View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless ballads
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:19:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(64 lines)


[I don't think my first post of this made it through -- if it did,
apologies for the repeat. - Amy]I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that
suggest
his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because
she
_was_ a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken
an
alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis mightsuggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.Amy DavisJames Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and
culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it
suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for
songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is
freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly
recent
> beginning.--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:24:10 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


In a message dated 24/10/2000  11:20:28, you write:<< Nigel Gatherer, Crieff >>For anyone not familiar: compiler of Songs and Ballads of Dundee (Edinburgh,
1986) and of the Album of the same name on Peter Shepheard's Springthyme
label.You're welcome here, Nigel.Did you get an answer to Little Jock Elliott II?John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:10:19 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(55 lines)


If The Digital Tradition has made Laws more useful, I';m delighted. My
point was that, even if you have Laws' examples available, it's not easy
to determine which code a "new" ballad should be assigned. A GOOD system
(and DigiTrad's is NOT good) would specify just what aspects of a ballad
woul;d define it's position or code number.This gets to be a real problem with degenerate versions. I heard Charlie
West, for instance, sing a version (I guess) of Babylon where the third
maiden simply killed the robber, and no family membership was stated nor
implied. Should this be considered as a version of the same ballad?Same goes for LOrd Randal and Billy Boy. Similar form and structure, very
different story.On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Bruce Olson wrote:> dick greenhaus wrote:
> >
> > In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
> > basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
> > distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
> > and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
> > examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.
> >
> >         Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
> > and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
> > I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.
> >
> > Heresy provided by dick greenhaus
> >
>
> Dick, as Bob Waltz points out in another posting, Laws, despite some
> deficiencies, is very useful. Where would we be without his two volumes?
> As for usefulness on the Mudcat Forum, I've often used Laws designation.
> For example, if someone requests a song and I recognized it as one in
> Laws indexes, I don't try to guess what titles or keywords I should look
> for it under in the Digital Tradition. I might never guess a correct
> one. I thumb through the appropriate subject heading (or maybe two of
> them) in Laws' indexes, and then post on the Mudcat Forum a 'search for
> (Laws) 'Xn' in DT' as a quick way for someone to find all versions in
> the DT.
>
> It is also becoming pretty much standard to give Laws designation in the
> UK as well as in the US. As I pointed out in an earlier posting today,
> I've made it easy to search for Laws Xn designation in the broadside
> ballad index on my website; Steve Roud lists it in his broadside and
> folk song indexes, and its given in the notes in 'The Greig-Duncan Folk
> Song Collection'.
>
> Bruce Olson
>
> Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
> ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
> or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:51:58 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that
>suggest
>his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because
>she
>was a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken
>an
>alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis might
>suggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.If metamorphosis could be demonstrated then an argument could be made
for a connection with "Leesome Brand" (Child 15), no problem.  But the
texts of "The Shooting of His Dear" that I've seen are usually explicit
that the hunter saw a white apron and mistook that for a swan.> [unmask],.Internet writes:
>The ghost demonstrates that the song is old. Look at the history
>of the supernatural ballads. They are constantly being rationalized.
>Most of them are very old. The current forms don't have supernatural
>elements. Neither do the more recent ballads.The Ghostly Fishermen, The Dreadful Ghost, She Moved through the Fair,
Lost Jimmy Whalen, Beautiful Susan, Edmund in the Lowlands, American
Woods, The Nightingale, Nancy of Yarmouth . . .  all modern ballads,
all feature ghosts/revenants in at least some versions.[unmask],.Internet writes:
>While Child may have considered his ballads as being pre-literature,
>there
>is a great deal of evidence that this simply wan't true. I hate the
>thought of categorizing something based on our ignorance of its source.Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to uphold ESPB as a canon of
traditional balladry, and I agree with Bob that catalogs like the
Ballad Index are eminently more useful as research tools.  But if
people are going to add 306, 307, 308 *to Child*, which is where this
discussion began, then it should be done in the spirit of what Child
was trying to accomplish, not from the perspective of a 20th century
approach to folksong research.  We don't know precisely his criteria
but we know his starting point, and it was quite different from the
more folk-oriented models of the past 75 years or so.  There are some
valid candidates for inclusion -- "The Bitter Withy," "Long A-Growing"
and perhaps others.  But songs like "The Shooting of His Dear" and "The
Bold Fisherman" only fit if certain scholarly interpretations are
accepted up front.  The texts themselves don't get us there.I disagree that certain kinds of ballads can't be studied as
"pre-literature" or at least in relation to non-literacy as cultural
condition.  Ballads are the best documented source for oral culture
research available in the English language, and the analytical tools
that have been made available over the past thirty years, with respect
to the stylistic analysis of texts and the anthropology and social
history of literacy, makes this a very promising avenue of ballad
research.  Granted it has more implications for European research than
for this side of the Atlantic, but it is definitely a viable line of
inquiry.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:20:04 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Nigel:Do tell us something about your "Songs from Dundee."  Is it still
available?EdOn Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Nigel Gatherer wrote:> A quick hello from new listmember Nigel Gatherer from not-so-sunny
> Perthshire in Scotland. I'm an amateur enthusiast with a particular
> interest in Scottish broadsides, and a general interest in old songs. I'll
> enjoy lurking for a while to see what sort of discussions develop.
>
> --
> Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
> mailto:[unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:58:12 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


In a message dated 10/24/00 8:57:25 AM, [unmask] writes:>The Ghostly Fishermen, The Dreadful Ghost, She Moved through the Fair,
>Lost Jimmy Whalen, Beautiful Susan, Edmund in the Lowlands, American
>Woods, The Nightingale, Nancy of Yarmouth . . .  all modern ballads,
>all feature ghosts/revenants in at least some versions.
*************************
I'm showing my ignorance here, but what version of "She Moved Thru the Fair"
definitely involves a ghostly revenant?  The one I sing is from Padraic
Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's always
appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, / She
came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in." This
was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green Book
of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation?"Lost Jimmy Whalen" (LAWS C-8)  is American in origin, and Child, though an
American himself,  was working entirely with the British isles corpus.
Moreover, it is cast in the first person  {"Alone as I wandered down by the
still river,"  etc.) , which  in itself would probably have caused Child to
reject it...   Barry says the song was known in 1886;  it seems to me that
the composer must have been familiar with older songs such as "The Unquiet
Grave."  I wonder why Child didn't include THAT one?  Maybe it's too weak as
a narrative....  I sing a lot of appropriate seasonal songs, and "Lost Jimmy
Whalen" is one of my favorites around Hallowe'en."The Nightingale" you mention must be the one about the wreck of the ship
_The Nightingale.", not the widely known one in which the text emulates
Bocaccio in using the singing of the nightingale as a metaphor for an  event
of sexual congress.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:16:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>but what version of "She Moved Thru the Fair"
>definitely involves a ghostly revenant?I had the "dead love" variant in mind, which is somewhat reminiscent of
classical ballad revenants in that the dead appears to return in bodily
form.  My understanding is that Margaret Barry introduced the motif to
make sense of the rather ambigous ending of Colum's poem.  Kind of an
odd example of someone looking to the supernatural to "rationalize" a
text.  It's a revival adaptation, I suppose, but either way it shows
the currency in modern tradition of the idea of the dead coming back.As for antecedants to "She Moved through the Fair," the only thing I
know of is a lyric song in Henry's _Songs of the People_ (H141; pp.
395-396), which contains the "night visit" stanza.  Whether this or
something like it is the source used by Colum, I don't know.  John
Moulden might be able to answer that.>"The Nightingale" you mention must be the one about the wreck of the
>shipYes, Laws M 37.  As you say not so well known as the bawdy song, but
Laws cites Scottish, English, Canadian and American versions.  This and
two or three of the other ballads I listed each have a dead sailor's or
dead emigrant's ghost returning home to a lover or family member.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Providence Sunday Journal
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:11:32 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Now here's an obscure question for you all. In April 1896, in a British
magazine, Katharine Tynan Hinkson wrote - "I remember years ago reading in
the Providence Sunday Journal - a New England paper, the then editor of
which, Mr. Alfred Williams, is an authority on folk-song and folk-lore - a
series of articles on children's singing games..."
Has anyone ever spotted these articles? Anyone have access to the paper? Any
clues at all? Might there be songs as well as games in the paper? etc.
Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:06:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]>*************************
<<I'm showing my ignorance here, but what version of "She Moved Thru the
Fair"
definitely involves a ghostly revenant?  The one I sing is from Padraic
Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's
always
appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, /
She
came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in."
This
was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green
Book
of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation?>>Those words ("...my dead love came in") appear in Margaret Barry's version
of the song, recorded in 1951, that appears on the "World Library of Folk
and Primitive Music" album devoted to music of Ireland. Margaret Barry came
from a long line of tinkers, but this song was one she learned from a John
McCormack recording of the Colum-Hughes composition. I haven't heard the
McCormack 78, so I haven't a clue whether he incorporated the revenant
lines, or they were added by Barry herself. (There is an album of McCormack
discs in the other room, lent by a neighbor, but that song isn't among them,
alas.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:38:07 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:> Do tell us something about your "Songs from Dundee."  Is it still
> available?I went to Dundee Art School in the late 1970s, and while there became
aware of, and subsequently passionate about, Scottish traditional music. I
started noticing that there were a few Dundee songs being sung. After I
left college, I researched more and compiled a considerable list of songs
which were either about the town of Dundee, or were regarded by Dundonians
as Dundee songs. I was encouraged to try to publish a collection when I
realised there hadn't been anything like it before.However, my primary source was libraries; collections of printed
broadsides, manuscripts, and old books. My rather dusty selection was
enlivened when I was introduced to folksong collector Peter Shepheard who,
along with Maurice Fleming, had been collecting from Dundee and district
singers since the 60s. Peter's recordings of songs from singers such as
Annie Watkins, Eck Harley and Charlie Lamb complemented the songs I'd
rooted out from history. Peter then brought out the record, a perfect
companion to the book.I'm happy to say that the book has just been republished (but I swear I
didn't join this list to publicise it!). I had a launch in Dundee a couple
of weeks ago, and Maureen Jelks, a fine singer, came and sang a few songs
from the book, including "Bonnie Susie Cleland" - a version of Lady Maisry
(Child 65) collected by William Motherwell.Songs and Ballads of Dundee, Nigel Gatherer.
Pub. John Donald, Edinburgh. ISBN 0-85976-538-5--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: She moved through the fair (was - Childless Ballads)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:52:06 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


In a message dated 24/10/2000  17:58:53, you write:<< The one I sing is from Padraic
 Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's always
 appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
 repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
 heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, / She
 came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in." This
 was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green Book
 of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
 and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
 know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation? >>I think it has always been assumed that Colum's lines - "So softly she came
that her feet made no din" implies otherworldliness. The origin of the
addition of "dead" is obscure, though it and an additional verse:The people were saying no two were e'er wed
But one has a secret that never is shared
Then she went on her way with her goods and her gear
And that was the last that I saw of my dear.(also of obscure origin) were associated in song books printed in Ireland in
the late fifties.Colum's original was not Gaelic but almost certainly the Enlish language song
known as "Out of the window," "Our wedding day" or "She moved through the
fair" versions of 2 of which are in Sam Henry's Songs of the People
(Huntington, Herrmann pages 395 and 454) - the inter-relationships have yet
to be clearly traced.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:07:32 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
>JamieIs this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
only.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:16:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>Child himself never wrote down the criteria he used in selecting the "305",
>but George Lyman Kittredge, who knew him well,  postulated what he though
>were probably some of his criteria. He was interested in ballads -- songs
>with a narrative (what D. K. Wilgus has described as the "And then,,,, and
>then...." construction) that had been  collected from the mouths of "the
>people."  (Child worked only from manuscripts and published sources;  he
>wasn't a collector himself)....Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
or that he ever heard a traditional singer?--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:37:05 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


John and Prurient People:I -- a man who claims to know more frankly dirty songs than anyone --
cannot recall any version of the "The Nightengale" in which the sex is
made explicit.EdOn Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> >Jamie
>
> Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> only.
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:50:12 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


John:F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
patriotic poetry which included some songs.Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
time at all in his father's sail loft.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:36:30 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


On 10/27/00, Ed Cray wrote:>John:
>
>F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
>what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
>to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
>copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
>the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
>patriotic poetry which included some songs.Even wrote some songs in that context. "Overtures from Richmond"
is a comic anti-Confederate song to the tune of Liliburlero.>Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
>that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
>time at all in his father's sail loft.Though he never seemed to admit to any such knowledge. Too good for
it, or something. :-(--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:43:45 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(25 lines)


Depends on your definition of "bawdy", Ed.On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> John and Prurient People:
>
> I -- a man who claims to know more frankly dirty songs than anyone --
> cannot recall any version of the "The Nightengale" in which the sex is
> made explicit.
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:
>
> > >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> > >Jamie
> >
> > Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> > the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> > this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> > only.
> > --
> > john garst    [unmask]
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:46:45 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
believe that his book(s) had only published sources.On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> John:
>
> F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
> to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
> copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
> the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> patriotic poetry which included some songs.
>
> Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
> time at all in his father's sail loft.
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:28:08 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
early life.Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads> That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
>
> > John:
> >
> > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
reputed
> > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
a
> > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
ahem,
> > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> >
> > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
any
> > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> >
> > Ed
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:58:44 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Ruairidh:Our library has a run of the journal.  The volume number suggests that the
desired number was published in 1880.  The pages you give (334-35) suggest
it is a review -- but of what?  I assume that "Professor Norton" was
actually Child's friend, Charles Eliot Norton.  I shall try to get a look
at this on Tuesday and will report to the list.EdOn Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Ruairidh Greig wrote:> Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
> the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
> 335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
> early life.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
>
>
> > That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> > Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> > believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > >
> > > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
> reputed
> > > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
> a
> > > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
> ahem,
> > > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
> any
> > > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:02:09 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


In a message dated 10/27/00 7:17:25 AM, [unmask] writes:>Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
>or that he ever heard a traditional singer?
****************************
Child has been quoted as saying  that he was "wholly incurious" about the
music of the ballads, although in his _The English and Scottish Popular
Ballads_, he did include an extensive index to published airs of the songs,
along with the tunes for 55 of them as an appendix  under the heading
"Ballad Airs From Manuscript."  There is no evidence that he ever heard any
of these actually sung. He was a student and scholar of written literature
(if you will excuse a tautology), and I think his main intent was to find
written or published versions of these songs that did not bear evidence of
editorial tampering by the collectors.From what I've read somewhere -- and can't remember where -- I think Child
did not consider the _Ballads_ his greatest work;  he was perhaps more
partial to his researches into Middle English, especially  his studies on how
Chaucer intended his written words to be pronounced.Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:31:44 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Sam:
Do you recall where those comments on Child came from?
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: [unmask] <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads>In a message dated 10/27/00 7:17:25 AM, [unmask] writes:
>
>>Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
>>or that he ever heard a traditional singer?
>****************************
>Child has been quoted as saying  that he was "wholly incurious" about the
>music of the ballads, although in his _The English and Scottish Popular
>Ballads_, he did include an extensive index to published airs of the songs,
>along with the tunes for 55 of them as an appendix  under the heading
>"Ballad Airs From Manuscript."  There is no evidence that he ever heard any
>of these actually sung. He was a student and scholar of written literature
>(if you will excuse a tautology), and I think his main intent was to find
>written or published versions of these songs that did not bear evidence of
>editorial tampering by the collectors.
>
>>From what I've read somewhere -- and can't remember where -- I think Child
>did not consider the _Ballads_ his greatest work;  he was perhaps more
>partial to his researches into Middle English, especially  his studies on
how
>Chaucer intended his written words to be pronounced.
>
>Sam
>La Jolla, CA
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: a message from Lani HermannFW: [[unmask]: Returned mail: User unknown]
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:48:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(161 lines)


Lani Hermann asked me to post the message below.  Please disregard the
header stuff.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 5:08 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: [[unmask]: Returned mail: User unknown]----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem
<[unmask]> -----Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)The original message was received at Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:10 -0800 (PST)
from lani@localhost   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
[unmask]   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to listserv.indiana.edu.:
>>> RCPT To:<[unmask]>
<<< 550 No such local user
550 ballad-l.request@listserv.indiana.edu... User unknown
...Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:10 -0800
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: [[unmask]: Rejected posting to
[unmask]]
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1iHi Marge.
My old ISP dropped me last month, and I've been busy traveling ever since,
so have not
had a chance to straighten out my new address.  Please post this anyway (I
rarely do,
but ....) and I'll try to get right by the software Real Soon Now.
 Thanks --
Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360----- Forwarded message from "L-Soft list server at Indiana University
(1.8d)" <[unmask]> -----Date:         Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:58:16 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at Indiana University (1.8d)"
<[unmask]>
Subject:      Rejected posting to [unmask]
To: [unmask]You  are  not  authorized  to  send   mail  to  the  BALLAD-L  list  from
your
[unmask] account. You might be  authorized to send to the
list
from another of your accounts, or perhaps when using another mail program
which
generates slightly  different addresses, but  LISTSERV has no way  to
associate
this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you
have
any question regarding the policy of the BALLAD-L list, please contact the
list
owners: [unmask]------------------------ Rejected message (51
lines) --------------------------
Return-Path: <[unmask]>
Received: from transbay.net (dns1.transbay.net) by piano.ucs.indiana.edu
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<[unmask]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:58:14 -0500
Received: (from lani@localhost)
        by transbay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07230;
        Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:58:10 -0800
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Cc: [unmask]
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
Message-ID: <[unmask]>
References: <00aa01c04371$3613b300$2d051ad8@norm-cohen>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <00aa01c04371$3613b300$2d051ad8@norm-cohen>; from
[unmask] on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:31:44AM -0800Boo, and Happy Halloween!
        Sorry to be responding to this thread a bit late, but I've been out o' town
-- saw Dick Greenhaus and Susan Friedman and the Nicholses at the FSGW
GetAway
week before last, and heard Jamie Moreira read a paper at the American
Folklore
Society meetings this past wkend.
        But I was amazed, scrolling through the piles of my back e-mail, that no
one
to date has even mentioned the recordings in the boxed set produced by the
late
Kenneth S. Goldstein and published by Riverside in 1956 (Riverside Records
Presents
The English and Scottish Popular Ballads (The Child Ballads) sung by Ewan
MacColl
and A.L. Lloyd, edited by ..., 4 vols + 1, RLP 12-621-9). Of the 82 items
recorded.
72 are in the Child canon, and the rest are Childless:
        The Bitter Withy, Lang A-Growing,  The Bramble Briar, The Seven Virgins,
Down
in Yon Forest, The Bold Fisherman, The Blind Beggar's Daughter of Bethnal
Green,
Six Dukes Went A-Fishing, The Holy Well, and The Shooting of His Dear.        Goldstein's Introduction says
        "The Child ballads have long remained the standard by which ballads are
judged.
This standard has been so difficult to attain that only a few ballads have
been
recommended in addition to Child's canon.  Of these, only one, The Bitter
Withy,
has been universally accepted by scholars as worthy of admission.  The last
volume of this recorded series includes ten British ballads not included by
Child.
Not all are the same high order as The Bitter Withy, but neither are many of
the
ballads which Child included.  There is little doubt, however, that though
they
may vary in excellence, all ten are equal or superior to many of the Child
ballads."
        He declines to offer a definition of the ballad, but cites some standard
references
(Coffin, Friedman, Gerould, Hodgart, Pound, Wells, Wimberly) and also defers
to
others (Sharp, Barry, Griegn, Keith, Bayard, Bronson) for 'musicological
knowledge.'
        I haven't yet looked again at Ed's original list, but I have the feeling --
he
peeked?  *8^)= -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360----- End forwarded message ---------- End forwarded message -----

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:29:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


The Riverside series noted in the repost from Lani Herrmann is the
original series which was later reissued under the Washington label.
Donald Duncan noted all the ballads in 'The Great British Ballads not
included in the Child Collection' in a posting of Oct. 22 (Washington
723, formerly Riverside 12-629). I have a mixed set with the original
Riverside issue of the non-Child ballads, and the 8 vols. of the Child
ballads on the Washington label.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:08:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(88 lines)


>Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'? I
>have seen no previous reference to it.I was skeptical of the existence of this, based on a recollection of
someone's sharp challenge to vague, undocumented stories about "Rising
Sun" songs in Britain, but Ted Anthony (author of a recent AP article
on "House of the Rising Sun" tells me that he has a copy of the
original field recording.  Thanks, Ted, for the following>I have the recording on a CD in New York, made for me by the Alan Lomax
>Archives in Manhattan, and I have heard it. I also have a transcript of it
>made shortly after the recording. In it, Cox sings "She Was a Rum One," and
>when he's done, Lomax says something to the effect of, "There's another way
>to start that song, isn't there, Harry?" Cox replies with the Rising Sun
>verse (in a very thick accent, even thicker than when he's singing).This leads me to believe that one can obtain a copy in the same way that
Ted did.>Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
>Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
>lines, although they are frankly sexual
>Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
>English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
>recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
>illegal!).
>Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none of
>them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that matter.
>So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
>Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
>should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!Since my post, I, too, have been checking slang dictionaries (on
line).  I found the following.A WWW site, http://lugnutz.com/slang.htm, identifies "visiting the
land of the rising sun" with "having sex with a menstruating woman.">Steve Roud
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: John Garst <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
>Subject: Rising Sun
>
>
>>  I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
>>  recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
>>  include the verse
>>
>>  "If you go to Lowestoft
>>  And ask for the Rising Sun,
>>  There you'll find two old whores,
>>  And my old woman's one."
>>
>>  This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
>>  the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
>>  in Britain, for a bordello.
>>
>>  A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
>>  transcribed as follows:
>>
>>      My woman got something, just like the rising sun
>>      My woman got something, like the rising sun
>>      You can never tell when the work is done
>>
>>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>>      Need to worry about your rollin'
>>      because they're sure going wrong (?)
>>
>>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>>      Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
>>
>>  This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
>>  could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
>>  surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
>>  nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
>>  in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
>>
>>  How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
>>  --
>>  john garst    [unmask]--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:48:17 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(129 lines)


John
Thanks for confirming the Harry Cox song - I look forward to hearing it
sometime. Harry was one of my favourite singers, and it's comforting to know
that there is material still out there which I haven't yet heard. It gives
me something to look forward to, like learning that a previously unknown
book by a favourite author has just been published. Incidentally, Topic
Records are issuing a new double CD of Harry in November, with lots of
previously unpublished songs on it.As for the slang site you found - very interesting in its own right but
hardly admissible as evidence in this case, because:1.    Lomax recorded Harry Cox in East Anglia in the early 1950s. Assuming
that Harry hadn't just learnt the verse in question, let's say he knew it
fifty years ago. He was born in 1885, so let's say he could have learnt the
verse up to 100 years ago.
2.    The slang website (as is usual) gives little information about
who/what/when produced it, but from its content I think we're safe to assume
that it's American, and recent. Let's at least assume also that the
compilers haven't simply made up their entries and that the items do have
some real currency in their community.
3.    But can we accept a present-day American 'Modern Street Slang' usage
as evidence for a meaning in a verse sung by an East Anglian farmworker
between 50 and 100 years ago?My scepticism remains undented.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Rising Sun> >Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'?
I
> >have seen no previous reference to it.
>
> I was skeptical of the existence of this, based on a recollection of
> someone's sharp challenge to vague, undocumented stories about "Rising
> Sun" songs in Britain, but Ted Anthony (author of a recent AP article
> on "House of the Rising Sun" tells me that he has a copy of the
> original field recording.  Thanks, Ted, for the following
>
> >I have the recording on a CD in New York, made for me by the Alan Lomax
> >Archives in Manhattan, and I have heard it. I also have a transcript of
it
> >made shortly after the recording. In it, Cox sings "She Was a Rum One,"
and
> >when he's done, Lomax says something to the effect of, "There's another
way
> >to start that song, isn't there, Harry?" Cox replies with the Rising Sun
> >verse (in a very thick accent, even thicker than when he's singing).
>
> This leads me to believe that one can obtain a copy in the same way that
> Ted did.
>
> >Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
> >Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
> >lines, although they are frankly sexual
> >Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
> >English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
> >recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
> >illegal!).
> >Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none
of
> >them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that
matter.
> >So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
> >Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
> >should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!
>
> Since my post, I, too, have been checking slang dictionaries (on
> line).  I found the following.
>
> A WWW site, http://lugnutz.com/slang.htm, identifies "visiting the
> land of the rising sun" with "having sex with a menstruating woman."
>
> >Steve Roud
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: John Garst <[unmask]>
> >To: <[unmask]>
> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
> >Subject: Rising Sun
> >
> >
> >>  I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
> >>  recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
> >>  include the verse
> >>
> >>  "If you go to Lowestoft
> >>  And ask for the Rising Sun,
> >>  There you'll find two old whores,
> >>  And my old woman's one."
> >>
> >>  This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
> >>  the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
> >>  in Britain, for a bordello.
> >>
> >>  A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
> >>  transcribed as follows:
> >>
> >>      My woman got something, just like the rising sun
> >>      My woman got something, like the rising sun
> >>      You can never tell when the work is done
> >>
> >>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
> >>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
> >>      Need to worry about your rollin'
> >>      because they're sure going wrong (?)
> >>
> >>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
> >>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
> >>      Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
> >>
> >>  This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
> >>  could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
> >>  surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
> >>  nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
> >>  in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
> >>
> >>  How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
> >>  --
> >>  john garst    [unmask]
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:05:53 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(30 lines) , text/html(44 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:40:12 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(20 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: meaning of "Golier"
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:43:50 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references to
a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a melody
for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the text.
Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what does
'golier' mean?
 It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption of
the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
Yrs,
Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:34:15 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Barbara
As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
end about drinking beer, ending
While we do say, Goliere.
Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
While we do say, Goliere!
And you shall drink it all up!
While we do say Goliere!
Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
heard of it before.One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
Steve Roud (in Sussex)----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 PM
Subject: meaning of "Golier"> In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references
to
> a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a
melody
> for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the
text.
> Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what
does
> 'golier' mean?
>  It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption
of
> the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
> Yrs,
> Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:06:37 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(45 lines)


John:The rising sun motif was a common decoration in the clerestory lights over
front door lintels of Georgian and Federal architecture.  It was also
carved into the backs of chairs as a decorative device.One can sometimes see it as a "survival" in the backs of American
presswood chairs manufactured in the last half of the 19th C.So the house of the rising sun just might be a reference to any
Georgian/Federal house -- regardless of comforts offered within.EdOn Sun, 1 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> >...
> >3.    But can we accept a present-day American 'Modern Street Slang' usage
> >as evidence for a meaning in a verse sung by an East Anglian farmworker
> >between 50 and 100 years ago?
> >
> >My scepticism remains undented.
> >Steve Roud
>
> Mine is dented by several findings of "rising sun" in sexual
> contexts, even though they are not all particularly consistent.
>
> I found a reference to an actual "House of the Rising Sun" in America
> (at http://www.hoffman-info.com/kingkill33.html).
>
> >Fredericksburg is also the location of the "House of the Rising
> >Sun," a masonic meeting place for such notables as founding fathers
> >George Washington and Benjamin Franklin (of Hell-Fire Club fame) and
> >George Mason.
>
> This far predates the presumed origin of the song "House of the
> Rising Sun" and it appears to have nothing to do with prostitution or
> sex (unless the American founding fathers were engaging there in
> ancient rituals not usually attributed to Freemasons).
>
>
>
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: Mary Ann Gilpatrick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:31:57 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


If you giv4 "Goliere" a French pronunciation, it rhymes with "say." Who knows
French? (or Breton?)roud wrote:> Barbara
> As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
> the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
> song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
> well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
> blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
> end about drinking beer, ending
> While we do say, Goliere.
> Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
> While we do say, Goliere!
> And you shall drink it all up!
> While we do say Goliere!
> Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
> appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
> those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
> any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
> Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
> been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
> but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
>
> Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
> devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
> (Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
> specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
> heard of it before.
>
> One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
> Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
> 'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
> that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
>
> One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
> it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
> Steve Roud (in Sussex)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 PM
> Subject: meaning of "Golier"
>
> > In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references
> to
> > a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a
> melody
> > for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the
> text.
> > Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what
> does
> > 'golier' mean?
> >  It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption
> of
> > the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
> > Yrs,
> > Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: golier
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:14:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I tried looking up the word "golier' and also "goliere" in the OED online,
but I turned up nothing.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Golier
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:28:28 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


A Google search for "golier OR goliere" gives about 520 hits.  There
are towns, people, and companies named "Golier" (and "De Golier").
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:23:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


>The rising sun motif was a common decoration in the clerestory lights over
>front door lintels of Georgian and Federal architecture.  It was also
>carved into the backs of chairs as a decorative device.
>
>One can sometimes see it as a "survival" in the backs of American
>presswood chairs manufactured in the last half of the 19th C.
>
>So the house of the rising sun just might be a reference to any
>Georgian/Federal house -- regardless of comforts offered within.
>
>Ed (Cray)Legman suggests that France's "Sun King" could have been a large
influence in popularizing rising sun patterns.Not only did early 19th-century New Orleans have a Rising Sun Tavern
but so did many other places in both Britain and America.  Indeed,
there was a "House of the Rising Sun" in New Orleans, but this is
hardly unique, since they were all over the place.  One might ask the
question, "Why is 'Rising Sun' such a popular name for taverns, inns,
pubs, bordellos(?), etc.?"If you search "Rising Sun" on the WWW, you will get many hits that
are sex related.  I suspect that most of these connections were made
after "House of the Rising Sun" became popular, but there is still, I
believe, an underlying thread of sexual linkage to "rising sun" that
predated, or may have been insulated from, that influence.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:03:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 10:34:15PM +0100, roud wrote:> Barbara
> As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of ======================================================================
        Looking through my Compact Edition of the OED, I find "goliard"
Class of educated jesters, buffoons, and authors ... loose and satirical
Latin verse ... 12th and 13th century ... Germany, France & England.
 ======================================================================        Sorry for the fragmentary typing, but I'm trying to juggle the
big volume, the keyboard, a pair of extra-strong glasses, and a
magnifying glass at once -- all but the glasses in my lap. :-)        Anyway -- could it be a corrupted form of this word?        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:47:30 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Off topic, perhaps, but... The decorative motif of the sunrise was certainly
popular for a long time before anyone collected "House of the Rising Sun";
there used to be a little book called "The English Sunrise" containing
photographs of architectural adornments using that motif. And other bits,
including a gorgeous one from an English table radio. My former wife had the
radio design (which resembled the engravings on the backs of National steel
guitars, but without the hula girls) inlaid on the fingerboard of her banjo.
Must search out that book one of these days.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:54:52 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(63 lines)


 At 10:34 PM 10/1/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Barbara
>As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
>presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
>also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
>the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
>song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
>well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
>blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
>end about drinking beer, ending
>While we do say, Goliere.
>Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
>While we do say, Goliere!
>And you shall drink it all up!
>While we do say Goliere!
>Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
>appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
>those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
>any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
>Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
>been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
>but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
>
>Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
>devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
>(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
>specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
>heard of it before.
>
>One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
>Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
>'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
>that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
>
>One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
>it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
>Steve Roud (in Sussex)
>The one verse that Belloc quotes reads:
"If Bonaparte
Shud zummon d'Eart
To land on Pevensey Level,
I have two sons
With our three guns
To blarst un to the de-e-vil.And he introduces it thus:
"With this Grizzlebeard, clearing his aged throat, tunefully carolled out
the following manly verse in the tune to which all Sussex songs have been
set, without exception, since the beginning of time -- the tune which is
called "Golier"."Which could mean the verse is part of the song, or it could be that poetic
license to which you referred. It does not, however sound like part of
"Woman in a Basket/Blanket".
Belloc goes on to describe a war between the Kings of Sussex and Kent over a
variant of the verse quoted, the only difference being that "the three men
come from Horsemonden".
Belloc does include music, and I can send you a MIDI attachment privately if
that helps.
Yrs,
Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:16 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(100 lines)


Barbara
Yes, send me the midi file ([unmask]). If my hunch is right (and it
is still only a hunch) - that Belloc is extrapolating from Beckett - the
tune will turn out to be LILLIBURLERO, which Beckett mentions twice (e.g.
"Many were the sets of words fitted to the popular air 'Lilliburlero'. Among
these was the toast known as 'There was an old woman'...").
I don't recognise Belloc's verse from elsewhere - it could be traditional,
but is very much like the pseudo-traditional of the period, summoning as it
does the vision of the simple sturdy Sussex peasant. Is there anything else
like it in the book? I wouldn't be surprised if the Kent/Sussex argument
turns up in another guise from which Belloc borrowed.
The 1886 reference to Sussex harvest songs which I mentioned has proved
problematic. It's meant to be in Notes & Queries 1886, but I have failed to
find it there, but will keep looking. It may be a wild goose chase anyway.
Regards
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"> At 10:34 PM 10/1/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >Barbara
> >As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> >presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> >also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
> >the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of
the
> >song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
> >well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
> >blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
> >end about drinking beer, ending
> >While we do say, Goliere.
> >Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
> >While we do say, Goliere!
> >And you shall drink it all up!
> >While we do say Goliere!
> >Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does
not
> >appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor
in
> >those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
> >any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
> >Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably
have
> >been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from
him,
> >but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
> >
> >Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
> >devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with
Belloc'
> >(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
> >specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
> >heard of it before.
> >
> >One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days.
The
> >Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to
the
> >'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
> >that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
> >
> >One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels,
and
> >it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
> >Steve Roud (in Sussex)
> >
>
> The one verse that Belloc quotes reads:
> "If Bonaparte
> Shud zummon d'Eart
> To land on Pevensey Level,
> I have two sons
> With our three guns
> To blarst un to the de-e-vil.
>
> And he introduces it thus:
> "With this Grizzlebeard, clearing his aged throat, tunefully carolled out
> the following manly verse in the tune to which all Sussex songs have been
> set, without exception, since the beginning of time -- the tune which is
> called "Golier"."
>
> Which could mean the verse is part of the song, or it could be that poetic
> license to which you referred. It does not, however sound like part of
> "Woman in a Basket/Blanket".
> Belloc goes on to describe a war between the Kings of Sussex and Kent over
a
> variant of the verse quoted, the only difference being that "the three men
> come from Horsemonden".
> Belloc does include music, and I can send you a MIDI attachment privately
if
> that helps.
> Yrs,
> Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sea Songs
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:17:18 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


For any list members who are living near or will be travelling to the New
Hampshire Seacoast, there will be a Maritime Folk Fesival in Portsmouth on
14-15 October. Music, songs, stories and demonstrations will be taking
place during the day on Sat. and Sun., all free. Saturday night concert
featuring Louis Killen, Jeff Warner, Danny and Joyce McLeod, and
Forebitter will be at the UU Church on State Street. For late breaking
details go to http://www.folkhorizons.org Hope to see some of you there  -
Tom & Linn

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Errors and Omissions
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:42:56 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(2 lines)


I forgot to mention that the Sat. night Sea Song Concert is $10.00 per
person. Mea Culpa - Tom

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: Kelly Feltault <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:38:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


This was posted to another folklore list this morning.  I thought many
on ballad-l would have useful suggestions and insights.  Please cc
responses to the student who sent the initial post.   ThanksCheers
Jamie>From: <[unmask]>
>
>To any and everyone who has an opinion regarding this issue: I am a
Junior at
>Wesleyan University and am doing some research regarding Joe Hill and
the
>intersection of labor and music in general, eventually resulting in a
senior thesis
>film. I am currently taking a look at the way in which the IWW used
songs, and
>had some general questions I would like to pose. First off, was the
manner that
>the IWW used music as an organising tool unique? Were there any other
>movements at that time or since then that have used songs in a similar
fashion?>The broader question is why did songs and IWW go hand in hand. What was
>unique about the movement that allowed for or needed music as a
motivating
>force? I understand these are broad, complicated questions, but I would
>appreciate any and all thoughts you have on this issue, in addition to
any sources
>that might help me in my research.
>
>   Thanks in advance.
>   -Jody Avirgan-
>   [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:18:22 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


In a message dated 10/10/00 10:36:40 AM, [unmask] writes:>This was posted to another folklore list this morning.  I thought many
>on ballad-l would have useful suggestions and insights.  Please cc
>responses to the student who sent the initial post.   Thanks
>
>Cheers
>Jamie
>
>>From: <[unmask]>
>>
>>To any and everyone who has an opinion regarding this issue: I am a
>Junior at
>>Wesleyan University and am doing some research regarding Joe Hill and
>the
>>intersection of labor and music in general, eventually resulting in a
>senior thesis
>>film. I am currently taking a look at the way in which the IWW used
>songs, and
>>had some general questions I would like to pose. First off, was the
>manner that
>>the IWW used music as an organising tool unique? Were there any other
>>movements at that time or since then that have used songs in a similar
>fashion?
>
>>The broader question is why did songs and IWW go hand in hand. What was
>>unique about the movement that allowed for or needed music as a
>motivating
>>force? I understand these are broad, complicated questions, but I would
>>appreciate any and all thoughts you have on this issue, in addition to
>any sources
>>that might help me in my research.
***********************
JodyFirst off, I think music was more of a crowd-gatherer than an  organizing
force for the IWW.  Its chief political function, to my mind, was as a sort
of cheerleading;  binding together a crowd of people who had already been
converted.  The IWW has printed its "Little Red Songbook" in many editions,
and it's still available from them.  You'll find all the words to a recent
edition of its songs reproduced on the Internet, at
<http://ww.acronet.net/~robokopp/iwww.html> :  this site is even better than
the "Little Red Book" itself, for it has a good many downloadable tunes.There's a lot information available in a book by Joyce Kornbluh: _Rebel
Voices, An IWW Anthology_.The IWW is still in existence,  and maintains a homepage at: <http://iww.org>.There is some mention of music in _Bird, Georgakas, and Shaffer: _Solidarity
Forever: An Oral History of the IWW.Phillip S. Foner has a good book (he as MANY books!)  called _American Labor
Songs of the Nineteenth Century_.  The IWW dates only from about 1905, so
doesn't get much space, but the book gives a lot of useful general
information abut Unions and Music.  The IWW is by no means the only Union
that has made good use of muic. When I was a Zoology Student at UCLA in 1937,
I joined the Hollywood Theater Alliance as a volunteer, singing and leading
songs on Union picket lines in the Los Angeles area.  This led to a paid ($50
a week!) job as a performer in the Alliance's musical revue, "Meet the
People,"  which ran in Hollywood for 10 months, and gave me the wherewithal
to marry and support a fellow-student (Art major) named Leslie. We have just
celebrated our 60th Anniversary.One of this country's great folk singers is U. Utah Phillips, who is a
card-carrying member of the IWW, as well as of Local 1000 of the American
Federation of Musicians.  (His real name is Bruce Phillips;  he comes from
Utah, and took his professional name following the example of T. Texas
Tyler.)  Bruce is not only a singer, raconteur, and IWW member, but a fine
historian, and I'll bet you could get a lot of information from a phone
conversation with him.  You could reach him through:  U. Utah Phillips / NO
GUFF RECORDS / PO Box 1235 / Nevada City, CA 95959; he doesn't have an e-mail
address.  Bruce has fallen on hard times, and his friends have set up a
web-site for him at: <http://www.utahphillips.org>, and that site has a
number of links to other sites that might help in  your research.Good luck!Sam Hinton
La Jolla, CA. USA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: Paddy Tutty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:06:00 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


That url should be:
   http://www.acronet.net/~robokopp/iww.htmlCheers,
Paddy Tutty[unmask] wrote:>  its songs reproduced on the Internet, at
> <http://ww.acronet.net/~robokopp/iwww.html> :  this site is even better than
> the "Little Red Book" itself, for it has a good many downloadable tunes.
>
> There's a lot information available in a book by Joyce Kornbluh: _Rebel
> Voices, An IWW Anthology_.
>
> The IWW is still in existence,  and maintains a homepage at: <http://iww.org>.
>
> There is some mention of music in _Bird, Georgakas, and Shaffer: _Solidarity
> Forever: An Oral History of the IWW.
>
> Phillip S. Foner has a good book (he as MANY books!)  called _American Labor
> Songs of the Nineteenth Century_.  The IWW dates only from about 1905, so
> doesn't get much space, but the book gives a lot of useful general
> information abut Unions and Music.  The IWW is by no means the only Union
> that has made good use of muic. When I was a Zoology Student at UCLA in 1937,
> I joined the Hollywood Theater Alliance as a volunteer, singing and leading
> songs on Union picket lines in the Los Angeles area.  This led to a paid ($50
> a week!) job as a performer in the Alliance's musical revue, "Meet the
> People,"  which ran in Hollywood for 10 months, and gave me the wherewithal
> to marry and support a fellow-student (Art major) named Leslie. We have just
> celebrated our 60th Anniversary.
>
> One of this country's great folk singers is U. Utah Phillips, who is a
> card-carrying member of the IWW, as well as of Local 1000 of the American
> Federation of Musicians.  (His real name is Bruce Phillips;  he comes from
> Utah, and took his professional name following the example of T. Texas
> Tyler.)  Bruce is not only a singer, raconteur, and IWW member, but a fine
> historian, and I'll bet you could get a lot of information from a phone
> conversation with him.  You could reach him through:  U. Utah Phillips / NO
> GUFF RECORDS / PO Box 1235 / Nevada City, CA 95959; he doesn't have an e-mail
> address.  Bruce has fallen on hard times, and his friends have set up a
> web-site for him at: <http://www.utahphillips.org>, and that site has a
> number of links to other sites that might help in  your research.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Sam Hinton
> La Jolla, CA. USA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:47:19 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Good People:There is material on the IWW singing tradition in Lori Elaine Tayloer,
"Joe Hill Incorporated: We Own Our Past," in Jeff Ferrell, "The
Brotherhood of Timber Workers and the Culture of Conflict" and in Sam
Richards, "The Joe Hill Legend in Britain," all in Archie Green, ed.,
_Songs About Work_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Folklore Institute,
1993).There is also material in Kenneth Allsop's _Hard Traveling_ (Hoddard and
Stoughton, 1967; Penguin, 1971); George Milburn's _Hobo's Hornbook_ (no
citation handy).Most of what has been written about the IWW is second hand, and
unreliable.  It also tends to center on the Western Federation of Miners
(an IWW affiliate) and on the martyred Joe Hill.  The significance of the
Wobblies in California, for example, is virtually unknown elsewhere --
despite the fact that literally dozens were convicted of murder after a
deputy was killed in Hopland during an IWW-led farm labor protest.  At the
other extreme, Steve Ross, a USC historian, has documented the fact that
many of the extras in the first movies made in Southern California were
itinerant Wobblies, drawn to the warmer climes in winter months.Similarly, the importance of the IWW in the northwestern woods cannot be
underestimated.A clear-eyed, and not flattering take on the IWW is in J. Anthony Lukas'
recent _Big Trouble_ (NY: Simon and Schuster, 1997).All but the last have material on singing in the ranks of labor.Ed Cray

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:44 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(5 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: IWW and music
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:12:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 1:08 AM
Subject: IWW and musicHi Jody:The IWW weren't unique in using music as an organizing tool; it had been
part of the Populist movement of the 1890s. Probably the best-known piece to
come out of that time was "The Farmer is the Man", but there were certainly
others. Check out John Greenway's "American Folk Songs of Protest" (I
*think* I'm remembering the title correctly).Subsequent movements that used music as an organizing and rallying tool
notably include the industrial labor-organization drives of the 1930s,
particularly those involving coal miners; the efforts to organize southern
tenant farmers beginning in the 1930s and continuing for several decades
thereafter; and of course the southern civil rights movement, beginning with
the Montgomery bus boycott of 1955. Music from the latter can be found on
the Smithsonian/Folkways set "Voices from the Civil Rights Movement" and the
disc "Sing for Freedom".You might want to get in touch with people from the Highlander Center
(formerly the Highlander Folk School); they were involved in all three
movements in various ways. Some discussion of the tenant farmers' movement
can be found in the biography of Lee Hays, "Lonesome Traveller".Hope this helps a little.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:58:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


It seems to me that music-as-protest derives from rhyme-as-protest.  I was thinking of John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?"  The rhyme has a lot more power then a more complexly worded argument.  Although there have also been any number of political poems, which were also perhaps sung,  in the centuries prior to ours, John Ball's rhyme is the predecessor of themes later sounded by the IWW and others.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:28:22 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


The same phenomenon can be seen in the activities of KISZ, the youth
wing of the old Hungarian Socialist Workers Party (there is a party of
the same name today, but it is not the same party). They organized
everything in the name of the party, because the party was where there
were funds, but in actual fact they were young people with a penchant
for organization and music. An event like a jazz festival might bring in
thousands of jazz enthusiasts and two new signed up members of the
party. Many of the young organizers of fifteen years ago are now not
only older, but selling insurance policies and working for advertising
questionnaire agencies...Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Website
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:31:42 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Dear everyone,I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
entries to the guestbook before they appear.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Website
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:56:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


>Dear everyone,
>
>I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
>fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
>a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
>to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
>Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
>entries to the guestbook before they appear.
>
>Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Website
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:58:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Sounds like Kilroy Was Here. Or was it Conrad?(oops, sorry about the last post, me finger slipped)JR>Dear everyone,
>
>I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
>fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
>a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
>to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
>Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
>entries to the guestbook before they appear.
>
>Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:13:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
then the gentleman?"....I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
digging and "span" to spinning?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:58:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> ...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
> then the gentleman?"....
>
> I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
> digging and "span" to spinning?Yes, indeed.  But, symbolically, those were typical male & female
acts, respectively.---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  What's _done_ we partly may compute,  :||
||:  But know not what's _resisted_.       :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:06:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


If my reference to John Ball was too obscure, I apologize.  Here's a brief bio I dug out elsewhere on the net (and slightly edited):            Ball, John, d. 1381, English priest and social reformer. He was one of the instigators of the Peasant's Revolt of 1381. He was an itinerant for many years, advocating               ecclesiastical poverty and social equality.  Excommunicated in 1376, he was in prison at Maidstone when the rebels released him in 1381. After the dispersal of the rebels, Ball was captured at Coventry. He was taken to St. Albans, where he was hanged, drawn, and quartered. He is perhaps best remembered for              giving currency to the couplet "When Adam delved and Eve span/Who was then the gentleman?" William Morris wrote one of his works on utopian socialism under the title The Dream of John Ball.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: IWW and Music
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:37:55 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:There is material on the IWW singing tradition in Lori Elaine Tayloer,
"Joe Hill Incorporated: We Own Our Past," in Jeff Ferrell, "The
Brotherhood of Timber Workers and the Culture of Conflict" and in Sam
Richards, "The Joe Hill Legend in Britain," all in Archie Green, ed.,
_Songs About Work_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Folklore Institute,
1993).Has anyone yet mentioned Archie's discussion in _Wobblies, Pile Butts, and
Other Heroes_?JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:02:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Lewis Becker wrote:
>
> If my reference to John Ball was too obscure, I apologize.  Here's a brief bio I dug out elsewhere on the net (and slightly edited):
>
>
>
> Lew BeckerParson [John] Ball is made to speak the lines at his first appearance in
the play 'Jack Straw', 1593.Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:58:08 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


yup.On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> ...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
> then the gentleman?"....
>
> I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
> digging and "span" to spinning?
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:41:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hi folks:Ummm...this discussion is very interesting, but I believe the student who
began it was primarily asking whether any *other* movements besides the IWW
used song as an organizing tool. I gather he has the IWW itself pretty well
covered.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:36:38 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:53:14 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(40 lines)


Well, let me mention a book we'll have out in another two or three months,
Joe Glazer's memoir, _Labor's Troubadour_.  Joe tells about singing for
various labor and civil rights endeavors, starting in 1944 as assistant
education director of the former Textile Workers Union of America.  He
transferred to the United Rubber Workers and then joined the USIA in 1961
as a labor specialist.  He retired in 1987, though you wouldn't know it,
since he keeps performing at union meetings and rallies and keeps writing
and recording songs.  These include "The Mill Was Made of Marble"
(probably his best-known piece), "Jellybean Blues," "Automation," "Too Old
to Work, Too Young to Die," and "They've Moved My Job to Georgia (or Was
It Tennessee?)."  He has more than twenty albums out.  At the end of the
book he profiles a number of the younger labor singers and gives some of
their songs (texts) as well, a nice generous gesture.Another non-IWW book that might be of interest in this discussion is
Shelly Romalis's _"Pistol Packin' Mama": Aunt Molly Jackson and the
Politics of Folksong_.JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Paul Stamler wrote:> Hi folks:
>
> Ummm...this discussion is very interesting, but I believe the student who
> began it was primarily asking whether any *other* movements besides the IWW
> used song as an organizing tool. I gather he has the IWW itself pretty well
> covered.
>
> Peace.
> Paul
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Tribute to Rounder -- Today on "No Time to Tarry Here"
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:27:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Hi folks:Just a second heads-up: For the first of two membership specials this week,
I will be presenting a tribute to Rounder Records on "No Time To Tarry Here"
this afternoon from 2-4pm central time (1900-2100 GMT). I didn't know this
when I planned the program, but we're just a week short of Rounder's 30th
anniversary, so it's an appropriate time to pay tribute to the label that
ranks with Folkways as an astonishing resource for traditional music and its
offshoots. The program will air on KDHX-St. Louis, 88.1FM; more to the point
for many of you, it will be on the web at:http://www.kdhx.orgEnjoy!Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New Address
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 15 Oct 2000 19:34:08 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Dear all,This is just to let you know that due the renaming of my university my
e-mail has also changed. It is now [unmask] and NOT
[unmask], so please remove the 'j'. Both e-mail addresses will
continue to reach me a little longer, but fairly soon I shall be utterly
j-less.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Data Base
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:25:56 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
George--
George Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Carolyn A. and Peter S. Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
(617) 552-4521
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:39:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 10/16/00, George Madaus wrote:>Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
>any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
>CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
>England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
>For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
>my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
>capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
>GeorgeYou need to specify a bit more. What do you want to do with this
thing? Do you want to be able to find all versions of, say,
"Barbara Allen" -- even if it's called "In Scarlet Town"? Or
is it enough to be able to search for the title on the recording?If the latter, I can make you a template (for FileMaker 3.0, but
I assume it will convert) in a couple of minutes.There are commercial databases around for this sort of thing, and
also shareware versions (in the $10 range, as I recall), but I
doubt they're worth it. Unless you need something fancy. In which
case they probably aren't *right* for what you need.Alternately I could tell you how to set up a text file for use with the
Ballad Index software. That way, you'd be able to do more complex
searches, assuming you can live with the user interface.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:50:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


George - e-mail me at [unmask], and we can get together and
I'll whip off something for you in Filemaker 4.1.  I do these for our
FSSGB (Folk Song Society of Greater Boston) library listings, and it
will only take a few minutes for a basic setup.  It's possible that by
doing it this way, you'll be able to take advantage of our listings as
we catalog our library and others.  And maybe you'd like to join our project...?-Don Duncan
 Cambridge, MA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:41:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(73 lines)


Dear RobertThanks for the reply. I won't get as complex as searching under alternative
names. What I have done is rate (subjectively) alternative version of a song
like Leave Her Johnny Leave  Her so I would like to be able to find all
version under that name across my collection and look at the rating. Further
I try to roughly classify song by genre e.g. songs of Mortality, navy
(construction), shanty, forebitter, coal mining, war, women's songs etc.. It
would of course be nice to have a filed that would be for alternative names
for the same song e.g., St. James Infirmary but that is just a wish.  I am
afraid of share ware or very specific software because of the possibility of
them being incompatible with new version of the system (I had this happen
with to me when I invested effort in a Hyper Card format only to find the
new system really didn't support this). Some one else suggested a soft ware
program for Windows called MySoftware which sounds great but again will it
work with System xx for the MAC?  I am leery about that.So I guess I am looking for something I hope will be ok for the MAC in the
future and lets me sort by Artist, country and song name rating and genre.I appreciate any help you can give me on this. All the best
George"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 10/16/00, George Madaus wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
> >any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
> >CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
> >England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
> >For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
> >my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
> >capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
> >George
>
> You need to specify a bit more. What do you want to do with this
> thing? Do you want to be able to find all versions of, say,
> "Barbara Allen" -- even if it's called "In Scarlet Town"? Or
> is it enough to be able to search for the title on the recording?
>
> If the latter, I can make you a template (for FileMaker 3.0, but
> I assume it will convert) in a couple of minutes.
>
> There are commercial databases around for this sort of thing, and
> also shareware versions (in the $10 range, as I recall), but I
> doubt they're worth it. Unless you need something fancy. In which
> case they probably aren't *right* for what you need.
>
> Alternately I could tell you how to set up a text file for use with the
> Ballad Index software. That way, you'd be able to do more complex
> searches, assuming you can live with the user interface.
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Commission on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 22:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


I don't know of any MAC software that will doe what you want, but I'd
strongly suggest that you try to find a database with full text search
capabilities; this makes life much simpler when you decide to change your
search requirements halfway down the road.If yoyu'll settle for a PC, I can give you (legally) a nice program that
will do what you want, and a great deal more.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW, Politics, and Music
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:53:59 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Lisa and Eavesdroppers:I would suggest that you instead subscribe to ballad-l.  Their interests
are catholic, they do not flame, and the members are rich with all sorts
of information.While they purportedly focus on ballads, in fact, they range widely.Ed
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 [unmask] wrote:> Hi everyone.  My name is Lisa Fishbein. I have a masters degree in music, and
> did my master's thesis on the music of the IWW.  Since we all have shared
> interests,  music history and the labor movement, I thought we could set up a
> mass mailings of discussions on related topics.  I now have you all in my
> e-mail address book under the heading IWW and Music.  Politics and music is
> such an appealing area of study, and I thought it may be nice, from time to
> time, if we all share perspectives.  Is this idea agreeable?
> Lisa Fishbein
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rambling rover
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 02:25:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi folks:Sorry to cross-post this, but I've got an obscure one. The title may
possibly "Rambling Rover"; it includes the line (possibly in the chorus)
"There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl". Anyone out
there recognize this? (Digital Tradition and the Traditional Ballad Index
both came up with nothing.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rambling rover
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:58:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


On 10/17/00, Paul Stamler wrote:>Hi folks:
>
>Sorry to cross-post this, but I've got an obscure one. The title may
>possibly "Rambling Rover"; it includes the line (possibly in the chorus)
>"There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl". Anyone out
>there recognize this? (Digital Tradition and the Traditional Ballad Index
>both came up with nothing.)It's not a traditional song; Andy M. Stewart of Silly Wizard wrote it.
It's in his songbook, and on at least two Silly Wizard recordings.Chorus runs something likeOh there's sober men in plenty,
And drunkards barely twenty,
There are men of over ninety
Who have never yet kissed a girl,
But gie me the ramblin' rover
Frae Orkney down to Dover
We will roam the country over
And together we'll face the world.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Rambling rover]
From: Dell Stinnett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:58:30 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Hi Paul!I think this is a traditional Irish pub song called Ramblin' Rover (I've got a
friend who does is on a regular basis as part of an Irish set.)  I can't
remember all of the words, but this line is part of the chorus.  I'm sure
someone will come in with the whole thing, but here's what I remember of the
chorus:There are <??> aplenty
And <??> barely twenty
There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl.
So give me the Ramblin' Rover
From Cockney down to Dover
We'll roam the county over
And together we'll face the world.-Dell----------------
I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere!
----------------
GaFilk - THE Georgia Filk Convention - January 5-7, 2001
http://www.gafilk.org____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/webmail

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Lost Reference
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 22:39:04 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Folks:I seek a book, or reference to be precise.  I lost it in a welter of web
pages turning before my eyes.The book is a (recently) published diary of a Revolutionary War seamen or
officer, captured by the British, and clapped in a prison hulk in NY
harbor.Does anyone know of the book, the title, the author, something?  It
apparently contains song texts of various songs current in the 1775-1781
era, including risque or bawdy texts.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: new book on "Frankie Silver"
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:00:35 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


I thought list members might be interested in knowing that Dan Patterson's
new book, "A Tree Accurst: Bobby McMillon and Stories of Frankie Silver"
has just come out on UNC Press.  I went to a talk he gave this afternoon
about it, and it was very interesting.  I haven't read the book yet, but a
quick skim suggests that it talks about the 1831 murder itself, the trial
and execution of Frankie, the ballad, the legend cycle, and Bobby McMillon,
the traditional ballad singer and storyteller from the same community in
Western North Carolina.  Here's a URL:
http://uncpress.unc.edu/FMPro?-DB=pubtest.fmp&-Format=detail.html&-RecID=126
44288&-Script=visited&-Find(In the interest of full disclosure, I should mention that Dan was my
thesis director and that I transcribed a lot of the video footage that
became the documentary film by Tom Davenport that led to this book.  But no
financial involvement.)Cheers,
Bruce
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Thanks
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 01:04:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hi folks:Thanks to all for help in finding "Ramblin' Rover". I have the lyrics, and
have forwarded them to the enquiring friend.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Lost Reference
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:00:56 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


Quite possibly not your book, as some of the facts are different. But
there is "A Sailor's Songbag: An American Rebel in an English Prison
1777-1779," edited with an introduction by George G. Carey (U. Mass.,
Amherst, 1976).This is a book of his songs rather than a diary; he was in Forton
Prison, England; and it was published 25 years ago. But it does have
a bawdy song or two in it. From the top -"Song No. 1... to kiss Susan Twas, loss of late and Cate
And as he walked up to London to pick up a lass
He showed them how well he could riggle his arse,"I have seen it remaindered. ( I might even be able to find a physical
copy - though I'd have a look on Bibliofind first if this is what
you're looking for).John Roberts.>Folks:
>
>I seek a book, or reference to be precise.  I lost it in a welter of web
>pages turning before my eyes.
>
>The book is a (recently) published diary of a Revolutionary War seamen or
>officer, captured by the British, and clapped in a prison hulk in NY
>harbor.
>
>Does anyone know of the book, the title, the author, something?  It
>apparently contains song texts of various songs current in the 1775-1781
>era, including risque or bawdy texts.
>
>Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ballad Found on Scots-l
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:32:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(100 lines)


A couple of days ago a subscriber to the scots-l mailing list posted
this ballad that he found in an old scrapbook. He is looking for
information/opinions about it.>From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
>To: [unmask]
>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:36:59 +0100
>Subject: Re: [scots-l] Little Jock Elliot II
>
>from a cutting in a scrapbook annotated: "Scotsman, 9 November 1892"
>........................................
>LITTLE JOCK ELLIOT II
>A Border Ballad
>(From the recital of Matthew Gotterson)
>
>There's freedom for me and my men
>Where the Liddel rins wild and free,
>Where my toor I'the heart o' the glen
>Is the pride o' my billies and me,
>And I keep my ain head wi' my hand
>And quell every enemie,
>For I kittle their ribs wi' my brand,
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Oh my name it is Little Jock Elliot
>        And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>I munt my gude nag wi' a will
>Whena fray's I'the wund, and he
>Cocks his lugs as he tugs for the hill
>That eneters the South countrie,
>Where pricking and spurring are rife,
>And the bluid boils up like a sea;
>But Southrons gang doon I'the strife!
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>In Liddesdale never a man
>Wad shrink frae the backing o' me,
>And Jed-forest gies me the van
>To strike 'gainst her enemie.
>In Coquetdale, Reed and Tyne
>We drive a prey wi' glee,
>And lounder the lubberts like swine,
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>Jock Ridley ance gaily rode doon
>To lift my ain horse frae the lea-
>A riever o' Tynedale renoun,
>A Ker-handed pricker was he.
>He made a fell dash I'the derk,
>But girnin I soon made him flee
>Wi' some weel-proggit holes in his serk;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>At Wheel-Kirk, within the Catrail,
>Priest David had thirty-and-three
>Gude nowt that were stown head and tail
>By Percy o' Keeldarstanelee.
>I chased up the unhallowed loon,
>Brought him and his horse to their knee,
>And wheeled back the nowt to their toun;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>In a raid I'the licht o' the moon
>The Bewcastle Cout sichted me,
>And swore he wad level my croon,
>And flaunted his sword michtilie.
>We met wi' a rush I'the pass,
>Wi' a clash made the steel-fire flee,
>But he fell like a stot on the grass;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>I fear neither Warden not law,
>Nor the troopers o' Queen Marie;
>Grim Bothwell frae me got a claw
>He'll never forget till he dee.
>I'll keep my ain head wi' my hand
>And my neck frae the hanging tree
>As lang as I waiggle a brand -
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Oh my name it is Little Jock Elliot
>        And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>........................................
>
>
>--
>Nigel Gatherer, Crieff  <[unmask]>
>The Scottish Music Pages:
>http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/gatherer/scottish/index.html
>
>--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:21:34 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
but nothing musical.Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:00:19 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(35 lines)


Donald:The song was credited to "Paul Campbell," the pseudonym for the Weavers,
and copyright in 1951 by Folkways Music Publishers.  It was included in
_Folksing,_ edited by Herbert Haufrecht (Hollis Publishing, 1959).  I have
not seen other printings.About the song's history, Pete Seeger in his _Incompleat Folksinger,_
p. 196 fn, states, "The drinking-gourd song, of course, originated long
before my time among the brave men and women of the pre-Civil War
Underground Railroad, and lived on in black folk tradition."It is not mentioned in Willens' biography of Lee Hays -- which is negative
evidence of a sort that suggests Hays did not bring the song to the
Weavers.  And I do not find it in the few collections of Negro spirituals
I have in my library.EdOn Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Donald A. Duncan wrote:> We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
> Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
> the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
>
> A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
> "drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
> search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
> but nothing musical.
>
> Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
> source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).
>
> -Don Duncan
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:11:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


On 10/18/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:>We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
>Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
>the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
>
>A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
>"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
>search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
>but nothing musical.
>
>Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
>source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).Keep in mind that the Ballad Index goes by the earliest verifiable
date. I'll agree, of course, that 1953 is too late -- because the
song appears in the Lomax "American Ballads and Folk Songs" (1934).On the other hand, the Lomax volume does not list a source. Every other
book containing the song seems to derive from Lomax or from the Weavers
recording.And we're talking about the Lomaxes here. They steal, they rewrite,
they conceal facts. I suspect they were the source for the Weavers
recording. (At least, it doesn't sound very "Leadbelly-ish" to me,
and the Weavers don't seem to have many other Black sources.) So
I don't think we *know* the history of this song.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:35:34 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?> On 10/18/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:
>
> >We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
> >Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
> >the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
> >
> >A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
> >"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
> >search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
> >but nothing musical.
> >
> >Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
> >source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was
it?).
>
> Keep in mind that the Ballad Index goes by the earliest verifiable
> date. I'll agree, of course, that 1953 is too late -- because the
> song appears in the Lomax "American Ballads and Folk Songs" (1934).
>
> On the other hand, the Lomax volume does not list a source. Every other
> book containing the song seems to derive from Lomax or from the Weavers
> recording.
>
> And we're talking about the Lomaxes here. They steal, they rewrite,
> they conceal facts. I suspect they were the source for the Weavers
> recording. (At least, it doesn't sound very "Leadbelly-ish" to me,
> and the Weavers don't seem to have many other Black sources.) So
> I don't think we *know* the history of this song.
>
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:30:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 10/19/00, roud wrote:>In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
>Steve RoudIf there was a previous message, I never saw it. Are you sure it
went to the list and not the original poster?But I'm still not sanguine. The *text* preceding the song is
attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
*knew* that.If this were anyone other than the Lomaxes, I would consider
this sufficient evidence. But I've now been over three different
Lomax books with a fine-tooth comb, and the only thing I can
say is, "Never trust a Lomax." Don't believe *anything* until
you've checked their original source.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:18:35 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Indeed, my message seems to have gone direct to the poster - apologies. It
was as follows (slightly amended):> There's a short piece by H.B. Parks on the song, including a text and tune
> collected about 1918, in 'Follow de Drinkin' Gou'd' (Publications of the
Texas
> Folklore Soc. Vol.7 1928 (reprinted 1965)) pp. 81-84 and also in Vol.26
(1954) of the
> same series.
> John Lomax included Parks' text and tune in his 'American Ballads & Folk
> Songs' (1934) pp.227-228, and this is probably where the Weavers'
generation picked it
> up from.
> Steve RoudThe article certainly exists. Parks says he collected fragments of the song
in 1912 and 1918, and the text he gives is from 'an old Negro at College
station, Texas'. Lomax's reference is a little sparse, but much better than
his usual standard.----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?> On 10/19/00, roud wrote:
>
> >In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
> >Steve Roud
>
> If there was a previous message, I never saw it. Are you sure it
> went to the list and not the original poster?
>
> But I'm still not sanguine. The *text* preceding the song is
> attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
> Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
> journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
> informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
> it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
> that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
> *knew* that.
>
> If this were anyone other than the Lomaxes, I would consider
> this sufficient evidence. But I've now been over three different
> Lomax books with a fine-tooth comb, and the only thing I can
> say is, "Never trust a Lomax." Don't believe *anything* until
> you've checked their original source.
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:04:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>...The *text* preceding the song is
>attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
>Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
>journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
>informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
>it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
>that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
>*knew* that."Follow the Drinking Gourd" is in one of the J. Frank Dobie Texas
Folklore books.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:04:03 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


H.B. Parks was an occasional contributor to the Proceedings of the Texas
Folklore Society in the 1920s.  His "Foller de Drinkin' Gou'd" [sic] was
printed in volume VII (which I do not have) of that series.The headnote in Lomax's _American Ballads and Folkssongs_ reprints Park's
quote from his informant.  It begins, "One of my great-uncles, who was
connected with the railroad movement, remembered that in the records of
the Anti-Slavery Society there was a story of a peg-leg sailor..."There was an Anti-Slavery Society, indeed, a number of them.
("Anti-Slavery Society" might be a generic description rather than a
formal name.)  I do not know where those records might now be.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:34:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Several people have expressed interest in this issue, so I thought I'd
forward some information to the list.Filemaker Pro runs on both PC (MS Office-compatible, full ODBC support)
and Mac, although swapping files may cause some differences in display
because of handling fonts differently, and there are some features for
the Mac which aren't done on the PC.  It's roughly comparable to MS
Access, but built by people who understand the "U" in "GUI"!FP started in the Mac World, and was developed further as a Claris (the
Apple software division which was spun off) program, during which time
it went cross-platform.  Recently Apple reabsorbed Claris, but left
Filemaker as its own company.  Their web site is at   http://www.filemaker.comThere are over 5 million copies of Filemaker around.  It's made in
various versions, including Filemaker Server which runs on Windows NT,
and a number of Fortune 500 companies are paying many thousands of
dollars for site licenses.  It can be run over an intranet, or serve the
internet (i.e. be accessed through a browser).  Filemaker Pro Developer
allows creation of run-time programs which can be distributed for
special applications.  There are companies around which make Filemaker
templates for a variety of applications, and consultants who specialize
in it.  In fact, a friend told me about a free download Filemaker Pro
run-time program which is used for CD libraries - if I remember
correctly, it was a companion to a program which read data from a CD in
the CD-ROM drive, dialed up a master web site, and downloaded the
appropriate song etc. information for the Filemaker Pro database.However, it's still a nice single-user relational database as well
($250); it shows its evolution as a Mac program which offers powerful
features to users who aren't programmers.  Its flexibility and user
interface features allow someone with little training to modify his
database (e.g. add additional fields, do additional or modified
screen/print layouts).  And as one becomes more familiar with it, one
can build in very powerful features - or you can just happily use it for
simple tasks.---For a project like indexing traditional or 'folk' songs, the best scheme
I've come up with is to list the actual title used on the record or in
the book, but also construct a table of "working titles" - i.e. single
designations for a given family of songs.  All the variations of a song
can be listed with a single working title - e.g. "Gambler's Blues" could
have a working title of "St. James Infirmary".  A good scheme would be
to look at the Ballad Index for help in designating a working title -
they've had to do it for the variants they've catalogued - but you can
develop your own scheme as well.  It's then trivial to simply pull up
all the members of that song family - i.e. that have the same working
title - and when scanning listings of titles, it's a convenient way to
remind yourself what each is.The use of categories is a little more interesting; there are a couple
of ways to handle these, but they're a standard way to index material.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:53:59 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(105 lines)


I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
that Version 5 has sorted them out:
a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
return to later.
c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
ones.For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).Hope this helps rather than confusesSteve Roud- Original Message -----
From: Donald A. Duncan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Data Base> Several people have expressed interest in this issue, so I thought I'd
> forward some information to the list.
>
> Filemaker Pro runs on both PC (MS Office-compatible, full ODBC support)
> and Mac, although swapping files may cause some differences in display
> because of handling fonts differently, and there are some features for
> the Mac which aren't done on the PC.  It's roughly comparable to MS
> Access, but built by people who understand the "U" in "GUI"!
>
> FP started in the Mac World, and was developed further as a Claris (the
> Apple software division which was spun off) program, during which time
> it went cross-platform.  Recently Apple reabsorbed Claris, but left
> Filemaker as its own company.  Their web site is at
>
>    http://www.filemaker.com
>
> There are over 5 million copies of Filemaker around.  It's made in
> various versions, including Filemaker Server which runs on Windows NT,
> and a number of Fortune 500 companies are paying many thousands of
> dollars for site licenses.  It can be run over an intranet, or serve the
> internet (i.e. be accessed through a browser).  Filemaker Pro Developer
> allows creation of run-time programs which can be distributed for
> special applications.  There are companies around which make Filemaker
> templates for a variety of applications, and consultants who specialize
> in it.  In fact, a friend told me about a free download Filemaker Pro
> run-time program which is used for CD libraries - if I remember
> correctly, it was a companion to a program which read data from a CD in
> the CD-ROM drive, dialed up a master web site, and downloaded the
> appropriate song etc. information for the Filemaker Pro database.
>
> However, it's still a nice single-user relational database as well
> ($250); it shows its evolution as a Mac program which offers powerful
> features to users who aren't programmers.  Its flexibility and user
> interface features allow someone with little training to modify his
> database (e.g. add additional fields, do additional or modified
> screen/print layouts).  And as one becomes more familiar with it, one
> can build in very powerful features - or you can just happily use it for
> simple tasks.
>
> ---
>
> For a project like indexing traditional or 'folk' songs, the best scheme
> I've come up with is to list the actual title used on the record or in
> the book, but also construct a table of "working titles" - i.e. single
> designations for a given family of songs.  All the variations of a song
> can be listed with a single working title - e.g. "Gambler's Blues" could
> have a working title of "St. James Infirmary".  A good scheme would be
> to look at the Ballad Index for help in designating a working title -
> they've had to do it for the variants they've catalogued - but you can
> develop your own scheme as well.  It's then trivial to simply pull up
> all the members of that song family - i.e. that have the same working
> title - and when scanning listings of titles, it's a convenient way to
> remind yourself what each is.
>
> The use of categories is a little more interesting; there are a couple
> of ways to handle these, but they're a standard way to index material.
>
> -Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:41:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(115 lines)


On 10/20/00, roud wrote:>I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
>Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
>it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
>can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
>All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
>understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
>with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
>that Version 5 has sorted them out:
>a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
>that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
>field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
>b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
>is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
>you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
>return to later.
>c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
>deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
>field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
>Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
>Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
>d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
>Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
>short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
>find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
>
>These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
>fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
>ones.
>
>For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
>expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
>searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
>(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).
>
>Hope this helps rather than confusesJust a few more clarifications (though we may have now gotten posts
from every Mac user on the list, so we're preaching to the choir :-).First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
but it's not a true relational database.Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
handicap for high-level work.Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
is far from obvious.The complaint about sorting is rather unfair, since it's universal. And
there is a cure: just use spaces or leading zeroes. E.g., instead of
Child 1
Child 10
Child 100
Child 2useChild 001
Child 002
Child 010
Child 100orChild   1
Child   2
Child  10
Child 100It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
probably be a very large TEXT field.I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
FileMaker.But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:23:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(133 lines)


I would only add one other caveat.  File maker 5.0 has a lot of problems that
hopefully will be corrected but right now  people I have talked with recommend
staying with 4.1."Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 10/20/00, roud wrote:
>
> >I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
> >Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
> >it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
> >can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
> >All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
> >understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
> >with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
> >that Version 5 has sorted them out:
> >a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
> >that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
> >field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
> >b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
> >is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
> >you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
> >return to later.
> >c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
> >deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
> >field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> >Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
> >Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
> >d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
> >Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
> >short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
> >find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
> >
> >These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
> >fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
> >ones.
> >
> >For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
> >expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
> >searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
> >(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).
> >
> >Hope this helps rather than confuses
>
> Just a few more clarifications (though we may have now gotten posts
> from every Mac user on the list, so we're preaching to the choir :-).
>
> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
> but it's not a true relational database.
>
> Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
> handicap for high-level work.
>
> Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
> is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
> of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
> is far from obvious.
>
> The complaint about sorting is rather unfair, since it's universal. And
> there is a cure: just use spaces or leading zeroes. E.g., instead of
> Child 1
> Child 10
> Child 100
> Child 2
>
> use
>
> Child 001
> Child 002
> Child 010
> Child 100
>
> or
>
> Child   1
> Child   2
> Child  10
> Child 100
>
> It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
> features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
> I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
> hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.
>
> The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
> probably be a very large TEXT field.
>
> I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
> FileMaker.
>
> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
> For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
> Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
> quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).
>
> Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Commission on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:34:18 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Perhaps I should write my own database program.Is this a huge job?
Or can it be done "simply"?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:30:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 10/20/00, John Garst wrote:>Perhaps I should write my own database program.
>
>Is this a huge job?
>Or can it be done "simply"?You need to specify more. :-) What do you want it to do? And what
tools do you have?If you mean writing from scratch, though -- yes, it *is* a big
job, particularly on the Mac. Especially if you want it to act
like a "real" Mac program.Your best tool for the job would probably be RealBASIC, but you're
still looking at several months of learning the program before
you can start coding the actual project.Let's put it this way: I've been writing code for 25 years. And
when I started writing Macintosh code, I'd been working on a Mac
for about eight years. It *still* took me two months to get a
program worth keeping, and it was on a smaller scale than a
database....But tell us more about what you want, and I may be able to make
a better guess at the magnitude of the problem.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Banks of Green Willow
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:16:13 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Dear All,My duo is in the throes of doing a version of Banks of Green Willow. The
source we have has a feel about it that there might be some more! Here
are the words. Does anyone know any more verses?Go and get your father's goodwill
And get your mother's money
And sail across the ocean
Along with young JohnnyThey had not been a-sailing
A-sailing many days-oh
Before she wants some woman's help
And cannot get anyGo and get me a silk napkin
To tie her head so easy
And I'll throw them overboard
Both she and her babyThey got him a silk napkin
To tie her head so easy
And they threw them overboard
Both she and her babySee how me love do tumble
See how me love do taver
See how me love do try to swim
It makes me heart quaverGo and get me love a coffin
Of the gold that shines yellow
And she shall be buried
By the banks of green willow.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:29:40 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


There are dozens of versions. If you've got access to Bronson, Traditional
Tunes of the Child Ballads Vol.1, he gives 18 versions at Child 24. Your
text is particularly close to several collected by Sharp in Somerset, but
what you're clearly missing is the first verse, something on the lines of:It's of a sea captain
Lived near the seaside (oh)
And he courted a lady
Till she proved with child.There isn't much more to it.Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Banks of Green Willow> Dear All,
>
> My duo is in the throes of doing a version of Banks of Green Willow. The
> source we have has a feel about it that there might be some more! Here
> are the words. Does anyone know any more verses?
>
> Go and get your father's goodwill
> And get your mother's money
> And sail across the ocean
> Along with young Johnny
>
> They had not been a-sailing
> A-sailing many days-oh
> Before she wants some woman's help
> And cannot get any
>
> Go and get me a silk napkin
> To tie her head so easy
> And I'll throw them overboard
> Both she and her baby
>
> They got him a silk napkin
> To tie her head so easy
> And they threw them overboard
> Both she and her baby
>
> See how me love do tumble
> See how me love do taver
> See how me love do try to swim
> It makes me heart quaver
>
> Go and get me love a coffin
> Of the gold that shines yellow
> And she shall be buried
> By the banks of green willow.
>
> Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:16:07 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


Good People:Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
Mary."  Etc., etc.Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
don't we as a group do so?Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 13:34:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Good People:
>
>Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
>curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
>clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
>
>Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
>know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
>is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
>texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
>Mary."  Etc., etc.
>
>Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
>don't we as a group do so?I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
dissatisfied.Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:52:39 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Child himself never wrote down the criteria he used in selecting the "305",
but George Lyman Kittredge, who knew him well,  postulated what he though
were probably some of his criteria. He was interested in ballads -- songs
with a narrative (what D. K. Wilgus has described as the "And then,,,, and
then...." construction) that had been  collected from the mouths of "the
people."  (Child worked only from manuscripts and published sources;  he
wasn't a collector himself)  and available to him with a  minimum of
editorial "correction"  or  "improvement."   He deliberately omitted
broadsides as being the products of literate editors who had probably changed
the original words and moods of "the folk".  (In this same vein, much later,
Maude Carpools rejected Jean Ritchie as a valid  purveyor of folklore,
because Jean knew how to read and write and had been to college!)I think Child's omission of some ballads was due to their not having been
collected and published by any of his predecessors;  as you say, he just
hadn't encounered them.  But I'm sure he rejected some on purpose.  I can
imagine his rejection of "The Frog and the Mouse"  because of its extensive
record of publication and commercial usage;  the Queen's Stationers
registered it as early as 1580 as the work of Edward White, and Grimaldi the
famous clown (1779-1837) sang a version of it as part of his act.  Probably
any of the versions available to Child could be shown to have derived from a
printed source."The Seven Joys of Mary"  lacks the narrative quality that Child seems to
have demanded.Child never seems to have thought that his work included every known ballad.
He used Bishop Percy's original manuscripts, and was well aware that a large
number of Percy's ballads had come from an incomplete set of handwritten
pages in a Scottish castle.  The Lady of the Manor had collected them from
servants many years earlier,  and subsequent servants were known to have
started many a fire with pages from the collection, and it was heartbreaking
to think how many old ballads had been destroyed.In Child's day, it was believed that the old ballads were dying out,  as the
peasantry was becoming literate, and he was in a hurry to select those that
he thought were genuine according to his criteria.  (And by the way, when
Percy published his great three-volume collection way back in 1765, it was
under the title of "Reliques of Ancient English Poetry_.  For a long time,
the genre was thought to be dying!Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 02:17:50 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(226 lines)


On the assumption that the title change will steer away the
uninterested, I'll comment further:roud wrote:
>
> All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
> understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
> with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
> that Version 5 has sorted them out:
> a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
> that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
> field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.It's true you can't "find in any field".  But for searches in multiple
fields, you can do some logical ORs by stacking Find requests.  Go to
Find mode, enter your search criteria in Title; CTRL-N (Command-N on the
Mac) to get a second Find page, enter your criteria in First Line;
repeat for other relevant fields.  It will find all records in which the
criterion occurs in any of the indicated fields.  I haven't succeeded
yet in scripting this - i.e. letting the user put in one criterion, then
searching the 5 probable fields as above - but I haven't put much effort
into it because I don't really have a use for it in the DBs I'm working on.The same system is used for exclusionary searches - enter the criterion
you wish to find, CTRL-N for a new request, enter the criterion to be
excluded, and click the "Omit" box in the status bar on the left.  It
makes complex searches a heck of a lot easier than long
parentheses-critical "command line" search strings, although I have the
nagging feeling that there are some searches you can't set up this way.> b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
> is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
> you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
> return to later.I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
bookmarks"; run it before you start.  It's not much different from other
"bookmark" functions (although it's persistent and unlimited); it's just
that people don't usually think of using fields in the databases instead
of variables.  If you're doing research, you can add other "Mark" fields
related to topic, and keep your selections as long as you need them;
it's sort of a dynamic 'category' field you can retitle at will.  Disk
space is cheap, and they don't use much - particularly when most are empty.[Tech note:  Filemaker does not provide single-box True/False buttons.
I use a text field, set as a radio button (more visible on screen than
check boxes) which uses a value list with a single value (e.g. "Yes",
which needn't show if you set the field small enough).  Clicking on this
will check it, but clicking again will not uncheck it, since radio
buttons are intended to log a single value among several; they're
unchecked by clicking another.  However, every field also has button
behavior, so you can format the 'button' behavior of the field to run a
script which toggles the value when you click on it.  It then behaves as
a True/False or Yes/blank toggle.  This is exactly how a programmed
button works - you just do the programming yourself the Filemaker way.]> c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
> deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
> field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
> Child 120, Child 201, and so on.I sometimes use Bob's technique of filling out the numbers to a standard
length (which is an old solution, but works best with known number sets
- i.e. where you won't have to go from 999 to 1000 and suddenly have it
stop working!).  The solution I use is paired text and number fields.
The first is "Child" or "K" or "DT"; the second is the number.  Sort by
alpha, then numeric.  No problems, no special entry, simpler sorts.
Requires entering in two fields instead of one, but it's quick enough.> d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
> Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
> short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
> find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
contains the string anywhere in it - the most common search and very
useful, particularly for large text fields.  If you want to constrain
the search, you use standard criteria; e.g. =, >, <, etc. (see the
"Symbols" drop-down on the left panel when in Find mode).  For an exact
match in a text string, use the 'logical equals', i.e. '=='.  This is
covered in the documentation.> These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
> fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
> ones.Filemaker is pretty fast, and does most of what you've described, but
the larger the database, the more scripting and layouts you tend to
require to speed operations.> For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
> expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
> searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
> (i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).Actually, Filemaker - when you approach it in the spirit of the
programmers, rather than the 'nuts & bolts' databases - does allow all
of this.  The last you do by modifying the previous search, and adding a
request; you then rerun the previous search with additional criteria.
This is actually superior to the sequential find, since at any time, in
Find mode, you can step through the previous criteria to see what you've
searched for, and modify any prior request if necessary to make a
subsequent request more appropriate."Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
> but it's not a true relational database.Perhaps, off-line, you could amplify on this?  It's not clear to me what
the difference is between cross-table lookups with specified
relationships vs. tables with primary and foreign keys.  It sounds like
a difference which isn't a difference.> Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
> handicap for high-level work.I agree; it's not designed for "high-level" work, and I have a problem
both with the way it prints out the scripts and the fact that you can't
copy and paste from the script window to put the contents of the script
- as seen by the programmer - into other documentation.  It's
occasionally irritating that it invisibly stores the "find" and "sort"
criteria; I title my scripts carefully.  It also bothers me that you
apparently can't run external functions in another language, although
that's supposed to be possible in 5.0.  I seriously miss "switch/case"
and "elseif" and a few other operators.That said, however, there's a lot to be said in favor of that scripting
environment for the non-professional user.  I keep scripts small and
informatively titled; complex scripts call internal scripts which
describe their function.  Substitute 'function' or 'procedure' for
'script', and it's exactly the way I write C programs.  The names of
environmental variables (e.g. "Status(CurrentUserName)" and script
functions make reading scripts a piece of cake; I don't have any trouble
debugging them.> Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
> is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
> of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
> is far from obvious.It's true that the procedure is far from obvious, but that's what
documentation is for.  Although occasionally cumbersome, the find system
is actually pretty flexible and, as I mentioned above, has some
advantages over the conventional ways of doing things - as well as
providing the neophyte with a much better intuitive sense of what the
computer is doing than command-line 'find' strings.> It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
> features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
> I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
> hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.
>
> The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
> probably be a very large TEXT field.I'm not sure what the concern with 5000 records is.  Our bug-tracking
database is over 4000 records now, with a lot of fields and 5 associated
files.  The longest standard operation - a record-by-record scripted
search of the entire database - takes slightly over 3 seconds [freeze
the window; video refresh for every record bogs it way down].
Unscripted searches are way faster; full-database sorts can take the
same length of time.  Hardly "go get a cup of coffee" operations -
although adding pictures or video can slow it down.> I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
> FileMaker.
>
> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?  In
bug-tracking, I have 8 global fields - four text and four numeric, for
'scratch' fields for scripts to use, some navigational fields (e.g. last
layout), some useability fields (e.g. user-specific starting layout or
preferred sort).  Fields are cheap and easy to add, and in Filemaker I
then just pick them from a list.  I used to have to do this manually,
with my own external documentation of variables.  Sure is easier in Filemaker.> For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
> Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
> quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).
>
> Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.Right - it would take a big library/collection operation to really
outgrow Filemaker.George Madaus wrote:
>
> I would only add one other caveat.  File maker 5.0 has a lot of problems that
> hopefully will be corrected but right now  people I have talked with recommend
> staying with 4.1.
>That's good to know; we're considering an upgrade.  Maybe when we get
together, you can give me some more detail.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 23:21:06 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(72 lines)


Bob asks for some criteria against which to measure the ballads Child
omitted but might have included had he known of them (pace, Sam Hinton),
or had he a more complete record.I think there are a few measures we might employ:1) The ballad probably pre-dates 1750, the approximate date of Bishop
Percy's _Reliques_ upon which Child relied.2) It exhibits the hallmarks of traditional ballad composition:
incremental repetition, "leaping and lingering," stock phrases, and so on.3) It need not have originated in England -- to answer one of Bob's
questions.4) Its first appearance may have been in print rather than in an
unpublished collection.  See, for example "John Dory," the A text of which
is reprinted from Thomas Ravenscroft.  (Which is why I think he did not
eliminate "The Frog and the Mouse" because it was registered with the
Stationer's Office.)  Further, there are versions of "Barbara Allen" that
owe their very existence to printing houses, yet Child included them in
the canon.EdOn Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:
>
> >Good People:
> >
> >Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> >curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> >clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
> >
> >Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> >know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> >is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> >texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> >Mary."  Etc., etc.
> >
> >Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> >don't we as a group do so?
>
> I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."
>
> There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
> fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
> definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
> ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
> in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
> which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?
>
> If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
> compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
> I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
> dissatisfied.
>
> Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
> What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:21:46 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


MJC Hodgart: The Ballads (London, 1950 rev 1962) discussed this in pp 19-25.He cites nine songs as being worth consideration for admission to the "canon"
on the basis that they substantially exhibit features included in those which
make up the 305.The bitter withy
Still growing
Corpus Christi
The seven virgins (not one for Ed)
The blind beggar
Bruton town
The shooting of his dear
Bold Fisherman(and with reservations) Six Dukes went a fishing.There is some discussion but the book is too brief a survey to do much more
than raise the question.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 10:50:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(253 lines)


On 10/22/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:>On the assumption that the title change will steer away the
>uninterested,Good idea. :-)>I'll comment further:
>
>roud wrote:
>>
>> All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
>> understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
>> with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
>> that Version 5 has sorted them out:
>> a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
>> that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
>> field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
>
>It's true you can't "find in any field".  But for searches in multiple
>fields, you can do some logical ORs by stacking Find requests.  Go to
>Find mode, enter your search criteria in Title; CTRL-N (Command-N on the
>Mac) to get a second Find page, enter your criteria in First Line;
>repeat for other relevant fields.  It will find all records in which the
>criterion occurs in any of the indicated fields.  I haven't succeeded
>yet in scripting this - i.e. letting the user put in one criterion, then
>searching the 5 probable fields as above - but I haven't put much effort
>into it because I don't really have a use for it in the DBs I'm working on.
>
>The same system is used for exclusionary searches - enter the criterion
>you wish to find, CTRL-N for a new request, enter the criterion to be
>excluded, and click the "Omit" box in the status bar on the left.  It
>makes complex searches a heck of a lot easier than long
>parentheses-critical "command line" search strings, although I have the
>nagging feeling that there are some searches you can't set up this way.All of this works, but I for one find it extremely irritating and difficult.
If I'm constructing a complex search, I find it difficult to not be able
to see all my search requests at once. And if I'm combining positive
and negative searches, it gets really complex.It's a drawback. Fatal? No. Particularly in this context. But it's a
poor mechanism.Also, this sort of search is very slow if you don't have all your
fields indexed. And -- despite your comment below about disk space
being cheap -- having a lot of indices and doing a lot of complex
searches causes databases to grow. I, at least, have to compact
my databases a lot, for speed and for backup purposes.> > b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
>> is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
>> you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
>> return to later.
>
>I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
>this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
>When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
>recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
>bookmarks"; run it before you start.A clever trick. Might be worth writing two scripts -- one to mark
and one to clear. That way you can simplify your find scripts by
doing your ORs and NOTs one at a time.Come to think of it, that argues for three scripts:
Mark Selected
Clear Selected
Clear All[ ... ]> > c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
>> deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
>> field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> > Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
>> Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
>
>I sometimes use Bob's technique of filling out the numbers to a standard
>length (which is an old solution, but works best with known number sets
>- i.e. where you won't have to go from 999 to 1000 and suddenly have it
>stop working!).  The solution I use is paired text and number fields.
>The first is "Child" or "K" or "DT"; the second is the number.  Sort by
>alpha, then numeric.  No problems, no special entry, simpler sorts.
>Requires entering in two fields instead of one, but it's quick enough.And very possibly produces smaller and faster indices, too.Alternately, if you're not sure how much space to allow -- well, here
I think the rule "disk space is cheap" *does* apply. :-) If you think you
might have a thousand entries, leave room for 10,000 or 100,000.> > d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
>> Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
>> short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
>> find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
>
>If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
>contains the string anywhere in itUm -- no. It will only find words starting with that string. (At least
in the version I've got.) But you *can* use wildcards such as *.[ ... ]> > These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
>> fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
>> ones.
>
>Filemaker is pretty fast,Actually, the speed varies. I have the fascinating advantage of having
the Ballad Index in both text and FileMaker format, and being able to
compare. Searching an indexed field in FileMaker is faster than searching
an indexed field with my (really clunky) Ballad Index software. However,
when searching an unindexed field, FileMaker is slower -- *much* slower
(FileMaker takes about twice as long to search a single unindexed field
as the Ballad Index requires to search *the whole Ballad Index text
file). So it's a good idea to plan in advance which fields you do or
don't want to index.I suppose I should explain: An "indexed" field is a field which FileMaker
chops up somehow so it can search it faster. All databases use this
format in some form or other. Searches on indexed fields are very fast
(functionally instantaneous, even in large databases) -- but they
make the database larger. Sometimes *much* larger.[ ... ]>"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>>
>> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
>> but it's not a true relational database.
>
>Perhaps, off-line, you could amplify on this?  It's not clear to me what
>the difference is between cross-table lookups with specified
>relationships vs. tables with primary and foreign keys.  It sounds like
>a difference which isn't a difference.I realize you asked for an off-list answer, but I'm going to make a
stab at it so everyone can understand.In a lot of instances, it doesn't make a difference. Particularly if
you keep your data clean. But there are two problems with the FileMaker
approach. First, because the two files are *completely separate*,
you can make modifications in one file without the other noticing it.To take the LPs-and-songs example, you can delete an LP from the
recordings file, and the Songs file never knows. It just keeps those
orphan songs on file, unless you take care not to let this happen.With a true indexed database, deleting the one will cause it to ask
you about the others.The other problem is that the links simply don't have all the features
of true relational links. Having worked with true relational databases
(Fourth Dimension and Helix, plus brief experience with a couple of
others), I can say that there *is* a difference, though I don't know
how to describe it in terms of LPs-and-songs.> > Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
>> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
>> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
>> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
>> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
>> handicap for high-level work.
>
>I agree; it's not designed for "high-level" work, and I have a problem
>both with the way it prints out the scripts and the fact that you can't
>copy and paste from the script window to put the contents of the script
>- as seen by the programmer - into other documentation.  It's
>occasionally irritating that it invisibly stores the "find" and "sort"
>criteria; I title my scripts carefully.  It also bothers me that you
>apparently can't run external functions in another language, although
>that's supposed to be possible in 5.0.  I seriously miss "switch/case"
>and "elseif" and a few other operators.Of course, those are true programmers' constructs. :-) But the lack
of COMMENTS is *really* bad....>That said, however, there's a lot to be said in favor of that scripting
>environment for the non-professional user.Agreed. It's an easy scripting language. It's just not very powerful. :-)[ ... ]> > The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
>> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
>> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> > And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
>> probably be a very large TEXT field.
>
>I'm not sure what the concern with 5000 records is.It's not a magic number. I suspect, in fact, that it has to do
with the size of the index files, and the number of sectors needed
for the file overall. I currently have a database of 11,000 records,
with about eight fields per record, which gives no trouble at all.
But it's a very small database overall -- those 11,000 records add
up to only a little over a megabyte. (The Ballad Index, by contrast,
needs 4.5M for 7,000 records.) The size of the whole database is
the real concern.[ ... ]> > I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
>> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
>> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
>> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
>> FileMaker.
>>
>> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
>> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
>> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
>> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
>> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
>
>Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
>variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
>persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
>other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?A variable exists in *one* place. A field exists in all of however
many records you have. A variable crosses all records; a field applies
only to one.A task I would like to do in FileMaker is to be able to count exactly
how many references there are in the Ballad Index. The total space
needed for this is one short integer. But to do it, I have to create
a whole new field and cast a total. Very bad.[ ... ]> > Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
>> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.
>
>Right - it would take a big library/collection operation to really
>outgrow Filemaker.The real point is not the amount of data, but the complexity of
the interrelationships. But that's the point: songs-and-LPs
does not require complex interrelationships. At most, a simple
link (and I'd argue against that; make it a flat file with the
song titles in a text field).
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:08:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


A nice idea, Ed, definitional difficulties notwithstanding.  It might be
informative to give a try at a list, if for no other reason than to
distinguish those which were verifiably in existence at the turn of the
century.  Those who care could undertake it could debate the propriety
of including any given song, but a lists of candidates would be informative.I note that the 8-volume set of MacColl & Lloyd singing Child Ballads
(Folk Music of the World series, Washington 715-722) had a 9th album,
traditional songs not included in Child (although I don't believe they
called them 'ballads' necessarily).  They included:The Bitter Withy
Lang A-Growing
The Seven Virgins
The Bramble Briar
Down in Yon Forest
The Bold Fisherman
The Blind Beggar's Daughter of Bethnal Green
Six Dukes Went A-Fishing
The Holy Well
The Shooting of His DearDoes anyone know why these particular songs were chosen?  Who was the
architect of this collection?And while we're at it, can anyone provide any details on the subsequent
discography of the collection?  I saw a late '50s reference that
Riverside was planning to reissue the records - did that ever happen?
Did anyone else republish them?  Did any other record series borrow from them?-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 01:03:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
. )The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic."The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
opposite.(Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
currency in tradition.")Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 05:12:29 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


In a message dated 23/10/2000  05:07:34, you write:<< (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
 to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
 currency in tradition.") >>Or the ones, like the "Star of Belleisle" (definitely Irish on qualitative
grounds and on the evidence of its appearance on a leaf of an indisputably
Irish songster in the Royal Irish Academy) which he includes in Native
American Balladry.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A second Croskeys CD
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:34:34 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


This is not strictly relevant to this forum but some may be interested. It
concerns a cd of stories produced to aid the rebuilding of a famous music
venue.Members may know that the Crosskeys Inn, in County Antrim, famous for music,
song and tale sessions, was destroyed by fire earlier this year. A CD of
music and song produced in aid of the rebuilding has already been issued; a
second has now been produced. Entitled "Tales Across the Ocean" it comprises
stories told by some of the most accomplished tellers of tales from Ireland,
north and south, and from North America.Further details may be obtained from me ([unmask])John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:40:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(87 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> >I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
> >this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
> >When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
> >recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
> >bookmarks"; run it before you start.
>
> A clever trick. Might be worth writing two scripts -- one to mark
> and one to clear. That way you can simplify your find scripts by
> doing your ORs and NOTs one at a time.
>
> Come to think of it, that argues for three scripts:
> Mark Selected
> Clear Selected
> Clear AllCute!  My concern has been with the records which are insufficiently
differentiated for practical search criteria; I'm interested in flagging
a small number of records in a larger found set.   I hadn't though of
using it for compound searches.  Worth doing!> Alternately, if you're not sure how much space to allow -- well, here
> I think the rule "disk space is cheap" *does* apply. :-) If you think you
> might have a thousand entries, leave room for 10,000 or 100,000.Yeah, but that just proliferates leading zeroes and/or spaces, and you
always have to get the number right, or they'll sort wrong.  In those
instances, I tend to start numbering at 10000 or 100,000 so there's a
real number for all places.  I sometimes use other 'decades' for
categorization - e.g. 500,000-599,999 for a specific subset of records.> >If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
> >contains the string anywhere in it
>
> Um -- no. It will only find words starting with that string. (At least
> in the version I've got.) But you *can* use wildcards such as *.I stand corrected!> To take the LPs-and-songs example, you can delete an LP from the
> recordings file, and the Songs file never knows. It just keeps those
> orphan songs on file, unless you take care not to let this happen.
>
> With a true indexed database, deleting the one will cause it to ask
> you about the others.A valid distinction for complex databases, although I should mention
that the process of deleting/modifying all related references is
sufficiently nasty that in our SQL 7 DB, we don't actually run the
procedure - just mark 'deleted' accounts as 'disabled'.  Someday, of
course, we'll have to bite the bullet....> >Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
> >variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
> >persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
> >other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?
>
> A variable exists in *one* place. A field exists in all of however
> many records you have. A variable crosses all records; a field applies
> only to one.
>
> A task I would like to do in FileMaker is to be able to count exactly
> how many references there are in the Ballad Index. The total space
> needed for this is one short integer. But to do it, I have to create
> a whole new field and cast a total. Very bad.'Global' field types are a single value, record-independent;
theoretically they're written in a single location.  The difference
between a single floating point value on disk and a single integer in
memory is miniscule.  I'd scan the records and increment the value in
the global field, ending with my total.  Sure you have to create the
global field, but you also have to specify and initialize a variable.
Am I missing something?All my scratch and calculation fields are global variables.  Another way
to handle this was used by my predecessor; she used a separate file to
store the counts and calculations involved in statistical analysis,
since they're not record-specific.  One can overwrite a single record
each time a calculation is done, or create a new record each time
analysis is performed, providing a historical record.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:29:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


On 10/23/00, James Moreira wrote:>If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
>didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
>. )Although I should note that "Bitter Withy" is an English song, and
the Ballad Index is still much stronger on American than British
material. (Funny, considering that I prefer the British ballads --
but it's what I have access to.)[ ... ]>"The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
>ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
>tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
>opposite.I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)>(Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
>to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
>currency in tradition.")I think the last is because Laws isn't as widely known or accessible.
I get very irked with Laws, personally. He's indispensable to me
(so many of the songs he catalogued are so wide-spread and under so
many titles), but he's as quirky as Child.On the other hand, that proves the whole problem with this project:
Any particular person can make up a list, but no two will make the
same list. Child's list has manifest inaccuracies; Laws added a lot
of additional songs, but it's a dubious list in many ways; now we're
talking about adding more but have no adequate definition of what
we want.I find myself wondering what is the point? Just to get some sort
of number on the things, so that we can find all the versions?
The Ballad Index in effect provides that function, but with a very
(very, very, very) loose definition of a ballad. Sure, we throw in
things which aren't ballads, at least in the high and noble form
most of us detect in the Child Ballads. But let's face it -- not
all the Child Ballads are actually as good as we think. Consider
"The Whummil Bore." Or such degenerate forms as "Billy Magee Magaw."One of the points Ed mentioned was the "Ballad" form -- the 4343 abab
rhyme, the internal refrains, etc. And yet, another thing that
working over thousands of texts has demonstrated to me is that the
metrical form is not an integral part of a ballad; too many ("The
Twa Sisters" is a fine example) change form -- with or without
the refrain, in single or double stanzas, etc. When we first discussed
creating the Ballad Index, I asked about putting in a metrical form
indication. This was clearly not a workable idea (and people
rejected it) -- though it would have been really, really fascinating
to do it on a text-by-text basis.But it's yet another problem with our definitions.I just don't think we're in a position to do a comprehensive ballad
catalog. There is too much we need to do *first*.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:19:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(26 lines)


Glaring omissions are Bamboo Briar (Bruton Town), Shooting of his Dear
(Molly Vaughn), Long A-Growing, Frog's Courtship. The Digital Tradition
has assigned numbers (starting with 306)to Childles ballads, just to keep
them gouped for searching reasons.On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Good People:
>
> Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
>
> Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> Mary."  Etc., etc.
>
> Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> don't we as a group do so?
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:31:10 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(83 lines)


The question really is: "WHat do we gain by numbering?" I find that it
helps to locate variants, and is very convenient for this. If you're
talking about somehow elevating a non-Child ballad's status, I'll leave;
Child included some pretty feeble ballads, and wasn't consistently clear
in specifying the basis for assigning numbers.On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Bob asks for some criteria against which to measure the ballads Child
> omitted but might have included had he known of them (pace, Sam Hinton),
> or had he a more complete record.
>
> I think there are a few measures we might employ:
>
> 1) The ballad probably pre-dates 1750, the approximate date of Bishop
> Percy's _Reliques_ upon which Child relied.
>
> 2) It exhibits the hallmarks of traditional ballad composition:
> incremental repetition, "leaping and lingering," stock phrases, and so on.
>
> 3) It need not have originated in England -- to answer one of Bob's
> questions.
>
> 4) Its first appearance may have been in print rather than in an
> unpublished collection.  See, for example "John Dory," the A text of which
> is reprinted from Thomas Ravenscroft.  (Which is why I think he did not
> eliminate "The Frog and the Mouse" because it was registered with the
> Stationer's Office.)  Further, there are versions of "Barbara Allen" that
> owe their very existence to printing houses, yet Child included them in
> the canon.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:
>
> > On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > >Good People:
> > >
> > >Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> > >curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> > >clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
> > >
> > >Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> > >know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> > >is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> > >texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> > >Mary."  Etc., etc.
> > >
> > >Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> > >don't we as a group do so?
> >
> > I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."
> >
> > There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
> > fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
> > definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
> > ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
> > in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
> > which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?
> >
> > If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
> > compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
> > I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
> > dissatisfied.
> >
> > Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
> > What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
> > --
> > Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> > 2095 Delaware Avenue
> > Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> > 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
> >
> > The Ballad Index Web Site:
> > http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:20:11 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(30 lines)


Jamie:Laws is next.EdOn Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:> If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
> didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
> . )
>
> The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
> Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
> Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
> other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
> as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic.
>
> "The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
> ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
> tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
> opposite.
>
> (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
> to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
> currency in tradition.")
>
> Cheers
> Jamie
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Latest Discoveries (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:13:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


Hi, folks:Richard Spottswood sent this, and I'm forwarding it. My finances aren't in
shape to buy more LPs at the moment (and neither are my shelves). Enjoy!
Peace,
PaulR Spottswood writesBrian is a local [Washington, DC] dealer.  Anyone interested should conact
him.  Dick---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2094 00:10:49 -0400
From: Brian McGuire <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Latest DiscoveriesHello Dick Spottswood:
I have found some items you might possibly be able to shed a little light
on.
There was an estate sale at a house on Massachussetts Ave. down in the
embassy neighborhood, right by Sheridan Circle, where there was an unusual
collection of folk music records, specifically concentrating on the old
Appalachian ballads.
I got a batch of LPs by folks such as Jean Ritchie, Bascom Lamar Lunsford,
Frank Warner, Cisco Houston, Eric Darling, etc., all original issues on
Elektra, Riverside, Vanguard, Folkways, etc. from the '50s and early '60s.
Generally in very good condition.  10" LP by Jean Ritchie which was
Elektra's first record.  If you know anybody who's hot for this stuff, send
them on.
But what I want to ask about is a bunch of apparantly home-recorded 78s of
various ballad singers.  There's 12 of them, Recordio Discs made by
Wilcox-Gay.
The singers are names such as Artus Moser, who I know has been recorded by
the Library of Congress, Virgil Sturgill, who I think may not be one of the
most authentic of folk artists, Joan Moser, Charlie LaCombe, Eva Russell,
Harry West (there's a Stinson 10-incher by him and his wife, also), Pleaz
Mobley, an old Kentucky geezer, I believe, J.R. Martin, who identifies
himself as being from such-and-such a place in North Carolina, Chester (or
Clester?) Houncell.
The sound quality is good, but the recordings are a little amateurish in
that as often as not the first or last half-second of a song is cut off.
Sometimes the singers pause in order to recollect the lyrics, apologizing.
Some of these pieces take up an entire side of a record, verse after verse
after verse!
Sometimes they have a few moments of comments and conversation before or
aft.  I wish they had more of that.
I really don't have any idea whose stuff this was--although the estate sale
people might surrender some information if pressed.
Does this sound like something folklorists would kill for?
Oh, here's another item I thought might be significant.  A Cisco Houston 78
album on Disc Records titled "Cowboy Songs."  Cover art by Ben Shahn, liner
notes by Woody Guthrie.  They spell his name "Huston" throughout.  One
record is cracked, unfortunately, but playable.  Dated 1947.
Do you have any observations, evaluations, or educated guesses regarding
this stuff?  Want to take a look/listen to it?
Sincerely,
Brian McGuire

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:03:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
>a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
 Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
good examples of this style.But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
beginning.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:34:03 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that suggest
his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because she
was a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken an
alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis might
suggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.Amy DavisJames Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
> beginning.--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:28:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(85 lines)


On 10/23/00, James Moreira wrote:>[unmask],.Internet writes:
>>I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
>>a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
>Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
>Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
>natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
>."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
>either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
>and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
>side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
>guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
>depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
>belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
>older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
>commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
>especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
>link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
>Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
>Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
> Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
>the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
>in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
>some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
>good examples of this style.
>
>But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
>narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
>involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
>by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
>remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
>beginning.This is backwards. I could argue many of the points in the first
paragraph, but the latter one is where it all comes apart.The ghost demonstrates that the song is old. Look at the history
of the supernatural ballads. They are constantly being rationalized.
Most of them are very old. The current forms don't have supernatural
elements. Neither do the more recent ballads.For the ghost to exist at all, the song must be old. And it must
have circulated early, because the versions almost all retain the
ghost. That means it circulated before the days of rationalization.The fact that a song mentions a gun doesn't make it recent. Guns
have been around for half a millennium! And it's not inherently
clear that the original involved a gun anyway. If a fourteenth
century song claims that X shot Y, you'll assume it involves a bow.
Five centuries later, you'd assume a gun. But the word "shot" applies
to both, and could have influenced the name of the weapon used.I'm not saying it's a great ballad; I don't like it much either.
But it is widespread, it is firmly established in oral tradition,
it shows extreme variation, and it has every hallmark of age.The song may well have originated as a "popular" or a "literary" rather
than a folk piece. So what? If literary origin disqualifies something
from the Child canon, then you have to disqualify 80% of the Robin
Hood ballads, and quite a few of the pieces in the final volume
of the Child corpus.People seem to keep playing with ballad definitions. I guess I'm
just too simple-minded for that. A ballad is a traditional song with
a story. I don't care about form, about origin, about date, or
about how it achieved currency. Neither did Child, by our standards,
or he would have included a very different list of songs!I'm going to vote with Dick Greenhaus on this: There is value to
some sort of a cataloguing system to put all the various versions
of a song "under one roof." (That's one of the things the Ballad
Index attempts, though our linking element is a title -- a thing
someone might actually remember! -- rather than a number.) But any
other sort of cataloguing is inherently arbitrary. No two people
will produce the same results. So I don't see the point.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: 16th and 17th century broadside ballad index
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:11:13 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


There have been some refinements added to the 16th and 17th
century broadside ballad index on my website. The file is a large
one in ASCII, not a database system. That means one can easily
search for a keyword or phrase anywhere in the file, as long as a
carriage return someplace in a line doesn't intervene. This is a
reasonable way to do things for a file that's of the order of a
megabyte or less, because it can usually be handled and rapidly
searched in a word processor program. Beyond about 3/4 of a
megabyte it becomes very time consuming to add in new items in proper
order, and I think a megabyte is probably a practical limit,
and beyond that a database system becomes mandatory.I've made a modification and slight extension of the index to
allow fast direct search on some serial numbers. I've extended
the 'Z' designation to act as a signal that a serial number
follows, and have concluded all serial numbers with the
terminator |, to eliminate accidental identities, e.g., so a
search for ZX20[|] won't turn up ZX200-209 and ZX2000-2099.ZNn is the same as previously; n being the arbitrary, but unique,
serial number of a ballad.New directly searchable serial numbers are as follows:ZBn denotes the serial number 'n' of a Stationers' Register
ballad entry in Hyder E. Rollins' 'An Analytical Index to the
Ballad Entries'.ZCn denotes Child ballad 'n' in 'The English and Scottish
Popular Ballads', sometimes with a letter, x, appended to
indicate which of Child's text the broadside refers to.ZLxn denotes the letter-number combination 'x n' in G. M. Laws,
Jr., 'American Balladry from British Broadsides'.ZRn denotes the number 'n' is Steve Roud's folk song and
broadside ballad indexes, but only for those known in traditional
versions. Roud has the same number for broadside and traditional
versions of a song, but the presence of a ZRn number does not
guarantee there is a known traditional text (even for some of the
Child ballads there is no known traditional text). Usually if
there is a ZRn noted there are more (and usually many more)
traditional texts noted in Steve's indexes than the few examples
I note in my broadside ballad index (and more than are in Laws'
two indexes or in 'The Traditional Ballad Index').Steve Roud, however, doesn't usually give a Roud number to
broadside ballads for which there is no known traditional
version, so there is no way to give a complete cross-referencing
of these broadside ballads in my index to those in his by a
simple ZRn serial number. For those interested only in folk songs
and their background, it would serve little purpose anyway.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:04:04 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(46 lines)


In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.        Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.Heresy provided by dick greenhausOn Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Jamie:
>
> Laws is next.
>
> Ed
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:
>
> > If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
> > didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
> > . )
> >
> > The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
> > Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
> > Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
> > other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
> > as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic.
> >
> > "The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
> > ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
> > tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
> > opposite.
> >
> > (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
> > to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
> > currency in tradition.")
> >
> > Cheers
> > Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:06:46 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


While Child may have considered his ballads as being pre-literature, there
is a great deal of evidence that this simply wan't true. I hate the
thought of categorizing something based on our ignorance of its source.On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
> beginning.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


On 10/23/00, dick greenhaus wrote:>In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
>basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
>distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
>and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
>examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.I think the number assignments are random. Hardly something we can
criticise in the context of Child. At least Laws's lettering system
gives approximate classification. It's a lot easier to find a
vaguely remembered ballad in Laws than in Child.I agree that he has a problem with separation criteria. (A useful
lesson for the Ballad Index; I'm trying to make those distinctions
in the notes.) But, again, Child didn't do it either. I'd love
to know how Child decided, in cases like "The Gaberlunzie Man" or
"The Twa Corbies," which were "valid" texts and which were
worthy of the appendices.It is unfortunate that Laws didn't give more and better examples,
but it's hard to blame him for producing an academic work in
the Sixties which doesn't have much value to us in the Nineties.
He could hardly know which books would be in or out of print.
And he was targeting college students anyway; they were supposed
to have access to better libraries.I don't mean to absolve Laws of all charges; his work does have
defects (and far too many typographical errors!). But his is the
only widespread classification scheme other than Child's; it's
extremely valuable simply for that.Would I like to start over again, going back even before Child,
and do the job right? Yes, of course I would! But it's not
going to happen. Laws is a lot better than nothing!>        Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
>and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
>I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.If it's any comfort, I have found the texts of several Laws Ballads
in the DT to be quite helpful.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:20:45 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


I'm generally in favor of indexing systems.  As Dick says, it's useful
if for no other reason than grouping songs apparently of the same
family.  I approve of Bob's BI policy of inclusivity; I've found the
Ballad Index particularly useful on songs like "Fare You Well, Mary Ann"
which are clearly not ballads but are from oral tradition at some level.My interest in a listing of this type is much less as an attempt to
extend Child's work, and more as a medium for a more widely-used system
for cataloguing.  Any widely-used system confers benefits in spite of
inadequacies and functional weakness - c.f. Microsoft for a conceptual
example) - but I think this group, with its extensive knowledge of both
the genre and definitions, is a better group than most to come up with
something, and to make clear its limitations, assumptions and exceptions.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:16:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


dick greenhaus wrote:
>
> In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
> basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
> distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
> and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
> examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.
>
>         Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
> and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
> I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.
>
> Heresy provided by dick greenhaus
>Dick, as Bob Waltz points out in another posting, Laws, despite some
deficiencies, is very useful. Where would we be without his two volumes?
As for usefulness on the Mudcat Forum, I've often used Laws designation.
For example, if someone requests a song and I recognized it as one in
Laws indexes, I don't try to guess what titles or keywords I should look
for it under in the Digital Tradition. I might never guess a correct
one. I thumb through the appropriate subject heading (or maybe two of
them) in Laws' indexes, and then post on the Mudcat Forum a 'search for
(Laws) 'Xn' in DT' as a quick way for someone to find all versions in
the DT.It is also becoming pretty much standard to give Laws designation in the
UK as well as in the US. As I pointed out in an earlier posting today,
I've made it easy to search for Laws Xn designation in the broadside
ballad index on my website; Steve Roud lists it in his broadside and
folk song indexes, and its given in the notes in 'The Greig-Duncan Folk
Song Collection'.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:17:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]><<The fact that a song mentions a gun doesn't make it recent. Guns
have been around for half a millennium! And it's not inherently
clear that the original involved a gun anyway. If a fourteenth
century song claims that X shot Y, you'll assume it involves a bow.
Five centuries later, you'd assume a gun. But the word "shot" applies
to both, and could have influenced the name of the weapon used.>>Not to mention a slingshot, used for hunting in times past -- and still
around, as stories from the West Bank make sadly clear.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Quick hello
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:39 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


A quick hello from new listmember Nigel Gatherer from not-so-sunny
Perthshire in Scotland. I'm an amateur enthusiast with a particular
interest in Scottish broadsides, and a general interest in old songs. I'll
enjoy lurking for a while to see what sort of discussions develop.--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless ballads
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:19:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(64 lines)


[I don't think my first post of this made it through -- if it did,
apologies for the repeat. - Amy]I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that
suggest
his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because
she
_was_ a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken
an
alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis mightsuggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.Amy DavisJames Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and
culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it
suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for
songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is
freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly
recent
> beginning.--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:24:10 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


In a message dated 24/10/2000  11:20:28, you write:<< Nigel Gatherer, Crieff >>For anyone not familiar: compiler of Songs and Ballads of Dundee (Edinburgh,
1986) and of the Album of the same name on Peter Shepheard's Springthyme
label.You're welcome here, Nigel.Did you get an answer to Little Jock Elliott II?John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:10:19 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(55 lines)


If The Digital Tradition has made Laws more useful, I';m delighted. My
point was that, even if you have Laws' examples available, it's not easy
to determine which code a "new" ballad should be assigned. A GOOD system
(and DigiTrad's is NOT good) would specify just what aspects of a ballad
woul;d define it's position or code number.This gets to be a real problem with degenerate versions. I heard Charlie
West, for instance, sing a version (I guess) of Babylon where the third
maiden simply killed the robber, and no family membership was stated nor
implied. Should this be considered as a version of the same ballad?Same goes for LOrd Randal and Billy Boy. Similar form and structure, very
different story.On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Bruce Olson wrote:> dick greenhaus wrote:
> >
> > In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
> > basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
> > distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
> > and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
> > examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.
> >
> >         Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
> > and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
> > I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.
> >
> > Heresy provided by dick greenhaus
> >
>
> Dick, as Bob Waltz points out in another posting, Laws, despite some
> deficiencies, is very useful. Where would we be without his two volumes?
> As for usefulness on the Mudcat Forum, I've often used Laws designation.
> For example, if someone requests a song and I recognized it as one in
> Laws indexes, I don't try to guess what titles or keywords I should look
> for it under in the Digital Tradition. I might never guess a correct
> one. I thumb through the appropriate subject heading (or maybe two of
> them) in Laws' indexes, and then post on the Mudcat Forum a 'search for
> (Laws) 'Xn' in DT' as a quick way for someone to find all versions in
> the DT.
>
> It is also becoming pretty much standard to give Laws designation in the
> UK as well as in the US. As I pointed out in an earlier posting today,
> I've made it easy to search for Laws Xn designation in the broadside
> ballad index on my website; Steve Roud lists it in his broadside and
> folk song indexes, and its given in the notes in 'The Greig-Duncan Folk
> Song Collection'.
>
> Bruce Olson
>
> Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
> ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
> or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:51:58 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that
>suggest
>his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because
>she
>was a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken
>an
>alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis might
>suggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.If metamorphosis could be demonstrated then an argument could be made
for a connection with "Leesome Brand" (Child 15), no problem.  But the
texts of "The Shooting of His Dear" that I've seen are usually explicit
that the hunter saw a white apron and mistook that for a swan.> [unmask],.Internet writes:
>The ghost demonstrates that the song is old. Look at the history
>of the supernatural ballads. They are constantly being rationalized.
>Most of them are very old. The current forms don't have supernatural
>elements. Neither do the more recent ballads.The Ghostly Fishermen, The Dreadful Ghost, She Moved through the Fair,
Lost Jimmy Whalen, Beautiful Susan, Edmund in the Lowlands, American
Woods, The Nightingale, Nancy of Yarmouth . . .  all modern ballads,
all feature ghosts/revenants in at least some versions.[unmask],.Internet writes:
>While Child may have considered his ballads as being pre-literature,
>there
>is a great deal of evidence that this simply wan't true. I hate the
>thought of categorizing something based on our ignorance of its source.Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to uphold ESPB as a canon of
traditional balladry, and I agree with Bob that catalogs like the
Ballad Index are eminently more useful as research tools.  But if
people are going to add 306, 307, 308 *to Child*, which is where this
discussion began, then it should be done in the spirit of what Child
was trying to accomplish, not from the perspective of a 20th century
approach to folksong research.  We don't know precisely his criteria
but we know his starting point, and it was quite different from the
more folk-oriented models of the past 75 years or so.  There are some
valid candidates for inclusion -- "The Bitter Withy," "Long A-Growing"
and perhaps others.  But songs like "The Shooting of His Dear" and "The
Bold Fisherman" only fit if certain scholarly interpretations are
accepted up front.  The texts themselves don't get us there.I disagree that certain kinds of ballads can't be studied as
"pre-literature" or at least in relation to non-literacy as cultural
condition.  Ballads are the best documented source for oral culture
research available in the English language, and the analytical tools
that have been made available over the past thirty years, with respect
to the stylistic analysis of texts and the anthropology and social
history of literacy, makes this a very promising avenue of ballad
research.  Granted it has more implications for European research than
for this side of the Atlantic, but it is definitely a viable line of
inquiry.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:20:04 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Nigel:Do tell us something about your "Songs from Dundee."  Is it still
available?EdOn Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Nigel Gatherer wrote:> A quick hello from new listmember Nigel Gatherer from not-so-sunny
> Perthshire in Scotland. I'm an amateur enthusiast with a particular
> interest in Scottish broadsides, and a general interest in old songs. I'll
> enjoy lurking for a while to see what sort of discussions develop.
>
> --
> Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
> mailto:[unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:58:12 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


In a message dated 10/24/00 8:57:25 AM, [unmask] writes:>The Ghostly Fishermen, The Dreadful Ghost, She Moved through the Fair,
>Lost Jimmy Whalen, Beautiful Susan, Edmund in the Lowlands, American
>Woods, The Nightingale, Nancy of Yarmouth . . .  all modern ballads,
>all feature ghosts/revenants in at least some versions.
*************************
I'm showing my ignorance here, but what version of "She Moved Thru the Fair"
definitely involves a ghostly revenant?  The one I sing is from Padraic
Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's always
appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, / She
came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in." This
was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green Book
of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation?"Lost Jimmy Whalen" (LAWS C-8)  is American in origin, and Child, though an
American himself,  was working entirely with the British isles corpus.
Moreover, it is cast in the first person  {"Alone as I wandered down by the
still river,"  etc.) , which  in itself would probably have caused Child to
reject it...   Barry says the song was known in 1886;  it seems to me that
the composer must have been familiar with older songs such as "The Unquiet
Grave."  I wonder why Child didn't include THAT one?  Maybe it's too weak as
a narrative....  I sing a lot of appropriate seasonal songs, and "Lost Jimmy
Whalen" is one of my favorites around Hallowe'en."The Nightingale" you mention must be the one about the wreck of the ship
_The Nightingale.", not the widely known one in which the text emulates
Bocaccio in using the singing of the nightingale as a metaphor for an  event
of sexual congress.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:16:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>but what version of "She Moved Thru the Fair"
>definitely involves a ghostly revenant?I had the "dead love" variant in mind, which is somewhat reminiscent of
classical ballad revenants in that the dead appears to return in bodily
form.  My understanding is that Margaret Barry introduced the motif to
make sense of the rather ambigous ending of Colum's poem.  Kind of an
odd example of someone looking to the supernatural to "rationalize" a
text.  It's a revival adaptation, I suppose, but either way it shows
the currency in modern tradition of the idea of the dead coming back.As for antecedants to "She Moved through the Fair," the only thing I
know of is a lyric song in Henry's _Songs of the People_ (H141; pp.
395-396), which contains the "night visit" stanza.  Whether this or
something like it is the source used by Colum, I don't know.  John
Moulden might be able to answer that.>"The Nightingale" you mention must be the one about the wreck of the
>shipYes, Laws M 37.  As you say not so well known as the bawdy song, but
Laws cites Scottish, English, Canadian and American versions.  This and
two or three of the other ballads I listed each have a dead sailor's or
dead emigrant's ghost returning home to a lover or family member.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Providence Sunday Journal
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:11:32 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Now here's an obscure question for you all. In April 1896, in a British
magazine, Katharine Tynan Hinkson wrote - "I remember years ago reading in
the Providence Sunday Journal - a New England paper, the then editor of
which, Mr. Alfred Williams, is an authority on folk-song and folk-lore - a
series of articles on children's singing games..."
Has anyone ever spotted these articles? Anyone have access to the paper? Any
clues at all? Might there be songs as well as games in the paper? etc.
Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:06:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]>*************************
<<I'm showing my ignorance here, but what version of "She Moved Thru the
Fair"
definitely involves a ghostly revenant?  The one I sing is from Padraic
Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's
always
appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, /
She
came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in."
This
was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green
Book
of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation?>>Those words ("...my dead love came in") appear in Margaret Barry's version
of the song, recorded in 1951, that appears on the "World Library of Folk
and Primitive Music" album devoted to music of Ireland. Margaret Barry came
from a long line of tinkers, but this song was one she learned from a John
McCormack recording of the Colum-Hughes composition. I haven't heard the
McCormack 78, so I haven't a clue whether he incorporated the revenant
lines, or they were added by Barry herself. (There is an album of McCormack
discs in the other room, lent by a neighbor, but that song isn't among them,
alas.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:38:07 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:> Do tell us something about your "Songs from Dundee."  Is it still
> available?I went to Dundee Art School in the late 1970s, and while there became
aware of, and subsequently passionate about, Scottish traditional music. I
started noticing that there were a few Dundee songs being sung. After I
left college, I researched more and compiled a considerable list of songs
which were either about the town of Dundee, or were regarded by Dundonians
as Dundee songs. I was encouraged to try to publish a collection when I
realised there hadn't been anything like it before.However, my primary source was libraries; collections of printed
broadsides, manuscripts, and old books. My rather dusty selection was
enlivened when I was introduced to folksong collector Peter Shepheard who,
along with Maurice Fleming, had been collecting from Dundee and district
singers since the 60s. Peter's recordings of songs from singers such as
Annie Watkins, Eck Harley and Charlie Lamb complemented the songs I'd
rooted out from history. Peter then brought out the record, a perfect
companion to the book.I'm happy to say that the book has just been republished (but I swear I
didn't join this list to publicise it!). I had a launch in Dundee a couple
of weeks ago, and Maureen Jelks, a fine singer, came and sang a few songs
from the book, including "Bonnie Susie Cleland" - a version of Lady Maisry
(Child 65) collected by William Motherwell.Songs and Ballads of Dundee, Nigel Gatherer.
Pub. John Donald, Edinburgh. ISBN 0-85976-538-5--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: She moved through the fair (was - Childless Ballads)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:52:06 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


In a message dated 24/10/2000  17:58:53, you write:<< The one I sing is from Padraic
 Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's always
 appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
 repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
 heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, / She
 came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in." This
 was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green Book
 of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
 and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
 know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation? >>I think it has always been assumed that Colum's lines - "So softly she came
that her feet made no din" implies otherworldliness. The origin of the
addition of "dead" is obscure, though it and an additional verse:The people were saying no two were e'er wed
But one has a secret that never is shared
Then she went on her way with her goods and her gear
And that was the last that I saw of my dear.(also of obscure origin) were associated in song books printed in Ireland in
the late fifties.Colum's original was not Gaelic but almost certainly the Enlish language song
known as "Out of the window," "Our wedding day" or "She moved through the
fair" versions of 2 of which are in Sam Henry's Songs of the People
(Huntington, Herrmann pages 395 and 454) - the inter-relationships have yet
to be clearly traced.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:07:32 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
>JamieIs this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
only.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:16:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>Child himself never wrote down the criteria he used in selecting the "305",
>but George Lyman Kittredge, who knew him well,  postulated what he though
>were probably some of his criteria. He was interested in ballads -- songs
>with a narrative (what D. K. Wilgus has described as the "And then,,,, and
>then...." construction) that had been  collected from the mouths of "the
>people."  (Child worked only from manuscripts and published sources;  he
>wasn't a collector himself)....Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
or that he ever heard a traditional singer?--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:37:05 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


John and Prurient People:I -- a man who claims to know more frankly dirty songs than anyone --
cannot recall any version of the "The Nightengale" in which the sex is
made explicit.EdOn Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> >Jamie
>
> Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> only.
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:50:12 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


John:F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
patriotic poetry which included some songs.Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
time at all in his father's sail loft.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:36:30 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


On 10/27/00, Ed Cray wrote:>John:
>
>F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
>what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
>to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
>copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
>the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
>patriotic poetry which included some songs.Even wrote some songs in that context. "Overtures from Richmond"
is a comic anti-Confederate song to the tune of Liliburlero.>Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
>that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
>time at all in his father's sail loft.Though he never seemed to admit to any such knowledge. Too good for
it, or something. :-(--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:43:45 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(25 lines)


Depends on your definition of "bawdy", Ed.On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> John and Prurient People:
>
> I -- a man who claims to know more frankly dirty songs than anyone --
> cannot recall any version of the "The Nightengale" in which the sex is
> made explicit.
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:
>
> > >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> > >Jamie
> >
> > Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> > the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> > this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> > only.
> > --
> > john garst    [unmask]
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:46:45 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
believe that his book(s) had only published sources.On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> John:
>
> F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
> to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
> copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
> the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> patriotic poetry which included some songs.
>
> Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
> time at all in his father's sail loft.
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:28:08 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
early life.Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads> That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
>
> > John:
> >
> > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
reputed
> > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
a
> > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
ahem,
> > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> >
> > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
any
> > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> >
> > Ed
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:58:44 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Ruairidh:Our library has a run of the journal.  The volume number suggests that the
desired number was published in 1880.  The pages you give (334-35) suggest
it is a review -- but of what?  I assume that "Professor Norton" was
actually Child's friend, Charles Eliot Norton.  I shall try to get a look
at this on Tuesday and will report to the list.EdOn Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Ruairidh Greig wrote:> Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
> the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
> 335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
> early life.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
>
>
> > That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> > Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> > believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > >
> > > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
> reputed
> > > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
> a
> > > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
> ahem,
> > > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
> any
> > > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:02:09 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


In a message dated 10/27/00 7:17:25 AM, [unmask] writes:>Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
>or that he ever heard a traditional singer?
****************************
Child has been quoted as saying  that he was "wholly incurious" about the
music of the ballads, although in his _The English and Scottish Popular
Ballads_, he did include an extensive index to published airs of the songs,
along with the tunes for 55 of them as an appendix  under the heading
"Ballad Airs From Manuscript."  There is no evidence that he ever heard any
of these actually sung. He was a student and scholar of written literature
(if you will excuse a tautology), and I think his main intent was to find
written or published versions of these songs that did not bear evidence of
editorial tampering by the collectors.From what I've read somewhere -- and can't remember where -- I think Child
did not consider the _Ballads_ his greatest work;  he was perhaps more
partial to his researches into Middle English, especially  his studies on how
Chaucer intended his written words to be pronounced.Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:31:44 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Sam:
Do you recall where those comments on Child came from?
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: [unmask] <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads>In a message dated 10/27/00 7:17:25 AM, [unmask] writes:
>
>>Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
>>or that he ever heard a traditional singer?
>****************************
>Child has been quoted as saying  that he was "wholly incurious" about the
>music of the ballads, although in his _The English and Scottish Popular
>Ballads_, he did include an extensive index to published airs of the songs,
>along with the tunes for 55 of them as an appendix  under the heading
>"Ballad Airs From Manuscript."  There is no evidence that he ever heard any
>of these actually sung. He was a student and scholar of written literature
>(if you will excuse a tautology), and I think his main intent was to find
>written or published versions of these songs that did not bear evidence of
>editorial tampering by the collectors.
>
>>From what I've read somewhere -- and can't remember where -- I think Child
>did not consider the _Ballads_ his greatest work;  he was perhaps more
>partial to his researches into Middle English, especially  his studies on
how
>Chaucer intended his written words to be pronounced.
>
>Sam
>La Jolla, CA
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: a message from Lani HermannFW: [[unmask]: Returned mail: User unknown]
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:48:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(161 lines)


Lani Hermann asked me to post the message below.  Please disregard the
header stuff.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 5:08 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: [[unmask]: Returned mail: User unknown]----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem
<[unmask]> -----Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)The original message was received at Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:10 -0800 (PST)
from lani@localhost   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
[unmask]   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to listserv.indiana.edu.:
>>> RCPT To:<[unmask]>
<<< 550 No such local user
550 ballad-l.request@listserv.indiana.edu... User unknown
...Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:10 -0800
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: [[unmask]: Rejected posting to
[unmask]]
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1iHi Marge.
My old ISP dropped me last month, and I've been busy traveling ever since,
so have not
had a chance to straighten out my new address.  Please post this anyway (I
rarely do,
but ....) and I'll try to get right by the software Real Soon Now.
 Thanks --
Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360----- Forwarded message from "L-Soft list server at Indiana University
(1.8d)" <[unmask]> -----Date:         Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:58:16 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at Indiana University (1.8d)"
<[unmask]>
Subject:      Rejected posting to [unmask]
To: [unmask]You  are  not  authorized  to  send   mail  to  the  BALLAD-L  list  from
your
[unmask] account. You might be  authorized to send to the
list
from another of your accounts, or perhaps when using another mail program
which
generates slightly  different addresses, but  LISTSERV has no way  to
associate
this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you
have
any question regarding the policy of the BALLAD-L list, please contact the
list
owners: [unmask]------------------------ Rejected message (51
lines) --------------------------
Return-Path: <[unmask]>
Received: from transbay.net (dns1.transbay.net) by piano.ucs.indiana.edu
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<[unmask]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:58:14 -0500
Received: (from lani@localhost)
        by transbay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07230;
        Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:58:10 -0800
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Cc: [unmask]
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
Message-ID: <[unmask]>
References: <00aa01c04371$3613b300$2d051ad8@norm-cohen>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <00aa01c04371$3613b300$2d051ad8@norm-cohen>; from
[unmask] on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:31:44AM -0800Boo, and Happy Halloween!
        Sorry to be responding to this thread a bit late, but I've been out o' town
-- saw Dick Greenhaus and Susan Friedman and the Nicholses at the FSGW
GetAway
week before last, and heard Jamie Moreira read a paper at the American
Folklore
Society meetings this past wkend.
        But I was amazed, scrolling through the piles of my back e-mail, that no
one
to date has even mentioned the recordings in the boxed set produced by the
late
Kenneth S. Goldstein and published by Riverside in 1956 (Riverside Records
Presents
The English and Scottish Popular Ballads (The Child Ballads) sung by Ewan
MacColl
and A.L. Lloyd, edited by ..., 4 vols + 1, RLP 12-621-9). Of the 82 items
recorded.
72 are in the Child canon, and the rest are Childless:
        The Bitter Withy, Lang A-Growing,  The Bramble Briar, The Seven Virgins,
Down
in Yon Forest, The Bold Fisherman, The Blind Beggar's Daughter of Bethnal
Green,
Six Dukes Went A-Fishing, The Holy Well, and The Shooting of His Dear.        Goldstein's Introduction says
        "The Child ballads have long remained the standard by which ballads are
judged.
This standard has been so difficult to attain that only a few ballads have
been
recommended in addition to Child's canon.  Of these, only one, The Bitter
Withy,
has been universally accepted by scholars as worthy of admission.  The last
volume of this recorded series includes ten British ballads not included by
Child.
Not all are the same high order as The Bitter Withy, but neither are many of
the
ballads which Child included.  There is little doubt, however, that though
they
may vary in excellence, all ten are equal or superior to many of the Child
ballads."
        He declines to offer a definition of the ballad, but cites some standard
references
(Coffin, Friedman, Gerould, Hodgart, Pound, Wells, Wimberly) and also defers
to
others (Sharp, Barry, Griegn, Keith, Bayard, Bronson) for 'musicological
knowledge.'
        I haven't yet looked again at Ed's original list, but I have the feeling --
he
peeked?  *8^)= -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360----- End forwarded message ---------- End forwarded message -----

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:29:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


The Riverside series noted in the repost from Lani Herrmann is the
original series which was later reissued under the Washington label.
Donald Duncan noted all the ballads in 'The Great British Ballads not
included in the Child Collection' in a posting of Oct. 22 (Washington
723, formerly Riverside 12-629). I have a mixed set with the original
Riverside issue of the non-Child ballads, and the 8 vols. of the Child
ballads on the Washington label.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:08:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(88 lines)


>Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'? I
>have seen no previous reference to it.I was skeptical of the existence of this, based on a recollection of
someone's sharp challenge to vague, undocumented stories about "Rising
Sun" songs in Britain, but Ted Anthony (author of a recent AP article
on "House of the Rising Sun" tells me that he has a copy of the
original field recording.  Thanks, Ted, for the following>I have the recording on a CD in New York, made for me by the Alan Lomax
>Archives in Manhattan, and I have heard it. I also have a transcript of it
>made shortly after the recording. In it, Cox sings "She Was a Rum One," and
>when he's done, Lomax says something to the effect of, "There's another way
>to start that song, isn't there, Harry?" Cox replies with the Rising Sun
>verse (in a very thick accent, even thicker than when he's singing).This leads me to believe that one can obtain a copy in the same way that
Ted did.>Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
>Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
>lines, although they are frankly sexual
>Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
>English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
>recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
>illegal!).
>Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none of
>them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that matter.
>So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
>Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
>should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!Since my post, I, too, have been checking slang dictionaries (on
line).  I found the following.A WWW site, http://lugnutz.com/slang.htm, identifies "visiting the
land of the rising sun" with "having sex with a menstruating woman.">Steve Roud
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: John Garst <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
>Subject: Rising Sun
>
>
>>  I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
>>  recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
>>  include the verse
>>
>>  "If you go to Lowestoft
>>  And ask for the Rising Sun,
>>  There you'll find two old whores,
>>  And my old woman's one."
>>
>>  This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
>>  the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
>>  in Britain, for a bordello.
>>
>>  A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
>>  transcribed as follows:
>>
>>      My woman got something, just like the rising sun
>>      My woman got something, like the rising sun
>>      You can never tell when the work is done
>>
>>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>>      Need to worry about your rollin'
>>      because they're sure going wrong (?)
>>
>>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>>      Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
>>
>>  This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
>>  could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
>>  surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
>>  nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
>>  in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
>>
>>  How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
>>  --
>>  john garst    [unmask]--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:48:17 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(129 lines)


John
Thanks for confirming the Harry Cox song - I look forward to hearing it
sometime. Harry was one of my favourite singers, and it's comforting to know
that there is material still out there which I haven't yet heard. It gives
me something to look forward to, like learning that a previously unknown
book by a favourite author has just been published. Incidentally, Topic
Records are issuing a new double CD of Harry in November, with lots of
previously unpublished songs on it.As for the slang site you found - very interesting in its own right but
hardly admissible as evidence in this case, because:1.    Lomax recorded Harry Cox in East Anglia in the early 1950s. Assuming
that Harry hadn't just learnt the verse in question, let's say he knew it
fifty years ago. He was born in 1885, so let's say he could have learnt the
verse up to 100 years ago.
2.    The slang website (as is usual) gives little information about
who/what/when produced it, but from its content I think we're safe to assume
that it's American, and recent. Let's at least assume also that the
compilers haven't simply made up their entries and that the items do have
some real currency in their community.
3.    But can we accept a present-day American 'Modern Street Slang' usage
as evidence for a meaning in a verse sung by an East Anglian farmworker
between 50 and 100 years ago?My scepticism remains undented.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Rising Sun> >Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'?
I
> >have seen no previous reference to it.
>
> I was skeptical of the existence of this, based on a recollection of
> someone's sharp challenge to vague, undocumented stories about "Rising
> Sun" songs in Britain, but Ted Anthony (author of a recent AP article
> on "House of the Rising Sun" tells me that he has a copy of the
> original field recording.  Thanks, Ted, for the following
>
> >I have the recording on a CD in New York, made for me by the Alan Lomax
> >Archives in Manhattan, and I have heard it. I also have a transcript of
it
> >made shortly after the recording. In it, Cox sings "She Was a Rum One,"
and
> >when he's done, Lomax says something to the effect of, "There's another
way
> >to start that song, isn't there, Harry?" Cox replies with the Rising Sun
> >verse (in a very thick accent, even thicker than when he's singing).
>
> This leads me to believe that one can obtain a copy in the same way that
> Ted did.
>
> >Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
> >Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
> >lines, although they are frankly sexual
> >Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
> >English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
> >recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
> >illegal!).
> >Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none
of
> >them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that
matter.
> >So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
> >Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
> >should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!
>
> Since my post, I, too, have been checking slang dictionaries (on
> line).  I found the following.
>
> A WWW site, http://lugnutz.com/slang.htm, identifies "visiting the
> land of the rising sun" with "having sex with a menstruating woman."
>
> >Steve Roud
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: John Garst <[unmask]>
> >To: <[unmask]>
> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
> >Subject: Rising Sun
> >
> >
> >>  I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
> >>  recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
> >>  include the verse
> >>
> >>  "If you go to Lowestoft
> >>  And ask for the Rising Sun,
> >>  There you'll find two old whores,
> >>  And my old woman's one."
> >>
> >>  This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
> >>  the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
> >>  in Britain, for a bordello.
> >>
> >>  A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
> >>  transcribed as follows:
> >>
> >>      My woman got something, just like the rising sun
> >>      My woman got something, like the rising sun
> >>      You can never tell when the work is done
> >>
> >>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
> >>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
> >>      Need to worry about your rollin'
> >>      because they're sure going wrong (?)
> >>
> >>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
> >>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
> >>      Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
> >>
> >>  This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
> >>  could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
> >>  surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
> >>  nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
> >>  in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
> >>
> >>  How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
> >>  --
> >>  john garst    [unmask]
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:05:53 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(30 lines) , text/html(44 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:40:12 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(20 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: meaning of "Golier"
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:43:50 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references to
a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a melody
for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the text.
Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what does
'golier' mean?
 It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption of
the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
Yrs,
Barbara Millikan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:34:15 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Barbara
As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
end about drinking beer, ending
While we do say, Goliere.
Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
While we do say, Goliere!
And you shall drink it all up!
While we do say Goliere!
Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
heard of it before.One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
Steve Roud (in Sussex)----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 PM
Subject: meaning of "Golier"> In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references
to
> a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a
melody
> for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the
text.
> Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what
does
> 'golier' mean?
>  It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption
of
> the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
> Yrs,
> Barbara Millikan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:06:37 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(45 lines)


John:The rising sun motif was a common decoration in the clerestory lights over
front door lintels of Georgian and Federal architecture.  It was also
carved into the backs of chairs as a decorative device.One can sometimes see it as a "survival" in the backs of American
presswood chairs manufactured in the last half of the 19th C.So the house of the rising sun just might be a reference to any
Georgian/Federal house -- regardless of comforts offered within.EdOn Sun, 1 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> >...
> >3.    But can we accept a present-day American 'Modern Street Slang' usage
> >as evidence for a meaning in a verse sung by an East Anglian farmworker
> >between 50 and 100 years ago?
> >
> >My scepticism remains undented.
> >Steve Roud
>
> Mine is dented by several findings of "rising sun" in sexual
> contexts, even though they are not all particularly consistent.
>
> I found a reference to an actual "House of the Rising Sun" in America
> (at http://www.hoffman-info.com/kingkill33.html).
>
> >Fredericksburg is also the location of the "House of the Rising
> >Sun," a masonic meeting place for such notables as founding fathers
> >George Washington and Benjamin Franklin (of Hell-Fire Club fame) and
> >George Mason.
>
> This far predates the presumed origin of the song "House of the
> Rising Sun" and it appears to have nothing to do with prostitution or
> sex (unless the American founding fathers were engaging there in
> ancient rituals not usually attributed to Freemasons).
>
>
>
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: Mary Ann Gilpatrick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:31:57 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


If you giv4 "Goliere" a French pronunciation, it rhymes with "say." Who knows
French? (or Breton?)roud wrote:> Barbara
> As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
> the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
> song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
> well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
> blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
> end about drinking beer, ending
> While we do say, Goliere.
> Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
> While we do say, Goliere!
> And you shall drink it all up!
> While we do say Goliere!
> Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
> appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
> those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
> any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
> Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
> been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
> but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
>
> Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
> devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
> (Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
> specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
> heard of it before.
>
> One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
> Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
> 'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
> that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
>
> One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
> it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
> Steve Roud (in Sussex)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 PM
> Subject: meaning of "Golier"
>
> > In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references
> to
> > a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a
> melody
> > for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the
> text.
> > Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what
> does
> > 'golier' mean?
> >  It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption
> of
> > the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
> > Yrs,
> > Barbara Millikan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: golier
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:14:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I tried looking up the word "golier' and also "goliere" in the OED online,
but I turned up nothing.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Golier
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:28:28 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


A Google search for "golier OR goliere" gives about 520 hits.  There
are towns, people, and companies named "Golier" (and "De Golier").
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:23:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


>The rising sun motif was a common decoration in the clerestory lights over
>front door lintels of Georgian and Federal architecture.  It was also
>carved into the backs of chairs as a decorative device.
>
>One can sometimes see it as a "survival" in the backs of American
>presswood chairs manufactured in the last half of the 19th C.
>
>So the house of the rising sun just might be a reference to any
>Georgian/Federal house -- regardless of comforts offered within.
>
>Ed (Cray)Legman suggests that France's "Sun King" could have been a large
influence in popularizing rising sun patterns.Not only did early 19th-century New Orleans have a Rising Sun Tavern
but so did many other places in both Britain and America.  Indeed,
there was a "House of the Rising Sun" in New Orleans, but this is
hardly unique, since they were all over the place.  One might ask the
question, "Why is 'Rising Sun' such a popular name for taverns, inns,
pubs, bordellos(?), etc.?"If you search "Rising Sun" on the WWW, you will get many hits that
are sex related.  I suspect that most of these connections were made
after "House of the Rising Sun" became popular, but there is still, I
believe, an underlying thread of sexual linkage to "rising sun" that
predated, or may have been insulated from, that influence.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:03:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 10:34:15PM +0100, roud wrote:> Barbara
> As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of ======================================================================
        Looking through my Compact Edition of the OED, I find "goliard"
Class of educated jesters, buffoons, and authors ... loose and satirical
Latin verse ... 12th and 13th century ... Germany, France & England.
 ======================================================================        Sorry for the fragmentary typing, but I'm trying to juggle the
big volume, the keyboard, a pair of extra-strong glasses, and a
magnifying glass at once -- all but the glasses in my lap. :-)        Anyway -- could it be a corrupted form of this word?        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:47:30 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Off topic, perhaps, but... The decorative motif of the sunrise was certainly
popular for a long time before anyone collected "House of the Rising Sun";
there used to be a little book called "The English Sunrise" containing
photographs of architectural adornments using that motif. And other bits,
including a gorgeous one from an English table radio. My former wife had the
radio design (which resembled the engravings on the backs of National steel
guitars, but without the hula girls) inlaid on the fingerboard of her banjo.
Must search out that book one of these days.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:54:52 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(63 lines)


 At 10:34 PM 10/1/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Barbara
>As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
>presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
>also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
>the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
>song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
>well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
>blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
>end about drinking beer, ending
>While we do say, Goliere.
>Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
>While we do say, Goliere!
>And you shall drink it all up!
>While we do say Goliere!
>Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
>appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
>those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
>any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
>Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
>been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
>but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
>
>Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
>devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
>(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
>specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
>heard of it before.
>
>One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
>Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
>'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
>that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
>
>One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
>it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
>Steve Roud (in Sussex)
>The one verse that Belloc quotes reads:
"If Bonaparte
Shud zummon d'Eart
To land on Pevensey Level,
I have two sons
With our three guns
To blarst un to the de-e-vil.And he introduces it thus:
"With this Grizzlebeard, clearing his aged throat, tunefully carolled out
the following manly verse in the tune to which all Sussex songs have been
set, without exception, since the beginning of time -- the tune which is
called "Golier"."Which could mean the verse is part of the song, or it could be that poetic
license to which you referred. It does not, however sound like part of
"Woman in a Basket/Blanket".
Belloc goes on to describe a war between the Kings of Sussex and Kent over a
variant of the verse quoted, the only difference being that "the three men
come from Horsemonden".
Belloc does include music, and I can send you a MIDI attachment privately if
that helps.
Yrs,
Barbara Millikan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:16 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(100 lines)


Barbara
Yes, send me the midi file ([unmask]). If my hunch is right (and it
is still only a hunch) - that Belloc is extrapolating from Beckett - the
tune will turn out to be LILLIBURLERO, which Beckett mentions twice (e.g.
"Many were the sets of words fitted to the popular air 'Lilliburlero'. Among
these was the toast known as 'There was an old woman'...").
I don't recognise Belloc's verse from elsewhere - it could be traditional,
but is very much like the pseudo-traditional of the period, summoning as it
does the vision of the simple sturdy Sussex peasant. Is there anything else
like it in the book? I wouldn't be surprised if the Kent/Sussex argument
turns up in another guise from which Belloc borrowed.
The 1886 reference to Sussex harvest songs which I mentioned has proved
problematic. It's meant to be in Notes & Queries 1886, but I have failed to
find it there, but will keep looking. It may be a wild goose chase anyway.
Regards
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"> At 10:34 PM 10/1/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >Barbara
> >As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> >presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> >also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
> >the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of
the
> >song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
> >well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
> >blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
> >end about drinking beer, ending
> >While we do say, Goliere.
> >Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
> >While we do say, Goliere!
> >And you shall drink it all up!
> >While we do say Goliere!
> >Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does
not
> >appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor
in
> >those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
> >any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
> >Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably
have
> >been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from
him,
> >but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
> >
> >Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
> >devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with
Belloc'
> >(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
> >specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
> >heard of it before.
> >
> >One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days.
The
> >Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to
the
> >'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
> >that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
> >
> >One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels,
and
> >it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
> >Steve Roud (in Sussex)
> >
>
> The one verse that Belloc quotes reads:
> "If Bonaparte
> Shud zummon d'Eart
> To land on Pevensey Level,
> I have two sons
> With our three guns
> To blarst un to the de-e-vil.
>
> And he introduces it thus:
> "With this Grizzlebeard, clearing his aged throat, tunefully carolled out
> the following manly verse in the tune to which all Sussex songs have been
> set, without exception, since the beginning of time -- the tune which is
> called "Golier"."
>
> Which could mean the verse is part of the song, or it could be that poetic
> license to which you referred. It does not, however sound like part of
> "Woman in a Basket/Blanket".
> Belloc goes on to describe a war between the Kings of Sussex and Kent over
a
> variant of the verse quoted, the only difference being that "the three men
> come from Horsemonden".
> Belloc does include music, and I can send you a MIDI attachment privately
if
> that helps.
> Yrs,
> Barbara Millikan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sea Songs
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:17:18 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


For any list members who are living near or will be travelling to the New
Hampshire Seacoast, there will be a Maritime Folk Fesival in Portsmouth on
14-15 October. Music, songs, stories and demonstrations will be taking
place during the day on Sat. and Sun., all free. Saturday night concert
featuring Louis Killen, Jeff Warner, Danny and Joyce McLeod, and
Forebitter will be at the UU Church on State Street. For late breaking
details go to http://www.folkhorizons.org Hope to see some of you there  -
Tom & Linn

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Errors and Omissions
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:42:56 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(2 lines)


I forgot to mention that the Sat. night Sea Song Concert is $10.00 per
person. Mea Culpa - Tom

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: Kelly Feltault <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:38:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


This was posted to another folklore list this morning.  I thought many
on ballad-l would have useful suggestions and insights.  Please cc
responses to the student who sent the initial post.   ThanksCheers
Jamie>From: <[unmask]>
>
>To any and everyone who has an opinion regarding this issue: I am a
Junior at
>Wesleyan University and am doing some research regarding Joe Hill and
the
>intersection of labor and music in general, eventually resulting in a
senior thesis
>film. I am currently taking a look at the way in which the IWW used
songs, and
>had some general questions I would like to pose. First off, was the
manner that
>the IWW used music as an organising tool unique? Were there any other
>movements at that time or since then that have used songs in a similar
fashion?>The broader question is why did songs and IWW go hand in hand. What was
>unique about the movement that allowed for or needed music as a
motivating
>force? I understand these are broad, complicated questions, but I would
>appreciate any and all thoughts you have on this issue, in addition to
any sources
>that might help me in my research.
>
>   Thanks in advance.
>   -Jody Avirgan-
>   [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:18:22 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


In a message dated 10/10/00 10:36:40 AM, [unmask] writes:>This was posted to another folklore list this morning.  I thought many
>on ballad-l would have useful suggestions and insights.  Please cc
>responses to the student who sent the initial post.   Thanks
>
>Cheers
>Jamie
>
>>From: <[unmask]>
>>
>>To any and everyone who has an opinion regarding this issue: I am a
>Junior at
>>Wesleyan University and am doing some research regarding Joe Hill and
>the
>>intersection of labor and music in general, eventually resulting in a
>senior thesis
>>film. I am currently taking a look at the way in which the IWW used
>songs, and
>>had some general questions I would like to pose. First off, was the
>manner that
>>the IWW used music as an organising tool unique? Were there any other
>>movements at that time or since then that have used songs in a similar
>fashion?
>
>>The broader question is why did songs and IWW go hand in hand. What was
>>unique about the movement that allowed for or needed music as a
>motivating
>>force? I understand these are broad, complicated questions, but I would
>>appreciate any and all thoughts you have on this issue, in addition to
>any sources
>>that might help me in my research.
***********************
JodyFirst off, I think music was more of a crowd-gatherer than an  organizing
force for the IWW.  Its chief political function, to my mind, was as a sort
of cheerleading;  binding together a crowd of people who had already been
converted.  The IWW has printed its "Little Red Songbook" in many editions,
and it's still available from them.  You'll find all the words to a recent
edition of its songs reproduced on the Internet, at
<http://ww.acronet.net/~robokopp/iwww.html> :  this site is even better than
the "Little Red Book" itself, for it has a good many downloadable tunes.There's a lot information available in a book by Joyce Kornbluh: _Rebel
Voices, An IWW Anthology_.The IWW is still in existence,  and maintains a homepage at: <http://iww.org>.There is some mention of music in _Bird, Georgakas, and Shaffer: _Solidarity
Forever: An Oral History of the IWW.Phillip S. Foner has a good book (he as MANY books!)  called _American Labor
Songs of the Nineteenth Century_.  The IWW dates only from about 1905, so
doesn't get much space, but the book gives a lot of useful general
information abut Unions and Music.  The IWW is by no means the only Union
that has made good use of muic. When I was a Zoology Student at UCLA in 1937,
I joined the Hollywood Theater Alliance as a volunteer, singing and leading
songs on Union picket lines in the Los Angeles area.  This led to a paid ($50
a week!) job as a performer in the Alliance's musical revue, "Meet the
People,"  which ran in Hollywood for 10 months, and gave me the wherewithal
to marry and support a fellow-student (Art major) named Leslie. We have just
celebrated our 60th Anniversary.One of this country's great folk singers is U. Utah Phillips, who is a
card-carrying member of the IWW, as well as of Local 1000 of the American
Federation of Musicians.  (His real name is Bruce Phillips;  he comes from
Utah, and took his professional name following the example of T. Texas
Tyler.)  Bruce is not only a singer, raconteur, and IWW member, but a fine
historian, and I'll bet you could get a lot of information from a phone
conversation with him.  You could reach him through:  U. Utah Phillips / NO
GUFF RECORDS / PO Box 1235 / Nevada City, CA 95959; he doesn't have an e-mail
address.  Bruce has fallen on hard times, and his friends have set up a
web-site for him at: <http://www.utahphillips.org>, and that site has a
number of links to other sites that might help in  your research.Good luck!Sam Hinton
La Jolla, CA. USA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: Paddy Tutty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:06:00 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


That url should be:
   http://www.acronet.net/~robokopp/iww.htmlCheers,
Paddy Tutty[unmask] wrote:>  its songs reproduced on the Internet, at
> <http://ww.acronet.net/~robokopp/iwww.html> :  this site is even better than
> the "Little Red Book" itself, for it has a good many downloadable tunes.
>
> There's a lot information available in a book by Joyce Kornbluh: _Rebel
> Voices, An IWW Anthology_.
>
> The IWW is still in existence,  and maintains a homepage at: <http://iww.org>.
>
> There is some mention of music in _Bird, Georgakas, and Shaffer: _Solidarity
> Forever: An Oral History of the IWW.
>
> Phillip S. Foner has a good book (he as MANY books!)  called _American Labor
> Songs of the Nineteenth Century_.  The IWW dates only from about 1905, so
> doesn't get much space, but the book gives a lot of useful general
> information abut Unions and Music.  The IWW is by no means the only Union
> that has made good use of muic. When I was a Zoology Student at UCLA in 1937,
> I joined the Hollywood Theater Alliance as a volunteer, singing and leading
> songs on Union picket lines in the Los Angeles area.  This led to a paid ($50
> a week!) job as a performer in the Alliance's musical revue, "Meet the
> People,"  which ran in Hollywood for 10 months, and gave me the wherewithal
> to marry and support a fellow-student (Art major) named Leslie. We have just
> celebrated our 60th Anniversary.
>
> One of this country's great folk singers is U. Utah Phillips, who is a
> card-carrying member of the IWW, as well as of Local 1000 of the American
> Federation of Musicians.  (His real name is Bruce Phillips;  he comes from
> Utah, and took his professional name following the example of T. Texas
> Tyler.)  Bruce is not only a singer, raconteur, and IWW member, but a fine
> historian, and I'll bet you could get a lot of information from a phone
> conversation with him.  You could reach him through:  U. Utah Phillips / NO
> GUFF RECORDS / PO Box 1235 / Nevada City, CA 95959; he doesn't have an e-mail
> address.  Bruce has fallen on hard times, and his friends have set up a
> web-site for him at: <http://www.utahphillips.org>, and that site has a
> number of links to other sites that might help in  your research.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Sam Hinton
> La Jolla, CA. USA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:47:19 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Good People:There is material on the IWW singing tradition in Lori Elaine Tayloer,
"Joe Hill Incorporated: We Own Our Past," in Jeff Ferrell, "The
Brotherhood of Timber Workers and the Culture of Conflict" and in Sam
Richards, "The Joe Hill Legend in Britain," all in Archie Green, ed.,
_Songs About Work_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Folklore Institute,
1993).There is also material in Kenneth Allsop's _Hard Traveling_ (Hoddard and
Stoughton, 1967; Penguin, 1971); George Milburn's _Hobo's Hornbook_ (no
citation handy).Most of what has been written about the IWW is second hand, and
unreliable.  It also tends to center on the Western Federation of Miners
(an IWW affiliate) and on the martyred Joe Hill.  The significance of the
Wobblies in California, for example, is virtually unknown elsewhere --
despite the fact that literally dozens were convicted of murder after a
deputy was killed in Hopland during an IWW-led farm labor protest.  At the
other extreme, Steve Ross, a USC historian, has documented the fact that
many of the extras in the first movies made in Southern California were
itinerant Wobblies, drawn to the warmer climes in winter months.Similarly, the importance of the IWW in the northwestern woods cannot be
underestimated.A clear-eyed, and not flattering take on the IWW is in J. Anthony Lukas'
recent _Big Trouble_ (NY: Simon and Schuster, 1997).All but the last have material on singing in the ranks of labor.Ed Cray

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:44 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(5 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: IWW and music
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:12:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 1:08 AM
Subject: IWW and musicHi Jody:The IWW weren't unique in using music as an organizing tool; it had been
part of the Populist movement of the 1890s. Probably the best-known piece to
come out of that time was "The Farmer is the Man", but there were certainly
others. Check out John Greenway's "American Folk Songs of Protest" (I
*think* I'm remembering the title correctly).Subsequent movements that used music as an organizing and rallying tool
notably include the industrial labor-organization drives of the 1930s,
particularly those involving coal miners; the efforts to organize southern
tenant farmers beginning in the 1930s and continuing for several decades
thereafter; and of course the southern civil rights movement, beginning with
the Montgomery bus boycott of 1955. Music from the latter can be found on
the Smithsonian/Folkways set "Voices from the Civil Rights Movement" and the
disc "Sing for Freedom".You might want to get in touch with people from the Highlander Center
(formerly the Highlander Folk School); they were involved in all three
movements in various ways. Some discussion of the tenant farmers' movement
can be found in the biography of Lee Hays, "Lonesome Traveller".Hope this helps a little.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:58:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


It seems to me that music-as-protest derives from rhyme-as-protest.  I was thinking of John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?"  The rhyme has a lot more power then a more complexly worded argument.  Although there have also been any number of political poems, which were also perhaps sung,  in the centuries prior to ours, John Ball's rhyme is the predecessor of themes later sounded by the IWW and others.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:28:22 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


The same phenomenon can be seen in the activities of KISZ, the youth
wing of the old Hungarian Socialist Workers Party (there is a party of
the same name today, but it is not the same party). They organized
everything in the name of the party, because the party was where there
were funds, but in actual fact they were young people with a penchant
for organization and music. An event like a jazz festival might bring in
thousands of jazz enthusiasts and two new signed up members of the
party. Many of the young organizers of fifteen years ago are now not
only older, but selling insurance policies and working for advertising
questionnaire agencies...Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Website
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:31:42 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Dear everyone,I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
entries to the guestbook before they appear.Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Website
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:56:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


>Dear everyone,
>
>I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
>fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
>a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
>to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
>Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
>entries to the guestbook before they appear.
>
>Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Website
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:58:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Sounds like Kilroy Was Here. Or was it Conrad?(oops, sorry about the last post, me finger slipped)JR>Dear everyone,
>
>I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
>fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
>a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
>to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
>Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
>entries to the guestbook before they appear.
>
>Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:13:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
then the gentleman?"....I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
digging and "span" to spinning?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:58:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> ...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
> then the gentleman?"....
>
> I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
> digging and "span" to spinning?Yes, indeed.  But, symbolically, those were typical male & female
acts, respectively.---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  What's _done_ we partly may compute,  :||
||:  But know not what's _resisted_.       :||

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:06:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


If my reference to John Ball was too obscure, I apologize.  Here's a brief bio I dug out elsewhere on the net (and slightly edited):            Ball, John, d. 1381, English priest and social reformer. He was one of the instigators of the Peasant's Revolt of 1381. He was an itinerant for many years, advocating               ecclesiastical poverty and social equality.  Excommunicated in 1376, he was in prison at Maidstone when the rebels released him in 1381. After the dispersal of the rebels, Ball was captured at Coventry. He was taken to St. Albans, where he was hanged, drawn, and quartered. He is perhaps best remembered for              giving currency to the couplet "When Adam delved and Eve span/Who was then the gentleman?" William Morris wrote one of his works on utopian socialism under the title The Dream of John Ball.Lew Becker

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: IWW and Music
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:37:55 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:There is material on the IWW singing tradition in Lori Elaine Tayloer,
"Joe Hill Incorporated: We Own Our Past," in Jeff Ferrell, "The
Brotherhood of Timber Workers and the Culture of Conflict" and in Sam
Richards, "The Joe Hill Legend in Britain," all in Archie Green, ed.,
_Songs About Work_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Folklore Institute,
1993).Has anyone yet mentioned Archie's discussion in _Wobblies, Pile Butts, and
Other Heroes_?JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:02:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Lewis Becker wrote:
>
> If my reference to John Ball was too obscure, I apologize.  Here's a brief bio I dug out elsewhere on the net (and slightly edited):
>
>
>
> Lew BeckerParson [John] Ball is made to speak the lines at his first appearance in
the play 'Jack Straw', 1593.Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:58:08 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


yup.On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> ...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
> then the gentleman?"....
>
> I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
> digging and "span" to spinning?
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:41:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hi folks:Ummm...this discussion is very interesting, but I believe the student who
began it was primarily asking whether any *other* movements besides the IWW
used song as an organizing tool. I gather he has the IWW itself pretty well
covered.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:36:38 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:53:14 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(40 lines)


Well, let me mention a book we'll have out in another two or three months,
Joe Glazer's memoir, _Labor's Troubadour_.  Joe tells about singing for
various labor and civil rights endeavors, starting in 1944 as assistant
education director of the former Textile Workers Union of America.  He
transferred to the United Rubber Workers and then joined the USIA in 1961
as a labor specialist.  He retired in 1987, though you wouldn't know it,
since he keeps performing at union meetings and rallies and keeps writing
and recording songs.  These include "The Mill Was Made of Marble"
(probably his best-known piece), "Jellybean Blues," "Automation," "Too Old
to Work, Too Young to Die," and "They've Moved My Job to Georgia (or Was
It Tennessee?)."  He has more than twenty albums out.  At the end of the
book he profiles a number of the younger labor singers and gives some of
their songs (texts) as well, a nice generous gesture.Another non-IWW book that might be of interest in this discussion is
Shelly Romalis's _"Pistol Packin' Mama": Aunt Molly Jackson and the
Politics of Folksong_.JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Paul Stamler wrote:> Hi folks:
>
> Ummm...this discussion is very interesting, but I believe the student who
> began it was primarily asking whether any *other* movements besides the IWW
> used song as an organizing tool. I gather he has the IWW itself pretty well
> covered.
>
> Peace.
> Paul
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Tribute to Rounder -- Today on "No Time to Tarry Here"
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:27:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Hi folks:Just a second heads-up: For the first of two membership specials this week,
I will be presenting a tribute to Rounder Records on "No Time To Tarry Here"
this afternoon from 2-4pm central time (1900-2100 GMT). I didn't know this
when I planned the program, but we're just a week short of Rounder's 30th
anniversary, so it's an appropriate time to pay tribute to the label that
ranks with Folkways as an astonishing resource for traditional music and its
offshoots. The program will air on KDHX-St. Louis, 88.1FM; more to the point
for many of you, it will be on the web at:http://www.kdhx.orgEnjoy!Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New Address
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 15 Oct 2000 19:34:08 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Dear all,This is just to let you know that due the renaming of my university my
e-mail has also changed. It is now [unmask] and NOT
[unmask], so please remove the 'j'. Both e-mail addresses will
continue to reach me a little longer, but fairly soon I shall be utterly
j-less.Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Data Base
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:25:56 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
George--
George Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Carolyn A. and Peter S. Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
(617) 552-4521
[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:39:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 10/16/00, George Madaus wrote:>Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
>any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
>CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
>England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
>For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
>my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
>capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
>GeorgeYou need to specify a bit more. What do you want to do with this
thing? Do you want to be able to find all versions of, say,
"Barbara Allen" -- even if it's called "In Scarlet Town"? Or
is it enough to be able to search for the title on the recording?If the latter, I can make you a template (for FileMaker 3.0, but
I assume it will convert) in a couple of minutes.There are commercial databases around for this sort of thing, and
also shareware versions (in the $10 range, as I recall), but I
doubt they're worth it. Unless you need something fancy. In which
case they probably aren't *right* for what you need.Alternately I could tell you how to set up a text file for use with the
Ballad Index software. That way, you'd be able to do more complex
searches, assuming you can live with the user interface.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:50:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


George - e-mail me at [unmask], and we can get together and
I'll whip off something for you in Filemaker 4.1.  I do these for our
FSSGB (Folk Song Society of Greater Boston) library listings, and it
will only take a few minutes for a basic setup.  It's possible that by
doing it this way, you'll be able to take advantage of our listings as
we catalog our library and others.  And maybe you'd like to join our project...?-Don Duncan
 Cambridge, MA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:41:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(73 lines)


Dear RobertThanks for the reply. I won't get as complex as searching under alternative
names. What I have done is rate (subjectively) alternative version of a song
like Leave Her Johnny Leave  Her so I would like to be able to find all
version under that name across my collection and look at the rating. Further
I try to roughly classify song by genre e.g. songs of Mortality, navy
(construction), shanty, forebitter, coal mining, war, women's songs etc.. It
would of course be nice to have a filed that would be for alternative names
for the same song e.g., St. James Infirmary but that is just a wish.  I am
afraid of share ware or very specific software because of the possibility of
them being incompatible with new version of the system (I had this happen
with to me when I invested effort in a Hyper Card format only to find the
new system really didn't support this). Some one else suggested a soft ware
program for Windows called MySoftware which sounds great but again will it
work with System xx for the MAC?  I am leery about that.So I guess I am looking for something I hope will be ok for the MAC in the
future and lets me sort by Artist, country and song name rating and genre.I appreciate any help you can give me on this. All the best
George"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 10/16/00, George Madaus wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
> >any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
> >CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
> >England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
> >For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
> >my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
> >capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
> >George
>
> You need to specify a bit more. What do you want to do with this
> thing? Do you want to be able to find all versions of, say,
> "Barbara Allen" -- even if it's called "In Scarlet Town"? Or
> is it enough to be able to search for the title on the recording?
>
> If the latter, I can make you a template (for FileMaker 3.0, but
> I assume it will convert) in a couple of minutes.
>
> There are commercial databases around for this sort of thing, and
> also shareware versions (in the $10 range, as I recall), but I
> doubt they're worth it. Unless you need something fancy. In which
> case they probably aren't *right* for what you need.
>
> Alternately I could tell you how to set up a text file for use with the
> Ballad Index software. That way, you'd be able to do more complex
> searches, assuming you can live with the user interface.
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Commission on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 22:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


I don't know of any MAC software that will doe what you want, but I'd
strongly suggest that you try to find a database with full text search
capabilities; this makes life much simpler when you decide to change your
search requirements halfway down the road.If yoyu'll settle for a PC, I can give you (legally) a nice program that
will do what you want, and a great deal more.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW, Politics, and Music
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:53:59 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Lisa and Eavesdroppers:I would suggest that you instead subscribe to ballad-l.  Their interests
are catholic, they do not flame, and the members are rich with all sorts
of information.While they purportedly focus on ballads, in fact, they range widely.Ed
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 [unmask] wrote:> Hi everyone.  My name is Lisa Fishbein. I have a masters degree in music, and
> did my master's thesis on the music of the IWW.  Since we all have shared
> interests,  music history and the labor movement, I thought we could set up a
> mass mailings of discussions on related topics.  I now have you all in my
> e-mail address book under the heading IWW and Music.  Politics and music is
> such an appealing area of study, and I thought it may be nice, from time to
> time, if we all share perspectives.  Is this idea agreeable?
> Lisa Fishbein
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rambling rover
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 02:25:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi folks:Sorry to cross-post this, but I've got an obscure one. The title may
possibly "Rambling Rover"; it includes the line (possibly in the chorus)
"There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl". Anyone out
there recognize this? (Digital Tradition and the Traditional Ballad Index
both came up with nothing.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rambling rover
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:58:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


On 10/17/00, Paul Stamler wrote:>Hi folks:
>
>Sorry to cross-post this, but I've got an obscure one. The title may
>possibly "Rambling Rover"; it includes the line (possibly in the chorus)
>"There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl". Anyone out
>there recognize this? (Digital Tradition and the Traditional Ballad Index
>both came up with nothing.)It's not a traditional song; Andy M. Stewart of Silly Wizard wrote it.
It's in his songbook, and on at least two Silly Wizard recordings.Chorus runs something likeOh there's sober men in plenty,
And drunkards barely twenty,
There are men of over ninety
Who have never yet kissed a girl,
But gie me the ramblin' rover
Frae Orkney down to Dover
We will roam the country over
And together we'll face the world.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Rambling rover]
From: Dell Stinnett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:58:30 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Hi Paul!I think this is a traditional Irish pub song called Ramblin' Rover (I've got a
friend who does is on a regular basis as part of an Irish set.)  I can't
remember all of the words, but this line is part of the chorus.  I'm sure
someone will come in with the whole thing, but here's what I remember of the
chorus:There are <??> aplenty
And <??> barely twenty
There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl.
So give me the Ramblin' Rover
From Cockney down to Dover
We'll roam the county over
And together we'll face the world.-Dell----------------
I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere!
----------------
GaFilk - THE Georgia Filk Convention - January 5-7, 2001
http://www.gafilk.org____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/webmail

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Lost Reference
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 22:39:04 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Folks:I seek a book, or reference to be precise.  I lost it in a welter of web
pages turning before my eyes.The book is a (recently) published diary of a Revolutionary War seamen or
officer, captured by the British, and clapped in a prison hulk in NY
harbor.Does anyone know of the book, the title, the author, something?  It
apparently contains song texts of various songs current in the 1775-1781
era, including risque or bawdy texts.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: new book on "Frankie Silver"
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:00:35 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


I thought list members might be interested in knowing that Dan Patterson's
new book, "A Tree Accurst: Bobby McMillon and Stories of Frankie Silver"
has just come out on UNC Press.  I went to a talk he gave this afternoon
about it, and it was very interesting.  I haven't read the book yet, but a
quick skim suggests that it talks about the 1831 murder itself, the trial
and execution of Frankie, the ballad, the legend cycle, and Bobby McMillon,
the traditional ballad singer and storyteller from the same community in
Western North Carolina.  Here's a URL:
http://uncpress.unc.edu/FMPro?-DB=pubtest.fmp&-Format=detail.html&-RecID=126
44288&-Script=visited&-Find(In the interest of full disclosure, I should mention that Dan was my
thesis director and that I transcribed a lot of the video footage that
became the documentary film by Tom Davenport that led to this book.  But no
financial involvement.)Cheers,
Bruce
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Thanks
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 01:04:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hi folks:Thanks to all for help in finding "Ramblin' Rover". I have the lyrics, and
have forwarded them to the enquiring friend.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Lost Reference
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:00:56 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


Quite possibly not your book, as some of the facts are different. But
there is "A Sailor's Songbag: An American Rebel in an English Prison
1777-1779," edited with an introduction by George G. Carey (U. Mass.,
Amherst, 1976).This is a book of his songs rather than a diary; he was in Forton
Prison, England; and it was published 25 years ago. But it does have
a bawdy song or two in it. From the top -"Song No. 1... to kiss Susan Twas, loss of late and Cate
And as he walked up to London to pick up a lass
He showed them how well he could riggle his arse,"I have seen it remaindered. ( I might even be able to find a physical
copy - though I'd have a look on Bibliofind first if this is what
you're looking for).John Roberts.>Folks:
>
>I seek a book, or reference to be precise.  I lost it in a welter of web
>pages turning before my eyes.
>
>The book is a (recently) published diary of a Revolutionary War seamen or
>officer, captured by the British, and clapped in a prison hulk in NY
>harbor.
>
>Does anyone know of the book, the title, the author, something?  It
>apparently contains song texts of various songs current in the 1775-1781
>era, including risque or bawdy texts.
>
>Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ballad Found on Scots-l
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:32:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(100 lines)


A couple of days ago a subscriber to the scots-l mailing list posted
this ballad that he found in an old scrapbook. He is looking for
information/opinions about it.>From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
>To: [unmask]
>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:36:59 +0100
>Subject: Re: [scots-l] Little Jock Elliot II
>
>from a cutting in a scrapbook annotated: "Scotsman, 9 November 1892"
>........................................
>LITTLE JOCK ELLIOT II
>A Border Ballad
>(From the recital of Matthew Gotterson)
>
>There's freedom for me and my men
>Where the Liddel rins wild and free,
>Where my toor I'the heart o' the glen
>Is the pride o' my billies and me,
>And I keep my ain head wi' my hand
>And quell every enemie,
>For I kittle their ribs wi' my brand,
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Oh my name it is Little Jock Elliot
>        And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>I munt my gude nag wi' a will
>Whena fray's I'the wund, and he
>Cocks his lugs as he tugs for the hill
>That eneters the South countrie,
>Where pricking and spurring are rife,
>And the bluid boils up like a sea;
>But Southrons gang doon I'the strife!
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>In Liddesdale never a man
>Wad shrink frae the backing o' me,
>And Jed-forest gies me the van
>To strike 'gainst her enemie.
>In Coquetdale, Reed and Tyne
>We drive a prey wi' glee,
>And lounder the lubberts like swine,
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>Jock Ridley ance gaily rode doon
>To lift my ain horse frae the lea-
>A riever o' Tynedale renoun,
>A Ker-handed pricker was he.
>He made a fell dash I'the derk,
>But girnin I soon made him flee
>Wi' some weel-proggit holes in his serk;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>At Wheel-Kirk, within the Catrail,
>Priest David had thirty-and-three
>Gude nowt that were stown head and tail
>By Percy o' Keeldarstanelee.
>I chased up the unhallowed loon,
>Brought him and his horse to their knee,
>And wheeled back the nowt to their toun;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>In a raid I'the licht o' the moon
>The Bewcastle Cout sichted me,
>And swore he wad level my croon,
>And flaunted his sword michtilie.
>We met wi' a rush I'the pass,
>Wi' a clash made the steel-fire flee,
>But he fell like a stot on the grass;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>I fear neither Warden not law,
>Nor the troopers o' Queen Marie;
>Grim Bothwell frae me got a claw
>He'll never forget till he dee.
>I'll keep my ain head wi' my hand
>And my neck frae the hanging tree
>As lang as I waiggle a brand -
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Oh my name it is Little Jock Elliot
>        And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>........................................
>
>
>--
>Nigel Gatherer, Crieff  <[unmask]>
>The Scottish Music Pages:
>http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/gatherer/scottish/index.html
>
>--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:21:34 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
but nothing musical.Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:00:19 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(35 lines)


Donald:The song was credited to "Paul Campbell," the pseudonym for the Weavers,
and copyright in 1951 by Folkways Music Publishers.  It was included in
_Folksing,_ edited by Herbert Haufrecht (Hollis Publishing, 1959).  I have
not seen other printings.About the song's history, Pete Seeger in his _Incompleat Folksinger,_
p. 196 fn, states, "The drinking-gourd song, of course, originated long
before my time among the brave men and women of the pre-Civil War
Underground Railroad, and lived on in black folk tradition."It is not mentioned in Willens' biography of Lee Hays -- which is negative
evidence of a sort that suggests Hays did not bring the song to the
Weavers.  And I do not find it in the few collections of Negro spirituals
I have in my library.EdOn Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Donald A. Duncan wrote:> We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
> Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
> the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
>
> A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
> "drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
> search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
> but nothing musical.
>
> Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
> source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).
>
> -Don Duncan
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:11:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


On 10/18/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:>We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
>Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
>the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
>
>A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
>"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
>search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
>but nothing musical.
>
>Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
>source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).Keep in mind that the Ballad Index goes by the earliest verifiable
date. I'll agree, of course, that 1953 is too late -- because the
song appears in the Lomax "American Ballads and Folk Songs" (1934).On the other hand, the Lomax volume does not list a source. Every other
book containing the song seems to derive from Lomax or from the Weavers
recording.And we're talking about the Lomaxes here. They steal, they rewrite,
they conceal facts. I suspect they were the source for the Weavers
recording. (At least, it doesn't sound very "Leadbelly-ish" to me,
and the Weavers don't seem to have many other Black sources.) So
I don't think we *know* the history of this song.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:35:34 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?> On 10/18/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:
>
> >We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
> >Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
> >the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
> >
> >A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
> >"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
> >search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
> >but nothing musical.
> >
> >Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
> >source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was
it?).
>
> Keep in mind that the Ballad Index goes by the earliest verifiable
> date. I'll agree, of course, that 1953 is too late -- because the
> song appears in the Lomax "American Ballads and Folk Songs" (1934).
>
> On the other hand, the Lomax volume does not list a source. Every other
> book containing the song seems to derive from Lomax or from the Weavers
> recording.
>
> And we're talking about the Lomaxes here. They steal, they rewrite,
> they conceal facts. I suspect they were the source for the Weavers
> recording. (At least, it doesn't sound very "Leadbelly-ish" to me,
> and the Weavers don't seem to have many other Black sources.) So
> I don't think we *know* the history of this song.
>
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:30:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 10/19/00, roud wrote:>In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
>Steve RoudIf there was a previous message, I never saw it. Are you sure it
went to the list and not the original poster?But I'm still not sanguine. The *text* preceding the song is
attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
*knew* that.If this were anyone other than the Lomaxes, I would consider
this sufficient evidence. But I've now been over three different
Lomax books with a fine-tooth comb, and the only thing I can
say is, "Never trust a Lomax." Don't believe *anything* until
you've checked their original source.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:18:35 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Indeed, my message seems to have gone direct to the poster - apologies. It
was as follows (slightly amended):> There's a short piece by H.B. Parks on the song, including a text and tune
> collected about 1918, in 'Follow de Drinkin' Gou'd' (Publications of the
Texas
> Folklore Soc. Vol.7 1928 (reprinted 1965)) pp. 81-84 and also in Vol.26
(1954) of the
> same series.
> John Lomax included Parks' text and tune in his 'American Ballads & Folk
> Songs' (1934) pp.227-228, and this is probably where the Weavers'
generation picked it
> up from.
> Steve RoudThe article certainly exists. Parks says he collected fragments of the song
in 1912 and 1918, and the text he gives is from 'an old Negro at College
station, Texas'. Lomax's reference is a little sparse, but much better than
his usual standard.----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?> On 10/19/00, roud wrote:
>
> >In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
> >Steve Roud
>
> If there was a previous message, I never saw it. Are you sure it
> went to the list and not the original poster?
>
> But I'm still not sanguine. The *text* preceding the song is
> attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
> Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
> journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
> informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
> it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
> that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
> *knew* that.
>
> If this were anyone other than the Lomaxes, I would consider
> this sufficient evidence. But I've now been over three different
> Lomax books with a fine-tooth comb, and the only thing I can
> say is, "Never trust a Lomax." Don't believe *anything* until
> you've checked their original source.
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:04:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>...The *text* preceding the song is
>attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
>Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
>journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
>informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
>it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
>that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
>*knew* that."Follow the Drinking Gourd" is in one of the J. Frank Dobie Texas
Folklore books.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:04:03 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


H.B. Parks was an occasional contributor to the Proceedings of the Texas
Folklore Society in the 1920s.  His "Foller de Drinkin' Gou'd" [sic] was
printed in volume VII (which I do not have) of that series.The headnote in Lomax's _American Ballads and Folkssongs_ reprints Park's
quote from his informant.  It begins, "One of my great-uncles, who was
connected with the railroad movement, remembered that in the records of
the Anti-Slavery Society there was a story of a peg-leg sailor..."There was an Anti-Slavery Society, indeed, a number of them.
("Anti-Slavery Society" might be a generic description rather than a
formal name.)  I do not know where those records might now be.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:34:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Several people have expressed interest in this issue, so I thought I'd
forward some information to the list.Filemaker Pro runs on both PC (MS Office-compatible, full ODBC support)
and Mac, although swapping files may cause some differences in display
because of handling fonts differently, and there are some features for
the Mac which aren't done on the PC.  It's roughly comparable to MS
Access, but built by people who understand the "U" in "GUI"!FP started in the Mac World, and was developed further as a Claris (the
Apple software division which was spun off) program, during which time
it went cross-platform.  Recently Apple reabsorbed Claris, but left
Filemaker as its own company.  Their web site is at   http://www.filemaker.comThere are over 5 million copies of Filemaker around.  It's made in
various versions, including Filemaker Server which runs on Windows NT,
and a number of Fortune 500 companies are paying many thousands of
dollars for site licenses.  It can be run over an intranet, or serve the
internet (i.e. be accessed through a browser).  Filemaker Pro Developer
allows creation of run-time programs which can be distributed for
special applications.  There are companies around which make Filemaker
templates for a variety of applications, and consultants who specialize
in it.  In fact, a friend told me about a free download Filemaker Pro
run-time program which is used for CD libraries - if I remember
correctly, it was a companion to a program which read data from a CD in
the CD-ROM drive, dialed up a master web site, and downloaded the
appropriate song etc. information for the Filemaker Pro database.However, it's still a nice single-user relational database as well
($250); it shows its evolution as a Mac program which offers powerful
features to users who aren't programmers.  Its flexibility and user
interface features allow someone with little training to modify his
database (e.g. add additional fields, do additional or modified
screen/print layouts).  And as one becomes more familiar with it, one
can build in very powerful features - or you can just happily use it for
simple tasks.---For a project like indexing traditional or 'folk' songs, the best scheme
I've come up with is to list the actual title used on the record or in
the book, but also construct a table of "working titles" - i.e. single
designations for a given family of songs.  All the variations of a song
can be listed with a single working title - e.g. "Gambler's Blues" could
have a working title of "St. James Infirmary".  A good scheme would be
to look at the Ballad Index for help in designating a working title -
they've had to do it for the variants they've catalogued - but you can
develop your own scheme as well.  It's then trivial to simply pull up
all the members of that song family - i.e. that have the same working
title - and when scanning listings of titles, it's a convenient way to
remind yourself what each is.The use of categories is a little more interesting; there are a couple
of ways to handle these, but they're a standard way to index material.-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:53:59 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(105 lines)


I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
that Version 5 has sorted them out:
a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
return to later.
c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
ones.For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).Hope this helps rather than confusesSteve Roud- Original Message -----
From: Donald A. Duncan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Data Base> Several people have expressed interest in this issue, so I thought I'd
> forward some information to the list.
>
> Filemaker Pro runs on both PC (MS Office-compatible, full ODBC support)
> and Mac, although swapping files may cause some differences in display
> because of handling fonts differently, and there are some features for
> the Mac which aren't done on the PC.  It's roughly comparable to MS
> Access, but built by people who understand the "U" in "GUI"!
>
> FP started in the Mac World, and was developed further as a Claris (the
> Apple software division which was spun off) program, during which time
> it went cross-platform.  Recently Apple reabsorbed Claris, but left
> Filemaker as its own company.  Their web site is at
>
>    http://www.filemaker.com
>
> There are over 5 million copies of Filemaker around.  It's made in
> various versions, including Filemaker Server which runs on Windows NT,
> and a number of Fortune 500 companies are paying many thousands of
> dollars for site licenses.  It can be run over an intranet, or serve the
> internet (i.e. be accessed through a browser).  Filemaker Pro Developer
> allows creation of run-time programs which can be distributed for
> special applications.  There are companies around which make Filemaker
> templates for a variety of applications, and consultants who specialize
> in it.  In fact, a friend told me about a free download Filemaker Pro
> run-time program which is used for CD libraries - if I remember
> correctly, it was a companion to a program which read data from a CD in
> the CD-ROM drive, dialed up a master web site, and downloaded the
> appropriate song etc. information for the Filemaker Pro database.
>
> However, it's still a nice single-user relational database as well
> ($250); it shows its evolution as a Mac program which offers powerful
> features to users who aren't programmers.  Its flexibility and user
> interface features allow someone with little training to modify his
> database (e.g. add additional fields, do additional or modified
> screen/print layouts).  And as one becomes more familiar with it, one
> can build in very powerful features - or you can just happily use it for
> simple tasks.
>
> ---
>
> For a project like indexing traditional or 'folk' songs, the best scheme
> I've come up with is to list the actual title used on the record or in
> the book, but also construct a table of "working titles" - i.e. single
> designations for a given family of songs.  All the variations of a song
> can be listed with a single working title - e.g. "Gambler's Blues" could
> have a working title of "St. James Infirmary".  A good scheme would be
> to look at the Ballad Index for help in designating a working title -
> they've had to do it for the variants they've catalogued - but you can
> develop your own scheme as well.  It's then trivial to simply pull up
> all the members of that song family - i.e. that have the same working
> title - and when scanning listings of titles, it's a convenient way to
> remind yourself what each is.
>
> The use of categories is a little more interesting; there are a couple
> of ways to handle these, but they're a standard way to index material.
>
> -Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:41:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(115 lines)


On 10/20/00, roud wrote:>I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
>Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
>it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
>can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
>All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
>understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
>with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
>that Version 5 has sorted them out:
>a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
>that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
>field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
>b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
>is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
>you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
>return to later.
>c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
>deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
>field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
>Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
>Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
>d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
>Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
>short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
>find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
>
>These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
>fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
>ones.
>
>For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
>expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
>searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
>(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).
>
>Hope this helps rather than confusesJust a few more clarifications (though we may have now gotten posts
from every Mac user on the list, so we're preaching to the choir :-).First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
but it's not a true relational database.Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
handicap for high-level work.Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
is far from obvious.The complaint about sorting is rather unfair, since it's universal. And
there is a cure: just use spaces or leading zeroes. E.g., instead of
Child 1
Child 10
Child 100
Child 2useChild 001
Child 002
Child 010
Child 100orChild   1
Child   2
Child  10
Child 100It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
probably be a very large TEXT field.I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
FileMaker.But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:23:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(133 lines)


I would only add one other caveat.  File maker 5.0 has a lot of problems that
hopefully will be corrected but right now  people I have talked with recommend
staying with 4.1."Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 10/20/00, roud wrote:
>
> >I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
> >Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
> >it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
> >can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
> >All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
> >understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
> >with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
> >that Version 5 has sorted them out:
> >a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
> >that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
> >field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
> >b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
> >is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
> >you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
> >return to later.
> >c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
> >deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
> >field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> >Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
> >Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
> >d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
> >Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
> >short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
> >find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
> >
> >These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
> >fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
> >ones.
> >
> >For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
> >expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
> >searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
> >(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).
> >
> >Hope this helps rather than confuses
>
> Just a few more clarifications (though we may have now gotten posts
> from every Mac user on the list, so we're preaching to the choir :-).
>
> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
> but it's not a true relational database.
>
> Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
> handicap for high-level work.
>
> Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
> is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
> of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
> is far from obvious.
>
> The complaint about sorting is rather unfair, since it's universal. And
> there is a cure: just use spaces or leading zeroes. E.g., instead of
> Child 1
> Child 10
> Child 100
> Child 2
>
> use
>
> Child 001
> Child 002
> Child 010
> Child 100
>
> or
>
> Child   1
> Child   2
> Child  10
> Child 100
>
> It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
> features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
> I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
> hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.
>
> The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
> probably be a very large TEXT field.
>
> I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
> FileMaker.
>
> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
> For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
> Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
> quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).
>
> Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Commission on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:34:18 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Perhaps I should write my own database program.Is this a huge job?
Or can it be done "simply"?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:30:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 10/20/00, John Garst wrote:>Perhaps I should write my own database program.
>
>Is this a huge job?
>Or can it be done "simply"?You need to specify more. :-) What do you want it to do? And what
tools do you have?If you mean writing from scratch, though -- yes, it *is* a big
job, particularly on the Mac. Especially if you want it to act
like a "real" Mac program.Your best tool for the job would probably be RealBASIC, but you're
still looking at several months of learning the program before
you can start coding the actual project.Let's put it this way: I've been writing code for 25 years. And
when I started writing Macintosh code, I'd been working on a Mac
for about eight years. It *still* took me two months to get a
program worth keeping, and it was on a smaller scale than a
database....But tell us more about what you want, and I may be able to make
a better guess at the magnitude of the problem.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Banks of Green Willow
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:16:13 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Dear All,My duo is in the throes of doing a version of Banks of Green Willow. The
source we have has a feel about it that there might be some more! Here
are the words. Does anyone know any more verses?Go and get your father's goodwill
And get your mother's money
And sail across the ocean
Along with young JohnnyThey had not been a-sailing
A-sailing many days-oh
Before she wants some woman's help
And cannot get anyGo and get me a silk napkin
To tie her head so easy
And I'll throw them overboard
Both she and her babyThey got him a silk napkin
To tie her head so easy
And they threw them overboard
Both she and her babySee how me love do tumble
See how me love do taver
See how me love do try to swim
It makes me heart quaverGo and get me love a coffin
Of the gold that shines yellow
And she shall be buried
By the banks of green willow.Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:29:40 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


There are dozens of versions. If you've got access to Bronson, Traditional
Tunes of the Child Ballads Vol.1, he gives 18 versions at Child 24. Your
text is particularly close to several collected by Sharp in Somerset, but
what you're clearly missing is the first verse, something on the lines of:It's of a sea captain
Lived near the seaside (oh)
And he courted a lady
Till she proved with child.There isn't much more to it.Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Banks of Green Willow> Dear All,
>
> My duo is in the throes of doing a version of Banks of Green Willow. The
> source we have has a feel about it that there might be some more! Here
> are the words. Does anyone know any more verses?
>
> Go and get your father's goodwill
> And get your mother's money
> And sail across the ocean
> Along with young Johnny
>
> They had not been a-sailing
> A-sailing many days-oh
> Before she wants some woman's help
> And cannot get any
>
> Go and get me a silk napkin
> To tie her head so easy
> And I'll throw them overboard
> Both she and her baby
>
> They got him a silk napkin
> To tie her head so easy
> And they threw them overboard
> Both she and her baby
>
> See how me love do tumble
> See how me love do taver
> See how me love do try to swim
> It makes me heart quaver
>
> Go and get me love a coffin
> Of the gold that shines yellow
> And she shall be buried
> By the banks of green willow.
>
> Andy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:16:07 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


Good People:Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
Mary."  Etc., etc.Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
don't we as a group do so?Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 13:34:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Good People:
>
>Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
>curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
>clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
>
>Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
>know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
>is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
>texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
>Mary."  Etc., etc.
>
>Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
>don't we as a group do so?I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
dissatisfied.Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:52:39 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Child himself never wrote down the criteria he used in selecting the "305",
but George Lyman Kittredge, who knew him well,  postulated what he though
were probably some of his criteria. He was interested in ballads -- songs
with a narrative (what D. K. Wilgus has described as the "And then,,,, and
then...." construction) that had been  collected from the mouths of "the
people."  (Child worked only from manuscripts and published sources;  he
wasn't a collector himself)  and available to him with a  minimum of
editorial "correction"  or  "improvement."   He deliberately omitted
broadsides as being the products of literate editors who had probably changed
the original words and moods of "the folk".  (In this same vein, much later,
Maude Carpools rejected Jean Ritchie as a valid  purveyor of folklore,
because Jean knew how to read and write and had been to college!)I think Child's omission of some ballads was due to their not having been
collected and published by any of his predecessors;  as you say, he just
hadn't encounered them.  But I'm sure he rejected some on purpose.  I can
imagine his rejection of "The Frog and the Mouse"  because of its extensive
record of publication and commercial usage;  the Queen's Stationers
registered it as early as 1580 as the work of Edward White, and Grimaldi the
famous clown (1779-1837) sang a version of it as part of his act.  Probably
any of the versions available to Child could be shown to have derived from a
printed source."The Seven Joys of Mary"  lacks the narrative quality that Child seems to
have demanded.Child never seems to have thought that his work included every known ballad.
He used Bishop Percy's original manuscripts, and was well aware that a large
number of Percy's ballads had come from an incomplete set of handwritten
pages in a Scottish castle.  The Lady of the Manor had collected them from
servants many years earlier,  and subsequent servants were known to have
started many a fire with pages from the collection, and it was heartbreaking
to think how many old ballads had been destroyed.In Child's day, it was believed that the old ballads were dying out,  as the
peasantry was becoming literate, and he was in a hurry to select those that
he thought were genuine according to his criteria.  (And by the way, when
Percy published his great three-volume collection way back in 1765, it was
under the title of "Reliques of Ancient English Poetry_.  For a long time,
the genre was thought to be dying!Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 02:17:50 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(226 lines)


On the assumption that the title change will steer away the
uninterested, I'll comment further:roud wrote:
>
> All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
> understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
> with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
> that Version 5 has sorted them out:
> a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
> that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
> field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.It's true you can't "find in any field".  But for searches in multiple
fields, you can do some logical ORs by stacking Find requests.  Go to
Find mode, enter your search criteria in Title; CTRL-N (Command-N on the
Mac) to get a second Find page, enter your criteria in First Line;
repeat for other relevant fields.  It will find all records in which the
criterion occurs in any of the indicated fields.  I haven't succeeded
yet in scripting this - i.e. letting the user put in one criterion, then
searching the 5 probable fields as above - but I haven't put much effort
into it because I don't really have a use for it in the DBs I'm working on.The same system is used for exclusionary searches - enter the criterion
you wish to find, CTRL-N for a new request, enter the criterion to be
excluded, and click the "Omit" box in the status bar on the left.  It
makes complex searches a heck of a lot easier than long
parentheses-critical "command line" search strings, although I have the
nagging feeling that there are some searches you can't set up this way.> b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
> is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
> you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
> return to later.I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
bookmarks"; run it before you start.  It's not much different from other
"bookmark" functions (although it's persistent and unlimited); it's just
that people don't usually think of using fields in the databases instead
of variables.  If you're doing research, you can add other "Mark" fields
related to topic, and keep your selections as long as you need them;
it's sort of a dynamic 'category' field you can retitle at will.  Disk
space is cheap, and they don't use much - particularly when most are empty.[Tech note:  Filemaker does not provide single-box True/False buttons.
I use a text field, set as a radio button (more visible on screen than
check boxes) which uses a value list with a single value (e.g. "Yes",
which needn't show if you set the field small enough).  Clicking on this
will check it, but clicking again will not uncheck it, since radio
buttons are intended to log a single value among several; they're
unchecked by clicking another.  However, every field also has button
behavior, so you can format the 'button' behavior of the field to run a
script which toggles the value when you click on it.  It then behaves as
a True/False or Yes/blank toggle.  This is exactly how a programmed
button works - you just do the programming yourself the Filemaker way.]> c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
> deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
> field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
> Child 120, Child 201, and so on.I sometimes use Bob's technique of filling out the numbers to a standard
length (which is an old solution, but works best with known number sets
- i.e. where you won't have to go from 999 to 1000 and suddenly have it
stop working!).  The solution I use is paired text and number fields.
The first is "Child" or "K" or "DT"; the second is the number.  Sort by
alpha, then numeric.  No problems, no special entry, simpler sorts.
Requires entering in two fields instead of one, but it's quick enough.> d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
> Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
> short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
> find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
contains the string anywhere in it - the most common search and very
useful, particularly for large text fields.  If you want to constrain
the search, you use standard criteria; e.g. =, >, <, etc. (see the
"Symbols" drop-down on the left panel when in Find mode).  For an exact
match in a text string, use the 'logical equals', i.e. '=='.  This is
covered in the documentation.> These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
> fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
> ones.Filemaker is pretty fast, and does most of what you've described, but
the larger the database, the more scripting and layouts you tend to
require to speed operations.> For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
> expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
> searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
> (i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).Actually, Filemaker - when you approach it in the spirit of the
programmers, rather than the 'nuts & bolts' databases - does allow all
of this.  The last you do by modifying the previous search, and adding a
request; you then rerun the previous search with additional criteria.
This is actually superior to the sequential find, since at any time, in
Find mode, you can step through the previous criteria to see what you've
searched for, and modify any prior request if necessary to make a
subsequent request more appropriate."Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
> but it's not a true relational database.Perhaps, off-line, you could amplify on this?  It's not clear to me what
the difference is between cross-table lookups with specified
relationships vs. tables with primary and foreign keys.  It sounds like
a difference which isn't a difference.> Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
> handicap for high-level work.I agree; it's not designed for "high-level" work, and I have a problem
both with the way it prints out the scripts and the fact that you can't
copy and paste from the script window to put the contents of the script
- as seen by the programmer - into other documentation.  It's
occasionally irritating that it invisibly stores the "find" and "sort"
criteria; I title my scripts carefully.  It also bothers me that you
apparently can't run external functions in another language, although
that's supposed to be possible in 5.0.  I seriously miss "switch/case"
and "elseif" and a few other operators.That said, however, there's a lot to be said in favor of that scripting
environment for the non-professional user.  I keep scripts small and
informatively titled; complex scripts call internal scripts which
describe their function.  Substitute 'function' or 'procedure' for
'script', and it's exactly the way I write C programs.  The names of
environmental variables (e.g. "Status(CurrentUserName)" and script
functions make reading scripts a piece of cake; I don't have any trouble
debugging them.> Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
> is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
> of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
> is far from obvious.It's true that the procedure is far from obvious, but that's what
documentation is for.  Although occasionally cumbersome, the find system
is actually pretty flexible and, as I mentioned above, has some
advantages over the conventional ways of doing things - as well as
providing the neophyte with a much better intuitive sense of what the
computer is doing than command-line 'find' strings.> It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
> features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
> I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
> hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.
>
> The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
> probably be a very large TEXT field.I'm not sure what the concern with 5000 records is.  Our bug-tracking
database is over 4000 records now, with a lot of fields and 5 associated
files.  The longest standard operation - a record-by-record scripted
search of the entire database - takes slightly over 3 seconds [freeze
the window; video refresh for every record bogs it way down].
Unscripted searches are way faster; full-database sorts can take the
same length of time.  Hardly "go get a cup of coffee" operations -
although adding pictures or video can slow it down.> I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
> FileMaker.
>
> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?  In
bug-tracking, I have 8 global fields - four text and four numeric, for
'scratch' fields for scripts to use, some navigational fields (e.g. last
layout), some useability fields (e.g. user-specific starting layout or
preferred sort).  Fields are cheap and easy to add, and in Filemaker I
then just pick them from a list.  I used to have to do this manually,
with my own external documentation of variables.  Sure is easier in Filemaker.> For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
> Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
> quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).
>
> Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.Right - it would take a big library/collection operation to really
outgrow Filemaker.George Madaus wrote:
>
> I would only add one other caveat.  File maker 5.0 has a lot of problems that
> hopefully will be corrected but right now  people I have talked with recommend
> staying with 4.1.
>That's good to know; we're considering an upgrade.  Maybe when we get
together, you can give me some more detail.-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 23:21:06 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(72 lines)


Bob asks for some criteria against which to measure the ballads Child
omitted but might have included had he known of them (pace, Sam Hinton),
or had he a more complete record.I think there are a few measures we might employ:1) The ballad probably pre-dates 1750, the approximate date of Bishop
Percy's _Reliques_ upon which Child relied.2) It exhibits the hallmarks of traditional ballad composition:
incremental repetition, "leaping and lingering," stock phrases, and so on.3) It need not have originated in England -- to answer one of Bob's
questions.4) Its first appearance may have been in print rather than in an
unpublished collection.  See, for example "John Dory," the A text of which
is reprinted from Thomas Ravenscroft.  (Which is why I think he did not
eliminate "The Frog and the Mouse" because it was registered with the
Stationer's Office.)  Further, there are versions of "Barbara Allen" that
owe their very existence to printing houses, yet Child included them in
the canon.EdOn Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:
>
> >Good People:
> >
> >Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> >curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> >clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
> >
> >Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> >know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> >is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> >texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> >Mary."  Etc., etc.
> >
> >Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> >don't we as a group do so?
>
> I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."
>
> There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
> fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
> definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
> ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
> in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
> which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?
>
> If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
> compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
> I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
> dissatisfied.
>
> Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
> What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:21:46 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


MJC Hodgart: The Ballads (London, 1950 rev 1962) discussed this in pp 19-25.He cites nine songs as being worth consideration for admission to the "canon"
on the basis that they substantially exhibit features included in those which
make up the 305.The bitter withy
Still growing
Corpus Christi
The seven virgins (not one for Ed)
The blind beggar
Bruton town
The shooting of his dear
Bold Fisherman(and with reservations) Six Dukes went a fishing.There is some discussion but the book is too brief a survey to do much more
than raise the question.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 10:50:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(253 lines)


On 10/22/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:>On the assumption that the title change will steer away the
>uninterested,Good idea. :-)>I'll comment further:
>
>roud wrote:
>>
>> All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
>> understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
>> with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
>> that Version 5 has sorted them out:
>> a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
>> that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
>> field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
>
>It's true you can't "find in any field".  But for searches in multiple
>fields, you can do some logical ORs by stacking Find requests.  Go to
>Find mode, enter your search criteria in Title; CTRL-N (Command-N on the
>Mac) to get a second Find page, enter your criteria in First Line;
>repeat for other relevant fields.  It will find all records in which the
>criterion occurs in any of the indicated fields.  I haven't succeeded
>yet in scripting this - i.e. letting the user put in one criterion, then
>searching the 5 probable fields as above - but I haven't put much effort
>into it because I don't really have a use for it in the DBs I'm working on.
>
>The same system is used for exclusionary searches - enter the criterion
>you wish to find, CTRL-N for a new request, enter the criterion to be
>excluded, and click the "Omit" box in the status bar on the left.  It
>makes complex searches a heck of a lot easier than long
>parentheses-critical "command line" search strings, although I have the
>nagging feeling that there are some searches you can't set up this way.All of this works, but I for one find it extremely irritating and difficult.
If I'm constructing a complex search, I find it difficult to not be able
to see all my search requests at once. And if I'm combining positive
and negative searches, it gets really complex.It's a drawback. Fatal? No. Particularly in this context. But it's a
poor mechanism.Also, this sort of search is very slow if you don't have all your
fields indexed. And -- despite your comment below about disk space
being cheap -- having a lot of indices and doing a lot of complex
searches causes databases to grow. I, at least, have to compact
my databases a lot, for speed and for backup purposes.> > b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
>> is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
>> you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
>> return to later.
>
>I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
>this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
>When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
>recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
>bookmarks"; run it before you start.A clever trick. Might be worth writing two scripts -- one to mark
and one to clear. That way you can simplify your find scripts by
doing your ORs and NOTs one at a time.Come to think of it, that argues for three scripts:
Mark Selected
Clear Selected
Clear All[ ... ]> > c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
>> deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
>> field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> > Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
>> Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
>
>I sometimes use Bob's technique of filling out the numbers to a standard
>length (which is an old solution, but works best with known number sets
>- i.e. where you won't have to go from 999 to 1000 and suddenly have it
>stop working!).  The solution I use is paired text and number fields.
>The first is "Child" or "K" or "DT"; the second is the number.  Sort by
>alpha, then numeric.  No problems, no special entry, simpler sorts.
>Requires entering in two fields instead of one, but it's quick enough.And very possibly produces smaller and faster indices, too.Alternately, if you're not sure how much space to allow -- well, here
I think the rule "disk space is cheap" *does* apply. :-) If you think you
might have a thousand entries, leave room for 10,000 or 100,000.> > d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
>> Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
>> short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
>> find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
>
>If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
>contains the string anywhere in itUm -- no. It will only find words starting with that string. (At least
in the version I've got.) But you *can* use wildcards such as *.[ ... ]> > These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
>> fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
>> ones.
>
>Filemaker is pretty fast,Actually, the speed varies. I have the fascinating advantage of having
the Ballad Index in both text and FileMaker format, and being able to
compare. Searching an indexed field in FileMaker is faster than searching
an indexed field with my (really clunky) Ballad Index software. However,
when searching an unindexed field, FileMaker is slower -- *much* slower
(FileMaker takes about twice as long to search a single unindexed field
as the Ballad Index requires to search *the whole Ballad Index text
file). So it's a good idea to plan in advance which fields you do or
don't want to index.I suppose I should explain: An "indexed" field is a field which FileMaker
chops up somehow so it can search it faster. All databases use this
format in some form or other. Searches on indexed fields are very fast
(functionally instantaneous, even in large databases) -- but they
make the database larger. Sometimes *much* larger.[ ... ]>"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>>
>> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
>> but it's not a true relational database.
>
>Perhaps, off-line, you could amplify on this?  It's not clear to me what
>the difference is between cross-table lookups with specified
>relationships vs. tables with primary and foreign keys.  It sounds like
>a difference which isn't a difference.I realize you asked for an off-list answer, but I'm going to make a
stab at it so everyone can understand.In a lot of instances, it doesn't make a difference. Particularly if
you keep your data clean. But there are two problems with the FileMaker
approach. First, because the two files are *completely separate*,
you can make modifications in one file without the other noticing it.To take the LPs-and-songs example, you can delete an LP from the
recordings file, and the Songs file never knows. It just keeps those
orphan songs on file, unless you take care not to let this happen.With a true indexed database, deleting the one will cause it to ask
you about the others.The other problem is that the links simply don't have all the features
of true relational links. Having worked with true relational databases
(Fourth Dimension and Helix, plus brief experience with a couple of
others), I can say that there *is* a difference, though I don't know
how to describe it in terms of LPs-and-songs.> > Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
>> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
>> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
>> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
>> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
>> handicap for high-level work.
>
>I agree; it's not designed for "high-level" work, and I have a problem
>both with the way it prints out the scripts and the fact that you can't
>copy and paste from the script window to put the contents of the script
>- as seen by the programmer - into other documentation.  It's
>occasionally irritating that it invisibly stores the "find" and "sort"
>criteria; I title my scripts carefully.  It also bothers me that you
>apparently can't run external functions in another language, although
>that's supposed to be possible in 5.0.  I seriously miss "switch/case"
>and "elseif" and a few other operators.Of course, those are true programmers' constructs. :-) But the lack
of COMMENTS is *really* bad....>That said, however, there's a lot to be said in favor of that scripting
>environment for the non-professional user.Agreed. It's an easy scripting language. It's just not very powerful. :-)[ ... ]> > The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
>> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
>> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> > And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
>> probably be a very large TEXT field.
>
>I'm not sure what the concern with 5000 records is.It's not a magic number. I suspect, in fact, that it has to do
with the size of the index files, and the number of sectors needed
for the file overall. I currently have a database of 11,000 records,
with about eight fields per record, which gives no trouble at all.
But it's a very small database overall -- those 11,000 records add
up to only a little over a megabyte. (The Ballad Index, by contrast,
needs 4.5M for 7,000 records.) The size of the whole database is
the real concern.[ ... ]> > I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
>> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
>> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
>> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
>> FileMaker.
>>
>> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
>> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
>> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
>> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
>> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
>
>Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
>variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
>persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
>other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?A variable exists in *one* place. A field exists in all of however
many records you have. A variable crosses all records; a field applies
only to one.A task I would like to do in FileMaker is to be able to count exactly
how many references there are in the Ballad Index. The total space
needed for this is one short integer. But to do it, I have to create
a whole new field and cast a total. Very bad.[ ... ]> > Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
>> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.
>
>Right - it would take a big library/collection operation to really
>outgrow Filemaker.The real point is not the amount of data, but the complexity of
the interrelationships. But that's the point: songs-and-LPs
does not require complex interrelationships. At most, a simple
link (and I'd argue against that; make it a flat file with the
song titles in a text field).
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:08:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


A nice idea, Ed, definitional difficulties notwithstanding.  It might be
informative to give a try at a list, if for no other reason than to
distinguish those which were verifiably in existence at the turn of the
century.  Those who care could undertake it could debate the propriety
of including any given song, but a lists of candidates would be informative.I note that the 8-volume set of MacColl & Lloyd singing Child Ballads
(Folk Music of the World series, Washington 715-722) had a 9th album,
traditional songs not included in Child (although I don't believe they
called them 'ballads' necessarily).  They included:The Bitter Withy
Lang A-Growing
The Seven Virgins
The Bramble Briar
Down in Yon Forest
The Bold Fisherman
The Blind Beggar's Daughter of Bethnal Green
Six Dukes Went A-Fishing
The Holy Well
The Shooting of His DearDoes anyone know why these particular songs were chosen?  Who was the
architect of this collection?And while we're at it, can anyone provide any details on the subsequent
discography of the collection?  I saw a late '50s reference that
Riverside was planning to reissue the records - did that ever happen?
Did anyone else republish them?  Did any other record series borrow from them?-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 01:03:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
. )The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic."The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
opposite.(Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
currency in tradition.")Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 05:12:29 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


In a message dated 23/10/2000  05:07:34, you write:<< (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
 to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
 currency in tradition.") >>Or the ones, like the "Star of Belleisle" (definitely Irish on qualitative
grounds and on the evidence of its appearance on a leaf of an indisputably
Irish songster in the Royal Irish Academy) which he includes in Native
American Balladry.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A second Croskeys CD
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:34:34 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


This is not strictly relevant to this forum but some may be interested. It
concerns a cd of stories produced to aid the rebuilding of a famous music
venue.Members may know that the Crosskeys Inn, in County Antrim, famous for music,
song and tale sessions, was destroyed by fire earlier this year. A CD of
music and song produced in aid of the rebuilding has already been issued; a
second has now been produced. Entitled "Tales Across the Ocean" it comprises
stories told by some of the most accomplished tellers of tales from Ireland,
north and south, and from North America.Further details may be obtained from me ([unmask])John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:40:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(87 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> >I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
> >this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
> >When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
> >recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
> >bookmarks"; run it before you start.
>
> A clever trick. Might be worth writing two scripts -- one to mark
> and one to clear. That way you can simplify your find scripts by
> doing your ORs and NOTs one at a time.
>
> Come to think of it, that argues for three scripts:
> Mark Selected
> Clear Selected
> Clear AllCute!  My concern has been with the records which are insufficiently
differentiated for practical search criteria; I'm interested in flagging
a small number of records in a larger found set.   I hadn't though of
using it for compound searches.  Worth doing!> Alternately, if you're not sure how much space to allow -- well, here
> I think the rule "disk space is cheap" *does* apply. :-) If you think you
> might have a thousand entries, leave room for 10,000 or 100,000.Yeah, but that just proliferates leading zeroes and/or spaces, and you
always have to get the number right, or they'll sort wrong.  In those
instances, I tend to start numbering at 10000 or 100,000 so there's a
real number for all places.  I sometimes use other 'decades' for
categorization - e.g. 500,000-599,999 for a specific subset of records.> >If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
> >contains the string anywhere in it
>
> Um -- no. It will only find words starting with that string. (At least
> in the version I've got.) But you *can* use wildcards such as *.I stand corrected!> To take the LPs-and-songs example, you can delete an LP from the
> recordings file, and the Songs file never knows. It just keeps those
> orphan songs on file, unless you take care not to let this happen.
>
> With a true indexed database, deleting the one will cause it to ask
> you about the others.A valid distinction for complex databases, although I should mention
that the process of deleting/modifying all related references is
sufficiently nasty that in our SQL 7 DB, we don't actually run the
procedure - just mark 'deleted' accounts as 'disabled'.  Someday, of
course, we'll have to bite the bullet....> >Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
> >variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
> >persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
> >other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?
>
> A variable exists in *one* place. A field exists in all of however
> many records you have. A variable crosses all records; a field applies
> only to one.
>
> A task I would like to do in FileMaker is to be able to count exactly
> how many references there are in the Ballad Index. The total space
> needed for this is one short integer. But to do it, I have to create
> a whole new field and cast a total. Very bad.'Global' field types are a single value, record-independent;
theoretically they're written in a single location.  The difference
between a single floating point value on disk and a single integer in
memory is miniscule.  I'd scan the records and increment the value in
the global field, ending with my total.  Sure you have to create the
global field, but you also have to specify and initialize a variable.
Am I missing something?All my scratch and calculation fields are global variables.  Another way
to handle this was used by my predecessor; she used a separate file to
store the counts and calculations involved in statistical analysis,
since they're not record-specific.  One can overwrite a single record
each time a calculation is done, or create a new record each time
analysis is performed, providing a historical record.-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:29:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


On 10/23/00, James Moreira wrote:>If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
>didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
>. )Although I should note that "Bitter Withy" is an English song, and
the Ballad Index is still much stronger on American than British
material. (Funny, considering that I prefer the British ballads --
but it's what I have access to.)[ ... ]>"The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
>ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
>tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
>opposite.I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)>(Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
>to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
>currency in tradition.")I think the last is because Laws isn't as widely known or accessible.
I get very irked with Laws, personally. He's indispensable to me
(so many of the songs he catalogued are so wide-spread and under so
many titles), but he's as quirky as Child.On the other hand, that proves the whole problem with this project:
Any particular person can make up a list, but no two will make the
same list. Child's list has manifest inaccuracies; Laws added a lot
of additional songs, but it's a dubious list in many ways; now we're
talking about adding more but have no adequate definition of what
we want.I find myself wondering what is the point? Just to get some sort
of number on the things, so that we can find all the versions?
The Ballad Index in effect provides that function, but with a very
(very, very, very) loose definition of a ballad. Sure, we throw in
things which aren't ballads, at least in the high and noble form
most of us detect in the Child Ballads. But let's face it -- not
all the Child Ballads are actually as good as we think. Consider
"The Whummil Bore." Or such degenerate forms as "Billy Magee Magaw."One of the points Ed mentioned was the "Ballad" form -- the 4343 abab
rhyme, the internal refrains, etc. And yet, another thing that
working over thousands of texts has demonstrated to me is that the
metrical form is not an integral part of a ballad; too many ("The
Twa Sisters" is a fine example) change form -- with or without
the refrain, in single or double stanzas, etc. When we first discussed
creating the Ballad Index, I asked about putting in a metrical form
indication. This was clearly not a workable idea (and people
rejected it) -- though it would have been really, really fascinating
to do it on a text-by-text basis.But it's yet another problem with our definitions.I just don't think we're in a position to do a comprehensive ballad
catalog. There is too much we need to do *first*.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:19:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(26 lines)


Glaring omissions are Bamboo Briar (Bruton Town), Shooting of his Dear
(Molly Vaughn), Long A-Growing, Frog's Courtship. The Digital Tradition
has assigned numbers (starting with 306)to Childles ballads, just to keep
them gouped for searching reasons.On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Good People:
>
> Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
>
> Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> Mary."  Etc., etc.
>
> Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> don't we as a group do so?
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:31:10 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(83 lines)


The question really is: "WHat do we gain by numbering?" I find that it
helps to locate variants, and is very convenient for this. If you're
talking about somehow elevating a non-Child ballad's status, I'll leave;
Child included some pretty feeble ballads, and wasn't consistently clear
in specifying the basis for assigning numbers.On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Bob asks for some criteria against which to measure the ballads Child
> omitted but might have included had he known of them (pace, Sam Hinton),
> or had he a more complete record.
>
> I think there are a few measures we might employ:
>
> 1) The ballad probably pre-dates 1750, the approximate date of Bishop
> Percy's _Reliques_ upon which Child relied.
>
> 2) It exhibits the hallmarks of traditional ballad composition:
> incremental repetition, "leaping and lingering," stock phrases, and so on.
>
> 3) It need not have originated in England -- to answer one of Bob's
> questions.
>
> 4) Its first appearance may have been in print rather than in an
> unpublished collection.  See, for example "John Dory," the A text of which
> is reprinted from Thomas Ravenscroft.  (Which is why I think he did not
> eliminate "The Frog and the Mouse" because it was registered with the
> Stationer's Office.)  Further, there are versions of "Barbara Allen" that
> owe their very existence to printing houses, yet Child included them in
> the canon.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:
>
> > On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > >Good People:
> > >
> > >Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> > >curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> > >clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
> > >
> > >Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> > >know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> > >is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> > >texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> > >Mary."  Etc., etc.
> > >
> > >Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> > >don't we as a group do so?
> >
> > I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."
> >
> > There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
> > fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
> > definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
> > ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
> > in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
> > which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?
> >
> > If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
> > compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
> > I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
> > dissatisfied.
> >
> > Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
> > What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
> > --
> > Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> > 2095 Delaware Avenue
> > Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> > 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
> >
> > The Ballad Index Web Site:
> > http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:20:11 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(30 lines)


Jamie:Laws is next.EdOn Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:> If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
> didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
> . )
>
> The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
> Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
> Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
> other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
> as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic.
>
> "The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
> ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
> tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
> opposite.
>
> (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
> to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
> currency in tradition.")
>
> Cheers
> Jamie
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Latest Discoveries (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:13:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


Hi, folks:Richard Spottswood sent this, and I'm forwarding it. My finances aren't in
shape to buy more LPs at the moment (and neither are my shelves). Enjoy!
Peace,
PaulR Spottswood writesBrian is a local [Washington, DC] dealer.  Anyone interested should conact
him.  Dick---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2094 00:10:49 -0400
From: Brian McGuire <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Latest DiscoveriesHello Dick Spottswood:
I have found some items you might possibly be able to shed a little light
on.
There was an estate sale at a house on Massachussetts Ave. down in the
embassy neighborhood, right by Sheridan Circle, where there was an unusual
collection of folk music records, specifically concentrating on the old
Appalachian ballads.
I got a batch of LPs by folks such as Jean Ritchie, Bascom Lamar Lunsford,
Frank Warner, Cisco Houston, Eric Darling, etc., all original issues on
Elektra, Riverside, Vanguard, Folkways, etc. from the '50s and early '60s.
Generally in very good condition.  10" LP by Jean Ritchie which was
Elektra's first record.  If you know anybody who's hot for this stuff, send
them on.
But what I want to ask about is a bunch of apparantly home-recorded 78s of
various ballad singers.  There's 12 of them, Recordio Discs made by
Wilcox-Gay.
The singers are names such as Artus Moser, who I know has been recorded by
the Library of Congress, Virgil Sturgill, who I think may not be one of the
most authentic of folk artists, Joan Moser, Charlie LaCombe, Eva Russell,
Harry West (there's a Stinson 10-incher by him and his wife, also), Pleaz
Mobley, an old Kentucky geezer, I believe, J.R. Martin, who identifies
himself as being from such-and-such a place in North Carolina, Chester (or
Clester?) Houncell.
The sound quality is good, but the recordings are a little amateurish in
that as often as not the first or last half-second of a song is cut off.
Sometimes the singers pause in order to recollect the lyrics, apologizing.
Some of these pieces take up an entire side of a record, verse after verse
after verse!
Sometimes they have a few moments of comments and conversation before or
aft.  I wish they had more of that.
I really don't have any idea whose stuff this was--although the estate sale
people might surrender some information if pressed.
Does this sound like something folklorists would kill for?
Oh, here's another item I thought might be significant.  A Cisco Houston 78
album on Disc Records titled "Cowboy Songs."  Cover art by Ben Shahn, liner
notes by Woody Guthrie.  They spell his name "Huston" throughout.  One
record is cracked, unfortunately, but playable.  Dated 1947.
Do you have any observations, evaluations, or educated guesses regarding
this stuff?  Want to take a look/listen to it?
Sincerely,
Brian McGuire

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:03:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
>a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
 Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
good examples of this style.But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
beginning.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:34:03 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that suggest
his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because she
was a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken an
alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis might
suggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.Amy DavisJames Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
> beginning.--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:28:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(85 lines)


On 10/23/00, James Moreira wrote:>[unmask],.Internet writes:
>>I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
>>a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
>Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
>Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
>natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
>."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
>either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
>and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
>side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
>guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
>depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
>belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
>older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
>commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
>especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
>link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
>Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
>Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
> Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
>the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
>in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
>some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
>good examples of this style.
>
>But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
>narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
>involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
>by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
>remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
>beginning.This is backwards. I could argue many of the points in the first
paragraph, but the latter one is where it all comes apart.The ghost demonstrates that the song is old. Look at the history
of the supernatural ballads. They are constantly being rationalized.
Most of them are very old. The current forms don't have supernatural
elements. Neither do the more recent ballads.For the ghost to exist at all, the song must be old. And it must
have circulated early, because the versions almost all retain the
ghost. That means it circulated before the days of rationalization.The fact that a song mentions a gun doesn't make it recent. Guns
have been around for half a millennium! And it's not inherently
clear that the original involved a gun anyway. If a fourteenth
century song claims that X shot Y, you'll assume it involves a bow.
Five centuries later, you'd assume a gun. But the word "shot" applies
to both, and could have influenced the name of the weapon used.I'm not saying it's a great ballad; I don't like it much either.
But it is widespread, it is firmly established in oral tradition,
it shows extreme variation, and it has every hallmark of age.The song may well have originated as a "popular" or a "literary" rather
than a folk piece. So what? If literary origin disqualifies something
from the Child canon, then you have to disqualify 80% of the Robin
Hood ballads, and quite a few of the pieces in the final volume
of the Child corpus.People seem to keep playing with ballad definitions. I guess I'm
just too simple-minded for that. A ballad is a traditional song with
a story. I don't care about form, about origin, about date, or
about how it achieved currency. Neither did Child, by our standards,
or he would have included a very different list of songs!I'm going to vote with Dick Greenhaus on this: There is value to
some sort of a cataloguing system to put all the various versions
of a song "under one roof." (That's one of the things the Ballad
Index attempts, though our linking element is a title -- a thing
someone might actually remember! -- rather than a number.) But any
other sort of cataloguing is inherently arbitrary. No two people
will produce the same results. So I don't see the point.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: 16th and 17th century broadside ballad index
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:11:13 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


There have been some refinements added to the 16th and 17th
century broadside ballad index on my website. The file is a large
one in ASCII, not a database system. That means one can easily
search for a keyword or phrase anywhere in the file, as long as a
carriage return someplace in a line doesn't intervene. This is a
reasonable way to do things for a file that's of the order of a
megabyte or less, because it can usually be handled and rapidly
searched in a word processor program. Beyond about 3/4 of a
megabyte it becomes very time consuming to add in new items in proper
order, and I think a megabyte is probably a practical limit,
and beyond that a database system becomes mandatory.I've made a modification and slight extension of the index to
allow fast direct search on some serial numbers. I've extended
the 'Z' designation to act as a signal that a serial number
follows, and have concluded all serial numbers with the
terminator |, to eliminate accidental identities, e.g., so a
search for ZX20[|] won't turn up ZX200-209 and ZX2000-2099.ZNn is the same as previously; n being the arbitrary, but unique,
serial number of a ballad.New directly searchable serial numbers are as follows:ZBn denotes the serial number 'n' of a Stationers' Register
ballad entry in Hyder E. Rollins' 'An Analytical Index to the
Ballad Entries'.ZCn denotes Child ballad 'n' in 'The English and Scottish
Popular Ballads', sometimes with a letter, x, appended to
indicate which of Child's text the broadside refers to.ZLxn denotes the letter-number combination 'x n' in G. M. Laws,
Jr., 'American Balladry from British Broadsides'.ZRn denotes the number 'n' is Steve Roud's folk song and
broadside ballad indexes, but only for those known in traditional
versions. Roud has the same number for broadside and traditional
versions of a song, but the presence of a ZRn number does not
guarantee there is a known traditional text (even for some of the
Child ballads there is no known traditional text). Usually if
there is a ZRn noted there are more (and usually many more)
traditional texts noted in Steve's indexes than the few examples
I note in my broadside ballad index (and more than are in Laws'
two indexes or in 'The Traditional Ballad Index').Steve Roud, however, doesn't usually give a Roud number to
broadside ballads for which there is no known traditional
version, so there is no way to give a complete cross-referencing
of these broadside ballads in my index to those in his by a
simple ZRn serial number. For those interested only in folk songs
and their background, it would serve little purpose anyway.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:04:04 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(46 lines)


In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.        Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.Heresy provided by dick greenhausOn Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Jamie:
>
> Laws is next.
>
> Ed
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:
>
> > If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
> > didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
> > . )
> >
> > The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
> > Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
> > Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
> > other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
> > as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic.
> >
> > "The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
> > ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
> > tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
> > opposite.
> >
> > (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
> > to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
> > currency in tradition.")
> >
> > Cheers
> > Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:06:46 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


While Child may have considered his ballads as being pre-literature, there
is a great deal of evidence that this simply wan't true. I hate the
thought of categorizing something based on our ignorance of its source.On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
> beginning.
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


On 10/23/00, dick greenhaus wrote:>In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
>basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
>distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
>and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
>examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.I think the number assignments are random. Hardly something we can
criticise in the context of Child. At least Laws's lettering system
gives approximate classification. It's a lot easier to find a
vaguely remembered ballad in Laws than in Child.I agree that he has a problem with separation criteria. (A useful
lesson for the Ballad Index; I'm trying to make those distinctions
in the notes.) But, again, Child didn't do it either. I'd love
to know how Child decided, in cases like "The Gaberlunzie Man" or
"The Twa Corbies," which were "valid" texts and which were
worthy of the appendices.It is unfortunate that Laws didn't give more and better examples,
but it's hard to blame him for producing an academic work in
the Sixties which doesn't have much value to us in the Nineties.
He could hardly know which books would be in or out of print.
And he was targeting college students anyway; they were supposed
to have access to better libraries.I don't mean to absolve Laws of all charges; his work does have
defects (and far too many typographical errors!). But his is the
only widespread classification scheme other than Child's; it's
extremely valuable simply for that.Would I like to start over again, going back even before Child,
and do the job right? Yes, of course I would! But it's not
going to happen. Laws is a lot better than nothing!>        Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
>and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
>I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.If it's any comfort, I have found the texts of several Laws Ballads
in the DT to be quite helpful.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:20:45 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


I'm generally in favor of indexing systems.  As Dick says, it's useful
if for no other reason than grouping songs apparently of the same
family.  I approve of Bob's BI policy of inclusivity; I've found the
Ballad Index particularly useful on songs like "Fare You Well, Mary Ann"
which are clearly not ballads but are from oral tradition at some level.My interest in a listing of this type is much less as an attempt to
extend Child's work, and more as a medium for a more widely-used system
for cataloguing.  Any widely-used system confers benefits in spite of
inadequacies and functional weakness - c.f. Microsoft for a conceptual
example) - but I think this group, with its extensive knowledge of both
the genre and definitions, is a better group than most to come up with
something, and to make clear its limitations, assumptions and exceptions.-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:16:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


dick greenhaus wrote:
>
> In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
> basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
> distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
> and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
> examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.
>
>         Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
> and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
> I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.
>
> Heresy provided by dick greenhaus
>Dick, as Bob Waltz points out in another posting, Laws, despite some
deficiencies, is very useful. Where would we be without his two volumes?
As for usefulness on the Mudcat Forum, I've often used Laws designation.
For example, if someone requests a song and I recognized it as one in
Laws indexes, I don't try to guess what titles or keywords I should look
for it under in the Digital Tradition. I might never guess a correct
one. I thumb through the appropriate subject heading (or maybe two of
them) in Laws' indexes, and then post on the Mudcat Forum a 'search for
(Laws) 'Xn' in DT' as a quick way for someone to find all versions in
the DT.It is also becoming pretty much standard to give Laws designation in the
UK as well as in the US. As I pointed out in an earlier posting today,
I've made it easy to search for Laws Xn designation in the broadside
ballad index on my website; Steve Roud lists it in his broadside and
folk song indexes, and its given in the notes in 'The Greig-Duncan Folk
Song Collection'.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:17:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]><<The fact that a song mentions a gun doesn't make it recent. Guns
have been around for half a millennium! And it's not inherently
clear that the original involved a gun anyway. If a fourteenth
century song claims that X shot Y, you'll assume it involves a bow.
Five centuries later, you'd assume a gun. But the word "shot" applies
to both, and could have influenced the name of the weapon used.>>Not to mention a slingshot, used for hunting in times past -- and still
around, as stories from the West Bank make sadly clear.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Quick hello
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:39 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


A quick hello from new listmember Nigel Gatherer from not-so-sunny
Perthshire in Scotland. I'm an amateur enthusiast with a particular
interest in Scottish broadsides, and a general interest in old songs. I'll
enjoy lurking for a while to see what sort of discussions develop.--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless ballads
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:19:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(64 lines)


[I don't think my first post of this made it through -- if it did,
apologies for the repeat. - Amy]I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that
suggest
his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because
she
_was_ a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken
an
alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis mightsuggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.Amy DavisJames Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and
culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it
suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for
songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is
freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly
recent
> beginning.--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:24:10 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


In a message dated 24/10/2000  11:20:28, you write:<< Nigel Gatherer, Crieff >>For anyone not familiar: compiler of Songs and Ballads of Dundee (Edinburgh,
1986) and of the Album of the same name on Peter Shepheard's Springthyme
label.You're welcome here, Nigel.Did you get an answer to Little Jock Elliott II?John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:10:19 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(55 lines)


If The Digital Tradition has made Laws more useful, I';m delighted. My
point was that, even if you have Laws' examples available, it's not easy
to determine which code a "new" ballad should be assigned. A GOOD system
(and DigiTrad's is NOT good) would specify just what aspects of a ballad
woul;d define it's position or code number.This gets to be a real problem with degenerate versions. I heard Charlie
West, for instance, sing a version (I guess) of Babylon where the third
maiden simply killed the robber, and no family membership was stated nor
implied. Should this be considered as a version of the same ballad?Same goes for LOrd Randal and Billy Boy. Similar form and structure, very
different story.On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Bruce Olson wrote:> dick greenhaus wrote:
> >
> > In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
> > basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
> > distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
> > and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
> > examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.
> >
> >         Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
> > and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
> > I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.
> >
> > Heresy provided by dick greenhaus
> >
>
> Dick, as Bob Waltz points out in another posting, Laws, despite some
> deficiencies, is very useful. Where would we be without his two volumes?
> As for usefulness on the Mudcat Forum, I've often used Laws designation.
> For example, if someone requests a song and I recognized it as one in
> Laws indexes, I don't try to guess what titles or keywords I should look
> for it under in the Digital Tradition. I might never guess a correct
> one. I thumb through the appropriate subject heading (or maybe two of
> them) in Laws' indexes, and then post on the Mudcat Forum a 'search for
> (Laws) 'Xn' in DT' as a quick way for someone to find all versions in
> the DT.
>
> It is also becoming pretty much standard to give Laws designation in the
> UK as well as in the US. As I pointed out in an earlier posting today,
> I've made it easy to search for Laws Xn designation in the broadside
> ballad index on my website; Steve Roud lists it in his broadside and
> folk song indexes, and its given in the notes in 'The Greig-Duncan Folk
> Song Collection'.
>
> Bruce Olson
>
> Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
> ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
> or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:51:58 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that
>suggest
>his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because
>she
>was a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken
>an
>alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis might
>suggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.If metamorphosis could be demonstrated then an argument could be made
for a connection with "Leesome Brand" (Child 15), no problem.  But the
texts of "The Shooting of His Dear" that I've seen are usually explicit
that the hunter saw a white apron and mistook that for a swan.> [unmask],.Internet writes:
>The ghost demonstrates that the song is old. Look at the history
>of the supernatural ballads. They are constantly being rationalized.
>Most of them are very old. The current forms don't have supernatural
>elements. Neither do the more recent ballads.The Ghostly Fishermen, The Dreadful Ghost, She Moved through the Fair,
Lost Jimmy Whalen, Beautiful Susan, Edmund in the Lowlands, American
Woods, The Nightingale, Nancy of Yarmouth . . .  all modern ballads,
all feature ghosts/revenants in at least some versions.[unmask],.Internet writes:
>While Child may have considered his ballads as being pre-literature,
>there
>is a great deal of evidence that this simply wan't true. I hate the
>thought of categorizing something based on our ignorance of its source.Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to uphold ESPB as a canon of
traditional balladry, and I agree with Bob that catalogs like the
Ballad Index are eminently more useful as research tools.  But if
people are going to add 306, 307, 308 *to Child*, which is where this
discussion began, then it should be done in the spirit of what Child
was trying to accomplish, not from the perspective of a 20th century
approach to folksong research.  We don't know precisely his criteria
but we know his starting point, and it was quite different from the
more folk-oriented models of the past 75 years or so.  There are some
valid candidates for inclusion -- "The Bitter Withy," "Long A-Growing"
and perhaps others.  But songs like "The Shooting of His Dear" and "The
Bold Fisherman" only fit if certain scholarly interpretations are
accepted up front.  The texts themselves don't get us there.I disagree that certain kinds of ballads can't be studied as
"pre-literature" or at least in relation to non-literacy as cultural
condition.  Ballads are the best documented source for oral culture
research available in the English language, and the analytical tools
that have been made available over the past thirty years, with respect
to the stylistic analysis of texts and the anthropology and social
history of literacy, makes this a very promising avenue of ballad
research.  Granted it has more implications for European research than
for this side of the Atlantic, but it is definitely a viable line of
inquiry.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:20:04 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Nigel:Do tell us something about your "Songs from Dundee."  Is it still
available?EdOn Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Nigel Gatherer wrote:> A quick hello from new listmember Nigel Gatherer from not-so-sunny
> Perthshire in Scotland. I'm an amateur enthusiast with a particular
> interest in Scottish broadsides, and a general interest in old songs. I'll
> enjoy lurking for a while to see what sort of discussions develop.
>
> --
> Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
> mailto:[unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:58:12 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


In a message dated 10/24/00 8:57:25 AM, [unmask] writes:>The Ghostly Fishermen, The Dreadful Ghost, She Moved through the Fair,
>Lost Jimmy Whalen, Beautiful Susan, Edmund in the Lowlands, American
>Woods, The Nightingale, Nancy of Yarmouth . . .  all modern ballads,
>all feature ghosts/revenants in at least some versions.
*************************
I'm showing my ignorance here, but what version of "She Moved Thru the Fair"
definitely involves a ghostly revenant?  The one I sing is from Padraic
Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's always
appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, / She
came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in." This
was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green Book
of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation?"Lost Jimmy Whalen" (LAWS C-8)  is American in origin, and Child, though an
American himself,  was working entirely with the British isles corpus.
Moreover, it is cast in the first person  {"Alone as I wandered down by the
still river,"  etc.) , which  in itself would probably have caused Child to
reject it...   Barry says the song was known in 1886;  it seems to me that
the composer must have been familiar with older songs such as "The Unquiet
Grave."  I wonder why Child didn't include THAT one?  Maybe it's too weak as
a narrative....  I sing a lot of appropriate seasonal songs, and "Lost Jimmy
Whalen" is one of my favorites around Hallowe'en."The Nightingale" you mention must be the one about the wreck of the ship
_The Nightingale.", not the widely known one in which the text emulates
Bocaccio in using the singing of the nightingale as a metaphor for an  event
of sexual congress.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:16:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(28 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>but what version of "She Moved Thru the Fair"
>definitely involves a ghostly revenant?I had the "dead love" variant in mind, which is somewhat reminiscent of
classical ballad revenants in that the dead appears to return in bodily
form.  My understanding is that Margaret Barry introduced the motif to
make sense of the rather ambigous ending of Colum's poem.  Kind of an
odd example of someone looking to the supernatural to "rationalize" a
text.  It's a revival adaptation, I suppose, but either way it shows
the currency in modern tradition of the idea of the dead coming back.As for antecedants to "She Moved through the Fair," the only thing I
know of is a lyric song in Henry's _Songs of the People_ (H141; pp.
395-396), which contains the "night visit" stanza.  Whether this or
something like it is the source used by Colum, I don't know.  John
Moulden might be able to answer that.>"The Nightingale" you mention must be the one about the wreck of the
>shipYes, Laws M 37.  As you say not so well known as the bawdy song, but
Laws cites Scottish, English, Canadian and American versions.  This and
two or three of the other ballads I listed each have a dead sailor's or
dead emigrant's ghost returning home to a lover or family member.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Providence Sunday Journal
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:11:32 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Now here's an obscure question for you all. In April 1896, in a British
magazine, Katharine Tynan Hinkson wrote - "I remember years ago reading in
the Providence Sunday Journal - a New England paper, the then editor of
which, Mr. Alfred Williams, is an authority on folk-song and folk-lore - a
series of articles on children's singing games..."
Has anyone ever spotted these articles? Anyone have access to the paper? Any
clues at all? Might there be songs as well as games in the paper? etc.
Steve Roud

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:06:49 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: <[unmask]>*************************
<<I'm showing my ignorance here, but what version of "She Moved Thru the
Fair"
definitely involves a ghostly revenant?  The one I sing is from Padraic
Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's
always
appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, /
She
came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in."
This
was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green
Book
of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation?>>Those words ("...my dead love came in") appear in Margaret Barry's version
of the song, recorded in 1951, that appears on the "World Library of Folk
and Primitive Music" album devoted to music of Ireland. Margaret Barry came
from a long line of tinkers, but this song was one she learned from a John
McCormack recording of the Colum-Hughes composition. I haven't heard the
McCormack 78, so I haven't a clue whether he incorporated the revenant
lines, or they were added by Barry herself. (There is an album of McCormack
discs in the other room, lent by a neighbor, but that song isn't among them,
alas.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Quick hello
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 25 Oct 2000 09:38:07 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:> Do tell us something about your "Songs from Dundee."  Is it still
> available?I went to Dundee Art School in the late 1970s, and while there became
aware of, and subsequently passionate about, Scottish traditional music. I
started noticing that there were a few Dundee songs being sung. After I
left college, I researched more and compiled a considerable list of songs
which were either about the town of Dundee, or were regarded by Dundonians
as Dundee songs. I was encouraged to try to publish a collection when I
realised there hadn't been anything like it before.However, my primary source was libraries; collections of printed
broadsides, manuscripts, and old books. My rather dusty selection was
enlivened when I was introduced to folksong collector Peter Shepheard who,
along with Maurice Fleming, had been collecting from Dundee and district
singers since the 60s. Peter's recordings of songs from singers such as
Annie Watkins, Eck Harley and Charlie Lamb complemented the songs I'd
rooted out from history. Peter then brought out the record, a perfect
companion to the book.I'm happy to say that the book has just been republished (but I swear I
didn't join this list to publicise it!). I had a launch in Dundee a couple
of weeks ago, and Maureen Jelks, a fine singer, came and sang a few songs
from the book, including "Bonnie Susie Cleland" - a version of Lady Maisry
(Child 65) collected by William Motherwell.Songs and Ballads of Dundee, Nigel Gatherer.
Pub. John Donald, Edinburgh. ISBN 0-85976-538-5--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: She moved through the fair (was - Childless Ballads)
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 05:52:06 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


In a message dated 24/10/2000  17:58:53, you write:<< The one I sing is from Padraic
 Colum's _A Treasury of Irish Folklore_ (NY, Crown Pub., 1954) and it's always
 appeared to me to be a love song to a girl who is very much alive, with its
 repetitive line "It will not be long, love, till our wedding day."  I have
 heard a version which changes Colum's lines "Last night she came to me, / She
 came softly in"  to "Last night she came to me, / My dead love came in." This
 was recorded by the group Jethro Tull in 1977, and appears in "The Green Book
 of Pagan Songs"  which is on the web at http://www.locksley.com/greenbook ,
 and I've always assumed the "dead'" phrase was a recent one.  Does anyone
 know what the Gaelic words meant before Colum's translation? >>I think it has always been assumed that Colum's lines - "So softly she came
that her feet made no din" implies otherworldliness. The origin of the
addition of "dead" is obscure, though it and an additional verse:The people were saying no two were e'er wed
But one has a secret that never is shared
Then she went on her way with her goods and her gear
And that was the last that I saw of my dear.(also of obscure origin) were associated in song books printed in Ireland in
the late fifties.Colum's original was not Gaelic but almost certainly the Enlish language song
known as "Out of the window," "Our wedding day" or "She moved through the
fair" versions of 2 of which are in Sam Henry's Songs of the People
(Huntington, Herrmann pages 395 and 454) - the inter-relationships have yet
to be clearly traced.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:07:32 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


>...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
>JamieIs this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
only.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:16:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>Child himself never wrote down the criteria he used in selecting the "305",
>but George Lyman Kittredge, who knew him well,  postulated what he though
>were probably some of his criteria. He was interested in ballads -- songs
>with a narrative (what D. K. Wilgus has described as the "And then,,,, and
>then...." construction) that had been  collected from the mouths of "the
>people."  (Child worked only from manuscripts and published sources;  he
>wasn't a collector himself)....Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
or that he ever heard a traditional singer?--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:37:05 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


John and Prurient People:I -- a man who claims to know more frankly dirty songs than anyone --
cannot recall any version of the "The Nightengale" in which the sex is
made explicit.EdOn Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> >Jamie
>
> Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> only.
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:50:12 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


John:F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
patriotic poetry which included some songs.Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
time at all in his father's sail loft.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:36:30 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


On 10/27/00, Ed Cray wrote:>John:
>
>F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
>what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
>to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
>copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
>the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
>patriotic poetry which included some songs.Even wrote some songs in that context. "Overtures from Richmond"
is a comic anti-Confederate song to the tune of Liliburlero.>Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
>that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
>time at all in his father's sail loft.Though he never seemed to admit to any such knowledge. Too good for
it, or something. :-(--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:43:45 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(25 lines)


Depends on your definition of "bawdy", Ed.On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> John and Prurient People:
>
> I -- a man who claims to know more frankly dirty songs than anyone --
> cannot recall any version of the "The Nightengale" in which the sex is
> made explicit.
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:
>
> > >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> > >Jamie
> >
> > Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> > the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> > this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> > only.
> > --
> > john garst    [unmask]
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:46:45 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
believe that his book(s) had only published sources.On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> John:
>
> F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was reputed
> to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?]," a
> copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War, ahem,
> the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> patriotic poetry which included some songs.
>
> Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent any
> time at all in his father's sail loft.
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ruairidh Greig <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 29 Oct 2000 11:28:08 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
early life.Ruairidh Greig----- Original Message -----
From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads> That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
>
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
>
> > John:
> >
> > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
reputed
> > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
a
> > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
ahem,
> > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> >
> > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
any
> > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> >
> > Ed
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 29 Oct 2000 09:58:44 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Ruairidh:Our library has a run of the journal.  The volume number suggests that the
desired number was published in 1880.  The pages you give (334-35) suggest
it is a review -- but of what?  I assume that "Professor Norton" was
actually Child's friend, Charles Eliot Norton.  I shall try to get a look
at this on Tuesday and will report to the list.EdOn Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Ruairidh Greig wrote:> Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
> the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
> 335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
> early life.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
>
>
> > That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> > Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> > believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > >
> > > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
> reputed
> > > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
> a
> > > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
> ahem,
> > > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
> any
> > > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:02:09 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


In a message dated 10/27/00 7:17:25 AM, [unmask] writes:>Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
>or that he ever heard a traditional singer?
****************************
Child has been quoted as saying  that he was "wholly incurious" about the
music of the ballads, although in his _The English and Scottish Popular
Ballads_, he did include an extensive index to published airs of the songs,
along with the tunes for 55 of them as an appendix  under the heading
"Ballad Airs From Manuscript."  There is no evidence that he ever heard any
of these actually sung. He was a student and scholar of written literature
(if you will excuse a tautology), and I think his main intent was to find
written or published versions of these songs that did not bear evidence of
editorial tampering by the collectors.From what I've read somewhere -- and can't remember where -- I think Child
did not consider the _Ballads_ his greatest work;  he was perhaps more
partial to his researches into Middle English, especially  his studies on how
Chaucer intended his written words to be pronounced.Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:31:44 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


Sam:
Do you recall where those comments on Child came from?
Norm
-----Original Message-----
From: [unmask] <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:02 AM
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads>In a message dated 10/27/00 7:17:25 AM, [unmask] writes:
>
>>Is there any evidence that Child had any interest in the music or singing,
>>or that he ever heard a traditional singer?
>****************************
>Child has been quoted as saying  that he was "wholly incurious" about the
>music of the ballads, although in his _The English and Scottish Popular
>Ballads_, he did include an extensive index to published airs of the songs,
>along with the tunes for 55 of them as an appendix  under the heading
>"Ballad Airs From Manuscript."  There is no evidence that he ever heard any
>of these actually sung. He was a student and scholar of written literature
>(if you will excuse a tautology), and I think his main intent was to find
>written or published versions of these songs that did not bear evidence of
>editorial tampering by the collectors.
>
>>From what I've read somewhere -- and can't remember where -- I think Child
>did not consider the _Ballads_ his greatest work;  he was perhaps more
>partial to his researches into Middle English, especially  his studies on
how
>Chaucer intended his written words to be pronounced.
>
>Sam
>La Jolla, CA
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: a message from Lani HermannFW: [[unmask]: Returned mail: User unknown]
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:48:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(161 lines)


Lani Hermann asked me to post the message below.  Please disregard the
header stuff.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 5:08 PM
To: [unmask]
Subject: [[unmask]: Returned mail: User unknown]----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem
<[unmask]> -----Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)The original message was received at Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:10 -0800 (PST)
from lani@localhost   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
[unmask]   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to listserv.indiana.edu.:
>>> RCPT To:<[unmask]>
<<< 550 No such local user
550 ballad-l.request@listserv.indiana.edu... User unknown
...Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:02:10 -0800
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: [[unmask]: Rejected posting to
[unmask]]
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1iHi Marge.
My old ISP dropped me last month, and I've been busy traveling ever since,
so have not
had a chance to straighten out my new address.  Please post this anyway (I
rarely do,
but ....) and I'll try to get right by the software Real Soon Now.
 Thanks --
Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360----- Forwarded message from "L-Soft list server at Indiana University
(1.8d)" <[unmask]> -----Date:         Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:58:16 -0500
From: "L-Soft list server at Indiana University (1.8d)"
<[unmask]>
Subject:      Rejected posting to [unmask]
To: [unmask]You  are  not  authorized  to  send   mail  to  the  BALLAD-L  list  from
your
[unmask] account. You might be  authorized to send to the
list
from another of your accounts, or perhaps when using another mail program
which
generates slightly  different addresses, but  LISTSERV has no way  to
associate
this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you
have
any question regarding the policy of the BALLAD-L list, please contact the
list
owners: [unmask]------------------------ Rejected message (51
lines) --------------------------
Return-Path: <[unmask]>
Received: from transbay.net (dns1.transbay.net) by piano.ucs.indiana.edu
(LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id
<[unmask]>; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 16:58:14 -0500
Received: (from lani@localhost)
        by transbay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07230;
        Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:58:10 -0800
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Cc: [unmask]
Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
Message-ID: <[unmask]>
References: <00aa01c04371$3613b300$2d051ad8@norm-cohen>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <00aa01c04371$3613b300$2d051ad8@norm-cohen>; from
[unmask] on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:31:44AM -0800Boo, and Happy Halloween!
        Sorry to be responding to this thread a bit late, but I've been out o' town
-- saw Dick Greenhaus and Susan Friedman and the Nicholses at the FSGW
GetAway
week before last, and heard Jamie Moreira read a paper at the American
Folklore
Society meetings this past wkend.
        But I was amazed, scrolling through the piles of my back e-mail, that no
one
to date has even mentioned the recordings in the boxed set produced by the
late
Kenneth S. Goldstein and published by Riverside in 1956 (Riverside Records
Presents
The English and Scottish Popular Ballads (The Child Ballads) sung by Ewan
MacColl
and A.L. Lloyd, edited by ..., 4 vols + 1, RLP 12-621-9). Of the 82 items
recorded.
72 are in the Child canon, and the rest are Childless:
        The Bitter Withy, Lang A-Growing,  The Bramble Briar, The Seven Virgins,
Down
in Yon Forest, The Bold Fisherman, The Blind Beggar's Daughter of Bethnal
Green,
Six Dukes Went A-Fishing, The Holy Well, and The Shooting of His Dear.        Goldstein's Introduction says
        "The Child ballads have long remained the standard by which ballads are
judged.
This standard has been so difficult to attain that only a few ballads have
been
recommended in addition to Child's canon.  Of these, only one, The Bitter
Withy,
has been universally accepted by scholars as worthy of admission.  The last
volume of this recorded series includes ten British ballads not included by
Child.
Not all are the same high order as The Bitter Withy, but neither are many of
the
ballads which Child included.  There is little doubt, however, that though
they
may vary in excellence, all ten are equal or superior to many of the Child
ballads."
        He declines to offer a definition of the ballad, but cites some standard
references
(Coffin, Friedman, Gerould, Hodgart, Pound, Wells, Wimberly) and also defers
to
others (Sharp, Barry, Griegn, Keith, Bayard, Bronson) for 'musicological
knowledge.'
        I haven't yet looked again at Ed's original list, but I have the feeling --
he
peeked?  *8^)= -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360----- End forwarded message ---------- End forwarded message -----

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:29:18 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


The Riverside series noted in the repost from Lani Herrmann is the
original series which was later reissued under the Washington label.
Donald Duncan noted all the ballads in 'The Great British Ballads not
included in the Child Collection' in a posting of Oct. 22 (Washington
723, formerly Riverside 12-629). I have a mixed set with the original
Riverside issue of the non-Child ballads, and the 8 vols. of the Child
ballads on the Washington label.Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:04:33 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:07:32AM -0400, John Garst wrote:
> >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> >Jamie
>
> Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> only.        The best kind!  The one I like to sing is Melvin Wine's "The Logger,"
where the lines        But he tuned up his fiddle, raised higher the string,
        And then he played the same tune over and over again.can be interpreted differently, depending on your state of mind.        This same version contains the deathless variant line        Two wives makes an army, too many for me!Which is the main reason I learned the song in the first place. -- Aloha,
Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 4 Nov 2000 02:02:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Greetings:
You may (or may not) be relieved to know that I have successfully re-subscribed
to ballad-l and, for the moment at least, can post directly to the list rather
than by ricochet with attendant header pendants.
        I did read this thread more leisurely, and am sorry I missed the early
response which did indeed cite the Riverside recordings, as well as (that
I missed) the source of the provisional list.  I do not regret having quoted
Ken Goldstein some re his choices.
        At the AFS meetings Lyn Wolz discussed Steve Roud's indexes, which include
"Roud numbers" which he added in order to provide a rough indication of families
of ballads, much like Laws or DT or (other) schemes, not with the intention of
graving these numbers in stone but to provide some hint as to potential kinship.
She reports that other researchers are now using these Roud numbers because they
are handy, as labels tend to be,  (Her presentation was a brief comparison-evaluation
of online song databases, which she promised to post on her website.  She's a
reference librarian at the University of Kansas, and says she's working with
Steve Roud to make his databases available/accessible on the 'Net.)
        Thinking about it, her paper was, for me, one of the high points of this
particular conference because it brought together and evaluated information that
I've been sort of accumulating over the years, and in compact and meaningful
form.  I hope she gets it together soon! -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: ghost <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:51:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


>  From [unmask] Fri Nov  3 20:14:37 2000
>  Date:         Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:04:33 -0800
>  From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
>  Subject:      Re: Childless Ballads
>  Comments: cc: [unmask]
>  To: [unmask]
>
>          This same version contains the deathless variant line
>
>          Two wives makes an army, too many for me!
>
>  Which is the main reason I learned the song in the first place. -- Aloha,
>  LaniOh shoot, I always thought it was "two wives *and* the army's too many for
me".

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 19:39:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


In M. J. C. Hodgart's 'The Ballads', 1950, in the Introduction he
says:'... But there are a few others of the same type which Child
overlooked or rejected. ..."The Bitter Withy", "Still Growing", "Corpus Christi [Down in yon
Forest]", "The Seven Virgins", "The Blind Beggar['s Daughter] of
Bethnal Green", "Bruton Town, "The Shooting of his Dear", "The
Bold Fisherman", and more doubtfully "Six Dukes went A-fishing".
..........'_____________The MacColl and Lloyd recording of non-Child ballads, Riverside
RLP 12-629 (later Washington 723) includes all, and adds "The
Holy Well", noting that 'Various scholars consider "The Holy
Well" to be but an interesting version of "The Bitter Withy"
ballad.'The incomplete BL copy of "The Noble Funeral of the Renowned
Champion the Duke of Grafton.. slain at the Siege of Cork"
(ZN316), from which  "Six Duke went A-fishing" stems, has been
printed in JFSS, 1908, and FMJ, 1965. Anyone have ready access to
the copy in the Morgan Library, New York?Bruce OlsonPS: The 17th century text of "The Nightingale's Song" is in the
Scarce Songs 1 file on my website, and is noted at ZN277 in the
broadside ballad index there.Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:43:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


ghost:>Oh shoot, I always thought it was "two wives *and* the army's too many for
>me".And I hear, in the Shorty and Juanita recording, "Two wives *in* the
army's too many for me."
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:03 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


In a message dated 06/11/2000  19:44:21, you write:<< And I hear, in the Shorty and Juanita recording, "Two wives *in* the
 army's too many for me." >>A different song - "The Gentleman Soldier" - for which see the Penguin Book
of English Folk Songs" (And the EFDSS Journal and its predecessor) has the
line:"Two wives are allowed in the army but one's too many for me."John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Chilldless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


I forgot to add part of Hodgart's quotation in 'The Ballads',
just before his list of 'Childless ballads': 'Only nine of them
are worth considering: The Bitter Withy, [etc]...'.Gordon H. Gerould, 'The Ballad of Tradition', 1932 (from reprint,
1957) gave only 7 'Childless Ballads': "The Bitter Withy", "The
Blind Beggar of Bednall Green", "The Seven Virgins", "The
Shooting of his Dear/ Molly Bawn", "Over Yonders a Park/ Corpus
Christi", "Bruton Town/ The Bramble Briar", and "The Bold
Fisherman". [Missing from Hodgart's (later) list are "Long A-
growing" and "Six Dukes went A-fishing"]He says: '"The Shooting of his Dear", or "Molly Bawn", ...
[irrelevant] ..., has been proved to have an elaborate
traditional history, though no version can be praised for its
beauty. It cannot be denied a place in the category.'............Long A-growing: From pooling of information in two threads in
August (Lang A Growing and The Trees they grow so High), it
appears that three published versions of "Young Craigstoun/
Craigston" all derive from a single copy in a manuscript, the
published versions stemming from a transcript made by C. K.
Sharpe. I'm all but certain that the original is the one in the
Glenbuchat collection, which Wm. Stenhouse noted in
'Illustrations to The Scots Musical Museum', #377.Bruce Olson--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:01:33 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(78 lines)


Ruairidh:I retrieved the long and affectionate obituary by Charles Eliot Norton of
his good friend F.J. Child as published in the Proceedings XXXII (1897),
pp. 333-339.  Of Child's youth, he writes:Francis James Child was born in Boston, on the 1st of February, 1825.  His
fathr was a sailmaker, one of that class of intelligent and independent
mechanics which has had a large share in determining the character of our
democratic community, as of old the same class had in Athens and in
Florence.  The boy was the third in a family of eight brothers and
sisters.  He was sent to the public schools.  His unusual capacities were
early displayed.  He stood first in  his classes, and was a favorite with
his schoolfellows.  At the English High School he won all the prizes, and
having by chance attracted the attention of our venerable felwlow citizen,
Mr. Epes S. Dixwell, then the Master of the Latin School, his father was
induced, at Mr. Dixwell's suggestion, to allow him to proceed to the
Latin school, that he might continue his studies and be prepared for
entrance to college.  He speedily caught up with the boys who had already
made progress in the study of Greek and Latin, and soon took the first
place here, as he had done in the schools which he had previously
attended.  The sweetness of his disposition, the pleasant mingling in his
nature of gay spirits and serious purpose, his high principles, his
unaffected modesty won the affection of his teachers and of his
comrades.  His superiority in his classes so so unmingled with pretension
or conceit, that it was admitted without question or envy."Child matricualted, with the financial assistance of Dixwell, then repaid
him with interest, according to Norton's obit.As time permits, I will look for other obits of Child, and see what I can
piece together.EdOn Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Ruairidh Greig wrote:> Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
> the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
> 335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
> early life.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
>
>
> > That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> > Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> > believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > >
> > > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
> reputed
> > > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
> a
> > > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
> ahem,
> > > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
> any
> > > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:23:14 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> As time permits, I will look for other obits of Child, and see what
> I can piece together.There is a charming one by G. L. Kittredge, quoting several paragraphs
of Norton's, in Vol. I of the _Ballads_.---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Big prizes make many losers.  :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Chilldless Ballads
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:20:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Date:         Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500
>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>Sender: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: Chilldless Ballads
>To: [unmask]
>
>I forgot to add part of Hodgart's quotation in 'The Ballads',
>just before his list of 'Childless ballads': 'Only nine of them
>are worth considering: The Bitter Withy, [etc]...'.
>
>Gordon H. Gerould, 'The Ballad of Tradition', 1932 (from reprint,
>1957) gave only 7 'Childless Ballads': "The Bitter Withy", "The
>Blind Beggar of Bednall Green", "The Seven Virgins", "The
>Shooting of his Dear/ Molly Bawn", "Over Yonders a Park/ Corpus
>Christi", "Bruton Town/ The Bramble Briar", and "The Bold
>Fisherman". [Missing from Hodgart's (later) list are "Long A-
>growing" and "Six Dukes went A-fishing"]
>
>He says: '"The Shooting of his Dear", or "Molly Bawn", ...
>[irrelevant] ..., has been proved to have an elaborate
>traditional history, though no version can be praised for its
>beauty. It cannot be denied a place in the category.'
>
>............
>
>Long A-growing: From pooling of information in two threads in
>August (Lang A Growing and The Trees they grow so High), it
>appears that three published versions of "Young Craigstoun/
>Craigston" all derive from a single copy in a manuscript, the
>published versions stemming from a transcript made by C. K.
>Sharpe. I'm all but certain that the original is the one in the
>Glenbuchat collection, which Wm. Stenhouse noted in
>'Illustrations to The Scots Musical Museum', #377.
>
>Bruce Olson
>
>--
>Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
>ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
>or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tips and Updates from WritersDigest.com 11-07-00
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:21:34 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(463 lines)


>From: Newsletter Manager <[unmask]>
>To: "[unmask]" <[unmask]>
>Subject: Tips and Updates from WritersDigest.com 11-07-00
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:17:05 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>Tips and Updates From Writer's Digest, 11-7-00
>For [unmask]
>
>http://www.writersdigest.com
>Your online guide to the writing life.
>
>========================================================
>Join Writer's Digest Book Club today and Choose 2 Books
>FREE with a 3rd Book for just $11.99 -- plus get a FREE
>Gift! As a member you'll enjoy great perks like: FREE
>shipping and handling, easy-to-earn FREE Bonus Books;
>networking opportunities. Plus savings up to 65% off the
>best writing instructional books available (more than 300
>titles in stock!). Click on
>http://www.writersdigest.com/wdbc to learn more.
>========================================================
>
>ON TAP TODAY
>
>* Letter From the Editor
>* Congratulations Brainstormer Winners
>* Fiction Software: What to Buy
>* News of the World...Wide Web
>* You Might Look Good in a Beret and a Goatee
>* 'On Writing'--and Winning--Like a King
>* E-Zine Promotion 101
>* Deadline Time: WD Zine Publishing Competition
>* Author Events Calendar--Looking Ahead
>* Ask the Editor: The Importance of Clips
>* Enter and Win: Got Any Ideas?
>* Hot Topics in the writersdigest.com Forum
>
>_________________________________________________________
>LETTER FROM THE EDITOR
>
>Welcome back. Today's newsletter reveals the winners of
>our first newsletter exclusive competition the "Fiction
>Writer's Brainstormer" contest. With more than 50 entries,
>the brainstormer competition was steep.
>
>If you didn't win, don't worry--we've still got an
>autographed copy of Jack Heffron's "The Writer's Idea
>Book" up for grabs, and you've got exactly one week to
>get your winning prompt in. Read on for details.
>
>This issue also includes a link to the low-down on some
>of the hottest fiction writing software programs and
>brings you up-to-date on the benefits of honing your
>"elevator speech," courtesy of the recently released
>book, "Guerrilla Marketing for Writers." So, read on
>and enjoy.
>
>-- Kelly Nickell, Newsletter Editor
>
>Do you have a suggestion or comment about this
>newsletter? Send it in via e-mail to [unmask]
>with "Newsletter Comments" in the subject line.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>CONGRATULATIONS BRAINSTORM WINNERS
>
>Congratulations to M. Gempel of Pennsylvania, C. Mertz
>of Missouri and D. Over of Maryland for correctly
>answering the five brainstormer questions. They each
>will receive a free copy of "Fiction Writer's
>Brainstormer" by James V. Smith Jr.
>
>In case you're wondering about those correct answers ...
>
>1. What is the one word that almost everybody
>   pronounces wrong?
>   Answer: Wrong is almost always pronounced wrong.
>
>2. On the other hand, can you identify at least four
>   words that anybody can pronounce right?
>   Answer: Write, right, rite and Wright are usually
>   pronounced right.
>
>3. In what dictionary does fiction begin with an f
>   and end with an e?
>   Answer: Fiction always begins with an f, and end
>   always begins with an e.
>
>4. Can you list two words that contain every letter
>   of the alphabet?
>   Answer: The alphabet.
>
>5. What's the commonplace sentence of only nine simple
>   words that uses every letter of the alphabet but does
>   not duplicate a single consonant?
>   Answer: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
>
>To learn more about James Smith's "Fiction Writer's
>Brainstormer," visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/brainstormer.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>FICTION SOFTWARE: WHAT TO BUY
>
>"For writers, the personal computer is the best thing
>to come along since the typewriter. But, like that old
>clickety-clack contraption, PCs or Macs won't do any
>writing for you. Today's empty screen is no less a
>curse than yesterday's blank page."
>
>So says Julio Ojeda-Zapata, Writer's Digest's Tools
>of the Trade columnist and a technology reporter for
>Knight Ridder. In the special issue of Writer's Digest
>"Guide to Writing Fiction Today" on sale now, Ojeda
>reviews 12 of the hottest fiction writing software,
>including Plots Unlimited, StoryBuilder, StoryCraft,
>Writer's Software Companion, Writer's Blocks, Dramatica
>Pro, Writer's DreamKit, StoryView, FictionMaster,
>FirstAid for Writers and Writer's Text Manager.
>
>Here's a little bit more from Ojeda on how he tackled
>this software topic:
>
>"Software specifically for fiction writers has
>proliferated in recent years, and at least one product
>aimed at nonfiction writers with a literary bent has
>surfaced. Which program or programs should writers
>buy? For aspiring novelists on tight budgets, this
>isn't a trivial question. And, after scrutinizing 12
>such products, we don't have an easy answer.
>
>"All the programs reviewed have unique features that
>many would consider useful and even indispensable.
>But not every product is right for everyone. Before
>buying, spend ample time on the publishers' Web sites
>and, whenever possible, download demo software that
>will give you a taste for the real thing. Above all,
>don't assume any of these programs can miraculously
>make you a good writer. Only you can do that, talent
>permitting. But, with the right computer tools, your
>workload can be lightened perceptibly, and your muse
>can be amplified as if by magic."
>
>To view a comprehensive chart evaluating each program's
>premise, execution, platform and price, visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/fiction/ojeda.html
>
>To read Ojeda's in-depth review of these products, pick
>up a copy of Guide to Writing Fiction Today, available
>in bookstores, by calling 1-800-289-0963 or through
>secure online ordering at:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/writingfiction.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>NEWS OF THE WORLD...WIDE WEB
>
>Despite a reported $30M backing, Bigwords.com closed its
>doors October 20th. Bigwords was the largest online
>retailer of university text books.
>
>http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20001106_92623.asp
>
>Starting immediately, Barnesandnoble.com will carry titles
>from MightyWords.com.
>
>http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20001106_92625.asp
>
>_________________________________________________________
>YOU MIGHT LOOK GOOD IN A BERET AND GOATEE
>
>A crack team of authors has been assembled for your
>training: Jay Conrad Levinson, father of guerrilla
>marketing, Rick Frishman, president of Planned
>Television Arts and Michael Larsen, successful
>literary agent and author.
>
>As writers, it's always essential to look for new
>ways to sell your work. The recently released
>"Guerrilla Marketing for Writers" (WD Books), offers
>100 proven insights and techniques that will help
>before and after you're published.
>
>Strengthening your proposals, creating unique and
>powerful marketing plans and utilizing marketing
>methods that are low-cost or no cost are just a few
>of the tactics that you'll learn.
>
>Here's a top-secret guerrilla marketing tip on the
>significance of "Your Elevator Speech":
>
>"An elevator speech is a newsy, passionate 60-to-90-
>second pitch to the media that must accomplish two
>goals: Mention three ways your books will change their
>audience's lives immediately and convey this information
>with irresistible enthusiasm.
>
>"Your elevator speech should last no longer than an
>elevator ride. Once perfected, it will be your open-
>sesame for time and space in the media.
>
>"The media base their responses to pitches partly on
>the words and partly on the excitement with which they
>are delivered. But this pitch, the essence of your book
>conveyed with passionate conviction, will serve you
>whenever you need to make anyone excited about your
>book including:
>
>* other writers
>* magazine or newspaper editors
>* your publicist
>* journalists and talk-show producers
>* booksellers
>* the people you want to book you to speak
>* the audiences you speak to
>
>"Don't share your elevator speech with anyone until
>your networks tell you it's dynamite that will explode
>in the mind of media people and convince them to book
>you on the spot. Make sure your elevator speech is
>equally effective whether it's delivered in person,
>over the phone, in print or on the net."
>
>For more information on "Guerrilla Marketing for
>Writers" visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/guerrillamarketing.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>'ON WRITING'--AND WINNING--LIKE A KING
>
>In his recent book, "On Writing" Stephen King invited
>readers to submit their writing to his website. But
>before you get thoughts of being discovered by King,
>and living a life only befitting the King--take note.
>There's a catch: it's a "very specific writing sample".
>
>Directions for entering your writing sample can only
>be obtained by reading King's book. If you have the
>book, and want to take a chance, visit
>http://www.stephenking.com or
>http://www.radiantideas.com/stephenking/sample.html
>
>Keep in mind, anything submitted which does not strictly
>follow the guidelines, 'will not be considered'.
>
>Inside.com reports the winner may have a chance to be
>published in the paperback reprint edition of the book.
>http://www.inside.com/story/Inside_Dope.html?art_id=0&podID=8
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DEADLINE TIME: WD ZINE PUBLISHING COMPETITION
>
>The deadline for the first Writer's Digest Zine
>Publishing Competition is fast approaching. If you
>still would like to enter your self-published zine
>or e-zine into the competition, you only have until
>Nov. 25. Don't miss out on the opportunity to have
>your zine eligible for more than $1,000 in prizes.
>
>WD wants to recognize the passion, talent and energy
>that goes into the creation of zines. There are 10
>categories to enter: literary/poetry, mystery,
>hobby/enthusiast, best art design, fantasy/horror,
>romance, genealogy/family history, informational
>(travel, general interest, news), science fiction
>and fanzine. For complete rules, list of awards and
>entry form, visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/zineawards
>
>_________________________________________________________
>AUTHOR EVENTS CALENDAR--LOOKING AHEAD
>
>Attend a writing workshop with a Writer's Digest author
>coming to a bookstore near you.
>
>Katherine Ramsland, author of Bliss: Writing to Find
>Your True Self
>     Wednesday Nov 8th, 7:30pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Willow Grove PA  Tel: 215/659-1001
>
>     Saturday Nov. 11th, 3:00pm
>     Borders Books & Music, Springfield, PA
>     Tel: 610/543-8588
>
>     Friday Nov. 24th, 7:00pm
>     Borders Books & Music, Ann Arbor, MI
>     Tel: 734/668-7652
>
>Jack Heffron, author of The Writer's Idea Book
>     Friday Nov. 17th, 7:00pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Lexington, KY  Tel: 606/543-8518
>
>     Sunday Nov. 19th, 3:00pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Cincinnati, OH Tel: 513/794-9440
>
>JacLynn Morris and Dr. Paul Fair (From Me to You)
>     Friday Nov. 17th, 7:30pm
>     Phoenix & Dragon Bookstore, Atlanta, GA
>     Tel: 404/255-5207
>
>Or meet your favorite writers, if you're in the
>neighborhood...
>
>Frances Mayes, author of In Tuscany
>     Wednesday, November 8th 7:30 pm
>     Tattered Cover, Denver CO
>     Tel: 303/322-1965 ext. 7446
>     http://www.tatteredcover.com
>
>Julia Cameron, author of Popcorn: Hollywood Stories
>     Thursday, November 9th 7pm
>     R.J. Julia Booksellers, Madison CT
>     Tel: 203/245-3959
>     http://www.rjjulia.com
>
>Madison Smartt Bell, author of Master of the Crossroads
>     Friday November 10th 6pm
>     Davis-Kidd Books, Memphis TN Tel: 901/683-9801
>     http://www.daviskidd.com/
>
>For more information, call stores directly.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>ASK THE EDITORS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CLIPS
>
>Gail Parsons asks: When a magazine wants 'clips' what
>exactly are they looking for? I am a reporter/feature
>writer for a daily paper and have begun to get my feet
>wet in freelancing. I have a lot of things published
>in the newspaper. Should the clips be related to the
>subject I am querying on?
>
>Melanie Rigney, editor of Writer's Digest says:
>First, welcome to the world of freelancing! You'll
>find it challenging and rewarding. If you can send
>clips that are somewhat related to the topic (you want
>to write for a dog lovers' magazine; you've done some
>human interest articles that involve pets), that's
>ideal. Showing you know something about the topic
>usually will give you a foot in the door. If you don't
>have a clip that's precisely related, send one that
>takes the same tone--for example, you probably wouldn't
>send a moving first-person essay if you were querying
>a trade magazine about doing a corporate case study.
>
>Send your questions to [unmask] with "Ask
>the Editors" in the subject line. The questions with
>the greatest general interest will be answered here by
>editors at Writer's Digest magazine, books and school;
>the Writer's Digest Book Club; Writers Online Workshop;
>and Personal Journaling magazine. Watch this newsletter
>for this new, occasional feature; questions and answers
>will be archived on the Web site as well. Sorry, but we
>don't recommend specific publishers, agents or editing
>services.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>ENTER AND WIN: GOT ANY IDEAS?
>
>The deadline is just one week away, so you better get
>that prompt in soon! Create your own writing prompt in
>100 words or less, and e-mail it to [unmask]
>with "Newsletter Contest" in the subject line. All
>entries must be in by November 14.
>
>The author of the winning prompt will receive an
>autographed copy of Jack Heffron's "The Writer's Idea
>Book," and the entry will appear in the November 21 WD
>Newsletter. Only one submission per entrant, so make
>it count.
>
>Need help? Here's an excerpted prompt from Heffron's
>book to get you started:
>
>PROMPT: Write about one of your pieces that began with
>an exciting idea but never achieved its potential.
>Speculate on what went wrong. Did you finish the piece?
>Does it now languish in a drawer? Or did you finish it
>but then lose interest in it?
>
>To learn more about "The Writer's Idea Book," visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/ideabook.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>HOT TOPICS IN THE WRITERSDIGEST.COM FORUM
>
>New to the Discussion Forum on WritersDigest.com:
>
>* Do you use fiction writing software programs? Share
>  your software secrets with the rest of the writing
>  world.
>
>Plus, contribute to the online clinic critique of
>"Dominica," by W. James M. McFalls.
>All at: http://www.writersdigest.com/forum
>
>________________________________________________________
>EXPLORE PAST ISSUES OF THE "TIPS AND UPDATES"
>NEWSLETTER
>
>Get access to all previous issues of this newsletter
>by visiting http://www.writersdigest.com/newsarchive
>
>There you can perform a keyword or subject search to
>pull up expert advice on all genres of writing and all
>areas of publishing. You can also access specific back
>issues by date if you have a particular newsletter you
>wish to review. (New issues don't enter the archive
>until about two weeks after initial publication.)
>
>_________________________________________________________
>SPONSOR THIS NEWSLETTER
>
>For information on sponsoring this newsletter or to
>receive a rate card, email [unmask],
>or call toll-free: 888-481-0427
>
>_________________________________________________________
>GET YOUR FREE ISSUE OF WRITER'S DIGEST MAGAZINE
>
>Packed with plenty of must-know info like how to polish
>your writing, submit your manuscripts successfully, break
>into hot, new markets, hook an agent, and more. Check
>out http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/mag_frame.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>WRITER'S DIGEST BOOK CLUB
>
>Join Writer's Digest Book Club today and Choose 2 Books
>FREE with a 3rd Book for just $11.99 -- plus get a FREE!
>Gift. Click on http://www.writersdigest.com/wdbc to learn
>more.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>JOIN THE WRITER'S DIGEST AFFILIATE PROGRAM
>
>Earn money with your writing-related website. Click
>below for program details.
>http://www.writersdigest.com/affiliate
>
>========================================================
>TELL A FRIEND
>If you know other writers who would be interested in
>receiving this newsletter, tell him or her to send an
>e-mail to [unmask] with SUBSCRIBE
>WD NEWSLETTER in the subject line of the message, or sign
>up online at http://www.writersdigest.com/newsletter
>========================================================
>UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION
>You have received this e-mail because you expressed
>interest in receiving updates about writing and about
>Writer's Digest products by e-mail. If you no longer want
>updates, send an e-mail to [unmask]
>with UNSUBSCRIBE WD NEWSLETTER in the subject line the
>message; send it from the e-mail address where you
>currently receive the newsletter.
>========================================================
>CHANGE OF ADDRESS
>To change addresses, use the procedures above to unsubscribe
>from your old address, and then subscribe from your new
>address.
>========================================================
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:12:38 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Friends:
I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
Many thanks,
Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:27:39 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Scandalous as this might sound, I don't think that UNC's folklore program
has offered a course in Anglo-American folksong and balladry since Dan
Patterson retired three or four years ago.  Glenn Hinson teaches
African-American vernacular music, and Terry Zug includes some in an
introduction to folklore class.BruceAt 06:12 PM 11/8/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Friends:
>I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
>in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
>so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
>Many thanks,
>Norm Cohen
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
NOTE: This email address will probably change
during November 2000 because Mindspring's
service is unreliable.  Look for me at bellsouth.net
probably.http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:33:08 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


Norm:Let us all know.  Just for curiosity's sake.EdOn Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Friends:
> I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
> in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
> so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
> Many thanks,
> Norm Cohen
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:21:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


I'll be offering a folksong course here at University of Maine after
Christmas, and I hope to alternate it every other year with a course on
narrative.I don't think a dedicated course in ballads has been offered at
Memorial since David Buchan died in 1994.  Neil Rosenberg and Peter
Narvaez both offer folksong courses (and Peter now offers a blues &
jazz course).Back in the late 80s, Sean Galvin did a survey of American universities
that still offered ballad courses.  It's been a while so I don't recall
the exact results but they weren't encouraging.  If I remeber rightly
he was also able to tie the decline in ballad/folksong offerings to a
general move away from genre based courses, or at least away from the
classic "analytic" genres -- folksong, folktale, proverb, etc.  In that
light, it would be interesting to know how many and what kind of
courses take up folksong/ballads as a significant part of the syllabus:
women's studies, politics of culture, popular culture,
sociology/anthropology of art, medieval studies.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:40:29 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Dear Ballad Group,
  In the Wife of Usher's Well, when the sons return to their mother, we have:
-----------
It fell about the Martinmass,
  When nights are lang and mirk,
The carlin wife's three sons came hame,
  And their hats were of the birk.
------------
I recall from somewhere in my dim past that "birk" (birch) has a symbolic,
perhaps religious or supernatural association. Could it be that because the
sons were wearing birch hats that this means they came to their mother from
heaven? Is this the balladeer's way of saying they are saints? If so, would
this meaning be evident to people living in centuries past in Scotland, or
even in America, where the ballad became popular in the Scots-Irish
tradition? Or, am I reading too much into this?
  Guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pete Brady

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:11:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


The source you're thinking of is probably L. C. Wimberly, FOlklore in
English and Scottish Ballads.  He discusses the stanza in question on
p. 243 and has more extented comments on related motifs pp. 155-57.Comparative folklore as practice by Wimberly used materials from
disparate traditions regardless of whether a connection could be
demonstrated, a la James Fraser in The Golden Bough.  So his readings
should be taken advisedly, but there is still much of interest and
value in his study.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:51:01 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


You need a Scots expert here (which I'm not), but the following notes may be
of interest, although they are inconclusive. A scan through a shelf-full of
Scots folklore books brings up surprisingly few references to birch tree
beliefs, but there are some. Some popular writers, such as Willa Muir
(Living With Ballads, 1965 p.154) make blanket statements such as 'birch was
one of the sacred trees in pre-Christian lore', but as they offer no
evidence their comments are worthless.The most telling point is that Scott, who printed the earliest known version
of the ballad (Child's A text) in 1802, makes no comment about the birk in
Scottish belief (but he does witter on about a Rabbinical tradition of a
ghost with a garland on his head, without showing how this was relevant) and
we can be pretty sure that he would have given Scottish parallels if he had
known them.L.C. Wimberley, in his 'Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads' (1928
pp.155-157) starts by saying 'the sacred nature of the birch is well known'
but then spoils this by giving lots of references - from India, Japan,
British Columbia, Central Asia, Lapland, etc. again without appearing to
worry whether these have any bearing on Scotland, plus one English
reference, but no Scottish ones. Nevertheless, he does make something of a
case for the birch being special by citing occurrences of birks in other
ballads - 'Braes of Yarrow' (Child 214), 'Sweet William's Ghost' (Child 77),
'Sir Hugh' (Child 155), 'Fair Janet' (Child 64) and several others. Someone
needs to count all the references to trees in Child, to find out if these
birches are statistically significant.The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
because it rhymed with 'mirk'.Incidentally, I am surprised to find that very few British versions have
been noted - 3 or 4 from Scotland, the same number from England - but dozens
in the United States, Sharp alone collected 33 versions in the Appalachians
in 1916/1918.Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?> Dear Ballad Group,
>   In the Wife of Usher's Well, when the sons return to their mother, we
have:
> -----------
> It fell about the Martinmass,
>   When nights are lang and mirk,
> The carlin wife's three sons came hame,
>   And their hats were of the birk.
> ------------
> I recall from somewhere in my dim past that "birk" (birch) has a symbolic,
> perhaps religious or supernatural association. Could it be that because
the
> sons were wearing birch hats that this means they came to their mother
from
> heaven? Is this the balladeer's way of saying they are saints? If so,
would
> this meaning be evident to people living in centuries past in Scotland, or
> even in America, where the ballad became popular in the Scots-Irish
> tradition? Or, am I reading too much into this?
>   Guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pete Brady

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Mary Louise Chown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:30:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


roud wrote:> You need a Scots expert here (which I'm not), but the following notes may be
> of interest, although they are inconclusive. A scan through a shelf-full of
> Scots folklore books brings up surprisingly few references to birch tree
> beliefs, but there are some. Some popular writers, such as Willa Muir
> (Living With Ballads, 1965 p.154) make blanket statements such as 'birch was
> one of the sacred trees in pre-Christian lore', but as they offer no
> evidence their comments are worthless.
>
> The most telling point is that Scott, who printed the earliest known version
> of the ballad (Child's A text) in 1802, makes no comment about the birk in
> Scottish belief (but he does witter on about a Rabbinical tradition of a
> ghost with a garland on his head, without showing how this was relevant) and
> we can be pretty sure that he would have given Scottish parallels if he had
> known them.
>
> L.C. Wimberley, in his 'Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads' (1928
> pp.155-157) starts by saying 'the sacred nature of the birch is well known'
> but then spoils this by giving lots of references - from India, Japan,
> British Columbia, Central Asia, Lapland, etc. again without appearing to
> worry whether these have any bearing on Scotland, plus one English
> reference, but no Scottish ones. Nevertheless, he does make something of a
> case for the birch being special by citing occurrences of birks in other
> ballads - 'Braes of Yarrow' (Child 214), 'Sweet William's Ghost' (Child 77),
> 'Sir Hugh' (Child 155), 'Fair Janet' (Child 64) and several others. Someone
> needs to count all the references to trees in Child, to find out if these
> birches are statistically significant.
>
> The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
> the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
> blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
> the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
> because it rhymed with 'mirk'.
>
> Incidentally, I am surprised to find that very few British versions have
> been noted - 3 or 4 from Scotland, the same number from England - but dozens
> in the United States, Sharp alone collected 33 versions in the Appalachians
> in 1916/1918.
>
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:40 PM
> Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
>Hi There from a lurker from Winnipeg Manitoba.   I may be able to shed some
light on the birch hats. It seems to me in my research on both ballads and
shamanic practices that the hats of birch signify that the sons have come from
the otherworld. Items of clothing such as hats and shoes(of bronze or iron )
were once recognized as otherworldly. If this is important to you I can try and
remember where I read this. Mary Louise Chown

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:03:06 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


    There are 58 versions of the ballad in Bronson:  _The Traditional Tunes
of the Child Ballads_ (vol. II, pp. 246-266),  and two of then  show the
stanza about the birchen hats.  Both of these mentions follow with a stanza
explaining that the birch grew at the Gates of Paradise.  One version not
included by Bronson  (probably because he used only printed sources) was
recorded a good many years ago by Buell Kazee,  under the title of "Lady
Gay," and as I remember it, the explanatory verse was as follows:That birch grew not in any slough
    Nor yet by any stream,
But at the Gates of Paradise
   That birch grew fresh and green.   Maria Leach, in her _Standard Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology and
Legend_, says that the symbolism of birch in the song, as it was explained by
 Robert Graves in _The White Goddess_,  was that the ghosts wearing these
hats did not intend to haunt the earth, but were going to return to Paradise
immediately.  This plan of returning to Paradise is perhaps borne out by one
of the Scottish versions (not one of the two versions in _Child_), which has
one of the three babes saying"The cock doth craw, the day doth daw:
   The channerin' worm doth chide.
Gin we be missed out o' our place
   A sair pain we maun bide."Around most Hallowe'ens, I include the Kazee version in my concerts because
of its ghostly affect, although my guitar accompaniment doesn't hold a candle
to Kazee's stark banjo!Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Mea Culpa?
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:08:24 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


My apologies in advance if you have recieved any bizarre missives with my
name attached.Somehow, some e-messages I was transferring from one computer to another
seem to have found their way to the Ballad List, I think.. They cropped up
on Linn's Ballad-L mail, but not on mine. This all leaves me very
bewildered.We are currently running two computers on line and need to transfer e-mail
from one to the other; especially if they contain attachments or "blue
letter" sites. This old performa can't handle either but the new G4 can.What is most confusing is the fact that the Ballad-L listing in the Address
Book is separated from the address I was forwarding to by a whole page.Please forgive if you got any of this Spamlike transmissions  -  Tom

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:44:59 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(9 lines)


Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:13:36 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
internal evidence.
The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old Time
Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is only
24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has 82pp.,
so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye Pack a
1930s radio singer?
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
Subject: Dating a Songbook> Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
> of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
> material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
> the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
>
> The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:21:47 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


Steve and Everyone:My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.Does that help?EdOn Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> internal evidence.
> The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old Time
> Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is only
> 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has 82pp.,
> so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye Pack a
> 1930s radio singer?
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> Subject: Dating a Songbook
>
>
> > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
> > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
> > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
> > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> >
> > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> >
> > Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mea Culpa?
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:28:43 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Don't worry, Tom. As Dan Rather put it on Tuesday night, "To err is human.
To really louse things up, you need a computer." (He quoted this as a
prologue to announcing that CBS was withdrawing its call of Florida for
Gore.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Dr Ian Russell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:40:23 +0000
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Dear Norm,Here at the Elphinstone Institute, University of Aberdeen,
we are setting up a taught M.Litt to run from autumn 2001
in Ethnology and Folklore (one year full time). It is
intended to survey the development, theory and practice of
the subject area in an international context, with special
concentration on Scottish materials. It will cover
appropriate research methodologies. In Component 1: Theory,
four of the weeks will be devoted to Ballad and Song. In
Component 2: Practice, there will also be four weeks.
Component 3 is the dissertation, which could focus on
ballad/song fieldwork, if appropriate.
It can be taken full or part-time.Our Continuing Education Dept has a course on Scottish
Culture and Tradition: Ballad and Song (6 credits) -
CN3010, at Level 3 (year 3) of the Scottish Studies M.A (72
credits). There are two other exit points, for a
certificate (24 credits) or a diploma (48 credits).There are also opportunities for suitable candidates to
undertake Ph.D. or M.Phil. research in Folksong or Ballads
at the Institute, as well as other related areas.Hope this is of some interest.Best wishes,
IanOn Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:12:38 -0800 Norm Cohen
<[unmask]> wrote:> Friends:
> I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
> in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
> so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
> Many thanks,
> Norm Cohen----------------------
Dr Ian Russell, Director
The Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen
AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272386
Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
[unmask]
Website:
www.abdn.ac.uk/elphinstone/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:51:14 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


The two versions I have, as follows. It is Version 2 which has the  song
'The Farmer's Letter to the President' which is dated 1933.[Version 1]
[Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballads / & Cowboy Songs
<Bottom>Compiled by / COWBOY LOYE / and / JUST PLAIN JOHN
Decoration in centre: stylized design of harp, trumpet, ribbons intertwined
Border fancy: repeating pattern, dotted semi-circles, three stemmed
'flower?' within each
24 numbered pages (but index continues on inside of back cover)
Orangey-brown (rust?) card cover
Song titles in caps.
First song on p.3: 'MOTHER'
First song on p.12: 'THE OLD HICKORY CANE',
First song on p.23 'DON'T LAY ME ON MY BACK IN MY LAST SLEEP'.[Version 2]
[Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballas / and / Cowboy Songs
<Bottom>Compiled by LOYE PACK / The Cowboy Singer
Decoration in centre: stylized harp
Border: plain rules: thin/thick/thin
80 numbered pages (plus 2 unnumbered and index continues on inside of back
cover)
Pale green card cover.
Song titles in caps.
First song on p.3: 'JUST BEFORE THE BATTLE MOTHER'
First song on p.40: 'THE OLD STEPSTONE'
First song on p.80: 'DON'T TAKE MY LITTLE HOME'----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook> Steve and Everyone:
>
> My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
> text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
> in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
> pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:
>
> > Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> > internal evidence.
> > The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old
Time
> > Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is
only
> > 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has
82pp.,
> > so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye
Pack a
> > 1930s radio singer?
> > Steve Roud
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> > Subject: Dating a Songbook
> >
> >
> > > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82
pages
> > > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly
written
> > > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor
crash in
> > > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> > >
> > > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> > >
> > > Ed
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 05:18:30 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(106 lines)


Steve:There were, apparently, multiple "editions" of Loye's "Old Time Ballads
and Cowboy Songs," at least in the 80-page version.  My copy agrees with
yours except in the color of the cover stock, and the fact that "The Old
Stepstone" is on page 39.  (The index says page 40.)  He must have removed
a song before page 40, and added something after.We can settle for a post-1933 date.What makes this songbook so interesting, in my opinion, is the confluence
of the new (a song about an airplane crash) with the old (homelitic
ballads).  In a sense it is a reflection of the national vote of a few
days ago: a significant portion of the voters cast ballots on moralistic
grounds (anti-Clinton, anti-abortion), an equal portion voted for secular
reasons.EdOn Sat, 11 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> The two versions I have, as follows. It is Version 2 which has the  song
> 'The Farmer's Letter to the President' which is dated 1933.
>
> [Version 1]
> [Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballads / & Cowboy Songs
> <Bottom>Compiled by / COWBOY LOYE / and / JUST PLAIN JOHN
> Decoration in centre: stylized design of harp, trumpet, ribbons intertwined
> Border fancy: repeating pattern, dotted semi-circles, three stemmed
> 'flower?' within each
> 24 numbered pages (but index continues on inside of back cover)
> Orangey-brown (rust?) card cover
> Song titles in caps.
> First song on p.3: 'MOTHER'
> First song on p.12: 'THE OLD HICKORY CANE',
> First song on p.23 'DON'T LAY ME ON MY BACK IN MY LAST SLEEP'.
>
> [Version 2]
> [Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballas / and / Cowboy Songs
> <Bottom>Compiled by LOYE PACK / The Cowboy Singer
> Decoration in centre: stylized harp
> Border: plain rules: thin/thick/thin
> 80 numbered pages (plus 2 unnumbered and index continues on inside of back
> cover)
> Pale green card cover.
> Song titles in caps.
> First song on p.3: 'JUST BEFORE THE BATTLE MOTHER'
> First song on p.40: 'THE OLD STEPSTONE'
> First song on p.80: 'DON'T TAKE MY LITTLE HOME'
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
>
>
> > Steve and Everyone:
> >
> > My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
> > text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
> > in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
> > pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:
> >
> > > Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> > > internal evidence.
> > > The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old
> Time
> > > Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is
> only
> > > 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has
> 82pp.,
> > > so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye
> Pack a
> > > 1930s radio singer?
> > > Steve Roud
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > > To: <[unmask]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> > > Subject: Dating a Songbook
> > >
> > >
> > > > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > > > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82
> pages
> > > > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly
> written
> > > > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor
> crash in
> > > > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> > > >
> > > > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> > > >
> > > > Ed
> > >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:22:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:>What makes this songbook so interesting, in my opinion, is the confluence
>of the new (a song about an airplane crash) with the old (homelitic
>ballads).  In a sense it is a reflection of the national vote of a few
>days ago: a significant portion of the voters cast ballots on moralistic
>grounds (anti-Clinton, anti-abortion), an equal portion voted for secular
>reasons.What about those who voted for other moralistic reasons (pro-Gore, pro-life)?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:25:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


What an error!>What about those who voted for other moralistic reasons (pro-Gore, pro-life)?
>--
>john garst    [unmask]Should have been "(pro-Gore, pro-choice)" and "anti-Bush."--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 11:20:46 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Thanks very much to the group for replying to my request about the possible
spiritual or symbolic meaning of "birk" in the Wife of Usher's Well. In
particular, Steve Roud points out something that went right by me, that the
next verse states that the birk grows at the gates of paradise.
  I first was told of the possible significance of "birk" in reference to
"Bonnie Lass O'Fyvie-O", where the last verse is "Green grow the birks upon
the bonnie bank," which seems neutral enough, except that someone told me
that this had a deeper meaning. In Fyvie-O, it seems a little far out to look
for hidden meanings. But in Usher's Well, this is about ghosts, and anything
could be happening.
  Pete BradyIn a message dated 11/9/00 3:52:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, [unmask]
writes:<< The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
 the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
 blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
 the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
 because it rhymed with 'mirk'. >>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New English CD
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:02:25 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


'Down the Cherry Tree' by Pop Maynard (Musical Traditions MTCD 400) - double
CD (93 minutes) including 32 songs recorded in pubs in Sussex, England by
Brian Matthews 1959-1961.Pop Maynard (1872-1962) was one of the finest unaccompanied singers to be
discovered in Post-War England, and these recordings have only recently come
to light. Rod Stradling has made them available as a limited edition, as
unedited field-recordings, for the benefit of enthusiast who will otherwise
miss out on some wonderful singing simply because there are pub-noises in
the background and people joining in the chorus. To keep the price down, Rod
has decided not to include the extensive booklet which usually accompanies
his CD releases, but the record is still excellent value for money.UK customers send £10 to Rod at 1 Castle Street, Stroud, Glos. GL5 2HP.
(Tel.01453 759475)
Overseas, email Rod at [unmask] for details how to payAnd if you are interested in other great CDs and articles, I suggest you
visit his Musical Traditions website at:  [unmask]Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: ghost <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:51:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Anyone who's got it wanna post the land-chantey
"(Polling, Polling) Way Down In Florida" that a group from DC premiered
at the NOMAD chantey-blast session this weekend?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:37:31 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


From the "horse's mouth" so to speak.    An Election Shanty
(to the tune of "Roll the Woodpile Down")1. Way down south where the palm trees grow
    Way down in Florida
   They say elections sure are slow.
    And we'll hold the recount now.
Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the whole state round;
    *That ballot of mine they will never find
    And we'll hold the recount now.2. Gore's campaign aides made a final push
   To round up voters to beat the Bush.Chorus3. Some punched for Bush, some punched for Gore;
   Some punched for two or three or more.Chorus4. Pat said "Those votes weren't meant for me,
   I'd be glad if I got three!"Chorus (2nd line changes)  *Those voters of mine crossed the Palm Beach line5. Reverend Jesse says "No fair!
   They won't let my people vote down there."Chorus (2nd line changes)  *That brown gal of mine got kicked out of line6. The lawyers'll fight over who gets sued
   But either way, guess who gets screwed?Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the whole state round;
        *That ballot of mine they will never find
        And we'll hold the recount now."2000 by The Civil Serpents (Kathy Westra, Mary LaMarca and George Stephens)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: Andy Alexis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:27:19 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


Jumping the gun just a teensy bit, I was kind of thinking
along the lines of (to the tune of "He's in the Jailhouse
Now"):Mr Bush met Mr. Cheney
at a bar and went insane-he
drove a car after having a beer or three
He got stopped by a trooper
who was a party pooper
I don't want to go to jail so I'll just pay a fineChorus
He's in the White House now (2x)
If he had to go to jail
His dad would have paid his bail
He's in the White House now.(c)2000 by Andy Alexis All rights reservedI wrote these verses; new verses welcomed (to be (c) by you
of course).  A verse about Capitol Punishment would be nice;
the original song has a chorus that changes to "He's in the
graveyard now".  The original song even has a verse about a
guy selling his votes for president twice...Andy Alexis, [unmask]
Visit me: http://www.calweb.com/~ndlxs
Sacramento, California
"The Pearl of the Central Valley"> -----Original Message-----
> >From the "horse's mouth" so to speak.
>
>     An Election Shanty
> (to the tune of "Roll the Woodpile Down")
>
> 1. Way down south where the palm trees grow
>     Way down in Florida
>    They say elections sure are slow.
>     And we'll hold the recount now.
> Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the
> whole state round;
>     *That ballot of mine they will never find
>     And we'll hold the recount now.
>
> 2. Gore's campaign aides made a final push
>    To round up voters to beat the Bush.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Singer New to Me
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:46:14 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
with Kate Russby (the spelling is phonetic).  She records on Compass
Records, and either has a new release or is making a first tour of the
U.S.  (She is Yorkshire born, and a second-generation singer of
traditional songs.)  Can anyone tell me more about her, or recommend any
of her CDs.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Cliford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 18:11:12 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


At 10:46 AM -0800 11/19/00, Ed Cray wrote:
>This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
>with Kate Russby (the spelling is phonetic).  Can anyone tell me more
>about >her, or recommend any of her CDs.
>
>EdEd,        Am aware of two CDs by Kate RUSBY, "Hourglass" [Compass Records 7
4255 2. (1998)] and "Sleepless" {Compass Records 7 4277 2 (1999)] both were
originally releaseed by Pure Records in the U.K. and I find both to be
very enjoyable. For those who find solace in "best of lists" both were
selested by Folk Roots as among the best new releases in their respective
years.        The 11 cuts on "Hourglass" are 1. Sir Eglamore; 2. As I Roved Out;
3. Jolly Ploughboys; 4. Annan Waters; 5. Stananivy / Jack & Jill; 6. A Rose
In April; 7. Radio Sweetheart; 8. I am Stretched On Your Grave; 9. Old Man
Time; 10. Drowned Lovers; 11. Bold Riley.        The 13 cuts on " Sleepless" 1. The Cobblers Daughter; 2. I Wonder
What Is Keeping My True Love Tonight ; 3. The Fairest Of All Yarrow; 4. The
Unquiet Grave; 5. Sho Heen; 6. Sweet Bride; 7. All God's Angels; 8. The
Wild Goose; 9. The Duke And The Tinker; 10. Our Town [a fine song by Iris
Dement]; 11. The Sleepless Sailor; 12. Cowsong; 13. Botany Bay        Compass Records has a web page at www.compassrecords.comCliff Ocheltree
New Orleans LA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Susan Tichy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:42:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
> with Kate RussbyKate Rusby also plays with the Poozies & has done some guest spots on
other albums. Here are all the listings that pop up at Sidestreet (a
small-label wholesaler).--SusanPoozies, The INFINITE BLUE long-awaited first American release from this
notable Scottish quartet: Karen Tweed, Kate Rusby, and Mary MacMaster
and Patsy Seddon of Sileas
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4261RAISE YOUR HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE
Compilation culled from their first three albums -- Karen Tweed, Kate
Rusby, and Sileas gals Mary MacMaster and Patsy Seddon
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4290Rusby, Kate
HOURGLASS
US release of 1997 album. With John McCusker, Alan Reid, Tony McManus,
Alison Kinnaird, others.
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4255
SLEEPLESS
With Darrell Scott, John McCusker and Tim O'Brien
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4277Todd, Gibb
CONNECTED
Original, traditional and contemporary ballads with an all-star lineup
including Kate Rusby, Tony McManus, John McCusker, Finbar Furey,
Alasdair Fraser, Joanie Madden, others
                        CD...LDL-CD1292McCusker, John
YELLA HOOSE
Second solo album for this Battlefield Band fiddler. Including guests
Tim O'Brien, Daryll Scott, Kate Rusby, Michael McGoldrick, Ian Carr,
Simon Thoumire, Andy Cutting, Gino Lupari, Malcolm Stitt, and Kevin
MacKenzie. Includes mainly original compositions and is produced by John
McCusker
                        CD...TEMP-CD2083

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:50:07 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:> This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
> with Kate Russby...Can anyone tell me more about her...I can't tell you an awful lot, except that she's a young English singer
with a great voice and a good ear for interpreting songs. A breath of
fresh air in many respects, in my opinion. I shouldn't think you'd be
disappointed if you sought her other recordings.--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff, Scotland
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Ted Moriarty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 06:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Kate Rusby also made an album with Kathryn Roberts--KATE RUSBY AND KATHRYN
ROBERTS is the title.
----- Original Message -----
From: Susan Tichy <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an
interview
> > with Kate Russby
>
> Kate Rusby also plays with the Poozies & has done some guest spots on
> other albums. Here are all the listings that pop up at Sidestreet (a
> small-label wholesaler).
>
> --Susan
>
> Poozies, The INFINITE BLUE long-awaited first American release from this
> notable Scottish quartet: Karen Tweed, Kate Rusby, and Mary MacMaster
> and Patsy Seddon of Sileas
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4261
>
> RAISE YOUR HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE
> Compilation culled from their first three albums -- Karen Tweed, Kate
> Rusby, and Sileas gals Mary MacMaster and Patsy Seddon
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4290
>
> Rusby, Kate
> HOURGLASS
> US release of 1997 album. With John McCusker, Alan Reid, Tony McManus,
> Alison Kinnaird, others.
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4255
> SLEEPLESS
> With Darrell Scott, John McCusker and Tim O'Brien
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4277
>
> Todd, Gibb
> CONNECTED
> Original, traditional and contemporary ballads with an all-star lineup
> including Kate Rusby, Tony McManus, John McCusker, Finbar Furey,
> Alasdair Fraser, Joanie Madden, others
>                         CD...LDL-CD1292
>
> McCusker, John
> YELLA HOOSE
> Second solo album for this Battlefield Band fiddler. Including guests
> Tim O'Brien, Daryll Scott, Kate Rusby, Michael McGoldrick, Ian Carr,
> Simon Thoumire, Andy Cutting, Gino Lupari, Malcolm Stitt, and Kevin
> MacKenzie. Includes mainly original compositions and is produced by John
> McCusker
>                         CD...TEMP-CD2083
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:00:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


I believe Kate Rusby's recordings are available from Elderly Instruments
(www.elderly.com) .Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: ADdress change
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:32:44 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


I'm quitting this server. Could you please change my URL to:[unmask]thanx much!

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:34:45 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


They're also available (as is everything else in print) from CAMSCO Music
)(www.camsco.com). And often at a lower price.On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Paul Stamler wrote:> I believe Kate Rusby's recordings are available from Elderly Instruments
> (www.elderly.com) .
>
>
> Peace.
> Paul
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Cliford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:05:12 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Ed,        Am aware of two CDs by Kate RUSBY, "Hourglass" [Compass Records 7
4255 2. (1998)] and "Sleepless" {Compass Records 7 4277 2 (1999)] both were
originally releaseed by Pure Records in the U.K. and I find both to be
very enjoyable. For those who find solace in "best of lists" both were
selested by Folk Roots as among the best new releases in their respective
years.        The 11 cuts on "Hourglass" are 1. Sir Eglamore; 2. As I Roved Out;
3. Jolly Ploughboys; 4. Annan Waters; 5. Stananivy / Jack & Jill; 6. A Rose
In April; 7. Radio Sweetheart; 8. I am Stretched On Your Grave; 9. Old Man
Time; 10. Drowned Lovers; 11. Bold Riley.        The 13 cuts on " Sleepless" 1. The Cobblers Daughter; 2. I Wonder
What Is Keeping My True Love Tonight ; 3. The Fairest Of All Yarrow; 4. The
Unquiet Grave; 5. Sho Heen; 6. Sweet Bride; 7. All God's Angels; 8. The
Wild Goose; 9. The Duke And The Tinker; 10. Our Town [a fine song by Iris
Dement]; 11. The Sleepless Sailor; 12. Cowsong; 13. Botany Bay        Compass Records has a web page at www.compassrecords.comCliff Ocheltree
New Orleans LA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: John Jacob Niles
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:32:21 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
understand him and his work?
Thanks
Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:48:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On 11/22/00, roud wrote:>The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
>before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
>examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
>understand him and his work?I don't think there have been articles on the subject (unless someone
has researched "Black is the Color of My True Love's Hair") -- but
it's easy enough to verify. Look at his "Ballad Book." Look up
"Judas." Or his moralized version of "The Fair Flower of Northumberland."
And what are the odds that he found the only surviving oral version of
"Robin Hood and the Monk"?--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:41:24 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was 16,
and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
collected by J.J.Niles.
  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:42:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Yes, but could your father's informants have learned the carols from the
booklet?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Trad Man
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 9:41 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: John Jacob NilesSome of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was
16,
and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
collected by J.J.Niles.
  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:34:42 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


On 11/23/00, Trad Man wrote:>Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
>and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
>elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was 16,
>and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
>The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
>collected by J.J.Niles.
>  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
>'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.I agree with Marge Steiner: These are rather dubious reports. I'm
willing to allow that the songs were collected from tradition, but
Niles could have introduced them himself. Source, not collector.A report of the Coventry Carol strikes me as most dubious. There
is no reason to think this song was ever traditional. We have our
copies from old manuscripts -- now burnt! If there is a version
in oral tradition, it was probably introduced from a written
source. Now I'm not saying that makes the song untraditional,
or that there is something wrong with songs introduced into the
tradition from written sources. But this is just the sort of
thing I'd expect of Niles.Don't mistake me: I *do* think Niles collected songs from tradition,
and had some songs within his own family tradition. But I also think
that one can never trust him in the absence of strong supporting
evidence. These collections of your father constitute supporting
evidence in the cases of those two songs -- if they weren't
traditional at the Niles did whatever he did, they are now.
But that is no help in assessing any of his other dubious
pieces.The irony is, if Niles had done all this rewriting and then sung
it for another collector, we'd call it traditional. But he didn't;
he rewrote and then submitted the results as traditional. It's why
I don't trust the Lomaxes, and why I don't trust Niles. They
convict themselves by their own works.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:59:37 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


In a message dated 11/22/00 4:34:02 AM, [unmask] writes:>The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
>before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
>examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
>understand him and his work?
>
>Thanks
>
>Steve Roud
**************************************************
I think D. K. Wilgus correctly identifies some problems with Niles in his
_Anglo-Americn Folksong Scholarship  Since 1898_  (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers
University Press, 1959, p. 213) when he says "The
coillector-performer-composer John Jacob Niles.....  has been unable to
separate his three roles. "    Niles, who was born in Kentucky in  1892,
thought of himself as a member of the Anglo-American folk culture of the
southern mountains, and could never see how his "creative" approach was
different from that of his farmer-carpenter father, a well-known singer of
folk songs in his community who, like most true folk singers, put his own
personal spin on his material.   It was typical of young John's approach
that he learned to play on a traditional three-string Appalachian dulcimer,
but soon felt held back by its limitations, and he invented and built several
8-stringed instruments -- beautiful example of careful woodcrafting,  but
hardly traditional.  His creativeness extended to the actual creation of new
songs -- many of them musically excellent --  some of which he said were
"collected"  from genuine folk singers.  (His second book,_Songs My Mother
Never Taught Me_, includes the love song "Venezuela,"  which had appeared in
his earlier book, _Singing Soldiers_, and his publisher convinced him that
the book would sell better if he called it a "folksong"  by some nameless
creator.   Fritz Kreisler, the classical violinist, had the same experience,
and some of his compositions, such as "The Old  Refrain"  and [I think]
"Schon Rosmarin"  were published as his arrangements of old folk tunes.)
    He began doing public performances in 1927, and, along with Carl Sandburg
and Richard Dyer-Bennett, quickly became an exemplar of folk music for the
concert audience.  In spite of his shortcomings as a scholar, he was a great
performer, and I'll always remember how I and the audience as a whole were
transfixed by his dramatic presentation of "The Maid Saved From the Gallows."
  One of his most controversial books was  _The Ballad Book of John Jacob
Niles_ (Boston, Houghton-Mifflin, 1961.)  Its songs are polished in true
Nilesian fashion, and many are obviously "collected"  from books, although he
does give the names of most of his supposed informants.  D. K. Wilgus once
said, in a personal conversation,  "He waited to publish this until the
people he named were all safely dead."
  You might like to read a short piece by Niles himself, called "My
Precarious Life In the Public Domain" (_The Atlantic_, December, 1948.)Sam Hinton
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:57:15 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


In a message dated 11/23/00 12:37:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:<<
 >Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
 >and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
 >elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was
16,
 >and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
 >The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
 >collected by J.J.Niles.
 >  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
 >'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody. I agree with Marge Steiner: These are rather dubious reports. I'm
 willing to allow that the songs were collected from tradition, but
 Niles could have introduced them himself. Source, not collector. A report of the Coventry Carol strikes me as most dubious. There
 is no reason to think this song was ever traditional. We have our
 copies from old manuscripts -- now burnt! If there is a version
 in oral tradition, it was probably introduced from a written
 source. Now I'm not saying that makes the song untraditional,
 or that there is something wrong with songs introduced into the
 tradition from written sources. But this is just the sort of
 thing I'd expect of Niles. Don't mistake me: I *do* think Niles collected songs from tradition,
 and had some songs within his own family tradition. But I also think
 that one can never trust him in the absence of strong supporting
 evidence. These collections of your father constitute supporting
 evidence in the cases of those two songs -- if they weren't
 traditional at the Niles did whatever he did, they are now.
 But that is no help in assessing any of his other dubious
 pieces.
  >>I have been able to do a little further research on the Christmas Carols
which Niles published.  Unfortunately at the time I found the booklet - close
to 30 years ago, I did not copy the title page, and so I can't say for
certain when it was published, although I suspect the information could be
found at the Library of Congress.  Niles claims to have collected the songs
from an un-named old lady in Tennessee in 1934.  The fact that my father
learned them virtually indentically in West Virginia in 1939 may support the
theory that the family learned them via performance by Niles, although the
melodies are odd enough that I am somewhat doubtful that they could be
learned so closely without multiple listenings.  As to the idea that they
were learned from the booklet, I think this extremely unlikely as the booklet
was not widely distributed and written for a scholarly audience (Opposite
each carol is a page which is blank except for a small sentence at the top
"Reserved the the student's notes and comments).  The family my father spent
that Christmas with was a coal mining family living near the poverty level,
and unlikely to be buying esoteric music books.
   I have heard another singer sing a very similar version of Jesus, Jesus
rest your head from a different source, so I am convinced that it is in
tradition.  As for the Coventry Carol, the fact that there seems to be only
one American traditional source does cast suspicion on it.  It seems
plausable that these songs may originate from Niles, but have been picked up
by traditional singers and therefore passed into oral tradition like "I
Wonder As I Wander".  Regardless, I have sung them for many years as songs
which I learned as a child from my father, and so, at least in my family,
they are certainly traditional.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 22:09:52 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


There is a film review of "John Jacob Niles" by Bill McNeil in JAF, 1979, p.
521, but it doesn't touch on his scholarship.  I recall some discussion by
D. K. Wilgus, probably in a record review, but can't put my hands on it yet.Niles did collect some material, at least early in his career; his book,
"Singing Soldiers" is of considerable interest for that particular genre.
It was unfortunate that at the height of his popularity in the folk revival
(ca late 1950s) it was more fashionable to have collected an unusual variant
than to have rearranged it.  I can't help but compare him to Fritz Kreisler,
who initially palmed off many of his finest compositions as reworkings of
old pieces he found in manuscripts in a European monastary library.
Eventually he 'fessed up, and outraged some critics who had been taken in.
If Niles had up front presented "Judas" etc. as his own arrangements he
would have had quite a different response.In his review, Bill castigates Niles' style in the strongest terms.  I
suppose I'm among the few (perhaps only?) folksong aficionados who actually
enjoys his singing -- tho I would certainly not make any claims for its
traditionality.  (WIth that I hastily hide behind a protective barrier
against the barrage of criticism that I now expect.)Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:36:49 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Dear Norm,Could you elaborate on "Singing Soldiers" a little more?Thanks,Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 13:42:18 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(74 lines)


Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the Niles discussion. It's clear
that few of us trust his publications, but it's a shame there doesn't seem
to have been a proper study of his work from this point of view, as I think
we still need to answer some basic questions.
His publications of the 1930s (Songs of the Hill-Folk, and More Songs of
the Hill-Folk, for example) follow the standard pattern for 'popular' books
of the time. The cover and title-page state "Collected and simply
arranged... by John Jacob Niles", and each song is attributed to a
particular place (e.g. "Whitesburg, Letcher County, Kentucky"). Thus the
authenticity of the songs is implied but not really stated, and being
popular works we know to treat them with caution.
His Ballad Book of 1961, however, is in a completely different league. It
has all the paraphernalia of a scholarly collection. Each song is
accompanied by the name of the singer(s), their address, the date of
recording, sketches of their character, and incidental details of when and
how he met them.
On the surface, this seems to be everything we could wish for. But we still
mistrust him, and not only for his peculiar-looking instruments! Did he
invent the whole thing, cobbling together texts from books and pretending
they were from singers who didn't really exist? Did he really collect from
these people but 'doctor/edit/fake' their texts? The Ballad Book was
published less that 25 years after the supposed dates of collection, I would
have thought the complete fake would have been relatively easily exposed by
the real experts who were around at the time and who were perfectly happy to
savage each other for sloppy scholarship. Is there anything which can be
salvaged from his material, or do we simply resign it to the dustbin en
masse?
It is perhaps ominous that the only major collection of his papers which I
have tracked down (I've misplaced the correspondence for a moment, but can
let people know details if they wish to follow it up) apparently contains no
fieldwork material at all.
If someone's looking for a Thesis topic, may I suggest Niles as a potential
subject?
(I've just, somewhat belatedly, checked the JAF Centennial Index, and there
are a few reviews which need following up, which I will report on if they
say anything relevant).
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles> There is a film review of "John Jacob Niles" by Bill McNeil in JAF, 1979,
p.
> 521, but it doesn't touch on his scholarship.  I recall some discussion by
> D. K. Wilgus, probably in a record review, but can't put my hands on it
yet.
>
> Niles did collect some material, at least early in his career; his book,
> "Singing Soldiers" is of considerable interest for that particular genre.
> It was unfortunate that at the height of his popularity in the folk
revival
> (ca late 1950s) it was more fashionable to have collected an unusual
variant
> than to have rearranged it.  I can't help but compare him to Fritz
Kreisler,
> who initially palmed off many of his finest compositions as reworkings of
> old pieces he found in manuscripts in a European monastary library.
> Eventually he 'fessed up, and outraged some critics who had been taken in.
> If Niles had up front presented "Judas" etc. as his own arrangements he
> would have had quite a different response.
>
> In his review, Bill castigates Niles' style in the strongest terms.  I
> suppose I'm among the few (perhaps only?) folksong aficionados who
actually
> enjoys his singing -- tho I would certainly not make any claims for its
> traditionality.  (WIth that I hastily hide behind a protective barrier
> against the barrage of criticism that I now expect.)
>
> Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Brief Mentions
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:35:55 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(43 lines)


Folks:I somehow managed to squeeze in a few moments to look over two recent
purchases: Hugh Anderson's _Farewell to Judges and Juries_ and the
festschrift for Edward "Sandy" Ives printed as Vol. 35 of _Northeast
Folklore._Despite their vast geographical differences -- Anderson is writing about
Australia, Ives spent his career in Maine and the Maritimes -- the two men
share an overwhelming belief in the need to place folk song in the larger
social context.  Thus Anderson's work is as much a history of
transportation (of convicts, not trains and such) as it is a collection of
broadsides devoted to that subject.  And the essays in the Ives
festschrift range widely from collecting to performance practice to
boatbuilding practices in Nova Scotia.Both books too are summations, if that is the correct word, of a lifetime
of scholarship, of devotion to a subject not widely honored in the
academy.  It would be hard to imagine a more engaging or comprehensive
book on convict transportation and the peopling of Australia by Britons
than Anderson's wide-ranging, heavily illustrated collection of ballads,
magazine articles, woodblocks, court cases, and pointed ephemera.Similarly, there is the custom of honoring beloved/influential teachers
with a collection of scholarly essays by former students and colleagues,
a festschrift.  The articles are supposed to reflect the range of the
honoree's work, his/her interests, and teaching.  Thus from editor
Pauleena MacDougall's biographical sketch of Edward Dawson Ives (aka
"Sandy") to Otto Willwood's concluding piece on the lost recordings of a
local logger we have a summary of Ives' work.I recommend both.EdP.S.  I noted in MacDougall's biography that Ives attended graduate school
at Indiana in 1960-61 with a group that included Bob Georges, Ellen
Stekert, Judith McCulloh, Joe Hickerson, and Alan Dundes.  (I might add
that the late Gus Meade, perhaps the most promising of ballad scholars,
was also among that lot.)  I was supposed to go there too (I suspect that
they recruited me because they wanted a five-string banjo picker; it sure
wasn't for my undergraduate grades).  In retrospect, I am glad I didn't
attend; I would have been the courtesy "B" in that company.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bruce virus
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:42:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


Ah...
12 years on the 'net and my very first "Tell everyone you know."I got virused to day by a feller named bruce.I am not knowledgeable on this but I'll just give you the best I got.It came as 5 e-mails from Bruce ???crief?? and addressed to me and several
others - each item differently.  The subject line in each was the same as
different executable e-mails I've received recently (FL_Ballot.exe, etc)
Remarkably each had some 546 lines in the message.Since this looked odd but had friendly Subjects, I saved to disk instead of
launching direct from my Reader. I ran MacAfee Viruscan with definitions
file 4.0.4099 (Nov 12, 2000) (and full heuristics) which showed then clean.I manually launched one (FW_.exe, etc) & got zapped.I use Win95-B and it put a command somewhere in my registry that almost any
Windows program call _must_ be proceeded by using winsvrc.exe, which it
can't find.  A Windows-looking dialog asks its location.  Of course it
doesn't exist.  I tried to fool it by creating an empty file _called_
winsvrc.exe in the root directory but then the virus simply claims that
_none_ of my programs are Windows 95 programs and cannot be run.  The
desktop opened more or less normally & Windows Explorer (which had been
open) worked ok but I could not run any significant or system program.I'm a good backer-upper and wished to restore User.dat, (user.da0 is also
corrupted by this wiseguy), and System.dat and System.ini and Win.ini (just
to be sure - I don't know I need them all) But back-up is a windows-based
program and won't work.Finally, since I (cheerfully patting myself on the back with both hands and
both feet) use Backup Version 6 from Win 3.95 (because it will _include_
selected files, not just _exclude_ them) I was able to drop to DOS and
restore the 4 files.I suffered no loss at all except about two hours of confusion.Strongly recommend:
Look out for e-mail of 546 or so lines
Back up the 4 system files in such a way they can be restored in DOS
        eg Win 3.x Back-up or perhaps create a Safe folder (directory) &
just copy them from \Windows to this.
        You'll need some DOS program that will deal with deleting, and
copying files that are marked Read-only, System, and Hidden.  (Norton
Commander or FA.exe to change the characturists, eg.)  Windows Explorer may
work if you can get _it_ to work.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bruce virus
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 20:42:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(109 lines)


On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:42:29PM -0500, Abby Sale wrote:> Ah...
> 12 years on the 'net and my very first "Tell everyone you know."
>
> I got virused to day by a feller named bruce.
>
> I am not knowledgeable on this but I'll just give you the best I got.
>
> It came as 5 e-mails from Bruce ???crief?? and addressed to me and several
> others - each item differently.  The subject line in each was the same as
> different executable e-mails I've received recently (FL_Ballot.exe, etc)
> Remarkably each had some 546 lines in the message.
>
> Since this looked odd but had friendly Subjects, I saved to disk instead of
> launching direct from my Reader. I ran MacAfee Viruscan with definitions
> file 4.0.4099 (Nov 12, 2000) (and full heuristics) which showed then clean.        You should have immediately downloaded the latest definitions
file, and even then, it *might* be too new to be recognized.  These
virus writers work fast to make new ones, unfortunately.> I manually launched one (FW_.exe, etc) & got zapped.        A basic rule is that *any* executable should not be trusted
unless:1)      You know the person who sent it to you.2)      You *knew* that he was going to send it to you, or have
        confirmed via phone conversation that he did send it to you, and
        *why*.3)      You know *what* it is supposed to do -- and you need to do
        that.        If you don't do all of this -- put it on a sacrificial computer
which has nothing important on it, and see whether it trashes *that*
machine -- don't trust it on your main system.        It may well be that your computer sent off copies of this under
*your* name to people in *your* address list, while it was trashing the
rest of the system.> I use Win95-B and it put a command somewhere in my registry that almost any
> Windows program call _must_ be proceeded by using winsvrc.exe, which it
> can't find.  A Windows-looking dialog asks its location.  Of course it
> doesn't exist.  I tried to fool it by creating an empty file _called_
> winsvrc.exe in the root directory but then the virus simply claims that
> _none_ of my programs are Windows 95 programs and cannot be run.  The
> desktop opened more or less normally & Windows Explorer (which had been
> open) worked ok but I could not run any significant or system program.        It may be expecting some kind of return from that winsvrc.exe
whenever it is run.  I don't do Windows, so I don't know whether it is a
standard program which the trojan deleted, or something that it was
going to add to do more mischief every time you booted or tried to run
some other program.> I'm a good backer-upper and wished to restore User.dat, (user.da0 is also
> corrupted by this wiseguy), and System.dat and System.ini and Win.ini (just
> to be sure - I don't know I need them all) But back-up is a windows-based
> program and won't work.
>
> Finally, since I (cheerfully patting myself on the back with both hands and
> both feet) use Backup Version 6 from Win 3.95 (because it will _include_
> selected files, not just _exclude_ them) I was able to drop to DOS and
> restore the 4 files.
>
> I suffered no loss at all except about two hours of confusion.        You probably need to find reports of this in some of the
anti-virus sites, to see whether it also adds other nasty programs
(perhaps named the same as a normal system program) which will bite you
later.> Strongly recommend:
> Look out for e-mail of 546 or so lines        Look out for *any* executable attachment.  Treat it like a
scorpion or a poisonous snake.  (I'm fairly safe, because I don't run a
system which knows *how* to run a .exe file. :-)> Back up the 4 system files in such a way they can be restored in DOS
>         eg Win 3.x Back-up or perhaps create a Safe folder (directory) &
> just copy them from \Windows to this.
>         You'll need some DOS program that will deal with deleting, and
> copying files that are marked Read-only, System, and Hidden.  (Norton
> Commander or FA.exe to change the characturists, eg.)  Windows Explorer may
> work if you can get _it_ to work.        While you're about it -- keep copies of the programs which you
use for restoring on floppies, in case what you have gets blown away.
And *don't* trust a folder which is on the system when the virus
strikes.  It may search through for other copies to corrupt.  It is a
*lot* safer having the backups on floppies or tapes.  And -- when you
try to restore, to have the write-protection tab turned on, so the virus
can't trash your backups while you are trying to restore.        I *hope* that you got it all -- but visit symantec's site, or
one of the others, to make *sure* about it.        Good Luck,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Bruce virus
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 26 Nov 2000 10:09:42 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(25 lines) , text/html(28 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Kenneth Peacock
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 15:44:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Neil Rosenberg just sent this to the Canadian folklore list.  Peacock
was a prolific and at times controversial collector who worked in
several different parts of the country.  He is probably best known for
his three volume collection, _Songs of the Newfoundland Outports_.Cheers
Jamie>Anna Guigne tells me that Kenneth Peacock died last Wednesday.
>He'd been in poor health for some time, and had been in hospital where
>he
>contracted pneumonia.  I haven't seen anything about this in
>print--though
>perhaps it was in the G&M which I haven't seen since then.  Anyhow, I
>think
>it's important to note his passing since he did so much for the study of
>vernacular music in Canada. Perhaps you can send a note to our
>FSAC  "list"?>Cheers
>N.>Neil V. Rosenberg,  Department of Folklore
>Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF A1B 3X8
>Office: 709-737-8405; fax: 709-737-4718

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:04:46 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Ed,Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:25:09 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


Hi Andy:
Singing Soldiers, by John J. Niles.  NY - London:  Chas Scribner's Sons,
1927.  Dedication:
"To the American Negro Soldiers who made this writing possible."  (!)
According to the Introduction, Niles was a member of the A.E.F. when, in
Paris in 1917, he "ran onto a paper-bound volume of French war-songs by
Monsieur Theodore Botrel, titled 'Les Chants du BIvouac.'"  Niles says that
gave him the idea to collect US Army war songs:  "...to make as nearly as
possible an unexpurgate record of the words and to write off the tunes
whenever I had time and music-score paper."  He goes on to say that he was
almost losing interest in the project when he encountered some negro troops:
"At last I had discovered something original--a kind of folk music, brought
up to date and adapted to the war situations--at the same time savoring of
the haunting melodic value found in the negro music I had known as a boy in
Kentucky."  So he spent the next seven years, while a pilot in the U.S. Air
Service, gathering songs.  He ended up with 29 songs, embedded in sort of a
personal diary of his experiences.   Most of the songs are unfamiliar; a few
are parodies of familiar spirituals (e.g., "Roll Jordan Roll); a few are
blues-like.  I can't vouch for the accuracy of the transcriptions, but I'd
be really surprised if J.J. wrote--or even did more than minor touching
up--any of them. That's a quick summary; hope it's useful.
Norm-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
To: [unmask] <[unmask]>
Date: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles>Dear Norm,
>
>Could you elaborate on "Singing Soldiers" a little more?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Andy
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 21:39:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Is there an email address?
Norm
>
>Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
>from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
>distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
>find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
>South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
>
>Cheers
>Jamie
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:13:06 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(23 lines)


Norm:Sorry, no email address on the book.  The University of Maine Press,
Orono, ought to be in the telephone directory.  The ISBN number is
0-89101-100-5.EdOn Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Is there an email address?
> Norm
> >
> >Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
> >from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
> >distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
> >find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
> >South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:16:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(40 lines)


You can e-mail Pauleena MacDougall at [unmask]  I
can't wait till my copy arrives.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Ed Cray
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 1:13 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: Brief MentionsNorm:Sorry, no email address on the book.  The University of Maine Press,
Orono, ought to be in the telephone directory.  The ISBN number is
0-89101-100-5.EdOn Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Is there an email address?
> Norm
> >
> >Many thanks for the plug for Sandy's festschrift, which finally arrived
> >from the printers a few weeks ago.  The Folklife Center's books are
> >distributed regionally, but anyone outside northern New England may
> >find it easier to order directly from the Maine Folklife Center, 5773
> >South Stevens, University of Maine, Orono, 04469-5773.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Brief Mentions
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:10:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


The center's e-mail address is [unmask]  There is also
a web page at www.umaine.edu/folklife, though we're still in the
process of updating the publications section.  Should be taken care of
this week.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:39:26 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


A couple of years ago, I had a brief correspondence with JJN's son.
As I recall, he was a musician, perhaps a conductor, living in
Germany.  He might be able to help out with these questions.  He
defended his father to me, saying that he was an entertainer who
never claimed to be a scholar.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Nancy-Jean Seigel <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 14:18:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


You are referring to John Edward Niles, son of John Jacob.  He is currently
Director and conductor at the Opera Theatre of Northern Virginia.   It would be
interesting for you to continue that conversation in light of this discussion.
However,  you probably got all you're gonna git!   ( Look here:
http://www.alamero.com/demo/index.htm) .Is there a second son also involved with music?John Garst <[unmask]>@[unmask]> on 11/28/2000 01:39:26 PMPlease respond to Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>Sent by:  Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>To:   [unmask]
cc:Subject:  Re: John Jacob NilesA couple of years ago, I had a brief correspondence with JJN's son.
As I recall, he was a musician, perhaps a conductor, living in
Germany.  He might be able to help out with these questions.  He
defended his father to me, saying that he was an entertainer who
never claimed to be a scholar.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:21:23 -0600
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(65 lines)


Catching up after the holidays.  Has anyone yet suggested getting in touch
with Ron Pen at Kentucky?  He's studied Niles serious for some time now.
Unless someone else surfaces sooner, I expect that Ron will do the Niles
book.In the summer of 1953 Niles performed at Aspen, Colorado, near Glenwood
Springs, where I was waiting tables in a resort hotel.  He sang many of
the pieces I knew from his LPs, and his voice had that same high
theatrical cast.  My memory (admittedly dim at this point) is that he
plucked/strummed a cello that had been cut in half along the sides (i.e.,
retaining the front surface) and whenever possible, at the ends of
phrases, wafted his right arm into the air so that the brilliant rings he
was wearing caught the light.  Made quite an impression on all the
blue-haired ladies present.JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the Niles discussion. It's clear
> that few of us trust his publications, but it's a shame there doesn't seem
> to have been a proper study of his work from this point of view, as I think
> we still need to answer some basic questions.
> His publications of the 1930s (Songs of the Hill-Folk, and More Songs of
> the Hill-Folk, for example) follow the standard pattern for 'popular' books
> of the time. The cover and title-page state "Collected and simply
> arranged... by John Jacob Niles", and each song is attributed to a
> particular place (e.g. "Whitesburg, Letcher County, Kentucky"). Thus the
> authenticity of the songs is implied but not really stated, and being
> popular works we know to treat them with caution.
> His Ballad Book of 1961, however, is in a completely different league. It
> has all the paraphernalia of a scholarly collection. Each song is
> accompanied by the name of the singer(s), their address, the date of
> recording, sketches of their character, and incidental details of when and
> how he met them.
> On the surface, this seems to be everything we could wish for. But we still
> mistrust him, and not only for his peculiar-looking instruments! Did he
> invent the whole thing, cobbling together texts from books and pretending
> they were from singers who didn't really exist? Did he really collect from
> these people but 'doctor/edit/fake' their texts? The Ballad Book was
> published less that 25 years after the supposed dates of collection, I would
> have thought the complete fake would have been relatively easily exposed by
> the real experts who were around at the time and who were perfectly happy to
> savage each other for sloppy scholarship. Is there anything which can be
> salvaged from his material, or do we simply resign it to the dustbin en
> masse?
> It is perhaps ominous that the only major collection of his papers which I
> have tracked down (I've misplaced the correspondence for a moment, but can
> let people know details if they wish to follow it up) apparently contains no
> fieldwork material at all.
> If someone's looking for a Thesis topic, may I suggest Niles as a potential
> subject?
> (I've just, somewhat belatedly, checked the JAF Centennial Index, and there
> are a few reviews which need following up, which I will report on if they
> say anything relevant).
> Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: Gerald Porter <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:01:14 +0200
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Dear Andy,
Another (indirect) Robin Hood item in Shakespeare is his use of 'under
the greenwood tree' in As You Like It 2.5.1 or thereabouts.  It comes
into that fabulous ballad Robin Hood and the Monk (Child 119), which I
would be eternally grateful to you for providing a tune for.Cheers, Gerald

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:15:20 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


Gerald --The only tune I've seen to Child 119 is in _The Ballad Book of John Jacob
Niles_.  (Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1961.)  As you know, this
collection has been much excoriated b y scholars, and it may be that the song
was composed by Mr. Niles himself.  Nevertheless, it's a good singable tune.
The words do not contain any reference to the Greenwood Tree. If you don't
have access to the book, and are interested,  I'll be glad to send you a
Xerox copy, for which I would need your snail-mail address.Sam Hinton
9420 La Jolla Shores Drive
La Jolla, CA, USA, 92037
< [unmask] >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: JJ NIles dulcimer
From: Margaret MacArthur <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 29 Nov 2000 11:36:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


Judy McCulloh wrote
>My memory (admittedly dim at this point) is that he
>plucked/strummed a cello that had been cut in half along the sides (i.e.,
>retaining the front surface)I have a big awkward dulcimer given to me by a woman from NY in the early
60s, supposedly made by Niles.  There is no signiture.  The frets seem to
be totally random, I don't see how it could have been played, but perhaps
it was fretted for one particular song, an odd tune it would be.I never heard Niles in person, but did enjoy his recordings, and respected
his interest in the long ballad.Margaret MacArthur

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Help With Sword Dance- Music?
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:01:39 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(196 lines)


I have submitted this to the mudcat dt with no luck yet....
What do you think....
Does anyone have the tune referred to or other music for this?
Many thanks in advance for your fine work....ConradSword Dancers
 It is still the practice, though less in repute than formerly, during the
Christmas holidays, for companies of pitmen and other workmen from the
neighbouring collieries to visit
 Sunderland, Durham, &c. to perform a sort of Play or Dance, accompanied by
song and music. Their appearance is hailed by the children with great satisfaction, and
they receive liberal contributions from the spectators.
 The dancers are girded with swords, and clad in white shirts or tunics,
decorated with a profusion of ribbands, or various colours, gathered from
the wardrobes of their mistresses and
 well-wishers.  The captain generallly wears a kind of faded uniform, with
a large cocked hat and feather, for pre-eminent distinction; and the
buffoon, or "Bessy," who acts as treasurer,
 and collects the cash in a tobacco-box, wears a hairy cap, with a fox's
brush* dependent.
 The music is simple, and not devoid of harmony: its peculiar beauty
depends, perhaps greatly, on the force of early associations.
 The party assemble promiscuously, and the captain forms a circle with his
sword, round which he walks, and sings; each actor following as he is
called upon. Six actors I have brought,
 Who were never on stage before;
 But they will do their best,
 And the best can do no more. The first that I call in,
 He is a squire's son;
 He's like to lose his love,
 Because he is too young. But though he be too young,
 He has money for to rove;
 And he will spend it all,
 Before he'll lose his love. The next that I call in,
 He is a taylor fine;
 What think you of his work?--
 He made this coat of mine. So comes good master Snip,
 His best respects to pay:
 He joins us in our trip,
 To drive dull care away. The next that I call in,
 He is a sailor bold;
 He's come to poverty
 By the lending of his gold. But though his gold's all gone,
 Again he'll plough the main,
 With heart both light and brave,
 To fight both France and Spain. Next comes a skipper bold,
 He'll do his part right weel;
 A clever blade, I'm told,
 As ever poy'd** a keel, Oh! the keel lads are bonny bonny lads,
 As I do understand;
 For they run both fore and aft,
 With their long sets in their hands. To join us in this play,
 Here comes a jolly dog,
 Who's soberevery day,
 When he can get no grog. But though he likes his grog,
 As all his friends can say,
 He always likes it best,
 When he has nought to pay. Last I come in mysel,
 I make one of this crew;
 And if you'd know my name,
 My name it is True Blue. *** The Dance then begins in slow, and measured cadence; which soon increases
in spirit, and at length bears the appearance of a serious
 affray.  The Rector, alarmed rushes forward to prevent bloodshed; and, in
his endeavours to separate the combatants, he receives a mortal blow, and
falls to the ground.
 Then follows the lament--the general accusation - and denial. Alas! our rector's dead,
 And on the ground is laid;
 some of us must suffer for't,
 Young men, I'm sore afraid. I'm sure 'twas none of I--
 I'm clear of the crime;
 'Twas him that follows me
 That drew his sword so fine. I'm sure 'twas none of I--
 I'm clear of the fact;
 'Twas him that follows me
 That did this bloody act. I'm sure 'twas none of I,
 Ye bloody villains all!
 For both my eyes were shut
 When this good man did fall. Then cheer up, my bonny bonny lads,
 And be of courage bold;
 For we'll take him to the church,
 and we'll bury him in the mould. Captain.--Oh! for a doctor, a right good doctor,
                  A ten pound doctor, oh! Doctor.-- Here am I. Captain-- Doctor, what's your fee? Doctor-- Ten pounds is my fee; but nine pounds, nineteen shillings, and
eleven pence,
               three farthings, will I take from thee. See here, see here, a doctor rare,
 Who travels much at home;
 Come, take my pills--they cure all ills,
 Past present and to come. The plague, the palsy, and the gout,
 The devil within, and the devil without--
 Every thing but a love-sick maid--
 And a consumption in the pocket. Take a little of my nif-naf,
 Put it on your tif-taf.
 Parson, rise up, and fight again,
 The doctor says you are not slain. The rector gradually recovers, which is the signal for general rejoicing
and congratulation. Captain-- You've seen them all call'd in,
 You've seen them all go round;
 Wait but a little while--
 Some pastime will be found. Cox-green's a bonny place,
 Where water washes clean;
 And Painshaw's on a hill,
 Where we have merry been. Then, fiddler, change thy tune,
 Play us a merry jig;
 Before that I'll be beat,
 I'll pawn both hat and wig. A general dance concludes the performance, to the old and favorite tune
of,
 "Kitty, Kitty, bo, bo!" *Query- if this was not formerly meant to represent the Lion's skin of the
ancient heros; and this is not the only classical allusion used by the
Sword Dancers, for a "Bessy" on the
 borders of Yorkshire, was heard to sing:
 "I've liv'd among musick these forty long years,
 And Drunk of the elegant spring"
 There can be little doubt that Helicon was the original reading. **Puoy, Puy, or Pouie, a long pole with an iron spike at the end; used in
propelling keels in shallow water.--Fr. appui. Brockett's Glossary. The
Puoy on the Tyne is the Set on the Wear. *** AT this part, the "Bessy" sometimes considers it necessary to give
some account of his own genealogy, viz:
 My father he was hang'd
 My mother was drown'd in a well;
 And now I' se left alone,
 All by my awn sel. -source: The Bishoprick Garland or a Collection of Legends, Songs Ballads
&c.. Belonging to The County of Durham. London: Nichols, and Baldwin &
Cradock.
 1834.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Help With Sword Dance- Music?
From: Mary Cliff <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:12:59 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Looks like something from the old Mummers Plays that show up in the annual
Christmas Revels productions, Conrad.  It's sung to a simple morris dance
tune.  The charm is in the "acting."  Check the Washington Revels website
and go from there:  www.revelsdc.orgI'm attending the Washington production tonight (dress rehearsal show).
I'll see what form the play takes in the Celtic production (if it's there).Happy hunting.Mary Cliff, TRADITIONS
WETA Radio
Washington, DC

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sword dance tune found Kitty bo-bo
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:29:36 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Of all things it was in the back of the book....
presumably though this is not the only tune used in the
dance....
It will be up on the related page with midi and notation
in a moment
http://www.geocities.com/matalizi/priests12.htmlT:Kitty Bo-Bo (Sword Dance Tune)
M:3/4
L:1/8
S:Bishoprick Garland
K:G
|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|B2G2B2|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|A2F2A2:||:GBdBdc|B2G2B2|GBdB
dB|A2F2A2:|Conrad Bladey

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sword dance tune found Kitty bo-bo
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:16:46 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


Ok I am ready for a break...must be all that liquid nails
used in working on the artcar (glued 30 more barbies on the cab roof of the
truck via magnet...)
I found the book had both tunes !@!@!@!#
so now the tunes you did know you can know!
Just go here midi, abc, notation....
http://www.geocities.com/matalzi/priests12.html#SworddancersConradConrad Bladey ***Peasant**** wrote:
>
> Of all things it was in the back of the book....
> presumably though this is not the only tune used in the
> dance....
> It will be up on the related page with midi and notation
> in a moment
> http://www.geocities.com/matalizi/priests12.html
>
> T:Kitty Bo-Bo (Sword Dance Tune)
> M:3/4
> L:1/8
> S:Bishoprick Garland
> K:G
> |gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|B2G2B2|gfed g/2f/2e/2d/2|A2F2A2:||:GBdBdc|B2G2B2|GBdB
> dB|A2F2A2:|
>
> Conrad Bladey--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sword Dance tune found
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:57:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


Conrad found the tunes in the first paragraph below while I was working
on this note. I forgot to change the reply address to that of Ballad-L,
so my message, below, went only to him. Here it is for all on the list.[My reprint edition, 1969, of Sharp's 'Bishopric Garland' has, on
pp 85-6, some tunes said to be from 'From Topliffe's Melodies
&c.', the first of which is entitled "Sword Dancers", and the
second is that of "Kitty-bo-bo".]That is, I believe the earliest recorded folk play. (The earlier
Revesby/ Raresby play is modeled along the lines of a folk play,
but isn't really 'folk'. Note that one song in it is based on "Last
Christmas 'twas my chance". Song and tune are on my website.)Two verses in Sharp's text, starting "See, here, see here a doctor rare"
are derived from a song with music in 'Pills to Purge Melancholy', V, p.
311, 1719-20 (originally in 'Pills', IV, 1706), where it starts "See,
sirs, see here! a Doctor rare". The 'Pills' heading is: 'The Mountebank
Song. Set and Sung by Mr. Leveridge, in a New Play call'd Farewell to
Folly', which is not quite correct. I've now lost my very old notes
tracking this, but according to my memory the song wasn't in Motteux's
play, but was sung as an interlude with it. The play was given at Drury
Lane Theatre in 1705 and published in 1707. [Some other folk plays
contain a bit more of the 'Pills' song. In others the doctor's lines are
based on a similar song "The Infallible Doctor", commencing 'From
France, from Spain from Rome I come', dating from 1686, and in 'Pills',
III, p. 31, 1719-20. The model for these mountebank doctors' songs is in
a manuscript of a court entertainment of 1618, 'The Anti-Masque of the
Mountebanks', much of which is reprinted in John Wardroper's 'Love and
Drollery', #220, 1969]Re: 'elegant spring' may have been originally been 'Helicon
spring', if so, it later turned into 'elecampagne', an extract of
the roots of which was used as a tonic or stimulant. We find it
in later folk plays as 'elecome pain', 'elegant paint', and
'Hallecumb pain' among the doctor's medicines (of which two drops
can restore the dead to life - R. J. E. Tiddy's 'The Mummers
Play'). [Cf. also 'Waters of Absalon' in the cante-fable "Little
Dicky Milburn/ Whigburn"]Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:23:17 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(88 lines)


Folks:For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.Ed-----Original Message-----
From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American MemoryGood afternoon,This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
apologies for any duplicate postings.Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
can be found at the following url:
<http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> . Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
materials include such highlights as:The first broadside account of Washington crossing the Delaware River in
1776.The Gerry-Mander, the 1812 caricature of the salamander-shaped
congressional district created by Federalist polemicists to satirize the
Massachusetts redistricting law spawned by zealous Republican colleagues
of Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts.A Western anti-slavery handbill, ca. 1850, urging Ohioans to “TURN OUT!”
for an abolition meeting and “Learn Your Duty to Yourselves, the Slave
and God.”The final issue of the Vicksburg Daily Citizen, July 4, 1863, printed on
wallpaper.An 1864 campaign souvenir “Lincoln Business Card,” suggesting that in
the spring of 1865 Lincoln would be at home in Illinois splitting rails
and swapping horses rather than residing at the White House.A reward poster for John Wilkes Booth (1865).One of the earliest printed references to baseball (1859).The National Woman Suffrage Association’s “Declaration and Protest of
the Women of the United States,” July 4, 1876, calling for the
impeachment of the nation's rulers.A poster from the mayor of San Francisco printed following the
earthquake and fire of 1906, warning that law enforcement officials
“have been authorized to KILL any and all persons found engaged in
Looting or in the Commission of Any Other Crime.”Much of the material in this collection was produced as events unfolded,
offering a unique snapshot of America's past that captures the concerns
and conditions of everyday living. Many of the items, never intended to
be kept for future generations, nonetheless provide important historical
information.  For example, an advertisement for paint from 1783 gives
clues about the colors that adorned the homes of the nation's earliest
citizens.  An 1840 poster for a lost dog shows that owners felt as
strongly about their pets 150 years ago as they do today.American Memory  is a project of the National Digital Library Program of
the Library of Congress. The Web site offers more than five million
historically important items of American history, in collaboration with
other institutions. More than ninety American Memory collections are now
available on topics ranging from presidential papers and photographs
from the Civil War to early films of Thomas Edison and panoramic maps,
to documents from the women's suffrage
and civil rights movements. The Library of Congress website can be found
at <www.loc.gov> .Please direct any questions to [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FW: Announcement of Update to the American Time CapsuleCollection of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory(fwd)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 30 Nov 2000 21:43:13 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(119 lines)


Indeed!
I was just in rare books at loc last week searching the
bound index.
Located a pamphlet on pope day but in the same file.....
a broadside from boston - not cataloged!
18th c.
Before I had a chance to fill in the form to have it copied
and go across the street to pay up and wait....
I had confirmation from a phonecall to the appropriate
office that it had just been digitized and would be on line
this week.....
So there it was today....
and not only images but full text....ConradEd Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> For those not subscribed to the Folklore list --
>
> In those 7,000 broadsides there just might be a song or two.
>
> Ed
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danna Bell-Russel [mailto:[unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:08 PM
> To: undisclosed-recipients:
> Subject: Announcement of Update to the American Time Capsule Collection
> of Broadsides and Printed Ephemera in American Memory
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> This announcement is being sent to a number of lists. Please accept our
> apologies for any duplicate postings.
>
> Update to An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of Broadsides and
> Other Printed Ephemera Now Available on American Memory
>
>  In September 1998 An American Time Capsule: Three Centuries of
> Broadsides and Other Printed Ephemera was made available to users of the
> American Memory online collections. On November 30, more than seven
> thousand additional items from one of the world’s greatest collections
> of Americana will be added to An American Time Capsule. The collection
> can be found at the following url:
> <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/rbpehtml/> .
>
>  Taken from the Library of Congress’s celebrated Printed Ephemera
> Collection in the Rare Book and Special Collections Division, the
> materials include such highlights as:
>
> The first broadside account of Washington crossing the Delaware River in
> 1776.
>
> The Gerry-Mander, the 1812 caricature of the salamander-shaped
> congressional district created by Federalist polemicists to satirize the
> Massachusetts redistricting law spawned by zealous Republican colleagues
> of Gov. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts.
>
> A Western anti-slavery handbill, ca. 1850, urging Ohioans to “TURN OUT!”
> for an abolition meeting and “Learn Your Duty to Yourselves, the Slave
> and God.”
>
> The final issue of the Vicksburg Daily Citizen, July 4, 1863, printed on
> wallpaper.
>
> An 1864 campaign souvenir “Lincoln Business Card,” suggesting that in
> the spring of 1865 Lincoln would be at home in Illinois splitting rails
> and swapping horses rather than residing at the White House.
>
> A reward poster for John Wilkes Booth (1865).
>
> One of the earliest printed references to baseball (1859).
>
> The National Woman Suffrage Association’s “Declaration and Protest of
> the Women of the United States,” July 4, 1876, calling for the
> impeachment of the nation's rulers.
>
> A poster from the mayor of San Francisco printed following the
> earthquake and fire of 1906, warning that law enforcement officials
> “have been authorized to KILL any and all persons found engaged in
> Looting or in the Commission of Any Other Crime.”
>
> Much of the material in this collection was produced as events unfolded,
> offering a unique snapshot of America's past that captures the concerns
> and conditions of everyday living. Many of the items, never intended to
> be kept for future generations, nonetheless provide important historical
> information.  For example, an advertisement for paint from 1783 gives
> clues about the colors that adorned the homes of the nation's earliest
> citizens.  An 1840 poster for a lost dog shows that owners felt as
> strongly about their pets 150 years ago as they do today.
>
> American Memory  is a project of the National Digital Library Program of
> the Library of Congress. The Web site offers more than five million
> historically important items of American history, in collaboration with
> other institutions. More than ninety American Memory collections are now
> available on topics ranging from presidential papers and photographs
> from the Civil War to early films of Thomas Edison and panoramic maps,
> to documents from the women's suffrage
> and civil rights movements. The Library of Congress website can be found
> at <www.loc.gov> .
>
> Please direct any questions to [unmask]--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:04:33 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 10:07:32AM -0400, John Garst wrote:
> >...As you say not so well known as the bawdy song....
> >Jamie
>
> Is this "bawdy song" the one with "see the waters a-gliding and hear
> the nightingale sing"?  If so, are there really bawdy versions of
> this?  The ones I've seen/heard are suggestive in very polite terms
> only.        The best kind!  The one I like to sing is Melvin Wine's "The Logger,"
where the lines        But he tuned up his fiddle, raised higher the string,
        And then he played the same tune over and over again.can be interpreted differently, depending on your state of mind.        This same version contains the deathless variant line        Two wives makes an army, too many for me!Which is the main reason I learned the song in the first place. -- Aloha,
Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 4 Nov 2000 02:02:30 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Greetings:
You may (or may not) be relieved to know that I have successfully re-subscribed
to ballad-l and, for the moment at least, can post directly to the list rather
than by ricochet with attendant header pendants.
        I did read this thread more leisurely, and am sorry I missed the early
response which did indeed cite the Riverside recordings, as well as (that
I missed) the source of the provisional list.  I do not regret having quoted
Ken Goldstein some re his choices.
        At the AFS meetings Lyn Wolz discussed Steve Roud's indexes, which include
"Roud numbers" which he added in order to provide a rough indication of families
of ballads, much like Laws or DT or (other) schemes, not with the intention of
graving these numbers in stone but to provide some hint as to potential kinship.
She reports that other researchers are now using these Roud numbers because they
are handy, as labels tend to be,  (Her presentation was a brief comparison-evaluation
of online song databases, which she promised to post on her website.  She's a
reference librarian at the University of Kansas, and says she's working with
Steve Roud to make his databases available/accessible on the 'Net.)
        Thinking about it, her paper was, for me, one of the high points of this
particular conference because it brought together and evaluated information that
I've been sort of accumulating over the years, and in compact and meaningful
form.  I hope she gets it together soon! -- Aloha, Lani<||> Lani Herrmann * NOTE NEW E-ADDRESS: [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Ave. * Richmond, CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: ghost <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:51:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


>  From [unmask] Fri Nov  3 20:14:37 2000
>  Date:         Fri, 3 Nov 2000 17:04:33 -0800
>  From: Cal & Lani Herrmann <[unmask]>
>  Subject:      Re: Childless Ballads
>  Comments: cc: [unmask]
>  To: [unmask]
>
>          This same version contains the deathless variant line
>
>          Two wives makes an army, too many for me!
>
>  Which is the main reason I learned the song in the first place. -- Aloha,
>  LaniOh shoot, I always thought it was "two wives *and* the army's too many for
me".

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 19:39:05 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


In M. J. C. Hodgart's 'The Ballads', 1950, in the Introduction he
says:'... But there are a few others of the same type which Child
overlooked or rejected. ..."The Bitter Withy", "Still Growing", "Corpus Christi [Down in yon
Forest]", "The Seven Virgins", "The Blind Beggar['s Daughter] of
Bethnal Green", "Bruton Town, "The Shooting of his Dear", "The
Bold Fisherman", and more doubtfully "Six Dukes went A-fishing".
..........'_____________The MacColl and Lloyd recording of non-Child ballads, Riverside
RLP 12-629 (later Washington 723) includes all, and adds "The
Holy Well", noting that 'Various scholars consider "The Holy
Well" to be but an interesting version of "The Bitter Withy"
ballad.'The incomplete BL copy of "The Noble Funeral of the Renowned
Champion the Duke of Grafton.. slain at the Siege of Cork"
(ZN316), from which  "Six Duke went A-fishing" stems, has been
printed in JFSS, 1908, and FMJ, 1965. Anyone have ready access to
the copy in the Morgan Library, New York?Bruce OlsonPS: The 17th century text of "The Nightingale's Song" is in the
Scarce Songs 1 file on my website, and is noted at ZN277 in the
broadside ballad index there.Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:43:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


ghost:>Oh shoot, I always thought it was "two wives *and* the army's too many for
>me".And I hear, in the Shorty and Juanita recording, "Two wives *in* the
army's too many for me."
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:57:03 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


In a message dated 06/11/2000  19:44:21, you write:<< And I hear, in the Shorty and Juanita recording, "Two wives *in* the
 army's too many for me." >>A different song - "The Gentleman Soldier" - for which see the Penguin Book
of English Folk Songs" (And the EFDSS Journal and its predecessor) has the
line:"Two wives are allowed in the army but one's too many for me."John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Chilldless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


I forgot to add part of Hodgart's quotation in 'The Ballads',
just before his list of 'Childless ballads': 'Only nine of them
are worth considering: The Bitter Withy, [etc]...'.Gordon H. Gerould, 'The Ballad of Tradition', 1932 (from reprint,
1957) gave only 7 'Childless Ballads': "The Bitter Withy", "The
Blind Beggar of Bednall Green", "The Seven Virgins", "The
Shooting of his Dear/ Molly Bawn", "Over Yonders a Park/ Corpus
Christi", "Bruton Town/ The Bramble Briar", and "The Bold
Fisherman". [Missing from Hodgart's (later) list are "Long A-
growing" and "Six Dukes went A-fishing"]He says: '"The Shooting of his Dear", or "Molly Bawn", ...
[irrelevant] ..., has been proved to have an elaborate
traditional history, though no version can be praised for its
beauty. It cannot be denied a place in the category.'............Long A-growing: From pooling of information in two threads in
August (Lang A Growing and The Trees they grow so High), it
appears that three published versions of "Young Craigstoun/
Craigston" all derive from a single copy in a manuscript, the
published versions stemming from a transcript made by C. K.
Sharpe. I'm all but certain that the original is the one in the
Glenbuchat collection, which Wm. Stenhouse noted in
'Illustrations to The Scots Musical Museum', #377.Bruce Olson--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:01:33 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(78 lines)


Ruairidh:I retrieved the long and affectionate obituary by Charles Eliot Norton of
his good friend F.J. Child as published in the Proceedings XXXII (1897),
pp. 333-339.  Of Child's youth, he writes:Francis James Child was born in Boston, on the 1st of February, 1825.  His
fathr was a sailmaker, one of that class of intelligent and independent
mechanics which has had a large share in determining the character of our
democratic community, as of old the same class had in Athens and in
Florence.  The boy was the third in a family of eight brothers and
sisters.  He was sent to the public schools.  His unusual capacities were
early displayed.  He stood first in  his classes, and was a favorite with
his schoolfellows.  At the English High School he won all the prizes, and
having by chance attracted the attention of our venerable felwlow citizen,
Mr. Epes S. Dixwell, then the Master of the Latin School, his father was
induced, at Mr. Dixwell's suggestion, to allow him to proceed to the
Latin school, that he might continue his studies and be prepared for
entrance to college.  He speedily caught up with the boys who had already
made progress in the study of Greek and Latin, and soon took the first
place here, as he had done in the schools which he had previously
attended.  The sweetness of his disposition, the pleasant mingling in his
nature of gay spirits and serious purpose, his high principles, his
unaffected modesty won the affection of his teachers and of his
comrades.  His superiority in his classes so so unmingled with pretension
or conceit, that it was admitted without question or envy."Child matricualted, with the financial assistance of Dixwell, then repaid
him with interest, according to Norton's obit.As time permits, I will look for other obits of Child, and see what I can
piece together.EdOn Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Ruairidh Greig wrote:> Does anyone have a copy of Professor Norton's article on Child published in
> the Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, XXXII,334,
> 335? I would be interested to know if it gave any more details about his
> early life.
>
> Ruairidh Greig
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dick greenhaus" <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
>
>
> > That was the mock-opera Il Pescabello. Child also wrote at least one
> > Civil-War song. While he may have heard one or more ballads informally, I
> > believe that his book(s) had only published sources.
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > > John:
> > >
> > > F.J. Child, a son of Boston and Harvard, was at least nominally aware of
> > > what were known as "traditional ballads."  While in school, he was
> reputed
> > > to be the author of a stage play, "The Story of the Lone Fishball [?],"
> a
> > > copy of which does not seem to have survived.  During the Civil War,
> ahem,
> > > the War Between the States, he edited an anthology of pro-Union and
> > > patriotic poetry which included some songs.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, Child was the son of a Boston sailmaker.  I cannot imagine
> > > that he would have remained entirely ignorant of sea songs if he spent
> any
> > > time at all in his father's sail loft.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 17:23:14 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(11 lines)


On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> As time permits, I will look for other obits of Child, and see what
> I can piece together.There is a charming one by G. L. Kittredge, quoting several paragraphs
of Norton's, in Vol. I of the _Ballads_.---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Big prizes make many losers.  :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Chilldless Ballads
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:20:29 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Date:         Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:33:53 -0500
>Reply-To: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>Sender: Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
>From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: Chilldless Ballads
>To: [unmask]
>
>I forgot to add part of Hodgart's quotation in 'The Ballads',
>just before his list of 'Childless ballads': 'Only nine of them
>are worth considering: The Bitter Withy, [etc]...'.
>
>Gordon H. Gerould, 'The Ballad of Tradition', 1932 (from reprint,
>1957) gave only 7 'Childless Ballads': "The Bitter Withy", "The
>Blind Beggar of Bednall Green", "The Seven Virgins", "The
>Shooting of his Dear/ Molly Bawn", "Over Yonders a Park/ Corpus
>Christi", "Bruton Town/ The Bramble Briar", and "The Bold
>Fisherman". [Missing from Hodgart's (later) list are "Long A-
>growing" and "Six Dukes went A-fishing"]
>
>He says: '"The Shooting of his Dear", or "Molly Bawn", ...
>[irrelevant] ..., has been proved to have an elaborate
>traditional history, though no version can be praised for its
>beauty. It cannot be denied a place in the category.'
>
>............
>
>Long A-growing: From pooling of information in two threads in
>August (Lang A Growing and The Trees they grow so High), it
>appears that three published versions of "Young Craigstoun/
>Craigston" all derive from a single copy in a manuscript, the
>published versions stemming from a transcript made by C. K.
>Sharpe. I'm all but certain that the original is the one in the
>Glenbuchat collection, which Wm. Stenhouse noted in
>'Illustrations to The Scots Musical Museum', #377.
>
>Bruce Olson
>
>--
>Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
>ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
>or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Tips and Updates from WritersDigest.com 11-07-00
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:21:34 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(463 lines)


>From: Newsletter Manager <[unmask]>
>To: "[unmask]" <[unmask]>
>Subject: Tips and Updates from WritersDigest.com 11-07-00
>Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:17:05 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>
>Tips and Updates From Writer's Digest, 11-7-00
>For [unmask]
>
>http://www.writersdigest.com
>Your online guide to the writing life.
>
>========================================================
>Join Writer's Digest Book Club today and Choose 2 Books
>FREE with a 3rd Book for just $11.99 -- plus get a FREE
>Gift! As a member you'll enjoy great perks like: FREE
>shipping and handling, easy-to-earn FREE Bonus Books;
>networking opportunities. Plus savings up to 65% off the
>best writing instructional books available (more than 300
>titles in stock!). Click on
>http://www.writersdigest.com/wdbc to learn more.
>========================================================
>
>ON TAP TODAY
>
>* Letter From the Editor
>* Congratulations Brainstormer Winners
>* Fiction Software: What to Buy
>* News of the World...Wide Web
>* You Might Look Good in a Beret and a Goatee
>* 'On Writing'--and Winning--Like a King
>* E-Zine Promotion 101
>* Deadline Time: WD Zine Publishing Competition
>* Author Events Calendar--Looking Ahead
>* Ask the Editor: The Importance of Clips
>* Enter and Win: Got Any Ideas?
>* Hot Topics in the writersdigest.com Forum
>
>_________________________________________________________
>LETTER FROM THE EDITOR
>
>Welcome back. Today's newsletter reveals the winners of
>our first newsletter exclusive competition the "Fiction
>Writer's Brainstormer" contest. With more than 50 entries,
>the brainstormer competition was steep.
>
>If you didn't win, don't worry--we've still got an
>autographed copy of Jack Heffron's "The Writer's Idea
>Book" up for grabs, and you've got exactly one week to
>get your winning prompt in. Read on for details.
>
>This issue also includes a link to the low-down on some
>of the hottest fiction writing software programs and
>brings you up-to-date on the benefits of honing your
>"elevator speech," courtesy of the recently released
>book, "Guerrilla Marketing for Writers." So, read on
>and enjoy.
>
>-- Kelly Nickell, Newsletter Editor
>
>Do you have a suggestion or comment about this
>newsletter? Send it in via e-mail to [unmask]
>with "Newsletter Comments" in the subject line.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>CONGRATULATIONS BRAINSTORM WINNERS
>
>Congratulations to M. Gempel of Pennsylvania, C. Mertz
>of Missouri and D. Over of Maryland for correctly
>answering the five brainstormer questions. They each
>will receive a free copy of "Fiction Writer's
>Brainstormer" by James V. Smith Jr.
>
>In case you're wondering about those correct answers ...
>
>1. What is the one word that almost everybody
>   pronounces wrong?
>   Answer: Wrong is almost always pronounced wrong.
>
>2. On the other hand, can you identify at least four
>   words that anybody can pronounce right?
>   Answer: Write, right, rite and Wright are usually
>   pronounced right.
>
>3. In what dictionary does fiction begin with an f
>   and end with an e?
>   Answer: Fiction always begins with an f, and end
>   always begins with an e.
>
>4. Can you list two words that contain every letter
>   of the alphabet?
>   Answer: The alphabet.
>
>5. What's the commonplace sentence of only nine simple
>   words that uses every letter of the alphabet but does
>   not duplicate a single consonant?
>   Answer: The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
>
>To learn more about James Smith's "Fiction Writer's
>Brainstormer," visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/brainstormer.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>FICTION SOFTWARE: WHAT TO BUY
>
>"For writers, the personal computer is the best thing
>to come along since the typewriter. But, like that old
>clickety-clack contraption, PCs or Macs won't do any
>writing for you. Today's empty screen is no less a
>curse than yesterday's blank page."
>
>So says Julio Ojeda-Zapata, Writer's Digest's Tools
>of the Trade columnist and a technology reporter for
>Knight Ridder. In the special issue of Writer's Digest
>"Guide to Writing Fiction Today" on sale now, Ojeda
>reviews 12 of the hottest fiction writing software,
>including Plots Unlimited, StoryBuilder, StoryCraft,
>Writer's Software Companion, Writer's Blocks, Dramatica
>Pro, Writer's DreamKit, StoryView, FictionMaster,
>FirstAid for Writers and Writer's Text Manager.
>
>Here's a little bit more from Ojeda on how he tackled
>this software topic:
>
>"Software specifically for fiction writers has
>proliferated in recent years, and at least one product
>aimed at nonfiction writers with a literary bent has
>surfaced. Which program or programs should writers
>buy? For aspiring novelists on tight budgets, this
>isn't a trivial question. And, after scrutinizing 12
>such products, we don't have an easy answer.
>
>"All the programs reviewed have unique features that
>many would consider useful and even indispensable.
>But not every product is right for everyone. Before
>buying, spend ample time on the publishers' Web sites
>and, whenever possible, download demo software that
>will give you a taste for the real thing. Above all,
>don't assume any of these programs can miraculously
>make you a good writer. Only you can do that, talent
>permitting. But, with the right computer tools, your
>workload can be lightened perceptibly, and your muse
>can be amplified as if by magic."
>
>To view a comprehensive chart evaluating each program's
>premise, execution, platform and price, visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/fiction/ojeda.html
>
>To read Ojeda's in-depth review of these products, pick
>up a copy of Guide to Writing Fiction Today, available
>in bookstores, by calling 1-800-289-0963 or through
>secure online ordering at:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/writingfiction.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>NEWS OF THE WORLD...WIDE WEB
>
>Despite a reported $30M backing, Bigwords.com closed its
>doors October 20th. Bigwords was the largest online
>retailer of university text books.
>
>http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20001106_92623.asp
>
>Starting immediately, Barnesandnoble.com will carry titles
>from MightyWords.com.
>
>http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20001106_92625.asp
>
>_________________________________________________________
>YOU MIGHT LOOK GOOD IN A BERET AND GOATEE
>
>A crack team of authors has been assembled for your
>training: Jay Conrad Levinson, father of guerrilla
>marketing, Rick Frishman, president of Planned
>Television Arts and Michael Larsen, successful
>literary agent and author.
>
>As writers, it's always essential to look for new
>ways to sell your work. The recently released
>"Guerrilla Marketing for Writers" (WD Books), offers
>100 proven insights and techniques that will help
>before and after you're published.
>
>Strengthening your proposals, creating unique and
>powerful marketing plans and utilizing marketing
>methods that are low-cost or no cost are just a few
>of the tactics that you'll learn.
>
>Here's a top-secret guerrilla marketing tip on the
>significance of "Your Elevator Speech":
>
>"An elevator speech is a newsy, passionate 60-to-90-
>second pitch to the media that must accomplish two
>goals: Mention three ways your books will change their
>audience's lives immediately and convey this information
>with irresistible enthusiasm.
>
>"Your elevator speech should last no longer than an
>elevator ride. Once perfected, it will be your open-
>sesame for time and space in the media.
>
>"The media base their responses to pitches partly on
>the words and partly on the excitement with which they
>are delivered. But this pitch, the essence of your book
>conveyed with passionate conviction, will serve you
>whenever you need to make anyone excited about your
>book including:
>
>* other writers
>* magazine or newspaper editors
>* your publicist
>* journalists and talk-show producers
>* booksellers
>* the people you want to book you to speak
>* the audiences you speak to
>
>"Don't share your elevator speech with anyone until
>your networks tell you it's dynamite that will explode
>in the mind of media people and convince them to book
>you on the spot. Make sure your elevator speech is
>equally effective whether it's delivered in person,
>over the phone, in print or on the net."
>
>For more information on "Guerrilla Marketing for
>Writers" visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/guerrillamarketing.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>'ON WRITING'--AND WINNING--LIKE A KING
>
>In his recent book, "On Writing" Stephen King invited
>readers to submit their writing to his website. But
>before you get thoughts of being discovered by King,
>and living a life only befitting the King--take note.
>There's a catch: it's a "very specific writing sample".
>
>Directions for entering your writing sample can only
>be obtained by reading King's book. If you have the
>book, and want to take a chance, visit
>http://www.stephenking.com or
>http://www.radiantideas.com/stephenking/sample.html
>
>Keep in mind, anything submitted which does not strictly
>follow the guidelines, 'will not be considered'.
>
>Inside.com reports the winner may have a chance to be
>published in the paperback reprint edition of the book.
>http://www.inside.com/story/Inside_Dope.html?art_id=0&podID=8
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DEADLINE TIME: WD ZINE PUBLISHING COMPETITION
>
>The deadline for the first Writer's Digest Zine
>Publishing Competition is fast approaching. If you
>still would like to enter your self-published zine
>or e-zine into the competition, you only have until
>Nov. 25. Don't miss out on the opportunity to have
>your zine eligible for more than $1,000 in prizes.
>
>WD wants to recognize the passion, talent and energy
>that goes into the creation of zines. There are 10
>categories to enter: literary/poetry, mystery,
>hobby/enthusiast, best art design, fantasy/horror,
>romance, genealogy/family history, informational
>(travel, general interest, news), science fiction
>and fanzine. For complete rules, list of awards and
>entry form, visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/zineawards
>
>_________________________________________________________
>AUTHOR EVENTS CALENDAR--LOOKING AHEAD
>
>Attend a writing workshop with a Writer's Digest author
>coming to a bookstore near you.
>
>Katherine Ramsland, author of Bliss: Writing to Find
>Your True Self
>     Wednesday Nov 8th, 7:30pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Willow Grove PA  Tel: 215/659-1001
>
>     Saturday Nov. 11th, 3:00pm
>     Borders Books & Music, Springfield, PA
>     Tel: 610/543-8588
>
>     Friday Nov. 24th, 7:00pm
>     Borders Books & Music, Ann Arbor, MI
>     Tel: 734/668-7652
>
>Jack Heffron, author of The Writer's Idea Book
>     Friday Nov. 17th, 7:00pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Lexington, KY  Tel: 606/543-8518
>
>     Sunday Nov. 19th, 3:00pm
>     Barnes & Noble, Cincinnati, OH Tel: 513/794-9440
>
>JacLynn Morris and Dr. Paul Fair (From Me to You)
>     Friday Nov. 17th, 7:30pm
>     Phoenix & Dragon Bookstore, Atlanta, GA
>     Tel: 404/255-5207
>
>Or meet your favorite writers, if you're in the
>neighborhood...
>
>Frances Mayes, author of In Tuscany
>     Wednesday, November 8th 7:30 pm
>     Tattered Cover, Denver CO
>     Tel: 303/322-1965 ext. 7446
>     http://www.tatteredcover.com
>
>Julia Cameron, author of Popcorn: Hollywood Stories
>     Thursday, November 9th 7pm
>     R.J. Julia Booksellers, Madison CT
>     Tel: 203/245-3959
>     http://www.rjjulia.com
>
>Madison Smartt Bell, author of Master of the Crossroads
>     Friday November 10th 6pm
>     Davis-Kidd Books, Memphis TN Tel: 901/683-9801
>     http://www.daviskidd.com/
>
>For more information, call stores directly.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>ASK THE EDITORS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CLIPS
>
>Gail Parsons asks: When a magazine wants 'clips' what
>exactly are they looking for? I am a reporter/feature
>writer for a daily paper and have begun to get my feet
>wet in freelancing. I have a lot of things published
>in the newspaper. Should the clips be related to the
>subject I am querying on?
>
>Melanie Rigney, editor of Writer's Digest says:
>First, welcome to the world of freelancing! You'll
>find it challenging and rewarding. If you can send
>clips that are somewhat related to the topic (you want
>to write for a dog lovers' magazine; you've done some
>human interest articles that involve pets), that's
>ideal. Showing you know something about the topic
>usually will give you a foot in the door. If you don't
>have a clip that's precisely related, send one that
>takes the same tone--for example, you probably wouldn't
>send a moving first-person essay if you were querying
>a trade magazine about doing a corporate case study.
>
>Send your questions to [unmask] with "Ask
>the Editors" in the subject line. The questions with
>the greatest general interest will be answered here by
>editors at Writer's Digest magazine, books and school;
>the Writer's Digest Book Club; Writers Online Workshop;
>and Personal Journaling magazine. Watch this newsletter
>for this new, occasional feature; questions and answers
>will be archived on the Web site as well. Sorry, but we
>don't recommend specific publishers, agents or editing
>services.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>ENTER AND WIN: GOT ANY IDEAS?
>
>The deadline is just one week away, so you better get
>that prompt in soon! Create your own writing prompt in
>100 words or less, and e-mail it to [unmask]
>with "Newsletter Contest" in the subject line. All
>entries must be in by November 14.
>
>The author of the winning prompt will receive an
>autographed copy of Jack Heffron's "The Writer's Idea
>Book," and the entry will appear in the November 21 WD
>Newsletter. Only one submission per entrant, so make
>it count.
>
>Need help? Here's an excerpted prompt from Heffron's
>book to get you started:
>
>PROMPT: Write about one of your pieces that began with
>an exciting idea but never achieved its potential.
>Speculate on what went wrong. Did you finish the piece?
>Does it now languish in a drawer? Or did you finish it
>but then lose interest in it?
>
>To learn more about "The Writer's Idea Book," visit:
>http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/ideabook.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>HOT TOPICS IN THE WRITERSDIGEST.COM FORUM
>
>New to the Discussion Forum on WritersDigest.com:
>
>* Do you use fiction writing software programs? Share
>  your software secrets with the rest of the writing
>  world.
>
>Plus, contribute to the online clinic critique of
>"Dominica," by W. James M. McFalls.
>All at: http://www.writersdigest.com/forum
>
>________________________________________________________
>EXPLORE PAST ISSUES OF THE "TIPS AND UPDATES"
>NEWSLETTER
>
>Get access to all previous issues of this newsletter
>by visiting http://www.writersdigest.com/newsarchive
>
>There you can perform a keyword or subject search to
>pull up expert advice on all genres of writing and all
>areas of publishing. You can also access specific back
>issues by date if you have a particular newsletter you
>wish to review. (New issues don't enter the archive
>until about two weeks after initial publication.)
>
>_________________________________________________________
>SPONSOR THIS NEWSLETTER
>
>For information on sponsoring this newsletter or to
>receive a rate card, email [unmask],
>or call toll-free: 888-481-0427
>
>_________________________________________________________
>GET YOUR FREE ISSUE OF WRITER'S DIGEST MAGAZINE
>
>Packed with plenty of must-know info like how to polish
>your writing, submit your manuscripts successfully, break
>into hot, new markets, hook an agent, and more. Check
>out http://www.writersdigest.com/catalog/mag_frame.html
>
>_________________________________________________________
>WRITER'S DIGEST BOOK CLUB
>
>Join Writer's Digest Book Club today and Choose 2 Books
>FREE with a 3rd Book for just $11.99 -- plus get a FREE!
>Gift. Click on http://www.writersdigest.com/wdbc to learn
>more.
>
>_________________________________________________________
>JOIN THE WRITER'S DIGEST AFFILIATE PROGRAM
>
>Earn money with your writing-related website. Click
>below for program details.
>http://www.writersdigest.com/affiliate
>
>========================================================
>TELL A FRIEND
>If you know other writers who would be interested in
>receiving this newsletter, tell him or her to send an
>e-mail to [unmask] with SUBSCRIBE
>WD NEWSLETTER in the subject line of the message, or sign
>up online at http://www.writersdigest.com/newsletter
>========================================================
>UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION
>You have received this e-mail because you expressed
>interest in receiving updates about writing and about
>Writer's Digest products by e-mail. If you no longer want
>updates, send an e-mail to [unmask]
>with UNSUBSCRIBE WD NEWSLETTER in the subject line the
>message; send it from the e-mail address where you
>currently receive the newsletter.
>========================================================
>CHANGE OF ADDRESS
>To change addresses, use the procedures above to unsubscribe
>from your old address, and then subscribe from your new
>address.
>========================================================
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:12:38 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Friends:
I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
Many thanks,
Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:27:39 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Scandalous as this might sound, I don't think that UNC's folklore program
has offered a course in Anglo-American folksong and balladry since Dan
Patterson retired three or four years ago.  Glenn Hinson teaches
African-American vernacular music, and Terry Zug includes some in an
introduction to folklore class.BruceAt 06:12 PM 11/8/00 -0800, you wrote:
>Friends:
>I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
>in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
>so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
>Many thanks,
>Norm Cohen
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
NOTE: This email address will probably change
during November 2000 because Mindspring's
service is unreliable.  Look for me at bellsouth.net
probably.http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 8 Nov 2000 22:33:08 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


Norm:Let us all know.  Just for curiosity's sake.EdOn Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Norm Cohen wrote:> Friends:
> I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
> in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
> so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
> Many thanks,
> Norm Cohen
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 10:21:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


I'll be offering a folksong course here at University of Maine after
Christmas, and I hope to alternate it every other year with a course on
narrative.I don't think a dedicated course in ballads has been offered at
Memorial since David Buchan died in 1994.  Neil Rosenberg and Peter
Narvaez both offer folksong courses (and Peter now offers a blues &
jazz course).Back in the late 80s, Sean Galvin did a survey of American universities
that still offered ballad courses.  It's been a while so I don't recall
the exact results but they weren't encouraging.  If I remeber rightly
he was also able to tie the decline in ballad/folksong offerings to a
general move away from genre based courses, or at least away from the
classic "analytic" genres -- folksong, folktale, proverb, etc.  In that
light, it would be interesting to know how many and what kind of
courses take up folksong/ballads as a significant part of the syllabus:
women's studies, politics of culture, popular culture,
sociology/anthropology of art, medieval studies.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 12:40:29 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Dear Ballad Group,
  In the Wife of Usher's Well, when the sons return to their mother, we have:
-----------
It fell about the Martinmass,
  When nights are lang and mirk,
The carlin wife's three sons came hame,
  And their hats were of the birk.
------------
I recall from somewhere in my dim past that "birk" (birch) has a symbolic,
perhaps religious or supernatural association. Could it be that because the
sons were wearing birch hats that this means they came to their mother from
heaven? Is this the balladeer's way of saying they are saints? If so, would
this meaning be evident to people living in centuries past in Scotland, or
even in America, where the ballad became popular in the Scots-Irish
tradition? Or, am I reading too much into this?
  Guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pete Brady

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 14:11:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


The source you're thinking of is probably L. C. Wimberly, FOlklore in
English and Scottish Ballads.  He discusses the stanza in question on
p. 243 and has more extented comments on related motifs pp. 155-57.Comparative folklore as practice by Wimberly used materials from
disparate traditions regardless of whether a connection could be
demonstrated, a la James Fraser in The Golden Bough.  So his readings
should be taken advisedly, but there is still much of interest and
value in his study.Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:51:01 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(68 lines)


You need a Scots expert here (which I'm not), but the following notes may be
of interest, although they are inconclusive. A scan through a shelf-full of
Scots folklore books brings up surprisingly few references to birch tree
beliefs, but there are some. Some popular writers, such as Willa Muir
(Living With Ballads, 1965 p.154) make blanket statements such as 'birch was
one of the sacred trees in pre-Christian lore', but as they offer no
evidence their comments are worthless.The most telling point is that Scott, who printed the earliest known version
of the ballad (Child's A text) in 1802, makes no comment about the birk in
Scottish belief (but he does witter on about a Rabbinical tradition of a
ghost with a garland on his head, without showing how this was relevant) and
we can be pretty sure that he would have given Scottish parallels if he had
known them.L.C. Wimberley, in his 'Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads' (1928
pp.155-157) starts by saying 'the sacred nature of the birch is well known'
but then spoils this by giving lots of references - from India, Japan,
British Columbia, Central Asia, Lapland, etc. again without appearing to
worry whether these have any bearing on Scotland, plus one English
reference, but no Scottish ones. Nevertheless, he does make something of a
case for the birch being special by citing occurrences of birks in other
ballads - 'Braes of Yarrow' (Child 214), 'Sweet William's Ghost' (Child 77),
'Sir Hugh' (Child 155), 'Fair Janet' (Child 64) and several others. Someone
needs to count all the references to trees in Child, to find out if these
birches are statistically significant.The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
because it rhymed with 'mirk'.Incidentally, I am surprised to find that very few British versions have
been noted - 3 or 4 from Scotland, the same number from England - but dozens
in the United States, Sharp alone collected 33 versions in the Appalachians
in 1916/1918.Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?> Dear Ballad Group,
>   In the Wife of Usher's Well, when the sons return to their mother, we
have:
> -----------
> It fell about the Martinmass,
>   When nights are lang and mirk,
> The carlin wife's three sons came hame,
>   And their hats were of the birk.
> ------------
> I recall from somewhere in my dim past that "birk" (birch) has a symbolic,
> perhaps religious or supernatural association. Could it be that because
the
> sons were wearing birch hats that this means they came to their mother
from
> heaven? Is this the balladeer's way of saying they are saints? If so,
would
> this meaning be evident to people living in centuries past in Scotland, or
> even in America, where the ballad became popular in the Scots-Irish
> tradition? Or, am I reading too much into this?
>   Guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Pete Brady

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Mary Louise Chown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:30:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(55 lines)


roud wrote:> You need a Scots expert here (which I'm not), but the following notes may be
> of interest, although they are inconclusive. A scan through a shelf-full of
> Scots folklore books brings up surprisingly few references to birch tree
> beliefs, but there are some. Some popular writers, such as Willa Muir
> (Living With Ballads, 1965 p.154) make blanket statements such as 'birch was
> one of the sacred trees in pre-Christian lore', but as they offer no
> evidence their comments are worthless.
>
> The most telling point is that Scott, who printed the earliest known version
> of the ballad (Child's A text) in 1802, makes no comment about the birk in
> Scottish belief (but he does witter on about a Rabbinical tradition of a
> ghost with a garland on his head, without showing how this was relevant) and
> we can be pretty sure that he would have given Scottish parallels if he had
> known them.
>
> L.C. Wimberley, in his 'Folklore in the English & Scottish Ballads' (1928
> pp.155-157) starts by saying 'the sacred nature of the birch is well known'
> but then spoils this by giving lots of references - from India, Japan,
> British Columbia, Central Asia, Lapland, etc. again without appearing to
> worry whether these have any bearing on Scotland, plus one English
> reference, but no Scottish ones. Nevertheless, he does make something of a
> case for the birch being special by citing occurrences of birks in other
> ballads - 'Braes of Yarrow' (Child 214), 'Sweet William's Ghost' (Child 77),
> 'Sir Hugh' (Child 155), 'Fair Janet' (Child 64) and several others. Someone
> needs to count all the references to trees in Child, to find out if these
> birches are statistically significant.
>
> The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
> the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
> blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
> the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
> because it rhymed with 'mirk'.
>
> Incidentally, I am surprised to find that very few British versions have
> been noted - 3 or 4 from Scotland, the same number from England - but dozens
> in the United States, Sharp alone collected 33 versions in the Appalachians
> in 1916/1918.
>
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:40 PM
> Subject: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
>Hi There from a lurker from Winnipeg Manitoba.   I may be able to shed some
light on the birch hats. It seems to me in my research on both ballads and
shamanic practices that the hats of birch signify that the sons have come from
the otherworld. Items of clothing such as hats and shoes(of bronze or iron )
were once recognized as otherworldly. If this is important to you I can try and
remember where I read this. Mary Louise Chown

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:03:06 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


    There are 58 versions of the ballad in Bronson:  _The Traditional Tunes
of the Child Ballads_ (vol. II, pp. 246-266),  and two of then  show the
stanza about the birchen hats.  Both of these mentions follow with a stanza
explaining that the birch grew at the Gates of Paradise.  One version not
included by Bronson  (probably because he used only printed sources) was
recorded a good many years ago by Buell Kazee,  under the title of "Lady
Gay," and as I remember it, the explanatory verse was as follows:That birch grew not in any slough
    Nor yet by any stream,
But at the Gates of Paradise
   That birch grew fresh and green.   Maria Leach, in her _Standard Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology and
Legend_, says that the symbolism of birch in the song, as it was explained by
 Robert Graves in _The White Goddess_,  was that the ghosts wearing these
hats did not intend to haunt the earth, but were going to return to Paradise
immediately.  This plan of returning to Paradise is perhaps borne out by one
of the Scottish versions (not one of the two versions in _Child_), which has
one of the three babes saying"The cock doth craw, the day doth daw:
   The channerin' worm doth chide.
Gin we be missed out o' our place
   A sair pain we maun bide."Around most Hallowe'ens, I include the Kazee version in my concerts because
of its ghostly affect, although my guitar accompaniment doesn't hold a candle
to Kazee's stark banjo!Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Mea Culpa?
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 16:08:24 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


My apologies in advance if you have recieved any bizarre missives with my
name attached.Somehow, some e-messages I was transferring from one computer to another
seem to have found their way to the Ballad List, I think.. They cropped up
on Linn's Ballad-L mail, but not on mine. This all leaves me very
bewildered.We are currently running two computers on line and need to transfer e-mail
from one to the other; especially if they contain attachments or "blue
letter" sites. This old performa can't handle either but the new G4 can.What is most confusing is the fact that the Ballad-L listing in the Address
Book is separated from the address I was forwarding to by a whole page.Please forgive if you got any of this Spamlike transmissions  -  Tom

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 15:44:59 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(9 lines)


Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:13:36 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(25 lines)


Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
internal evidence.
The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old Time
Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is only
24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has 82pp.,
so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye Pack a
1930s radio singer?
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
Subject: Dating a Songbook> Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
> of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
> material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
> the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
>
> The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
>
> Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2000 17:21:47 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


Steve and Everyone:My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.Does that help?EdOn Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> internal evidence.
> The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old Time
> Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is only
> 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has 82pp.,
> so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye Pack a
> 1930s radio singer?
> Steve Roud
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> Subject: Dating a Songbook
>
>
> > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82 pages
> > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly written
> > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor crash in
> > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> >
> > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> >
> > Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Mea Culpa?
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:28:43 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Don't worry, Tom. As Dan Rather put it on Tuesday night, "To err is human.
To really louse things up, you need a computer." (He quoted this as a
prologue to announcing that CBS was withdrawing its call of Florida for
Gore.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Folksong/balladry classes
From: Dr Ian Russell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:40:23 +0000
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(53 lines)


Dear Norm,Here at the Elphinstone Institute, University of Aberdeen,
we are setting up a taught M.Litt to run from autumn 2001
in Ethnology and Folklore (one year full time). It is
intended to survey the development, theory and practice of
the subject area in an international context, with special
concentration on Scottish materials. It will cover
appropriate research methodologies. In Component 1: Theory,
four of the weeks will be devoted to Ballad and Song. In
Component 2: Practice, there will also be four weeks.
Component 3 is the dissertation, which could focus on
ballad/song fieldwork, if appropriate.
It can be taken full or part-time.Our Continuing Education Dept has a course on Scottish
Culture and Tradition: Ballad and Song (6 credits) -
CN3010, at Level 3 (year 3) of the Scottish Studies M.A (72
credits). There are two other exit points, for a
certificate (24 credits) or a diploma (48 credits).There are also opportunities for suitable candidates to
undertake Ph.D. or M.Phil. research in Folksong or Ballads
at the Institute, as well as other related areas.Hope this is of some interest.Best wishes,
IanOn Wed, 8 Nov 2000 18:12:38 -0800 Norm Cohen
<[unmask]> wrote:> Friends:
> I'm curious to know how many colleges/universities currently offer courses
> in Anglo-American or American folksong or balladry.  Could any of you who do
> so (or are at instititutions that do so) drop me a note?
> Many thanks,
> Norm Cohen----------------------
Dr Ian Russell, Director
The Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen
AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272386
Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
[unmask]
Website:
www.abdn.ac.uk/elphinstone/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 12:51:14 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(84 lines)


The two versions I have, as follows. It is Version 2 which has the  song
'The Farmer's Letter to the President' which is dated 1933.[Version 1]
[Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballads / & Cowboy Songs
<Bottom>Compiled by / COWBOY LOYE / and / JUST PLAIN JOHN
Decoration in centre: stylized design of harp, trumpet, ribbons intertwined
Border fancy: repeating pattern, dotted semi-circles, three stemmed
'flower?' within each
24 numbered pages (but index continues on inside of back cover)
Orangey-brown (rust?) card cover
Song titles in caps.
First song on p.3: 'MOTHER'
First song on p.12: 'THE OLD HICKORY CANE',
First song on p.23 'DON'T LAY ME ON MY BACK IN MY LAST SLEEP'.[Version 2]
[Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballas / and / Cowboy Songs
<Bottom>Compiled by LOYE PACK / The Cowboy Singer
Decoration in centre: stylized harp
Border: plain rules: thin/thick/thin
80 numbered pages (plus 2 unnumbered and index continues on inside of back
cover)
Pale green card cover.
Song titles in caps.
First song on p.3: 'JUST BEFORE THE BATTLE MOTHER'
First song on p.40: 'THE OLD STEPSTONE'
First song on p.80: 'DON'T TAKE MY LITTLE HOME'----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook> Steve and Everyone:
>
> My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
> text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
> in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
> pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.
>
> Does that help?
>
> Ed
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:
>
> > Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> > internal evidence.
> > The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old
Time
> > Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is
only
> > 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has
82pp.,
> > so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye
Pack a
> > 1930s radio singer?
> > Steve Roud
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > To: <[unmask]>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> > Subject: Dating a Songbook
> >
> >
> > > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82
pages
> > > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly
written
> > > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor
crash in
> > > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> > >
> > > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> > >
> > > Ed
> >

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 05:18:30 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(106 lines)


Steve:There were, apparently, multiple "editions" of Loye's "Old Time Ballads
and Cowboy Songs," at least in the 80-page version.  My copy agrees with
yours except in the color of the cover stock, and the fact that "The Old
Stepstone" is on page 39.  (The index says page 40.)  He must have removed
a song before page 40, and added something after.We can settle for a post-1933 date.What makes this songbook so interesting, in my opinion, is the confluence
of the new (a song about an airplane crash) with the old (homelitic
ballads).  In a sense it is a reflection of the national vote of a few
days ago: a significant portion of the voters cast ballots on moralistic
grounds (anti-Clinton, anti-abortion), an equal portion voted for secular
reasons.EdOn Sat, 11 Nov 2000, roud wrote:> The two versions I have, as follows. It is Version 2 which has the  song
> 'The Farmer's Letter to the President' which is dated 1933.
>
> [Version 1]
> [Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballads / & Cowboy Songs
> <Bottom>Compiled by / COWBOY LOYE / and / JUST PLAIN JOHN
> Decoration in centre: stylized design of harp, trumpet, ribbons intertwined
> Border fancy: repeating pattern, dotted semi-circles, three stemmed
> 'flower?' within each
> 24 numbered pages (but index continues on inside of back cover)
> Orangey-brown (rust?) card cover
> Song titles in caps.
> First song on p.3: 'MOTHER'
> First song on p.12: 'THE OLD HICKORY CANE',
> First song on p.23 'DON'T LAY ME ON MY BACK IN MY LAST SLEEP'.
>
> [Version 2]
> [Cover and title page the same] <Top>Old Time Ballas / and / Cowboy Songs
> <Bottom>Compiled by LOYE PACK / The Cowboy Singer
> Decoration in centre: stylized harp
> Border: plain rules: thin/thick/thin
> 80 numbered pages (plus 2 unnumbered and index continues on inside of back
> cover)
> Pale green card cover.
> Song titles in caps.
> First song on p.3: 'JUST BEFORE THE BATTLE MOTHER'
> First song on p.40: 'THE OLD STEPSTONE'
> First song on p.80: 'DON'T TAKE MY LITTLE HOME'
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 1:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
>
>
> > Steve and Everyone:
> >
> > My copy of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs" is printed on 60 pound
> > text, with a red-brown cover printed on 60-pound cover stock.  It was set
> > in a job shop (based on the border) in 6 pt Century Schoolbook, with 6
> > pt. Century Schoolbook all cap song titles.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, roud wrote:
> >
> > > Norm Cohen (Long Steel Rail) dates this as c1934, presumably on the same
> > > internal evidence.
> > > The bibliographic details are confusing: of the 2 copies I have of Old
> Time
> > > Ballads & Cowboy Songs, the one by 'Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John' is
> only
> > > 24pp., but the other 'compiled by Loye Pack the Cowboy Singer' has
> 82pp.,
> > > so neither quite matches yours. Are there others out there? Was Loye
> Pack a
> > > 1930s radio singer?
> > > Steve Roud
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
> > > To: <[unmask]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 11:44 PM
> > > Subject: Dating a Songbook
> > >
> > >
> > > > Can anyone help me fix the date of "Old Time Ballads and Cowboy Songs"
> > > > compiled by Cowboy Loye and Just Plain John?  The 4x7" contains 82
> pages
> > > > of 19th C. homelitic songs, traditional ballads, and some newly
> written
> > > > material ("The Crash of a Large Airliner" inspired by a tri-motor
> crash in
> > > > the mid-1930s; and another addressed to newly elected FDR in 1932).
> > > >
> > > > The booklet/chapbook contains no date or place of publication.
> > > >
> > > > Ed
> > >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:22:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:>What makes this songbook so interesting, in my opinion, is the confluence
>of the new (a song about an airplane crash) with the old (homelitic
>ballads).  In a sense it is a reflection of the national vote of a few
>days ago: a significant portion of the voters cast ballots on moralistic
>grounds (anti-Clinton, anti-abortion), an equal portion voted for secular
>reasons.What about those who voted for other moralistic reasons (pro-Gore, pro-life)?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Dating a Songbook
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 10:25:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


What an error!>What about those who voted for other moralistic reasons (pro-Gore, pro-life)?
>--
>john garst    [unmask]Should have been "(pro-Gore, pro-choice)" and "anti-Bush."--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Usher's Well: Hats of the birk -- meaning?
From: Pete Brady <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 11:20:46 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Thanks very much to the group for replying to my request about the possible
spiritual or symbolic meaning of "birk" in the Wife of Usher's Well. In
particular, Steve Roud points out something that went right by me, that the
next verse states that the birk grows at the gates of paradise.
  I first was told of the possible significance of "birk" in reference to
"Bonnie Lass O'Fyvie-O", where the last verse is "Green grow the birks upon
the bonnie bank," which seems neutral enough, except that someone told me
that this had a deeper meaning. In Fyvie-O, it seems a little far out to look
for hidden meanings. But in Usher's Well, this is about ghosts, and anything
could be happening.
  Pete BradyIn a message dated 11/9/00 3:52:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, [unmask]
writes:<< The verse which follows the one quoted makes it clear that the tree grew at
 the gates of paradise, but this doesn't mean that all birches were so
 blessed. Indeed, without independent corroberation it could be argued that
 the species of this tree might not be significant, or indeed, simply used
 because it rhymed with 'mirk'. >>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New English CD
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 11 Nov 2000 17:02:25 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


'Down the Cherry Tree' by Pop Maynard (Musical Traditions MTCD 400) - double
CD (93 minutes) including 32 songs recorded in pubs in Sussex, England by
Brian Matthews 1959-1961.Pop Maynard (1872-1962) was one of the finest unaccompanied singers to be
discovered in Post-War England, and these recordings have only recently come
to light. Rod Stradling has made them available as a limited edition, as
unedited field-recordings, for the benefit of enthusiast who will otherwise
miss out on some wonderful singing simply because there are pub-noises in
the background and people joining in the chorus. To keep the price down, Rod
has decided not to include the extensive booklet which usually accompanies
his CD releases, but the record is still excellent value for money.UK customers send £10 to Rod at 1 Castle Street, Stroud, Glos. GL5 2HP.
(Tel.01453 759475)
Overseas, email Rod at [unmask] for details how to payAnd if you are interested in other great CDs and articles, I suggest you
visit his Musical Traditions website at:  [unmask]Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: ghost <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 16:51:37 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


Anyone who's got it wanna post the land-chantey
"(Polling, Polling) Way Down In Florida" that a group from DC premiered
at the NOMAD chantey-blast session this weekend?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 17:37:31 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(42 lines)


From the "horse's mouth" so to speak.    An Election Shanty
(to the tune of "Roll the Woodpile Down")1. Way down south where the palm trees grow
    Way down in Florida
   They say elections sure are slow.
    And we'll hold the recount now.
Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the whole state round;
    *That ballot of mine they will never find
    And we'll hold the recount now.2. Gore's campaign aides made a final push
   To round up voters to beat the Bush.Chorus3. Some punched for Bush, some punched for Gore;
   Some punched for two or three or more.Chorus4. Pat said "Those votes weren't meant for me,
   I'd be glad if I got three!"Chorus (2nd line changes)  *Those voters of mine crossed the Palm Beach line5. Reverend Jesse says "No fair!
   They won't let my people vote down there."Chorus (2nd line changes)  *That brown gal of mine got kicked out of line6. The lawyers'll fight over who gets sued
   But either way, guess who gets screwed?Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the whole state round;
        *That ballot of mine they will never find
        And we'll hold the recount now."2000 by The Civil Serpents (Kathy Westra, Mary LaMarca and George Stephens)

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: "Way Down In Florida" parody
From: Andy Alexis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:27:19 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


Jumping the gun just a teensy bit, I was kind of thinking
along the lines of (to the tune of "He's in the Jailhouse
Now"):Mr Bush met Mr. Cheney
at a bar and went insane-he
drove a car after having a beer or three
He got stopped by a trooper
who was a party pooper
I don't want to go to jail so I'll just pay a fineChorus
He's in the White House now (2x)
If he had to go to jail
His dad would have paid his bail
He's in the White House now.(c)2000 by Andy Alexis All rights reservedI wrote these verses; new verses welcomed (to be (c) by you
of course).  A verse about Capitol Punishment would be nice;
the original song has a chorus that changes to "He's in the
graveyard now".  The original song even has a verse about a
guy selling his votes for president twice...Andy Alexis, [unmask]
Visit me: http://www.calweb.com/~ndlxs
Sacramento, California
"The Pearl of the Central Valley"> -----Original Message-----
> >From the "horse's mouth" so to speak.
>
>     An Election Shanty
> (to the tune of "Roll the Woodpile Down")
>
> 1. Way down south where the palm trees grow
>     Way down in Florida
>    They say elections sure are slow.
>     And we'll hold the recount now.
> Chorus: Polling, polling, they're polling the
> whole state round;
>     *That ballot of mine they will never find
>     And we'll hold the recount now.
>
> 2. Gore's campaign aides made a final push
>    To round up voters to beat the Bush.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Singer New to Me
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:46:14 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(8 lines)


This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
with Kate Russby (the spelling is phonetic).  She records on Compass
Records, and either has a new release or is making a first tour of the
U.S.  (She is Yorkshire born, and a second-generation singer of
traditional songs.)  Can anyone tell me more about her, or recommend any
of her CDs.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Cliford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 18:11:12 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


At 10:46 AM -0800 11/19/00, Ed Cray wrote:
>This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
>with Kate Russby (the spelling is phonetic).  Can anyone tell me more
>about >her, or recommend any of her CDs.
>
>EdEd,        Am aware of two CDs by Kate RUSBY, "Hourglass" [Compass Records 7
4255 2. (1998)] and "Sleepless" {Compass Records 7 4277 2 (1999)] both were
originally releaseed by Pure Records in the U.K. and I find both to be
very enjoyable. For those who find solace in "best of lists" both were
selested by Folk Roots as among the best new releases in their respective
years.        The 11 cuts on "Hourglass" are 1. Sir Eglamore; 2. As I Roved Out;
3. Jolly Ploughboys; 4. Annan Waters; 5. Stananivy / Jack & Jill; 6. A Rose
In April; 7. Radio Sweetheart; 8. I am Stretched On Your Grave; 9. Old Man
Time; 10. Drowned Lovers; 11. Bold Riley.        The 13 cuts on " Sleepless" 1. The Cobblers Daughter; 2. I Wonder
What Is Keeping My True Love Tonight ; 3. The Fairest Of All Yarrow; 4. The
Unquiet Grave; 5. Sho Heen; 6. Sweet Bride; 7. All God's Angels; 8. The
Wild Goose; 9. The Duke And The Tinker; 10. Our Town [a fine song by Iris
Dement]; 11. The Sleepless Sailor; 12. Cowsong; 13. Botany Bay        Compass Records has a web page at www.compassrecords.comCliff Ocheltree
New Orleans LA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Susan Tichy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:42:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
> with Kate RussbyKate Rusby also plays with the Poozies & has done some guest spots on
other albums. Here are all the listings that pop up at Sidestreet (a
small-label wholesaler).--SusanPoozies, The INFINITE BLUE long-awaited first American release from this
notable Scottish quartet: Karen Tweed, Kate Rusby, and Mary MacMaster
and Patsy Seddon of Sileas
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4261RAISE YOUR HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE
Compilation culled from their first three albums -- Karen Tweed, Kate
Rusby, and Sileas gals Mary MacMaster and Patsy Seddon
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4290Rusby, Kate
HOURGLASS
US release of 1997 album. With John McCusker, Alan Reid, Tony McManus,
Alison Kinnaird, others.
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4255
SLEEPLESS
With Darrell Scott, John McCusker and Tim O'Brien
                        CD...COMPASS-CD4277Todd, Gibb
CONNECTED
Original, traditional and contemporary ballads with an all-star lineup
including Kate Rusby, Tony McManus, John McCusker, Finbar Furey,
Alasdair Fraser, Joanie Madden, others
                        CD...LDL-CD1292McCusker, John
YELLA HOOSE
Second solo album for this Battlefield Band fiddler. Including guests
Tim O'Brien, Daryll Scott, Kate Rusby, Michael McGoldrick, Ian Carr,
Simon Thoumire, Andy Cutting, Gino Lupari, Malcolm Stitt, and Kevin
MacKenzie. Includes mainly original compositions and is produced by John
McCusker
                        CD...TEMP-CD2083

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 08:50:07 +0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:> This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an interview
> with Kate Russby...Can anyone tell me more about her...I can't tell you an awful lot, except that she's a young English singer
with a great voice and a good ear for interpreting songs. A breath of
fresh air in many respects, in my opinion. I shouldn't think you'd be
disappointed if you sought her other recordings.--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff, Scotland
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Ted Moriarty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 06:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Kate Rusby also made an album with Kathryn Roberts--KATE RUSBY AND KATHRYN
ROBERTS is the title.
----- Original Message -----
From: Susan Tichy <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me> Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > This morning National Public Radio's Weekend Edition I heard an
interview
> > with Kate Russby
>
> Kate Rusby also plays with the Poozies & has done some guest spots on
> other albums. Here are all the listings that pop up at Sidestreet (a
> small-label wholesaler).
>
> --Susan
>
> Poozies, The INFINITE BLUE long-awaited first American release from this
> notable Scottish quartet: Karen Tweed, Kate Rusby, and Mary MacMaster
> and Patsy Seddon of Sileas
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4261
>
> RAISE YOUR HEAD: A RETROSPECTIVE
> Compilation culled from their first three albums -- Karen Tweed, Kate
> Rusby, and Sileas gals Mary MacMaster and Patsy Seddon
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4290
>
> Rusby, Kate
> HOURGLASS
> US release of 1997 album. With John McCusker, Alan Reid, Tony McManus,
> Alison Kinnaird, others.
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4255
> SLEEPLESS
> With Darrell Scott, John McCusker and Tim O'Brien
>                         CD...COMPASS-CD4277
>
> Todd, Gibb
> CONNECTED
> Original, traditional and contemporary ballads with an all-star lineup
> including Kate Rusby, Tony McManus, John McCusker, Finbar Furey,
> Alasdair Fraser, Joanie Madden, others
>                         CD...LDL-CD1292
>
> McCusker, John
> YELLA HOOSE
> Second solo album for this Battlefield Band fiddler. Including guests
> Tim O'Brien, Daryll Scott, Kate Rusby, Michael McGoldrick, Ian Carr,
> Simon Thoumire, Andy Cutting, Gino Lupari, Malcolm Stitt, and Kevin
> MacKenzie. Includes mainly original compositions and is produced by John
> McCusker
>                         CD...TEMP-CD2083
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 09:00:49 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


I believe Kate Rusby's recordings are available from Elderly Instruments
(www.elderly.com) .Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: ADdress change
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:32:44 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


I'm quitting this server. Could you please change my URL to:[unmask]thanx much!

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:34:45 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


They're also available (as is everything else in print) from CAMSCO Music
)(www.camsco.com). And often at a lower price.On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Paul Stamler wrote:> I believe Kate Rusby's recordings are available from Elderly Instruments
> (www.elderly.com) .
>
>
> Peace.
> Paul
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A Singer New to Me
From: Cliford J Ocheltree <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:05:12 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Ed,        Am aware of two CDs by Kate RUSBY, "Hourglass" [Compass Records 7
4255 2. (1998)] and "Sleepless" {Compass Records 7 4277 2 (1999)] both were
originally releaseed by Pure Records in the U.K. and I find both to be
very enjoyable. For those who find solace in "best of lists" both were
selested by Folk Roots as among the best new releases in their respective
years.        The 11 cuts on "Hourglass" are 1. Sir Eglamore; 2. As I Roved Out;
3. Jolly Ploughboys; 4. Annan Waters; 5. Stananivy / Jack & Jill; 6. A Rose
In April; 7. Radio Sweetheart; 8. I am Stretched On Your Grave; 9. Old Man
Time; 10. Drowned Lovers; 11. Bold Riley.        The 13 cuts on " Sleepless" 1. The Cobblers Daughter; 2. I Wonder
What Is Keeping My True Love Tonight ; 3. The Fairest Of All Yarrow; 4. The
Unquiet Grave; 5. Sho Heen; 6. Sweet Bride; 7. All God's Angels; 8. The
Wild Goose; 9. The Duke And The Tinker; 10. Our Town [a fine song by Iris
Dement]; 11. The Sleepless Sailor; 12. Cowsong; 13. Botany Bay        Compass Records has a web page at www.compassrecords.comCliff Ocheltree
New Orleans LA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: John Jacob Niles
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:32:21 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
understand him and his work?
Thanks
Steve Roud

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 07:48:57 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On 11/22/00, roud wrote:>The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
>before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
>examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
>understand him and his work?I don't think there have been articles on the subject (unless someone
has researched "Black is the Color of My True Love's Hair") -- but
it's easy enough to verify. Look at his "Ballad Book." Look up
"Judas." Or his moralized version of "The Fair Flower of Northumberland."
And what are the odds that he found the only surviving oral version of
"Robin Hood and the Monk"?--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 09:41:24 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was 16,
and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
collected by J.J.Niles.
  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:42:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


Yes, but could your father's informants have learned the carols from the
booklet?        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Trad Man
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 9:41 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: John Jacob NilesSome of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was
16,
and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
collected by J.J.Niles.
  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 11:34:42 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


On 11/23/00, Trad Man wrote:>Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
>and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
>elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was 16,
>and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
>The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
>collected by J.J.Niles.
>  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
>'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody.I agree with Marge Steiner: These are rather dubious reports. I'm
willing to allow that the songs were collected from tradition, but
Niles could have introduced them himself. Source, not collector.A report of the Coventry Carol strikes me as most dubious. There
is no reason to think this song was ever traditional. We have our
copies from old manuscripts -- now burnt! If there is a version
in oral tradition, it was probably introduced from a written
source. Now I'm not saying that makes the song untraditional,
or that there is something wrong with songs introduced into the
tradition from written sources. But this is just the sort of
thing I'd expect of Niles.Don't mistake me: I *do* think Niles collected songs from tradition,
and had some songs within his own family tradition. But I also think
that one can never trust him in the absence of strong supporting
evidence. These collections of your father constitute supporting
evidence in the cases of those two songs -- if they weren't
traditional at the Niles did whatever he did, they are now.
But that is no help in assessing any of his other dubious
pieces.The irony is, if Niles had done all this rewriting and then sung
it for another collector, we'd call it traditional. But he didn't;
he rewrote and then submitted the results as traditional. It's why
I don't trust the Lomaxes, and why I don't trust Niles. They
convict themselves by their own works.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:59:37 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


In a message dated 11/22/00 4:34:02 AM, [unmask] writes:>The suspect nature of Niles' scholarship has been touched on in this list
>before, but can anyone point me in the direction of any studies which
>examine this, or other articles/books about Niles which might help me
>understand him and his work?
>
>Thanks
>
>Steve Roud
**************************************************
I think D. K. Wilgus correctly identifies some problems with Niles in his
_Anglo-Americn Folksong Scholarship  Since 1898_  (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers
University Press, 1959, p. 213) when he says "The
coillector-performer-composer John Jacob Niles.....  has been unable to
separate his three roles. "    Niles, who was born in Kentucky in  1892,
thought of himself as a member of the Anglo-American folk culture of the
southern mountains, and could never see how his "creative" approach was
different from that of his farmer-carpenter father, a well-known singer of
folk songs in his community who, like most true folk singers, put his own
personal spin on his material.   It was typical of young John's approach
that he learned to play on a traditional three-string Appalachian dulcimer,
but soon felt held back by its limitations, and he invented and built several
8-stringed instruments -- beautiful example of careful woodcrafting,  but
hardly traditional.  His creativeness extended to the actual creation of new
songs -- many of them musically excellent --  some of which he said were
"collected"  from genuine folk singers.  (His second book,_Songs My Mother
Never Taught Me_, includes the love song "Venezuela,"  which had appeared in
his earlier book, _Singing Soldiers_, and his publisher convinced him that
the book would sell better if he called it a "folksong"  by some nameless
creator.   Fritz Kreisler, the classical violinist, had the same experience,
and some of his compositions, such as "The Old  Refrain"  and [I think]
"Schon Rosmarin"  were published as his arrangements of old folk tunes.)
    He began doing public performances in 1927, and, along with Carl Sandburg
and Richard Dyer-Bennett, quickly became an exemplar of folk music for the
concert audience.  In spite of his shortcomings as a scholar, he was a great
performer, and I'll always remember how I and the audience as a whole were
transfixed by his dramatic presentation of "The Maid Saved From the Gallows."
  One of his most controversial books was  _The Ballad Book of John Jacob
Niles_ (Boston, Houghton-Mifflin, 1961.)  Its songs are polished in true
Nilesian fashion, and many are obviously "collected"  from books, although he
does give the names of most of his supposed informants.  D. K. Wilgus once
said, in a personal conversation,  "He waited to publish this until the
people he named were all safely dead."
  You might like to read a short piece by Niles himself, called "My
Precarious Life In the Public Domain" (_The Atlantic_, December, 1948.)Sam Hinton
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Trad Man <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 17:57:15 EST
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


In a message dated 11/23/00 12:37:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[unmask] writes:<<
 >Some of his work, at least, was legitimate.  He published a booklet of songs
 >and carols from the Appalachians.  None of the versions were to be found
 >elsewhere, but my father made a trip to West Virginia in 1939 when he was
16,
 >and learned two Christmas carols from the family he was staying with there.
 >The texts and music were almost exactly the same as two of the carols
 >collected by J.J.Niles.
 >  The carols were 'Jesus, Jesus Rest Your Head', and a version of the
 >'Coventry Carol' with a very unusual melody. I agree with Marge Steiner: These are rather dubious reports. I'm
 willing to allow that the songs were collected from tradition, but
 Niles could have introduced them himself. Source, not collector. A report of the Coventry Carol strikes me as most dubious. There
 is no reason to think this song was ever traditional. We have our
 copies from old manuscripts -- now burnt! If there is a version
 in oral tradition, it was probably introduced from a written
 source. Now I'm not saying that makes the song untraditional,
 or that there is something wrong with songs introduced into the
 tradition from written sources. But this is just the sort of
 thing I'd expect of Niles. Don't mistake me: I *do* think Niles collected songs from tradition,
 and had some songs within his own family tradition. But I also think
 that one can never trust him in the absence of strong supporting
 evidence. These collections of your father constitute supporting
 evidence in the cases of those two songs -- if they weren't
 traditional at the Niles did whatever he did, they are now.
 But that is no help in assessing any of his other dubious
 pieces.
  >>I have been able to do a little further research on the Christmas Carols
which Niles published.  Unfortunately at the time I found the booklet - close
to 30 years ago, I did not copy the title page, and so I can't say for
certain when it was published, although I suspect the information could be
found at the Library of Congress.  Niles claims to have collected the songs
from an un-named old lady in Tennessee in 1934.  The fact that my father
learned them virtually indentically in West Virginia in 1939 may support the
theory that the family learned them via performance by Niles, although the
melodies are odd enough that I am somewhat doubtful that they could be
learned so closely without multiple listenings.  As to the idea that they
were learned from the booklet, I think this extremely unlikely as the booklet
was not widely distributed and written for a scholarly audience (Opposite
each carol is a page which is blank except for a small sentence at the top
"Reserved the the student's notes and comments).  The family my father spent
that Christmas with was a coal mining family living near the poverty level,
and unlikely to be buying esoteric music books.
   I have heard another singer sing a very similar version of Jesus, Jesus
rest your head from a different source, so I am convinced that it is in
tradition.  As for the Coventry Carol, the fact that there seems to be only
one American traditional source does cast suspicion on it.  It seems
plausable that these songs may originate from Niles, but have been picked up
by traditional singers and therefore passed into oral tradition like "I
Wonder As I Wander".  Regardless, I have sung them for many years as songs
which I learned as a child from my father, and so, at least in my family,
they are certainly traditional.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 23 Nov 2000 22:09:52 -0800
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


There is a film review of "John Jacob Niles" by Bill McNeil in JAF, 1979, p.
521, but it doesn't touch on his scholarship.  I recall some discussion by
D. K. Wilgus, probably in a record review, but can't put my hands on it yet.Niles did collect some material, at least early in his career; his book,
"Singing Soldiers" is of considerable interest for that particular genre.
It was unfortunate that at the height of his popularity in the folk revival
(ca late 1950s) it was more fashionable to have collected an unusual variant
than to have rearranged it.  I can't help but compare him to Fritz Kreisler,
who initially palmed off many of his finest compositions as reworkings of
old pieces he found in manuscripts in a European monastary library.
Eventually he 'fessed up, and outraged some critics who had been taken in.
If Niles had up front presented "Judas" etc. as his own arrangements he
would have had quite a different response.In his review, Bill castigates Niles' style in the strongest terms.  I
suppose I'm among the few (perhaps only?) folksong aficionados who actually
enjoys his singing -- tho I would certainly not make any claims for its
traditionality.  (WIth that I hastily hide behind a protective barrier
against the barrage of criticism that I now expect.)Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 10:36:49 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Dear Norm,Could you elaborate on "Singing Soldiers" a little more?Thanks,Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 13:42:18 -0000
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(74 lines)


Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the Niles discussion. It's clear
that few of us trust his publications, but it's a shame there doesn't seem
to have been a proper study of his work from this point of view, as I think
we still need to answer some basic questions.
His publications of the 1930s (Songs of the Hill-Folk, and More Songs of
the Hill-Folk, for example) follow the standard pattern for 'popular' books
of the time. The cover and title-page state "Collected and simply
arranged... by John Jacob Niles", and each song is attributed to a
particular place (e.g. "Whitesburg, Letcher County, Kentucky"). Thus the
authenticity of the songs is implied but not really stated, and being
popular works we know to treat them with caution.
His Ballad Book of 1961, however, is in a completely different league. It
has all the paraphernalia of a scholarly collection. Each song is
accompanied by the name of the singer(s), their address, the date of
recording, sketches of their character, and incidental details of when and
how he met them.
On the surface, this seems to be everything we could wish for. But we still
mistrust him, and not only for his peculiar-looking instruments! Did he
invent the whole thing, cobbling together texts from books and pretending
they were from singers who didn't really exist? Did he really collect from
these people but 'doctor/edit/fake' their texts? The Ballad Book was
published less that 25 years after the supposed dates of collection, I would
have thought the complete fake would have been relatively easily exposed by
the real experts who were around at the time and who were perfectly happy to
savage each other for sloppy scholarship. Is there anything which can be
salvaged from his material, or do we simply resign it to the dustbin en
masse?
It is perhaps ominous that the only major collection of his papers which I
have tracked down (I've misplaced the correspondence for a moment, but can
let people know details if they wish to follow it up) apparently contains no
fieldwork material at all.
If someone's looking for a Thesis topic, may I suggest Niles as a potential
subject?
(I've just, somewhat belatedly, checked the JAF Centennial Index, and there
are a few reviews which need following up, which I will report on if they
say anything relevant).
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Norm Cohen <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 6:09 AM
Subject: Re: John Jacob Niles> There is a film review of "John Jacob Niles" by Bill McNeil in JAF, 1979,
p.
> 521, but it doesn't touch on his scholarship.  I recall some discussion by
> D. K. Wilgus, probably in a record review, but can't put my hands on it
yet.
>
> Niles did collect some material, at least early in his career; his book,
> "Singing Soldiers" is of considerable interest for that particular genre.
> It was unfortunate that at the height of his popularity in the folk
revival
> (ca late 1950s) it was more fashionable to have collected an unusual
variant
> than to have rearranged it.  I can't help but compare him to Fritz
Kreisler,
> who initially palmed off many of his finest compositions as reworkings of
> old pieces he found in manuscripts in a European monastary library.
> Eventually he 'fessed up, and outraged some critics who had been taken in.
> If Niles had up front presented "Judas" etc. as his own arrangements he
> would have had quite a different response.
>
> In his review, Bill castigates Niles' style in the strongest terms.  I
> suppose I'm among the few (perhaps only?) folksong aficionados who
actually
> enjoys his singing -- tho I would certainly not make any claims for its
> traditionality.  (WIth that I hastily hide behind a protective barrier
> against the barrage of criticism that I now expect.)
>
> Norm Cohen

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Brief Mentions
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 09:35:55 -0800
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(43 lines)


Folks:I somehow managed to squeeze in a few moments to look over two recent
purchases: Hugh Anderson's _Farewell to Judges and Juries_ and the
festschrift for Edward "Sandy" Ives printed as Vol. 35 of _Northeast
Folklore._Despite their vast geographical differences -- Anderson is writing about
Australia, Ives spent his career in Maine and the Maritimes -- the two men
share an overwhelming belief in the need to place folk song in the larger
social context.  Thus Anderson's work is as much a history of
transportation (of convicts, not trains and such) as it is a collection of
broadsides devoted to that subject.  And the essays in the Ives
festschrift range widely from collecting to performance practice to
boatbuilding practices in Nova Scotia.Both books too are summations, if that is the correct word, of a lifetime
of scholarship, of devotion to a subject not widely honored in the
academy.  It would be hard to imagine a more engaging or comprehensive
book on convict transportation and the peopling of Australia by Britons
than Anderson's wide-ranging, heavily illustrated collection of ballads,
magazine articles, woodblocks, court cases, and pointed ephemera.Similarly, there is the custom of honoring beloved/influential teachers
with a collection of scholarly essays by former students and colleagues,
a festschrift.  The articles are supposed to reflect the range of the
honoree's work, his/her interests, and teaching.  Thus from editor
Pauleena MacDougall's biographical sketch of Edward Dawson Ives (aka
"Sandy") to Otto Willwood's concluding piece on the lost recordings of a
local logger we have a summary of Ives' work.I recommend both.EdP.S.  I noted in MacDougall's biography that Ives attended graduate school
at Indiana in 1960-61 with a group that included Bob Georges, Ellen
Stekert, Judith McCulloh, Joe Hickerson, and Alan Dundes.  (I might add
that the late Gus Meade, perhaps the most promising of ballad scholars,
was also among that lot.)  I was supposed to go there too (I suspect that
they recruited me because they wanted a five-string banjo picker; it sure
wasn't for my undergraduate grades).  In retrospect, I am glad I didn't
attend; I would have been the courtesy "B" in that company.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Bruce virus
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:42:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


Ah...
12 years on the 'net and my very first "Tell everyone you know."I got virused to day by a feller named bruce.I am not knowledgeable on this but I'll just give you the best I got.It came as 5 e-mails from Bruce ???crief?? and addressed to me and several
others - each item differently.  The subject line in each was the same as
different executable e-mails I've received recently (FL_Ballot.exe, etc)
Remarkably each had some 546 lines in the message.Since this looked odd but had friendly Subjects, I saved to disk instead of
launching direct from my Reader. I ran MacAfee Viruscan with definitions
file 4.0.4099 (Nov 12, 2000) (and full heuristics) which showed then clean.I manually launched one (FW_.exe, etc) & got zapped.I use Win95-B and it put a command somewhere in my registry that almost any
Windows program call _must_ be proceeded by using winsvrc.exe, which it
can't find.  A Windows-looking dialog asks its location.  Of course it
doesn't exist.  I tried to fool it by creating an empty file _called_
winsvrc.exe in the root directory but then the virus simply claims that
_none_ of my programs are Windows 95 programs and cannot be run.  The
desktop opened more or less normally & Windows Explorer (which had been
open) worked ok but I could not run any significant or system program.I'm a good backer-upper and wished to restore User.dat, (user.da0 is also
corrupted by this wiseguy), and System.dat and System.ini and Win.ini (just
to be sure - I don't know I need them all) But back-up is a windows-based
program and won't work.Finally, since I (cheerfully patting myself on the back with both hands and
both feet) use Backup Version 6 from Win 3.95 (because it will _include_
selected files, not just _exclude_ them) I was able to drop to DOS and
restore the 4 files.I suffered no loss at all except about two hours of confusion.Strongly recommend:
Look out for e-mail of 546 or so lines
Back up the 4 system files in such a way they can be restored in DOS
        eg Win 3.x Back-up or perhaps create a Safe folder (directory) &
just copy them from \Windows to this.
        You'll need some DOS program that will deal with deleting, and
copying files that are marked Read-only, System, and Hidden.  (Norton
Commander or FA.exe to change the characturists, eg.)  Windows Explorer may
work if you can get _it_ to work.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--