View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bruce virus
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 20:42:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(109 lines)


On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Abby Sale wrote:> Ah...
> 12 years on the 'net and my very first "Tell everyone you know."
>
> I got virused to day by a feller named bruce.
>
> I am not knowledgeable on this but I'll just give you the best I got.
>
> It came as 5 e-mails from Bruce ???crief?? and addressed to me and several
> others - each item differently.  The subject line in each was the same as
> different executable e-mails I've received recently (FL_Ballot.exe, etc)
> Remarkably each had some 546 lines in the message.
>
> Since this looked odd but had friendly Subjects, I saved to disk instead of
> launching direct from my Reader. I ran MacAfee Viruscan with definitions
> file 4.0.4099 (Nov 12, 2000) (and full heuristics) which showed then clean.        You should have immediately downloaded the latest definitions
file, and even then, it *might* be too new to be recognized.  These
virus writers work fast to make new ones, unfortunately.> I manually launched one (FW_.exe, etc) & got zapped.        A basic rule is that *any* executable should not be trusted
unless:1)      You know the person who sent it to you.2)      You *knew* that he was going to send it to you, or have
        confirmed via phone conversation that he did send it to you, and
        *why*.3)      You know *what* it is supposed to do -- and you need to do
        that.        If you don't do all of this -- put it on a sacrificial computer
which has nothing important on it, and see whether it trashes *that*
machine -- don't trust it on your main system.        It may well be that your computer sent off copies of this under
*your* name to people in *your* address list, while it was trashing the
rest of the system.> I use Win95-B and it put a command somewhere in my registry that almost any
> Windows program call _must_ be proceeded by using winsvrc.exe, which it
> can't find.  A Windows-looking dialog asks its location.  Of course it
> doesn't exist.  I tried to fool it by creating an empty file _called_
> winsvrc.exe in the root directory but then the virus simply claims that
> _none_ of my programs are Windows 95 programs and cannot be run.  The
> desktop opened more or less normally & Windows Explorer (which had been
> open) worked ok but I could not run any significant or system program.        It may be expecting some kind of return from that winsvrc.exe
whenever it is run.  I don't do Windows, so I don't know whether it is a
standard program which the trojan deleted, or something that it was
going to add to do more mischief every time you booted or tried to run
some other program.> I'm a good backer-upper and wished to restore User.dat, (user.da0 is also
> corrupted by this wiseguy), and System.dat and System.ini and Win.ini (just
> to be sure - I don't know I need them all) But back-up is a windows-based
> program and won't work.
>
> Finally, since I (cheerfully patting myself on the back with both hands and
> both feet) use Backup Version 6 from Win 3.95 (because it will _include_
> selected files, not just _exclude_ them) I was able to drop to DOS and
> restore the 4 files.
>
> I suffered no loss at all except about two hours of confusion.        You probably need to find reports of this in some of the
anti-virus sites, to see whether it also adds other nasty programs
(perhaps named the same as a normal system program) which will bite you
later.> Strongly recommend:
> Look out for e-mail of 546 or so lines        Look out for *any* executable attachment.  Treat it like a
scorpion or a poisonous snake.  (I'm fairly safe, because I don't run a
system which knows *how* to run a .exe file. :-)> Back up the 4 system files in such a way they can be restored in DOS
>         eg Win 3.x Back-up or perhaps create a Safe folder (directory) &
> just copy them from \Windows to this.
>         You'll need some DOS program that will deal with deleting, and
> copying files that are marked Read-only, System, and Hidden.  (Norton
> Commander or FA.exe to change the characturists, eg.)  Windows Explorer may
> work if you can get _it_ to work.        While you're about it -- keep copies of the programs which you
use for restoring on floppies, in case what you have gets blown away.
And *don't* trust a folder which is on the system when the virus
strikes.  It may search through for other copies to corrupt.  It is a
*lot* safer having the backups on floppies or tapes.  And -- when you
try to restore, to have the write-protection tab turned on, so the virus
can't trash your backups while you are trying to restore.        I *hope* that you got it all -- but visit symantec's site, or
one of the others, to make *sure* about it.        Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bruce virus
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 26 Nov 2000 10:09:42 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(25 lines) , text/html(28 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Kenneth Peacock
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:44:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Neil Rosenberg just sent this to the Canadian folklore list.  Peacock
was a prolific and at times controversial collector who worked in
several different parts of the country.  He is probably best known for
his three volume collection, _Songs of the Newfoundland Outports_.Cheers
Jamie>Anna Guigne tells me that Kenneth Peacock died last Wednesday.
>He'd been in poor health for some time, and had been in hospital where
>he
>contracted pneumonia.  I haven't seen anything about this in
>print--though
>perhaps it was in the G&M which I haven't seen since then.  Anyhow, I
>think
>it's important to note his passing since he did so much for the study of
>vernacular music in Canada. Perhaps you can send a note to our
>FSAC  "list"?>Cheers
>N.>Neil V. Rosenberg,  Department of Folklore
>Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF A1B 3X8
>Office: 709-737-8405; fax: 709-737-4718

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:04:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Ed,Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:25:09 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


Hi Andy:
Singing Soldiers, by John J. Niles.  NY - London:  Chas Scribner's Sons,
1927.  Dedication:
"To the American Negro Soldiers who made this writing possible."  (!)
According to the Introduction, Niles was a member of the A.E.F. when, in
Paris in 1917, he "ran onto a paper-bound volume of French war-songs by
Monsieur Theodore Botrel, titled 'Les Chants du BIvouac.'"  Niles says that
gave him the idea to collect US Army war songs:  "...to make as nearly as
possible an unexpurgate record of the words and to write off the tunes
whenever I had time and music-score paper."  He goes on to say that he was
almost losing interest in the project when he encountered some negro troops:
"At last I had discovered something original--a kind of folk music, brought
up to date and adapted to the war situations--at the same time savoring of
the haunting melodic value found in the negro music I had known as a boy in
Kentucky."  So he spent the next seven years, while a pilot in the U.S. Air
Service, gathering songs.  He ended up with 29 songs, embedded in sort of a
personal diary of his experiences.   Most of the songs are unfamiliar; a few
are parodies of familiar spirituals (e.g., "Roll Jordan Roll); a few are
blues-like.  I can't vouch for the accuracy of the transcriptions, but I'd
be really surprised if J.J. wrote--or even did more than minor touching
up--any of them. That's a quick summary; hope it's useful.
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles>Dear Norm,
>
>Could you elaborate on "Singing Soldiers" a little more?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Andy
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:39:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Is there an email address?
Norm
>
>Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
>from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
>distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
>find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
>South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
>
>Cheers
>Jamie
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:13:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


Norm:Sorry, no email address on the book.  The University of Maine Press,
Orono, ought to be in the telephone directory.  The ISBN number is
0-89101-100-5.EdOn Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Is there an email address?
> Norm
> >
> >Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
> >from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
> >distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
> >find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
> >South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:16:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


You can e-mail Pauleena MacDougall at [unmask]  I
can't wait till my copy arrives.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Ed Cray
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 1:13 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: Brief MentionsNorm:Sorry, no email address on the book.  The University of Maine Press,
Orono, ought to be in the telephone directory.  The ISBN number is
0-89101-100-5.EdOn Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Is there an email address?
> Norm
> >
> >Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
> >from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
> >distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
> >find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
> >South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:10:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


The center's e-mail address is [unmask]  There is also
a web page at www.umaine.edu/folklife, though we're still in the
process of updating the publications section.  Should be taken care of
this week.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:39:26 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


A couple of years ago, I had a brief correspondence with JJN's son.
As I recall, he was a musician, perhaps a conductor, living in
Germany.  He might be able to help out with these questions.  He
defended his father to me, saying that he was an entertainer who
never claimed to be a scholar.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Nancy-Jean Seigel <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:18:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


You are referring to John Edward Niles, son of John Jacob.  He is currently
Director and conductor at the Opera Theatre of Northern Virginia.   It would be
interesting for you to continue that conversation in light of this discussion.
However,  you probably got all you're gonna git!   ( Look here:
http://www.alamero.com/demo/index.htm) .Is there a second son also involved with music?John Garst <[unmask]>@[unmask]> on 11/28/2000 01:39:26 PMPlease respond to Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>Sent by:  Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>To:   [unmask]
cc:Subject:  Re: John Jacob NilesA couple of years ago, I had a brief correspondence with JJN's son.
As I recall, he was a musician, perhaps a conductor, living in
Germany.  He might be able to help out with these questions.  He
defended his father to me, saying that he was an entertainer who
never claimed to be a scholar.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:21:23 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(65 lines)


Catching up after the holidays.  Has anyone yet suggested getting in touch
with Ron Pen at Kentucky?  He's studied Niles serious for some time now.
Unless someone else surfaces sooner, I expect that Ron will do the Niles
book.In the summer of 1953 Niles performed at Aspen, Colorado, near Glenwood
Springs, where I was waiting tables in a resort hotel.  He sang many of
the pieces I knew from his LPs, and his voice had that same high
theatrical cast.  My memory (admittedly dim at this point) is that he
plucked/strummed a cello that had been cut in half along the sides (i.e.,
retaining the front surface) and whenever possible, at the ends of
phrases, wafted his right arm into the air so that the brilliant rings he
was wearing caught the light.  Made quite an impression on all the
blue-haired ladies present.JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the Niles discussion. It's clear
> that few of us trust his publications, but it's a shame there doesn't seem
> to have been a proper study of his work from this point of view, as I think
> we still need to answer some basic questions.
> His publications of the 1930s (Songs of the Hill-Folk, and More Songs of
> the Hill-Folk, for example) follow the standard pattern for 'popular' books
> of the time. The cover and title-page state "Collected and simply
> arranged... by John Jacob Niles", and each song is attributed to a
> particular place (e.g. "Whitesburg, Letcher County, Kentucky"). Thus the
> authenticity of the songs is implied but not really stated, and being
> popular works we know to treat them with caution.
> His Ballad Book of 1961, however, is in a completely different league. It
> has all the paraphernalia of a scholarly collection. Each song is
> accompanied by the name of the singer(s), their address, the date of
> recording, sketches of their character, and incidental details of when and
> how he met them.
> On the surface, this seems to be everything we could wish for. But we still
> mistrust him, and not only for his peculiar-looking instruments! Did he
> invent the whole thing, cobbling together texts from books and pretending
> they were from singers who didn't really exist? Did he really collect from
> these people but 'doctor/edit/fake' their texts? The Ballad Book was
> published less that 25 years after the supposed dates of collection, I would
> have thought the complete fake would have been relatively easily exposed by
> the real experts who were around at the time and who were perfectly happy to
> savage each other for sloppy scholarship. Is there anything which can be
> salvaged from his material, or do we simply resign it to the dustbin en
> masse?
> It is perhaps ominous that the only major collection of his papers which I
> have tracked down (I've misplaced the correspondence for a moment, but can
> let people know details if they wish to follow it up) apparently contains no
> fieldwork material at all.
> If someone's looking for a Thesis topic, may I suggest Niles as a potential
> subject?
> (I've just, somewhat belatedly, checked the JAF Centennial Index, and there
> are a few reviews which need following up, which I will report on if they
> say anything relevant).
> Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: Gerald Porter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:01:14 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Dear Andy,
Another (indirect) Robin Hood item in Shakespeare is his use of 'under
the greenwood tree' in As You Like It 2.5.1 or thereabouts.  It comes
into that fabulous ballad Robin Hood and the Monk (Child 119), which I
would be eternally grateful to you for providing a tune for.Cheers, Gerald

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:15:20 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


Gerald --The only tune I've seen to Child 119 is in _The Ballad Book of John Jacob
Niles_.  (Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1961.)  As you know, this
collection has been much excoriated b y scholars, and it may be that the song
was composed by Mr. Niles himself.  Nevertheless, it's a good singable tune.
The words do not contain any reference to the Greenwood Tree. If you don't
have access to the book, and are interested,  I'll be glad to send you a
Xerox copy, for which I would need your snail-mail address.Sam Hinton
9420 La Jolla Shores Drive
La Jolla, CA, USA, 92037
< [unmask] >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: JJ NIles dulcimer
From: Margaret MacArthur <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:36:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Judy McCulloh wrote
>My memory (admittedly dim at this point) is that he
>plucked/strummed a cello that had been cut in half along the sides (i.e.,
>retaining the front surface)I have a big awkward dulcimer given to me by a woman from NY in the early
60s, supposedly made by Niles.  There is no signiture.  The frets seem to
be totally random, I don't see how it could have been played, but perhaps
it was fretted for one particular song, an odd tune it would be.I never heard Niles in person, but did enjoy his recordings, and respected
his interest in the long ballad.Margaret MacArthur

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Help With Sword Dance- Music?
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:01:39 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(196 lines)


I have submitted this to the mudcat dt with no luck yet....
What do you think....
Does anyone have the tune referred to or other music for this?
Many thanks in advance for your fine work....ConradSword Dancers
 It is still the practice, though less in repute than formerly, during the
Christmas holidays, for companies of pitmen and other workmen from the
neighbouring collieries to visit
 Sunderland, Durham, &c. to perform a sort of Play or Dance, accompanied by
song and music. Their appearance is hailed by the children with great satisfaction, and
they receive liberal contributions from the spectators.
 The dancers are girded with swords, and clad in white shirts or tunics,
decorated with a profusion of ribbands, or various colours, gathered from
the wardrobes of their mistresses and
 well-wishers.  The captain generallly wears a kind of faded uniform, with
a large cocked hat and feather, for pre-eminent distinction; and the
buffoon, or "Bessy," who acts as treasurer,
 and collects the cash in a tobacco-box, wears a hairy cap, with a fox's
brush* dependent.
 The music is simple, and not devoid of harmony: its peculiar beauty
depends, perhaps greatly, on the force of early associations.
 The party assemble promiscuously, and the captain forms a circle with his
sword, round which he walks, and sings; each actor following as he is
called upon. Six actors I have brought,
 Who were never on stage before;
 But they will do their best,
 And the best can do no more. The first that I call in,
 He is a squire's son;
 He's like to lose his love,
 Because he is too young. But though he be too young,
 He has money for to rove;
 And he will spend it all,
 Before he'll lose his love. The next that I call in,
 He is a taylor fine;
 What think you of his work?--
 He made this coat of mine. So comes good master Snip,
 His best respects to pay:
 He joins us in our trip,
 To drive dull care away. The next that I call in,
 He is a sailor bold;
 He's come to poverty
 By the lending of his gold. But though his gold's all gone,
 Again he'll plough the main,
 With heart both light and brave,
 To fight both France and Spain. Next comes a skipper bold,
 He'll do his part right weel;
 A clever blade, I'm told,
 As ever poy'd** a keel, Oh! the keel lads are bonny bonny lads,
 As I do understand;
 For they run both fore and aft,
 With their long sets in their hands. To join us in this play,
 Here comes a jolly dog,
 Who's soberevery day,
 When he can get no grog. But though he likes his grog,
 As all his friends can say,
 He always likes it best,
 When he has nought to pay. Last I come in mysel,
 I make one of this crew;
 And if you'd know my name,
 My name it is True Blue. *** The Dance then begins in slow, and measured cadence; which soon increases
in spirit, and at length bears the appearance of a serious
 affray.  The Rector, alarmed rushes forward to prevent bloodshed; and, in
his endeavours to separate the combatants, he receives a mortal blow, and
falls to the ground.
 Then follows the lament--the general accusation - and denial. Alas! our rector's dead,
 And on the ground is laid;
 some of us must suffer for't,
 Young men, I'm sore afraid. I'm sure 'twas none of I--
 I'm clear of the crime;
 'Twas him that follows me
 That drew his sword so fine. I'm sure 'twas none of I--
 I'm clear of the fact;
 'Twas him that follows me
 That did this bloody act. I'm sure 'twas none of I,
 Ye bloody villains all!
 For both my eyes were shut
 When this good man did fall. Then cheer up, my bonny bonny lads,
 And be of courage bold;
 For we'll take him to the church,
 and we'll bury him in the mould. Captain.--Oh! for a doctor, a right good doctor,
                  A ten pound doctor, oh! Doctor.-- Here am I. Captain-- Doctor, what's your fee? Doctor-- Ten pounds is my fee; but nine pounds, nineteen shillings, and
eleven pence,
               three farthings, will I take from thee. See here, see here, a doctor rare,
 Who travels much at home;
 Come, take my pills--they cure all ills,
 Past present and to come. The plague, the palsy, and the gout,
 The devil within, and the devil without--
 Every thing but a love-sick maid--
 And a consumption in the pocket. Take a little of my nif-naf,
 Put it on your tif-taf.
 Parson, rise up, and fight again,
 The doctor says you are not slain. The rector gradually recovers, which is the signal for general rejoicing
and congratulation. Captain-- You've seen them all call'd in,
 You've seen them all go round;
 Wait but a little while--
 Some pastime will be found. Cox-green's a bonny place,
 Where water washes clean;
 And Painshaw's on a hill,
 Where we have merry been. Then, fiddler, change thy tune,
 Play us a merry jig;
 Before that I'll be beat,
 I'll pawn both hat and wig. A general dance concludes the performance, to the old and favorite tune
of,
 "Kitty, Kitty, bo, bo!" *Query- if this was not formerly meant to represent the Lion's skin of the
ancient heros; and this is not the only classical allusion used by the
Sword Dancers, for a "Bessy" on the
 borders of Yorkshire, was heard to sing:
 "I've liv'd among musick these forty long years,
 And Drunk of the elegant spring"
 There can be little doubt that Helicon was the original reading. **Puoy, Puy, or Pouie, a long pole with an iron spike at the end; used in
propelling keels in shallow water.--Fr. appui. Brockett's Glossary. The
Puoy on the Tyne is the Set on the Wear. *** AT this part, the "Bessy" sometimes considers it necessary to give
some account of his own genealogy, viz:
 My father he was hang'd
 My mother was drown'd in a well;
 And now I' se left alone,
 All by my awn sel. -source: The Bishoprick Garland or a Collection of Legends, Songs Ballads
&c.. Belonging to The County of Durham. London: Nichols, and Baldwin &
Cradock.
 1834.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Help With Sword Dance- Music?
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:12:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Looks like something from the old Mummers Plays that show up in the annual
Christmas Revels productions, Conrad.  It's sung to a simple morris dance
tune.  The charm is in the "acting."  Check the Washington Revels website
and go from there:  www.revelsdc.orgI'm attending the Washington production tonight (dress rehearsal show).
I'll see what form the play takes in the Celtic production (if it's there).Happy hunting.Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio
Washington, DC

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sword dance tune found Kitty bo-bo
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:29:36 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Of all things it was in the back of the book....
presumably though this is not the only tune used in the
dance....
It will be up on the related page with midi and notation
in a moment
http://www.geocities.com/matalizi/priests12.htmlT:Kitty Bo-Bo (Sword Dance Tune)
M:3/4
L:1/8
S:Bishoprick Garland
K:G
|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|B2G2B2|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|A2F2A2:||:GBdBdc|B2G2B2|GBdB
dB|A2F2A2:|Conrad Bladey

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sword dance tune found Kitty bo-bo
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:16:46 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


Ok I am ready for a break...must be all that liquid nails
used in working on the artcar (glued 30 more barbies on the cab roof of the
truck via magnet...)
I found the book had both tunes !@!@!@!#
so now the tunes you did know you can know!
Just go here midi, abc, notation....
http://www.geocities.com/matalzi/priests12.html#SworddancersConradConrad Bladey ***Peasant**** wrote:
>
> Of all things it was in the back of the book....
> presumably though this is not the only tune used in the
> dance....
> It will be up on the related page with midi and notation
> in a moment
> http://www.geocities.com/matalizi/priests12.html
>
> T:Kitty Bo-Bo (Sword Dance Tune)
> M:3/4
> L:1/8
> S:Bishoprick Garland
> K:G
> |gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|B2G2B2|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|A2F2A2:||:GBdBdc|B2G2B2|GBdB
> dB|A2F2A2:|
>
> Conrad Bladey--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sword Dance tune found
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:57:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


Conrad found the tunes in the first paragraph below while I was working
on this note. I forgot to change the reply address to that of Ballad-L,
so my message, below, went only to him. Here it is for all on the list.[My reprint edition, 1969, of Sharp's 'Bishopric Garland' has, on
pp 85-6, some tunes said to be from 'From Topliffe's Melodies
&c.', the first of which is entitled "Sword Dancers", and the
second is that of "Kitty-bo-bo".]That is, I believe the earliest recorded folk play. (The earlier
Revesby/ Raresby play is modeled along the lines of a folk play,
but isn't really 'folk'. Note that one song in it is based on "Last
Christmas 'twas my chance". Song and tune are on my website.)Two verses in Sharp's text, starting "See, here, see here a doctor rare"
are derived from a song with music in 'Pills to Purge Melancholy', V, p.
311, 1719-20 (originally in 'Pills', IV, 1706), where it starts "See,
sirs, see here! a Doctor rare". The 'Pills' heading is: 'The Mountebank
Song. Set and Sung by Mr. Leveridge, in a New Play call'd Farewell to
Folly', which is not quite correct. I've now lost my very old notes
tracking this, but according to my memory the song wasn't in Motteux's
play, but was sung as an interlude with it. The play was given at Drury
Lane Theatre in 1705 and published in 1707. [Some other folk plays
contain a bit more of the 'Pills' song. In others the doctor's lines are
based on a similar song "The Infallible Doctor", commencing 'From
France, from Spain from Rome I come', dating from 1686, and in 'Pills',
III, p. 31, 1719-20. The model for these mountebank doctors' songs is in
a manuscript of a court entertainment of 1618, 'The Anti-Masque of the
Mountebanks', much of which is reprinted in John Wardroper's 'Love and
Drollery', #220, 1969]Re: 'elegant spring' may have been originally been 'Helicon
spring', if so, it later turned into 'elecampagne', an extract of
the roots of which was used as a tonic or stimulant. We find it
in later folk plays as 'elecome pain', 'elegant paint', and
'Hallecumb pain' among the doctor's medicines (of which two drops
can restore the dead to life - R. J. E. Tiddy's 'The Mummers
Play'). [Cf. also 'Waters of Absalon' in the cante-fable "Little
Dicky Milburn/ Whigburn"]Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:23:17 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(88 lines)


Folks:For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.Ed-----Original Message-----
From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American MemoryGood afternoon,This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
apologies for any duplicate postings.Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
can be found at the following url:
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> . Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
materials include such highlights as:The first broadside account of Washington crossing the Delaware River in
1776.The Gerry-Mander, the 1812 caricature of the salamander-shaped
congressional district created by Federalist polemicists to satirize the
Massachusetts redistricting law spawned by zealous Republican colleagues
of Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts.A Western anti-slavery handbill, ca. 1850, urging Ohioans to “TURN OUT!”
for an abolition meeting and “Learn Your Duty to Yourselves, the Slave
and God.”The final issue of the Vicksburg Daily Citizen, July 4, 1863, printed on
wallpaper.An 1864 campaign souvenir “Lincoln Business Card,” suggesting that in
the spring of 1865 Lincoln would be at home in Illinois splitting rails
and swapping horses rather than residing at the White House.A reward poster for John Wilkes Booth (1865).One of the earliest printed references to baseball (1859).The National Woman Suffrage Association’s “Declaration and Protest of
the Women of the United States,” July 4, 1876, calling for the
impeachment of the nation's rulers.A poster from the mayor of San Francisco printed following the
earthquake and fire of 1906, warning that law enforcement officials
“have been authorized to KILL any and all persons found engaged in
Looting or in the Commission of Any Other Crime.”Much of the material in this collection was produced as events unfolded,
offering a unique snapshot of America's past that captures the concerns
and conditions of everyday living. Many of the items, never intended to
be kept for future generations, nonetheless provide important historical
information.  For example, an advertisement for paint from 1783 gives
clues about the colors that adorned the homes of the nation's earliest
citizens.  An 1840 poster for a lost dog shows that owners felt as
strongly about their pets 150 years ago as they do today.American Memory  is a project of the National Digital Library Program of
the Library of Congress. The Web site offers more than five million
historically important items of American history, in collaboration with
other institutions. More than ninety American Memory collections are now
available on topics ranging from presidential papers and photographs
from the Civil War to early films of Thomas Edison and panoramic maps,
to documents from the women's suffrage
and civil rights movements. The Library of Congress website can be found
at <www.loc.gov> .Please direct any questions to [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time CapsuleCollection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory(fwd)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:43:13 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(119 lines)


Indeed!
I was just in rare books at loc last week searching the
bound index.
Located a pamphlet on pope day but in the same file.....
a broadside from boston - not cataloged!
18th c.
Before I had a chance to fill in the form to have it copied
and go across the street to pay up and wait....
I had confirmation from a phonecall to the appropriate
office that it had just been digitized and would be on line
this week.....
So there it was today....
and not only images but full text....ConradEd Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --
>
> In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.
>
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
> apologies for any duplicate postings.
>
> Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
> Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory
>
>  In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
> Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
> American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
> thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
> of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
> can be found at the following url:
> <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .
>
>  Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
> Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
> materials include such highlights as:
>
> The first broadside account of Washington crossing the Delaware River in
> 1776.
>
> The Gerry-Mander, the 1812 caricature of the salamander-shaped
> congressional district created by Federalist polemicists to satirize the
> Massachusetts redistricting law spawned by zealous Republican colleagues
> of Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts.
>
> A Western anti-slavery handbill, ca. 1850, urging Ohioans to “TURN OUT!”
> for an abolition meeting and “Learn Your Duty to Yourselves, the Slave
> and God.”
>
> The final issue of the Vicksburg Daily Citizen, July 4, 1863, printed on
> wallpaper.
>
> An 1864 campaign souvenir “Lincoln Business Card,” suggesting that in
> the spring of 1865 Lincoln would be at home in Illinois splitting rails
> and swapping horses rather than residing at the White House.
>
> A reward poster for John Wilkes Booth (1865).
>
> One of the earliest printed references to baseball (1859).
>
> The National Woman Suffrage Association’s “Declaration and Protest of
> the Women of the United States,” July 4, 1876, calling for the
> impeachment of the nation's rulers.
>
> A poster from the mayor of San Francisco printed following the
> earthquake and fire of 1906, warning that law enforcement officials
> “have been authorized to KILL any and all persons found engaged in
> Looting or in the Commission of Any Other Crime.”
>
> Much of the material in this collection was produced as events unfolded,
> offering a unique snapshot of America's past that captures the concerns
> and conditions of everyday living. Many of the items, never intended to
> be kept for future generations, nonetheless provide important historical
> information.  For example, an advertisement for paint from 1783 gives
> clues about the colors that adorned the homes of the nation's earliest
> citizens.  An 1840 poster for a lost dog shows that owners felt as
> strongly about their pets 150 years ago as they do today.
>
> American Memory  is a project of the National Digital Library Program of
> the Library of Congress. The Web site offers more than five million
> historically important items of American history, in collaboration with
> other institutions. More than ninety American Memory collections are now
> available on topics ranging from presidential papers and photographs
> from the Civil War to early films of Thomas Edison and panoramic maps,
> to documents from the women's suffrage
> and civil rights movements. The Library of Congress website can be found
> at <www.loc.gov> .
>
> Please direct any questions to [unmask]--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:04:33 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:07:32AM -0400, John Garst wrote:
> >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> >Jamie
>
> Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> only.        The best kind!  The one I like to sing is Melvin Wine's "The Logger,"
where the lines        But he tuned up his fiddle, raised higher the string,
        And then he played the same tune over and over again.can be interpreted differently, depending on your state of mind.        This same version contains the deathless variant line        Two wives makes an army, too many for me!Which is the main reason I learned the song in the first place. -- Aloha,
Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 4 Nov 2000 02:02:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Greetings:
You may (or may not) be relieved to know that I have successfully re-subscribed
to ballad-l and, for the moment at least, can post directly to the list rather
than by ricochet with attendant header pendants.
        I did read this thread more leisurely, and am sorry I missed the early
response which did indeed cite the Riverside recordings, as well as (that
I missed) the source of the provisional list.  I do not regret having quoted
Ken Goldstein some re his choices.
        At the AFS meetings Lyn Wolz discussed Steve Roud's indexes, which include
"Roud numbers" which he added in order to provide a rough indication of families
of ballads, much like Laws or DT or (other) schemes, not with the intention of
graving these numbers in stone but to provide some hint as to potential kinship.
She reports that other researchers are now using these Roud numbers because they
are handy, as labels tend to be,  (Her presentation was a brief comparison-evaluation
of online song databases, which she promised to post on her website.  She's a
reference librarian at the University of Kansas, and says she's working with
Steve Roud to make his databases available/accessible on the 'Net.)
        Thinking about it, her paper was, for me, one of the high points of this
particular conference because it brought together and evaluated information that
I've been sort of accumulating over the years, and in compact and meaningful
form.  I hope she gets it together soon! -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: ghost <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:51:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


>  From [unmask] Fri Nov  3 20:14:37 2000
>  Date:         Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:04:33 -0800
>  From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
>  Subject:      Re: Childless Ballads
>  Comments: cc: [unmask]
>  To: [unmask]
>
>          This same version contains the deathless variant line
>
>          Two wives makes an army, too many for me!
>
>  Which is the main reason I learned the song in the first place. -- Aloha,
>  LaniOh shoot, I always thought it was "two wives *and* the army's too many for
me".

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 19:39:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


In M. J. C. Hodgart's 'The Ballads', 1950, in the Introduction he
says:'... But there are a few others of the same type which Child
overlooked or rejected. ..."The Bitter Withy", "Still Growing", "Corpus Christi [Down in yon
Forest]", "The Seven Virgins", "The Blind Beggar['s Daughter] of
Bethnal Green", "Bruton Town, "The Shooting of his Dear", "The
Bold Fisherman", and more doubtfully "Six Dukes went A-fishing".
..........'_____________The MacColl and Lloyd recording of non-Child ballads, Riverside
RLP 12-629 (later Washington 723) includes all, and adds "The
Holy Well", noting that 'Various scholars consider "The Holy
Well" to be but an interesting version of "The Bitter Withy"
ballad.'The incomplete BL copy of "The Noble Funeral of the Renowned
Champion the Duke of Grafton.. slain at the Siege of Cork"
(ZN316), from which  "Six Duke went A-fishing" stems, has been
printed in JFSS, 1908, and FMJ, 1965. Anyone have ready access to
the copy in the Morgan Library, New York?Bruce OlsonPS: The 17th century text of "The Nightingale's Song" is in the
Scarce Songs 1 file on my website, and is noted at ZN277 in the
broadside ballad index there.Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:43:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


ghost:>Oh shoot, I always thought it was "two wives *and* the army's too many for
>me".And I hear, in the Shorty and Juanita recording, "Two wives *in* the
army's too many for me."
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:03 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


In a message dated 06/11/2000  19:44:21, you write:<< And I hear, in the Shorty and Juanita recording, "Two wives *in* the
 army's too many for me." >>A different song - "The Gentleman Soldier" - for which see the Penguin Book
of English Folk Songs" (And the EFDSS Journal and its predecessor) has the
line:"Two wives are allowed in the army but one's too many for me."John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Chilldless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


I forgot to add part of Hodgart's quotation in 'The Ballads',
just before his list of 'Childless ballads': 'Only nine of them
are worth considering: The Bitter Withy, [etc]...'.Gordon H. Gerould, 'The Ballad of Tradition', 1932 (from reprint,
1957) gave only 7 'Childless Ballads': "The Bitter Withy", "The
Blind Beggar of Bednall Green", "The Seven Virgins", "The
Shooting of his Dear/ Molly Bawn", "Over Yonders a Park/ Corpus
Christi", "Bruton Town/ The Bramble Briar", and "The Bold
Fisherman". [Missing from Hodgart's (later) list are "Long A-
growing" and "Six Dukes went A-fishing"]He says: '"The Shooting of his Dear", or "Molly Bawn", ...
[irrelevant] ..., has been proved to have an elaborate
traditional history, though no version can be praised for its
beauty. It cannot be denied a place in the category.'............Long A-growing: From pooling of information in two threads in
August (Lang A Growing and The Trees they grow so High), it
appears that three published versions of "Young Craigstoun/
Craigston" all derive from a single copy in a manuscript, the
published versions stemming from a transcript made by C. K.
Sharpe. I'm all but certain that the original is the one in the
Glenbuchat collection, which Wm. Stenhouse noted in
'Illustrations to The Scots Musical Museum', #377.Bruce Olson--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:01:33 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(78 lines)


Ruairidh:I retrieved the long and affectionate obituary by Charles Eliot Norton of
his good friend F.J. Child as published in the Proceedings XXXII (1897),
pp. 333-339.  Of Child's youth, he writes:Francis James Child was born in Boston, on the 1st of February, 1825.  His
fathr was a sailmaker, one of that class of intelligent and independent
mechanics which has had a large share in determining the character of our
democratic community, as of old the same class had in Athens and in
Florence.  The boy was the third in a family of eight brothers and
sisters.  He was sent to the public schools.  His unusual capacities were
early displayed.  He stood first in  his classes, and was a favorite with
his schoolfellows.  At the English High School he won all the prizes, and
having by chance attracted the attention of our venerable felwlow citizen,
Mr. Epes S. Dixwell, then the Master of the Latin School, his father was
induced, at Mr. Dixwell's suggestion, to allow him to proceed to the
Latin school, that he might continue his studies and be prepared for
entrance to college.  He speedily caught up with the boys who had already
made progress in the study of Greek and Latin, and soon took the first
place here, as he had done in the schools which he had previously
attended.  The sweetness of his disposition, the pleasant mingling in his
nature of gay spirits and serious purpose, his high principles, his
unaffected modesty won the affection of his teachers and of his
comrades.  His superiority in his classes so so unmingled with pretension
or conceit, that it was admitted without question or envy."Child matricualted, with the financial assistance of Dixwell, then repaid
him with interest, according to Norton's obit.As time permits, I will look for other obits of Child, and see what I can
piece together.EdOn Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Ruairidh Greig wrote:> Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
> the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
> 335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
> early life.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
>
>
> > That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> > Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> > believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > >
> > > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
> reputed
> > > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
> a
> > > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
> ahem,
> > > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
> any
> > > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:23:14 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> As time permits, I will look for other obits of Child, and see what
> I can piece together.There is a charming one by G. L. Kittredge, quoting several paragraphs
of Norton's, in Vol. I of the _Ballads_.---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Big prizes make many losers.  :||

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Chilldless Ballads
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:20:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Date:         Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500
>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>Sender: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: Chilldless Ballads
>To: [unmask]
>
>I forgot to add part of Hodgart's quotation in 'The Ballads',
>just before his list of 'Childless ballads': 'Only nine of them
>are worth considering: The Bitter Withy, [etc]...'.
>
>Gordon H. Gerould, 'The Ballad of Tradition', 1932 (from reprint,
>1957) gave only 7 'Childless Ballads': "The Bitter Withy", "The
>Blind Beggar of Bednall Green", "The Seven Virgins", "The
>Shooting of his Dear/ Molly Bawn", "Over Yonders a Park/ Corpus
>Christi", "Bruton Town/ The Bramble Briar", and "The Bold
>Fisherman". [Missing from Hodgart's (later) list are "Long A-
>growing" and "Six Dukes went A-fishing"]
>
>He says: '"The Shooting of his Dear", or "Molly Bawn", ...
>[irrelevant] ..., has been proved to have an elaborate
>traditional history, though no version can be praised for its
>beauty. It cannot be denied a place in the category.'
>
>............
>
>Long A-growing: From pooling of information in two threads in
>August (Lang A Growing and The Trees they grow so High), it
>appears that three published versions of "Young Craigstoun/
>Craigston" all derive from a single copy in a manuscript, the
>published versions stemming from a transcript made by C. K.
>Sharpe. I'm all but certain that the original is the one in the
>Glenbuchat collection, which Wm. Stenhouse noted in
>'Illustrations to The Scots Musical Museum', #377.
>
>Bruce Olson
>
>--
>Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
>ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
>or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tips and Updates from WritersDigest.com 11-07-00
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:21:34 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(463 lines)


>From: Newsletter Manager <[unmask]>
>To: "[unmask]" <[unmask]>
>Subject: Tips and Updates from WritersDigest.com 11-07-00
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:17:05 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>Tips and Updates From Writer's Digest, 11-7-00
>For [unmask]
>
>http://www.writersdigest.com
>Your online guide to the writing life.
>
>========================================================
>Join Writer's Digest Book Club today and Choose 2 Books
>FREE with a 3rd Book for just $11.99 -- plus get a FREE
>Gift! As a member you'll enjoy great perks like: FREE
>shipping and handling, easy-to-earn FREE Bonus Books;
>networking opportunities. Plus savings up to 65% off the
>best writing instructional books available (more than 300
>titles in stock!). Click on
>http://www.writersdigest.com/wdbc to learn more.
>========================================================
>
>ON TAP TODAY
>
>* Letter From the Editor
>* Congratulations Brainstormer Winners
>* Fiction Software: What to Buy
>* News of the World...Wide Web
>* You Might Look Good in a Beret and a Goatee
>* 'On Writing'--and Winning--Like a King
>* E-Zine Promotion 101
>* Deadline Time: WD Zine Publishing Competition
>* Author Events Calendar--Looking Ahead
>* Ask the Editor: The Importance of Clips
>* Enter and Win: Got Any Ideas?
>* Hot Topics in the writersdigest.com Forum
>
>_________________________________________________________
>LETTER FROM THE EDITOR
>
>Welcome back. Today's newsletter reveals the winners of
>our first newsletter exclusive competition the "Fiction
>Writer's Brainstormer" contest. With more than 50 entries,
>the brainstormer competition was steep.
>
>If you didn't win, don't worry--we've still got an
>autographed copy of Jack Heffron's "The Writer's Idea
>Book" up for grabs, and you've got exactly one week to
>get your winning prompt in. Read on for details.
>
>This issue also includes a link to the low-down on some
>of the hottest fiction writing software programs and
>brings you up-to-date on the benefits of honing your
>"elevator speech," courtesy of the recently released
>book, "Guerrilla Marketing for Writers." So, read on
>and enjoy.
>
>-- Kelly Nickell, Newsletter Editor
>
>Do you have a suggestion or comment about this
>newsletter? Send it in via e-mail to [unmask]
>with "Newsletter Comments" in the subject line.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>CONGRATULATIONS BRAINSTORM WINNERS
>
>Congratulations to M. Gempel of Pennsylvania, C. Mertz
>of Missouri and D. Over of Maryland for correctly
>answering the five brainstormer questions. They each
>will receive a free copy of "Fiction Writer's
>Brainstormer" by James V. Smith Jr.
>
>In case you're wondering about those correct answers ...
>
>1. What is the one word that almost everybody
>   pronounces wrong?
>   Answer: Wrong is almost always pronounced wrong.
>
>2. On the other hand, can you identify at least four
>   words that anybody can pronounce right?
>   Answer: Write, right, rite and Wright are usually
>   pronounced right.
>
>3. In what dictionary does fiction begin with an f
>   and end with an e?
>   Answer: Fiction always begins with an f, and end
>   always begins with an e.
>
>4. Can you list two words that contain every letter
>   of the alphabet?
>   Answer: The alphabet.
>
>5. What's the commonplace sentence of only nine simple
>   words that uses every letter of the alphabet but does
>   not duplicate a single consonant?
>   Answer: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
>
>To learn more about James Smith's "Fiction Writer's
>Brainstormer," visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/brainstormer.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>FICTION SOFTWARE: WHAT TO BUY
>
>"For writers, the personal computer is the best thing
>to come along since the typewriter. But, like that old
>clickety-clack contraption, PCs or Macs won't do any
>writing for you. Today's empty screen is no less a
>curse than yesterday's blank page."
>
>So says Julio Ojeda-Zapata, Writer's Digest's Tools
>of the Trade columnist and a technology reporter for
>Knight Ridder. In the special issue of Writer's Digest
>"Guide to Writing Fiction Today" on sale now, Ojeda
>reviews 12 of the hottest fiction writing software,
>including Plots Unlimited, StoryBuilder, StoryCraft,
>Writer's Software Companion, Writer's Blocks, Dramatica
>Pro, Writer's DreamKit, StoryView, FictionMaster,
>FirstAid for Writers and Writer's Text Manager.
>
>Here's a little bit more from Ojeda on how he tackled
>this software topic:
>
>"Software specifically for fiction writers has
>proliferated in recent years, and at least one product
>aimed at nonfiction writers with a literary bent has
>surfaced. Which program or programs should writers
>buy? For aspiring novelists on tight budgets, this
>isn't a trivial question. And, after scrutinizing 12
>such products, we don't have an easy answer.
>
>"All the programs reviewed have unique features that
>many would consider useful and even indispensable.
>But not every product is right for everyone. Before
>buying, spend ample time on the publishers' Web sites
>and, whenever possible, download demo software that
>will give you a taste for the real thing. Above all,
>don't assume any of these programs can miraculously
>make you a good writer. Only you can do that, talent
>permitting. But, with the right computer tools, your
>workload can be lightened perceptibly, and your muse
>can be amplified as if by magic."
>
>To view a comprehensive chart evaluating each program's
>premise, execution, platform and price, visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/fiction/ojeda.html
>
>To read Ojeda's in-depth review of these products, pick
>up a copy of Guide to Writing Fiction Today, available
>in bookstores, by calling 1-800-289-0963 or through
>secure online ordering at:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/writingfiction.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>NEWS OF THE WORLD...WIDE WEB
>
>Despite a reported $30M backing, Bigwords.com closed its
>doors October 20th. Bigwords was the largest online
>retailer of university text books.
>
>http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20001106_92623.asp
>
>Starting immediately, Barnesandnoble.com will carry titles
>from MightyWords.com.
>
>http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20001106_92625.asp
>
>_________________________________________________________
>YOU MIGHT LOOK GOOD IN A BERET AND GOATEE
>
>A crack team of authors has been assembled for your
>training: Jay Conrad Levinson, father of guerrilla
>marketing, Rick Frishman, president of Planned
>Television Arts and Michael Larsen, successful
>literary agent and author.
>
>As writers, it's always essential to look for new
>ways to sell your work. The recently released
>"Guerrilla Marketing for Writers" (WD Books), offers
>100 proven insights and techniques that will help
>before and after you're published.
>
>Strengthening your proposals, creating unique and
>powerful marketing plans and utilizing marketing
>methods that are low-cost or no cost are just a few
>of the tactics that you'll learn.
>
>Here's a top-secret guerrilla marketing tip on the
>significance of "Your Elevator Speech":
>
>"An elevator speech is a newsy, passionate 60-to-90-
>second pitch to the media that must accomplish two
>goals: Mention three ways your books will change their
>audience's lives immediately and convey this information
>with irresistible enthusiasm.
>
>"Your elevator speech should last no longer than an
>elevator ride. Once perfected, it will be your open-
>sesame for time and space in the media.
>
>"The media base their responses to pitches partly on
>the words and partly on the excitement with which they
>are delivered. But this pitch, the essence of your book
>conveyed with passionate conviction, will serve you
>whenever you need to make anyone excited about your
>book including:
>
>* other writers
>* magazine or newspaper editors
>* your publicist
>* journalists and talk-show producers
>* booksellers
>* the people you want to book you to speak
>* the audiences you speak to
>
>"Don't share your elevator speech with anyone until
>your networks tell you it's dynamite that will explode
>in the mind of media people and convince them to book
>you on the spot. Make sure your elevator speech is
>equally effective whether it's delivered in person,
>over the phone, in print or on the net."
>
>For more information on "Guerrilla Marketing for
>Writers" visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/guerrillamarketing.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>'ON WRITING'--AND WINNING--LIKE A KING
>
>In his recent book, "On Writing" Stephen King invited
>readers to submit their writing to his website. But
>before you get thoughts of being discovered by King,
>and living a life only befitting the King--take note.
>There's a catch: it's a "very specific writing sample".
>
>Directions for entering your writing sample can only
>be obtained by reading King's book. If you have the
>book, and want to take a chance, visit
>http://www.stephenking.com or
>http://www.radiantideas.com/stephenking/sample.html
>
>Keep in mind, anything submitted which does not strictly
>follow the guidelines, 'will not be considered'.
>
>Inside.com reports the winner may have a chance to be
>published in the paperback reprint edition of the book.
>http://www.inside.com/story/Inside_Dope.html?art_id=0&podID=8
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DEADLINE TIME: WD ZINE PUBLISHING COMPETITION
>
>The deadline for the first Writer's Digest Zine
>Publishing Competition is fast approaching. If you
>still would like to enter your self-published zine
>or e-zine into the competition, you only have until
>Nov. 25. Don't miss out on the opportunity to have
>your zine eligible for more than $1,000 in prizes.
>
>WD wants to recognize the passion, talent and energy
>that goes into the creation of zines. There are 10
>categories to enter: literary/poetry, mystery,
>hobby/enthusiast, best art design, fantasy/horror,
>romance, genealogy/family history, informational
>(travel, general interest, news), science fiction
>and fanzine. For complete rules, list of awards and
>entry form, visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/zineawards
>
>_________________________________________________________
>AUTHOR EVENTS CALENDAR--LOOKING AHEAD
>
>Attend a writing workshop with a Writer's Digest author
>coming to a bookstore near you.
>
>Katherine Ramsland, author of Bliss: Writing to Find
>Your True Self
>     Wednesday Nov 8th, 7:30pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Willow Grove PA  Tel: 215/659-1001
>
>     Saturday Nov. 11th, 3:00pm
>     Borders Books & Music, Springfield, PA
>     Tel: 610/543-8588
>
>     Friday Nov. 24th, 7:00pm
>     Borders Books & Music, Ann Arbor, MI
>     Tel: 734/668-7652
>
>Jack Heffron, author of The Writer's Idea Book
>     Friday Nov. 17th, 7:00pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Lexington, KY  Tel: 606/543-8518
>
>     Sunday Nov. 19th, 3:00pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Cincinnati, OH Tel: 513/794-9440
>
>JacLynn Morris and Dr. Paul Fair (From Me to You)
>     Friday Nov. 17th, 7:30pm
>     Phoenix & Dragon Bookstore, Atlanta, GA
>     Tel: 404/255-5207
>
>Or meet your favorite writers, if you're in the
>neighborhood...
>
>Frances Mayes, author of In Tuscany
>     Wednesday, November 8th 7:30 pm
>     Tattered Cover, Denver CO
>     Tel: 303/322-1965 ext. 7446
>     http://www.tatteredcover.com
>
>Julia Cameron, author of Popcorn: Hollywood Stories
>     Thursday, November 9th 7pm
>     R.J. Julia Booksellers, Madison CT
>     Tel: 203/245-3959
>     http://www.rjjulia.com
>
>Madison Smartt Bell, author of Master of the Crossroads
>     Friday November 10th 6pm
>     Davis-Kidd Books, Memphis TN Tel: 901/683-9801
>     http://www.daviskidd.com/
>
>For more information, call stores directly.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>ASK THE EDITORS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CLIPS
>
>Gail Parsons asks: When a magazine wants 'clips' what
>exactly are they looking for? I am a reporter/feature
>writer for a daily paper and have begun to get my feet
>wet in freelancing. I have a lot of things published
>in the newspaper. Should the clips be related to the
>subject I am querying on?
>
>Melanie Rigney, editor of Writer's Digest says:
>First, welcome to the world of freelancing! You'll
>find it challenging and rewarding. If you can send
>clips that are somewhat related to the topic (you want
>to write for a dog lovers' magazine; you've done some
>human interest articles that involve pets), that's
>ideal. Showing you know something about the topic
>usually will give you a foot in the door. If you don't
>have a clip that's precisely related, send one that
>takes the same tone--for example, you probably wouldn't
>send a moving first-person essay if you were querying
>a trade magazine about doing a corporate case study.
>
>Send your questions to [unmask] with "Ask
>the Editors" in the subject line. The questions with
>the greatest general interest will be answered here by
>editors at Writer's Digest magazine, books and school;
>the Writer's Digest Book Club; Writers Online Workshop;
>and Personal Journaling magazine. Watch this newsletter
>for this new, occasional feature; questions and answers
>will be archived on the Web site as well. Sorry, but we
>don't recommend specific publishers, agents or editing
>services.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>ENTER AND WIN: GOT ANY IDEAS?
>
>The deadline is just one week away, so you better get
>that prompt in soon! Create your own writing prompt in
>100 words or less, and e-mail it to [unmask]
>with "Newsletter Contest" in the subject line. All
>entries must be in by November 14.
>
>The author of the winning prompt will receive an
>autographed copy of Jack Heffron's "The Writer's Idea
>Book," and the entry will appear in the November 21 WD
>Newsletter. Only one submission per entrant, so make
>it count.
>
>Need help? Here's an excerpted prompt from Heffron's
>book to get you started:
>
>PROMPT: Write about one of your pieces that began with
>an exciting idea but never achieved its potential.
>Speculate on what went wrong. Did you finish the piece?
>Does it now languish in a drawer? Or did you finish it
>but then lose interest in it?
>
>To learn more about "The Writer's Idea Book," visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/ideabook.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>HOT TOPICS IN THE WRITERSDIGEST.COM FORUM
>
>New to the Discussion Forum on WritersDigest.com:
>
>* Do you use fiction writing software programs? Share
>  your software secrets with the rest of the writing
>  world.
>
>Plus, contribute to the online clinic critique of
>"Dominica," by W. James M. McFalls.
>All at: http://www.writersdigest.com/forum
>
>________________________________________________________
>EXPLORE PAST ISSUES OF THE "TIPS AND UPDATES"
>NEWSLETTER
>
>Get access to all previous issues of this newsletter
>by visiting http://www.writersdigest.com/newsarchive
>
>There you can perform a keyword or subject search to
>pull up expert advice on all genres of writing and all
>areas of publishing. You can also access specific back
>issues by date if you have a particular newsletter you
>wish to review. (New issues don't enter the archive
>until about two weeks after initial publication.)
>
>_________________________________________________________
>SPONSOR THIS NEWSLETTER
>
>For information on sponsoring this newsletter or to
>receive a rate card, email [unmask],
>or call toll-free: 888-481-0427
>
>_________________________________________________________
>GET YOUR FREE ISSUE OF WRITER'S DIGEST MAGAZINE
>
>Packed with plenty of must-know info like how to polish
>your writing, submit your manuscripts successfully, break
>into hot, new markets, hook an agent, and more. Check
>out http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/mag_frame.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>WRITER'S DIGEST BOOK CLUB
>
>Join Writer's Digest Book Club today and Choose 2 Books
>FREE with a 3rd Book for just $11.99 -- plus get a FREE!
>Gift. Click on http://www.writersdigest.com/wdbc to learn
>more.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>JOIN THE WRITER'S DIGEST AFFILIATE PROGRAM
>
>Earn money with your writing-related website. Click
>below for program details.
>http://www.writersdigest.com/affiliate
>
>========================================================
>TELL A FRIEND
>If you know other writers who would be interested in
>receiving this newsletter, tell him or her to send an
>e-mail to [unmask] with SUBSCRIBE
>WD NEWSLETTER in the subject line of the message, or sign
>up online at http://www.writersdigest.com/newsletter
>========================================================
>UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION
>You have received this e-mail because you expressed
>interest in receiving updates about writing and about
>Writer's Digest products by e-mail. If you no longer want
>updates, send an e-mail to [unmask]
>with UNSUBSCRIBE WD NEWSLETTER in the subject line the
>message; send it from the e-mail address where you
>currently receive the newsletter.
>========================================================
>CHANGE OF ADDRESS
>To change addresses, use the procedures above to unsubscribe
>from your old address, and then subscribe from your new
>address.
>========================================================
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:12:38 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Friends:
I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
Many thanks,
Norm Cohen

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:27:39 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Scandalous as this might sound, I don't think that UNC's folklore program
has offered a course in Anglo-American folksong and balladry since Dan
Patterson retired three or four years ago.  Glenn Hinson teaches
African-American vernacular music, and Terry Zug includes some in an
introduction to folklore class.BruceAt 06:12 PM 11/8/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Friends:
>I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
>in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
>so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
>Many thanks,
>Norm Cohen
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
NOTE: This email address will probably change
during November 2000 because Mindspring's
service is unreliable.  Look for me at bellsouth.net
probably.http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:33:08 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


Norm:Let us all know.  Just for curiosity's sake.EdOn Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Friends:
> I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
> in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
> so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
> Many thanks,
> Norm Cohen
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:21:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


I'll be offering a folksong course here at University of Maine after
Christmas, and I hope to alternate it every other year with a course on
narrative.I don't think a dedicated course in ballads has been offered at
Memorial since David Buchan died in 1994.  Neil Rosenberg and Peter
Narvaez both offer folksong courses (and Peter now offers a blues &
jazz course).Back in the late 80s, Sean Galvin did a survey of American universities
that still offered ballad courses.  It's been a while so I don't recall
the exact results but they weren't encouraging.  If I remeber rightly
he was also able to tie the decline in ballad/folksong offerings to a
general move away from genre based courses, or at least away from the
classic "analytic" genres -- folksong, folktale, proverb, etc.  In that
light, it would be interesting to know how many and what kind of
courses take up folksong/ballads as a significant part of the syllabus:
women's studies, politics of culture, popular culture,
sociology/anthropology of art, medieval studies.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:40:29 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Dear Ballad Group,
  In the Wife of Usher's Well, when the sons return to their mother, we have:
-----------
It fell about the Martinmass,
  When nights are lang and mirk,
The carlin wife's three sons came hame,
  And their hats were of the birk.
------------
I recall from somewhere in my dim past that "birk" (birch) has a symbolic,
perhaps religious or supernatural association. Could it be that because the
sons were wearing birch hats that this means they came to their mother from
heaven? Is this the balladeer's way of saying they are saints? If so, would
this meaning be evident to people living in centuries past in Scotland, or
even in America, where the ballad became popular in the Scots-Irish
tradition? Or, am I reading too much into this?
  Guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pete Brady

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:11:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


The source you're thinking of is probably L. C. Wimberly, FOlklore in
English and Scottish Ballads.  He discusses the stanza in question on
p. 243 and has more extented comments on related motifs pp. 155-57.Comparative folklore as practice by Wimberly used materials from
disparate traditions regardless of whether a connection could be
demonstrated, a la James Fraser in The Golden Bough.  So his readings
should be taken advisedly, but there is still much of interest and
value in his study.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:51:01 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


You need a Scots expert here (which I'm not), but the following notes may be
of interest, although they are inconclusive. A scan through a shelf-full of
Scots folklore books brings up surprisingly few references to birch tree
beliefs, but there are some. Some popular writers, such as Willa Muir
(Living With Ballads, 1965 p.154) make blanket statements such as 'birch was
one of the sacred trees in pre-Christian lore', but as they offer no
evidence their comments are worthless.The most telling point is that Scott, who printed the earliest known version
of the ballad (Child's A text) in 1802, makes no comment about the birk in
Scottish belief (but he does witter on about a Rabbinical tradition of a
ghost with a garland on his head, without showing how this was relevant) and
we can be pretty sure that he would have given Scottish parallels if he had
known them.L.C. Wimberley, in his 'Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads' (1928
pp.155-157) starts by saying 'the sacred nature of the birch is well known'
but then spoils this by giving lots of references - from India, Japan,
British Columbia, Central Asia, Lapland, etc. again without appearing to
worry whether these have any bearing on Scotland, plus one English
reference, but no Scottish ones. Nevertheless, he does make something of a
case for the birch being special by citing occurrences of birks in other
ballads - 'Braes of Yarrow' (Child 214), 'Sweet William's Ghost' (Child 77),
'Sir Hugh' (Child 155), 'Fair Janet' (Child 64) and several others. Someone
needs to count all the references to trees in Child, to find out if these
birches are statistically significant.The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
because it rhymed with 'mirk'.Incidentally, I am surprised to find that very few British versions have
been noted - 3 or 4 from Scotland, the same number from England - but dozens
in the United States, Sharp alone collected 33 versions in the Appalachians
in 1916/1918.Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?> Dear Ballad Group,
>   In the Wife of Usher's Well, when the sons return to their mother, we
have:
> -----------
> It fell about the Martinmass,
>   When nights are lang and mirk,
> The carlin wife's three sons came hame,
>   And their hats were of the birk.
> ------------
> I recall from somewhere in my dim past that "birk" (birch) has a symbolic,
> perhaps religious or supernatural association. Could it be that because
the
> sons were wearing birch hats that this means they came to their mother
from
> heaven? Is this the balladeer's way of saying they are saints? If so,
would
> this meaning be evident to people living in centuries past in Scotland, or
> even in America, where the ballad became popular in the Scots-Irish
> tradition? Or, am I reading too much into this?
>   Guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pete Brady

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Mary Louise Chown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:30:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


roud wrote:> You need a Scots expert here (which I'm not), but the following notes may be
> of interest, although they are inconclusive. A scan through a shelf-full of
> Scots folklore books brings up surprisingly few references to birch tree
> beliefs, but there are some. Some popular writers, such as Willa Muir
> (Living With Ballads, 1965 p.154) make blanket statements such as 'birch was
> one of the sacred trees in pre-Christian lore', but as they offer no
> evidence their comments are worthless.
>
> The most telling point is that Scott, who printed the earliest known version
> of the ballad (Child's A text) in 1802, makes no comment about the birk in
> Scottish belief (but he does witter on about a Rabbinical tradition of a
> ghost with a garland on his head, without showing how this was relevant) and
> we can be pretty sure that he would have given Scottish parallels if he had
> known them.
>
> L.C. Wimberley, in his 'Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads' (1928
> pp.155-157) starts by saying 'the sacred nature of the birch is well known'
> but then spoils this by giving lots of references - from India, Japan,
> British Columbia, Central Asia, Lapland, etc. again without appearing to
> worry whether these have any bearing on Scotland, plus one English
> reference, but no Scottish ones. Nevertheless, he does make something of a
> case for the birch being special by citing occurrences of birks in other
> ballads - 'Braes of Yarrow' (Child 214), 'Sweet William's Ghost' (Child 77),
> 'Sir Hugh' (Child 155), 'Fair Janet' (Child 64) and several others. Someone
> needs to count all the references to trees in Child, to find out if these
> birches are statistically significant.
>
> The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
> the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
> blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
> the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
> because it rhymed with 'mirk'.
>
> Incidentally, I am surprised to find that very few British versions have
> been noted - 3 or 4 from Scotland, the same number from England - but dozens
> in the United States, Sharp alone collected 33 versions in the Appalachians
> in 1916/1918.
>
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:40 PM
> Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
>Hi There from a lurker from Winnipeg Manitoba.   I may be able to shed some
light on the birch hats. It seems to me in my research on both ballads and
shamanic practices that the hats of birch signify that the sons have come from
the otherworld. Items of clothing such as hats and shoes(of bronze or iron )
were once recognized as otherworldly. If this is important to you I can try and
remember where I read this. Mary Louise Chown

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:03:06 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


    There are 58 versions of the ballad in Bronson:  _The Traditional Tunes
of the Child Ballads_ (vol. II, pp. 246-266),  and two of then  show the
stanza about the birchen hats.  Both of these mentions follow with a stanza
explaining that the birch grew at the Gates of Paradise.  One version not
included by Bronson  (probably because he used only printed sources) was
recorded a good many years ago by Buell Kazee,  under the title of "Lady
Gay," and as I remember it, the explanatory verse was as follows:That birch grew not in any slough
    Nor yet by any stream,
But at the Gates of Paradise
   That birch grew fresh and green.   Maria Leach, in her _Standard Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology and
Legend_, says that the symbolism of birch in the song, as it was explained by
 Robert Graves in _The White Goddess_,  was that the ghosts wearing these
hats did not intend to haunt the earth, but were going to return to Paradise
immediately.  This plan of returning to Paradise is perhaps borne out by one
of the Scottish versions (not one of the two versions in _Child_), which has
one of the three babes saying"The cock doth craw, the day doth daw:
   The channerin' worm doth chide.
Gin we be missed out o' our place
   A sair pain we maun bide."Around most Hallowe'ens, I include the Kazee version in my concerts because
of its ghostly affect, although my guitar accompaniment doesn't hold a candle
to Kazee's stark banjo!Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Mea Culpa?
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:08:24 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


My apologies in advance if you have recieved any bizarre missives with my
name attached.Somehow, some e-messages I was transferring from one computer to another
seem to have found their way to the Ballad List, I think.. They cropped up
on Linn's Ballad-L mail, but not on mine. This all leaves me very
bewildered.We are currently running two computers on line and need to transfer e-mail
from one to the other; especially if they contain attachments or "blue
letter" sites. This old performa can't handle either but the new G4 can.What is most confusing is the fact that the Ballad-L listing in the Address
Book is separated from the address I was forwarding to by a whole page.Please forgive if you got any of this Spamlike transmissions  -  Tom

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:44:59 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(9 lines)


Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:13:36 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
internal evidence.
The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old Time
Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is only
24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has 82pp.,
so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye Pack a
1930s radio singer?
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
Subject: Dating a Songbook> Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
> of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
> material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
> the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
>
> The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
>
> Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:21:47 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


Steve and Everyone:My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.Does that help?EdOn Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> internal evidence.
> The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old Time
> Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is only
> 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has 82pp.,
> so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye Pack a
> 1930s radio singer?
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> Subject: Dating a Songbook
>
>
> > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
> > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
> > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
> > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> >
> > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> >
> > Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mea Culpa?
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:28:43 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Don't worry, Tom. As Dan Rather put it on Tuesday night, "To err is human.
To really louse things up, you need a computer." (He quoted this as a
prologue to announcing that CBS was withdrawing its call of Florida for
Gore.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Dr Ian Russell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:40:23 +0000
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Dear Norm,Here at the Elphinstone Institute, University of Aberdeen,
we are setting up a taught M.Litt to run from autumn 2001
in Ethnology and Folklore (one year full time). It is
intended to survey the development, theory and practice of
the subject area in an international context, with special
concentration on Scottish materials. It will cover
appropriate research methodologies. In Component 1: Theory,
four of the weeks will be devoted to Ballad and Song. In
Component 2: Practice, there will also be four weeks.
Component 3 is the dissertation, which could focus on
ballad/song fieldwork, if appropriate.
It can be taken full or part-time.Our Continuing Education Dept has a course on Scottish
Culture and Tradition: Ballad and Song (6 credits) -
CN3010, at Level 3 (year 3) of the Scottish Studies M.A (72
credits). There are two other exit points, for a
certificate (24 credits) or a diploma (48 credits).There are also opportunities for suitable candidates to
undertake Ph.D. or M.Phil. research in Folksong or Ballads
at the Institute, as well as other related areas.Hope this is of some interest.Best wishes,
IanOn Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:12:38 -0800 Norm Cohen
<[unmask]> wrote:> Friends:
> I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
> in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
> so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
> Many thanks,
> Norm Cohen----------------------
Dr Ian Russell, Director
The Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen
AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272386
Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
[unmask]
Website:
www.abdn.ac.uk/elphinstone/

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:51:14 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


The two versions I have, as follows. It is Version 2 which has the  song
'The Farmer's Letter to the President' which is dated 1933.[Version 1]
[Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballads / & Cowboy Songs
<Bottom>Compiled by / COWBOY LOYE / and / JUST PLAIN JOHN
Decoration in centre: stylized design of harp, trumpet, ribbons intertwined
Border fancy: repeating pattern, dotted semi-circles, three stemmed
'flower?' within each
24 numbered pages (but index continues on inside of back cover)
Orangey-brown (rust?) card cover
Song titles in caps.
First song on p.3: 'MOTHER'
First song on p.12: 'THE OLD HICKORY CANE',
First song on p.23 'DON'T LAY ME ON MY BACK IN MY LAST SLEEP'.[Version 2]
[Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballas / and / Cowboy Songs
<Bottom>Compiled by LOYE PACK / The Cowboy Singer
Decoration in centre: stylized harp
Border: plain rules: thin/thick/thin
80 numbered pages (plus 2 unnumbered and index continues on inside of back
cover)
Pale green card cover.
Song titles in caps.
First song on p.3: 'JUST BEFORE THE BATTLE MOTHER'
First song on p.40: 'THE OLD STEPSTONE'
First song on p.80: 'DON'T TAKE MY LITTLE HOME'----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook> Steve and Everyone:
>
> My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
> text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
> in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
> pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:
>
> > Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> > internal evidence.
> > The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old
Time
> > Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is
only
> > 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has
82pp.,
> > so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye
Pack a
> > 1930s radio singer?
> > Steve Roud
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> > Subject: Dating a Songbook
> >
> >
> > > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82
pages
> > > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly
written
> > > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor
crash in
> > > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> > >
> > > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> > >
> > > Ed
> >

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 05:18:30 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(106 lines)


Steve:There were, apparently, multiple "editions" of Loye's "Old Time Ballads
and Cowboy Songs," at least in the 80-page version.  My copy agrees with
yours except in the color of the cover stock, and the fact that "The Old
Stepstone" is on page 39.  (The index says page 40.)  He must have removed
a song before page 40, and added something after.We can settle for a post-1933 date.What makes this songbook so interesting, in my opinion, is the confluence
of the new (a song about an airplane crash) with the old (homelitic
ballads).  In a sense it is a reflection of the national vote of a few
days ago: a significant portion of the voters cast ballots on moralistic
grounds (anti-Clinton, anti-abortion), an equal portion voted for secular
reasons.EdOn Sat, 11 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> The two versions I have, as follows. It is Version 2 which has the  song
> 'The Farmer's Letter to the President' which is dated 1933.
>
> [Version 1]
> [Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballads / & Cowboy Songs
> <Bottom>Compiled by / COWBOY LOYE / and / JUST PLAIN JOHN
> Decoration in centre: stylized design of harp, trumpet, ribbons intertwined
> Border fancy: repeating pattern, dotted semi-circles, three stemmed
> 'flower?' within each
> 24 numbered pages (but index continues on inside of back cover)
> Orangey-brown (rust?) card cover
> Song titles in caps.
> First song on p.3: 'MOTHER'
> First song on p.12: 'THE OLD HICKORY CANE',
> First song on p.23 'DON'T LAY ME ON MY BACK IN MY LAST SLEEP'.
>
> [Version 2]
> [Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballas / and / Cowboy Songs
> <Bottom>Compiled by LOYE PACK / The Cowboy Singer
> Decoration in centre: stylized harp
> Border: plain rules: thin/thick/thin
> 80 numbered pages (plus 2 unnumbered and index continues on inside of back
> cover)
> Pale green card cover.
> Song titles in caps.
> First song on p.3: 'JUST BEFORE THE BATTLE MOTHER'
> First song on p.40: 'THE OLD STEPSTONE'
> First song on p.80: 'DON'T TAKE MY LITTLE HOME'
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
>
>
> > Steve and Everyone:
> >
> > My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
> > text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
> > in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
> > pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:
> >
> > > Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> > > internal evidence.
> > > The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old
> Time
> > > Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is
> only
> > > 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has
> 82pp.,
> > > so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye
> Pack a
> > > 1930s radio singer?
> > > Steve Roud
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > > To: <[unmask]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> > > Subject: Dating a Songbook
> > >
> > >
> > > > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > > > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82
> pages
> > > > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly
> written
> > > > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor
> crash in
> > > > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> > > >
> > > > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> > > >
> > > > Ed
> > >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:22:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:>What makes this songbook so interesting, in my opinion, is the confluence
>of the new (a song about an airplane crash) with the old (homelitic
>ballads).  In a sense it is a reflection of the national vote of a few
>days ago: a significant portion of the voters cast ballots on moralistic
>grounds (anti-Clinton, anti-abortion), an equal portion voted for secular
>reasons.What about those who voted for other moralistic reasons (pro-Gore, pro-life)?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:25:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


What an error!>What about those who voted for other moralistic reasons (pro-Gore, pro-life)?
>--
>john garst    [unmask]Should have been "(pro-Gore, pro-choice)" and "anti-Bush."--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 11:20:46 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Thanks very much to the group for replying to my request about the possible
spiritual or symbolic meaning of "birk" in the Wife of Usher's Well. In
particular, Steve Roud points out something that went right by me, that the
next verse states that the birk grows at the gates of paradise.
  I first was told of the possible significance of "birk" in reference to
"Bonnie Lass O'Fyvie-O", where the last verse is "Green grow the birks upon
the bonnie bank," which seems neutral enough, except that someone told me
that this had a deeper meaning. In Fyvie-O, it seems a little far out to look
for hidden meanings. But in Usher's Well, this is about ghosts, and anything
could be happening.
  Pete BradyIn a message dated 11/9/00 3:52:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, [unmask]
writes:<< The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
 the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
 blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
 the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
 because it rhymed with 'mirk'. >>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New English CD
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:02:25 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


'Down the Cherry Tree' by Pop Maynard (Musical Traditions MTCD 400) - double
CD (93 minutes) including 32 songs recorded in pubs in Sussex, England by
Brian Matthews 1959-1961.Pop Maynard (1872-1962) was one of the finest unaccompanied singers to be
discovered in Post-War England, and these recordings have only recently come
to light. Rod Stradling has made them available as a limited edition, as
unedited field-recordings, for the benefit of enthusiast who will otherwise
miss out on some wonderful singing simply because there are pub-noises in
the background and people joining in the chorus. To keep the price down, Rod
has decided not to include the extensive booklet which usually accompanies
his CD releases, but the record is still excellent value for money.UK customers send £10 to Rod at 1 Castle Street, Stroud, Glos. GL5 2HP.
(Tel.01453 759475)
Overseas, email Rod at [unmask] for details how to payAnd if you are interested in other great CDs and articles, I suggest you
visit his Musical Traditions website at:  [unmask]Steve Roud

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: ghost <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:51:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Anyone who's got it wanna post the land-chantey
"(Polling, Polling) Way Down In Florida" that a group from DC premiered
at the NOMAD chantey-blast session this weekend?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:37:31 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


From the "horse's mouth" so to speak.    An Election Shanty
(to the tune of "Roll the Woodpile Down")1. Way down south where the palm trees grow
    Way down in Florida
   They say elections sure are slow.
    And we'll hold the recount now.
Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the whole state round;
    *That ballot of mine they will never find
    And we'll hold the recount now.2. Gore's campaign aides made a final push
   To round up voters to beat the Bush.Chorus3. Some punched for Bush, some punched for Gore;
   Some punched for two or three or more.Chorus4. Pat said "Those votes weren't meant for me,
   I'd be glad if I got three!"Chorus (2nd line changes)  *Those voters of mine crossed the Palm Beach line5. Reverend Jesse says "No fair!
   They won't let my people vote down there."Chorus (2nd line changes)  *That brown gal of mine got kicked out of line6. The lawyers'll fight over who gets sued
   But either way, guess who gets screwed?Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the whole state round;
        *That ballot of mine they will never find
        And we'll hold the recount now."2000 by The Civil Serpents (Kathy Westra, Mary LaMarca and George Stephens)

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: Andy Alexis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:27:19 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


Jumping the gun just a teensy bit, I was kind of thinking
along the lines of (to the tune of "He's in the Jailhouse
Now"):Mr Bush met Mr. Cheney
at a bar and went insane-he
drove a car after having a beer or three
He got stopped by a trooper
who was a party pooper
I don't want to go to jail so I'll just pay a fineChorus
He's in the White House now (2x)
If he had to go to jail
His dad would have paid his bail
He's in the White House now.(c)2000 by Andy Alexis All rights reservedI wrote these verses; new verses welcomed (to be (c) by you
of course).  A verse about Capitol Punishment would be nice;
the original song has a chorus that changes to "He's in the
graveyard now".  The original song even has a verse about a
guy selling his votes for president twice...Andy Alexis, [unmask]
Visit me: http://www.calweb.com/~ndlxs
Sacramento, California
"The Pearl of the Central Valley"> -----Original Message-----
> >From the "horse's mouth" so to speak.
>
>     An Election Shanty
> (to the tune of "Roll the Woodpile Down")
>
> 1. Way down south where the palm trees grow
>     Way down in Florida
>    They say elections sure are slow.
>     And we'll hold the recount now.
> Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the
> whole state round;
>     *That ballot of mine they will never find
>     And we'll hold the recount now.
>
> 2. Gore's campaign aides made a final push
>    To round up voters to beat the Bush.
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Singer New to Me
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:46:14 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
with Kate Russby (the spelling is phonetic).  She records on Compass
Records, and either has a new release or is making a first tour of the
U.S.  (She is Yorkshire born, and a second-generation singer of
traditional songs.)  Can anyone tell me more about her, or recommend any
of her CDs.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Cliford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 18:11:12 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


At 10:46 AM -0800 11/19/00, Ed Cray wrote:
>This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
>with Kate Russby (the spelling is phonetic).  Can anyone tell me more
>about >her, or recommend any of her CDs.
>
>EdEd,        Am aware of two CDs by Kate RUSBY, "Hourglass" [Compass Records 7
4255 2. (1998)] and "Sleepless" {Compass Records 7 4277 2 (1999)] both were
originally releaseed by Pure Records in the U.K. and I find both to be
very enjoyable. For those who find solace in "best of lists" both were
selested by Folk Roots as among the best new releases in their respective
years.        The 11 cuts on "Hourglass" are 1. Sir Eglamore; 2. As I Roved Out;
3. Jolly Ploughboys; 4. Annan Waters; 5. Stananivy / Jack & Jill; 6. A Rose
In April; 7. Radio Sweetheart; 8. I am Stretched On Your Grave; 9. Old Man
Time; 10. Drowned Lovers; 11. Bold Riley.        The 13 cuts on " Sleepless" 1. The Cobblers Daughter; 2. I Wonder
What Is Keeping My True Love Tonight ; 3. The Fairest Of All Yarrow; 4. The
Unquiet Grave; 5. Sho Heen; 6. Sweet Bride; 7. All God's Angels; 8. The
Wild Goose; 9. The Duke And The Tinker; 10. Our Town [a fine song by Iris
Dement]; 11. The Sleepless Sailor; 12. Cowsong; 13. Botany Bay        Compass Records has a web page at www.compassrecords.comCliff Ocheltree
New Orleans LA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Susan Tichy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:42:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
> with Kate RussbyKate Rusby also plays with the Poozies & has done some guest spots on
other albums. Here are all the listings that pop up at Sidestreet (a
small-label wholesaler).--SusanPoozies, The INFINITE BLUE long-awaited first American release from this
notable Scottish quartet: Karen Tweed, Kate Rusby, and Mary MacMaster
and Patsy Seddon of Sileas
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4261RAISE YOUR HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE
Compilation culled from their first three albums -- Karen Tweed, Kate
Rusby, and Sileas gals Mary MacMaster and Patsy Seddon
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4290Rusby, Kate
HOURGLASS
US release of 1997 album. With John McCusker, Alan Reid, Tony McManus,
Alison Kinnaird, others.
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4255
SLEEPLESS
With Darrell Scott, John McCusker and Tim O'Brien
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4277Todd, Gibb
CONNECTED
Original, traditional and contemporary ballads with an all-star lineup
including Kate Rusby, Tony McManus, John McCusker, Finbar Furey,
Alasdair Fraser, Joanie Madden, others
                        CD...LDL-CD1292McCusker, John
YELLA HOOSE
Second solo album for this Battlefield Band fiddler. Including guests
Tim O'Brien, Daryll Scott, Kate Rusby, Michael McGoldrick, Ian Carr,
Simon Thoumire, Andy Cutting, Gino Lupari, Malcolm Stitt, and Kevin
MacKenzie. Includes mainly original compositions and is produced by John
McCusker
                        CD...TEMP-CD2083

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:50:07 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:> This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
> with Kate Russby...Can anyone tell me more about her...I can't tell you an awful lot, except that she's a young English singer
with a great voice and a good ear for interpreting songs. A breath of
fresh air in many respects, in my opinion. I shouldn't think you'd be
disappointed if you sought her other recordings.--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff, Scotland
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Ted Moriarty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 06:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Kate Rusby also made an album with Kathryn Roberts--KATE RUSBY AND KATHRYN
ROBERTS is the title.
----- Original Message -----
From: Susan Tichy <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an
interview
> > with Kate Russby
>
> Kate Rusby also plays with the Poozies & has done some guest spots on
> other albums. Here are all the listings that pop up at Sidestreet (a
> small-label wholesaler).
>
> --Susan
>
> Poozies, The INFINITE BLUE long-awaited first American release from this
> notable Scottish quartet: Karen Tweed, Kate Rusby, and Mary MacMaster
> and Patsy Seddon of Sileas
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4261
>
> RAISE YOUR HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE
> Compilation culled from their first three albums -- Karen Tweed, Kate
> Rusby, and Sileas gals Mary MacMaster and Patsy Seddon
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4290
>
> Rusby, Kate
> HOURGLASS
> US release of 1997 album. With John McCusker, Alan Reid, Tony McManus,
> Alison Kinnaird, others.
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4255
> SLEEPLESS
> With Darrell Scott, John McCusker and Tim O'Brien
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4277
>
> Todd, Gibb
> CONNECTED
> Original, traditional and contemporary ballads with an all-star lineup
> including Kate Rusby, Tony McManus, John McCusker, Finbar Furey,
> Alasdair Fraser, Joanie Madden, others
>                         CD...LDL-CD1292
>
> McCusker, John
> YELLA HOOSE
> Second solo album for this Battlefield Band fiddler. Including guests
> Tim O'Brien, Daryll Scott, Kate Rusby, Michael McGoldrick, Ian Carr,
> Simon Thoumire, Andy Cutting, Gino Lupari, Malcolm Stitt, and Kevin
> MacKenzie. Includes mainly original compositions and is produced by John
> McCusker
>                         CD...TEMP-CD2083
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:00:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


I believe Kate Rusby's recordings are available from Elderly Instruments
(www.elderly.com) .Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: ADdress change
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:32:44 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


I'm quitting this server. Could you please change my URL to:[unmask]thanx much!

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:34:45 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


They're also available (as is everything else in print) from CAMSCO Music
)(www.camsco.com). And often at a lower price.On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Paul Stamler wrote:> I believe Kate Rusby's recordings are available from Elderly Instruments
> (www.elderly.com) .
>
>
> Peace.
> Paul
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Cliford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:05:12 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Ed,        Am aware of two CDs by Kate RUSBY, "Hourglass" [Compass Records 7
4255 2. (1998)] and "Sleepless" {Compass Records 7 4277 2 (1999)] both were
originally releaseed by Pure Records in the U.K. and I find both to be
very enjoyable. For those who find solace in "best of lists" both were
selested by Folk Roots as among the best new releases in their respective
years.        The 11 cuts on "Hourglass" are 1. Sir Eglamore; 2. As I Roved Out;
3. Jolly Ploughboys; 4. Annan Waters; 5. Stananivy / Jack & Jill; 6. A Rose
In April; 7. Radio Sweetheart; 8. I am Stretched On Your Grave; 9. Old Man
Time; 10. Drowned Lovers; 11. Bold Riley.        The 13 cuts on " Sleepless" 1. The Cobblers Daughter; 2. I Wonder
What Is Keeping My True Love Tonight ; 3. The Fairest Of All Yarrow; 4. The
Unquiet Grave; 5. Sho Heen; 6. Sweet Bride; 7. All God's Angels; 8. The
Wild Goose; 9. The Duke And The Tinker; 10. Our Town [a fine song by Iris
Dement]; 11. The Sleepless Sailor; 12. Cowsong; 13. Botany Bay        Compass Records has a web page at www.compassrecords.comCliff Ocheltree
New Orleans LA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: John Jacob Niles
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:32:21 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
understand him and his work?
Thanks
Steve Roud

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:48:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On 11/22/00, roud wrote:>The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
>before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
>examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
>understand him and his work?I don't think there have been articles on the subject (unless someone
has researched "Black is the Color of My True Love's Hair") -- but
it's easy enough to verify. Look at his "Ballad Book." Look up
"Judas." Or his moralized version of "The Fair Flower of Northumberland."
And what are the odds that he found the only surviving oral version of
"Robin Hood and the Monk"?--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:41:24 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was 16,
and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
collected by J.J.Niles.
  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:42:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Yes, but could your father's informants have learned the carols from the
booklet?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Trad Man
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 9:41 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: John Jacob NilesSome of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was
16,
and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
collected by J.J.Niles.
  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:34:42 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


On 11/23/00, Trad Man wrote:>Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
>and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
>elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was 16,
>and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
>The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
>collected by J.J.Niles.
>  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
>'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.I agree with Marge Steiner: These are rather dubious reports. I'm
willing to allow that the songs were collected from tradition, but
Niles could have introduced them himself. Source, not collector.A report of the Coventry Carol strikes me as most dubious. There
is no reason to think this song was ever traditional. We have our
copies from old manuscripts -- now burnt! If there is a version
in oral tradition, it was probably introduced from a written
source. Now I'm not saying that makes the song untraditional,
or that there is something wrong with songs introduced into the
tradition from written sources. But this is just the sort of
thing I'd expect of Niles.Don't mistake me: I *do* think Niles collected songs from tradition,
and had some songs within his own family tradition. But I also think
that one can never trust him in the absence of strong supporting
evidence. These collections of your father constitute supporting
evidence in the cases of those two songs -- if they weren't
traditional at the Niles did whatever he did, they are now.
But that is no help in assessing any of his other dubious
pieces.The irony is, if Niles had done all this rewriting and then sung
it for another collector, we'd call it traditional. But he didn't;
he rewrote and then submitted the results as traditional. It's why
I don't trust the Lomaxes, and why I don't trust Niles. They
convict themselves by their own works.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:59:37 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


In a message dated 11/22/00 4:34:02 AM, [unmask] writes:>The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
>before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
>examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
>understand him and his work?
>
>Thanks
>
>Steve Roud
**************************************************
I think D. K. Wilgus correctly identifies some problems with Niles in his
_Anglo-Americn Folksong Scholarship  Since 1898_  (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers
University Press, 1959, p. 213) when he says "The
coillector-performer-composer John Jacob Niles.....  has been unable to
separate his three roles. "    Niles, who was born in Kentucky in  1892,
thought of himself as a member of the Anglo-American folk culture of the
southern mountains, and could never see how his "creative" approach was
different from that of his farmer-carpenter father, a well-known singer of
folk songs in his community who, like most true folk singers, put his own
personal spin on his material.   It was typical of young John's approach
that he learned to play on a traditional three-string Appalachian dulcimer,
but soon felt held back by its limitations, and he invented and built several
8-stringed instruments -- beautiful example of careful woodcrafting,  but
hardly traditional.  His creativeness extended to the actual creation of new
songs -- many of them musically excellent --  some of which he said were
"collected"  from genuine folk singers.  (His second book,_Songs My Mother
Never Taught Me_, includes the love song "Venezuela,"  which had appeared in
his earlier book, _Singing Soldiers_, and his publisher convinced him that
the book would sell better if he called it a "folksong"  by some nameless
creator.   Fritz Kreisler, the classical violinist, had the same experience,
and some of his compositions, such as "The Old  Refrain"  and [I think]
"Schon Rosmarin"  were published as his arrangements of old folk tunes.)
    He began doing public performances in 1927, and, along with Carl Sandburg
and Richard Dyer-Bennett, quickly became an exemplar of folk music for the
concert audience.  In spite of his shortcomings as a scholar, he was a great
performer, and I'll always remember how I and the audience as a whole were
transfixed by his dramatic presentation of "The Maid Saved From the Gallows."
  One of his most controversial books was  _The Ballad Book of John Jacob
Niles_ (Boston, Houghton-Mifflin, 1961.)  Its songs are polished in true
Nilesian fashion, and many are obviously "collected"  from books, although he
does give the names of most of his supposed informants.  D. K. Wilgus once
said, in a personal conversation,  "He waited to publish this until the
people he named were all safely dead."
  You might like to read a short piece by Niles himself, called "My
Precarious Life In the Public Domain" (_The Atlantic_, December, 1948.)Sam Hinton
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:57:15 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


In a message dated 11/23/00 12:37:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:<<
 >Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
 >and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
 >elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was
16,
 >and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
 >The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
 >collected by J.J.Niles.
 >  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
 >'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody. I agree with Marge Steiner: These are rather dubious reports. I'm
 willing to allow that the songs were collected from tradition, but
 Niles could have introduced them himself. Source, not collector. A report of the Coventry Carol strikes me as most dubious. There
 is no reason to think this song was ever traditional. We have our
 copies from old manuscripts -- now burnt! If there is a version
 in oral tradition, it was probably introduced from a written
 source. Now I'm not saying that makes the song untraditional,
 or that there is something wrong with songs introduced into the
 tradition from written sources. But this is just the sort of
 thing I'd expect of Niles. Don't mistake me: I *do* think Niles collected songs from tradition,
 and had some songs within his own family tradition. But I also think
 that one can never trust him in the absence of strong supporting
 evidence. These collections of your father constitute supporting
 evidence in the cases of those two songs -- if they weren't
 traditional at the Niles did whatever he did, they are now.
 But that is no help in assessing any of his other dubious
 pieces.
  >>I have been able to do a little further research on the Christmas Carols
which Niles published.  Unfortunately at the time I found the booklet - close
to 30 years ago, I did not copy the title page, and so I can't say for
certain when it was published, although I suspect the information could be
found at the Library of Congress.  Niles claims to have collected the songs
from an un-named old lady in Tennessee in 1934.  The fact that my father
learned them virtually indentically in West Virginia in 1939 may support the
theory that the family learned them via performance by Niles, although the
melodies are odd enough that I am somewhat doubtful that they could be
learned so closely without multiple listenings.  As to the idea that they
were learned from the booklet, I think this extremely unlikely as the booklet
was not widely distributed and written for a scholarly audience (Opposite
each carol is a page which is blank except for a small sentence at the top
"Reserved the the student's notes and comments).  The family my father spent
that Christmas with was a coal mining family living near the poverty level,
and unlikely to be buying esoteric music books.
   I have heard another singer sing a very similar version of Jesus, Jesus
rest your head from a different source, so I am convinced that it is in
tradition.  As for the Coventry Carol, the fact that there seems to be only
one American traditional source does cast suspicion on it.  It seems
plausable that these songs may originate from Niles, but have been picked up
by traditional singers and therefore passed into oral tradition like "I
Wonder As I Wander".  Regardless, I have sung them for many years as songs
which I learned as a child from my father, and so, at least in my family,
they are certainly traditional.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 22:09:52 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


There is a film review of "John Jacob Niles" by Bill McNeil in JAF, 1979, p.
521, but it doesn't touch on his scholarship.  I recall some discussion by
D. K. Wilgus, probably in a record review, but can't put my hands on it yet.Niles did collect some material, at least early in his career; his book,
"Singing Soldiers" is of considerable interest for that particular genre.
It was unfortunate that at the height of his popularity in the folk revival
(ca late 1950s) it was more fashionable to have collected an unusual variant
than to have rearranged it.  I can't help but compare him to Fritz Kreisler,
who initially palmed off many of his finest compositions as reworkings of
old pieces he found in manuscripts in a European monastary library.
Eventually he 'fessed up, and outraged some critics who had been taken in.
If Niles had up front presented "Judas" etc. as his own arrangements he
would have had quite a different response.In his review, Bill castigates Niles' style in the strongest terms.  I
suppose I'm among the few (perhaps only?) folksong aficionados who actually
enjoys his singing -- tho I would certainly not make any claims for its
traditionality.  (WIth that I hastily hide behind a protective barrier
against the barrage of criticism that I now expect.)Norm Cohen

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:36:49 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Dear Norm,Could you elaborate on "Singing Soldiers" a little more?Thanks,Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 13:42:18 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(74 lines)


Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the Niles discussion. It's clear
that few of us trust his publications, but it's a shame there doesn't seem
to have been a proper study of his work from this point of view, as I think
we still need to answer some basic questions.
His publications of the 1930s (Songs of the Hill-Folk, and More Songs of
the Hill-Folk, for example) follow the standard pattern for 'popular' books
of the time. The cover and title-page state "Collected and simply
arranged... by John Jacob Niles", and each song is attributed to a
particular place (e.g. "Whitesburg, Letcher County, Kentucky"). Thus the
authenticity of the songs is implied but not really stated, and being
popular works we know to treat them with caution.
His Ballad Book of 1961, however, is in a completely different league. It
has all the paraphernalia of a scholarly collection. Each song is
accompanied by the name of the singer(s), their address, the date of
recording, sketches of their character, and incidental details of when and
how he met them.
On the surface, this seems to be everything we could wish for. But we still
mistrust him, and not only for his peculiar-looking instruments! Did he
invent the whole thing, cobbling together texts from books and pretending
they were from singers who didn't really exist? Did he really collect from
these people but 'doctor/edit/fake' their texts? The Ballad Book was
published less that 25 years after the supposed dates of collection, I would
have thought the complete fake would have been relatively easily exposed by
the real experts who were around at the time and who were perfectly happy to
savage each other for sloppy scholarship. Is there anything which can be
salvaged from his material, or do we simply resign it to the dustbin en
masse?
It is perhaps ominous that the only major collection of his papers which I
have tracked down (I've misplaced the correspondence for a moment, but can
let people know details if they wish to follow it up) apparently contains no
fieldwork material at all.
If someone's looking for a Thesis topic, may I suggest Niles as a potential
subject?
(I've just, somewhat belatedly, checked the JAF Centennial Index, and there
are a few reviews which need following up, which I will report on if they
say anything relevant).
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles> There is a film review of "John Jacob Niles" by Bill McNeil in JAF, 1979,
p.
> 521, but it doesn't touch on his scholarship.  I recall some discussion by
> D. K. Wilgus, probably in a record review, but can't put my hands on it
yet.
>
> Niles did collect some material, at least early in his career; his book,
> "Singing Soldiers" is of considerable interest for that particular genre.
> It was unfortunate that at the height of his popularity in the folk
revival
> (ca late 1950s) it was more fashionable to have collected an unusual
variant
> than to have rearranged it.  I can't help but compare him to Fritz
Kreisler,
> who initially palmed off many of his finest compositions as reworkings of
> old pieces he found in manuscripts in a European monastary library.
> Eventually he 'fessed up, and outraged some critics who had been taken in.
> If Niles had up front presented "Judas" etc. as his own arrangements he
> would have had quite a different response.
>
> In his review, Bill castigates Niles' style in the strongest terms.  I
> suppose I'm among the few (perhaps only?) folksong aficionados who
actually
> enjoys his singing -- tho I would certainly not make any claims for its
> traditionality.  (WIth that I hastily hide behind a protective barrier
> against the barrage of criticism that I now expect.)
>
> Norm Cohen

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Brief Mentions
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:35:55 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(43 lines)


Folks:I somehow managed to squeeze in a few moments to look over two recent
purchases: Hugh Anderson's _Farewell to Judges and Juries_ and the
festschrift for Edward "Sandy" Ives printed as Vol. 35 of _Northeast
Folklore._Despite their vast geographical differences -- Anderson is writing about
Australia, Ives spent his career in Maine and the Maritimes -- the two men
share an overwhelming belief in the need to place folk song in the larger
social context.  Thus Anderson's work is as much a history of
transportation (of convicts, not trains and such) as it is a collection of
broadsides devoted to that subject.  And the essays in the Ives
festschrift range widely from collecting to performance practice to
boatbuilding practices in Nova Scotia.Both books too are summations, if that is the correct word, of a lifetime
of scholarship, of devotion to a subject not widely honored in the
academy.  It would be hard to imagine a more engaging or comprehensive
book on convict transportation and the peopling of Australia by Britons
than Anderson's wide-ranging, heavily illustrated collection of ballads,
magazine articles, woodblocks, court cases, and pointed ephemera.Similarly, there is the custom of honoring beloved/influential teachers
with a collection of scholarly essays by former students and colleagues,
a festschrift.  The articles are supposed to reflect the range of the
honoree's work, his/her interests, and teaching.  Thus from editor
Pauleena MacDougall's biographical sketch of Edward Dawson Ives (aka
"Sandy") to Otto Willwood's concluding piece on the lost recordings of a
local logger we have a summary of Ives' work.I recommend both.EdP.S.  I noted in MacDougall's biography that Ives attended graduate school
at Indiana in 1960-61 with a group that included Bob Georges, Ellen
Stekert, Judith McCulloh, Joe Hickerson, and Alan Dundes.  (I might add
that the late Gus Meade, perhaps the most promising of ballad scholars,
was also among that lot.)  I was supposed to go there too (I suspect that
they recruited me because they wanted a five-string banjo picker; it sure
wasn't for my undergraduate grades).  In retrospect, I am glad I didn't
attend; I would have been the courtesy "B" in that company.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bruce virus
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:42:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


Ah...
12 years on the 'net and my very first "Tell everyone you know."I got virused to day by a feller named bruce.I am not knowledgeable on this but I'll just give you the best I got.It came as 5 e-mails from Bruce ???crief?? and addressed to me and several
others - each item differently.  The subject line in each was the same as
different executable e-mails I've received recently (FL_Ballot.exe, etc)
Remarkably each had some 546 lines in the message.Since this looked odd but had friendly Subjects, I saved to disk instead of
launching direct from my Reader. I ran MacAfee Viruscan with definitions
file 4.0.4099 (Nov 12, 2000) (and full heuristics) which showed then clean.I manually launched one (FW_.exe, etc) & got zapped.I use Win95-B and it put a command somewhere in my registry that almost any
Windows program call _must_ be proceeded by using winsvrc.exe, which it
can't find.  A Windows-looking dialog asks its location.  Of course it
doesn't exist.  I tried to fool it by creating an empty file _called_
winsvrc.exe in the root directory but then the virus simply claims that
_none_ of my programs are Windows 95 programs and cannot be run.  The
desktop opened more or less normally & Windows Explorer (which had been
open) worked ok but I could not run any significant or system program.I'm a good backer-upper and wished to restore User.dat, (user.da0 is also
corrupted by this wiseguy), and System.dat and System.ini and Win.ini (just
to be sure - I don't know I need them all) But back-up is a windows-based
program and won't work.Finally, since I (cheerfully patting myself on the back with both hands and
both feet) use Backup Version 6 from Win 3.95 (because it will _include_
selected files, not just _exclude_ them) I was able to drop to DOS and
restore the 4 files.I suffered no loss at all except about two hours of confusion.Strongly recommend:
Look out for e-mail of 546 or so lines
Back up the 4 system files in such a way they can be restored in DOS
        eg Win 3.x Back-up or perhaps create a Safe folder (directory) &
just copy them from \Windows to this.
        You'll need some DOS program that will deal with deleting, and
copying files that are marked Read-only, System, and Hidden.  (Norton
Commander or FA.exe to change the characturists, eg.)  Windows Explorer may
work if you can get _it_ to work.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bruce virus
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 20:42:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(109 lines)


On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Abby Sale wrote:> Ah...
> 12 years on the 'net and my very first "Tell everyone you know."
>
> I got virused to day by a feller named bruce.
>
> I am not knowledgeable on this but I'll just give you the best I got.
>
> It came as 5 e-mails from Bruce ???crief?? and addressed to me and several
> others - each item differently.  The subject line in each was the same as
> different executable e-mails I've received recently (FL_Ballot.exe, etc)
> Remarkably each had some 546 lines in the message.
>
> Since this looked odd but had friendly Subjects, I saved to disk instead of
> launching direct from my Reader. I ran MacAfee Viruscan with definitions
> file 4.0.4099 (Nov 12, 2000) (and full heuristics) which showed then clean.        You should have immediately downloaded the latest definitions
file, and even then, it *might* be too new to be recognized.  These
virus writers work fast to make new ones, unfortunately.> I manually launched one (FW_.exe, etc) & got zapped.        A basic rule is that *any* executable should not be trusted
unless:1)      You know the person who sent it to you.2)      You *knew* that he was going to send it to you, or have
        confirmed via phone conversation that he did send it to you, and
        *why*.3)      You know *what* it is supposed to do -- and you need to do
        that.        If you don't do all of this -- put it on a sacrificial computer
which has nothing important on it, and see whether it trashes *that*
machine -- don't trust it on your main system.        It may well be that your computer sent off copies of this under
*your* name to people in *your* address list, while it was trashing the
rest of the system.> I use Win95-B and it put a command somewhere in my registry that almost any
> Windows program call _must_ be proceeded by using winsvrc.exe, which it
> can't find.  A Windows-looking dialog asks its location.  Of course it
> doesn't exist.  I tried to fool it by creating an empty file _called_
> winsvrc.exe in the root directory but then the virus simply claims that
> _none_ of my programs are Windows 95 programs and cannot be run.  The
> desktop opened more or less normally & Windows Explorer (which had been
> open) worked ok but I could not run any significant or system program.        It may be expecting some kind of return from that winsvrc.exe
whenever it is run.  I don't do Windows, so I don't know whether it is a
standard program which the trojan deleted, or something that it was
going to add to do more mischief every time you booted or tried to run
some other program.> I'm a good backer-upper and wished to restore User.dat, (user.da0 is also
> corrupted by this wiseguy), and System.dat and System.ini and Win.ini (just
> to be sure - I don't know I need them all) But back-up is a windows-based
> program and won't work.
>
> Finally, since I (cheerfully patting myself on the back with both hands and
> both feet) use Backup Version 6 from Win 3.95 (because it will _include_
> selected files, not just _exclude_ them) I was able to drop to DOS and
> restore the 4 files.
>
> I suffered no loss at all except about two hours of confusion.        You probably need to find reports of this in some of the
anti-virus sites, to see whether it also adds other nasty programs
(perhaps named the same as a normal system program) which will bite you
later.> Strongly recommend:
> Look out for e-mail of 546 or so lines        Look out for *any* executable attachment.  Treat it like a
scorpion or a poisonous snake.  (I'm fairly safe, because I don't run a
system which knows *how* to run a .exe file. :-)> Back up the 4 system files in such a way they can be restored in DOS
>         eg Win 3.x Back-up or perhaps create a Safe folder (directory) &
> just copy them from \Windows to this.
>         You'll need some DOS program that will deal with deleting, and
> copying files that are marked Read-only, System, and Hidden.  (Norton
> Commander or FA.exe to change the characturists, eg.)  Windows Explorer may
> work if you can get _it_ to work.        While you're about it -- keep copies of the programs which you
use for restoring on floppies, in case what you have gets blown away.
And *don't* trust a folder which is on the system when the virus
strikes.  It may search through for other copies to corrupt.  It is a
*lot* safer having the backups on floppies or tapes.  And -- when you
try to restore, to have the write-protection tab turned on, so the virus
can't trash your backups while you are trying to restore.        I *hope* that you got it all -- but visit symantec's site, or
one of the others, to make *sure* about it.        Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bruce virus
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 26 Nov 2000 10:09:42 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(25 lines) , text/html(28 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Kenneth Peacock
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:44:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Neil Rosenberg just sent this to the Canadian folklore list.  Peacock
was a prolific and at times controversial collector who worked in
several different parts of the country.  He is probably best known for
his three volume collection, _Songs of the Newfoundland Outports_.Cheers
Jamie>Anna Guigne tells me that Kenneth Peacock died last Wednesday.
>He'd been in poor health for some time, and had been in hospital where
>he
>contracted pneumonia.  I haven't seen anything about this in
>print--though
>perhaps it was in the G&M which I haven't seen since then.  Anyhow, I
>think
>it's important to note his passing since he did so much for the study of
>vernacular music in Canada. Perhaps you can send a note to our
>FSAC  "list"?>Cheers
>N.>Neil V. Rosenberg,  Department of Folklore
>Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF A1B 3X8
>Office: 709-737-8405; fax: 709-737-4718

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:04:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Ed,Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:25:09 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


Hi Andy:
Singing Soldiers, by John J. Niles.  NY - London:  Chas Scribner's Sons,
1927.  Dedication:
"To the American Negro Soldiers who made this writing possible."  (!)
According to the Introduction, Niles was a member of the A.E.F. when, in
Paris in 1917, he "ran onto a paper-bound volume of French war-songs by
Monsieur Theodore Botrel, titled 'Les Chants du BIvouac.'"  Niles says that
gave him the idea to collect US Army war songs:  "...to make as nearly as
possible an unexpurgate record of the words and to write off the tunes
whenever I had time and music-score paper."  He goes on to say that he was
almost losing interest in the project when he encountered some negro troops:
"At last I had discovered something original--a kind of folk music, brought
up to date and adapted to the war situations--at the same time savoring of
the haunting melodic value found in the negro music I had known as a boy in
Kentucky."  So he spent the next seven years, while a pilot in the U.S. Air
Service, gathering songs.  He ended up with 29 songs, embedded in sort of a
personal diary of his experiences.   Most of the songs are unfamiliar; a few
are parodies of familiar spirituals (e.g., "Roll Jordan Roll); a few are
blues-like.  I can't vouch for the accuracy of the transcriptions, but I'd
be really surprised if J.J. wrote--or even did more than minor touching
up--any of them. That's a quick summary; hope it's useful.
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles>Dear Norm,
>
>Could you elaborate on "Singing Soldiers" a little more?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Andy
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:39:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Is there an email address?
Norm
>
>Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
>from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
>distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
>find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
>South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
>
>Cheers
>Jamie
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:13:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


Norm:Sorry, no email address on the book.  The University of Maine Press,
Orono, ought to be in the telephone directory.  The ISBN number is
0-89101-100-5.EdOn Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Is there an email address?
> Norm
> >
> >Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
> >from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
> >distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
> >find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
> >South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:16:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


You can e-mail Pauleena MacDougall at [unmask]  I
can't wait till my copy arrives.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Ed Cray
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 1:13 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: Brief MentionsNorm:Sorry, no email address on the book.  The University of Maine Press,
Orono, ought to be in the telephone directory.  The ISBN number is
0-89101-100-5.EdOn Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Is there an email address?
> Norm
> >
> >Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
> >from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
> >distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
> >find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
> >South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:10:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


The center's e-mail address is [unmask]  There is also
a web page at www.umaine.edu/folklife, though we're still in the
process of updating the publications section.  Should be taken care of
this week.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:39:26 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


A couple of years ago, I had a brief correspondence with JJN's son.
As I recall, he was a musician, perhaps a conductor, living in
Germany.  He might be able to help out with these questions.  He
defended his father to me, saying that he was an entertainer who
never claimed to be a scholar.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Nancy-Jean Seigel <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:18:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


You are referring to John Edward Niles, son of John Jacob.  He is currently
Director and conductor at the Opera Theatre of Northern Virginia.   It would be
interesting for you to continue that conversation in light of this discussion.
However,  you probably got all you're gonna git!   ( Look here:
http://www.alamero.com/demo/index.htm) .Is there a second son also involved with music?John Garst <[unmask]>@[unmask]> on 11/28/2000 01:39:26 PMPlease respond to Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>Sent by:  Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>To:   [unmask]
cc:Subject:  Re: John Jacob NilesA couple of years ago, I had a brief correspondence with JJN's son.
As I recall, he was a musician, perhaps a conductor, living in
Germany.  He might be able to help out with these questions.  He
defended his father to me, saying that he was an entertainer who
never claimed to be a scholar.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:21:23 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(65 lines)


Catching up after the holidays.  Has anyone yet suggested getting in touch
with Ron Pen at Kentucky?  He's studied Niles serious for some time now.
Unless someone else surfaces sooner, I expect that Ron will do the Niles
book.In the summer of 1953 Niles performed at Aspen, Colorado, near Glenwood
Springs, where I was waiting tables in a resort hotel.  He sang many of
the pieces I knew from his LPs, and his voice had that same high
theatrical cast.  My memory (admittedly dim at this point) is that he
plucked/strummed a cello that had been cut in half along the sides (i.e.,
retaining the front surface) and whenever possible, at the ends of
phrases, wafted his right arm into the air so that the brilliant rings he
was wearing caught the light.  Made quite an impression on all the
blue-haired ladies present.JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the Niles discussion. It's clear
> that few of us trust his publications, but it's a shame there doesn't seem
> to have been a proper study of his work from this point of view, as I think
> we still need to answer some basic questions.
> His publications of the 1930s (Songs of the Hill-Folk, and More Songs of
> the Hill-Folk, for example) follow the standard pattern for 'popular' books
> of the time. The cover and title-page state "Collected and simply
> arranged... by John Jacob Niles", and each song is attributed to a
> particular place (e.g. "Whitesburg, Letcher County, Kentucky"). Thus the
> authenticity of the songs is implied but not really stated, and being
> popular works we know to treat them with caution.
> His Ballad Book of 1961, however, is in a completely different league. It
> has all the paraphernalia of a scholarly collection. Each song is
> accompanied by the name of the singer(s), their address, the date of
> recording, sketches of their character, and incidental details of when and
> how he met them.
> On the surface, this seems to be everything we could wish for. But we still
> mistrust him, and not only for his peculiar-looking instruments! Did he
> invent the whole thing, cobbling together texts from books and pretending
> they were from singers who didn't really exist? Did he really collect from
> these people but 'doctor/edit/fake' their texts? The Ballad Book was
> published less that 25 years after the supposed dates of collection, I would
> have thought the complete fake would have been relatively easily exposed by
> the real experts who were around at the time and who were perfectly happy to
> savage each other for sloppy scholarship. Is there anything which can be
> salvaged from his material, or do we simply resign it to the dustbin en
> masse?
> It is perhaps ominous that the only major collection of his papers which I
> have tracked down (I've misplaced the correspondence for a moment, but can
> let people know details if they wish to follow it up) apparently contains no
> fieldwork material at all.
> If someone's looking for a Thesis topic, may I suggest Niles as a potential
> subject?
> (I've just, somewhat belatedly, checked the JAF Centennial Index, and there
> are a few reviews which need following up, which I will report on if they
> say anything relevant).
> Steve Roud

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: Gerald Porter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:01:14 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Dear Andy,
Another (indirect) Robin Hood item in Shakespeare is his use of 'under
the greenwood tree' in As You Like It 2.5.1 or thereabouts.  It comes
into that fabulous ballad Robin Hood and the Monk (Child 119), which I
would be eternally grateful to you for providing a tune for.Cheers, Gerald

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:15:20 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


Gerald --The only tune I've seen to Child 119 is in _The Ballad Book of John Jacob
Niles_.  (Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1961.)  As you know, this
collection has been much excoriated b y scholars, and it may be that the song
was composed by Mr. Niles himself.  Nevertheless, it's a good singable tune.
The words do not contain any reference to the Greenwood Tree. If you don't
have access to the book, and are interested,  I'll be glad to send you a
Xerox copy, for which I would need your snail-mail address.Sam Hinton
9420 La Jolla Shores Drive
La Jolla, CA, USA, 92037
< [unmask] >

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: JJ NIles dulcimer
From: Margaret MacArthur <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:36:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Judy McCulloh wrote
>My memory (admittedly dim at this point) is that he
>plucked/strummed a cello that had been cut in half along the sides (i.e.,
>retaining the front surface)I have a big awkward dulcimer given to me by a woman from NY in the early
60s, supposedly made by Niles.  There is no signiture.  The frets seem to
be totally random, I don't see how it could have been played, but perhaps
it was fretted for one particular song, an odd tune it would be.I never heard Niles in person, but did enjoy his recordings, and respected
his interest in the long ballad.Margaret MacArthur

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Help With Sword Dance- Music?
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:01:39 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(196 lines)


I have submitted this to the mudcat dt with no luck yet....
What do you think....
Does anyone have the tune referred to or other music for this?
Many thanks in advance for your fine work....ConradSword Dancers
 It is still the practice, though less in repute than formerly, during the
Christmas holidays, for companies of pitmen and other workmen from the
neighbouring collieries to visit
 Sunderland, Durham, &c. to perform a sort of Play or Dance, accompanied by
song and music. Their appearance is hailed by the children with great satisfaction, and
they receive liberal contributions from the spectators.
 The dancers are girded with swords, and clad in white shirts or tunics,
decorated with a profusion of ribbands, or various colours, gathered from
the wardrobes of their mistresses and
 well-wishers.  The captain generallly wears a kind of faded uniform, with
a large cocked hat and feather, for pre-eminent distinction; and the
buffoon, or "Bessy," who acts as treasurer,
 and collects the cash in a tobacco-box, wears a hairy cap, with a fox's
brush* dependent.
 The music is simple, and not devoid of harmony: its peculiar beauty
depends, perhaps greatly, on the force of early associations.
 The party assemble promiscuously, and the captain forms a circle with his
sword, round which he walks, and sings; each actor following as he is
called upon. Six actors I have brought,
 Who were never on stage before;
 But they will do their best,
 And the best can do no more. The first that I call in,
 He is a squire's son;
 He's like to lose his love,
 Because he is too young. But though he be too young,
 He has money for to rove;
 And he will spend it all,
 Before he'll lose his love. The next that I call in,
 He is a taylor fine;
 What think you of his work?--
 He made this coat of mine. So comes good master Snip,
 His best respects to pay:
 He joins us in our trip,
 To drive dull care away. The next that I call in,
 He is a sailor bold;
 He's come to poverty
 By the lending of his gold. But though his gold's all gone,
 Again he'll plough the main,
 With heart both light and brave,
 To fight both France and Spain. Next comes a skipper bold,
 He'll do his part right weel;
 A clever blade, I'm told,
 As ever poy'd** a keel, Oh! the keel lads are bonny bonny lads,
 As I do understand;
 For they run both fore and aft,
 With their long sets in their hands. To join us in this play,
 Here comes a jolly dog,
 Who's soberevery day,
 When he can get no grog. But though he likes his grog,
 As all his friends can say,
 He always likes it best,
 When he has nought to pay. Last I come in mysel,
 I make one of this crew;
 And if you'd know my name,
 My name it is True Blue. *** The Dance then begins in slow, and measured cadence; which soon increases
in spirit, and at length bears the appearance of a serious
 affray.  The Rector, alarmed rushes forward to prevent bloodshed; and, in
his endeavours to separate the combatants, he receives a mortal blow, and
falls to the ground.
 Then follows the lament--the general accusation - and denial. Alas! our rector's dead,
 And on the ground is laid;
 some of us must suffer for't,
 Young men, I'm sore afraid. I'm sure 'twas none of I--
 I'm clear of the crime;
 'Twas him that follows me
 That drew his sword so fine. I'm sure 'twas none of I--
 I'm clear of the fact;
 'Twas him that follows me
 That did this bloody act. I'm sure 'twas none of I,
 Ye bloody villains all!
 For both my eyes were shut
 When this good man did fall. Then cheer up, my bonny bonny lads,
 And be of courage bold;
 For we'll take him to the church,
 and we'll bury him in the mould. Captain.--Oh! for a doctor, a right good doctor,
                  A ten pound doctor, oh! Doctor.-- Here am I. Captain-- Doctor, what's your fee? Doctor-- Ten pounds is my fee; but nine pounds, nineteen shillings, and
eleven pence,
               three farthings, will I take from thee. See here, see here, a doctor rare,
 Who travels much at home;
 Come, take my pills--they cure all ills,
 Past present and to come. The plague, the palsy, and the gout,
 The devil within, and the devil without--
 Every thing but a love-sick maid--
 And a consumption in the pocket. Take a little of my nif-naf,
 Put it on your tif-taf.
 Parson, rise up, and fight again,
 The doctor says you are not slain. The rector gradually recovers, which is the signal for general rejoicing
and congratulation. Captain-- You've seen them all call'd in,
 You've seen them all go round;
 Wait but a little while--
 Some pastime will be found. Cox-green's a bonny place,
 Where water washes clean;
 And Painshaw's on a hill,
 Where we have merry been. Then, fiddler, change thy tune,
 Play us a merry jig;
 Before that I'll be beat,
 I'll pawn both hat and wig. A general dance concludes the performance, to the old and favorite tune
of,
 "Kitty, Kitty, bo, bo!" *Query- if this was not formerly meant to represent the Lion's skin of the
ancient heros; and this is not the only classical allusion used by the
Sword Dancers, for a "Bessy" on the
 borders of Yorkshire, was heard to sing:
 "I've liv'd among musick these forty long years,
 And Drunk of the elegant spring"
 There can be little doubt that Helicon was the original reading. **Puoy, Puy, or Pouie, a long pole with an iron spike at the end; used in
propelling keels in shallow water.--Fr. appui. Brockett's Glossary. The
Puoy on the Tyne is the Set on the Wear. *** AT this part, the "Bessy" sometimes considers it necessary to give
some account of his own genealogy, viz:
 My father he was hang'd
 My mother was drown'd in a well;
 And now I' se left alone,
 All by my awn sel. -source: The Bishoprick Garland or a Collection of Legends, Songs Ballads
&c.. Belonging to The County of Durham. London: Nichols, and Baldwin &
Cradock.
 1834.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Help With Sword Dance- Music?
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:12:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Looks like something from the old Mummers Plays that show up in the annual
Christmas Revels productions, Conrad.  It's sung to a simple morris dance
tune.  The charm is in the "acting."  Check the Washington Revels website
and go from there:  www.revelsdc.orgI'm attending the Washington production tonight (dress rehearsal show).
I'll see what form the play takes in the Celtic production (if it's there).Happy hunting.Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio
Washington, DC

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sword dance tune found Kitty bo-bo
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:29:36 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Of all things it was in the back of the book....
presumably though this is not the only tune used in the
dance....
It will be up on the related page with midi and notation
in a moment
http://www.geocities.com/matalizi/priests12.htmlT:Kitty Bo-Bo (Sword Dance Tune)
M:3/4
L:1/8
S:Bishoprick Garland
K:G
|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|B2G2B2|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|A2F2A2:||:GBdBdc|B2G2B2|GBdB
dB|A2F2A2:|Conrad Bladey

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sword dance tune found Kitty bo-bo
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:16:46 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


Ok I am ready for a break...must be all that liquid nails
used in working on the artcar (glued 30 more barbies on the cab roof of the
truck via magnet...)
I found the book had both tunes !@!@!@!#
so now the tunes you did know you can know!
Just go here midi, abc, notation....
http://www.geocities.com/matalzi/priests12.html#SworddancersConradConrad Bladey ***Peasant**** wrote:
>
> Of all things it was in the back of the book....
> presumably though this is not the only tune used in the
> dance....
> It will be up on the related page with midi and notation
> in a moment
> http://www.geocities.com/matalizi/priests12.html
>
> T:Kitty Bo-Bo (Sword Dance Tune)
> M:3/4
> L:1/8
> S:Bishoprick Garland
> K:G
> |gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|B2G2B2|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|A2F2A2:||:GBdBdc|B2G2B2|GBdB
> dB|A2F2A2:|
>
> Conrad Bladey--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sword Dance tune found
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:57:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


Conrad found the tunes in the first paragraph below while I was working
on this note. I forgot to change the reply address to that of Ballad-L,
so my message, below, went only to him. Here it is for all on the list.[My reprint edition, 1969, of Sharp's 'Bishopric Garland' has, on
pp 85-6, some tunes said to be from 'From Topliffe's Melodies
&c.', the first of which is entitled "Sword Dancers", and the
second is that of "Kitty-bo-bo".]That is, I believe the earliest recorded folk play. (The earlier
Revesby/ Raresby play is modeled along the lines of a folk play,
but isn't really 'folk'. Note that one song in it is based on "Last
Christmas 'twas my chance". Song and tune are on my website.)Two verses in Sharp's text, starting "See, here, see here a doctor rare"
are derived from a song with music in 'Pills to Purge Melancholy', V, p.
311, 1719-20 (originally in 'Pills', IV, 1706), where it starts "See,
sirs, see here! a Doctor rare". The 'Pills' heading is: 'The Mountebank
Song. Set and Sung by Mr. Leveridge, in a New Play call'd Farewell to
Folly', which is not quite correct. I've now lost my very old notes
tracking this, but according to my memory the song wasn't in Motteux's
play, but was sung as an interlude with it. The play was given at Drury
Lane Theatre in 1705 and published in 1707. [Some other folk plays
contain a bit more of the 'Pills' song. In others the doctor's lines are
based on a similar song "The Infallible Doctor", commencing 'From
France, from Spain from Rome I come', dating from 1686, and in 'Pills',
III, p. 31, 1719-20. The model for these mountebank doctors' songs is in
a manuscript of a court entertainment of 1618, 'The Anti-Masque of the
Mountebanks', much of which is reprinted in John Wardroper's 'Love and
Drollery', #220, 1969]Re: 'elegant spring' may have been originally been 'Helicon
spring', if so, it later turned into 'elecampagne', an extract of
the roots of which was used as a tonic or stimulant. We find it
in later folk plays as 'elecome pain', 'elegant paint', and
'Hallecumb pain' among the doctor's medicines (of which two drops
can restore the dead to life - R. J. E. Tiddy's 'The Mummers
Play'). [Cf. also 'Waters of Absalon' in the cante-fable "Little
Dicky Milburn/ Whigburn"]Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:23:17 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(88 lines)


Folks:For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.Ed-----Original Message-----
From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American MemoryGood afternoon,This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
apologies for any duplicate postings.Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
can be found at the following url:
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> . Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
materials include such highlights as:The first broadside account of Washington crossing the Delaware River in
1776.The Gerry-Mander, the 1812 caricature of the salamander-shaped
congressional district created by Federalist polemicists to satirize the
Massachusetts redistricting law spawned by zealous Republican colleagues
of Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts.A Western anti-slavery handbill, ca. 1850, urging Ohioans to “TURN OUT!”
for an abolition meeting and “Learn Your Duty to Yourselves, the Slave
and God.”The final issue of the Vicksburg Daily Citizen, July 4, 1863, printed on
wallpaper.An 1864 campaign souvenir “Lincoln Business Card,” suggesting that in
the spring of 1865 Lincoln would be at home in Illinois splitting rails
and swapping horses rather than residing at the White House.A reward poster for John Wilkes Booth (1865).One of the earliest printed references to baseball (1859).The National Woman Suffrage Association’s “Declaration and Protest of
the Women of the United States,” July 4, 1876, calling for the
impeachment of the nation's rulers.A poster from the mayor of San Francisco printed following the
earthquake and fire of 1906, warning that law enforcement officials
“have been authorized to KILL any and all persons found engaged in
Looting or in the Commission of Any Other Crime.”Much of the material in this collection was produced as events unfolded,
offering a unique snapshot of America's past that captures the concerns
and conditions of everyday living. Many of the items, never intended to
be kept for future generations, nonetheless provide important historical
information.  For example, an advertisement for paint from 1783 gives
clues about the colors that adorned the homes of the nation's earliest
citizens.  An 1840 poster for a lost dog shows that owners felt as
strongly about their pets 150 years ago as they do today.American Memory  is a project of the National Digital Library Program of
the Library of Congress. The Web site offers more than five million
historically important items of American history, in collaboration with
other institutions. More than ninety American Memory collections are now
available on topics ranging from presidential papers and photographs
from the Civil War to early films of Thomas Edison and panoramic maps,
to documents from the women's suffrage
and civil rights movements. The Library of Congress website can be found
at <www.loc.gov> .Please direct any questions to [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time CapsuleCollection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory(fwd)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:43:13 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(119 lines)


Indeed!
I was just in rare books at loc last week searching the
bound index.
Located a pamphlet on pope day but in the same file.....
a broadside from boston - not cataloged!
18th c.
Before I had a chance to fill in the form to have it copied
and go across the street to pay up and wait....
I had confirmation from a phonecall to the appropriate
office that it had just been digitized and would be on line
this week.....
So there it was today....
and not only images but full text....ConradEd Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --
>
> In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.
>
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
> apologies for any duplicate postings.
>
> Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
> Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory
>
>  In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
> Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
> American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
> thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
> of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
> can be found at the following url:
> <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .
>
>  Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
> Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
> materials include such highlights as:
>
> The first broadside account of Washington crossing the Delaware River in
> 1776.
>
> The Gerry-Mander, the 1812 caricature of the salamander-shaped
> congressional district created by Federalist polemicists to satirize the
> Massachusetts redistricting law spawned by zealous Republican colleagues
> of Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts.
>
> A Western anti-slavery handbill, ca. 1850, urging Ohioans to “TURN OUT!”
> for an abolition meeting and “Learn Your Duty to Yourselves, the Slave
> and God.”
>
> The final issue of the Vicksburg Daily Citizen, July 4, 1863, printed on
> wallpaper.
>
> An 1864 campaign souvenir “Lincoln Business Card,” suggesting that in
> the spring of 1865 Lincoln would be at home in Illinois splitting rails
> and swapping horses rather than residing at the White House.
>
> A reward poster for John Wilkes Booth (1865).
>
> One of the earliest printed references to baseball (1859).
>
> The National Woman Suffrage Association’s “Declaration and Protest of
> the Women of the United States,” July 4, 1876, calling for the
> impeachment of the nation's rulers.
>
> A poster from the mayor of San Francisco printed following the
> earthquake and fire of 1906, warning that law enforcement officials
> “have been authorized to KILL any and all persons found engaged in
> Looting or in the Commission of Any Other Crime.”
>
> Much of the material in this collection was produced as events unfolded,
> offering a unique snapshot of America's past that captures the concerns
> and conditions of everyday living. Many of the items, never intended to
> be kept for future generations, nonetheless provide important historical
> information.  For example, an advertisement for paint from 1783 gives
> clues about the colors that adorned the homes of the nation's earliest
> citizens.  An 1840 poster for a lost dog shows that owners felt as
> strongly about their pets 150 years ago as they do today.
>
> American Memory  is a project of the National Digital Library Program of
> the Library of Congress. The Web site offers more than five million
> historically important items of American history, in collaboration with
> other institutions. More than ninety American Memory collections are now
> available on topics ranging from presidential papers and photographs
> from the Civil War to early films of Thomas Edison and panoramic maps,
> to documents from the women's suffrage
> and civil rights movements. The Library of Congress website can be found
> at <www.loc.gov> .
>
> Please direct any questions to [unmask]--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: W a s s a i l Listings Free! for 2000 send them in!
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:22:34 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Free listing of all Wassail events...If you are a wassailer...and everyone should be....
read on if not just delete but not before sending this on
to a Wassailer!
As you may know....the Wassail Epicenter at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5567/wassail.html
Contains a page upon which Wassail events of all kinds all
over the world are listed. This is a free service!The waswhere page is:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5567/waswhere.htmlWant to have your event listed?
Simple- just send me an e.mail and I will add your event in.
The pages have become very popular and you will be noticed.
Just another service of Hutman Productions....(most of our web
work is donated to the world and not commercial....to help us
you may go to http://www.cbladey.com and click on the help us link on the
right)
To let us know of your event send e.mail to:
[unmask]Please feel free to send this onward via snail or net to those who may not
be on one of these lists. Then help them to reach us.Many thanks for your kind assistance.Enjoy!
Since last year many new songs and verses have been added.
Your help is always greatly appreciated.Conrad

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Gigs
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:28:42 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
"performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
frame of mind?Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
light carriages?Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:59:58 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Oxford Dictionary of Slang (1998) dates its earliest appearance to 1926 and
says it was applied to musicians playing an engagement playing jazz,
dance-music etc. - The usage example given implies that the word was used
also (and perhaps previously) to mean a job. " ... knockin' himself out on a
mail-handler gig at the Post Office where the pay is so lousy he's got to
work a part-time gig." but neither of the other uses of the word given in
this dictionary applies.
Origin is given as "Unknown"It would seem that the use of the term was at first confined within one or
two genres of music but has now become general.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 12:00:21 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


<<I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
"performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
frame of mind?Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
light carriages?>>The Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang lists first
reference as 1908, in the sense of "job" or occupation; in the sense of
"musical engagement, esp. for a single performance" first use is 1926, from
jazz slang. The only postulated definition is as a mutation of "gag", which
doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's noted as perhaps influenced by an
earlier definition from the policy racket, "a set of usually three numbers
played by a bettor", and that is noted in turn as perhaps being influenced
by the "two-wheeled, one-horse carriage". Lots of perhapses in there. Def.
1, by the way, is "a woman's vagina", but that doesn't sound like it's
closely related to the jazz usage. Perhaps it comes from what happens to
frogs at the end of a gig, and what happens to musicians ditto.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:24:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(26 lines)


Andy:Tony Thorne, _The Dictionary of Contemporary Slang_ states under
"gig": "The exact origin of the word [in speaking of a performance] is
obscure, but may be related to `jig' in the sense of a dance."In other words, he doesn't know either.None of my other slang or Americanism dictionaries is helpful.  "Gig" in
other uses (a child's pacifier, the female buttocks, etc.) seems to be
descended from the Creole.EdOn Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Andy Rouse wrote:> I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
> "performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
> frame of mind?
>
> Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
> was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
> light carriages?
>
> Andy
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:31:43 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Paul:I can't resist this.  Wentworth and Flexner in their dictionary of
American slang give multiple definitions of "gig."  They then add this
comment: "The relations, if any, btween a child's pacifier or fetish, the
rectum and vagina, a party, a sex orgy, jazz music, a pronged fork, and a
reprimand are most interesting, and lie in the field of psychology rather
than of etymology."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:16:05 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Certainly "jig" the dance is related to "gigue" or "giga" which were 6/8
dances used as the last movement in any number of Baroque suites.  The leap,
however, to 1920's jazz usage seems extremely remote.Mark

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:26:51 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


I found only about 70 songs by using the keywords "ballad" and "song."
However, there's a much bigger collection (couple thousand) at
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amsshtml/amsshome.html
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:23 PM
Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)Folks:For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.Ed-----Original Message-----
From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American MemoryGood afternoon,This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
apologies for any duplicate postings.Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American MemoryIn September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
can be found at the following url:
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
materials include such highlights as:

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:39:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.John Roberts.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time CapsuleCollection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory(fwd)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:49:58 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(69 lines)


These are later in time 19th century only
the others are from the rare book room.
and go way way back in some cases...
also more international.ConradNorm Cohen wrote:
>
> I found only about 70 songs by using the keywords "ballad" and "song."
> However, there's a much bigger collection (couple thousand) at
> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amsshtml/amsshome.html
> Norm
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:23 PM
> Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
>
> Folks:
>
> For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --
>
> In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.
>
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
> apologies for any duplicate postings.
>
> Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
> Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory
>
> In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
> Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
> American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
> thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
> of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
> can be found at the following url:
> <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .
>
> Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
> Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
> materials include such highlights as:--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:18:49 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


With this discussion of the origin of "gig," we have spawned a topic that may
explode in the same manner as the origin of the expression "the whole nine
yards" in the quotations news group! If so, this might go on for a long time.
Pete Brady

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 08:08:27 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Roberts wrote:> Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
> thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
> comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
> where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
> songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
> the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.
>
> John Roberts.
>This is the most logical, etiologically and etymologically, legend laid
before us to date.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:45:21 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Paul Beale, _Partridge's Concise Dict. of Slang & Unconventional English_
(1989), "containing only terms known to have arisen in the 20th century,"
gives as his first definition "gig, n.  An engagement to play at a party
for one evening: dance bands' [jargon or slang]; since ca. 1935. [He
cites, as a source for that part, Stanley Jackson, _An Indiscreet Guide to
Soho_, 1946, & continues...] [Derived from] Standard English _gig_, a
dance." - Beale, who is Partridge's successor, lists 6 more defs., 4 of
them Aussie slang ("young girl," "detective," etc.) & 2 of them post-1960s
USA developments of #1.Beale's work generally leaves a far stronger impression of solidity--
"stolidity" would be a complement here-- than do Wentw. & Flexner,
especially in cases like that virtual, even if semi-joking, reification in
"the relations, if any, btween a child's pacifier or fetish, the rectum
and vagina, a party, a sex orgy, ... are most interesting..."  - The steps
are too short from there to the improbable links between "carriage" and
"engagement to play," and onward to the sometimes pernicious pseudo-
definitive crap that is all over the Internet: "rule of thumb," "picnic,"
"graveyard shift," "saved by the bell,"  "raining cats & dogs," etc.Beale has a standard tag for these: "[From] a probably apocryphal story."
Outside the naturally dry context of reference books, they deserve
something closer to Letterman's "Stupid Pet Tricks" -- "Stupid Net
Etiologies," maybe. -- It'd be more amusing if not for its general
contribution to the national dumbing-down (my students believe an
appalling amount of that apocrypha) and the particular offensiveness of
some: "Never use the word 'picnic' because it's an old code phrase meaning
'pick a nigger to lynch.'" A very bright Black ex-student of mine, a
Biology M.A., asked me seriously if it were true.Oh, well. Who said, "Some people are born to circulate mistakes, and
others to go around erasing them. This keeps everybody busy."?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:40:54 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


The problem with such post-facto definitions is precisely that they are
plausible on the surface. If we de-construct this one:
a) we have no indication as yet that the term predates the 20th century or
that Music Hall artists used it or knew it
b) Top MHall artists certainly did rush from theatre to theatre, but I'm
pretty sure late 19th century London cabs were not 'gigs' in any sense (they
were Hackney cabs, Hansom cabs, etc., which were very different)
c) If we think about the reality of the situation, rather than simply place
two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal  relationship (which
is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin stories' really
occurs), the idea that the performers would confuse (either deliberately or
not) the terms for the conveyance and the destination is pretty far-fetched.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Gigs> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Roberts wrote:
>
> > Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
> > thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
> > comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
> > where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
> > songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
> > the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> >
>
> This is the most logical, etiologically and etymologically, legend laid
> before us to date.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:49:15 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


"... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
stories' really occurs)..."Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
the appropriate context?Michael Bell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:40:05 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Thanks!
Yes of course you may!
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: Gigs> "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> stories' really occurs)..."
>
> Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> the appropriate context?
>
> Michael Bell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:40:57 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(36 lines)


Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
these:  "The story is too good to check."Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
evening's musical employment.You scholars take all the fun out of it.Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:> Thanks!
> Yes of course you may!
> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Gigs
>
>
> > "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> > relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> > stories' really occurs)..."
> >
> > Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> > the appropriate context?
> >
> > Michael Bell
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:14:55 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(45 lines)


Ed, Steve, eavesdroppers-- Gary Fine, the sociologist (scholar -- sorry)
had another great phrase for it: "Too good to be false." Now pass that
shaker, OK?Cheers / MikeOn Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
>
> There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
> these:  "The story is too good to check."
>
> Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
> such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
> evening's musical employment.
>
> You scholars take all the fun out of it.
>
> Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> > Yes of course you may!
> > Steve
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: Gigs
> >
> >
> > > "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> > > relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> > > stories' really occurs)..."
> > >
> > > Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> > > the appropriate context?
> > >
> > > Michael Bell
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:33:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


This discussion meandered about a Canadian folk music list for several
days.   delurking....So I went to the "Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia" inherited from my
family -- old when I spent hours, days with it as a little kid --
copyright 1889 through 1901.The explanation preceding the definitions for "gig" note that "words
spelled gig are of various and obscure origin.  [The first] has various
senses involving the idea of rapid or whirling motion, of which "fiddle"
appears to be the oldest;" then there are references to the Icelandic word
for fiddle, Swedish for Jew's harp, Danish, Middle Dutch, Middle Low
German, Spanish and Portuguese words for fiddle.Therefore it's first definition is that of "fiddle" but it does not find a
literary reference for the term.
"A whirling or rustling sound, as that made by the blowing of wind through
branches of trees."
"Something that is whirled or moves or acts with rapidity and ease."  [a
top, a whirligig; a light carriage, on-horse chaise; a long lightly built
rowing boat adapted for racing]"Sport; fun; lively time." [reference Provincial English].
"To move up and down or spin round; wriggle."
"To fasten the leather strap to the shield."
"To use a gig or gigging-machine."
"To move lightly or rapidly; impart a free, easy motion to.""A fishing-spear."
"A device for taking fish, a kind of pull-devil designed to be dragged
through the water."
"To spear with a gig."Then as "properly pronounced jig:"  "A wanton silly girl; a flighty
person." [references of Old French, Danish, Icelandic, Swedish]... and finally:  "To engender" [from Latin for beget].I love old encyclopedias -- and you should see the Atlas!
... back to lurking ...Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio
Washington, DC

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:06:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
>
> There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
> these:  "The story is too good to check."
>
> Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
> such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
> evening's musical employment.
>
> You scholars take all the fun out of it.
>
> Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:
> ..Ed, fun and joy for me is when I've sorted through and tossed out all
the chaff and see what just might be a glimmer of truth left. Those are
rare gems that are hard to come by, and finding one calls for a
celebration.OED gives 'gig' as a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage as
first appearing in 1791, as well as other older (even to the 13th
century), but irrelevant definitions. That might have served for
a group of 2, but wouldn't hold the cast of 4 that appeared in
John Roberts' 'gig' last Friday night (even with their
instruments and mummers' play costumes on the roof and/or tied on
the back). Cited usages to 1898 don't use the word as we have it
for our subject.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:51:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
> >
> ......
>........
> OED gives 'gig' as a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage as
> first appearing in 1791, as well as other older (even to the 13th
> century), but irrelevant definitions.Whoops, I used to get annoyed by people making the same error I just
made above. The thirteen hundreds are the 14th century.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:18:33 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


At risk of being obvious - since this is a reminder of previously posted
facts:1. I quoted The Oxford Dictionary of Slang (1999) - an abridgement of a more
substantial work - which gave a usage example - this example used gig in the
now conventional sense of an "engagement to perform" but also in the sense of
a "job"
2. Ed's much commented upon dictionary, actually gave a reference for "gig"
in the sense of "job" (meaning some kind of regular empoyment) - I remember
it as 1901 - perhaps Ed, you will confirm this.The step from gig, meaning job, towards a more restricted usage - but still
within the realm of work seems slight.If my memory is correct then what we ought to be looking for is the first
application of the word "gig" to mean, an ordinary common-or-garden form of
regular employment. The usage by Jazz musicians seems simply to be a
specialised case of that meaning.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tip Top Album
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:52:35 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


I'd be grateful for some help. I am indexing a 1936 song folio entitled the
TIP TOP ALBUM OF CARSON J. ROBISON SONGS: TOGETHER WITH HILL COUNTRY BALLADS
AND OLD TIME SONGS, compiled & edited by Joe Davis, published by Tip Top Pub
Inc of New York.
My problem is that the contents page lists 50 titles, which correspond to
the actual contents up to page 18 and again from page 50 onwards, but bear
no relation to the songs in the section in between. This copy therefore
seems to be a combination of two different folios.
My question is - are they all like this, or do I simply have a rogue copy?
Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Marcus Merrin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:16:04 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


I wasn't following very closely, so I may have missed something on this one.It seems far more likely to me that in a musical context gig could have come
from the Elizabethan sense of the word 'jig'.
C.R Baskervil  defines it thus:  ..... in its standard form was a short
burlesque comedy sung in verse and interspersed with lively dancing.It seems there are some thirty-odd texts of these stage-jigs extant.  They
don't get many re-runs these days.I suppose to nail this down we would have to find some 15 - 18th cent. use of
the word in this context..... I leave it as a class exercise.   :-)  --  Marcus
Merrin PhD. B.Sc. MRSC(CChem)
Chemistry and Internet Solutions
EmptyAir Consulting[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 08:26:19 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


John Moulden and Other Etymologists:Wentworth and Flexner, generally considered to be a reliable scholarly
source for American slang up to 1960 (its publication date), dates
"gig" in the meaning of a job or performance to ca. 1915-1920, basing it
on Louis Armstrong's 1958 biography; and on Alan Lomax, _Mr. Jelly Roll_
[Morton] published in 1954.The much older Farmer and Henley, Slang and Its Analogues (1890-1904),
offers a definition of "gig" as descended from the French _gigue_ (a
dance) to mean "fun; a frolic; a spree" with just maybe a hint of sexual
license as in the 1888 use: "A laughter-loving lass of eighteen who
dearly loved a bit of gig."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tip Top Album
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:59:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Steve,My copy is published by M.M.Cole, with a copyright date on the back cover of 1930.  It is entitled, "M.M. Cole Edition of Carson J. Robison's World's Greatest Collection of Mountain Ballads and Old Time Songs. "  The Contenets page (which may not be the same as your contenst page) correlates perfectly with the actual songs.  I'll be happy to send you whatever additional information you would like.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tip Top Album
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:01:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Steve,My copy is published by M.M.Cole, with a copyright date on the back cover of 1930.  It is entitled, "M.M. Cole Edition of Carson J. Robison's World's Greatest Collection of Mountain Ballads and Old Time Songs. "  The Contents page (which may not be the same as your contents page) correlates perfectly with the actual songs.  I'll be happy to send you whatever additional information you would like.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Archie Green
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:44:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


What is Archie Green's e-mail address?  (If he has one.)
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Archie Green
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:26:19 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


John:  He has none.  Try telephone (415-552-3741)
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:44 AM
Subject: Archie Green>What is Archie Green's e-mail address?  (If he has one.)
>--
>john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:49:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Folks:Just in case anyone is looking for it, there is a four-volume set of
Randolph's Ozark Folksongs, one volume hardbound, three softbound, for
sale for a total of $56 at Lawrence's Books, in Torrance, Calif.Use abebooks.com to check it out.  The price seems right for this critical
state collection.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:59:53 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


On 12/16/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>Just in case anyone is looking for it, there is a four-volume set of
>Randolph's Ozark Folksongs, one volume hardbound, three softbound, for
>sale for a total of $56 at Lawrence's Books, in Torrance, Calif.
>
>Use abebooks.com to check it out.  The price seems right for this critical
>state collection.Isn't Randolph still in print? I got my copies new, and the
Homestead Pickin' Parlor (the local folk music store) has copies
of several volumes sitting on their shelves.Of course, those are probably more expensive than a used set....--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 09:26:25 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Folks:Bob asks if the four-volume Randolph Ozark set is still in print.  There
was a reprint from the State Historical Society of Missouri, but I do not
know if it is still available.  (Norm Cohen's one-volume abridgement may
still be available from Illinois.)And $56 for the four volumes _is_ a pretty fair price.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:59:34 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


The State Historical Society reprint volumes have the distinct advantage of
an excellent introduction by W.K. McNeil and additional bibliographic
information. However, they omit at least 15 songs which appear in the
earlier set (presumably because of copyright problems?) - so the true
scholar needs both the originals and the reprint on his/her shelves!!
Merry Christmas all
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: Randolph> Folks:
>
> Bob asks if the four-volume Randolph Ozark set is still in print.  There
> was a reprint from the State Historical Society of Missouri, but I do not
> know if it is still available.  (Norm Cohen's one-volume abridgement may
> still be available from Illinois.)
>
> And $56 for the four volumes _is_ a pretty fair price.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:41:17 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(74 lines)


Dear Ballad-listers,Actually, it was the University of Missouri Press that did the four-volume
reprint of _OFS_ (less the problematic items to which Steve alluded). The
State Historical Society of Missouri was the original publisher (1946-50).Missouri's web site indicates that only volume 4, _Religious Songs and
Other Items_, is still available, at $39 cloth and $19.95 paperback.A useful address to bookmark:  <http://aaup.pupress.princeton.edu>.  This
is the home page of the Association of American University Presses.  In
the WWW section click on "AAUP Member Home Pages."  Then click on the
press you want to check.  You can also search *all* member presses by
staying on the AAUP home page and using the "Search the Books Catalog"
feature.  When I did that for _Ozark Folksongs_ just now, I got the same
information about volume 4 of _OFS_.  There was also an entry for volume
3, indicating that the cloth was out of print (OP).  Noting about the
corresponding paperback, but since that didn't come up on Missouri's web
site, I assume it went OP before the cloth.  Presumably volumes 1 and 2
went OP some time ago, which is how it usually happens--the later volumes
in a series or multi-volume set hang around the longest.  Same thing
happened with Bronson, as I recall.As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.Holiday greetings to all!JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, roud wrote:> The State Historical Society reprint volumes have the distinct advantage of
> an excellent introduction by W.K. McNeil and additional bibliographic
> information. However, they omit at least 15 songs which appear in the
> earlier set (presumably because of copyright problems?) - so the true
> scholar needs both the originals and the reprint on his/her shelves!!
> Merry Christmas all
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 5:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Randolph
>
>
> > Folks:
> >
> > Bob asks if the four-volume Randolph Ozark set is still in print.
There
> > was a reprint from the State Historical Society of Missouri, but I do not
> > know if it is still available.  (Norm Cohen's one-volume abridgement may
> > still be available from Illinois.)
> >
> > And $56 for the four volumes _is_ a pretty fair price.
> >
> > Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:56:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


On 12/17/00, Judy McCulloh wrote:[ ... ]>As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
>edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.
>
>Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
>*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
>buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
>required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
>reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.I don't teach a class, and am not a professor, so I'm talking out of
turn here :-), but I don't think I *would* use this book for a class.
The point of a class text is to experience the whole range of a
regional collection. An abridged version (which must inherently lack
either the full range of texts of the more popular songs, or many
of the less popular songs) doesn't do that. Rather, the sort of
book to use for a region's songs is something like Eddy or Cox --
not nearly as comprehensive as Randolph, but covering everything
the collectors found.Put it this way: Abridged Randolph and Eddy both have subsets of
the material in their local states. But Eddy's subset evolved
naturally -- it's what turned up in a more limited skimming of
the material. The abridged Randolph, even when done by someone
with the taste and skill of Norm Cohen, is still a "laboratory
product"; it didn't turn up in the field.If I were to urge the republication of an abridgement, I think
the obvious one is Bronson's _Singing Tradition_. Or, perhaps,
it's time for an abridged version of Child. It might be possible
to publish Child in one volume if one limited the number of texts
printed and left off the critical apparatus and such and left out
the songs never collected in the field. An abridged Child is not
like an abridged Randolph; Child is an overview, and abridging
it merely means you get a more distant overview. But abridging
Randolph changes its nature completely.Or perhaps another approach: All these books are songbooks. Perhaps
something like one of Botkin's books would be a better tool for a
folklore course.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:04:39 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


Robert makes many valid points about the drawbacks of the one-volume
Randolph Ozark Folksongs.  However, the 4-volume set is "complete" only in a
very limited sense: there was a lot of material VR collected that he chose
not to include; also, an important and major category was necessarily
omitted--namely, bawdy songs.  I used those arguments in justifying editing
a 1-vol. edition, tho I was and still am sympathetic to RW's point of view.
(Reminder:  anything I say on this topic is bound to be biased.)
Norm Cohen-----Original Message-----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, December 17, 2000 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Randolph>On 12/17/00, Judy McCulloh wrote:
>
>[ ... ]
>
>>As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
>>edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.
>>
>>Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
>>*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
>>buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
>>required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
>>reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.
>
>I don't teach a class, and am not a professor, so I'm talking out of
>turn here :-), but I don't think I *would* use this book for a class.
>The point of a class text is to experience the whole range of a
>regional collection. An abridged version (which must inherently lack
>either the full range of texts of the more popular songs, or many
>of the less popular songs) doesn't do that. Rather, the sort of
>book to use for a region's songs is something like Eddy or Cox --
>not nearly as comprehensive as Randolph, but covering everything
>the collectors found.
>
>Put it this way: Abridged Randolph and Eddy both have subsets of
>the material in their local states. But Eddy's subset evolved
>naturally -- it's what turned up in a more limited skimming of
>the material. The abridged Randolph, even when done by someone
>with the taste and skill of Norm Cohen, is still a "laboratory
>product"; it didn't turn up in the field.
>
>If I were to urge the republication of an abridgement, I think
>the obvious one is Bronson's _Singing Tradition_. Or, perhaps,
>it's time for an abridged version of Child. It might be possible
>to publish Child in one volume if one limited the number of texts
>printed and left off the critical apparatus and such and left out
>the songs never collected in the field. An abridged Child is not
>like an abridged Randolph; Child is an overview, and abridging
>it merely means you get a more distant overview. But abridging
>Randolph changes its nature completely.
>
>Or perhaps another approach: All these books are songbooks. Perhaps
>something like one of Botkin's books would be a better tool for a
>folklore course.
>--
>Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
>2095 Delaware Avenue
>Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
>651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
>The Ballad Index Web Site:
>http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:04:50 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Folks:Judy confirms what Amazon.com states: The Randolph reprint, Vols. I-III,
is out of print.  Vol. IV is available, according to the website, for
$19.95, with a 4-6 week delivery time.I still say $56 for the reprint (one volume hard, three soft) is a pretty
good price.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:20:57 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(90 lines)


Folks:I have some problem with Bob's argument about the value of the Cohen
abridgement of Randolph's four volumes.1) Contrary to Bob's arguments, the one-volume abridgement is fairly
representative of Randolph's collectanea (other than the bawdy material,
which same Norm points out Randolph himself had to exclude).2) I don't think there are any other state collections as broad as
Randolph's, with the possible exception of the Brown (North Carolina)
collection edited by H.M. Belden.3) What might be missing from Randolph (work songs, black folk genres in
general, etc.) is missing from every other state collection I can think
of.  Then there are no lumbering songs, no "ethnic" music, no chanteys,
etc. -- none of which are found in the state collections with which I am
familiar.4) Botkin's treasuries are fine, but are often full of what his great
critic, Richard Dorson, called "fakelore," material of dubious oral
currency.  And there are few songs/ballads in these.5) Reprinting Bronson's _Singing Tradition_ is a fine idea, but not as a
text in a classroom.  It is, after all, merely a collection of those Child
ballads which came down to us with tunes.  And a highly selected,
laboratory (Bob's word) selection at that.6) Reprinting Child is an even better idea, but it is not and never will
be a textbook.  What it leaves out would require another book.  Or
two.  It is not even a a complete collection of folk ballads.EdOn Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> On 12/17/00, Judy McCulloh wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
> >edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.
> >
> >Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
> >*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
> >buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
> >required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
> >reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.
>
> I don't teach a class, and am not a professor, so I'm talking out of
> turn here :-), but I don't think I *would* use this book for a class.
> The point of a class text is to experience the whole range of a
> regional collection. An abridged version (which must inherently lack
> either the full range of texts of the more popular songs, or many
> of the less popular songs) doesn't do that. Rather, the sort of
> book to use for a region's songs is something like Eddy or Cox --
> not nearly as comprehensive as Randolph, but covering everything
> the collectors found.
>
> Put it this way: Abridged Randolph and Eddy both have subsets of
> the material in their local states. But Eddy's subset evolved
> naturally -- it's what turned up in a more limited skimming of
> the material. The abridged Randolph, even when done by someone
> with the taste and skill of Norm Cohen, is still a "laboratory
> product"; it didn't turn up in the field.
>
> If I were to urge the republication of an abridgement, I think
> the obvious one is Bronson's _Singing Tradition_. Or, perhaps,
> it's time for an abridged version of Child. It might be possible
> to publish Child in one volume if one limited the number of texts
> printed and left off the critical apparatus and such and left out
> the songs never collected in the field. An abridged Child is not
> like an abridged Randolph; Child is an overview, and abridging
> it merely means you get a more distant overview. But abridging
> Randolph changes its nature completely.
>
> Or perhaps another approach: All these books are songbooks. Perhaps
> something like one of Botkin's books would be a better tool for a
> folklore course.
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 03:09:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


Ed, stop me if I'm wrong, but didn't Kittredge edit a "student edition" of
Child? It seems to me that such an abridgment is sort of what these ballad
scholars are calling for in this exchange. As for the edited Randolph, I was
just asked to check on the song "S.A.V.E.D" in my original editions, as it isn't
in the reprinted collection. Copyright problems, I assume. As for the Frank
Brown collection of North Carolina material: Randolph would never have been
caught so unaware as to print "T for Texas, T for Tennessee" with a note saying
"We have not found this in other folksong collections." (Do we blame that on
Belden?) Maybe I'm just inclined to favor the autodidacts of the folklore world,
excepting Sandy Ives, whose writing is like a good, warm conversation, in spite
of his academic credentials.
    Sandy PatonEd Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> I have some problem with Bob's argument about the value of the Cohen
> abridgement of Randolph's four volumes.
>
> 1) Contrary to Bob's arguments, the one-volume abridgement is fairly
> representative of Randolph's collectanea (other than the bawdy material,
> which same Norm points out Randolph himself had to exclude).
>
> 2) I don't think there are any other state collections as broad as
> Randolph's, with the possible exception of the Brown (North Carolina)
> collection edited by H.M. Belden.
>
> 3) What might be missing from Randolph (work songs, black folk genres in
> general, etc.) is missing from every other state collection I can think
> of.  Then there are no lumbering songs, no "ethnic" music, no chanteys,
> etc. -- none of which are found in the state collections with which I am
> familiar.
>
> 4) Botkin's treasuries are fine, but are often full of what his great
> critic, Richard Dorson, called "fakelore," material of dubious oral
> currency.  And there are few songs/ballads in these.
>
> 5) Reprinting Bronson's _Singing Tradition_ is a fine idea, but not as a
> text in a classroom.  It is, after all, merely a collection of those Child
> ballads which came down to us with tunes.  And a highly selected,
> laboratory (Bob's word) selection at that.
>
> 6) Reprinting Child is an even better idea, but it is not and never will
> be a textbook.  What it leaves out would require another book.  Or
> two.  It is not even a a complete collection of folk ballads.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:26:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(122 lines)


I'm not trying to start an argument, but I think Ed has misunderstood
me. So I'll try to clarify. Keep in mind that *all* of this is in the
context of a folk song course. Nothing else. I'm trying to make sure
the students know what they need to know.On 12/17/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>I have some problem with Bob's argument about the value of the Cohen
>abridgement of Randolph's four volumes.
>
>1) Contrary to Bob's arguments, the one-volume abridgement is fairly
>representative of Randolph's collectanea (other than the bawdy material,
>which same Norm points out Randolph himself had to exclude).And which is lacking from every regional collection, for that matter.
It's too bad that there wasn't a combined publication of Randolph
and Randolph/Legman.But this isn't the point I'm making. Randolph/Cohen is probably a
more representative collection of Ozark songs than Eddy is of
Ohio songs. But the mere fact that it has limits defined by the
editor makes it fundamentally different from an inclusive
collection.This is not a defect in Child, because Child is *already* a
compilation.It's a different sort of a work. Not better or
worse; just different.Compilation *is* a defect in a regional collection. Cox or
Eddy, for all their limited scope, are *natural* collections.
I regard that as an important distinction. I don't think a
human being (even Norm Cohen) can edit a collection so as to
maintain that distinction.This doesn't make Randolph/Cohen useless. Randolph contains
a lot of junk. If you want good, representative texts of
Ozark material, then Randolph/Cohen is much easier to manage,
and has all the "good stuff." But that's a different use.>2) I don't think there are any other state collections as broad as
>Randolph's, with the possible exception of the Brown (North Carolina)
>collection edited by H.M. Belden.Agreed -- and the Ozarks preserve a wide variety of material rarely
encountered elsewhere. But that's an argument for republishing
Randolph in its entirety. :-)Again, I'm speaking specifically of a folklore course. Students
in such a course should see all the range of material that turns
up. The fragments. The unidentifiables. The mixtures. An abridged
edition will perforce give up some of this. It makes it harder
for students to realize what they are facing. :-)I say that as a joke, but it's a serious point. I went into the
Ballad Index project with no idea how many odds and ends and
fragments there are floating around. A student *needs* to see
all these items to know what lies ahead.>3) What might be missing from Randolph (work songs, black folk genres in
>general, etc.) is missing from every other state collection I can think
>of.  Then there are no lumbering songs, no "ethnic" music, no chanteys,
>etc. -- none of which are found in the state collections with which I am
>familiar.Of course. I don't think Randolph, in *any* form, is a complete text.
No state collection is. You need many books for a good course. But one
of those should be "everything found in the state.">4) Botkin's treasuries are fine, but are often full of what his great
>critic, Richard Dorson, called "fakelore," material of dubious oral
>currency.  And there are few songs/ballads in these.Depends on the collection. _American Folklore_ has many songs. The
others don't have nearly as much.The charge of "fakelore" can hardly be denied. If you already have a
folk *song* course, it's useless. But I'm trying to sneak into
folk song into a folklore course. If there is something better for
that quest, I don't know of it. The two genres are generally
separated (even by Randolph -- he published an Ozark *folklore*
book, too :-).But I'll admit that my mention of Botkin confused the issue. I
was talking about a different need.>5) Reprinting Bronson's _Singing Tradition_ is a fine idea, but not as a
>text in a classroom.  It is, after all, merely a collection of those Child
>ballads which came down to us with tunes.  And a highly selected,
>laboratory (Bob's word) selection at that.I don't see that as a fair criticism. Child itself is a laboratory
selection (as you pointed out in your next item). If Child is held
up as a model, then Bronson is a logical supplement. Now be it noted:
I don't have a high opinion of the Child canon. But if it is granted
canonical status, it needs the tunes. The four-volume Bronson is
what we really want, just as we want the four-volume Randolph.
But given what Child is, _Singing Tradition_ is a more reasonable
classroom item (as a supplement to Coffin, perhaps) than is
Randolph/Cohen.To try to make this clearer, let's assume that I were somehow responsible
for a folk song class. I would probably want to use at least six books:Laws I & II
Two "state" collections, one from the north and one from the
  south (e.g. Eddy or Cox; if we have one such "pure" collection,
  then I would allow Randolph/Cohen as well. But there must be
  the "pure" collection)
One "subject" collection, featuring a type of music (e.g. Beck
  or Hugill)
One "summary" collection (e.g. Bronson's _Singing Tradition_,
  or Coffin/Renwick)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Paddy Tutty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:16:18 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


To delurk briefly, I would like to second this opinion that the four-volume
Bronson is what we really want!   Does anyone know if it has ever been available
in soft-cover?Paddy Tutty"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> The four-volume Bronson is
> what we really want, just as we want the four-volume Randolph.
> But given what Child is, _Singing Tradition_ is a more reasonable
> classroom item (as a supplement to Coffin, perhaps) than is
> Randolph/Cohen.
>Paddy Tutty
Prairie Druid Music
http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/wuidland/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:45:01 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


Sandy:Yes, George L. did edit a abridgement of Child's ten fasicles for
students.  (Houghton published it, I believe.)  But I still don't think it
will serve as a text in an American folk song class:  it is, after all, no
more than a subset of Child ballads.  There are so many other forms of the
ballad not included: broadside, North American, fo'c'sle, bawdy, etc.And what about all the other forms of folk song?Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:15:07 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(51 lines)


On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote in part:
>
> To try to make this clearer, let's assume that I were somehow responsible
> for a folk song class. I would probably want to use at least six books:
>
> Laws I & II
> Two "state" collections, one from the north and one from the
>   south (e.g. Eddy or Cox; if we have one such "pure" collection,
>   then I would allow Randolph/Cohen as well. But there must be
>   the "pure" collection)
> One "subject" collection, featuring a type of music (e.g. Beck
>   or Hugill)
> One "summary" collection (e.g. Bronson's _Singing Tradition_,
>   or Coffin/Renwick)
> --This is truly an academic question: what texts to use in a class.Right now, at the minimum of $50 per volume, you would have students
laying out $300 for a three- or four-unit/hour/credit course.  I think
most would agree that is just too much money.In my opinion (never humble), the two Laws books are researchers' tools,
never intended for classroom use.I don't know what a "state" collection proves.  You can say in one line
that good collectors sweep up a lot of non-traditional material,
fragments, pop songs, folk rhymes, etc., etc.  Not to mention tales,
jokes, anecdotes, local legends, etc.And I don't know what you can learn from Hugill's 609 pages that might be
generalized to miners (Korson), lumberjacks (Gray, Rickaby, Beck) or
cowboys (Lomax, et al).  That all trades have both ballads and worksongs?Bronson is too narrow in scope.  No childrens songs to be found there.  No
bawdy ballads.  No American ballads.There have been collections of ballads: Mac Leach did one in the Fifties,
memory serving.  But as much as we love them, ballads are just a small
part of that corpus we call American folk music.  If you are teaching a
folk song class, you have to range more widely.Lastly, we would have to decide just what thrust this class was to take,
and thus revive an argument that dates to the first years of the 20th
C. within the American Folklore Society: is folklore a humanity or a
science, that is, is it a branch of anthropology or of literature?  The
answer to that depends upon your world view.Me?  I got my B.A. in anthro.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:15:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Agreed, Ed. Not to be used as a text for a class in general folksong, but
then, neither would the abridged, paperbound Bronson do for that purpose.
Forgot that was the goal of the list's exchange. Randolph is still the best,
in my mind, for the Anglo stuff (sans bawdy), because he knew his songsters
better than most academics. Included stuff that would have made Creighton
vomit. But he's have to be supplemented with a good survey of Afro stuff, for
sure, and Hugill and Rickaby, and... Ah, well.
    Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:18:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Oh, yes -- and Cray, for those who can't afford Randolph/Legman! Sorry for the
omission in the previous post! %^)
    Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: textbooks: was Randolph
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:34:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


In coming up with a list of textbooks for an American Folksong course, one
has to remember several things: first of all, americans are not just
Anglo-Americans or Afro-Americans, and one would want to include studies of
the song of at least a sampling of the diverse ethnic groups in this
country.  One survey text is Nettl's Folk Music of the United States, which
gives students at least a taste of some of the ethnic musical traditions in
this country.  Also, one would want to present a picture of how songs
function, either for individual singers, or within community contexts.  I
thinkof repertoire studies, such as Abraham's book on Almeda Riddle, or the
recent book on Jeannie Devlin, Never Without a Song.  And Ives' books on
Larry Gorman and Joe Scott--OK, those guys are Canadian--address, from a
historical perspective, song and community.  OK, gang, any other textbook
suggestions?  I have various syllabi kicking around, which I can unearth,
and I'll add to the list.  But, any other takers?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: textbooks
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:43:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


On the corrido, there's Paredes' With His Pistol in His Hand.  by the way,
there are lots of good videos around, too, and I'll unearth some resources
there, too.  I did use quite a few videos on music and song, including one
that was shot in Northern Indiana that spoke of Tambouritza traditions in
"the region."  anyway, more later.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: textbooks
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:35:22 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


This is a most interesting thread, going from the availability of a song
collection to a call for textbooks.Were I credentialed enough to teach in a college or university and called
upon to offer a course in Folksong or even North American Folksong, there
are two books that I would choose.The first, which I sadly understand is out of print, would be Folk Song in
England by A.L. Lloyd.  This book offers an overview of folksong and
balladry to include virtually all categories, except for gospel and
spiritual, and even these are given mention. It is very general, yet very
inclusive; ballads, lyrics, work songs, ribaldry, ancient and modern songs,
and with many tips of the hat to American variants. Above all, it is very
readable and yet has enough footnotes to please the most persistant pedant.The second tome would be Traditional American Folk Songs  by Anne Warner.
This wonderful compendium of the Warner collection would round out the
class. While not a complete picture of American folk song, being a
collection of songs collected in Eastern  states, it does present a
selection of both lyrics and ballads, all of which were being sung well
into the 20th Century.  This is surely a most valuable link to past
generations of singers and can serve to inspire those new to the folksong
tradition. This book is all the more important since the release of a
selection of Frank and Anne's field recordings on CD last year.On an entirely different note, did anyone else on this list tune into All
Things Considered on Saturday to hear Sam Hinton singing his song,  "Its A
Long Way From (some organism whose name I can't remember and would be
loathe to attempt to spell)"?A joyful Yuletide to All  -  Tom

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: textbooks
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:32:42 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


On 12/18/00, tom hall wrote:>This is a most interesting thread, going from the availability of a song
>collection to a call for textbooks.I thought we *started* with the issue of textbooks. That was why the
issue came up. :-) I hope people don't think I'm trying, e.g., to
"slam" Randolph/Cohen. If you want to just sit down and find something
from the Ozarks, I think it much easier to use than the big volume.
I just think a student of folk songs needs to understand something
which is not evident from most cleaned up songbooks (including
Child): That very many collections are fragments, that they often
contain foreign and floating verses, that the original piece often
cannot be discerned or reconstructed. In other words, that folk songs
are *messy* things.>Were I credentialed enough to teach in a college or university and called
>upon to offer a course in Folksong or even North American Folksong, there
>are two books that I would choose.Which just goes to show how hard all this is, because no two of us
have named the same books. :-) (Though I don't consider my list
definitive. While I know what I would like to demonstrate, I don't
know which are the best books out there.)[ ... ]>The second tome would be Traditional American Folk Songs  by Anne Warner.
>This wonderful compendium of the Warner collection would round out the
>class. While not a complete picture of American folk song, being a
>collection of songs collected in Eastern  states, it does present a
>selection of both lyrics and ballads, all of which were being sung well
>into the 20th Century.  This is surely a most valuable link to past
>generations of singers and can serve to inspire those new to the folksong
>tradition. This book is all the more important since the release of a
>selection of Frank and Anne's field recordings on CD last year.And yet, I find that book a little bit strange. It's another laboratory
product, but that isn't the only reason. It just seems like an odd set.
Take "Yankee" John Galusha, one of their best informants. All his
material is obscure -- most of it never turned up anywhere else. It
just seems odd. Maybe Galusha wrote it.And there is the problem I mentioned above: All the pieces are nice
and pretty and complete. I don't think you can properly teach a folk
song course without dealing with the problem of sorting and identifying
fragments.Plus, I really do think you need to show the difference between
collections by region versus collections by occupation. Hard to
do from Warner. :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: textbooks
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:04:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


<<The first, which I sadly understand is out of print, would be Folk Song in
England by A.L. Lloyd.  This book offers an overview of folksong and
balladry to include virtually all categories, except for gospel and
spiritual, and even these are given mention. It is very general, yet very
inclusive; ballads, lyrics, work songs, ribaldry, ancient and modern songs,
and with many tips of the hat to American variants. Above all, it is very
readable and yet has enough footnotes to please the most persistant
pedant.>>Although I think I'd suggest to non-musicologists in the class that they
skip the chapter on the technical aspects of the music, going back perhaps
and reading it afterwards. I've touted the book to many friends who have
been so intimidated by that chapter that they never got to the rest of the
book, where the songs are.<<On an entirely different note, did anyone else on this list tune into All
Things Considered on Saturday to hear Sam Hinton singing his song,  "Its A
Long Way From (some organism whose name I can't remember and would be
loathe to attempt to spell)"?>>Amphioxus. No -- nuts! That's a wonderful song. Maybe the segment's still on
the NPR website."It's a long way from amphioxus, it's a long way to us
It's a long, long way from amphioxus to the meanest human cuss
Well, it's goodbye to fins and gill slits and it's welcome lungs and hair
It's a long, long way from amphioxus, but we all came from there."Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:03:10 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


As we discuss this issue of textbooks for classes, I suddenly find
myself with a question. An important one. :-)What *is* a class on folk song?I mean it. When I gave my list of potential books, I was thinking
of what was needed to train field collectors. They need to accept
that they won't get pristine versions every time, that they'll have
to sort a lot of chaff and have to try to figure out what kind of
wheat is emerging from the chaff.But that's *my* vision. It assumes that the students are already
committed to folk song studies. In this day and age, that's probably
a mistake.So what *are* we trying to teach?--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:17:49 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> As we discuss this issue of textbooks for classes, I suddenly find
> myself with a question. An important one. :-)
>
> What *is* a class on folk song?
>
> I mean it. When I gave my list of potential books, I was thinking
> of what was needed to train field collectors. They need to accept
> that they won't get pristine versions every time, that they'll have
> to sort a lot of chaff and have to try to figure out what kind of
> wheat is emerging from the chaff.
>
> But that's *my* vision. It assumes that the students are already
> committed to folk song studies. In this day and age, that's probably
> a mistake.
>
> So what *are* we trying to teach?
>Simple awareness, and a modest bit of appreciation of singers and songs --Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "Conery, Kathleen Ann" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:29:30 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(29 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
> It assumes that the students are already
> committed to folk song studies.Ed Cray wrote:
>Simple awareness, and a modest bit of appreciation of singers and songs --Isn't this the difference between an undergraduate course
(probably taken to fulfill some sort of humanities or
general education requirement, chosen because it sounded
"fun") and a graduate course (where the student has already
discovered their interest in the general field, and is
looking to focus in on their core passion, and hone their
career skills)? Not that either is a "better" class than
the other; they simply supply different needs.
In grad school $300 for texts and/or supplies for a class
that was central to my degree was high, but not out of
line. In undergrad I'd have dropped the class.I can appreciate the question of where "folksong studies"
belong; in Literature or Anthropology. I received an MFA in
Theatre, and there were the same discussions about certain
plays, and their authors, being taught in English classes.
Personally, I can see advantages to both views.Kathleen
--
Conery, Kathleen Ann
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: "Conery, Kathleen Ann" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:44:35 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Please excuse what is probably a foolish question. While I
am a great listener of traditional songs and ballads, I
have no training in the area.
Listening once again to a fine recording by John Roberts
and Tony Barrand, "Dark Ships in the Forest" (I believe...
I've misplaced the sleeve cover), I notice that one of my
favorite songs ("Tom of Bedlam") is from a book that I've
heard of many times; "Pills to Purge Melancholy". What is
this book?
All that I know (or think I know) is that it was published
a long time ago (1700s?) and the author/compiler's name is
D'Urfey? Is it a compilation from other collections, did he
collect these in the field, or did he compose these songs?
Is it available in some sort of a reprint form? Or only
through interlibrary loan? Do the songs include tunes with
lyrics or suggestions of tunes?Kathleen
--
Conery, Kathleen Ann
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: fwd: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "Conery, Kathleen Ann" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:42:45 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(57 lines)


I'm assuming this was meant as a reply to the list? I must
have some odd default setting as it came only to me.--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:40:21 -0600
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song ClassesOn 12/20/00, Conery, Kathleen Ann wrote:>"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>> It assumes that the students are already
>> committed to folk song studies.
>
>Ed Cray wrote:
>>Simple awareness, and a modest bit of appreciation of singers and songs --
>
>Isn't this the difference between an undergraduate course
>(probably taken to fulfill some sort of humanities or
>general education requirement, chosen because it sounded
>"fun") and a graduate course (where the student has already
>discovered their interest in the general field, and is
>looking to focus in on their core passion, and hone their
>career skills)? Not that either is a "better" class than
>the other; they simply supply different needs.
>In grad school $300 for texts and/or supplies for a class
>that was central to my degree was high, but not out of
>line. In undergrad I'd have dropped the class.Actually, depressing as it is, there are undergraduate courses
in the engineering disciplines where the cost of textbooks
approaches $300. Supply and demand....I would put it this way: The difference is not between graduate
and undergraduate courses, but between specialized and
non-specialized classes. Though I'll concede that even *that*
is more of a distinction in mathematical than non-mathematical
courses -- I could do much better in Shakespeare class than
a lit major could in quantum mechanics. :-)But the question remains, what would we *like* to be
teaching, and what books would be involved?
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."
--- End Forwarded Message ---Actually when I thought about it... the difference in text
costs might also be related to the fact that my undergrad
days were around twenty years ago now.
Kathleen
--
Conery, Kathleen Ann
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:05:24 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Kathleen:_Pills to Purge Melancholy_ is a six-volume collection of stage, street,
popular songs, folk songs and ballads edited by Henry Playford between
1698-1706, then reedited by minor poet/editor/playwright Thomas D'Urfey in
1719-1720.  (Hence D'Urfey gets credit.)  It is the biggest collection of
Restoration songs and ballads, WITH THE MUSIC, I know of.  It is also
unexpurgated.It was reprinted in 1876, and that edition reprinted in 1959 by Folklore
Library Publishers of New York, another of the redoutable Kenneth
S. Goldstein's projects.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:19:13 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


If you're trying to order a copy through a library system, you should note
that the full title is:
Wit and Mirth, or Pills to Purge Melancholy
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy> Kathleen:
>
> _Pills to Purge Melancholy_ is a six-volume collection of stage, street,
> popular songs, folk songs and ballads edited by Henry Playford between
> 1698-1706, then reedited by minor poet/editor/playwright Thomas D'Urfey in
> 1719-1720.  (Hence D'Urfey gets credit.)  It is the biggest collection of
> Restoration songs and ballads, WITH THE MUSIC, I know of.  It is also
> unexpurgated.
>
> It was reprinted in 1876, and that edition reprinted in 1959 by Folklore
> Library Publishers of New York, another of the redoutable Kenneth
> S. Goldstein's projects.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:37:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Kathleen:
>
> _Pills to Purge Melancholy_ is a six-volume collection of stage, street,
> popular songs, folk songs and ballads edited by Henry Playford between
> 1698-1706, then reedited by minor poet/editor/playwright Thomas D'Urfey in
> 1719-1720.  (Hence D'Urfey gets credit.)  It is the biggest collection of
> Restoration songs and ballads, WITH THE MUSIC, I know of.  It is also
> unexpurgated.
>
> It was reprinted in 1876, and that edition reprinted in 1959 by Folklore
> Library Publishers of New York, another of the redoutable Kenneth
> S. Goldstein's projects.
>
> EdCyrus L. Day gives an account of the various editions in the 1959
reprint. This is taken from Day and Murrie's 'English Songbooks,
1651-1702', 1940. There are other extant copies of some volumes of some
editions in addition to those he lists of page xii of his Introduction,
but none that I know of are the missing vol. I of the 2nd ed., 1702 or
the 1st ed. of vol. iii, 1702.It's not true that 'Pills to Purge Melancholy' is completely
unexpurgated.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: fwd: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:57:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:42:45PM -0600, Conery, Kathleen Ann wrote:> Reply-To:     [unmask]> I'm assuming this was meant as a reply to the list? I must
> have some odd default setting as it came only to me.        Note to all who use this mailing list.  The "Reply-To: " header
is preserved, not reset to the list.  So -- *if* you have it set, as
Kathleen has, the replies will all come to you alone as long as the
replying e-mail program honors the "Reply-To: " header -- *unless* the
person replying notices the "Reply-To: " and takes special action to
reset the address.        Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Testing, testing.
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:35:11 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Don:This is a test, it is only a test.I use U-Dub's successor to Elm, Pine (a Unix program).  Apparently, I
accidentally hit the "h" key, and turned off the full headers.Let's see if this fixes it.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Basic Library
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:02:53 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


Folks:I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
and must turn to the experts here assembled.I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have had
such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
such as Robert Johnson.Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 07:53:06 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 12/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
>hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
>number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
>and must turn to the experts here assembled.
>
>I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have had
>such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
>such as Robert Johnson.
>
>Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
>also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
>[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).I'd try to find a catalog of the Document record label. I've never
seen one (they're based in Austria, of all places), but the number
of reissues I've seen is absolutely astonishing. And it's not just
the big names. I have things like Kelly Harrell and Burnett &
Rutherford, and have seen quite a few others. And while the notes
aren't spectacular, they're far better than the absolutely dreadful
notes County includes with its CD re-releases. Every track is
documented as best they can: Personnel, date of recording, and issue
number.If I had the money, I'd be trying to buy their whole catalog....--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Textbooks for course in FolkSong
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 10:34:02 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


When I proposed a course in Folk Song at SUNY Binghamton, I used Pete
Seeger's THE COMPLETE FOLKSINGER, A.L.Lloyd's FOLK SONG in ENGLAND, and Jean
Ritchie's SINGING FAMILY OF THE CUMBERLANDS (which also had a record
attached).  I agree that Almeda Riddle's A SINGER AND HER SONGS by R.Abraham
would be a fine alternative to the last - it could be accompanied by her
Minstrel Record.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ed Cray's basic library
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 14:14:42 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(40 lines) , text/html(44 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:06:44 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


   Ed,Yazoo has an extraordinarily fine assortment of CD reissues of
hillbilly/country 78's on about 20 generalized topics.  Each is on a 2 CD
set.  I highly recommend that you get a catalogue and check them out.Mark GilstonIn a message dated 12/22/00 1:03:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:<< I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
 hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
 number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
 and must turn to the experts here assembled.
  >>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:08:52 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Document does indeed have a phenomenal catalogue of reissues, but they are
recorded from used 78's with the barest minimum of clean up and many of the
tracks are practically unlistenable.   ... caveat emptor

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 23:07:11 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


Ed:
There is no easy (certainly no short) answer to your query.  Five years or
so ago, one could compile a pretty good "basic" library of hillbilly
reissues on LPs.  Now that LPs are passe and we have switched to CDs we are
almost back at the starting gate again.  Some companies are simply reissuing
some of their good LPs on CD; even though CDs can hold almost twice what an
LP can.  So some companies are issuing revised/expanded versions of LPs.
County is doing much of the latter.  Yazoo, about whom Sandy Paton wrote
enthusiastically, has put out some lovely compilations musically, generally
topically oriented.  A serious shortcoming is inadequate documentation:
almost no discographic data (original recording dates, places, etc), and
very little commentary on the selections.  Johnny Parth's Document (Germany)
label is planning to do for hillbilly what he has been doing for blues &
gospel:  reissue everything by every artist, arranged by artist, in
chronological order.  Bob Waltz spoke favorably about that.  Trouble is,
it's hardly a "basic" library.  For many artists we don't need everything
they recorded--especially for anything like a basic selection.  On the plus
side,  Document provides complete discographic data and some background
material as well.  Unfortunately, Parth does not have the patience, it
seems, to wait for good, clean copies; consequently many of the CDs are
marred by very noisy tracks taken from 2nd or 3rd generation dubs from poor
originals.  Of course, if you want the material just for reference purposes,
that may not be considered a serious drawback.
I don't think you can put together the proper basic library on CD at the
moment, but if you want recommendations, mine would include the following.
I make these from the perspective of someone interested in hillbilly music
because (1) it is an important repository of recordings of traditional
artists doing traditional material ; and (2) lots of these artists strongly
affected oral tradition subsequent to their recordings.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Uncle Dave Macon -- a must.  County CO 3505 is the best single-CD available
now
Charlie Poole--one of the most influential No Carolina stringbands.  County
CDs 3501 and 3508 include much of the best.
Skillet Lickers--the most popular of the Georgia bands.  Try County 3509
E V Stoneman--County 3510
Eck Robertson--the first traditional fiddler; probably more here than you
need, but try County 3515
Grayson & Whitter--very influential duo; Ralph Stanley even put out a CD of
their songs last year.  County 3517 has the best
Columbia C4K 47911:  Roots 'n' Blues.  A 4-CD box of hillbilly and black
artists, similar in scope to the Harry Smith Anthology (which is also a
must)
Columbia C2K 47966:  White Country Blues.  A great compilation documenting
the influence of black music on hillbilly musicians
Country Music Foundation CMF 011:  THe Bristol Sessions.  A well documented
package of material from the important 1927 sessions conducted by Ralph Peer
that produced both the Carter Family and Jimmie Rodgers, as well as many
other great artitsts
Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
good choice
RCA 2100-2-R:  Something Got Hold of Me.  If it's still available, this is a
nice compilation of sacred music from the 20s and 30s.
If your budget allows, Bear Family has reissued the complete Carter Family
and the complete Jimmie Rodgers sessions; wonderful packages with extensive
documentation, but not cheap.  If you want to discuss this further, perhaps
I shouldn't clutter up the ballad list with my own personal idiosyncracies.
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:02 PM
Subject: A Basic Library>Folks:
>
>I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
>hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
>number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
>and must turn to the experts here assembled.
>
>I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have had
>such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
>such as Robert Johnson.
>
>Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
>also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
>[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).
>
>Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 08:21:19 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(120 lines)


If list members were compiling a basic library of folksong recordings, who
would they include in the North American unaccompanied traditional ballad
section, in the sub-heading "complex, decorative style"? I have some
recordings which I think came from the Warner collection, but where else
should I look?Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "Norm Cohen" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: A Basic Library> Ed:
> There is no easy (certainly no short) answer to your query.  Five years or
> so ago, one could compile a pretty good "basic" library of hillbilly
> reissues on LPs.  Now that LPs are passe and we have switched to CDs we
are
> almost back at the starting gate again.  Some companies are simply
reissuing
> some of their good LPs on CD; even though CDs can hold almost twice what
an
> LP can.  So some companies are issuing revised/expanded versions of LPs.
> County is doing much of the latter.  Yazoo, about whom Sandy Paton wrote
> enthusiastically, has put out some lovely compilations musically,
generally
> topically oriented.  A serious shortcoming is inadequate documentation:
> almost no discographic data (original recording dates, places, etc), and
> very little commentary on the selections.  Johnny Parth's Document
(Germany)
> label is planning to do for hillbilly what he has been doing for blues &
> gospel:  reissue everything by every artist, arranged by artist, in
> chronological order.  Bob Waltz spoke favorably about that.  Trouble is,
> it's hardly a "basic" library.  For many artists we don't need everything
> they recorded--especially for anything like a basic selection.  On the
plus
> side,  Document provides complete discographic data and some background
> material as well.  Unfortunately, Parth does not have the patience, it
> seems, to wait for good, clean copies; consequently many of the CDs are
> marred by very noisy tracks taken from 2nd or 3rd generation dubs from
poor
> originals.  Of course, if you want the material just for reference
purposes,
> that may not be considered a serious drawback.
> I don't think you can put together the proper basic library on CD at the
> moment, but if you want recommendations, mine would include the following.
> I make these from the perspective of someone interested in hillbilly music
> because (1) it is an important repository of recordings of traditional
> artists doing traditional material ; and (2) lots of these artists
strongly
> affected oral tradition subsequent to their recordings.
> RECOMMENDATIONS
> Uncle Dave Macon -- a must.  County CO 3505 is the best single-CD
available
> now
> Charlie Poole--one of the most influential No Carolina stringbands.
County
> CDs 3501 and 3508 include much of the best.
> Skillet Lickers--the most popular of the Georgia bands.  Try County 3509
> E V Stoneman--County 3510
> Eck Robertson--the first traditional fiddler; probably more here than you
> need, but try County 3515
> Grayson & Whitter--very influential duo; Ralph Stanley even put out a CD
of
> their songs last year.  County 3517 has the best
> Columbia C4K 47911:  Roots 'n' Blues.  A 4-CD box of hillbilly and black
> artists, similar in scope to the Harry Smith Anthology (which is also a
> must)
> Columbia C2K 47966:  White Country Blues.  A great compilation documenting
> the influence of black music on hillbilly musicians
> Country Music Foundation CMF 011:  THe Bristol Sessions.  A well
documented
> package of material from the important 1927 sessions conducted by Ralph
Peer
> that produced both the Carter Family and Jimmie Rodgers, as well as many
> other great artitsts
> Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
> produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
> hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
> good choice
> RCA 2100-2-R:  Something Got Hold of Me.  If it's still available, this is
a
> nice compilation of sacred music from the 20s and 30s.
> If your budget allows, Bear Family has reissued the complete Carter Family
> and the complete Jimmie Rodgers sessions; wonderful packages with
extensive
> documentation, but not cheap.  If you want to discuss this further,
perhaps
> I shouldn't clutter up the ballad list with my own personal
idiosyncracies.
> Norm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:02 PM
> Subject: A Basic Library
>
>
> >Folks:
> >
> >I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
> >hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
> >number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard
none,
> >and must turn to the experts here assembled.
> >
> >I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have
had
> >such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
> >such as Robert Johnson.
> >
> >Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
> >also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
> >[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).
> >
> >Ed
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Document Recordings (Was: Re: A Basic Library)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 09:40:54 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(154 lines)


On 12/22/00, Norm Cohen wrote:>Ed:
>There is no easy (certainly no short) answer to your query.  Five years or
>so ago, one could compile a pretty good "basic" library of hillbilly
>reissues on LPs.  Now that LPs are passe and we have switched to CDs we are
>almost back at the starting gate again.  Some companies are simply reissuing
>some of their good LPs on CD; even though CDs can hold almost twice what an
>LP can.  So some companies are issuing revised/expanded versions of LPs.
>County is doing much of the latter.As a footnote: They aren't so much revising as recombining. For
example, they converted four LPs of Charlie Poole to three CDs.
A good trick, that: If you had part of their Charlie Poole collection
on LP (I did), you may still have to buy all the CDs to fill out
your set. :-(More irritating is the fact that they *still* haven't come up with
decent liner notes.>Yazoo, about whom Sandy Paton wrote
>enthusiastically, has put out some lovely compilations musically, generally
>topically oriented.  A serious shortcoming is inadequate documentation:
>almost no discographic data (original recording dates, places, etc), and
>very little commentary on the selections.  Johnny Parth's Document (Germany)
>label is planning to do for hillbilly what he has been doing for blues &
>gospel:  reissue everything by every artist, arranged by artist, in
>chronological order.  Bob Waltz spoke favorably about that.  Trouble is,
>it's hardly a "basic" library.  For many artists we don't need everything
>they recorded--especially for anything like a basic selection.I'll agree with this overall -- but I still think that one should have
*all* of at least a few artists' recordings. For example, people who
came to Kelly Harrell from the material on the Folkways anthology
would think that he did mostly pure versions of standard ballads
(Charles Guiteau, The State of Arkansas). But in fact, though his
material is almost all traditional (unlike, say, Charlie Poole),
it's not all ballads; he has something of everything, including
playparties ("Cave Love Has Gained the Day").Harrell might be a good performer to use as an instance of
"everything he ever did" -- it's only two CDs on document,
and these, at least, aren't too noisy.Another good one, from that standpoint (even though it's a bit
more recent) is the Smithsonian/Folkways recording of
Bascom Lamar Lunsford, "Ballads, Banjo Tunes, and Sacred
Songs of Western North Carolina." It's not from the 78 era,
and it's edited (sigh), but it gives a good feel for the
whole range of music people would sing.>On the plus
>side,  Document provides complete discographic data and some background
>material as well.  Unfortunately, Parth does not have the patience, it
>seems, to wait for good, clean copies; consequently many of the CDs are
>marred by very noisy tracks taken from 2nd or 3rd generation dubs from poor
>originals.  Of course, if you want the material just for reference purposes,
>that may not be considered a serious drawback.This brings up some questions, and maybe we should compile a "group"
answer. The Document recordings I have heard are all pretty clean
(better than some of County's Charlie Poole material), and I don't
like fiddling with recordings if they are tolerable as they are.
(Of course, there are cuts which need help; that's a different
story. But I'd consider that the exception rather than the rule.)And I'll admit that they don't have great notes; I'd rather see more.
It's just that the chief competition -- at least from what I've
seen -- is County, and County's stuff is even worse from the
documentation standpoint.Anyway, can we compile a catalog of "good" versus "bad" Document
recordings? This would be helpful to me, at least, in deciding
what to pick up next. (I just discovered the series recently,
and the music store of course doesn't have store plays. They
don't even have the complete series in stock.)I must admit that I've only listened to three of them enough to
be sure of the quality. All are quite good if you ask me:Burnett & Rutherford    (DOCD-8025)
Kelly Harrell Volume 1  (DOCD-8026)
Kelly Harrell Volume 2  (DOCD-8027)(Hm -- just as a though: All three of those came out in 1998. Is
it possible that Document's early releases were un-cleaned-up,
but that they're trying harder now?)>I don't think you can put together the proper basic library on CD at the
>moment, but if you want recommendations, mine would include the following.
>I make these from the perspective of someone interested in hillbilly music
>because (1) it is an important repository of recordings of traditional
>artists doing traditional material ; and (2) lots of these artists strongly
>affected oral tradition subsequent to their recordings.Looking at the list below, I find myself thinking: Can we possibly
*ourselves* compile liner notes for these?>RECOMMENDATIONSSome random observations on the ones I have>Uncle Dave Macon -- a must.  County CO 3505 is the best single-CD available
>nowThis one at least gives dates of recording, though that's ALL it gives.>Charlie Poole--one of the most influential No Carolina stringbands.  County
>CDs 3501 and 3508 include much of the best.Though, since there are only three, you might as well buy the whole
set if you're buying two. :-) Also, anyone buying Charlie Poole records
should pick up Kinney Rorrer's book on Poole. It has complete recording
details, song texts -- and, as an added bonus, a Poole biography.
(The biography is the main point, actually, but I bought it for the
appendices.)[ ... ]>E V Stoneman--County 3510The best notes I've ever seen on a County recording. The bad news?
Well, my copy may be unusual -- but it skips a lot. Yes, the *CD*
skips. It wasn't pressed very well.[ ... ]>Grayson & Whitter--very influential duo; Ralph Stanley even put out a CD of
>their songs last year.  County 3517 has the bestHas dates of recordings, and you can glean facts about some of the songs
from the overall notes. But, generally, another County flop in the notes
department.[ ... ]>Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
>produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
>hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
>good choiceAnother good one of this sort is Old-Time Mountain Ballads, County
CD-3504. 18 cuts, from Clarence Ashley, Burnett & Rutherford (2 cuts),
B. F. Shelton, Kelly Harrell, Grayson & Whitter (2 cuts), Red Fox
Chasers, Buell Kazee, Blind Alfred Reed, Rutherford & Foster,
Hickory Nuts, Green Bailey, Aulton Ray, John Hammond, Byrd Moore,
Frank Jenkins's Pilot Mountaineers, and Dave Macon. This is another
one with decent discographic data.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 13:20:59 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Norm:Thank you for the most excellent list.I would recommend that you continue your suggestions (or I would suggest
you continue your recommendations).  Perhaps you would be willing to
venture into the area of country blues, jug bands, and medicine show
musicians.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 13:34:22 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


Ruairidh:In seeking examples of the "decorative" singing style, you might start
with the Archive of American Folksong two CDs on the ballad (AFS 14 and
AFS 21).  There are some accompanied ballads on these compilations (Woody
Guthrie's "Gypsy Davy" among them) but most are unaccompanied.Beyond that, I suggest Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
northern singers.  One after the other is stunning.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folk and Country re-recordings (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 21:15:11 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


Folks:Dick seems to be having problems with his email system, so I am sending
this to the list for him.The point is this: he stands ready to aid us in our need for CDs.  Which
is good.Now, if he would just let us know what the "new" (or old) releases were
each month --Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 23:10:42 -0500
From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Folk and Country re-recordingsHi Ed-
I've been posting this message to the Balld list, but it dowsn't seem to
be getting out. Anyway, Camsco Music, which is me, carries EVERY folk,
old-time country and generally folkish record in print. This includes
Yazoo's splendid series of re-mastered commercial recordings from the
20s and 30s, Document's complete, but unevenly recorded, collection, the
entire Folkways line, Rounder, County, Arhooly, Shanachie, the Bear
Family's monumental (and pricey) collections and whatever else. And my
prices are very competitive to those of people like CDNow and
Amazon.com.you can reach Camsco at:    [unmask]or by phone at:                   800/548-FOLK(3655)You not only get the most complete selection available with one-stop
convenience, but you have unlimited access to whatever small expertise I
may have accumulated.dick greenhaus

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Grim Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 05:01:13 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(50 lines)


Folks:I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:A subscription series.I do not know how many are on the ballad-l list, but perhaps there are 50
people hereon subscribed willing to venture $20 to help underwrite the
republication of the very important Frank Proffitt material.  (I noted
about half a dozen familiar names from ballad-l on the Tabula Gratulatoria
[Latin for "subscribers"] in the recent Edward Ives _festschrift._ By
buying in advance, one helps to underwrite the cost.The price is not too high when one considers that I routinely pay $18.50
for a CD here in California ($16.98 plus 8.5 percent sales tax) and get
nowhere near the comprehensive liner notes Folk-Legacy includes.  We might
even get Sandy to write a retrospective appreciation of Proffitt, whom I
consider to be a singer of the very first rank.Will those with a more mercantile sense (Dick Greenhaus, are you
listening?) please reply.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 00:53:11 -0500
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
To: "Cray, Ed" <[unmask]>
Subject: well, I tried!I took your suggestion to heart, Ed, and sent my note to the list, but
never saw it appear there. Don't know what I did wrong. I did add one
additional 2 volume set - I Can't Be Satisfied - Early American Women
Blues Singers. I remember Dick having a full tub of the Document series,
and I got one of the Global Village CDs from him, but that is of field
recordings, not early commercial "rural" stuff.
    What is astonishing to me now is the new Voice of the People series
that Topic has released -- 20 volumes of field recorded material in
Britain, mostly unaccompanied. How in hell do they ever expect to get
their bait back? I'm struggling to get a couple of my own field
recordings onto CD, especially my Frank Proffitt stuff, as I do think my
recordings were done on better equipment than Frank Warner was able to
use for his field collecting, but experience has shown me that they
won't sell enough to cover their production costs, even if you write
another glowing review to give 'em a boost.
    Anyway, if you think my note to you is appropriate for the Ballad-L,
and want to post it there, it's okay with me. I tried, but never saw it
arrive.
    Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Nancy-Jean Seigel <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:20:34 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
needed, let's do what must be done.Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 06:23:26 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Folks:Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?EdOn Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:> To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
>
> The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> needed, let's do what must be done.
>
> Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
>
> Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:45:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Sure ...
Lorne Brown
Toronto CanadaEd Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?
>
> Ed
>
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:
>
> > To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
> >
> > The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> > treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> > valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> > needed, let's do what must be done.
> >
> > Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> > republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> > collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
> >
> > Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:47:36 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


Absolutely.Lorne Brown wrote:> Sure ...
> Lorne Brown
> Toronto Canada
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Folks:
> >
> > Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:
> >
> > > To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
> > >
> > > The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> > > treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> > > valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> > > needed, let's do what must be done.
> > >
> > > Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> > > republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> > > collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
> > >
> > > Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
> > >--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Carolyn A. and Peter S. Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:17:32 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


I'd be in agreement.Perhaps this question could be posed again after "the holidays" (Christmas to
Europeans.)John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Less Grim Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:49:45 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(3 lines)


Now we are five --Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Karen Kaplan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:48:05 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(58 lines) , text/html(81 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:58:24 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


I'll subscribe.Lew Becker
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Mary Stafford <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:19:03 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Count me in.Mary Stafford
[unmask]I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:A subscription series.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Less Grim Economics
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:32:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:49:45 -0800, Ed Cray wrote:
>Now we are five --
>
>Ed
Now we are six --
(Me too.)--
Jeri Corlew

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:29:25 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


Sign me up too, and let me know where to send the check.At 05:01 AM 12/24/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Folks:
>
>I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:
>
>A subscription series.
>
>I do not know how many are on the ballad-l list, but perhaps there are 50
>people hereon subscribed willing to venture $20 to help underwrite the
>republication of the very important Frank Proffitt material.  (I noted
>about half a dozen familiar names from ballad-l on the Tabula Gratulatoria
>[Latin for "subscribers"] in the recent Edward Ives _festschrift._ By
>buying in advance, one helps to underwrite the cost.
>
>The price is not too high when one considers that I routinely pay $18.50
>for a CD here in California ($16.98 plus 8.5 percent sales tax) and get
>nowhere near the comprehensive liner notes Folk-Legacy includes.  We might
>even get Sandy to write a retrospective appreciation of Proffitt, whom I
>consider to be a singer of the very first rank.
>
>Will those with a more mercantile sense (Dick Greenhaus, are you
>listening?) please reply.
>
>Ed
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 00:53:11 -0500
>From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
>To: "Cray, Ed" <[unmask]>
>Subject: well, I tried!
>
>I took your suggestion to heart, Ed, and sent my note to the list, but
>never saw it appear there. Don't know what I did wrong. I did add one
>additional 2 volume set - I Can't Be Satisfied - Early American Women
>Blues Singers. I remember Dick having a full tub of the Document series,
>and I got one of the Global Village CDs from him, but that is of field
>recordings, not early commercial "rural" stuff.
>    What is astonishing to me now is the new Voice of the People series
>that Topic has released -- 20 volumes of field recorded material in
>Britain, mostly unaccompanied. How in hell do they ever expect to get
>their bait back? I'm struggling to get a couple of my own field
>recordings onto CD, especially my Frank Proffitt stuff, as I do think my
>recordings were done on better equipment than Frank Warner was able to
>use for his field collecting, but experience has shown me that they
>won't sell enough to cover their production costs, even if you write
>another glowing review to give 'em a boost.
>    Anyway, if you think my note to you is appropriate for the Ballad-L,
>and want to post it there, it's okay with me. I tried, but never saw it
>arrive.
>    Sandy
>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: "Roy G. Berkeley" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:13:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Count me in.
Roy BerkeleyLorne Brown wrote:> Sure ...
> Lorne Brown
> Toronto Canada
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Folks:
> >
> > Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:
> >
> > > To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
> > >
> > > The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> > > treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> > > valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> > > needed, let's do what must be done.
> > >
> > > Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> > > republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> > > collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
> > >
> > > Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
> > >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Promising Economics
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:28:28 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


Count us in too. To whom does the check get sent?  Wassail!  Tom & Linn

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: "David N. Pyles" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:34:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


Ditto for me.Dave PylesAt 12:29 PM 12/24/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Date:    Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:29:25 -0800
>From:    Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Grim Economics
>
>Sign me up too, and let me know where to send the check.=====================
David N. Pyles
acousticmusic.com
P. O. Box 459
Brattleboro, VT 05302-0459
(802) 257-0336 Mon-Thur 9:30am-4:30pm
http://www.acousticmusic.com/frames
http://www.acousticmusic.com/frames/fame.htm
=====================
The last time somebody listened to a Bush, folks wandered in the desert for
40 years

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:55:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I'm in and I'll raise.It sure would be nice to see the Beech Mtn Anthologies back along with
Gunning and the Tar Heels.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Promising Economics
From: Gwenzilla <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:51:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Please, put my name on that list as well.Gwen Knighton                                   [unmask]
                      www.threeweirdsisters.com
______________________________________________________________________
Those who abandon their own dreams . . . will try to discourage yours.
______________________________________________________________________
                  -*Cyny Telyn* -- /Sing/ the harp-

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:58:21 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 05:01:13AM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:
>
> A subscription series.
>
> I do not know how many are on the ballad-l list, but perhaps there are 50
> people hereon subscribed willing to venture $20 to help underwrite the
> republication of the very important Frank Proffitt material.  (I noted        Count me in.        We'll need an address (and probably something specific to make
the check out to, such as "republication fund" or whatever you select.)        Merry Christmas,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Nathan Rose <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:12:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


I'll subscribe.Nathan Rose

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:47:26 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Good folks all:
    I've written a note of gratitude to Ed Cray, thanking him for his
offer of help with the production costs of the Proffitt CD. I've already
had it re-mastered digitally from the original field tapes and am now
about halfway through the notes for the insert booklet, which will be
about 28 pages (whew!). I'm looking at an early Spring release, if the
creek don't rise.
    What I would suggest is that you all hold onto your hard-earned cash
and let me notify you via the listserv when the "product" is in hand. At
that time, a simple order via phone (800-836-0901) or e-missive
([unmask]) or even (gasp) via our web site's credit card
encrypted order blank. Click on this: <http://www.folklegacy.com>.
Calling gives you a chance to talk with Caroline, always a pleasant
experience, but beware, she may also sell you the "Ballads and Songs of
Tradition" CD that is already on the market. A sampling from forty years
of field collecting, with a booklet of less academic and more personal
notes than usual, but nearly 60 pages of 'em (once reviewed here by our
friend, Ed Cray, his own self)! We can front for the initial production
costs, friends, but it's reassuring to know that a bunch of you ballad
people are willing to place orders. I'll let you know when the CD is
available. In the meantime, let your money earn interest in your mutual
fund account. You all do have mutual fund accounts, don't you? %^)
    With warmest good wishes to all for the holidays and the millennium
to come!
    Sandy Paton (Folk-Legacy's resident folk fogey)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 17:33:04 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(72 lines)


On 12/24/00, Sandy Paton wrote:[ ... ]>    What I would suggest is that you all hold onto your hard-earned cash
>and let me notify you via the listserv when the "product" is in hand. At
>that time, a simple order via phone (800-836-0901) or e-missive
>([unmask]) or even (gasp) via our web site's credit card
>encrypted order blank. Click on this: <http://www.folklegacy.com>.
>Calling gives you a chance to talk with Caroline, always a pleasant
>experience, but beware, she may also sell you the "Ballads and Songs of
>Tradition" CD that is already on the market. A sampling from forty years
>of field collecting, with a booklet of less academic and more personal
>notes than usual, but nearly 60 pages of 'em (once reviewed here by our
>friend, Ed Cray, his own self)! We can front for the initial production
>costs, friends, but it's reassuring to know that a bunch of you ballad
>people are willing to place orders. I'll let you know when the CD is
>available. In the meantime, let your money earn interest in your mutual
>fund account. You all do have mutual fund accounts, don't you? %^)
>    With warmest good wishes to all for the holidays and the millennium
>to come!Just a question on cost saving and liner notes:I've always loved Folk-Legacy's liner notes, and one of these days
I'm going to sit down and figure out how much it costs to get the
notes for the 20 or so albums I have which came without them, and
order them (a complicated task, since they're for CDs and LPs and
I think *one* cassette -- I *hate* cassettes...).But do they really need to be printed liner notes and lyric sheets?
Particularly the latter? That's a lot of paper, and hence a significant
extra expense.Why not just put the lyrics on the CD? Even if you fill the CD
chock-full of music, it's nearly certain that you'll have a few
megabytes hanging off the end. Probably more than a few. Use that
space to create a CD-ROM in miniature. With the lyric sheets,
liner notes, and anything else that springs to mind (photos of
the performers? Tributes from the members of this list, maybe? :-).
There is no added cost, and a lot of added value.I know that there are people out there who don't have CD drives to
read the things. That's why I don't think the *complete* liner notes
should go on the CD-ROM partition. But a CD-ROM lets you put in much
more information than you can supply on paper. And I think that a
*very* large fraction of the audience for a Folk-Legacy disc will
have some sort of computer access.A couple of years ago, Copper Creek records was doing this with
all their CDs. Then, for some reason, they stopped. I hated it.
It was really sad. Not only did it mean that their liner notes
went back from being good to being lousy (I know Folk-Legacy
won't be guilty of that :-), but it also cost me the fun of
digging around and seeing what was on the CD. :-)As an aside: There is probably a great deal of stuff in Folk-Legacy's
archives none of us have ever heard. It would be great if that could
somehow be made available. We're all used to reissues of 78s and the
like; we don't demand the highest sound quality. What are the odds
of a bare-bones in-the-basement A-to-D conversion, and of selling
these things on CD-R? I suppose there are problems with rights and
such -- but I hate to see that material go to waste.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:56:21 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(25 lines)


On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote in part:> As an aside: There is probably a great deal of stuff in Folk-Legacy's
> archives none of us have ever heard. It would be great if that could
> somehow be made available. We're all used to reissues of 78s and the
> like; we don't demand the highest sound quality. What are the odds
> of a bare-bones in-the-basement A-to-D conversion, and of selling
> these things on CD-R? I suppose there are problems with rights and
> such -- but I hate to see that material go to waste.
>To which Ed Cray answers (in part) before the Christmas cheer overwhelms
his normally good judgment:I would meld my earlier idea of a subscription with Bob's suggestion of
emptying Paton's basement.  What if we were to subscribe to, say, reissues
and/or new releases on a quarterly basis?Like Bob, I think including the "lesser" songs not released on LP is an
excellent idea.Unlike Bob, I do not think filling out the CD with printed text in lieu of
a booklet is a good idea.  I like those inserts.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 20:03:43 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


 Let's hear it for paper liner booklets !!!    I would also be very
interested in having the Beech Mountain material available on CD and would
happily pay $20 for a copy.-Mark Gilston

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Edie Gale Hays <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 20:27:17 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


>I'll subscribe.Me too.Edie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More On Electronic vs. Paper Liner Notes
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:57:18 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(73 lines)


Since there seems to be a bit of a surge in favour of paper
liner notes, I'd like to makes some points on this subject.First, let's distinguish between SOURCE NOTES and SONG TEXTS.
Source notes are absolutely vital to every user of a recording,
and I agree, these should stay in a booklet in the CD.But song texts are different. Why do we want the song texts?
I don't know about you, but my usual use for a lyric sheet
is to learn to sing the song.Now back in the days of LPs, when Folk-Legacy was using those
wonderful full-size booklets, their "built-in" lyric sheets
were wonderful. They were easy to read, and you could get
whole songs on a given page.But now think about a CD liner insert. They're tiny. With
the best intentions in the world, song lyrics have to be
printed in small type, in crazy column arrangements, with
songs flowing from page to page. In other words, it's much
harder to learn the song lyrics from those.Put the lyrics in a file on the CD, though, and the user
can print out the songs he/she wants at a size large enough
to be usable.Then, too, those lyric files are useful to everyone, not
just those who have good eyesight.And another thing about putting the notes on a CD insert:
You're always tempted to cut corners. Suppose you cut
one paragraph from a song introduction. Or you cut a photo.
It can potentially gain you *four pages*. If you're
printing on glossy paper, that could be 30-50 cents saved
per CD. Besides, the jewel box can only hold so much paper.
There is an upper bound on what you can include.Whereas the capacity of the CD-ROM, even if it only gets
the "end" of the disc after it's been filled with songs,
is nearly unlimited. 4 MB (the equivalent of about half
a minute of music) could hold the complete texts and notes
for every song, the complete Folk-Legacy catalog, a dozen
scholarly articles, and eight or nine JPEG photos of the
performers -- and still have space left over.If people still want lyric sheets in their liner notes, well,
I won't really object. But this isn't an either/or proposition.
Put whatever must go in the liner notes in the liner notes.
But put all that, *and more*, on the CD itself. Again, note
the key fact here: It's added value at *no added cost*.It could even become a selling point: "Every Folk-Legacy
Album, in addition to the music and complete song texts
and notes, comes with on-disc extras: Complete notes,
photos of the performers, and at least one surprise on
every record." The "surprise" could vary from record to
record -- e.g. a Gordon Bok album could include photos
of some of his woodcuts, while an album of Civil War songs
might include a history of the Battle of Gettysburg, and
an album of Jacobite songs might have copies of paintings
of Culloden. Or you could include sheet music of the songs,
or guitar chords. An album of folktales could include an
essay on the sources, or maps of the places involved, or
a glossary of the words used. All this takes is a good
imagination....
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: More On Electronic vs. Paper Liner Notes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 10:41:49 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Bob:Fine.  We will compromise.Sandy will write his usually brilliant source notes, then print them in
booklet form for the CD.  Then Sandy will hire a couple of researchers,
send them all around the world to gather illustrative materials, arrange
clearances, pay fees, digitize the resulting research, and tack it all on
the end of the CD in ROM form.And some sonovabitch somewhere will grumble about the $20 asking price,
insisting it only costs a buck to a buck and a quarter to manufacture the
damn CD, and, boy, these record companies are sure raking it in.Merry Christmas, Bob, to you and yours, and to any Ballad-list
eavesdroppers.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ed Cray's basic library
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:21:32 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


<<Ed, if you haven't found them yet, let me urge you to check out the Yazoo
series of
re-issues that Shanachie has produced: Music of Kentucky (2 volumes), Times
Ain't
Like They Used to Be (4 volumes!), Hard Times Come Again No More (2
volumes), My Rough and Rowdy Ways (Badman Ballads and Hellraising Songs, 2
volumes), The Rose Grew Round the Briar (Early American Rural Love Songs, 2
volumes), When I Was a Cowboy (2 volumes), Ruckus Juice and Chitlins (The
Great
Jug Bands, 2 volumes), The Story That the Crow Told Me (Early American Rural
Children's Songs, 2 volumes), How Can I Keep From Singing (Early American
Religious Music and Song, 2 volumes), The Half Ain't Never Been Told (More
Religious Music and Song, 2 volumes) and The Cornshucker's Frolic (Downhome
Music and Entertainment from the American Countryside, 2 volumes). These are
among my favorite CDs and are now kept in my office to play on the computer
system while I'm working. Great stuff! For instance, there are FOUR cuts of
the
great Alfred Karnes on The Music of Kentucky Volume 1. Dick Greenhaus at
<http://www.camsco.com> can get all of these for you and will give you a
very
good price. He also deserves the business, as he is doing a great job of
making real
folk music available through one convenient source.  Forgot to include the 2
volume I Can't Be Satisfied (Early American Women Blues Singers). >>To Sandy's comments, which saved me making the same recommendations, I'd add
that Yazoo also puts out CDs devoted to individual artists, including
original sessions by Mississippi John Hurt, Skip James, and new editions
(from cleaner discs) by Blind Blake & Blind Lemon Jefferson. Also the series
of ethnic recordings including "The Secret Museum of Mankind" and volumes
devoted to reissued Irish and Klezmer material. All remastered by Richard
Nevins, one of the best remastering engineers on earth. The only weakness is
poor notes and virtually zero discographical information -- but the music is
fabulous, and so's the sound.Rounder has also done excellent work, usually with better discography but
not as good sound. Document's sound is often awful but they're great for the
Complete Anybody, with good info.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Document Recordings (Was: Re: A Basic Library)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:41:06 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]><<Another good one, from that standpoint (even though it's a bit
more recent) is the Smithsonian/Folkways recording of
Bascom Lamar Lunsford, "Ballads, Banjo Tunes, and Sacred
Songs of Western North Carolina." It's not from the 78 era,
and it's edited (sigh), but it gives a good feel for the
whole range of music people would sing.>>An idea, yes, but nothing close to the whole collection. There's a whole LP
on Tradition, for example, and I don't think any of that made the
Smith/Folk. anthology.<<This brings up some questions, and maybe we should compile a "group"
answer. The Document recordings I have heard are all pretty clean
(better than some of County's Charlie Poole material), and I don't
like fiddling with recordings if they are tolerable as they are.
(Of course, there are cuts which need help; that's a different
story. But I'd consider that the exception rather than the rule.)>><<(Hm -- just as a though: All three of those came out in 1998. Is
it possible that Document's early releases were un-cleaned-up,
but that they're trying harder now?)>>I don't think so; Parth assembles most of his discs from cassette dubs of
the originals, or sometimes dubs of dubs, with crude noise reduction that
pumps and grinds. My Alphabetical Four CD, for example, varies from
fairly-okay to godawful, including one track missing the first minute of
music (it comes in at the break). I have the 78s for four of these sides and
I can tell you the sound is a whole lot better than the Document CDs.>Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
>produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
>hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
>good choiceThe whole Global Village Music of Virginia series looks good on paper, and
the ones I've heard have decent sound when possible and at least proper
dates.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:46:27 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


<<Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?>>Count me in.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Fw: William Main Doerflinger 1909-2000
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:56:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(66 lines)


Forward.>From: Dan Milner
>To:
>Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 4:46 PM
>Subject: William Main Doerflinger 1909-2000> William Main Doerflinger  1909-2000
>
> It is with great sorrow that I pass on the word that William Main
> Doerflinger, folk song collector and author-compiler of Shantymen and
> Shantyboys (later reissued as Songs of the Sailor and Lumberman) died at
> 6:45AM on December 23rd at his home in New Jersey.  Bill died from a
stroke
> following an operation.  He was 91.
>
> Bill, of course, was the only person ever to collect the great forebitter,
> "The Leaving of Liverpool," from tradition.
>
> Bill told me that he started collecting folk songs as a student at
Princeton
> University.  His first field trip was to Nova Scotia and his first
informant
> was the bus driver who drove him to his first night's accommodation.  His
> specialty was, of course, the songs he found in coastal New England and
the
> Canadian Maritimes, and in New York at Sailors' Snug Harbor and other
> places.  They were the repertoire of deepwater mariners and offshore
> fishermen, and lumbermen who felled trees in northern forests.
>
> Bill and my wife, Bonnie, befriended each other 20 years ago.  It was
> through her that I had the good fortune to meet him.  Bill was courtly,
kind
> and witty, yet he could be a "no-nonsense" man when it was appropriate.
He
> was, by profession, a book editor and, consequently, someone familiar with
> both truth and fiction.  After I asked him to look over the notes of my
CD,
> Irish Ballads & Songs of the Sea, I became the beneficiary of his great
> knowledge and simple frankness when clearly set me straight on a few
points.
> We were just about to embark on another project.  Bonnie and I had dinner
> with him last month and enjoyed a delightful evening of talk about folk
> songs and world travel.
>
> Bill Doerflinger was the dean of sea music and one of America's great folk
> song collectors and scholars, an irreplaceable person who sought out and
> found the true songs of maritime workers and, fortunately for us, recorded
> them for our enjoyment.  We will be forever in his debt.
>
> A memorial service will be held next month.  Details will be forthcoming.
>
> Dan Milner
>
>
>____________________________________________________
Send your FOLKDJ-L mail to the right place!  Post messages to:           [unmask]
  Send Listserv commands to:  [unmask]
  Contact the list manager:   [unmask]All the details at http://folkradio.org

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: More On Electronic vs. Paper Liner Notes
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:40:31 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


On 12/25/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Bob:
>
>Fine.  We will compromise.
>
>Sandy will write his usually brilliant source notes, then print them in
>booklet form for the CD.  Then Sandy will hire a couple of researchers,
>send them all around the world to gather illustrative materials, arrange
>clearances, pay fees, digitize the resulting research, and tack it all on
>the end of the CD in ROM form.
>
>And some sonovabitch somewhere will grumble about the $20 asking price,
>insisting it only costs a buck to a buck and a quarter to manufacture the
>damn CD, and, boy, these record companies are sure raking it in.And they're going to complain less when they pay $20 and *don't*
get the extras? :-)Besides, won't the people who buy *these* sorts of CDs understand
the problem? We're talking runs of thousands of CDs at best, perhaps
more like hundreds. Everyone knows that the basic cost for
small-run CDs is the startup cost. The *incremental* cost is $1.25,
but the first one costs $5000!I'd still argue that people are more likely to buy if you give
them something extra. I know *I* would be. And, again, it costs
nothing. Wouldn't most of us be willing to write short essays
at no cost for recordings we really enjoy and treasure? I
certainly would.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: RIP William Main Doerflinger 1909-2000
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:21:11 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(19 lines)


Folks:Bill Doerflinger had another important connection to folk music.He was the acquisitions editor at E.P. Dutton in 1942, charged with
finding new projects for the publisher.  He read a short autobiographical
piece by Woody Guthrie, "so good and vivid that I advised Dutton to offer
Woody a contract for his autobiography." (Letter to Cray, August 27, 1999)Because Woody had no idea how to structure a book, Dutton called in
Doeflinger's wife, Joy Homer-Doerflinger, to help shape what became _Bound
for Glory._ For her services as editor and as Guthrie's literary agent,
she received a 20 percent interest in the earnings of the book.I might add that in discussing this and his collecting of sea songs,
Doerflinger seemed to be pleased to credit his wife.  Of his own seminal
role, he just shrugged.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:37:29 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


Sandy:
I do hope that as you realize your plans to convert to CD, you do the 2
Beech Mountain Ballads LPs.  They were wonderful collections of traditional
old style ballad singing and I always recommended them to anyone who cared
to listen.
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, December 24, 2000 1:49 PM
Subject: Sandy Paton's thank you note.>Good folks all:
>    I've written a note of gratitude to Ed Cray, thanking him for his
>offer of help with the production costs of the Proffitt CD. I've already
>had it re-mastered digitally from the original field tapes and am now
>about halfway through the notes for the insert booklet, which will be
>about 28 pages (whew!). I'm looking at an early Spring release, if the
>creek don't rise.
>    What I would suggest is that you all hold onto your hard-earned cash
>and let me notify you via the listserv when the "product" is in hand. At
>that time, a simple order via phone (800-836-0901) or e-missive
>([unmask]) or even (gasp) via our web site's credit card
>encrypted order blank. Click on this: <http://www.folklegacy.com>.
>Calling gives you a chance to talk with Caroline, always a pleasant
>experience, but beware, she may also sell you the "Ballads and Songs of
>Tradition" CD that is already on the market. A sampling from forty years
>of field collecting, with a booklet of less academic and more personal
>notes than usual, but nearly 60 pages of 'em (once reviewed here by our
>friend, Ed Cray, his own self)! We can front for the initial production
>costs, friends, but it's reassuring to know that a bunch of you ballad
>people are willing to place orders. I'll let you know when the CD is
>available. In the meantime, let your money earn interest in your mutual
>fund account. You all do have mutual fund accounts, don't you? %^)
>    With warmest good wishes to all for the holidays and the millennium
>to come!
>    Sandy Paton (Folk-Legacy's resident folk fogey)
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Sandy:
> I do hope that as you realize your plans to convert to CD, you do the 2
> Beech Mountain Ballads LPs.  They were wonderful collections of traditional
> old style ballad singing and I always recommended them to anyone who cared
> to listen.
> Norm
>
Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
_A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 02:58:25 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:56:21PM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> Like Bob, I think including the "lesser" songs not released on LP is an
> excellent idea.
        Amen!> Unlike Bob, I do not think filling out the CD with printed text in lieu of
> a booklet is a good idea.  I like those inserts.
        So do I, but my aging eyes *still* are unable to make out the teeny
typography those things possess without considerable effort.  What is your
secret?
        Incidentally, you may consider me a member of the reissue-donors/guarantors
group, too. -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: How real was Thomas the Rhymer?
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 15:44:57 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


As I understand it, there are several layers to Thomas the Rhymer.There's the ballad, and the poem that was based on.
There's the books of prophecy which appeared under his name.And there's the real person -- or is there?Dan Goodman
[unmask]
http://www.visi.com/~dsgood/index.html
Whatever you wish for me, may you have twice as much.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: How real was Thomas the Rhymer?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:16:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


On 12/26/00, Dan Goodman wrote:>As I understand it, there are several layers to Thomas the Rhymer.
>
>There's the ballad, and the poem that was based on.
>There's the books of prophecy which appeared under his name.
>
>And there's the real person -- or is there?There is. At least, there is a Thomas of Ercildoune whose name
is mentioned in genuine records.  A charter c. 1265 cites him
as a witness (interesting point on that one, too: It's a charter
of Petrus de Haga of Bemersyde, and one of Thomas's prophecies runs
something like, "Tide, tide, whate'er betyde, There'll aye be
Haigs at Bemersyde." And, interestingly, there still are, though
the line was interrupted for a while.)Another charter, somewhat later, is even more interesting: in 1294,
a Thomas of Ercildoune, "son and heir of Thomas Rhymer of Ercildoune,"
is cited.His prophecies are, of course, another matter. The only one I've seen
which gives the slightest evidence of being contemporary is the one
about Alexander III's death (where he said, on a clear day, that
such a storm was breaking as Scotland had not seen for many a year).
That does *not* make it contemporary, or the others late, but it's
the only one we can really call well-attested.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folk-Lyric
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:44:59 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Ed,In response to Ruairidh's inquiry on American "decorative" singing
styles, you recommended "Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
northern singers." Could you expand? I've not heard of them and find
nothing useful on the web.~ Becky Nankivell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folk-Lyric
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 01:23:16 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(56 lines)


Good People:Lest anyone else was confused by my early morning epistle, I wrote
"Folk-Lyric" when I meant to write "Folk-Legacy."I apologize to you.In the meantime, Sandy Paton (he of Folk-Legacy) wrote the following to
an embarrassed Ed CrayOn Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Sandy Paton wrote:> Folk-Lyric was a label Harry Oster founded when he was teaching down in
> Louisiana. He offered it to me when he decided to give it up, but I was
> afraid to take it on, fearing it would be more than I could handle
> alone. So it went to our good friend Chris Strachwitz at Arhoolie. You
> can click here to check out his web site.
> <http://www.arhoolie.com/history/index.html> Harry's field work
> contributed some fine blues singers to Chris' label. I'm not familiar
> with any of his "northern" singers and the decorative style they may
> represent, since most of Chris' work has been in the Cajun and Tex-Mex
> regions, and the African-American music of the south. He began by
> recording Mance Lipscomb from Texas.
>     One example of a moderately decorated Appalachian singing style
> might be my own recordings of "Uncle" Monroe Presnell, an octogenarian
> ballad singer I recorded on Beech Mountain in North Carolina. A fine
> examplar of the genre. There are several examples of his style on my two
> volume "Traditional Music of Beech Mountain" (now, unfortunately, only
> available as cassettes. Check out my web site at
> <http://www.folklegacy.com>, if that would be of interest to you.
>     Sandy
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
>
> > Becky:
> >
> > As you can see, I am forwarding you good query to the man  most
> > able to answer it.  Me?  I'm real good on bawdy songs.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:44:59 -0700
> > From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
> > To: [unmask]
> > Subject: Folk-Lyric
> >
> > Ed,
> >
> > In response to Ruairidh's inquiry on American "decorative" singing
> > styles, you recommended "Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
> > northern singers." Could you expand? I've not heard of them and find
> > nothing useful on the web.
> >
> > ~ Becky Nankivell
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:57:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
history.By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long every
lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of New
Orleans is still singing the old songs.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville:
: Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
: From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
: Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
:
: Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
: _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
: 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
: Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
: mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
: and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
: Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
: of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
: richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
:
: Ed
:

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ballad Recordings
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:32:03 -0000
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(5 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Brent:Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
county.It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.EdOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
> history.
>
> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long every
> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>
> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of New
> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
>
> Brent Cantrell
> Knoxville
>
>
> :
> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
> :
> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
> :
> : Ed
> :
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:54:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:32:03 -0000, Ruairidh Greig
<[unmask]> wrote:>Is Uncle Monroe Presnell the same as Lee Monroe Presnell mentioned on one
of the  Cordelia's Dad CDs? If so are there any recordings of him available
on CD?
>
>Ruairidh
>Mr. Presnell shows up on the two volumes of the Warner Collection, "Her
bright smile haunts me still" and "Nothing seems better to me."  They were
both published this year by Appleseed, the same folks that published
Cordelis's Dad's "Spine."  I beleive there is at least one cut on Sandy
Paton's recently produced "Ballads and Songs of Tradition." As far as I
know the only other place you can find him it on the Beech Mountain
anthology produced also by Sandy Paton and previously mentioned on this
list.  I think it is available on tape only.  Sandy can answer that.Other good unaccompanied (Upland South) ballad cds (but no Lee Monroe
Presnell) include "Doug and Jack Wallin" on Smithsonian Folkways, the "High
Atmosphere" compilation on Rounder, "My dearest dear" by Sheila Kay Adams,
and many songs by Almeda Riddle scattered through the "Southern Journey"
series on Rounder (there are other good singers there too) and in "Songs of
the South" on Atlantic. You can also order any of the Folkways recordings
on CD and from that the "Old Love Songs and Ballads from the Big Laurel,
North Carolina" compilation from Sodom, NC and "End of an old song" by
Dillard Chandler are particularly good.Brent Cantrell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:16:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(83 lines)


Ed:Its easy to get turned around in all this.  I've been trying to sketch out
a working geneology or census of the Western North Carolina singers for the
last couple of years but it is all pretty daunting.  Wallins, Chandlers,
Nortons, Ramseys, Adams, Hicks, Gentrys, Longs, Presnells, and Harmons in
at least two major traditons centered in Watauga and Monroe Counties seem
to be somehow related.  There is also a third major singing tradition on
the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee which includes Dee and Delta Hicks,
Bessford Hicks, Johnny Ray Hicks, and Hamper McBee (a lot of that great
singing showed up on County LPs in the early 80's) and at least one of the
Tennessee Hicks have claimed relation the the North Carolina branch.Anyway its delightful to see this great material getting reissued.Brent Cantrell
KnoxvilleOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800, Ed Cray <[unmask]> wrote:>Brent:
>
>Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
>the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
>county.
>
>It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
>have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
>
>Ed
>
>
>
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
>
>> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
>> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
>> history.
>>
>> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
>> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
>> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
>> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long
every
>> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also
somehow
>> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>>
>> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of
New
>> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
>>
>> Brent Cantrell
>> Knoxville
>>
>>
>> :
>> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
>> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
>> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
>> :
>> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N,
Smith's
>> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of
Kentucky,
>> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
>> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded
her
>> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived
in
>> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old
Counc"
>> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that
congerie
>> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
>> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
>> :
>> : Ed
>> :
>>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folk-Lyric
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:05:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


Dear Sandy,Thanks for the information about Folk-Lyric. What I did find on a Yahoo
search led to blues and whatnot on Arhoolie, as you described.I guess the key part of what I'm interested in is the "northern" part of
Ruairidh's original question, rather than the "decorated" aspect. I have
heard and enjoyed Lee Monroe Presnell both on your recent and wonderful
"Ballads and Songs of Tradition" cd, and on the two Appleseed releases
of the Warner collection.But, it seems that among most of  the re-releases of field collected
songs from America, the emphasis is heavily southern -- undoubtedly due
to the visibility and the influence of the Lomaxes. I'd like to hear
more of the northern stuff, part because it's hard to find, and in part
because that's where my own roots and affinities lie. The first Warner
cd has some, and I hope that later issues may have more. Any other
suggestions?~ BeckySandy Paton wrote:> Hello, Nan:
>     I hope this can help you. It's a copy, with a few modifications,
> of
> the response I sent to Ed Cray when he forwarded your query to me.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Folk-Lyric was a label Harry Oster founded when he was teaching down
> in
> Louisiana in the early 1960s. He offered it to me when he decided to
> give it up, but I was afraid to take it on, fearing it would be more
> than I could handle
> alone. So it went to our good friend Chris Strachwitz at Arhoolie. You
>
> can click here to check out the Arhoolie web site.
> <http://www.arhoolie.com/history/index.html> Harry's field work
> contributed some fine blues singers to Chris' label, artists like
> Robert
> Pete Williams whose blues could wrench your heart. I'm not familiar
> with any of his "northern" singers and the decorative style they may
> represent, since most of Chris' work has been in the Cajun and Tex-Mex
>
> regions, and the African-American music of the south. He began by
> recording Mance Lipscomb from Texas, if I remember correctly.
>     One example of a moderately decorated Appalachian singing style
> might be my own recordings of "Uncle" Monroe Presnell, an octogenarian
>
> ballad singer I recorded on Beech Mountain in North Carolina. A fine
> examplar of the genre. There are several examples of his style on my
> two
>
> volume "Traditional Music of Beech Mountain" (now, unfortunately, only
>
> available as cassettes). Check out my web site at
> <http://www.folklegacy.com>, if that would be of interest to you.
>     Sandy Paton (Folk-Legacy's resident folk fogey)Ed Cray wrote:> Becky:
>
> As you can see, I am forwarding you good query to the man  most
> able to answer it.  Me?  I'm real good on bawdy songs.
>
> Ed
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:44:59 -0700
> From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Folk-Lyric
>
> Ed,
>
> In response to Ruairidh's inquiry on American "decorative" singing
> styles, you recommended "Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
> northern singers." Could you expand? I've not heard of them and find
> nothing useful on the web.
>
> ~ Becky Nankivell--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music[unmask]
http://www.tftm.org
NOTE NEW PHONE: 520-293-3783
PO Box 40654
Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 10:26:46 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(95 lines)


Brent:What are your publication plans?  It seems to me that you are tracking
folk song as the Swiss and German ethnographers tracked hay-tying,
fence-building, etc., town-by-town.  This could be marvelously
instructive.EdOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:> Ed:
>
> Its easy to get turned around in all this.  I've been trying to sketch out
> a working geneology or census of the Western North Carolina singers for the
> last couple of years but it is all pretty daunting.  Wallins, Chandlers,
> Nortons, Ramseys, Adams, Hicks, Gentrys, Longs, Presnells, and Harmons in
> at least two major traditons centered in Watauga and Monroe Counties seem
> to be somehow related.  There is also a third major singing tradition on
> the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee which includes Dee and Delta Hicks,
> Bessford Hicks, Johnny Ray Hicks, and Hamper McBee (a lot of that great
> singing showed up on County LPs in the early 80's) and at least one of the
> Tennessee Hicks have claimed relation the the North Carolina branch.
>
> Anyway its delightful to see this great material getting reissued.
>
> Brent Cantrell
> Knoxville
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800, Ed Cray <[unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Brent:
> >
> >Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
> >the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
> >county.
> >
> >It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
> >have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
> >
> >Ed
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
> >
> >> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
> >> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
> >> history.
> >>
> >> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
> >> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
> >> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
> >> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long
> every
> >> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
> >>
> >> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also
> somehow
> >> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
> >>
> >> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of
> New
> >> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
> >>
> >> Brent Cantrell
> >> Knoxville
> >>
> >>
> >> :
> >> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
> >> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> >> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
> >> :
> >> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N,
> Smith's
> >> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of
> Kentucky,
> >> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
> >> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded
> her
> >> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived
> in
> >> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old
> Counc"
> >> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that
> congerie
> >> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
> >> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
> >> :
> >> : Ed
> >> :
> >>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:17:28 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


Almeda Riddle also has a wonderful record on the Minstrel Label (out of NYC)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:04:02 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(43 lines) , text/html(47 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:21:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Jane Gentry and Maud Long also told some of the "Jack Tales" that seem to be
traced back to Council Harmon on Beech Mountain. Gentry's links to the Beech
Mountain/Watauga area and people seem strong, although she certainly left there as
a child. Betty Smith's book offers a fascinating insight into the work of Cecil
Sharp in the Appalachians. Well worth reading!
    SandyEd Cray wrote:> Brent:
>
> Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
> the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
> county.
>
> It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
> have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
>
> Ed
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
>
> > Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
> > Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
> > history.
> >
> > By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
> > Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
> > Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
> > left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long every
> > lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> > related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
> >
> > BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of New
> > Orleans is still singing the old songs.
> >
> > Brent Cantrell
> > Knoxville
> >
> >
> > :
> > : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
> > : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
> > :
> > : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
> > : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
> > : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
> > : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
> > : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
> > : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
> > : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
> > : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
> > : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
> > :
> > : Ed
> > :
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:27:33 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


On 12/27/00, Sandy Paton wrote:[ ... ]>    Before leaving the subject, there are a couple of other singers you should hear whose style puts me in mind of Mr. Presnell: William Harrison Burnett from Fayetteville, Arkansas, who contributes a couple of songs to my CD-125, and Dillard Chandler, a wonderful ballad singer who can be heard on Smithsonian/Folkways, but I can't remember, right now, the title of the album. Can Dick Greenhaus see this and come to my rescue? What album is he on, Dick?Can't guarantee this is the album, but there are five or six cuts
by Dillard Chandler onPeter Gott and John Cohen (eds.):"Old Love Songs and Ballads
  from the Big Laurel, North Carolina," Folkways FA-2309 (1964)The Ballad Index strikes again. :-)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:12:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Almeda's wonderful album is available only as an LP and may be obtained from
Folk-Legacy (along with other vinyl dinosaurs) at the price of $6 each, or $5
each if you buy five or more. Check the vinyl listings on our web site. You'll
find it at <http://www.folklegacy.com>
    SandyTrad Man wrote:> Almeda Riddle also has a wonderful record on the Minstrel Label (out of NYC)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:15:00 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


That's it! You ALL should own that one.
    Sandy"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 12/27/00, Sandy Paton wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >    Before leaving the subject, there are a couple of other singers you should hear whose style puts me in mind of Mr. Presnell: William Harrison Burnett from Fayetteville, Arkansas, who contributes a couple of songs to my CD-125, and Dillard Chandler, a wonderful ballad singer who can be heard on Smithsonian/Folkways, but I can't remember, right now, the title of the album. Can Dick Greenhaus see this and come to my rescue? What album is he on, Dick?
>
> Can't guarantee this is the album, but there are five or six cuts
> by Dillard Chandler on
>
> Peter Gott and John Cohen (eds.):"Old Love Songs and Ballads
>   from the Big Laurel, North Carolina," Folkways FA-2309 (1964)
>
> The Ballad Index strikes again. :-)
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:23:34 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


This sounds like a great project.  It should be followed up by a study to
see if there are any correlations between ballad variation and kinships.
Norm Cohen-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers>Ed:
>
>Its easy to get turned around in all this.  I've been trying to sketch out
>a working geneology or census of the Western North Carolina singers for the
>last couple of years but it is all pretty daunting.  Wallins, Chandlers,
>Nortons, Ramseys, Adams, Hicks, Gentrys, Longs, Presnells, and Harmons in
>at least two major traditons centered in Watauga and Monroe Counties seem
>to be somehow related.  There is also a third major singing tradition on
>the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee which includes Dee and Delta Hicks,
>Bessford Hicks, Johnny Ray Hicks, and Hamper McBee (a lot of that great
>singing showed up on County LPs in the early 80's) and at least one of the
>Tennessee Hicks have claimed relation the the North Carolina branch.
>
>Anyway its delightful to see this great material getting reissued.
>
>Brent Cantrell
>Knoxville
>
>
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800, Ed Cray <[unmask]> wrote:
>
>>Brent:
>>
>>Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
>>the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
>>county.
>>
>>It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
>>have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
>>
>>Ed
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
>>
>>> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
>>> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
>>> history.
>>>
>>> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
>>> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line
between
>>> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she
had
>>> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long
>every
>>> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also
>somehow
>>> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>>>
>>> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of
>New
>>> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
>>>
>>> Brent Cantrell
>>> Knoxville
>>>
>>>
>>> :
>>> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
>>> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
>>> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
>>> :
>>> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N,
>Smith's
>>> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of
>Kentucky,
>>> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of
Cecil
>>> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded
>her
>>> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived
>in
>>> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old
>Counc"
>>> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that
>congerie
>>> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
>>> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
>>> :
>>> : Ed
>>> :
>>>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:50:19 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Folks:Sandy's note suggests one of the great problems of the folk music revival:
the almost total divorcement of folk song and ballad from folklore in
general.  Quoting from Herbert Halpert's notes to Richard Chase's _The
Jack Tales,_ "It is worth noting that both Mrs. Jane Gentry and Sam Harmon
[who furnished collectors with numbers of folk tales] were singers with
remarkable repertories." (p. 186 of the 50th anniversary edition)EdOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Sandy Paton wrote:> Jane Gentry and Maud Long also told some of the "Jack Tales" that seem to be
> traced back to Council Harmon on Beech Mountain. Gentry's links to the Beech
> Mountain/Watauga area and people seem strong, although she certainly left there as
> a child. Betty Smith's book offers a fascinating insight into the work of Cecil
> Sharp in the Appalachians. Well worth reading!
>     Sandy
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Northern singers
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 23:22:15 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


Here's Sandy Paton's reply to my question about northern singers, in
case others are interested. Thanks, Sandy, I think I'll be putting in a
custom cassette order soon.~ Becky NankivellHello, Becky:
    There are several recordings representing the northern tradition on
Folk-Legacy, but they are available only as cassettes right now. I will
be
extracting material from them when I get to work on another volume of
the
"Ballads and Songs of Tradition" series. You definitely should hear
Sarah
Cleveland, of Brant Lake, New York, a remarkable ballad singer from the
Adirondacks. Another Adirondack singer I recorded was Lawrence Older of
Middle Grove, New York, who had several fine Child ballads in his
repertoire. You will find these cassettes listed under the "Custom"
section
of my Folk-Legacy web site. Note that these cassettes come with the
booklets
of notes and texts that accompanied the original LPs.
    I also produced a collection of field recordings for New World
Records
which is now available as a CD. The title is "Brave Boys" (and they
sub-titled it "New England" traditions, even though three of the most
important singers were from New York State, but... ah, well!). You can
find
that CD listed in the index on my web site. Go to "browse" and look
around.
<http://www.folklegacy.com>
    Frank Warner gathered material from Yankee John Galusha, Lena BourneFish, and George Edwards, all three are important singers in the
northern
tradition. I would suggest you also check out the Canadian field
recordings
from the Maritimes. Sandy Ives always thought the Maine tradition was
very
closely related to that of the maritimes. The Creighton collectanea fromNova Scotia issued by Folkways (now Smithsonian/Folkways) should be of
particular interest to you. Back in the 60s, I recorded Marie Hare, a
ballad
singer from New Brunswick. Her album is another in my "custom cassette"
series. Her style was strong and straightforward, but not decorated in
the
Irish manner.
    Hope all this stuff is of some help to you. I appreciate your
interest.
    Sandy--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music[unmask]
http://www.tftm.org
NOTE NEW PHONE: 520-293-3783
PO Box 40654
Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Brightening Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 23:06:45 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Folks:FYI, 20 of you have opted to subscribe to a Folk-Legacy reprint series (if
a subscription series becomes available).It is only further evidence of a confraternity on this list.Sandy will advise us when he has the Frank Proffitt CD available for
purchase.If there is to be a subscription series, and I personally think it a good
thing, it will not go into effect until the next release.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:34:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


I just returned from two weeks of Christmas travel to find the thread
about Jane Gentry in my mailbox.  Perhaps someone might be interested
in the following.In about 1976, Art Rosenbaum joined the faculty of the University of
Georgia.  He knew Joe Hickerson, of the Library of Congress and
Archive for American Folk Song, and so did I.  Joe came to Athens on
a combination "collecting" and lecturing trip (by "collecting," I
mean that he borrowed tapes of field recordings from Art and me to
take back to the LC for duplication there.)  In the course of his
lecture about the AAFS (for a good crowd in a small auditorium on
campus), he mentioned Jane Gentry, discussed her daughter Maude
Long's contributions to the Archive, and played an excerpt of a
recording of Maude (telling a Jack tale, as I recall.)When the floor was opened for questions, the Director of General
Research, Charlie Douglas, stood up and asked if Joe knew where Maude
Long was at that time.  Joe, of course, had no idea.  Well, Charlie
continued, she's my mother-in-law and she lives right here in Athens.Charlie's wife was Jane Long Douglas, a namesake of her grandmother
Jane Gentry.  Sadly, only a few years later, Charlie died from a
burst aneurysm.  At the time he was stricken, he was in his basement
shop teaching his regular course in dulcimer making.His widow Jane is an accomplished musician who still lives in Athens.
I've never been able to persuade her sing songs or tell stories she
might have learned from her mother.  She says she doesn't recall
them.  One of my favorite research projects that I fantasize about is
having a hypnotist do age regression on Jane:  "Jane, you are 14
years old an in the kitchen with your mother.  She is singing.  Sing
along with her."  I haven't got very far with that.I have heard that a daughter of Charlie's and Jane's has taken up
traditional song.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:43:45 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


Ed:
I haven't forgotten your message.  Re the jug bands.  There were many great
LP reissues at one time, but the only CD anthologies I know of are the pair
on Yazoo:  2032/2033:  Ruckus Juice & Chitlins (spelling approximate).
There are complete sets of the Memphis Jug Band and Cannon's Jug
Stompers--probably the two major bands closest to folk tradition.  There are
many bands closer to jazz idiom, some of which have been reissued in toto on
Document and related labels (I have on hand Clifford Hayes & the Louisville
Jug Bands, but there must be others), but they are not "essential."  There
is a good Yazoo CD of the Memphis Jug Band that reissues the double LP of
the same title, which is a pretty good basic collection.
There is nothing I know of that overviews medicine show entertainers as a
genre.  There were at one time LPs devoted to Peg Leg Sam (Trix 3302:
Medicine Show Man) and Pink Anderson (Folkways FS 3588:  Carolina Medicine
Show Hokum and Blues; Prest. Bluesville BV1051:  Vol. 2--Medicine Show Man;
and others), which exemplified typical medicine show material but only in a
rather general way--i.e., same kind of material you'd get from many other
African-American songsters of that generation.  The last medicine show to
perform was supposedly in Pittsboro, NC, in 1972, featuring Peg Leg Sam
Jackson and Chief Thundercloud.  An LP of recordings from those performances
was issued on Flyright LP 507/8:  The Last Medicine Show),   I don't know if
it's been reissued on CD.   There was a video produced:  Born in Hard Luck,
on Davenport Films, but you can't look at it and get a good view of what a
medicine show performance was like.   Many white musicians had experience in
medicine shows, including Clarence Ashley, Jimmie Rodgers, Doc Hopkins, etc,
but their repertoires as recorded don't always reflect that.  One to look
for is Harmonica Frank Floyd.  He did a couple pieces, "The Great Medical
Menagerist" and "Swamp Root" that are typical medicine show patter worked
into song/talking blues format.  Both were reissued on a Puritan LP (3003)
and then on CD --I think the Genes label; I don't have the latter but I've
seen it on Amazon.com (just look for Harmonica Frank).
Your request about blues will take more time.
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, December 23, 2000 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: A Basic Library>Norm:
>
>Thank you for the most excellent list.
>
>I would recommend that you continue your suggestions (or I would suggest
>you continue your recommendations).  Perhaps you would be willing to
>venture into the area of country blues, jug bands, and medicine show
>musicians.
>
>Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:46:17 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


It should be noted that "The Jug Bands", an anthology on Folkways, and the
Folkways Pink Anderson LP are available on CD-R from Smithsonian/Folkways,
although it takes a couple of months for them to arrive. The whole catalog,
in fact, is available.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:52:52 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


John:Can you get Jane Gentry's great-granddaughter to sing for you?  Or maybe
she will help persuade her mother to sing.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 07:06:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


As I mentioned several posts above, Jane Gentry's Great Grand Daughter,
Daron Douglas, sings regularly.  We have had several programs featuring her
at the Laurel Theater in Knoxville and she was a regular participant in our
arts in the schools program.  Daron is also a great fiddler and has an LP
and a CD out (no ballad singing though).  BTW we tape all our concerts and
have several hours of Daron on DAT and Reel to reel -- along with several
other ballad singers.  Late last spring she moved to New Orleans and so we
haven't been able to book her a lot recently.  A photo of Daron is in Betty
Smith's book facing page 115.BTW, One of the great -- and generally unknown -- singers of recent time is
Johnny Ray Hicks of Fentress County Tennessee (This is NOT Ray Hick of NC).
Sadly, Mr. Hicks died last September, but we were able to tape him at his
home during several sessions before his died, and we will be combining some
of those tapes with our live concert tapes to produce a CD during the first
half of next year.  Johnny Ray was a cousin of Dee Hicks and was also
related to Dee's wife Delta whose songs show up on County 789 and on a
couple of Tennessee Folklore Society recordings including the great
"Historical Ballads of the Tennessee Valley."In a second project, some recordings made in the fifties by Guy Carawan of
Singer May Justus (of the Cocke, County Tennessee ballad tradition) have
come to light and we will be publishing those as well.  Ms. Justus was far
better know as a children's book writer, but she had been recorded singing
ballads as early as 1938, Some discs of her singing are in the Edwin C.
Kirkland Collection of Knoxville Folksong.  She was living up on the
Cumberland Plateau near the old Highlander Center when Guy first came to
work there in the 50's.If anyone would like to hear some of the folks, I'll try to play some of the
selections the next couple of weeks on my radio show, "Wild Hog in the
Woods," which airs 8:00pm EST on WDVX.  You can hear it at
http://www.wdvx.com/new_page_1.htm   I usually don't play more that two or
three a cappella ballads each show because some people can't deal handle
them.Brent Cantrell
Executive Director
Jubilee Community Arts
Knoxville

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 11:53:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Brent Cantrell wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.Since I'm doing the Christmas Revels here in Cambridge with Sheila Kay
Adams of the Sodom singers, I asked her about this - and I'm not sure
you're gonna believe the answer.She says Jane (Harmon/Hicks) Gentry - *that* Jane Gentry - is not
related, but the *other* Jane Gentry who was a ballad singer in Hot
Springs when Cecil Sharp came through - Jane Chandler Gentry - was a
relative, her granny's(?) Aunt Jane.  She said both were living there,
but Sharp only collected from one.Apparently for a long time Granny thought everyone was talking about her
Aunt Jane, until they looked into it and discovered it was another Jane
Gentry.  And apparently the "other" Jane Gentry is the only relation
between the two groups.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:10:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I just realized while mentally reviewing the conversation that Sheila
was probably talking about one of the others rather than her granny when
she mentioned whose Aunt Jane was in Hot Springs.  I'm a little unclear
on the Sodom genealogy where, as Sheila puts it, her family tree "looks
more like a telephone pole".-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:33:02 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(47 lines)


Donald:I am confused, thoroughly confused.In the _Journal of American Folklore_ 38 (1925), Isabel Gordon Carter
prints for what I believe is the first time a collection of Jack tales
(pp. 340 ff.).  On page 340, Carter notes, "The first fifteen stories were
told by Mrs. Jane Gentry of Hot Springs, North Carolina.  Mrs. Gentry was
born in Randolph County, North Carolina.  She heard the stories when she
was a child from her grandfather [presumably Council Harmon] who had
learned them from his mother [Sabra Hicks].  At first Mrs. Gentry could
not take seriously the writer's request for stories.  She had given Cecil
Sharp and others many of the ballads appearing in theri collections but no
one had asked for the stories which she had always told to amuse
children."Betty Smith, _A Singer Among Singers,_ p. 10, notes, "Although Cecil Sharp
and Isabel Gordon Carter published Jane Gentry's oral materials..."Clearly we are talking about one and the same woman.  Or are we?EdOn Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Donald A. Duncan wrote:> Brent Cantrell wrote:
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> > related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>
> Since I'm doing the Christmas Revels here in Cambridge with Sheila Kay
> Adams of the Sodom singers, I asked her about this - and I'm not sure
> you're gonna believe the answer.
>
> She says Jane (Harmon/Hicks) Gentry - *that* Jane Gentry - is not
> related, but the *other* Jane Gentry who was a ballad singer in Hot
> Springs when Cecil Sharp came through - Jane Chandler Gentry - was a
> relative, her granny's(?) Aunt Jane.  She said both were living there,
> but Sharp only collected from one.
>
> Apparently for a long time Granny thought everyone was talking about her
> Aunt Jane, until they looked into it and discovered it was another Jane
> Gentry.  And apparently the "other" Jane Gentry is the only relation
> between the two groups.
>
> -Don Duncan
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Greetings
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:47:46 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(5 lines)


Folks and Friends:Happy new millenium (finally) --Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Greetings
From: Pat Holub <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Dec 2000 22:56:47 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


At 07:47 PM 12/31/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Folks and Friends:
>
>Happy new millenium (finally) --
>
>EdHi Ed and other ballad listers,     Happy New Year to you all.  I usually like to spend New Year's Eve
with friends, but I'm home alone tonight because I have a cold.  So, I'll
send along my greetings to you, Ed, and the list.Regards,
Pat Holub    >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New Year's Greetings
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:02:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hi, folks.  Happy New Year to everyone!  I'm home, too, because I just got
back from a retreat, and I wasn't into going from retreat mode into party
mode without re-entry time.  I also want to thank everyone for their
contributions.  Do keep them coming.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: W a s s a i l Listings Free! for 2000 send them in!
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:22:34 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Free listing of all Wassail events...If you are a wassailer...and everyone should be....
read on if not just delete but not before sending this on
to a Wassailer!
As you may know....the Wassail Epicenter at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5567/wassail.html
Contains a page upon which Wassail events of all kinds all
over the world are listed. This is a free service!The waswhere page is:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5567/waswhere.htmlWant to have your event listed?
Simple- just send me an e.mail and I will add your event in.
The pages have become very popular and you will be noticed.
Just another service of Hutman Productions....(most of our web
work is donated to the world and not commercial....to help us
you may go to http://www.cbladey.com and click on the help us link on the
right)
To let us know of your event send e.mail to:
[unmask]Please feel free to send this onward via snail or net to those who may not
be on one of these lists. Then help them to reach us.Many thanks for your kind assistance.Enjoy!
Since last year many new songs and verses have been added.
Your help is always greatly appreciated.Conrad

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Gigs
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:28:42 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
"performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
frame of mind?Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
light carriages?Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:59:58 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Oxford Dictionary of Slang (1998) dates its earliest appearance to 1926 and
says it was applied to musicians playing an engagement playing jazz,
dance-music etc. - The usage example given implies that the word was used
also (and perhaps previously) to mean a job. " ... knockin' himself out on a
mail-handler gig at the Post Office where the pay is so lousy he's got to
work a part-time gig." but neither of the other uses of the word given in
this dictionary applies.
Origin is given as "Unknown"It would seem that the use of the term was at first confined within one or
two genres of music but has now become general.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 12:00:21 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


<<I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
"performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
frame of mind?Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
light carriages?>>The Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang lists first
reference as 1908, in the sense of "job" or occupation; in the sense of
"musical engagement, esp. for a single performance" first use is 1926, from
jazz slang. The only postulated definition is as a mutation of "gag", which
doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's noted as perhaps influenced by an
earlier definition from the policy racket, "a set of usually three numbers
played by a bettor", and that is noted in turn as perhaps being influenced
by the "two-wheeled, one-horse carriage". Lots of perhapses in there. Def.
1, by the way, is "a woman's vagina", but that doesn't sound like it's
closely related to the jazz usage. Perhaps it comes from what happens to
frogs at the end of a gig, and what happens to musicians ditto.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:24:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(26 lines)


Andy:Tony Thorne, _The Dictionary of Contemporary Slang_ states under
"gig": "The exact origin of the word [in speaking of a performance] is
obscure, but may be related to `jig' in the sense of a dance."In other words, he doesn't know either.None of my other slang or Americanism dictionaries is helpful.  "Gig" in
other uses (a child's pacifier, the female buttocks, etc.) seems to be
descended from the Creole.EdOn Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Andy Rouse wrote:> I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
> "performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
> frame of mind?
>
> Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
> was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
> light carriages?
>
> Andy
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:31:43 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Paul:I can't resist this.  Wentworth and Flexner in their dictionary of
American slang give multiple definitions of "gig."  They then add this
comment: "The relations, if any, btween a child's pacifier or fetish, the
rectum and vagina, a party, a sex orgy, jazz music, a pronged fork, and a
reprimand are most interesting, and lie in the field of psychology rather
than of etymology."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:16:05 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Certainly "jig" the dance is related to "gigue" or "giga" which were 6/8
dances used as the last movement in any number of Baroque suites.  The leap,
however, to 1920's jazz usage seems extremely remote.Mark

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:26:51 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


I found only about 70 songs by using the keywords "ballad" and "song."
However, there's a much bigger collection (couple thousand) at
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amsshtml/amsshome.html
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:23 PM
Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)Folks:For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.Ed-----Original Message-----
From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American MemoryGood afternoon,This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
apologies for any duplicate postings.Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American MemoryIn September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
can be found at the following url:
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
materials include such highlights as:

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:39:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.John Roberts.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time CapsuleCollection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory(fwd)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:49:58 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(69 lines)


These are later in time 19th century only
the others are from the rare book room.
and go way way back in some cases...
also more international.ConradNorm Cohen wrote:
>
> I found only about 70 songs by using the keywords "ballad" and "song."
> However, there's a much bigger collection (couple thousand) at
> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amsshtml/amsshome.html
> Norm
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:23 PM
> Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
>
> Folks:
>
> For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --
>
> In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.
>
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
> apologies for any duplicate postings.
>
> Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
> Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory
>
> In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
> Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
> American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
> thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
> of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
> can be found at the following url:
> <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .
>
> Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
> Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
> materials include such highlights as:--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:18:49 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


With this discussion of the origin of "gig," we have spawned a topic that may
explode in the same manner as the origin of the expression "the whole nine
yards" in the quotations news group! If so, this might go on for a long time.
Pete Brady

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 08:08:27 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Roberts wrote:> Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
> thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
> comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
> where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
> songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
> the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.
>
> John Roberts.
>This is the most logical, etiologically and etymologically, legend laid
before us to date.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:45:21 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Paul Beale, _Partridge's Concise Dict. of Slang & Unconventional English_
(1989), "containing only terms known to have arisen in the 20th century,"
gives as his first definition "gig, n.  An engagement to play at a party
for one evening: dance bands' [jargon or slang]; since ca. 1935. [He
cites, as a source for that part, Stanley Jackson, _An Indiscreet Guide to
Soho_, 1946, & continues...] [Derived from] Standard English _gig_, a
dance." - Beale, who is Partridge's successor, lists 6 more defs., 4 of
them Aussie slang ("young girl," "detective," etc.) & 2 of them post-1960s
USA developments of #1.Beale's work generally leaves a far stronger impression of solidity--
"stolidity" would be a complement here-- than do Wentw. & Flexner,
especially in cases like that virtual, even if semi-joking, reification in
"the relations, if any, btween a child's pacifier or fetish, the rectum
and vagina, a party, a sex orgy, ... are most interesting..."  - The steps
are too short from there to the improbable links between "carriage" and
"engagement to play," and onward to the sometimes pernicious pseudo-
definitive crap that is all over the Internet: "rule of thumb," "picnic,"
"graveyard shift," "saved by the bell,"  "raining cats & dogs," etc.Beale has a standard tag for these: "[From] a probably apocryphal story."
Outside the naturally dry context of reference books, they deserve
something closer to Letterman's "Stupid Pet Tricks" -- "Stupid Net
Etiologies," maybe. -- It'd be more amusing if not for its general
contribution to the national dumbing-down (my students believe an
appalling amount of that apocrypha) and the particular offensiveness of
some: "Never use the word 'picnic' because it's an old code phrase meaning
'pick a nigger to lynch.'" A very bright Black ex-student of mine, a
Biology M.A., asked me seriously if it were true.Oh, well. Who said, "Some people are born to circulate mistakes, and
others to go around erasing them. This keeps everybody busy."?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:40:54 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


The problem with such post-facto definitions is precisely that they are
plausible on the surface. If we de-construct this one:
a) we have no indication as yet that the term predates the 20th century or
that Music Hall artists used it or knew it
b) Top MHall artists certainly did rush from theatre to theatre, but I'm
pretty sure late 19th century London cabs were not 'gigs' in any sense (they
were Hackney cabs, Hansom cabs, etc., which were very different)
c) If we think about the reality of the situation, rather than simply place
two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal  relationship (which
is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin stories' really
occurs), the idea that the performers would confuse (either deliberately or
not) the terms for the conveyance and the destination is pretty far-fetched.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Gigs> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Roberts wrote:
>
> > Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
> > thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
> > comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
> > where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
> > songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
> > the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> >
>
> This is the most logical, etiologically and etymologically, legend laid
> before us to date.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:49:15 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


"... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
stories' really occurs)..."Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
the appropriate context?Michael Bell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:40:05 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Thanks!
Yes of course you may!
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: Gigs> "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> stories' really occurs)..."
>
> Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> the appropriate context?
>
> Michael Bell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:40:57 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(36 lines)


Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
these:  "The story is too good to check."Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
evening's musical employment.You scholars take all the fun out of it.Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:> Thanks!
> Yes of course you may!
> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Gigs
>
>
> > "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> > relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> > stories' really occurs)..."
> >
> > Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> > the appropriate context?
> >
> > Michael Bell
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:14:55 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(45 lines)


Ed, Steve, eavesdroppers-- Gary Fine, the sociologist (scholar -- sorry)
had another great phrase for it: "Too good to be false." Now pass that
shaker, OK?Cheers / MikeOn Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
>
> There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
> these:  "The story is too good to check."
>
> Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
> such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
> evening's musical employment.
>
> You scholars take all the fun out of it.
>
> Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> > Yes of course you may!
> > Steve
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: Gigs
> >
> >
> > > "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> > > relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> > > stories' really occurs)..."
> > >
> > > Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> > > the appropriate context?
> > >
> > > Michael Bell
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:33:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


This discussion meandered about a Canadian folk music list for several
days.   delurking....So I went to the "Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia" inherited from my
family -- old when I spent hours, days with it as a little kid --
copyright 1889 through 1901.The explanation preceding the definitions for "gig" note that "words
spelled gig are of various and obscure origin.  [The first] has various
senses involving the idea of rapid or whirling motion, of which "fiddle"
appears to be the oldest;" then there are references to the Icelandic word
for fiddle, Swedish for Jew's harp, Danish, Middle Dutch, Middle Low
German, Spanish and Portuguese words for fiddle.Therefore it's first definition is that of "fiddle" but it does not find a
literary reference for the term.
"A whirling or rustling sound, as that made by the blowing of wind through
branches of trees."
"Something that is whirled or moves or acts with rapidity and ease."  [a
top, a whirligig; a light carriage, on-horse chaise; a long lightly built
rowing boat adapted for racing]"Sport; fun; lively time." [reference Provincial English].
"To move up and down or spin round; wriggle."
"To fasten the leather strap to the shield."
"To use a gig or gigging-machine."
"To move lightly or rapidly; impart a free, easy motion to.""A fishing-spear."
"A device for taking fish, a kind of pull-devil designed to be dragged
through the water."
"To spear with a gig."Then as "properly pronounced jig:"  "A wanton silly girl; a flighty
person." [references of Old French, Danish, Icelandic, Swedish]... and finally:  "To engender" [from Latin for beget].I love old encyclopedias -- and you should see the Atlas!
... back to lurking ...Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio
Washington, DC

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:06:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
>
> There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
> these:  "The story is too good to check."
>
> Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
> such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
> evening's musical employment.
>
> You scholars take all the fun out of it.
>
> Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:
> ..Ed, fun and joy for me is when I've sorted through and tossed out all
the chaff and see what just might be a glimmer of truth left. Those are
rare gems that are hard to come by, and finding one calls for a
celebration.OED gives 'gig' as a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage as
first appearing in 1791, as well as other older (even to the 13th
century), but irrelevant definitions. That might have served for
a group of 2, but wouldn't hold the cast of 4 that appeared in
John Roberts' 'gig' last Friday night (even with their
instruments and mummers' play costumes on the roof and/or tied on
the back). Cited usages to 1898 don't use the word as we have it
for our subject.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:51:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
> >
> ......
>........
> OED gives 'gig' as a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage as
> first appearing in 1791, as well as other older (even to the 13th
> century), but irrelevant definitions.Whoops, I used to get annoyed by people making the same error I just
made above. The thirteen hundreds are the 14th century.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:18:33 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


At risk of being obvious - since this is a reminder of previously posted
facts:1. I quoted The Oxford Dictionary of Slang (1999) - an abridgement of a more
substantial work - which gave a usage example - this example used gig in the
now conventional sense of an "engagement to perform" but also in the sense of
a "job"
2. Ed's much commented upon dictionary, actually gave a reference for "gig"
in the sense of "job" (meaning some kind of regular empoyment) - I remember
it as 1901 - perhaps Ed, you will confirm this.The step from gig, meaning job, towards a more restricted usage - but still
within the realm of work seems slight.If my memory is correct then what we ought to be looking for is the first
application of the word "gig" to mean, an ordinary common-or-garden form of
regular employment. The usage by Jazz musicians seems simply to be a
specialised case of that meaning.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tip Top Album
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:52:35 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


I'd be grateful for some help. I am indexing a 1936 song folio entitled the
TIP TOP ALBUM OF CARSON J. ROBISON SONGS: TOGETHER WITH HILL COUNTRY BALLADS
AND OLD TIME SONGS, compiled & edited by Joe Davis, published by Tip Top Pub
Inc of New York.
My problem is that the contents page lists 50 titles, which correspond to
the actual contents up to page 18 and again from page 50 onwards, but bear
no relation to the songs in the section in between. This copy therefore
seems to be a combination of two different folios.
My question is - are they all like this, or do I simply have a rogue copy?
Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Marcus Merrin <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:16:04 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


I wasn't following very closely, so I may have missed something on this one.It seems far more likely to me that in a musical context gig could have come
from the Elizabethan sense of the word 'jig'.
C.R Baskervil  defines it thus:  ..... in its standard form was a short
burlesque comedy sung in verse and interspersed with lively dancing.It seems there are some thirty-odd texts of these stage-jigs extant.  They
don't get many re-runs these days.I suppose to nail this down we would have to find some 15 - 18th cent. use of
the word in this context..... I leave it as a class exercise.   :-)  --  Marcus
Merrin PhD. B.Sc. MRSC(CChem)
Chemistry and Internet Solutions
EmptyAir Consulting[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 08:26:19 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


John Moulden and Other Etymologists:Wentworth and Flexner, generally considered to be a reliable scholarly
source for American slang up to 1960 (its publication date), dates
"gig" in the meaning of a job or performance to ca. 1915-1920, basing it
on Louis Armstrong's 1958 biography; and on Alan Lomax, _Mr. Jelly Roll_
[Morton] published in 1954.The much older Farmer and Henley, Slang and Its Analogues (1890-1904),
offers a definition of "gig" as descended from the French _gigue_ (a
dance) to mean "fun; a frolic; a spree" with just maybe a hint of sexual
license as in the 1888 use: "A laughter-loving lass of eighteen who
dearly loved a bit of gig."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tip Top Album
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 11:59:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Steve,My copy is published by M.M.Cole, with a copyright date on the back cover of 1930.  It is entitled, "M.M. Cole Edition of Carson J. Robison's World's Greatest Collection of Mountain Ballads and Old Time Songs. "  The Contenets page (which may not be the same as your contenst page) correlates perfectly with the actual songs.  I'll be happy to send you whatever additional information you would like.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Tip Top Album
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:01:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Steve,My copy is published by M.M.Cole, with a copyright date on the back cover of 1930.  It is entitled, "M.M. Cole Edition of Carson J. Robison's World's Greatest Collection of Mountain Ballads and Old Time Songs. "  The Contents page (which may not be the same as your contents page) correlates perfectly with the actual songs.  I'll be happy to send you whatever additional information you would like.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Archie Green
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 14:44:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


What is Archie Green's e-mail address?  (If he has one.)
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Archie Green
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:26:19 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


John:  He has none.  Try telephone (415-552-3741)
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:44 AM
Subject: Archie Green>What is Archie Green's e-mail address?  (If he has one.)
>--
>john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:49:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Folks:Just in case anyone is looking for it, there is a four-volume set of
Randolph's Ozark Folksongs, one volume hardbound, three softbound, for
sale for a total of $56 at Lawrence's Books, in Torrance, Calif.Use abebooks.com to check it out.  The price seems right for this critical
state collection.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:59:53 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


On 12/16/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>Just in case anyone is looking for it, there is a four-volume set of
>Randolph's Ozark Folksongs, one volume hardbound, three softbound, for
>sale for a total of $56 at Lawrence's Books, in Torrance, Calif.
>
>Use abebooks.com to check it out.  The price seems right for this critical
>state collection.Isn't Randolph still in print? I got my copies new, and the
Homestead Pickin' Parlor (the local folk music store) has copies
of several volumes sitting on their shelves.Of course, those are probably more expensive than a used set....--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 09:26:25 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Folks:Bob asks if the four-volume Randolph Ozark set is still in print.  There
was a reprint from the State Historical Society of Missouri, but I do not
know if it is still available.  (Norm Cohen's one-volume abridgement may
still be available from Illinois.)And $56 for the four volumes _is_ a pretty fair price.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:59:34 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


The State Historical Society reprint volumes have the distinct advantage of
an excellent introduction by W.K. McNeil and additional bibliographic
information. However, they omit at least 15 songs which appear in the
earlier set (presumably because of copyright problems?) - so the true
scholar needs both the originals and the reprint on his/her shelves!!
Merry Christmas all
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: Randolph> Folks:
>
> Bob asks if the four-volume Randolph Ozark set is still in print.  There
> was a reprint from the State Historical Society of Missouri, but I do not
> know if it is still available.  (Norm Cohen's one-volume abridgement may
> still be available from Illinois.)
>
> And $56 for the four volumes _is_ a pretty fair price.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:41:17 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(74 lines)


Dear Ballad-listers,Actually, it was the University of Missouri Press that did the four-volume
reprint of _OFS_ (less the problematic items to which Steve alluded). The
State Historical Society of Missouri was the original publisher (1946-50).Missouri's web site indicates that only volume 4, _Religious Songs and
Other Items_, is still available, at $39 cloth and $19.95 paperback.A useful address to bookmark:  <http://aaup.pupress.princeton.edu>.  This
is the home page of the Association of American University Presses.  In
the WWW section click on "AAUP Member Home Pages."  Then click on the
press you want to check.  You can also search *all* member presses by
staying on the AAUP home page and using the "Search the Books Catalog"
feature.  When I did that for _Ozark Folksongs_ just now, I got the same
information about volume 4 of _OFS_.  There was also an entry for volume
3, indicating that the cloth was out of print (OP).  Noting about the
corresponding paperback, but since that didn't come up on Missouri's web
site, I assume it went OP before the cloth.  Presumably volumes 1 and 2
went OP some time ago, which is how it usually happens--the later volumes
in a series or multi-volume set hang around the longest.  Same thing
happened with Bronson, as I recall.As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.Holiday greetings to all!JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, roud wrote:> The State Historical Society reprint volumes have the distinct advantage of
> an excellent introduction by W.K. McNeil and additional bibliographic
> information. However, they omit at least 15 songs which appear in the
> earlier set (presumably because of copyright problems?) - so the true
> scholar needs both the originals and the reprint on his/her shelves!!
> Merry Christmas all
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 5:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Randolph
>
>
> > Folks:
> >
> > Bob asks if the four-volume Randolph Ozark set is still in print.
There
> > was a reprint from the State Historical Society of Missouri, but I do not
> > know if it is still available.  (Norm Cohen's one-volume abridgement may
> > still be available from Illinois.)
> >
> > And $56 for the four volumes _is_ a pretty fair price.
> >
> > Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:56:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


On 12/17/00, Judy McCulloh wrote:[ ... ]>As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
>edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.
>
>Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
>*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
>buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
>required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
>reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.I don't teach a class, and am not a professor, so I'm talking out of
turn here :-), but I don't think I *would* use this book for a class.
The point of a class text is to experience the whole range of a
regional collection. An abridged version (which must inherently lack
either the full range of texts of the more popular songs, or many
of the less popular songs) doesn't do that. Rather, the sort of
book to use for a region's songs is something like Eddy or Cox --
not nearly as comprehensive as Randolph, but covering everything
the collectors found.Put it this way: Abridged Randolph and Eddy both have subsets of
the material in their local states. But Eddy's subset evolved
naturally -- it's what turned up in a more limited skimming of
the material. The abridged Randolph, even when done by someone
with the taste and skill of Norm Cohen, is still a "laboratory
product"; it didn't turn up in the field.If I were to urge the republication of an abridgement, I think
the obvious one is Bronson's _Singing Tradition_. Or, perhaps,
it's time for an abridged version of Child. It might be possible
to publish Child in one volume if one limited the number of texts
printed and left off the critical apparatus and such and left out
the songs never collected in the field. An abridged Child is not
like an abridged Randolph; Child is an overview, and abridging
it merely means you get a more distant overview. But abridging
Randolph changes its nature completely.Or perhaps another approach: All these books are songbooks. Perhaps
something like one of Botkin's books would be a better tool for a
folklore course.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:04:39 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


Robert makes many valid points about the drawbacks of the one-volume
Randolph Ozark Folksongs.  However, the 4-volume set is "complete" only in a
very limited sense: there was a lot of material VR collected that he chose
not to include; also, an important and major category was necessarily
omitted--namely, bawdy songs.  I used those arguments in justifying editing
a 1-vol. edition, tho I was and still am sympathetic to RW's point of view.
(Reminder:  anything I say on this topic is bound to be biased.)
Norm Cohen-----Original Message-----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, December 17, 2000 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Randolph>On 12/17/00, Judy McCulloh wrote:
>
>[ ... ]
>
>>As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
>>edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.
>>
>>Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
>>*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
>>buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
>>required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
>>reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.
>
>I don't teach a class, and am not a professor, so I'm talking out of
>turn here :-), but I don't think I *would* use this book for a class.
>The point of a class text is to experience the whole range of a
>regional collection. An abridged version (which must inherently lack
>either the full range of texts of the more popular songs, or many
>of the less popular songs) doesn't do that. Rather, the sort of
>book to use for a region's songs is something like Eddy or Cox --
>not nearly as comprehensive as Randolph, but covering everything
>the collectors found.
>
>Put it this way: Abridged Randolph and Eddy both have subsets of
>the material in their local states. But Eddy's subset evolved
>naturally -- it's what turned up in a more limited skimming of
>the material. The abridged Randolph, even when done by someone
>with the taste and skill of Norm Cohen, is still a "laboratory
>product"; it didn't turn up in the field.
>
>If I were to urge the republication of an abridgement, I think
>the obvious one is Bronson's _Singing Tradition_. Or, perhaps,
>it's time for an abridged version of Child. It might be possible
>to publish Child in one volume if one limited the number of texts
>printed and left off the critical apparatus and such and left out
>the songs never collected in the field. An abridged Child is not
>like an abridged Randolph; Child is an overview, and abridging
>it merely means you get a more distant overview. But abridging
>Randolph changes its nature completely.
>
>Or perhaps another approach: All these books are songbooks. Perhaps
>something like one of Botkin's books would be a better tool for a
>folklore course.
>--
>Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
>2095 Delaware Avenue
>Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
>651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
>The Ballad Index Web Site:
>http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:04:50 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Folks:Judy confirms what Amazon.com states: The Randolph reprint, Vols. I-III,
is out of print.  Vol. IV is available, according to the website, for
$19.95, with a 4-6 week delivery time.I still say $56 for the reprint (one volume hard, three soft) is a pretty
good price.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:20:57 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(90 lines)


Folks:I have some problem with Bob's argument about the value of the Cohen
abridgement of Randolph's four volumes.1) Contrary to Bob's arguments, the one-volume abridgement is fairly
representative of Randolph's collectanea (other than the bawdy material,
which same Norm points out Randolph himself had to exclude).2) I don't think there are any other state collections as broad as
Randolph's, with the possible exception of the Brown (North Carolina)
collection edited by H.M. Belden.3) What might be missing from Randolph (work songs, black folk genres in
general, etc.) is missing from every other state collection I can think
of.  Then there are no lumbering songs, no "ethnic" music, no chanteys,
etc. -- none of which are found in the state collections with which I am
familiar.4) Botkin's treasuries are fine, but are often full of what his great
critic, Richard Dorson, called "fakelore," material of dubious oral
currency.  And there are few songs/ballads in these.5) Reprinting Bronson's _Singing Tradition_ is a fine idea, but not as a
text in a classroom.  It is, after all, merely a collection of those Child
ballads which came down to us with tunes.  And a highly selected,
laboratory (Bob's word) selection at that.6) Reprinting Child is an even better idea, but it is not and never will
be a textbook.  What it leaves out would require another book.  Or
two.  It is not even a a complete collection of folk ballads.EdOn Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> On 12/17/00, Judy McCulloh wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >As for the one-volume abridgment of _Ozark Folksongs_ that Norm Cohen
> >edited for us, that is currently out of stock (OS) but not OP.
> >
> >Well now, given the opening, let me ask:  If this one-volume version
> >*were* available, would any of you buy it?  Do you know people who would
> >buy it?  Better yet, would any of you (or your colleagues) assign it as a
> >required class text?  If so, then I'd have a stronger argument for a
> >reprint.  Thanks for any and all advice.
>
> I don't teach a class, and am not a professor, so I'm talking out of
> turn here :-), but I don't think I *would* use this book for a class.
> The point of a class text is to experience the whole range of a
> regional collection. An abridged version (which must inherently lack
> either the full range of texts of the more popular songs, or many
> of the less popular songs) doesn't do that. Rather, the sort of
> book to use for a region's songs is something like Eddy or Cox --
> not nearly as comprehensive as Randolph, but covering everything
> the collectors found.
>
> Put it this way: Abridged Randolph and Eddy both have subsets of
> the material in their local states. But Eddy's subset evolved
> naturally -- it's what turned up in a more limited skimming of
> the material. The abridged Randolph, even when done by someone
> with the taste and skill of Norm Cohen, is still a "laboratory
> product"; it didn't turn up in the field.
>
> If I were to urge the republication of an abridgement, I think
> the obvious one is Bronson's _Singing Tradition_. Or, perhaps,
> it's time for an abridged version of Child. It might be possible
> to publish Child in one volume if one limited the number of texts
> printed and left off the critical apparatus and such and left out
> the songs never collected in the field. An abridged Child is not
> like an abridged Randolph; Child is an overview, and abridging
> it merely means you get a more distant overview. But abridging
> Randolph changes its nature completely.
>
> Or perhaps another approach: All these books are songbooks. Perhaps
> something like one of Botkin's books would be a better tool for a
> folklore course.
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 03:09:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


Ed, stop me if I'm wrong, but didn't Kittredge edit a "student edition" of
Child? It seems to me that such an abridgment is sort of what these ballad
scholars are calling for in this exchange. As for the edited Randolph, I was
just asked to check on the song "S.A.V.E.D" in my original editions, as it isn't
in the reprinted collection. Copyright problems, I assume. As for the Frank
Brown collection of North Carolina material: Randolph would never have been
caught so unaware as to print "T for Texas, T for Tennessee" with a note saying
"We have not found this in other folksong collections." (Do we blame that on
Belden?) Maybe I'm just inclined to favor the autodidacts of the folklore world,
excepting Sandy Ives, whose writing is like a good, warm conversation, in spite
of his academic credentials.
    Sandy PatonEd Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> I have some problem with Bob's argument about the value of the Cohen
> abridgement of Randolph's four volumes.
>
> 1) Contrary to Bob's arguments, the one-volume abridgement is fairly
> representative of Randolph's collectanea (other than the bawdy material,
> which same Norm points out Randolph himself had to exclude).
>
> 2) I don't think there are any other state collections as broad as
> Randolph's, with the possible exception of the Brown (North Carolina)
> collection edited by H.M. Belden.
>
> 3) What might be missing from Randolph (work songs, black folk genres in
> general, etc.) is missing from every other state collection I can think
> of.  Then there are no lumbering songs, no "ethnic" music, no chanteys,
> etc. -- none of which are found in the state collections with which I am
> familiar.
>
> 4) Botkin's treasuries are fine, but are often full of what his great
> critic, Richard Dorson, called "fakelore," material of dubious oral
> currency.  And there are few songs/ballads in these.
>
> 5) Reprinting Bronson's _Singing Tradition_ is a fine idea, but not as a
> text in a classroom.  It is, after all, merely a collection of those Child
> ballads which came down to us with tunes.  And a highly selected,
> laboratory (Bob's word) selection at that.
>
> 6) Reprinting Child is an even better idea, but it is not and never will
> be a textbook.  What it leaves out would require another book.  Or
> two.  It is not even a a complete collection of folk ballads.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:26:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(122 lines)


I'm not trying to start an argument, but I think Ed has misunderstood
me. So I'll try to clarify. Keep in mind that *all* of this is in the
context of a folk song course. Nothing else. I'm trying to make sure
the students know what they need to know.On 12/17/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>I have some problem with Bob's argument about the value of the Cohen
>abridgement of Randolph's four volumes.
>
>1) Contrary to Bob's arguments, the one-volume abridgement is fairly
>representative of Randolph's collectanea (other than the bawdy material,
>which same Norm points out Randolph himself had to exclude).And which is lacking from every regional collection, for that matter.
It's too bad that there wasn't a combined publication of Randolph
and Randolph/Legman.But this isn't the point I'm making. Randolph/Cohen is probably a
more representative collection of Ozark songs than Eddy is of
Ohio songs. But the mere fact that it has limits defined by the
editor makes it fundamentally different from an inclusive
collection.This is not a defect in Child, because Child is *already* a
compilation.It's a different sort of a work. Not better or
worse; just different.Compilation *is* a defect in a regional collection. Cox or
Eddy, for all their limited scope, are *natural* collections.
I regard that as an important distinction. I don't think a
human being (even Norm Cohen) can edit a collection so as to
maintain that distinction.This doesn't make Randolph/Cohen useless. Randolph contains
a lot of junk. If you want good, representative texts of
Ozark material, then Randolph/Cohen is much easier to manage,
and has all the "good stuff." But that's a different use.>2) I don't think there are any other state collections as broad as
>Randolph's, with the possible exception of the Brown (North Carolina)
>collection edited by H.M. Belden.Agreed -- and the Ozarks preserve a wide variety of material rarely
encountered elsewhere. But that's an argument for republishing
Randolph in its entirety. :-)Again, I'm speaking specifically of a folklore course. Students
in such a course should see all the range of material that turns
up. The fragments. The unidentifiables. The mixtures. An abridged
edition will perforce give up some of this. It makes it harder
for students to realize what they are facing. :-)I say that as a joke, but it's a serious point. I went into the
Ballad Index project with no idea how many odds and ends and
fragments there are floating around. A student *needs* to see
all these items to know what lies ahead.>3) What might be missing from Randolph (work songs, black folk genres in
>general, etc.) is missing from every other state collection I can think
>of.  Then there are no lumbering songs, no "ethnic" music, no chanteys,
>etc. -- none of which are found in the state collections with which I am
>familiar.Of course. I don't think Randolph, in *any* form, is a complete text.
No state collection is. You need many books for a good course. But one
of those should be "everything found in the state.">4) Botkin's treasuries are fine, but are often full of what his great
>critic, Richard Dorson, called "fakelore," material of dubious oral
>currency.  And there are few songs/ballads in these.Depends on the collection. _American Folklore_ has many songs. The
others don't have nearly as much.The charge of "fakelore" can hardly be denied. If you already have a
folk *song* course, it's useless. But I'm trying to sneak into
folk song into a folklore course. If there is something better for
that quest, I don't know of it. The two genres are generally
separated (even by Randolph -- he published an Ozark *folklore*
book, too :-).But I'll admit that my mention of Botkin confused the issue. I
was talking about a different need.>5) Reprinting Bronson's _Singing Tradition_ is a fine idea, but not as a
>text in a classroom.  It is, after all, merely a collection of those Child
>ballads which came down to us with tunes.  And a highly selected,
>laboratory (Bob's word) selection at that.I don't see that as a fair criticism. Child itself is a laboratory
selection (as you pointed out in your next item). If Child is held
up as a model, then Bronson is a logical supplement. Now be it noted:
I don't have a high opinion of the Child canon. But if it is granted
canonical status, it needs the tunes. The four-volume Bronson is
what we really want, just as we want the four-volume Randolph.
But given what Child is, _Singing Tradition_ is a more reasonable
classroom item (as a supplement to Coffin, perhaps) than is
Randolph/Cohen.To try to make this clearer, let's assume that I were somehow responsible
for a folk song class. I would probably want to use at least six books:Laws I & II
Two "state" collections, one from the north and one from the
  south (e.g. Eddy or Cox; if we have one such "pure" collection,
  then I would allow Randolph/Cohen as well. But there must be
  the "pure" collection)
One "subject" collection, featuring a type of music (e.g. Beck
  or Hugill)
One "summary" collection (e.g. Bronson's _Singing Tradition_,
  or Coffin/Renwick)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Paddy Tutty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 10:16:18 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


To delurk briefly, I would like to second this opinion that the four-volume
Bronson is what we really want!   Does anyone know if it has ever been available
in soft-cover?Paddy Tutty"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> The four-volume Bronson is
> what we really want, just as we want the four-volume Randolph.
> But given what Child is, _Singing Tradition_ is a more reasonable
> classroom item (as a supplement to Coffin, perhaps) than is
> Randolph/Cohen.
>Paddy Tutty
Prairie Druid Music
http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/wuidland/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 08:45:01 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


Sandy:Yes, George L. did edit a abridgement of Child's ten fasicles for
students.  (Houghton published it, I believe.)  But I still don't think it
will serve as a text in an American folk song class:  it is, after all, no
more than a subset of Child ballads.  There are so many other forms of the
ballad not included: broadside, North American, fo'c'sle, bawdy, etc.And what about all the other forms of folk song?Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:15:07 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(51 lines)


On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote in part:
>
> To try to make this clearer, let's assume that I were somehow responsible
> for a folk song class. I would probably want to use at least six books:
>
> Laws I & II
> Two "state" collections, one from the north and one from the
>   south (e.g. Eddy or Cox; if we have one such "pure" collection,
>   then I would allow Randolph/Cohen as well. But there must be
>   the "pure" collection)
> One "subject" collection, featuring a type of music (e.g. Beck
>   or Hugill)
> One "summary" collection (e.g. Bronson's _Singing Tradition_,
>   or Coffin/Renwick)
> --This is truly an academic question: what texts to use in a class.Right now, at the minimum of $50 per volume, you would have students
laying out $300 for a three- or four-unit/hour/credit course.  I think
most would agree that is just too much money.In my opinion (never humble), the two Laws books are researchers' tools,
never intended for classroom use.I don't know what a "state" collection proves.  You can say in one line
that good collectors sweep up a lot of non-traditional material,
fragments, pop songs, folk rhymes, etc., etc.  Not to mention tales,
jokes, anecdotes, local legends, etc.And I don't know what you can learn from Hugill's 609 pages that might be
generalized to miners (Korson), lumberjacks (Gray, Rickaby, Beck) or
cowboys (Lomax, et al).  That all trades have both ballads and worksongs?Bronson is too narrow in scope.  No childrens songs to be found there.  No
bawdy ballads.  No American ballads.There have been collections of ballads: Mac Leach did one in the Fifties,
memory serving.  But as much as we love them, ballads are just a small
part of that corpus we call American folk music.  If you are teaching a
folk song class, you have to range more widely.Lastly, we would have to decide just what thrust this class was to take,
and thus revive an argument that dates to the first years of the 20th
C. within the American Folklore Society: is folklore a humanity or a
science, that is, is it a branch of anthropology or of literature?  The
answer to that depends upon your world view.Me?  I got my B.A. in anthro.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:15:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Agreed, Ed. Not to be used as a text for a class in general folksong, but
then, neither would the abridged, paperbound Bronson do for that purpose.
Forgot that was the goal of the list's exchange. Randolph is still the best,
in my mind, for the Anglo stuff (sans bawdy), because he knew his songsters
better than most academics. Included stuff that would have made Creighton
vomit. But he's have to be supplemented with a good survey of Afro stuff, for
sure, and Hugill and Rickaby, and... Ah, well.
    Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Randolph
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:18:15 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Oh, yes -- and Cray, for those who can't afford Randolph/Legman! Sorry for the
omission in the previous post! %^)
    Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: textbooks: was Randolph
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:34:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(19 lines)


In coming up with a list of textbooks for an American Folksong course, one
has to remember several things: first of all, americans are not just
Anglo-Americans or Afro-Americans, and one would want to include studies of
the song of at least a sampling of the diverse ethnic groups in this
country.  One survey text is Nettl's Folk Music of the United States, which
gives students at least a taste of some of the ethnic musical traditions in
this country.  Also, one would want to present a picture of how songs
function, either for individual singers, or within community contexts.  I
thinkof repertoire studies, such as Abraham's book on Almeda Riddle, or the
recent book on Jeannie Devlin, Never Without a Song.  And Ives' books on
Larry Gorman and Joe Scott--OK, those guys are Canadian--address, from a
historical perspective, song and community.  OK, gang, any other textbook
suggestions?  I have various syllabi kicking around, which I can unearth,
and I'll add to the list.  But, any other takers?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: textbooks
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:43:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


On the corrido, there's Paredes' With His Pistol in His Hand.  by the way,
there are lots of good videos around, too, and I'll unearth some resources
there, too.  I did use quite a few videos on music and song, including one
that was shot in Northern Indiana that spoke of Tambouritza traditions in
"the region."  anyway, more later.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: textbooks
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:35:22 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


This is a most interesting thread, going from the availability of a song
collection to a call for textbooks.Were I credentialed enough to teach in a college or university and called
upon to offer a course in Folksong or even North American Folksong, there
are two books that I would choose.The first, which I sadly understand is out of print, would be Folk Song in
England by A.L. Lloyd.  This book offers an overview of folksong and
balladry to include virtually all categories, except for gospel and
spiritual, and even these are given mention. It is very general, yet very
inclusive; ballads, lyrics, work songs, ribaldry, ancient and modern songs,
and with many tips of the hat to American variants. Above all, it is very
readable and yet has enough footnotes to please the most persistant pedant.The second tome would be Traditional American Folk Songs  by Anne Warner.
This wonderful compendium of the Warner collection would round out the
class. While not a complete picture of American folk song, being a
collection of songs collected in Eastern  states, it does present a
selection of both lyrics and ballads, all of which were being sung well
into the 20th Century.  This is surely a most valuable link to past
generations of singers and can serve to inspire those new to the folksong
tradition. This book is all the more important since the release of a
selection of Frank and Anne's field recordings on CD last year.On an entirely different note, did anyone else on this list tune into All
Things Considered on Saturday to hear Sam Hinton singing his song,  "Its A
Long Way From (some organism whose name I can't remember and would be
loathe to attempt to spell)"?A joyful Yuletide to All  -  Tom

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: textbooks
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 18 Dec 2000 20:32:42 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


On 12/18/00, tom hall wrote:>This is a most interesting thread, going from the availability of a song
>collection to a call for textbooks.I thought we *started* with the issue of textbooks. That was why the
issue came up. :-) I hope people don't think I'm trying, e.g., to
"slam" Randolph/Cohen. If you want to just sit down and find something
from the Ozarks, I think it much easier to use than the big volume.
I just think a student of folk songs needs to understand something
which is not evident from most cleaned up songbooks (including
Child): That very many collections are fragments, that they often
contain foreign and floating verses, that the original piece often
cannot be discerned or reconstructed. In other words, that folk songs
are *messy* things.>Were I credentialed enough to teach in a college or university and called
>upon to offer a course in Folksong or even North American Folksong, there
>are two books that I would choose.Which just goes to show how hard all this is, because no two of us
have named the same books. :-) (Though I don't consider my list
definitive. While I know what I would like to demonstrate, I don't
know which are the best books out there.)[ ... ]>The second tome would be Traditional American Folk Songs  by Anne Warner.
>This wonderful compendium of the Warner collection would round out the
>class. While not a complete picture of American folk song, being a
>collection of songs collected in Eastern  states, it does present a
>selection of both lyrics and ballads, all of which were being sung well
>into the 20th Century.  This is surely a most valuable link to past
>generations of singers and can serve to inspire those new to the folksong
>tradition. This book is all the more important since the release of a
>selection of Frank and Anne's field recordings on CD last year.And yet, I find that book a little bit strange. It's another laboratory
product, but that isn't the only reason. It just seems like an odd set.
Take "Yankee" John Galusha, one of their best informants. All his
material is obscure -- most of it never turned up anywhere else. It
just seems odd. Maybe Galusha wrote it.And there is the problem I mentioned above: All the pieces are nice
and pretty and complete. I don't think you can properly teach a folk
song course without dealing with the problem of sorting and identifying
fragments.Plus, I really do think you need to show the difference between
collections by region versus collections by occupation. Hard to
do from Warner. :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: textbooks
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:04:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


<<The first, which I sadly understand is out of print, would be Folk Song in
England by A.L. Lloyd.  This book offers an overview of folksong and
balladry to include virtually all categories, except for gospel and
spiritual, and even these are given mention. It is very general, yet very
inclusive; ballads, lyrics, work songs, ribaldry, ancient and modern songs,
and with many tips of the hat to American variants. Above all, it is very
readable and yet has enough footnotes to please the most persistant
pedant.>>Although I think I'd suggest to non-musicologists in the class that they
skip the chapter on the technical aspects of the music, going back perhaps
and reading it afterwards. I've touted the book to many friends who have
been so intimidated by that chapter that they never got to the rest of the
book, where the songs are.<<On an entirely different note, did anyone else on this list tune into All
Things Considered on Saturday to hear Sam Hinton singing his song,  "Its A
Long Way From (some organism whose name I can't remember and would be
loathe to attempt to spell)"?>>Amphioxus. No -- nuts! That's a wonderful song. Maybe the segment's still on
the NPR website."It's a long way from amphioxus, it's a long way to us
It's a long, long way from amphioxus to the meanest human cuss
Well, it's goodbye to fins and gill slits and it's welcome lungs and hair
It's a long, long way from amphioxus, but we all came from there."Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:03:10 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


As we discuss this issue of textbooks for classes, I suddenly find
myself with a question. An important one. :-)What *is* a class on folk song?I mean it. When I gave my list of potential books, I was thinking
of what was needed to train field collectors. They need to accept
that they won't get pristine versions every time, that they'll have
to sort a lot of chaff and have to try to figure out what kind of
wheat is emerging from the chaff.But that's *my* vision. It assumes that the students are already
committed to folk song studies. In this day and age, that's probably
a mistake.So what *are* we trying to teach?--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Dec 2000 09:17:49 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> As we discuss this issue of textbooks for classes, I suddenly find
> myself with a question. An important one. :-)
>
> What *is* a class on folk song?
>
> I mean it. When I gave my list of potential books, I was thinking
> of what was needed to train field collectors. They need to accept
> that they won't get pristine versions every time, that they'll have
> to sort a lot of chaff and have to try to figure out what kind of
> wheat is emerging from the chaff.
>
> But that's *my* vision. It assumes that the students are already
> committed to folk song studies. In this day and age, that's probably
> a mistake.
>
> So what *are* we trying to teach?
>Simple awareness, and a modest bit of appreciation of singers and songs --Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "Conery, Kathleen Ann" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:29:30 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(29 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
> It assumes that the students are already
> committed to folk song studies.Ed Cray wrote:
>Simple awareness, and a modest bit of appreciation of singers and songs --Isn't this the difference between an undergraduate course
(probably taken to fulfill some sort of humanities or
general education requirement, chosen because it sounded
"fun") and a graduate course (where the student has already
discovered their interest in the general field, and is
looking to focus in on their core passion, and hone their
career skills)? Not that either is a "better" class than
the other; they simply supply different needs.
In grad school $300 for texts and/or supplies for a class
that was central to my degree was high, but not out of
line. In undergrad I'd have dropped the class.I can appreciate the question of where "folksong studies"
belong; in Literature or Anthropology. I received an MFA in
Theatre, and there were the same discussions about certain
plays, and their authors, being taught in English classes.
Personally, I can see advantages to both views.Kathleen
--
Conery, Kathleen Ann
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: "Conery, Kathleen Ann" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:44:35 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Please excuse what is probably a foolish question. While I
am a great listener of traditional songs and ballads, I
have no training in the area.
Listening once again to a fine recording by John Roberts
and Tony Barrand, "Dark Ships in the Forest" (I believe...
I've misplaced the sleeve cover), I notice that one of my
favorite songs ("Tom of Bedlam") is from a book that I've
heard of many times; "Pills to Purge Melancholy". What is
this book?
All that I know (or think I know) is that it was published
a long time ago (1700s?) and the author/compiler's name is
D'Urfey? Is it a compilation from other collections, did he
collect these in the field, or did he compose these songs?
Is it available in some sort of a reprint form? Or only
through interlibrary loan? Do the songs include tunes with
lyrics or suggestions of tunes?Kathleen
--
Conery, Kathleen Ann
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: fwd: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "Conery, Kathleen Ann" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:42:45 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(57 lines)


I'm assuming this was meant as a reply to the list? I must
have some odd default setting as it came only to me.--- Begin Forwarded Message ---
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:40:21 -0600
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song ClassesOn 12/20/00, Conery, Kathleen Ann wrote:>"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>> It assumes that the students are already
>> committed to folk song studies.
>
>Ed Cray wrote:
>>Simple awareness, and a modest bit of appreciation of singers and songs --
>
>Isn't this the difference between an undergraduate course
>(probably taken to fulfill some sort of humanities or
>general education requirement, chosen because it sounded
>"fun") and a graduate course (where the student has already
>discovered their interest in the general field, and is
>looking to focus in on their core passion, and hone their
>career skills)? Not that either is a "better" class than
>the other; they simply supply different needs.
>In grad school $300 for texts and/or supplies for a class
>that was central to my degree was high, but not out of
>line. In undergrad I'd have dropped the class.Actually, depressing as it is, there are undergraduate courses
in the engineering disciplines where the cost of textbooks
approaches $300. Supply and demand....I would put it this way: The difference is not between graduate
and undergraduate courses, but between specialized and
non-specialized classes. Though I'll concede that even *that*
is more of a distinction in mathematical than non-mathematical
courses -- I could do much better in Shakespeare class than
a lit major could in quantum mechanics. :-)But the question remains, what would we *like* to be
teaching, and what books would be involved?
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."
--- End Forwarded Message ---Actually when I thought about it... the difference in text
costs might also be related to the fact that my undergrad
days were around twenty years ago now.
Kathleen
--
Conery, Kathleen Ann
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:05:24 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Kathleen:_Pills to Purge Melancholy_ is a six-volume collection of stage, street,
popular songs, folk songs and ballads edited by Henry Playford between
1698-1706, then reedited by minor poet/editor/playwright Thomas D'Urfey in
1719-1720.  (Hence D'Urfey gets credit.)  It is the biggest collection of
Restoration songs and ballads, WITH THE MUSIC, I know of.  It is also
unexpurgated.It was reprinted in 1876, and that edition reprinted in 1959 by Folklore
Library Publishers of New York, another of the redoutable Kenneth
S. Goldstein's projects.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:19:13 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


If you're trying to order a copy through a library system, you should note
that the full title is:
Wit and Mirth, or Pills to Purge Melancholy
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy> Kathleen:
>
> _Pills to Purge Melancholy_ is a six-volume collection of stage, street,
> popular songs, folk songs and ballads edited by Henry Playford between
> 1698-1706, then reedited by minor poet/editor/playwright Thomas D'Urfey in
> 1719-1720.  (Hence D'Urfey gets credit.)  It is the biggest collection of
> Restoration songs and ballads, WITH THE MUSIC, I know of.  It is also
> unexpurgated.
>
> It was reprinted in 1876, and that edition reprinted in 1959 by Folklore
> Library Publishers of New York, another of the redoutable Kenneth
> S. Goldstein's projects.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Pills to Purge Melancholoy
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 20 Dec 2000 16:37:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Kathleen:
>
> _Pills to Purge Melancholy_ is a six-volume collection of stage, street,
> popular songs, folk songs and ballads edited by Henry Playford between
> 1698-1706, then reedited by minor poet/editor/playwright Thomas D'Urfey in
> 1719-1720.  (Hence D'Urfey gets credit.)  It is the biggest collection of
> Restoration songs and ballads, WITH THE MUSIC, I know of.  It is also
> unexpurgated.
>
> It was reprinted in 1876, and that edition reprinted in 1959 by Folklore
> Library Publishers of New York, another of the redoutable Kenneth
> S. Goldstein's projects.
>
> EdCyrus L. Day gives an account of the various editions in the 1959
reprint. This is taken from Day and Murrie's 'English Songbooks,
1651-1702', 1940. There are other extant copies of some volumes of some
editions in addition to those he lists of page xii of his Introduction,
but none that I know of are the missing vol. I of the 2nd ed., 1702 or
the 1st ed. of vol. iii, 1702.It's not true that 'Pills to Purge Melancholy' is completely
unexpurgated.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: fwd: Re: Textbooks and Folk Song Classes
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:57:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:42:45PM -0600, Conery, Kathleen Ann wrote:> Reply-To:     [unmask]> I'm assuming this was meant as a reply to the list? I must
> have some odd default setting as it came only to me.        Note to all who use this mailing list.  The "Reply-To: " header
is preserved, not reset to the list.  So -- *if* you have it set, as
Kathleen has, the replies will all come to you alone as long as the
replying e-mail program honors the "Reply-To: " header -- *unless* the
person replying notices the "Reply-To: " and takes special action to
reset the address.        Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Testing, testing.
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:35:11 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Don:This is a test, it is only a test.I use U-Dub's successor to Elm, Pine (a Unix program).  Apparently, I
accidentally hit the "h" key, and turned off the full headers.Let's see if this fixes it.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Basic Library
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Dec 2000 22:02:53 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


Folks:I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
and must turn to the experts here assembled.I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have had
such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
such as Robert Johnson.Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 07:53:06 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 12/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Folks:
>
>I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
>hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
>number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
>and must turn to the experts here assembled.
>
>I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have had
>such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
>such as Robert Johnson.
>
>Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
>also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
>[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).I'd try to find a catalog of the Document record label. I've never
seen one (they're based in Austria, of all places), but the number
of reissues I've seen is absolutely astonishing. And it's not just
the big names. I have things like Kelly Harrell and Burnett &
Rutherford, and have seen quite a few others. And while the notes
aren't spectacular, they're far better than the absolutely dreadful
notes County includes with its CD re-releases. Every track is
documented as best they can: Personnel, date of recording, and issue
number.If I had the money, I'd be trying to buy their whole catalog....--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Textbooks for course in FolkSong
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 10:34:02 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


When I proposed a course in Folk Song at SUNY Binghamton, I used Pete
Seeger's THE COMPLETE FOLKSINGER, A.L.Lloyd's FOLK SONG in ENGLAND, and Jean
Ritchie's SINGING FAMILY OF THE CUMBERLANDS (which also had a record
attached).  I agree that Almeda Riddle's A SINGER AND HER SONGS by R.Abraham
would be a fine alternative to the last - it could be accompanied by her
Minstrel Record.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ed Cray's basic library
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 14:14:42 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(40 lines) , text/html(44 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:06:44 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


   Ed,Yazoo has an extraordinarily fine assortment of CD reissues of
hillbilly/country 78's on about 20 generalized topics.  Each is on a 2 CD
set.  I highly recommend that you get a catalogue and check them out.Mark GilstonIn a message dated 12/22/00 1:03:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:<< I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
 hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
 number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
 and must turn to the experts here assembled.
  >>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 20:08:52 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Document does indeed have a phenomenal catalogue of reissues, but they are
recorded from used 78's with the barest minimum of clean up and many of the
tracks are practically unlistenable.   ... caveat emptor

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 23:07:11 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


Ed:
There is no easy (certainly no short) answer to your query.  Five years or
so ago, one could compile a pretty good "basic" library of hillbilly
reissues on LPs.  Now that LPs are passe and we have switched to CDs we are
almost back at the starting gate again.  Some companies are simply reissuing
some of their good LPs on CD; even though CDs can hold almost twice what an
LP can.  So some companies are issuing revised/expanded versions of LPs.
County is doing much of the latter.  Yazoo, about whom Sandy Paton wrote
enthusiastically, has put out some lovely compilations musically, generally
topically oriented.  A serious shortcoming is inadequate documentation:
almost no discographic data (original recording dates, places, etc), and
very little commentary on the selections.  Johnny Parth's Document (Germany)
label is planning to do for hillbilly what he has been doing for blues &
gospel:  reissue everything by every artist, arranged by artist, in
chronological order.  Bob Waltz spoke favorably about that.  Trouble is,
it's hardly a "basic" library.  For many artists we don't need everything
they recorded--especially for anything like a basic selection.  On the plus
side,  Document provides complete discographic data and some background
material as well.  Unfortunately, Parth does not have the patience, it
seems, to wait for good, clean copies; consequently many of the CDs are
marred by very noisy tracks taken from 2nd or 3rd generation dubs from poor
originals.  Of course, if you want the material just for reference purposes,
that may not be considered a serious drawback.
I don't think you can put together the proper basic library on CD at the
moment, but if you want recommendations, mine would include the following.
I make these from the perspective of someone interested in hillbilly music
because (1) it is an important repository of recordings of traditional
artists doing traditional material ; and (2) lots of these artists strongly
affected oral tradition subsequent to their recordings.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Uncle Dave Macon -- a must.  County CO 3505 is the best single-CD available
now
Charlie Poole--one of the most influential No Carolina stringbands.  County
CDs 3501 and 3508 include much of the best.
Skillet Lickers--the most popular of the Georgia bands.  Try County 3509
E V Stoneman--County 3510
Eck Robertson--the first traditional fiddler; probably more here than you
need, but try County 3515
Grayson & Whitter--very influential duo; Ralph Stanley even put out a CD of
their songs last year.  County 3517 has the best
Columbia C4K 47911:  Roots 'n' Blues.  A 4-CD box of hillbilly and black
artists, similar in scope to the Harry Smith Anthology (which is also a
must)
Columbia C2K 47966:  White Country Blues.  A great compilation documenting
the influence of black music on hillbilly musicians
Country Music Foundation CMF 011:  THe Bristol Sessions.  A well documented
package of material from the important 1927 sessions conducted by Ralph Peer
that produced both the Carter Family and Jimmie Rodgers, as well as many
other great artitsts
Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
good choice
RCA 2100-2-R:  Something Got Hold of Me.  If it's still available, this is a
nice compilation of sacred music from the 20s and 30s.
If your budget allows, Bear Family has reissued the complete Carter Family
and the complete Jimmie Rodgers sessions; wonderful packages with extensive
documentation, but not cheap.  If you want to discuss this further, perhaps
I shouldn't clutter up the ballad list with my own personal idiosyncracies.
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:02 PM
Subject: A Basic Library>Folks:
>
>I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
>hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
>number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard none,
>and must turn to the experts here assembled.
>
>I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have had
>such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
>such as Robert Johnson.
>
>Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
>also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
>[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).
>
>Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 08:21:19 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(120 lines)


If list members were compiling a basic library of folksong recordings, who
would they include in the North American unaccompanied traditional ballad
section, in the sub-heading "complex, decorative style"? I have some
recordings which I think came from the Warner collection, but where else
should I look?Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "Norm Cohen" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: A Basic Library> Ed:
> There is no easy (certainly no short) answer to your query.  Five years or
> so ago, one could compile a pretty good "basic" library of hillbilly
> reissues on LPs.  Now that LPs are passe and we have switched to CDs we
are
> almost back at the starting gate again.  Some companies are simply
reissuing
> some of their good LPs on CD; even though CDs can hold almost twice what
an
> LP can.  So some companies are issuing revised/expanded versions of LPs.
> County is doing much of the latter.  Yazoo, about whom Sandy Paton wrote
> enthusiastically, has put out some lovely compilations musically,
generally
> topically oriented.  A serious shortcoming is inadequate documentation:
> almost no discographic data (original recording dates, places, etc), and
> very little commentary on the selections.  Johnny Parth's Document
(Germany)
> label is planning to do for hillbilly what he has been doing for blues &
> gospel:  reissue everything by every artist, arranged by artist, in
> chronological order.  Bob Waltz spoke favorably about that.  Trouble is,
> it's hardly a "basic" library.  For many artists we don't need everything
> they recorded--especially for anything like a basic selection.  On the
plus
> side,  Document provides complete discographic data and some background
> material as well.  Unfortunately, Parth does not have the patience, it
> seems, to wait for good, clean copies; consequently many of the CDs are
> marred by very noisy tracks taken from 2nd or 3rd generation dubs from
poor
> originals.  Of course, if you want the material just for reference
purposes,
> that may not be considered a serious drawback.
> I don't think you can put together the proper basic library on CD at the
> moment, but if you want recommendations, mine would include the following.
> I make these from the perspective of someone interested in hillbilly music
> because (1) it is an important repository of recordings of traditional
> artists doing traditional material ; and (2) lots of these artists
strongly
> affected oral tradition subsequent to their recordings.
> RECOMMENDATIONS
> Uncle Dave Macon -- a must.  County CO 3505 is the best single-CD
available
> now
> Charlie Poole--one of the most influential No Carolina stringbands.
County
> CDs 3501 and 3508 include much of the best.
> Skillet Lickers--the most popular of the Georgia bands.  Try County 3509
> E V Stoneman--County 3510
> Eck Robertson--the first traditional fiddler; probably more here than you
> need, but try County 3515
> Grayson & Whitter--very influential duo; Ralph Stanley even put out a CD
of
> their songs last year.  County 3517 has the best
> Columbia C4K 47911:  Roots 'n' Blues.  A 4-CD box of hillbilly and black
> artists, similar in scope to the Harry Smith Anthology (which is also a
> must)
> Columbia C2K 47966:  White Country Blues.  A great compilation documenting
> the influence of black music on hillbilly musicians
> Country Music Foundation CMF 011:  THe Bristol Sessions.  A well
documented
> package of material from the important 1927 sessions conducted by Ralph
Peer
> that produced both the Carter Family and Jimmie Rodgers, as well as many
> other great artitsts
> Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
> produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
> hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
> good choice
> RCA 2100-2-R:  Something Got Hold of Me.  If it's still available, this is
a
> nice compilation of sacred music from the 20s and 30s.
> If your budget allows, Bear Family has reissued the complete Carter Family
> and the complete Jimmie Rodgers sessions; wonderful packages with
extensive
> documentation, but not cheap.  If you want to discuss this further,
perhaps
> I shouldn't clutter up the ballad list with my own personal
idiosyncracies.
> Norm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, December 21, 2000 10:02 PM
> Subject: A Basic Library
>
>
> >Folks:
> >
> >I am interested in compiling a basic library of folk music as recorded on
> >hillbilly/country 78s, and later anthologized on CD.  I understand that a
> >number of smaller labels have reissued these collections, have heard
none,
> >and must turn to the experts here assembled.
> >
> >I know the Carter Family, Dock Boggs, the Stanley Brothers, et al have
had
> >such releases -- not to mention the older collections of bluesmen/women
> >such as Robert Johnson.
> >
> >Yes, I have the Harry Smith collection as reissued on Folkways.  (I
> >also understand that there is a fourth volume on Revenant
> >[www.harrysmitharchives.com/works/anthology4/html]).
> >
> >Ed
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Document Recordings (Was: Re: A Basic Library)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 09:40:54 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(154 lines)


On 12/22/00, Norm Cohen wrote:>Ed:
>There is no easy (certainly no short) answer to your query.  Five years or
>so ago, one could compile a pretty good "basic" library of hillbilly
>reissues on LPs.  Now that LPs are passe and we have switched to CDs we are
>almost back at the starting gate again.  Some companies are simply reissuing
>some of their good LPs on CD; even though CDs can hold almost twice what an
>LP can.  So some companies are issuing revised/expanded versions of LPs.
>County is doing much of the latter.As a footnote: They aren't so much revising as recombining. For
example, they converted four LPs of Charlie Poole to three CDs.
A good trick, that: If you had part of their Charlie Poole collection
on LP (I did), you may still have to buy all the CDs to fill out
your set. :-(More irritating is the fact that they *still* haven't come up with
decent liner notes.>Yazoo, about whom Sandy Paton wrote
>enthusiastically, has put out some lovely compilations musically, generally
>topically oriented.  A serious shortcoming is inadequate documentation:
>almost no discographic data (original recording dates, places, etc), and
>very little commentary on the selections.  Johnny Parth's Document (Germany)
>label is planning to do for hillbilly what he has been doing for blues &
>gospel:  reissue everything by every artist, arranged by artist, in
>chronological order.  Bob Waltz spoke favorably about that.  Trouble is,
>it's hardly a "basic" library.  For many artists we don't need everything
>they recorded--especially for anything like a basic selection.I'll agree with this overall -- but I still think that one should have
*all* of at least a few artists' recordings. For example, people who
came to Kelly Harrell from the material on the Folkways anthology
would think that he did mostly pure versions of standard ballads
(Charles Guiteau, The State of Arkansas). But in fact, though his
material is almost all traditional (unlike, say, Charlie Poole),
it's not all ballads; he has something of everything, including
playparties ("Cave Love Has Gained the Day").Harrell might be a good performer to use as an instance of
"everything he ever did" -- it's only two CDs on document,
and these, at least, aren't too noisy.Another good one, from that standpoint (even though it's a bit
more recent) is the Smithsonian/Folkways recording of
Bascom Lamar Lunsford, "Ballads, Banjo Tunes, and Sacred
Songs of Western North Carolina." It's not from the 78 era,
and it's edited (sigh), but it gives a good feel for the
whole range of music people would sing.>On the plus
>side,  Document provides complete discographic data and some background
>material as well.  Unfortunately, Parth does not have the patience, it
>seems, to wait for good, clean copies; consequently many of the CDs are
>marred by very noisy tracks taken from 2nd or 3rd generation dubs from poor
>originals.  Of course, if you want the material just for reference purposes,
>that may not be considered a serious drawback.This brings up some questions, and maybe we should compile a "group"
answer. The Document recordings I have heard are all pretty clean
(better than some of County's Charlie Poole material), and I don't
like fiddling with recordings if they are tolerable as they are.
(Of course, there are cuts which need help; that's a different
story. But I'd consider that the exception rather than the rule.)And I'll admit that they don't have great notes; I'd rather see more.
It's just that the chief competition -- at least from what I've
seen -- is County, and County's stuff is even worse from the
documentation standpoint.Anyway, can we compile a catalog of "good" versus "bad" Document
recordings? This would be helpful to me, at least, in deciding
what to pick up next. (I just discovered the series recently,
and the music store of course doesn't have store plays. They
don't even have the complete series in stock.)I must admit that I've only listened to three of them enough to
be sure of the quality. All are quite good if you ask me:Burnett & Rutherford    (DOCD-8025)
Kelly Harrell Volume 1  (DOCD-8026)
Kelly Harrell Volume 2  (DOCD-8027)(Hm -- just as a though: All three of those came out in 1998. Is
it possible that Document's early releases were un-cleaned-up,
but that they're trying harder now?)>I don't think you can put together the proper basic library on CD at the
>moment, but if you want recommendations, mine would include the following.
>I make these from the perspective of someone interested in hillbilly music
>because (1) it is an important repository of recordings of traditional
>artists doing traditional material ; and (2) lots of these artists strongly
>affected oral tradition subsequent to their recordings.Looking at the list below, I find myself thinking: Can we possibly
*ourselves* compile liner notes for these?>RECOMMENDATIONSSome random observations on the ones I have>Uncle Dave Macon -- a must.  County CO 3505 is the best single-CD available
>nowThis one at least gives dates of recording, though that's ALL it gives.>Charlie Poole--one of the most influential No Carolina stringbands.  County
>CDs 3501 and 3508 include much of the best.Though, since there are only three, you might as well buy the whole
set if you're buying two. :-) Also, anyone buying Charlie Poole records
should pick up Kinney Rorrer's book on Poole. It has complete recording
details, song texts -- and, as an added bonus, a Poole biography.
(The biography is the main point, actually, but I bought it for the
appendices.)[ ... ]>E V Stoneman--County 3510The best notes I've ever seen on a County recording. The bad news?
Well, my copy may be unusual -- but it skips a lot. Yes, the *CD*
skips. It wasn't pressed very well.[ ... ]>Grayson & Whitter--very influential duo; Ralph Stanley even put out a CD of
>their songs last year.  County 3517 has the bestHas dates of recordings, and you can glean facts about some of the songs
from the overall notes. But, generally, another County flop in the notes
department.[ ... ]>Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
>produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
>hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
>good choiceAnother good one of this sort is Old-Time Mountain Ballads, County
CD-3504. 18 cuts, from Clarence Ashley, Burnett & Rutherford (2 cuts),
B. F. Shelton, Kelly Harrell, Grayson & Whitter (2 cuts), Red Fox
Chasers, Buell Kazee, Blind Alfred Reed, Rutherford & Foster,
Hickory Nuts, Green Bailey, Aulton Ray, John Hammond, Byrd Moore,
Frank Jenkins's Pilot Mountaineers, and Dave Macon. This is another
one with decent discographic data.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 13:20:59 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Norm:Thank you for the most excellent list.I would recommend that you continue your suggestions (or I would suggest
you continue your recommendations).  Perhaps you would be willing to
venture into the area of country blues, jug bands, and medicine show
musicians.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 13:34:22 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


Ruairidh:In seeking examples of the "decorative" singing style, you might start
with the Archive of American Folksong two CDs on the ballad (AFS 14 and
AFS 21).  There are some accompanied ballads on these compilations (Woody
Guthrie's "Gypsy Davy" among them) but most are unaccompanied.Beyond that, I suggest Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
northern singers.  One after the other is stunning.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folk and Country re-recordings (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Dec 2000 21:15:11 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


Folks:Dick seems to be having problems with his email system, so I am sending
this to the list for him.The point is this: he stands ready to aid us in our need for CDs.  Which
is good.Now, if he would just let us know what the "new" (or old) releases were
each month --Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 23:10:42 -0500
From: Dick Greenhaus <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Folk and Country re-recordingsHi Ed-
I've been posting this message to the Balld list, but it dowsn't seem to
be getting out. Anyway, Camsco Music, which is me, carries EVERY folk,
old-time country and generally folkish record in print. This includes
Yazoo's splendid series of re-mastered commercial recordings from the
20s and 30s, Document's complete, but unevenly recorded, collection, the
entire Folkways line, Rounder, County, Arhooly, Shanachie, the Bear
Family's monumental (and pricey) collections and whatever else. And my
prices are very competitive to those of people like CDNow and
Amazon.com.you can reach Camsco at:    [unmask]or by phone at:                   800/548-FOLK(3655)You not only get the most complete selection available with one-stop
convenience, but you have unlimited access to whatever small expertise I
may have accumulated.dick greenhaus

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Grim Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 05:01:13 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(50 lines)


Folks:I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:A subscription series.I do not know how many are on the ballad-l list, but perhaps there are 50
people hereon subscribed willing to venture $20 to help underwrite the
republication of the very important Frank Proffitt material.  (I noted
about half a dozen familiar names from ballad-l on the Tabula Gratulatoria
[Latin for "subscribers"] in the recent Edward Ives _festschrift._ By
buying in advance, one helps to underwrite the cost.The price is not too high when one considers that I routinely pay $18.50
for a CD here in California ($16.98 plus 8.5 percent sales tax) and get
nowhere near the comprehensive liner notes Folk-Legacy includes.  We might
even get Sandy to write a retrospective appreciation of Proffitt, whom I
consider to be a singer of the very first rank.Will those with a more mercantile sense (Dick Greenhaus, are you
listening?) please reply.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 00:53:11 -0500
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
To: "Cray, Ed" <[unmask]>
Subject: well, I tried!I took your suggestion to heart, Ed, and sent my note to the list, but
never saw it appear there. Don't know what I did wrong. I did add one
additional 2 volume set - I Can't Be Satisfied - Early American Women
Blues Singers. I remember Dick having a full tub of the Document series,
and I got one of the Global Village CDs from him, but that is of field
recordings, not early commercial "rural" stuff.
    What is astonishing to me now is the new Voice of the People series
that Topic has released -- 20 volumes of field recorded material in
Britain, mostly unaccompanied. How in hell do they ever expect to get
their bait back? I'm struggling to get a couple of my own field
recordings onto CD, especially my Frank Proffitt stuff, as I do think my
recordings were done on better equipment than Frank Warner was able to
use for his field collecting, but experience has shown me that they
won't sell enough to cover their production costs, even if you write
another glowing review to give 'em a boost.
    Anyway, if you think my note to you is appropriate for the Ballad-L,
and want to post it there, it's okay with me. I tried, but never saw it
arrive.
    Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Nancy-Jean Seigel <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:20:34 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
needed, let's do what must be done.Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 06:23:26 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Folks:Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?EdOn Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:> To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
>
> The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> needed, let's do what must be done.
>
> Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
>
> Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:45:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Sure ...
Lorne Brown
Toronto CanadaEd Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?
>
> Ed
>
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:
>
> > To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
> >
> > The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> > treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> > valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> > needed, let's do what must be done.
> >
> > Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> > republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> > collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
> >
> > Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:47:36 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


Absolutely.Lorne Brown wrote:> Sure ...
> Lorne Brown
> Toronto Canada
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Folks:
> >
> > Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:
> >
> > > To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
> > >
> > > The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> > > treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> > > valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> > > needed, let's do what must be done.
> > >
> > > Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> > > republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> > > collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
> > >
> > > Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
> > >--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Carolyn A. and Peter S. Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:17:32 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


I'd be in agreement.Perhaps this question could be posed again after "the holidays" (Christmas to
Europeans.)John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Less Grim Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:49:45 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(3 lines)


Now we are five --Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Karen Kaplan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:48:05 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(58 lines) , text/html(81 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:58:24 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


I'll subscribe.Lew Becker
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Mary Stafford <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:19:03 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Count me in.Mary Stafford
[unmask]I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:A subscription series.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Less Grim Economics
From: Jeri Corlew <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 11:32:43 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 07:49:45 -0800, Ed Cray wrote:
>Now we are five --
>
>Ed
Now we are six --
(Me too.)--
Jeri Corlew

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:29:25 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


Sign me up too, and let me know where to send the check.At 05:01 AM 12/24/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Folks:
>
>I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:
>
>A subscription series.
>
>I do not know how many are on the ballad-l list, but perhaps there are 50
>people hereon subscribed willing to venture $20 to help underwrite the
>republication of the very important Frank Proffitt material.  (I noted
>about half a dozen familiar names from ballad-l on the Tabula Gratulatoria
>[Latin for "subscribers"] in the recent Edward Ives _festschrift._ By
>buying in advance, one helps to underwrite the cost.
>
>The price is not too high when one considers that I routinely pay $18.50
>for a CD here in California ($16.98 plus 8.5 percent sales tax) and get
>nowhere near the comprehensive liner notes Folk-Legacy includes.  We might
>even get Sandy to write a retrospective appreciation of Proffitt, whom I
>consider to be a singer of the very first rank.
>
>Will those with a more mercantile sense (Dick Greenhaus, are you
>listening?) please reply.
>
>Ed
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 00:53:11 -0500
>From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
>To: "Cray, Ed" <[unmask]>
>Subject: well, I tried!
>
>I took your suggestion to heart, Ed, and sent my note to the list, but
>never saw it appear there. Don't know what I did wrong. I did add one
>additional 2 volume set - I Can't Be Satisfied - Early American Women
>Blues Singers. I remember Dick having a full tub of the Document series,
>and I got one of the Global Village CDs from him, but that is of field
>recordings, not early commercial "rural" stuff.
>    What is astonishing to me now is the new Voice of the People series
>that Topic has released -- 20 volumes of field recorded material in
>Britain, mostly unaccompanied. How in hell do they ever expect to get
>their bait back? I'm struggling to get a couple of my own field
>recordings onto CD, especially my Frank Proffitt stuff, as I do think my
>recordings were done on better equipment than Frank Warner was able to
>use for his field collecting, but experience has shown me that they
>won't sell enough to cover their production costs, even if you write
>another glowing review to give 'em a boost.
>    Anyway, if you think my note to you is appropriate for the Ballad-L,
>and want to post it there, it's okay with me. I tried, but never saw it
>arrive.
>    Sandy
>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: "Roy G. Berkeley" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:13:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


Count me in.
Roy BerkeleyLorne Brown wrote:> Sure ...
> Lorne Brown
> Toronto Canada
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Folks:
> >
> > Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Nancy-Jean Seigel wrote:
> >
> > > To the "folks still above ground" who can do something about it,
> > >
> > > The Voice of the People series put out by Topic is a treasure as well as a
> > > treasury.  Shouldn't we be supporting any and all efforts to get our own
> > > valuable field recordings out and available?  If a ground swell movement is
> > > needed, let's do what must be done.
> > >
> > > Sandy Paton needs support to give us what will disappear if he cannot
> > > republicize and give scholarly description to materials from his years of
> > > collecting.  I'm for the underwrite suggestion.
> > >
> > > Nancy-Jean Ballard Seigel
> > >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Promising Economics
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 13:28:28 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


Count us in too. To whom does the check get sent?  Wassail!  Tom & Linn

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: "David N. Pyles" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:34:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


Ditto for me.Dave PylesAt 12:29 PM 12/24/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Date:    Sun, 24 Dec 2000 09:29:25 -0800
>From:    Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
>Subject: Re: Grim Economics
>
>Sign me up too, and let me know where to send the check.=====================
David N. Pyles
acousticmusic.com
P. O. Box 459
Brattleboro, VT 05302-0459
(802) 257-0336 Mon-Thur 9:30am-4:30pm
http://www.acousticmusic.com/frames
http://www.acousticmusic.com/frames/fame.htm
=====================
The last time somebody listened to a Bush, folks wandered in the desert for
40 years

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:55:39 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I'm in and I'll raise.It sure would be nice to see the Beech Mtn Anthologies back along with
Gunning and the Tar Heels.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Promising Economics
From: Gwenzilla <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:51:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Please, put my name on that list as well.Gwen Knighton                                   [unmask]
                      www.threeweirdsisters.com
______________________________________________________________________
Those who abandon their own dreams . . . will try to discourage yours.
______________________________________________________________________
                  -*Cyny Telyn* -- /Sing/ the harp-

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:58:21 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 05:01:13AM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> I have an idea that might address Sandy Paton's dilemma:
>
> A subscription series.
>
> I do not know how many are on the ballad-l list, but perhaps there are 50
> people hereon subscribed willing to venture $20 to help underwrite the
> republication of the very important Frank Proffitt material.  (I noted        Count me in.        We'll need an address (and probably something specific to make
the check out to, such as "republication fund" or whatever you select.)        Merry Christmas,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Nathan Rose <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:12:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


I'll subscribe.Nathan Rose

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:47:26 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Good folks all:
    I've written a note of gratitude to Ed Cray, thanking him for his
offer of help with the production costs of the Proffitt CD. I've already
had it re-mastered digitally from the original field tapes and am now
about halfway through the notes for the insert booklet, which will be
about 28 pages (whew!). I'm looking at an early Spring release, if the
creek don't rise.
    What I would suggest is that you all hold onto your hard-earned cash
and let me notify you via the listserv when the "product" is in hand. At
that time, a simple order via phone (800-836-0901) or e-missive
([unmask]) or even (gasp) via our web site's credit card
encrypted order blank. Click on this: <http://www.folklegacy.com>.
Calling gives you a chance to talk with Caroline, always a pleasant
experience, but beware, she may also sell you the "Ballads and Songs of
Tradition" CD that is already on the market. A sampling from forty years
of field collecting, with a booklet of less academic and more personal
notes than usual, but nearly 60 pages of 'em (once reviewed here by our
friend, Ed Cray, his own self)! We can front for the initial production
costs, friends, but it's reassuring to know that a bunch of you ballad
people are willing to place orders. I'll let you know when the CD is
available. In the meantime, let your money earn interest in your mutual
fund account. You all do have mutual fund accounts, don't you? %^)
    With warmest good wishes to all for the holidays and the millennium
to come!
    Sandy Paton (Folk-Legacy's resident folk fogey)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 17:33:04 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(72 lines)


On 12/24/00, Sandy Paton wrote:[ ... ]>    What I would suggest is that you all hold onto your hard-earned cash
>and let me notify you via the listserv when the "product" is in hand. At
>that time, a simple order via phone (800-836-0901) or e-missive
>([unmask]) or even (gasp) via our web site's credit card
>encrypted order blank. Click on this: <http://www.folklegacy.com>.
>Calling gives you a chance to talk with Caroline, always a pleasant
>experience, but beware, she may also sell you the "Ballads and Songs of
>Tradition" CD that is already on the market. A sampling from forty years
>of field collecting, with a booklet of less academic and more personal
>notes than usual, but nearly 60 pages of 'em (once reviewed here by our
>friend, Ed Cray, his own self)! We can front for the initial production
>costs, friends, but it's reassuring to know that a bunch of you ballad
>people are willing to place orders. I'll let you know when the CD is
>available. In the meantime, let your money earn interest in your mutual
>fund account. You all do have mutual fund accounts, don't you? %^)
>    With warmest good wishes to all for the holidays and the millennium
>to come!Just a question on cost saving and liner notes:I've always loved Folk-Legacy's liner notes, and one of these days
I'm going to sit down and figure out how much it costs to get the
notes for the 20 or so albums I have which came without them, and
order them (a complicated task, since they're for CDs and LPs and
I think *one* cassette -- I *hate* cassettes...).But do they really need to be printed liner notes and lyric sheets?
Particularly the latter? That's a lot of paper, and hence a significant
extra expense.Why not just put the lyrics on the CD? Even if you fill the CD
chock-full of music, it's nearly certain that you'll have a few
megabytes hanging off the end. Probably more than a few. Use that
space to create a CD-ROM in miniature. With the lyric sheets,
liner notes, and anything else that springs to mind (photos of
the performers? Tributes from the members of this list, maybe? :-).
There is no added cost, and a lot of added value.I know that there are people out there who don't have CD drives to
read the things. That's why I don't think the *complete* liner notes
should go on the CD-ROM partition. But a CD-ROM lets you put in much
more information than you can supply on paper. And I think that a
*very* large fraction of the audience for a Folk-Legacy disc will
have some sort of computer access.A couple of years ago, Copper Creek records was doing this with
all their CDs. Then, for some reason, they stopped. I hated it.
It was really sad. Not only did it mean that their liner notes
went back from being good to being lousy (I know Folk-Legacy
won't be guilty of that :-), but it also cost me the fun of
digging around and seeing what was on the CD. :-)As an aside: There is probably a great deal of stuff in Folk-Legacy's
archives none of us have ever heard. It would be great if that could
somehow be made available. We're all used to reissues of 78s and the
like; we don't demand the highest sound quality. What are the odds
of a bare-bones in-the-basement A-to-D conversion, and of selling
these things on CD-R? I suppose there are problems with rights and
such -- but I hate to see that material go to waste.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 15:56:21 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(25 lines)


On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote in part:> As an aside: There is probably a great deal of stuff in Folk-Legacy's
> archives none of us have ever heard. It would be great if that could
> somehow be made available. We're all used to reissues of 78s and the
> like; we don't demand the highest sound quality. What are the odds
> of a bare-bones in-the-basement A-to-D conversion, and of selling
> these things on CD-R? I suppose there are problems with rights and
> such -- but I hate to see that material go to waste.
>To which Ed Cray answers (in part) before the Christmas cheer overwhelms
his normally good judgment:I would meld my earlier idea of a subscription with Bob's suggestion of
emptying Paton's basement.  What if we were to subscribe to, say, reissues
and/or new releases on a quarterly basis?Like Bob, I think including the "lesser" songs not released on LP is an
excellent idea.Unlike Bob, I do not think filling out the CD with printed text in lieu of
a booklet is a good idea.  I like those inserts.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 20:03:43 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


 Let's hear it for paper liner booklets !!!    I would also be very
interested in having the Beech Mountain material available on CD and would
happily pay $20 for a copy.-Mark Gilston

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Edie Gale Hays <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2000 20:27:17 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


>I'll subscribe.Me too.Edie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: More On Electronic vs. Paper Liner Notes
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:57:18 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(73 lines)


Since there seems to be a bit of a surge in favour of paper
liner notes, I'd like to makes some points on this subject.First, let's distinguish between SOURCE NOTES and SONG TEXTS.
Source notes are absolutely vital to every user of a recording,
and I agree, these should stay in a booklet in the CD.But song texts are different. Why do we want the song texts?
I don't know about you, but my usual use for a lyric sheet
is to learn to sing the song.Now back in the days of LPs, when Folk-Legacy was using those
wonderful full-size booklets, their "built-in" lyric sheets
were wonderful. They were easy to read, and you could get
whole songs on a given page.But now think about a CD liner insert. They're tiny. With
the best intentions in the world, song lyrics have to be
printed in small type, in crazy column arrangements, with
songs flowing from page to page. In other words, it's much
harder to learn the song lyrics from those.Put the lyrics in a file on the CD, though, and the user
can print out the songs he/she wants at a size large enough
to be usable.Then, too, those lyric files are useful to everyone, not
just those who have good eyesight.And another thing about putting the notes on a CD insert:
You're always tempted to cut corners. Suppose you cut
one paragraph from a song introduction. Or you cut a photo.
It can potentially gain you *four pages*. If you're
printing on glossy paper, that could be 30-50 cents saved
per CD. Besides, the jewel box can only hold so much paper.
There is an upper bound on what you can include.Whereas the capacity of the CD-ROM, even if it only gets
the "end" of the disc after it's been filled with songs,
is nearly unlimited. 4 MB (the equivalent of about half
a minute of music) could hold the complete texts and notes
for every song, the complete Folk-Legacy catalog, a dozen
scholarly articles, and eight or nine JPEG photos of the
performers -- and still have space left over.If people still want lyric sheets in their liner notes, well,
I won't really object. But this isn't an either/or proposition.
Put whatever must go in the liner notes in the liner notes.
But put all that, *and more*, on the CD itself. Again, note
the key fact here: It's added value at *no added cost*.It could even become a selling point: "Every Folk-Legacy
Album, in addition to the music and complete song texts
and notes, comes with on-disc extras: Complete notes,
photos of the performers, and at least one surprise on
every record." The "surprise" could vary from record to
record -- e.g. a Gordon Bok album could include photos
of some of his woodcuts, while an album of Civil War songs
might include a history of the Battle of Gettysburg, and
an album of Jacobite songs might have copies of paintings
of Culloden. Or you could include sheet music of the songs,
or guitar chords. An album of folktales could include an
essay on the sources, or maps of the places involved, or
a glossary of the words used. All this takes is a good
imagination....
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: More On Electronic vs. Paper Liner Notes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 10:41:49 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Bob:Fine.  We will compromise.Sandy will write his usually brilliant source notes, then print them in
booklet form for the CD.  Then Sandy will hire a couple of researchers,
send them all around the world to gather illustrative materials, arrange
clearances, pay fees, digitize the resulting research, and tack it all on
the end of the CD in ROM form.And some sonovabitch somewhere will grumble about the $20 asking price,
insisting it only costs a buck to a buck and a quarter to manufacture the
damn CD, and, boy, these record companies are sure raking it in.Merry Christmas, Bob, to you and yours, and to any Ballad-list
eavesdroppers.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ed Cray's basic library
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:21:32 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


<<Ed, if you haven't found them yet, let me urge you to check out the Yazoo
series of
re-issues that Shanachie has produced: Music of Kentucky (2 volumes), Times
Ain't
Like They Used to Be (4 volumes!), Hard Times Come Again No More (2
volumes), My Rough and Rowdy Ways (Badman Ballads and Hellraising Songs, 2
volumes), The Rose Grew Round the Briar (Early American Rural Love Songs, 2
volumes), When I Was a Cowboy (2 volumes), Ruckus Juice and Chitlins (The
Great
Jug Bands, 2 volumes), The Story That the Crow Told Me (Early American Rural
Children's Songs, 2 volumes), How Can I Keep From Singing (Early American
Religious Music and Song, 2 volumes), The Half Ain't Never Been Told (More
Religious Music and Song, 2 volumes) and The Cornshucker's Frolic (Downhome
Music and Entertainment from the American Countryside, 2 volumes). These are
among my favorite CDs and are now kept in my office to play on the computer
system while I'm working. Great stuff! For instance, there are FOUR cuts of
the
great Alfred Karnes on The Music of Kentucky Volume 1. Dick Greenhaus at
<http://www.camsco.com> can get all of these for you and will give you a
very
good price. He also deserves the business, as he is doing a great job of
making real
folk music available through one convenient source.  Forgot to include the 2
volume I Can't Be Satisfied (Early American Women Blues Singers). >>To Sandy's comments, which saved me making the same recommendations, I'd add
that Yazoo also puts out CDs devoted to individual artists, including
original sessions by Mississippi John Hurt, Skip James, and new editions
(from cleaner discs) by Blind Blake & Blind Lemon Jefferson. Also the series
of ethnic recordings including "The Secret Museum of Mankind" and volumes
devoted to reissued Irish and Klezmer material. All remastered by Richard
Nevins, one of the best remastering engineers on earth. The only weakness is
poor notes and virtually zero discographical information -- but the music is
fabulous, and so's the sound.Rounder has also done excellent work, usually with better discography but
not as good sound. Document's sound is often awful but they're great for the
Complete Anybody, with good info.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Document Recordings (Was: Re: A Basic Library)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:41:06 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]><<Another good one, from that standpoint (even though it's a bit
more recent) is the Smithsonian/Folkways recording of
Bascom Lamar Lunsford, "Ballads, Banjo Tunes, and Sacred
Songs of Western North Carolina." It's not from the 78 era,
and it's edited (sigh), but it gives a good feel for the
whole range of music people would sing.>>An idea, yes, but nothing close to the whole collection. There's a whole LP
on Tradition, for example, and I don't think any of that made the
Smith/Folk. anthology.<<This brings up some questions, and maybe we should compile a "group"
answer. The Document recordings I have heard are all pretty clean
(better than some of County's Charlie Poole material), and I don't
like fiddling with recordings if they are tolerable as they are.
(Of course, there are cuts which need help; that's a different
story. But I'd consider that the exception rather than the rule.)>><<(Hm -- just as a though: All three of those came out in 1998. Is
it possible that Document's early releases were un-cleaned-up,
but that they're trying harder now?)>>I don't think so; Parth assembles most of his discs from cassette dubs of
the originals, or sometimes dubs of dubs, with crude noise reduction that
pumps and grinds. My Alphabetical Four CD, for example, varies from
fairly-okay to godawful, including one track missing the first minute of
music (it comes in at the break). I have the 78s for four of these sides and
I can tell you the sound is a whole lot better than the Document CDs.>Global Village CD 1004: Native Virginia Ballads.  A reissue of an LP
>produced by the Blue Ridge Instutute, tho not all the selections are from
>hillbilly recordings.  But as a genre CD, rather than an artist CD, it's a
>good choiceThe whole Global Village Music of Virginia series looks good on paper, and
the ones I've heard have decent sound when possible and at least proper
dates.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Grim Economics
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:46:27 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


<<Okay, that's two.  Anyone else want to ante up?>>Count me in.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Fw: William Main Doerflinger 1909-2000
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:56:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(66 lines)


Forward.>From: Dan Milner
>To:
>Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 4:46 PM
>Subject: William Main Doerflinger 1909-2000> William Main Doerflinger  1909-2000
>
> It is with great sorrow that I pass on the word that William Main
> Doerflinger, folk song collector and author-compiler of Shantymen and
> Shantyboys (later reissued as Songs of the Sailor and Lumberman) died at
> 6:45AM on December 23rd at his home in New Jersey.  Bill died from a
stroke
> following an operation.  He was 91.
>
> Bill, of course, was the only person ever to collect the great forebitter,
> "The Leaving of Liverpool," from tradition.
>
> Bill told me that he started collecting folk songs as a student at
Princeton
> University.  His first field trip was to Nova Scotia and his first
informant
> was the bus driver who drove him to his first night's accommodation.  His
> specialty was, of course, the songs he found in coastal New England and
the
> Canadian Maritimes, and in New York at Sailors' Snug Harbor and other
> places.  They were the repertoire of deepwater mariners and offshore
> fishermen, and lumbermen who felled trees in northern forests.
>
> Bill and my wife, Bonnie, befriended each other 20 years ago.  It was
> through her that I had the good fortune to meet him.  Bill was courtly,
kind
> and witty, yet he could be a "no-nonsense" man when it was appropriate.
He
> was, by profession, a book editor and, consequently, someone familiar with
> both truth and fiction.  After I asked him to look over the notes of my
CD,
> Irish Ballads & Songs of the Sea, I became the beneficiary of his great
> knowledge and simple frankness when clearly set me straight on a few
points.
> We were just about to embark on another project.  Bonnie and I had dinner
> with him last month and enjoyed a delightful evening of talk about folk
> songs and world travel.
>
> Bill Doerflinger was the dean of sea music and one of America's great folk
> song collectors and scholars, an irreplaceable person who sought out and
> found the true songs of maritime workers and, fortunately for us, recorded
> them for our enjoyment.  We will be forever in his debt.
>
> A memorial service will be held next month.  Details will be forthcoming.
>
> Dan Milner
>
>
>____________________________________________________
Send your FOLKDJ-L mail to the right place!  Post messages to:           [unmask]
  Send Listserv commands to:  [unmask]
  Contact the list manager:   [unmask]All the details at http://folkradio.org

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: More On Electronic vs. Paper Liner Notes
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 14:40:31 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


On 12/25/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Bob:
>
>Fine.  We will compromise.
>
>Sandy will write his usually brilliant source notes, then print them in
>booklet form for the CD.  Then Sandy will hire a couple of researchers,
>send them all around the world to gather illustrative materials, arrange
>clearances, pay fees, digitize the resulting research, and tack it all on
>the end of the CD in ROM form.
>
>And some sonovabitch somewhere will grumble about the $20 asking price,
>insisting it only costs a buck to a buck and a quarter to manufacture the
>damn CD, and, boy, these record companies are sure raking it in.And they're going to complain less when they pay $20 and *don't*
get the extras? :-)Besides, won't the people who buy *these* sorts of CDs understand
the problem? We're talking runs of thousands of CDs at best, perhaps
more like hundreds. Everyone knows that the basic cost for
small-run CDs is the startup cost. The *incremental* cost is $1.25,
but the first one costs $5000!I'd still argue that people are more likely to buy if you give
them something extra. I know *I* would be. And, again, it costs
nothing. Wouldn't most of us be willing to write short essays
at no cost for recordings we really enjoy and treasure? I
certainly would.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: RIP William Main Doerflinger 1909-2000
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:21:11 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(19 lines)


Folks:Bill Doerflinger had another important connection to folk music.He was the acquisitions editor at E.P. Dutton in 1942, charged with
finding new projects for the publisher.  He read a short autobiographical
piece by Woody Guthrie, "so good and vivid that I advised Dutton to offer
Woody a contract for his autobiography." (Letter to Cray, August 27, 1999)Because Woody had no idea how to structure a book, Dutton called in
Doeflinger's wife, Joy Homer-Doerflinger, to help shape what became _Bound
for Glory._ For her services as editor and as Guthrie's literary agent,
she received a 20 percent interest in the earnings of the book.I might add that in discussing this and his collecting of sea songs,
Doerflinger seemed to be pleased to credit his wife.  Of his own seminal
role, he just shrugged.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:37:29 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


Sandy:
I do hope that as you realize your plans to convert to CD, you do the 2
Beech Mountain Ballads LPs.  They were wonderful collections of traditional
old style ballad singing and I always recommended them to anyone who cared
to listen.
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Sunday, December 24, 2000 1:49 PM
Subject: Sandy Paton's thank you note.>Good folks all:
>    I've written a note of gratitude to Ed Cray, thanking him for his
>offer of help with the production costs of the Proffitt CD. I've already
>had it re-mastered digitally from the original field tapes and am now
>about halfway through the notes for the insert booklet, which will be
>about 28 pages (whew!). I'm looking at an early Spring release, if the
>creek don't rise.
>    What I would suggest is that you all hold onto your hard-earned cash
>and let me notify you via the listserv when the "product" is in hand. At
>that time, a simple order via phone (800-836-0901) or e-missive
>([unmask]) or even (gasp) via our web site's credit card
>encrypted order blank. Click on this: <http://www.folklegacy.com>.
>Calling gives you a chance to talk with Caroline, always a pleasant
>experience, but beware, she may also sell you the "Ballads and Songs of
>Tradition" CD that is already on the market. A sampling from forty years
>of field collecting, with a booklet of less academic and more personal
>notes than usual, but nearly 60 pages of 'em (once reviewed here by our
>friend, Ed Cray, his own self)! We can front for the initial production
>costs, friends, but it's reassuring to know that a bunch of you ballad
>people are willing to place orders. I'll let you know when the CD is
>available. In the meantime, let your money earn interest in your mutual
>fund account. You all do have mutual fund accounts, don't you? %^)
>    With warmest good wishes to all for the holidays and the millennium
>to come!
>    Sandy Paton (Folk-Legacy's resident folk fogey)
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Sandy:
> I do hope that as you realize your plans to convert to CD, you do the 2
> Beech Mountain Ballads LPs.  They were wonderful collections of traditional
> old style ballad singing and I always recommended them to anyone who cared
> to listen.
> Norm
>
Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
_A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 02:58:25 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 03:56:21PM -0800, Ed Cray wrote:> Like Bob, I think including the "lesser" songs not released on LP is an
> excellent idea.
        Amen!> Unlike Bob, I do not think filling out the CD with printed text in lieu of
> a booklet is a good idea.  I like those inserts.
        So do I, but my aging eyes *still* are unable to make out the teeny
typography those things possess without considerable effort.  What is your
secret?
        Incidentally, you may consider me a member of the reissue-donors/guarantors
group, too. -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: How real was Thomas the Rhymer?
From: Dan Goodman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 15:44:57 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


As I understand it, there are several layers to Thomas the Rhymer.There's the ballad, and the poem that was based on.
There's the books of prophecy which appeared under his name.And there's the real person -- or is there?Dan Goodman
[unmask]
http://www.visi.com/~dsgood/index.html
Whatever you wish for me, may you have twice as much.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: How real was Thomas the Rhymer?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:16:14 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


On 12/26/00, Dan Goodman wrote:>As I understand it, there are several layers to Thomas the Rhymer.
>
>There's the ballad, and the poem that was based on.
>There's the books of prophecy which appeared under his name.
>
>And there's the real person -- or is there?There is. At least, there is a Thomas of Ercildoune whose name
is mentioned in genuine records.  A charter c. 1265 cites him
as a witness (interesting point on that one, too: It's a charter
of Petrus de Haga of Bemersyde, and one of Thomas's prophecies runs
something like, "Tide, tide, whate'er betyde, There'll aye be
Haigs at Bemersyde." And, interestingly, there still are, though
the line was interrupted for a while.)Another charter, somewhat later, is even more interesting: in 1294,
a Thomas of Ercildoune, "son and heir of Thomas Rhymer of Ercildoune,"
is cited.His prophecies are, of course, another matter. The only one I've seen
which gives the slightest evidence of being contemporary is the one
about Alexander III's death (where he said, on a clear day, that
such a storm was breaking as Scotland had not seen for many a year).
That does *not* make it contemporary, or the others late, but it's
the only one we can really call well-attested.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folk-Lyric
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:44:59 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Ed,In response to Ruairidh's inquiry on American "decorative" singing
styles, you recommended "Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
northern singers." Could you expand? I've not heard of them and find
nothing useful on the web.~ Becky Nankivell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folk-Lyric
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 01:23:16 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(56 lines)


Good People:Lest anyone else was confused by my early morning epistle, I wrote
"Folk-Lyric" when I meant to write "Folk-Legacy."I apologize to you.In the meantime, Sandy Paton (he of Folk-Legacy) wrote the following to
an embarrassed Ed CrayOn Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Sandy Paton wrote:> Folk-Lyric was a label Harry Oster founded when he was teaching down in
> Louisiana. He offered it to me when he decided to give it up, but I was
> afraid to take it on, fearing it would be more than I could handle
> alone. So it went to our good friend Chris Strachwitz at Arhoolie. You
> can click here to check out his web site.
> <http://www.arhoolie.com/history/index.html> Harry's field work
> contributed some fine blues singers to Chris' label. I'm not familiar
> with any of his "northern" singers and the decorative style they may
> represent, since most of Chris' work has been in the Cajun and Tex-Mex
> regions, and the African-American music of the south. He began by
> recording Mance Lipscomb from Texas.
>     One example of a moderately decorated Appalachian singing style
> might be my own recordings of "Uncle" Monroe Presnell, an octogenarian
> ballad singer I recorded on Beech Mountain in North Carolina. A fine
> examplar of the genre. There are several examples of his style on my two
> volume "Traditional Music of Beech Mountain" (now, unfortunately, only
> available as cassettes. Check out my web site at
> <http://www.folklegacy.com>, if that would be of interest to you.
>     Sandy
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
>
> > Becky:
> >
> > As you can see, I am forwarding you good query to the man  most
> > able to answer it.  Me?  I'm real good on bawdy songs.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:44:59 -0700
> > From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
> > To: [unmask]
> > Subject: Folk-Lyric
> >
> > Ed,
> >
> > In response to Ruairidh's inquiry on American "decorative" singing
> > styles, you recommended "Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
> > northern singers." Could you expand? I've not heard of them and find
> > nothing useful on the web.
> >
> > ~ Becky Nankivell
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:57:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
history.By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long every
lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of New
Orleans is still singing the old songs.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville:
: Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
: From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
: Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
:
: Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
: _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
: 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
: Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
: mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
: and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
: Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
: of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
: richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
:
: Ed
:

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ballad Recordings
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:32:03 -0000
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(5 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Brent:Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
county.It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.EdOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
> history.
>
> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long every
> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>
> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of New
> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
>
> Brent Cantrell
> Knoxville
>
>
> :
> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
> :
> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
> :
> : Ed
> :
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:54:09 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:32:03 -0000, Ruairidh Greig
<[unmask]> wrote:>Is Uncle Monroe Presnell the same as Lee Monroe Presnell mentioned on one
of the  Cordelia's Dad CDs? If so are there any recordings of him available
on CD?
>
>Ruairidh
>Mr. Presnell shows up on the two volumes of the Warner Collection, "Her
bright smile haunts me still" and "Nothing seems better to me."  They were
both published this year by Appleseed, the same folks that published
Cordelis's Dad's "Spine."  I beleive there is at least one cut on Sandy
Paton's recently produced "Ballads and Songs of Tradition." As far as I
know the only other place you can find him it on the Beech Mountain
anthology produced also by Sandy Paton and previously mentioned on this
list.  I think it is available on tape only.  Sandy can answer that.Other good unaccompanied (Upland South) ballad cds (but no Lee Monroe
Presnell) include "Doug and Jack Wallin" on Smithsonian Folkways, the "High
Atmosphere" compilation on Rounder, "My dearest dear" by Sheila Kay Adams,
and many songs by Almeda Riddle scattered through the "Southern Journey"
series on Rounder (there are other good singers there too) and in "Songs of
the South" on Atlantic. You can also order any of the Folkways recordings
on CD and from that the "Old Love Songs and Ballads from the Big Laurel,
North Carolina" compilation from Sodom, NC and "End of an old song" by
Dillard Chandler are particularly good.Brent Cantrell

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:16:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(83 lines)


Ed:Its easy to get turned around in all this.  I've been trying to sketch out
a working geneology or census of the Western North Carolina singers for the
last couple of years but it is all pretty daunting.  Wallins, Chandlers,
Nortons, Ramseys, Adams, Hicks, Gentrys, Longs, Presnells, and Harmons in
at least two major traditons centered in Watauga and Monroe Counties seem
to be somehow related.  There is also a third major singing tradition on
the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee which includes Dee and Delta Hicks,
Bessford Hicks, Johnny Ray Hicks, and Hamper McBee (a lot of that great
singing showed up on County LPs in the early 80's) and at least one of the
Tennessee Hicks have claimed relation the the North Carolina branch.Anyway its delightful to see this great material getting reissued.Brent Cantrell
KnoxvilleOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800, Ed Cray <[unmask]> wrote:>Brent:
>
>Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
>the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
>county.
>
>It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
>have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
>
>Ed
>
>
>
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
>
>> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
>> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
>> history.
>>
>> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
>> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
>> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
>> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long
every
>> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also
somehow
>> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>>
>> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of
New
>> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
>>
>> Brent Cantrell
>> Knoxville
>>
>>
>> :
>> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
>> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
>> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
>> :
>> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N,
Smith's
>> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of
Kentucky,
>> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
>> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded
her
>> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived
in
>> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old
Counc"
>> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that
congerie
>> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
>> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
>> :
>> : Ed
>> :
>>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folk-Lyric
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 11:05:30 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(92 lines)


Dear Sandy,Thanks for the information about Folk-Lyric. What I did find on a Yahoo
search led to blues and whatnot on Arhoolie, as you described.I guess the key part of what I'm interested in is the "northern" part of
Ruairidh's original question, rather than the "decorated" aspect. I have
heard and enjoyed Lee Monroe Presnell both on your recent and wonderful
"Ballads and Songs of Tradition" cd, and on the two Appleseed releases
of the Warner collection.But, it seems that among most of  the re-releases of field collected
songs from America, the emphasis is heavily southern -- undoubtedly due
to the visibility and the influence of the Lomaxes. I'd like to hear
more of the northern stuff, part because it's hard to find, and in part
because that's where my own roots and affinities lie. The first Warner
cd has some, and I hope that later issues may have more. Any other
suggestions?~ BeckySandy Paton wrote:> Hello, Nan:
>     I hope this can help you. It's a copy, with a few modifications,
> of
> the response I sent to Ed Cray when he forwarded your query to me.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Folk-Lyric was a label Harry Oster founded when he was teaching down
> in
> Louisiana in the early 1960s. He offered it to me when he decided to
> give it up, but I was afraid to take it on, fearing it would be more
> than I could handle
> alone. So it went to our good friend Chris Strachwitz at Arhoolie. You
>
> can click here to check out the Arhoolie web site.
> <http://www.arhoolie.com/history/index.html> Harry's field work
> contributed some fine blues singers to Chris' label, artists like
> Robert
> Pete Williams whose blues could wrench your heart. I'm not familiar
> with any of his "northern" singers and the decorative style they may
> represent, since most of Chris' work has been in the Cajun and Tex-Mex
>
> regions, and the African-American music of the south. He began by
> recording Mance Lipscomb from Texas, if I remember correctly.
>     One example of a moderately decorated Appalachian singing style
> might be my own recordings of "Uncle" Monroe Presnell, an octogenarian
>
> ballad singer I recorded on Beech Mountain in North Carolina. A fine
> examplar of the genre. There are several examples of his style on my
> two
>
> volume "Traditional Music of Beech Mountain" (now, unfortunately, only
>
> available as cassettes). Check out my web site at
> <http://www.folklegacy.com>, if that would be of interest to you.
>     Sandy Paton (Folk-Legacy's resident folk fogey)Ed Cray wrote:> Becky:
>
> As you can see, I am forwarding you good query to the man  most
> able to answer it.  Me?  I'm real good on bawdy songs.
>
> Ed
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:44:59 -0700
> From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask]
> Subject: Folk-Lyric
>
> Ed,
>
> In response to Ruairidh's inquiry on American "decorative" singing
> styles, you recommended "Folk-Lyric's multiple offerings, mostly of
> northern singers." Could you expand? I've not heard of them and find
> nothing useful on the web.
>
> ~ Becky Nankivell--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music[unmask]
http://www.tftm.org
NOTE NEW PHONE: 520-293-3783
PO Box 40654
Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 10:26:46 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(95 lines)


Brent:What are your publication plans?  It seems to me that you are tracking
folk song as the Swiss and German ethnographers tracked hay-tying,
fence-building, etc., town-by-town.  This could be marvelously
instructive.EdOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:> Ed:
>
> Its easy to get turned around in all this.  I've been trying to sketch out
> a working geneology or census of the Western North Carolina singers for the
> last couple of years but it is all pretty daunting.  Wallins, Chandlers,
> Nortons, Ramseys, Adams, Hicks, Gentrys, Longs, Presnells, and Harmons in
> at least two major traditons centered in Watauga and Monroe Counties seem
> to be somehow related.  There is also a third major singing tradition on
> the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee which includes Dee and Delta Hicks,
> Bessford Hicks, Johnny Ray Hicks, and Hamper McBee (a lot of that great
> singing showed up on County LPs in the early 80's) and at least one of the
> Tennessee Hicks have claimed relation the the North Carolina branch.
>
> Anyway its delightful to see this great material getting reissued.
>
> Brent Cantrell
> Knoxville
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800, Ed Cray <[unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Brent:
> >
> >Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
> >the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
> >county.
> >
> >It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
> >have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
> >
> >Ed
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
> >
> >> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
> >> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
> >> history.
> >>
> >> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
> >> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
> >> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
> >> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long
> every
> >> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
> >>
> >> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also
> somehow
> >> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
> >>
> >> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of
> New
> >> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
> >>
> >> Brent Cantrell
> >> Knoxville
> >>
> >>
> >> :
> >> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
> >> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> >> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
> >> :
> >> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N,
> Smith's
> >> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of
> Kentucky,
> >> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
> >> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded
> her
> >> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived
> in
> >> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old
> Counc"
> >> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that
> congerie
> >> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
> >> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
> >> :
> >> : Ed
> >> :
> >>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:17:28 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


Almeda Riddle also has a wonderful record on the Minstrel Label (out of NYC)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:04:02 -0500
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(43 lines) , text/html(47 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:21:51 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Jane Gentry and Maud Long also told some of the "Jack Tales" that seem to be
traced back to Council Harmon on Beech Mountain. Gentry's links to the Beech
Mountain/Watauga area and people seem strong, although she certainly left there as
a child. Betty Smith's book offers a fascinating insight into the work of Cecil
Sharp in the Appalachians. Well worth reading!
    SandyEd Cray wrote:> Brent:
>
> Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
> the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
> county.
>
> It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
> have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
>
> Ed
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
>
> > Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
> > Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
> > history.
> >
> > By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
> > Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line between
> > Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she had
> > left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long every
> > lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> > related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
> >
> > BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of New
> > Orleans is still singing the old songs.
> >
> > Brent Cantrell
> > Knoxville
> >
> >
> > :
> > : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
> > : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
> > :
> > : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N, Smith's
> > : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of Kentucky,
> > : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of Cecil
> > : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded her
> > : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived in
> > : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old Counc"
> > : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that congerie
> > : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
> > : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
> > :
> > : Ed
> > :
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:27:33 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


On 12/27/00, Sandy Paton wrote:[ ... ]>    Before leaving the subject, there are a couple of other singers you should hear whose style puts me in mind of Mr. Presnell: William Harrison Burnett from Fayetteville, Arkansas, who contributes a couple of songs to my CD-125, and Dillard Chandler, a wonderful ballad singer who can be heard on Smithsonian/Folkways, but I can't remember, right now, the title of the album. Can Dick Greenhaus see this and come to my rescue? What album is he on, Dick?Can't guarantee this is the album, but there are five or six cuts
by Dillard Chandler onPeter Gott and John Cohen (eds.):"Old Love Songs and Ballads
  from the Big Laurel, North Carolina," Folkways FA-2309 (1964)The Ballad Index strikes again. :-)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:12:55 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Almeda's wonderful album is available only as an LP and may be obtained from
Folk-Legacy (along with other vinyl dinosaurs) at the price of $6 each, or $5
each if you buy five or more. Check the vinyl listings on our web site. You'll
find it at <http://www.folklegacy.com>
    SandyTrad Man wrote:> Almeda Riddle also has a wonderful record on the Minstrel Label (out of NYC)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Ballad Recordings
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:15:00 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


That's it! You ALL should own that one.
    Sandy"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 12/27/00, Sandy Paton wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >    Before leaving the subject, there are a couple of other singers you should hear whose style puts me in mind of Mr. Presnell: William Harrison Burnett from Fayetteville, Arkansas, who contributes a couple of songs to my CD-125, and Dillard Chandler, a wonderful ballad singer who can be heard on Smithsonian/Folkways, but I can't remember, right now, the title of the album. Can Dick Greenhaus see this and come to my rescue? What album is he on, Dick?
>
> Can't guarantee this is the album, but there are five or six cuts
> by Dillard Chandler on
>
> Peter Gott and John Cohen (eds.):"Old Love Songs and Ballads
>   from the Big Laurel, North Carolina," Folkways FA-2309 (1964)
>
> The Ballad Index strikes again. :-)
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:23:34 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


This sounds like a great project.  It should be followed up by a study to
see if there are any correlations between ballad variation and kinships.
Norm Cohen-----Original Message-----
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers>Ed:
>
>Its easy to get turned around in all this.  I've been trying to sketch out
>a working geneology or census of the Western North Carolina singers for the
>last couple of years but it is all pretty daunting.  Wallins, Chandlers,
>Nortons, Ramseys, Adams, Hicks, Gentrys, Longs, Presnells, and Harmons in
>at least two major traditons centered in Watauga and Monroe Counties seem
>to be somehow related.  There is also a third major singing tradition on
>the Cumberland Plateau in Tennessee which includes Dee and Delta Hicks,
>Bessford Hicks, Johnny Ray Hicks, and Hamper McBee (a lot of that great
>singing showed up on County LPs in the early 80's) and at least one of the
>Tennessee Hicks have claimed relation the the North Carolina branch.
>
>Anyway its delightful to see this great material getting reissued.
>
>Brent Cantrell
>Knoxville
>
>
>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:31:23 -0800, Ed Cray <[unmask]> wrote:
>
>>Brent:
>>
>>Forgive my hasty reading of Smith.  I assumed the Watauga "homesite" since
>>the family seemed to trace its roots to "Old Counc" Harmon, of that
>>county.
>>
>>It is sort of like my acknowledgement that I was born in Cleveland, yet
>>have not set foot in that city for 45 years.  I'm still from Cleveland.
>>
>>Ed
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Brent Cantrell wrote:
>>
>>> Betty Smith did, indeed, produce a fine book in _A Singer Among Singers:
>>> Jane Hicks Gentry_ , but I think Ed was a little off on Jane Gentry's
>>> history.
>>>
>>> By the time Cecil Sharp got to the mountains Jane Gentry had been in Hot
>>> Springs, a resort town in Madison County (right at the TN-NC line
between
>>> Knoxville and Asheville) for several decades.  I believe she said she
had
>>> left Watauga County as a child - about 1875.  I don't think Maud Long
>every
>>> lived in Watauga County.  Betty Smith lives in Hot Springs today.
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also
>somehow
>>> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>>>
>>> BTW, Daron Douglas, Maud's grand-daughter, late of Knoxville and now of
>New
>>> Orleans is still singing the old songs.
>>>
>>> Brent Cantrell
>>> Knoxville
>>>
>>>
>>> :
>>> : Date:    Mon, 25 Dec 2000 21:23:39 -0800
>>> : From:    Ed Cray <[unmask]>
>>> : Subject: Re: Sandy Paton's thank you note.
>>> :
>>> : Let me add, for those who don't know the book, a plug for Betty N,
>Smith's
>>> : _A Singer Among Singers: Jane Hicks Gentry_ (University Press of
>Kentucky,
>>> : 1998).  Ms. Gentry, of Watauga County, North Carolina, was one of
Cecil
>>> : Sharp's most important informants.  Her daughter, Maud Long, recorded
>her
>>> : mother's songs and jack tales for the Library of Congress.  They lived
>in
>>> : and around Beech Mountain along with the other descendents of "Old
>Counc"
>>> : Harmon, intermarrying with Hickses and Proffitts.  Arguably, that
>congerie
>>> : of singers, tale-tellers and musicians collectively handed down the
>>> : richest trove of Southern Mountain folklore we have.
>>> :
>>> : Ed
>>> :
>>>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:50:19 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Folks:Sandy's note suggests one of the great problems of the folk music revival:
the almost total divorcement of folk song and ballad from folklore in
general.  Quoting from Herbert Halpert's notes to Richard Chase's _The
Jack Tales,_ "It is worth noting that both Mrs. Jane Gentry and Sam Harmon
[who furnished collectors with numbers of folk tales] were singers with
remarkable repertories." (p. 186 of the 50th anniversary edition)EdOn Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Sandy Paton wrote:> Jane Gentry and Maud Long also told some of the "Jack Tales" that seem to be
> traced back to Council Harmon on Beech Mountain. Gentry's links to the Beech
> Mountain/Watauga area and people seem strong, although she certainly left there as
> a child. Betty Smith's book offers a fascinating insight into the work of Cecil
> Sharp in the Appalachians. Well worth reading!
>     Sandy
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Northern singers
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 23:22:15 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


Here's Sandy Paton's reply to my question about northern singers, in
case others are interested. Thanks, Sandy, I think I'll be putting in a
custom cassette order soon.~ Becky NankivellHello, Becky:
    There are several recordings representing the northern tradition on
Folk-Legacy, but they are available only as cassettes right now. I will
be
extracting material from them when I get to work on another volume of
the
"Ballads and Songs of Tradition" series. You definitely should hear
Sarah
Cleveland, of Brant Lake, New York, a remarkable ballad singer from the
Adirondacks. Another Adirondack singer I recorded was Lawrence Older of
Middle Grove, New York, who had several fine Child ballads in his
repertoire. You will find these cassettes listed under the "Custom"
section
of my Folk-Legacy web site. Note that these cassettes come with the
booklets
of notes and texts that accompanied the original LPs.
    I also produced a collection of field recordings for New World
Records
which is now available as a CD. The title is "Brave Boys" (and they
sub-titled it "New England" traditions, even though three of the most
important singers were from New York State, but... ah, well!). You can
find
that CD listed in the index on my web site. Go to "browse" and look
around.
<http://www.folklegacy.com>
    Frank Warner gathered material from Yankee John Galusha, Lena BourneFish, and George Edwards, all three are important singers in the
northern
tradition. I would suggest you also check out the Canadian field
recordings
from the Maritimes. Sandy Ives always thought the Maine tradition was
very
closely related to that of the maritimes. The Creighton collectanea fromNova Scotia issued by Folkways (now Smithsonian/Folkways) should be of
particular interest to you. Back in the 60s, I recorded Marie Hare, a
ballad
singer from New Brunswick. Her album is another in my "custom cassette"
series. Her style was strong and straightforward, but not decorated in
the
Irish manner.
    Hope all this stuff is of some help to you. I appreciate your
interest.
    Sandy--
Becky Nankivell, Managing Director
Tucson Friends of Traditional Music[unmask]
http://www.tftm.org
NOTE NEW PHONE: 520-293-3783
PO Box 40654
Tucson, AZ 85717-0654

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Brightening Economics
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 23:06:45 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Folks:FYI, 20 of you have opted to subscribe to a Folk-Legacy reprint series (if
a subscription series becomes available).It is only further evidence of a confraternity on this list.Sandy will advise us when he has the Frank Proffitt CD available for
purchase.If there is to be a subscription series, and I personally think it a good
thing, it will not go into effect until the next release.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:34:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


I just returned from two weeks of Christmas travel to find the thread
about Jane Gentry in my mailbox.  Perhaps someone might be interested
in the following.In about 1976, Art Rosenbaum joined the faculty of the University of
Georgia.  He knew Joe Hickerson, of the Library of Congress and
Archive for American Folk Song, and so did I.  Joe came to Athens on
a combination "collecting" and lecturing trip (by "collecting," I
mean that he borrowed tapes of field recordings from Art and me to
take back to the LC for duplication there.)  In the course of his
lecture about the AAFS (for a good crowd in a small auditorium on
campus), he mentioned Jane Gentry, discussed her daughter Maude
Long's contributions to the Archive, and played an excerpt of a
recording of Maude (telling a Jack tale, as I recall.)When the floor was opened for questions, the Director of General
Research, Charlie Douglas, stood up and asked if Joe knew where Maude
Long was at that time.  Joe, of course, had no idea.  Well, Charlie
continued, she's my mother-in-law and she lives right here in Athens.Charlie's wife was Jane Long Douglas, a namesake of her grandmother
Jane Gentry.  Sadly, only a few years later, Charlie died from a
burst aneurysm.  At the time he was stricken, he was in his basement
shop teaching his regular course in dulcimer making.His widow Jane is an accomplished musician who still lives in Athens.
I've never been able to persuade her sing songs or tell stories she
might have learned from her mother.  She says she doesn't recall
them.  One of my favorite research projects that I fantasize about is
having a hypnotist do age regression on Jane:  "Jane, you are 14
years old an in the kitchen with your mother.  She is singing.  Sing
along with her."  I haven't got very far with that.I have heard that a daughter of Charlie's and Jane's has taken up
traditional song.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:43:45 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(51 lines)


Ed:
I haven't forgotten your message.  Re the jug bands.  There were many great
LP reissues at one time, but the only CD anthologies I know of are the pair
on Yazoo:  2032/2033:  Ruckus Juice & Chitlins (spelling approximate).
There are complete sets of the Memphis Jug Band and Cannon's Jug
Stompers--probably the two major bands closest to folk tradition.  There are
many bands closer to jazz idiom, some of which have been reissued in toto on
Document and related labels (I have on hand Clifford Hayes & the Louisville
Jug Bands, but there must be others), but they are not "essential."  There
is a good Yazoo CD of the Memphis Jug Band that reissues the double LP of
the same title, which is a pretty good basic collection.
There is nothing I know of that overviews medicine show entertainers as a
genre.  There were at one time LPs devoted to Peg Leg Sam (Trix 3302:
Medicine Show Man) and Pink Anderson (Folkways FS 3588:  Carolina Medicine
Show Hokum and Blues; Prest. Bluesville BV1051:  Vol. 2--Medicine Show Man;
and others), which exemplified typical medicine show material but only in a
rather general way--i.e., same kind of material you'd get from many other
African-American songsters of that generation.  The last medicine show to
perform was supposedly in Pittsboro, NC, in 1972, featuring Peg Leg Sam
Jackson and Chief Thundercloud.  An LP of recordings from those performances
was issued on Flyright LP 507/8:  The Last Medicine Show),   I don't know if
it's been reissued on CD.   There was a video produced:  Born in Hard Luck,
on Davenport Films, but you can't look at it and get a good view of what a
medicine show performance was like.   Many white musicians had experience in
medicine shows, including Clarence Ashley, Jimmie Rodgers, Doc Hopkins, etc,
but their repertoires as recorded don't always reflect that.  One to look
for is Harmonica Frank Floyd.  He did a couple pieces, "The Great Medical
Menagerist" and "Swamp Root" that are typical medicine show patter worked
into song/talking blues format.  Both were reissued on a Puritan LP (3003)
and then on CD --I think the Genes label; I don't have the latter but I've
seen it on Amazon.com (just look for Harmonica Frank).
Your request about blues will take more time.
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, December 23, 2000 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: A Basic Library>Norm:
>
>Thank you for the most excellent list.
>
>I would recommend that you continue your suggestions (or I would suggest
>you continue your recommendations).  Perhaps you would be willing to
>venture into the area of country blues, jug bands, and medicine show
>musicians.
>
>Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Basic Library
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 15:46:17 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


It should be noted that "The Jug Bands", an anthology on Folkways, and the
Folkways Pink Anderson LP are available on CD-R from Smithsonian/Folkways,
although it takes a couple of months for them to arrive. The whole catalog,
in fact, is available.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Dec 2000 12:52:52 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


John:Can you get Jane Gentry's great-granddaughter to sing for you?  Or maybe
she will help persuade her mother to sing.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Brent Cantrell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 07:06:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


As I mentioned several posts above, Jane Gentry's Great Grand Daughter,
Daron Douglas, sings regularly.  We have had several programs featuring her
at the Laurel Theater in Knoxville and she was a regular participant in our
arts in the schools program.  Daron is also a great fiddler and has an LP
and a CD out (no ballad singing though).  BTW we tape all our concerts and
have several hours of Daron on DAT and Reel to reel -- along with several
other ballad singers.  Late last spring she moved to New Orleans and so we
haven't been able to book her a lot recently.  A photo of Daron is in Betty
Smith's book facing page 115.BTW, One of the great -- and generally unknown -- singers of recent time is
Johnny Ray Hicks of Fentress County Tennessee (This is NOT Ray Hick of NC).
Sadly, Mr. Hicks died last September, but we were able to tape him at his
home during several sessions before his died, and we will be combining some
of those tapes with our live concert tapes to produce a CD during the first
half of next year.  Johnny Ray was a cousin of Dee Hicks and was also
related to Dee's wife Delta whose songs show up on County 789 and on a
couple of Tennessee Folklore Society recordings including the great
"Historical Ballads of the Tennessee Valley."In a second project, some recordings made in the fifties by Guy Carawan of
Singer May Justus (of the Cocke, County Tennessee ballad tradition) have
come to light and we will be publishing those as well.  Ms. Justus was far
better know as a children's book writer, but she had been recorded singing
ballads as early as 1938, Some discs of her singing are in the Edwin C.
Kirkland Collection of Knoxville Folksong.  She was living up on the
Cumberland Plateau near the old Highlander Center when Guy first came to
work there in the 50's.If anyone would like to hear some of the folks, I'll try to play some of the
selections the next couple of weeks on my radio show, "Wild Hog in the
Woods," which airs 8:00pm EST on WDVX.  You can hear it at
http://www.wdvx.com/new_page_1.htm   I usually don't play more that two or
three a cappella ballads each show because some people can't deal handle
them.Brent Cantrell
Executive Director
Jubilee Community Arts
Knoxville

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 11:53:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


Brent Cantrell wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.Since I'm doing the Christmas Revels here in Cambridge with Sheila Kay
Adams of the Sodom singers, I asked her about this - and I'm not sure
you're gonna believe the answer.She says Jane (Harmon/Hicks) Gentry - *that* Jane Gentry - is not
related, but the *other* Jane Gentry who was a ballad singer in Hot
Springs when Cecil Sharp came through - Jane Chandler Gentry - was a
relative, her granny's(?) Aunt Jane.  She said both were living there,
but Sharp only collected from one.Apparently for a long time Granny thought everyone was talking about her
Aunt Jane, until they looked into it and discovered it was another Jane
Gentry.  And apparently the "other" Jane Gentry is the only relation
between the two groups.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:10:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I just realized while mentally reviewing the conversation that Sheila
was probably talking about one of the others rather than her granny when
she mentioned whose Aunt Jane was in Hot Springs.  I'm a little unclear
on the Sodom genealogy where, as Sheila puts it, her family tree "looks
more like a telephone pole".-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer Among Singers
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:33:02 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(47 lines)


Donald:I am confused, thoroughly confused.In the _Journal of American Folklore_ 38 (1925), Isabel Gordon Carter
prints for what I believe is the first time a collection of Jack tales
(pp. 340 ff.).  On page 340, Carter notes, "The first fifteen stories were
told by Mrs. Jane Gentry of Hot Springs, North Carolina.  Mrs. Gentry was
born in Randolph County, North Carolina.  She heard the stories when she
was a child from her grandfather [presumably Council Harmon] who had
learned them from his mother [Sabra Hicks].  At first Mrs. Gentry could
not take seriously the writer's request for stories.  She had given Cecil
Sharp and others many of the ballads appearing in theri collections but no
one had asked for the stories which she had always told to amuse
children."Betty Smith, _A Singer Among Singers,_ p. 10, notes, "Although Cecil Sharp
and Isabel Gordon Carter published Jane Gentry's oral materials..."Clearly we are talking about one and the same woman.  Or are we?EdOn Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Donald A. Duncan wrote:> Brent Cantrell wrote:
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, the Hicks-Gentry-Longs of Hot Springs are also somehow
> > related to the singers in Sodom -- the Wallins, Nortons, and Chandlers.
>
> Since I'm doing the Christmas Revels here in Cambridge with Sheila Kay
> Adams of the Sodom singers, I asked her about this - and I'm not sure
> you're gonna believe the answer.
>
> She says Jane (Harmon/Hicks) Gentry - *that* Jane Gentry - is not
> related, but the *other* Jane Gentry who was a ballad singer in Hot
> Springs when Cecil Sharp came through - Jane Chandler Gentry - was a
> relative, her granny's(?) Aunt Jane.  She said both were living there,
> but Sharp only collected from one.
>
> Apparently for a long time Granny thought everyone was talking about her
> Aunt Jane, until they looked into it and discovered it was another Jane
> Gentry.  And apparently the "other" Jane Gentry is the only relation
> between the two groups.
>
> -Don Duncan
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Greetings
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Dec 2000 19:47:46 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(5 lines)


Folks and Friends:Happy new millenium (finally) --Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Greetings
From: Pat Holub <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 31 Dec 2000 22:56:47 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


At 07:47 PM 12/31/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Folks and Friends:
>
>Happy new millenium (finally) --
>
>EdHi Ed and other ballad listers,     Happy New Year to you all.  I usually like to spend New Year's Eve
with friends, but I'm home alone tonight because I have a cold.  So, I'll
send along my greetings to you, Ed, and the list.Regards,
Pat Holub    >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New Year's Greetings
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:02:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hi, folks.  Happy New Year to everyone!  I'm home, too, because I just got
back from a retreat, and I wasn't into going from retreat mode into party
mode without re-entry time.  I also want to thank everyone for their
contributions.  Do keep them coming.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: W a s s a i l Listings Free! for 2000 send them in!
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 01:22:34 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Free listing of all Wassail events...If you are a wassailer...and everyone should be....
read on if not just delete but not before sending this on
to a Wassailer!
As you may know....the Wassail Epicenter at:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5567/wassail.html
Contains a page upon which Wassail events of all kinds all
over the world are listed. This is a free service!The waswhere page is:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5567/waswhere.htmlWant to have your event listed?
Simple- just send me an e.mail and I will add your event in.
The pages have become very popular and you will be noticed.
Just another service of Hutman Productions....(most of our web
work is donated to the world and not commercial....to help us
you may go to http://www.cbladey.com and click on the help us link on the
right)
To let us know of your event send e.mail to:
[unmask]Please feel free to send this onward via snail or net to those who may not
be on one of these lists. Then help them to reach us.Many thanks for your kind assistance.Enjoy!
Since last year many new songs and verses have been added.
Your help is always greatly appreciated.Conrad

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Gigs
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:28:42 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
"performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
frame of mind?Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
light carriages?Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 09:59:58 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Oxford Dictionary of Slang (1998) dates its earliest appearance to 1926 and
says it was applied to musicians playing an engagement playing jazz,
dance-music etc. - The usage example given implies that the word was used
also (and perhaps previously) to mean a job. " ... knockin' himself out on a
mail-handler gig at the Post Office where the pay is so lousy he's got to
work a part-time gig." but neither of the other uses of the word given in
this dictionary applies.
Origin is given as "Unknown"It would seem that the use of the term was at first confined within one or
two genres of music but has now become general.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 12:00:21 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


<<I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
"performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
frame of mind?Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
light carriages?>>The Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang lists first
reference as 1908, in the sense of "job" or occupation; in the sense of
"musical engagement, esp. for a single performance" first use is 1926, from
jazz slang. The only postulated definition is as a mutation of "gag", which
doesn't make a lot of sense, but it's noted as perhaps influenced by an
earlier definition from the policy racket, "a set of usually three numbers
played by a bettor", and that is noted in turn as perhaps being influenced
by the "two-wheeled, one-horse carriage". Lots of perhapses in there. Def.
1, by the way, is "a woman's vagina", but that doesn't sound like it's
closely related to the jazz usage. Perhaps it comes from what happens to
frogs at the end of a gig, and what happens to musicians ditto.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:24:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(26 lines)


Andy:Tony Thorne, _The Dictionary of Contemporary Slang_ states under
"gig": "The exact origin of the word [in speaking of a performance] is
obscure, but may be related to `jig' in the sense of a dance."In other words, he doesn't know either.None of my other slang or Americanism dictionaries is helpful.  "Gig" in
other uses (a child's pacifier, the female buttocks, etc.) seems to be
descended from the Creole.EdOn Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Andy Rouse wrote:> I have been asked for the origin of the word "gig" as in its meaning of
> "performance". Does anyone out there happen to be in an etymological
> frame of mind?
>
> Of the dictionary definituions I found, a shortened form of "whirligig"
> was the most inviting - or perhaps early folkies went to their venues in
> light carriages?
>
> Andy
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:31:43 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(10 lines)


Paul:I can't resist this.  Wentworth and Flexner in their dictionary of
American slang give multiple definitions of "gig."  They then add this
comment: "The relations, if any, btween a child's pacifier or fetish, the
rectum and vagina, a party, a sex orgy, jazz music, a pronged fork, and a
reprimand are most interesting, and lie in the field of psychology rather
than of etymology."Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:16:05 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


Certainly "jig" the dance is related to "gigue" or "giga" which were 6/8
dances used as the last movement in any number of Baroque suites.  The leap,
however, to 1920's jazz usage seems extremely remote.Mark

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Dec 2000 19:26:51 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


I found only about 70 songs by using the keywords "ballad" and "song."
However, there's a much bigger collection (couple thousand) at
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amsshtml/amsshome.html
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:23 PM
Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)Folks:For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.Ed-----Original Message-----
From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American MemoryGood afternoon,This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
apologies for any duplicate postings.Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American MemoryIn September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
can be found at the following url:
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
materials include such highlights as:

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 01:39:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.John Roberts.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time CapsuleCollection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory(fwd)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 07:49:58 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(69 lines)


These are later in time 19th century only
the others are from the rare book room.
and go way way back in some cases...
also more international.ConradNorm Cohen wrote:
>
> I found only about 70 songs by using the keywords "ballad" and "song."
> However, there's a much bigger collection (couple thousand) at
> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amsshtml/amsshome.html
> Norm
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
> Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:23 PM
> Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
>
> Folks:
>
> For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --
>
> In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.
>
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
> apologies for any duplicate postings.
>
> Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
> Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory
>
> In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
> Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
> American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
> thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
> of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
> can be found at the following url:
> <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .
>
> Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
> Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
> materials include such highlights as:--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:18:49 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


With this discussion of the origin of "gig," we have spawned a topic that may
explode in the same manner as the origin of the expression "the whole nine
yards" in the quotations news group! If so, this might go on for a long time.
Pete Brady

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 08:08:27 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Roberts wrote:> Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
> thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
> comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
> where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
> songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
> the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.
>
> John Roberts.
>This is the most logical, etiologically and etymologically, legend laid
before us to date.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:45:21 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Paul Beale, _Partridge's Concise Dict. of Slang & Unconventional English_
(1989), "containing only terms known to have arisen in the 20th century,"
gives as his first definition "gig, n.  An engagement to play at a party
for one evening: dance bands' [jargon or slang]; since ca. 1935. [He
cites, as a source for that part, Stanley Jackson, _An Indiscreet Guide to
Soho_, 1946, & continues...] [Derived from] Standard English _gig_, a
dance." - Beale, who is Partridge's successor, lists 6 more defs., 4 of
them Aussie slang ("young girl," "detective," etc.) & 2 of them post-1960s
USA developments of #1.Beale's work generally leaves a far stronger impression of solidity--
"stolidity" would be a complement here-- than do Wentw. & Flexner,
especially in cases like that virtual, even if semi-joking, reification in
"the relations, if any, btween a child's pacifier or fetish, the rectum
and vagina, a party, a sex orgy, ... are most interesting..."  - The steps
are too short from there to the improbable links between "carriage" and
"engagement to play," and onward to the sometimes pernicious pseudo-
definitive crap that is all over the Internet: "rule of thumb," "picnic,"
"graveyard shift," "saved by the bell,"  "raining cats & dogs," etc.Beale has a standard tag for these: "[From] a probably apocryphal story."
Outside the naturally dry context of reference books, they deserve
something closer to Letterman's "Stupid Pet Tricks" -- "Stupid Net
Etiologies," maybe. -- It'd be more amusing if not for its general
contribution to the national dumbing-down (my students believe an
appalling amount of that apocrypha) and the particular offensiveness of
some: "Never use the word 'picnic' because it's an old code phrase meaning
'pick a nigger to lynch.'" A very bright Black ex-student of mine, a
Biology M.A., asked me seriously if it were true.Oh, well. Who said, "Some people are born to circulate mistakes, and
others to go around erasing them. This keeps everybody busy."?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:40:54 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


The problem with such post-facto definitions is precisely that they are
plausible on the surface. If we de-construct this one:
a) we have no indication as yet that the term predates the 20th century or
that Music Hall artists used it or knew it
b) Top MHall artists certainly did rush from theatre to theatre, but I'm
pretty sure late 19th century London cabs were not 'gigs' in any sense (they
were Hackney cabs, Hansom cabs, etc., which were very different)
c) If we think about the reality of the situation, rather than simply place
two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal  relationship (which
is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin stories' really
occurs), the idea that the performers would confuse (either deliberately or
not) the terms for the conveyance and the destination is pretty far-fetched.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Gigs> On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, John Roberts wrote:
>
> > Just back from a weekend tour so I missed the beginning of this
> > thread. I hope I'm not being too redundant. As I heard it, the usage
> > comes from the days of the English music hall (particularly London)
> > where a performer would do several halls in an evening, two or three
> > songs each, taking a gig, the small horse-drawn carriage, as a cab to
> > the next one. So, on to the next gig... and the term stuck from there.
> >
> > John Roberts.
> >
>
> This is the most logical, etiologically and etymologically, legend laid
> before us to date.
>
> Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 16:49:15 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


"... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
stories' really occurs)..."Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
the appropriate context?Michael Bell

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:40:05 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Thanks!
Yes of course you may!
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: Gigs> "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> stories' really occurs)..."
>
> Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> the appropriate context?
>
> Michael Bell

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 17:40:57 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(36 lines)


Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
these:  "The story is too good to check."Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
evening's musical employment.You scholars take all the fun out of it.Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:> Thanks!
> Yes of course you may!
> Steve
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Gigs
>
>
> > "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> > relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> > stories' really occurs)..."
> >
> > Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> > the appropriate context?
> >
> > Michael Bell
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Dec 2000 21:14:55 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(45 lines)


Ed, Steve, eavesdroppers-- Gary Fine, the sociologist (scholar -- sorry)
had another great phrase for it: "Too good to be false." Now pass that
shaker, OK?Cheers / MikeOn Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
>
> There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
> these:  "The story is too good to check."
>
> Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
> such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
> evening's musical employment.
>
> You scholars take all the fun out of it.
>
> Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)
>
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> > Yes of course you may!
> > Steve
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Bell Michael <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 11:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: Gigs
> >
> >
> > > "... simply place two concepts side by side and thereby assume a causal
> > > relationship (which is where the sleight of hand in such popular 'origin
> > > stories' really occurs)..."
> > >
> > > Beautifully put, Steve. I hope I may quote you to my future classes, in
> > > the appropriate context?
> > >
> > > Michael Bell
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 00:33:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


This discussion meandered about a Canadian folk music list for several
days.   delurking....So I went to the "Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia" inherited from my
family -- old when I spent hours, days with it as a little kid --
copyright 1889 through 1901.The explanation preceding the definitions for "gig" note that "words
spelled gig are of various and obscure origin.  [The first] has various
senses involving the idea of rapid or whirling motion, of which "fiddle"
appears to be the oldest;" then there are references to the Icelandic word
for fiddle, Swedish for Jew's harp, Danish, Middle Dutch, Middle Low
German, Spanish and Portuguese words for fiddle.Therefore it's first definition is that of "fiddle" but it does not find a
literary reference for the term.
"A whirling or rustling sound, as that made by the blowing of wind through
branches of trees."
"Something that is whirled or moves or acts with rapidity and ease."  [a
top, a whirligig; a light carriage, on-horse chaise; a long lightly built
rowing boat adapted for racing]"Sport; fun; lively time." [reference Provincial English].
"To move up and down or spin round; wriggle."
"To fasten the leather strap to the shield."
"To use a gig or gigging-machine."
"To move lightly or rapidly; impart a free, easy motion to.""A fishing-spear."
"A device for taking fish, a kind of pull-devil designed to be dragged
through the water."
"To spear with a gig."Then as "properly pronounced jig:"  "A wanton silly girl; a flighty
person." [references of Old French, Danish, Icelandic, Swedish]... and finally:  "To engender" [from Latin for beget].I love old encyclopedias -- and you should see the Atlas!
... back to lurking ...Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio
Washington, DC

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:06:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
>
> There is an old journalistic maxim I slavishly follow in such cases as
> these:  "The story is too good to check."
>
> Don't spoil our fun of answering the Wentworth and Flexner question of how
> such disparate definitions can all be linked: gig meaning carriage and
> evening's musical employment.
>
> You scholars take all the fun out of it.
>
> Ed (with half of a strong martini under his belt)
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, roud wrote:
> ..Ed, fun and joy for me is when I've sorted through and tossed out all
the chaff and see what just might be a glimmer of truth left. Those are
rare gems that are hard to come by, and finding one calls for a
celebration.OED gives 'gig' as a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage as
first appearing in 1791, as well as other older (even to the 13th
century), but irrelevant definitions. That might have served for
a group of 2, but wouldn't hold the cast of 4 that appeared in
John Roberts' 'gig' last Friday night (even with their
instruments and mummers' play costumes on the roof and/or tied on
the back). Cited usages to 1898 don't use the word as we have it
for our subject.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 02:51:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > Steve, Micahel, Eavesdroppers:
> >
> ......
>........
> OED gives 'gig' as a light two-wheeled one-horse carriage as
> first appearing in 1791, as well as other older (even to the 13th
> century), but irrelevant definitions.Whoops, I used to get annoyed by people making the same error I just
made above. The thirteen hundreds are the 14th century.Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Gigs
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:18:33 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


At risk of being obvious - since this is a reminder of previously posted
facts:1. I quoted The Oxford Dictionary of Slang (1999) - an abridgement of a more
substantial work - which gave a usage example - this example used gig in the
now conventional sense of an "engagement to perform" but also in the sense of
a "job"
2. Ed's much commented upon dictionary, actually gave a reference for "gig"
in the sense of "job" (meaning some kind of regular empoyment) - I remember
it as 1901 - perhaps Ed, you will confirm this.The step from gig, meaning job, towards a more restricted usage - but still
within the realm of work seems slight.If my memory is correct then what we ought to be looking for is the first
application of the word "gig" to mean, an ordinary common-or-garden form of
regular employment. The usage by Jazz musicians seems simply to be a
specialised case of that meaning.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--