:01:43PM -0500, Bruce Olson wrote:> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >
> > Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
> > configuration here.
> >
> > Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
> > see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to        [ ... ]> > into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
> > it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
> > I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.        [ ... ]> 'From:' seems to be the address from which the message was posted, so I
> don't know what you can do if you want off-list replies to go to a
> different email address than the one you posted from.        Learn how to forge your headers. :-)        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:24:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


DoN. Nichols wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:01:43PM -0500, Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> > Bruce Olson wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
> > > configuration here.
> > >
> > > Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
> > > see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > > into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
> > > it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
> > > I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > 'From:' seems to be the address from which the message was posted, so I
> > don't know what you can do if you want off-list replies to go to a
> > different email address than the one you posted from.
>
>         Learn how to forge your headers. :-)
>
>         Enjoy,
>                 DoN.
>
> --
>  Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>         (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>            --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---Or add a reply-to address into your message, or put a reply-to address
in the signature file that you put at the end of the messsages you send
(if you have made such).Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 00:43:42 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(57 lines)


> Lani asks about meter as a determiner or identifier.  In her thesis on
> "tune families," Anne Dhu Shapiro cites it as just one factor, a theory
> with which I concur.  George Pullen Jackson in his four works on the white
> spiritual identifies hundreds of long meter (6 and 7 beats per line)
> tunes.  If meter alone were of much help in identifying tunes, I suspect
> he would have grouped many more of these tunes in "families" or
> "clusters."Tune classification has very little to do with what I was asking; if you
look through the list of tunes you get from an unusual metre in "Le Cle
du Caveau", you won't get very many tunes but they will be *totally*
unrelated to each other by any musical criterion beyond fitting the same
text.What I'm after is knowing *exactly* what tune a broadside-monger had
in mind.  A tune in the same general family from an unrelated time
and place is no use to me at all.  If I get a bunch of candidates from
the same time and place (e.g. known in Edinburgh at the time of the 1832
cholera) I can sift them on a textual basis - which one would make for
the most apt parody, given the usual words people thought of for it then?As I said, in three of the examples I listed I can't think of EVEN ONE
tune that fits.  I'd be delighted to get a list of hundreds of tunes,
I could search it a lot more productively than a list of *zero* tunes,
which is where I'm at just now.  I'm quite used to reading the whole of
Gore's fiddle tune index from cover to cover at a sitting looking for
one relevant item.: Please, let me ask for a small step backwards:  I am aware
: that there are many collections of hymns which include detailed
: summaries of the verse patterns, usually in the form of a series
: of numbers indicating the number of syllables in each line of a
: verse, e.g. 7,7,7,7, or 8,6,8,6.
:  Would that be the basis of the projected 'index'?  Or some other
: metric measurement?I can't get at "Le Cle du Caveau" any more to check, but it was a bit
more sophisticated than that - typically with a French song you mix
masculine and feminine rhymes together in equal proportions in a
distinctive pattern, and the classification took account of this (in
your notation you might get something like 7M,7F,7F,7M, which cuts the
search space down by a factor of 6).  The one time I really needed
to use it, it got me bang onto a tune with an obvious (in hindsight)
historical connection to my target text in a couple of minutes.  It
really is an effective tool.The rhyme pattern of that cholera song (three matching masculine rhymes
and an unrhymed dactylic ending) is so unusual that, even if you were
to ignore all other metric features, it must cut the search space down
to a handful of items from the total corpus of English song.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:43:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>  > Lani asks about meter as a determiner or identifier.  In her thesis on
>>  "tune families," Anne Dhu Shapiro cites it as just one factor, a theory
>  > with which I concur.In my analysis, I would not include meter at all when looking at melody.--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 17:10:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Are you ready to gnash your teeth, folks?One of the newer universities in England threw out all its folk books a
couple of years back. Allegedly it needed the shelf space. So... A friend
of mine picked up 1 full set of Bronson for £5 in total, and then another
set missing volume 4 for another fiver. They were going to give it away
because of the missing volume............Anyone got a spare volume 4?CheersSimon

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Ship in the Sky" Returns
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:47:15 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Sorry to be so late in responding to this.  To my ear, the tune is not
"Wreck of Old 97" or "Ship that Never Returned" (which is much the same
tune), but is much closer to Carson Robison's "Wreck of Number Nine" ("On a
cold winter's night....").
Norm

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Ship in the Sky" Returns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:10:28 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Norm:I will file your suggestion away with the others received.  Trouble is, I
can't write in my supposedly authoritative biography that Guthrie MAY have
used this or that tune.But I will figure out a way to blame you folks for not giving me a firm
answer.EdOn Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Norm Cohen wrote:> Sorry to be so late in responding to this.  To my ear, the tune is not
> "Wreck of Old 97" or "Ship that Never Returned" (which is much the same
> tune), but is much closer to Carson Robison's "Wreck of Number Nine" ("On a
> cold winter's night....").
> Norm
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More Ebay Finds
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:13:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Hi!        Here I am again! One particular seller seems to have a number of
auctions of folklore books from the 1920's and 1930's.        1486384241 Folklore from the Schoharie Hills, New York by
Gardner published 1937
        1486422505 - Folklore from Maryland by Whitney & Canfield 1925
        1486419312 - Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads by
Wimberly published in 1928
        1486423534 - Folk Songs of Old New England by Linscott 1939
        1486421363 - Ballads and Songs of Southern Michigan by Gardner &
Chickering published in 1939        Other items of interest:        1486429566 - Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border by Scot not sure
what edition
        1486011285 - Percy's Reliques (volume 1 of 2)
        1485360285 - 4 issues of the New York Folklore Quarterly dated
between May, 1945 and winter, 1946
        1485492499 - Colcord Songs of American Sailormen 1938                Hope that there is something of interest here!                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Addition to Ebay List
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:43:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Hi Again!        Sorry to be back so soon but I found this after sending the last
email.        1486409612 - English Folk Songs from the Southern Appalachians
                        Cecil Sharp 1960 edition                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Addition to Ebay List
From: Patricia Lee Conroy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 18 Nov 2001 08:14:28 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Dolores, what is the price of Sharp's English Folk Songs from the Southern
Appalachians (1960)?
Thanks, Patricia Conroy----- Original Message -----
From: "Dolores Nichols" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: Addition to Ebay List> Hi Again!
>
>         Sorry to be back so soon but I found this after sending the last
> email.
>
>         1486409612 - English Folk Songs from the Southern Appalachians
>                         Cecil Sharp 1960 edition
>
>                                 Dolores
>
> --
> Dolores Nichols                 |
> D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
> Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
>         --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Addition to Ebay List
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:51:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 08:14:28AM -0800, Patricia Lee Conroy wrote:
>
> Dolores, what is the price of Sharp's English Folk Songs from the Southern
> Appalachians (1960)?
> Thanks, Patricia ConroyPatricia,        The copy of Sharp's English Folk Songs from the Southern
Appalachians is currently at $12.50 with 2 bids and closes on Nov. 25.
It is hard to predict what will happen to the price. Most of these
folklore books don't get a lot of bids and this is the Thanksgiving
weekend so that may also keep the price down.                Good luck if you decide to bid on it!                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 01:05:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
The gin was getting low
I scarcely think we'll get a little drink
Till we get to Buffalo-ho-hoNot much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?Thanks in advance.All the best,
Dan Milner

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:33:12 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(29 lines)


Dan:The earliest printed text I have in my library is in Carl Sandburg's
_American Songbag,_ published in 1927 (p. 180).Lomax and Lomax, _American Ballads and Folk Songs_ (1934), pp. 455-474,
has a clutch of "Erie Canal" songs, including one variant said to be sung
at the Alhambra Varieties in Buffalo, NY, in the eighteen eighties, and
another, taken from the "Negro Foreget-Me-Not Songster" (Cincinnati:
Bratton and Barnard, 1848) on pp. 471, which has two of the verses
in the "Erie Canal" in Sandburg.EdOn Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Dan Milner wrote:> Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
> The gin was getting low
> I scarcely think we'll get a little drink
> Till we get to Buffalo-ho-ho
>
> Not much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
> Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> All the best,
> Dan Milner
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:43:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Dan:
>
> The earliest printed text I have in my library is in Carl Sandburg's
> _American Songbag,_ published in 1927 (p. 180).
>
> Lomax and Lomax, _American Ballads and Folk Songs_ (1934), pp. 455-474,
> has a clutch of "Erie Canal" songs, including one variant said to be sung
> at the Alhambra Varieties in Buffalo, NY, in the eighteen eighties, and
> another, taken from the "Negro Foreget-Me-Not Songster" (Cincinnati:
> Bratton and Barnard, 1848) on pp. 471, which has two of the verses
> in the "Erie Canal" in Sandburg.
>
> Ed
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Dan Milner wrote:
>
> > Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
> > The gin was getting low
> > I scarcely think we'll get a little drink
> > Till we get to Buffalo-ho-ho
> >
> > Not much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
> > Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Dan Milner
> >The storm near Albany on the way (from New York) to Bufflao
may well be the same as that in the comic song "The Raging Canal",
and I suspect "The E-R-I-E" was inspired by that song. The Levy sheet
music collection has copies of "The Raging Canal" of 1844.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:28:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 01:05:40 -0500, Dan Milner wrote:>Not much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
>Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?
>
I suspect that this, like many canal songs, has an elderly but
never-printed bawdy side.  Lomax (see Ed's post) seems to say just that.
While you're looking, you may wish to also check for the non-parlor
versions.Dyer-Bennet notes he actually collected the following in Portland, Maine
and later heard Burl Ives sing a nearly identical version.As sung by Richard Dyer-Bennett on _1601_, R D-B Records, 1962.             The Eer-i-e Canal        We were forty miles from Albany
        Forget it I never shall;
        What a hell-of-a storm we had one night
        On the Eer-i-e Canal.        cho:    O the Eer-i-e was a-rising
                And the gin was a-getting low.
                And I scarcely think we'll get a drink
                'Till we get to Buffalo-o-o
                'Till we get to Buffalo.        The captain, he come up on deck
        With a spy-glass in his hand;
        But the fog, it was so fuckin' thick
        That he could not see the land.        Our cook, she was a grand old gal,
        She wore a ragged dress;
        We h'isted her upon a pole
        As a signal of distress.        The captain, he got married,
        And the cook was tossed in jail,
        And I'm the only son-of-a-bitch
        That's left to tell the tale.The Erie Canal opened from Lake Erie to the Hudson River on Oct. 10, 1825
so that's your earliest possible date.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
                        Boycott South Carolina!
        http://www.naacp.org/news/releases/confederateflag011201.shtml

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Reprints
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:31:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
<http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
reprints, but it is available.John Roberts.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:33:23 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> reprints, but it is available.        Hmm ... I wonder which version they chose to reprint.  We have
a very old reprint, which I understand left out some of the more
"interesting" songs which were in the original.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:04:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


I do believe it was taken from the Folklore Associates reprint of
about 1960 (?)  though I may well be wrong on this.John.>On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:
>
>> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
>> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
>> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
>> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
>> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
>> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
>> reprints, but it is available.
>
>        Hmm ... I wonder which version they chose to reprint.  We have
>a very old reprint, which I understand left out some of the more
>"interesting" songs which were in the original.
>
>        Enjoy,
>                DoN.
>
>--
> Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:18:16 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


John and Others:This is interesting.  Ken Goldstein in 1959 reprinted _Pills_ in three
volumes.  I wonder just how many copies he sold, and how many Higginson
has run.EdOn Tue, 20 Nov 2001, John Roberts wrote:> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> reprints, but it is available.
>
> John Roberts.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:49:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Yes Ed, I think that's the one they used. Apparently reprinters can't
copyright the book, only new material such as an introduction, so
they could use it to base theirs on. (So I was a year off...).I believe the current edition is "print on demand." I could find out
all the details if you really wanted to know. I made the original
suggestion to a fiddling friend who works there, as it was a book I'd
lusted after for some time. It was close enough to their main
genealogy/history theme for them to do it, especially as one of their
employees is a musician specializing music of the  Colonial period.John.>John and Others:
>
>This is interesting.  Ken Goldstein in 1959 reprinted _Pills_ in three
>volumes.  I wonder just how many copies he sold, and how many Higginson
>has run.
>
>Ed
>
>
>On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, John Roberts wrote:
>
>> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
>> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
>> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
>> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
>> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
>> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
>> reprints, but it is available.
>>
>> John Roberts.
>>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:02:28 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


John noted that the Pills was available "on demand."  I've noticed quite a
few reprints of scarce old ballad books are being offered by one outfit
called, I believe, "Books on Demand."  They have access to a copyable copy
and reprint it, dog-eared and all, as requested.  The prices are rather high
(the few I noted were in the couple hundred $ range).
Norm Cohen> Yes Ed, I think that's the one they used. Apparently reprinters can't
> copyright the book, only new material such as an introduction, so
> they could use it to base theirs on. (So I was a year off...).
>
> I believe the current edition is "print on demand." I could find out
> all the details if you really wanted to know. I made the original
> suggestion to a fiddling friend who works there, as it was a book I'd
> lusted after for some time. It was close enough to their main
> genealogy/history theme for them to do it, especially as one of their
> employees is a musician specializing music of the  Colonial period.
>
> John.
> >>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:13:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
marriage'TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
emigration'TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
rural working men & women'TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
false lovers'TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
frolics'TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
national issues'TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
amorous encounters'TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
& Welsh travellers & gypsies'TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
shore'TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
'The joys & curse of drink'TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
courtship & marriage'TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
Seasonal events'TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
& poaching'TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
song'CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
loves traditional music.Please let me know if you're interested

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:21:15 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(106 lines)


Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of recording
credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
collectors and researchers.Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
>
>
>
> If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
>
> These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
>
> TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> marriage'
>
> TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
>
> TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
>
> TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> emigration'
>
> TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> rural working men & women'
>
> TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> false lovers'
>
> TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> frolics'
>
> TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> national issues'
>
> TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
>
> TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> amorous encounters'
>
> TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
>
> TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> shore'
>
> TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> 'The joys & curse of drink'
>
> TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
>
> TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> courtship & marriage'
>
> TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> Seasonal events'
>
> TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
>
> TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> & poaching'
>
> TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
>
> TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> song'
>
>
> CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> loves traditional music.
>
> Please let me know if you're interested
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:42:01 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(117 lines)


This benighted Canadian presumes the $300 is in US dollars? (c. $500 Can).
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ruairidh Greig" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of
recording
> credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
> collectors and researchers.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
> Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
>
> > CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> > of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> > Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> > ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> > Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> > McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> > Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> > Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> > Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> > Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> > Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> > Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> > Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> > John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> > Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> > Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> > Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> > Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> > Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
> >
> > These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> > indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> > material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> > each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
> >
> > TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> > marriage'
> >
> > TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> > sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
> >
> > TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
> >
> > TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> > emigration'
> >
> > TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> > rural working men & women'
> >
> > TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> > false lovers'
> >
> > TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> > frolics'
> >
> > TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> > national issues'
> >
> > TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
> >
> > TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> > amorous encounters'
> >
> > TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> > & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
> >
> > TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> > shore'
> >
> > TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> > 'The joys & curse of drink'
> >
> > TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
> >
> > TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> > courtship & marriage'
> >
> > TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> > Seasonal events'
> >
> > TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
> >
> > TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> > & poaching'
> >
> > TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
> >
> > TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> > song'
> >
> >
> > CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> > been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> > complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> > wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> > loves traditional music.
> >
> > Please let me know if you're interested
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:50:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(128 lines)


Read more carefully Jon! (Read beday and not beknight, perhaps).
That's $200. And a deal I would jump at, myself, if I didn't have
them already.JR>This benighted Canadian presumes the $300 is in US dollars? (c. $500 Can).
>Jon>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ruairidh Greig" <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
>Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
>
>> Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of
>recording
>> credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
>> collectors and researchers.
>>
>> Ruairidh Greig
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
>> To: <[unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
>> Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>>
>>
>> > CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
>> > of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
>> > Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
>> > ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
>> > Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
>> > McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
>> > Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
>> > Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
>> > Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
>> > Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
>> > Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
>> > Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
>> > Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
>> > John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
>> > Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
>> > Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
>> > Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
>> > Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
>> > Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
>> >
>> > These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
>> > indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
>> > material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
>> > each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
>> >
>> > TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
>> > marriage'
>> >
>> > TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
>> > sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
>> >
>> > TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
>> >
>> > TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
>> > emigration'
>> >
>> > TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
>> > rural working men & women'
>> >
>> > TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
>> > false lovers'
>> >
>> > TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
>> > frolics'
>> >
>> > TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
>> > national issues'
>> >
>> > TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
>> >
>> > TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
>> > amorous encounters'
>> >
>> > TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
>> > & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
>> >
>> > TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
>> > shore'
>> >
>> > TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
>> > 'The joys & curse of drink'
>> >
>> > TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
>> >
>> > TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
>> > courtship & marriage'
>> >
>> > TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
>> > Seasonal events'
>> >
>> > TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
>> >
>> > TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
>> > & poaching'
>> >
>> > TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
>> >
>> > TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
>> > song'
>> >
>> >
>> > CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
>> > been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
>> > complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
>> > wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
>> > loves traditional music.
>> >
>> > Please let me know if you're interested
>> >
>>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:29:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(127 lines)


Hi Dick!I was not aware that you have been offering individual items from The Voice
of the People for $12.98.  We have a few of the CDs already and I will get a
few more from you at that price.Without differing that VOTP is a monumental collection and as much as I
respect your opinion and good work, I have to differ with the bracketed part
of your statement, "These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and
Bert Lloyd (and indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer)
learned their material from."  With regard to Ireland, there is a vibrant
song tradition in many parts of the country and many people with anywhere
from a few to a truckload of songs that were learned only from people only
in their own locality plus other people who have combed libraries and every
other possible source for "new" old songs.  Certainly, many well known
singers have specialized in songs from the repertoires of Joe Heaney, Paddy
Tunney or Geordie Hanna, for example, but the output of commercial
recordings does not accurately reflect the scene at large.  There's a little
too much paint on your brush!Please send me an e-mail about your movements in the near future and I'll
arrange to get a few VOTP CDs from you.  Thanks for letting us know.All the best,
Dan Milner----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
>
>
>
> If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
>
> These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
>
> TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> marriage'
>
> TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
>
> TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
>
> TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> emigration'
>
> TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> rural working men & women'
>
> TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> false lovers'
>
> TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> frolics'
>
> TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> national issues'
>
> TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
>
> TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> amorous encounters'
>
> TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
>
> TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> shore'
>
> TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> 'The joys & curse of drink'
>
> TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
>
> TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> courtship & marriage'
>
> TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> Seasonal events'
>
> TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
>
> TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> & poaching'
>
> TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
>
> TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> song'
>
>
> CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> loves traditional music.
>
> Please let me know if you're interested

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:32:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Caroline and I both jumped, she by phone as a surprise present for me,
me by e-pistle as a surprise present for her. Fortunately, Greenhaus
knew we really needed only one set! Nice to deal with a dealer who is
also a good friend.
        Sandy (Paton, that is -- not Ives -- "Hello, Sandy!")John Roberts wrote:
>
> Read more carefully Jon! (Read beday and not beknight, perhaps).
> That's $200. And a deal I would jump at, myself, if I didn't have
> them already.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:40:18 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


Dick:Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:06:29 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(5 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:19:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


There are extensive reviews of this set on the Musical Traditions page at:
http://www.mustrad.org.uk/(Oops - I just looked there and for some reason I get a "not found"
message - I should check)Anyway, it has very little to do with Peter Kennedy, much more to do
with Topic Records' archives, and, by association, with A.L. Lloyd.
Much of the material comes from out of print Topic LP releases of
traditional singers. The balance is mostly from unpublished field
recordings, selected by the compiler, Reg Hall, to fill in the gaps
in his conception of what the set was going to be. It is definitely a
one-man work, rather than an overview of the British tradition by
committee, though of course others gave him input.I don't know offhand if they used _any_ of Kennedy's recordings. I
recall they wanted to, for the Coppers, I yhink, as an example, but
there was some issue with him over copyright, and in the end I think
they may have decided to pursue other avenues.The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
as I get older I get less open-handed.John Roberts.>Dick:
>
>Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
>full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
>passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
>suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
>
>Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 22:00:00 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


For information
Peter Kennedy had nothing at all to do with the Voice of the People CDs -
they were produced and edited by Reg Hall, whose editorial standards are
well known.
There are no cut-down or cobbled together tracks.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> Dick:
>
> Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
> full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:55:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(121 lines)


That's $200 (US), Jon. Doesn't help the US/Canada exchange rate any, but it does
bring down the total.Jon Bartlett wrote:> This benighted Canadian presumes the $300 is in US dollars? (c. $500 Can).
> Jon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ruairidh Greig" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
> > Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of
> recording
> > credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
> > collectors and researchers.
> >
> > Ruairidh Greig
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
> > Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
> >
> >
> > > CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> > > of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> > > Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> > > ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> > > Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> > > McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> > > Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> > > Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> > > Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> > > Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> > > Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> > > Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> > > Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> > > John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> > > Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> > > Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> > > Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> > > Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> > > Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
> > >
> > > These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> > > indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> > > material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> > > each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
> > >
> > > TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> > > marriage'
> > >
> > > TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> > > sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
> > >
> > > TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
> > >
> > > TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> > > emigration'
> > >
> > > TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> > > rural working men & women'
> > >
> > > TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> > > false lovers'
> > >
> > > TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> > > frolics'
> > >
> > > TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> > > national issues'
> > >
> > > TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
> > >
> > > TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> > > amorous encounters'
> > >
> > > TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> > > & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
> > >
> > > TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> > > shore'
> > >
> > > TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> > > 'The joys & curse of drink'
> > >
> > > TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
> > >
> > > TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> > > courtship & marriage'
> > >
> > > TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> > > Seasonal events'
> > >
> > > TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
> > >
> > > TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> > > & poaching'
> > >
> > > TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
> > >
> > > TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> > > song'
> > >
> > >
> > > CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> > > been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> > > complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> > > wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> > > loves traditional music.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you're interested
> > >
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:02:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


I haven't  had time to listen to the entire set yet, but everything I've heard
has been complete. The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
five-pound sack.dickEd Cray wrote:> Dick:
>
> Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
> full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:59:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon series.
I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the original
LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if you
have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
Norm Cohen
>
> The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> as I get older I get less open-handed.
>
> John Roberts.
>
>
>
> >Dick:
> >
> >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are
the
> >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> >
> >Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:43:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


Norm-
I have no real information about this, but Rounder provided a gap in the
numbering between the second Classic Ballads volune and Songs of Seduction.
Could it be that the missing tracks may resurface (I no longer have my vinyl
copy, so I'm not sure exactly what was on which.dickNorm Cohen wrote:> I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon series.
> I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
> classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the original
> LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if you
> have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
> Norm Cohen
> >
> > The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> > collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> > material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> > Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> > Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> > where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> > the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> > all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> > I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> > as I get older I get less open-handed.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> >
> >
> >
> > >Dick:
> > >
> > >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are
> the
> > >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> > >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> > >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> > >
> > >Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: listserv will be unavailable from 10-5 on Friday
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:44:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi, folks.  I've been notified that our listserv will be unavailable on
friday, the 23rd, from ten to six, for a system upgrade.  Hope that that
won't mess things up for us all.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 00:51:44 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(95 lines)


I believe that the main reason Alan Lomax adopted a cut-and-paste approach
was that at the time he was making much of his living (certainly while in
Europe) as a radio presenter of 'folk music'. That's what you did on
documentaries in those days - you talked about the stuff, played a brief
snippet, talked, played another snippet and so on. This was especially
useful if you wanted to compare/contrast different approaches to the same
song, etc. And you only had half-an-hour..To be charitable, as someone else has commented - at the time, there was so
little material availble on record, and little prospect of there being much
more in the future, and the collectors were finding such a wealth of
material that they were under pressure to cram as much as possible into what
little 'space' they had. Remember that this was before the real Revival took
hold and expanded the market.What is a great great pity is that some of the Rounder CDs and some (not all
by any means) of Peter Kennedy's Folktrax issues continue this outdated
approach.To be less charitable: Alan Lomax had the example of his father (John)
before him. Some of John's books are notorious for their cut-and-splice
texts.There is an excellent article in the forthcoming issue of Folk Music Journal
(Vol.8:2, 2002), by E. David Gregory, called 'Lomax in London: the BBC and
the Folk-Song Revival in England'.Incidentally, I helped Reg Hall a bit with the Voice of the People series,
and I can state categorically that no material controlled by Peter Kennedy
was used. Partly because much of his material is already available on his
own Folktrax label. However, a brand new CD from Topic, also edited by Reg
Hall - 'Come Write Me Down', by the Copper Family uses many of PK's
recordings, and makes up for their absence on the VOTP series.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> Norm-
> I have no real information about this, but Rounder provided a gap in the
> numbering between the second Classic Ballads volune and Songs of
Seduction.
> Could it be that the missing tracks may resurface (I no longer have my
vinyl
> copy, so I'm not sure exactly what was on which.
>
> dick
>
> Norm Cohen wrote:
>
> > I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon
series.
> > I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
> > classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the
original
> > LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if
you
> > have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
> > Norm Cohen
> > >
> > > The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> > > collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> > > material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> > > Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> > > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > > of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> > > Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> > > where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> > > the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> > > all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> > > I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> > > as I get older I get less open-handed.
> > >
> > > John Roberts.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Dick:
> > > >
> > > >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts
are
> > the
> > > >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> > > >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a
comment
> > > >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> > > >
> > > >Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:00:08 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(111 lines)


Good People:Steve Roud sets the record (and me) straight.It was the Folktrax compilations that used snippets, not the Topic series
Dick Greenhaus has commended.  I apologize if I ruffled any feathers in my
ignorance.Happy Thanksgiving,EdOn Thu, 22 Nov 2001, roud wrote:> I believe that the main reason Alan Lomax adopted a cut-and-paste approach
> was that at the time he was making much of his living (certainly while in
> Europe) as a radio presenter of 'folk music'. That's what you did on
> documentaries in those days - you talked about the stuff, played a brief
> snippet, talked, played another snippet and so on. This was especially
> useful if you wanted to compare/contrast different approaches to the same
> song, etc. And you only had half-an-hour..
>
> To be charitable, as someone else has commented - at the time, there was so
> little material availble on record, and little prospect of there being much
> more in the future, and the collectors were finding such a wealth of
> material that they were under pressure to cram as much as possible into what
> little 'space' they had. Remember that this was before the real Revival took
> hold and expanded the market.
>
> What is a great great pity is that some of the Rounder CDs and some (not all
> by any means) of Peter Kennedy's Folktrax issues continue this outdated
> approach.
>
> To be less charitable: Alan Lomax had the example of his father (John)
> before him. Some of John's books are notorious for their cut-and-splice
> texts.
>
> There is an excellent article in the forthcoming issue of Folk Music Journal
> (Vol.8:2, 2002), by E. David Gregory, called 'Lomax in London: the BBC and
> the Folk-Song Revival in England'.
>
> Incidentally, I helped Reg Hall a bit with the Voice of the People series,
> and I can state categorically that no material controlled by Peter Kennedy
> was used. Partly because much of his material is already available on his
> own Folktrax label. However, a brand new CD from Topic, also edited by Reg
> Hall - 'Come Write Me Down', by the Copper Family uses many of PK's
> recordings, and makes up for their absence on the VOTP series.
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
>
> > Norm-
> > I have no real information about this, but Rounder provided a gap in the
> > numbering between the second Classic Ballads volune and Songs of
> Seduction.
> > Could it be that the missing tracks may resurface (I no longer have my
> vinyl
> > copy, so I'm not sure exactly what was on which.
> >
> > dick
> >
> > Norm Cohen wrote:
> >
> > > I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon
> series.
> > > I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
> > > classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the
> original
> > > LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if
> you
> > > have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
> > > Norm Cohen
> > > >
> > > > The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> > > > collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> > > > material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> > > > Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> > > > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > > > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > > > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > > > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > > > of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> > > > Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> > > > where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> > > > the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> > > > all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> > > > I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> > > > as I get older I get less open-handed.
> > > >
> > > > John Roberts.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Dick:
> > > > >
> > > > >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts
> are
> > > the
> > > > >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> > > > >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a
> comment
> > > > >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> > > > >
> > > > >Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re-editing Caedmon
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 02:03:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(162 lines)


Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:>The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
>which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
>and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
>releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
>partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
>LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
>five-pound sack.
>
[and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]I wrote (less graciously):> For example, at least three the
> Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> of bits of performances.Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
topic has changed.THE ELFIN KNIGHTTwo versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
primarily Bob & Ron).Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
on the CD. Full marks to PK.FALSE KNIGHTThe CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
which only has the Quinn version.LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHTOn CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
recording, and is complete.DOUGLAS TRAGEDYA recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
equivalent on the LPTWA SISTERS (Binnorie)The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
"Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
from Ord.On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.LORD RANDALThe CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
something?]EDWARDTwo different collages!The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
verses are in the CD notes.The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
included.Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
"omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
mentioned above.KING ORFEOThe audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.THE CRUEL MOTHERThe CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
apparently his complete version.THE BROOMFIELD WAGERThe LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
from the LP, is also returned._____
Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
performance that draws the audience into the story.John Roberts.
John Roberts.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:36:58 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(177 lines)


Great thanks to John Roberts for this bit of sleuthing.  I agree
wholeheartedly - give us the ballad, the whole ballad and nothing but the
ballad (tho I must say that the "collages" are wonderful teaching tools,
particularly for students with no notion of the folk process).
Jon Bartlett
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Roberts" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: Re-editing Caedmon> Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:
>
> >The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
> >which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of
Britain
> >and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
> >releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
> >partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations
on
> >LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds
into a
> >five-pound sack.
> >
> [and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]
>
> I wrote (less graciously):
>
> > For example, at least three the
> > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > of bits of performances.
>
>
> Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
> I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
> LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
> in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
> so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
> delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
> topic has changed.
>
>
> THE ELFIN KNIGHT
>
> Two versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
> 9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
> because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
> primarily Bob & Ron).
>
> Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
> on the CD. Full marks to PK.
>
>
> FALSE KNIGHT
>
> The CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
> Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
> for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
> the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
> which only has the Quinn version.
>
>
> LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHT
>
> On CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
> LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
> in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
> recording, and is complete.
>
>
> DOUGLAS TRAGEDY
>
> A recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
> equivalent on the LP
>
>
> TWA SISTERS (Binnorie)
>
> The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
> "Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
> from Ord.
>
> On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
> John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
> Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.
>
>
> LORD RANDAL
>
> The CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
> Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
> the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
> from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
> translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
> version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
> the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
> something?]
>
>
> EDWARD
>
> Two different collages!
>
> The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
> version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
> 2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
> verses are in the CD notes.
>
> The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
> Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
> included.
>
> Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
> will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
> the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
> this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
> employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.
>
> The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
> "omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
> verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
> The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
> the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
> mentioned above.
>
>
> KING ORFEO
>
> The audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
> LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
> this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
> showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.
>
>
> THE CRUEL MOTHER
>
> The CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
> gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
> Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
> booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
> more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
> copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
> her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
> Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.
>
> On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
> apparently his complete version.
>
>
> THE BROOMFIELD WAGER
>
> The LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
> On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
> the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
> from the LP, is also returned.
>
> _____
> Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
> while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
> comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
> I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
> with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
> withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
> wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
> and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
> pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
> something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
> no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
> particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
> performance that draws the audience into the story.
>
> John Roberts.
> John Roberts.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Gerald Porter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:52:24 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


I have a 'first edition' of Pills to Purge Melancholy given me by a
neighbour who died earlier this year.  Now I've been told that the set
was reprinted page-for-page in the middle of the nineteenth century,
even down to using the original date (1719-20).  Can anyone let me know
how I can tell whether I have the original 1st edition or not (all
right, I know there were other editions before 1719, but they were
considerably shorter)?  It's not self-evident from the condition of the
volumes.Gerald PorterOn Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:
>
> > Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> > that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> > the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> > <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> > nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> > yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> > reprints, but it is available.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:01:07 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


> I have a 'first edition' of Pills to Purge Melancholy given me by a
> neighbour who died earlier this year.  Now I've been told that the set
> was reprinted page-for-page in the middle of the nineteenth century,
> even down to using the original date (1719-20).  Can anyone let me
> know how I can tell whether I have the original 1st edition or not
> [...] It's not self-evident from the condition of the volumes.Watermarks.  Take it to a good reference library and ask them to help.
The rare book room at the National Library of Scotland has books of
watermarks covering the whole history of printing and special lights
for transilluminating pages without burning holes in them.  I've never
done it myself, but from the number of people I've seen at it, it can't
be difficult.You could just transilluminate a page and trace the watermark yourself,
then put a scan of the tracing on the web.  If somebody here has a copy
known to be either the original or the reprint they could then tell you
if yours matches what they've got.=================== <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> ===================

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:19:55 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(172 lines)


Many  thanx, John. The problem with being in this business is the very real risk of learning something.dick
>
> From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
> Date: 2001/11/22 Thu AM 01:03:15 CST
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re-editing Caedmon
>
> Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:
>
> >The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
> >which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
> >and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
> >releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
> >partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
> >LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
> >five-pound sack.
> >
> [and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]
>
> I wrote (less graciously):
>
> > For example, at least three the
> > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > of bits of performances.
>
>
> Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
> I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
> LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
> in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
> so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
> delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
> topic has changed.
>
>
> THE ELFIN KNIGHT
>
> Two versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
> 9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
> because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
> primarily Bob & Ron).
>
> Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
> on the CD. Full marks to PK.
>
>
> FALSE KNIGHT
>
> The CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
> Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
> for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
> the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
> which only has the Quinn version.
>
>
> LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHT
>
> On CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
> LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
> in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
> recording, and is complete.
>
>
> DOUGLAS TRAGEDY
>
> A recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
> equivalent on the LP
>
>
> TWA SISTERS (Binnorie)
>
> The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
> "Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
> from Ord.
>
> On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
> John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
> Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.
>
>
> LORD RANDAL
>
> The CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
> Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
> the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
> from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
> translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
> version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
> the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
> something?]
>
>
> EDWARD
>
> Two different collages!
>
> The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
> version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
> 2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
> verses are in the CD notes.
>
> The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
> Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
> included.
>
> Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
> will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
> the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
> this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
> employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.
>
> The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
> "omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
> verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
> The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
> the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
> mentioned above.
>
>
> KING ORFEO
>
> The audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
> LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
> this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
> showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.
>
>
> THE CRUEL MOTHER
>
> The CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
> gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
> Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
> booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
> more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
> copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
> her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
> Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.
>
> On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
> apparently his complete version.
>
>
> THE BROOMFIELD WAGER
>
> The LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
> On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
> the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
> from the LP, is also returned.
>
> _____
> Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
> while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
> comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
> I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
> with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
> withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
> wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
> and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
> pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
> something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
> no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
> particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
> performance that draws the audience into the story.
>
> John Roberts.
> John Roberts.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:28:18 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(43 lines)


Gerald and Others:Cyrus L. Day's introduction to the Folklore Library reprint of 1959 of the
six volumes (in three) of _Pills to Purge Melancholy_ offers this
information (p. x): In 1876, the six volumes of the 1719-1720 _Pills_ were
reprinted anonymously -- presumably by J.S. Farmer.  "Except that the long
's' is abandoned, the pages look almost exactly like the pages of the
original edition.  The text, though not impeccable, is extraordinarily
accurate."In short, look for the long "s."Now, I've got to go stuff a turkey.Happy Thanksgiving to all --EdOn Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gerald Porter wrote:> I have a 'first edition' of Pills to Purge Melancholy given me by a
> neighbour who died earlier this year.  Now I've been told that the set
> was reprinted page-for-page in the middle of the nineteenth century,
> even down to using the original date (1719-20).  Can anyone let me know
> how I can tell whether I have the original 1st edition or not (all
> right, I know there were other editions before 1719, but they were
> considerably shorter)?  It's not self-evident from the condition of the
> volumes.
>
> Gerald Porter
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> > > that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> > > the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> > > <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> > > nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> > > yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> > > reprints, but it is available.
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:08:51 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(185 lines)


BTW, John-Musical Traditions has released a CD of Cyril Poacher in which he sings Broomfield Wager without the "Hold the Wheel"
shouted chorus. Did PK excise it from the CD version, or was it a different performance?>
> From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
> Date: 2001/11/22 Thu AM 10:19:55 CST
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
>
> Many  thanx, John. The problem with being in this business is the very real risk of learning something.
>
> dick
> >
> > From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
> > Date: 2001/11/22 Thu AM 01:03:15 CST
> > To: [unmask]
> > Subject: Re-editing Caedmon
> >
> > Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:
> >
> > >The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
> > >which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
> > >and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
> > >releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
> > >partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
> > >LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
> > >five-pound sack.
> > >
> > [and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]
> >
> > I wrote (less graciously):
> >
> > > For example, at least three the
> > > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > > of bits of performances.
> >
> >
> > Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
> > I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
> > LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
> > in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
> > so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
> > delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
> > topic has changed.
> >
> >
> > THE ELFIN KNIGHT
> >
> > Two versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
> > 9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
> > because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
> > primarily Bob & Ron).
> >
> > Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
> > on the CD. Full marks to PK.
> >
> >
> > FALSE KNIGHT
> >
> > The CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
> > Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
> > for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
> > the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
> > which only has the Quinn version.
> >
> >
> > LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHT
> >
> > On CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
> > LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
> > in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
> > recording, and is complete.
> >
> >
> > DOUGLAS TRAGEDY
> >
> > A recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
> > equivalent on the LP
> >
> >
> > TWA SISTERS (Binnorie)
> >
> > The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
> > "Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
> > from Ord.
> >
> > On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
> > John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
> > Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.
> >
> >
> > LORD RANDAL
> >
> > The CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
> > Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
> > the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
> > from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
> > translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
> > version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
> > the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
> > something?]
> >
> >
> > EDWARD
> >
> > Two different collages!
> >
> > The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
> > version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
> > 2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
> > verses are in the CD notes.
> >
> > The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
> > Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
> > included.
> >
> > Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
> > will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
> > the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
> > this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
> > employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.
> >
> > The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
> > "omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
> > verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
> > The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
> > the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
> > mentioned above.
> >
> >
> > KING ORFEO
> >
> > The audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
> > LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
> > this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
> > showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.
> >
> >
> > THE CRUEL MOTHER
> >
> > The CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
> > gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
> > Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
> > booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
> > more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
> > copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
> > her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
> > Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.
> >
> > On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
> > apparently his complete version.
> >
> >
> > THE BROOMFIELD WAGER
> >
> > The LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
> > On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
> > the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
> > from the LP, is also returned.
> >
> > _____
> > Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
> > while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
> > comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
> > I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
> > with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
> > withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
> > wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
> > and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
> > pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
> > something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
> > no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
> > particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
> > performance that draws the audience into the story.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> > John Roberts.
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:36:43 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(15 lines) , text/html(11 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:48:27 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(55 lines) , text/enriched(62 lines)


This particular recording was made in September, 1974, at Cyril's
home. I don't have the MT recording, but I do have Tony Engle's
recording of the same song (from the Topic LP), from sessions
recorded in August and September of the same year, so they must be
very close. The MT notes say: "On Cyril's earlier recording, made by
the BBC (Child Ballads Vol I, Topic 12T160), the singer and audience
constantly interject the phrase 'hold the wheel'.  This allegedly
arose as a result of the singer trying to explain the story to a
visiting yachtsman who misunderstood 'had his way' as 'hold the
wheel', but by the 1970s Cyril had gone back to the old way of
singing it."The notes to the Topic LP give the same explanation, except the
phrase is 'had his will'; they add that "Cyril prefers to sing the
song without it."So we have two time periods, but also two different social
situations. In the pub in 1957, not only was the "hold the wheel"
chorus added, but the performance included the common refrain of
repeating the last half of each verse. Cyril certainly leads this
refrain, singing it through in the first couple of verses, and
starting it off in the following ones. He does not, however, join in
on the  "hold the wheel." At home, a good many years later, with no
audience, we don't get the refrain or the chorus. I wonder, even
though by the 1970s the "hold the wheel" was apparently dropped in
the pub, if his audience there would let him go to the next verse
without the repeat.To try to answer your specific question, Kennedy's CD version was the
same performance as on the LP. Someone jumped the gun a bit, adding
the "hold the wheel" between the first verse and refrain rather than
after the refrain, and PK chose to snip that out of the LP version.John Roberts.In a message dated 11/23/2001 12:08:45 AM GMT Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:Musical Traditions has released a CD of Cyril Poacher in which he
sings Broomfield Wager without the "Hold the Wheel"
shouted chorus. Did PK excise it from the CD version, or was it a
different performance?Different performance - these recording were made around 1965 by Mike
Yates, Ginette Dunn, Keith Summers and others - not a Kennedy in
sight.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More Ebay Auctions
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:43:00 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


Hi!        I hope that everyone (in the US) had a good Thanksgiving
yesterday!!        Well, individual volumes of various editions of Child keep
appearing. This week it is volume V of the 1957 Folklore Press edition.
        Auction 1487613456 for those who are interested.        Other auctions of possible interest:        The Ballad Book by Leach 1487452966
        Anglo-American Folksong Style by Abrahams & Foss 1487474731
        Folk Songs of the Kentucky Mountains by McGill (1917) 1487462202
        Come A Singing! Canadian Folk-Songs (1973 reprint) by Barbeau,
Lismer & Bourinot 1487469818
        A Canadian Song Book (1960 edition) by MacMillan 1487470664One of the Peter Kennedy CDs that we have been discussing has appeared
on Ebay - Harry Cox's What will become of England Recorded in Norfolk &
London, England in 1953 by Lomax and Kennedy Auction #1488204665.                                Happy Bidding!
                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:20:09 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On the principle that people around this list have better
backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
what will probably prove a dumb question.When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
And wished that my Annie that day had then died.Note the metrical pattern:U-U U-U || U-U -U(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
|| is the caesura)Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
The books don't even admit it exists; it's not an iamb
or a dactyl or a trochee or an anapest or a spondee. I
tried five different references, and those are the only
five feet they mentions.Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
Book_ (#XXII):First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
And there cam bonnetmen following the pleughAny other suggestions?
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:24:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:20:09 -0600, you wrote:>On the principle that people around this list have better
>backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
>what will probably prove a dumb question.
>
>When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
>the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>
>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
>Note the metrical pattern:
>
>U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
>(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
>|| is the caesura)
>
>Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
>that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
>Book_ (#XXII):
>
>First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
>And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>
>Any other suggestions?Isn't it more like:
U-U U-U || U-U U-
because the lines end on a stressed syllable?Not traditional, but 'Dancing at Whitsun'
The tune's nearly the same as 'Jamie Foyers' so that's another one.
At least one version of 'Bonnie Light Horseman'?
It seems to me it would be a common pattern for songs in 3/4 time, but I
may be missing something.Jeri Corlew

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Martin Ryan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:06:51 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Is it not an iamb followed by three anapaests?Deep in the recesses of my mind lurks:"I sprang to the stirrup and Joris and he
I galloped, he galloped, we galloped all threeRegardsMartin Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: 26 November 2001 15:03
Subject: Strange Metrical Question>On the principle that people around this list have better
>backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
>what will probably prove a dumb question.
>
>When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
>the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>
>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
>Note the metrical pattern:
>
>U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
>(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
>|| is the caesura)
>
>Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
>The books don't even admit it exists; it's not an iamb
>or a dactyl or a trochee or an anapest or a spondee. I
>tried five different references, and those are the only
>five feet they mentions.
>
>Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
>that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
>Book_ (#XXII):
>
>First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
>And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>
>Any other suggestions?
>--
>Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
>1078 Colne Street
>Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
>651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
>The Ballad Index Web Site:
>http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:15:07 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


On 11/26/01, Jeri Corlew wrote:>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:20:09 -0600, you wrote:
>
>>On the principle that people around this list have better
>>backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
>>what will probably prove a dumb question.
>>
>>When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
>>the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>>
> >And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>>
>>Note the metrical pattern:
>>
>>U-U U-U || U-U -U
>>
>>(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
>>|| is the caesura)
>>
>>Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
>>that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
>>Book_ (#XXII):
>>
>>First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
>>And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>>
>>Any other suggestions?
>
>Isn't it more like:
>U-U U-U || U-U U-
>because the lines end on a stressed syllable?Hm. Not the way I read it. Looking at "Black Phyllis,"
it does look like some "should" put the stress on the first
syllable of the final foot and some on the second. OK,
declare it a final spondee:U-U U-U || U-U -->Not traditional, but 'Dancing at Whitsun'That *is* a traditional tune, "The Week Before Easter."
But it's not the same pattern. "Week Before Easter" is
four full feet of three syllables. Here, there are
eleven syllables per line.>The tune's nearly the same as 'Jamie Foyers' so that's another one.I agree that's in eleven syllables per line. I don't know the
tune, so I can't guarantee this, but doesn't it scan differently,
thoug?>At least one version of 'Bonnie Light Horseman'?
>It seems to me it would be a common pattern for songs in 3/4 time, but I
>may be missing something.Part of my problem is that I have a very hard time comparing
songs with lyrics-without-music. But none of them seem to
scan the same way to me.On 11/26/01, Martin Ryan wrote:>Is it not an iamb followed by three anapaests?You can read it that way, but I don't stress it that way.
You don't get the caesura in the right place.Maybe I read poetry funny :-), but it look at that
stanza of "Black Phyllis." The first three lines
all have the comma at the same place: After syllable
six. To me, that says (in the absence of a tune) that
it's two three-syllable feet, then a three and a two.>Deep in the recesses of my mind lurks:
>
>"I sprang to the stirrup and Joris and he
>I galloped, he galloped, we galloped all threeThat sounds closer. Doesn't sound like a folk song,
though. :-)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:49:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
unstressed syllable)?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:19:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
>unstressed syllable)?Ugh! WITH, not WILL.--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:28:53 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


On 11/26/01, John Garst wrote:>>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>
>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
>unstressed syllable)?Is that allowed? That is, can it be called "anapestic" if it
is missing a syllable? (Serious question.)
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:37:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>On 11/26/01, John Garst wrote:
>
>>>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>
>>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
>>unstressed syllable)?
>
>Is that allowed? That is, can it be called "anapestic" if it
>is missing a syllable? (Serious question.)I think so (notice the uncertainty).
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:11:09 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(96 lines)


Bob,I think it's your scansion that's at fault, I'm afraid. What you have is an
anacrucial start on each line. Thus you should render the verse (omitting
the caesurae for clarity):
u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
u/-u/-u/-uu/-
u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-Line 3 is the only odd one out in it has two trochees replacing two dactyls.
The effect of the anacrusis is to break a trochee across the line end.Dactylic verse with an anacrucial start is enormously common in English
poetry. The most famous is probably Browning's "How I brought the good news
from Ghent to Aix" which from memory goesI sprang to the stirrup, and Joris and he
I galloped, Dirk galloped, we galloped all three
...etcIn folk song, try "The Fair Flower of Northumberland":The provost's ae daughter was a-walking alane
Ah but her love it was easily won
When she heard the Scots prisoner a makin' his mane
And she was the flowr o' Northumberland- the same anacrucial start, although there is no anacrucial bridge between
lines 1 and 2 and the foot bridging lines 2 and 3 is a dactyl.Or:I once loved a lass, and I loved her sae weel,
And I curséd all others that thoght o' her ill,
But now she's rewarded me weel for my love
For she's gone to be wed tae anotherSee George Saintsbury, Historical Manual of English Prosody, (London:
Macmillan, 1919). He covers anacrusis in his glossary.I find that anacrusis is one of those things where it helps to be a morris
dancer to recognise it, because it's where you leap into the air to "drop"
on to the beat.Hope this helpsSimon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: Strange Metrical Question> On the principle that people around this list have better
> backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
> what will probably prove a dumb question.
>
> When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
> the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>
> And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
> And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
> It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
> And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
> Note the metrical pattern:
>
> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
> (where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
> || is the caesura)
>
> Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
> The books don't even admit it exists; it's not an iamb
> or a dactyl or a trochee or an anapest or a spondee. I
> tried five different references, and those are the only
> five feet they mentions.
>
> Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
> that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
> Book_ (#XXII):
>
> First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
> And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>
> Any other suggestions?
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 1078 Colne Street
> Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
> 651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Mudcat?
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:26:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,Best,
John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:09:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:26:43 -0500, John Roberts wrote:>So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
>requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,I'm not Dick, but I'm one of the volunteer administrators at Mudcat.
John, if you're referring to the current Mud-outage, the servers appear to
have taken a bit of a holiday.  Max Speigel, who is responsible for Mudcat,
is away for the weekend and a bit more - probably until Tue or Wed.  The
servers won't get re-booted until he returns.Jeri Corlew

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:22:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Aw, c'mon fellers. We're talking about FOLK SONG. There's no authority
that says something is or isn't OK--just a singer who sings it anyway
that feels right. The lyric that Mr Waltz asked about sings nicely to an
enormous number of jig tunes (try Larry O'Gaff or Top of Cork Road) as
well as many 3/4 tunes. As for missing unstressed syllables, this often
varies from verse to verse.Take "The Black Cook" as an example:verse 1. If you'll LIS-ten to Me I will Tell you a Story
verse 2.con-CER-ning a DOC-tor that LIVED in our TOWNTrying to overly formal is a Procrustean exercise, to say the least.dick greenhausJohn Garst wrote:> >On 11/26/01, John Garst wrote:
> >
> >>>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
> >>
> >>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
> >>unstressed syllable)?
> >
> >Is that allowed? That is, can it be called "anapestic" if it
> >is missing a syllable? (Serious question.)
>
> I think so (notice the uncertainty).
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


I don't think so. Max is running it out of his home, and I suspect he's
away for the holiday. I can't reach him to confirm, though.dick greenhausJohn Roberts wrote:> So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
> requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,
>
> Best,
> John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


My apologies for the last message which was intended as a personal email.It's my brain that needs reconfiguring.John Roberts.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: Susan Friedman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:21:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


John - Max doesn't have elves anymore, so if he isn't home to fix a problem
it stays down until he returns.  I suspect Max went away for the weekend and
was not there to bring mudcat back up.Susan of DT-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of John Roberts
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 5:27 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Mudcat?So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,Best,
John

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:49:56 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(52 lines)


>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.> Note the metrical pattern:
> U-U U-U || U-U -UYou mean
  U-U U-U || U-U U-> Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?An amphibrach.> Second, can anyone think of another folk song using that meter?There's one which I think is in Sharp/Karpeles, "80 English Folksongs
from the Southern Appalachians" - from memory as I can't find it:   Oh tell me, oh tell me, oh will you agree
   Oh will you agree and get married to me?
   Oh Willie, oh Willie, that never will do,
   For I am too young to get married to you.The tune follows the metre with startling fidelity, it's the clearest
example of modal rhythm I know of in English-language song:X:1
T:?
M:4/4
L:1/4
K:A Minor % minor/dorian hexatonic
E|A2c  A|G2A  G|E2G  A|A3||
E|A2c  A|G2A  G|E2G  A|A3||
E|A2c  d|e2d  c|e2d  A|c3||
B|A2c  A|G2A  G|E2G  A|A3|]What's the tune for the one you quote above?Q: What kind of dinosaur goes "GAAAH!! gnash gnash GAAAH!! gnash gnash"
   before swooping on its prey?
A: The terror dactyl.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:56:55 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


On 11/26/01, Simon Furey wrote:>Bob,
>
>I think it's your scansion that's at fault, I'm afraid.Well -- it's the way I *would* read it. But it sounds like I'm
a minority. Maybe it's all the Swedish influence here in
Minnesota. :-)[ ... ]>Or:
>
>I once loved a lass, and I loved her sae weel,
>And I curséd all others that thoght o' her ill,
>But now she's rewarded me weel for my love
>For she's gone to be wed tae anotherIf this scans the same way to you, then we've located our
problem. We really *do* scan "Black Phyllis" differently.
I assume I scan this the way you do, since I know "I Once
Loved a Lass" with an actual tune.>See George Saintsbury, Historical Manual of English Prosody, (London:
>Macmillan, 1919). He covers anacrusis in his glossary.
>
>I find that anacrusis is one of those things where it helps to be a morris
>dancer to recognise it, because it's where you leap into the air to "drop"
>on to the beat.Well -- I can do the equivalent when I have a tune. Just sit there
with a mental guitar or autoharp and say thumb-brush-brush. :-)[ ... ]On 11/26/01, Jack Campin wrote:> >    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
>> Note the metrical pattern:
>> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
>You mean
>  U-U U-U || U-U U-As I mentioned in another message, I didn't. I later changed
it to a final spondee, because I was ambivalent about stresses
on the final line. Again, that's how *I* read it. Whatever
that says.> > Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
>
>An amphibrach.Thanks! This is worth knowing apart from all the rest.[ ... ]>What's the tune for the one you quote above?That's the problem. Neither the item in Cox nor the one
in Kinloch had a tune, and both are fragmentary. That's
why this is so hard. I suspect that was my problem. If
I have a tune, I adjust the scansion to fit the tune.
In the case of "Black Phyllis," I had to go by the
native rhythms of my speech. Evidently, for whatever
reason, those don't match the rest of yours.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:24:31 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


In a message dated 11/26/01 2:12:12 PM, [unmask] writes:>What you have is an anacrucial start on each line. Thus you should render
the verse (omitting the caesurae for clarity):>u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
>u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
>u/-u/-u/-uu/-
>u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
*****************************
    t seems to me that  Simon has hit the nail on the head.  The verse you
quote has four lines, each consisting of an anacrusis followed by three
dactyls and one iamb,  except for Line 3, as Simpon points out. That could
easily be brought into the metrical pattern by adding an "and" and a couple
of  "I's" to read  " It RAiNED and it HAILED and I SAT and I CRIED";  more
likely, the singer would simply hold some syllables for two beats (a full
quarter note in 6/8 time), as "It RAI-ained and HAILED and I SA-at and CRIED."This dactylic form is very common in folksongs, although it does not conform
to what is often called the "ballad metro. There is also a contemporary light
verse form called "Double Dactyls,"  which must begin with a first line s uch
as "Jiggery Pokery"  or Higg;ledy Piggledy" and must contain one line of a
single six-syllable word with stress on the first and fourth syllables (e.g.,
"antediluvian.")   There's an old Irish double jig called "The Top of Cork
Road" and when words were added, as in "Father O'Flynn"  and "To Dhrink Wid
the Divil,"   each line starts in a manner very similar to the pattern of
"Black Phyllis."  "Father O'Flynn"  begins:
    "Of PRIESTs we can OFFer a CHARMing vaRIety,
      Far reNOWNED for their LEARNing and PIety;....."Still more similar is "Daniel O'Connell"  as sung by Canadian Irish singer
O. J. Abbott: it begins with a two-syllable abacrusis, sung as two
16th--notes in a 6/8 tune:    "Ah ye LOVers of MIRTH, now I PRAY pay atTENtion
       And LISten to WHAT I am GOING to reLATE,,,,,,"
        ("GOING" has to be pronounced as one syllable.)Arthur Scammel used the first part of that tune in his celebrated Nova Scotia
song, "The Squid-Jiggin' Ground:"    "Oh THIS is the PLACE where the FISHermen GAther
           In OILskins and BOOTS and Cape ANNES buttoned DOWN"
      All SIZes of FIGgers with SQUID-lines and JIGgers,
          They CONgregate HERE on the SQUID-jiggin' GROUND."Sam
La Jolla, CA, USA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Sandy Ives <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:39:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Sam Hinton and Simon cover it rather well. Just to add a footnote, see my LARRY GORMAN, pp.27, 155, 195-96.  It was a fairly common pattern for local satirical songs in the Maritimes.  Anyhow, all this scansion stuff has to be taken with a grain or
so of salt when we're dealing with oral tradition.
Sandy Ives

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:35:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Here are I am again! I see that some of you have been bidding on some of
these books. I am glad that you are finding these emails of use!
On to the new list -        1489156837 - the complete 5 volume Dover edition of Child (not
cheap!)
        1039195738 - English and Scottish Ballads by Sargent & Kittredge
                1904 first edition
        1489790411 - Irish Street Ballads by O'Lochlainn 1952 reprint
        1489750184 - Ballads from the Pubs of Ireland by Healy 1968
paperback edition
        1480110073 - Folklore of Canada by McClelland & Stewart appears
to be a 1990 softcover reprint        A couple of unusual items that I noticed        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
interesting.
        1490115569 - Mountain Songs by Grover Hite from Beckley, WV This
is a 24 page booklet from the 1940's or 1950's.                                Good Luck!
                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:23:02 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(60 lines)


SAm:Of all the posited answers, your's seems the most logical.Damned if I ever could get the anapests from the iambs.EdOn Mon, 26 Nov 2001 [unmask] wrote:> In a message dated 11/26/01 2:12:12 PM, [unmask] writes:
>
> >What you have is an anacrucial start on each line. Thus you should render
> the verse (omitting the caesurae for clarity):
>
> >u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
> >u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
> >u/-u/-u/-uu/-
> >u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
> *****************************
>     t seems to me that  Simon has hit the nail on the head.  The verse you
> quote has four lines, each consisting of an anacrusis followed by three
> dactyls and one iamb,  except for Line 3, as Simpon points out. That could
> easily be brought into the metrical pattern by adding an "and" and a couple
> of  "I's" to read  " It RAiNED and it HAILED and I SAT and I CRIED";  more
> likely, the singer would simply hold some syllables for two beats (a full
> quarter note in 6/8 time), as "It RAI-ained and HAILED and I SA-at and CRIED."
>
> This dactylic form is very common in folksongs, although it does not conform
> to what is often called the "ballad metro. There is also a contemporary light
> verse form called "Double Dactyls,"  which must begin with a first line s uch
> as "Jiggery Pokery"  or Higg;ledy Piggledy" and must contain one line of a
> single six-syllable word with stress on the first and fourth syllables (e.g.,
> "antediluvian.")   There's an old Irish double jig called "The Top of Cork
> Road" and when words were added, as in "Father O'Flynn"  and "To Dhrink Wid
> the Divil,"   each line starts in a manner very similar to the pattern of
> "Black Phyllis."  "Father O'Flynn"  begins:
>     "Of PRIESTs we can OFFer a CHARMing vaRIety,
>       Far reNOWNED for their LEARNing and PIety;....."
>
> Still more similar is "Daniel O'Connell"  as sung by Canadian Irish singer
> O. J. Abbott: it begins with a two-syllable abacrusis, sung as two
> 16th--notes in a 6/8 tune:
>
>     "Ah ye LOVers of MIRTH, now I PRAY pay atTENtion
>        And LISten to WHAT I am GOING to reLATE,,,,,,"
>         ("GOING" has to be pronounced as one syllable.)
>
> Arthur Scammel used the first part of that tune in his celebrated Nova Scotia
> song, "The Squid-Jiggin' Ground:"
>
>     "Oh THIS is the PLACE where the FISHermen GAther
>            In OILskins and BOOTS and Cape ANNES buttoned DOWN"
>       All SIZes of FIGgers with SQUID-lines and JIGgers,
>           They CONgregate HERE on the SQUID-jiggin' GROUND."
>
> Sam
> La Jolla, CA, USA
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:03:25 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]><<This dactylic form is very common in folksongs, although it does not
conform
to what is often called the "ballad metro. There is also a contemporary
light
verse form called "Double Dactyls,"  which must begin with a first line s
uch
as "Jiggery Pokery"  or Higg;ledy Piggledy" and must contain one line of a
single six-syllable word with stress on the first and fourth syllables
(e.g.,
"antediluvian.") >>Aha --"Risselty-rosselty
Hey bombosity
Knickety-knackety
Retrical quality
Willoughby-Wallaby now-now-now"Sorry, off the subject. But that suddenly rang a bell, in 6/8.<<    "Ah ye LOVers of MIRTH, now I PRAY pay atTENtion
       And LISten to WHAT I am GOING to reLATE,,,,,,">>See, also, "Stick to the Craythur". Thank you, Sam!Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:43:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


[unmask] writes:
>        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
>
>        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
>editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
>no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
>interesting.Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.Cheers
Jamie Moreira

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:32:20 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


>>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>>> Note the metrical pattern:
>>> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>> You mean
>>  U-U U-U || U-U U-
> As I mentioned in another message, I didn't. I later changed
> it to a final spondee, because I was ambivalent about stresses
> on the final line. Again, that's how *I* read it.You're saying the last syllable of each line *isn't* stressed??>>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
       U     _   U     U     _  U    U    _  U  U   _You say *A*stride, ...*ING* bride???=================== <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> ===================

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:09:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


On 11/27/01, Jack Campin wrote:> >>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>>>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>>>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>>>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>>>> Note the metrical pattern:
>>>> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>>> You mean
>>>  U-U U-U || U-U U-
>> As I mentioned in another message, I didn't. I later changed
>> it to a final spondee, because I was ambivalent about stresses
>> on the final line. Again, that's how *I* read it.
>
>You're saying the last syllable of each line *isn't* stressed??
>
>>>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>       U     _   U     U     _  U    U    _  U  U   _
>
>You say *A*stride, ...*ING* bride???It depends on whether I'm reading poetry. :-) Once a metre is
established, I'm likely to follow it, whatever it forces on
me.In *isolation* (i.e. taking only the phrases "charger
astride" and "unwilling bride"), I would say *A*stride,
but -ing *BRIDE*
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:39:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


James Moreira wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
> Cheers
> Jamie MoreiraThomas Evans 'Old Ballads, Historical and Narative', 4 vols, 1784, was
the 2nd edition, but I haven't discovered the date or number of volumes
of the original edition. His son, R. H. Evans, issued a new edition,
said to be enlarged, in 4 vols. in 1810.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Evans - Old ballads
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:19:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


The Library of Congress catalog indicates that the 1777 edition was 2 volumes. The 1810 edition was 4 volumes.  I do not know whether or to what extent additions were made in the 1810 edition.Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/27/01 01:39PM >>>
James Moreira wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
> Cheers
> Jamie MoreiraThomas Evans 'Old Ballads, Historical and Narative', 4 vols, 1784, was
the 2nd edition, but I haven't discovered the date or number of volumes
of the original edition. His son, R. H. Evans, issued a new edition,
said to be enlarged, in 4 vols. in 1810.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:26:36 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Re: Evans, Ballads. The Library of Congress catalog indicates that the 1777 edition was 2 volumes. The 1810 edition was 4 volumes.  I do not know whether or to what extent additions were made in the 1810 edition.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:04:22 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


The Library of Congree catalog indicates that the 1777 edition was in 2 volumes and the 1810 edition in 4 volumes. How much material was in fact added in 1810 is a different question, however.Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/27/01 01:39PM >>>
James Moreira wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
> Cheers
> Jamie MoreiraThomas Evans 'Old Ballads, Historical and Narative', 4 vols, 1784, was
the 2nd edition, but I haven't discovered the date or number of volumes
of the original edition. His son, R. H. Evans, issued a new edition,
said to be enlarged, in 4 vols. in 1810.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:23:36 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Bob said:
>
> It depends on whether I'm reading poetry. :-) Once a metre is
> established, I'm likely to follow it, whatever it forces on
> me.
>
> In *isolation* (i.e. taking only the phrases "charger
> astride" and "unwilling bride"), I would say *A*stride,
> but -ing *BRIDE*
> --That's the point. We are talking about songs here, not spoken poetry. This
is a critical issue, and we must go back to the great man Bronson: "Q. When
is a ballad not a ballad? A. When it has no tune."
Accepting the fact that you haven't got a tune for your song, I can
understand a bit of your problem. However, the apparent rhythms will help
(to some extent - there are lots of "false friends" in  non-English
traditions where the rhythm of the words and the rhythm of the tune don't
actually match, but let that pass).  The thing to do is to look at songs
whose words have roughly similar rhythms and look at their music. If you see
an anacrusis (a pick-up measure, I believe you call it on your side of the
pond) at the start of a melody, then you need an anacrusis in your scansion.
That's a thing that a poetry *reader* is likely to miss, because spoken
poetry has a lot more freedom than song, being free of the tune constraints.
If you go through Bronson and see how many tunes start with a pick-up
measure you'll understand why I said that anacrusis is a very common
phenomenon.As for what you say in responding to Jack, that your native speech alters
your rhythmical perception, that's great. That's one way tune variations
creep in. I say sing the song to suit yourself; I'm all for variation so we
bring life back to these lovely old ballads. It's folk song after all, which
I think was Dick's point. Good luck with your tune-fitting!CheersSimon

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:16:24 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.In The Sacred Harp (3rd Ed, 1860), this meter is called 11s.  It is
represented there by 10 tunes and hymns.  The most familiar of these
may be"Mid scenes of confusion and creature complaints" (Home, Sweet Home)or possibly"How firm a foundation, ye saints of the Lord"The one I like best is"No more shall the sound of the war-whoop be heard"In The Original Sacred Harp (1911), meter 11s is described further as
"consisting of four lines in anapestic, each line containing eleven
syllables."Retrospectively, this provides authority for my earlier analysis -
anapaestic with a missing beat in the first foot.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:08:25 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes
are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
In references I've seen, the 1777 edn. is 2 vols, but the 1784 edn is 4
vols.
Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:15:25 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Automatic digest processor <[unmask]>, in the person of Ed
Cray, writes:> Damned if I ever could get the anapests from the iambs.  The _Pseudo-Anapest_
  Moves awkwardly at best;
  His feet are long, uneven and retractile.
  Who hunts the beast in rhythm
  Should take his meter withm
  And _still_ may only bag a Ptero-Dactyl.    -- Frederick WinsorDambed thoiamb forabor anapest.
--
---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  15.  Never Go to a Man's Apartment       167  :||
||:  16.  How to Behave When You Get There    173  :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Jack the Rabbit, Jack the Bear
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(75 lines)


Jack the Rabbit,
Jack the Bear,
Can't you (Cain'choo) line 'em
Just a hair?TCI Section Crew "Track Lining Song," 1927, Paramount 12478 (4378-2)This is not exactly a ballad, but it turns out that there is a
connection of "Jack the Rabbit, Jack the Bear" with material that
could have made a ballad.  (I suppose that this use of "made" is
something like that in "He's going to make a doctor."  I haven't
checked my dictionary to see if this is really kosher.)Anyhow, I came across the following while searching old newspapers
for something about John Henry. From an 1887 newspaper:
**********
Jasper, Ala., April 19. - [Special] - One of the largest crowds ever
seen in Jasper was here Friday to witness the hanging of Anderson
Oakes, colored, alias Walter Jackson and "Jack the Bear."
...
He talked freely with those permitted to visit him.  He said that he
felt better than he ever felt before in his life and was anxious to
start to glory.
...
When asked if he had anything to say he said: "Tell all the people to
let whiskey alone, if it hadn't been for whiskey I never would have
killed Mr. Utten.  Tell them to stay away from bar rooms, and out of
bad company."
...
Sheriff Barton performed the duty of putting the rope and letting the
trap door drop and the body fell breaking the neck and the wretched
man died without a relative or friend present.  The cheerful way in
which Jack met his fate made every one present feel less serious.
**********
 From an earlier issue:
**********
He is of a bright copper color, about five feet eight inches in
height, and will weigh about 150 pounds.When asked to speak of his past life, he said:  "I am twenty-three
years old, was born and raised in North Carolina, but have traveled a
good deal in Tennessee, Kentucky and Mississippi...As to the killing
of Mr. Wooten, I know nothing.  I was drinking."
...
Pope Wooten, the young man for whose murder Jackson must suffer the
extreme penalty, was from Stone Mountain, Ga., and was engaged in
railroad work in Walker County.  While walking along one of the
highways he was ambushed and shot to death by a band of negroes, one
of the leaders of whom was Walter Jackson, "Jack the Bear."Another called a leader, with several aliases, was known as "Jack the
Rabbit."  He was recently arrested in Griffin, Ga., and brought here
and lodged in jail where he now is.The first of the negroes arrested, Troupe, says that the gang was
organized for the purpose of gambling and stealing or engaging in any
other lawless act by which they thought might flourish.  They
proposed to operate principally in and about the railroad camp along
the Kansas City and Georgia Pacific railroads.
**********Now, where did Jack the Rabbit and Jack the Bear get their nicknames?Is there other lore about Jack the Rabbit and Jack the Bear?  (It
seems to me highly likely that the TCI crew, with its Alabama
connection, was referring to the murderers.)I note that Duke Ellington recorded a song entitle "Jack the Bear"
and that Bruce Springsteen used "Jack the Rabbit" in his song
"Rosalita."
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:57:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Thanks to those who responded to this query.All the best,
Dan Milner

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: question
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:07:50 +0100
Content-Type:multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(39 lines) , message/rfc822(3823 bytes)


(Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)> Dear everyone,
>
> In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
>
> 1) Resources are limited.
> 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> pressure groups all over the place of course.
> 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and Cultures,"
> not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> research.
> 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
>
> Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> was it worth it!
>
> Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> apace!
>
> Andy
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Andrew C Rouse
> Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of Humanities,
> Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
>
> tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:28:13 -0800
Content-Type:multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(3 lines) , message/rfc822(7 kB)



Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:56:16 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(76 lines)


Andy,
I have mentioned this source before, but I really think it is worth
consideration if you haven't looked there.Llanerch publishers ( http://www.llanerch-publishers.co.uk/ ) have some
extremely interesting reprints, of which the following is a sample:S Baring Gould: A Garland of Country Songs
Bryce & Stokoe: Northumbrian Minstrelsy with the small pipe tunes
J Payne Collier: Broadside Black Letter Ballads
Keith Norman MacDonald: The Gesto Collection of Higland Music
A. W Moore: Manx Ballads and Music
Roy Palmer: A Book of British Ballads
Roy Palmer: Bushes and Briars; Folk Music Collected by Ralph Vaughan
Williams
Georger Petrie: The Complete Collection of Irish Music (3 vols)
Frances F Tolmie: 105 Songs from Occupation from the Western of Scotland
(anon) The Besom Maker & Other Country Folk Songs
(anon) The Dance Music of ScotlandThey cost about ten quid a book (more or less), which is jolly reasonable.
I should point out that I have nothing to do with this organisation except
as a happy customer. However, I unashamedly admit I am keen to encourage
their efforts in reprinting such works.CheersSimon----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Rouse" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: question> (Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)
>
> > Dear everyone,
> >
> > In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> > department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
> >
> > 1) Resources are limited.
> > 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> > pressure groups all over the place of course.
> > 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and Cultures,"
> > not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> > research.
> > 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> > Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
> >
> > Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> > you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> > heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> > hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> > slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> > facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> > was it worth it!
> >
> > Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> > apace!
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Andrew C Rouse
> > Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of Humanities,
> > Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
> >
> > tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> > home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> > Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> > Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:36:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


Hi, Dave.  we don't have formal rules here.  However, the consensus among
list members, with which I concur, is that folks should not send
attachments.  There are folk who can't open them, and some who are reluctant
to do so, because of the potential for viruses.  So, you might want to
consider posting your request for info on Vilikens and his Dina in plain
text.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of DAVID THOMSON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:28 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:38:56 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


David:According to Laws, _British Broadside Ballads Traditional in America,_ p.
196, the Harry Dichter sheet music catalogue of 1947 lists "Vilikins and
his Dinah" "Comp. by John Parry. Bost. Oliver Ditson. ca. 1855."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Villikens and His Dinah (without "attachments")
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:13:15 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(127 lines)


Hello Everyone - I am trying to determine when the ballad "Villikens and
His Dinah"
was first published.  The song is credited to John Parry and there are
two musical
Parrys listed but I don't know which of them was the author:Parry, John, 1776-1851andParry, John Orlando, 1810-1879The melody of the song is sometimes referred to as "traditional"
when it provided the tune for "Joe Bowers" circa the '49 Gold Rush
which eventually evolved into "Sweet Betsy from Pike."  In the sound
track of
Ken Burns' upcoming PBS documentary on Mark Twain the melody is
prominently
featured and it sounds like it is probably the "theme" of the show.To summarize,  here are the questions I'm trying to find the answers to:- When was "Villikens and Dinah" first published?- Was the melody "traditional" or written by Perry for "Villikens and
His Dinah"?- Which of the two John Parrys above was the author?- When did "Joe Bowers" get transformed into "Sweet Betsy >From Pike"?Thanks very much to all of you for reading this!Best,DAVE THOMSON
Los AngelesP.S.  Two footnotes:1. A connection with Alice in Wonderland
2. They Lyrics of Joe Bowers circa 1949 showing that "Sweet Betsy" was
once "Sally Black"In Martin Gardner's Annotated Alice in Wonderland there is a connection
is mentioned with Lewis Carroll's
little friend Alice Liddell and a couple of pussy cats:The Liddell sisters were fond of the family's two tabby cats, Dinah and
Villikens, named after a popular song,
"Villikens and His Dinah." Dinah and her two kittens, Kitty and
Snowdrop, reappear in the first chapter of the second Alicebook, and later, in Alice's dream, as the Red and White Queens."JOE BOWERS"My name it is Joe Bowers;
I've got a brother Ike;
I came from old Missouri,
All the way from Pike.
I'll tell you why I left thar
And why I came to roam
And leave my poor old mammy
So far away from home.
I used to court a gal thar,
Her name was Sally Black.
I axed her if she'd marry me;
She said it was a whack.
Says she to me, 'Joe Bowers,
Before we hitch for life,
You ought to get a little home
To keep your little wife.'
'Oh, Sally, dearest Sally,
Oh, Sally, for your sake
I'll go to California
And try to raise a stake.'
Says she to me, 'Joe Bowers,
You are the man to win;
Here's a kiss to bind the bargain,'
And she hove a dozen in.
When I got in that country
I hadn't nary red,
I had such wolfish feelings
I wished myself 'most dead;
But the thought of my dear Sally
Soon made them feelings git,
And I whispered hopes to Bowers [md]
I wish I had 'em yit.At length I went to mining,
Put in my biggest licks;
Came down upon the boulders
Just like a thousand bricks:
I worked both late and early,
In rain, in sun, in snow [md]
I was working for my Sally;
It was all the same to Joe.
At length I got a letter
From my dear brother Ike,
It came from old Missouri,
All the way from Pike;
It brought to me the darndest news
That ever you did hear.
My heart is almost [busttin?]',
So pray excuse this tear.
It said that Sal was false to me,
Her love for me had fled,
She'd got married to a butcher [md]
The butcher's hair was red.
And more than that, the letter said [md]
It's enough to make me swear [md]
That Sally had a baby;
The baby had red hair.
Now I've told you all
About this sad affair,
'Bout Sally marrying a butcher,
That butcher with red hair.
But whether 'twas a boy or gal child
The letter never said;
It only said the baby's hair
Was inclined to be red.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:23:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own copy?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:33:54 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


A dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books, Lexington, Kentucky).Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own copy?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:49:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


Thanks much.  I'll contact them.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of Lewis Becker
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:34 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of LawsA dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books,
Lexington, Kentucky).Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own copy?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:12:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Lew is quite correct, Marge, and that appears to be the only copy available
from the usual on-line sources.  If you go to http://www.bookfinder.com/
and type in Malcolm Laws in the Author box, you'll be able to order it
on-line.  I find that process can be somewhat trying, though, so perhaps a
phone call would be well spent.Black Swan's number is 859-252-7255.All the best,
Dan MIlner----- Original Message -----
From: "Lewis Becker" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws> A dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books,
Lexington, Kentucky).
>
> Lew Becker
>
> >>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
> Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
> copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
> print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own
copy?
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:52:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


Thanks much, Dan.  It's been damn inconvenient not to have one readily at
hand.  Of course, the university has one of the finest folklore libraries in
the world, but I'd much rather have that basic source right at home: I have
all of Child and Bronson.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of Dan Milner
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:12 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of LawsLew is quite correct, Marge, and that appears to be the only copy available
from the usual on-line sources.  If you go to http://www.bookfinder.com/
and type in Malcolm Laws in the Author box, you'll be able to order it
on-line.  I find that process can be somewhat trying, though, so perhaps a
phone call would be well spent.Black Swan's number is 859-252-7255.All the best,
Dan MIlner----- Original Message -----
From: "Lewis Becker" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws> A dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books,
Lexington, Kentucky).
>
> Lew Becker
>
> >>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
> Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
> copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
> print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own
copy?
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:56:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> David:
>
> According to Laws, _British Broadside Ballads Traditional in America,_ p.
> 196, the Harry Dichter sheet music catalogue of 1947 lists "Vilikins and
> his Dinah" "Comp. by John Parry. Bost. Oliver Ditson. ca. 1855."
>
> EdIn the Levy sheet music collection are 3 undated '4th' editions of
"Vilikens and his Dinah", published at Boston (Ditson), Baltimore, and
London. Two give John Parry as author and composer, and one gives John
Bernard. Also there is 'the correct edition' with no date, author or
composer given.The first three say it was sung in the musical farce 'The
Wandering Minstrel' at the Royal Olympic Theatre. I know of
no index of 19th century English stage pieces, but I've never
looked for such.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sweet Betsy
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:28:25 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Folks:A moment of unaccustomed leisure allowed me to ransack my library for
"Sweet Betsy"/"Vilikins" and with that I recalled the redoubtable Norman
Cazden, Herbert Haufrecht and Norman Studer _Folk Songs of the Catskills._
There on pp 156-158, in the notes I assume were written by Cazden, is the
specific date of 1851 for the publication of the sheet music (in England)
of "Vilikins."Apparently it first appeared in a musical farce entitled _The Wandering
Minstrel_ which George Lyman Kittredge (not a man to be argued with)
attributed to the pen of Henry Mayhew (he of the very important London
Labor and London Poor).Cazden notes that the first publication in the United States of the text
of "Vilikins and His Dinah" was in the "Bobbin Around Songster" of 1851.
Seven years later, he continues, the tune was sufficiently familiar in
California for John A. Stone to use it for the air of his "Sweet Betsy
from Pike," as printed in "Put's Golden Songster."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 00:44:20 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]><<According to Laws, _British Broadside Ballads Traditional in America,_ p.
196, the Harry Dichter sheet music catalogue of 1947 lists "Vilikins and
his Dinah" "Comp. by John Parry. Bost. Oliver Ditson. ca. 1855.">>And I don't think it's any relation to "Joe Bowers" -- the tunes and meter
are quite different. "Joe Bowers" is in 4/4 time, ballad meter, while
"Villikens/Sweet Betsy" is in 3/4.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: question
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:56:26 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(91 lines)


Llanerch Publishers
Agreed their cheap and cheerful reprints are a godsend but, most
unfortunately, they went out of business about 2/3 months ago. They were
selling off their stock then. There was some talk of another publisher
buying them up but I don't know if that happened. My last two emails to them
went unanswered.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: question> Andy,
> I have mentioned this source before, but I really think it is worth
> consideration if you haven't looked there.
>
> Llanerch publishers ( http://www.llanerch-publishers.co.uk/ ) have some
> extremely interesting reprints, of which the following is a sample:
>
> S Baring Gould: A Garland of Country Songs
> Bryce & Stokoe: Northumbrian Minstrelsy with the small pipe tunes
> J Payne Collier: Broadside Black Letter Ballads
> Keith Norman MacDonald: The Gesto Collection of Higland Music
> A. W Moore: Manx Ballads and Music
> Roy Palmer: A Book of British Ballads
> Roy Palmer: Bushes and Briars; Folk Music Collected by Ralph Vaughan
> Williams
> Georger Petrie: The Complete Collection of Irish Music (3 vols)
> Frances F Tolmie: 105 Songs from Occupation from the Western of Scotland
> (anon) The Besom Maker & Other Country Folk Songs
> (anon) The Dance Music of Scotland
>
> They cost about ten quid a book (more or less), which is jolly reasonable.
> I should point out that I have nothing to do with this organisation except
> as a happy customer. However, I unashamedly admit I am keen to encourage
> their efforts in reprinting such works.
>
> Cheers
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Rouse" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> Subject: question
>
>
> > (Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)
> >
> > > Dear everyone,
> > >
> > > In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> > > department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
> > >
> > > 1) Resources are limited.
> > > 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> > > pressure groups all over the place of course.
> > > 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and Cultures,"
> > > not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> > > research.
> > > 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> > > Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
> > >
> > > Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> > > you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> > > heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> > > hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> > > slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> > > facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> > > was it worth it!
> > >
> > > Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> > > apace!
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > Andrew C Rouse
> > > Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of Humanities,
> > > Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
> > >
> > > tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> > > home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> > > Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> > > Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:19:56 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(107 lines)


That's really sad, but thanks for the info, Steve. Let's hope somebody does
step in.
Cheers
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "roud" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: question> Llanerch Publishers
> Agreed their cheap and cheerful reprints are a godsend but, most
> unfortunately, they went out of business about 2/3 months ago. They were
> selling off their stock then. There was some talk of another publisher
> buying them up but I don't know if that happened. My last two emails to
them
> went unanswered.
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:56 PM
> Subject: Re: question
>
>
> > Andy,
> > I have mentioned this source before, but I really think it is worth
> > consideration if you haven't looked there.
> >
> > Llanerch publishers ( http://www.llanerch-publishers.co.uk/ ) have some
> > extremely interesting reprints, of which the following is a sample:
> >
> > S Baring Gould: A Garland of Country Songs
> > Bryce & Stokoe: Northumbrian Minstrelsy with the small pipe tunes
> > J Payne Collier: Broadside Black Letter Ballads
> > Keith Norman MacDonald: The Gesto Collection of Higland Music
> > A. W Moore: Manx Ballads and Music
> > Roy Palmer: A Book of British Ballads
> > Roy Palmer: Bushes and Briars; Folk Music Collected by Ralph Vaughan
> > Williams
> > Georger Petrie: The Complete Collection of Irish Music (3 vols)
> > Frances F Tolmie: 105 Songs from Occupation from the Western of Scotland
> > (anon) The Besom Maker & Other Country Folk Songs
> > (anon) The Dance Music of Scotland
> >
> > They cost about ten quid a book (more or less), which is jolly
reasonable.
> > I should point out that I have nothing to do with this organisation
except
> > as a happy customer. However, I unashamedly admit I am keen to encourage
> > their efforts in reprinting such works.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andy Rouse" <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> > Subject: question
> >
> >
> > > (Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)
> > >
> > > > Dear everyone,
> > > >
> > > > In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> > > > department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
> > > >
> > > > 1) Resources are limited.
> > > > 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> > > > pressure groups all over the place of course.
> > > > 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and
Cultures,"
> > > > not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> > > > research.
> > > > 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> > > > Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
> > > >
> > > > Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> > > > you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> > > > heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> > > > hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> > > > slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> > > > facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> > > > was it worth it!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> > > > apace!
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > > Andrew C Rouse
> > > > Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of
Humanities,
> > > > Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
> > > >
> > > > tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> > > > home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> > > > Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> > > > Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: (Fwd) Re: English Outlaws and Highwaymen
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:46:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:              Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:52:49 -0600
From:                   Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Subject:                Re: English Outlaws and Highwaymen
To:                     [unmask]From the Usenet group alt.www.sitesISongs, poems, stories, memoirs, letters, satires, sermons, and
other  writings from the times are used to tell about the  English
highwayman from the 14th through the 19th centuries. For further
research, there are annotated links and an extensive bibliography.
http://www.outlawsandhighwaymen.com/--
Dan Goodman
[unmask]Dan Goodman
[unmask]
http://www.visi.com/~dsgood.html
Whatever you wish for me, may you have twice as much.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Villikens and His Dinah
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:16:51 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Thank you all for the responses to my questions on this subject!
Best,
Dave Thomson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 01:52:19 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]><<While I have a half-dozen other titles in mind, with Heiman's permission,
I am soliciting your recommendations for reprints.>>Cecil Sharp's material, both English and American -- I think it's mostly out
of print now.
Carl Sandburg's "American Songbag"
Mary Wheeler's "Steamboatin' Days"
Perhaps A.L. Lloyd's industrial folksongs. Okay, I'm mostly post-1923.William Francis Allen, Charles Pickard Ware & Lucy McKim Garrison "Slave
Songs of the United States" (1867).
Henry Edward Krehbiel "Afro-American Folk Songs" (1914).Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:02:57 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Sandburg's American Songbag (or is it Sondbird's American Sandbag) was
reprinted in 1990 by Harcourt Brace; I believe it's still available.
Norm Cohen----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stamler" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
>
> <<While I have a half-dozen other titles in mind, with Heiman's
permission,
> I am soliciting your recommendations for reprints.>>
>
> Cecil Sharp's material, both English and American -- I think it's mostly
out
> of print now.
> Carl Sandburg's "American Songbag"
> Mary Wheeler's "Steamboatin' Days"
> Perhaps A.L. Lloyd's industrial folksongs. Okay, I'm mostly post-1923.
>
> William Francis Allen, Charles Pickard Ware & Lucy McKim Garrison "Slave
> Songs of the United States" (1867).
> Henry Edward Krehbiel "Afro-American Folk Songs" (1914).
>
> Peace,
> Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:23:26 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(82 lines)


How about Robert Gordon's articles in the NY Times?  Or a complete set of
his columns from Adventure Magazine?  Maybe too esoteric.
An excellent collection, even tho quite post-1923, is Al Friedman's Viking
Bookof English Ballads.  Is anyone working ona reprint of this?
By the way, what they are doing with Child sounds like a magnificent
project.
Norm
=
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Cray" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)> Folks:
>
> Mark Heiman is the publisher at Loomis House Press, which is bringing out
> the new edition of Child.
>
> He is interested in your suggestions of other books in the area of folk
> song/ballad and folklore which he might reprint.
>
> I immediately proposed Motherwell's Minstrelsy Ancient and Modern; and
> Ford's Vagabond Songs.
>
> While I have a half-dozen other titles in mind, with Heiman's permission,
> I am soliciting your recommendations for reprints.
>
> I will forward all such notices to Heiman.
>
> Ed
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:56:01 -0600
> From: "Mark F. Heiman, Loomis House Press" <[unmask]>
> To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> Subject: Re: folksong/lore books
>
> Ed,
> Thanks for your suggestions.  Please pass along any other titles you can
> think of, and share the request with others.  While pre-1923 works are
> easiest to manage with regard to rights, we're not averse to attempting to
> obtain rights for a newer work that would be of particular value.
> Naturally, we're particularly interested in titles with both scholarly and
> popular interest.
>
> We expect to be concentrating on completing the Child set over the next
> couple of years, but if there were something smaller (and what isn't?) and
> particularly interesting suggested, we might work it in between volumes.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Mark F. Heiman
>
>
>
> --On Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:29 PM -0800 Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Mark:
> >
> > I can suggest a number of titles in both folklore and folk song/ballad.
> > First and foremost would be an annotated reprint of William Motherwell's
> > Ancient Ballads.  I would also suggest Robert Ford's Vagabond
> > Songs.  Neither of these have been reprinted, so far as I know.
> >
> > I can list a dozen more titles without much thought, all in the public
> > domain, all long out of print.
> >
> > Would you object if I were to forward your query to a a list of ballad
> > lovers, scholars?  I think you would get a flurry of replies from folks
> > who have spent time looking for this or that volume.
> >
> > I should mention too that others like myself have expressed interest in
a
> > CD-ROM of Child, which we could easily search.  (I have Ken Goldstein's
> > Folklore Press of Child reprinted in 1956 [?] in three volumes.)
> >
> > Ed
> >

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 14:35:51 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Vaughan Williams/Lloyd: Penguin Book of English Folksongs, this time on
acid-free paper.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:03:27 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


I saw it (the 1990 paperback 'edition') about an hour ago at my local
Borders Bookstore.Bruce OlsonNorm Cohen wrote:
>
> Sandburg's American Songbag (or is it Sondbird's American Sandbag) was
> reprinted in 1990 by Harcourt Brace; I believe it's still available.
> Norm Cohen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Stamler" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:52 PM
> Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> >
> > <<While I have a half-dozen other titles in mind, with Heiman's
> permission,
> > I am soliciting your recommendations for reprints.>>
> >
> > Cecil Sharp's material, both English and American -- I think it's mostly
> out
> > of print now.
> > Carl Sandburg's "American Songbag"
> > Mary Wheeler's "Steamboatin' Days"
> > Perhaps A.L. Lloyd's industrial folksongs. Okay, I'm mostly post-1923.
> >
> > William Francis Allen, Charles Pickard Ware & Lucy McKim Garrison "Slave
> > Songs of the United States" (1867).
> > Henry Edward Krehbiel "Afro-American Folk Songs" > >
> > Peace,
> > Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Latest On Ebay
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:12:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Hi!        I feel a little strange posting about old editions of Child
amidst all this talk about a new one but here goes.        1479817572 - another complete set of the Dover edition; opening
at much higher price than the last set.
        1480878638 - Scottish and English Ballads published in Edinburgh
in 1872
        1480692827 - Songs of the Sea by Stan Hugill This is not his
large classic book of shanties but a later (1977) coffeetable size book.                                Happy Bidding!
                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: Cristilyn Schoenborn <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:29:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that "Mad Maudlin"
referred to a sister asylum of Bedlam. Is this true or am I
misremembering? Thanks for any information you can provide.Cris

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:18:53 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Maudlin is  another way of  referring to the hospital of St. Mary Magdalen
( Maudlen)>I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that "Mad Maudlin"
>referred to a sister asylum of Bedlam. Is this true or am I
>misremembering? Thanks for any information you can provide.
>
>Cris

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:20:04 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


On 11/1/01, Cristilyn Schoenborn wrote:>I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that "Mad Maudlin"
>referred to a sister asylum of Bedlam. Is this true or am I
>misremembering? Thanks for any information you can provide.You are quite correct. Magdalene ("maudlin") hospital was a
female asylum corresponding to Bethlehem ("bedlam") hospital
for men.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:20:27 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


"Bedlam" is the English pronunciation og "Bethlehem"--the name of an
asylum. Magdalen was another--pronounced "Maudlin". So help me!Cristilyn Schoenborn wrote:> I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that "Mad Maudlin"
> referred to a sister asylum of Bedlam. Is this true or am I
> misremembering? Thanks for any information you can provide.
>
> Cris

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: Cristilyn Schoenborn <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:41:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Thanks to everyone who answered! I had searched the web without success,
but thought someone here must know.Thanks again,
Cris

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 18:51:35 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


An excellent collection, even tho quite post-1923, is Al Friedman's Viking
Bookof English Ballads.  Is anyone working ona reprint of this?-- I have it on good authority that Penguin/Viking once asked Friedman
about doing a revised edition; not at all unreasonably, he said
[approximately], OK, but how about dressing it up with a few
illustrations? And the bean counters said no. That seems to have been the
end of that. As I recall, it went out of print in 1986, after a sterling
30-year run.Cheers / MB

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: folksong/lore books (fwd)
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 02:40:54 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Paul Stamler wrote:>Vaughan Williams/Lloyd: Penguin Book of English Folksongs, this time on
acid-free paper.The English Folk Dance and Song Society has recently discovered that they
appear to hold all the rights to that book, apart from the typefaces
originally used and the "Penguin" part of the title. There is a good chance
of it's being re-issued in some form before very long, though I don't think
that any concrete plans exist just yet.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: What to reprint
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 19:15:13 -0800
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(24 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: What to reprint
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:56:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


Jon Bartlett wrote:
>
> Who as the character who said, "Think of me as Santa Claus"?
> My personal wishlist
> 1. Journal of the EFDSS (the whole thing, in 1 vol.)
> 2. Last Leaves and Folk Songs of the NE, Greig
> 3. Bronson, Trad Tunes of the Child Ballads
> 4. Sharp, Appalachians
> 5. John Ord, Bothy ballads
>
> re Songbag: I just bought a 2nd hander on eBay for $3.
> Jon BartlettJohn Donald Publishers Ltd, Edinburgh, reprinted
John Ord's 'Bothy Ballads' about 1997 in paperback,
with a new introduction (with pictures) by Sandy Fenton.I got it severals months ago, but publication
date isn't given. ISBN 0 85976 303 XYou can locate it at www.bookfinder.comBruce Olson--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 1 Nov 2001 23:12:26 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


<<You are quite correct. Magdalene ("maudlin") hospital was a
female asylum corresponding to Bethlehem ("bedlam") hospital
for men.>>And the building which housed one of them (I forget which -- and each one
had at least two locations over the centuries) is now the Imperial War
Museum.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:57:43 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


>> I seem to remember hearing or reading somewhere that "Mad
>> Maudlin" referred to a sister asylum of Bedlam. Is this
>> true or am I misremembering?
> Maudlin is  another way of  referring to the hospital of
> St. Mary Magdalen (Maudlen)"Magdalene asylums", at least from the 18th century on, were houses
for reforming prostitutes.  See Linda Mahood's "The Magdalenes"
(Routledge, 1990).=================== <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> ===================

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: What to reprint
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:36:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


In conscience, I can only recommend something I don't already have and would
actually buy.  "Last Leaves," Greig & Keith and "Ballads & Sea Songs,"
Greenleaf & Mansfield would be most welcome.All the best,
Dan Milner----- Original Message -----
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: What to reprint> Jon Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > Who as the character who said, "Think of me as Santa Claus"?
> > My personal wishlist
> > 1. Journal of the EFDSS (the whole thing, in 1 vol.)
> > 2. Last Leaves and Folk Songs of the NE, Greig
> > 3. Bronson, Trad Tunes of the Child Ballads
> > 4. Sharp, Appalachians
> > 5. John Ord, Bothy ballads
> >
> > re Songbag: I just bought a 2nd hander on eBay for $3.
> > Jon Bartlett
>
> John Donald Publishers Ltd, Edinburgh, reprinted
> John Ord's 'Bothy Ballads' about 1997 in paperback,
> with a new introduction (with pictures) by Sandy Fenton.
>
> I got it severals months ago, but publication
> date isn't given. ISBN 0 85976 303 X
>
> You can locate it at www.bookfinder.com
>
> Bruce Olson
>
> --
> Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
> broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
> or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>
> Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: What to reprint
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:32:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


[unmask],InetGW2 writes:
>In conscience, I can only recommend something I don't already have and would
>actually buy.  "Last Leaves," Greig & Keith and "Ballads & Sea Songs,"
>Greenleaf & Mansfield would be most welcome.The Folklore Department at Memorial University in St. John's was talking quite recently about reprinting Greenleaf & Mansfield.  I'm not sure how far the plans have gotten, though.I would also second Jon's call for reprinting of Bronson.  Even unaffordable copies are difficult to find!Making Child available on CD-ROM is excellent news.  Does anyone know if it will include everything (headnotes, bibliography & sources, etc.)?Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: What to reprint
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:59:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


An electronic edition (on CD) of  any standard work would be extremely helpful,
if a full-text search engine were incorporated.
The technology is relatively cheap and simple, and the advantage over a printed
index/table of contents is immense. Further, there'd never be a problem of going
out of print or  finding enough orders for a new press run.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: What to reprint
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:05:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I was going to ask for The Shanty Book by R. R. Terry, but a search on
bookfinder.com revealed a new two volume edition. However, when I clicked
on that, I got an out of stock message.Does anyone know more about this work? publisher and availability?Many thanks  --  Tom

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bronson
From: Mary Stafford <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:22:44 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Just out of curiosity, anyone have an idea of the value of the Bronson volumes? I have the full set, bought years back as they were being published, in excellent shape. Not that I'm thinking of selling them, but that I sort of want to have an idea of value as I leave them to my kids in my will! I also have the hardcover Child set published by Cooper Square Press, condition good (some covers a bit loose, all pages intact), and Sharp's English Folk Songs From the Southern Appalachians, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, London, 1932, also in good condition. Any guesses at value would be appreciated.Mary Stafford
[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:04:08 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


>Just out of curiosity, anyone have an idea of the value of the Bronson
>volumes? I have the full set, bought years back as they were being
>published, in excellent shape. Not that I'm thinking of selling them, but
>that I sort of want to have an idea of value as I leave them to my kids in
>my will! I also have the hardcover Child set published by Cooper Square
>Press, condition good (some covers a bit loose, all pages intact), and
>Sharp's English Folk Songs From the Southern Appalachians, 2 volumes,
>Oxford University Press, London, 1932, also in good condition. Any guesses
>at value would be appreciated.
>
>Mary Stafford
>[unmask]Go to bookfinder.com, enter author and/or title. This will give you some
idea of what booksellers are asking for the specific books. You may have to
do this over a period of time as not all your books may be available at any
one time.  You may find widely differing prices; some booksellers are
notoriously high.--  Tom

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:38:35 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(35 lines)


On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Mary Stafford wrote:> Just out of curiosity, anyone have an idea of the value of the Bronson
> volumes? I have the full set, bought years back as they were being
> published, in excellent shape. Not that I'm thinking of selling them,
> but that I sort of want to have an idea of value as I leave them to my
> kids in my will! I also have the hardcover Child set published by
> Cooper Square Press, condition good (some covers a bit loose, all
> pages intact), and Sharp's English Folk Songs From the Southern
> Appalachians, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, London, 1932, also
> in good condition. Any guesses at value would be appreciated.
>
> Mary Stafford
> [unmask]
>Mary:For just the same estate reasons, I have been noting prices of various
books on folklore and folk song since 1998.My notes indicate that the last time a Bronson volume was offered, in
2000, it went for $250 for the single volume.Child in the Cooper Square edition, ex-library, went for $600 FOR THE
FIRST OF THE THREE VOLUMES ALONE.  I have seen the Dover reprint offered
(and sold) for $500 to $900.  Andrew Carnegie's bound, presentation copy
of the original edition -- he underwrote some of Child's expenses -- sold
earlier this year for $5,000, I believe.  A full set of the Child was
available for $4,500.I have not seen Sharp-Karpeles, 1932 or 1952 offered.  It's price will
similarly be in the hundreds.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tom O'Bedlam Question
From: "Roy G. Berkeley" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:04:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Right, Paul- the Imperial War Museum is on the site of the former Bedlam.  In
fact, I think
that it still uses the original main building as part of its now-larger
building.Paul Stamler wrote:> <<You are quite correct. Magdalene ("maudlin") hospital was a
> female asylum corresponding to Bethlehem ("bedlam") hospital
> for men.>>
>
> And the building which housed one of them (I forget which -- and each one
> had at least two locations over the centuries) is now the Imperial War
> Museum.
>
> Peace,
> Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More Ebay Finds
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 3 Nov 2001 18:58:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Hi!        A number of books have appeared in the last two days. Most are
dedicated to the study of a particular state/province.        1481218455 - Songs and Ballads from Nova Scotia by Creighton
        1481513450 - Ballads and Songs from Ohio by Eddy (1939)
        1481506644 - South Carolina Ballads by Smith (1928)
        1481497260 - Ballads of the Kentucky Highlands by Fuson (1931)
        1481495105 - The Ballad of Tradition by Geraould (1932)        Most of these are being sold by the same bookseller.                                        Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ship in the Sky
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 4 Nov 2001 10:11:38 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


Guys:I need help, specifically, the source of the tune Woody Guthrie used for
his "Ship in the Sky."  The song, written in November 15, 1941, is a
seen-from-a-child-eye restatement of Franklin Roosevelt's Arsenal of
Democracy program.The first stanza runs:A curly headed kid with a sunshiny smile
Heard the roar of a plane as it sailed through the sky.
To her playmates she cried with a bright twinkling eye,
My daddy rides that ship in sky!   My daddy rides that ship in the sky (2)
   Mama's not afraid, and neither am I,
   So my daddy rides that ship in the sky!  etc.The tune source lurks just beyond memory, flitting in and out of my grasp.
Will someone put me out of my misery?  (Full credit granted in my
forthcoming biography of Guthrie.)Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: hmm
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 3 Nov 2001 11:16:04 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Dear all,I thought you might like to reflect on this gaffe in a student essay."The album consists of 6 traditional, but little-known, English songs.
This album has no celtic flavor, being entirely folk."Perhaps we are being confronted with a new bona fide meaning here? The
perpetrator in question is definitely a product of the urban discotheque
culture whose presence in my course is more likely due a need to meet
the minimum semester credit requirements rather than any interest in the
topic, but I just wonder if "celtic" really has become a "style" - you
know, like skiffle, blues, beebop, rap, house... !!!! Stranger things
have happened to words.Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:46:56 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


<<Perhaps we are being confronted with a new bona fide meaning here? The
perpetrator in question is definitely a product of the urban discotheque
culture whose presence in my course is more likely due a need to meet
the minimum semester credit requirements rather than any interest in the
topic, but I just wonder if "celtic" really has become a "style" - you
know, like skiffle, blues, beebop, rap, house... !!!! Stranger things
have happened to words.>>It certainly has; you take a couple of traditional instruments like whistle,
add layers of synthesizer, drench the whole thing in artificial reverb, and
presto. It's become formulaic, in the same way that bluegrass did a couple
of decades ago.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 08:02:05 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(27 lines)


Andy:The very word "folk" in commercial music circles means anyone who plays an
acoustic guitar and sings.EdOn Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Andy Rouse wrote:> Dear all,
>
> I thought you might like to reflect on this gaffe in a student essay.
>
> "The album consists of 6 traditional, but little-known, English songs.
> This album has no celtic flavor, being entirely folk."
>
> Perhaps we are being confronted with a new bona fide meaning here? The
> perpetrator in question is definitely a product of the urban discotheque
> culture whose presence in my course is more likely due a need to meet
> the minimum semester credit requirements rather than any interest in the
> topic, but I just wonder if "celtic" really has become a "style" - you
> know, like skiffle, blues, beebop, rap, house... !!!! Stranger things
> have happened to words.
>
> Andy
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Clifford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:36:54 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


At 11:16 AM +0100 11/3/01, Andy Rouse wrote:
>I just wonder if "celtic" really has become a "style"        Can't speak for your student's taste but, from a marketing point of
view, "Celtic" is a "style." Both of the major shops here in N.O., Tower
and Virgin, have a "Celtic" section though it is clear that the staff has
little idea what "Celtic" means unless it is part of the CD's title or a
bagpipe appears on the cover. In the book section of these stores and other
book shops in town one finds at least three or four "guides" to recorded
"Celtic" music.Cliff

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:48:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Aww, come on.  Celtic music has something to do with ethnic Celts, with
REAL sources -- you kow, Irish, Scots, Cornish, Manx, Welsh, Breton,
Galician.
That other stuff with heavy reverb and tin whistles, bodhrans and stuff
added on -- that's CELTOID.  Been using this useful term for years.Back to lurking -- including some VERY interesting and enlightening posts,
thank you.Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio - Washington, DC

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:02:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Well, Pete Seeger put it best when he said that folk songs are just songs
sung by folks.  I just cringe everytime I hear someone repeat that.A year ago, I was thinking of recording some songs of Irish and Scottish
origin under a Celtic banner but I was strongly advised that the
entertainment world had by then perverted Celtic to mean ethereal, English,
New Age, etc. (stuff we humorously used to call Celtoid) and the recording
would miss its intended audience by using the "C" word.What are you going to do?  We're just a few folks against all those "folks."All the best,
Dan Milner----- Original Message -----
From: "Clifford J Ocheltree" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: hmm> At 11:16 AM +0100 11/3/01, Andy Rouse wrote:
> >I just wonder if "celtic" really has become a "style"
>
>         Can't speak for your student's taste but, from a marketing point
of
> view, "Celtic" is a "style." Both of the major shops here in N.O., Tower
> and Virgin, have a "Celtic" section though it is clear that the staff has
> little idea what "Celtic" means unless it is part of the CD's title or a
> bagpipe appears on the cover. In the book section of these stores and
other
> book shops in town one finds at least three or four "guides" to recorded
> "Celtic" music.
>
> Cliff

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:05:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Ah, yes, Mary.  Great minds think alike.All the best,
Dan Milner----- Original Message -----
From: "Mary Cliff" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: hmm> Aww, come on.  Celtic music has something to do with ethnic Celts, with
> REAL sources -- you kow, Irish, Scots, Cornish, Manx, Welsh, Breton,
> Galician.
> That other stuff with heavy reverb and tin whistles, bodhrans and stuff
> added on -- that's CELTOID.  Been using this useful term for years.
>
> Back to lurking -- including some VERY interesting and enlightening posts,
> thank you.
>
> Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
> WETA Radio - Washington, DC

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:59:58 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


On 11/5/01, Dan Milner wrote:>Well, Pete Seeger put it best when he said that folk songs are just songs
>sung by folks.  I just cringe everytime I hear someone repeat that.
>
>A year ago, I was thinking of recording some songs of Irish and Scottish
>origin under a Celtic banner but I was strongly advised that the
>entertainment world had by then perverted Celtic to mean ethereal, English,
>New Age, etc. (stuff we humorously used to call Celtoid) and the recording
>would miss its intended audience by using the "C" word.My local music store, which SHOULD know better, is guilty of the same
thing: If it comes from the British Isles, or is an American recording
of British songs (e.g. Connie Dover or the local Irish acts), it's
"Celtic."Personally, I use "British Isles" if it's from the British Isles,
and use "Celtic" only if I can't understand the words. :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:33:27 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


[unmask] writes:
>Ah, yes, Mary.  Great minds think alike.
>
>All the best,
>Dan MilnerThanks for the compliment, Dan. *-)
And for reminding me I'm overdo for a good sea song set.Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio - Washington, DC

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:00:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


I was taken aback a year or two ago in Borders, when I saw a CD
titled something like "The Celtic Sounds of Roy Orbison," with a
cover picture of an Irish pasture or suchlike. Thinking it might have
been some long lost roots project or a Phil Cunningham-produced remix
I checked the back cover, but it was just another repackaging of his
standard hit selections.John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Kathleen Conery <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:00:04 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


> --On Monday, November 5, 2001 1:00 PM -0500 John Roberts
> <[unmask]> wrote:
>> I was taken aback a year or two ago in Borders, when I saw a CD
>> titled something like "The Celtic Sounds of Roy Orbison," with a
>> cover picture of an Irish pasture or suchlike.This is a perfect example of both the use and uselessness of the term
"Celtic" for, perhaps atypical consumer, me.
My attention is caught by the term... enough to check out the
CD/Festival/Show/Program/Whatever. If I can't get further definition of
what they mean by "Celtic" then I rarely risk the money or time, but they
succeeded in gaining my interest, at least momentarily, and that's the
point of marketing.
I find the same thing when looking at other areas of interest to me such as
Ballads. I was uncertain of the parameters of the term when I joined this
list, and now see that many people misunderstand/misuse it. I want more
information on what this performer/producer is presenting as a ballad
before I commit.
And as far as "Folk", again speaking as a consumer only, I find the term to
have become almost totally useless.
Kathleen--
Kathleen Conery
[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:42:28 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


In a message dated 11/5/01 3:02:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, [unmask]
writes:I find that using the expression "Traditional Folk" or "Traditional Ballads"
at least makes people figure that I'm referring to something different than
singer-songwriter  with guitar or Bing Crosby crooning.I believe the "Folk songs are songs sung by folks" line comes from Woodie
Guthrie, although Pete Seeger no doubt used it on occasion.  My recollection
is that the actual line was more like.  "Folks songs - well I ain't heard no
horses singing them"Mark<< I find the same thing when looking at other areas of interest to me such as
 Ballads. I was uncertain of the parameters of the term when I joined this
 list, and now see that many people misunderstand/misuse it. I want more
 information on what this performer/producer is presenting as a ballad
 before I commit.
 And as far as "Folk", again speaking as a consumer only, I find the term to
 have become almost totally useless. >>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 17:03:25 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


And probably also for a good Newcastle set....
The pages at
http://www.geocities.com/matalzi/geordiesang.htmlWill soon receive another 40 songs as we are still the leader in bringing
geordie songs to the internet-unfunded too I might add.ConradMary Cliff wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >Ah, yes, Mary.  Great minds think alike.
> >
> >All the best,
> >Dan Milner
>
> Thanks for the compliment, Dan. *-)
> And for reminding me I'm overdo for a good sea song set.
>
> Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
> WETA Radio - Washington, DC--
He left his home in the heart of the North
To seek streets paved with gold
But when he reached the golden land of dreams
He found he'd struck fool's goldNow some men work for love of  silver.
And some men work for love of gold.
And some men work for bugger all.
And that's all they can afford- The Whiskey Priests, Streets Paved with
Gold

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:01:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


In a message dated 11/5/01 3:02:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[unmask]
writes:<<I find that using the expression "Traditional Folk" or "Traditional
Ballads"
at least makes people figure that I'm referring to something different than
singer-songwriter  with guitar or Bing Crosby crooning.>>Although a few years ago, the Grammy award for "Best Traditional Folk
Recording" was won by Greg Brown, a talented singer-songwriter but still not
a singer-songwriter. In some circles, "Traditional" now means "no drums".<<I believe the "Folk songs are songs sung by folks" line comes from Woodie
Guthrie, although Pete Seeger no doubt used it on occasion.  My recollection
is that the actual line was more like.  "Folks songs - well I ain't heard no
horses singing them">>That quote ("They must be folk songs -- I ain't heard no horses singin'
'em") was a catch-phrase of Big Bill Broonzy back in the 1940s-1950s. Got
picked up and attributed to all sorts of other people, including Lead Belly
and Louis Armstrong.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 01:06:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


Yes, Celtic is definitely a style, though it may not be codified, nor may it
have the same definition nationwide (or throughout the English world).  I
guess that begs the question of how many people have to agree that a style
exists before it is a style.I think of "Celtic" as a new-age form, with prettified lyrics and some Irish
roots.  Album covers are often a little out of focus with some pastoral
scene.  There for a while, Celtic bands seemed a dime-a-dozen in the US
southeast and I got the feeling they were sometimes formed as a lifestyle
statement.  This might be a trifle unfair, but I should think that a Celtic
band ought to have at least one practising wiccan (preferably drawing her
power from past Driudic priestesses) and several of the members should be
packing crystals.I put Celtic in a different category than the Irish and Scot popular music
that also evolved from the traditional music of those islands (and might be
compared to bluegrass -- though those musician seem more self-conscious than
bluegrassers).I know several traditional Irish musician who intensely dislike the term
"Celtic Music."So, I see nothing at all contradictory in the statement:  "The album
consists of 6 traditional, but little-known, English songs.  This album has
no celtic flavor, being entirely folk."Brent Cantrell
Executive Director
Jubilee Community Arts
Knoxville

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 5 Nov 2001 23:19:27 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(13 lines)


> That quote ("They must be folk songs -- I ain't heard no horses singin'
> 'em") was a catch-phrase of Big Bill Broonzy back in the 1940s-1950s. Got
> picked up and attributed to all sorts of other people, including Lead Belly
> and Louis Armstrong.
>
> Peace,
> Paul... a bit like the legendary riposte to a naive query "What exactly is the
appeal of jazz?"-- not only attributed to Satch, Duke, "somebody," et al.,
but with versions ranging from "There's some people that if they don't
know, you can't tell 'em" to "If it has to be explained to you, you'll
never understand it."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: please weigh in on this
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:55:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Hi, folks.  I need you all to weigh in on what you would prefer: right now,
the list option on replies is that unless your mail program overrfides it,
your reply will go only to the person who sent the message.  Would you like
that to continue, or would you rather that your replies go to the whole
list?  I'd like to see what the consensus is before I decide to make the
change.  Thanks much.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: please weigh in on this
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:12:21 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


On 11/6/01, Marge Steiner wrote:>Hi, folks.  I need you all to weigh in on what you would prefer: right now,
>the list option on replies is that unless your mail program overrfides it,
>your reply will go only to the person who sent the message.  Would you like
>that to continue, or would you rather that your replies go to the whole
>list?  I'd like to see what the consensus is before I decide to make the
>change.  Thanks much.I would vote for replies to the list. If I see a message to
Ballad-L, my general tendency is to react to the list. I expect
to have to change the address if I want to reply to the individual.I've made this mistake too many times. :-)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Information on a Pantomime request
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:33:15 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


A broadside recently turned up on ebay-
an advert for Theatre Royal Covent Garden London
It mentions
Harlequin Guy Fawkes
or
The Fifth of November
Pantomime.Anyone know of a good source for the score/text of old Pantomimes
Early 19th century?interesting chant turned up on the bottom a new one for the collection
Remember, remember
The Fifth Of November
Gunpowder, Treason and plotwe see no reason
Why gunpowder Treason
Should ever be forgotGuy Fawkes, Guy
With his lantern so sly
Got into parliament house.Conrad

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: please weigh in on this
From: "David G. Engle" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:55:22 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


>Hi, folks.  I need you all to weigh in on what you would prefer: right now,
>the list option on replies is that unless your mail program overrfides it,
>your reply will go only to the person who sent the message.  Would you like
>that to continue, or would you rather that your replies go to the whole
>list?  I'd like to see what the consensus is before I decide to make the
>change.  Thanks much.
>
>        Marge
>
>
>E-mail: [unmask]Oh, to the list, very much to the list!Peace,DavidDavid G. Engleemail:  [unmask]
web:    http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore
        http://www.csufresno.edu/forlang        The Traditional Ballad Index:
        http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: please weigh in on this
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:22:38 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Marge:I, for one, would prefer to be able to answer privately, with the option
of adding "ballad-l" on the cc: list.  Just as I did with this message.EdOn Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hi, folks.  I need you all to weigh in on what you would prefer: right now,
> the list option on replies is that unless your mail program overrfides it,
> your reply will go only to the person who sent the message.  Would you like
> that to continue, or would you rather that your replies go to the whole
> list?  I'd like to see what the consensus is before I decide to make the
> change.  Thanks much.
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: please weigh in on this
From: Kristine Batey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:13:09 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


>Unless I stop and think, I tend to assume my replies are going to the
>list. That's what I'd prefer.Kristine Batey
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.  USA
[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: please weigh in on this
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:29:41 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


I go along with most of the rest of the folks -- I'd like replies to
automatically go to the list. Is it possible, though, for it to be
individually selectable, so Ed can have it go to the sender?Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Weighing In
From: Linn Schulz <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 09:09:28 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Put me down for replies to the list. I can always
reply to poster easily enough if it's not of general
interest, but most matters brought to the list ARE of
general interest.Linn***************************************************************
Linn S. Schulz
Writing - Editing - Print Design & Production
phone/fax 603-942-7604
Mailing Address: PO Box 4402, Portsmouth, NH 03802
USA****************************************************************__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: please weigh in on this
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:46:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


To the list, please. That's how I find out who here has expertise and
interests in particular areas, and we cover a lot of areas.If replies are off list then list members don't know what has already
been answered in that manner. It can lead to needless duplication of
effort.Bruce Olson--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Weighing In
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:50:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


It should certainly go to the list. A list is what this is.At the moment it is variable (my computerese is far too limited for
me to know why), some posts reply automatically to just the sender,
some to the list.Obviously it's easy enough to reply individually by inserting the
sender's name in the "To" field, but an "unthinking" reply should be
there for all to see :-)John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Weighing In
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:16:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 12:50:56PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:> It should certainly go to the list. A list is what this is.        Absolutely.> At the moment it is variable (my computerese is far too limited for
> me to know why), some posts reply automatically to just the sender,
> some to the list.        If the poster's e-mail program sets a "Reply-To: " header line,
the list manager program keeps that.  Otherwise, it inserts its own
"Reply-To: " header pointing to the list.  Thus some (such as I) who
have set up to have their "Reply-To: " set will get individual replies,
whether they want them such or not.> Obviously it's easy enough to reply individually by inserting the
> sender's name in the "To" field, but an "unthinking" reply should be
> there for all to see :-)        Agreed.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Weighing In
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:45:09 -0800
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(5 lines) , text/html(17 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Weighing In
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:46:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Please have messages go to the entire list for all the good reasons already
stated. Once in a while, for reasons beyond my ken, a reply I had intended
for the list went only to the individual poster  -  very frustrating. As
others said, one can easily PM the individual.--  Tom

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Weighing In
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:48:06 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


On 11/6/01, Jon Bartlett wrote:>List or personal?  List, please.  I have another question: I'd like to circulate a draft paper (on "Lamkin") to the list for comments.  I'm not an academic and don't know whether this is kosher; if it is, is there a separate subsite for it? (I just see short-form responses on this list but maybe there's some other "room" I don't know about).(Sounds like Bluebeard).The basic rule is, "No attachments to the list," sez I. If you can
post it as text, and it isn't unreasonably large, do it and see what
happens. But if you want us to read a Microsoft W*rd file -- count
me out.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Weighing In
From: Rob Hutten <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:17:17 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


Jon Bartlett wrote:
> > I'd like to circulate a draft paper (on "Lamkin") to the list for comments.
And Robert B. Waltz replied::
>
> The basic rule is, "No attachments to the list," sez I. If you can
> post it as text, and it isn't unreasonably large, do it and see what
> happens. But if you want us to read a Microsoft W*rd file -- count
> me out.If anyone wants to circulate a document or other file to the list,
feel free to send it to me personally ([unmask]) and I'll
post it on my website.  You can then post just the URL to the list,
and everybody's happy.-Rob

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: oops!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:06:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Appologies from your inept listowner.  I just checked with our university's
list administrator, and, apprently, the list is configured as it should be,
so that replies should go to the entire list.  It may be that some folks are
having issues with their individual mail programs.  sorry about all this: I
don't have to do this stuff very often, so there you are!        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: from the administratorFW: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:18:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(139 lines)


Hi, folks.  I'm not sure what else to suggest.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Peg Bassett [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:00 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmmMarge,The list is configured correctly; the problem is with the email client that
your subscriber is using.  He/she will need to get assistance from their
local support person to change the behavior on replies.PegPeg Bassett
UITS Messaging Team
IUB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marge Steiner" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:55 PM
Subject: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm>
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Stamler [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 2:17 AM
> To: Marge Steiner (Ballad-L)
> Subject: Fw: hmm
>
>
> Hi Marge:
>
> For some reason, my stuff gets posted to the list with the automatic
setting
> of "Reply To:" me rather than the list. See John's message to me
(following
> my signature). I don't quite see how to fix this in my e-mail program; is
it
> a list setting?
>
> Peace,
> Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
> To: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:42 AM
> Subject: Re: hmm
>
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Here's the preamble to one of your mailings to the ballad list as it
> comes to me on Eudora:
>
> Delivered-To: [unmask]
> X-Priority: 3
> Date:         Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:01:57 -0600
> Reply-To:     Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
> Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> From:         Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
> Subject:      Re: hmm
> To:           [unmask]
>
> Compare the "Reply to" field with those below. Mark Gilston and Ed
> Cray have it set to reply to the list; you and Dick Greenhaus have it
> set so replies are sent to them. It seems about 50/50. Bruce Olson
> gets reply to the list when he posts as "Bruce Olson" - when he posts
> as "W. B. OLSON" the reply field is back to him. Beats me. I'm not
> sure where that gets set. I just get annoyed with myself when I
> forget to check.
>
> Cheers,
> John.
>
>
>
>
> Here's the preamble to a couple more:
>
> Delivered-To: [unmask]
> Date:         Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:42:28 EST
> Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> From:         Trad Man <[unmask]>
> Subject:      Re: hmm
> To:           [unmask]
>
>
> Delivered-To: [unmask]
> Date:         Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:38:35 -0800
> Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> From:         Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> Subject:      Re: Bronson
> To:           [unmask]
>
> Delivered-To: [unmask]
> X-Accept-Language: en
> Date:         Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:59:11 -0500
> Reply-To:     [unmask]
> Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> From:         dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
> Subject:      Re: What to reprint
> To:           [unmask]
>
>
>
>
> ><<I did it again dammit! Everytime I use your email as a route to a
> >reply it goes to you rather than to the list. If I pick another post
> >from someone else it goes to the list automatically. Have you got
> >your "reply field" set differently or something?>>
> >
> >I don't think so...nope, nothing obvious poking up in my settings. Odd;
> does
> >this happen when you reply to anyone else?
> >
> >Peace,
> >Paul
>
>
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 5 Nov 2001 to 6 Nov 2001 - Special issue (#2001-196)
From: Margaret MacArthur <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:30:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Replying to the list works for meMargaret MacArthur
Box 15 MacArthur Road
Marlboro VT 05344
802/254/2549
[unmask]
http://www.margaretmacarthur.com
from the heart of the Green Mountains

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: from the administratorFW: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:36:17 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]><<Hi, folks.  I'm not sure what else to suggest<<The list is configured correctly; the problem is with the email client
that
your subscriber is using.  He/she will need to get assistance from their
local support person to change the behavior on replies.>>Local support person? Ha! I'm an individual user, and I'm using a M-------t
product. Their motto is, "You want support? Buy a kidney belt."I'm one of the people whose stuff gets replied to off-list (in fact, I found
out about it because John Roberts accidentally sent a reply to one of my
messages that only went to me). Anyone here know how to make Outlook Express
sit up and do right?Marge is another -- at least, I just replied to her message, and had to
paste in the list's address.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: could you let me know...
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:39:58 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Could people who are having problems sending replies let me know, and also
what mail clients you use?  Once again, I'm not a computer nird at all, but
I can inquire.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: BALLAD-L Digest - 5 Nov 2001 to 6 Nov 2001 - Special issue (#2001-196)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:42:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Fascinating.  When I hit "Reply" for this it came up "To" the list
address, but when I do the same with other messages, including those
from Marge, it comes up "To" the individual!>Replying to the list works for me
>
>Margaret MacArthur
>Box 15 MacArthur Road
>Marlboro VT 05344
>802/254/2549
>[unmask]
>http://www.margaretmacarthur.com
>from the heart of the Green Mountains--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: could you let me know...
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:52:42 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


On 11/6/01, Marge Steiner wrote:>Could people who are having problems sending replies let me know, and also
>what mail clients you use?  Once again, I'm not a computer nird at all, but
>I can inquire.
>
>        MargeSome help here for people: The problem is not in the e-mail clients
of the RECIPIENTS of messages to the list. It's in the program
of the SENDERS. (Though whether it's a problem is one of those
unanswerable questions. It actually means, ironically, that they
have configured their software correctly. :-)The key here is the Reply-To: field in individual messages.
If a message has a "value" in this field, a reply will go to
that address. For example, messages from Marge Steiner contain
the lineReply-To: [unmask]So when I replied to *this* message, the reply "tried to"
go to Marge Steiner until I overrode it.Other messages contain the "correct" Reply-To: value
of the list address.It is my understanding that LISTSERV and most of its relatives
will INSERT the Reply-To: value of the list if no Reply-To:
value is specified by the sender, but will "respect" the
Reply-To: value of the sender if there is something there.Thus, the behavior of the list is "proper" for LISTSERV. But
it's not what we want. :-) What we want is an override: We
want the list to set the Reply-To: value to Ballad-L
*no matter what*.I don't know if that's possible with this software. But you
can try explaining it to the computer guru there.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ship in the Sky (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:05:52 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(34 lines)


Folks:Michael gave permission for me to post this reply to my query.  The
"Midnight Special" family tree is particularly interesting.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 21:51:52 -0700 (MST)
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Ship in the SkyThe tune source lurks just beyond memory, flitting in and out of my graspDear Ed-- I empathize. (See below.) I'm no good at this, either; too bad
John Hartford and Sam Bayard aren't around to tell us. But the tune of the
first line reminds me of "Old 97" (tho' the latter is a few notes longer),
& Woody's second follows from the first, in a way. To my ears, the
4th-line melody echoes popular music more than a folk source. That's as
much as I can think of right now.For years I was bugged by a distorted, just-beyond-memory echo in John
Hurt's "Richland WOmen Blues," & finally realized that if you speed it up,
you get CHuck Berry's "Sweet Little Sixteen." A ripoff of which, "Surfin'
U.S.A.," was like a second-stage rocket to the pop music of the 1960s.I mentioned this to a summer folklore class years ago, & a student came up
afterward & said, "You realize that tune is 'The Midnight Special,' don't
you?" I could have throttled the kid where he stood. He was absolutely
right.All best / Mike Bell

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:12:11 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(13 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: from the administratorFW: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 17:22:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(167 lines)


Marge Steiner wrote:
>
> Hi, folks.  I'm not sure what else to suggest.
>
>         Marge
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peg Bassett [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 4:00 PM
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm
>
> Marge,
>
> The list is configured correctly; the problem is with the email client that
> your subscriber is using.  He/she will need to get assistance from their
> local support person to change the behavior on replies.
>
> Peg
>
> Peg Bassett
> UITS Messaging Team
> IUB
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marge Steiner" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 3:55 PM
> Subject: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm
>
> >
> >
> >
> > E-mail: [unmask]
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Stamler [mailto:[unmask]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 2:17 AM
> > To: Marge Steiner (Ballad-L)
> > Subject: Fw: hmm
> >
> >
> > Hi Marge:
> >
> > For some reason, my stuff gets posted to the list with the automatic
> setting
> > of "Reply To:" me rather than the list. See John's message to me
> (following
> > my signature). I don't quite see how to fix this in my e-mail program; is
> it
> > a list setting?
> >
> > Peace,
> > Paul
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
> > To: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: hmm
> >
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Here's the preamble to one of your mailings to the ballad list as it
> > comes to me on Eudora:
> >
> > Delivered-To: [unmask]
> > X-Priority: 3
> > Date:         Tue, 6 Nov 2001 00:01:57 -0600
> > Reply-To:     Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
> > Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > From:         Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
> > Subject:      Re: hmm
> > To:           [unmask]
> >
> > Compare the "Reply to" field with those below. Mark Gilston and Ed
> > Cray have it set to reply to the list; you and Dick Greenhaus have it
> > set so replies are sent to them. It seems about 50/50. Bruce Olson
> > gets reply to the list when he posts as "Bruce Olson" - when he posts
> > as "W. B. OLSON" the reply field is back to him. Beats me. I'm not
> > sure where that gets set. I just get annoyed with myself when I
> > forget to check.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > John.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Here's the preamble to a couple more:
> >
> > Delivered-To: [unmask]
> > Date:         Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:42:28 EST
> > Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > From:         Trad Man <[unmask]>
> > Subject:      Re: hmm
> > To:           [unmask]
> >
> >
> > Delivered-To: [unmask]
> > Date:         Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:38:35 -0800
> > Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > From:         Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > Subject:      Re: Bronson
> > To:           [unmask]
> >
> > Delivered-To: [unmask]
> > X-Accept-Language: en
> > Date:         Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:59:11 -0500
> > Reply-To:     [unmask]
> > Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > From:         dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
> > Subject:      Re: What to reprint
> > To:           [unmask]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ><<I did it again dammit! Everytime I use your email as a route to a
> > >reply it goes to you rather than to the list. If I pick another post
> > >from someone else it goes to the list automatically. Have you got
> > >your "reply field" set differently or something?>>
> > >
> > >I don't think so...nope, nothing obvious poking up in my settings. Odd;
> > does
> > >this happen when you reply to anyone else?
> > >
> > >Peace,
> > >Paul
> >
> >
> >Sorry, I wiped out my unneeded "Reply to" address at one time (see Don
Nichols posting), but somehow it got back in. (Probably after reloading
Netscape following a bit of a system crash I had some months ago) I've
now deleted it again, so the 'Reply' address will revert to the list,
not to my email address."Reply to" seems to be usefull only if your posting web address is
different from your receiving web address.Since Don's message apparently hasn't been well understood, let me
expand a bit on it:Note that the way the listserv server is set up (unlike the older
majordomo server), it is up to the POSTER to set up his own email
WITHOUT a "Reply to" if he wants replys to go to the list. If there is a
"Reply to" in his or her own postings (a default somewhere in his or her
own email sending setup), then the listserv server will use the poster's
"Reply to" address as the "To" address for a reply, and not put in the
list address as the "To" address. In my old Netscape this "Reply to" is
at Options/ News and Mail Preferences/ Identity.Note that Marge Steiner has a "Reply to" address in her own email setup,
so a click-on 'Reply' to her postings will go only to her, not to the
list.Since we can't change the listserv setup, it's up to each poster to take
care of it in his or her own email setup.Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Weighing In
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:08:01 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


Jon:I would welcome seeing your "Lamkin" article.  I would welcome anyone's
contributions.  As I have said before, the nicest thing about this group
is the wisdom of its members -- and their kindness to strangers.EdOn Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Jon Bartlett wrote:> List or personal?  List, please.  I have another question: I'd like to circulate a draft paper (on "Lamkin") to the list for comments.  I'm not an academic and don't know whether this is kosher; if it is, is there a separate subsite for it? (I just see short-form responses on this list but maybe there's some other "room" I don't know about).(Sounds like Bluebeard).
>
> Jon Bartlett
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 23:09:23 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


This was listed in the Garland catalogue for (I think) a couple of years
running, and I tried to get it at the time, but without success. I seem to
remember some correspondence with him that it was 'nearly finished' but I'm
pretty sure it never saw the light day. It's a shame, because its 'imminent
publication' stopped me from attempting to publish my own bibliography on
the subject.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:12 PM
Subject: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography> The Library of Congress OPAC shows:
>
> Street Literature in Great Britain and America: A bibliography/Rainer
Wehse
> New York; London: Garland Pub., 1985
>
> The LC Clasification states "8506 BOOK NOT YET IN LC"
>
> I can find this listed no-where else. Can anyone confirm the apparent
> probability that it was never published?
>
> John Moulden
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:13:52 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


Marge:'S okay, I was a minority of one anyway.  (I think I may have
misunderstood the question.)EdOn Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Marge Steiner wrote:> Appologies from your inept listowner.  I just checked with our university's
> list administrator, and, apprently, the list is configured as it should be,
> so that replies should go to the entire list.  It may be that some folks are
> having issues with their individual mail programs.  sorry about all this: I
> don't have to do this stuff very often, so there you are!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:31:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 04:06:10PM -0500, Marge Steiner wrote:> Appologies from your inept listowner.  I just checked with our university's
> list administrator, and, apprently, the list is configured as it should be,
> so that replies should go to the entire list.  It may be that some folks are
> having issues with their individual mail programs.  sorry about all this: I
> don't have to do this stuff very often, so there you are!        What is happening is that some of us (me included, and you as
well, after checking the headers of this message) have the "Reply-To: "
header set in their e-mail program.  Your list server leaves this as it
is, if it is set, otherwise installs one pointing to the list.        Not all e-mail programs honor the "Reply-To: " header, but those
which do will reply to that address in preference to the "From: "
address, which is always pointing to the list address.        Is it possible for your admin staff to configure the server to
override "Reply-To: " headers, instead of leaving them intact?  This
would make the behavior of the list consistent no matter whose posting
is being replied to.  Otherwise you (and I) will get lots of replies
which were intended for the list.  I didn't even remember to check and
correct the address when I replied to your initial question, so it went
to you alone, rather than to the list.        Thanks,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: from the administratorFW: the message that sparked all thisFW: hmm
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:44:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(64 lines)


On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 05:22:03PM -0500, W. B. OLSON wrote:        [ ... lots of preceding discussion snipped ... ]> Sorry, I wiped out my unneeded "Reply to" address at one time (see Don
> Nichols posting), but somehow it got back in. (Probably after reloading
> Netscape following a bit of a system crash I had some months ago) I've
> now deleted it again, so the 'Reply' address will revert to the list,
> not to my email address.
>
> "Reply to" seems to be usefull only if your posting web address is
> different from your receiving web address.        Not *web* address, but e-mail address.  It is a way of assuring
that replies go to a common mail server even if the user's e-mail agent
tries to add the system name into the "From: " address.  As an example,
in earlier mail programs, the system would insist on making my "From: "
address show up as <[unmask]>, instead of
<[unmask]>, which is the proper address.  (However, the
other does still work, but it means that the address changes if I post
from a different machine, and I don't want this to happen.)  So -- there
*are* good reasons for using a "Reply-To: ".> Since Don's message apparently hasn't been well understood, let me
> expand a bit on it:
>
> Note that the way the listserv server is set up (unlike the older
> majordomo server), it is up to the POSTER to set up his own email
> WITHOUT a "Reply to" if he wants replys to go to the list.        For 99.9% of my e-mail I *want* a properly configured "Reply-To: "
to be present, and I have no way to *automatically* suppress it in just
this one mailing list.  This means that I would have to remember to
remove it for each posting -- as much of a pain as having to correct the
address when replying.  (I'll see if I can remember to do this in *this*
one message when I get to a point where that is possible.)        O.K.  It *is* possible, but it may send out an empty "Reply-To: "
instead of totally deleting it.>                                                            If there is a
> "Reply to" in his or her own postings (a default somewhere in his or her
> own email sending setup), then the listserv server will use the poster's
> "Reply to" address as the "To" address for a reply, and not put in the
> list address as the "To" address. In my old Netscape this "Reply to" is
> at Options/ News and Mail Preferences/ Identity.
>
> Note that Marge Steiner has a "Reply to" address in her own email setup,
> so a click-on 'Reply' to her postings will go only to her, not to the
> list.
>
> Since we can't change the listserv setup, it's up to each poster to take
> care of it in his or her own email setup.        Maybe we *can* change the behavior, now that Marge has the
information on just what to ask for.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: could you let me know...
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:49:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 04:39:58PM -0500, Marge Steiner wrote:> Reply-To:     [unmask]        [ ... ]> Could people who are having problems sending replies let me know, and also
> what mail clients you use?  Once again, I'm not a computer nird at all, but
> I can inquire.        It is really *not* a function of which client you are using to
reply, but rather how the person's system to whom you are replying is
set up.  I've left the "Reply-To: " header from your message quoted
above.  If you can ask your e-mail client to show you *all* the headers
of the messages, you will note that some will have "Reply-To: " set to
the list, and others will have it set to their own e-mail address.  This
is a function of whether their e-mail client (actually, both the
behavior of the MUA (Mail User Agent) and the MTA (Mail Transport
Agent), so it *may* be out of the control of an individual poster.        So -- if your support staff could find out whether it is
possible to set the list server to override the "Reply-To: " header in
messages it processes to send out, that would make the behavior the same
for all.        Thanks, and Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ship in the Sky
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 6 Nov 2001 22:38:46 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


This has no connection with the tune, but the idea of the song is
reminiscent of Charles Graham's 1895 pop hit, "My Dad's the
Engineer"--telling passengers not to worry, etc.
Norm----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Cray" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 10:11 AM
Subject: Ship in the Sky> Guys:
>
> I need help, specifically, the source of the tune Woody Guthrie used for
> his "Ship in the Sky."  The song, written in November 15, 1941, is a
> seen-from-a-child-eye restatement of Franklin Roosevelt's Arsenal of
> Democracy program.
>
> The first stanza runs:
>
> A curly headed kid with a sunshiny smile
> Heard the roar of a plane as it sailed through the sky.
> To her playmates she cried with a bright twinkling eye,
> My daddy rides that ship in sky!
>
>    My daddy rides that ship in the sky (2)
>    Mama's not afraid, and neither am I,
>    So my daddy rides that ship in the sky!  etc.
>
> The tune source lurks just beyond memory, flitting in and out of my grasp.
> Will someone put me out of my misery?  (Full credit granted in my
> forthcoming biography of Guthrie.)
>
> Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 04:52:20 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(6 lines) , text/html(5 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:50:54 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Last thing I heard, Paul Smith was - try [unmask] or Mike
Preston, but he subscribes to this list, I think, so might have seen your
query.
Steve----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:52 AM
Subject: Re: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography> Thanks to Steve Roud for confirmation that this was never published. Is
> anyone in contact with Rainer Wehse?
>
> John Moulden
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ship in the Sky
From: Gerald Porter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:39:28 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


As Cisco Houston sings it, the opening sounds just like the chorus of The Ship
that Never Returned by Henry Clay Work, but then it veers off, as often with
Guthrie's songs.  Perhaps that's why it's so elusive.Gerald PorterLainaus Ed Cray <[unmask]>:> Guys:
>
> I need help, specifically, the source of the tune Woody Guthrie used
> for
> his "Ship in the Sky."  The song, written in November 15, 1941, is a
> seen-from-a-child-eye restatement of Franklin Roosevelt's Arsenal of
> Democracy program.
>
> The first stanza runs:
>
> A curly headed kid with a sunshiny smile
> Heard the roar of a plane as it sailed through the sky.
> To her playmates she cried with a bright twinkling eye,
> My daddy rides that ship in sky!
>
>    My daddy rides that ship in the sky (2)
>    Mama's not afraid, and neither am I,
>    So my daddy rides that ship in the sky!  etc.
>
> The tune source lurks just beyond memory, flitting in and out of my
> grasp.
> Will someone put me out of my misery?  (Full credit granted in my
> forthcoming biography of Guthrie.)
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rainer Wehse - Bibliography
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:29:19 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


>John Moulden writes
>Is anyone in contact with Rainer Wehse?He was (is?) a member of the Ballad Commission, so you could try sending a request to the mailbase list.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: identifying tunes for some Edinburgh broadsides
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:49:45 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(89 lines)


I am currently hypertexting a humungous book on the social history of
Edinburgh as reflected in its topical music (both vocal and instrumental),
having given up on getting it published in book form and deciding to
publish it myself as a CD-ROM (text in very spartan HTML, tunes in ABC).
Most of the songs are from broadsides, and I've identified the tunes for
nearly all of them, but there are a few I'm stuck on.  I'm sure they
pastiche specific texts but I can't figure out what.(1) a good supernatural ballad of 1829 on Burke and Hare, which begins      O! dark was the midnight when Hare fled away,
      Not a star in the sky gave him one cheering ray,
      But still now and then, would the blue lightnings glare,
      And some strange cries assail'd him, like shrieks of despair      CHORUS: Over vale, over hill, I will watch thee for ill,
              I will haunt all thy wanderings and follow thee still.(2) an obscene satire on Episcopacy from the time of Charles II,
    beginning:      Of all the pleasures men can have,
      Above, or yet below,
      The fairest and the rarest,
      I will unto you show.      It's call'd the Bischop's Kiss,
      That dwells in Edenburgh Toun,
      Which to the world doeth declare,
      How he desserves the goun.(3) an occasional piece on a family that froze to death in the snow
    after nobody would let them in to shelter from a storm, probably
    in the 1830s (the deaths don't seem to be in the parish records,
    but the circumstantial detail is too convincing for it to have
    been made up).  Maybe based on a hymn?      ALL you who have a heart to feel,
         Your fellow creatures woes,
      Attend while I with acheing heart
         A mournful tale disclose.
      How six poor wanderers were forced
         Not many nights ago,
      To brave the raging of the frost,
         And face the drifting snow.      CHORUS: Christians shield at your door,
              And do not frown upon the poor.(4) a beer advertisement from 1839, which fits the tune for "Abdul the
    Bul-Bul Emir" perfectly (what's that one called?) but perhaps was
    meant for something more specific:      Though grey are my locks, and wrinkled my brow,
      Though my strength and my eyesight both fail,
      I'm as blythe as the lark and cheerful e'en now,
      O'er a bottle of John Fowler's Ale.(5) a ballad on the cholera of 1832, with all the verses sharing minor
    variants of the same refrain line (this was published a couple of
    years back and the compiler of that edition couldn't identify a
    specific tune either):      Oh but the times are dull and dreary,
      Every thing goes topsey teary,
      A-travelling night and day I'm weary
         Through the streets of Edinburgh.(6) Does anybody know of a tune popular in the 1830s for Byron's _The
    Destruction of Sennacherib_ ("The Assyrian came down like a wolf
    on the fold...")?  I have a parody of it which from the context
    ought to have been meant to be singable.I have also managed to lose my note of the text for "Ye're Welcome Whigs
From Bothwell Brigs" (I've got the tune) - somebody remind me where this
is to be found?-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ship in the Sky
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:02:38 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


It just struck me that the tune for "Ship in the Sky" is extremely similar to
"Hard, Ain't It Hard", a traditional song in the "Died for Love" family which
Woodie recorded with the Almanac Singers.-Mark

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: "Roy G. Berkeley" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 12:06:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


And I seem to remember always hearing the "..I never heard no horse sing" quip
attributed to Big Bill Broonzy by Pete Seeger...Trad Man wrote:> In a message dated 11/5/01 3:02:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, [unmask]
> writes:
>
> I find that using the expression "Traditional Folk" or "Traditional Ballads"
> at least makes people figure that I'm referring to something different than
> singer-songwriter  with guitar or Bing Crosby crooning.
>
> I believe the "Folk songs are songs sung by folks" line comes from Woodie
> Guthrie, although Pete Seeger no doubt used it on occasion.  My recollection
> is that the actual line was more like.  "Folks songs - well I ain't heard no
> horses singing them"
>
> Mark
>
> << I find the same thing when looking at other areas of interest to me such as
>  Ballads. I was uncertain of the parameters of the term when I joined this
>  list, and now see that many people misunderstand/misuse it. I want more
>  information on what this performer/producer is presenting as a ballad
>  before I commit.
>  And as far as "Folk", again speaking as a consumer only, I find the term to
>  have become almost totally useless. >>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: could you let me know...
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 12:23:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


DoN. Nichols wrote:
>...................>         So -- if your support staff could find out whether it is
> possible to set the list server to override the "Reply-To: " header in
> messages it processes to send out, that would make the behavior the same
> for all.
>
>         Thanks, and Good Luck,
>                 DoN.
>AMEN!Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ship in the Sky
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:06:35 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(51 lines)


Norm:I just wonder if Guthrie, who knew dozens and dozens of sentimental
"heart" songs of the late 19th C. -- and cherished a few such as "The
Picture That's Turned to the Wall" -- knew or knew of Graham's song.
I will put it in the notes to the book.Thanks,EdOn Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Norm Cohen wrote:> This has no connection with the tune, but the idea of the song is
> reminiscent of Charles Graham's 1895 pop hit, "My Dad's the
> Engineer"--telling passengers not to worry, etc.
> Norm
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ed Cray" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 10:11 AM
> Subject: Ship in the Sky
>
>
> > Guys:
> >
> > I need help, specifically, the source of the tune Woody Guthrie used for
> > his "Ship in the Sky."  The song, written in November 15, 1941, is a
> > seen-from-a-child-eye restatement of Franklin Roosevelt's Arsenal of
> > Democracy program.
> >
> > The first stanza runs:
> >
> > A curly headed kid with a sunshiny smile
> > Heard the roar of a plane as it sailed through the sky.
> > To her playmates she cried with a bright twinkling eye,
> > My daddy rides that ship in sky!
> >
> >    My daddy rides that ship in the sky (2)
> >    Mama's not afraid, and neither am I,
> >    So my daddy rides that ship in the sky!  etc.
> >
> > The tune source lurks just beyond memory, flitting in and out of my grasp.
> > Will someone put me out of my misery?  (Full credit granted in my
> > forthcoming biography of Guthrie.)
> >
> > Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: from the administratorFW: oops!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 13:14:35 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


OK, Peg says that there isn't a general override fix.  I'll need to have
someone play around with my E-mail program, too, to see if there's an
individual fix for me.  So, i guess that's something that we'll all have to
do.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Peg Bassett [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 1:06 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: oops!Marge,The list is configured correctly.  If the replies are going back to the
sender rather than the list then that is an individual email client issue
that I cannot fix.Peg Bassett
UITS Messaging Team
IUB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marge Steiner" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 1:04 PM
Subject: FW: oops!> Once again, would you be able to set it up such that all reply/to headers
> are overridden, so that everyone who wants to reply to the list can have
> their messages go to the list, irrespective of what their individual
E-mail
> program does?
>
> Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
> Behalf Of DoN. Nichols
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:32 PM
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: oops!
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 04:06:10PM -0500, Marge Steiner wrote:
>
> > Appologies from your inept listowner.  I just checked with our
> university's
> > list administrator, and, apprently, the list is configured as it should
> be,
> > so that replies should go to the entire list.  It may be that some folks
> are
> > having issues with their individual mail programs.  sorry about all
this:
> I
> > don't have to do this stuff very often, so there you are!
>
>         What is happening is that some of us (me included, and you as
> well, after checking the headers of this message) have the "Reply-To: "
> header set in their e-mail program.  Your list server leaves this as it
> is, if it is set, otherwise installs one pointing to the list.
>
>         Not all e-mail programs honor the "Reply-To: " header, but those
> which do will reply to that address in preference to the "From: "
> address, which is always pointing to the list address.
>
>         Is it possible for your admin staff to configure the server to
> override "Reply-To: " headers, instead of leaving them intact?  This
> would make the behavior of the list consistent no matter whose posting
> is being replied to.  Otherwise you (and I) will get lots of replies
> which were intended for the list.  I didn't even remember to check and
> correct the address when I replied to your initial question, so it went
> to you alone, rather than to the list.
>
>         Thanks,
>                 DoN.
>
> --
>  Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>         (too) near Washington D.C. |
> http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>            --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 13:16:27 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


I remember Gordon Bok asking me if I knew the definition of traditional
music. As I was formulating some learned, scholarly response in my mind, he
announced, "Anything on vinyl!"Lorne Brown
The Ballad Project> And I seem to remember always hearing the "..I never heard no horse sing"
quip
> attributed to Big Bill Broonzy by Pete Seeger...
>
> >
> > << I find the same thing when looking at other areas of interest to me
such as
> >  Ballads. I was uncertain of the parameters of the term when I joined
this
> >  list, and now see that many people misunderstand/misuse it. I want more
> >  information on what this performer/producer is presenting as a ballad
> >  before I commit.
> >  And as far as "Folk", again speaking as a consumer only, I find the
term to
> >  have become almost totally useless. >>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: from the administratorFW: oops!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 13:26:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


>OK, Peg says that there isn't a general override fix....Then perhaps you need to change list-serv programs.  I belong to
several lists, and this is the only one with this problem, which is a
nuisance.--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes for some Edinburgh broadsides
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:52:34 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


Jack:James Fuld, _The Book of World Famous Music,_ p. 84, credits one Percy
French, ex of Trinity College, Dublin, with writing "Abdulla Bulbul Ameer"
in 1877.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Percy French
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:50:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Percy French wrote humorous and sentimental Irish songs and verse.  It is not unusual to hear the Mountains of Mourne sung in folk circles (although clearly not a traditional song) or to hear his verse recited.  The Percy French Society has a terrific home page on the web.Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/07/01 01:52PM >>>
Jack:James Fuld, _The Book of World Famous Music,_ p. 84, credits one Percy
French, ex of Trinity College, Dublin, with writing "Abdulla Bulbul Ameer"
in 1877.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: from the administratorFW: oops!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 16:12:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


I do this from my university account, which is the only one I have.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of John Garst
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 1:27 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: from the administratorFW: oops!>OK, Peg says that there isn't a general override fix....Then perhaps you need to change list-serv programs.  I belong to
several lists, and this is the only one with this problem, which is a
nuisance.--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Ship in the Sky" Returns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:30:45 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(27 lines)


Folks:Asking those on the list to help me identify the tune(s) Woody Guthrie
might have used for his "(My Daddy Rides a) Ship in the Sky," I received
the following votes:Frank Hamilton and Trad Man (aka Mark) voted for "Hard, Ain't It Hard."Guy Logsdon suggested it might be a "loose" adaptation of "Wreck of the
Old '97."  Then on sober (no jokes, please) reflection, Guy allowed as
"Frank H might be right."Michael Bell deemed the first eight bars from "Old 97," and the last four
in a popular song style.Gerald Porter credited the chorus of Henry Clay Work's "The Ship That
Never Returned"  for the first four bars.I tend to think that the basic tune is "Hard, Ain't It Hard," which
Guthrie learned from his uncle Jeff when a young teenager, and which
Guthrie sang often.I thank all those who voted.EdP.S.  Please pardon the pun on the subject line.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Ship in the Sky" Returns
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:48:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


On Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:30:45 -0800, you wrote:>I tend to think that the basic tune is "Hard, Ain't It Hard," which
>Guthrie learned from his uncle Jeff when a young teenager, and which
>Guthrie sang often.
>
I suppose I'd sound silly if I mentioned the fact the tune sounds (to me,
anyway) a bit like "The German Clockwinder" transposed from 3/4 time.Jeri

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: Alan Ackerman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:30:29 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Hmmm. Are they sure?
I just hit the Reply button in Eudora and got
To: [unmask]I had to change it manually to
To: [unmask]>Appologies from your inept listowner.  I just checked with our university's
>list administrator, and, apprently, the list is configured as it should be,
>so that replies should go to the entire list.  It may be that some folks are
>having issues with their individual mail programs.  sorry about all this: I
>don't have to do this stuff very often, so there you are!
>
>         Marge
>
>
>E-mail: [unmask]--
Alan Ackerman, [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Copper Family CD
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 00:15:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


For anyone interested in English traditional harmony singing, the
release of Topic's new CD of Copper family singing from the 50s and 60s
is good news indeed. Until this release, the only Copper family material
available was a Folk-Legacy cassette and two CDs (Coppersongs2 and
Coppersongs3) of the current generation of Coppers (with Bob). IMO, an
important CD.The track list is:
THE COPPER FAMILY COME WRITE ME DOWN 1 Spencer The Rover [Bob & Ron]
 2 Good Ale [Bob & Ron]
 3 Thousands Or More [Jim]
 4 Babes In The Wood [Bob & Ron]
 5 The Banks Of The Sweet Primroses [Bob, John, Jim & Ron]
 6 Sweep! Chimney Sweep! [Bob & Jim]
 7 Two Young Brethren [Bob & Ron]
 8 The Brisk and Bonny Lad [Bob & Jim]
 9 The Month Of May [Bob & Ron]
 10 The Honest Labourer [Ron]
 11 The Birds In The Spring [Bob & Ron]
 12 My Father Had An Acre Of Land [Jim & Bob]
 13 Shepherd Of The Downs [Bob & Ron]
 14 The Threshing Song [Ron & Bob]
15 The Seasons Round [Bob & Ron]
16 Sportsmen, Arouse! [Jim]
17 Hard Times Of Old England [Ron]
18 The Lark In The Morning [Bob & Ron]
19 Warlike Seamen [Bob, John, Jim & Ron]
20 When Spring Comes In [Bob & Ron]
21 The Brisk Young Ploughboy [Bob & Jim]
22 Cupid's Garden [Bob & Ron]
23 Dame Durden [Bob & Ron]
24 The Claudy Banks [Bob & Jim]
25 General Wolfe [Jim]
26 Adieu, Sweet Lovely Nancy [Bob & Jim]
27 Talking [Jim]
28 Come Write Me Down, Ye Powers Above [Bob, John, Jim &
Ron]Yes, Camsco Music (800/548-FOLK [3655]) carries it. $18.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Shanteymen
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:56:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(50 lines)


On Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:48:16 +0100, Andy Rouse wrote:>Dear all,
>
>As usual, I have a question. Did shanteymen receive an augmented wage or
>other remuneration that stood themm apart from the rest of the crew?
>
This question was raised in r.m.f some time back and I posted my impression
that the chanteyman was a skilled sailor with chanteying as his specialty.
This was roundly challenged by the three very knowledgable chanteymen that
post and who each know a great deal more than I do about it - Bullough,
King & Finn.  I have considerable respect for them all.  They concurred
that the chanteyman was much like the chain-gang song leader - just a
working member of the gang with all normal duties.  He might be granted a
few minor boons but that's all.Still, being the stubborn sort I am, I held to my opinion.  I based it on
a) My own interpretation of Hugill (I found nothing specific pro or con,
though) b) On a quip of MacColl's as he started a sea-song set in 1959:
"The chanteyman was paid _twice_... once by the shipowners not to sing too
slow and once by the sailors not to sing too fast." and c) Terry Kinsey,
_Songs of the Sea_, p.12: "The shanteyman was a person of some importance
aboard ship, especially if he had the added talent of being able to scratch
out a tune on a fiddle..., blow a tin whistle or squeeze a concertina...On
the ship's muster book he would be entered as being an 'idler' - not
meaning a person lacking industry or prone to laziness but one having no
watch-keeping or station-keeping responsibilities on board ship.  He was
excused all heaving and hauling work, or, if he actually did tail onto a
rope or breast a capstan bar, he would exert only token effort so as to
save his wind for shanteying, for he was there solely to organize the
working parties by his choice of shanty to suit the task and by concerting
their efforts by singing the shanty verses.  His other shipboard duties
would be of a non-seamanlike nature, possibly as the captain's stewart,
'cookie's mate' or 'chippie's louse.'"Shay, however, (in observing working chanteying at the _very_ end of the
chantey era) gives the single line: "...the chanteyman, who also put his
back to the task, would sound off:..."It is reasonable to suppose the function varied.  Perhaps, as has been
suggested, the role changed in different eras and different ships.  Being
minimal at the beginning, a crew member in the packet era then a full
"idler" in the clipper era (when greater skill was most needed) then
shrinking back in the "steam-clipper" and post-clipper era.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
                        Boycott South Carolina!
        http://www.naacp.org/news/releases/confederateflag011201.shtml

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: Linn Schulz <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 07:03:43 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
I got her e-mail, not the list's.My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
tried to reply.Linn******************************************************************
Linn S. Schulz
Writing - Editing - Print Design & Production
phone/fax 603-942-7604
Mailing Address: PO Box 4402, Portsmouth, NH 03802
USA******************************************************************__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:15:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


>Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
>got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
>I got her e-mail, not the list's.
>
>My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
>using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
>the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
>tried to reply.
>
>LinnAs had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
[unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
configured the way most of us want it to be.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: Rob Hutten <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 11:18:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


John writes:
> As had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
> not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
> that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
> [unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
> messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
> is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
> the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
> configured the way most of us want it to be.I agree.  I administer thirty-some mailing lists using three different
listserver packages, and I always have them configured so that replies
go to the entire list.  I've never seen the Reply-To behaviour we're
experiencing on ballad-l.-Rob

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:34:59 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


On 11/8/01, Linn Schulz wrote:>Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
>got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
>I got her e-mail, not the list's.
>
>My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
>using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
>the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
>tried to reply.Again, it's not YOUR e-mail program. It is the e-mail
SETTINGS (not the PROGRAM, the SETTINGS) of the person
who sent the mail. If that person's mail has a reply-to
field, the reply goes there. If that person's mail does
NOT have a reply-to field, the reply goes to Ballad-L.Until and unless Marge Steiner can convince the university's
guru to fix this, there is no point talking about it; there
is nothing any of us can do about it, except misconfigure
our own e-mail programs.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 08:57:01 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(36 lines)


John:Just to complicate things:  My email reader (Pine, working on Unix) works
perfectly.  The reply to is listed as ballad-l, and when I reply, that
address comes up.That would suggest that Indiana's guru has configured ballad-l
"correctly."  Or would it?EdOn Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:> >Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
> >got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
> >I got her e-mail, not the list's.
> >
> >My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
> >using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
> >the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
> >tried to reply.
> >
> >Linn
>
> As had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
> not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
> that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
> [unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
> messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
> is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
> the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
> configured the way most of us want it to be.
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:07:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


If you get this action universally, that is, with messages from all
list members, then that suggests that the previous suggestion that
perhaps there is a way to set your e-mail program to ignore the
"Reply-to" field and to reply to the sender instead.>John:
>
>Just to complicate things:  My email reader (Pine, working on Unix) works
>perfectly.  The reply to is listed as ballad-l, and when I reply, that
>address comes up.
>
>That would suggest that Indiana's guru has configured ballad-l
>"correctly."  Or would it?
>
>Ed
>
>
>On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:
>
>>  >Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
>>  >got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
>>  >I got her e-mail, not the list's.
>>  >
>>  >My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
>>  >using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
>>  >the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
>>  >tried to reply.
>>  >
>>  >Linn
>>
>>  As had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
>>  not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
>>  that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
>>  [unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
>>  messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
>>  is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
>>  the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
>>  configured the way most of us want it to be.
>>  --
>>  john garst    [unmask]
>>--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:07:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 08:57:01AM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> John:
>
> Just to complicate things:  My email reader (Pine, working on Unix) works
> perfectly.  The reply to is listed as ballad-l, and when I reply, that
> address comes up.        That depends on whose article you are responding to.  If you try
responding to mine (which has the "Reply-To; " *properly* set, it should
attempt to send to me, unless you override it.  If it does not, than
someone has configured pine to ignore the "Reply-To: " header, which
suggests that it has not been upgraded recently.  It used to be an
option in configuring some e-mail programs (such as unix's elm) to
ignore "Reply-To: ", because of problems.  To quote from the "Configure"
script for elm 2.5.2: ======================================================================
One of the more annoying quirks of the UUCP network and various other
systems that interact with it are that everyone seems to have different
ideas about how to do routing, etc.  Therefore, a lot of times e-mail
will arrive from off site with corrupt, unusable "Reply-To:" and "From:"
fields.  This next question relates to whether your site is liable to
get mangled fields or not...Does your site receive e-mail with valid "Reply-To:" and "From:" fields?
======================================================================        Now -- consider that UUCP is no longer common (very far from
common) these days.  So almost any *properly* configured e-mail program
*should* honor "Reply-To: ".  *And*, any properly-configured e-mail
program *should* generate "Reply-To: " headers.  This suggests that very
few of the e-mail programs in use on this list are properly configured.
Marge's is one, mine is another, Dolores' is still another.        Looking at the sources for pine4.04, I find: ======================================================================
When replying, you usually have to answer some questions.  If the message
is to multiple people and/or specified with a Reply-To: header, then you
will have to decide who should get the reply.  You also need to decide
 ======================================================================which suggests that pine normally *does* honor the "Reply-To: " header.> That would suggest that Indiana's guru has configured ballad-l
> "correctly."  Or would it?        Not necessarily.  Have you yet checked the behavior when
responding to one of those known to have "Reply-To: " set?  (What
happens when you reply to mine?)> Ed
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:        [ ... ]> > As had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
> > not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
> > that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
> > [unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
> > messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
> > is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
> > the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
> > configured the way most of us want it to be.        I would be interested to know *which* list server program is
being used.  I might try downloading the sources and seeing whether
there really *is* a configuration option for this.        Of course, it *may* be that this is the behavior desired on
*other* lists for which this same listserver is being used, and that it
can't be configured on a list-by-list basis.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:14:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:07:33PM -0500, John Garst wrote:
> >
> >Just to complicate things:  My email reader (Pine, working on Unix) works
> >perfectly.  The reply to is listed as ballad-l, and when I reply, that
> >address comes up.> If you get this action universally, that is, with messages from all
> list members, then that suggests that the previous suggestion that
> perhaps there is a way to set your e-mail program to ignore the
> "Reply-to" field and to reply to the sender instead.        At least with elm, that configuration must be done at compile
time, and would be a system-wide choice, not an individual choice, as
shown by the excerpt from elm's "Configure" script.  In other words, out
of the user's hands.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:36:32 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(63 lines)


John:If so, it does it "opaquely."  I hit "reply to" and get ballad-l's
address.In this instance, when writing to you, I had to deliberately select the
"from" address, rather than "reply to."Then, having fingered you, the sender, the Pine program asks if I want to
also send it to the "from: [unmask]What am I doing right?  Write?EdOn Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:> If you get this action universally, that is, with messages from all
> list members, then that suggests that the previous suggestion that
> perhaps there is a way to set your e-mail program to ignore the
> "Reply-to" field and to reply to the sender instead.
>
> >John:
> >
> >Just to complicate things:  My email reader (Pine, working on Unix) works
> >perfectly.  The reply to is listed as ballad-l, and when I reply, that
> >address comes up.
> >
> >That would suggest that Indiana's guru has configured ballad-l
> >"correctly."  Or would it?
> >
> >Ed
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:
> >
> >>  >Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
> >>  >got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
> >>  >I got her e-mail, not the list's.
> >>  >
> >>  >My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
> >>  >using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
> >>  >the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
> >>  >tried to reply.
> >>  >
> >>  >Linn
> >>
> >>  As had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
> >>  not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
> >>  that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
> >>  [unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
> >>  messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
> >>  is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
> >>  the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
> >>  configured the way most of us want it to be.
> >>  --
> >>  john garst    [unmask]
> >>
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 13:45:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(73 lines)


Ed, the header that came with your message does not contain a "Reply
to" field. Evidently your program does not support "Reply to".  If I
choose "Reply" in Eudora it comes up "To" you, not to the list.  If I
choose "Reply to all" it comes up "To" you with a "Cc" to the list,
which is what I'm doing now, so you'll get two copies of this.At 10:36 AM -0800 11/8/01, Ed Cray wrote:
>John:
>
>If so, it does it "opaquely."  I hit "reply to" and get ballad-l's
>address.
>
>In this instance, when writing to you, I had to deliberately select the
>"from" address, rather than "reply to."
>
>Then, having fingered you, the sender, the Pine program asks if I want to
>also send it to the "from: [unmask]
>
>What am I doing right?  Write?
>
>Ed
>
>
>On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:
>
>>  If you get this action universally, that is, with messages from all
>>  list members, then that suggests that the previous suggestion that
>>  perhaps there is a way to set your e-mail program to ignore the
>>  "Reply-to" field and to reply to the sender instead.
>>
>>  >John:
>>  >
>>  >Just to complicate things:  My email reader (Pine, working on Unix) works
>>  >perfectly.  The reply to is listed as ballad-l, and when I reply, that
>>  >address comes up.
>>  >
>>  >That would suggest that Indiana's guru has configured ballad-l
>>  >"correctly."  Or would it?
>>  >
>>  >Ed
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:
>>  >
>>  >>  >Hmm . . . I just hit Reply from Yahoo on this one and
>>  >>  >got Ballad-L. When I hit it on Marge's original post,
>>  >>  >I got her e-mail, not the list's.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >My "real" e-mailer is Eudora, and that's what Tom is
>>  >>  >using (for list traffic), too -- and I think he said
>>  >>  >the individual poster came up, not the list, when he
>>  >>  >tried to reply.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >Linn
>>  >>
>>  >>  As had been stated before, it seems to depend on the sender, which is
>>  >>  not the way it ought to work.  I can't imagine a list-serve program
>>  >>  that cannot be set to place its own address, in this case
>>  >>  [unmask], in the "Reply to" field when it relays
>>  >>  messages.  Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
>>  >>  is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
>>  >>  the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
>>  >>  configured the way most of us want it to be.
>>  >>  --
>>  >>  john garst    [unmask]
>>  >>
>>
>>  --
>>  john garst    [unmask]
>>--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 00:43:20 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


I seem to have drawn a complete blank here with my question about
identifying what originals a bunch of pastiche broadsides might
have been based on.  No answers about any of them.I wouldn't have had any such problem if they'd been in French.
Anyone else here seen "Le Cle du Caveau"?  It was a vast tune
anthology, built up by a committee over decades, first published
in the 1830s, which indexed the tunes by the verse form of the
songs they belonged to.  Like the codes used for the metres of
hymns, but more precise, and they never gave up and just said
"Irregular".  If you've got an obscure verse form (and French
verse is a good deal more formally heterogeneous than English)
that book will direct you to a tune for it and indirectly to
other texts of the same form.Has anybody ever attempted such a thing for English/Scots songs?
If one had ever been completed I assume we'd know about it.  It
could be a good collective project for an electronic forum.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:57:27 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


Jack et al:The only verse form that I have found in the Anglo-American corpus that
will "predict" a tune is the "Captain Kidd-Samuel Hall" group.  Bertrand
Bronson's "Samuel Hall's Family Tree," to which -- he said modestly -- you
may add the citations in my _Erotic Muse,_ pp. 43-48.Have others found similar predictors?EdOn Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Jack Campin wrote:> I seem to have drawn a complete blank here with my question about
> identifying what originals a bunch of pastiche broadsides might
> have been based on.  No answers about any of them.
>
> I wouldn't have had any such problem if they'd been in French.
> Anyone else here seen "Le Cle du Caveau"?  It was a vast tune
> anthology, built up by a committee over decades, first published
> in the 1830s, which indexed the tunes by the verse form of the
> songs they belonged to.  Like the codes used for the metres of
> hymns, but more precise, and they never gave up and just said
> "Irregular".  If you've got an obscure verse form (and French
> verse is a good deal more formally heterogeneous than English)
> that book will direct you to a tune for it and indirectly to
> other texts of the same form.
>
> Has anybody ever attempted such a thing for English/Scots songs?
> If one had ever been completed I assume we'd know about it.  It
> could be a good collective project for an electronic forum.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
> tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
> food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 22:40:21 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


I've got a recording (Jeff Warner & Jeff Davis's "Two Little Boys") with
a song that they note was collected by Maud Karpeles in Virginia in the
1950's. (The song is "Pat Do This", a modal kind of Irish working on the
railway song.) Where can I find that material? Were there recordings?
What searching I've done on-line today indicates there's not a separate
book authored or edited by her that would include stuff from that date
and time -- at least that I can tell.~ Becky
--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music
[unmask]   *   www.tftm.org
             520-293-3783
P.O. Box 40654, Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 01:23:35 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


<<The only verse form that I have found in the Anglo-American corpus that
will "predict" a tune is the "Captain Kidd-Samuel Hall" group.  Bertrand
Bronson's "Samuel Hall's Family Tree," to which -- he said modestly -- you
may add the citations in my _Erotic Muse,_ pp. 43-48.Have others found similar predictors?>>Two that come immediately to mind. First are the songs "Shooting Goshen's
Cocks Up" (recorded by George "Pop" Maynard for Peter Kennedy in 1956), "The
Drummer and the Cook" (in Richard Terry's collection of sea chanties) and
"The Barking Barber (Bow Wow Wow), from Chappell. All have the same unique
chorus form (X denotes the stressed syllable, y the unstressed:)X X XX y X y X y XyX X XThe "X X X" line is, of course, "Bow wow wow" in the piece in Chappell.The second is "When Jones's Ale was New". The peculiar construction of the
verses is matched by only one tune.Is that the sort of thing you were looking for?Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 05:17:56 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(8 lines) , text/html(5 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 11:15:25 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


>The only verse form that I have found in the Anglo-American corpus that
>will "predict" a tune is the "Captain Kidd-Samuel Hall" group.  Bertrand
>Bronson's "Samuel Hall's Family Tree," to which -- he said modestly -- you
>may add the citations in my _Erotic Muse,_ pp. 43-48.However, there are dozens of "Kidd-meter" tunes.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:24:26 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(40 lines)


Paul et al:Yes.Anyone have other ideas?EdOn Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Paul Stamler wrote:> <<The only verse form that I have found in the Anglo-American corpus that
> will "predict" a tune is the "Captain Kidd-Samuel Hall" group.  Bertrand
> Bronson's "Samuel Hall's Family Tree," to which -- he said modestly -- you
> may add the citations in my _Erotic Muse,_ pp. 43-48.
>
> Have others found similar predictors?>>
>
> Two that come immediately to mind. First are the songs "Shooting Goshen's
> Cocks Up" (recorded by George "Pop" Maynard for Peter Kennedy in 1956), "The
> Drummer and the Cook" (in Richard Terry's collection of sea chanties) and
> "The Barking Barber (Bow Wow Wow), from Chappell. All have the same unique
> chorus form (X denotes the stressed syllable, y the unstressed:)
>
> X X X
>
> X y X y X y Xy
>
> X X X
>
> The "X X X" line is, of course, "Bow wow wow" in the piece in Chappell.
>
> The second is "When Jones's Ale was New". The peculiar construction of the
> verses is matched by only one tune.
>
> Is that the sort of thing you were looking for?
>
> Peace,
> Paul
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 08:27:31 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


John:I would argue, however, that they are related (modal, major, minor, etc.)
in a tune family.  As intellectual authority, I summon the ghost of B.
Bronson.EdOn Fri, 9 Nov 2001, John Garst wrote:> >The only verse form that I have found in the Anglo-American corpus that
> >will "predict" a tune is the "Captain Kidd-Samuel Hall" group.  Bertrand
> >Bronson's "Samuel Hall's Family Tree," to which -- he said modestly -- you
> >may add the citations in my _Erotic Muse,_ pp. 43-48.
>
> However, there are dozens of "Kidd-meter" tunes.
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 15:33:12 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


> The only verse form that I have found in the Anglo-American corpus that
> will "predict" a tune is the "Captain Kidd-Samuel Hall" group.  Bertrand
> Bronson's "Samuel Hall's Family Tree," to which -- he said modestly --
> you may add the citations in my _Erotic Muse,_ pp. 43-48.
> Have others found similar predictors?A "Derry down" or "Which nobody can deny" refrain is a bit of a giveaway,
isn't it?  So is a last line of each verse ending in "morning".I'm not looking for unique identifiability.  What "Le Cle du Caveau"
gives you, typically, is a few dozen alternatives.  It's still a
large timesaver if you can cut your search space down from the entire
known literature of English song to about 50 options.Of the items I listed, two are quite generic in form (the beer ad and
the 17th century satire) and would need a search of hundreds of texts
of the time to see what the author might have had in his head, even
after filtering out things that don't match the verse form.  The others
(from 1829 to 1838, roughly) are much less common, and I can think
of *no* examples in the Scots repertoire that match any of them.  My
guess is that most are based on English popular songs of the period
(though the only tunes I can think of that fit the cholera one in rhyme
scheme and metre are Gaelic).  Unfortunately that's a time and place for
which big, comprehensive anthologies of such material are hard to come
by.  It's easier both three decades before and after.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:33:16 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


The short 5th (and last) line of verses "Last Christmas twas my chance"
(1622?) is quite distinctive. Since "Gallants [or Panders] come away"
appeared at about the same time and has the same distinctive meter I've
equated the two titles, although C. M. Simpson in BBBM makes no mention
of "Gallants/Panders come away". "Panders (or Gallants?) come away" is
in the Percy Folio MS: Loose and Humorous Songs, and the reference in it
to Venetia Stanley puts the song to a time before her marriage to Sir
Kenelm Digby was made public (early 1625?).However, "Last Christmas twas my chance" in Simpson's BBBM, #272, isn't
the original tune. The original tune (and song) from a BL MSS is on my
website in place of Simpson's tune, which came from Pills to Purge
Melancholy, V, 1719, the text there being an incomplete "Last Christmas
twas my chance". From its distinctive meter "A Puritan of late" (in
Scarce Songs 1 file with "Last Christmas") is undoubtably also to this
tune. Note that a song in the Revesby Sword Play is modeled on, and
borrows from, "Last Christmas twas my chance". Simpson thought the Pills
tune was old, but how old is anybody's guess.Also the last two lines (or one long line) concluding verses to
the 1590s tune "Bragandary" (under that or later titles) have a very
distinctive meter. The "Bragandary" title, apparently corrupt Gaelic,
remains unexplained. I think it's probably something along the lines of
'(breag) pseudo/unreal/imitation/toy of (daire) oak'.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 17:20:25 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


>John:
>
>I would argue, however, that they are related (modal, major, minor, etc.)
>in a tune family.  As intellectual authority, I summon the ghost of B.
>Bronson.
>
>EdRelation is in the eye of the beholder.  I don't even think that
WONDROUS LOVE is very closely related to CAPTAIN KIDD, and neither is
much like SAINTS BOUND FOR HEAVEN.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 17:34:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


John-
As Art Thieme once put it, it's in the ear of the behearer.If anyone ever develops a workable system of classifying similar tunes
(Bronson didn't), the copyright lawyers will
make him rich.John Garst wrote:> >John:
> >
> >I would argue, however, that they are related (modal, major, minor, etc.)
> >in a tune family.  As intellectual authority, I summon the ghost of B.
> >Bronson.
> >
> >Ed
>
> Relation is in the eye of the beholder.  I don't even think that
> WONDROUS LOVE is very closely related to CAPTAIN KIDD, and neither is
> much like SAINTS BOUND FOR HEAVEN.
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 9 Nov 2001 18:38:06 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


In a message dated 11/9/01 2:34:51 PM, [unmask] writes:>If anyone ever develops a workable system of classifying similar tunes
>(Bronson didn't), the copyright lawyers will
>make him rich.
********************************
To the best of my knowledge, the scholar who came closest to this was the
late Samuel P. Bayard in his groupings of traditional fiddle tunes.Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 02:05:51 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Folks,
        I must admit not having paid a lot of attention to this
thread until now.
        Please, let me ask for a small step backwards:  I am aware
that there are many collections of hymns which include detailed
summaries of the verse patterns, usually in the form of a series
of numbers indicating the number of syllables in each line of a
verse, e.g. 7,7,7,7, or 8,6,8,6.
        Would that be the basis of the projected 'index'?  Or some other
metric measurement?  Please illustrate! -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:01:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:05:51AM -0800, Cal & Lani Herrmann wrote:> Folks,
>         I must admit not having paid a lot of attention to this
> thread until now.
>         Please, let me ask for a small step backwards:  I am aware
> that there are many collections of hymns which include detailed
> summaries of the verse patterns, usually in the form of a series
> of numbers indicating the number of syllables in each line of a
> verse, e.g. 7,7,7,7, or 8,6,8,6.
>         Would that be the basis of the projected 'index'?  Or some other
> metric measurement?  Please illustrate! -- Aloha, Lani        How about the technique used in at least one "fakebook" that I
have seen?  It simply charts the direction of change of pitch, so a
line of a tune might be marked as "^^^V^VVV^" (which, BTW, could be
easily turned into binary, making the above "11101000" or hex "E8" for
a more compact notation.)  This would make it easy to compare tunes by
computer, should that become desirable.  It would recognize similar
tunes in any key.        Of course, it doesn't do anything with timing. Perhaps that is
not needed for determining similarity as a quick-classification system.        I don't see one thing covered in my memory of that system -- how
to represent a note which was the same as the previous one.  I guess in
the initial system, it could be '-', but it would force the binary
notation to two bits per note, '01' for "up", '00' for "no change", and
'11' for "down" (since that is a representation of a negative number.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:15:26 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


"DoN. Nichols" wrote:
>
>         What is happening is that some of us (me included, and you as
> well, after checking the headers of this message) have the "Reply-To: "
> header set in their e-mail program.  Your list server leaves this as it
> is, if it is set, otherwise installs one pointing to the list.
>
>         Not all e-mail programs honor the "Reply-To: " header, but those
> which do will reply to that address in preference to the "From: "
> address, which is always pointing to the list address.
>
>         Is it possible for your admin staff to configure the server to
> override "Reply-To: " headers, instead of leaving them intact?  This
> would make the behavior of the list consistent no matter whose posting
> is being replied to.  Otherwise you (and I) will get lots of replies
> which were intended for the list.  I didn't even remember to check and
> correct the address when I replied to your initial question, so it went
> to you alone, rather than to the list.Thanks, Don, for explaining this.  I expect replies to go to the list
automatically, and they usually do.  But I've recently seen responses
which only go to me, and have to be reposted, and some others (like this
one) which my "Reply" button directs to the sender.  Now I understand. I
have a 'Reply-To' header set, and so do you.In my mind, the list is misconfigured - it ought to override.  I suppose
there are reasons to have a list which doesn't - one which is mostly for
posting information, for instance - but, as John points out, the *point*
of any kind of discussion list is that the responses go to everybody!-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:27:32 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: DoN. Nichols <[unmask]><<        Of course, it doesn't do anything with timing. Perhaps that is
not needed for determining similarity as a quick-classification system.>>Not only not needed much of the time, but hopelessly confusing. How can one
notate the time when it isn't constant? I remember hearing two tapes of Cas
Wallin performing the same song at folk festival workshops one day apart. In
one he sang it with completely free rhythm, the other with a strong beat and
quite different note values. Just felt different that day I guess. Which is
The Cas Wallin Version?Peace,

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: oops!
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:03:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


John Garst wrote:> Marge says that the computer guru says that their program
> is configured "correctly."  I guess that means that it is configured
> the way the guru wanted it to be.  I still think it could be
> configured the way most of us want it to be.The guru also said it depends on the e-mail reader, which it doesn't.
Since I use Netscape Communicator, I can view the source of the incoming
e-mail, including all the gory details or routing and characters sets
etc.  I sent Marge two different headers so she can show her
administrator that the Reply-To field is a characteristic of the
incoming message.I think they've changed settings or software.  I've always had a
Reply-To set, and I never had this problem with this list until
recently, when several people started complaining about it.-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:51:28 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:01:31PM -0500, DoN. Nichols wrote:
>         How about the technique used in at least one "fakebook" that I
> have seen?  It simply charts the direction of change of pitch, so a
...
> notation to two bits per note, '01' for "up", '00' for "no change", and
> '11' for "down" (since that is a representation of a negative number.        You are describing the system Denys Parsons, then of the British
Library, first published in 1975 in his Directory of Musical Themes
(I had the exact title on a piece of paper which has gotten lost on my
desk....).  His system used U, D, and R (for Repeat), but had absolutely
no room for metrical indications of any sort.
         But I was asking for the system Jack Campin originally alluded to,
for which (shame on me) he might have provided an example, but it got lost
....  I think he referred to verse forms, which to me mean metrics of some
sort.
        Thanks, though, for making me dig out Parsons' system -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:50:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


On 11/10/01, Paul Stamler wrote:>----- Original Message -----
>From: DoN. Nichols <[unmask]>
>
><<        Of course, it doesn't do anything with timing. Perhaps that is
>not needed for determining similarity as a quick-classification system.>>
>
>Not only not needed much of the time, but hopelessly confusing. How can one
>notate the time when it isn't constant? I remember hearing two tapes of Cas
>Wallin performing the same song at folk festival workshops one day apart. In
>one he sang it with completely free rhythm, the other with a strong beat and
>quite different note values. Just felt different that day I guess. Which is
>The Cas Wallin Version?I was going to stay out of this, since I rather suspect that we won't
reach a conclusion, and I *know* I can't contribute much. :-)But I think this misses something important. Not *one* of you has
mentioned harmonic patterns.Take an example we probably all know: The Pachelbel Canon and
"The Streets of London." Listen to three versions of the Canon
and two of "Streets."Chances are that no two will have the same tune.What, then, defines the Canon? And what makes it the same as
"Streets of London"? Answer: The chord sequence. The Pachelbel Canon
is a tune in duple, with the sequenceD A Bm F#m
G D E(7) A
D A Bm F#m
G D A D
  etc.Now take one I was struggling with today. Peter Kennedy claims that
"The Budgeon It Is a Delicate Trade" is "All Around My Hat."It ain't even close.Why? Because "The Budgeon" uses sharped fifths, that's why. Great tune.
(Also known as "The Miller of Dee" and "The Jolly Grinder.") But no
one would recognize it as "All Around My Hat."So I would argue very strongly that the shape of a tune is determined,
in descending order of significance, by* Its meter
* Its chord pattern
* Its scaleWithin those three constraints, almost anything is possible.An aside: I've got another metrical pattern which seems to define
a tune. It's the pattern for "Boney on the Isle of Saint Helena"
(or whatever title you use for that piece). Look up, for instance,
"Farewell to Mackenzie" in Fowke/Mills/Blume. If you know "Saint
Helena," you will *know* without hesitation that they're the
same song.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:03:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On 11/10/01, Cal & Lani Herrmann wrote:>On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:01:31PM -0500, DoN. Nichols wrote:
>>         How about the technique used in at least one "fakebook" that I
>> have seen?  It simply charts the direction of change of pitch, so a
>...
>> notation to two bits per note, '01' for "up", '00' for "no change", and
>> '11' for "down" (since that is a representation of a negative number.
>
>        You are describing the system Denys Parsons, then of the British
>Library, first published in 1975 in his Directory of Musical Themes
>(I had the exact title on a piece of paper which has gotten lost on my
>desk....).  His system used U, D, and R (for Repeat), but had absolutely
>no room for metrical indications of any sort.Actually, what he's describing is more than a millennium older than
that. It's called "neuming," and it's the earliest surviving ancestor
of modern music notation. (There were other ancient Greek notation
systems, actually *better* ones, but they died without offspring.)
Neumes weren't intended to *teach* you the tune, but to remind someone
who already knew it.The earliest neuming systems had three symbols only: / (up), \ (down),
and ^ (up then down). In effect, a space indicated "no change."Neuming evolved over the years, adding more and more symbols and then
staff lines and all sorts of stuff. But that was the basic principle.I won't swear this is the earliest known neumed manuscript, but
the Bible manuscript Psi/044, of about the ninth century, has
neumes indicating how to sing portions of the New Testament.If you want to see a fragment of a neumed manuscript (using a
slightly more evolved version of the system), see the article
on "Neumes" at the ENTTC site:http://www.skypoint.com/~waltzmnI know of no instance of neumes being used without an accompanying
text, but that's because the assumption was that you already knew
the tune. :-)

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:32:54 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


This Up-Down system was used to notate the incipits of thousands of madrigals
by Harry Lincoln at SUNY Binghamton in the mid 70's as well.  Other than
occupying immense amounts of time for grad students, it didn't seem to be
terribly useful.  I suspect with folk songs it would be even less so since
small variations in the tune or interpretation of the harmonic structure
could easily replace an U R R  with a U D U. (For the easiest example, think
about cadences.)- Mark

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:52:05 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(63 lines)


Don:There have been attempts to "computerize" melodies for comparison
purposes.  The earliest such effort was Charles Seeger's "melograph,"
which in 1960 could take a single musical line and mark it on graph paper.
Unfortunately, the melograph could not differentiate between voice and
instrument.At his death, Seeger was working with computer engineers to do just what
you have proposed.  I do not know how far along Seeger got in the project
-- or if anyone has followed up on his pioneering work.Lani asks about meter as a determiner or identifier.  In her thesis on
"tune families," Anne Dhu Shapiro cites it as just one factor, a theory
with which I concur.  George Pullen Jackson in his four works on the white
spiritual identifies hundreds of long meter (6 and 7 beats per line)
tunes.  If meter alone were of much help in identifying tunes, I suspect
he would have grouped many more of these tunes in "families" or
"clusters."EdOn Sat, 10 Nov 2001, DoN. Nichols wrote:> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:05:51AM -0800, Cal & Lani Herrmann wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >         I must admit not having paid a lot of attention to this
> > thread until now.
> >         Please, let me ask for a small step backwards:  I am aware
> > that there are many collections of hymns which include detailed
> > summaries of the verse patterns, usually in the form of a series
> > of numbers indicating the number of syllables in each line of a
> > verse, e.g. 7,7,7,7, or 8,6,8,6.
> >         Would that be the basis of the projected 'index'?  Or some other
> > metric measurement?  Please illustrate! -- Aloha, Lani
>
>         How about the technique used in at least one "fakebook" that I
> have seen?  It simply charts the direction of change of pitch, so a
> line of a tune might be marked as "^^^V^VVV^" (which, BTW, could be
> easily turned into binary, making the above "11101000" or hex "E8" for
> a more compact notation.)  This would make it easy to compare tunes by
> computer, should that become desirable.  It would recognize similar
> tunes in any key.
>
>         Of course, it doesn't do anything with timing. Perhaps that is
> not needed for determining similarity as a quick-classification system.
>
>         I don't see one thing covered in my memory of that system -- how
> to represent a note which was the same as the previous one.  I guess in
> the initial system, it could be '-', but it would force the binary
> notation to two bits per note, '01' for "up", '00' for "no change", and
> '11' for "down" (since that is a representation of a negative number.
>
>         Enjoy,
>                 DoN.
>
> --
>  Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>         (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>            --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ghost subscription
From: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:45:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


I am sorry to bother the whole list about this, but the instructions I
received when I subscribed seem not to include an email address at
which I can reach a human being in connection with administrative
matters.For several months I had been receiving two copies of every posting to
this list.  Perusing the instructions, I noticed that at any rate I
could reduce the number of emails by switching to digest form.  So I
did that.  Sure enough, one of my subscriptions subsequently arrived
as a digest, but the other one continued as individual postings.I next tried unsubscribing.  That caused the digests to stop.  Hurray,
I thought, now I'll switch my remaining subscription to digest form.
In response to that attempt, I got the following reply:> Date:         Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:39:25 -0500
> From: "L-Soft list server at Indiana University (1.8d)"              <[unmask]>
> Subject:      Re: Digest
> To: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
> Status:  O
> X-Content-Length: 274
> Lines: 9
> Xref: OEMCOMPUTER mail.misc:6832> > set ballad-l digest
> You are not subscribed to the BALLAD-L list.> Summary of resource utilization
> -------------------------------
>  CPU time:        0.040 sec
>  Overhead CPU:    0.160 sec
>  CPU model:         200MHz Pentium Pro 512k (256M)
>  Job origin:      [unmask]It also wouldn't let me post this message.  So I resubscribed, and
once again (presumably) have two subscriptions.Can anyone explain what is going on, or put me in touch with someone
in Indiana who can?
--
---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame,   :||
||:  The good deeds a man has done before defend him.  :||

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ghost subscription
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:15:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


Hi, Joe.  The ghost subscription problem can often be hard to fix.  I'll
pass this onto our list guru.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Joe Fineman
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 6:45 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Ghost subscriptionI am sorry to bother the whole list about this, but the instructions I
received when I subscribed seem not to include an email address at
which I can reach a human being in connection with administrative
matters.For several months I had been receiving two copies of every posting to
this list.  Perusing the instructions, I noticed that at any rate I
could reduce the number of emails by switching to digest form.  So I
did that.  Sure enough, one of my subscriptions subsequently arrived
as a digest, but the other one continued as individual postings.I next tried unsubscribing.  That caused the digests to stop.  Hurray,
I thought, now I'll switch my remaining subscription to digest form.
In response to that attempt, I got the following reply:> Date:         Wed, 7 Nov 2001 08:39:25 -0500
> From: "L-Soft list server at Indiana University (1.8d)"
<[unmask]>
> Subject:      Re: Digest
> To: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
> Status:  O
> X-Content-Length: 274
> Lines: 9
> Xref: OEMCOMPUTER mail.misc:6832> > set ballad-l digest
> You are not subscribed to the BALLAD-L list.> Summary of resource utilization
> -------------------------------
>  CPU time:        0.040 sec
>  Overhead CPU:    0.160 sec
>  CPU model:         200MHz Pentium Pro 512k (256M)
>  Job origin:      [unmask]It also wouldn't let me post this message.  So I resubscribed, and
once again (presumably) have two subscriptions.Can anyone explain what is going on, or put me in touch with someone
in Indiana who can?
--
---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame,   :||
||:  The good deeds a man has done before defend him.  :||

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ghost subscription
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:30:54 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 06:45:29PM -0500, Joe Fineman wrote:        [ ... ]> Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> From:         Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
> Subject:      Ghost subscription        [ ... ]> I am sorry to bother the whole list about this, but the instructions I
> received when I subscribed seem not to include an email address at
> which I can reach a human being in connection with administrative
> matters.
>
> For several months I had been receiving two copies of every posting to
> this list.  Perusing the instructions, I noticed that at any rate I
> could reduce the number of emails by switching to digest form.  So I
> did that.  Sure enough, one of my subscriptions subsequently arrived
> as a digest, but the other one continued as individual postings.        I wonder whether you had your "Reply-To: " set at one point.
That would result in you getting one copy of a replay to *your* postings
from every person who replied, *plus* one going to the list (if they
noticed that the reply was going to you individually).  Original
postings, and replies to postings by others should have come in singles.        However, if you were getting two copies of *everything* posted,
it suggests that somehow you were subscribed *twice* -- perhaps under
slightly different versions of your e-mail address.  Not bad enough to
keep you from getting the replies, but enough so the system couldn't
tell that there was really only one of you.        A possible way that this could happen would be if some
administrative change to your ISP caused the system to start rejecting
your postings, forcing you to re-subscribe.  This would have left the
old subscription still delivering e-mail to you, but left you unable to
post through that subscription.> I next tried unsubscribing.  That caused the digests to stop.  Hurray,
> I thought, now I'll switch my remaining subscription to digest form.
> In response to that attempt, I got the following reply:        [ ... ]> > > set ballad-l digest
> > You are not subscribed to the BALLAD-L list.
>
> > Summary of resource utilization
> > -------------------------------
> >  CPU time:        0.040 sec
> >  Overhead CPU:    0.160 sec
> >  CPU model:         200MHz Pentium Pro 512k (256M)
> >  Job origin:      [unmask]
>
> It also wouldn't let me post this message.  So I resubscribed, and
> once again (presumably) have two subscriptions.
>
> Can anyone explain what is going on, or put me in touch with someone
> in Indiana who can?        Well ... you have my speculations above.  Whether your
unsubscripton cleared the old one as well remains to be seen.        If you start getting two copies of everything again, look *very*
closely at the headers -- in particular, look at the address to which
they are delivered.  It may depend on what mail program your ISP is
using.  Some (such as the qmail which I use) add a "Delivered-To: "
header, so I can see what address was used even when the "To: " shows
the mailing list address.        In the meanwhile, you got Marge's attention, and she will pass
it on to the admin staff, who can check for such problems.  (You may
have destroyed the evidence that they needed by your unsubscription.
We'll see. :-)        Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:58:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


The Mudcat Cafe has provided the answer, or most of it: her papers from
the trip are in the EFDSS Vaughan Williams Memorial Library, recordings
released by BBC with copies at VWML and National Sound Archive, and
recordings also in the posession of Peter Kennedy with two anthologies
available through Folktrax. The Virginia anthology has a lot of banjo, I
suspect Jeff Davis (it was that Jeff) got "Pat Do This" from there.
Thanks to Mick and Malcolm Douglas for the help. Links available on that
Mudcat thread at http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=40934&messages=12Nancy-Jean Seigel has also written me that she's got a letter indicating
that Helen Flanders and Maud Karpeles got together for a visit when Maud
was visiting the LoC.I wrote:
 > I've got a recording (Jeff Warner & Jeff Davis's "Two Little Boys")
 > with a song that they note was collected by Maud Karpeles in Virginia
 > in the 1950's. (The song is "Pat Do This", a modal kind of Irish
 > working on the railway song.) Where can I find that material? Were
 > there recordings? What searching I've done on-line today indicates
 > there's not a separate book authored or edited by her that would
 > include stuff from that date and time -- at least that I can tell.~ Becky
--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music
[unmask]   *   www.tftm.org
             520-293-3783
P.O. Box 40654, Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:56:14 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(40 lines) , text/html(51 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Hillbilly Discography
From: Clifford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:23:19 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


        Recently became aware of a discography of "hillbilly" 78s sold at
E-Bay. A 2001 publication privately printed by a Robert R. Olson. Was
outbid and wondered if anyone knew of or how I might contact Mr. Olson.        Thanks.Cliff

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ghost subscription
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:42:21 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(98 lines)


I nominate Don Nichols as email gostmaster general of the United States.Positives: he gets to be called general.  No unwanted spores in email.  He
sits in the President's cabinet.Negatives: He sits in the President's cabinet.EdOn Sat, 10 Nov 2001, DoN. Nichols wrote:> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 06:45:29PM -0500, Joe Fineman wrote:
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > Sender:       Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> > From:         Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
> > Subject:      Ghost subscription
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > I am sorry to bother the whole list about this, but the instructions I
> > received when I subscribed seem not to include an email address at
> > which I can reach a human being in connection with administrative
> > matters.
> >
> > For several months I had been receiving two copies of every posting to
> > this list.  Perusing the instructions, I noticed that at any rate I
> > could reduce the number of emails by switching to digest form.  So I
> > did that.  Sure enough, one of my subscriptions subsequently arrived
> > as a digest, but the other one continued as individual postings.
>
>         I wonder whether you had your "Reply-To: " set at one point.
> That would result in you getting one copy of a replay to *your* postings
> from every person who replied, *plus* one going to the list (if they
> noticed that the reply was going to you individually).  Original
> postings, and replies to postings by others should have come in singles.
>
>         However, if you were getting two copies of *everything* posted,
> it suggests that somehow you were subscribed *twice* -- perhaps under
> slightly different versions of your e-mail address.  Not bad enough to
> keep you from getting the replies, but enough so the system couldn't
> tell that there was really only one of you.
>
>         A possible way that this could happen would be if some
> administrative change to your ISP caused the system to start rejecting
> your postings, forcing you to re-subscribe.  This would have left the
> old subscription still delivering e-mail to you, but left you unable to
> post through that subscription.
>
> > I next tried unsubscribing.  That caused the digests to stop.  Hurray,
> > I thought, now I'll switch my remaining subscription to digest form.
> > In response to that attempt, I got the following reply:
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > > > set ballad-l digest
> > > You are not subscribed to the BALLAD-L list.
> >
> > > Summary of resource utilization
> > > -------------------------------
> > >  CPU time:        0.040 sec
> > >  Overhead CPU:    0.160 sec
> > >  CPU model:         200MHz Pentium Pro 512k (256M)
> > >  Job origin:      [unmask]
> >
> > It also wouldn't let me post this message.  So I resubscribed, and
> > once again (presumably) have two subscriptions.
> >
> > Can anyone explain what is going on, or put me in touch with someone
> > in Indiana who can?
>
>         Well ... you have my speculations above.  Whether your
> unsubscripton cleared the old one as well remains to be seen.
>
>         If you start getting two copies of everything again, look *very*
> closely at the headers -- in particular, look at the address to which
> they are delivered.  It may depend on what mail program your ISP is
> using.  Some (such as the qmail which I use) add a "Delivered-To: "
> header, so I can see what address was used even when the "To: " shows
> the mailing list address.
>
>         In the meanwhile, you got Marge's attention, and she will pass
> it on to the admin staff, who can check for such problems.  (You may
> have destroyed the evidence that they needed by your unsubscription.
> We'll see. :-)
>
>         Good Luck,
>                 DoN.
>
> --
>  Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>         (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>            --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Hillbilly Discography
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:44:34 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(17 lines)


Cliff:If you find Olson, let us all know.EdOn Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Clifford J Ocheltree wrote:>         Recently became aware of a discography of "hillbilly" 78s sold at
> E-Bay. A 2001 publication privately printed by a Robert R. Olson. Was
> outbid and wondered if anyone knew of or how I might contact Mr. Olson.
>
>         Thanks.
>
> Cliff
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Malcolm Douglas <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 22:52:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


Robert B. Waltz wrote:>Peter Kennedy claims that
>"The Budgeon It Is a Delicate Trade" is "All Around My Hat.">It ain't even close.I was puzzling over that myself a while ago, and came to the conclusion that
Kennedy  was referring to the wrong tune in the first place. The tune
Chappell gives in "National English Airs" as the "original" of "All Around
My Hat" (number 90) is clearly a close relation (I haven't seen NEA, and
rely here on Anne Gilchrist's reference in  the Journal of the Folk Song
Society, Volume 8, issue 31, 1927); it isn't, however, reproduced in
"Popular Music of the Olden Time". In PMOT, Chappell discusses "The Budgeon"
in some detail, but doesn't mention "All Around My Hat" at all. I'm assuming
for the moment that Kennedy just got it wrong, but would be grateful for any
elucidation or correction that anyone might be inclined to offer.Malcolm Douglas

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Hillbilly Discography
From: Clifford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 22:09:01 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(113 lines)


        After my posting I did a bit of on-lin searching. Found the
folloing about Mr. Olson and the book itself. Wrote to the gentleman who
had the information on his web-site at the adress given
<[unmask]> and have not had a reply, yet. I don't feel too bad
about missing the bid at E-Bay, the book went for $30.        In looking for OLSON I did find he posts to the following listhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/78-cAs for what I did find from http://www.garlic.com/~tgracyk/companion.htmHere is one more new book--COUNTRY MUSIC ON 78s, compiled by country music
historian Robert R. Olson$33 postpaid. Nearly 300 pages.NEW BOOK, published late 2001. "COUNTRY MUSIC ON 78s," compiled by country
music historian Robert R. Olson. 294 pages. If you want to know what record
company issued which country titles and "hillbilly" artists on the original
78 rpm discs, this is the book for you--unique! Not available in any store.
Privately published. As the title page suggests, here are lists of country
music titles & artists found on old 78 rpm discs issued from the mid-1920s
to World War II. These are numerical listings in the country "series" of 12
different 78 rpm labels, including Brunswick 100-600 series, Columbia's
15000-D series, Decca's 5000 series, Okeh's 45000 series, Victor's V-40000
& 23500 series, Vocalion's 5000 series, Broadway's 8000 series, the Grey
Gull/Radiex 4000 series, Herwin's 75500 series, Paramount's 3000 series,
and Romeo's 5000 series (the Romeo 5000 series is the same as the Oriole
8000 series and the Jewel 20000 series, as far as 20053). Columbia's
20000/21000 country series is not included because it is
post-WWII. Book is 9 x 11 inches, spiral binding.Here are names of typical artists in the lists: Uncle Dave Macon, Ernest V.
Stoneman, Fiddlin' John Carson & His Virginia Reelers, Jenkins Family,
Blind Andy (Andrew Jenkins), Frank Hutchinson, Allen Brothers, Jimmie
Rodgers, Gene Autry, Jimmie Davis, Bud Billings (this is really Frank
Luther), Carter Family, Grinnell Giggers, Kelly Harrell, Gunboat Billy &
the Sparrow (on Victor 23698, this is really Arthur Fields & Fred Hall--not
country artists at all!), George Reneau, Lester McFarland & Robert A.
Gardner, Bradley Kincaid, Jimmie Wakely & His Rough Riders, Cliff Carlisle,
Shelton Brothers, Texas Jim Lewis & His Lone Star Cowboys, and so on. Also
in the book are rare visuals, including advertisements from Talking Machine
World and other phonograph trade journals -- here are ads for Fiddlin' John
Carson, Henry Whitter, Gid Tanner and Riley Puckett, Ernest Thompson,
Samantha Bumgarner and Eva Davis (pioneers among female hillbilly
artists--1924!), Cliff Bruner, McFarland and Gardner, the Tennessee
Ramblers, and so on. $33 postpaid.BOOK #9 -- Country Music on 78s. Numerical lists of all country series on
labels before 1940, by Robert Olson; $33; 310 pages.NEW BOOK published July 2001: "COUNTRY MUSIC ON 78s," compiled by country
music historian Robert R. Olson. 294 pages. If you want to know what record
company issued which country titles and "hillbilly" artists on the original
78 rpm discs, this is the book for you--unique! A lifelong collector of old
78s, Olson has spent decades studying country music on 78 rpm discs that
were issued in the
1920s and 1930s (he has studied primary sources, such as company studio
logs when they exist, and has been in contact with hundreds of other
collectors). This book is not available in any store. Privately published.
As the title page suggests, here are lists of country music titles &
artists found on old 78 rpm discs issued from the mid-1920s to World War
II. These are numerical listings in the country "series" of 12 different 78
rpm labels, including Brunswick 100-600 series, Columbia's 15000-D series,
Decca's 5000 series, Okeh's 45000 series,
Victor's V-40000 & 23500 series, Vocalion's 5000 series, Broadway's 8000
series, the Grey Gull/Radiex 4000 series, Herwin's 75500 series,
Paramount's 3000 series, and Romeo's 5000 series (the Romeo 5000 series is
the same as the Oriole 8000 series and the Jewel 20000 series, as far as
20053). Columbia's 20000/21000 country series is not included because it is
post-WWII.  Book is 9 x 11 inches, spiral binding. Here are names of
typical artists in the lists: Uncle Dave Macon, Ernest V. Stoneman,
Fiddlin' John Carson & His Virginia Reelers, Jenkins Family, Blind Andy
(Andrew Jenkins), Frank Hutchinson, Allen Brothers, Jimmie Rodgers, Gene
Autry, Jimmie Davis, Bud Billings (this is really Frank Luther), Carter
Family, Grinnell Giggers, Kelly Harrell, Gunboat Billy & the Sparrow (on
Victor 23698, this is really Arthur Fields & Fred Hall--not country artists
at all!), George Reneau, Lester McFarland & Robert A. Gardner, Bradley
Kincaid, Jimmie Wakely & His Rough Riders, Cliff Carlisle, Shelton
Brothers, Texas Jim Lewis & His Lone Star Cowboys, and so on. In the book
are RARE advertisements from Talking Machine World and other phonograph
trade journals--Okeh ads for Fiddlin' John Carson, Henry Whitter, Gid
Tanner and Riley Puckett, Ernest Thompson, Samantha Bumgarner and Eva Davis
(pioneers among female hillbilly
artists--1924!), Cliff Bruner, McFarland and Gardner, the Tennessee
Ramblers, and so on.At 7:44 PM -0800 11/10/01, Ed Cray wrote:
>Cliff:
>
>If you find Olson, let us all know.
>
>Ed
>
>
>On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Clifford J Ocheltree wrote:
>
>>         Recently became aware of a discography of "hillbilly" 78s sold at
>> E-Bay. A 2001 publication privately printed by a Robert R. Olson. Was
>> outbid and wondered if anyone knew of or how I might contact Mr. Olson.
>>
>>         Thanks.
>>
>> Cliff
>>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folktrax
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 10 Nov 2001 23:52:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


I've been thinking of buying some of the Folktrax CDs, but after those
Rounder British ballad compilations of a couple of years ago I don't trust
Peter Kennedy's editing.  There were some beautiful songs there but many
were all chopped up.  I'm looking for radio material and listening pleasure,
and snippits of ballad performances strung together are of little use to me.Has anybody here listened to any of the following Folktrax CDs?  Do they
seem to contain full performances rather than short clips of recordings?FTX-903, Various Artists, Fire on the Mountain, Following the Appalachian
Trail
FTX-907, Various Artists, Black is the colour, Maud's Appalachian Collection
1
FTX-908, Various Artists, Cumberland Gap, Maud's Appalachian Collection 2
FTX-923, Hicks Family (of Beech Mountain, NC), Pretty Crowin' chickens
FTX-926, Various Artists, Barbaree
FTX-927, Various Artists, Old Joe Clark
FTX-929, Presnell, Lee Monroe; and Rebecca King Jones, House Carpenter, The
FTX-931, Proffitt, Frank, Bolamkin
FTX-932, Proffitt, Frank, John Hardy
FTX-933, Proffitt, Frank, Going back to North CarolinaBrent Cantrell
Knoxville town

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ghost subscription
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:19:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Joe - this may be a side effect of using 'TheWorld.com' in place of
'world.std.com'?  Your unsubscribe unsubscribed TheWorld.com but
TheWorld.com can't unsubscribe world.std.com?  This sort of thing
typically is because of a change in e-mail address.-Don

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ghost subscription
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:19:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 07:42:21PM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> I nominate Don Nichols as email gostmaster general of the United States.
>
> Positives: he gets to be called general.  No unwanted spores in email.  He
> sits in the President's cabinet.
>
> Negatives: He sits in the President's cabinet.        I think that the negative outweighs the positives, so I must
respectfully decline the post.        Thanks,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 09:21:49 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(13 lines) , text/html(11 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: hmm
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:18:33 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Dear All,I haven't been near a computer for 48 hours (joy and rapture) so I have
just had the opportunity to read all your wise saws about Celtoidity.Nice comments.Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 21:01:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Mary Stafford wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, anyone have an idea of the value of the Bronson volumes? I have the full set, bought years back as they were being published, in excellent shape. Not that I'm thinking of selling them, but that I sort of want to have an idea of value as I leave them to my kids in my will! I also have the hardcover Child set published by Cooper Square Press, condition good (some covers a bit loose, all pages intact), and Sharp's English Folk Songs From the Southern Appalachians, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, London, 1932, also in good condition. Any guesses at value would be appreciated.
>To confirm what Ed said, a friend who specializes in folk-related books
told me in 1998 or early 1999 that he could get $500 for the set in
reasonably good condition.  In early 2000 I saw, I think, 2 volumes
only, listed for $250.  A local bookseller had one volume and was asking
$125, which I couldn't afford.  He asked what the e-price was; I told
him, and he said that indicated his price was in the ballpark.Since that time my bookdealer friend has told me that if I find a copy
at $125, he'll take it!  What seems to have happened is that the only
way most people can find the book is electronically, and someone is
willing to pay the price - so now more people are selling
electronically, and prices have gone up.I was astonished at what people were asking for the Dover Child set - I
was looking for a set for $50, which was the going price a few years
ago.  But the price has kept going up, and turnover is limited, so I
shrugged and bought a set for $350 recently.  All the other sets were
listed for $500 and up, and single volumes are going for $70-90 - I've
been told I got a bargain!!!  Go figure!Anyway, I'd feel comfortable saying your set is worth $1,000 - if I
manage to stay afloat in this economic environment for awhile longer,
I'd consider paying that myself, and of course yours doesn't have the
library defacement/wear.  But of course, that's last year's price... The
people who have them are keeping them, so when a full set finally shows
up on E-Bay, who knows how high a bidder will go?  And if someone
decides to reprint them (no candidates in sight), it could come down
with a crash...!!-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Maud Karpeles in Virginia
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 23:08:32 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Thanks, John, I forgot to mention here that I did see that in the info
on the Folktrax web site. Obviously without consulting him I still can't
say for certain that Jeff got it directly from there, but it sure seems
likely!John Moulden wrote:
 >> The Virginia anthology has a lot of banjo, I
 >> suspect Jeff Davis (it was that Jeff) got "Pat Do This" from there. > "Pat do this" is recorded on Folktrax 908 "Cumberland Gap" A16
 > recorded from Florence Fitzgerald (Mrs Puckett) Afton, Nelson County
 > Va.~ Becky
--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music
[unmask]   *   www.tftm.org
             520-293-3783
P.O. Box 40654, Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson and Reprints
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:56:21 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Donald and Eavesdroppers:You note that the prices of various books (Bronson's four volumes/the
Dover reprint of Child) will fall, sometimes precipitously when reprint
editions are offered.Logic would suggest this is true, but my three year tracking of prices for
folklore and folk music books suggests the fall is not so severe as one
might think.  Kenneth Goldstein's reprints in the 1960s and 1970s of
various standard collections (White, Henry, Gardner and Chickering,
Morris, Eddy, et al), command prices in the $40-$50 range, while the first
editions go for $50-75.As it happens, there is a publisher, apparently knowledgable, willing to
reprint various folk song collections.  He has Bronson under
consideration.  If you have any further suggestions, send them along.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 12 Nov 2001 20:26:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be that
messages will go to the list.Let me know how it works.     MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "W. B. OLSON" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 12 Nov 2001 21:10:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Marge Steiner wrote:
>
> Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be that
> messages will go to the list.
>
> Let me know how it works.
>
>      Marge
>
> E-mail: [unmask]Great! Thank you very much.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:43:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


<<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
that
messages will go to the list.Let me know how it works.>>I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
in the first place!)Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:30:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Well since it was I who replied to your message, I shall do so again.
And indeed it's going to the right place. Well done Marge.John Roberts.><<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
>that
>messages will go to the list.
>
>Let me know how it works.>>
>
>I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
>happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
>in the first place!)
>
>Peace,
>Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 07:35:08 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


On 11/13/01, John Roberts wrote:>Well since it was I who replied to your message, I shall do so again.
>And indeed it's going to the right place. Well done Marge.I have replied to all four messages so far (didn't send the first
one because my mail server was out last night). All four went back
to Ballad-L. Several were from people who have reply-to headers
in their mail.So, yes, I think you can declare it officially fixed.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:06:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:43:29AM -0600, Paul Stamler wrote:> Reply-To:     Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>> <<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
> that
> messages will go to the list.
>
> Let me know how it works.>>
>
> I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
> happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
> in the first place!)        O.K.  I'll reply to it, but it isn't necessary, since I could
see the "Reply-To: " (which I've left quoted above from the headers.)        Thanks, Marge,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 13:42:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Paul Stamler wrote:
>
> <<Hopefully the reply function will now work so that the default will be
> that
> messages will go to the list.
>
> Let me know how it works.>>
>
> I just tried, and it did. So now someone reply to this, and let's see what
> happens. (Since a reply to a message of mine was what brought the issue up
> in the first place!)
>
> Peace,
> PaulPaul,You did not bring it up in the first place.If you look at the messages with subject 'Reply-to:' in the Ballad-L
Archives for March of 1999, you will see that I raised the issue then,
but we were told the listserv server was configured 'correctly', with
the implication that nothing could be done to change it. After 2 1/2
years we now have the server configured the way I would call 'correct'.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:52:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
configuration here.Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to
Ballad-L as the listserv server is presently configured.  Is it
the email address from which the message was posted, or that
given in the 'Reply to' specified by the poster in his/her email
setup? I've put a fake 'Reply to' address, [unmask],
into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:01:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
> configuration here.
>
> Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
> see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to
> Ballad-L as the listserv server is presently configured.  Is it
> the email address from which the message was posted, or that
> given in the 'Reply to' specified by the poster in his/her email
> setup? I've put a fake 'Reply to' address, [unmask],
> into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
> it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
> I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.
>
> Bruce Olson
> --
> Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
> broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
> or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>
> Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.'From:' seems to be the address from which the message was posted, so I
don't know what you can do if you want off-list replies to go to a
different email address than the one you posted from.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:46:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:01:43PM -0500, Bruce Olson wrote:> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >
> > Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
> > configuration here.
> >
> > Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
> > see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to        [ ... ]> > into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
> > it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
> > I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.        [ ... ]> 'From:' seems to be the address from which the message was posted, so I
> don't know what you can do if you want off-list replies to go to a
> different email address than the one you posted from.        Learn how to forge your headers. :-)        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: think we've solved Reply-To problems!
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 13 Nov 2001 17:24:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


DoN. Nichols wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 04:01:43PM -0500, Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> > Bruce Olson wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry to bother you, but I want to make a final text of the new listserv
> > > configuration here.
> > >
> > > Please do not reply to the 'From' address here. This is a test to
> > > see what now appears in the 'From:' address of messages to
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > > into my email setup for this posting, and if all is now well I think
> > > it will appear here as the 'From:' address, but I can't be sure that
> > > I can guess what someone else takes to be 'correctly' configured.
>
>         [ ... ]
>
> > 'From:' seems to be the address from which the message was posted, so I
> > don't know what you can do if you want off-list replies to go to a
> > different email address than the one you posted from.
>
>         Learn how to forge your headers. :-)
>
>         Enjoy,
>                 DoN.
>
> --
>  Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>         (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>            --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---Or add a reply-to address into your message, or put a reply-to address
in the signature file that you put at the end of the messsages you send
(if you have made such).Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 00:43:42 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(57 lines)


> Lani asks about meter as a determiner or identifier.  In her thesis on
> "tune families," Anne Dhu Shapiro cites it as just one factor, a theory
> with which I concur.  George Pullen Jackson in his four works on the white
> spiritual identifies hundreds of long meter (6 and 7 beats per line)
> tunes.  If meter alone were of much help in identifying tunes, I suspect
> he would have grouped many more of these tunes in "families" or
> "clusters."Tune classification has very little to do with what I was asking; if you
look through the list of tunes you get from an unusual metre in "Le Cle
du Caveau", you won't get very many tunes but they will be *totally*
unrelated to each other by any musical criterion beyond fitting the same
text.What I'm after is knowing *exactly* what tune a broadside-monger had
in mind.  A tune in the same general family from an unrelated time
and place is no use to me at all.  If I get a bunch of candidates from
the same time and place (e.g. known in Edinburgh at the time of the 1832
cholera) I can sift them on a textual basis - which one would make for
the most apt parody, given the usual words people thought of for it then?As I said, in three of the examples I listed I can't think of EVEN ONE
tune that fits.  I'd be delighted to get a list of hundreds of tunes,
I could search it a lot more productively than a list of *zero* tunes,
which is where I'm at just now.  I'm quite used to reading the whole of
Gore's fiddle tune index from cover to cover at a sitting looking for
one relevant item.: Please, let me ask for a small step backwards:  I am aware
: that there are many collections of hymns which include detailed
: summaries of the verse patterns, usually in the form of a series
: of numbers indicating the number of syllables in each line of a
: verse, e.g. 7,7,7,7, or 8,6,8,6.
:  Would that be the basis of the projected 'index'?  Or some other
: metric measurement?I can't get at "Le Cle du Caveau" any more to check, but it was a bit
more sophisticated than that - typically with a French song you mix
masculine and feminine rhymes together in equal proportions in a
distinctive pattern, and the classification took account of this (in
your notation you might get something like 7M,7F,7F,7M, which cuts the
search space down by a factor of 6).  The one time I really needed
to use it, it got me bang onto a tune with an obvious (in hindsight)
historical connection to my target text in a couple of minutes.  It
really is an effective tool.The rhyme pattern of that cholera song (three matching masculine rhymes
and an unrhymed dactylic ending) is so unusual that, even if you were
to ignore all other metric features, it must cut the search space down
to a handful of items from the total corpus of English song.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: identifying tunes from verse patterns
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:43:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>  > Lani asks about meter as a determiner or identifier.  In her thesis on
>>  "tune families," Anne Dhu Shapiro cites it as just one factor, a theory
>  > with which I concur.In my analysis, I would not include meter at all when looking at melody.--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bronson
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 17:10:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Are you ready to gnash your teeth, folks?One of the newer universities in England threw out all its folk books a
couple of years back. Allegedly it needed the shelf space. So... A friend
of mine picked up 1 full set of Bronson for £5 in total, and then another
set missing volume 4 for another fiver. They were going to give it away
because of the missing volume............Anyone got a spare volume 4?CheersSimon

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Ship in the Sky" Returns
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:47:15 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Sorry to be so late in responding to this.  To my ear, the tune is not
"Wreck of Old 97" or "Ship that Never Returned" (which is much the same
tune), but is much closer to Carson Robison's "Wreck of Number Nine" ("On a
cold winter's night....").
Norm

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Ship in the Sky" Returns
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:10:28 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Norm:I will file your suggestion away with the others received.  Trouble is, I
can't write in my supposedly authoritative biography that Guthrie MAY have
used this or that tune.But I will figure out a way to blame you folks for not giving me a firm
answer.EdOn Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Norm Cohen wrote:> Sorry to be so late in responding to this.  To my ear, the tune is not
> "Wreck of Old 97" or "Ship that Never Returned" (which is much the same
> tune), but is much closer to Carson Robison's "Wreck of Number Nine" ("On a
> cold winter's night....").
> Norm
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More Ebay Finds
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:13:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Hi!        Here I am again! One particular seller seems to have a number of
auctions of folklore books from the 1920's and 1930's.        1486384241 Folklore from the Schoharie Hills, New York by
Gardner published 1937
        1486422505 - Folklore from Maryland by Whitney & Canfield 1925
        1486419312 - Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads by
Wimberly published in 1928
        1486423534 - Folk Songs of Old New England by Linscott 1939
        1486421363 - Ballads and Songs of Southern Michigan by Gardner &
Chickering published in 1939        Other items of interest:        1486429566 - Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border by Scot not sure
what edition
        1486011285 - Percy's Reliques (volume 1 of 2)
        1485360285 - 4 issues of the New York Folklore Quarterly dated
between May, 1945 and winter, 1946
        1485492499 - Colcord Songs of American Sailormen 1938                Hope that there is something of interest here!                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Addition to Ebay List
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 16 Nov 2001 23:43:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Hi Again!        Sorry to be back so soon but I found this after sending the last
email.        1486409612 - English Folk Songs from the Southern Appalachians
                        Cecil Sharp 1960 edition                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Addition to Ebay List
From: Patricia Lee Conroy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 18 Nov 2001 08:14:28 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Dolores, what is the price of Sharp's English Folk Songs from the Southern
Appalachians (1960)?
Thanks, Patricia Conroy----- Original Message -----
From: "Dolores Nichols" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 8:43 PM
Subject: Addition to Ebay List> Hi Again!
>
>         Sorry to be back so soon but I found this after sending the last
> email.
>
>         1486409612 - English Folk Songs from the Southern Appalachians
>                         Cecil Sharp 1960 edition
>
>                                 Dolores
>
> --
> Dolores Nichols                 |
> D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
> Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
>         --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Addition to Ebay List
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:51:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 08:14:28AM -0800, Patricia Lee Conroy wrote:
>
> Dolores, what is the price of Sharp's English Folk Songs from the Southern
> Appalachians (1960)?
> Thanks, Patricia ConroyPatricia,        The copy of Sharp's English Folk Songs from the Southern
Appalachians is currently at $12.50 with 2 bids and closes on Nov. 25.
It is hard to predict what will happen to the price. Most of these
folklore books don't get a lot of bids and this is the Thanksgiving
weekend so that may also keep the price down.                Good luck if you decide to bid on it!                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 01:05:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
The gin was getting low
I scarcely think we'll get a little drink
Till we get to Buffalo-ho-hoNot much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?Thanks in advance.All the best,
Dan Milner

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:33:12 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(29 lines)


Dan:The earliest printed text I have in my library is in Carl Sandburg's
_American Songbag,_ published in 1927 (p. 180).Lomax and Lomax, _American Ballads and Folk Songs_ (1934), pp. 455-474,
has a clutch of "Erie Canal" songs, including one variant said to be sung
at the Alhambra Varieties in Buffalo, NY, in the eighteen eighties, and
another, taken from the "Negro Foreget-Me-Not Songster" (Cincinnati:
Bratton and Barnard, 1848) on pp. 471, which has two of the verses
in the "Erie Canal" in Sandburg.EdOn Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Dan Milner wrote:> Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
> The gin was getting low
> I scarcely think we'll get a little drink
> Till we get to Buffalo-ho-ho
>
> Not much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
> Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> All the best,
> Dan Milner
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 12:43:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Dan:
>
> The earliest printed text I have in my library is in Carl Sandburg's
> _American Songbag,_ published in 1927 (p. 180).
>
> Lomax and Lomax, _American Ballads and Folk Songs_ (1934), pp. 455-474,
> has a clutch of "Erie Canal" songs, including one variant said to be sung
> at the Alhambra Varieties in Buffalo, NY, in the eighteen eighties, and
> another, taken from the "Negro Foreget-Me-Not Songster" (Cincinnati:
> Bratton and Barnard, 1848) on pp. 471, which has two of the verses
> in the "Erie Canal" in Sandburg.
>
> Ed
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Dan Milner wrote:
>
> > Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
> > The gin was getting low
> > I scarcely think we'll get a little drink
> > Till we get to Buffalo-ho-ho
> >
> > Not much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
> > Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Dan Milner
> >The storm near Albany on the way (from New York) to Bufflao
may well be the same as that in the comic song "The Raging Canal",
and I suspect "The E-R-I-E" was inspired by that song. The Levy sheet
music collection has copies of "The Raging Canal" of 1844.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 13:28:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 01:05:40 -0500, Dan Milner wrote:>Not much dialogue in it but The Erie Canal is, I guess, a narrative ballad.
>Does anyone know the origin or have the earliest printed text please?
>
I suspect that this, like many canal songs, has an elderly but
never-printed bawdy side.  Lomax (see Ed's post) seems to say just that.
While you're looking, you may wish to also check for the non-parlor
versions.Dyer-Bennet notes he actually collected the following in Portland, Maine
and later heard Burl Ives sing a nearly identical version.As sung by Richard Dyer-Bennett on _1601_, R D-B Records, 1962.             The Eer-i-e Canal        We were forty miles from Albany
        Forget it I never shall;
        What a hell-of-a storm we had one night
        On the Eer-i-e Canal.        cho:    O the Eer-i-e was a-rising
                And the gin was a-getting low.
                And I scarcely think we'll get a drink
                'Till we get to Buffalo-o-o
                'Till we get to Buffalo.        The captain, he come up on deck
        With a spy-glass in his hand;
        But the fog, it was so fuckin' thick
        That he could not see the land.        Our cook, she was a grand old gal,
        She wore a ragged dress;
        We h'isted her upon a pole
        As a signal of distress.        The captain, he got married,
        And the cook was tossed in jail,
        And I'm the only son-of-a-bitch
        That's left to tell the tale.The Erie Canal opened from Lake Erie to the Hudson River on Oct. 10, 1825
so that's your earliest possible date.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
                        Boycott South Carolina!
        http://www.naacp.org/news/releases/confederateflag011201.shtml

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Reprints
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:31:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
<http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
reprints, but it is available.John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 18:33:23 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> reprints, but it is available.        Hmm ... I wonder which version they chose to reprint.  We have
a very old reprint, which I understand left out some of the more
"interesting" songs which were in the original.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:04:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


I do believe it was taken from the Folklore Associates reprint of
about 1960 (?)  though I may well be wrong on this.John.>On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:
>
>> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
>> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
>> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
>> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
>> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
>> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
>> reprints, but it is available.
>
>        Hmm ... I wonder which version they chose to reprint.  We have
>a very old reprint, which I understand left out some of the more
>"interesting" songs which were in the original.
>
>        Enjoy,
>                DoN.
>
>--
> Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
>        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
>           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:18:16 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


John and Others:This is interesting.  Ken Goldstein in 1959 reprinted _Pills_ in three
volumes.  I wonder just how many copies he sold, and how many Higginson
has run.EdOn Tue, 20 Nov 2001, John Roberts wrote:> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> reprints, but it is available.
>
> John Roberts.
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 01:49:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Yes Ed, I think that's the one they used. Apparently reprinters can't
copyright the book, only new material such as an introduction, so
they could use it to base theirs on. (So I was a year off...).I believe the current edition is "print on demand." I could find out
all the details if you really wanted to know. I made the original
suggestion to a fiddling friend who works there, as it was a book I'd
lusted after for some time. It was close enough to their main
genealogy/history theme for them to do it, especially as one of their
employees is a musician specializing music of the  Colonial period.John.>John and Others:
>
>This is interesting.  Ken Goldstein in 1959 reprinted _Pills_ in three
>volumes.  I wonder just how many copies he sold, and how many Higginson
>has run.
>
>Ed
>
>
>On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, John Roberts wrote:
>
>> Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
>> that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
>> the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
>> <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
>> nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
>> yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
>> reprints, but it is available.
>>
>> John Roberts.
>>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:02:28 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


John noted that the Pills was available "on demand."  I've noticed quite a
few reprints of scarce old ballad books are being offered by one outfit
called, I believe, "Books on Demand."  They have access to a copyable copy
and reprint it, dog-eared and all, as requested.  The prices are rather high
(the few I noted were in the couple hundred $ range).
Norm Cohen> Yes Ed, I think that's the one they used. Apparently reprinters can't
> copyright the book, only new material such as an introduction, so
> they could use it to base theirs on. (So I was a year off...).
>
> I believe the current edition is "print on demand." I could find out
> all the details if you really wanted to know. I made the original
> suggestion to a fiddling friend who works there, as it was a book I'd
> lusted after for some time. It was close enough to their main
> genealogy/history theme for them to do it, especially as one of their
> employees is a musician specializing music of the  Colonial period.
>
> John.
> >>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:13:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
marriage'TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
emigration'TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
rural working men & women'TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
false lovers'TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
frolics'TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
national issues'TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
amorous encounters'TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
& Welsh travellers & gypsies'TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
shore'TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
'The joys & curse of drink'TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
courtship & marriage'TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
Seasonal events'TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
& poaching'TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
song'CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
loves traditional music.Please let me know if you're interested

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 19:21:15 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(106 lines)


Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of recording
credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
collectors and researchers.Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
>
>
>
> If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
>
> These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
>
> TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> marriage'
>
> TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
>
> TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
>
> TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> emigration'
>
> TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> rural working men & women'
>
> TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> false lovers'
>
> TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> frolics'
>
> TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> national issues'
>
> TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
>
> TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> amorous encounters'
>
> TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
>
> TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> shore'
>
> TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> 'The joys & curse of drink'
>
> TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
>
> TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> courtship & marriage'
>
> TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> Seasonal events'
>
> TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
>
> TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> & poaching'
>
> TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
>
> TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> song'
>
>
> CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> loves traditional music.
>
> Please let me know if you're interested
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:42:01 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(117 lines)


This benighted Canadian presumes the $300 is in US dollars? (c. $500 Can).
Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ruairidh Greig" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of
recording
> credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
> collectors and researchers.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
> Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
>
> > CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> > of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> > Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> > ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> > Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> > McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> > Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> > Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> > Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> > Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> > Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> > Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> > Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> > John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> > Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> > Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> > Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> > Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> > Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
> >
> > These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> > indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> > material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> > each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
> >
> > TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> > marriage'
> >
> > TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> > sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
> >
> > TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
> >
> > TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> > emigration'
> >
> > TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> > rural working men & women'
> >
> > TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> > false lovers'
> >
> > TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> > frolics'
> >
> > TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> > national issues'
> >
> > TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
> >
> > TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> > amorous encounters'
> >
> > TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> > & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
> >
> > TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> > shore'
> >
> > TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> > 'The joys & curse of drink'
> >
> > TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
> >
> > TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> > courtship & marriage'
> >
> > TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> > Seasonal events'
> >
> > TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
> >
> > TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> > & poaching'
> >
> > TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
> >
> > TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> > song'
> >
> >
> > CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> > been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> > complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> > wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> > loves traditional music.
> >
> > Please let me know if you're interested
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:50:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(128 lines)


Read more carefully Jon! (Read beday and not beknight, perhaps).
That's $200. And a deal I would jump at, myself, if I didn't have
them already.JR>This benighted Canadian presumes the $300 is in US dollars? (c. $500 Can).
>Jon>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ruairidh Greig" <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
>Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
>
>> Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of
>recording
>> credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
>> collectors and researchers.
>>
>> Ruairidh Greig
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
>> To: <[unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
>> Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>>
>>
>> > CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
>> > of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
>> > Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
>> > ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
>> > Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
>> > McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
>> > Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
>> > Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
>> > Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
>> > Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
>> > Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
>> > Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
>> > Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
>> > John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
>> > Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
>> > Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
>> > Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
>> > Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
>> > Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
>> >
>> > These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
>> > indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
>> > material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
>> > each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
>> >
>> > TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
>> > marriage'
>> >
>> > TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
>> > sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
>> >
>> > TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
>> >
>> > TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
>> > emigration'
>> >
>> > TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
>> > rural working men & women'
>> >
>> > TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
>> > false lovers'
>> >
>> > TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
>> > frolics'
>> >
>> > TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
>> > national issues'
>> >
>> > TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
>> >
>> > TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
>> > amorous encounters'
>> >
>> > TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
>> > & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
>> >
>> > TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
>> > shore'
>> >
>> > TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
>> > 'The joys & curse of drink'
>> >
>> > TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
>> >
>> > TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
>> > courtship & marriage'
>> >
>> > TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
>> > Seasonal events'
>> >
>> > TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
>> >
>> > TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
>> > & poaching'
>> >
>> > TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
>> >
>> > TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
>> > song'
>> >
>> >
>> > CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
>> > been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
>> > complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
>> > wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
>> > loves traditional music.
>> >
>> > Please let me know if you're interested
>> >
>>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:29:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(127 lines)


Hi Dick!I was not aware that you have been offering individual items from The Voice
of the People for $12.98.  We have a few of the CDs already and I will get a
few more from you at that price.Without differing that VOTP is a monumental collection and as much as I
respect your opinion and good work, I have to differ with the bracketed part
of your statement, "These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and
Bert Lloyd (and indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer)
learned their material from."  With regard to Ireland, there is a vibrant
song tradition in many parts of the country and many people with anywhere
from a few to a truckload of songs that were learned only from people only
in their own locality plus other people who have combed libraries and every
other possible source for "new" old songs.  Certainly, many well known
singers have specialized in songs from the repertoires of Joe Heaney, Paddy
Tunney or Geordie Hanna, for example, but the output of commercial
recordings does not accurately reflect the scene at large.  There's a little
too much paint on your brush!Please send me an e-mail about your movements in the near future and I'll
arrange to get a few VOTP CDs from you.  Thanks for letting us know.All the best,
Dan Milner----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
>
>
>
> If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
>
> These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
>
> TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> marriage'
>
> TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
>
> TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
>
> TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> emigration'
>
> TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> rural working men & women'
>
> TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> false lovers'
>
> TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> frolics'
>
> TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> national issues'
>
> TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
>
> TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> amorous encounters'
>
> TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
>
> TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> shore'
>
> TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> 'The joys & curse of drink'
>
> TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
>
> TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> courtship & marriage'
>
> TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> Seasonal events'
>
> TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
>
> TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> & poaching'
>
> TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
>
> TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> song'
>
>
> CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> loves traditional music.
>
> Please let me know if you're interested

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 15:32:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Caroline and I both jumped, she by phone as a surprise present for me,
me by e-pistle as a surprise present for her. Fortunately, Greenhaus
knew we really needed only one set! Nice to deal with a dealer who is
also a good friend.
        Sandy (Paton, that is -- not Ives -- "Hello, Sandy!")John Roberts wrote:
>
> Read more carefully Jon! (Read beday and not beknight, perhaps).
> That's $200. And a deal I would jump at, myself, if I didn't have
> them already.
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:40:18 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


Dick:Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:06:29 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(10 lines) , text/html(5 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:19:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


There are extensive reviews of this set on the Musical Traditions page at:
http://www.mustrad.org.uk/(Oops - I just looked there and for some reason I get a "not found"
message - I should check)Anyway, it has very little to do with Peter Kennedy, much more to do
with Topic Records' archives, and, by association, with A.L. Lloyd.
Much of the material comes from out of print Topic LP releases of
traditional singers. The balance is mostly from unpublished field
recordings, selected by the compiler, Reg Hall, to fill in the gaps
in his conception of what the set was going to be. It is definitely a
one-man work, rather than an overview of the British tradition by
committee, though of course others gave him input.I don't know offhand if they used _any_ of Kennedy's recordings. I
recall they wanted to, for the Coppers, I yhink, as an example, but
there was some issue with him over copyright, and in the end I think
they may have decided to pursue other avenues.The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
as I get older I get less open-handed.John Roberts.>Dick:
>
>Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
>full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
>passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
>suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
>
>Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 22:00:00 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


For information
Peter Kennedy had nothing at all to do with the Voice of the People CDs -
they were produced and edited by Reg Hall, whose editorial standards are
well known.
There are no cut-down or cobbled together tracks.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> Dick:
>
> Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
> full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
>
> Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:55:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(121 lines)


That's $200 (US), Jon. Doesn't help the US/Canada exchange rate any, but it does
bring down the total.Jon Bartlett wrote:> This benighted Canadian presumes the $300 is in US dollars? (c. $500 Can).
> Jon
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ruairidh Greig" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
> > Don't credit Peter Kennedy with recording all of them- the list of
> recording
> > credits is a "who's who" of a generation or more of British and Irish
> > collectors and researchers.
> >
> > Ruairidh Greig
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:13 PM
> > Subject: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
> >
> >
> > > CRASS COMMERCIAL ANNOUNCEMENT TO FOLLOW:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you're not familiar with Topic's monumental "Voice of the People" set
> > > of CDs, it consists of twenty (20!) CDs of field recordings collected by
> > > Peter Kennedy. It's probably THE most impressive collection of its type
> > > ever assembled, with artists that include : Sarah Makem, Geoff Ling,
> > > Mary Anne Haynes, Tommy McGarth, Pop Maynard, Willie Clancy, Jimmy
> > > McBeath, Paddy Tunney, Harry Cox, Rose Murphy, Joe Heanny Belle Stewart,
> > > Phil Tanners, Eddie Butcher, Turp Brown, Margaret Barry, Walter Pardon,
> > > Martin Gorman, Joseph Taylor, Jimmy McBeath, Micho Russell, Jeannie
> > > Robertson. Cyril Pocher, Tom Willet, Johnny Doughty, John Rae, Sam
> > > Larner, Lizzie Higgins, Turp Brown, George Ling, Walter Pardon, Frank
> > > Verrill, Harry Upton, Micho Russell, Bob Hart, Bob Roberts, Willie
> > > Scott, Fred Jordon, Packie Manus, Byrne, Liz Jefferies, Stanley
> > > Robertson, Geordie Hannah, John McDonald, Ben Butcher, Freda Palmer,
> > > John Reilly, Phoebe Smith, Enos White, Scan Tester, Eddie Butchers,
> > > Michael Coleman, Sarah Anne O'Neill, Paddy Breen, Davie Stewart, Jinky
> > > Wells, Tom Lennihan, Jimmy Nights, Bob Cann, Maggy Murphy, Bampton
> > > Morris, Charlie Wills, Sheila Stewart, Jasper Smith, May Bradley, Percy
> > > Brown, Oscar Woods, Stephen Baldwin, Walter Bulwer, Font Whatling, Fred
> > > Whiting, Sarah Makem, Amy Birch, Wiggie Smith, George Spicer etc. etc.
> > >
> > > These are the people that the likes of Ewan MacColl and Bert Lloyd (and
> > > indirectly almost every later British and Irish singer) learned their
> > > material from. The CDs are well remastered,  typically have 20-25 tracks
> > > each, come with lavish notes and are organized by subject material:
> > >
> > > TSCD651 COME LET US BUY THE LICENCE 'Songs of courtship &
> > > marriage'
> > >
> > > TSCD652 MY SHIP SHALL SAIL THE OCEAN 'Songs of tempest &
> > > sea battles, sailor lads & fishermen'
> > >
> > > TSCD653 O'ER HIS GRAVE THE GRASS GREW GREEN 'Tragic Ballads'
> > >
> > > TSCD654 FAREWELL, MY OWN NATIVE LAND 'Songs of exile &
> > > emigration'
> > >
> > > TSCD655 COME ALL MY LADS THAT FOLLOW THE PLOUGH 'The life of
> > > rural working men & women'
> > >
> > > TSCD656 TONIGHT I'LL MAKE YOU MY BRIDE 'Ballads of true &
> > > false lovers'
> > >
> > > TSCD657 FIRST I'M GOING TO SING YOU A DITTY 'Rural fun &
> > > frolics'
> > >
> > > TSCD658 A STORY I'M JUST ABOUT TO TELL 'Local events &
> > > national issues'
> > >
> > > TSCD659 RIG-A-JIG-JIG 'Dance music of the south of England'
> > >
> > > TSCD660 WHO'S THAT AT MY BED WINDOW? 'Songs of love &
> > > amorous encounters'
> > >
> > > TSCD661 MY FATHER'S THE KING OF THE GYPSIES 'Music of English
> > > & Welsh travellers & gypsies'
> > >
> > > TSCD662 WE'VE RECEIVED ORDERS TO SAIL 'Jackie Tar at sea & on
> > > shore'
> > >
> > > TSCD663 THEY ORDERED THEIR PINTS OF BEER AND BOTTLES OF SHERRY
> > > 'The joys & curse of drink'
> > >
> > > TSCD664 TROUBLES THEY ARE BUT FEW 'Dance tunes & ditties'
> > >
> > > TSCD665 AS ME AND MY LOVE SAT COURTING 'Songs of love,
> > > courtship & marriage'
> > >
> > > TSCD666 YOU LAZY LOT OF BONE-SHAKERS 'Songs & dance tunes of
> > > Seasonal events'
> > >
> > > TSCD667 IT FELL ON A DAY A BONNY SUMMER DAY 'Ballads'
> > >
> > > TSCD668 TO CATCH A FINE BUCK WAS MY DELIGHT 'Songs of hunting
> > > & poaching'
> > >
> > > TSCD669 RANTING & REELING 'Dance music of the north of England'
> > >
> > > TSCD670 THERE IS A MAN UPON THE FARM 'Working men & women in
> > > song'
> > >
> > >
> > > CAMSCO has been selling these CDs for $12.98 each, and, IMO, they've
> > > been a bargain. We're now able (for a very limited time) to offer the
> > > complete set at a price of $200 (less than I have been paying
> > > wholesale.) It would make a spectacular Christmas present for anyone who
> > > loves traditional music.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if you're interested
> > >
> >

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:02:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


I haven't  had time to listen to the entire set yet, but everything I've heard
has been complete. The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
five-pound sack.dickEd Cray wrote:> Dick:
>
> Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are the
> full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
>
> Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:59:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon series.
I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the original
LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if you
have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
Norm Cohen
>
> The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> as I get older I get less open-handed.
>
> John Roberts.
>
>
>
> >Dick:
> >
> >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are
the
> >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> >
> >Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:43:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


Norm-
I have no real information about this, but Rounder provided a gap in the
numbering between the second Classic Ballads volune and Songs of Seduction.
Could it be that the missing tracks may resurface (I no longer have my vinyl
copy, so I'm not sure exactly what was on which.dickNorm Cohen wrote:> I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon series.
> I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
> classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the original
> LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if you
> have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
> Norm Cohen
> >
> > The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> > collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> > material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> > Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> > Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> > where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> > the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> > all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> > I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> > as I get older I get less open-handed.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> >
> >
> >
> > >Dick:
> > >
> > >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts are
> the
> > >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> > >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a comment
> > >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> > >
> > >Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: listserv will be unavailable from 10-5 on Friday
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:44:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi, folks.  I've been notified that our listserv will be unavailable on
friday, the 23rd, from ten to six, for a system upgrade.  Hope that that
won't mess things up for us all.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 00:51:44 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(95 lines)


I believe that the main reason Alan Lomax adopted a cut-and-paste approach
was that at the time he was making much of his living (certainly while in
Europe) as a radio presenter of 'folk music'. That's what you did on
documentaries in those days - you talked about the stuff, played a brief
snippet, talked, played another snippet and so on. This was especially
useful if you wanted to compare/contrast different approaches to the same
song, etc. And you only had half-an-hour..To be charitable, as someone else has commented - at the time, there was so
little material availble on record, and little prospect of there being much
more in the future, and the collectors were finding such a wealth of
material that they were under pressure to cram as much as possible into what
little 'space' they had. Remember that this was before the real Revival took
hold and expanded the market.What is a great great pity is that some of the Rounder CDs and some (not all
by any means) of Peter Kennedy's Folktrax issues continue this outdated
approach.To be less charitable: Alan Lomax had the example of his father (John)
before him. Some of John's books are notorious for their cut-and-splice
texts.There is an excellent article in the forthcoming issue of Folk Music Journal
(Vol.8:2, 2002), by E. David Gregory, called 'Lomax in London: the BBC and
the Folk-Song Revival in England'.Incidentally, I helped Reg Hall a bit with the Voice of the People series,
and I can state categorically that no material controlled by Peter Kennedy
was used. Partly because much of his material is already available on his
own Folktrax label. However, a brand new CD from Topic, also edited by Reg
Hall - 'Come Write Me Down', by the Copper Family uses many of PK's
recordings, and makes up for their absence on the VOTP series.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs> Norm-
> I have no real information about this, but Rounder provided a gap in the
> numbering between the second Classic Ballads volune and Songs of
Seduction.
> Could it be that the missing tracks may resurface (I no longer have my
vinyl
> copy, so I'm not sure exactly what was on which.
>
> dick
>
> Norm Cohen wrote:
>
> > I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon
series.
> > I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
> > classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the
original
> > LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if
you
> > have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
> > Norm Cohen
> > >
> > > The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> > > collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> > > material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> > > Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> > > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > > of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> > > Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> > > where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> > > the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> > > all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> > > I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> > > as I get older I get less open-handed.
> > >
> > > John Roberts.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Dick:
> > > >
> > > >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts
are
> > the
> > > >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> > > >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a
comment
> > > >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> > > >
> > > >Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:00:08 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(111 lines)


Good People:Steve Roud sets the record (and me) straight.It was the Folktrax compilations that used snippets, not the Topic series
Dick Greenhaus has commended.  I apologize if I ruffled any feathers in my
ignorance.Happy Thanksgiving,EdOn Thu, 22 Nov 2001, roud wrote:> I believe that the main reason Alan Lomax adopted a cut-and-paste approach
> was that at the time he was making much of his living (certainly while in
> Europe) as a radio presenter of 'folk music'. That's what you did on
> documentaries in those days - you talked about the stuff, played a brief
> snippet, talked, played another snippet and so on. This was especially
> useful if you wanted to compare/contrast different approaches to the same
> song, etc. And you only had half-an-hour..
>
> To be charitable, as someone else has commented - at the time, there was so
> little material availble on record, and little prospect of there being much
> more in the future, and the collectors were finding such a wealth of
> material that they were under pressure to cram as much as possible into what
> little 'space' they had. Remember that this was before the real Revival took
> hold and expanded the market.
>
> What is a great great pity is that some of the Rounder CDs and some (not all
> by any means) of Peter Kennedy's Folktrax issues continue this outdated
> approach.
>
> To be less charitable: Alan Lomax had the example of his father (John)
> before him. Some of John's books are notorious for their cut-and-splice
> texts.
>
> There is an excellent article in the forthcoming issue of Folk Music Journal
> (Vol.8:2, 2002), by E. David Gregory, called 'Lomax in London: the BBC and
> the Folk-Song Revival in England'.
>
> Incidentally, I helped Reg Hall a bit with the Voice of the People series,
> and I can state categorically that no material controlled by Peter Kennedy
> was used. Partly because much of his material is already available on his
> own Folktrax label. However, a brand new CD from Topic, also edited by Reg
> Hall - 'Come Write Me Down', by the Copper Family uses many of PK's
> recordings, and makes up for their absence on the VOTP series.
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
>
>
> > Norm-
> > I have no real information about this, but Rounder provided a gap in the
> > numbering between the second Classic Ballads volune and Songs of
> Seduction.
> > Could it be that the missing tracks may resurface (I no longer have my
> vinyl
> > copy, so I'm not sure exactly what was on which.
> >
> > dick
> >
> > Norm Cohen wrote:
> >
> > > I second John's misgivings on the Rounder "reissues" of the Caedmon
> series.
> > > I was not so distressed by the medley versions (which I often use for
> > > classroom purposes) but by the fact that some of the tracks on the
> original
> > > LPs had been deleted entirely from the new production.  The moral is, if
> you
> > > have the LPs, they will not be superannuated by the Rounder CDs.
> > > Norm Cohen
> > > >
> > > > The issues that have come up latterly regarding Peter Kennedy's
> > > > collages were concerning the Rounder releases of the Alan Lomax
> > > > material, the English sections of which (and much of the Irish and
> > > > Scots) are being edited by him. For example, at least three the
> > > > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > > > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > > > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > > > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > > > of bits of performances. Another example in the England volume of the
> > > > Columbia World Library of Primitive Music (or something like that)
> > > > where the rationale was to keep the volume as it stood as reflecting
> > > > the tight programming of the original. There are in-depth reviews of
> > > > all these, too, on the Musical Traditions pages. If I felt generous,
> > > > I would put down his editing, or lack of it, to simple laziness, but
> > > > as I get older I get less open-handed.
> > > >
> > > > John Roberts.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >Dick:
> > > > >
> > > > >Yours is a good offer, but dog in the manger, I wonder if the cuts
> are
> > > the
> > > > >full songs or edited/truncated versions.  My question is based on a
> > > > >passing comment by someone on this list a couple of weeks ago, a
> comment
> > > > >suggesting that Kennedy had edited the tapes for release.
> > > > >
> > > > >Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re-editing Caedmon
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 02:03:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(162 lines)


Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:>The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
>which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
>and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
>releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
>partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
>LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
>five-pound sack.
>
[and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]I wrote (less graciously):> For example, at least three the
> Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> of bits of performances.Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
topic has changed.THE ELFIN KNIGHTTwo versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
primarily Bob & Ron).Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
on the CD. Full marks to PK.FALSE KNIGHTThe CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
which only has the Quinn version.LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHTOn CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
recording, and is complete.DOUGLAS TRAGEDYA recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
equivalent on the LPTWA SISTERS (Binnorie)The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
"Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
from Ord.On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.LORD RANDALThe CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
something?]EDWARDTwo different collages!The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
verses are in the CD notes.The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
included.Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
"omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
mentioned above.KING ORFEOThe audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.THE CRUEL MOTHERThe CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
apparently his complete version.THE BROOMFIELD WAGERThe LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
from the LP, is also returned._____
Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
performance that draws the audience into the story.John Roberts.
John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: Jon Bartlett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:36:58 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(177 lines)


Great thanks to John Roberts for this bit of sleuthing.  I agree
wholeheartedly - give us the ballad, the whole ballad and nothing but the
ballad (tho I must say that the "collages" are wonderful teaching tools,
particularly for students with no notion of the folk process).
Jon Bartlett
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Roberts" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:03 PM
Subject: Re-editing Caedmon> Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:
>
> >The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
> >which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of
Britain
> >and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
> >releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
> >partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations
on
> >LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds
into a
> >five-pound sack.
> >
> [and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]
>
> I wrote (less graciously):
>
> > For example, at least three the
> > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > of bits of performances.
>
>
> Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
> I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
> LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
> in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
> so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
> delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
> topic has changed.
>
>
> THE ELFIN KNIGHT
>
> Two versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
> 9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
> because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
> primarily Bob & Ron).
>
> Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
> on the CD. Full marks to PK.
>
>
> FALSE KNIGHT
>
> The CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
> Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
> for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
> the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
> which only has the Quinn version.
>
>
> LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHT
>
> On CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
> LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
> in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
> recording, and is complete.
>
>
> DOUGLAS TRAGEDY
>
> A recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
> equivalent on the LP
>
>
> TWA SISTERS (Binnorie)
>
> The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
> "Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
> from Ord.
>
> On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
> John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
> Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.
>
>
> LORD RANDAL
>
> The CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
> Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
> the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
> from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
> translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
> version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
> the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
> something?]
>
>
> EDWARD
>
> Two different collages!
>
> The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
> version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
> 2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
> verses are in the CD notes.
>
> The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
> Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
> included.
>
> Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
> will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
> the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
> this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
> employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.
>
> The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
> "omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
> verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
> The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
> the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
> mentioned above.
>
>
> KING ORFEO
>
> The audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
> LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
> this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
> showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.
>
>
> THE CRUEL MOTHER
>
> The CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
> gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
> Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
> booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
> more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
> copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
> her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
> Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.
>
> On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
> apparently his complete version.
>
>
> THE BROOMFIELD WAGER
>
> The LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
> On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
> the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
> from the LP, is also returned.
>
> _____
> Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
> while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
> comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
> I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
> with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
> withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
> wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
> and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
> pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
> something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
> no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
> particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
> performance that draws the audience into the story.
>
> John Roberts.
> John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Gerald Porter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:52:24 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


I have a 'first edition' of Pills to Purge Melancholy given me by a
neighbour who died earlier this year.  Now I've been told that the set
was reprinted page-for-page in the middle of the nineteenth century,
even down to using the original date (1719-20).  Can anyone let me know
how I can tell whether I have the original 1st edition or not (all
right, I know there were other editions before 1719, but they were
considerably shorter)?  It's not self-evident from the condition of the
volumes.Gerald PorterOn Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:
>
> > Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> > that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> > the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> > <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> > nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> > yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> > reprints, but it is available.
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:01:07 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


> I have a 'first edition' of Pills to Purge Melancholy given me by a
> neighbour who died earlier this year.  Now I've been told that the set
> was reprinted page-for-page in the middle of the nineteenth century,
> even down to using the original date (1719-20).  Can anyone let me
> know how I can tell whether I have the original 1st edition or not
> [...] It's not self-evident from the condition of the volumes.Watermarks.  Take it to a good reference library and ask them to help.
The rare book room at the National Library of Scotland has books of
watermarks covering the whole history of printing and special lights
for transilluminating pages without burning holes in them.  I've never
done it myself, but from the number of people I've seen at it, it can't
be difficult.You could just transilluminate a page and trace the watermark yourself,
then put a scan of the tracing on the web.  If somebody here has a copy
known to be either the original or the reprint they could then tell you
if yours matches what they've got.=================== <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> ===================

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:19:55 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(172 lines)


Many  thanx, John. The problem with being in this business is the very real risk of learning something.dick
>
> From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
> Date: 2001/11/22 Thu AM 01:03:15 CST
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re-editing Caedmon
>
> Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:
>
> >The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
> >which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
> >and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
> >releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
> >partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
> >LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
> >five-pound sack.
> >
> [and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]
>
> I wrote (less graciously):
>
> > For example, at least three the
> > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > of bits of performances.
>
>
> Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
> I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
> LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
> in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
> so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
> delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
> topic has changed.
>
>
> THE ELFIN KNIGHT
>
> Two versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
> 9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
> because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
> primarily Bob & Ron).
>
> Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
> on the CD. Full marks to PK.
>
>
> FALSE KNIGHT
>
> The CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
> Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
> for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
> the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
> which only has the Quinn version.
>
>
> LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHT
>
> On CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
> LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
> in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
> recording, and is complete.
>
>
> DOUGLAS TRAGEDY
>
> A recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
> equivalent on the LP
>
>
> TWA SISTERS (Binnorie)
>
> The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
> "Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
> from Ord.
>
> On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
> John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
> Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.
>
>
> LORD RANDAL
>
> The CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
> Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
> the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
> from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
> translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
> version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
> the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
> something?]
>
>
> EDWARD
>
> Two different collages!
>
> The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
> version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
> 2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
> verses are in the CD notes.
>
> The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
> Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
> included.
>
> Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
> will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
> the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
> this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
> employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.
>
> The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
> "omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
> verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
> The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
> the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
> mentioned above.
>
>
> KING ORFEO
>
> The audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
> LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
> this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
> showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.
>
>
> THE CRUEL MOTHER
>
> The CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
> gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
> Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
> booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
> more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
> copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
> her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
> Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.
>
> On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
> apparently his complete version.
>
>
> THE BROOMFIELD WAGER
>
> The LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
> On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
> the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
> from the LP, is also returned.
>
> _____
> Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
> while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
> comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
> I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
> with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
> withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
> wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
> and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
> pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
> something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
> no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
> particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
> performance that draws the audience into the story.
>
> John Roberts.
> John Roberts.
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Reprints
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:28:18 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(43 lines)


Gerald and Others:Cyrus L. Day's introduction to the Folklore Library reprint of 1959 of the
six volumes (in three) of _Pills to Purge Melancholy_ offers this
information (p. x): In 1876, the six volumes of the 1719-1720 _Pills_ were
reprinted anonymously -- presumably by J.S. Farmer.  "Except that the long
's' is abandoned, the pages look almost exactly like the pages of the
original edition.  The text, though not impeccable, is extraordinarily
accurate."In short, look for the long "s."Now, I've got to go stuff a turkey.Happy Thanksgiving to all --EdOn Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gerald Porter wrote:> I have a 'first edition' of Pills to Purge Melancholy given me by a
> neighbour who died earlier this year.  Now I've been told that the set
> was reprinted page-for-page in the middle of the nineteenth century,
> even down to using the original date (1719-20).  Can anyone let me know
> how I can tell whether I have the original 1st edition or not (all
> right, I know there were other editions before 1719, but they were
> considerably shorter)?  It's not self-evident from the condition of the
> volumes.
>
> Gerald Porter
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 05:31:41PM -0500, John Roberts wrote:
> >
> > > Since we've been talking about reprinted books, I thought I'd mention
> > > that Thomas D'Urfey's Pills To Purge Melancholy has been reprinted by
> > > the Higginson Book Company of Salem MA
> > > <http://www.higginsonbooks.com/> and can be ordered from them in a
> > > nice 3-volume hardbound set for about $225, I think. The book is not
> > > yet listed on their website, which deals mostly with genealogical
> > > reprints, but it is available.
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 18:08:51 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(185 lines)


BTW, John-Musical Traditions has released a CD of Cyril Poacher in which he sings Broomfield Wager without the "Hold the Wheel"
shouted chorus. Did PK excise it from the CD version, or was it a different performance?>
> From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
> Date: 2001/11/22 Thu AM 10:19:55 CST
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
>
> Many  thanx, John. The problem with being in this business is the very real risk of learning something.
>
> dick
> >
> > From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
> > Date: 2001/11/22 Thu AM 01:03:15 CST
> > To: [unmask]
> > Subject: Re-editing Caedmon
> >
> > Dick Greenhaus wrote, very graciously:
> >
> > >The notorious "snippet" recording was the old Caedmon set,
> > >which has been re-released in part by Rounder as Classic Ballads of Britain
> > >and Ireland (v1 and v2 )and Songs of Seduction. In all three of the Topic
> > >releases, additional material has been added to reduce, if not eliminate,
> > >partial versions. I'm sure that the editing was due to time limitations on
> > >LPs---something like the classic blivet problem of putting ten pounds into a
> > >five-pound sack.
> > >
> > [and I presume you meant "Rounder" when you said "Topic" above]
> >
> > I wrote (less graciously):
> >
> > > For example, at least three the
> > > Caedmon "Folk Songs of Britain" series have been released so far,
> > > including the two volumes of Child ballads, and Kennedy passed up the
> > > opportunity to restore the partial ballads to completeness, and
> > > indeed in some instances came up with whole new cut-and-paste medleys
> > > of bits of performances.
> >
> >
> > Well, I _do_ have the Caedmon set as well as the Rounder releases, so
> > I thought I'd do a comparison. This covers Side 1 of the first Child
> > LP, and its equivalents on the Child Volume 1 CD. Since I'm writing
> > in plain text (at least I think I am), I can't do tables and columns,
> > so this may be a bit rambling. If it's too rambling, you all have a
> > delete button. And I've changed the subject header, too, since the
> > topic has changed.
> >
> >
> > THE ELFIN KNIGHT
> >
> > Two versions on the LP, Bob & Ron Copper, "An Acre of Land," includes
> > 9 of the 14 verses printed in the booklet. Not on the CD (perhaps
> > because PK planned to include it in the new Topic CD of the Coppers,
> > primarily Bob & Ron).
> >
> > Thomas Moran "Strawberry Lane". 5 of 12 verses sung on the LP, all 12
> > on the CD. Full marks to PK.
> >
> >
> > FALSE KNIGHT
> >
> > The CD starts with a spoken intro from Duncan McPhee, talking to
> > Hamish Henderson; he then says "I'll sing it later on, I'll record it
> > for you," and there are indeed 3 verses in the notes, but _not_ on
> > the CD which goes straight to Frank Quinn, 4 verses, same as the LP
> > which only has the Quinn version.
> >
> >
> > LADY ISABEL & THE ELF KNIGHT
> >
> > On CD and LP by Fred Jordan, but they are different recordings. The
> > LP version, sung in F#, has 1-10 of the 15 verses, (the whole text is
> > in the notes), the CD version (sung lower, in D) is a concert
> > recording, and is complete.
> >
> >
> > DOUGLAS TRAGEDY
> >
> > A recited fragment is inserted here on the CD - there is no
> > equivalent on the LP
> >
> >
> > TWA SISTERS (Binnorie)
> >
> > The LP has 6 verses from John Strachan [aside: was that pronounced
> > "Strakkan" or "Strawn"?] and the booklet adds a further 11 verses
> > from Ord.
> >
> > On the CD there is a new collage! 8 verses are sung, rotating between
> > John Strachan (vs. 1,3,and 6 from the LP), Dorothy Fourbister, and
> > Ethel Findlater. The CD texts give only the verses that are sung.
> >
> >
> > LORD RANDAL
> >
> > The CD is the same as the LP, a collage of Scottish, Irish-English,
> > Irish-Gaelic and Welsh. Notes are essentially the same too, giving
> > the sung texts only (the Gaelic only in English translation apart
> > from the first line of the verse, the Welsh in Welsh and in
> > translation). The notes also give the "rest of story" of the Welsh
> > version, but only in English translation. [Did I read somewhere that
> > the Welsh singers, Eirlys & Eddis Thomas, are his in-laws or
> > something?]
> >
> >
> > EDWARD
> >
> > Two different collages!
> >
> > The CD starts with 4 verses from Mary Ellen Connors; on the LP this
> > version is sung by Paddy Tunney (as learned from her) - he sings vs.
> > 2,3,5,6,7 of her text, 7 verses in the LP notes. Only the first 4
> > verses are in the CD notes.
> >
> > The CD continues with 6 verses of "My Son David" from Jeannie
> > Robertson; the LP has only 3 verses, but the text of the others is
> > included.
> >
> > Then on the CD we get 4 verses from Thomas Moran, starting with "What
> > will you do when your father comes home?" There is no indication in
> > the CD notes that Mr. Moran might have verses before and/or after
> > this segment, and in general this is the case when a singer is
> > employed to give a ballad segment in these collages.
> >
> > The CD continues with 3 verses from Angela Brasil. There is a verse
> > "omitted" in this segment and the text is included, so there are 4
> > verses in the CD notes, but again no indication there might be more.
> > The LP notes give a 6-verse text. On the LP she sings verses 3-6, on
> > the CD 4-6. Strangely, the LP notes do not give the "omitted" verse
> > mentioned above.
> >
> >
> > KING ORFEO
> >
> > The audio segments are the same, the 4 verses from John Stickle. The
> > LP notes give a 21-verse text from 1865; the CD notes only mention
> > this, but they do include portions of the text from an 1880 article,
> > showing where Mr. Stickle's verses would fit in.
> >
> >
> > THE CRUEL MOTHER
> >
> > The CD is a collage of segments from three singers. Duncan Burke
> > gives a fragmentary version, with some of the story spoken. Cecilia
> > Costello covers the first part of the story with 5 verses (the
> > booklet only has 4, and there is, again, no indication there might be
> > more of her text - I can't remember if it's on her solo LP, and my
> > copy seems to be on walkabout so I can't check, but I would expect
> > her version to be relatively complete). Then there are 4 verses from
> > Thomas Moran, again no indication there might be more.
> >
> > On the LP Thomas Moran's is the only version, and he sings 6 verses,
> > apparently his complete version.
> >
> >
> > THE BROOMFIELD WAGER
> >
> > The LP has Cyril Poacher singing 5 verses, 2 more given in the notes.
> > On the CD the performance is restored to its entirety, and a "Hold
> > the wheel" shouted out between the first verse and chorus, excised
> > from the LP, is also returned.
> >
> > _____
> > Well, that covers just one side of an LP, and it took me a good
> > while. I'd done brief reviews of the Rounder CDs, with minimal
> > comparison to the LPs, and a more detailed comparison is something
> > I'd wanted to do. Unfortunately, the main conclusion I draw is that
> > with Peter Kennedy you never know quite what you're dealing with. I
> > withdraw my snide comment about laziness (in another post), but I do
> > wish he could be more direct. But when you get only bits of a ballad,
> > and as the examples above show he's still doing new cutting and
> > pasting of what I've been calling his collages, the end result is
> > something that is no use to the person just trying to learn the song,
> > no use to the ballad scholar, and essentially unlistenable,
> > particularly as a "ballad" where it is the continuity of the
> > performance that draws the audience into the story.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> > John Roberts.
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:36:43 EST
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(15 lines) , text/html(11 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Re-editing Caedmon
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:48:27 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(55 lines) , text/enriched(62 lines)


This particular recording was made in September, 1974, at Cyril's
home. I don't have the MT recording, but I do have Tony Engle's
recording of the same song (from the Topic LP), from sessions
recorded in August and September of the same year, so they must be
very close. The MT notes say: "On Cyril's earlier recording, made by
the BBC (Child Ballads Vol I, Topic 12T160), the singer and audience
constantly interject the phrase 'hold the wheel'.  This allegedly
arose as a result of the singer trying to explain the story to a
visiting yachtsman who misunderstood 'had his way' as 'hold the
wheel', but by the 1970s Cyril had gone back to the old way of
singing it."The notes to the Topic LP give the same explanation, except the
phrase is 'had his will'; they add that "Cyril prefers to sing the
song without it."So we have two time periods, but also two different social
situations. In the pub in 1957, not only was the "hold the wheel"
chorus added, but the performance included the common refrain of
repeating the last half of each verse. Cyril certainly leads this
refrain, singing it through in the first couple of verses, and
starting it off in the following ones. He does not, however, join in
on the  "hold the wheel." At home, a good many years later, with no
audience, we don't get the refrain or the chorus. I wonder, even
though by the 1970s the "hold the wheel" was apparently dropped in
the pub, if his audience there would let him go to the next verse
without the repeat.To try to answer your specific question, Kennedy's CD version was the
same performance as on the LP. Someone jumped the gun a bit, adding
the "hold the wheel" between the first verse and refrain rather than
after the refrain, and PK chose to snip that out of the LP version.John Roberts.In a message dated 11/23/2001 12:08:45 AM GMT Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:Musical Traditions has released a CD of Cyril Poacher in which he
sings Broomfield Wager without the "Hold the Wheel"
shouted chorus. Did PK excise it from the CD version, or was it a
different performance?Different performance - these recording were made around 1965 by Mike
Yates, Ginette Dunn, Keith Summers and others - not a Kennedy in
sight.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More Ebay Auctions
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 23 Nov 2001 12:43:00 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


Hi!        I hope that everyone (in the US) had a good Thanksgiving
yesterday!!        Well, individual volumes of various editions of Child keep
appearing. This week it is volume V of the 1957 Folklore Press edition.
        Auction 1487613456 for those who are interested.        Other auctions of possible interest:        The Ballad Book by Leach 1487452966
        Anglo-American Folksong Style by Abrahams & Foss 1487474731
        Folk Songs of the Kentucky Mountains by McGill (1917) 1487462202
        Come A Singing! Canadian Folk-Songs (1973 reprint) by Barbeau,
Lismer & Bourinot 1487469818
        A Canadian Song Book (1960 edition) by MacMillan 1487470664One of the Peter Kennedy CDs that we have been discussing has appeared
on Ebay - Harry Cox's What will become of England Recorded in Norfolk &
London, England in 1953 by Lomax and Kennedy Auction #1488204665.                                Happy Bidding!
                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:20:09 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On the principle that people around this list have better
backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
what will probably prove a dumb question.When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
And wished that my Annie that day had then died.Note the metrical pattern:U-U U-U || U-U -U(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
|| is the caesura)Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
The books don't even admit it exists; it's not an iamb
or a dactyl or a trochee or an anapest or a spondee. I
tried five different references, and those are the only
five feet they mentions.Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
Book_ (#XXII):First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
And there cam bonnetmen following the pleughAny other suggestions?
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:24:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:20:09 -0600, you wrote:>On the principle that people around this list have better
>backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
>what will probably prove a dumb question.
>
>When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
>the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>
>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
>Note the metrical pattern:
>
>U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
>(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
>|| is the caesura)
>
>Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
>that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
>Book_ (#XXII):
>
>First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
>And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>
>Any other suggestions?Isn't it more like:
U-U U-U || U-U U-
because the lines end on a stressed syllable?Not traditional, but 'Dancing at Whitsun'
The tune's nearly the same as 'Jamie Foyers' so that's another one.
At least one version of 'Bonnie Light Horseman'?
It seems to me it would be a common pattern for songs in 3/4 time, but I
may be missing something.Jeri Corlew

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Martin Ryan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:06:51 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Is it not an iamb followed by three anapaests?Deep in the recesses of my mind lurks:"I sprang to the stirrup and Joris and he
I galloped, he galloped, we galloped all threeRegardsMartin Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: 26 November 2001 15:03
Subject: Strange Metrical Question>On the principle that people around this list have better
>backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
>what will probably prove a dumb question.
>
>When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
>the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>
>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
>Note the metrical pattern:
>
>U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
>(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
>|| is the caesura)
>
>Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
>The books don't even admit it exists; it's not an iamb
>or a dactyl or a trochee or an anapest or a spondee. I
>tried five different references, and those are the only
>five feet they mentions.
>
>Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
>that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
>Book_ (#XXII):
>
>First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
>And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>
>Any other suggestions?
>--
>Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
>1078 Colne Street
>Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
>651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
>The Ballad Index Web Site:
>http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:15:07 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


On 11/26/01, Jeri Corlew wrote:>On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:20:09 -0600, you wrote:
>
>>On the principle that people around this list have better
>>backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
>>what will probably prove a dumb question.
>>
>>When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
>>the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>>
> >And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>>
>>Note the metrical pattern:
>>
>>U-U U-U || U-U -U
>>
>>(where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
>>|| is the caesura)
>>
>>Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
>>that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
>>Book_ (#XXII):
>>
>>First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
>>And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>>
>>Any other suggestions?
>
>Isn't it more like:
>U-U U-U || U-U U-
>because the lines end on a stressed syllable?Hm. Not the way I read it. Looking at "Black Phyllis,"
it does look like some "should" put the stress on the first
syllable of the final foot and some on the second. OK,
declare it a final spondee:U-U U-U || U-U -->Not traditional, but 'Dancing at Whitsun'That *is* a traditional tune, "The Week Before Easter."
But it's not the same pattern. "Week Before Easter" is
four full feet of three syllables. Here, there are
eleven syllables per line.>The tune's nearly the same as 'Jamie Foyers' so that's another one.I agree that's in eleven syllables per line. I don't know the
tune, so I can't guarantee this, but doesn't it scan differently,
thoug?>At least one version of 'Bonnie Light Horseman'?
>It seems to me it would be a common pattern for songs in 3/4 time, but I
>may be missing something.Part of my problem is that I have a very hard time comparing
songs with lyrics-without-music. But none of them seem to
scan the same way to me.On 11/26/01, Martin Ryan wrote:>Is it not an iamb followed by three anapaests?You can read it that way, but I don't stress it that way.
You don't get the caesura in the right place.Maybe I read poetry funny :-), but it look at that
stanza of "Black Phyllis." The first three lines
all have the comma at the same place: After syllable
six. To me, that says (in the absence of a tune) that
it's two three-syllable feet, then a three and a two.>Deep in the recesses of my mind lurks:
>
>"I sprang to the stirrup and Joris and he
>I galloped, he galloped, we galloped all threeThat sounds closer. Doesn't sound like a folk song,
though. :-)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:49:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
unstressed syllable)?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:19:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
>unstressed syllable)?Ugh! WITH, not WILL.--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:28:53 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


On 11/26/01, John Garst wrote:>>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>
>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
>unstressed syllable)?Is that allowed? That is, can it be called "anapestic" if it
is missing a syllable? (Serious question.)
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:37:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>On 11/26/01, John Garst wrote:
>
>>>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>
>>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
>>unstressed syllable)?
>
>Is that allowed? That is, can it be called "anapestic" if it
>is missing a syllable? (Serious question.)I think so (notice the uncertainty).
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:11:09 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(96 lines)


Bob,I think it's your scansion that's at fault, I'm afraid. What you have is an
anacrucial start on each line. Thus you should render the verse (omitting
the caesurae for clarity):
u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
u/-u/-u/-uu/-
u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-Line 3 is the only odd one out in it has two trochees replacing two dactyls.
The effect of the anacrusis is to break a trochee across the line end.Dactylic verse with an anacrucial start is enormously common in English
poetry. The most famous is probably Browning's "How I brought the good news
from Ghent to Aix" which from memory goesI sprang to the stirrup, and Joris and he
I galloped, Dirk galloped, we galloped all three
...etcIn folk song, try "The Fair Flower of Northumberland":The provost's ae daughter was a-walking alane
Ah but her love it was easily won
When she heard the Scots prisoner a makin' his mane
And she was the flowr o' Northumberland- the same anacrucial start, although there is no anacrucial bridge between
lines 1 and 2 and the foot bridging lines 2 and 3 is a dactyl.Or:I once loved a lass, and I loved her sae weel,
And I curséd all others that thoght o' her ill,
But now she's rewarded me weel for my love
For she's gone to be wed tae anotherSee George Saintsbury, Historical Manual of English Prosody, (London:
Macmillan, 1919). He covers anacrusis in his glossary.I find that anacrusis is one of those things where it helps to be a morris
dancer to recognise it, because it's where you leap into the air to "drop"
on to the beat.Hope this helpsSimon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:20 PM
Subject: Strange Metrical Question> On the principle that people around this list have better
> backgrounds in English poetry than I do, I'm going to ask
> what will probably prove a dumb question.
>
> When I was indexing Cox's _Folksongs of the South_, I met
> the odd, damaged piece "Black Phyllis," which begins:
>
> And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
> And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
> It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
> And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
> Note the metrical pattern:
>
> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
> (where U represents an unstressed syllable and - a stress;
> || is the caesura)
>
> Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
> The books don't even admit it exists; it's not an iamb
> or a dactyl or a trochee or an anapest or a spondee. I
> tried five different references, and those are the only
> five feet they mentions.
>
> Second, can anyone think of another folk song using
> that meter? The closest I've found is in Kinloch's _Ballad
> Book_ (#XXII):
>
> First there cam whipmen, and that not a few,
> And there cam bonnetmen following the pleugh
>
> Any other suggestions?
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 1078 Colne Street
> Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
> 651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Mudcat?
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:26:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,Best,
John

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:09:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:26:43 -0500, John Roberts wrote:>So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
>requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,I'm not Dick, but I'm one of the volunteer administrators at Mudcat.
John, if you're referring to the current Mud-outage, the servers appear to
have taken a bit of a holiday.  Max Speigel, who is responsible for Mudcat,
is away for the weekend and a bit more - probably until Tue or Wed.  The
servers won't get re-booted until he returns.Jeri Corlew

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:22:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Aw, c'mon fellers. We're talking about FOLK SONG. There's no authority
that says something is or isn't OK--just a singer who sings it anyway
that feels right. The lyric that Mr Waltz asked about sings nicely to an
enormous number of jig tunes (try Larry O'Gaff or Top of Cork Road) as
well as many 3/4 tunes. As for missing unstressed syllables, this often
varies from verse to verse.Take "The Black Cook" as an example:verse 1. If you'll LIS-ten to Me I will Tell you a Story
verse 2.con-CER-ning a DOC-tor that LIVED in our TOWNTrying to overly formal is a Procrustean exercise, to say the least.dick greenhausJohn Garst wrote:> >On 11/26/01, John Garst wrote:
> >
> >>>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
> >>
> >>Anapaestic will an incomplete initial foot (missing the first
> >>unstressed syllable)?
> >
> >Is that allowed? That is, can it be called "anapestic" if it
> >is missing a syllable? (Serious question.)
>
> I think so (notice the uncertainty).
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


I don't think so. Max is running it out of his home, and I suspect he's
away for the holiday. I can't reach him to confirm, though.dick greenhausJohn Roberts wrote:> So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
> requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,
>
> Best,
> John

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:24:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


My apologies for the last message which was intended as a personal email.It's my brain that needs reconfiguring.John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mudcat?
From: Susan Friedman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:21:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


John - Max doesn't have elves anymore, so if he isn't home to fix a problem
it stays down until he returns.  I suspect Max went away for the weekend and
was not there to bring mudcat back up.Susan of DT-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of John Roberts
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 5:27 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Mudcat?So Dick, are we really losing Mudcat? You may be swamped with similar
requests for info, but you're the only person I know to ask,Best,
John

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 23:49:56 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(52 lines)


>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.> Note the metrical pattern:
> U-U U-U || U-U -UYou mean
  U-U U-U || U-U U-> Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?An amphibrach.> Second, can anyone think of another folk song using that meter?There's one which I think is in Sharp/Karpeles, "80 English Folksongs
from the Southern Appalachians" - from memory as I can't find it:   Oh tell me, oh tell me, oh will you agree
   Oh will you agree and get married to me?
   Oh Willie, oh Willie, that never will do,
   For I am too young to get married to you.The tune follows the metre with startling fidelity, it's the clearest
example of modal rhythm I know of in English-language song:X:1
T:?
M:4/4
L:1/4
K:A Minor % minor/dorian hexatonic
E|A2c  A|G2A  G|E2G  A|A3||
E|A2c  A|G2A  G|E2G  A|A3||
E|A2c  d|e2d  c|e2d  A|c3||
B|A2c  A|G2A  G|E2G  A|A3|]What's the tune for the one you quote above?Q: What kind of dinosaur goes "GAAAH!! gnash gnash GAAAH!! gnash gnash"
   before swooping on its prey?
A: The terror dactyl.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 18:56:55 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


On 11/26/01, Simon Furey wrote:>Bob,
>
>I think it's your scansion that's at fault, I'm afraid.Well -- it's the way I *would* read it. But it sounds like I'm
a minority. Maybe it's all the Swedish influence here in
Minnesota. :-)[ ... ]>Or:
>
>I once loved a lass, and I loved her sae weel,
>And I curséd all others that thoght o' her ill,
>But now she's rewarded me weel for my love
>For she's gone to be wed tae anotherIf this scans the same way to you, then we've located our
problem. We really *do* scan "Black Phyllis" differently.
I assume I scan this the way you do, since I know "I Once
Loved a Lass" with an actual tune.>See George Saintsbury, Historical Manual of English Prosody, (London:
>Macmillan, 1919). He covers anacrusis in his glossary.
>
>I find that anacrusis is one of those things where it helps to be a morris
>dancer to recognise it, because it's where you leap into the air to "drop"
>on to the beat.Well -- I can do the equivalent when I have a tune. Just sit there
with a mental guitar or autoharp and say thumb-brush-brush. :-)[ ... ]On 11/26/01, Jack Campin wrote:> >    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>
>> Note the metrical pattern:
>> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>
>You mean
>  U-U U-U || U-U U-As I mentioned in another message, I didn't. I later changed
it to a final spondee, because I was ambivalent about stresses
on the final line. Again, that's how *I* read it. Whatever
that says.> > Now here's my question: What is the name of a U-U foot?
>
>An amphibrach.Thanks! This is worth knowing apart from all the rest.[ ... ]>What's the tune for the one you quote above?That's the problem. Neither the item in Cox nor the one
in Kinloch had a tune, and both are fragmentary. That's
why this is so hard. I suspect that was my problem. If
I have a tune, I adjust the scansion to fit the tune.
In the case of "Black Phyllis," I had to go by the
native rhythms of my speech. Evidently, for whatever
reason, those don't match the rest of yours.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:24:31 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


In a message dated 11/26/01 2:12:12 PM, [unmask] writes:>What you have is an anacrucial start on each line. Thus you should render
the verse (omitting the caesurae for clarity):>u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
>u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
>u/-u/-u/-uu/-
>u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
*****************************
    t seems to me that  Simon has hit the nail on the head.  The verse you
quote has four lines, each consisting of an anacrusis followed by three
dactyls and one iamb,  except for Line 3, as Simpon points out. That could
easily be brought into the metrical pattern by adding an "and" and a couple
of  "I's" to read  " It RAiNED and it HAILED and I SAT and I CRIED";  more
likely, the singer would simply hold some syllables for two beats (a full
quarter note in 6/8 time), as "It RAI-ained and HAILED and I SA-at and CRIED."This dactylic form is very common in folksongs, although it does not conform
to what is often called the "ballad metro. There is also a contemporary light
verse form called "Double Dactyls,"  which must begin with a first line s uch
as "Jiggery Pokery"  or Higg;ledy Piggledy" and must contain one line of a
single six-syllable word with stress on the first and fourth syllables (e.g.,
"antediluvian.")   There's an old Irish double jig called "The Top of Cork
Road" and when words were added, as in "Father O'Flynn"  and "To Dhrink Wid
the Divil,"   each line starts in a manner very similar to the pattern of
"Black Phyllis."  "Father O'Flynn"  begins:
    "Of PRIESTs we can OFFer a CHARMing vaRIety,
      Far reNOWNED for their LEARNing and PIety;....."Still more similar is "Daniel O'Connell"  as sung by Canadian Irish singer
O. J. Abbott: it begins with a two-syllable abacrusis, sung as two
16th--notes in a 6/8 tune:    "Ah ye LOVers of MIRTH, now I PRAY pay atTENtion
       And LISten to WHAT I am GOING to reLATE,,,,,,"
        ("GOING" has to be pronounced as one syllable.)Arthur Scammel used the first part of that tune in his celebrated Nova Scotia
song, "The Squid-Jiggin' Ground:"    "Oh THIS is the PLACE where the FISHermen GAther
           In OILskins and BOOTS and Cape ANNES buttoned DOWN"
      All SIZes of FIGgers with SQUID-lines and JIGgers,
          They CONgregate HERE on the SQUID-jiggin' GROUND."Sam
La Jolla, CA, USA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Sandy Ives <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:39:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Sam Hinton and Simon cover it rather well. Just to add a footnote, see my LARRY GORMAN, pp.27, 155, 195-96.  It was a fairly common pattern for local satirical songs in the Maritimes.  Anyhow, all this scansion stuff has to be taken with a grain or
so of salt when we're dealing with oral tradition.
Sandy Ives

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:35:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Here are I am again! I see that some of you have been bidding on some of
these books. I am glad that you are finding these emails of use!
On to the new list -        1489156837 - the complete 5 volume Dover edition of Child (not
cheap!)
        1039195738 - English and Scottish Ballads by Sargent & Kittredge
                1904 first edition
        1489790411 - Irish Street Ballads by O'Lochlainn 1952 reprint
        1489750184 - Ballads from the Pubs of Ireland by Healy 1968
paperback edition
        1480110073 - Folklore of Canada by McClelland & Stewart appears
to be a 1990 softcover reprint        A couple of unusual items that I noticed        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
interesting.
        1490115569 - Mountain Songs by Grover Hite from Beckley, WV This
is a 24 page booklet from the 1940's or 1950's.                                Good Luck!
                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:23:02 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(60 lines)


SAm:Of all the posited answers, your's seems the most logical.Damned if I ever could get the anapests from the iambs.EdOn Mon, 26 Nov 2001 [unmask] wrote:> In a message dated 11/26/01 2:12:12 PM, [unmask] writes:
>
> >What you have is an anacrucial start on each line. Thus you should render
> the verse (omitting the caesurae for clarity):
>
> >u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
> >u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
> >u/-u/-u/-uu/-
> >u/-uu/-uu/-uu/-
> *****************************
>     t seems to me that  Simon has hit the nail on the head.  The verse you
> quote has four lines, each consisting of an anacrusis followed by three
> dactyls and one iamb,  except for Line 3, as Simpon points out. That could
> easily be brought into the metrical pattern by adding an "and" and a couple
> of  "I's" to read  " It RAiNED and it HAILED and I SAT and I CRIED";  more
> likely, the singer would simply hold some syllables for two beats (a full
> quarter note in 6/8 time), as "It RAI-ained and HAILED and I SA-at and CRIED."
>
> This dactylic form is very common in folksongs, although it does not conform
> to what is often called the "ballad metro. There is also a contemporary light
> verse form called "Double Dactyls,"  which must begin with a first line s uch
> as "Jiggery Pokery"  or Higg;ledy Piggledy" and must contain one line of a
> single six-syllable word with stress on the first and fourth syllables (e.g.,
> "antediluvian.")   There's an old Irish double jig called "The Top of Cork
> Road" and when words were added, as in "Father O'Flynn"  and "To Dhrink Wid
> the Divil,"   each line starts in a manner very similar to the pattern of
> "Black Phyllis."  "Father O'Flynn"  begins:
>     "Of PRIESTs we can OFFer a CHARMing vaRIety,
>       Far reNOWNED for their LEARNing and PIety;....."
>
> Still more similar is "Daniel O'Connell"  as sung by Canadian Irish singer
> O. J. Abbott: it begins with a two-syllable abacrusis, sung as two
> 16th--notes in a 6/8 tune:
>
>     "Ah ye LOVers of MIRTH, now I PRAY pay atTENtion
>        And LISten to WHAT I am GOING to reLATE,,,,,,"
>         ("GOING" has to be pronounced as one syllable.)
>
> Arthur Scammel used the first part of that tune in his celebrated Nova Scotia
> song, "The Squid-Jiggin' Ground:"
>
>     "Oh THIS is the PLACE where the FISHermen GAther
>            In OILskins and BOOTS and Cape ANNES buttoned DOWN"
>       All SIZes of FIGgers with SQUID-lines and JIGgers,
>           They CONgregate HERE on the SQUID-jiggin' GROUND."
>
> Sam
> La Jolla, CA, USA
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:03:25 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]><<This dactylic form is very common in folksongs, although it does not
conform
to what is often called the "ballad metro. There is also a contemporary
light
verse form called "Double Dactyls,"  which must begin with a first line s
uch
as "Jiggery Pokery"  or Higg;ledy Piggledy" and must contain one line of a
single six-syllable word with stress on the first and fourth syllables
(e.g.,
"antediluvian.") >>Aha --"Risselty-rosselty
Hey bombosity
Knickety-knackety
Retrical quality
Willoughby-Wallaby now-now-now"Sorry, off the subject. But that suddenly rang a bell, in 6/8.<<    "Ah ye LOVers of MIRTH, now I PRAY pay atTENtion
       And LISten to WHAT I am GOING to reLATE,,,,,,">>See, also, "Stick to the Craythur". Thank you, Sam!Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:43:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


[unmask] writes:
>        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
>
>        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
>editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
>no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
>interesting.Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.Cheers
Jamie Moreira

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:32:20 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


>>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>>> Note the metrical pattern:
>>> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>> You mean
>>  U-U U-U || U-U U-
> As I mentioned in another message, I didn't. I later changed
> it to a final spondee, because I was ambivalent about stresses
> on the final line. Again, that's how *I* read it.You're saying the last syllable of each line *isn't* stressed??>>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
       U     _   U     U     _  U    U    _  U  U   _You say *A*stride, ...*ING* bride???=================== <http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/> ===================

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:09:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


On 11/27/01, Jack Campin wrote:> >>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>>>>    And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>>>>    It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>>>>    And wished that my Annie that day had then died.
>>>> Note the metrical pattern:
>>>> U-U U-U || U-U -U
>>> You mean
>>>  U-U U-U || U-U U-
>> As I mentioned in another message, I didn't. I later changed
>> it to a final spondee, because I was ambivalent about stresses
>> on the final line. Again, that's how *I* read it.
>
>You're saying the last syllable of each line *isn't* stressed??
>
>>>>    And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>       U     _   U     U     _  U    U    _  U  U   _
>
>You say *A*stride, ...*ING* bride???It depends on whether I'm reading poetry. :-) Once a metre is
established, I'm likely to follow it, whatever it forces on
me.In *isolation* (i.e. taking only the phrases "charger
astride" and "unwilling bride"), I would say *A*stride,
but -ing *BRIDE*
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:39:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


James Moreira wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
> Cheers
> Jamie MoreiraThomas Evans 'Old Ballads, Historical and Narative', 4 vols, 1784, was
the 2nd edition, but I haven't discovered the date or number of volumes
of the original edition. His son, R. H. Evans, issued a new edition,
said to be enlarged, in 4 vols. in 1810.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Evans - Old ballads
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:19:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


The Library of Congress catalog indicates that the 1777 edition was 2 volumes. The 1810 edition was 4 volumes.  I do not know whether or to what extent additions were made in the 1810 edition.Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/27/01 01:39PM >>>
James Moreira wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
> Cheers
> Jamie MoreiraThomas Evans 'Old Ballads, Historical and Narative', 4 vols, 1784, was
the 2nd edition, but I haven't discovered the date or number of volumes
of the original edition. His son, R. H. Evans, issued a new edition,
said to be enlarged, in 4 vols. in 1810.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:26:36 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Re: Evans, Ballads. The Library of Congress catalog indicates that the 1777 edition was 2 volumes. The 1810 edition was 4 volumes.  I do not know whether or to what extent additions were made in the 1810 edition.Lew Becker

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:04:22 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


The Library of Congree catalog indicates that the 1777 edition was in 2 volumes and the 1810 edition in 4 volumes. How much material was in fact added in 1810 is a different question, however.Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/27/01 01:39PM >>>
James Moreira wrote:
>
> [unmask] writes:
> >        A couple of unusual items that I noticed
> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
> Cheers
> Jamie MoreiraThomas Evans 'Old Ballads, Historical and Narative', 4 vols, 1784, was
the 2nd edition, but I haven't discovered the date or number of volumes
of the original edition. His son, R. H. Evans, issued a new edition,
said to be enlarged, in 4 vols. in 1810.Bruce OlsonRoots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:23:36 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Bob said:
>
> It depends on whether I'm reading poetry. :-) Once a metre is
> established, I'm likely to follow it, whatever it forces on
> me.
>
> In *isolation* (i.e. taking only the phrases "charger
> astride" and "unwilling bride"), I would say *A*stride,
> but -ing *BRIDE*
> --That's the point. We are talking about songs here, not spoken poetry. This
is a critical issue, and we must go back to the great man Bronson: "Q. When
is a ballad not a ballad? A. When it has no tune."
Accepting the fact that you haven't got a tune for your song, I can
understand a bit of your problem. However, the apparent rhythms will help
(to some extent - there are lots of "false friends" in  non-English
traditions where the rhythm of the words and the rhythm of the tune don't
actually match, but let that pass).  The thing to do is to look at songs
whose words have roughly similar rhythms and look at their music. If you see
an anacrusis (a pick-up measure, I believe you call it on your side of the
pond) at the start of a melody, then you need an anacrusis in your scansion.
That's a thing that a poetry *reader* is likely to miss, because spoken
poetry has a lot more freedom than song, being free of the tune constraints.
If you go through Bronson and see how many tunes start with a pick-up
measure you'll understand why I said that anacrusis is a very common
phenomenon.As for what you say in responding to Jack, that your native speech alters
your rhythmical perception, that's great. That's one way tune variations
creep in. I say sing the song to suit yourself; I'm all for variation so we
bring life back to these lovely old ballads. It's folk song after all, which
I think was Dick's point. Good luck with your tune-fitting!CheersSimon

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:16:24 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


>And then came black Phyllis, his charger astride,
>And took away Annie, his unwilling bride.
>It rained, it hailed, and I sat and cried,
>And wished that my Annie that day had then died.In The Sacred Harp (3rd Ed, 1860), this meter is called 11s.  It is
represented there by 10 tunes and hymns.  The most familiar of these
may be"Mid scenes of confusion and creature complaints" (Home, Sweet Home)or possibly"How firm a foundation, ye saints of the Lord"The one I like best is"No more shall the sound of the war-whoop be heard"In The Original Sacred Harp (1911), meter 11s is described further as
"consisting of four lines in anapestic, each line containing eleven
syllables."Retrospectively, this provides authority for my earlier analysis -
anapaestic with a missing beat in the first foot.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Latest Finds on Ebay
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:08:25 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


> >
> >        148360470 - Old Ballads Historical and Narrative 2 volumes
> >editor? Evans supposedly dated 1777. This closes tomorrow morning. I've
> >no idea what the contents really are but the age makes it seem
> >interesting.
>
> Note that this is usually a four volume work.  It may be that the volumes
are combined, but I would check with the seller before bidding.
>
In references I've seen, the 1777 edn. is 2 vols, but the 1784 edn is 4
vols.
Norm Cohen

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Strange Metrical Question
From: Joe Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:15:25 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Automatic digest processor <[unmask]>, in the person of Ed
Cray, writes:> Damned if I ever could get the anapests from the iambs.  The _Pseudo-Anapest_
  Moves awkwardly at best;
  His feet are long, uneven and retractile.
  Who hunts the beast in rhythm
  Should take his meter withm
  And _still_ may only bag a Ptero-Dactyl.    -- Frederick WinsorDambed thoiamb forabor anapest.
--
---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  15.  Never Go to a Man's Apartment       167  :||
||:  16.  How to Behave When You Get There    173  :||

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Jack the Rabbit, Jack the Bear
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(75 lines)


Jack the Rabbit,
Jack the Bear,
Can't you (Cain'choo) line 'em
Just a hair?TCI Section Crew "Track Lining Song," 1927, Paramount 12478 (4378-2)This is not exactly a ballad, but it turns out that there is a
connection of "Jack the Rabbit, Jack the Bear" with material that
could have made a ballad.  (I suppose that this use of "made" is
something like that in "He's going to make a doctor."  I haven't
checked my dictionary to see if this is really kosher.)Anyhow, I came across the following while searching old newspapers
for something about John Henry. From an 1887 newspaper:
**********
Jasper, Ala., April 19. - [Special] - One of the largest crowds ever
seen in Jasper was here Friday to witness the hanging of Anderson
Oakes, colored, alias Walter Jackson and "Jack the Bear."
...
He talked freely with those permitted to visit him.  He said that he
felt better than he ever felt before in his life and was anxious to
start to glory.
...
When asked if he had anything to say he said: "Tell all the people to
let whiskey alone, if it hadn't been for whiskey I never would have
killed Mr. Utten.  Tell them to stay away from bar rooms, and out of
bad company."
...
Sheriff Barton performed the duty of putting the rope and letting the
trap door drop and the body fell breaking the neck and the wretched
man died without a relative or friend present.  The cheerful way in
which Jack met his fate made every one present feel less serious.
**********
 From an earlier issue:
**********
He is of a bright copper color, about five feet eight inches in
height, and will weigh about 150 pounds.When asked to speak of his past life, he said:  "I am twenty-three
years old, was born and raised in North Carolina, but have traveled a
good deal in Tennessee, Kentucky and Mississippi...As to the killing
of Mr. Wooten, I know nothing.  I was drinking."
...
Pope Wooten, the young man for whose murder Jackson must suffer the
extreme penalty, was from Stone Mountain, Ga., and was engaged in
railroad work in Walker County.  While walking along one of the
highways he was ambushed and shot to death by a band of negroes, one
of the leaders of whom was Walter Jackson, "Jack the Bear."Another called a leader, with several aliases, was known as "Jack the
Rabbit."  He was recently arrested in Griffin, Ga., and brought here
and lodged in jail where he now is.The first of the negroes arrested, Troupe, says that the gang was
organized for the purpose of gambling and stealing or engaging in any
other lawless act by which they thought might flourish.  They
proposed to operate principally in and about the railroad camp along
the Kansas City and Georgia Pacific railroads.
**********Now, where did Jack the Rabbit and Jack the Bear get their nicknames?Is there other lore about Jack the Rabbit and Jack the Bear?  (It
seems to me highly likely that the TCI crew, with its Alabama
connection, was referring to the murderers.)I note that Duke Ellington recorded a song entitle "Jack the Bear"
and that Bruce Springsteen used "Jack the Rabbit" in his song
"Rosalita."
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Oh, the E-RI-E was a-risin'
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:57:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


Thanks to those who responded to this query.All the best,
Dan Milner

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: question
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:07:50 +0100
Content-Type:multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(39 lines) , message/rfc822(3823 bytes)


(Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)> Dear everyone,
>
> In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
>
> 1) Resources are limited.
> 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> pressure groups all over the place of course.
> 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and Cultures,"
> not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> research.
> 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
>
> Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> was it worth it!
>
> Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> apace!
>
> Andy
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Andrew C Rouse
> Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of Humanities,
> Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
>
> tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 02:28:13 -0800
Content-Type:multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(3 lines) , message/rfc822(7 kB)



Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:56:16 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(76 lines)


Andy,
I have mentioned this source before, but I really think it is worth
consideration if you haven't looked there.Llanerch publishers ( http://www.llanerch-publishers.co.uk/ ) have some
extremely interesting reprints, of which the following is a sample:S Baring Gould: A Garland of Country Songs
Bryce & Stokoe: Northumbrian Minstrelsy with the small pipe tunes
J Payne Collier: Broadside Black Letter Ballads
Keith Norman MacDonald: The Gesto Collection of Higland Music
A. W Moore: Manx Ballads and Music
Roy Palmer: A Book of British Ballads
Roy Palmer: Bushes and Briars; Folk Music Collected by Ralph Vaughan
Williams
Georger Petrie: The Complete Collection of Irish Music (3 vols)
Frances F Tolmie: 105 Songs from Occupation from the Western of Scotland
(anon) The Besom Maker & Other Country Folk Songs
(anon) The Dance Music of ScotlandThey cost about ten quid a book (more or less), which is jolly reasonable.
I should point out that I have nothing to do with this organisation except
as a happy customer. However, I unashamedly admit I am keen to encourage
their efforts in reprinting such works.CheersSimon----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Rouse" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: question> (Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)
>
> > Dear everyone,
> >
> > In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> > department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
> >
> > 1) Resources are limited.
> > 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> > pressure groups all over the place of course.
> > 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and Cultures,"
> > not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> > research.
> > 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> > Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
> >
> > Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> > you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> > heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> > hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> > slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> > facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> > was it worth it!
> >
> > Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> > apace!
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > Andrew C Rouse
> > Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of Humanities,
> > Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
> >
> > tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> > home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> > Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> > Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 19:36:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


Hi, Dave.  we don't have formal rules here.  However, the consensus among
list members, with which I concur, is that folks should not send
attachments.  There are folk who can't open them, and some who are reluctant
to do so, because of the potential for viruses.  So, you might want to
consider posting your request for info on Vilikens and his Dina in plain
text.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of DAVID THOMSON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:28 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:38:56 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


David:According to Laws, _British Broadside Ballads Traditional in America,_ p.
196, the Harry Dichter sheet music catalogue of 1947 lists "Vilikins and
his Dinah" "Comp. by John Parry. Bost. Oliver Ditson. ca. 1855."Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Villikens and His Dinah (without "attachments")
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:13:15 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(127 lines)


Hello Everyone - I am trying to determine when the ballad "Villikens and
His Dinah"
was first published.  The song is credited to John Parry and there are
two musical
Parrys listed but I don't know which of them was the author:Parry, John, 1776-1851andParry, John Orlando, 1810-1879The melody of the song is sometimes referred to as "traditional"
when it provided the tune for "Joe Bowers" circa the '49 Gold Rush
which eventually evolved into "Sweet Betsy from Pike."  In the sound
track of
Ken Burns' upcoming PBS documentary on Mark Twain the melody is
prominently
featured and it sounds like it is probably the "theme" of the show.To summarize,  here are the questions I'm trying to find the answers to:- When was "Villikens and Dinah" first published?- Was the melody "traditional" or written by Perry for "Villikens and
His Dinah"?- Which of the two John Parrys above was the author?- When did "Joe Bowers" get transformed into "Sweet Betsy >From Pike"?Thanks very much to all of you for reading this!Best,DAVE THOMSON
Los AngelesP.S.  Two footnotes:1. A connection with Alice in Wonderland
2. They Lyrics of Joe Bowers circa 1949 showing that "Sweet Betsy" was
once "Sally Black"In Martin Gardner's Annotated Alice in Wonderland there is a connection
is mentioned with Lewis Carroll's
little friend Alice Liddell and a couple of pussy cats:The Liddell sisters were fond of the family's two tabby cats, Dinah and
Villikens, named after a popular song,
"Villikens and His Dinah." Dinah and her two kittens, Kitty and
Snowdrop, reappear in the first chapter of the second Alicebook, and later, in Alice's dream, as the Red and White Queens."JOE BOWERS"My name it is Joe Bowers;
I've got a brother Ike;
I came from old Missouri,
All the way from Pike.
I'll tell you why I left thar
And why I came to roam
And leave my poor old mammy
So far away from home.
I used to court a gal thar,
Her name was Sally Black.
I axed her if she'd marry me;
She said it was a whack.
Says she to me, 'Joe Bowers,
Before we hitch for life,
You ought to get a little home
To keep your little wife.'
'Oh, Sally, dearest Sally,
Oh, Sally, for your sake
I'll go to California
And try to raise a stake.'
Says she to me, 'Joe Bowers,
You are the man to win;
Here's a kiss to bind the bargain,'
And she hove a dozen in.
When I got in that country
I hadn't nary red,
I had such wolfish feelings
I wished myself 'most dead;
But the thought of my dear Sally
Soon made them feelings git,
And I whispered hopes to Bowers [md]
I wish I had 'em yit.At length I went to mining,
Put in my biggest licks;
Came down upon the boulders
Just like a thousand bricks:
I worked both late and early,
In rain, in sun, in snow [md]
I was working for my Sally;
It was all the same to Joe.
At length I got a letter
From my dear brother Ike,
It came from old Missouri,
All the way from Pike;
It brought to me the darndest news
That ever you did hear.
My heart is almost [busttin?]',
So pray excuse this tear.
It said that Sal was false to me,
Her love for me had fled,
She'd got married to a butcher [md]
The butcher's hair was red.
And more than that, the letter said [md]
It's enough to make me swear [md]
That Sally had a baby;
The baby had red hair.
Now I've told you all
About this sad affair,
'Bout Sally marrying a butcher,
That butcher with red hair.
But whether 'twas a boy or gal child
The letter never said;
It only said the baby's hair
Was inclined to be red.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:23:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own copy?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:33:54 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


A dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books, Lexington, Kentucky).Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own copy?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:49:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


Thanks much.  I'll contact them.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of Lewis Becker
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:34 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of LawsA dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books,
Lexington, Kentucky).Lew Becker>>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own copy?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Dan Milner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:12:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Lew is quite correct, Marge, and that appears to be the only copy available
from the usual on-line sources.  If you go to http://www.bookfinder.com/
and type in Malcolm Laws in the Author box, you'll be able to order it
on-line.  I find that process can be somewhat trying, though, so perhaps a
phone call would be well spent.Black Swan's number is 859-252-7255.All the best,
Dan MIlner----- Original Message -----
From: "Lewis Becker" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws> A dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books,
Lexington, Kentucky).
>
> Lew Becker
>
> >>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
> Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
> copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
> print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own
copy?
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:52:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


Thanks much, Dan.  It's been damn inconvenient not to have one readily at
hand.  Of course, the university has one of the finest folklore libraries in
the world, but I'd much rather have that basic source right at home: I have
all of Child and Bronson.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On Behalf
Of Dan Milner
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:12 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of LawsLew is quite correct, Marge, and that appears to be the only copy available
from the usual on-line sources.  If you go to http://www.bookfinder.com/
and type in Malcolm Laws in the Author box, you'll be able to order it
on-line.  I find that process can be somewhat trying, though, so perhaps a
phone call would be well spent.Black Swan's number is 859-252-7255.All the best,
Dan MIlner----- Original Message -----
From: "Lewis Becker" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: obtaining my own copy of Laws> A dealer's booksite lists the Laws as available for $50 (Black Swan Books,
Lexington, Kentucky).
>
> Lew Becker
>
> >>> [unmask] 11/29/01 08:23PM >>>
> Ed's giving Dave the Laws citation reminded me how much I've wanted my own
> copy of american Balladry from British Broadsides, but it's beeen out of
> print for years.  Does anyone know where and how I might obtain my own
copy?
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:56:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> David:
>
> According to Laws, _British Broadside Ballads Traditional in America,_ p.
> 196, the Harry Dichter sheet music catalogue of 1947 lists "Vilikins and
> his Dinah" "Comp. by John Parry. Bost. Oliver Ditson. ca. 1855."
>
> EdIn the Levy sheet music collection are 3 undated '4th' editions of
"Vilikens and his Dinah", published at Boston (Ditson), Baltimore, and
London. Two give John Parry as author and composer, and one gives John
Bernard. Also there is 'the correct edition' with no date, author or
composer given.The first three say it was sung in the musical farce 'The
Wandering Minstrel' at the Royal Olympic Theatre. I know of
no index of 19th century English stage pieces, but I've never
looked for such.Bruce Olson
--
Roots of Folk: Old British Isles popular and folk songs, tunes,
broadside ballads at my no-spam website - www.erols.com/olsonw
or just <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>Motto: Keep at it; muddling through always works.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sweet Betsy
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:28:25 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Folks:A moment of unaccustomed leisure allowed me to ransack my library for
"Sweet Betsy"/"Vilikins" and with that I recalled the redoubtable Norman
Cazden, Herbert Haufrecht and Norman Studer _Folk Songs of the Catskills._
There on pp 156-158, in the notes I assume were written by Cazden, is the
specific date of 1851 for the publication of the sheet music (in England)
of "Vilikins."Apparently it first appeared in a musical farce entitled _The Wandering
Minstrel_ which George Lyman Kittredge (not a man to be argued with)
attributed to the pen of Henry Mayhew (he of the very important London
Labor and London Poor).Cazden notes that the first publication in the United States of the text
of "Vilikins and His Dinah" was in the "Bobbin Around Songster" of 1851.
Seven years later, he continues, the tune was sufficiently familiar in
California for John A. Stone to use it for the air of his "Sweet Betsy
from Pike," as printed in "Put's Golden Songster."Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Fwd: Villikens and His Dinah]
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 00:44:20 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]><<According to Laws, _British Broadside Ballads Traditional in America,_ p.
196, the Harry Dichter sheet music catalogue of 1947 lists "Vilikins and
his Dinah" "Comp. by John Parry. Bost. Oliver Ditson. ca. 1855.">>And I don't think it's any relation to "Joe Bowers" -- the tunes and meter
are quite different. "Joe Bowers" is in 4/4 time, ballad meter, while
"Villikens/Sweet Betsy" is in 3/4.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: question
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:56:26 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(91 lines)


Llanerch Publishers
Agreed their cheap and cheerful reprints are a godsend but, most
unfortunately, they went out of business about 2/3 months ago. They were
selling off their stock then. There was some talk of another publisher
buying them up but I don't know if that happened. My last two emails to them
went unanswered.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: question> Andy,
> I have mentioned this source before, but I really think it is worth
> consideration if you haven't looked there.
>
> Llanerch publishers ( http://www.llanerch-publishers.co.uk/ ) have some
> extremely interesting reprints, of which the following is a sample:
>
> S Baring Gould: A Garland of Country Songs
> Bryce & Stokoe: Northumbrian Minstrelsy with the small pipe tunes
> J Payne Collier: Broadside Black Letter Ballads
> Keith Norman MacDonald: The Gesto Collection of Higland Music
> A. W Moore: Manx Ballads and Music
> Roy Palmer: A Book of British Ballads
> Roy Palmer: Bushes and Briars; Folk Music Collected by Ralph Vaughan
> Williams
> Georger Petrie: The Complete Collection of Irish Music (3 vols)
> Frances F Tolmie: 105 Songs from Occupation from the Western of Scotland
> (anon) The Besom Maker & Other Country Folk Songs
> (anon) The Dance Music of Scotland
>
> They cost about ten quid a book (more or less), which is jolly reasonable.
> I should point out that I have nothing to do with this organisation except
> as a happy customer. However, I unashamedly admit I am keen to encourage
> their efforts in reprinting such works.
>
> Cheers
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Rouse" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> Subject: question
>
>
> > (Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)
> >
> > > Dear everyone,
> > >
> > > In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> > > department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
> > >
> > > 1) Resources are limited.
> > > 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> > > pressure groups all over the place of course.
> > > 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and Cultures,"
> > > not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> > > research.
> > > 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> > > Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
> > >
> > > Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> > > you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> > > heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> > > hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> > > slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> > > facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> > > was it worth it!
> > >
> > > Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> > > apace!
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > Andrew C Rouse
> > > Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of Humanities,
> > > Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
> > >
> > > tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> > > home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> > > Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> > > Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: question
From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 18:19:56 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(107 lines)


That's really sad, but thanks for the info, Steve. Let's hope somebody does
step in.
Cheers
Simon
----- Original Message -----
From: "roud" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: question> Llanerch Publishers
> Agreed their cheap and cheerful reprints are a godsend but, most
> unfortunately, they went out of business about 2/3 months ago. They were
> selling off their stock then. There was some talk of another publisher
> buying them up but I don't know if that happened. My last two emails to
them
> went unanswered.
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Simon Furey <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:56 PM
> Subject: Re: question
>
>
> > Andy,
> > I have mentioned this source before, but I really think it is worth
> > consideration if you haven't looked there.
> >
> > Llanerch publishers ( http://www.llanerch-publishers.co.uk/ ) have some
> > extremely interesting reprints, of which the following is a sample:
> >
> > S Baring Gould: A Garland of Country Songs
> > Bryce & Stokoe: Northumbrian Minstrelsy with the small pipe tunes
> > J Payne Collier: Broadside Black Letter Ballads
> > Keith Norman MacDonald: The Gesto Collection of Higland Music
> > A. W Moore: Manx Ballads and Music
> > Roy Palmer: A Book of British Ballads
> > Roy Palmer: Bushes and Briars; Folk Music Collected by Ralph Vaughan
> > Williams
> > Georger Petrie: The Complete Collection of Irish Music (3 vols)
> > Frances F Tolmie: 105 Songs from Occupation from the Western of Scotland
> > (anon) The Besom Maker & Other Country Folk Songs
> > (anon) The Dance Music of Scotland
> >
> > They cost about ten quid a book (more or less), which is jolly
reasonable.
> > I should point out that I have nothing to do with this organisation
except
> > as a happy customer. However, I unashamedly admit I am keen to encourage
> > their efforts in reprinting such works.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Simon
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andy Rouse" <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:07 AM
> > Subject: question
> >
> >
> > > (Sorry about the >>> Got rejected first time round.)
> > >
> > > > Dear everyone,
> > > >
> > > > In the near future I have to compile a list of book bids for my
> > > > department. Sounds good? There are hitches.
> > > >
> > > > 1) Resources are limited.
> > > > 2) EVERYONE in the department is busy amassing a list of books, with
> > > > pressure groups all over the place of course.
> > > > 3) The department is the "Dept. of English Literatures and
Cultures,"
> > > > not the Good Samaritan Dept. for studies in folk song and ballad
> > > > research.
> > > > 4) I can only order books that are in print, new (so no original
> > > > Childs!), and which are published in Britain.
> > > >
> > > > Nevertheless, if any of you have any brilliant ideas - especially if
> > > > you know there's something hot off the press which I may not have
> > > > heard of, or a new reprint of a "clasic," I'd be grateful for any
> > > > hints. Please keep in mind that I have already had my feet roasted
> > > > slowly over a slow fire by inadvertantly ordering the complete Pepys
> > > > facsimile, which debarred me from book bids for some time... but boy
> > > > was it worth it!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers. Our first Christmas concert is December 1st. The season is
> > > > apace!
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > > Andrew C Rouse
> > > > Department of English Literatures and Cultures, Faculty of
Humanities,
> > > > Janus Pannonius University, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6, 7624 Hungary.
> > > >
> > > > tel/fax: 36-72-314714       e-mail: [unmask]
> > > > home page: www.nortonbury.com/andy/
> > > > Simply English: www.alfanet.hu/simply/
> > > > Nortonbury Dictionary of Quotations: www. nortonbury.com

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: (Fwd) Re: English Outlaws and Highwaymen
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:46:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:              Fri, 30 Nov 2001 11:52:49 -0600
From:                   Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Subject:                Re: English Outlaws and Highwaymen
To:                     [unmask]From the Usenet group alt.www.sitesISongs, poems, stories, memoirs, letters, satires, sermons, and
other  writings from the times are used to tell about the  English
highwayman from the 14th through the 19th centuries. For further
research, there are annotated links and an extensive bibliography.
http://www.outlawsandhighwaymen.com/--
Dan Goodman
[unmask]Dan Goodman
[unmask]
http://www.visi.com/~dsgood.html
Whatever you wish for me, may you have twice as much.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Villikens and His Dinah
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:16:51 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Thank you all for the responses to my questions on this subject!
Best,
Dave Thomson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: question
From: Pat Holub <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Dec 2001 22:06:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Hi ballad listers,
     Does anybody have information about the label called Wildgoose?
Actually, I think I want to get a CD which is on that label, and think I
communicated with the head of that label once, but don't remember how.  I
think the label is somewhere in England.  I wonder if their distribution
would make this CD available in the large Tower record store near me.  If
anybody has advice on this, please write me, either on or off the list,
whichever you think.     Thanks in advance.Regards,
pat Holub

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: WildGoose Records
From: DAVID THOMSON <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Dec 2001 07:09:33 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


Found their web site via google.
Best,
Dave Thomsonhttp://www.wildgoose.co.uk/                       English folk music from WildGoose Records                        WildGoose specialises in the folk music of
England. Doug. Bailey, who founded the label and
                        studio in the 1980's, has been involved in
English music for over 30 years as a performer, a
                        producer and an engineer.                        Most people are familiar with Irish and Scottish
music, but far less aware of English music.
                        Sadly, some think that there is no English
music. We at WildGoose wish to do what we can to
                        alter this situation.                        Our recordings cover a great range of English
dance, vocal and choral music, both old and
                        new, with a strong bias toward the traditional.
Many albums are representative of a particular
                        region of England. There are also albums of
early music, Playford and lively village band
                        music.                        Please browse our catalogue if you would like to
know more.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: WildGoose Records
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Dec 2001 22:42:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


(a crass commercial note)CAMSCO Music (800/548-3655) carries the Wild Goose line of recordings.DAVID THOMSON wrote:> Found their web site via google.
> Best,
> Dave Thomson
>
> http://www.wildgoose.co.uk/
>
>                        English folk music from WildGoose Records
>
>                         WildGoose specialises in the folk music of
> England. Doug. Bailey, who founded the label and
>                         studio in the 1980's, has been involved in
> English music for over 30 years as a performer, a
>                         producer and an engineer.
>
>                         Most people are familiar with Irish and Scottish
> music, but far less aware of English music.
>                         Sadly, some think that there is no English
> music. We at WildGoose wish to do what we can to
>                         alter this situation.
>
>                         Our recordings cover a great range of English
> dance, vocal and choral music, both old and
>                         new, with a strong bias toward the traditional.
> Many albums are representative of a particular
>                         region of England. There are also albums of
> early music, Playford and lively village band
>                         music.
>
>                         Please browse our catalogue if you would like to
> know more.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More Ebay Items of Interest
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:49:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


Hi!        Here I am again! This is what has appeared over the last few
days.        1490525398 - Reliques of Ancient English Poetry by Percy 3
volumes 1858?
        1491188580 - dover edition of Child missing Volume 4        Other books of possible interest:        1491760543 - Passing the Time in Ballymenone by Glassie
        1041312063 - Brown Girl in the Ring by Lomax, Elder & Hawes 1997
        song games of the eastern Caribbean                                Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: Jean Lepley <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:37:14 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(16 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' eroticmyth"
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:01:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


A *very* interesting topic, and one which has attracted my attention in
the past - in the case of the Twa Magicians, the not too distant past.
I'd very much like to read and comment on your material, but it's going
to be hard to spare the time with my holiday schedule (tech week and
then 18 performances in 16 days for the rest of the month).  If you're
not in a hurry, you'll hear from me.And have you talked to Dianne Dugaw?-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:18:58 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(36 lines) , text/html(45 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:32:53 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(48 lines)


I am at work where I do not have my folklore library, while at my home
office I am a victim of @home/excite's demise and cannot go on line.That said I will add to John's note that I attempted to sketch the links
between "The Twa Magicians"/"Hares on the Mountain"/"Sally My Dear"/"Roll
Your Leg Over" in my _Erotic Muse._  (I suggest the second edition is the
fuller of the two.)Ed CrayOn Tue, 4 Dec 2001, John Garst wrote:> >Hi folks,
> >   I'm hungry for feedback on a controversial ballad-based project
> >that's not just addressed to scholars and includes a strong personal
> >component (<A
> >href="http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/">http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/</A>
> >).  I'm not altogether happy with this mix, but neither was I happy
> >with relegating the subject to the confines of pure scholarship.
> > Starting with a footnote-laden academic paper, I rethought it for
> >the intelligent general reader and am finally putting notes (and
> >bibliography) back into the paper.  My apologies for their as yet
> >incomplete state.  Chasing down references to books and journals
> >that can only be found in university libraries is frustratingly
> >inefficient when I'm no longer a university student and thus have no
> >borrowing (or parking) privileges -- couldn't I use the web instead
> >of trying to access U. of Washington books from a two-hour,
> >off-campus parking spot?   Anyway, feel free to comment.
>
> I didn't see anything at your site about Roll Your Leg Over or G.
> Legman's treatments of bawdry.  I'm not saying that they are
> necessarily relevant to your theses, but they could be brought in, I
> think.  Everyone seems to think that Roll Your Leg Over is a Twa
> Magicians descendant, and it is wildly popular in certain singing
> circles.  I recall hearing it barreled out some 40 years ago, by a
> professional entertainer, mainly a comedian, as I recall, in Pat
> O'Brien's in New Orleans.  The crowd (the place is always packed with
> tourists) of drinkers (they feature a fruit/rum concoction called the
> "Hurricane, and they challenge you to drink two) seemed to really
> enjoy it.  Perhaps it is a degraded, vulgar form of The Twa
> Magicians, but unlike Twa it has needed no revival.  Perhaps your
> theories/interpretations could apply to Roll.  See G. Legman/Vance
> Randolph, Blow the Candle Out, Vol II of "Unprintable" Ozark
> Folksongs and Folklore, No. 236.
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:41:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>I am at work where I do not have my folklore library, while at my home
>office I am a victim of @home/excite's demise and cannot go on line.
>
>That said I will add to John's note that I attempted to sketch the links
>between "The Twa Magicians"/"Hares on the Mountain"/"Sally My Dear"/"Roll
>Your Leg Over" in my _Erotic Muse._  (I suggest the second edition is the
>fuller of the two.)
>
>Ed CrayOf course, and I should have mentioned it.  Sorry, Ed.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' eroticmyth"
From: robinia <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Dec 2001 04:19:00 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(32 lines) , text/html(30 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:54:21 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


> I'm hungry for feedback on a controversial ballad-based project that's
> not just addressed to scholars and includes a strong personal component
> (<A href="http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/"
   >http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/</A> ).Quick initial response: your take on this is sorta structuralist, in that
you're identifying reasons why the story might have continuing appeal,
given human nature and the sort of relationships men and women have had
to each other in the times and places where this song is documented; why
its says something that needs telling.  And that's convincing.But that doesn't have much to say about the *magical* component.  This
hasn't operated in an overt way in Christian Western Europe lately, but
there are other societies in which the sexual and magical aspects make
equal sense: have you read Florinda Donner's "Shabono"? - there is a
magical-rape episode near the end which is very close to the theme of
the ballad.  There is no obvious reason why anyone would need to glue
supernatural content on to a social/psychological parable; is it not at
least possible that the magical aspects came first, and the ballad was
later adapted to the more "realistic" functions you're describing?  (If
it did come out of some shamanic tradition like the one Donner describes,
the adaptation might have involved regularizing the genders; shamans in
most of Asia can be either sex, and bisexual or homosexual shamans are
common).Do you see "The Outlandish Knight" as a variant of the same idea? - in
that one the magical/metaphysical component is harder to minimize.  And
the struggle is usually deadlier.This has reminded me I've been meaning for years to translate a Turkish
version of "Two Magicians", recorded by Ruhi Su.  I'll pass it on here
in due course, now I've found it (having given up on finding my paper
copy and looked at the Ruhi Su "motherpage" instead).  The original is
at <http://www.siir.gen.tr/siir/ruhi_su_turkuleri/soylesi.htm>.  It's
attributed (in the text itself) to Pir Sultan Abdal but I can't find it
in the collected edition of his poems.Two points about the HTML on your site: the index links use absolute URLs,
which have to be fixed when downloading it all to look at later, and there
are a heck of a lot of ugly "&nbsp;"'s in the verse quotations which could
largely be eliminated by using PRE or BLOCKQUOTE ("&nbsp;" is like ignoring
the tabs in your word processor and formatting just with spaces).-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: sargent/kittredge
From: Sandy Ives <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:22:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Seems to me I recall someone lusting after the Sargent/Kittredge one-volume Child ESPB.  Saw one the other day.
Contact << [unmask] >>  Phone 207-992-2080.  Luck.
sandy ives

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist'erotic myth"
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:03:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Jack Campin wrote:
>
> Two points about the HTML on your site: the index links use absolute URLs,
> which have to be fixed when downloading it all to look at later, and there
> are a heck of a lot of ugly "&nbsp;"'s in the verse quotations which could
> largely be eliminated by using PRE or BLOCKQUOTE ("&nbsp;" is like ignoring
> the tabs in your word processor and formatting just with spaces).And in the defense of the beginner, I'd suggest that I have found
<BLOCKQUOTE> unpredictable in its results, and don't like monospaced
fonts (which <PRE> invokes).  I use tables - a little cumbersome,
although made easier by cut-and-paste - but foolproof, and they allow
other controls like alignment and background color.But in cases like this, "whatever works" is my rule of thumb!  In my
site's "Sea Poetry" section, I settled on good old non-breaking spaces
as the only practical way to reproduce the formatting of the original
versions I was copying.  So I'm sympathetic...-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist'erotic myth"
From: robinia <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 6 Dec 2001 00:09:24 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


Oh dear, I confess to being an imbecile at HTML!  In fact, I thought that
Netscape composer was handling that whole technical side of things and
hesitate to "take charge" at this point lest I only make them worse.  You
should have seen this site last January, when for a whole month it wasn't
communicating to anyone at all -- a month of error messages and temper
tantrums at the keyboard, a month of computer hell that I hope never to go
through again.  Maybe I should have held onto my ex-husband; he was great at
this stuff...  Of course it's MY site, so I need to learn, but what do I
learn first? I'm still trying to footnote the thing and have a sneaking
suspicion that I ought to be able to make individual links from the text to
each footnote; not having yet figured out how to do so, I'm settling for
just making one big link.  You might wlso have noticed that I can't seem to
get my foreign (French or German) characters right, and that really bugs me
too; I could get them in WordPerfect, but WordPerfect didn't work for site
building.
Sooo..... I'm saving your suggestions and grateful for them even if I'm not
immediately following up on them.  I only hope that my clumsy computer
syntax doesn't drive would-be readers away and promise to enroll in the
computer equivalent of "basic writing" after the holidays are over.> From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
> Organization: Software Tool & Die
> Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:03:32 -0500
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist'erotic
> myth"
>
> Jack Campin wrote:
>>
>> Two points about the HTML on your site: the index links use absolute URLs,
>> which have to be fixed when downloading it all to look at later, and there
>> are a heck of a lot of ugly "&nbsp;"'s in the verse quotations which could
>> largely be eliminated by using PRE or BLOCKQUOTE ("&nbsp;" is like ignoring
>> the tabs in your word processor and formatting just with spaces).
>
> And in the defense of the beginner, I'd suggest that I have found
> <BLOCKQUOTE> unpredictable in its results, and don't like monospaced
> fonts (which <PRE> invokes).  I use tables - a little cumbersome,
> although made easier by cut-and-paste - but foolproof, and they allow
> other controls like alignment and background color.
>
> But in cases like this, "whatever works" is my rule of thumb!  In my
> site's "Sea Poetry" section, I settled on good old non-breaking spaces
> as the only practical way to reproduce the formatting of the original
> versions I was copying.  So I'm sympathetic...
>
> -Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Coding HTML (Was: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment...)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:10:53 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(66 lines)


On 12/6/01, robinia wrote:>Oh dear, I confess to being an imbecile at HTML!  In fact, I thought that
>Netscape composer was handling that whole technical side of things and
>hesitate to "take charge" at this point lest I only make them worse.  You
>should have seen this site last January, when for a whole month it wasn't
>communicating to anyone at all -- a month of error messages and temper
>tantrums at the keyboard, a month of computer hell that I hope never to go
>through again.  Maybe I should have held onto my ex-husband; he was great at
>this stuff...  Of course it's MY site, so I need to learn, but what do I
>learn first? I'm still trying to footnote the thing and have a sneaking
>suspicion that I ought to be able to make individual links from the text to
>each footnote; not having yet figured out how to do so, I'm settling for
>just making one big link.  You might wlso have noticed that I can't seem to
>get my foreign (French or German) characters right, and that really bugs me
>too; I could get them in WordPerfect, but WordPerfect didn't work for site
>building.
>Sooo..... I'm saving your suggestions and grateful for them even if I'm not
>immediately following up on them.  I only hope that my clumsy computer
>syntax doesn't drive would-be readers away and promise to enroll in the
>computer equivalent of "basic writing" after the holidays are over.This is the perpetual problem of HTML editors (and why I personally
think they should be taken off the market): They try to pretend
they're word processors -- but they aren't, because HTML is
a "content" language, intended to transmit information, not
format it.An important point here to remember is that different browsers will
parse HTML differently -- e.g. the version of Netscape Navigator
I have defaults to using Times, but my version of Internet Explorer
uses Helvetica. The more things you override, the more likely it
is that you'll get a mess.Personally, I think the <PRE> tag is a good idea; it's the *cleanest*
way to display formatting. Yes, the result is ugly -- but it's
guaranteed.As for diacriticals, HTML supports everything you should need for
Greek or German. The trick is to use HTML *entities* (special
codes), not type the characters in directly. (As a wild guess,
are you using a Macintosh? There is a strange bug in Navigator
under which, if you type a Macintosh diacritical, it displays
the equivalent PC diacritical.) I don't know where the "entities"
command is any more -- but it *does* exist.HTML is not a complicated markup language; you can learn all
you need in a day or two. And you don't need to get a current
book, since it's all backward compatible. You might want to
check library closeouts or used bookstores. Even if you don't
want to code your own HTML, it will give you a better idea of
what actually *works* and what doesn't. In the interim, I really
would advise you to try to keep things simple. That's the key
to good HTML. Don't use fonts, don't change type sizes if you
don't have to, don't use any more formatting than is absolutely
needed. The result may not be as pretty, but it's more likely to
work for everyone.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: John Henry and Lazarus
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:33:19 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


One of Guy Johnson's informants placed Lazarus and George Collins,
both hunted down and killed, at the same time and place as John
Henry, that is, in the area of Leeds, Alabama, about 16 miles east of
Birmingham, in about 1887.  Most likely this is just a confusion of
songs, Lazarus being a common prison worksong and George Collins a
Child ballad.  However, the Birmingham City Directory for that period
assures me that there were people there named Lazarus and George
Collins, so I'm going to keep snooping a little on this.My questions:Do you know of versions in which "John Henry" and "Lazarus" are mixed?Do you know of versions in which the "captain," rather than the "high
sheriff" or "sheriff," says "Go and bring me Lazarus, Bring him dead
or alive"?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: robinia <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:53:16 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(77 lines)


Some quick answers: first, my apologies for the clumsy HTML.  I've been
relying on Netscape to "translate" for me, and obviously I should learn to
take charge myself.  But I have everything to learn (like just what an
"absolute URL" is) and am a little scared of mucking things up in the course
of "improving" them.  Do I have to jettison Netscape entirely to make any of
the suggested changes? (As one of my responders guessed, I'm composing on a
Mac.)
And I have to confess that the ballad, per se, isn't my primary focus.  It's
rather the hold it continues to exercise upon our erotic imagination -- a
common "erotic myth" -- which I'm more interested in pursuing than the
historical origins of the "magic" itself.  (And I'm happy to find at least
one scholar, Roger deV. Renwick, in his introduction to English Folk Poetry,
supporting me in this general direction, though not, to be sure, in the
particular "imaginative life" that I'm defending.)  So I don't pursue the
magical element from the historical side -- that would only be a distraction
from my main argument which, God knows, is already complicated enough! --
and yet I trust you will see that it is, in the end, a crucial part of this
"myth of the lady and the lusty smith"..  You're right, of course, that the
struggle can take a murderous shape as in The Outlandish Knight or
Broomfield Hill or Reynardine; I refer in passing to these murderous old
forms of the magic, but am obviously more interested in what "polite
society" can do to it.
> From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
> Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:54:21 +0000
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic
> myth"
>
>> I'm hungry for feedback on a controversial ballad-based project that's
>> not just addressed to scholars and includes a strong personal component
>> (<A href="http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/"
>> http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/</A> ).
>
> Quick initial response: your take on this is sorta structuralist, in that
> you're identifying reasons why the story might have continuing appeal,
> given human nature and the sort of relationships men and women have had
> to each other in the times and places where this song is documented; why
> its says something that needs telling.  And that's convincing.
>
> But that doesn't have much to say about the *magical* component.  This
> hasn't operated in an overt way in Christian Western Europe lately, but
> there are other societies in which the sexual and magical aspects make
> equal sense: have you read Florinda Donner's "Shabono"? - there is a
> magical-rape episode near the end which is very close to the theme of
> the ballad.  There is no obvious reason why anyone would need to glue
> supernatural content on to a social/psychological parable; is it not at
> least possible that the magical aspects came first, and the ballad was
> later adapted to the more "realistic" functions you're describing?  (If
> it did come out of some shamanic tradition like the one Donner describes,
> the adaptation might have involved regularizing the genders; shamans in
> most of Asia can be either sex, and bisexual or homosexual shamans are
> common).
>
> Do you see "The Outlandish Knight" as a variant of the same idea? - in
> that one the magical/metaphysical component is harder to minimize.  And
> the struggle is usually deadlier.
>
> This has reminded me I've been meaning for years to translate a Turkish
> version of "Two Magicians", recorded by Ruhi Su.  I'll pass it on here
> in due course, now I've found it (having given up on finding my paper
> copy and looked at the Ruhi Su "motherpage" instead).  The original is
> at <http://www.siir.gen.tr/siir/ruhi_su_turkuleri/soylesi.htm>.  It's
> attributed (in the text itself) to Pir Sultan Abdal but I can't find it
> in the collected edition of his poems.
>
> Two points about the HTML on your site: the index links use absolute URLs,
> which have to be fixed when downloading it all to look at later, and there
> are a heck of a lot of ugly "&nbsp;"'s in the verse quotations which could
> largely be eliminated by using PRE or BLOCKQUOTE ("&nbsp;" is like ignoring
> the tabs in your word processor and formatting just with spaces).
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
> tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
> food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: robinia <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 7 Dec 2001 03:17:46 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


> From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
> Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:54:21 +0000
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic
> myth"
>
>> I'm hungry for feedback on a controversial ballad-based project that's
>> not just addressed to scholars and includes a strong personal component
>> (<A href="http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/"
>> http://www.reenchantmentofsex.com/</A> ).
>
> Quick initial response: your take on this is sorta structuralist, in that
> you're identifying reasons why the story might have continuing appeal,
> given human nature and the sort of relationships men and women have had
> to each other in the times and places where this song is documented; why
> its says something that needs telling.  And that's convincing.
>
> But that doesn't have much to say about the *magical* component.  This
> hasn't operated in an overt way in Christian Western Europe lately, but
> there are other societies in which the sexual and magical aspects make
> equal sense: have you read Florinda Donner's "Shabono"? - there is a
> magical-rape episode near the end which is very close to the theme of
> the ballad.  There is no obvious reason why anyone would need to glue
> supernatural content on to a social/psychological parable; is it not at
> least possible that the magical aspects came first, and the ballad was
> later adapted to the more "realistic" functions you're describing?  (If
> it did come out of some shamanic tradition like the one Donner describes,
> the adaptation might have involved regularizing the genders; shamans in
> most of Asia can be either sex, and bisexual or homosexual shamans are
> common).
>
> Do you see "The Outlandish Knight" as a variant of the same idea? - in
> that one the magical/metaphysical component is harder to minimize.  And
> the struggle is usually deadlier.
>
> This has reminded me I've been meaning for years to translate a Turkish
> version of "Two Magicians", recorded by Ruhi Su.  I'll pass it on here
> in due course, now I've found it (having given up on finding my paper
> copy and looked at the Ruhi Su "motherpage" instead).  The original is
> at <http://www.siir.gen.tr/siir/ruhi_su_turkuleri/soylesi.htm>.  It's
> attributed (in the text itself) to Pir Sultan Abdal but I can't find it
> in the collected edition of his poems.
>
> Two points about the HTML on your site: the index links use absolute URLs,
> which have to be fixed when downloading it all to look at later, and there
> are a heck of a lot of ugly "&nbsp;"'s in the verse quotations which could
> largely be eliminated by using PRE or BLOCKQUOTE ("&nbsp;" is like ignoring
> the tabs in your word processor and formatting just with spaces).
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
> tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
> food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: reenchantment ms.
From: robinia <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 7 Dec 2001 04:56:44 -0700
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(19 lines) , text/html(12 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Coding HTML (Was: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment...)
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:50:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Rod Stradling has written a nice guide to HTML, entitled, "How to write
plain, simple HTML," and posted it on the Musical Traditions site:
http://www.mustrad.org.uk/coding.htm. I've not made use of the
information, but it seems clearly explained, and as that site is an
example of the techniques and principles he describes, it looks like it
could be just the ticket for you, footnotes and all.robinia <[unmask]> wrote:
 > Oh dear, I confess to being an imbecile at HTML!~ Becky
--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music
[unmask]   *   www.tftm.org
             520-293-3783
P.O. Box 40654, Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:56:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:53:16PM -0700, robinia wrote:> Some quick answers: first, my apologies for the clumsy HTML.  I've been
> relying on Netscape to "translate" for me, and obviously I should learn to
> take charge myself.  But I have everything to learn (like just what an
> "absolute URL" is) and am a little scared of mucking things up in the course
> of "improving" them.  Do I have to jettison Netscape entirely to make any of
> the suggested changes? (As one of my responders guessed, I'm composing on a
> Mac.)        Well ... let's start with your uncertainty about what an "absolute
URL" is.  You need one to get to a remote web site (just as I would need
one to visit your site).  Once there, a reference to another page, or to
an image, or sound files, or whatever else -- on *your* server -- can
leave off the extra information, with the assumption that all other
things you reference are located relative to the current one.        As an example, I've taken an index which exists on one of my
pages -- unpublished -- and built an absolute and relative form of it.
I will take only a pair of lines out of each:        Absolute form first.  Note that the "HREF=" is followed by the
full "http://www.d-and-d.com/somewhere/" (which leads to the directory
where the page lives).  The "tina-insides" part leads us down a single
subdirectory level deeper. ======================================================================
<A
HREF=http://www.d-and-d.com/somewhere/tina-insides/index.html>
Photos studying the exterior and interior of somebodys
concertina.
</A>
 ======================================================================        This is the relative form.  It assumes that we start at the
current level, and just specifies the "tina-insides" followed by the
name of the file being used (another index.html file for that
subdirectory, to keep the upper level from being too large and taking
too long to load.  There are several other subdirectories.        Note that the example given above will fail, as I have modified
parts of the URL.  As I said -- this is a private page.  I've also
changed the label as to whose instrument it happens to be. ======================================================================
<A HREF=tina-insides/index.html>
Photos studying the exterior and interior of somebody's
concertina.
</A>
 ======================================================================        The primary advantage of the second format is that it can be
moved to a new system, placed somewhere else in the directory tree, and
it will continue to work as well as it did before.  In the absolute
form, as soon as they hit the first link, it would go to *your* page,
not the local copy -- or try to, if it happened to have been put on a
system with no net connection for convenient study.        Now -- if you're working on a Mac, I suspect that the concept of
directories and subdirectories may be at least partially hidden from
you.  I think that they are called "folders" on a Mac, and may not
accept subdirectories (sub folders?).        I'm used to working on unix systems, but the subdirectories
concept works on Windows and even MS-DOS systems, too.        Most of my public pages contain absolute links, simply because
one of my browsers dislikes the relative links.> And I have to confess that the ballad, per se, isn't my primary focus.  It's
> rather the hold it continues to exercise upon our erotic imagination -- a
> common "erotic myth" -- which I'm more interested in pursuing than the
> historical origins of the "magic" itself.        I'll avoid commenting on this part, other than to say that I
have enjoyed the ballad for a long time, and friends still sing it.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:49:02 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


On 12/7/01, DoN. Nichols wrote:[ ... ]>        Now -- if you're working on a Mac, I suspect that the concept of
>directories and subdirectories may be at least partially hidden from
>you.  I think that they are called "folders" on a Mac, and may not
>accept subdirectories (sub folders?).FWIW, there is no problem on the Mac. It does things *exactly* the
same way as Wintel or unix machines as far as a browser is
concerned. They just use a different name ("folders" instead of
"directories").There are technical differences between Mac and Windows and
unix directories, but they all have to do with internal path
structures and don't affect web page construction in any way.The real question here is, is Netscape Composer forcing the
absolute links, and is there a way around that? I actually
did some work with Composer at one time, and managed to do
relative links -- but I was already going into the HTML and
fiddling with it manually. Soon after, I went to pure hand
coding.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: Jack Campin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:51:07 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


> Now -- if you're working on a Mac, I suspect that the concept of
> directories and subdirectories may be at least partially hidden from
> you.  I think that they are called "folders" on a Mac, and may not
> accept subdirectories (sub folders?).No; I use Macs, and it works just the same as on Unix except you can
use a wider range of filenames.> Most of my public pages contain absolute links, simply because one
> of my browsers dislikes the relative links.Which one would that be?  (I have no intention of using absolute links
anywhere; with a slow modem you soon learn they cost money).  Perhaps
I need to warn users of that program to stay away from my site.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack Campin  *   11 Third Street, Newtongrange, Midlothian EH22 4PU, Scotland
tel 0131 660 4760  *  fax 0870 055 4975  *  http://www.purr.demon.co.uk/jack/
food intolerance data & recipes, freeware Mac logic fonts, and Scottish music

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:46:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 05:49:02PM -0600, Robert B. Waltz wrote:        [ ... ]> On 12/7/01, DoN. Nichols wrote:        [ ... ]> The real question here is, is Netscape Composer forcing the
> absolute links, and is there a way around that? I actually
> did some work with Composer at one time, and managed to do
> relative links -- but I was already going into the HTML and
> fiddling with it manually. Soon after, I went to pure hand
> coding.        No -- it is not Composer (which I do not use), nor any
"authoring" tool used for building the pages.  I do all my page building
either with shell scripts (for ones which are mostly directories full
of photos to document something or other), or by hand, for the more
complex pages.        It is a specialized browser which I use for checking out pages
for errors, and for visiting sites which I don't trust, because it does
not have *any* Java or JavaScript capabilities, so it is more secure
than something like Netscape or IE, in which you may *think* that you
have these features disabled, but happen to have been forced to turn
them on to access come commercial site.  (I try to avoid such sites, but
it is not possible to always do so.)        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: ms. on the "re-enchantment of sex: defense of a 'rapist' erotic myth"
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 9 Dec 2001 16:56:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 11:51:07PM +0000, Jack Campin wrote:        (I said):> > Now -- if you're working on a Mac, I suspect that the concept of
> > directories and subdirectories may be at least partially hidden from
> > you.  I think that they are called "folders" on a Mac, and may not
> > accept subdirectories (sub folders?).
>
> No; I use Macs, and it works just the same as on Unix except you can
> use a wider range of filenames.        Hmm ... what do you mean "a wider range of filenames"?  There
are some characters which are awkward to use (because of the command
line interpreters), but only two absolutely forbidden characters.  One is
'/' (which is the subdirectory delimiter), and the other is the null
character, simply because it defines the end of *any* string in 'C'.  I
suspect that the Mac has the same limitations, though with a different
subdirectory separator.        I know that the Mac is different, because I had serious problems
deleting some files created over NFS (Networked File System) on a unix
box with a Mac doing the creating.  The files had a '/' in the name, and
I had to do a raw edit of the directory to change that character before
I could delete it.  NFS apparently does not live by the same
restrictions as the underlying unix when the mounting system is non-unix.        This experience was at work when I was a unix systems
administrator and one of the client machines was a Mac.        I suspect that the latest version of Mac's OS (OS-X) has exactly
the same filename restrictions as unix, since it is built on a unix
kernel.>
> > Most of my public pages contain absolute links, simply because one
> > of my browsers dislikes the relative links.
>
> Which one would that be?  (I have no intention of using absolute links
> anywhere; with a slow modem you soon learn they cost money).  Perhaps
> I need to warn users of that program to stay away from my site.        You are unlikely to encounter it.  It is a very strict browser
for unix, designed to verify that the page conforms to the standards.
As I have just answered in another reply, the only time that I use it on
a remote site is when I don't trust that site anyway.        The actual problem with the relative links may be caused by some
failing in my web code, and this very strict browser is reacting to
that, while more common browsers let it pass.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
        (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
           --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Taking It Out on the Laird o Wariston
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:01:39 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(111 lines)


Balladeers --Label this an official goof. I meant this for Ballad-L, and
managed to send it to my Ballad Index mailing list instead.
But it's for all of you. I'll post my original message, an
answer from Paul Stamler, and my response to him....First my original post:>Balladeers --
>
>Once again I am amazed by how hearing a good ballad singer
>*sing* a song can make it into something completely different.
>
>The singer was Gordeanna McCulloch (she's done this to me
>before), and the song was "The Laird o' Wariston" (Child
>#194). Now McCulloch's version is pretty definitely a
>"fake"; she had it from Ewan MacColl, and there are no
>tunes in Bronson, nor recent reports of the song. It looks
>like another MacColl setting of a text with no tune.
>(The MacColl/McCulloch version is very much like a
>shortened version of Child's C text, which is from
>Buchan.)
>
>But it doesn't matter; it got me looking at the "Laird."
>
>And I find myself wondering if Child #194 is really one
>song.
>
>Child has three texts. A and B are clearly derived
>from the same original. The Laird and Lady quarrel, he
>strikes her, she and her nurse kill him, and she is
>executed. "A" is mostly a goodnight; "B" has only a
>short form of this, but more details of the story.
>
>In Child's C text, the situation changes completely.
>Lady Wariston is a child bride, and shortly after
>their marriage, Wariston sets out for sea. When he
>returns a year later, he finds his wife has borne
>a son. He angrily says it is not his (though she
>says she's too young to have had another lover).
>He casts her out, she vows revenge, her nurse kills
>Wariston, and then there is a very long execution
>scene.
>
>Metrically, the texts are quite dissimilar. A is rather
>irregular (there are parts I cannot make to scan, though
>we will doubtless all remember my last problem with
>scansion :-), but the dominant metre is 3-3-3-3. It looks
>literary to me. B is standard ballad 4-3-4-3 metre.
>C is 4-4-4-4. There are common lyrics between "B" and
>"C," but relatively few and commonplace ("O Wariston,
>[O Wariston,] I would that you would sink for sin.")
>A degree of cross-fertilization would be sufficient to
>explain them.
>
>The obvious assumption is that two songs on the same
>theme are the same song. But this is by no means
>universal -- consider the _Titanic_. If that seems too
>big an event, consider that there are *three* songs
>about the Meeks family murders, and who but locals
>knew about that? The murder of Wariston is a
>historical event, with details seemingly like A
>and B but little like C. It could have been publicised
>enough to produce two songs.
>
>So: Anyone else think that Wariston A and B are one
>song, and C another?--------------------------------------------------------------Now Paul's response:>So: Anyone else think that Wariston A and B are one
>song, and C another?>>
>
>Quite possibly, from your description (I don't have a complete Child here to
>look at). But that raises the interesting question: who would write a ballad
>about a historical event, but deviate drastically from the generally-known
>facts? And why?--------------------------------------------------------------And my response:A good question, but hardly a fair one. A *lot* of ballads do that --
e.g. "The Death of Queen Jane" asserts that Jane Seymour was subjected
to surgery when she wasn't.One possible explanation is that the "C" text of "Wariston" is a
broadside based on some other source, with a few lurid facts thrown
in. It's certainly happened before!Another is that the author didn't know much. Wariston and his lady
*did* suffer an arranged marriage, and they were young, though not
as young as the "C" text implies. The ballad-maker may have thought
an explanation was needed.Or maybe it's a simple conflation, "Wariston" getting combined with
something else. What?--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
1078 Colne Street
Saint Paul, MN 55103-1348
651-489-1930 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:54:02 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(139 lines) , text/html(156 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Special Price on Voice of the People CDs
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:01:57 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(184 lines) , text/html(160 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--