View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 14:46:23 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


On 7/2/00, John Roberts wrote:>There is a CD-Recordable FAQ at:
>
>http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/
>
>I too am interested in answers to Ed's questions, but I am not at all
>computer-literate, (I use a Mac). On that side, it seems my bundled
>software (Toast) needs an $80 upgrade to Toast DeLuxe do do any
>simple editing to a sound file I record through the computer's audio
>input - I am told that the shareware SoundSculptor will also do the
>job. But currently I'm still collecting information, so I haven't
>tried anything in this direction yet. Toast DeLuxe apparently has a
>"clean-up" routine that works fairly well on soundfiles created from
>LP; though it's not "professional quality" it does a reasonable job
>of removing clicks and so forth. (That's just what I've heard). Any
>Mac people out there?
>
>John Roberts.I'm a Mac person, too, though I haven't actually *done* this
process yet. (Haven't found the right cable combination, and
am being very careful about it. :-)I've been reading the magazines, though, and also been careful
about my versions of Toast. :-) FWIW, the upgrade you need isn't
really Toast Pro; it's Toast 4.0. That comes with CD Spin Doctor
(the program for separating tracks on CDs), which was not included
in Toast 3.0 or earlier. It also has some sound editing capabilities,
though if you want to do something fancy, you'll need more.The question really is one of how much you're willing to pay to
fix the tracks, and how much time you're willing to spend.Someone really ought to sell an all-in-one solution for this
(high-quality sound board, cables, and software) -- but I haven't
heard of any such thing.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: An Artcar Anthem
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:08:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(77 lines)


Here it is folks An Artcar Anthem! (lyrics below for all to use!) Enjoy!
to get the wonderous midi (fun) go here:
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/artcaranthem.html
(this is fun go to the page and click on the midi link!)
this is the link for the midi but may not work from here...
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/carbox.midLITTLE     PlAIN      CARS
An Artcar Anthem!  Little Plain Cars          Adapted  from Malvina Reynolds “Little Houses”          Little plain cars on the car lots,
          Little plain cars  made of  status quo-a-stuff
          Little plain cars on the high-a-ways,
          Little plain cars all the same,
          There's a black one and a brown one
          And a blue one and a red one
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          And the people in the plain cars
          All went to the university
          Where they were put in plain cars
          And they came out all the same
          And there's doctors and lawyers
          And street rod-od-ers
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          And they all play on the golf course
          And drink their hand crafted-beer
          And they all have pretty children
          And the children go to school,
          And the children go to summer camp
          And then to the university
          Where they are all  put in plain cars
          And they drive out all the same.          And the boys go into business
          And marry and raise a family
          Drivein  plain cars made of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same,
          There's a green one and a pink one
          And a blue one and a yellow one
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          But the one child  he’s an ar-tist
          And knows that his freedom’s real
          Tired of plain cars made of status quo-a-stuff
          That all look just the same,
          Now there’s glued ones and there are painted ones
          And a carved one and a magnet one
          And they’re all made out of  joy and smiles
          And they all are all the rage!          (alt last verse or add on - And they all the world will change!)ABC NotationT:Little Plain Cars a.k.a. Little Boxes
M:4/4
L:1/4
Q:1/4=100
C:adapted from tune by Malvina Reynolds
K:C
G1/2A/2|G2E2G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2G/2|c2c2c3/2d/2|
edccc3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|F2F2F3/2G/2|E2E2E3/2F/2|
D4G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2G/2|c2c2c3/2d/2|
e3/2d/2c2c3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|FFFFF3/2G/2|
E2E2D3/2D/2|C4|e3/2d/2c2c3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|FFFFF3/2G/2|
E2E2D3/2D/2|C4||Words  adapted by Conrad Bladey
And there aint no copyright down here!
Ask only for credit when all others want cash!

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:21:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


<<Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
safely filed.)
Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.
I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.
What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?>>Two routes you can go. One is to get a decent DAT recorder (Sony's are okay,
with decent if not screamingly great converters) and a sound card with a
digital interface. This has the advantage of giving you input level controls
and a recorder you can use for other purposes as well as giving you a
straight 16-bit signal without needing to be dithered. The digital output of
the DAT recorder would feed the digital in of the sound card, and vice
versa.The alternative, simpler and more direct, would be a CardDeluxe sound card
from Digital Audio Labs. Very high quality despite living inside a computer
case (nasty electrical environment for audio). It's 24 bits, so you'd need
to dither the signal down to 16 bits for printing onto a CD (truncating the
data causes very audible distortion). About $300 for the card, street price
with careful shopping.The Cadillac route would be to buy an Apogee Rosetta converter for about a
grand, plus a digital-in sound card. The sound quality on this unit is
fantastic, but I'm not sure it's worth the extra cash if you're not a
studio.You'll also need a CD burner; I've had decent luck with the Yamahas. And
software; Adaptec Easy-CD seems to be the standard, but I've found it to be
pretty buggy. Last year PC World ran a comparison article between several
brands of CD-burning software; if you could look it up, that would be
useful. You also could use some descratching software; you'd be surprised
how much cleaner even good-sounding discs can get with some *light*
descratching. I use DC-ART software from Diamond Cut, which is clunky but
does a fair job. There's much better stuff out there from Sound Forge and
Sek'd, but they both cost a lot more. I don't suggest the fancier denoising
stuff; except for CEDAR, which is thousands of dollars, these programs
damage the audio more than I can stand, and I'd prefer to live with the
hiss. The low-cut filter and notch filter built into DC-ART can be useful
for some of those Ken Goldstein recordings, which tend to have hum (notch
filter) or rumble (low-cut, aka high-pass).Finally, liner notes -- you can make hybrid discs, audio plus data, and scan
(or type -- urghh) the notes into your computer as text, then store the text
on the same disc as the music. Awkward, but doable in theory (I've never
actually done this, so can't speak from experience).Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D (Mac)
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:52:09 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(36 lines) , text/enriched(50 lines)


Bob Waltz wrote:>I've been reading the magazines, though, and also been careful
>about my versions of Toast. :-) FWIW, the upgrade you need isn't
>really Toast Pro; it's Toast 4.0. That comes with CD Spin Doctor
>(the program for separating tracks on CDs), which was not included
>in Toast 3.0 or earlier. It also has some sound editing capabilities,
>though if you want to do something fancy, you'll need more.Bob,I bought a Yamaha burner about 3 weeks ago. It came bundled with
Toast 4.0.1.1, which does _not_ include Spin Doctor. To get the
latter you need Toast 4 De Luxe (yes I suppose nominally they're both
Toast 4.0, but there's a big difference). From the Adaptec webpage:What's the difference between Toast 4 Deluxe and Toast 4 Standard?
Standard is an OEM (bundled) version. It doesn't have many of the
advanced features that Toast Deluxe has such as DAO (Disc-at-Once)
support, MP3, Liquid Audio, and more advance formats, nor does it
have the CD Spin Doctor or Photo Relay applications.The De Luxe version is around $80 street and there's no upgrade path.
I felt a little gypped as the bundled PC software does seem to have
Spin Doctor's capabilities.Peter Berryman recommended SoundSculptor to me ($30 shareware, it
needs to be licensecd to enable Save) to do soundfile editing.John.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D (Mac)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2000 19:41:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


> I bought a Yamaha burner about 3 weeks ago. It came bundled with
> Toast 4.0.1.1, which does _not_ include Spin Doctor. To get the
> latter you need Toast 4 De Luxe (yes I suppose nominally they're both
> Toast 4.0, but there's a big difference).Something odd here, John.  A housemate who purchased a G3 with Pro Tools
bought Toast 4.0 (4.0.2?), and upgraded it to 4.1 because his burner
wasn't supported.  Both came with Audio Extractor and Spin Doctor.  I
wonder if you got Toast Lite?-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:31:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


Hi folks:Most of you probably know about this, but just in case... a good portion of
the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and
AIFF files of the field recordings, and MIDI files of the tunes that are
transcribed. Searchable by singer's name, song name or catalog number. Not
everything in the collection is up yet, but it's already a treasure trove.
It's at:http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.htmlPeace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:24:10 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Thanks, Paul, for that information. This is a valuable site to have
bookmarked.Lorne Brown
The Ballad Project
TorontoPaul Stamler wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> Most of you probably know about this, but just in case... a good portion of
> the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
> line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and
> AIFF files of the field recordings, and MIDI files of the tunes that are
> transcribed. Searchable by singer's name, song name or catalog number. Not
> everything in the collection is up yet, but it's already a treasure trove.
> It's at:
>
> http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.html
>
> Peace.
> Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: St Thomas, (US) Virgin Islands.
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:34:07 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


So we're off on the 17th for a couple of weeks in the islands.  Seemed like
a good idea.  Now I'm concerned I won't find any folksong there and I won't
have anything to do with my time.I'm bringing the Sony Walkman Pro (WMD3) of course but seriously doubt I'll
get to use it.Abrahams was kind enough to reply but had no suggestions.The single reference I find in my own stuff to St Thomas is obscure.. On the
_Unfortunate Rake_ record "Bright Summer Morning" was collected by "Van Dam
and T. Combs" there in 1953.  But I find no reference or any publication for
a Van Dam or a Van Dam Combs at OCLC.Any suggestions re printed matter?
Better (but forlornly) any suggestions re contact points?Thank you.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:41:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:31:44 -0500, Paul Stamler wrote:>the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
>line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and but it's already a treasure trove.
>
>http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.html
>
And it is good.  I wasn't aware of Hunter but I'm instantly intrigued.  At
the top there (#3) is "A Lensman, A Tinsman, A Tinker, A Tailor."  Maybe
it's common but I've never before seen a version with verse one the common
Scottish but the tune, chorus & second verse from the common US versions.Great!-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Very important literary award
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:16:12 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


One never knows from whence vital entries for the Happy! file will spring.
Hopefully you caught the very important literary award given Gary Dahl, as
reported by Reuters in today's paper.  It led to the following Happy! entry:Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton Lytton (of Knebworth), 1st Baron, born
5/25/1803 (d1/18/1873) and who wrote _Last Days of Pompeii_.  Of far more
importance, he is the eponym for the annual (from 1982) San Jose State U.
"Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest" (for really bad writing; entry deadline is
the traditional US date for creative writing, April 15) to honor his _Paul
Clifford_ which begins "It was a dark and stormy night."
http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/english/bulwer.htmLytton's ancestral estate at Knebworth was used by Tim Burton as the setting
for "stately Wayne Manor" in the movie "Batman."As of October 1999, the exact phrase "dark and stormy" occurs in 11 songs at
Digital Tradition:BAGCOACH      On a dark and stormy night as the
BARFTBOY      the night was dark and stormy, and the moon
DRNKHELL      It was a dark and stormy night, I saw
FTHFULSL      'Twas on a dark and stormy night The snow
FLYDUTCH      'Twas on a dark and stormy night well southward
GUYREED       do remember one dark and stormy night The rain
EVRYINCH      of woe One dark and stormy night. He was
FTHSAILR      Twas on a dark and stormy night, the snow
PRSHSNOW      It's on a dark and stormy night, the snow
WRKHURON      On a dark and stormy night When orders
ROYALPLM      On a dark and stormy night The rainand this throws into wild disarray and confusion the whole conceptual-
ization of bad writing and the ballad.  Monstrous questions are raised.Is pure bathos more acceptable as song than as "legitimate" writing?
Is bathos _always_ to be taken as a joke?  (Even in Temperance songs.)
Do any of these songs predate _Paul Clifford_?
And/or, where did the dread phrase arise?
Etc.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Very important literary award
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:48:37 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


Abby,I haven't looked at each song closely, but just about all of the ones
you mention are late 19th / early 20th C sentimental ballads, disaster
ballads, or songs written at that time as caricatures of "folksongs"
(i.e. Jack Was Every Inch a Sailor -- which started life as a show tune
around the turn of the century).  My suspicion is that they were
primarily the output of songmills, Tin Pan Alley or its precursors.  If
so, that particular commercial environment is probably more responsible
for the "bad" writing, than the ballad form per se.  It does raise the
question, though, of where does "formulaic" end, and trite and
hackneyed begin?One of the things that struck me about " it was a dark and stormy
night," is that folk sea-disaster ballads from the same period are
commonly detailed, as ballads go, in their depiction of vessels in
storms: they often include details of wind direction and strength, wave
height, sometimes cloud formations, course headings, rigging
adjustments made in preparation for severe weather, and so on.
Granted, this tends to be executed prosaically, but that's a lesser sin
than excess.Bill Ellis takes up the question of "bathos" in his article on "The
Blind Girl" (JAF 91, 1978).  He argued that such sentimental and, to
us, excessively written ballads had a genuine effect on Victorian and
Edwardian audiences.  That would also appear to be the case from
William Roy Mackenzie's descriptions of ballad singers in Nova Scotia.
Perhaps it was the weak end of the Romantic emphasis on emotion and
high drama, a poor man's "storm and stress," albeit a century later.But then again, when it comes right down to it, aren't the opening bars
of "The Ride of the Valkyries" just an aural equivalent of "It was a
dark and stormy night" : )Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fiddle Convention in 2001
From: Dr Ian Russell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:23:44 +0100
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(72 lines)


Dear All,
For those of us who enjoy a tune as much as a lyric, you
might like to note the following convention.
Apologies for any cross posting.
Best wishes,
IanNorth Atlantic Fiddle Convention
Crossing Boundaries
25 - 29 July 2001
University of Aberdeen, ScotlandCrossing Boundaries is devoted to traditional
fiddlers and fiddle music from countries around
the northern seas, combining an international
conference with performance events and workshops,
as well as opportunities for informal sessions.The North East of Scotland, famous for its
fiddle tradition, is the setting for this event,
organised by the Elphinstone Institute in
conjunction with other local, national, and
international arts and cultural
organisations: SCaT (Scottish Culture and Traditions),
and the Lemon Tree in Aberdeen; Aberdeenshire Arts;
the Irish Centre for World Music, University of Limerick;
the Department of Ethnology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.The convention will focus on the way the fiddle,
fiddle music, and styles of playing cross boundaries
of all kinds - geographical, political and
personal - creating new styles and fresh musical insights.The conference will explore the past and future
of traditional fiddling in social, ethnological, and musical
contexts, with keynote contributions.  Themes include:
transmission, performance, social context, symbolic or
religious function, stylistics, material culture, dance,
supernatural beliefs, folklore, and iconography.If you are interested in attending, contributing,
performing, or offering an academic paper (abstract of
300 words, deadline 1 April 2001), please e-mail or
write to the Elphinstone Institute. (The Institute
may present abstracts of papers for peer review and
anticipates the publication of the proceedings.)Convenors: Ian Russell and Mary Anne AlburgerThe Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272996 Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
Website: www.abdn.ac.uk/Elphinstone/
E-mail:  [unmask]----------------------
Dr Ian Russell, Director
The Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen
AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272386
Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
[unmask]
Website:
www.abdn.ac.uk/elphinstone/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: happy!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:43:48 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
Woody Guthrie's birthday!        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: happy!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:06:42 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(17 lines)


On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
> Woody Guthrie's birthday!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>Had he lived, he would have been 88 years old today.  And probably still
sitting at his portable typewriter, pounding away, margin to margin, all
caps on the same questions of race and class that troubled him before he
lost his voice.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: happy!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:46:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Yes, no doubt.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Ed Cray
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 10:07 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: happy!On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
> Woody Guthrie's birthday!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>Had he lived, he would have been 88 years old today.  And probably still
sitting at his portable typewriter, pounding away, margin to margin, all
caps on the same questions of race and class that troubled him before he
lost his voice.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:41:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Balladeers --I thought about heading this with the subject "Have I Got a Deal
For You," but those of you with spam filters probably wouldn't
like the results. :-)Anyway, folks, a person I work with is retiring and getting rid
of his old folk music books. I've taken some off his hands already
(you can't have them! Back! Back!), but there are a number I already
have. I volunteered/promised to make them available to you folks
first. (I realize that selling books over Ballad-L may be against
policy, but how else are you going to learn about these? As a lousy
compromise, I won't list the prices unless our Esteemed List Mom
permits.)Anyway, here are the books:Roger D. Abrahams & George Foss, _Anglo-American Folksong Style_.
   Paperback, first printing. Binding is in good shape, but the
   contents are heavily underlined; the owner used it to teach
   a folklore class at the University of Minnesota.Richard Chase, _American Folk Tales and Songs_. 1971 Dover
   paperback edition. Some underlining and notes, mostly in
   the folklore rather than the song portion. Binding is in
   good shape except that the cellophane on the cover is
   starting to peel. (I've seen *new* Dover books with that
   problem.)Francis James Child -- you know what. The Bible. _The English
   and Scottish Popular Ballads_. The Dover five-volume set.
   Not sure which printing (they may not even all be the
   same), but they were bought in the Sixties. Completely unmarked,
   as best I can tell. The spines are a bit faded from sun,
   and the pages are just a little brown around the edges for
   the same reason, but the bindings are in good shape.Josiah H. Combs (edited by D. K. Wilgus), _Folk-Songs of the
   Southern United States_. Hardcover. Second printing (1969).
   Appears to be in mint condition; I wish I could keep this
   one and sell my copy. :-)Alan Lomax, _Folk Songs of North America_. Hardcover, no date
  but I'd guess it was printed in the Sixties. Excellent condition
  (I can't find a mark in it) except that the dust jacket is
  rather battered.If anyone is interested, let me know off-list and I'll tell you
what we're going to try to soak you for. :-) Or feel free to
contact me with questions.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: Gwenzilla <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 12:53:50 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:OK, what do you want for the Child?Gwen Knighton                                    [unmask]_______________________________________________________________________
        And this curve, is your smile
        And this cross, is your heart      (KaTe--The Red Shoes)
        And this line,  is your path
_______________________________________________________________________
                   -*Cyny Telyn* -- /Sing/ the harp-

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:04:23 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 12:53:50PM -0400, Gwenzilla wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:
>
> OK, what do you want for the Child?        This sounds like either kidnapping or slavery. :-)        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:21:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On 7/15/00, Gwenzilla wrote:>On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:
>
>OK, what do you want for the Child?A good home, first and foremost. :-)Just a reminder: Please contact me *off-list*. Don't want to
be exposing our dirty laundry in public. :-) (At least until
Ms. Steiner gives us permission.)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: Mary Louise Chown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:04:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> Anyway, here are the books:
>
>
>
> Richard Chase, _American Folk Tales and Songs_. 1971 Dover
>    paperback edition. Some underlining and notes, mostly in
>    the folklore rather than the song portion. Binding is in
>    good shape except that the cellophane on the cover is
>    starting to peel. (I've seen *new* Dover books with that
>    problem.)
>
> Francis James Child -- you know what. The Bible. _The English
>    and Scottish Popular Ballads_. The Dover five-volume set.
>    Not sure which printing (they may not even all be the
>    same), but they were bought in the Sixties. Completely unmarked,
>    as best I can tell. The spines are a bit faded from sun,
>    and the pages are just a little brown around the edges for
>    the same reason, but the bindings are in good shape.
>
> Alan Lomax, _Folk Songs of North America_. Hardcover, no date
>   but I'd guess it was printed in the Sixties. Excellent condition
>   (I can't find a mark in it) except that the dust jacket is
>   rather battered.
>
> If anyone is interested, let me know off-list and I'll tell you
> what we're going to try to soak you for. :-) Or feel free to
> contact me with questions.
>
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."Hello Bob  Can ypou tell me the prices for the above books
Mary Louise Chown

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
I should have charged more. :-)The other books are still available.This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
just on a weekend!I hate to think how many of us are waiting in line for Laws
or Bronson.We need a way to communicate with each other if things like this
turn up.How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
much work as I think it will be. :-).Here's what I have in mind:Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
Child.Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)So:Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
buy it.Thoughts:How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
save some time.Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
people "Sorry, Child is sold."
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:42:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


I have done this in the past and it works wonderfully
if you simply use a guestbook....
take out a geocities account and make a guestbook.
folks can add in what is available and then note what is not
available when it finds a home
periodically a summation can be posted
better you can  go to
http://guestworld.tripod.lycos.com/
and get a very good guestbook for free which you can edit
right down to message content.
Every so often delete obsolete entries based upon
responses from sellers.
Seller, donors would have to inform the guestbook when item
was gone...not too hard.
you would remind folk to do so and to provide a means of contact and method of transfer.Create a simple web page explain this and add in the guestbook link.
not hard but does very well. I have a few of these going now.Conrad"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)
>
> Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
> I should have charged more. :-)
>
> The other books are still available.
>
> This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
> for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
> common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
> also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
> just on a weekend!
>
> I hate to think how many of us are waiting in line for Laws
> or Bronson.
>
> We need a way to communicate with each other if things like this
> turn up.
>
> How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
> to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
> much work as I think it will be. :-).
>
> Here's what I have in mind:
>
> Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
> most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
> the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
> bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
> Child.
>
> Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
> people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.
>
> It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
> when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)
>
> So:
>
> Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
> to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
> even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
> be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
> buy it.
>
> Thoughts:
>
> How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
> in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.
>
> Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
> save some time.
>
> Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
> people "Sorry, Child is sold."
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:37:02 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(83 lines)


>DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)
>
>Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
>I should have charged more. :-)
>
>The other books are still available.
>
>This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
>for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
>common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
>also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
>just on a weekend!The Dover Child edition is fairly rare these days, sometimes, when
available, running into the hundreds for a set.  Not only is it out of
print, but has been for a long time. What's worse is that in the latter
days of its availability, Dover had not printed as many copies of Volume
Three as they had the other four.
>
>How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
>to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
>much work as I think it will be. :-).Sounds like a reaaly fine idea.>Here's what I have in mind:
>
>Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
>most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
>the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
>bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
>Child.You might also ask for lists of books that people wabt to sell. I.m sure
there are titles out there that I might like, but if I don't know they
exist...Perhaps the simplest way to do this would be to send out periodically a
list of books wanted and books for sale. Each list has the name and e-mail
of the buyer/seller and specific price and/or price range.  This shifts the
responsibility to the buyer and seller and quickly gets you out of the
middle. Maybe this could also include vinyl as well as paper.If this works out without too much  hassle, a swappers list might be a good
addition. In the case of out-of-print or otherwise unobtainable material, a
copy swap might prove feasible. For example, I'd love to swap a photocopy
of Part One of Terry's "The Shanty Book" for a copy of Part Two.I'm looking forward to the first list. This is indeed a most noble
undertaking  - Tom>Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
>people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.
>
>It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
>when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)
>
>So:
>
>Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
>to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
>even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
>be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
>buy it.
>
>Thoughts:
>
>How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
>in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.
>
>Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
>save some time.
>
>Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
>people "Sorry, Child is sold."
>--
>Bob Waltz
>[unmask]
>
>"The one thing we learn from history --
>   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Astonished!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:36:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


"Child, Francis James Ed English and Scottish Popular Ballads; 5 Vols.
Dover, 1965 Trade Paperback. Good/No Jacket. Book # 13936
Price: US$ 500.00
Presented by BLACK OAK BOOKS, ABAA, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A."john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:29:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On 7/16/00, John Garst wrote:>"Child, Francis James Ed English and Scottish Popular Ballads; 5 Vols.
>Dover, 1965 Trade Paperback. Good/No Jacket. Book # 13936
>Price: US$ 500.00
>Presented by BLACK OAK BOOKS, ABAA, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A."When I was pricing the various books this fellow had for sale, I found
a few like that -- e.g. a copy of Gomme for $125 and a copy of
Jackson's book on spirituals for $50. These were on the order of
four times what the other sets cost.Maybe they invoked Child's ghost and had him sign it. :-)But it's an argument for some sort of database to tell us what these
things *ought* to cost. It was tough, sitting there researching
how much to charge *myself* for a copy of Laws. :-)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:05:46 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about $250 four
years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I think I found an ad in
the classified of _Texas Monthly_

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Hardy & Bonaparte
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:19:45 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Not a ballad, but certainly in the group's realm of expertise?In Thomas Hardy's "The Trumpet Major" the soldiers sing (omitting his diacriticals):When lawyers strive to heal a breach,
And parsons practise what they preach;
Then Boney he'll come pouncing down,
And march his men on London Town!Rollicum rorum, tollollorum,
Rollicum rorum, tollollay.(etc. - 4 verses offered, a total of 14 referred to!)Was this Hardy's own creation, or (and?) is there a melody anyone knows of?~ Becky Nankivell
Tucson, Arizona

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:21:05 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Quoth herself:
> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about $250 four
> years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I think I found an ad in
> the classified of _Texas Monthly_I recall finding a set of the Dover reprints in the local Pegasus book store
some time ago and posting its existence there, probably on this very list.
Price was very reasonable, about $20 per volume (up from the original cover
price, something like $5.95). I sure hope someone followed up on that one and
phoned the store. -- aloha, Lani<||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 21:15:55 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


And last year I found a Dover set of Child in a small bookstore in Camden,
Maine -- memory serving.  The dealer, whose name I posted on ballad-l,
wanted like $20 a volume.  Not a bad price considering that Wildmon had a
set of the original edition for $1000 earlier this year.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Margaret Anderson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 23:40:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


> I recall finding a set of the Dover reprints in the local Pegasus book store
> some time ago and posting its existence there, probably on this very list.
> Price was very reasonable, about $20 per volume (up from the original cover
> price, something like $5.95). I sure hope someone followed up on that one and
> phoned the store. -- aloha, LaniActually, the original price on the covers of my set is $2.75.  I got them about
30 years ago and it cost all the cash I had at the time.  I've gotten more than my
money's worth from them.Discussions like this make me feel unusually wealthy.Margaret

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:59:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Lani and Ed, I don't think you need worry about anyone passing up such
information posted to the list.  I responded within something like 8
hours of Ed's posting (which was, as I recall, $50 for the set), and was
the fifth respondent.  The books had already been sold, of course.  I
was the sixth inquiry regarding Bob's set, and they were of course gone.
 We keep trying, though.While we're in the eat-your-heart-out mode, the set I'm currently using
is borrowed from my housemate Sandy (of Sandy's Music here in
Cambridge).  A friend of his found the complete set, in excellent
unmarked condition, at a yard sale, and bought it ridiculously cheap
figuring Sandy would want it - which of course was correct.Meanwhile, and perhaps because this is Child country, we here in the
Boston area continue to have access to Child and numerous other
interesting ballad collections and commentary because of the local
libraries.  There are 5 complete Dover collections (and one partial),
one Cooper Square set and apparently one original edition
(non-circulating) in our local suburban network.  This doesn't count a
couple of sets of Child's earlier collection (1857-58, reprinted 1880)
and about 18 copies of the Student's Cambridge Edition.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Please, folks, Child is SOLD
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:48:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


To all the folks who are asking about Child:Please, folks, it's SOLD.I am keeping a waiting list, but it's already nearly a dozen names
long. I've stopped adding names to it. So I'm not even going to answer
any more.The *other* books are still available. Speaking as someone who
has all of them, Combs/Wilgus, in particular, is a good, useful volume
to have around. Lots of good versions of a wide variety of ballads
in that book....--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: book sales and exchanges
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:49:48 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi, folks.  I would ask that book sales and exchanges be conducted off-list.
if you want to announce the availability of a book on the list, that's fine,
but, please ask those interested to contact you privately.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:09:49 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 [unmask] wrote:> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about
> $250 four years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I
> think I found an ad in the classified of _Texas Monthly_I bought my Dover edition in 1982, when it was still in print & cost
$7.50 per volume.  Evidently I should have sunk my savings in spare
copies; it has outperformed the stock market.  Having confessed that I
own it, I suppose I had better insure it.Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Look on yonder, see that eagle rise.                :||
||:  He was born on land, but he sure enjoys the skies.  :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:54:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Okay, which one of you got to Tim Fout in Louisville before I did, and
got the Dover set for $21.50? I was the SECOND caller, dammit! Nice
e-pistle form the lad this morning, however, calling for contributions
to the "educate the dumb bookseller fund." Seems to be a genuinely nice
fellow. Ain't you ashamed to have taken advantage of him?
        Sandy Paton
        Folk-Legacy
<http://www.folklegacy.com>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:28:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


On 7/17/00, Joseph C Fineman wrote:>On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 [unmask] wrote:
>
>> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about
>> $250 four years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I
>> think I found an ad in the classified of _Texas Monthly_
>
>I bought my Dover edition in 1982, when it was still in print & cost
>$7.50 per volume.  Evidently I should have sunk my savings in spare
>copies; it has outperformed the stock market.  Having confessed that I
>own it, I suppose I had better insure it.
>
>Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
>out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
>it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
>for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?There are several problems, of different sorts.One is the problem of space/data representation. Child often draws
analogies to non-English ballads. Some are in languages which do
not use the Roman alphabet. Some of these cannot be represented in
normal HTML. The alternatives are to present the files as scans
or as Acrobat files. Both get LARGE.If you do scan for conversion to HTML, you also have to be able
to scan those funny characters.And who proofreads these hundreds of thousands of words? You
can't spellcheck it; the spelling is funny anyway.And you're talking about scanning some thousands of pages.And finally, there is the care and feeding of the books themselves.
What this discussion has shown is that my copy of Child is even
more precious than I thought. :-) Am I going to risk their spines
by running thousands of pages through my scanner?And a final thought: I've been trying for four years to get
people to do books for the Ballad Index. Response has been
pretty poor -- and that's a much easier task than doing Child!
Where are the volunteers?What might be possible is a collective project: If someone has a
web server with a lot of available space, we might be able to do
this as a group -- with each person doing, say, ten ballads, and
the administrator posting the results.But, quite frankly, I wonder about the utility even of this. Child
is, despite everything, easy to find compared to Bronson or
Coffin/Renwick. In ten years of looking, I've had my chances at
three complete sets of Child and I believe some individual volumes.
Plus there are several copies in local libraries. To the best of my
knowledge, there is only one library copy of Bronson in the
Twin Cities, and it's not available for general use. The only
volume I've managed to acquire is Volume I.And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.If we're going to do an "online Child," we shouldn't stop
there. I realize that Bronson and Coffin/Renwick are still under
copyright. But we should at least add summaries of that information.And for that matter, *because* Child is relatively available,
might it not be better to work on other rare books? I realize
that Laws is still under copyright, too -- but what about Sharp?
Dean? Rickaby? All those early regional collections? Those strike
me as a greater need. (Of course, let it be said that I regard
Child as overrated. Child, for all his brilliance, did not
really understand what was and was not traditional!)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: susan tichy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:11:24 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


>And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.Are you talking about The British Traditional Ballad in North America ? I
have one I paid only $20 for... perhaps the dealer I bought it from needs
that seminar for dumb book dealers... but I do too, for a didn't know it was
that rare.Susan Tichy
(fan of that great old murder ballad "Long Lurking")__________________________________________________________________
Hungry Gulch Books & Trails * PO Box 357, Westcliffe, CO 81252 USA
719-783-2244 * [unmask] * http://www.hungrygulch.com
New & Used Books * Book Searches * Special Orders * Maps * Discount Music
Publishers of _The Colorado Sangre de Cristo: A Complete Trail Guide_

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:39:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


On 7/17/00, susan tichy wrote:> >And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.
>
>Are you talking about The British Traditional Ballad in North America ? I
>have one I paid only $20 for... perhaps the dealer I bought it from needs
>that seminar for dumb book dealers... but I do too, for a didn't know it was
>that rare.The fact that a book is rare doesn't mean that the price *has* to be
high. :-) Chances are, if I ever find a copy at a local bookstore,
it will be priced around there. Doesn't make it more or less important.BTW -- let's *not* have that seminar for dumb book dealers. It's
hard enough paying for the books *with* dumb dealers. :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:28:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:42:32PM -0500, Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** wrote:
>
> I have done this in the past and it works wonderfully
> if you simply use a guestbook....
> take out a geocities account and make a guestbook.
> folks can add in what is available and then note what is not
> available when it finds a home
> periodically a summation can be posted
> better you can  go to
> http://guestworld.tripod.lycos.com/
> and get a very good guestbook for free which you can edit
> right down to message content.
> Every so often delete obsolete entries based upon
> responses from sellers.
> Seller, donors would have to inform the guestbook when item
> was gone...not too hard.
> you would remind folk to do so and to provide a means of contact and method of transfer.
>
> Create a simple web page explain this and add in the guestbook link.
> not hard but does very well. I have a few of these going now.
>
> ConradI don't think that this is a good idea for a couple of reasons. The
first is spam. Any publicly available web page will have every email
address on it harvested by robots run by the companies peddling those
CDs of "10 million addresses". Maybe you like spam but most people
don't. Second, some folks may not want their want list, price limits and
transactions be that public. Also the guestbook software on most servers
was not really designed for this sort of application. They are
vulnerable to abuses and some of them are not very secure.I think that Bob's idea is a good one and is better managed by problem not
directly on the Net.                        Just my 2 cents ( or maybe 4).
                                        Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 02:22:58 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Quoth Our Fearless Leader:
> >Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
> >out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
> >it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
> >for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the modern
business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I did,
and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I believe, one
of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but I
don't  remember seeing one lately.
        Lillian Krelove of Legacy Books used to be another such, but she's
sold the business to Sing Out! and they seem to have other fish to pursue.
        Good luck! -- Aloha, Lani<||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:41:16 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


>Quoth Our Fearless Leader:
>> >Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
>> >out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
>> >it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
>> >for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?Another good source for ballads and folk music is Ben Koenig who owns a
book store in Plainfield VT. You can reach him at
[unmask] Happy questing  - Tom>
>        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
>who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the
>modern
>business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
>20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
>01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I did,
>and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I
>believe, one
>of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but I
>don't  remember seeing one lately.
>        Lillian Krelove of Legacy Books used to be another such, but she's
>sold the business to Sing Out! and they seem to have other fish to pursue.
>        Good luck! -- Aloha, Lani
>
><||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
><||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:29:42 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


In a message dated 18/07/2000  09:23:20, Lani Herrmann wrote:<<        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
 who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the
modern
 business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
 20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
 01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I
did,
 and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I believe,
one
 of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but
I
 don't  remember seeing one lately. >>I'm sorry to have to tell you that when I last stayed with David and Chris,
in April last year, they had just issued their last list. There was too
little folklore on the market to make that anything but occasional and when
Universities and colleges ceased the study of classics, the supply of books
in that area being the staple support of the Bland enterprise, the
continuance of the business became impossible.For those who knew them personally, I'm glad to say they are all well and
that Chris has, despite the end of the business, retired from teaching. When
we last spoke, there was talk of a sideline in furniture resoration.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:06:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(99 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)>* Preservation: The living traditions of the nation are captured in a
>multitude of media formats, and each medium presents new and unique
>problems in terms of shelf life and stability.  There is no consensus on
>the advisability of one form over another.  No matter the medium, our
>field
>tapes are disintegrating rapidly.  There is an immediate need to develop
>national guidelines for preservation of folklife collections in a range
>of
>formats.<<I have no right to comment, since I'm not a professional in this
field, but....*This* one is obvious. CD-R! You can get a CD burner for $300, in
these days, and a good A-to-D converter board for $200. Then it's
just a matter of playing the results into the computer, and burning
the CD.>>Um, it's not always quite that simple. First off, professional-level A/D
converters, with genuinely clean sound and accurate clocks, are more like
$1,000, and given that the copies may well become the only surviving
version, it behooves us to make them as well as possible.Second, playing the recordings isn't always as straightforward as it might
seem. Tape formats vary tremendously, requiring different machines for
playback, and the playback machine needs to be tweaked for each tape (head
azimuth, primarily). Tape also, unfortunately, has deteriorated with age,
and many of the tapes from the late 1960s through the early 1980s suffer
from a malady known a hydrolyzation. The binders used in these tapes were
hygroscopic; they absorbed water from the air, turning into long-chain, very
sticky molecules that cause the tape to stick/slip across the tape heads,
creating a hideous screech. Tape in this unfortunate condition needs to be
baked, ideally in a convection oven for several hours, then copied as
quickly as possible. In short, copying tapes into a computer is a highly
labor-intensive process.Other recordings, on 78rpm aluminum discs and commercial shellac discs, also
require a great deal of care and specialized equipment for transfer --
high-quality, low-rumble, low-flutter turntables, good cartridges with
stylus points of the proper radius (varies from disc to disc), high-quality
preamplifiers with adjustable playback equalization to compensate for the
lack of standardization before 1955 or so, etc. etc. etc..<<There is a small cost for the CDs -- particularly since archives
should be made from high-quality CD-R disks (from what I understand,
gold die is by far the most stable, and you need to be sure that
each disk has enough of it and is properly assembled).>>Yes, gold-dye CDs are definitely the most stable -- but for archival use,
they should still be stored in dark, temperature- and humidity-controlled
conditions. And they should be made in triplicate, stored in different
places (see "earthquake").<<There is the question of AIFF or MP3 format -- but this should
be obvious, too: The archived versions should be AIFF. MP3 is
for net distribution, if it comes to that.>>Agreed on the last point -- archival recordings should be completely
unprocessed, non-bit-reduced, etc.. But I have some doubt about AIFF -- most
of the world being Wintel, .wav formats are more the norm. And there's
something to be said for storing the data in music-CD format, simply because
there are literally billions of players out there, and the odds of being
stuck with a recording and having no way to play it are much less (see
"Elcassette", "DCC" and other lost formats). The down side of this is that
you're limited to a 16-bit word length on standard CDs, and the audible
difference between 16 bits and 20 bits, properly done, is not trivial, even
on older recordings.I've written a couple of articles on this subject, "Making It Last, Parts 1
& 2"; they appeared in _Recording_ magazine a few months ago. If anyone's
interested, go to _Recording_'s website, www.recordingmag.com , and look in
the "issue search" database under the title, or under Stamler.<<What is *truly* needed is a national project to get all these song
versions organized. This is essentially what the Ballad Index was
intended to do. Unfortunately, participation in the project has
been rather abysmal. (It might help if we had someone other than
me as editor. I don't have the skills, I don't have the contacts,
and I don't have the financial base. :-) If we could organize all
the songs under such a database, and include all the versions in
various collections, we'd truly have something.>>I think that's a separate issue; I've always seen the Ballad Index as a
different sort of effort, the scope of which was more limited (we don't, for
example, index most strictly-instrumental pieces, and these constitute a
goodly chunk of field recordings). I agree that the larger project is also
worth doing, but don't really see the Ballad Index as conflicting with that,
or as being a smaller, failed effort along those lines. I see it, instead,
as an excellent work in progress, with a well-delimited mission.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:53:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(128 lines)


And here I thought this thread was dead. :-)Be it noted that I'm not in serious disagreement with Paul here;
he's supplying technical information that I don't have. At best,
I'm trying to answer his objections.On 7/1/00, Paul Stamler wrote:>----- Original Message -----
>From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 9:35 AM
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
>
>
> >* Preservation: The living traditions of the nation are captured in a
> >multitude of media formats, and each medium presents new and unique
> >problems in terms of shelf life and stability.  There is no consensus on
> >the advisability of one form over another.  No matter the medium, our
> >field
> >tapes are disintegrating rapidly.  There is an immediate need to develop
> >national guidelines for preservation of folklife collections in a range
> >of
> >formats.
>
><<I have no right to comment, since I'm not a professional in this
>field, but....
>
>*This* one is obvious. CD-R! You can get a CD burner for $300, in
>these days, and a good A-to-D converter board for $200. Then it's
>just a matter of playing the results into the computer, and burning
>the CD.>>
>
>Um, it's not always quite that simple. First off, professional-level A/D
>converters, with genuinely clean sound and accurate clocks, are more like
>$1,000, and given that the copies may well become the only surviving
>version, it behooves us to make them as well as possible.Fair enough. But the two basic observations remain: It's a digital
format, so once you copy it, you can make copies which do not decay
when reproduced. And it's an up-front cost, with the media cheap
thereafter.I do think there needs to be a regular schedule of reproduction:
Every five years, you make a new copy. Or, better yet, three new
copies. But that's still cheaper than most forms of analog copying.As an aside: Given the state of some of the originals, I wonder
if fancy A-to-D conversions gain us much. :-)[ ... ]><<There is a small cost for the CDs -- particularly since archives
>should be made from high-quality CD-R disks (from what I understand,
>gold die is by far the most stable, and you need to be sure that
>each disk has enough of it and is properly assembled).>>
>
>Yes, gold-dye CDs are definitely the most stable -- but for archival use,
>they should still be stored in dark, temperature- and humidity-controlled
>conditions. And they should be made in triplicate, stored in different
>places (see "earthquake").Of course, those comments apply to *anything*. In all seriousness,
CDs are *better* in this department, because you can make archive
and "active" copies, with no loss of quality.><<There is the question of AIFF or MP3 format -- but this should
>be obvious, too: The archived versions should be AIFF. MP3 is
>for net distribution, if it comes to that.>>
>
>Agreed on the last point -- archival recordings should be completely
>unprocessed, non-bit-reduced, etc.. But I have some doubt about AIFF -- most
>of the world being Wintel, .wav formats are more the norm.No, most of the world is CD players. :-) (As you note below.) I'm
not arguing for a particular computer format; I'm arguing for whatever
they use on CDs.>And there's
>something to be said for storing the data in music-CD format,Which was what I meant. The documentation I have says that AIFF *is*
music-CD format. If I'm wrong (and you would know better than I),
then substitute the correct term. :-)[ ... ]><<What is *truly* needed is a national project to get all these song
>versions organized. This is essentially what the Ballad Index was
>intended to do. Unfortunately, participation in the project has
>been rather abysmal. (It might help if we had someone other than
>me as editor. I don't have the skills, I don't have the contacts,
>and I don't have the financial base. :-) If we could organize all
>the songs under such a database, and include all the versions in
>various collections, we'd truly have something.>>
>
>I think that's a separate issue;It *is* a separate issue from archiving. :-) But there really ought
to be a way to coordinate which recordings go with which songs.>I've always seen the Ballad Index as a
>different sort of effort, the scope of which was more limited (we don't, for
>example, index most strictly-instrumental pieces, and these constitute a
>goodly chunk of field recordings). I agree that the larger project is also
>worth doing, but don't really see the Ballad Index as conflicting with that,
>or as being a smaller, failed effort along those lines. I see it, instead,
>as an excellent work in progress, with a well-delimited mission.The point I'm trying to make is simply that it's a universal database,
intended to include all traditional materials. Not just Child ballads
or Laws ballads or something -- we have too many restricted databases
of that sort already.I'm not saying the Ballad Index has failed, either. It's simply
a demonstration of a problem we have: Any such cataloging effort
requires two things: A central curator *and* people to participate.
If either fails, you don't get what you need. We need that central
curator. And I'm not sure where we find someone for the job. The
one thing one can say for the Ballad Index is that it actually
exists. :-) The relative effort of expanding it is less than starting
from scratch. (Maybe. Depends on the data we want, of course.)Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Jerichos and Thomasvilles
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:43:00 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


There are 35 communities named "Jericho" in 22 states of the USA.  An
additional 3 communities in 2 additional states are named "Jerico."  There
are 14 named "Thomasville" in 12 states.  8 states have at least one each
of "Jericho" (or "Jerico") and "Thomasville."  All of these 8 are east of
the Mississippi River or have it as their eastern border.  4 of the 8 are
southern states, 2 are border states, and 2 are purely Yankee.  Perhaps
Bad Lee Brown blew Little Sadie down in one of these "Thomasville"s.I've had no luck so far searching legal records for what I've considered to be
the most likely states.  Of course, these only give appeals, and if a judgment
is not appealed there will be no record in the accessible legal literature.I'm familiar with Tom Ashley's "Little Sadie," and I know about a few other
versions, which I haven't yet heard.  We have "Lee Brown," "Sadie,"
"Jericho," and "Thomasville."Does anyone know of any other clues to the
historical basis of this ballad in the texts of other versions?Any procedural tips?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:14:41 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


In most cases that need urgent attention today, the question of fidelity
is more or less moot---the amount of sound degradation one might encounter
from ANY of the A/D conversions (including just playing an phonograph
recording or reel-to-reel tape into a cheap CD burner) is negligible when
you consider the quality ofreproduction that was there in the first place
in the period 1930-1960 or so.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:05:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 01:53:52PM -0500, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> And here I thought this thread was dead. :-)
>
> Be it noted that I'm not in serious disagreement with Paul here;
> he's supplying technical information that I don't have. At best,
> I'm trying to answer his objections.
>
> On 7/1/00, Paul Stamler wrote:
> >From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>        [ ... ]> >*This* one is obvious. CD-R! You can get a CD burner for $300, in
> >these days, and a good A-to-D converter board for $200. Then it's
> >just a matter of playing the results into the computer, and burning
> >the CD.>>
> >
> >Um, it's not always quite that simple. First off, professional-level A/D
> >converters, with genuinely clean sound and accurate clocks, are more like
> >$1,000, and given that the copies may well become the only surviving
> >version, it behooves us to make them as well as possible.
>
> Fair enough. But the two basic observations remain: It's a digital
> format, so once you copy it, you can make copies which do not decay
> when reproduced. And it's an up-front cost, with the media cheap
> thereafter.        Hmm ... the copies are *not* always perfect.  The format is
designed so, if a sample is corrupted, it is replaced, either with the
preceding or following sample, or somewhat better, it is replaced by an
average between the preceding and following samples.  This is not
enough to be detected, but over many generations of copies, it adds up,
so you *will* see slow degradation of the recordings through
generations, even with digital.> I do think there needs to be a regular schedule of reproduction:
> Every five years, you make a new copy. Or, better yet, three new
> copies. But that's still cheaper than most forms of analog copying.        See above.  There is something to be said about scheduling the
copies near the maximum safe time.        What I would suggest, here, is to make a set of copies, then
when the next time interval passes, make copies of both the original and
the several years younger copy.  Continue this until the number of
errors detected on reading the first one rises above something like
twenty to one hundred over the whole length of the recording.        What would be a nice touch would be to modify the format to
record checksums every 1024 samples or so, so you could tell which
recordings were clean where, and combine the two to make a more perfect
copy than the ones used as input.> As an aside: Given the state of some of the originals, I wonder
> if fancy A-to-D conversions gain us much. :-)        That depends on the age of the recording in question, the
technology used, and the storage conditions.        [ ... ]> >Yes, gold-dye CDs are definitely the most stable -- but for archival use,
> >they should still be stored in dark, temperature- and humidity-controlled
> >conditions. And they should be made in triplicate, stored in different
> >places (see "earthquake").
>
> Of course, those comments apply to *anything*. In all seriousness,
> CDs are *better* in this department, because you can make archive
> and "active" copies, with no loss of quality.        As above -- not *no* loss of quality, but *lesser* loss of
quality.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New folk site songs in ogg format (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:51:34 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Folks:Tara Calishain is a researcher of extraordinary abilities who sends me
sites from time to time.  I haven't seen this one.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:50:04 -0400
From: Tara Calishain <[unmask]>
To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Subject: New folk site songs in ogg formatHi Ed,You've probably already seen this but just in case..best,Tara==
39. efolkMusic.com Offers Open-Format Ogg Vorbis Downloads
get 01011904.txtCHAPEL HILL, NC -- (INTERNET WIRE) -- efolkMusic.com is a "filtered" artist
promotion and cd/download distribution site that is rapidly becoming a
premier site for folk, bluegrass, Celtic and roots-rock downloads and cds.
"Our user base is growing primarily because of the high quality of our
music," says Frank. "You don't have to wade thru the muck to find good
music, because that's the only kind we have.
http://www1.internetwire.com/iwire/iwpr?id=11904&cat=te

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Jerichos and Thomasvilles
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:54:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


<<I'm familiar with Tom Ashley's "Little Sadie," and I know about a few
other
versions, which I haven't yet heard.  We have "Lee Brown," "Sadie,"
"Jericho," and "Thomasville."
Does anyone know of any other clues to the
historical basis of this ballad in the texts of other versions?
Any procedural tips?>>Only that, as the Ballad Index reports the ballad's earliest collected date
as 1922, you should look at earlier dates.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Jerichos and Thomasvilles
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:10:35 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(72 lines)


I think the most likely candidate would be North Carolina.  The version of
the song I'm most familiar with is Tommy Jarrell's, which breaks the
four-line verse in half with repeats, giving it a structure a lot more like
most blues.  As I read the story, the shooting happens in one place, near
Thomasville where the sheriff is from, and Lee Brown flees but is captured
at Jericho and returned to the county seat of the county where the shooting
occurred to stand trial.  William S. Powell's _North Carolina Gazetteer_
says that Jericho is a community in southern Caswell County (there are a
couple others in NC) had a post office from 1905 to 1920.  Thomasville is a
manufacturing town in northern Davidson County, N.C.  To get from
Thomasville to Jericho, you would cross Guilford County (where Greensboro
is) from southwest to northeast.  Why would the sheriff from Thomasville
chase Brown?  I would guess that the shooting happened in Thomasville.
Brown was put on a train to go to the county seat after he was caught in
Jericho, so there must have been a railroad in or fairly near Jericho.  If
you go to the American Memory collection at LOC, they have a bunch of old
railroad maps scanned in, including several for North Carolina.  Looking at
a 1900 map, there's no railroad in most of Caswell County, but from Jericho
(which is near Anderson on modern maps), it would have been about fifteen
miles south to Burlington or Graham which are both on the Southern line
which then goes west through Greensboro and back to Thomasville.Having done some research on ballads involving crimes (are there any
others?) from NC around this time period, I can say it is a huge hassle
since you never quite know without checking whether county records are in
some dusty attic in the county seat or if they found their way to the state
archives in Raleigh.  There is an OPAC for the state archives (I think if
you look up "North Carolina Department of Archives and History" you'll find
your way to it), but it's really, really awful and hard to use.All this also raises the question, if my geographic hunch is right, of why
Lee Brown would have gone to Jericho instead of staying on the Southern
(presuming he went part of the way by train) and getting way out of town.
I would guess that he had relatives in Jericho, probably was from Jericho
and working in Thomasville where he got mixed up with the wrong crowd,
drank too much, carried a pistol, etc. etc.BruceAt 03:43 PM 7/1/00 -0400, you wrote:
>There are 35 communities named "Jericho" in 22 states of the USA.  An
>additional 3 communities in 2 additional states are named "Jerico."  There
>are 14 named "Thomasville" in 12 states.  8 states have at least one each
>of "Jericho" (or "Jerico") and "Thomasville."  All of these 8 are east of
>the Mississippi River or have it as their eastern border.  4 of the 8 are
>southern states, 2 are border states, and 2 are purely Yankee.  Perhaps
>Bad Lee Brown blew Little Sadie down in one of these "Thomasville"s.
>
>I've had no luck so far searching legal records for what I've considered
to be
>the most likely states.  Of course, these only give appeals, and if a
judgment
>is not appealed there will be no record in the accessible legal literature.
>
>I'm familiar with Tom Ashley's "Little Sadie," and I know about a few other
>versions, which I haven't yet heard.  We have "Lee Brown," "Sadie,"
>"Jericho," and "Thomasville."
>
>Does anyone know of any other clues to the
>historical basis of this ballad in the texts of other versions?
>
>Any procedural tips?
>
>john garst    [unmask]
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker
SUPPORT DEMOCRACY -- VOTE GREEN:
        http://www.votenader.org

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:29:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(47 lines)


Bob Waltz wrote:<<Fair enough. But the two basic observations remain: It's a digital
format, so once you copy it, you can make copies which do not decay
when reproduced. And it's an up-front cost, with the media cheap
thereafter.>>The latter is certainly true. But as others have pointed out already,
digital copying isn't necessarily perfect, and it's worth noting that
digital doesn't deteriorate -- it crashes. In other words, rather than slow,
steady degradation, the sound is perfect, and then it isn't there at all.On the back side of that, digital recordings, including CDs, are made with a
high degree of redundancy for just this reason; the encoding methods are
designed to make error correction maximally effective. And this is true
error correction, not interpolation: the missing digit is restored exactly.
Minor errors are completely corrected in a proper copy; only the worst
errors are interpolated. And I can tell you that a single-sample error, with
interpolation, is highly unlikely to be audible. I spend a lot of time
drawing the scratches out of musical waveforms, and you'd be surprised how
much you can get away with before a hand-drawn quarter-cycle becomes
audible.<<As an aside: Given the state of some of the originals, I wonder
if fancy A-to-D conversions gain us much. :-) >>Yes. A basic tenet of the (dismal) science of information theory is that a
chain is not as strong as its weakest link; it's *weaker* than its weakest
link. To put it more concretely, distortion in an audio circuit is
cumulative, and the distortion of an already-distorted signal creates far
more havoc. I recently tested a moderately-priced high-quality A/D converter
intended for small-studio use (it's made by Apogee, and short of Sony's new
SACD/DSD process it produces some of the best digital audio I've heard); the
improvement in quality from better analog stages, more linear A/D converter
chips and a far more stable clock was immediately audible on an acoustic 78
I used as a real torture test.<<Which was what I meant. The documentation I have says that AIFF *is*
music-CD format. If I'm wrong (and you would know better than I),
then substitute the correct term. :-) >>Duhhh. Yep, I was still somewhere over the Atlantic on that one. Somehow I
mistook AIFF for the Macintosh audio format, which of course is something
else entirely. More coffee, please, Tanya.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A-to-D
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:11:45 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(22 lines)


Paul:Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
safely filed.)Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?EdP.S.:  Others are welcome to contribute their suggestions.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:34:17 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


There is a CD-Recordable FAQ at:http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/I too am interested in answers to Ed's questions, but I am not at all
computer-literate, (I use a Mac). On that side, it seems my bundled
software (Toast) needs an $80 upgrade to Toast DeLuxe do do any
simple editing to a sound file I record through the computer's audio
input - I am told that the shareware SoundSculptor will also do the
job. But currently I'm still collecting information, so I haven't
tried anything in this direction yet. Toast DeLuxe apparently has a
"clean-up" routine that works fairly well on soundfiles created from
LP; though it's not "professional quality" it does a reasonable job
of removing clicks and so forth. (That's just what I've heard). Any
Mac people out there?John Roberts.>Paul:
>
>Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
>including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
>Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
>CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
>notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
>safely filed.)
>
>Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
>not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
>etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.
>
>I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
>from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
>32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.
>
>What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?
>
>Ed
>
>P.S.:  Others are welcome to contribute their suggestions.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: R W Gordon
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 15:14:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


The Library of Congress does not appear to have Robert W. Gordon's papers
from his stay in Darien, GA, 1925-28, during which time he did research on
"Delia."  I have found a WWW site that says that the University of Oregon
has some of his papers, occupying 7 feet of shelf space.Does anyone who has seen these papers recall whether or not Gordon's
material from his stay in Darien is there?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 14:46:23 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


On 7/2/00, John Roberts wrote:>There is a CD-Recordable FAQ at:
>
>http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/
>
>I too am interested in answers to Ed's questions, but I am not at all
>computer-literate, (I use a Mac). On that side, it seems my bundled
>software (Toast) needs an $80 upgrade to Toast DeLuxe do do any
>simple editing to a sound file I record through the computer's audio
>input - I am told that the shareware SoundSculptor will also do the
>job. But currently I'm still collecting information, so I haven't
>tried anything in this direction yet. Toast DeLuxe apparently has a
>"clean-up" routine that works fairly well on soundfiles created from
>LP; though it's not "professional quality" it does a reasonable job
>of removing clicks and so forth. (That's just what I've heard). Any
>Mac people out there?
>
>John Roberts.I'm a Mac person, too, though I haven't actually *done* this
process yet. (Haven't found the right cable combination, and
am being very careful about it. :-)I've been reading the magazines, though, and also been careful
about my versions of Toast. :-) FWIW, the upgrade you need isn't
really Toast Pro; it's Toast 4.0. That comes with CD Spin Doctor
(the program for separating tracks on CDs), which was not included
in Toast 3.0 or earlier. It also has some sound editing capabilities,
though if you want to do something fancy, you'll need more.The question really is one of how much you're willing to pay to
fix the tracks, and how much time you're willing to spend.Someone really ought to sell an all-in-one solution for this
(high-quality sound board, cables, and software) -- but I haven't
heard of any such thing.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: An Artcar Anthem
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:08:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(77 lines)


Here it is folks An Artcar Anthem! (lyrics below for all to use!) Enjoy!
to get the wonderous midi (fun) go here:
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/artcaranthem.html
(this is fun go to the page and click on the midi link!)
this is the link for the midi but may not work from here...
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/carbox.midLITTLE     PlAIN      CARS
An Artcar Anthem!  Little Plain Cars          Adapted  from Malvina Reynolds “Little Houses”          Little plain cars on the car lots,
          Little plain cars  made of  status quo-a-stuff
          Little plain cars on the high-a-ways,
          Little plain cars all the same,
          There's a black one and a brown one
          And a blue one and a red one
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          And the people in the plain cars
          All went to the university
          Where they were put in plain cars
          And they came out all the same
          And there's doctors and lawyers
          And street rod-od-ers
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          And they all play on the golf course
          And drink their hand crafted-beer
          And they all have pretty children
          And the children go to school,
          And the children go to summer camp
          And then to the university
          Where they are all  put in plain cars
          And they drive out all the same.          And the boys go into business
          And marry and raise a family
          Drivein  plain cars made of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same,
          There's a green one and a pink one
          And a blue one and a yellow one
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          But the one child  he’s an ar-tist
          And knows that his freedom’s real
          Tired of plain cars made of status quo-a-stuff
          That all look just the same,
          Now there’s glued ones and there are painted ones
          And a carved one and a magnet one
          And they’re all made out of  joy and smiles
          And they all are all the rage!          (alt last verse or add on - And they all the world will change!)ABC NotationT:Little Plain Cars a.k.a. Little Boxes
M:4/4
L:1/4
Q:1/4=100
C:adapted from tune by Malvina Reynolds
K:C
G1/2A/2|G2E2G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2G/2|c2c2c3/2d/2|
edccc3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|F2F2F3/2G/2|E2E2E3/2F/2|
D4G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2G/2|c2c2c3/2d/2|
e3/2d/2c2c3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|FFFFF3/2G/2|
E2E2D3/2D/2|C4|e3/2d/2c2c3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|FFFFF3/2G/2|
E2E2D3/2D/2|C4||Words  adapted by Conrad Bladey
And there aint no copyright down here!
Ask only for credit when all others want cash!

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:21:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


<<Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
safely filed.)
Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.
I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.
What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?>>Two routes you can go. One is to get a decent DAT recorder (Sony's are okay,
with decent if not screamingly great converters) and a sound card with a
digital interface. This has the advantage of giving you input level controls
and a recorder you can use for other purposes as well as giving you a
straight 16-bit signal without needing to be dithered. The digital output of
the DAT recorder would feed the digital in of the sound card, and vice
versa.The alternative, simpler and more direct, would be a CardDeluxe sound card
from Digital Audio Labs. Very high quality despite living inside a computer
case (nasty electrical environment for audio). It's 24 bits, so you'd need
to dither the signal down to 16 bits for printing onto a CD (truncating the
data causes very audible distortion). About $300 for the card, street price
with careful shopping.The Cadillac route would be to buy an Apogee Rosetta converter for about a
grand, plus a digital-in sound card. The sound quality on this unit is
fantastic, but I'm not sure it's worth the extra cash if you're not a
studio.You'll also need a CD burner; I've had decent luck with the Yamahas. And
software; Adaptec Easy-CD seems to be the standard, but I've found it to be
pretty buggy. Last year PC World ran a comparison article between several
brands of CD-burning software; if you could look it up, that would be
useful. You also could use some descratching software; you'd be surprised
how much cleaner even good-sounding discs can get with some *light*
descratching. I use DC-ART software from Diamond Cut, which is clunky but
does a fair job. There's much better stuff out there from Sound Forge and
Sek'd, but they both cost a lot more. I don't suggest the fancier denoising
stuff; except for CEDAR, which is thousands of dollars, these programs
damage the audio more than I can stand, and I'd prefer to live with the
hiss. The low-cut filter and notch filter built into DC-ART can be useful
for some of those Ken Goldstein recordings, which tend to have hum (notch
filter) or rumble (low-cut, aka high-pass).Finally, liner notes -- you can make hybrid discs, audio plus data, and scan
(or type -- urghh) the notes into your computer as text, then store the text
on the same disc as the music. Awkward, but doable in theory (I've never
actually done this, so can't speak from experience).Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D (Mac)
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:52:09 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(36 lines) , text/enriched(50 lines)


Bob Waltz wrote:>I've been reading the magazines, though, and also been careful
>about my versions of Toast. :-) FWIW, the upgrade you need isn't
>really Toast Pro; it's Toast 4.0. That comes with CD Spin Doctor
>(the program for separating tracks on CDs), which was not included
>in Toast 3.0 or earlier. It also has some sound editing capabilities,
>though if you want to do something fancy, you'll need more.Bob,I bought a Yamaha burner about 3 weeks ago. It came bundled with
Toast 4.0.1.1, which does _not_ include Spin Doctor. To get the
latter you need Toast 4 De Luxe (yes I suppose nominally they're both
Toast 4.0, but there's a big difference). From the Adaptec webpage:What's the difference between Toast 4 Deluxe and Toast 4 Standard?
Standard is an OEM (bundled) version. It doesn't have many of the
advanced features that Toast Deluxe has such as DAO (Disc-at-Once)
support, MP3, Liquid Audio, and more advance formats, nor does it
have the CD Spin Doctor or Photo Relay applications.The De Luxe version is around $80 street and there's no upgrade path.
I felt a little gypped as the bundled PC software does seem to have
Spin Doctor's capabilities.Peter Berryman recommended SoundSculptor to me ($30 shareware, it
needs to be licensecd to enable Save) to do soundfile editing.John.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D (Mac)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2000 19:41:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


> I bought a Yamaha burner about 3 weeks ago. It came bundled with
> Toast 4.0.1.1, which does _not_ include Spin Doctor. To get the
> latter you need Toast 4 De Luxe (yes I suppose nominally they're both
> Toast 4.0, but there's a big difference).Something odd here, John.  A housemate who purchased a G3 with Pro Tools
bought Toast 4.0 (4.0.2?), and upgraded it to 4.1 because his burner
wasn't supported.  Both came with Audio Extractor and Spin Doctor.  I
wonder if you got Toast Lite?-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:31:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


Hi folks:Most of you probably know about this, but just in case... a good portion of
the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and
AIFF files of the field recordings, and MIDI files of the tunes that are
transcribed. Searchable by singer's name, song name or catalog number. Not
everything in the collection is up yet, but it's already a treasure trove.
It's at:http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.htmlPeace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:24:10 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Thanks, Paul, for that information. This is a valuable site to have
bookmarked.Lorne Brown
The Ballad Project
TorontoPaul Stamler wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> Most of you probably know about this, but just in case... a good portion of
> the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
> line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and
> AIFF files of the field recordings, and MIDI files of the tunes that are
> transcribed. Searchable by singer's name, song name or catalog number. Not
> everything in the collection is up yet, but it's already a treasure trove.
> It's at:
>
> http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.html
>
> Peace.
> Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: St Thomas, (US) Virgin Islands.
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:34:07 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


So we're off on the 17th for a couple of weeks in the islands.  Seemed like
a good idea.  Now I'm concerned I won't find any folksong there and I won't
have anything to do with my time.I'm bringing the Sony Walkman Pro (WMD3) of course but seriously doubt I'll
get to use it.Abrahams was kind enough to reply but had no suggestions.The single reference I find in my own stuff to St Thomas is obscure.. On the
_Unfortunate Rake_ record "Bright Summer Morning" was collected by "Van Dam
and T. Combs" there in 1953.  But I find no reference or any publication for
a Van Dam or a Van Dam Combs at OCLC.Any suggestions re printed matter?
Better (but forlornly) any suggestions re contact points?Thank you.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:41:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:31:44 -0500, Paul Stamler wrote:>the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
>line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and but it's already a treasure trove.
>
>http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.html
>
And it is good.  I wasn't aware of Hunter but I'm instantly intrigued.  At
the top there (#3) is "A Lensman, A Tinsman, A Tinker, A Tailor."  Maybe
it's common but I've never before seen a version with verse one the common
Scottish but the tune, chorus & second verse from the common US versions.Great!-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Very important literary award
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:16:12 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


One never knows from whence vital entries for the Happy! file will spring.
Hopefully you caught the very important literary award given Gary Dahl, as
reported by Reuters in today's paper.  It led to the following Happy! entry:Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton Lytton (of Knebworth), 1st Baron, born
5/25/1803 (d1/18/1873) and who wrote _Last Days of Pompeii_.  Of far more
importance, he is the eponym for the annual (from 1982) San Jose State U.
"Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest" (for really bad writing; entry deadline is
the traditional US date for creative writing, April 15) to honor his _Paul
Clifford_ which begins "It was a dark and stormy night."
http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/english/bulwer.htmLytton's ancestral estate at Knebworth was used by Tim Burton as the setting
for "stately Wayne Manor" in the movie "Batman."As of October 1999, the exact phrase "dark and stormy" occurs in 11 songs at
Digital Tradition:BAGCOACH      On a dark and stormy night as the
BARFTBOY      the night was dark and stormy, and the moon
DRNKHELL      It was a dark and stormy night, I saw
FTHFULSL      'Twas on a dark and stormy night The snow
FLYDUTCH      'Twas on a dark and stormy night well southward
GUYREED       do remember one dark and stormy night The rain
EVRYINCH      of woe One dark and stormy night. He was
FTHSAILR      Twas on a dark and stormy night, the snow
PRSHSNOW      It's on a dark and stormy night, the snow
WRKHURON      On a dark and stormy night When orders
ROYALPLM      On a dark and stormy night The rainand this throws into wild disarray and confusion the whole conceptual-
ization of bad writing and the ballad.  Monstrous questions are raised.Is pure bathos more acceptable as song than as "legitimate" writing?
Is bathos _always_ to be taken as a joke?  (Even in Temperance songs.)
Do any of these songs predate _Paul Clifford_?
And/or, where did the dread phrase arise?
Etc.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Very important literary award
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:48:37 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


Abby,I haven't looked at each song closely, but just about all of the ones
you mention are late 19th / early 20th C sentimental ballads, disaster
ballads, or songs written at that time as caricatures of "folksongs"
(i.e. Jack Was Every Inch a Sailor -- which started life as a show tune
around the turn of the century).  My suspicion is that they were
primarily the output of songmills, Tin Pan Alley or its precursors.  If
so, that particular commercial environment is probably more responsible
for the "bad" writing, than the ballad form per se.  It does raise the
question, though, of where does "formulaic" end, and trite and
hackneyed begin?One of the things that struck me about " it was a dark and stormy
night," is that folk sea-disaster ballads from the same period are
commonly detailed, as ballads go, in their depiction of vessels in
storms: they often include details of wind direction and strength, wave
height, sometimes cloud formations, course headings, rigging
adjustments made in preparation for severe weather, and so on.
Granted, this tends to be executed prosaically, but that's a lesser sin
than excess.Bill Ellis takes up the question of "bathos" in his article on "The
Blind Girl" (JAF 91, 1978).  He argued that such sentimental and, to
us, excessively written ballads had a genuine effect on Victorian and
Edwardian audiences.  That would also appear to be the case from
William Roy Mackenzie's descriptions of ballad singers in Nova Scotia.
Perhaps it was the weak end of the Romantic emphasis on emotion and
high drama, a poor man's "storm and stress," albeit a century later.But then again, when it comes right down to it, aren't the opening bars
of "The Ride of the Valkyries" just an aural equivalent of "It was a
dark and stormy night" : )Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fiddle Convention in 2001
From: Dr Ian Russell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:23:44 +0100
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(72 lines)


Dear All,
For those of us who enjoy a tune as much as a lyric, you
might like to note the following convention.
Apologies for any cross posting.
Best wishes,
IanNorth Atlantic Fiddle Convention
Crossing Boundaries
25 - 29 July 2001
University of Aberdeen, ScotlandCrossing Boundaries is devoted to traditional
fiddlers and fiddle music from countries around
the northern seas, combining an international
conference with performance events and workshops,
as well as opportunities for informal sessions.The North East of Scotland, famous for its
fiddle tradition, is the setting for this event,
organised by the Elphinstone Institute in
conjunction with other local, national, and
international arts and cultural
organisations: SCaT (Scottish Culture and Traditions),
and the Lemon Tree in Aberdeen; Aberdeenshire Arts;
the Irish Centre for World Music, University of Limerick;
the Department of Ethnology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.The convention will focus on the way the fiddle,
fiddle music, and styles of playing cross boundaries
of all kinds - geographical, political and
personal - creating new styles and fresh musical insights.The conference will explore the past and future
of traditional fiddling in social, ethnological, and musical
contexts, with keynote contributions.  Themes include:
transmission, performance, social context, symbolic or
religious function, stylistics, material culture, dance,
supernatural beliefs, folklore, and iconography.If you are interested in attending, contributing,
performing, or offering an academic paper (abstract of
300 words, deadline 1 April 2001), please e-mail or
write to the Elphinstone Institute. (The Institute
may present abstracts of papers for peer review and
anticipates the publication of the proceedings.)Convenors: Ian Russell and Mary Anne AlburgerThe Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272996 Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
Website: www.abdn.ac.uk/Elphinstone/
E-mail:  [unmask]----------------------
Dr Ian Russell, Director
The Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen
AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272386
Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
[unmask]
Website:
www.abdn.ac.uk/elphinstone/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: happy!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:43:48 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
Woody Guthrie's birthday!        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: happy!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:06:42 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(17 lines)


On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
> Woody Guthrie's birthday!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>Had he lived, he would have been 88 years old today.  And probably still
sitting at his portable typewriter, pounding away, margin to margin, all
caps on the same questions of race and class that troubled him before he
lost his voice.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: happy!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:46:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Yes, no doubt.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Ed Cray
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 10:07 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: happy!On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
> Woody Guthrie's birthday!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>Had he lived, he would have been 88 years old today.  And probably still
sitting at his portable typewriter, pounding away, margin to margin, all
caps on the same questions of race and class that troubled him before he
lost his voice.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:41:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Balladeers --I thought about heading this with the subject "Have I Got a Deal
For You," but those of you with spam filters probably wouldn't
like the results. :-)Anyway, folks, a person I work with is retiring and getting rid
of his old folk music books. I've taken some off his hands already
(you can't have them! Back! Back!), but there are a number I already
have. I volunteered/promised to make them available to you folks
first. (I realize that selling books over Ballad-L may be against
policy, but how else are you going to learn about these? As a lousy
compromise, I won't list the prices unless our Esteemed List Mom
permits.)Anyway, here are the books:Roger D. Abrahams & George Foss, _Anglo-American Folksong Style_.
   Paperback, first printing. Binding is in good shape, but the
   contents are heavily underlined; the owner used it to teach
   a folklore class at the University of Minnesota.Richard Chase, _American Folk Tales and Songs_. 1971 Dover
   paperback edition. Some underlining and notes, mostly in
   the folklore rather than the song portion. Binding is in
   good shape except that the cellophane on the cover is
   starting to peel. (I've seen *new* Dover books with that
   problem.)Francis James Child -- you know what. The Bible. _The English
   and Scottish Popular Ballads_. The Dover five-volume set.
   Not sure which printing (they may not even all be the
   same), but they were bought in the Sixties. Completely unmarked,
   as best I can tell. The spines are a bit faded from sun,
   and the pages are just a little brown around the edges for
   the same reason, but the bindings are in good shape.Josiah H. Combs (edited by D. K. Wilgus), _Folk-Songs of the
   Southern United States_. Hardcover. Second printing (1969).
   Appears to be in mint condition; I wish I could keep this
   one and sell my copy. :-)Alan Lomax, _Folk Songs of North America_. Hardcover, no date
  but I'd guess it was printed in the Sixties. Excellent condition
  (I can't find a mark in it) except that the dust jacket is
  rather battered.If anyone is interested, let me know off-list and I'll tell you
what we're going to try to soak you for. :-) Or feel free to
contact me with questions.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: Gwenzilla <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 12:53:50 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:OK, what do you want for the Child?Gwen Knighton                                    [unmask]_______________________________________________________________________
        And this curve, is your smile
        And this cross, is your heart      (KaTe--The Red Shoes)
        And this line,  is your path
_______________________________________________________________________
                   -*Cyny Telyn* -- /Sing/ the harp-

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:04:23 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 12:53:50PM -0400, Gwenzilla wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:
>
> OK, what do you want for the Child?        This sounds like either kidnapping or slavery. :-)        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:21:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On 7/15/00, Gwenzilla wrote:>On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:
>
>OK, what do you want for the Child?A good home, first and foremost. :-)Just a reminder: Please contact me *off-list*. Don't want to
be exposing our dirty laundry in public. :-) (At least until
Ms. Steiner gives us permission.)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: Mary Louise Chown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:04:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> Anyway, here are the books:
>
>
>
> Richard Chase, _American Folk Tales and Songs_. 1971 Dover
>    paperback edition. Some underlining and notes, mostly in
>    the folklore rather than the song portion. Binding is in
>    good shape except that the cellophane on the cover is
>    starting to peel. (I've seen *new* Dover books with that
>    problem.)
>
> Francis James Child -- you know what. The Bible. _The English
>    and Scottish Popular Ballads_. The Dover five-volume set.
>    Not sure which printing (they may not even all be the
>    same), but they were bought in the Sixties. Completely unmarked,
>    as best I can tell. The spines are a bit faded from sun,
>    and the pages are just a little brown around the edges for
>    the same reason, but the bindings are in good shape.
>
> Alan Lomax, _Folk Songs of North America_. Hardcover, no date
>   but I'd guess it was printed in the Sixties. Excellent condition
>   (I can't find a mark in it) except that the dust jacket is
>   rather battered.
>
> If anyone is interested, let me know off-list and I'll tell you
> what we're going to try to soak you for. :-) Or feel free to
> contact me with questions.
>
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."Hello Bob  Can ypou tell me the prices for the above books
Mary Louise Chown

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
I should have charged more. :-)The other books are still available.This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
just on a weekend!I hate to think how many of us are waiting in line for Laws
or Bronson.We need a way to communicate with each other if things like this
turn up.How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
much work as I think it will be. :-).Here's what I have in mind:Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
Child.Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)So:Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
buy it.Thoughts:How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
save some time.Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
people "Sorry, Child is sold."
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:42:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


I have done this in the past and it works wonderfully
if you simply use a guestbook....
take out a geocities account and make a guestbook.
folks can add in what is available and then note what is not
available when it finds a home
periodically a summation can be posted
better you can  go to
http://guestworld.tripod.lycos.com/
and get a very good guestbook for free which you can edit
right down to message content.
Every so often delete obsolete entries based upon
responses from sellers.
Seller, donors would have to inform the guestbook when item
was gone...not too hard.
you would remind folk to do so and to provide a means of contact and method of transfer.Create a simple web page explain this and add in the guestbook link.
not hard but does very well. I have a few of these going now.Conrad"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)
>
> Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
> I should have charged more. :-)
>
> The other books are still available.
>
> This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
> for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
> common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
> also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
> just on a weekend!
>
> I hate to think how many of us are waiting in line for Laws
> or Bronson.
>
> We need a way to communicate with each other if things like this
> turn up.
>
> How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
> to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
> much work as I think it will be. :-).
>
> Here's what I have in mind:
>
> Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
> most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
> the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
> bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
> Child.
>
> Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
> people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.
>
> It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
> when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)
>
> So:
>
> Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
> to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
> even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
> be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
> buy it.
>
> Thoughts:
>
> How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
> in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.
>
> Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
> save some time.
>
> Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
> people "Sorry, Child is sold."
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:37:02 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(83 lines)


>DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)
>
>Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
>I should have charged more. :-)
>
>The other books are still available.
>
>This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
>for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
>common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
>also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
>just on a weekend!The Dover Child edition is fairly rare these days, sometimes, when
available, running into the hundreds for a set.  Not only is it out of
print, but has been for a long time. What's worse is that in the latter
days of its availability, Dover had not printed as many copies of Volume
Three as they had the other four.
>
>How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
>to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
>much work as I think it will be. :-).Sounds like a reaaly fine idea.>Here's what I have in mind:
>
>Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
>most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
>the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
>bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
>Child.You might also ask for lists of books that people wabt to sell. I.m sure
there are titles out there that I might like, but if I don't know they
exist...Perhaps the simplest way to do this would be to send out periodically a
list of books wanted and books for sale. Each list has the name and e-mail
of the buyer/seller and specific price and/or price range.  This shifts the
responsibility to the buyer and seller and quickly gets you out of the
middle. Maybe this could also include vinyl as well as paper.If this works out without too much  hassle, a swappers list might be a good
addition. In the case of out-of-print or otherwise unobtainable material, a
copy swap might prove feasible. For example, I'd love to swap a photocopy
of Part One of Terry's "The Shanty Book" for a copy of Part Two.I'm looking forward to the first list. This is indeed a most noble
undertaking  - Tom>Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
>people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.
>
>It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
>when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)
>
>So:
>
>Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
>to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
>even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
>be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
>buy it.
>
>Thoughts:
>
>How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
>in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.
>
>Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
>save some time.
>
>Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
>people "Sorry, Child is sold."
>--
>Bob Waltz
>[unmask]
>
>"The one thing we learn from history --
>   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Astonished!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:36:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


"Child, Francis James Ed English and Scottish Popular Ballads; 5 Vols.
Dover, 1965 Trade Paperback. Good/No Jacket. Book # 13936
Price: US$ 500.00
Presented by BLACK OAK BOOKS, ABAA, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A."john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:29:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On 7/16/00, John Garst wrote:>"Child, Francis James Ed English and Scottish Popular Ballads; 5 Vols.
>Dover, 1965 Trade Paperback. Good/No Jacket. Book # 13936
>Price: US$ 500.00
>Presented by BLACK OAK BOOKS, ABAA, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A."When I was pricing the various books this fellow had for sale, I found
a few like that -- e.g. a copy of Gomme for $125 and a copy of
Jackson's book on spirituals for $50. These were on the order of
four times what the other sets cost.Maybe they invoked Child's ghost and had him sign it. :-)But it's an argument for some sort of database to tell us what these
things *ought* to cost. It was tough, sitting there researching
how much to charge *myself* for a copy of Laws. :-)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:05:46 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about $250 four
years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I think I found an ad in
the classified of _Texas Monthly_

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Hardy & Bonaparte
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:19:45 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Not a ballad, but certainly in the group's realm of expertise?In Thomas Hardy's "The Trumpet Major" the soldiers sing (omitting his diacriticals):When lawyers strive to heal a breach,
And parsons practise what they preach;
Then Boney he'll come pouncing down,
And march his men on London Town!Rollicum rorum, tollollorum,
Rollicum rorum, tollollay.(etc. - 4 verses offered, a total of 14 referred to!)Was this Hardy's own creation, or (and?) is there a melody anyone knows of?~ Becky Nankivell
Tucson, Arizona

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:21:05 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Quoth herself:
> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about $250 four
> years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I think I found an ad in
> the classified of _Texas Monthly_I recall finding a set of the Dover reprints in the local Pegasus book store
some time ago and posting its existence there, probably on this very list.
Price was very reasonable, about $20 per volume (up from the original cover
price, something like $5.95). I sure hope someone followed up on that one and
phoned the store. -- aloha, Lani<||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 21:15:55 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


And last year I found a Dover set of Child in a small bookstore in Camden,
Maine -- memory serving.  The dealer, whose name I posted on ballad-l,
wanted like $20 a volume.  Not a bad price considering that Wildmon had a
set of the original edition for $1000 earlier this year.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Margaret Anderson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 23:40:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


> I recall finding a set of the Dover reprints in the local Pegasus book store
> some time ago and posting its existence there, probably on this very list.
> Price was very reasonable, about $20 per volume (up from the original cover
> price, something like $5.95). I sure hope someone followed up on that one and
> phoned the store. -- aloha, LaniActually, the original price on the covers of my set is $2.75.  I got them about
30 years ago and it cost all the cash I had at the time.  I've gotten more than my
money's worth from them.Discussions like this make me feel unusually wealthy.Margaret

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:59:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Lani and Ed, I don't think you need worry about anyone passing up such
information posted to the list.  I responded within something like 8
hours of Ed's posting (which was, as I recall, $50 for the set), and was
the fifth respondent.  The books had already been sold, of course.  I
was the sixth inquiry regarding Bob's set, and they were of course gone.
 We keep trying, though.While we're in the eat-your-heart-out mode, the set I'm currently using
is borrowed from my housemate Sandy (of Sandy's Music here in
Cambridge).  A friend of his found the complete set, in excellent
unmarked condition, at a yard sale, and bought it ridiculously cheap
figuring Sandy would want it - which of course was correct.Meanwhile, and perhaps because this is Child country, we here in the
Boston area continue to have access to Child and numerous other
interesting ballad collections and commentary because of the local
libraries.  There are 5 complete Dover collections (and one partial),
one Cooper Square set and apparently one original edition
(non-circulating) in our local suburban network.  This doesn't count a
couple of sets of Child's earlier collection (1857-58, reprinted 1880)
and about 18 copies of the Student's Cambridge Edition.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Please, folks, Child is SOLD
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:48:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


To all the folks who are asking about Child:Please, folks, it's SOLD.I am keeping a waiting list, but it's already nearly a dozen names
long. I've stopped adding names to it. So I'm not even going to answer
any more.The *other* books are still available. Speaking as someone who
has all of them, Combs/Wilgus, in particular, is a good, useful volume
to have around. Lots of good versions of a wide variety of ballads
in that book....--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: book sales and exchanges
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:49:48 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi, folks.  I would ask that book sales and exchanges be conducted off-list.
if you want to announce the availability of a book on the list, that's fine,
but, please ask those interested to contact you privately.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:09:49 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 [unmask] wrote:> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about
> $250 four years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I
> think I found an ad in the classified of _Texas Monthly_I bought my Dover edition in 1982, when it was still in print & cost
$7.50 per volume.  Evidently I should have sunk my savings in spare
copies; it has outperformed the stock market.  Having confessed that I
own it, I suppose I had better insure it.Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Look on yonder, see that eagle rise.                :||
||:  He was born on land, but he sure enjoys the skies.  :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:54:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Okay, which one of you got to Tim Fout in Louisville before I did, and
got the Dover set for $21.50? I was the SECOND caller, dammit! Nice
e-pistle form the lad this morning, however, calling for contributions
to the "educate the dumb bookseller fund." Seems to be a genuinely nice
fellow. Ain't you ashamed to have taken advantage of him?
        Sandy Paton
        Folk-Legacy
<http://www.folklegacy.com>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:28:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


On 7/17/00, Joseph C Fineman wrote:>On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 [unmask] wrote:
>
>> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about
>> $250 four years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I
>> think I found an ad in the classified of _Texas Monthly_
>
>I bought my Dover edition in 1982, when it was still in print & cost
>$7.50 per volume.  Evidently I should have sunk my savings in spare
>copies; it has outperformed the stock market.  Having confessed that I
>own it, I suppose I had better insure it.
>
>Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
>out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
>it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
>for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?There are several problems, of different sorts.One is the problem of space/data representation. Child often draws
analogies to non-English ballads. Some are in languages which do
not use the Roman alphabet. Some of these cannot be represented in
normal HTML. The alternatives are to present the files as scans
or as Acrobat files. Both get LARGE.If you do scan for conversion to HTML, you also have to be able
to scan those funny characters.And who proofreads these hundreds of thousands of words? You
can't spellcheck it; the spelling is funny anyway.And you're talking about scanning some thousands of pages.And finally, there is the care and feeding of the books themselves.
What this discussion has shown is that my copy of Child is even
more precious than I thought. :-) Am I going to risk their spines
by running thousands of pages through my scanner?And a final thought: I've been trying for four years to get
people to do books for the Ballad Index. Response has been
pretty poor -- and that's a much easier task than doing Child!
Where are the volunteers?What might be possible is a collective project: If someone has a
web server with a lot of available space, we might be able to do
this as a group -- with each person doing, say, ten ballads, and
the administrator posting the results.But, quite frankly, I wonder about the utility even of this. Child
is, despite everything, easy to find compared to Bronson or
Coffin/Renwick. In ten years of looking, I've had my chances at
three complete sets of Child and I believe some individual volumes.
Plus there are several copies in local libraries. To the best of my
knowledge, there is only one library copy of Bronson in the
Twin Cities, and it's not available for general use. The only
volume I've managed to acquire is Volume I.And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.If we're going to do an "online Child," we shouldn't stop
there. I realize that Bronson and Coffin/Renwick are still under
copyright. But we should at least add summaries of that information.And for that matter, *because* Child is relatively available,
might it not be better to work on other rare books? I realize
that Laws is still under copyright, too -- but what about Sharp?
Dean? Rickaby? All those early regional collections? Those strike
me as a greater need. (Of course, let it be said that I regard
Child as overrated. Child, for all his brilliance, did not
really understand what was and was not traditional!)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: susan tichy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:11:24 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


>And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.Are you talking about The British Traditional Ballad in North America ? I
have one I paid only $20 for... perhaps the dealer I bought it from needs
that seminar for dumb book dealers... but I do too, for a didn't know it was
that rare.Susan Tichy
(fan of that great old murder ballad "Long Lurking")__________________________________________________________________
Hungry Gulch Books & Trails * PO Box 357, Westcliffe, CO 81252 USA
719-783-2244 * [unmask] * http://www.hungrygulch.com
New & Used Books * Book Searches * Special Orders * Maps * Discount Music
Publishers of _The Colorado Sangre de Cristo: A Complete Trail Guide_

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:39:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


On 7/17/00, susan tichy wrote:> >And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.
>
>Are you talking about The British Traditional Ballad in North America ? I
>have one I paid only $20 for... perhaps the dealer I bought it from needs
>that seminar for dumb book dealers... but I do too, for a didn't know it was
>that rare.The fact that a book is rare doesn't mean that the price *has* to be
high. :-) Chances are, if I ever find a copy at a local bookstore,
it will be priced around there. Doesn't make it more or less important.BTW -- let's *not* have that seminar for dumb book dealers. It's
hard enough paying for the books *with* dumb dealers. :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:28:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:42:32PM -0500, Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** wrote:
>
> I have done this in the past and it works wonderfully
> if you simply use a guestbook....
> take out a geocities account and make a guestbook.
> folks can add in what is available and then note what is not
> available when it finds a home
> periodically a summation can be posted
> better you can  go to
> http://guestworld.tripod.lycos.com/
> and get a very good guestbook for free which you can edit
> right down to message content.
> Every so often delete obsolete entries based upon
> responses from sellers.
> Seller, donors would have to inform the guestbook when item
> was gone...not too hard.
> you would remind folk to do so and to provide a means of contact and method of transfer.
>
> Create a simple web page explain this and add in the guestbook link.
> not hard but does very well. I have a few of these going now.
>
> ConradI don't think that this is a good idea for a couple of reasons. The
first is spam. Any publicly available web page will have every email
address on it harvested by robots run by the companies peddling those
CDs of "10 million addresses". Maybe you like spam but most people
don't. Second, some folks may not want their want list, price limits and
transactions be that public. Also the guestbook software on most servers
was not really designed for this sort of application. They are
vulnerable to abuses and some of them are not very secure.I think that Bob's idea is a good one and is better managed by problem not
directly on the Net.                        Just my 2 cents ( or maybe 4).
                                        Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 02:22:58 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Quoth Our Fearless Leader:
> >Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
> >out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
> >it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
> >for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the modern
business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I did,
and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I believe, one
of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but I
don't  remember seeing one lately.
        Lillian Krelove of Legacy Books used to be another such, but she's
sold the business to Sing Out! and they seem to have other fish to pursue.
        Good luck! -- Aloha, Lani<||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:41:16 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


>Quoth Our Fearless Leader:
>> >Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
>> >out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
>> >it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
>> >for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?Another good source for ballads and folk music is Ben Koenig who owns a
book store in Plainfield VT. You can reach him at
[unmask] Happy questing  - Tom>
>        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
>who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the
>modern
>business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
>20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
>01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I did,
>and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I
>believe, one
>of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but I
>don't  remember seeing one lately.
>        Lillian Krelove of Legacy Books used to be another such, but she's
>sold the business to Sing Out! and they seem to have other fish to pursue.
>        Good luck! -- Aloha, Lani
>
><||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
><||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:29:42 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


In a message dated 18/07/2000  09:23:20, Lani Herrmann wrote:<<        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
 who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the
modern
 business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
 20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
 01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I
did,
 and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I believe,
one
 of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but
I
 don't  remember seeing one lately. >>I'm sorry to have to tell you that when I last stayed with David and Chris,
in April last year, they had just issued their last list. There was too
little folklore on the market to make that anything but occasional and when
Universities and colleges ceased the study of classics, the supply of books
in that area being the staple support of the Bland enterprise, the
continuance of the business became impossible.For those who knew them personally, I'm glad to say they are all well and
that Chris has, despite the end of the business, retired from teaching. When
we last spoke, there was talk of a sideline in furniture resoration.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:06:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(99 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)>* Preservation: The living traditions of the nation are captured in a
>multitude of media formats, and each medium presents new and unique
>problems in terms of shelf life and stability.  There is no consensus on
>the advisability of one form over another.  No matter the medium, our
>field
>tapes are disintegrating rapidly.  There is an immediate need to develop
>national guidelines for preservation of folklife collections in a range
>of
>formats.<<I have no right to comment, since I'm not a professional in this
field, but....*This* one is obvious. CD-R! You can get a CD burner for $300, in
these days, and a good A-to-D converter board for $200. Then it's
just a matter of playing the results into the computer, and burning
the CD.>>Um, it's not always quite that simple. First off, professional-level A/D
converters, with genuinely clean sound and accurate clocks, are more like
$1,000, and given that the copies may well become the only surviving
version, it behooves us to make them as well as possible.Second, playing the recordings isn't always as straightforward as it might
seem. Tape formats vary tremendously, requiring different machines for
playback, and the playback machine needs to be tweaked for each tape (head
azimuth, primarily). Tape also, unfortunately, has deteriorated with age,
and many of the tapes from the late 1960s through the early 1980s suffer
from a malady known a hydrolyzation. The binders used in these tapes were
hygroscopic; they absorbed water from the air, turning into long-chain, very
sticky molecules that cause the tape to stick/slip across the tape heads,
creating a hideous screech. Tape in this unfortunate condition needs to be
baked, ideally in a convection oven for several hours, then copied as
quickly as possible. In short, copying tapes into a computer is a highly
labor-intensive process.Other recordings, on 78rpm aluminum discs and commercial shellac discs, also
require a great deal of care and specialized equipment for transfer --
high-quality, low-rumble, low-flutter turntables, good cartridges with
stylus points of the proper radius (varies from disc to disc), high-quality
preamplifiers with adjustable playback equalization to compensate for the
lack of standardization before 1955 or so, etc. etc. etc..<<There is a small cost for the CDs -- particularly since archives
should be made from high-quality CD-R disks (from what I understand,
gold die is by far the most stable, and you need to be sure that
each disk has enough of it and is properly assembled).>>Yes, gold-dye CDs are definitely the most stable -- but for archival use,
they should still be stored in dark, temperature- and humidity-controlled
conditions. And they should be made in triplicate, stored in different
places (see "earthquake").<<There is the question of AIFF or MP3 format -- but this should
be obvious, too: The archived versions should be AIFF. MP3 is
for net distribution, if it comes to that.>>Agreed on the last point -- archival recordings should be completely
unprocessed, non-bit-reduced, etc.. But I have some doubt about AIFF -- most
of the world being Wintel, .wav formats are more the norm. And there's
something to be said for storing the data in music-CD format, simply because
there are literally billions of players out there, and the odds of being
stuck with a recording and having no way to play it are much less (see
"Elcassette", "DCC" and other lost formats). The down side of this is that
you're limited to a 16-bit word length on standard CDs, and the audible
difference between 16 bits and 20 bits, properly done, is not trivial, even
on older recordings.I've written a couple of articles on this subject, "Making It Last, Parts 1
& 2"; they appeared in _Recording_ magazine a few months ago. If anyone's
interested, go to _Recording_'s website, www.recordingmag.com , and look in
the "issue search" database under the title, or under Stamler.<<What is *truly* needed is a national project to get all these song
versions organized. This is essentially what the Ballad Index was
intended to do. Unfortunately, participation in the project has
been rather abysmal. (It might help if we had someone other than
me as editor. I don't have the skills, I don't have the contacts,
and I don't have the financial base. :-) If we could organize all
the songs under such a database, and include all the versions in
various collections, we'd truly have something.>>I think that's a separate issue; I've always seen the Ballad Index as a
different sort of effort, the scope of which was more limited (we don't, for
example, index most strictly-instrumental pieces, and these constitute a
goodly chunk of field recordings). I agree that the larger project is also
worth doing, but don't really see the Ballad Index as conflicting with that,
or as being a smaller, failed effort along those lines. I see it, instead,
as an excellent work in progress, with a well-delimited mission.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 13:53:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(128 lines)


And here I thought this thread was dead. :-)Be it noted that I'm not in serious disagreement with Paul here;
he's supplying technical information that I don't have. At best,
I'm trying to answer his objections.On 7/1/00, Paul Stamler wrote:>----- Original Message -----
>From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 9:35 AM
>Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
>
>
> >* Preservation: The living traditions of the nation are captured in a
> >multitude of media formats, and each medium presents new and unique
> >problems in terms of shelf life and stability.  There is no consensus on
> >the advisability of one form over another.  No matter the medium, our
> >field
> >tapes are disintegrating rapidly.  There is an immediate need to develop
> >national guidelines for preservation of folklife collections in a range
> >of
> >formats.
>
><<I have no right to comment, since I'm not a professional in this
>field, but....
>
>*This* one is obvious. CD-R! You can get a CD burner for $300, in
>these days, and a good A-to-D converter board for $200. Then it's
>just a matter of playing the results into the computer, and burning
>the CD.>>
>
>Um, it's not always quite that simple. First off, professional-level A/D
>converters, with genuinely clean sound and accurate clocks, are more like
>$1,000, and given that the copies may well become the only surviving
>version, it behooves us to make them as well as possible.Fair enough. But the two basic observations remain: It's a digital
format, so once you copy it, you can make copies which do not decay
when reproduced. And it's an up-front cost, with the media cheap
thereafter.I do think there needs to be a regular schedule of reproduction:
Every five years, you make a new copy. Or, better yet, three new
copies. But that's still cheaper than most forms of analog copying.As an aside: Given the state of some of the originals, I wonder
if fancy A-to-D conversions gain us much. :-)[ ... ]><<There is a small cost for the CDs -- particularly since archives
>should be made from high-quality CD-R disks (from what I understand,
>gold die is by far the most stable, and you need to be sure that
>each disk has enough of it and is properly assembled).>>
>
>Yes, gold-dye CDs are definitely the most stable -- but for archival use,
>they should still be stored in dark, temperature- and humidity-controlled
>conditions. And they should be made in triplicate, stored in different
>places (see "earthquake").Of course, those comments apply to *anything*. In all seriousness,
CDs are *better* in this department, because you can make archive
and "active" copies, with no loss of quality.><<There is the question of AIFF or MP3 format -- but this should
>be obvious, too: The archived versions should be AIFF. MP3 is
>for net distribution, if it comes to that.>>
>
>Agreed on the last point -- archival recordings should be completely
>unprocessed, non-bit-reduced, etc.. But I have some doubt about AIFF -- most
>of the world being Wintel, .wav formats are more the norm.No, most of the world is CD players. :-) (As you note below.) I'm
not arguing for a particular computer format; I'm arguing for whatever
they use on CDs.>And there's
>something to be said for storing the data in music-CD format,Which was what I meant. The documentation I have says that AIFF *is*
music-CD format. If I'm wrong (and you would know better than I),
then substitute the correct term. :-)[ ... ]><<What is *truly* needed is a national project to get all these song
>versions organized. This is essentially what the Ballad Index was
>intended to do. Unfortunately, participation in the project has
>been rather abysmal. (It might help if we had someone other than
>me as editor. I don't have the skills, I don't have the contacts,
>and I don't have the financial base. :-) If we could organize all
>the songs under such a database, and include all the versions in
>various collections, we'd truly have something.>>
>
>I think that's a separate issue;It *is* a separate issue from archiving. :-) But there really ought
to be a way to coordinate which recordings go with which songs.>I've always seen the Ballad Index as a
>different sort of effort, the scope of which was more limited (we don't, for
>example, index most strictly-instrumental pieces, and these constitute a
>goodly chunk of field recordings). I agree that the larger project is also
>worth doing, but don't really see the Ballad Index as conflicting with that,
>or as being a smaller, failed effort along those lines. I see it, instead,
>as an excellent work in progress, with a well-delimited mission.The point I'm trying to make is simply that it's a universal database,
intended to include all traditional materials. Not just Child ballads
or Laws ballads or something -- we have too many restricted databases
of that sort already.I'm not saying the Ballad Index has failed, either. It's simply
a demonstration of a problem we have: Any such cataloging effort
requires two things: A central curator *and* people to participate.
If either fails, you don't get what you need. We need that central
curator. And I'm not sure where we find someone for the job. The
one thing one can say for the Ballad Index is that it actually
exists. :-) The relative effort of expanding it is less than starting
from scratch. (Maybe. Depends on the data we want, of course.)Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Jerichos and Thomasvilles
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:43:00 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


There are 35 communities named "Jericho" in 22 states of the USA.  An
additional 3 communities in 2 additional states are named "Jerico."  There
are 14 named "Thomasville" in 12 states.  8 states have at least one each
of "Jericho" (or "Jerico") and "Thomasville."  All of these 8 are east of
the Mississippi River or have it as their eastern border.  4 of the 8 are
southern states, 2 are border states, and 2 are purely Yankee.  Perhaps
Bad Lee Brown blew Little Sadie down in one of these "Thomasville"s.I've had no luck so far searching legal records for what I've considered to be
the most likely states.  Of course, these only give appeals, and if a judgment
is not appealed there will be no record in the accessible legal literature.I'm familiar with Tom Ashley's "Little Sadie," and I know about a few other
versions, which I haven't yet heard.  We have "Lee Brown," "Sadie,"
"Jericho," and "Thomasville."Does anyone know of any other clues to the
historical basis of this ballad in the texts of other versions?Any procedural tips?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:14:41 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


In most cases that need urgent attention today, the question of fidelity
is more or less moot---the amount of sound degradation one might encounter
from ANY of the A/D conversions (including just playing an phonograph
recording or reel-to-reel tape into a cheap CD burner) is negligible when
you consider the quality ofreproduction that was there in the first place
in the period 1930-1960 or so.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:05:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 01:53:52PM -0500, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> And here I thought this thread was dead. :-)
>
> Be it noted that I'm not in serious disagreement with Paul here;
> he's supplying technical information that I don't have. At best,
> I'm trying to answer his objections.
>
> On 7/1/00, Paul Stamler wrote:
> >From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>        [ ... ]> >*This* one is obvious. CD-R! You can get a CD burner for $300, in
> >these days, and a good A-to-D converter board for $200. Then it's
> >just a matter of playing the results into the computer, and burning
> >the CD.>>
> >
> >Um, it's not always quite that simple. First off, professional-level A/D
> >converters, with genuinely clean sound and accurate clocks, are more like
> >$1,000, and given that the copies may well become the only surviving
> >version, it behooves us to make them as well as possible.
>
> Fair enough. But the two basic observations remain: It's a digital
> format, so once you copy it, you can make copies which do not decay
> when reproduced. And it's an up-front cost, with the media cheap
> thereafter.        Hmm ... the copies are *not* always perfect.  The format is
designed so, if a sample is corrupted, it is replaced, either with the
preceding or following sample, or somewhat better, it is replaced by an
average between the preceding and following samples.  This is not
enough to be detected, but over many generations of copies, it adds up,
so you *will* see slow degradation of the recordings through
generations, even with digital.> I do think there needs to be a regular schedule of reproduction:
> Every five years, you make a new copy. Or, better yet, three new
> copies. But that's still cheaper than most forms of analog copying.        See above.  There is something to be said about scheduling the
copies near the maximum safe time.        What I would suggest, here, is to make a set of copies, then
when the next time interval passes, make copies of both the original and
the several years younger copy.  Continue this until the number of
errors detected on reading the first one rises above something like
twenty to one hundred over the whole length of the recording.        What would be a nice touch would be to modify the format to
record checksums every 1024 samples or so, so you could tell which
recordings were clean where, and combine the two to make a more perfect
copy than the ones used as input.> As an aside: Given the state of some of the originals, I wonder
> if fancy A-to-D conversions gain us much. :-)        That depends on the age of the recording in question, the
technology used, and the storage conditions.        [ ... ]> >Yes, gold-dye CDs are definitely the most stable -- but for archival use,
> >they should still be stored in dark, temperature- and humidity-controlled
> >conditions. And they should be made in triplicate, stored in different
> >places (see "earthquake").
>
> Of course, those comments apply to *anything*. In all seriousness,
> CDs are *better* in this department, because you can make archive
> and "active" copies, with no loss of quality.        As above -- not *no* loss of quality, but *lesser* loss of
quality.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New folk site songs in ogg format (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:51:34 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Folks:Tara Calishain is a researcher of extraordinary abilities who sends me
sites from time to time.  I haven't seen this one.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 13:50:04 -0400
From: Tara Calishain <[unmask]>
To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Subject: New folk site songs in ogg formatHi Ed,You've probably already seen this but just in case..best,Tara==
39. efolkMusic.com Offers Open-Format Ogg Vorbis Downloads
get 01011904.txtCHAPEL HILL, NC -- (INTERNET WIRE) -- efolkMusic.com is a "filtered" artist
promotion and cd/download distribution site that is rapidly becoming a
premier site for folk, bluegrass, Celtic and roots-rock downloads and cds.
"Our user base is growing primarily because of the high quality of our
music," says Frank. "You don't have to wade thru the muck to find good
music, because that's the only kind we have.
http://www1.internetwire.com/iwire/iwpr?id=11904&cat=te

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Jerichos and Thomasvilles
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:54:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


<<I'm familiar with Tom Ashley's "Little Sadie," and I know about a few
other
versions, which I haven't yet heard.  We have "Lee Brown," "Sadie,"
"Jericho," and "Thomasville."
Does anyone know of any other clues to the
historical basis of this ballad in the texts of other versions?
Any procedural tips?>>Only that, as the Ballad Index reports the ballad's earliest collected date
as 1922, you should look at earlier dates.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Jerichos and Thomasvilles
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:10:35 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(72 lines)


I think the most likely candidate would be North Carolina.  The version of
the song I'm most familiar with is Tommy Jarrell's, which breaks the
four-line verse in half with repeats, giving it a structure a lot more like
most blues.  As I read the story, the shooting happens in one place, near
Thomasville where the sheriff is from, and Lee Brown flees but is captured
at Jericho and returned to the county seat of the county where the shooting
occurred to stand trial.  William S. Powell's _North Carolina Gazetteer_
says that Jericho is a community in southern Caswell County (there are a
couple others in NC) had a post office from 1905 to 1920.  Thomasville is a
manufacturing town in northern Davidson County, N.C.  To get from
Thomasville to Jericho, you would cross Guilford County (where Greensboro
is) from southwest to northeast.  Why would the sheriff from Thomasville
chase Brown?  I would guess that the shooting happened in Thomasville.
Brown was put on a train to go to the county seat after he was caught in
Jericho, so there must have been a railroad in or fairly near Jericho.  If
you go to the American Memory collection at LOC, they have a bunch of old
railroad maps scanned in, including several for North Carolina.  Looking at
a 1900 map, there's no railroad in most of Caswell County, but from Jericho
(which is near Anderson on modern maps), it would have been about fifteen
miles south to Burlington or Graham which are both on the Southern line
which then goes west through Greensboro and back to Thomasville.Having done some research on ballads involving crimes (are there any
others?) from NC around this time period, I can say it is a huge hassle
since you never quite know without checking whether county records are in
some dusty attic in the county seat or if they found their way to the state
archives in Raleigh.  There is an OPAC for the state archives (I think if
you look up "North Carolina Department of Archives and History" you'll find
your way to it), but it's really, really awful and hard to use.All this also raises the question, if my geographic hunch is right, of why
Lee Brown would have gone to Jericho instead of staying on the Southern
(presuming he went part of the way by train) and getting way out of town.
I would guess that he had relatives in Jericho, probably was from Jericho
and working in Thomasville where he got mixed up with the wrong crowd,
drank too much, carried a pistol, etc. etc.BruceAt 03:43 PM 7/1/00 -0400, you wrote:
>There are 35 communities named "Jericho" in 22 states of the USA.  An
>additional 3 communities in 2 additional states are named "Jerico."  There
>are 14 named "Thomasville" in 12 states.  8 states have at least one each
>of "Jericho" (or "Jerico") and "Thomasville."  All of these 8 are east of
>the Mississippi River or have it as their eastern border.  4 of the 8 are
>southern states, 2 are border states, and 2 are purely Yankee.  Perhaps
>Bad Lee Brown blew Little Sadie down in one of these "Thomasville"s.
>
>I've had no luck so far searching legal records for what I've considered
to be
>the most likely states.  Of course, these only give appeals, and if a
judgment
>is not appealed there will be no record in the accessible legal literature.
>
>I'm familiar with Tom Ashley's "Little Sadie," and I know about a few other
>versions, which I haven't yet heard.  We have "Lee Brown," "Sadie,"
>"Jericho," and "Thomasville."
>
>Does anyone know of any other clues to the
>historical basis of this ballad in the texts of other versions?
>
>Any procedural tips?
>
>john garst    [unmask]
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker
SUPPORT DEMOCRACY -- VOTE GREEN:
        http://www.votenader.org

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: Folk Heritage Recordings in Crisis (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:29:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(47 lines)


Bob Waltz wrote:<<Fair enough. But the two basic observations remain: It's a digital
format, so once you copy it, you can make copies which do not decay
when reproduced. And it's an up-front cost, with the media cheap
thereafter.>>The latter is certainly true. But as others have pointed out already,
digital copying isn't necessarily perfect, and it's worth noting that
digital doesn't deteriorate -- it crashes. In other words, rather than slow,
steady degradation, the sound is perfect, and then it isn't there at all.On the back side of that, digital recordings, including CDs, are made with a
high degree of redundancy for just this reason; the encoding methods are
designed to make error correction maximally effective. And this is true
error correction, not interpolation: the missing digit is restored exactly.
Minor errors are completely corrected in a proper copy; only the worst
errors are interpolated. And I can tell you that a single-sample error, with
interpolation, is highly unlikely to be audible. I spend a lot of time
drawing the scratches out of musical waveforms, and you'd be surprised how
much you can get away with before a hand-drawn quarter-cycle becomes
audible.<<As an aside: Given the state of some of the originals, I wonder
if fancy A-to-D conversions gain us much. :-) >>Yes. A basic tenet of the (dismal) science of information theory is that a
chain is not as strong as its weakest link; it's *weaker* than its weakest
link. To put it more concretely, distortion in an audio circuit is
cumulative, and the distortion of an already-distorted signal creates far
more havoc. I recently tested a moderately-priced high-quality A/D converter
intended for small-studio use (it's made by Apogee, and short of Sony's new
SACD/DSD process it produces some of the best digital audio I've heard); the
improvement in quality from better analog stages, more linear A/D converter
chips and a far more stable clock was immediately audible on an acoustic 78
I used as a real torture test.<<Which was what I meant. The documentation I have says that AIFF *is*
music-CD format. If I'm wrong (and you would know better than I),
then substitute the correct term. :-) >>Duhhh. Yep, I was still somewhere over the Atlantic on that one. Somehow I
mistook AIFF for the Macintosh audio format, which of course is something
else entirely. More coffee, please, Tanya.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A-to-D
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:11:45 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(22 lines)


Paul:Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
safely filed.)Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?EdP.S.:  Others are welcome to contribute their suggestions.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:34:17 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


There is a CD-Recordable FAQ at:http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/I too am interested in answers to Ed's questions, but I am not at all
computer-literate, (I use a Mac). On that side, it seems my bundled
software (Toast) needs an $80 upgrade to Toast DeLuxe do do any
simple editing to a sound file I record through the computer's audio
input - I am told that the shareware SoundSculptor will also do the
job. But currently I'm still collecting information, so I haven't
tried anything in this direction yet. Toast DeLuxe apparently has a
"clean-up" routine that works fairly well on soundfiles created from
LP; though it's not "professional quality" it does a reasonable job
of removing clicks and so forth. (That's just what I've heard). Any
Mac people out there?John Roberts.>Paul:
>
>Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
>including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
>Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
>CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
>notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
>safely filed.)
>
>Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
>not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
>etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.
>
>I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
>from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
>32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.
>
>What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?
>
>Ed
>
>P.S.:  Others are welcome to contribute their suggestions.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: R W Gordon
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 15:14:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


The Library of Congress does not appear to have Robert W. Gordon's papers
from his stay in Darien, GA, 1925-28, during which time he did research on
"Delia."  I have found a WWW site that says that the University of Oregon
has some of his papers, occupying 7 feet of shelf space.Does anyone who has seen these papers recall whether or not Gordon's
material from his stay in Darien is there?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 2 Jul 2000 14:46:23 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


On 7/2/00, John Roberts wrote:>There is a CD-Recordable FAQ at:
>
>http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/
>
>I too am interested in answers to Ed's questions, but I am not at all
>computer-literate, (I use a Mac). On that side, it seems my bundled
>software (Toast) needs an $80 upgrade to Toast DeLuxe do do any
>simple editing to a sound file I record through the computer's audio
>input - I am told that the shareware SoundSculptor will also do the
>job. But currently I'm still collecting information, so I haven't
>tried anything in this direction yet. Toast DeLuxe apparently has a
>"clean-up" routine that works fairly well on soundfiles created from
>LP; though it's not "professional quality" it does a reasonable job
>of removing clicks and so forth. (That's just what I've heard). Any
>Mac people out there?
>
>John Roberts.I'm a Mac person, too, though I haven't actually *done* this
process yet. (Haven't found the right cable combination, and
am being very careful about it. :-)I've been reading the magazines, though, and also been careful
about my versions of Toast. :-) FWIW, the upgrade you need isn't
really Toast Pro; it's Toast 4.0. That comes with CD Spin Doctor
(the program for separating tracks on CDs), which was not included
in Toast 3.0 or earlier. It also has some sound editing capabilities,
though if you want to do something fancy, you'll need more.The question really is one of how much you're willing to pay to
fix the tracks, and how much time you're willing to spend.Someone really ought to sell an all-in-one solution for this
(high-quality sound board, cables, and software) -- but I haven't
heard of any such thing.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: An Artcar Anthem
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:08:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(77 lines)


Here it is folks An Artcar Anthem! (lyrics below for all to use!) Enjoy!
to get the wonderous midi (fun) go here:
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/artcaranthem.html
(this is fun go to the page and click on the midi link!)
this is the link for the midi but may not work from here...
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/carbox.midLITTLE     PlAIN      CARS
An Artcar Anthem!  Little Plain Cars          Adapted  from Malvina Reynolds “Little Houses”          Little plain cars on the car lots,
          Little plain cars  made of  status quo-a-stuff
          Little plain cars on the high-a-ways,
          Little plain cars all the same,
          There's a black one and a brown one
          And a blue one and a red one
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          And the people in the plain cars
          All went to the university
          Where they were put in plain cars
          And they came out all the same
          And there's doctors and lawyers
          And street rod-od-ers
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          And they all play on the golf course
          And drink their hand crafted-beer
          And they all have pretty children
          And the children go to school,
          And the children go to summer camp
          And then to the university
          Where they are all  put in plain cars
          And they drive out all the same.          And the boys go into business
          And marry and raise a family
          Drivein  plain cars made of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same,
          There's a green one and a pink one
          And a blue one and a yellow one
          And they're all made out of status quo-a-stuff
          And they all look just the same.          But the one child  he’s an ar-tist
          And knows that his freedom’s real
          Tired of plain cars made of status quo-a-stuff
          That all look just the same,
          Now there’s glued ones and there are painted ones
          And a carved one and a magnet one
          And they’re all made out of  joy and smiles
          And they all are all the rage!          (alt last verse or add on - And they all the world will change!)ABC NotationT:Little Plain Cars a.k.a. Little Boxes
M:4/4
L:1/4
Q:1/4=100
C:adapted from tune by Malvina Reynolds
K:C
G1/2A/2|G2E2G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2G/2|c2c2c3/2d/2|
edccc3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|F2F2F3/2G/2|E2E2E3/2F/2|
D4G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2A/2|G2E2G3/2G/2|c2c2c3/2d/2|
e3/2d/2c2c3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|FFFFF3/2G/2|
E2E2D3/2D/2|C4|e3/2d/2c2c3/2A/2|G2G2G3/2A/2|FFFFF3/2G/2|
E2E2D3/2D/2|C4||Words  adapted by Conrad Bladey
And there aint no copyright down here!
Ask only for credit when all others want cash!

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:21:14 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


<<Okay, here's the situation.  I have about 350 LPs, vintage 1954-1985,
including a number of the Riverside and Prestige folk recordings edited by
Kenny Goldstein.  I want to transfer at least the classical recordings to
CD. Transfer of the folk is dependent upon whether I want to lose the
notes.  (The Folkways notes, of course, are separate booklets, already
safely filed.)
Sound quality on the classical recordings is fair to excellent, and I do
not think I will have to remove scratches or "enhance" the warmth,
etc.  At age 67, I don't hear as well as I used to anyway.
I have a good turntable, arm and needle, and a pre-amp to boost the signal
from the cartridge.  Obviously, I have a computer.  My sound card is a
32-bit generic from Taiwan that works.
What equipment do I need, and what brands/models would you recommend?>>Two routes you can go. One is to get a decent DAT recorder (Sony's are okay,
with decent if not screamingly great converters) and a sound card with a
digital interface. This has the advantage of giving you input level controls
and a recorder you can use for other purposes as well as giving you a
straight 16-bit signal without needing to be dithered. The digital output of
the DAT recorder would feed the digital in of the sound card, and vice
versa.The alternative, simpler and more direct, would be a CardDeluxe sound card
from Digital Audio Labs. Very high quality despite living inside a computer
case (nasty electrical environment for audio). It's 24 bits, so you'd need
to dither the signal down to 16 bits for printing onto a CD (truncating the
data causes very audible distortion). About $300 for the card, street price
with careful shopping.The Cadillac route would be to buy an Apogee Rosetta converter for about a
grand, plus a digital-in sound card. The sound quality on this unit is
fantastic, but I'm not sure it's worth the extra cash if you're not a
studio.You'll also need a CD burner; I've had decent luck with the Yamahas. And
software; Adaptec Easy-CD seems to be the standard, but I've found it to be
pretty buggy. Last year PC World ran a comparison article between several
brands of CD-burning software; if you could look it up, that would be
useful. You also could use some descratching software; you'd be surprised
how much cleaner even good-sounding discs can get with some *light*
descratching. I use DC-ART software from Diamond Cut, which is clunky but
does a fair job. There's much better stuff out there from Sound Forge and
Sek'd, but they both cost a lot more. I don't suggest the fancier denoising
stuff; except for CEDAR, which is thousands of dollars, these programs
damage the audio more than I can stand, and I'd prefer to live with the
hiss. The low-cut filter and notch filter built into DC-ART can be useful
for some of those Ken Goldstein recordings, which tend to have hum (notch
filter) or rumble (low-cut, aka high-pass).Finally, liner notes -- you can make hybrid discs, audio plus data, and scan
(or type -- urghh) the notes into your computer as text, then store the text
on the same disc as the music. Awkward, but doable in theory (I've never
actually done this, so can't speak from experience).Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D (Mac)
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:52:09 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(36 lines) , text/enriched(50 lines)


Bob Waltz wrote:>I've been reading the magazines, though, and also been careful
>about my versions of Toast. :-) FWIW, the upgrade you need isn't
>really Toast Pro; it's Toast 4.0. That comes with CD Spin Doctor
>(the program for separating tracks on CDs), which was not included
>in Toast 3.0 or earlier. It also has some sound editing capabilities,
>though if you want to do something fancy, you'll need more.Bob,I bought a Yamaha burner about 3 weeks ago. It came bundled with
Toast 4.0.1.1, which does _not_ include Spin Doctor. To get the
latter you need Toast 4 De Luxe (yes I suppose nominally they're both
Toast 4.0, but there's a big difference). From the Adaptec webpage:What's the difference between Toast 4 Deluxe and Toast 4 Standard?
Standard is an OEM (bundled) version. It doesn't have many of the
advanced features that Toast Deluxe has such as DAO (Disc-at-Once)
support, MP3, Liquid Audio, and more advance formats, nor does it
have the CD Spin Doctor or Photo Relay applications.The De Luxe version is around $80 street and there's no upgrade path.
I felt a little gypped as the bundled PC software does seem to have
Spin Doctor's capabilities.Peter Berryman recommended SoundSculptor to me ($30 shareware, it
needs to be licensecd to enable Save) to do soundfile editing.John.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: A-to-D (Mac)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Tue, 4 Jul 2000 19:41:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


> I bought a Yamaha burner about 3 weeks ago. It came bundled with
> Toast 4.0.1.1, which does _not_ include Spin Doctor. To get the
> latter you need Toast 4 De Luxe (yes I suppose nominally they're both
> Toast 4.0, but there's a big difference).Something odd here, John.  A housemate who purchased a G3 with Pro Tools
bought Toast 4.0 (4.0.2?), and upgraded it to 4.1 because his burner
wasn't supported.  Both came with Audio Extractor and Spin Doctor.  I
wonder if you got Toast Lite?-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:31:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


Hi folks:Most of you probably know about this, but just in case... a good portion of
the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and
AIFF files of the field recordings, and MIDI files of the tunes that are
transcribed. Searchable by singer's name, song name or catalog number. Not
everything in the collection is up yet, but it's already a treasure trove.
It's at:http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.htmlPeace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Lorne Brown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:24:10 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Thanks, Paul, for that information. This is a valuable site to have
bookmarked.Lorne Brown
The Ballad Project
TorontoPaul Stamler wrote:
>
> Hi folks:
>
> Most of you probably know about this, but just in case... a good portion of
> the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
> line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and
> AIFF files of the field recordings, and MIDI files of the tunes that are
> transcribed. Searchable by singer's name, song name or catalog number. Not
> everything in the collection is up yet, but it's already a treasure trove.
> It's at:
>
> http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.html
>
> Peace.
> Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: St Thomas, (US) Virgin Islands.
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:34:07 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


So we're off on the 17th for a couple of weeks in the islands.  Seemed like
a good idea.  Now I'm concerned I won't find any folksong there and I won't
have anything to do with my time.I'm bringing the Sony Walkman Pro (WMD3) of course but seriously doubt I'll
get to use it.Abrahams was kind enough to reply but had no suggestions.The single reference I find in my own stuff to St Thomas is obscure.. On the
_Unfortunate Rake_ record "Bright Summer Morning" was collected by "Van Dam
and T. Combs" there in 1953.  But I find no reference or any publication for
a Van Dam or a Van Dam Combs at OCLC.Any suggestions re printed matter?
Better (but forlornly) any suggestions re contact points?Thank you.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: MAx Hunter Collection
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:41:25 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:31:44 -0500, Paul Stamler wrote:>the Max Hunter collection of folk songs of the Ozark region has been put on
>line. including lyrics and (mostly) tune transcriptions, plus RealAudio and but it's already a treasure trove.
>
>http://www.smsu.edu/folksong/MaxHunter/index.html
>
And it is good.  I wasn't aware of Hunter but I'm instantly intrigued.  At
the top there (#3) is "A Lensman, A Tinsman, A Tinker, A Tailor."  Maybe
it's common but I've never before seen a version with verse one the common
Scottish but the tune, chorus & second verse from the common US versions.Great!-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Very important literary award
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:16:12 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


One never knows from whence vital entries for the Happy! file will spring.
Hopefully you caught the very important literary award given Gary Dahl, as
reported by Reuters in today's paper.  It led to the following Happy! entry:Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton Lytton (of Knebworth), 1st Baron, born
5/25/1803 (d1/18/1873) and who wrote _Last Days of Pompeii_.  Of far more
importance, he is the eponym for the annual (from 1982) San Jose State U.
"Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest" (for really bad writing; entry deadline is
the traditional US date for creative writing, April 15) to honor his _Paul
Clifford_ which begins "It was a dark and stormy night."
http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/english/bulwer.htmLytton's ancestral estate at Knebworth was used by Tim Burton as the setting
for "stately Wayne Manor" in the movie "Batman."As of October 1999, the exact phrase "dark and stormy" occurs in 11 songs at
Digital Tradition:BAGCOACH      On a dark and stormy night as the
BARFTBOY      the night was dark and stormy, and the moon
DRNKHELL      It was a dark and stormy night, I saw
FTHFULSL      'Twas on a dark and stormy night The snow
FLYDUTCH      'Twas on a dark and stormy night well southward
GUYREED       do remember one dark and stormy night The rain
EVRYINCH      of woe One dark and stormy night. He was
FTHSAILR      Twas on a dark and stormy night, the snow
PRSHSNOW      It's on a dark and stormy night, the snow
WRKHURON      On a dark and stormy night When orders
ROYALPLM      On a dark and stormy night The rainand this throws into wild disarray and confusion the whole conceptual-
ization of bad writing and the ballad.  Monstrous questions are raised.Is pure bathos more acceptable as song than as "legitimate" writing?
Is bathos _always_ to be taken as a joke?  (Even in Temperance songs.)
Do any of these songs predate _Paul Clifford_?
And/or, where did the dread phrase arise?
Etc.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - in Orlando, Florida
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Very important literary award
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:48:37 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


Abby,I haven't looked at each song closely, but just about all of the ones
you mention are late 19th / early 20th C sentimental ballads, disaster
ballads, or songs written at that time as caricatures of "folksongs"
(i.e. Jack Was Every Inch a Sailor -- which started life as a show tune
around the turn of the century).  My suspicion is that they were
primarily the output of songmills, Tin Pan Alley or its precursors.  If
so, that particular commercial environment is probably more responsible
for the "bad" writing, than the ballad form per se.  It does raise the
question, though, of where does "formulaic" end, and trite and
hackneyed begin?One of the things that struck me about " it was a dark and stormy
night," is that folk sea-disaster ballads from the same period are
commonly detailed, as ballads go, in their depiction of vessels in
storms: they often include details of wind direction and strength, wave
height, sometimes cloud formations, course headings, rigging
adjustments made in preparation for severe weather, and so on.
Granted, this tends to be executed prosaically, but that's a lesser sin
than excess.Bill Ellis takes up the question of "bathos" in his article on "The
Blind Girl" (JAF 91, 1978).  He argued that such sentimental and, to
us, excessively written ballads had a genuine effect on Victorian and
Edwardian audiences.  That would also appear to be the case from
William Roy Mackenzie's descriptions of ballad singers in Nova Scotia.
Perhaps it was the weak end of the Romantic emphasis on emotion and
high drama, a poor man's "storm and stress," albeit a century later.But then again, when it comes right down to it, aren't the opening bars
of "The Ride of the Valkyries" just an aural equivalent of "It was a
dark and stormy night" : )Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fiddle Convention in 2001
From: Dr Ian Russell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:23:44 +0100
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(72 lines)


Dear All,
For those of us who enjoy a tune as much as a lyric, you
might like to note the following convention.
Apologies for any cross posting.
Best wishes,
IanNorth Atlantic Fiddle Convention
Crossing Boundaries
25 - 29 July 2001
University of Aberdeen, ScotlandCrossing Boundaries is devoted to traditional
fiddlers and fiddle music from countries around
the northern seas, combining an international
conference with performance events and workshops,
as well as opportunities for informal sessions.The North East of Scotland, famous for its
fiddle tradition, is the setting for this event,
organised by the Elphinstone Institute in
conjunction with other local, national, and
international arts and cultural
organisations: SCaT (Scottish Culture and Traditions),
and the Lemon Tree in Aberdeen; Aberdeenshire Arts;
the Irish Centre for World Music, University of Limerick;
the Department of Ethnology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.The convention will focus on the way the fiddle,
fiddle music, and styles of playing cross boundaries
of all kinds - geographical, political and
personal - creating new styles and fresh musical insights.The conference will explore the past and future
of traditional fiddling in social, ethnological, and musical
contexts, with keynote contributions.  Themes include:
transmission, performance, social context, symbolic or
religious function, stylistics, material culture, dance,
supernatural beliefs, folklore, and iconography.If you are interested in attending, contributing,
performing, or offering an academic paper (abstract of
300 words, deadline 1 April 2001), please e-mail or
write to the Elphinstone Institute. (The Institute
may present abstracts of papers for peer review and
anticipates the publication of the proceedings.)Convenors: Ian Russell and Mary Anne AlburgerThe Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272996 Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
Website: www.abdn.ac.uk/Elphinstone/
E-mail:  [unmask]----------------------
Dr Ian Russell, Director
The Elphinstone Institute
University of Aberdeen
24 High Street
Aberdeen
AB24 3EB
Tel: +44 (0)1224 272386
Fax: +44 (0)1224 272728
[unmask]
Website:
www.abdn.ac.uk/elphinstone/

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: happy!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 09:43:48 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
Woody Guthrie's birthday!        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: happy!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 08:06:42 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(17 lines)


On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
> Woody Guthrie's birthday!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>Had he lived, he would have been 88 years old today.  And probably still
sitting at his portable typewriter, pounding away, margin to margin, all
caps on the same questions of race and class that troubled him before he
lost his voice.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: happy!
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 14 Jul 2000 10:46:11 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


Yes, no doubt.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]-----Original Message-----
From: Forum for ballad scholars [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of Ed Cray
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 10:07 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Re: happy!On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Marge Steiner wrote:> Hey, folks, this is July 14t, and, in addition to being Bastille Day, it's
> Woody Guthrie's birthday!
>
>         Marge
>
>
> E-mail: [unmask]
>Had he lived, he would have been 88 years old today.  And probably still
sitting at his portable typewriter, pounding away, margin to margin, all
caps on the same questions of race and class that troubled him before he
lost his voice.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:41:06 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Balladeers --I thought about heading this with the subject "Have I Got a Deal
For You," but those of you with spam filters probably wouldn't
like the results. :-)Anyway, folks, a person I work with is retiring and getting rid
of his old folk music books. I've taken some off his hands already
(you can't have them! Back! Back!), but there are a number I already
have. I volunteered/promised to make them available to you folks
first. (I realize that selling books over Ballad-L may be against
policy, but how else are you going to learn about these? As a lousy
compromise, I won't list the prices unless our Esteemed List Mom
permits.)Anyway, here are the books:Roger D. Abrahams & George Foss, _Anglo-American Folksong Style_.
   Paperback, first printing. Binding is in good shape, but the
   contents are heavily underlined; the owner used it to teach
   a folklore class at the University of Minnesota.Richard Chase, _American Folk Tales and Songs_. 1971 Dover
   paperback edition. Some underlining and notes, mostly in
   the folklore rather than the song portion. Binding is in
   good shape except that the cellophane on the cover is
   starting to peel. (I've seen *new* Dover books with that
   problem.)Francis James Child -- you know what. The Bible. _The English
   and Scottish Popular Ballads_. The Dover five-volume set.
   Not sure which printing (they may not even all be the
   same), but they were bought in the Sixties. Completely unmarked,
   as best I can tell. The spines are a bit faded from sun,
   and the pages are just a little brown around the edges for
   the same reason, but the bindings are in good shape.Josiah H. Combs (edited by D. K. Wilgus), _Folk-Songs of the
   Southern United States_. Hardcover. Second printing (1969).
   Appears to be in mint condition; I wish I could keep this
   one and sell my copy. :-)Alan Lomax, _Folk Songs of North America_. Hardcover, no date
  but I'd guess it was printed in the Sixties. Excellent condition
  (I can't find a mark in it) except that the dust jacket is
  rather battered.If anyone is interested, let me know off-list and I'll tell you
what we're going to try to soak you for. :-) Or feel free to
contact me with questions.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: Gwenzilla <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 12:53:50 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:OK, what do you want for the Child?Gwen Knighton                                    [unmask]_______________________________________________________________________
        And this curve, is your smile
        And this cross, is your heart      (KaTe--The Red Shoes)
        And this line,  is your path
_______________________________________________________________________
                   -*Cyny Telyn* -- /Sing/ the harp-

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:04:23 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 12:53:50PM -0400, Gwenzilla wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:
>
> OK, what do you want for the Child?        This sounds like either kidnapping or slavery. :-)        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:21:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


On 7/15/00, Gwenzilla wrote:>On Sat, Jul 15, 2000, Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]> wrote:
>
>OK, what do you want for the Child?A good home, first and foremost. :-)Just a reminder: Please contact me *off-list*. Don't want to
be exposing our dirty laundry in public. :-) (At least until
Ms. Steiner gives us permission.)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Where to start -- maybe "Books Available...."
From: Mary Louise Chown <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:04:02 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> Anyway, here are the books:
>
>
>
> Richard Chase, _American Folk Tales and Songs_. 1971 Dover
>    paperback edition. Some underlining and notes, mostly in
>    the folklore rather than the song portion. Binding is in
>    good shape except that the cellophane on the cover is
>    starting to peel. (I've seen *new* Dover books with that
>    problem.)
>
> Francis James Child -- you know what. The Bible. _The English
>    and Scottish Popular Ballads_. The Dover five-volume set.
>    Not sure which printing (they may not even all be the
>    same), but they were bought in the Sixties. Completely unmarked,
>    as best I can tell. The spines are a bit faded from sun,
>    and the pages are just a little brown around the edges for
>    the same reason, but the bindings are in good shape.
>
> Alan Lomax, _Folk Songs of North America_. Hardcover, no date
>   but I'd guess it was printed in the Sixties. Excellent condition
>   (I can't find a mark in it) except that the dust jacket is
>   rather battered.
>
> If anyone is interested, let me know off-list and I'll tell you
> what we're going to try to soak you for. :-) Or feel free to
> contact me with questions.
>
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."Hello Bob  Can ypou tell me the prices for the above books
Mary Louise Chown

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:03:07 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
I should have charged more. :-)The other books are still available.This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
just on a weekend!I hate to think how many of us are waiting in line for Laws
or Bronson.We need a way to communicate with each other if things like this
turn up.How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
much work as I think it will be. :-).Here's what I have in mind:Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
Child.Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)So:Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
buy it.Thoughts:How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
save some time.Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
people "Sorry, Child is sold."
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:42:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(98 lines)


I have done this in the past and it works wonderfully
if you simply use a guestbook....
take out a geocities account and make a guestbook.
folks can add in what is available and then note what is not
available when it finds a home
periodically a summation can be posted
better you can  go to
http://guestworld.tripod.lycos.com/
and get a very good guestbook for free which you can edit
right down to message content.
Every so often delete obsolete entries based upon
responses from sellers.
Seller, donors would have to inform the guestbook when item
was gone...not too hard.
you would remind folk to do so and to provide a means of contact and method of transfer.Create a simple web page explain this and add in the guestbook link.
not hard but does very well. I have a few of these going now.Conrad"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)
>
> Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
> I should have charged more. :-)
>
> The other books are still available.
>
> This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
> for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
> common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
> also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
> just on a weekend!
>
> I hate to think how many of us are waiting in line for Laws
> or Bronson.
>
> We need a way to communicate with each other if things like this
> turn up.
>
> How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
> to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
> much work as I think it will be. :-).
>
> Here's what I have in mind:
>
> Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
> most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
> the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
> bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
> Child.
>
> Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
> people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.
>
> It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
> when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)
>
> So:
>
> Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
> to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
> even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
> be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
> buy it.
>
> Thoughts:
>
> How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
> in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.
>
> Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
> save some time.
>
> Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
> people "Sorry, Child is sold."
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:37:02 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(83 lines)


>DoN: Don't you dare say *anything* about that subject. :-)
>
>Folks, you can stop asking about the Child set; it's sold. I suppose
>I should have charged more. :-)
>
>The other books are still available.
>
>This brings up a real question, though: I've had five requests
>for all or part of Child -- and this even though it's a fairly
>common book (I've run across three complete sets in my life, and
>also seen it in several universities). And that's five requests
>just on a weekend!The Dover Child edition is fairly rare these days, sometimes, when
available, running into the hundreds for a set.  Not only is it out of
print, but has been for a long time. What's worse is that in the latter
days of its availability, Dover had not printed as many copies of Volume
Three as they had the other four.
>
>How would people feel about a Ballad-L book exchange? I'm willing
>to administer this (I think. Assuming it's no more than twice as
>much work as I think it will be. :-).Sounds like a reaaly fine idea.>Here's what I have in mind:
>
>Every person submits a list of up to, say, six books you want
>most. I'll make up a database keyed by title and person who makes
>the request. If someone finds, say, a set of Child in a used
>bookstore, I can then put you in contact with those who want
>Child.You might also ask for lists of books that people wabt to sell. I.m sure
there are titles out there that I might like, but if I don't know they
exist...Perhaps the simplest way to do this would be to send out periodically a
list of books wanted and books for sale. Each list has the name and e-mail
of the buyer/seller and specific price and/or price range.  This shifts the
responsibility to the buyer and seller and quickly gets you out of the
middle. Maybe this could also include vinyl as well as paper.If this works out without too much  hassle, a swappers list might be a good
addition. In the case of out-of-print or otherwise unobtainable material, a
copy swap might prove feasible. For example, I'd love to swap a photocopy
of Part One of Terry's "The Shanty Book" for a copy of Part Two.I'm looking forward to the first list. This is indeed a most noble
undertaking  - Tom>Before you ask, I would not charge for this. All I do is put
>people in touch. Up to you to arrange the details of the sale.
>
>It would be nice, of course, if people would keep me up to date
>when their request lists change, or their e-mail addresses. :-)
>
>So:
>
>Is this worth doing? It seems like a good idea to me; I'm willing
>to let people know when *I* find stuff in a used bookstore. I could
>even post lists of "most popular titles" periodically, so you could
>be confident about buying those books, knowing that someone will
>buy it.
>
>Thoughts:
>
>How do we decide who gets first crack at books? I'd say "first
>in the database, first served" -- but I'm open to suggestions.
>
>Also, should we list how much people are willing to pay? Might
>save some time.
>
>Any other thoughts? This just came to me as I sat there telling
>people "Sorry, Child is sold."
>--
>Bob Waltz
>[unmask]
>
>"The one thing we learn from history --
>   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Astonished!
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:36:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


"Child, Francis James Ed English and Scottish Popular Ballads; 5 Vols.
Dover, 1965 Trade Paperback. Good/No Jacket. Book # 13936
Price: US$ 500.00
Presented by BLACK OAK BOOKS, ABAA, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A."john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:29:04 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(26 lines)


On 7/16/00, John Garst wrote:>"Child, Francis James Ed English and Scottish Popular Ballads; 5 Vols.
>Dover, 1965 Trade Paperback. Good/No Jacket. Book # 13936
>Price: US$ 500.00
>Presented by BLACK OAK BOOKS, ABAA, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A."When I was pricing the various books this fellow had for sale, I found
a few like that -- e.g. a copy of Gomme for $125 and a copy of
Jackson's book on spirituals for $50. These were on the order of
four times what the other sets cost.Maybe they invoked Child's ghost and had him sign it. :-)But it's an argument for some sort of database to tell us what these
things *ought* to cost. It was tough, sitting there researching
how much to charge *myself* for a copy of Laws. :-)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 19:05:46 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(3 lines)


I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about $250 four
years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I think I found an ad in
the classified of _Texas Monthly_

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Hardy & Bonaparte
From: Becky Nankivell <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:19:45 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Not a ballad, but certainly in the group's realm of expertise?In Thomas Hardy's "The Trumpet Major" the soldiers sing (omitting his diacriticals):When lawyers strive to heal a breach,
And parsons practise what they preach;
Then Boney he'll come pouncing down,
And march his men on London Town!Rollicum rorum, tollollorum,
Rollicum rorum, tollollay.(etc. - 4 verses offered, a total of 14 referred to!)Was this Hardy's own creation, or (and?) is there a melody anyone knows of?~ Becky Nankivell
Tucson, Arizona

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:21:05 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Quoth herself:
> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about $250 four
> years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I think I found an ad in
> the classified of _Texas Monthly_I recall finding a set of the Dover reprints in the local Pegasus book store
some time ago and posting its existence there, probably on this very list.
Price was very reasonable, about $20 per volume (up from the original cover
price, something like $5.95). I sure hope someone followed up on that one and
phoned the store. -- aloha, Lani<||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 21:15:55 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


And last year I found a Dover set of Child in a small bookstore in Camden,
Maine -- memory serving.  The dealer, whose name I posted on ballad-l,
wanted like $20 a volume.  Not a bad price considering that Wildmon had a
set of the original edition for $1000 earlier this year.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Margaret Anderson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 23:40:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


> I recall finding a set of the Dover reprints in the local Pegasus book store
> some time ago and posting its existence there, probably on this very list.
> Price was very reasonable, about $20 per volume (up from the original cover
> price, something like $5.95). I sure hope someone followed up on that one and
> phoned the store. -- aloha, LaniActually, the original price on the covers of my set is $2.75.  I got them about
30 years ago and it cost all the cash I had at the time.  I've gotten more than my
money's worth from them.Discussions like this make me feel unusually wealthy.Margaret

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:59:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


Lani and Ed, I don't think you need worry about anyone passing up such
information posted to the list.  I responded within something like 8
hours of Ed's posting (which was, as I recall, $50 for the set), and was
the fifth respondent.  The books had already been sold, of course.  I
was the sixth inquiry regarding Bob's set, and they were of course gone.
 We keep trying, though.While we're in the eat-your-heart-out mode, the set I'm currently using
is borrowed from my housemate Sandy (of Sandy's Music here in
Cambridge).  A friend of his found the complete set, in excellent
unmarked condition, at a yard sale, and bought it ridiculously cheap
figuring Sandy would want it - which of course was correct.Meanwhile, and perhaps because this is Child country, we here in the
Boston area continue to have access to Child and numerous other
interesting ballad collections and commentary because of the local
libraries.  There are 5 complete Dover collections (and one partial),
one Cooper Square set and apparently one original edition
(non-circulating) in our local suburban network.  This doesn't count a
couple of sets of Child's earlier collection (1857-58, reprinted 1880)
and about 18 copies of the Student's Cambridge Edition.-Don Duncan

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Please, folks, Child is SOLD
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:48:31 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


To all the folks who are asking about Child:Please, folks, it's SOLD.I am keeping a waiting list, but it's already nearly a dozen names
long. I've stopped adding names to it. So I'm not even going to answer
any more.The *other* books are still available. Speaking as someone who
has all of them, Combs/Wilgus, in particular, is a good, useful volume
to have around. Lots of good versions of a wide variety of ballads
in that book....--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: book sales and exchanges
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:49:48 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Hi, folks.  I would ask that book sales and exchanges be conducted off-list.
if you want to announce the availability of a book on the list, that's fine,
but, please ask those interested to contact you privately.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:09:49 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 [unmask] wrote:> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about
> $250 four years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I
> think I found an ad in the classified of _Texas Monthly_I bought my Dover edition in 1982, when it was still in print & cost
$7.50 per volume.  Evidently I should have sunk my savings in spare
copies; it has outperformed the stock market.  Having confessed that I
own it, I suppose I had better insure it.Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  Look on yonder, see that eagle rise.                :||
||:  He was born on land, but he sure enjoys the skies.  :||

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:54:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


Okay, which one of you got to Tim Fout in Louisville before I did, and
got the Dover set for $21.50? I was the SECOND caller, dammit! Nice
e-pistle form the lad this morning, however, calling for contributions
to the "educate the dumb bookseller fund." Seems to be a genuinely nice
fellow. Ain't you ashamed to have taken advantage of him?
        Sandy Paton
        Folk-Legacy
<http://www.folklegacy.com>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:28:45 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


On 7/17/00, Joseph C Fineman wrote:>On Sun, 16 Jul 2000 [unmask] wrote:
>
>> I got my used Child collection from a used book dealer for about
>> $250 four years ago.  Alas, I cannot remember where I got it.  I
>> think I found an ad in the classified of _Texas Monthly_
>
>I bought my Dover edition in 1982, when it was still in print & cost
>$7.50 per volume.  Evidently I should have sunk my savings in spare
>copies; it has outperformed the stock market.  Having confessed that I
>own it, I suppose I had better insure it.
>
>Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
>out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
>it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
>for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?There are several problems, of different sorts.One is the problem of space/data representation. Child often draws
analogies to non-English ballads. Some are in languages which do
not use the Roman alphabet. Some of these cannot be represented in
normal HTML. The alternatives are to present the files as scans
or as Acrobat files. Both get LARGE.If you do scan for conversion to HTML, you also have to be able
to scan those funny characters.And who proofreads these hundreds of thousands of words? You
can't spellcheck it; the spelling is funny anyway.And you're talking about scanning some thousands of pages.And finally, there is the care and feeding of the books themselves.
What this discussion has shown is that my copy of Child is even
more precious than I thought. :-) Am I going to risk their spines
by running thousands of pages through my scanner?And a final thought: I've been trying for four years to get
people to do books for the Ballad Index. Response has been
pretty poor -- and that's a much easier task than doing Child!
Where are the volunteers?What might be possible is a collective project: If someone has a
web server with a lot of available space, we might be able to do
this as a group -- with each person doing, say, ten ballads, and
the administrator posting the results.But, quite frankly, I wonder about the utility even of this. Child
is, despite everything, easy to find compared to Bronson or
Coffin/Renwick. In ten years of looking, I've had my chances at
three complete sets of Child and I believe some individual volumes.
Plus there are several copies in local libraries. To the best of my
knowledge, there is only one library copy of Bronson in the
Twin Cities, and it's not available for general use. The only
volume I've managed to acquire is Volume I.And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.If we're going to do an "online Child," we shouldn't stop
there. I realize that Bronson and Coffin/Renwick are still under
copyright. But we should at least add summaries of that information.And for that matter, *because* Child is relatively available,
might it not be better to work on other rare books? I realize
that Laws is still under copyright, too -- but what about Sharp?
Dean? Rickaby? All those early regional collections? Those strike
me as a greater need. (Of course, let it be said that I regard
Child as overrated. Child, for all his brilliance, did not
really understand what was and was not traditional!)--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: susan tichy <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:11:24 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


>And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.Are you talking about The British Traditional Ballad in North America ? I
have one I paid only $20 for... perhaps the dealer I bought it from needs
that seminar for dumb book dealers... but I do too, for a didn't know it was
that rare.Susan Tichy
(fan of that great old murder ballad "Long Lurking")__________________________________________________________________
Hungry Gulch Books & Trails * PO Box 357, Westcliffe, CO 81252 USA
719-783-2244 * [unmask] * http://www.hungrygulch.com
New & Used Books * Book Searches * Special Orders * Maps * Discount Music
Publishers of _The Colorado Sangre de Cristo: A Complete Trail Guide_

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 17 Jul 2000 14:39:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(22 lines)


On 7/17/00, susan tichy wrote:> >And I've never so much as seen Coffin/Renwick.
>
>Are you talking about The British Traditional Ballad in North America ? I
>have one I paid only $20 for... perhaps the dealer I bought it from needs
>that seminar for dumb book dealers... but I do too, for a didn't know it was
>that rare.The fact that a book is rare doesn't mean that the price *has* to be
high. :-) Chances are, if I ever find a copy at a local bookstore,
it will be priced around there. Doesn't make it more or less important.BTW -- let's *not* have that seminar for dumb book dealers. It's
hard enough paying for the books *with* dumb dealers. :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Book Exchange (Child Sold -- Sorry)
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:28:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(44 lines)


On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:42:32PM -0500, Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** wrote:
>
> I have done this in the past and it works wonderfully
> if you simply use a guestbook....
> take out a geocities account and make a guestbook.
> folks can add in what is available and then note what is not
> available when it finds a home
> periodically a summation can be posted
> better you can  go to
> http://guestworld.tripod.lycos.com/
> and get a very good guestbook for free which you can edit
> right down to message content.
> Every so often delete obsolete entries based upon
> responses from sellers.
> Seller, donors would have to inform the guestbook when item
> was gone...not too hard.
> you would remind folk to do so and to provide a means of contact and method of transfer.
>
> Create a simple web page explain this and add in the guestbook link.
> not hard but does very well. I have a few of these going now.
>
> ConradI don't think that this is a good idea for a couple of reasons. The
first is spam. Any publicly available web page will have every email
address on it harvested by robots run by the companies peddling those
CDs of "10 million addresses". Maybe you like spam but most people
don't. Second, some folks may not want their want list, price limits and
transactions be that public. Also the guestbook software on most servers
was not really designed for this sort of application. They are
vulnerable to abuses and some of them are not very secure.I think that Bob's idea is a good one and is better managed by problem not
directly on the Net.                        Just my 2 cents ( or maybe 4).
                                        Dolores--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 02:22:58 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Quoth Our Fearless Leader:
> >Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
> >out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
> >it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
> >for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the modern
business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I did,
and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I believe, one
of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but I
don't  remember seeing one lately.
        Lillian Krelove of Legacy Books used to be another such, but she's
sold the business to Sing Out! and they seem to have other fish to pursue.
        Good luck! -- Aloha, Lani<||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
<||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: Tom Hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 09:41:16 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


>Quoth Our Fearless Leader:
>> >Seriously, it is scandalous that such a work should _ever_ have been
>> >out of print.  So much for the publishing business.  But, hot damn!
>> >it's in the public domain.  Would it be that big a job, these days,
>> >for someone to put the whole thing on the Web?Another good source for ballads and folk music is Ben Koenig who owns a
book store in Plainfield VT. You can reach him at
[unmask] Happy questing  - Tom>
>        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
>who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the
>modern
>business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
>20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
>01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I did,
>and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I
>believe, one
>of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but I
>don't  remember seeing one lately.
>        Lillian Krelove of Legacy Books used to be another such, but she's
>sold the business to Sing Out! and they seem to have other fish to pursue.
>        Good luck! -- Aloha, Lani
>
><||>            Lani Herrmann * [unmask]
><||> 5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond CA 94805 * (510) 237-7360

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Astonished!
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 18 Jul 2000 10:29:42 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


In a message dated 18/07/2000  09:23:20, Lani Herrmann wrote:<<        I'm sure I have already mentioned David and Chris Bland in England,
 who are good honest (but *not* dumb) booksellers -- they have entered the
modern
 business age with a fax number, though no e-mail yet. Their address:
 20 Belvoir Gardens, Skircoat Green, Halifax, Yorks. HX3 ONF, U,K. Phone
 01-422-351-212 (as of several years ago).  You can submit a wish list.  I
did,
 and got copies of Peter Kennedy's book as well as Brunnings and, I believe,
one
 of the Lawses. They issue a printed list in folklore, used to be annual, but
I
 don't  remember seeing one lately. >>I'm sorry to have to tell you that when I last stayed with David and Chris,
in April last year, they had just issued their last list. There was too
little folklore on the market to make that anything but occasional and when
Universities and colleges ceased the study of classics, the supply of books
in that area being the staple support of the Bland enterprise, the
continuance of the business became impossible.For those who knew them personally, I'm glad to say they are all well and
that Chris has, despite the end of the business, retired from teaching. When
we last spoke, there was talk of a sideline in furniture resoration.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands chanteys
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:12:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:34:07 -0400, Abby Sale wrote:>So we're off on the 17th for a couple of weeks in the islands.  Seemed like
>a good idea.  Now I'm concerned I won't find any folksong there and I won't
>have anything to do with my time.
>
Well, I did find some stuff to do but limited folksong.On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:17:50 -0400, John Garst wrote:>I've been told that "Delia" is known all over the Caribbean.  If you get a
>chance, you might ask a few locals if they know it.
>
Didn't find that but may have made some good contacts.  At the last moment,
as usual so I didn't get to tape anything but I think I did find some
interesting chantey singing.  Used for construction as implied in _Deep the
Water_.  Anyone heading for St. Thomas & seriously interested in collecting
should contact me.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - of Orlando, Florida
         Currently overlooking a fire ant hill back in Orlando
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Newcastle Songs
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:43:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.
All of fordyce is now there....
We will move ahead to justify it all with Allen and add a few
then on to the rest of Joe Wilson.
Once the lyrics are in place we chace tunes.
If someone notices a tune that is not there but in title feel
free to send an .abc.
After we nail down tunes then we go for the indexes....
But lyrics first....Take a tour-
http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~dc920/HomePage.priests.html
you may wish to start with the main index of all the sangs from
this page.Enjoy!Conrad
--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:17:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(50 lines)


A couple of months ago, someone (John Roberts, I think) was asking
about converting LPs and cassettes to CDs using a Macintosh. The
complaint was that the version of Toast bundled with his CD drive
did not include CD Spin Doctor, and so could not be used to digitize
sound.An addendum, for any other Mac users out there: I just got a job
creating a musician's web site, and so I went out to get software
to create MP3 files.The software is called SoundJam MP Plus, from Cassidy & Greene -- and
it provides the rest of what you need for less than the cost of
the upgrade to Toast Deluxe. (Luckily for me, I decided to spend
the extra $3 for the version in the box, rather than using the
downloadable version. :-)The box includes1) The cable to connect a stereo to the Mac (this is actually a
   more useful cable than the one with Toast Deluxe -- it's a
   few centimetres longer, and given how hard it was for me
   to get the cable to run that far, I *needed* that :-)
2) Digitizing software.
   The digitizing software isn't as convenient as CD Spin Doctor,
   but it works with Toast, so it does what you need. And it
   does MP3, too. (Which you can use to put material on web
   sites.)Comparative costs: $40 for SoundJam, $80 for Toast Pro. You
do need a PowerPC Mac with a reasonably fast processor (they
say at least 100 MHz; I'd guess you really need twice that).
I haven't tried the set-up yet, but it all looks good.We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 01:22:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


<<We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.>>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a mike
input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
being applied...Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:35:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


On 8/11/00, Paul Stamler wrote:><<We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
>Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
>I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
>on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
>straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
>I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
>is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
>I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.>>
>
>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a mike
>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>being applied...It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....)Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:21:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a
mike
>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>being applied...<<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.>>Then, if it's working without horrible distortion, it probably is a line
input, regardless of Mac's labeling. Funny, I thought only Windows machines
had weird stuff like that. :-)<<Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....) >>Try Media Source -- 800-241-8857 ext 317. They're a little slow to return
voice-mail messages, but they'll sell you Sony silver-backed green-dye discs
for about $1.65/ea including jewel boxes and shipping, in quantities of 100,
which is a decent price.<<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
unusually low gain.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:42:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(75 lines)


On 8/11/00, Paul Stamler wrote:> >The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a
>mike
>>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>>being applied...
>
><<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
>has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)
>
>As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.>>
>
>Then, if it's working without horrible distortion, it probably is a line
>input, regardless of Mac's labeling. Funny, I thought only Windows machines
>had weird stuff like that. :-)For what it's worth, the system *software* seems to refer to it as
"Sound In." But everyone calls it the "Microphone Port" because,
well, it has a microphone icon by it. :-)><<Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
>claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
>Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
>*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
>give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
>with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
>Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
>quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
>burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
>This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
>all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
>conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
>"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....) >>
>
>Try Media Source -- 800-241-8857 ext 317. They're a little slow to return
>voice-mail messages, but they'll sell you Sony silver-backed green-dye discs
>for about $1.65/ea including jewel boxes and shipping, in quantities of 100,
>which is a decent price.I got a 50-pack of Kodak Gold for $40 from Office Depot, and they've
worked excellently. Whereas I've had high rates of failure from
Maxell blues, Imation greens, and no-name blues. I'm sticking with
the Kodaks from now on -- at least until someone does real product
testing.I've no great desire to order by mail; I'm just pointing out that
they're very good at making you *think* you're getting good disks
(gold die, reputable company, etc.) when in fact you're getting
junk. (The Maxells are called "Maxell gold," even though they use
blue dye, and the Imations were carefully photographed to give the
impression that they were gold, too.)><<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
>where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
>I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
>someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
>so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
>
>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
>of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
>decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
>consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
>unusually low gain.Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:01:19 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 01:42:03PM -0500, Robert B. Waltz wrote:        [ ... ]> ><<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
> >has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)        It may have assumed amplified microphones.  The ones which I use
for the Sun have a coin battery in them, and a power switch.        Or perhaps, they assume that you will run the microphones
through a mixer before you get to the sound card.        [ ... ]> ><<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
> >where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
> >I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
> >someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
> >so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
> >
> >That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
> >of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
> >decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
> >consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
> >unusually low gain.
>
> Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
> an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-)        Well ... I *think* that line level does have a standard, but
phono pickup cartridges vary widely in sensitivity -- so much so that
some need custom preamps.  The higher the quality, the more likely it is
to need custom preamps, I think.        However -- *some* systems do have individual level controls on
each input.  One which I remember was the Heathkit integrated preamp/amp
which was the companion to my AJ-15 FM tuner. (At least I *think* that
was the model number at this remove in time.)  The amplifier was the
AA-15 as I remember.  Anyway, it had (behind a swing-down panel) a bank
of screwdriver adjust individual level pots for each channel.  I presume
that some other systems have similar features.        However, as long as the CD level is higher than the LPs, it is
possible to build a simple box to go between the CD player and the
preamp inputs to equalize the levels.  Send me e-mail for the design,
since it is too far off topic for here.        First -- check whether the CD player has a pot (perhaps on the
back) to adjust its output level.        You'll *still* have to deal with the fact that different records
are recorded at varying levels.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Stephanie Smith <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 20:19:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Hello All,I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song, "My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
So handsome and bonnie and free.
Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
But now he's far over the sea.I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
May news never get to the keel.
I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
Would put my poor heart in a ??If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the reference.StephanieStephanie Smith
Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage
Smithsonian Institution
[unmask]>>> Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]> 08/05/00 18:53 PM >>>
been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.... <snip>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 21:45:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


I must say that I have not run into this yet....
I will take a look in Allan because I am not
finished there yet.
More later....
Which Jez Lowe cd is it on.
I like some Jez Lowe stuff but if find him a bit
pessimistic and not as uplifting as the ancient tradition.
ConradStephanie Smith wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song, "My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:
>
> Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
> So handsome and bonnie and free.
> Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
> But now he's far over the sea.
>
> I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:
>
> Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
> May news never get to the keel.
> I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
> Would put my poor heart in a ??
>
> If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the reference.
>
> Stephanie
>
> Stephanie Smith
> Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage
> Smithsonian Institution
> [unmask]
>
> >>> Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]> 08/05/00 18:53 PM >>>
> been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
> The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.... <snip>--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 05:46:26 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
quotations.Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
wrote.
Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
My bonny keel laddie for me o!
He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
[keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
And he brings the white money to me, o!Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
An' are you sure he's weel, o!
He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
T' help to moor the keel, o!
[This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
The canny keel laddie for me o!
He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
And brings the white money to me, o!It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:45:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(66 lines)


Both lyrics are in my Sang book collection
Note however that the correct spelling is Minstrelsy the correct spelling is:Bonny
(Bonnie)
You will find them here:
I cite Crawhall, 1888 for the pit one.
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/priests2.html#The Bonnie PitJez has created his own versions of many songs.
Perhaps my favorite is Byker Hill.Conrad[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John Moulden--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:52:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Crawhall spells it Bonnie.
Conrad[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John Moulden--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:00:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


> (I wish
>someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
>so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
>
>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
>of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
>decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
>consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
>unusually low gain.<<Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-) >>The latter was fairly common in the early days of hi-fi, on some of the
higher-end gear, but got too costly and space-consuming when stereo came
along. On modern fancy systems with digital control of levels, it would be
fairly easy to implement, and some manufacturers do. As for an industry
standard -- well, it would be fairly straightforward in some respects (and
in fact Full Scale = 2.0 volts is a de facto standard on most CD players).
But consider that CDs, and to a greater extent LPs, have a huge range of
nominal levels. If LPs really adhered to "0 VU = 5 cm/sec) and cartridges
stuck to "1 cm/sec yields 1mV output" we could get somewhere, and if CDs
weren't mastered to be as hot in average level as possible, and damn
consistency, we could get further.Apropos of this (and to inject some obligatory discussion of ballad-related
stuff), I have noticed that English folk labels seem unduly aggressive about
using noise reduction in their reissues of analog-mastered stuff. The
Fellside reissues of material by Anne Briggs and A. L. Lloyd are cases in
point -- you can hear the noise pumping badly, and it's far more annoying
than plain old continuous hiss. And Topic's reissue of Swarbrick's first
record is atrocious -- so heavily noise-reduced that it generates horrible
distortion.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:42:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John MouldenSteve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
Bards', p. 36, 1812."Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.Bruce Olson--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:50:12 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> [unmask] wrote:
> >
> > Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> > quotations.
> >
> > Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> > Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> > and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> >............
> >.............
> > John Moulden
>
> Steve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
> as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
> traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
> versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
> these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
> Bards', p. 36, 1812.
>
> "Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
> listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
> Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.
>
> I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.
>
> Bruce OlsonSorry, that should have been Bruce and Stokoe above.Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
"Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
songs and should have checked for that.Clarification: The text in Allen's 'Tyneside Songs' is "The
Bonnie Pit Laddie" according to Roud's index (and opening
line quoted there).Numbers are good identifies, IF one gets the numbers correct. If one
assumes that Roud misassigned the number for "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" in
Bruce and Stokoe, then things seems to work out alright.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 15 Aug 2000 04:53:37 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(85 lines)


From - Roy Palmer: The Oxford Book of Sea Songs (1986) number 7:
His Sources - words Harleian Mss (British Library) (printed in Halliwell
(1841) Early
Naval Ballads of England page 18; tune Claud Simpson: British Broadside
Ballad and
its Music page 392Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eightIn eighty-eight, ere I was born,
As I can well remember,
In August was a fleet prepared,
The month before September.Spain, with Biscayne, Portugal,
Toledo and Granado,
All these did meet and make a fleet,
And called it the Armado.Where they had got provision,
As mustard, peas and bacon,
Some say two ships were full of whips,
But I think they were mistaken.There was a little man of Spain
That shot well in a gun, a,
Don Pedro hight, as good a knight
As the Knight of the Sun, a.King Philip made him admiral
And charg'd him to stay, a
But to destroy both man and boy
And then to run away, a.The King of Spain did fret amain,
And to do yet more harm, a
He sent along, to make him strong,
The famous Prince of Parma.When they had sailed along the seas
And anchored upon Dover,
Our Englishmen did board them then
And cast the Spaniards over.Our queen was then at Tilbury,
What could you more desire, a?
For whose sweet sake Sir Francis Drake
Did set them all on fire, a.But let them look about themselves,
For if they come again, a,
They shall be served with that same sauce
As they were, I know when, a.[Palmer's note and glosses]
The ballad looks back at the armada, possibly from the time of James 1. Some
of
the details have become blurred, though the picture of victory remains clear
enough. August] the main fighting was in fact over by the end of July.
Biscayne] Vizcava, one of the Basque provinces
full of whips] a widely-held belief. Cf. Deloney's'New Ballet of the straunge
and most
cruel Whippes which the Spanyards had prepared to whippe and torment English
men
and women'.
Don Pedro] the Spanish commander-in-chief was in fact Don Alonso Perez, Duke
of
Medina Sidonia.
hight] called
Knight of the Sun] hero of a Spanish romance, The Mirrour of Princely Deedes
and
Knighthood, which was widely known in England through translations.
amain] with all his might
Parma] the Duke of Parma's fleet was to have joined the armada from the
Netherlands,
but failed to do so.
 Tilbury] Queen Elizabeth delivered a rousing triumphal speech there in
August 1588.
 She was mounted on a white horse, thus giving rise, it is said, to the
nursery rhyme,
'Ride a  cock horse'.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:14:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(110 lines)


[unmask] wrote:
>
> >From - Roy Palmer: The Oxford Book of Sea Songs (1986) number 7:
> His Sources - words Harleian Mss (British Library) (printed in Halliwell
> (1841) Early
> Naval Ballads of England page 18; tune Claud Simpson: British Broadside
> Ballad and
> its Music page 392
>
> Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
>
> In eighty-eight, ere I was born,
> As I can well remember,
> In August was a fleet prepared,
> The month before September.
>
> Spain, with Biscayne, Portugal,
> Toledo and Granado,
> All these did meet and make a fleet,
> And called it the Armado.
>
> Where they had got provision,
> As mustard, peas and bacon,
> Some say two ships were full of whips,
> But I think they were mistaken.
>
> There was a little man of Spain
> That shot well in a gun, a,
> Don Pedro hight, as good a knight
> As the Knight of the Sun, a.
>
> King Philip made him admiral
> And charg'd him to stay, a
> But to destroy both man and boy
> And then to run away, a.
>
> The King of Spain did fret amain,
> And to do yet more harm, a
> He sent along, to make him strong,
> The famous Prince of Parma.
>
> When they had sailed along the seas
> And anchored upon Dover,
> Our Englishmen did board them then
> And cast the Spaniards over.
>
> Our queen was then at Tilbury,
> What could you more desire, a?
> For whose sweet sake Sir Francis Drake
> Did set them all on fire, a.
>
> But let them look about themselves,
> For if they come again, a,
> They shall be served with that same sauce
> As they were, I know when, a.
>
> [Palmer's note and glosses]
> The ballad looks back at the armada, possibly from the time of James 1. Some
> of
> the details have become blurred, though the picture of victory remains clear
> enough.
>
>  August] the main fighting was in fact over by the end of July.
> Biscayne] Vizcava, one of the Basque provinces
> full of whips] a widely-held belief. Cf. Deloney's'New Ballet of the straunge
> and most
> cruel Whippes which the Spanyards had prepared to whippe and torment English
> men
> and women'.
> Don Pedro] the Spanish commander-in-chief was in fact Don Alonso Perez, Duke
> of
> Medina Sidonia.
> hight] called
> Knight of the Sun] hero of a Spanish romance, The Mirrour of Princely Deedes
> and
> Knighthood, which was widely known in England through translations.
> amain] with all his might
> Parma] the Duke of Parma's fleet was to have joined the armada from the
> Netherlands,
> but failed to do so.
>  Tilbury] Queen Elizabeth delivered a rousing triumphal speech there in
> August 1588.
>  She was mounted on a white horse, thus giving rise, it is said, to the
> nursery rhyme,
> 'Ride a  cock horse'.
>
> John MouldenPalmer reprinted the wrong version of the tune from Simpson's 'The
British Broadside Ballad and Its Music'. He copied Simpson's #251
(with change of key from Am to Dm), which is an early version of "Jog
On". A seven verse version of the song above is in 'Pills to Purge
Melancholy', IV, p. 37, 1719-20, the only place any version of the song
is connected to any tune, and that version of "Jog On" in 'Pills' is
Simpson's #252. (ABCs of both versions of "Jog On" are in the broadside
ballad tunes on my website).According to Simpson the title "Sir Francis Drake: Or, Eight
Eight" occurs as the title only on the 'Pills' version of the
song. Simpson notes a total of 8 copies of the song (including BL MS
Harl. 791) which he divides into two variants, but among the 4 texts I
have even his variants have variants, so I won't dwell on that. The
earliest printed copy noted is of 1640, and Simpson has this as the
'other' version relative to the text above.Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:25:14 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


At 08:19 PM 8/13/00 -0400, Stephanie Smith wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song,
"My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know
there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe
recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:
>
>Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
>So handsome and bonnie and free.
>Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
>But now he's far over the sea.
>
>I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:
>
>Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
>May news never get to the keel.
>I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
>Would put my poor heart in a ??
>
>If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the
reference.I have the song on a contemporary recording by the Geordie group "Salt of
the Earth". In the notes, they attribute it to H. Robson and J. Lowe and
say: "[Keel Laddie] is a revised version of a Henry Robson (1775-1850) song,
*The Sandgate Lassie's Lamentation*, to be found in its original form in
*Allan's Tyneside Songs* 1862 and also *Bell's Northern Bards* 1812.They sing the last verse as follows:If he died in commotion, or drowned on the sea,
May news never get to the kee'.
I would always be sad at the loss o' me lad,
For he'd stay in me heart till I dee.Let me know if you want the rest transcribed.
Barbara

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:44:30 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(125 lines)


Mea culpa!Yes, there are errors in the FOLK SONG and BROADSIDES INDEXES, and I'm
always pleased to hear of them and put them right - although it's a bit
embarrassing in front of the whole world!
The following will (I hope) nail it - but it won't help Stephanie's original
query as the words she quotes don't appear in the old versions at all. The
information supplied by Barbara Millikan confuses matters further, as THE
SANDGATE LASSIE'S LAMENT(ATION) is a completely different song.There have been several mentions of John Bell in the correspondence, and I
suggest that anyone interested in songs from the Tyneside area should
acquaint themselves with his work. He is one of the unsung heroes of song
collection, as he was early in the field and ecelectic in his sources. Many
of the well-known 'Tyneside' songs are found first in his writings. Try to
get hold of a copy of his RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN BARDS, published in 1812,
but the 1971 reprint published by Frank Graham has a very useful
introduction by Dave Harker - it turns up occasionally on Bibliofind, I
think. Dave Harker also edited SONGS FROM THE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION OF JOHN
BELL, published by the Surtees Society (1985). These books do not, however,
include tunes.
J. Collingwood Bruce and John Stokoe's NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY (1882 but
recently reprinted by Llanerch) is mostly useful because it adds tunes, but
its texts are derivative and, perhaps, suspect. They certainly do not
acknowledge their debt to Bell's work Similarly, John Stoke and Samuel Reay,
SONGS AND BALLADS OF NORTHERN ENGLAND (1899?).To give all the information I know on the songs in question, and to sort out
the errors in the FOLK SONG INDEX (those not interested can stop here):The references to the BANKS OF THE DEE are simply a typing error (they
should be 3847 rather than 3487) so please ignore them.There are two BONNIE.....LADDIE songs, closely related - BONNIE PIT LADDIE,
and BONNIE KEEL LADDIE, plus a third -A COLLIER LAD - which has some textual
similarity. It is not clear which is oldest, although the KEEL one appears
first in print.BONNIE PIT LADDIE (Roud 3487) is the most common, appearing first in a
2-verse text in Bell's RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN BARDS (1812). ALLAN'S TYNESIDE
SONGS and Cuthbert Sharp's BISHOPRICK GARLAND (1834)reprint this text, as
does Bruce & Stokoe NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY, but they add a tune. The song
has also been collected more recently, with tune - by Cecil Sharp in
Berkshire (not published), and other collected versions in Dawney, DOON THE
WAGON WAY (1973) and Polwarth NORTH COUNTRY SONGS (1969). There were a
number of chapbook printings in the 19th century, which I have not seenBONNIE KEEL LADDIE (Roud 9021)
NB the number for the version from Bruce & Stokoe is wrongly given in the
Index as 3487.
This is printed less often and, as far as I know, not found in recent
tradition. The dating of the first version is unclear. A one-verse text
appears in Ritson's NORTHUMBERLAND GARLAND (1809), but this seems to reprint
a 1794 edition. A 3-verse text appears in Bell's RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN
BARDS (1812), and again Bruce and Stokoe NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY reprint it
(no tune) without acknowledgement. There is another version (no tune) in
WHISTLE-BINKIE Vol.2 (1890), claimed as the composition of Robert White.
Again there were several chapbook printings.A COLLIER LAD (at present Roud 3487 but will be re-assigned to 16148)
The only version I know is in Dawney, DOON THE WAGON WAY (1973), collected
by Tony Green in 1966. Only the first 4 lines are similar to the other
songs.Hope this helps
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >
> > [unmask] wrote:
> > >
> > > Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> > > quotations.
> > >
> > > Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch
Publishers,
> > > Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit
Laddie"
> > > and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly
related.
> > >............
> > >.............
> > > John Moulden
> >
> > Steve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
> > as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
> > traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
> > versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
> > these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
> > Bards', p. 36, 1812.
> >
> > "Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
> > listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
> > Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.
> >
> > I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.
> >
> > Bruce Olson
>
> Sorry, that should have been Bruce and Stokoe above.
>
> Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
> "Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
> few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
> index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
> songs and should have checked for that.
>
> Clarification: The text in Allen's 'Tyneside Songs' is "The
> Bonnie Pit Laddie" according to Roud's index (and opening
> line quoted there).
>
> Numbers are good identifies, IF one gets the numbers correct. If one
> assumes that Roud misassigned the number for "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" in
> Bruce and Stokoe, then things seems to work out alright.
>
> Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:06:51 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>.............> Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
> "Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
> few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
> index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
> songs and should have checked for that.
>........> Bruce OlsonSorry, about the duplicate records bit above, and my humblest
apologies to Steve Roud. My ASKSAM 3 database system isn't
reading the data in Steve Roud's folk song index correctly. It is
duplicating blocks of records already read in. When I find
apparent duplicates the record serial numbers differ by
7728, and the 2nd record isn't in Steve Roud's data file.
My total ASKSAM database for the folk song index comes out to
108716 records, but I don't yet know how many are false
duplicates, or whether I am missing records in the data file.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:00:06 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >........
> > Bruce Olson
>
> Sorry, about the duplicate records bit above, and my humblest
> apologies to Steve Roud. My ASKSAM 3 database system isn't
> reading the data in Steve Roud's folk song index correctly. It is
> duplicating blocks of records already read in. When I find
> apparent duplicates the record serial numbers differ by
> 7728, and the 2nd record isn't in Steve Roud's data file.
> My total ASKSAM database for the folk song index comes out to
> 108716 records, but I don't yet know how many are false
> duplicates, or whether I am missing records in the data file.
> Bruce Olson
>........My ASKSAM database software isn't the problem with the duplicate
records that I have had.The problem is undoubtably a hardware glitch.The first 7728 records of SONG2.TXT were read in, but a control
or flag bit didn't get set or, it immediately got gobbled up by a
computer gremlin.As a result the ASKSAM program didn't know it had already read
them, and proceeded to read them again.I am appalled that it took me so long to figure out the significance
of that difference of 7728 between the serial number of a record and its
duplicate in my ASKSAM data file.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:05:27 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(1 lines)


Sounds suspiciously like Bonnie Pit Laddie, with a scene shift.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Unusual version of "Delia"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:08:53 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


From THE BEST BLUEGRASS SONGBOOK - YET!
Compiled and edited by Arthur Bayas and Lipton Nemser (pseudonyms?)
c1978
Lewis Music Publishing Co., Inc.
263 Veterans Blvd.
Carlstadt, NJ 07072The version of "Delia" published in this book is stunning for its comic
treatment of the tragedy and for the accuracy of its last verse.  So far,
I have not found any of these verses elsewhere.  If it weren't for the
inclusion of the last verse, which squares precisely with historical fact,
I might have concluded that the compilers just made this version up,
patterning the story after that of other versions.  However, the
information in that verse is not the kind of thing one makes up, so this
confers an element of autheticity and tradition to the whole text.I'd surely like to know where the compilers got this text.Can anyone help?************************DELIA GONEMiss Delia, she two-timed
Her Tony Saturday night,
And on this date she met her fate,
He shot her down at sight.
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!Chorus
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   Delia did a "two time"
   On a Saturday night,
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   She's gone!He brought her a cocktail,
The very best in the town,
But she refused to down the shot
And so he shot her down.He wanted to marry,
But she preferred to be loose,
She did not want a goose to cook
And so he cooked her goose.So Tony was locked up,
The judge refused to set bail,
For such a crime, he should do time,
Say, 99 years in jail.Then Tony said, "Thank You,"
"Your Honor treated me fine,"
He knew the judge could well have said,
"Nine hundred ninety-nine."*************************The day after Moses "Cooney" Houston's trial (March 14, 1901) in the
Superior Court of Savannah, GA, the Savannah Morning News carried the
headline,
THANKED THE JUDGE,
and the story began,
"'Thank you, Sir.' This was the response made by Moses Houston...to Judge
Seabrook, when the latter sentenced him to spend the remained of his life
in the penitentiary, for the wilful murder of Delia Green."The jury had returned a verdict of guilty with a recommendation for
mercy.  At that time, in Georgia, there was no code of juvenile justice,
so Houston, at age 14, was tried and sentenced in the same manner as an
adult.  The sentence given by the judge was the minimum allowed by law.
I'm not sure what all the alternatives might have been, but one was
death.  The life sentence was not as harsh as it sounds - a convict with a
life sentence was eligible for parole after serving seven years, I've been
told.  Houston actually served 13 years before being paroled at age 27.  I
suspect that he later received a pardon (an application was made a few
years after his parole, but I've not yet discovered how it was acted on).john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Obituary, Johnny Ray Hicks
From: "Cantrell, Brent" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:18:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


One of the last of the great, performing  a capella ballad singers of the
Upland South, Johnny Ray Hicks, died last night at his home in Fentress
County, Tennessee.   Johnny Ray performed at the Library of Congress and the
Smithsonian Folk Festival, and he was a regular performer at State Parks on
the Cumberland Plateau and at the Laurel Theater in Knoxville.   Johnny Ray
was a cousin of Dee Hicks.   Mr. Hicks was 75 years old.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Delia - Hurston
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:03:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


 John Cowley pointed out to me that in Pamela Bordelon's book, Go Gator and
Muddy the Water, part of a text of "Delia" is given, collected "from
around Fernandina" (FL), presumably in the 1930s.  Here is the first
verse.Coonie told Delia on a Christmas Eve night,
If you tell me 'bout my mama I'm sho going to take your life.
   She's dead, she's dead and gone.This is the only version I've seen that identifies the killing as having
occurred on Christmas Eve.  The first line is factually correct in every
respect: "Coonie," "Delia," "Christmas Eve night," and argument.(1) What does the second line above mean?Recall that Coonie and Delia were 14-year old neighbors in Yamacraw,
Savannah, GA, in 1900, and that they had been "seeing" one another for a
few months.  I have no indication that they had been living together.
Delia denied Coonie's claims about their having a sexual relationship,
saying "You lie! You know that I am a lady! You son of a bitch!"I believe that the second line above refers to Delia's calling Cooney
a "son of a bitch."  I recall that my mother told me, when I was learning
to curse,
never to call anyone a "son of a bitch" because that would be calling
his/her mother a dog.Perhaps this is an example of "blues" or "nodal" ballad style.The last verse given by Bordelon isMama, oh, mama, how could I stand
When al round my bedside was full of married men
  So she's dead, she's dead and gone.Hurston describes this verse as "Coonie justifies his killing of Delia."(2) What this "justification" verse mean?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Delia - Hurston
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:13:09 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(68 lines)


John:The last verse you quote below from Bordelon, p. 73, which you describe as
"Coonie justifies his killing of Delia" is not really the justification.
Hurston has unfortunately edited the song to save space.  After the first
verse which you give below, she condenses with this line:(Coonie shoots Delia to death in several verses)Then she includes this verse:Coonie in the jailhouse drinking out a silver cup
Poor Delia in the graveyard don't care if she never wake up
She's dead, she's dead and gone.Then another elipse, summarized by:(Coonie justifies his killing of Delia)And finally there is the opaque final verse you quote.EdOn Wed, 30 Aug 2000, John Garst wrote:>  John Cowley pointed out to me that in Pamela Bordelon's book, Go Gator and
> Muddy the Water, part of a text of "Delia" is given, collected "from
> around Fernandina" (FL), presumably in the 1930s.  Here is the first
> verse.
>
> Coonie told Delia on a Christmas Eve night,
> If you tell me 'bout my mama I'm sho going to take your life.
>    She's dead, she's dead and gone.
>
> This is the only version I've seen that identifies the killing as having
> occurred on Christmas Eve.  The first line is factually correct in every
> respect: "Coonie," "Delia," "Christmas Eve night," and argument.
>
> (1) What does the second line above mean?
>
> Recall that Coonie and Delia were 14-year old neighbors in Yamacraw,
> Savannah, GA, in 1900, and that they had been "seeing" one another for a
> few months.  I have no indication that they had been living together.
> Delia denied Coonie's claims about their having a sexual relationship,
> saying "You lie! You know that I am a lady! You son of a bitch!"
>
> I believe that the second line above refers to Delia's calling Cooney
> a "son of a bitch."  I recall that my mother told me, when I was learning
> to curse,
> never to call anyone a "son of a bitch" because that would be calling
> his/her mother a dog.
>
> Perhaps this is an example of "blues" or "nodal" ballad style.
>
> The last verse given by Bordelon is
>
> Mama, oh, mama, how could I stand
> When al round my bedside was full of married men
>   So she's dead, she's dead and gone.
>
> Hurston describes this verse as "Coonie justifies his killing of Delia."
>
> (2) What this "justification" verse mean?
>
>
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands chanteys
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:12:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:34:07 -0400, Abby Sale wrote:>So we're off on the 17th for a couple of weeks in the islands.  Seemed like
>a good idea.  Now I'm concerned I won't find any folksong there and I won't
>have anything to do with my time.
>
Well, I did find some stuff to do but limited folksong.On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:17:50 -0400, John Garst wrote:>I've been told that "Delia" is known all over the Caribbean.  If you get a
>chance, you might ask a few locals if they know it.
>
Didn't find that but may have made some good contacts.  At the last moment,
as usual so I didn't get to tape anything but I think I did find some
interesting chantey singing.  Used for construction as implied in _Deep the
Water_.  Anyone heading for St. Thomas & seriously interested in collecting
should contact me.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - of Orlando, Florida
         Currently overlooking a fire ant hill back in Orlando
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Newcastle Songs
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:43:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.
All of fordyce is now there....
We will move ahead to justify it all with Allen and add a few
then on to the rest of Joe Wilson.
Once the lyrics are in place we chace tunes.
If someone notices a tune that is not there but in title feel
free to send an .abc.
After we nail down tunes then we go for the indexes....
But lyrics first....Take a tour-
http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~dc920/HomePage.priests.html
you may wish to start with the main index of all the sangs from
this page.Enjoy!Conrad
--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:17:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(50 lines)


A couple of months ago, someone (John Roberts, I think) was asking
about converting LPs and cassettes to CDs using a Macintosh. The
complaint was that the version of Toast bundled with his CD drive
did not include CD Spin Doctor, and so could not be used to digitize
sound.An addendum, for any other Mac users out there: I just got a job
creating a musician's web site, and so I went out to get software
to create MP3 files.The software is called SoundJam MP Plus, from Cassidy & Greene -- and
it provides the rest of what you need for less than the cost of
the upgrade to Toast Deluxe. (Luckily for me, I decided to spend
the extra $3 for the version in the box, rather than using the
downloadable version. :-)The box includes1) The cable to connect a stereo to the Mac (this is actually a
   more useful cable than the one with Toast Deluxe -- it's a
   few centimetres longer, and given how hard it was for me
   to get the cable to run that far, I *needed* that :-)
2) Digitizing software.
   The digitizing software isn't as convenient as CD Spin Doctor,
   but it works with Toast, so it does what you need. And it
   does MP3, too. (Which you can use to put material on web
   sites.)Comparative costs: $40 for SoundJam, $80 for Toast Pro. You
do need a PowerPC Mac with a reasonably fast processor (they
say at least 100 MHz; I'd guess you really need twice that).
I haven't tried the set-up yet, but it all looks good.We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 01:22:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


<<We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.>>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a mike
input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
being applied...Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:35:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


On 8/11/00, Paul Stamler wrote:><<We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
>Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
>I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
>on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
>straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
>I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
>is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
>I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.>>
>
>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a mike
>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>being applied...It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....)Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:21:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a
mike
>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>being applied...<<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.>>Then, if it's working without horrible distortion, it probably is a line
input, regardless of Mac's labeling. Funny, I thought only Windows machines
had weird stuff like that. :-)<<Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....) >>Try Media Source -- 800-241-8857 ext 317. They're a little slow to return
voice-mail messages, but they'll sell you Sony silver-backed green-dye discs
for about $1.65/ea including jewel boxes and shipping, in quantities of 100,
which is a decent price.<<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
unusually low gain.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:42:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(75 lines)


On 8/11/00, Paul Stamler wrote:> >The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a
>mike
>>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>>being applied...
>
><<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
>has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)
>
>As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.>>
>
>Then, if it's working without horrible distortion, it probably is a line
>input, regardless of Mac's labeling. Funny, I thought only Windows machines
>had weird stuff like that. :-)For what it's worth, the system *software* seems to refer to it as
"Sound In." But everyone calls it the "Microphone Port" because,
well, it has a microphone icon by it. :-)><<Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
>claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
>Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
>*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
>give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
>with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
>Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
>quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
>burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
>This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
>all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
>conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
>"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....) >>
>
>Try Media Source -- 800-241-8857 ext 317. They're a little slow to return
>voice-mail messages, but they'll sell you Sony silver-backed green-dye discs
>for about $1.65/ea including jewel boxes and shipping, in quantities of 100,
>which is a decent price.I got a 50-pack of Kodak Gold for $40 from Office Depot, and they've
worked excellently. Whereas I've had high rates of failure from
Maxell blues, Imation greens, and no-name blues. I'm sticking with
the Kodaks from now on -- at least until someone does real product
testing.I've no great desire to order by mail; I'm just pointing out that
they're very good at making you *think* you're getting good disks
(gold die, reputable company, etc.) when in fact you're getting
junk. (The Maxells are called "Maxell gold," even though they use
blue dye, and the Imations were carefully photographed to give the
impression that they were gold, too.)><<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
>where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
>I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
>someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
>so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
>
>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
>of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
>decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
>consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
>unusually low gain.Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:01:19 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 01:42:03PM -0500, Robert B. Waltz wrote:        [ ... ]> ><<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
> >has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)        It may have assumed amplified microphones.  The ones which I use
for the Sun have a coin battery in them, and a power switch.        Or perhaps, they assume that you will run the microphones
through a mixer before you get to the sound card.        [ ... ]> ><<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
> >where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
> >I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
> >someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
> >so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
> >
> >That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
> >of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
> >decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
> >consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
> >unusually low gain.
>
> Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
> an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-)        Well ... I *think* that line level does have a standard, but
phono pickup cartridges vary widely in sensitivity -- so much so that
some need custom preamps.  The higher the quality, the more likely it is
to need custom preamps, I think.        However -- *some* systems do have individual level controls on
each input.  One which I remember was the Heathkit integrated preamp/amp
which was the companion to my AJ-15 FM tuner. (At least I *think* that
was the model number at this remove in time.)  The amplifier was the
AA-15 as I remember.  Anyway, it had (behind a swing-down panel) a bank
of screwdriver adjust individual level pots for each channel.  I presume
that some other systems have similar features.        However, as long as the CD level is higher than the LPs, it is
possible to build a simple box to go between the CD player and the
preamp inputs to equalize the levels.  Send me e-mail for the design,
since it is too far off topic for here.        First -- check whether the CD player has a pot (perhaps on the
back) to adjust its output level.        You'll *still* have to deal with the fact that different records
are recorded at varying levels.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Stephanie Smith <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 20:19:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Hello All,I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song, "My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
So handsome and bonnie and free.
Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
But now he's far over the sea.I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
May news never get to the keel.
I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
Would put my poor heart in a ??If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the reference.StephanieStephanie Smith
Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage
Smithsonian Institution
[unmask]>>> Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]> 08/05/00 18:53 PM >>>
been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.... <snip>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 21:45:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


I must say that I have not run into this yet....
I will take a look in Allan because I am not
finished there yet.
More later....
Which Jez Lowe cd is it on.
I like some Jez Lowe stuff but if find him a bit
pessimistic and not as uplifting as the ancient tradition.
ConradStephanie Smith wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song, "My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:
>
> Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
> So handsome and bonnie and free.
> Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
> But now he's far over the sea.
>
> I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:
>
> Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
> May news never get to the keel.
> I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
> Would put my poor heart in a ??
>
> If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the reference.
>
> Stephanie
>
> Stephanie Smith
> Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage
> Smithsonian Institution
> [unmask]
>
> >>> Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]> 08/05/00 18:53 PM >>>
> been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
> The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.... <snip>--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 05:46:26 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
quotations.Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
wrote.
Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
My bonny keel laddie for me o!
He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
[keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
And he brings the white money to me, o!Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
An' are you sure he's weel, o!
He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
T' help to moor the keel, o!
[This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
The canny keel laddie for me o!
He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
And brings the white money to me, o!It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:45:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(66 lines)


Both lyrics are in my Sang book collection
Note however that the correct spelling is Minstrelsy the correct spelling is:Bonny
(Bonnie)
You will find them here:
I cite Crawhall, 1888 for the pit one.
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/priests2.html#The Bonnie PitJez has created his own versions of many songs.
Perhaps my favorite is Byker Hill.Conrad[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John Moulden--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:52:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Crawhall spells it Bonnie.
Conrad[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John Moulden--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:00:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


> (I wish
>someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
>so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
>
>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
>of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
>decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
>consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
>unusually low gain.<<Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-) >>The latter was fairly common in the early days of hi-fi, on some of the
higher-end gear, but got too costly and space-consuming when stereo came
along. On modern fancy systems with digital control of levels, it would be
fairly easy to implement, and some manufacturers do. As for an industry
standard -- well, it would be fairly straightforward in some respects (and
in fact Full Scale = 2.0 volts is a de facto standard on most CD players).
But consider that CDs, and to a greater extent LPs, have a huge range of
nominal levels. If LPs really adhered to "0 VU = 5 cm/sec) and cartridges
stuck to "1 cm/sec yields 1mV output" we could get somewhere, and if CDs
weren't mastered to be as hot in average level as possible, and damn
consistency, we could get further.Apropos of this (and to inject some obligatory discussion of ballad-related
stuff), I have noticed that English folk labels seem unduly aggressive about
using noise reduction in their reissues of analog-mastered stuff. The
Fellside reissues of material by Anne Briggs and A. L. Lloyd are cases in
point -- you can hear the noise pumping badly, and it's far more annoying
than plain old continuous hiss. And Topic's reissue of Swarbrick's first
record is atrocious -- so heavily noise-reduced that it generates horrible
distortion.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:42:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John MouldenSteve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
Bards', p. 36, 1812."Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.Bruce Olson--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:50:12 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> [unmask] wrote:
> >
> > Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> > quotations.
> >
> > Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> > Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> > and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> >............
> >.............
> > John Moulden
>
> Steve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
> as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
> traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
> versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
> these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
> Bards', p. 36, 1812.
>
> "Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
> listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
> Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.
>
> I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.
>
> Bruce OlsonSorry, that should have been Bruce and Stokoe above.Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
"Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
songs and should have checked for that.Clarification: The text in Allen's 'Tyneside Songs' is "The
Bonnie Pit Laddie" according to Roud's index (and opening
line quoted there).Numbers are good identifies, IF one gets the numbers correct. If one
assumes that Roud misassigned the number for "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" in
Bruce and Stokoe, then things seems to work out alright.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 15 Aug 2000 04:53:37 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(85 lines)


From - Roy Palmer: The Oxford Book of Sea Songs (1986) number 7:
His Sources - words Harleian Mss (British Library) (printed in Halliwell
(1841) Early
Naval Ballads of England page 18; tune Claud Simpson: British Broadside
Ballad and
its Music page 392Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eightIn eighty-eight, ere I was born,
As I can well remember,
In August was a fleet prepared,
The month before September.Spain, with Biscayne, Portugal,
Toledo and Granado,
All these did meet and make a fleet,
And called it the Armado.Where they had got provision,
As mustard, peas and bacon,
Some say two ships were full of whips,
But I think they were mistaken.There was a little man of Spain
That shot well in a gun, a,
Don Pedro hight, as good a knight
As the Knight of the Sun, a.King Philip made him admiral
And charg'd him to stay, a
But to destroy both man and boy
And then to run away, a.The King of Spain did fret amain,
And to do yet more harm, a
He sent along, to make him strong,
The famous Prince of Parma.When they had sailed along the seas
And anchored upon Dover,
Our Englishmen did board them then
And cast the Spaniards over.Our queen was then at Tilbury,
What could you more desire, a?
For whose sweet sake Sir Francis Drake
Did set them all on fire, a.But let them look about themselves,
For if they come again, a,
They shall be served with that same sauce
As they were, I know when, a.[Palmer's note and glosses]
The ballad looks back at the armada, possibly from the time of James 1. Some
of
the details have become blurred, though the picture of victory remains clear
enough. August] the main fighting was in fact over by the end of July.
Biscayne] Vizcava, one of the Basque provinces
full of whips] a widely-held belief. Cf. Deloney's'New Ballet of the straunge
and most
cruel Whippes which the Spanyards had prepared to whippe and torment English
men
and women'.
Don Pedro] the Spanish commander-in-chief was in fact Don Alonso Perez, Duke
of
Medina Sidonia.
hight] called
Knight of the Sun] hero of a Spanish romance, The Mirrour of Princely Deedes
and
Knighthood, which was widely known in England through translations.
amain] with all his might
Parma] the Duke of Parma's fleet was to have joined the armada from the
Netherlands,
but failed to do so.
 Tilbury] Queen Elizabeth delivered a rousing triumphal speech there in
August 1588.
 She was mounted on a white horse, thus giving rise, it is said, to the
nursery rhyme,
'Ride a  cock horse'.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:14:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(110 lines)


[unmask] wrote:
>
> >From - Roy Palmer: The Oxford Book of Sea Songs (1986) number 7:
> His Sources - words Harleian Mss (British Library) (printed in Halliwell
> (1841) Early
> Naval Ballads of England page 18; tune Claud Simpson: British Broadside
> Ballad and
> its Music page 392
>
> Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
>
> In eighty-eight, ere I was born,
> As I can well remember,
> In August was a fleet prepared,
> The month before September.
>
> Spain, with Biscayne, Portugal,
> Toledo and Granado,
> All these did meet and make a fleet,
> And called it the Armado.
>
> Where they had got provision,
> As mustard, peas and bacon,
> Some say two ships were full of whips,
> But I think they were mistaken.
>
> There was a little man of Spain
> That shot well in a gun, a,
> Don Pedro hight, as good a knight
> As the Knight of the Sun, a.
>
> King Philip made him admiral
> And charg'd him to stay, a
> But to destroy both man and boy
> And then to run away, a.
>
> The King of Spain did fret amain,
> And to do yet more harm, a
> He sent along, to make him strong,
> The famous Prince of Parma.
>
> When they had sailed along the seas
> And anchored upon Dover,
> Our Englishmen did board them then
> And cast the Spaniards over.
>
> Our queen was then at Tilbury,
> What could you more desire, a?
> For whose sweet sake Sir Francis Drake
> Did set them all on fire, a.
>
> But let them look about themselves,
> For if they come again, a,
> They shall be served with that same sauce
> As they were, I know when, a.
>
> [Palmer's note and glosses]
> The ballad looks back at the armada, possibly from the time of James 1. Some
> of
> the details have become blurred, though the picture of victory remains clear
> enough.
>
>  August] the main fighting was in fact over by the end of July.
> Biscayne] Vizcava, one of the Basque provinces
> full of whips] a widely-held belief. Cf. Deloney's'New Ballet of the straunge
> and most
> cruel Whippes which the Spanyards had prepared to whippe and torment English
> men
> and women'.
> Don Pedro] the Spanish commander-in-chief was in fact Don Alonso Perez, Duke
> of
> Medina Sidonia.
> hight] called
> Knight of the Sun] hero of a Spanish romance, The Mirrour of Princely Deedes
> and
> Knighthood, which was widely known in England through translations.
> amain] with all his might
> Parma] the Duke of Parma's fleet was to have joined the armada from the
> Netherlands,
> but failed to do so.
>  Tilbury] Queen Elizabeth delivered a rousing triumphal speech there in
> August 1588.
>  She was mounted on a white horse, thus giving rise, it is said, to the
> nursery rhyme,
> 'Ride a  cock horse'.
>
> John MouldenPalmer reprinted the wrong version of the tune from Simpson's 'The
British Broadside Ballad and Its Music'. He copied Simpson's #251
(with change of key from Am to Dm), which is an early version of "Jog
On". A seven verse version of the song above is in 'Pills to Purge
Melancholy', IV, p. 37, 1719-20, the only place any version of the song
is connected to any tune, and that version of "Jog On" in 'Pills' is
Simpson's #252. (ABCs of both versions of "Jog On" are in the broadside
ballad tunes on my website).According to Simpson the title "Sir Francis Drake: Or, Eight
Eight" occurs as the title only on the 'Pills' version of the
song. Simpson notes a total of 8 copies of the song (including BL MS
Harl. 791) which he divides into two variants, but among the 4 texts I
have even his variants have variants, so I won't dwell on that. The
earliest printed copy noted is of 1640, and Simpson has this as the
'other' version relative to the text above.Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:25:14 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


At 08:19 PM 8/13/00 -0400, Stephanie Smith wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song,
"My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know
there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe
recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:
>
>Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
>So handsome and bonnie and free.
>Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
>But now he's far over the sea.
>
>I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:
>
>Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
>May news never get to the keel.
>I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
>Would put my poor heart in a ??
>
>If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the
reference.I have the song on a contemporary recording by the Geordie group "Salt of
the Earth". In the notes, they attribute it to H. Robson and J. Lowe and
say: "[Keel Laddie] is a revised version of a Henry Robson (1775-1850) song,
*The Sandgate Lassie's Lamentation*, to be found in its original form in
*Allan's Tyneside Songs* 1862 and also *Bell's Northern Bards* 1812.They sing the last verse as follows:If he died in commotion, or drowned on the sea,
May news never get to the kee'.
I would always be sad at the loss o' me lad,
For he'd stay in me heart till I dee.Let me know if you want the rest transcribed.
Barbara

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:44:30 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(125 lines)


Mea culpa!Yes, there are errors in the FOLK SONG and BROADSIDES INDEXES, and I'm
always pleased to hear of them and put them right - although it's a bit
embarrassing in front of the whole world!
The following will (I hope) nail it - but it won't help Stephanie's original
query as the words she quotes don't appear in the old versions at all. The
information supplied by Barbara Millikan confuses matters further, as THE
SANDGATE LASSIE'S LAMENT(ATION) is a completely different song.There have been several mentions of John Bell in the correspondence, and I
suggest that anyone interested in songs from the Tyneside area should
acquaint themselves with his work. He is one of the unsung heroes of song
collection, as he was early in the field and ecelectic in his sources. Many
of the well-known 'Tyneside' songs are found first in his writings. Try to
get hold of a copy of his RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN BARDS, published in 1812,
but the 1971 reprint published by Frank Graham has a very useful
introduction by Dave Harker - it turns up occasionally on Bibliofind, I
think. Dave Harker also edited SONGS FROM THE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION OF JOHN
BELL, published by the Surtees Society (1985). These books do not, however,
include tunes.
J. Collingwood Bruce and John Stokoe's NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY (1882 but
recently reprinted by Llanerch) is mostly useful because it adds tunes, but
its texts are derivative and, perhaps, suspect. They certainly do not
acknowledge their debt to Bell's work Similarly, John Stoke and Samuel Reay,
SONGS AND BALLADS OF NORTHERN ENGLAND (1899?).To give all the information I know on the songs in question, and to sort out
the errors in the FOLK SONG INDEX (those not interested can stop here):The references to the BANKS OF THE DEE are simply a typing error (they
should be 3847 rather than 3487) so please ignore them.There are two BONNIE.....LADDIE songs, closely related - BONNIE PIT LADDIE,
and BONNIE KEEL LADDIE, plus a third -A COLLIER LAD - which has some textual
similarity. It is not clear which is oldest, although the KEEL one appears
first in print.BONNIE PIT LADDIE (Roud 3487) is the most common, appearing first in a
2-verse text in Bell's RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN BARDS (1812). ALLAN'S TYNESIDE
SONGS and Cuthbert Sharp's BISHOPRICK GARLAND (1834)reprint this text, as
does Bruce & Stokoe NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY, but they add a tune. The song
has also been collected more recently, with tune - by Cecil Sharp in
Berkshire (not published), and other collected versions in Dawney, DOON THE
WAGON WAY (1973) and Polwarth NORTH COUNTRY SONGS (1969). There were a
number of chapbook printings in the 19th century, which I have not seenBONNIE KEEL LADDIE (Roud 9021)
NB the number for the version from Bruce & Stokoe is wrongly given in the
Index as 3487.
This is printed less often and, as far as I know, not found in recent
tradition. The dating of the first version is unclear. A one-verse text
appears in Ritson's NORTHUMBERLAND GARLAND (1809), but this seems to reprint
a 1794 edition. A 3-verse text appears in Bell's RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN
BARDS (1812), and again Bruce and Stokoe NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY reprint it
(no tune) without acknowledgement. There is another version (no tune) in
WHISTLE-BINKIE Vol.2 (1890), claimed as the composition of Robert White.
Again there were several chapbook printings.A COLLIER LAD (at present Roud 3487 but will be re-assigned to 16148)
The only version I know is in Dawney, DOON THE WAGON WAY (1973), collected
by Tony Green in 1966. Only the first 4 lines are similar to the other
songs.Hope this helps
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >
> > [unmask] wrote:
> > >
> > > Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> > > quotations.
> > >
> > > Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch
Publishers,
> > > Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit
Laddie"
> > > and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly
related.
> > >............
> > >.............
> > > John Moulden
> >
> > Steve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
> > as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
> > traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
> > versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
> > these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
> > Bards', p. 36, 1812.
> >
> > "Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
> > listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
> > Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.
> >
> > I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.
> >
> > Bruce Olson
>
> Sorry, that should have been Bruce and Stokoe above.
>
> Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
> "Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
> few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
> index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
> songs and should have checked for that.
>
> Clarification: The text in Allen's 'Tyneside Songs' is "The
> Bonnie Pit Laddie" according to Roud's index (and opening
> line quoted there).
>
> Numbers are good identifies, IF one gets the numbers correct. If one
> assumes that Roud misassigned the number for "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" in
> Bruce and Stokoe, then things seems to work out alright.
>
> Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:06:51 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>.............> Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
> "Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
> few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
> index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
> songs and should have checked for that.
>........> Bruce OlsonSorry, about the duplicate records bit above, and my humblest
apologies to Steve Roud. My ASKSAM 3 database system isn't
reading the data in Steve Roud's folk song index correctly. It is
duplicating blocks of records already read in. When I find
apparent duplicates the record serial numbers differ by
7728, and the 2nd record isn't in Steve Roud's data file.
My total ASKSAM database for the folk song index comes out to
108716 records, but I don't yet know how many are false
duplicates, or whether I am missing records in the data file.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:00:06 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >........
> > Bruce Olson
>
> Sorry, about the duplicate records bit above, and my humblest
> apologies to Steve Roud. My ASKSAM 3 database system isn't
> reading the data in Steve Roud's folk song index correctly. It is
> duplicating blocks of records already read in. When I find
> apparent duplicates the record serial numbers differ by
> 7728, and the 2nd record isn't in Steve Roud's data file.
> My total ASKSAM database for the folk song index comes out to
> 108716 records, but I don't yet know how many are false
> duplicates, or whether I am missing records in the data file.
> Bruce Olson
>........My ASKSAM database software isn't the problem with the duplicate
records that I have had.The problem is undoubtably a hardware glitch.The first 7728 records of SONG2.TXT were read in, but a control
or flag bit didn't get set or, it immediately got gobbled up by a
computer gremlin.As a result the ASKSAM program didn't know it had already read
them, and proceeded to read them again.I am appalled that it took me so long to figure out the significance
of that difference of 7728 between the serial number of a record and its
duplicate in my ASKSAM data file.Bruce Olson

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:05:27 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(1 lines)


Sounds suspiciously like Bonnie Pit Laddie, with a scene shift.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Unusual version of "Delia"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:08:53 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


From THE BEST BLUEGRASS SONGBOOK - YET!
Compiled and edited by Arthur Bayas and Lipton Nemser (pseudonyms?)
c1978
Lewis Music Publishing Co., Inc.
263 Veterans Blvd.
Carlstadt, NJ 07072The version of "Delia" published in this book is stunning for its comic
treatment of the tragedy and for the accuracy of its last verse.  So far,
I have not found any of these verses elsewhere.  If it weren't for the
inclusion of the last verse, which squares precisely with historical fact,
I might have concluded that the compilers just made this version up,
patterning the story after that of other versions.  However, the
information in that verse is not the kind of thing one makes up, so this
confers an element of autheticity and tradition to the whole text.I'd surely like to know where the compilers got this text.Can anyone help?************************DELIA GONEMiss Delia, she two-timed
Her Tony Saturday night,
And on this date she met her fate,
He shot her down at sight.
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!Chorus
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   Delia did a "two time"
   On a Saturday night,
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   She's gone!He brought her a cocktail,
The very best in the town,
But she refused to down the shot
And so he shot her down.He wanted to marry,
But she preferred to be loose,
She did not want a goose to cook
And so he cooked her goose.So Tony was locked up,
The judge refused to set bail,
For such a crime, he should do time,
Say, 99 years in jail.Then Tony said, "Thank You,"
"Your Honor treated me fine,"
He knew the judge could well have said,
"Nine hundred ninety-nine."*************************The day after Moses "Cooney" Houston's trial (March 14, 1901) in the
Superior Court of Savannah, GA, the Savannah Morning News carried the
headline,
THANKED THE JUDGE,
and the story began,
"'Thank you, Sir.' This was the response made by Moses Houston...to Judge
Seabrook, when the latter sentenced him to spend the remained of his life
in the penitentiary, for the wilful murder of Delia Green."The jury had returned a verdict of guilty with a recommendation for
mercy.  At that time, in Georgia, there was no code of juvenile justice,
so Houston, at age 14, was tried and sentenced in the same manner as an
adult.  The sentence given by the judge was the minimum allowed by law.
I'm not sure what all the alternatives might have been, but one was
death.  The life sentence was not as harsh as it sounds - a convict with a
life sentence was eligible for parole after serving seven years, I've been
told.  Houston actually served 13 years before being paroled at age 27.  I
suspect that he later received a pardon (an application was made a few
years after his parole, but I've not yet discovered how it was acted on).john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Obituary, Johnny Ray Hicks
From: "Cantrell, Brent" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:18:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


One of the last of the great, performing  a capella ballad singers of the
Upland South, Johnny Ray Hicks, died last night at his home in Fentress
County, Tennessee.   Johnny Ray performed at the Library of Congress and the
Smithsonian Folk Festival, and he was a regular performer at State Parks on
the Cumberland Plateau and at the Laurel Theater in Knoxville.   Johnny Ray
was a cousin of Dee Hicks.   Mr. Hicks was 75 years old.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Delia - Hurston
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:03:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


 John Cowley pointed out to me that in Pamela Bordelon's book, Go Gator and
Muddy the Water, part of a text of "Delia" is given, collected "from
around Fernandina" (FL), presumably in the 1930s.  Here is the first
verse.Coonie told Delia on a Christmas Eve night,
If you tell me 'bout my mama I'm sho going to take your life.
   She's dead, she's dead and gone.This is the only version I've seen that identifies the killing as having
occurred on Christmas Eve.  The first line is factually correct in every
respect: "Coonie," "Delia," "Christmas Eve night," and argument.(1) What does the second line above mean?Recall that Coonie and Delia were 14-year old neighbors in Yamacraw,
Savannah, GA, in 1900, and that they had been "seeing" one another for a
few months.  I have no indication that they had been living together.
Delia denied Coonie's claims about their having a sexual relationship,
saying "You lie! You know that I am a lady! You son of a bitch!"I believe that the second line above refers to Delia's calling Cooney
a "son of a bitch."  I recall that my mother told me, when I was learning
to curse,
never to call anyone a "son of a bitch" because that would be calling
his/her mother a dog.Perhaps this is an example of "blues" or "nodal" ballad style.The last verse given by Bordelon isMama, oh, mama, how could I stand
When al round my bedside was full of married men
  So she's dead, she's dead and gone.Hurston describes this verse as "Coonie justifies his killing of Delia."(2) What this "justification" verse mean?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Delia - Hurston
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:13:09 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(68 lines)


John:The last verse you quote below from Bordelon, p. 73, which you describe as
"Coonie justifies his killing of Delia" is not really the justification.
Hurston has unfortunately edited the song to save space.  After the first
verse which you give below, she condenses with this line:(Coonie shoots Delia to death in several verses)Then she includes this verse:Coonie in the jailhouse drinking out a silver cup
Poor Delia in the graveyard don't care if she never wake up
She's dead, she's dead and gone.Then another elipse, summarized by:(Coonie justifies his killing of Delia)And finally there is the opaque final verse you quote.EdOn Wed, 30 Aug 2000, John Garst wrote:>  John Cowley pointed out to me that in Pamela Bordelon's book, Go Gator and
> Muddy the Water, part of a text of "Delia" is given, collected "from
> around Fernandina" (FL), presumably in the 1930s.  Here is the first
> verse.
>
> Coonie told Delia on a Christmas Eve night,
> If you tell me 'bout my mama I'm sho going to take your life.
>    She's dead, she's dead and gone.
>
> This is the only version I've seen that identifies the killing as having
> occurred on Christmas Eve.  The first line is factually correct in every
> respect: "Coonie," "Delia," "Christmas Eve night," and argument.
>
> (1) What does the second line above mean?
>
> Recall that Coonie and Delia were 14-year old neighbors in Yamacraw,
> Savannah, GA, in 1900, and that they had been "seeing" one another for a
> few months.  I have no indication that they had been living together.
> Delia denied Coonie's claims about their having a sexual relationship,
> saying "You lie! You know that I am a lady! You son of a bitch!"
>
> I believe that the second line above refers to Delia's calling Cooney
> a "son of a bitch."  I recall that my mother told me, when I was learning
> to curse,
> never to call anyone a "son of a bitch" because that would be calling
> his/her mother a dog.
>
> Perhaps this is an example of "blues" or "nodal" ballad style.
>
> The last verse given by Bordelon is
>
> Mama, oh, mama, how could I stand
> When al round my bedside was full of married men
>   So she's dead, she's dead and gone.
>
> Hurston describes this verse as "Coonie justifies his killing of Delia."
>
> (2) What this "justification" verse mean?
>
>
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands chanteys
From: Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Abby Sale <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:12:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 08:34:07 -0400, Abby Sale wrote:>So we're off on the 17th for a couple of weeks in the islands.  Seemed like
>a good idea.  Now I'm concerned I won't find any folksong there and I won't
>have anything to do with my time.
>
Well, I did find some stuff to do but limited folksong.On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 10:17:50 -0400, John Garst wrote:>I've been told that "Delia" is known all over the Caribbean.  If you get a
>chance, you might ask a few locals if they know it.
>
Didn't find that but may have made some good contacts.  At the last moment,
as usual so I didn't get to tape anything but I think I did find some
interesting chantey singing.  Used for construction as implied in _Deep the
Water_.  Anyone heading for St. Thomas & seriously interested in collecting
should contact me.-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
                  I am Abby Sale - of Orlando, Florida
         Currently overlooking a fire ant hill back in Orlando
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---
        Boycott South Carolina! - http://www.naacp.org/SCEconomic2.html
               What is the sound of ONE side compromising?

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Newcastle Songs
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:43:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.
All of fordyce is now there....
We will move ahead to justify it all with Allen and add a few
then on to the rest of Joe Wilson.
Once the lyrics are in place we chace tunes.
If someone notices a tune that is not there but in title feel
free to send an .abc.
After we nail down tunes then we go for the indexes....
But lyrics first....Take a tour-
http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~dc920/HomePage.priests.html
you may wish to start with the main index of all the sangs from
this page.Enjoy!Conrad
--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 10 Aug 2000 13:17:33 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(50 lines)


A couple of months ago, someone (John Roberts, I think) was asking
about converting LPs and cassettes to CDs using a Macintosh. The
complaint was that the version of Toast bundled with his CD drive
did not include CD Spin Doctor, and so could not be used to digitize
sound.An addendum, for any other Mac users out there: I just got a job
creating a musician's web site, and so I went out to get software
to create MP3 files.The software is called SoundJam MP Plus, from Cassidy & Greene -- and
it provides the rest of what you need for less than the cost of
the upgrade to Toast Deluxe. (Luckily for me, I decided to spend
the extra $3 for the version in the box, rather than using the
downloadable version. :-)The box includes1) The cable to connect a stereo to the Mac (this is actually a
   more useful cable than the one with Toast Deluxe -- it's a
   few centimetres longer, and given how hard it was for me
   to get the cable to run that far, I *needed* that :-)
2) Digitizing software.
   The digitizing software isn't as convenient as CD Spin Doctor,
   but it works with Toast, so it does what you need. And it
   does MP3, too. (Which you can use to put material on web
   sites.)Comparative costs: $40 for SoundJam, $80 for Toast Pro. You
do need a PowerPC Mac with a reasonably fast processor (they
say at least 100 MHz; I'd guess you really need twice that).
I haven't tried the set-up yet, but it all looks good.We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 01:22:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


<<We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.>>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a mike
input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
being applied...Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:35:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


On 8/11/00, Paul Stamler wrote:><<We also talked about sound input and the need for sound cards.
>Paul Stamler said that you really need a quality sound card.
>I can't speak for the PC -- but for the stuff I've been digitizing
>on the Mac, I can't tell the difference between the stuff
>straight from the LP and the stuff I've burned to the CD.
>I don't have the world's greatest ears -- but if all you want
>is to keep from wearing down your LPs, and make the music portable,
>I'd say the Mac stereo microphone input does just fine.>>
>
>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a mike
>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>being applied...It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....)Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:21:53 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


>The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a
mike
>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>being applied...<<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.>>Then, if it's working without horrible distortion, it probably is a line
input, regardless of Mac's labeling. Funny, I thought only Windows machines
had weird stuff like that. :-)<<Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....) >>Try Media Source -- 800-241-8857 ext 317. They're a little slow to return
voice-mail messages, but they'll sell you Sony silver-backed green-dye discs
for about $1.65/ea including jewel boxes and shipping, in quantities of 100,
which is a decent price.<<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
unusually low gain.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:42:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(75 lines)


On 8/11/00, Paul Stamler wrote:> >The microphone input? If you're coming from the "Tape Out" jack on your
>>stereo I'd expect that to be causing pretty heavy overload going into a
>mike
>>input. The line input would be a lot cleaner. If, on the other hand, you're
>>coming straight from the turntable's cartridge, then the RIAA curve isn't
>>being applied...
>
><<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
>has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)
>
>As for the other -- yes, I'm coming from the "tape out" jacks.>>
>
>Then, if it's working without horrible distortion, it probably is a line
>input, regardless of Mac's labeling. Funny, I thought only Windows machines
>had weird stuff like that. :-)For what it's worth, the system *software* seems to refer to it as
"Sound In." But everyone calls it the "Microphone Port" because,
well, it has a microphone icon by it. :-)><<Beyond that, I just did what the instructions told me. :-) I don't
>claim it's ideal. But I'm not a sound engineer, either. I'm sure
>Paul, who is, could get a much better sound file using his equipment
>*and his skills*. If I had the last copy on earth of something, I'd
>give it to him and ask him to clean it up. (I'm tempted to do that
>with my horrible, thirty-years-in-a-public-library copy of
>Cynthia Gooding's "Queen of Hearts.") But my goal is something
>quick and dirty: Play the LP, define and rearrange the tracks,
>burn the CD. No engineering, no thinking, no knowledge required. :-)
>This set-up *works*; the only problems it has given my have involved
>all the cheap CD-Rs I bought before I knew better. (I've reached the
>conclusion that you *can't* buy CD-R mail order; they'll sell you
>"Gold Premium" CDs that are actually blue....) >>
>
>Try Media Source -- 800-241-8857 ext 317. They're a little slow to return
>voice-mail messages, but they'll sell you Sony silver-backed green-dye discs
>for about $1.65/ea including jewel boxes and shipping, in quantities of 100,
>which is a decent price.I got a 50-pack of Kodak Gold for $40 from Office Depot, and they've
worked excellently. Whereas I've had high rates of failure from
Maxell blues, Imation greens, and no-name blues. I'm sticking with
the Kodaks from now on -- at least until someone does real product
testing.I've no great desire to order by mail; I'm just pointing out that
they're very good at making you *think* you're getting good disks
(gold die, reputable company, etc.) when in fact you're getting
junk. (The Maxells are called "Maxell gold," even though they use
blue dye, and the Imations were carefully photographed to give the
impression that they were gold, too.)><<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
>where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
>I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
>someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
>so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
>
>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
>of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
>decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
>consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
>unusually low gain.Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-)--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 15:01:19 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 01:42:03PM -0500, Robert B. Waltz wrote:        [ ... ]> ><<It probably *is* a line input, since it takes a stereo jack. But it
> >has an icon of a microphone on it. :-)        It may have assumed amplified microphones.  The ones which I use
for the Sun have a coin battery in them, and a power switch.        Or perhaps, they assume that you will run the microphones
through a mixer before you get to the sound card.        [ ... ]> ><<Be it noted that I am *not* an audiophile; in the handful of instances
> >where I have both CD and LP versions of a song, the only difference
> >I can hear is that the CD version is consistently louder. (I wish
> >someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
> >so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
> >
> >That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
> >of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
> >decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
> >consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
> >unusually low gain.
>
> Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
> an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-)        Well ... I *think* that line level does have a standard, but
phono pickup cartridges vary widely in sensitivity -- so much so that
some need custom preamps.  The higher the quality, the more likely it is
to need custom preamps, I think.        However -- *some* systems do have individual level controls on
each input.  One which I remember was the Heathkit integrated preamp/amp
which was the companion to my AJ-15 FM tuner. (At least I *think* that
was the model number at this remove in time.)  The amplifier was the
AA-15 as I remember.  Anyway, it had (behind a swing-down panel) a bank
of screwdriver adjust individual level pots for each channel.  I presume
that some other systems have similar features.        However, as long as the CD level is higher than the LPs, it is
possible to build a simple box to go between the CD player and the
preamp inputs to equalize the levels.  Send me e-mail for the design,
since it is too far off topic for here.        First -- check whether the CD player has a pot (perhaps on the
back) to adjust its output level.        You'll *still* have to deal with the fact that different records
are recorded at varying levels.        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Stephanie Smith <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 20:19:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Hello All,I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song, "My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
So handsome and bonnie and free.
Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
But now he's far over the sea.I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
May news never get to the keel.
I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
Would put my poor heart in a ??If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the reference.StephanieStephanie Smith
Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage
Smithsonian Institution
[unmask]>>> Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]> 08/05/00 18:53 PM >>>
been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.... <snip>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 13 Aug 2000 21:45:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(53 lines)


I must say that I have not run into this yet....
I will take a look in Allan because I am not
finished there yet.
More later....
Which Jez Lowe cd is it on.
I like some Jez Lowe stuff but if find him a bit
pessimistic and not as uplifting as the ancient tradition.
ConradStephanie Smith wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song, "My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:
>
> Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
> So handsome and bonnie and free.
> Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
> But now he's far over the sea.
>
> I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:
>
> Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
> May news never get to the keel.
> I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
> Would put my poor heart in a ??
>
> If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the reference.
>
> Stephanie
>
> Stephanie Smith
> Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage
> Smithsonian Institution
> [unmask]
>
> >>> Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]> 08/05/00 18:53 PM >>>
> been a while since I have reported in....busy fingers....
> The Newcassel Songbook has a few hundred new sets of lyrics.... <snip>--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 05:46:26 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
quotations.Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
wrote.
Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
My bonny keel laddie for me o!
He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
[keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
And he brings the white money to me, o!Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
An' are you sure he's weel, o!
He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
T' help to moor the keel, o!
[This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
The canny keel laddie for me o!
He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
And brings the white money to me, o!It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:45:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(66 lines)


Both lyrics are in my Sang book collection
Note however that the correct spelling is Minstrelsy the correct spelling is:Bonny
(Bonnie)
You will find them here:
I cite Crawhall, 1888 for the pit one.
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/5863/priests2.html#The Bonnie PitJez has created his own versions of many songs.
Perhaps my favorite is Byker Hill.Conrad[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John Moulden--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Conrad Bladey ***Peasant**** <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 07:52:10 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(56 lines)


Crawhall spells it Bonnie.
Conrad[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John Moulden--
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Do You want to know more? Simply send an e.mail to this address-
[unmask]
Check out Our Guide to the Traditional Irish Wedding and our Guide
to the Traditional Irish Wake and our Teatime Companion-
http://members.xoom.com/bladocelt/sumord.html More information:
http://members.xoom.com/_XMCM/bladocelt/hutbook.html
and
http://www.bcpl.lib.md.us/~cbladey/hutmanA.html
My ICQ # is  4699667
Instant messenger= lippet
#####################################################

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: LPs to CDs (on the Mac) revisited
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:00:29 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(36 lines)


> (I wish
>someone would design a stereo system to take that into account,
>so I wouldn't have to reset the volume control so much!)>>
>
>That's not really a function of what's on the CD vs. what's on the LP, but
>of the comparative gains of the phono preamp in your receiver and the
>decoding system in your CD player. On my workroom system, CDs are
>consistently *softer* than LPs, because I'm using a portable CD player with
>unusually low gain.<<Isn't there some way to get an industry standard on gain? :-) Or build
an amplifier with some sort of a differential volume control? :-) >>The latter was fairly common in the early days of hi-fi, on some of the
higher-end gear, but got too costly and space-consuming when stereo came
along. On modern fancy systems with digital control of levels, it would be
fairly easy to implement, and some manufacturers do. As for an industry
standard -- well, it would be fairly straightforward in some respects (and
in fact Full Scale = 2.0 volts is a de facto standard on most CD players).
But consider that CDs, and to a greater extent LPs, have a huge range of
nominal levels. If LPs really adhered to "0 VU = 5 cm/sec) and cartridges
stuck to "1 cm/sec yields 1mV output" we could get somewhere, and if CDs
weren't mastered to be as hot in average level as possible, and damn
consistency, we could get further.Apropos of this (and to inject some obligatory discussion of ballad-related
stuff), I have noticed that English folk labels seem unduly aggressive about
using noise reduction in their reissues of analog-mastered stuff. The
Fellside reissues of material by Anne Briggs and A. L. Lloyd are cases in
point -- you can hear the noise pumping badly, and it's far more annoying
than plain old continuous hiss. And Topic's reissue of Swarbrick's first
record is atrocious -- so heavily noise-reduced that it generates horrible
distortion.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:42:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


[unmask] wrote:
>
> Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> quotations.
>
> Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> AL Lloyd: Folk Song in England gives The Bonnie Pit Laddie with the air much
> as in Bruce and Stokoe, and on page 332 says the song was widespread in
> northern England and that it was was still sung traditionally in 1967 when he
> wrote.
> Allan's Tyneside Songs gives the same words as Bruce and Stokoe but
> attributes them to Robert Bell's Rhymes of Northern Bards (1812)
>
> It thus seems that the following words are the only traditional ones (Steve
> Roud lists only Bell, and Bruce and Stokoe as sources)
>
> My bonny keel laddie, my canny keel laddie,
> My bonny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his keel, as black as the deil,
> [keel is pronounced kee-ul - from Anglo-Saxon "ce-ol = a ship", I believe]
> And he brings the white money to me, o!
>
> Ha' ye seen owt o' my canny man,
> An' are you sure he's weel, o!
> He's geane ower land, wiv a stick in his hand,
> T' help to moor the keel, o!
> [This verse is often in another song beloved of choirs "Ma canny lad"]
>
> The canny keel laddie, the bonny keel laddie,
> The canny keel laddie for me o!
> He sits in his huddock and claws his bare buttock,
> And brings the white money to me, o!
>
> It seems probable therefore that the lines quoted by Stephanie have been
> recently written, perhaps by Jez Lowe.
>
> John MouldenSteve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
Bards', p. 36, 1812."Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.Bruce Olson--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:50:12 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(46 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> [unmask] wrote:
> >
> > Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> > quotations.
> >
> > Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch Publishers,
> > Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit Laddie"
> > and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly related.
> >............
> >.............
> > John Moulden
>
> Steve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
> as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
> traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
> versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
> these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
> Bards', p. 36, 1812.
>
> "Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
> listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
> Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.
>
> I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.
>
> Bruce OlsonSorry, that should have been Bruce and Stokoe above.Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
"Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
songs and should have checked for that.Clarification: The text in Allen's 'Tyneside Songs' is "The
Bonnie Pit Laddie" according to Roud's index (and opening
line quoted there).Numbers are good identifies, IF one gets the numbers correct. If one
assumes that Roud misassigned the number for "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" in
Bruce and Stokoe, then things seems to work out alright.Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 15 Aug 2000 04:53:37 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(85 lines)


From - Roy Palmer: The Oxford Book of Sea Songs (1986) number 7:
His Sources - words Harleian Mss (British Library) (printed in Halliwell
(1841) Early
Naval Ballads of England page 18; tune Claud Simpson: British Broadside
Ballad and
its Music page 392Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eightIn eighty-eight, ere I was born,
As I can well remember,
In August was a fleet prepared,
The month before September.Spain, with Biscayne, Portugal,
Toledo and Granado,
All these did meet and make a fleet,
And called it the Armado.Where they had got provision,
As mustard, peas and bacon,
Some say two ships were full of whips,
But I think they were mistaken.There was a little man of Spain
That shot well in a gun, a,
Don Pedro hight, as good a knight
As the Knight of the Sun, a.King Philip made him admiral
And charg'd him to stay, a
But to destroy both man and boy
And then to run away, a.The King of Spain did fret amain,
And to do yet more harm, a
He sent along, to make him strong,
The famous Prince of Parma.When they had sailed along the seas
And anchored upon Dover,
Our Englishmen did board them then
And cast the Spaniards over.Our queen was then at Tilbury,
What could you more desire, a?
For whose sweet sake Sir Francis Drake
Did set them all on fire, a.But let them look about themselves,
For if they come again, a,
They shall be served with that same sauce
As they were, I know when, a.[Palmer's note and glosses]
The ballad looks back at the armada, possibly from the time of James 1. Some
of
the details have become blurred, though the picture of victory remains clear
enough. August] the main fighting was in fact over by the end of July.
Biscayne] Vizcava, one of the Basque provinces
full of whips] a widely-held belief. Cf. Deloney's'New Ballet of the straunge
and most
cruel Whippes which the Spanyards had prepared to whippe and torment English
men
and women'.
Don Pedro] the Spanish commander-in-chief was in fact Don Alonso Perez, Duke
of
Medina Sidonia.
hight] called
Knight of the Sun] hero of a Spanish romance, The Mirrour of Princely Deedes
and
Knighthood, which was widely known in England through translations.
amain] with all his might
Parma] the Duke of Parma's fleet was to have joined the armada from the
Netherlands,
but failed to do so.
 Tilbury] Queen Elizabeth delivered a rousing triumphal speech there in
August 1588.
 She was mounted on a white horse, thus giving rise, it is said, to the
nursery rhyme,
'Ride a  cock horse'.John Moulden

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:14:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(110 lines)


[unmask] wrote:
>
> >From - Roy Palmer: The Oxford Book of Sea Songs (1986) number 7:
> His Sources - words Harleian Mss (British Library) (printed in Halliwell
> (1841) Early
> Naval Ballads of England page 18; tune Claud Simpson: British Broadside
> Ballad and
> its Music page 392
>
> Sir Francis Drake; or, Eighty-eight
>
> In eighty-eight, ere I was born,
> As I can well remember,
> In August was a fleet prepared,
> The month before September.
>
> Spain, with Biscayne, Portugal,
> Toledo and Granado,
> All these did meet and make a fleet,
> And called it the Armado.
>
> Where they had got provision,
> As mustard, peas and bacon,
> Some say two ships were full of whips,
> But I think they were mistaken.
>
> There was a little man of Spain
> That shot well in a gun, a,
> Don Pedro hight, as good a knight
> As the Knight of the Sun, a.
>
> King Philip made him admiral
> And charg'd him to stay, a
> But to destroy both man and boy
> And then to run away, a.
>
> The King of Spain did fret amain,
> And to do yet more harm, a
> He sent along, to make him strong,
> The famous Prince of Parma.
>
> When they had sailed along the seas
> And anchored upon Dover,
> Our Englishmen did board them then
> And cast the Spaniards over.
>
> Our queen was then at Tilbury,
> What could you more desire, a?
> For whose sweet sake Sir Francis Drake
> Did set them all on fire, a.
>
> But let them look about themselves,
> For if they come again, a,
> They shall be served with that same sauce
> As they were, I know when, a.
>
> [Palmer's note and glosses]
> The ballad looks back at the armada, possibly from the time of James 1. Some
> of
> the details have become blurred, though the picture of victory remains clear
> enough.
>
>  August] the main fighting was in fact over by the end of July.
> Biscayne] Vizcava, one of the Basque provinces
> full of whips] a widely-held belief. Cf. Deloney's'New Ballet of the straunge
> and most
> cruel Whippes which the Spanyards had prepared to whippe and torment English
> men
> and women'.
> Don Pedro] the Spanish commander-in-chief was in fact Don Alonso Perez, Duke
> of
> Medina Sidonia.
> hight] called
> Knight of the Sun] hero of a Spanish romance, The Mirrour of Princely Deedes
> and
> Knighthood, which was widely known in England through translations.
> amain] with all his might
> Parma] the Duke of Parma's fleet was to have joined the armada from the
> Netherlands,
> but failed to do so.
>  Tilbury] Queen Elizabeth delivered a rousing triumphal speech there in
> August 1588.
>  She was mounted on a white horse, thus giving rise, it is said, to the
> nursery rhyme,
> 'Ride a  cock horse'.
>
> John MouldenPalmer reprinted the wrong version of the tune from Simpson's 'The
British Broadside Ballad and Its Music'. He copied Simpson's #251
(with change of key from Am to Dm), which is an early version of "Jog
On". A seven verse version of the song above is in 'Pills to Purge
Melancholy', IV, p. 37, 1719-20, the only place any version of the song
is connected to any tune, and that version of "Jog On" in 'Pills' is
Simpson's #252. (ABCs of both versions of "Jog On" are in the broadside
ballad tunes on my website).According to Simpson the title "Sir Francis Drake: Or, Eight
Eight" occurs as the title only on the 'Pills' version of the
song. Simpson notes a total of 8 copies of the song (including BL MS
Harl. 791) which he divides into two variants, but among the 4 texts I
have even his variants have variants, so I won't dwell on that. The
earliest printed copy noted is of 1640, and Simpson has this as the
'other' version relative to the text above.Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 01:25:14 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


At 08:19 PM 8/13/00 -0400, Stephanie Smith wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I've been trying to track down what I think is a traditional Geordie song,
"My Bonnie Keel Laddie."  I didn't see it in Conrad's compilation, but know
there's more being added all the time.  I heard this on a Jez Lowe
recording, and I think it's traditional.  The chorus runs:
>
>Oh me keel laddie, me bonnie keel laddie,
>So handsome and bonnie and free.
>Had he stayed on the Tyne, he now would be mine,
>But now he's far over the sea.
>
>I can't hear the words clearly on the last verse, which goes:
>
>Should he die in commotion, or drown in the ocean,
>May news never get to the keel.
>I'd e'er be so sad for the loss o' me lad,
>Would put my poor heart in a ??
>
>If anyone knows a printed source for this song, I'd be grateful for the
reference.I have the song on a contemporary recording by the Geordie group "Salt of
the Earth". In the notes, they attribute it to H. Robson and J. Lowe and
say: "[Keel Laddie] is a revised version of a Henry Robson (1775-1850) song,
*The Sandgate Lassie's Lamentation*, to be found in its original form in
*Allan's Tyneside Songs* 1862 and also *Bell's Northern Bards* 1812.They sing the last verse as follows:If he died in commotion, or drowned on the sea,
May news never get to the kee'.
I would always be sad at the loss o' me lad,
For he'd stay in me heart till I dee.Let me know if you want the rest transcribed.
Barbara

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:44:30 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(125 lines)


Mea culpa!Yes, there are errors in the FOLK SONG and BROADSIDES INDEXES, and I'm
always pleased to hear of them and put them right - although it's a bit
embarrassing in front of the whole world!
The following will (I hope) nail it - but it won't help Stephanie's original
query as the words she quotes don't appear in the old versions at all. The
information supplied by Barbara Millikan confuses matters further, as THE
SANDGATE LASSIE'S LAMENT(ATION) is a completely different song.There have been several mentions of John Bell in the correspondence, and I
suggest that anyone interested in songs from the Tyneside area should
acquaint themselves with his work. He is one of the unsung heroes of song
collection, as he was early in the field and ecelectic in his sources. Many
of the well-known 'Tyneside' songs are found first in his writings. Try to
get hold of a copy of his RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN BARDS, published in 1812,
but the 1971 reprint published by Frank Graham has a very useful
introduction by Dave Harker - it turns up occasionally on Bibliofind, I
think. Dave Harker also edited SONGS FROM THE MANUSCRIPT COLLECTION OF JOHN
BELL, published by the Surtees Society (1985). These books do not, however,
include tunes.
J. Collingwood Bruce and John Stokoe's NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY (1882 but
recently reprinted by Llanerch) is mostly useful because it adds tunes, but
its texts are derivative and, perhaps, suspect. They certainly do not
acknowledge their debt to Bell's work Similarly, John Stoke and Samuel Reay,
SONGS AND BALLADS OF NORTHERN ENGLAND (1899?).To give all the information I know on the songs in question, and to sort out
the errors in the FOLK SONG INDEX (those not interested can stop here):The references to the BANKS OF THE DEE are simply a typing error (they
should be 3847 rather than 3487) so please ignore them.There are two BONNIE.....LADDIE songs, closely related - BONNIE PIT LADDIE,
and BONNIE KEEL LADDIE, plus a third -A COLLIER LAD - which has some textual
similarity. It is not clear which is oldest, although the KEEL one appears
first in print.BONNIE PIT LADDIE (Roud 3487) is the most common, appearing first in a
2-verse text in Bell's RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN BARDS (1812). ALLAN'S TYNESIDE
SONGS and Cuthbert Sharp's BISHOPRICK GARLAND (1834)reprint this text, as
does Bruce & Stokoe NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY, but they add a tune. The song
has also been collected more recently, with tune - by Cecil Sharp in
Berkshire (not published), and other collected versions in Dawney, DOON THE
WAGON WAY (1973) and Polwarth NORTH COUNTRY SONGS (1969). There were a
number of chapbook printings in the 19th century, which I have not seenBONNIE KEEL LADDIE (Roud 9021)
NB the number for the version from Bruce & Stokoe is wrongly given in the
Index as 3487.
This is printed less often and, as far as I know, not found in recent
tradition. The dating of the first version is unclear. A one-verse text
appears in Ritson's NORTHUMBERLAND GARLAND (1809), but this seems to reprint
a 1794 edition. A 3-verse text appears in Bell's RHYMES OF THE NORTHERN
BARDS (1812), and again Bruce and Stokoe NORTHUMBRIAN MINSTRELSY reprint it
(no tune) without acknowledgement. There is another version (no tune) in
WHISTLE-BINKIE Vol.2 (1890), claimed as the composition of Robert White.
Again there were several chapbook printings.A COLLIER LAD (at present Roud 3487 but will be re-assigned to 16148)
The only version I know is in Dawney, DOON THE WAGON WAY (1973), collected
by Tony Green in 1966. Only the first 4 lines are similar to the other
songs.Hope this helps
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >
> > [unmask] wrote:
> > >
> > > Stepahanie Smith (to whom greetings) asked about this song and gave
> > > quotations.
> > >
> > > Bruce and Stokoe: Northumbrian Minsterlsy (Reprint, Llanerch
Publishers,
> > > Felinfach, 1998 - ISBN 1 86143 039 6) page 150 gives "The Bonnie Pit
Laddie"
> > > and "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" sung to the same tune and clearly
related.
> > >............
> > >.............
> > > John Moulden
> >
> > Steve Roud's folksong index has both songs from Bruce and Stockoe
> > as Roud #3487 -["Bonny Pit Laddie"], with several other
> > traditional and songster versions listed [along with several
> > versions of "The Banks of the Dee" which should be #3847]. Among
> > these is "Bonnie Pit Laddie" in Bell's 'Rhymes of the Northern
> > Bards', p. 36, 1812.
> >
> > "Bonnie Keel Laddie" is Roud #9021, and only two texts are
> > listed: 'Whistle Binkie', 1890, and one in Bell's 'Rhymes of the
> > Northern Bards', p. 7, 1812.
> >
> > I'm confused, and, alas, I've never even seen a copy of Bell's book.
> >
> > Bruce Olson
>
> Sorry, that should have been Bruce and Stokoe above.
>
> Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
> "Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
> few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
> index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
> songs and should have checked for that.
>
> Clarification: The text in Allen's 'Tyneside Songs' is "The
> Bonnie Pit Laddie" according to Roud's index (and opening
> line quoted there).
>
> Numbers are good identifies, IF one gets the numbers correct. If one
> assumes that Roud misassigned the number for "The Bonnie Keel Laddie" in
> Bruce and Stokoe, then things seems to work out alright.
>
> Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:06:51 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>.............> Also, there aren't as many traditional and songster versions of
> "Bonnie Pit Laddie" as I had thought. There seem to be quite a
> few duplicate records on my CD rom version of the folk song
> index, and I had already run into this complication on a few other
> songs and should have checked for that.
>........> Bruce OlsonSorry, about the duplicate records bit above, and my humblest
apologies to Steve Roud. My ASKSAM 3 database system isn't
reading the data in Steve Roud's folk song index correctly. It is
duplicating blocks of records already read in. When I find
apparent duplicates the record serial numbers differ by
7728, and the 2nd record isn't in Steve Roud's data file.
My total ASKSAM database for the folk song index comes out to
108716 records, but I don't yet know how many are false
duplicates, or whether I am missing records in the data file.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Pit Laddie
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2000 01:00:06 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


Bruce Olson wrote:
>
> Bruce Olson wrote:
> >........
> > Bruce Olson
>
> Sorry, about the duplicate records bit above, and my humblest
> apologies to Steve Roud. My ASKSAM 3 database system isn't
> reading the data in Steve Roud's folk song index correctly. It is
> duplicating blocks of records already read in. When I find
> apparent duplicates the record serial numbers differ by
> 7728, and the 2nd record isn't in Steve Roud's data file.
> My total ASKSAM database for the folk song index comes out to
> 108716 records, but I don't yet know how many are false
> duplicates, or whether I am missing records in the data file.
> Bruce Olson
>........My ASKSAM database software isn't the problem with the duplicate
records that I have had.The problem is undoubtably a hardware glitch.The first 7728 records of SONG2.TXT were read in, but a control
or flag bit didn't get set or, it immediately got gobbled up by a
computer gremlin.As a result the ASKSAM program didn't know it had already read
them, and proceeded to read them again.I am appalled that it took me so long to figure out the significance
of that difference of 7728 between the serial number of a record and its
duplicate in my ASKSAM data file.Bruce Olson

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Newcastle Song: Bonnie Keel Laddie
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:05:27 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(1 lines)


Sounds suspiciously like Bonnie Pit Laddie, with a scene shift.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Unusual version of "Delia"
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:08:53 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(81 lines)


From THE BEST BLUEGRASS SONGBOOK - YET!
Compiled and edited by Arthur Bayas and Lipton Nemser (pseudonyms?)
c1978
Lewis Music Publishing Co., Inc.
263 Veterans Blvd.
Carlstadt, NJ 07072The version of "Delia" published in this book is stunning for its comic
treatment of the tragedy and for the accuracy of its last verse.  So far,
I have not found any of these verses elsewhere.  If it weren't for the
inclusion of the last verse, which squares precisely with historical fact,
I might have concluded that the compilers just made this version up,
patterning the story after that of other versions.  However, the
information in that verse is not the kind of thing one makes up, so this
confers an element of autheticity and tradition to the whole text.I'd surely like to know where the compilers got this text.Can anyone help?************************DELIA GONEMiss Delia, she two-timed
Her Tony Saturday night,
And on this date she met her fate,
He shot her down at sight.
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!Chorus
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   Delia did a "two time"
   On a Saturday night,
   Delia gone, One more round, Delia gone!
   She's gone!He brought her a cocktail,
The very best in the town,
But she refused to down the shot
And so he shot her down.He wanted to marry,
But she preferred to be loose,
She did not want a goose to cook
And so he cooked her goose.So Tony was locked up,
The judge refused to set bail,
For such a crime, he should do time,
Say, 99 years in jail.Then Tony said, "Thank You,"
"Your Honor treated me fine,"
He knew the judge could well have said,
"Nine hundred ninety-nine."*************************The day after Moses "Cooney" Houston's trial (March 14, 1901) in the
Superior Court of Savannah, GA, the Savannah Morning News carried the
headline,
THANKED THE JUDGE,
and the story began,
"'Thank you, Sir.' This was the response made by Moses Houston...to Judge
Seabrook, when the latter sentenced him to spend the remained of his life
in the penitentiary, for the wilful murder of Delia Green."The jury had returned a verdict of guilty with a recommendation for
mercy.  At that time, in Georgia, there was no code of juvenile justice,
so Houston, at age 14, was tried and sentenced in the same manner as an
adult.  The sentence given by the judge was the minimum allowed by law.
I'm not sure what all the alternatives might have been, but one was
death.  The life sentence was not as harsh as it sounds - a convict with a
life sentence was eligible for parole after serving seven years, I've been
told.  Houston actually served 13 years before being paroled at age 27.  I
suspect that he later received a pardon (an application was made a few
years after his parole, but I've not yet discovered how it was acted on).john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Obituary, Johnny Ray Hicks
From: "Cantrell, Brent" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:18:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


One of the last of the great, performing  a capella ballad singers of the
Upland South, Johnny Ray Hicks, died last night at his home in Fentress
County, Tennessee.   Johnny Ray performed at the Library of Congress and the
Smithsonian Folk Festival, and he was a regular performer at State Parks on
the Cumberland Plateau and at the Laurel Theater in Knoxville.   Johnny Ray
was a cousin of Dee Hicks.   Mr. Hicks was 75 years old.Brent Cantrell
Knoxville

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Delia - Hurston
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:03:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


 John Cowley pointed out to me that in Pamela Bordelon's book, Go Gator and
Muddy the Water, part of a text of "Delia" is given, collected "from
around Fernandina" (FL), presumably in the 1930s.  Here is the first
verse.Coonie told Delia on a Christmas Eve night,
If you tell me 'bout my mama I'm sho going to take your life.
   She's dead, she's dead and gone.This is the only version I've seen that identifies the killing as having
occurred on Christmas Eve.  The first line is factually correct in every
respect: "Coonie," "Delia," "Christmas Eve night," and argument.(1) What does the second line above mean?Recall that Coonie and Delia were 14-year old neighbors in Yamacraw,
Savannah, GA, in 1900, and that they had been "seeing" one another for a
few months.  I have no indication that they had been living together.
Delia denied Coonie's claims about their having a sexual relationship,
saying "You lie! You know that I am a lady! You son of a bitch!"I believe that the second line above refers to Delia's calling Cooney
a "son of a bitch."  I recall that my mother told me, when I was learning
to curse,
never to call anyone a "son of a bitch" because that would be calling
his/her mother a dog.Perhaps this is an example of "blues" or "nodal" ballad style.The last verse given by Bordelon isMama, oh, mama, how could I stand
When al round my bedside was full of married men
  So she's dead, she's dead and gone.Hurston describes this verse as "Coonie justifies his killing of Delia."(2) What this "justification" verse mean?john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Delia - Hurston
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:13:09 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(68 lines)


John:The last verse you quote below from Bordelon, p. 73, which you describe as
"Coonie justifies his killing of Delia" is not really the justification.
Hurston has unfortunately edited the song to save space.  After the first
verse which you give below, she condenses with this line:(Coonie shoots Delia to death in several verses)Then she includes this verse:Coonie in the jailhouse drinking out a silver cup
Poor Delia in the graveyard don't care if she never wake up
She's dead, she's dead and gone.Then another elipse, summarized by:(Coonie justifies his killing of Delia)And finally there is the opaque final verse you quote.EdOn Wed, 30 Aug 2000, John Garst wrote:>  John Cowley pointed out to me that in Pamela Bordelon's book, Go Gator and
> Muddy the Water, part of a text of "Delia" is given, collected "from
> around Fernandina" (FL), presumably in the 1930s.  Here is the first
> verse.
>
> Coonie told Delia on a Christmas Eve night,
> If you tell me 'bout my mama I'm sho going to take your life.
>    She's dead, she's dead and gone.
>
> This is the only version I've seen that identifies the killing as having
> occurred on Christmas Eve.  The first line is factually correct in every
> respect: "Coonie," "Delia," "Christmas Eve night," and argument.
>
> (1) What does the second line above mean?
>
> Recall that Coonie and Delia were 14-year old neighbors in Yamacraw,
> Savannah, GA, in 1900, and that they had been "seeing" one another for a
> few months.  I have no indication that they had been living together.
> Delia denied Coonie's claims about their having a sexual relationship,
> saying "You lie! You know that I am a lady! You son of a bitch!"
>
> I believe that the second line above refers to Delia's calling Cooney
> a "son of a bitch."  I recall that my mother told me, when I was learning
> to curse,
> never to call anyone a "son of a bitch" because that would be calling
> his/her mother a dog.
>
> Perhaps this is an example of "blues" or "nodal" ballad style.
>
> The last verse given by Bordelon is
>
> Mama, oh, mama, how could I stand
> When al round my bedside was full of married men
>   So she's dead, she's dead and gone.
>
> Hurston describes this verse as "Coonie justifies his killing of Delia."
>
> (2) What this "justification" verse mean?
>
>
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Okie Lit Crit
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Sep 2000 14:58:54 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


James N. Gregory's _American Exodus_ is a superlative history of the
Okie/Dust Bowl migration to California.  It contains a brilliant chapter
on the role of country music in the lives of those southwesterners
entitled "The Language of a Subculture."  Footnote 103 on page 294 quotes
a Kern County (Bakersfield) high school teacher straining to reconcile her
misconceptions of the Okies with the reality she discovered in the
classroom:"Complaining that they do not appreciate the classic adventure novels like
_Ivanhoe,_ she noted disparagingly that instead "like most primitives, my
subjects _like_ poetry, provided they can recognize it as such.  They come
from a ballad-loving race, of English and Scotch-Irish stock.  In the
tests for appreciation of poetry they show surprising soundness of
judgement [sic] and feeling for rhythm."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Legacy of B. Botkin
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2000 17:37:48 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


An ad came in today's mail for a conference on "American Folklore and
the Legacy of Benjamin Botkin," Feb. 1-3, 2001, at the University of
Nebraska - Linclon.  Further info can be had at their web site:
http://www.unl.edu/botkin/Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Okie Lit Crit
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:02:48 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(24 lines)


Folks:I sent this out on the 3rd, and may have missed it when it was posted.  If
so, and this then is a repeated message, forgive me.EdJames N. Gregory's _American Exodus_ is a superlative history of the
Okie/Dust Bowl migration to California.  It contains a brilliant chapter
on the role of country music in the lives of those southwesterners
entitled "The Language of a Subculture."  Footnote 103 on page 294 quotes
a Kern County (Bakersfield) high school teacher straining to reconcile her
misconceptions of the Okies with the reality she discovered in the
classroom:"Complaining that they do not appreciate the classic adventure novels like
_Ivanhoe,_ she noted disparagingly that instead "like most primitives, my
subjects _like_ poetry, provided they can recognize it as such.  They come
from a ballad-loving race, of English and Scotch-Irish stock.  In the
tests for appreciation of poetry they show surprising soundness of
judgement [sic] and feeling for rhythm."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Seeking advice on ballad research (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:49:41 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(33 lines)


Good People:Beena is in India -- Kerala, if I recollect properly.  She was rebuffed by
academics when she asked about ballad studies on the UK ballad list.  They
were interested only in post-modernism, etc.Bruce, be nice to her.  And lets all send her encouragement in her
passion.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Beena Thomas <[unmask]>
To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Seeking advice on ballad researchDear Ed
Thanks so much for responding to my cry for help.And
thanks even more for sending me the address of another
great ballad group. This is really my lucky week.By
the way I'm very intrigued about these "out of the
mainstream adventures"!Thanks again for welcoming me to your group.
Best wishes
Beena__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Opps
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:54:45 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Andy:I inadvertantly, and carelessly insulted our colleagues on the UK ballad
list.  It was not they who rebuffed Beena of Kerala, but academics at
various institutions in Great Britain.  I should also note that in a
private e-mail to me Beena wrote that at least some of these English
English professors were apologetic, saying they knew nothing about
ballads.Which does say something about the woeful state of folklore studies in the
Academy, doesn't it?And why this list -- and that of our friends across the pond -- is so
important.  In the end, ironically, we amateurs may be the ones to keep
the study of folklore and folk song alive.  Just as we were the ones to
give it birth.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Opps
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:06:45 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


>...academics at
>various institutions in Great Britain.  I should also note that in a
>private e-mail to me Beena wrote that at least some of these English
>English professors were apologetic, saying they knew nothing about
>ballads.
>
>Which does say something about the woeful state of folklore studies in the
>Academy, doesn't it?
>
>And why this list -- and that of our friends across the pond -- is so
>important.  In the end, ironically, we amateurs may be the ones to keep
>the study of folklore and folk song alive.  Just as we were the ones to
>give it birth.John Cowley comes to mind - a born professor, I think, but not
employed by an academic institution.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Bull" Martin
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Louis "Bull" Martin; who shot and killed Ella Cherwith(?) Speed on
September 3, 1894, in the French Quarter of New Orleans (an event that
lives on in the ballad "Ella Speed"), was convicted of manslaughter in May,
1895, and sentenced to 20 years in the state penitentiary; was back at his
job as a bartender at Trauth's saloon at the Dryades Market in time to
have an entry in Soard's New Orleans City Directory of 1901.  Ella Speed's
"landlady," Miss Pauline Jones, was still in business, though not at the
same location.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Modicum of Respect
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:29:28 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(75 lines)


Folks:Note the item below, forwarded by a history list I am on.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:58:09 -0400
From: Kriste Lindenmeyer <[unmask]>
Reply-To: H-Net Gilded Age and Progressive Era List <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Weekend Digest I, September 16, 2000**********************************************
1. Storytelling in the Millennium (Baylor U Conference on Narrative, Spring
2001)
Location: Texas, United States
Call for Papers Deadline: 2001-02-09Finding Meaning through Narrative
after Post-ModernismDepartment of English,
Baylor University
Co-Sponsored by the Baylor Institute for Oral History
Waco, Texas, 9-10 February 2001How is meaning found and transmitted through narrative, through
story-telling, in the wake of the post-modern project? How has storytelling
in the past as well as the present changed and developed, responding to the
loss of metanarratives that inform and define human culture?Keynote Speaker:
Scott Russell Sanders, Distinguished Professor of English and Director of
the Wells Scholars Program at Indiana University at Bloomington, author of
eight fiction works, including The Invisible Company, Fetching the Dead,
and Wonders Hidden; nonfiction works (nine) include Writing from the
Center, Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World, and Hunting for
Hope. He has also written several children's books, and his writing appears
in Harper's, the New York Times, and Best American Essays among many other
publications. His writings especially address our relation to nature,
issues of social justice, the character of community, and the impact of
science on our lives.Possible paper and/or panel topics:
Finding a language: Creating Universality through Narrative without a
Common Myth * Moral Formation and Storytelling * Telling Old Stories in New
Ways * Telling the Stories of our Lives * Meaning after Post-Modernism in
the Stories Poems Tell * Reclaiming the American Oral Tradition * Effects
on National or Global Culture(s) of the Loss of Metanarratives * Spiritual
Journeys in Narrative * Local and Regional Histories * Binding the
Generations through Storytelling * Storytelling and the Changing Canon *
The Changing Text: Intersections of Narrative with Technology * The Child's
Voice in Narrative * The Fantastic: Fairy Tales, Science Fiction, Magical
Realism, and Narrative * Popular Culture, Technology, and the Stories We
Tell * Education: Deconstructed Literature and the Post-Modern Student *
Critical Approaches to Narrative after Post-Modernism * Narrative Form and
the Transmission of Meaning * Narrating Faith in a Post-Modern Culture *
Narrative and the Importance of PlaceMail or email abstracts (50-100 words) of papers suitable for a 20 minute
presentation and/or panel proposals no later than 15 October 2000. Send to
Rebecca Munro at the address below.Contact information:
c/o Rebecca Munro
Baylor Department of English
Box 97404
Waco, Texas 76798-7404Email:  [unmask]Call for Papers website:
http://www.baylor.edu/~narrative2001

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: House of the Rising Sun
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:10:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Hi folks:This appeared on the folkdj-l list, posted by Ron Mura:Peace.
PaulThere's a good AP article on the history of this song being carried by
various newspapers.  One link:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000916/aponline113406_000.ht
m

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Swift's Poems
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:42:11 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


James Woolley of Lafayette College, Easton, PA, has contacted me about
Swift's poems. If anyone can help can they please contact him direct on
[unmask]"I'm editing the poems of Jonathan Swift and therefore trying to keep track
of poems by him and attributed to him. Some of these --not many but maybe
two or three dozen--were political ballads and often published as
broadsides. The period I'm interested in is 1660-1800--I go back that far
because some 17c. works have been mis-attributed to Swift. I would of
course be interested in finding manuscript texts as well".

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: The Ballad of the South Coast
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:50:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(116 lines)


"South Coast" has been recorded often and continues in the
repertoires of active singers like Ramblin' Jack Elliot.  As recorded
by Terry Gilkyson and the Easy Riders, it is credited to Lillian Bos
Ross, Sam Eskin, Richard Dehr, and Frank Miller.  On the basis of the
material below, I believe that the words and music are by Ross and
that the others (the Easy Riders) are credited only because they
claim an arrangement.Lillian Bos Ross, a California novelist, wrote "The Ballad of the
South Coast" under the pseudonym "Shanagolden" and deposited her song
in the copyright office Library of Congress.  Joe Hickerson retrieved
a copy for me some years ago.  That deposit is undated, but a deposit
of a second song she wrote, "Year of Yarrow," from the same source,
is stamped SEP 11 1946.  The assumption that these materials were
deposited at the same time dates "South Coast," tentatively.
(Actually, if the numbers on the deposits mean something, "South
Coast" may have substantially post-dated "Year of Yarrow" - the
latter bears the number 41844 while the former is 251782.)  "Year of
Yarrow" has words by Lillian Bos Ross and music by Sam Eskin, so
there was an Eskin-Ross connection as early as 1946.  However, the
deposited sheet for "The Ballad of the South Coast" credits
"Shanagolden" only (implying words and music)."South Coast" refers to the region of the Big Sur.  The town of Jolon
still exists.Here are the words as they appear in the Digital Tradition.>  THE SOUTH COAST
>  (Lillian Bos Ross, Sam Eskin, Richard Dehr & Frank Miller)
>
>  My name is Lonhano de Castro
>  My father was a Spanish Grandee
>  But I won my wife in a card game
>  To hell with those lords o'er the sea
>
>          Well the South Coast is a wild coast and lonely
>          You might win in a game at Cholon
>          But a lion still rules the Barranca
>          And a man there is always alone
>
>  I played in a card game at Holon
>  I played with an outlaw named Juan
>  And after I'd taken his money
>  I staked all against his daughter Dawn
>
>  I picked up the ace ... I had won her
>  My heart it was down at my feet
>  Jumped up to my throat in a hurry
>  Like a young summer's day she was sweet.
>
>  He opened the door to the kitchen
>  And he called the girl out with a curse
>  Saying "Take her, Goddamn her, you've won her
>  She's yours now for better or worse"
>
>  Her arms had to tighten around me
>  As we rode down the hills to the south
>  Not a word did I hear from her that day
>  Nor a kiss from her pretty young mouth
>
>  But that was a gay happy winter
>  We carved on a cradle of pine
>  By the fire in that neat little cabin
>  And I sang with that gay wife of mine.
>
>  That night I got hurt in a landslide
>  Crushed hip and twice broken bone
>  She saddled her pony like lightning
>  And rode off for the doctor in Cholon
>
>  The lion screamed in the Barranca
>  Buck, he bolted and he fell on his side
>  My young wife lay dead in the moonlight
>  My heart died that night with my bride
>
>  Copyright Blackwood Music
>  recorded by Ramblin' Jack Elliott on "Ramblin' Jack Elliott" (1961)
>  and by Arlo Guthrie on "Son Of The Wind" (1991)
>  @gambler @wife @love
>  filename[ SOUTHCST
>  MJ"Shanagolden"'s original version opens:My name is Lonjano de Castro,
My father was a Spanish grandee;
But I won my wife in a card game -
To hell with those lords o'er the sea.The song has 12 verses.  Although the music has the chorus after the
first verse, the pattern for the rest of the song has it after every
three verses, so I think that "Shanagolden" intended for the chorus
to be sung after the first three verses and after each subsequent set
of three verses.Here are the second and third verses and chorus.  These verses (and
some of the later ones) do not appear to have survived in popular
recordings.In my youth I had a Monterey homestead,
Creeks, valleys, and mountains all mine;
I built me a snug little shanty
And I roofed it and floored it with pine.I had a bronco, a buckskin -
Like a bird he flew over the trail;
I rode him out forty miles every Friday
Just to get me some grub and some mail.   But the South Coast's a wild coast and lonely,
   You might win at a game at Jolon;
   But the lion still rules the barranca
   And a man there is always alone.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: The Ballad of the South Coast
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:50:09 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


John:I heard this in Santa Monica and Topanga ca. 1949-1950, among the
folkniks.  Quite popular.  So your dating is not far off.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FW: Job Announcement (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:51:25 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(70 lines)


This might be of interest to some subscribers --Ed-----Original Message-----
From: [unmask] [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of reaten
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 7:48 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Job AnnouncementSeptember 25, 2000Dear Colleague:        The Archives of Traditional Music is at an important juncture in
its half-century history.  We are looking for a new director to help
direct this leading institution of ethnographic sound and video recordings
through the fast-paced technological changes that are emerging. Indiana
University is one of the leading universities in developing computing
technologies.The director will simultaneously be a faculty member of the newly formed
Ethnomusicology Institute within the Department of Folklore and
Ethnomusicology.  He or she will also be considered for the Laura Boulton
Professorship, a newly established position made possible by the
generosity of the Boulton Endowment to Indiana University.        I urge you to help us find the very best candidates possible for
this position, which will have an impact on all of us who conduct research
in the field of ethnomusicology.  We encourage nominations or
self-nominations and will be interviewing at the meetings in Toronto,
November 1-5.        Enclosed please find the job ad for this position, which I
encourage you to share with your colleagues.Sincerely,Ruth M. Stone, Chair
Search and Screen Committee_________________________________________________________________The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University, the largest
university-based ethnographic sound archives in the United States, is
searching for a Director to begin July 1, 2001. The Director, will hold a
faculty appointment (rank open) and teach half-time in the Department of
Folklore and Ethnomusicology and will be considered for the Laura Boulton
Professorship, an endowed position providing research support.  Area of
specialization within ethnomusicology is open; Ph.D. and relevant
experience required. The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University
(http://www.indiana.edu/~libarchm/) houses a rich collection of music,
oral history, linguistic data, interviews with rhythm and blues artists,
and early jazz discs.  Videotapes, photographs, and manuscripts complement
the audio recordings.  Review of applications will begin November 1, 2000
and will remain open until the position is filled.  Letters of
application, including curriculum vitae, and three letters of
recommendation should be sent to the Search and Screen Committee, Archives
of Traditional Music, Morrison Hall 117, Indiana University, Indiana
University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.  Indiana University is an equal
opportunity and affirmative action employer.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Liner Notes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:53:31 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


Folks:Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:37:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.
>
> EdOddly enough, Ed, I have them. I'll mail you a copy on Monday, if that's
soon enough for you.
        Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:47:11 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


Ed- Why not just contact Sandy Paton at Folk-Legacy? 860/364-5661On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:46:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Ed,Just FYI, if you're needing more information, we have Archie Green's
manuscripts here at the Southern Folklife Collection, which include 40-some
folders of correspondence, research notes, discography etc. for Sara Ogan
Gunning.  You can view an online finding aid at
http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/g/Green,Archie .
best,
Amy Davis--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:43:29 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Quoth yourself:
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.Short answer: yes.  Do you want a copy?  (Folk-Leg may also still have
copies.)  BTW, hi there.  I'm planning to go to Columbus this year for
AFS, on (among other things) rumors of another fiddle panel). -- Aloha,
Lani< || > Lani Herrmann * [unmask] * (510) 237-7360
< || >      5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Wow but that took a long time!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:31:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(52 lines)


Balladeers --After six months of work, and another months of false starts using
FTP, Ballad Index Version 1.3 is finally ready!This version includes an update to both the software and the
text of the Index.The books newly added to this version include:(no author), _The Dime Song Book Number 2)
J. H. Cox, _Folk-Songs of the South_
J. S. Manifold, _The Penguin Australian Song Book_
Meredith/Covell/Brown, _Folk Songs of Australian, Volume 2_
  (the sort-of sequuel to Meredith/Anderson
John & Marcia Pankake, _A Prairie Home Companion Folk Song Book_
Steven Suanders and Deane L. Root, _The Music of Stephen C. Foster, Volume 2_Paul Stamler and I also did assorted recordingsWe now have 4095 traditional songs, known by 6992 titles.The software has been updated for all platforms, though I'm not
sure the new features under unix are worth the bother of downloading.The most noticeable update to the Mac version is greater stability.
There are other features, but they're too complicated to explain. :-(NOTE: The Ballad Index has *not* been tested under OS X; I don't have
  the OS X beta. Nor have I the knowledge to carbonize it. If anyone
  does want to try it under OS X, I'd be interested to hear the results.The most heavily updated version, however, is that for PC. I really
recommend this update for PC users. Noteworthy among its features:
The Page Up, Page Down, and arrow keys now work, and you don't have
to press ENTER after every command.I'm told that DOS functions have been curtailed under Windows ME.
I have had no opportunity to test this (and probably won't have
such an opportunity in the near future). Again, if someone has ME
and wants to test the Index, I'd be interested in the results.The web site for the Index is listed in the sig below.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Peter Kennedy info
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:04:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
in England?  You can reply to me off list.Thanks,  Amy--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:24:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
include the verse"If you go to Lowestoft
And ask for the Rising Sun,
There you'll find two old whores,
And my old woman's one."This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
in Britain, for a bordello.A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
transcribed as follows:    My woman got something, just like the rising sun
    My woman got something, like the rising sun
    You can never tell when the work is done    It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
    It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
    Need to worry about your rollin'
    because they're sure going wrong (?)    She got something round, and it looks like a bear
    She got something round, and it looks like a bear
    Sometime I wonder what in the hell is thereThis sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
in the Randolph Unprintable volume).How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Peter Kennedy info
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:24:35 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Peter's email is
[unmask]
or
[unmask]
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 2:04 PM
Subject: Peter Kennedy info> Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
> in England?  You can reply to me off list.
>
> Thanks,  Amy
>
> --
> Amy Davis
> Folklife Assistant
> Southern Folklife Collection
> UNC-Chapel Hill
> (919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:00:30 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'? I
have seen no previous reference to it.
Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
lines, although they are frankly sexual
Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
illegal!).
Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none of
them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that matter.
So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
Subject: Rising Sun> I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
> recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
> include the verse
>
> "If you go to Lowestoft
> And ask for the Rising Sun,
> There you'll find two old whores,
> And my old woman's one."
>
> This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
> the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
> in Britain, for a bordello.
>
> A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
> transcribed as follows:
>
>     My woman got something, just like the rising sun
>     My woman got something, like the rising sun
>     You can never tell when the work is done
>
>     It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>     It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>     Need to worry about your rollin'
>     because they're sure going wrong (?)
>
>     She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>     She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>     Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
>
> This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
> could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
> surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
> nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
> in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
>
> How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Peter Kennedy info
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:01:32 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Quoth Amy Davis:
> Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
> in England?  You can reply to me off list.        Yes, but not here at work; and I'm in the midst of a change
(e-mail, not terrestrial) bigtime.  (Anyway, your e-mail address didn't
show up in the headers I got!) Will try again later anyway. -- Aloha,
Lani< || > Lani Herrmann * [unmask] * (510) 237-7360
< || >      5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Okie Lit Crit
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Sep 2000 14:58:54 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


James N. Gregory's _American Exodus_ is a superlative history of the
Okie/Dust Bowl migration to California.  It contains a brilliant chapter
on the role of country music in the lives of those southwesterners
entitled "The Language of a Subculture."  Footnote 103 on page 294 quotes
a Kern County (Bakersfield) high school teacher straining to reconcile her
misconceptions of the Okies with the reality she discovered in the
classroom:"Complaining that they do not appreciate the classic adventure novels like
_Ivanhoe,_ she noted disparagingly that instead "like most primitives, my
subjects _like_ poetry, provided they can recognize it as such.  They come
from a ballad-loving race, of English and Scotch-Irish stock.  In the
tests for appreciation of poetry they show surprising soundness of
judgement [sic] and feeling for rhythm."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Legacy of B. Botkin
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2000 17:37:48 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


An ad came in today's mail for a conference on "American Folklore and
the Legacy of Benjamin Botkin," Feb. 1-3, 2001, at the University of
Nebraska - Linclon.  Further info can be had at their web site:
http://www.unl.edu/botkin/Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Okie Lit Crit
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:02:48 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(24 lines)


Folks:I sent this out on the 3rd, and may have missed it when it was posted.  If
so, and this then is a repeated message, forgive me.EdJames N. Gregory's _American Exodus_ is a superlative history of the
Okie/Dust Bowl migration to California.  It contains a brilliant chapter
on the role of country music in the lives of those southwesterners
entitled "The Language of a Subculture."  Footnote 103 on page 294 quotes
a Kern County (Bakersfield) high school teacher straining to reconcile her
misconceptions of the Okies with the reality she discovered in the
classroom:"Complaining that they do not appreciate the classic adventure novels like
_Ivanhoe,_ she noted disparagingly that instead "like most primitives, my
subjects _like_ poetry, provided they can recognize it as such.  They come
from a ballad-loving race, of English and Scotch-Irish stock.  In the
tests for appreciation of poetry they show surprising soundness of
judgement [sic] and feeling for rhythm."Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Seeking advice on ballad research (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:49:41 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(33 lines)


Good People:Beena is in India -- Kerala, if I recollect properly.  She was rebuffed by
academics when she asked about ballad studies on the UK ballad list.  They
were interested only in post-modernism, etc.Bruce, be nice to her.  And lets all send her encouragement in her
passion.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Beena Thomas <[unmask]>
To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Seeking advice on ballad researchDear Ed
Thanks so much for responding to my cry for help.And
thanks even more for sending me the address of another
great ballad group. This is really my lucky week.By
the way I'm very intrigued about these "out of the
mainstream adventures"!Thanks again for welcoming me to your group.
Best wishes
Beena__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Opps
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:54:45 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Andy:I inadvertantly, and carelessly insulted our colleagues on the UK ballad
list.  It was not they who rebuffed Beena of Kerala, but academics at
various institutions in Great Britain.  I should also note that in a
private e-mail to me Beena wrote that at least some of these English
English professors were apologetic, saying they knew nothing about
ballads.Which does say something about the woeful state of folklore studies in the
Academy, doesn't it?And why this list -- and that of our friends across the pond -- is so
important.  In the end, ironically, we amateurs may be the ones to keep
the study of folklore and folk song alive.  Just as we were the ones to
give it birth.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Opps
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:06:45 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


>...academics at
>various institutions in Great Britain.  I should also note that in a
>private e-mail to me Beena wrote that at least some of these English
>English professors were apologetic, saying they knew nothing about
>ballads.
>
>Which does say something about the woeful state of folklore studies in the
>Academy, doesn't it?
>
>And why this list -- and that of our friends across the pond -- is so
>important.  In the end, ironically, we amateurs may be the ones to keep
>the study of folklore and folk song alive.  Just as we were the ones to
>give it birth.John Cowley comes to mind - a born professor, I think, but not
employed by an academic institution.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Bull" Martin
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Louis "Bull" Martin; who shot and killed Ella Cherwith(?) Speed on
September 3, 1894, in the French Quarter of New Orleans (an event that
lives on in the ballad "Ella Speed"), was convicted of manslaughter in May,
1895, and sentenced to 20 years in the state penitentiary; was back at his
job as a bartender at Trauth's saloon at the Dryades Market in time to
have an entry in Soard's New Orleans City Directory of 1901.  Ella Speed's
"landlady," Miss Pauline Jones, was still in business, though not at the
same location.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Modicum of Respect
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:29:28 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(75 lines)


Folks:Note the item below, forwarded by a history list I am on.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:58:09 -0400
From: Kriste Lindenmeyer <[unmask]>
Reply-To: H-Net Gilded Age and Progressive Era List <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Weekend Digest I, September 16, 2000**********************************************
1. Storytelling in the Millennium (Baylor U Conference on Narrative, Spring
2001)
Location: Texas, United States
Call for Papers Deadline: 2001-02-09Finding Meaning through Narrative
after Post-ModernismDepartment of English,
Baylor University
Co-Sponsored by the Baylor Institute for Oral History
Waco, Texas, 9-10 February 2001How is meaning found and transmitted through narrative, through
story-telling, in the wake of the post-modern project? How has storytelling
in the past as well as the present changed and developed, responding to the
loss of metanarratives that inform and define human culture?Keynote Speaker:
Scott Russell Sanders, Distinguished Professor of English and Director of
the Wells Scholars Program at Indiana University at Bloomington, author of
eight fiction works, including The Invisible Company, Fetching the Dead,
and Wonders Hidden; nonfiction works (nine) include Writing from the
Center, Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World, and Hunting for
Hope. He has also written several children's books, and his writing appears
in Harper's, the New York Times, and Best American Essays among many other
publications. His writings especially address our relation to nature,
issues of social justice, the character of community, and the impact of
science on our lives.Possible paper and/or panel topics:
Finding a language: Creating Universality through Narrative without a
Common Myth * Moral Formation and Storytelling * Telling Old Stories in New
Ways * Telling the Stories of our Lives * Meaning after Post-Modernism in
the Stories Poems Tell * Reclaiming the American Oral Tradition * Effects
on National or Global Culture(s) of the Loss of Metanarratives * Spiritual
Journeys in Narrative * Local and Regional Histories * Binding the
Generations through Storytelling * Storytelling and the Changing Canon *
The Changing Text: Intersections of Narrative with Technology * The Child's
Voice in Narrative * The Fantastic: Fairy Tales, Science Fiction, Magical
Realism, and Narrative * Popular Culture, Technology, and the Stories We
Tell * Education: Deconstructed Literature and the Post-Modern Student *
Critical Approaches to Narrative after Post-Modernism * Narrative Form and
the Transmission of Meaning * Narrating Faith in a Post-Modern Culture *
Narrative and the Importance of PlaceMail or email abstracts (50-100 words) of papers suitable for a 20 minute
presentation and/or panel proposals no later than 15 October 2000. Send to
Rebecca Munro at the address below.Contact information:
c/o Rebecca Munro
Baylor Department of English
Box 97404
Waco, Texas 76798-7404Email:  [unmask]Call for Papers website:
http://www.baylor.edu/~narrative2001

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: House of the Rising Sun
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:10:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Hi folks:This appeared on the folkdj-l list, posted by Ron Mura:Peace.
PaulThere's a good AP article on the history of this song being carried by
various newspapers.  One link:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000916/aponline113406_000.ht
m

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Swift's Poems
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:42:11 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


James Woolley of Lafayette College, Easton, PA, has contacted me about
Swift's poems. If anyone can help can they please contact him direct on
[unmask]"I'm editing the poems of Jonathan Swift and therefore trying to keep track
of poems by him and attributed to him. Some of these --not many but maybe
two or three dozen--were political ballads and often published as
broadsides. The period I'm interested in is 1660-1800--I go back that far
because some 17c. works have been mis-attributed to Swift. I would of
course be interested in finding manuscript texts as well".

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: The Ballad of the South Coast
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:50:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(116 lines)


"South Coast" has been recorded often and continues in the
repertoires of active singers like Ramblin' Jack Elliot.  As recorded
by Terry Gilkyson and the Easy Riders, it is credited to Lillian Bos
Ross, Sam Eskin, Richard Dehr, and Frank Miller.  On the basis of the
material below, I believe that the words and music are by Ross and
that the others (the Easy Riders) are credited only because they
claim an arrangement.Lillian Bos Ross, a California novelist, wrote "The Ballad of the
South Coast" under the pseudonym "Shanagolden" and deposited her song
in the copyright office Library of Congress.  Joe Hickerson retrieved
a copy for me some years ago.  That deposit is undated, but a deposit
of a second song she wrote, "Year of Yarrow," from the same source,
is stamped SEP 11 1946.  The assumption that these materials were
deposited at the same time dates "South Coast," tentatively.
(Actually, if the numbers on the deposits mean something, "South
Coast" may have substantially post-dated "Year of Yarrow" - the
latter bears the number 41844 while the former is 251782.)  "Year of
Yarrow" has words by Lillian Bos Ross and music by Sam Eskin, so
there was an Eskin-Ross connection as early as 1946.  However, the
deposited sheet for "The Ballad of the South Coast" credits
"Shanagolden" only (implying words and music)."South Coast" refers to the region of the Big Sur.  The town of Jolon
still exists.Here are the words as they appear in the Digital Tradition.>  THE SOUTH COAST
>  (Lillian Bos Ross, Sam Eskin, Richard Dehr & Frank Miller)
>
>  My name is Lonhano de Castro
>  My father was a Spanish Grandee
>  But I won my wife in a card game
>  To hell with those lords o'er the sea
>
>          Well the South Coast is a wild coast and lonely
>          You might win in a game at Cholon
>          But a lion still rules the Barranca
>          And a man there is always alone
>
>  I played in a card game at Holon
>  I played with an outlaw named Juan
>  And after I'd taken his money
>  I staked all against his daughter Dawn
>
>  I picked up the ace ... I had won her
>  My heart it was down at my feet
>  Jumped up to my throat in a hurry
>  Like a young summer's day she was sweet.
>
>  He opened the door to the kitchen
>  And he called the girl out with a curse
>  Saying "Take her, Goddamn her, you've won her
>  She's yours now for better or worse"
>
>  Her arms had to tighten around me
>  As we rode down the hills to the south
>  Not a word did I hear from her that day
>  Nor a kiss from her pretty young mouth
>
>  But that was a gay happy winter
>  We carved on a cradle of pine
>  By the fire in that neat little cabin
>  And I sang with that gay wife of mine.
>
>  That night I got hurt in a landslide
>  Crushed hip and twice broken bone
>  She saddled her pony like lightning
>  And rode off for the doctor in Cholon
>
>  The lion screamed in the Barranca
>  Buck, he bolted and he fell on his side
>  My young wife lay dead in the moonlight
>  My heart died that night with my bride
>
>  Copyright Blackwood Music
>  recorded by Ramblin' Jack Elliott on "Ramblin' Jack Elliott" (1961)
>  and by Arlo Guthrie on "Son Of The Wind" (1991)
>  @gambler @wife @love
>  filename[ SOUTHCST
>  MJ"Shanagolden"'s original version opens:My name is Lonjano de Castro,
My father was a Spanish grandee;
But I won my wife in a card game -
To hell with those lords o'er the sea.The song has 12 verses.  Although the music has the chorus after the
first verse, the pattern for the rest of the song has it after every
three verses, so I think that "Shanagolden" intended for the chorus
to be sung after the first three verses and after each subsequent set
of three verses.Here are the second and third verses and chorus.  These verses (and
some of the later ones) do not appear to have survived in popular
recordings.In my youth I had a Monterey homestead,
Creeks, valleys, and mountains all mine;
I built me a snug little shanty
And I roofed it and floored it with pine.I had a bronco, a buckskin -
Like a bird he flew over the trail;
I rode him out forty miles every Friday
Just to get me some grub and some mail.   But the South Coast's a wild coast and lonely,
   You might win at a game at Jolon;
   But the lion still rules the barranca
   And a man there is always alone.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: The Ballad of the South Coast
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:50:09 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


John:I heard this in Santa Monica and Topanga ca. 1949-1950, among the
folkniks.  Quite popular.  So your dating is not far off.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FW: Job Announcement (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:51:25 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(70 lines)


This might be of interest to some subscribers --Ed-----Original Message-----
From: [unmask] [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of reaten
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 7:48 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Job AnnouncementSeptember 25, 2000Dear Colleague:        The Archives of Traditional Music is at an important juncture in
its half-century history.  We are looking for a new director to help
direct this leading institution of ethnographic sound and video recordings
through the fast-paced technological changes that are emerging. Indiana
University is one of the leading universities in developing computing
technologies.The director will simultaneously be a faculty member of the newly formed
Ethnomusicology Institute within the Department of Folklore and
Ethnomusicology.  He or she will also be considered for the Laura Boulton
Professorship, a newly established position made possible by the
generosity of the Boulton Endowment to Indiana University.        I urge you to help us find the very best candidates possible for
this position, which will have an impact on all of us who conduct research
in the field of ethnomusicology.  We encourage nominations or
self-nominations and will be interviewing at the meetings in Toronto,
November 1-5.        Enclosed please find the job ad for this position, which I
encourage you to share with your colleagues.Sincerely,Ruth M. Stone, Chair
Search and Screen Committee_________________________________________________________________The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University, the largest
university-based ethnographic sound archives in the United States, is
searching for a Director to begin July 1, 2001. The Director, will hold a
faculty appointment (rank open) and teach half-time in the Department of
Folklore and Ethnomusicology and will be considered for the Laura Boulton
Professorship, an endowed position providing research support.  Area of
specialization within ethnomusicology is open; Ph.D. and relevant
experience required. The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University
(http://www.indiana.edu/~libarchm/) houses a rich collection of music,
oral history, linguistic data, interviews with rhythm and blues artists,
and early jazz discs.  Videotapes, photographs, and manuscripts complement
the audio recordings.  Review of applications will begin November 1, 2000
and will remain open until the position is filled.  Letters of
application, including curriculum vitae, and three letters of
recommendation should be sent to the Search and Screen Committee, Archives
of Traditional Music, Morrison Hall 117, Indiana University, Indiana
University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.  Indiana University is an equal
opportunity and affirmative action employer.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Liner Notes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:53:31 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


Folks:Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:37:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.
>
> EdOddly enough, Ed, I have them. I'll mail you a copy on Monday, if that's
soon enough for you.
        Sandy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:47:11 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


Ed- Why not just contact Sandy Paton at Folk-Legacy? 860/364-5661On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:46:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Ed,Just FYI, if you're needing more information, we have Archie Green's
manuscripts here at the Southern Folklife Collection, which include 40-some
folders of correspondence, research notes, discography etc. for Sara Ogan
Gunning.  You can view an online finding aid at
http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/g/Green,Archie .
best,
Amy Davis--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:43:29 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Quoth yourself:
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.Short answer: yes.  Do you want a copy?  (Folk-Leg may also still have
copies.)  BTW, hi there.  I'm planning to go to Columbus this year for
AFS, on (among other things) rumors of another fiddle panel). -- Aloha,
Lani< || > Lani Herrmann * [unmask] * (510) 237-7360
< || >      5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Wow but that took a long time!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:31:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(52 lines)


Balladeers --After six months of work, and another months of false starts using
FTP, Ballad Index Version 1.3 is finally ready!This version includes an update to both the software and the
text of the Index.The books newly added to this version include:(no author), _The Dime Song Book Number 2)
J. H. Cox, _Folk-Songs of the South_
J. S. Manifold, _The Penguin Australian Song Book_
Meredith/Covell/Brown, _Folk Songs of Australian, Volume 2_
  (the sort-of sequuel to Meredith/Anderson
John & Marcia Pankake, _A Prairie Home Companion Folk Song Book_
Steven Suanders and Deane L. Root, _The Music of Stephen C. Foster, Volume 2_Paul Stamler and I also did assorted recordingsWe now have 4095 traditional songs, known by 6992 titles.The software has been updated for all platforms, though I'm not
sure the new features under unix are worth the bother of downloading.The most noticeable update to the Mac version is greater stability.
There are other features, but they're too complicated to explain. :-(NOTE: The Ballad Index has *not* been tested under OS X; I don't have
  the OS X beta. Nor have I the knowledge to carbonize it. If anyone
  does want to try it under OS X, I'd be interested to hear the results.The most heavily updated version, however, is that for PC. I really
recommend this update for PC users. Noteworthy among its features:
The Page Up, Page Down, and arrow keys now work, and you don't have
to press ENTER after every command.I'm told that DOS functions have been curtailed under Windows ME.
I have had no opportunity to test this (and probably won't have
such an opportunity in the near future). Again, if someone has ME
and wants to test the Index, I'd be interested in the results.The web site for the Index is listed in the sig below.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Peter Kennedy info
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:04:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
in England?  You can reply to me off list.Thanks,  Amy--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:24:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
include the verse"If you go to Lowestoft
And ask for the Rising Sun,
There you'll find two old whores,
And my old woman's one."This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
in Britain, for a bordello.A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
transcribed as follows:    My woman got something, just like the rising sun
    My woman got something, like the rising sun
    You can never tell when the work is done    It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
    It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
    Need to worry about your rollin'
    because they're sure going wrong (?)    She got something round, and it looks like a bear
    She got something round, and it looks like a bear
    Sometime I wonder what in the hell is thereThis sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
in the Randolph Unprintable volume).How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Peter Kennedy info
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:24:35 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Peter's email is
[unmask]
or
[unmask]
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 2:04 PM
Subject: Peter Kennedy info> Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
> in England?  You can reply to me off list.
>
> Thanks,  Amy
>
> --
> Amy Davis
> Folklife Assistant
> Southern Folklife Collection
> UNC-Chapel Hill
> (919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:00:30 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'? I
have seen no previous reference to it.
Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
lines, although they are frankly sexual
Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
illegal!).
Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none of
them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that matter.
So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
Subject: Rising Sun> I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
> recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
> include the verse
>
> "If you go to Lowestoft
> And ask for the Rising Sun,
> There you'll find two old whores,
> And my old woman's one."
>
> This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
> the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
> in Britain, for a bordello.
>
> A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
> transcribed as follows:
>
>     My woman got something, just like the rising sun
>     My woman got something, like the rising sun
>     You can never tell when the work is done
>
>     It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>     It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>     Need to worry about your rollin'
>     because they're sure going wrong (?)
>
>     She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>     She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>     Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
>
> This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
> could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
> surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
> nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
> in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
>
> How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Peter Kennedy info
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:01:32 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Quoth Amy Davis:
> Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
> in England?  You can reply to me off list.        Yes, but not here at work; and I'm in the midst of a change
(e-mail, not terrestrial) bigtime.  (Anyway, your e-mail address didn't
show up in the headers I got!) Will try again later anyway. -- Aloha,
Lani< || > Lani Herrmann * [unmask] * (510) 237-7360
< || >      5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Okie Lit Crit
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 3 Sep 2000 14:58:54 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


James N. Gregory's _American Exodus_ is a superlative history of the
Okie/Dust Bowl migration to California.  It contains a brilliant chapter
on the role of country music in the lives of those southwesterners
entitled "The Language of a Subculture."  Footnote 103 on page 294 quotes
a Kern County (Bakersfield) high school teacher straining to reconcile her
misconceptions of the Okies with the reality she discovered in the
classroom:"Complaining that they do not appreciate the classic adventure novels like
_Ivanhoe,_ she noted disparagingly that instead "like most primitives, my
subjects _like_ poetry, provided they can recognize it as such.  They come
from a ballad-loving race, of English and Scotch-Irish stock.  In the
tests for appreciation of poetry they show surprising soundness of
judgement [sic] and feeling for rhythm."Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Legacy of B. Botkin
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2000 17:37:48 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


An ad came in today's mail for a conference on "American Folklore and
the Legacy of Benjamin Botkin," Feb. 1-3, 2001, at the University of
Nebraska - Linclon.  Further info can be had at their web site:
http://www.unl.edu/botkin/Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Okie Lit Crit
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2000 15:02:48 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(24 lines)


Folks:I sent this out on the 3rd, and may have missed it when it was posted.  If
so, and this then is a repeated message, forgive me.EdJames N. Gregory's _American Exodus_ is a superlative history of the
Okie/Dust Bowl migration to California.  It contains a brilliant chapter
on the role of country music in the lives of those southwesterners
entitled "The Language of a Subculture."  Footnote 103 on page 294 quotes
a Kern County (Bakersfield) high school teacher straining to reconcile her
misconceptions of the Okies with the reality she discovered in the
classroom:"Complaining that they do not appreciate the classic adventure novels like
_Ivanhoe,_ she noted disparagingly that instead "like most primitives, my
subjects _like_ poetry, provided they can recognize it as such.  They come
from a ballad-loving race, of English and Scotch-Irish stock.  In the
tests for appreciation of poetry they show surprising soundness of
judgement [sic] and feeling for rhythm."Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Seeking advice on ballad research (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:49:41 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(33 lines)


Good People:Beena is in India -- Kerala, if I recollect properly.  She was rebuffed by
academics when she asked about ballad studies on the UK ballad list.  They
were interested only in post-modernism, etc.Bruce, be nice to her.  And lets all send her encouragement in her
passion.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Beena Thomas <[unmask]>
To: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Subject: Re: Seeking advice on ballad researchDear Ed
Thanks so much for responding to my cry for help.And
thanks even more for sending me the address of another
great ballad group. This is really my lucky week.By
the way I'm very intrigued about these "out of the
mainstream adventures"!Thanks again for welcoming me to your group.
Best wishes
Beena__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Opps
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:54:45 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(18 lines)


Andy:I inadvertantly, and carelessly insulted our colleagues on the UK ballad
list.  It was not they who rebuffed Beena of Kerala, but academics at
various institutions in Great Britain.  I should also note that in a
private e-mail to me Beena wrote that at least some of these English
English professors were apologetic, saying they knew nothing about
ballads.Which does say something about the woeful state of folklore studies in the
Academy, doesn't it?And why this list -- and that of our friends across the pond -- is so
important.  In the end, ironically, we amateurs may be the ones to keep
the study of folklore and folk song alive.  Just as we were the ones to
give it birth.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Opps
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 8 Sep 2000 11:06:45 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


>...academics at
>various institutions in Great Britain.  I should also note that in a
>private e-mail to me Beena wrote that at least some of these English
>English professors were apologetic, saying they knew nothing about
>ballads.
>
>Which does say something about the woeful state of folklore studies in the
>Academy, doesn't it?
>
>And why this list -- and that of our friends across the pond -- is so
>important.  In the end, ironically, we amateurs may be the ones to keep
>the study of folklore and folk song alive.  Just as we were the ones to
>give it birth.John Cowley comes to mind - a born professor, I think, but not
employed by an academic institution.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: "Bull" Martin
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Louis "Bull" Martin; who shot and killed Ella Cherwith(?) Speed on
September 3, 1894, in the French Quarter of New Orleans (an event that
lives on in the ballad "Ella Speed"), was convicted of manslaughter in May,
1895, and sentenced to 20 years in the state penitentiary; was back at his
job as a bartender at Trauth's saloon at the Dryades Market in time to
have an entry in Soard's New Orleans City Directory of 1901.  Ella Speed's
"landlady," Miss Pauline Jones, was still in business, though not at the
same location.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Modicum of Respect
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:29:28 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(75 lines)


Folks:Note the item below, forwarded by a history list I am on.Ed---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:58:09 -0400
From: Kriste Lindenmeyer <[unmask]>
Reply-To: H-Net Gilded Age and Progressive Era List <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Weekend Digest I, September 16, 2000**********************************************
1. Storytelling in the Millennium (Baylor U Conference on Narrative, Spring
2001)
Location: Texas, United States
Call for Papers Deadline: 2001-02-09Finding Meaning through Narrative
after Post-ModernismDepartment of English,
Baylor University
Co-Sponsored by the Baylor Institute for Oral History
Waco, Texas, 9-10 February 2001How is meaning found and transmitted through narrative, through
story-telling, in the wake of the post-modern project? How has storytelling
in the past as well as the present changed and developed, responding to the
loss of metanarratives that inform and define human culture?Keynote Speaker:
Scott Russell Sanders, Distinguished Professor of English and Director of
the Wells Scholars Program at Indiana University at Bloomington, author of
eight fiction works, including The Invisible Company, Fetching the Dead,
and Wonders Hidden; nonfiction works (nine) include Writing from the
Center, Staying Put: Making a Home in a Restless World, and Hunting for
Hope. He has also written several children's books, and his writing appears
in Harper's, the New York Times, and Best American Essays among many other
publications. His writings especially address our relation to nature,
issues of social justice, the character of community, and the impact of
science on our lives.Possible paper and/or panel topics:
Finding a language: Creating Universality through Narrative without a
Common Myth * Moral Formation and Storytelling * Telling Old Stories in New
Ways * Telling the Stories of our Lives * Meaning after Post-Modernism in
the Stories Poems Tell * Reclaiming the American Oral Tradition * Effects
on National or Global Culture(s) of the Loss of Metanarratives * Spiritual
Journeys in Narrative * Local and Regional Histories * Binding the
Generations through Storytelling * Storytelling and the Changing Canon *
The Changing Text: Intersections of Narrative with Technology * The Child's
Voice in Narrative * The Fantastic: Fairy Tales, Science Fiction, Magical
Realism, and Narrative * Popular Culture, Technology, and the Stories We
Tell * Education: Deconstructed Literature and the Post-Modern Student *
Critical Approaches to Narrative after Post-Modernism * Narrative Form and
the Transmission of Meaning * Narrating Faith in a Post-Modern Culture *
Narrative and the Importance of PlaceMail or email abstracts (50-100 words) of papers suitable for a 20 minute
presentation and/or panel proposals no later than 15 October 2000. Send to
Rebecca Munro at the address below.Contact information:
c/o Rebecca Munro
Baylor Department of English
Box 97404
Waco, Texas 76798-7404Email:  [unmask]Call for Papers website:
http://www.baylor.edu/~narrative2001

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: House of the Rising Sun
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:10:52 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Hi folks:This appeared on the folkdj-l list, posted by Ron Mura:Peace.
PaulThere's a good AP article on the history of this song being carried by
various newspapers.  One link:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20000916/aponline113406_000.ht
m

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Swift's Poems
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:42:11 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


James Woolley of Lafayette College, Easton, PA, has contacted me about
Swift's poems. If anyone can help can they please contact him direct on
[unmask]"I'm editing the poems of Jonathan Swift and therefore trying to keep track
of poems by him and attributed to him. Some of these --not many but maybe
two or three dozen--were political ballads and often published as
broadsides. The period I'm interested in is 1660-1800--I go back that far
because some 17c. works have been mis-attributed to Swift. I would of
course be interested in finding manuscript texts as well".

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: The Ballad of the South Coast
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:50:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(116 lines)


"South Coast" has been recorded often and continues in the
repertoires of active singers like Ramblin' Jack Elliot.  As recorded
by Terry Gilkyson and the Easy Riders, it is credited to Lillian Bos
Ross, Sam Eskin, Richard Dehr, and Frank Miller.  On the basis of the
material below, I believe that the words and music are by Ross and
that the others (the Easy Riders) are credited only because they
claim an arrangement.Lillian Bos Ross, a California novelist, wrote "The Ballad of the
South Coast" under the pseudonym "Shanagolden" and deposited her song
in the copyright office Library of Congress.  Joe Hickerson retrieved
a copy for me some years ago.  That deposit is undated, but a deposit
of a second song she wrote, "Year of Yarrow," from the same source,
is stamped SEP 11 1946.  The assumption that these materials were
deposited at the same time dates "South Coast," tentatively.
(Actually, if the numbers on the deposits mean something, "South
Coast" may have substantially post-dated "Year of Yarrow" - the
latter bears the number 41844 while the former is 251782.)  "Year of
Yarrow" has words by Lillian Bos Ross and music by Sam Eskin, so
there was an Eskin-Ross connection as early as 1946.  However, the
deposited sheet for "The Ballad of the South Coast" credits
"Shanagolden" only (implying words and music)."South Coast" refers to the region of the Big Sur.  The town of Jolon
still exists.Here are the words as they appear in the Digital Tradition.>  THE SOUTH COAST
>  (Lillian Bos Ross, Sam Eskin, Richard Dehr & Frank Miller)
>
>  My name is Lonhano de Castro
>  My father was a Spanish Grandee
>  But I won my wife in a card game
>  To hell with those lords o'er the sea
>
>          Well the South Coast is a wild coast and lonely
>          You might win in a game at Cholon
>          But a lion still rules the Barranca
>          And a man there is always alone
>
>  I played in a card game at Holon
>  I played with an outlaw named Juan
>  And after I'd taken his money
>  I staked all against his daughter Dawn
>
>  I picked up the ace ... I had won her
>  My heart it was down at my feet
>  Jumped up to my throat in a hurry
>  Like a young summer's day she was sweet.
>
>  He opened the door to the kitchen
>  And he called the girl out with a curse
>  Saying "Take her, Goddamn her, you've won her
>  She's yours now for better or worse"
>
>  Her arms had to tighten around me
>  As we rode down the hills to the south
>  Not a word did I hear from her that day
>  Nor a kiss from her pretty young mouth
>
>  But that was a gay happy winter
>  We carved on a cradle of pine
>  By the fire in that neat little cabin
>  And I sang with that gay wife of mine.
>
>  That night I got hurt in a landslide
>  Crushed hip and twice broken bone
>  She saddled her pony like lightning
>  And rode off for the doctor in Cholon
>
>  The lion screamed in the Barranca
>  Buck, he bolted and he fell on his side
>  My young wife lay dead in the moonlight
>  My heart died that night with my bride
>
>  Copyright Blackwood Music
>  recorded by Ramblin' Jack Elliott on "Ramblin' Jack Elliott" (1961)
>  and by Arlo Guthrie on "Son Of The Wind" (1991)
>  @gambler @wife @love
>  filename[ SOUTHCST
>  MJ"Shanagolden"'s original version opens:My name is Lonjano de Castro,
My father was a Spanish grandee;
But I won my wife in a card game -
To hell with those lords o'er the sea.The song has 12 verses.  Although the music has the chorus after the
first verse, the pattern for the rest of the song has it after every
three verses, so I think that "Shanagolden" intended for the chorus
to be sung after the first three verses and after each subsequent set
of three verses.Here are the second and third verses and chorus.  These verses (and
some of the later ones) do not appear to have survived in popular
recordings.In my youth I had a Monterey homestead,
Creeks, valleys, and mountains all mine;
I built me a snug little shanty
And I roofed it and floored it with pine.I had a bronco, a buckskin -
Like a bird he flew over the trail;
I rode him out forty miles every Friday
Just to get me some grub and some mail.   But the South Coast's a wild coast and lonely,
   You might win at a game at Jolon;
   But the lion still rules the barranca
   And a man there is always alone.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: The Ballad of the South Coast
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 12:50:09 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(6 lines)


John:I heard this in Santa Monica and Topanga ca. 1949-1950, among the
folkniks.  Quite popular.  So your dating is not far off.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FW: Job Announcement (fwd)
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000 14:51:25 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(70 lines)


This might be of interest to some subscribers --Ed-----Original Message-----
From: [unmask] [mailto:[unmask]]On
Behalf Of reaten
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 7:48 AM
To: [unmask]
Subject: Job AnnouncementSeptember 25, 2000Dear Colleague:        The Archives of Traditional Music is at an important juncture in
its half-century history.  We are looking for a new director to help
direct this leading institution of ethnographic sound and video recordings
through the fast-paced technological changes that are emerging. Indiana
University is one of the leading universities in developing computing
technologies.The director will simultaneously be a faculty member of the newly formed
Ethnomusicology Institute within the Department of Folklore and
Ethnomusicology.  He or she will also be considered for the Laura Boulton
Professorship, a newly established position made possible by the
generosity of the Boulton Endowment to Indiana University.        I urge you to help us find the very best candidates possible for
this position, which will have an impact on all of us who conduct research
in the field of ethnomusicology.  We encourage nominations or
self-nominations and will be interviewing at the meetings in Toronto,
November 1-5.        Enclosed please find the job ad for this position, which I
encourage you to share with your colleagues.Sincerely,Ruth M. Stone, Chair
Search and Screen Committee_________________________________________________________________The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University, the largest
university-based ethnographic sound archives in the United States, is
searching for a Director to begin July 1, 2001. The Director, will hold a
faculty appointment (rank open) and teach half-time in the Department of
Folklore and Ethnomusicology and will be considered for the Laura Boulton
Professorship, an endowed position providing research support.  Area of
specialization within ethnomusicology is open; Ph.D. and relevant
experience required. The Archives of Traditional Music at Indiana University
(http://www.indiana.edu/~libarchm/) houses a rich collection of music,
oral history, linguistic data, interviews with rhythm and blues artists,
and early jazz discs.  Videotapes, photographs, and manuscripts complement
the audio recordings.  Review of applications will begin November 1, 2000
and will remain open until the position is filled.  Letters of
application, including curriculum vitae, and three letters of
recommendation should be sent to the Search and Screen Committee, Archives
of Traditional Music, Morrison Hall 117, Indiana University, Indiana
University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.  Indiana University is an equal
opportunity and affirmative action employer.

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Liner Notes
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:53:31 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


Folks:Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.Ed

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Sandy Paton <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:37:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:
>
> Folks:
>
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.
>
> EdOddly enough, Ed, I have them. I'll mail you a copy on Monday, if that's
soon enough for you.
        Sandy

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:47:11 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


Ed- Why not just contact Sandy Paton at Folk-Legacy? 860/364-5661On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Folks:
>
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:46:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Ed,Just FYI, if you're needing more information, we have Archie Green's
manuscripts here at the Southern Folklife Collection, which include 40-some
folders of correspondence, research notes, discography etc. for Sara Ogan
Gunning.  You can view an online finding aid at
http://www.lib.unc.edu/mss/inv/g/Green,Archie .
best,
Amy Davis--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Liner Notes
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 25 Sep 2000 09:43:29 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


Quoth yourself:
> Does anyone have Archie Green's notes to Sara Ogan Gunning (Folk Legacy
> 26)?  I need to see just how Archie handled the question of Communists
> appropriating songs and singers during the Popular Front Era.Short answer: yes.  Do you want a copy?  (Folk-Leg may also still have
copies.)  BTW, hi there.  I'm planning to go to Columbus this year for
AFS, on (among other things) rumors of another fiddle panel). -- Aloha,
Lani< || > Lani Herrmann * [unmask] * (510) 237-7360
< || >      5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Wow but that took a long time!
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:31:32 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(52 lines)


Balladeers --After six months of work, and another months of false starts using
FTP, Ballad Index Version 1.3 is finally ready!This version includes an update to both the software and the
text of the Index.The books newly added to this version include:(no author), _The Dime Song Book Number 2)
J. H. Cox, _Folk-Songs of the South_
J. S. Manifold, _The Penguin Australian Song Book_
Meredith/Covell/Brown, _Folk Songs of Australian, Volume 2_
  (the sort-of sequuel to Meredith/Anderson
John & Marcia Pankake, _A Prairie Home Companion Folk Song Book_
Steven Suanders and Deane L. Root, _The Music of Stephen C. Foster, Volume 2_Paul Stamler and I also did assorted recordingsWe now have 4095 traditional songs, known by 6992 titles.The software has been updated for all platforms, though I'm not
sure the new features under unix are worth the bother of downloading.The most noticeable update to the Mac version is greater stability.
There are other features, but they're too complicated to explain. :-(NOTE: The Ballad Index has *not* been tested under OS X; I don't have
  the OS X beta. Nor have I the knowledge to carbonize it. If anyone
  does want to try it under OS X, I'd be interested to hear the results.The most heavily updated version, however, is that for PC. I really
recommend this update for PC users. Noteworthy among its features:
The Page Up, Page Down, and arrow keys now work, and you don't have
to press ENTER after every command.I'm told that DOS functions have been curtailed under Windows ME.
I have had no opportunity to test this (and probably won't have
such an opportunity in the near future). Again, if someone has ME
and wants to test the Index, I'd be interested in the results.The web site for the Index is listed in the sig below.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Peter Kennedy info
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:04:30 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
in England?  You can reply to me off list.Thanks,  Amy--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:24:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
include the verse"If you go to Lowestoft
And ask for the Rising Sun,
There you'll find two old whores,
And my old woman's one."This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
in Britain, for a bordello.A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
transcribed as follows:    My woman got something, just like the rising sun
    My woman got something, like the rising sun
    You can never tell when the work is done    It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
    It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
    Need to worry about your rollin'
    because they're sure going wrong (?)    She got something round, and it looks like a bear
    She got something round, and it looks like a bear
    Sometime I wonder what in the hell is thereThis sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
in the Randolph Unprintable volume).How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Peter Kennedy info
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:24:35 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(24 lines)


Peter's email is
[unmask]
or
[unmask]
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 2:04 PM
Subject: Peter Kennedy info> Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
> in England?  You can reply to me off list.
>
> Thanks,  Amy
>
> --
> Amy Davis
> Folklife Assistant
> Southern Folklife Collection
> UNC-Chapel Hill
> (919) 962-1345

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:00:30 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'? I
have seen no previous reference to it.
Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
lines, although they are frankly sexual
Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
illegal!).
Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none of
them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that matter.
So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
Subject: Rising Sun> I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
> recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
> include the verse
>
> "If you go to Lowestoft
> And ask for the Rising Sun,
> There you'll find two old whores,
> And my old woman's one."
>
> This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
> the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
> in Britain, for a bordello.
>
> A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
> transcribed as follows:
>
>     My woman got something, just like the rising sun
>     My woman got something, like the rising sun
>     You can never tell when the work is done
>
>     It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>     It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>     Need to worry about your rollin'
>     because they're sure going wrong (?)
>
>     She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>     She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>     Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
>
> This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
> could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
> surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
> nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
> in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
>
> How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Peter Kennedy info
From: Cal Herrmann <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 16:01:32 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Quoth Amy Davis:
> Do any of you ballad-l folks have contact information for Peter Kennedy
> in England?  You can reply to me off list.        Yes, but not here at work; and I'm in the midst of a change
(e-mail, not terrestrial) bigtime.  (Anyway, your e-mail address didn't
show up in the headers I got!) Will try again later anyway. -- Aloha,
Lani< || > Lani Herrmann * [unmask] * (510) 237-7360
< || >      5621 Sierra Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805

Original Message:

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 13:08:43 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(88 lines)


>Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'? I
>have seen no previous reference to it.I was skeptical of the existence of this, based on a recollection of
someone's sharp challenge to vague, undocumented stories about "Rising
Sun" songs in Britain, but Ted Anthony (author of a recent AP article
on "House of the Rising Sun" tells me that he has a copy of the
original field recording.  Thanks, Ted, for the following>I have the recording on a CD in New York, made for me by the Alan Lomax
>Archives in Manhattan, and I have heard it. I also have a transcript of it
>made shortly after the recording. In it, Cox sings "She Was a Rum One," and
>when he's done, Lomax says something to the effect of, "There's another way
>to start that song, isn't there, Harry?" Cox replies with the Rising Sun
>verse (in a very thick accent, even thicker than when he's singing).This leads me to believe that one can obtain a copy in the same way that
Ted did.>Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
>Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
>lines, although they are frankly sexual
>Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
>English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
>recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
>illegal!).
>Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none of
>them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that matter.
>So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
>Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
>should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!Since my post, I, too, have been checking slang dictionaries (on
line).  I found the following.A WWW site, http://lugnutz.com/slang.htm, identifies "visiting the
land of the rising sun" with "having sex with a menstruating woman.">Steve Roud
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: John Garst <[unmask]>
>To: <[unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
>Subject: Rising Sun
>
>
>>  I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
>>  recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
>>  include the verse
>>
>>  "If you go to Lowestoft
>>  And ask for the Rising Sun,
>>  There you'll find two old whores,
>>  And my old woman's one."
>>
>>  This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
>>  the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
>>  in Britain, for a bordello.
>>
>>  A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
>>  transcribed as follows:
>>
>>      My woman got something, just like the rising sun
>>      My woman got something, like the rising sun
>>      You can never tell when the work is done
>>
>>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
>>      Need to worry about your rollin'
>>      because they're sure going wrong (?)
>>
>>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
>>      Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
>>
>>  This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
>>  could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
>>  surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
>>  nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
>>  in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
>>
>>  How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
>>  --
>>  john garst    [unmask]--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 19:48:17 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(129 lines)


John
Thanks for confirming the Harry Cox song - I look forward to hearing it
sometime. Harry was one of my favourite singers, and it's comforting to know
that there is material still out there which I haven't yet heard. It gives
me something to look forward to, like learning that a previously unknown
book by a favourite author has just been published. Incidentally, Topic
Records are issuing a new double CD of Harry in November, with lots of
previously unpublished songs on it.As for the slang site you found - very interesting in its own right but
hardly admissible as evidence in this case, because:1.    Lomax recorded Harry Cox in East Anglia in the early 1950s. Assuming
that Harry hadn't just learnt the verse in question, let's say he knew it
fifty years ago. He was born in 1885, so let's say he could have learnt the
verse up to 100 years ago.
2.    The slang website (as is usual) gives little information about
who/what/when produced it, but from its content I think we're safe to assume
that it's American, and recent. Let's at least assume also that the
compilers haven't simply made up their entries and that the items do have
some real currency in their community.
3.    But can we accept a present-day American 'Modern Street Slang' usage
as evidence for a meaning in a verse sung by an East Anglian farmworker
between 50 and 100 years ago?My scepticism remains undented.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: Rising Sun> >Problem one: Can anyone confirm that Harry Cox sang 'She Was a Rum One'?
I
> >have seen no previous reference to it.
>
> I was skeptical of the existence of this, based on a recollection of
> someone's sharp challenge to vague, undocumented stories about "Rising
> Sun" songs in Britain, but Ted Anthony (author of a recent AP article
> on "House of the Rising Sun" tells me that he has a copy of the
> original field recording.  Thanks, Ted, for the following
>
> >I have the recording on a CD in New York, made for me by the Alan Lomax
> >Archives in Manhattan, and I have heard it. I also have a transcript of
it
> >made shortly after the recording. In it, Cox sings "She Was a Rum One,"
and
> >when he's done, Lomax says something to the effect of, "There's another
way
> >to start that song, isn't there, Harry?" Cox replies with the Rising Sun
> >verse (in a very thick accent, even thicker than when he's singing).
>
> This leads me to believe that one can obtain a copy in the same way that
> Ted did.
>
> >Problem two: The other two British versions of the song known to me - by
> >Jeannie Robertson and Davy Stewart - contain nothing remotely like these
> >lines, although they are frankly sexual
> >Problem three: 'The Rising Sun' is a perfectly respectable name for an
> >English pub, and I wouldn't be surprised if Lowestoft had one before the
> >recent mania for changing pub names (which, incidentally, should be
> >illegal!).
> >Problem four: I've just checked 11  British slang dictionaries and none
of
> >them mention Rising Sun as a bordello - or as anything else for that
matter.
> >So - further evidence required before we accept your theory.
> >Surely, if anything is to be described as 'Rising' in this context,  it
> >should be the male, rather than the female sexual parts!
>
> Since my post, I, too, have been checking slang dictionaries (on
> line).  I found the following.
>
> A WWW site, http://lugnutz.com/slang.htm, identifies "visiting the
> land of the rising sun" with "having sex with a menstruating woman."
>
> >Steve Roud
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: John Garst <[unmask]>
> >To: <[unmask]>
> >Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:24 PM
> >Subject: Rising Sun
> >
> >
> >>  I have been assured by someone who has heard it that the Harry Cox
> >>  recording of "She's a Rum One," collected by Alan Lomax, does indeed
> >>  include the verse
> >>
> >>  "If you go to Lowestoft
> >>  And ask for the Rising Sun,
> >>  There you'll find two old whores,
> >>  And my old woman's one."
> >>
> >>  This has been cited in connection with the American ballad "House of
> >>  the Rising Sun" as evidence that "Rising Sun" is a traditional term,
> >>  in Britain, for a bordello.
> >>
> >>  A blues recording by Texas Alexander, The Risin' Sun (1928), has been
> >>  transcribed as follows:
> >>
> >>      My woman got something, just like the rising sun
> >>      My woman got something, like the rising sun
> >>      You can never tell when the work is done
> >>
> >>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
> >>      It's no use to worry, but the day's been long
> >>      Need to worry about your rollin'
> >>      because they're sure going wrong (?)
> >>
> >>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
> >>      She got something round, and it looks like a bear
> >>      Sometime I wonder what in the hell is there
> >>
> >>  This sounds like the "rising sun" is the vagina.  The "rising" part
> >>  could refer to female sexual arousal.  If this is correct, then I'm
> >>  surprised that G. Legman never ran into this usage (apparently,
> >>  nothing like this is included in his notes on House of the Rising Sun
> >>  in the Randolph Unprintable volume).
> >>
> >>  How about it, Brits (and others)?  Is any of this speculation valid?
> >>  --
> >>  john garst    [unmask]
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:05:53 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(30 lines) , text/html(44 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 15:40:12 -0400
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(20 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: meaning of "Golier"
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:43:50 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references to
a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a melody
for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the text.
Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what does
'golier' mean?
 It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption of
the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
Yrs,
Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 22:34:15 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Barbara
As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
end about drinking beer, ending
While we do say, Goliere.
Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
While we do say, Goliere!
And you shall drink it all up!
While we do say Goliere!
Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
heard of it before.One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
Steve Roud (in Sussex)----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 PM
Subject: meaning of "Golier"> In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references
to
> a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a
melody
> for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the
text.
> Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what
does
> 'golier' mean?
>  It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption
of
> the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
> Yrs,
> Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:06:37 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(45 lines)


John:The rising sun motif was a common decoration in the clerestory lights over
front door lintels of Georgian and Federal architecture.  It was also
carved into the backs of chairs as a decorative device.One can sometimes see it as a "survival" in the backs of American
presswood chairs manufactured in the last half of the 19th C.So the house of the rising sun just might be a reference to any
Georgian/Federal house -- regardless of comforts offered within.EdOn Sun, 1 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> >...
> >3.    But can we accept a present-day American 'Modern Street Slang' usage
> >as evidence for a meaning in a verse sung by an East Anglian farmworker
> >between 50 and 100 years ago?
> >
> >My scepticism remains undented.
> >Steve Roud
>
> Mine is dented by several findings of "rising sun" in sexual
> contexts, even though they are not all particularly consistent.
>
> I found a reference to an actual "House of the Rising Sun" in America
> (at http://www.hoffman-info.com/kingkill33.html).
>
> >Fredericksburg is also the location of the "House of the Rising
> >Sun," a masonic meeting place for such notables as founding fathers
> >George Washington and Benjamin Franklin (of Hell-Fire Club fame) and
> >George Mason.
>
> This far predates the presumed origin of the song "House of the
> Rising Sun" and it appears to have nothing to do with prostitution or
> sex (unless the American founding fathers were engaging there in
> ancient rituals not usually attributed to Freemasons).
>
>
>
>
> --
> john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: Mary Ann Gilpatrick <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:31:57 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(62 lines)


If you giv4 "Goliere" a French pronunciation, it rhymes with "say." Who knows
French? (or Breton?)roud wrote:> Barbara
> As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
> the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
> song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
> well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
> blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
> end about drinking beer, ending
> While we do say, Goliere.
> Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
> While we do say, Goliere!
> And you shall drink it all up!
> While we do say Goliere!
> Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
> appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
> those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
> any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
> Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
> been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
> but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
>
> Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
> devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
> (Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
> specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
> heard of it before.
>
> One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
> Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
> 'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
> that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
>
> One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
> it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
> Steve Roud (in Sussex)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
> To: <[unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:43 PM
> Subject: meaning of "Golier"
>
> > In Hilaire Belloc's 1912 book, The Four Men, he makes several references
> to
> > a song that ends with the line "..and I will sing Golier." He quotes a
> melody
> > for the phrase on the frontspiece, and includes several fragments in the
> text.
> > Is there such a song, either written by Belloc, or traditional, and what
> does
> > 'golier' mean?
> >  It has been suggested to me that the word is  Gaelic and is a corruption
> of
> > the expression 'go leor' which means 'plenty of something'.
> > Yrs,
> > Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: golier
From: Marge Steiner <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 1 Oct 2000 20:14:50 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


I tried looking up the word "golier' and also "goliere" in the OED online,
but I turned up nothing.        MargeE-mail: [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Golier
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:28:28 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(4 lines)


A Google search for "golier OR goliere" gives about 520 hits.  There
are towns, people, and companies named "Golier" (and "De Golier").
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:23:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


>The rising sun motif was a common decoration in the clerestory lights over
>front door lintels of Georgian and Federal architecture.  It was also
>carved into the backs of chairs as a decorative device.
>
>One can sometimes see it as a "survival" in the backs of American
>presswood chairs manufactured in the last half of the 19th C.
>
>So the house of the rising sun just might be a reference to any
>Georgian/Federal house -- regardless of comforts offered within.
>
>Ed (Cray)Legman suggests that France's "Sun King" could have been a large
influence in popularizing rising sun patterns.Not only did early 19th-century New Orleans have a Rising Sun Tavern
but so did many other places in both Britain and America.  Indeed,
there was a "House of the Rising Sun" in New Orleans, but this is
hardly unique, since they were all over the place.  One might ask the
question, "Why is 'Rising Sun' such a popular name for taverns, inns,
pubs, bordellos(?), etc.?"If you search "Rising Sun" on the WWW, you will get many hits that
are sex related.  I suspect that most of these connections were made
after "House of the Rising Sun" became popular, but there is still, I
believe, an underlying thread of sexual linkage to "rising sun" that
predated, or may have been insulated from, that influence.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: "DoN. Nichols" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Donald Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 14:03:22 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(27 lines)


On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 10:34:15PM +0100, roud wrote:> Barbara
> As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of ======================================================================
        Looking through my Compact Edition of the OED, I find "goliard"
Class of educated jesters, buffoons, and authors ... loose and satirical
Latin verse ... 12th and 13th century ... Germany, France & England.
 ======================================================================        Sorry for the fragmentary typing, but I'm trying to juggle the
big volume, the keyboard, a pair of extra-strong glasses, and a
magnifying glass at once -- all but the glasses in my lap. :-)        Anyway -- could it be a corrupted form of this word?        Enjoy,
                DoN.--
 Email:   <[unmask]>   | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
    My Concertina web page:        | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
        --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rising Sun
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 13:47:30 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(11 lines)


Off topic, perhaps, but... The decorative motif of the sunrise was certainly
popular for a long time before anyone collected "House of the Rising Sun";
there used to be a little book called "The English Sunrise" containing
photographs of architectural adornments using that motif. And other bits,
including a gorgeous one from an English table radio. My former wife had the
radio design (which resembled the engravings on the backs of National steel
guitars, but without the hula girls) inlaid on the fingerboard of her banjo.
Must search out that book one of these days.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 2 Oct 2000 21:54:52 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(63 lines)


 At 10:34 PM 10/1/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Barbara
>As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
>presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
>also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
>the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of the
>song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
>well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
>blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
>end about drinking beer, ending
>While we do say, Goliere.
>Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
>While we do say, Goliere!
>And you shall drink it all up!
>While we do say Goliere!
>Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does not
>appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor in
>those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
>any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
>Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably have
>been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from him,
>but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
>
>Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
>devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with Belloc'
>(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
>specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
>heard of it before.
>
>One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days. The
>Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to the
>'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
>that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
>
>One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels, and
>it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
>Steve Roud (in Sussex)
>The one verse that Belloc quotes reads:
"If Bonaparte
Shud zummon d'Eart
To land on Pevensey Level,
I have two sons
With our three guns
To blarst un to the de-e-vil.And he introduces it thus:
"With this Grizzlebeard, clearing his aged throat, tunefully carolled out
the following manly verse in the tune to which all Sussex songs have been
set, without exception, since the beginning of time -- the tune which is
called "Golier"."Which could mean the verse is part of the song, or it could be that poetic
license to which you referred. It does not, however sound like part of
"Woman in a Basket/Blanket".
Belloc goes on to describe a war between the Kings of Sussex and Kent over a
variant of the verse quoted, the only difference being that "the three men
come from Horsemonden".
Belloc does include music, and I can send you a MIDI attachment privately if
that helps.
Yrs,
Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 3 Oct 2000 23:44:16 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(100 lines)


Barbara
Yes, send me the midi file ([unmask]). If my hunch is right (and it
is still only a hunch) - that Belloc is extrapolating from Beckett - the
tune will turn out to be LILLIBURLERO, which Beckett mentions twice (e.g.
"Many were the sets of words fitted to the popular air 'Lilliburlero'. Among
these was the toast known as 'There was an old woman'...").
I don't recognise Belloc's verse from elsewhere - it could be traditional,
but is very much like the pseudo-traditional of the period, summoning as it
does the vision of the simple sturdy Sussex peasant. Is there anything else
like it in the book? I wouldn't be surprised if the Kent/Sussex argument
turns up in another guise from which Belloc borrowed.
The 1886 reference to Sussex harvest songs which I mentioned has proved
problematic. It's meant to be in Notes & Queries 1886, but I have failed to
find it there, but will keep looking. It may be a wild goose chase anyway.
Regards
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Millikan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: meaning of "Golier"> At 10:34 PM 10/1/00 +0100, you wrote:
> >Barbara
> >As far as I know, the word 'Golier' or 'Goliere' remains a mystery. I had
> >presumed that Belloc made it up (as poets do that sort of thing), but it
> >also turns up in Arthur Beckett's book about Sussex called 'The Spirit of
> >the Downs' (p.82) which was published in 1909. Beckett gives the text of
the
> >song 'There was an old woman drawn up in a basket' (which is a fairly
> >well-known song in Britain, more usually called 'Old woman tossed up in a
> >blanket'). Beckett's version of the 'Old Woman' has lines tacked onto the
> >end about drinking beer, ending
> >While we do say, Goliere.
> >Goliere! Goliere! Goliere! Goliere!
> >While we do say, Goliere!
> >And you shall drink it all up!
> >While we do say Goliere!
> >Now Beckett is a more 'reliable' writer than Belloc, but the word does
not
> >appear in any of the national dialect dictionaries I have consulted, nor
in
> >those of  Sussex (or neighbouring counties). These words do not appear in
> >any other version of the 'Old Woman' song that I can find. I don't have
> >Belloc's book to hand, but as it was written in 1911, he would probably
have
> >been familiar with Beckett's work, and may simply have lifted it from
him,
> >but this doesn't explain where Beckett got it from.
> >
> >Bob Copper, who probably knows more about Sussex songs than anyone else,
> >devotes a few pages to the question in his book 'Across Sussex with
Belloc'
> >(Alan Sutton, 1994), but he admits to being completely baffled by it, and
> >specifically states that neither he nor any other singer he's asked has
> >heard of it before.
> >
> >One small lead that I can't follow up from home, but will in a few days.
The
> >Opies' 'Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes' notes an 1886 reference to
the
> >'Old Woman' rhyme being used in a Sussex harvest song, and it is possible
> >that this was Beckett's source. I will let you know if this is relevant.
> >
> >One other point. Sussex is a very long way from the land of the Gaels,
and
> >it is highly unlikely that the word has any Gaelic roots.
> >Steve Roud (in Sussex)
> >
>
> The one verse that Belloc quotes reads:
> "If Bonaparte
> Shud zummon d'Eart
> To land on Pevensey Level,
> I have two sons
> With our three guns
> To blarst un to the de-e-vil.
>
> And he introduces it thus:
> "With this Grizzlebeard, clearing his aged throat, tunefully carolled out
> the following manly verse in the tune to which all Sussex songs have been
> set, without exception, since the beginning of time -- the tune which is
> called "Golier"."
>
> Which could mean the verse is part of the song, or it could be that poetic
> license to which you referred. It does not, however sound like part of
> "Woman in a Basket/Blanket".
> Belloc goes on to describe a war between the Kings of Sussex and Kent over
a
> variant of the verse quoted, the only difference being that "the three men
> come from Horsemonden".
> Belloc does include music, and I can send you a MIDI attachment privately
if
> that helps.
> Yrs,
> Barbara Millikan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Sea Songs
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:17:18 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


For any list members who are living near or will be travelling to the New
Hampshire Seacoast, there will be a Maritime Folk Fesival in Portsmouth on
14-15 October. Music, songs, stories and demonstrations will be taking
place during the day on Sat. and Sun., all free. Saturday night concert
featuring Louis Killen, Jeff Warner, Danny and Joyce McLeod, and
Forebitter will be at the UU Church on State Street. For late breaking
details go to http://www.folkhorizons.org Hope to see some of you there  -
Tom & Linn

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Errors and Omissions
From: tom hall <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:42:56 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(2 lines)


I forgot to mention that the Sat. night Sea Song Concert is $10.00 per
person. Mea Culpa - Tom

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: Kelly Feltault <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:38:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


This was posted to another folklore list this morning.  I thought many
on ballad-l would have useful suggestions and insights.  Please cc
responses to the student who sent the initial post.   ThanksCheers
Jamie>From: <[unmask]>
>
>To any and everyone who has an opinion regarding this issue: I am a
Junior at
>Wesleyan University and am doing some research regarding Joe Hill and
the
>intersection of labor and music in general, eventually resulting in a
senior thesis
>film. I am currently taking a look at the way in which the IWW used
songs, and
>had some general questions I would like to pose. First off, was the
manner that
>the IWW used music as an organising tool unique? Were there any other
>movements at that time or since then that have used songs in a similar
fashion?>The broader question is why did songs and IWW go hand in hand. What was
>unique about the movement that allowed for or needed music as a
motivating
>force? I understand these are broad, complicated questions, but I would
>appreciate any and all thoughts you have on this issue, in addition to
any sources
>that might help me in my research.
>
>   Thanks in advance.
>   -Jody Avirgan-
>   [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:18:22 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(80 lines)


In a message dated 10/10/00 10:36:40 AM, [unmask] writes:>This was posted to another folklore list this morning.  I thought many
>on ballad-l would have useful suggestions and insights.  Please cc
>responses to the student who sent the initial post.   Thanks
>
>Cheers
>Jamie
>
>>From: <[unmask]>
>>
>>To any and everyone who has an opinion regarding this issue: I am a
>Junior at
>>Wesleyan University and am doing some research regarding Joe Hill and
>the
>>intersection of labor and music in general, eventually resulting in a
>senior thesis
>>film. I am currently taking a look at the way in which the IWW used
>songs, and
>>had some general questions I would like to pose. First off, was the
>manner that
>>the IWW used music as an organising tool unique? Were there any other
>>movements at that time or since then that have used songs in a similar
>fashion?
>
>>The broader question is why did songs and IWW go hand in hand. What was
>>unique about the movement that allowed for or needed music as a
>motivating
>>force? I understand these are broad, complicated questions, but I would
>>appreciate any and all thoughts you have on this issue, in addition to
>any sources
>>that might help me in my research.
***********************
JodyFirst off, I think music was more of a crowd-gatherer than an  organizing
force for the IWW.  Its chief political function, to my mind, was as a sort
of cheerleading;  binding together a crowd of people who had already been
converted.  The IWW has printed its "Little Red Songbook" in many editions,
and it's still available from them.  You'll find all the words to a recent
edition of its songs reproduced on the Internet, at
<http://ww.acronet.net/~robokopp/iwww.html> :  this site is even better than
the "Little Red Book" itself, for it has a good many downloadable tunes.There's a lot information available in a book by Joyce Kornbluh: _Rebel
Voices, An IWW Anthology_.The IWW is still in existence,  and maintains a homepage at: <http://iww.org>.There is some mention of music in _Bird, Georgakas, and Shaffer: _Solidarity
Forever: An Oral History of the IWW.Phillip S. Foner has a good book (he as MANY books!)  called _American Labor
Songs of the Nineteenth Century_.  The IWW dates only from about 1905, so
doesn't get much space, but the book gives a lot of useful general
information abut Unions and Music.  The IWW is by no means the only Union
that has made good use of muic. When I was a Zoology Student at UCLA in 1937,
I joined the Hollywood Theater Alliance as a volunteer, singing and leading
songs on Union picket lines in the Los Angeles area.  This led to a paid ($50
a week!) job as a performer in the Alliance's musical revue, "Meet the
People,"  which ran in Hollywood for 10 months, and gave me the wherewithal
to marry and support a fellow-student (Art major) named Leslie. We have just
celebrated our 60th Anniversary.One of this country's great folk singers is U. Utah Phillips, who is a
card-carrying member of the IWW, as well as of Local 1000 of the American
Federation of Musicians.  (His real name is Bruce Phillips;  he comes from
Utah, and took his professional name following the example of T. Texas
Tyler.)  Bruce is not only a singer, raconteur, and IWW member, but a fine
historian, and I'll bet you could get a lot of information from a phone
conversation with him.  You could reach him through:  U. Utah Phillips / NO
GUFF RECORDS / PO Box 1235 / Nevada City, CA 95959; he doesn't have an e-mail
address.  Bruce has fallen on hard times, and his friends have set up a
web-site for him at: <http://www.utahphillips.org>, and that site has a
number of links to other sites that might help in  your research.Good luck!Sam Hinton
La Jolla, CA. USA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: Paddy Tutty <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:06:00 -0600
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


That url should be:
   http://www.acronet.net/~robokopp/iww.htmlCheers,
Paddy Tutty[unmask] wrote:>  its songs reproduced on the Internet, at
> <http://ww.acronet.net/~robokopp/iwww.html> :  this site is even better than
> the "Little Red Book" itself, for it has a good many downloadable tunes.
>
> There's a lot information available in a book by Joyce Kornbluh: _Rebel
> Voices, An IWW Anthology_.
>
> The IWW is still in existence,  and maintains a homepage at: <http://iww.org>.
>
> There is some mention of music in _Bird, Georgakas, and Shaffer: _Solidarity
> Forever: An Oral History of the IWW.
>
> Phillip S. Foner has a good book (he as MANY books!)  called _American Labor
> Songs of the Nineteenth Century_.  The IWW dates only from about 1905, so
> doesn't get much space, but the book gives a lot of useful general
> information abut Unions and Music.  The IWW is by no means the only Union
> that has made good use of muic. When I was a Zoology Student at UCLA in 1937,
> I joined the Hollywood Theater Alliance as a volunteer, singing and leading
> songs on Union picket lines in the Los Angeles area.  This led to a paid ($50
> a week!) job as a performer in the Alliance's musical revue, "Meet the
> People,"  which ran in Hollywood for 10 months, and gave me the wherewithal
> to marry and support a fellow-student (Art major) named Leslie. We have just
> celebrated our 60th Anniversary.
>
> One of this country's great folk singers is U. Utah Phillips, who is a
> card-carrying member of the IWW, as well as of Local 1000 of the American
> Federation of Musicians.  (His real name is Bruce Phillips;  he comes from
> Utah, and took his professional name following the example of T. Texas
> Tyler.)  Bruce is not only a singer, raconteur, and IWW member, but a fine
> historian, and I'll bet you could get a lot of information from a phone
> conversation with him.  You could reach him through:  U. Utah Phillips / NO
> GUFF RECORDS / PO Box 1235 / Nevada City, CA 95959; he doesn't have an e-mail
> address.  Bruce has fallen on hard times, and his friends have set up a
> web-site for him at: <http://www.utahphillips.org>, and that site has a
> number of links to other sites that might help in  your research.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Sam Hinton
> La Jolla, CA. USA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:47:19 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(32 lines)


Good People:There is material on the IWW singing tradition in Lori Elaine Tayloer,
"Joe Hill Incorporated: We Own Our Past," in Jeff Ferrell, "The
Brotherhood of Timber Workers and the Culture of Conflict" and in Sam
Richards, "The Joe Hill Legend in Britain," all in Archie Green, ed.,
_Songs About Work_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Folklore Institute,
1993).There is also material in Kenneth Allsop's _Hard Traveling_ (Hoddard and
Stoughton, 1967; Penguin, 1971); George Milburn's _Hobo's Hornbook_ (no
citation handy).Most of what has been written about the IWW is second hand, and
unreliable.  It also tends to center on the Western Federation of Miners
(an IWW affiliate) and on the martyred Joe Hill.  The significance of the
Wobblies in California, for example, is virtually unknown elsewhere --
despite the fact that literally dozens were convicted of murder after a
deputy was killed in Hopland during an IWW-led farm labor protest.  At the
other extreme, Steve Ross, a USC historian, has documented the fact that
many of the extras in the first movies made in Southern California were
itinerant Wobblies, drawn to the warmer climes in winter months.Similarly, the importance of the IWW in the northwestern woods cannot be
underestimated.A clear-eyed, and not flattering take on the IWW is in J. Anthony Lukas'
recent _Big Trouble_ (NY: Simon and Schuster, 1997).All but the last have material on singing in the ranks of labor.Ed Cray

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fwd: IWW and Music
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:52:44 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(5 lines) , text/html(14 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: IWW and music
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:12:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(33 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 1:08 AM
Subject: IWW and musicHi Jody:The IWW weren't unique in using music as an organizing tool; it had been
part of the Populist movement of the 1890s. Probably the best-known piece to
come out of that time was "The Farmer is the Man", but there were certainly
others. Check out John Greenway's "American Folk Songs of Protest" (I
*think* I'm remembering the title correctly).Subsequent movements that used music as an organizing and rallying tool
notably include the industrial labor-organization drives of the 1930s,
particularly those involving coal miners; the efforts to organize southern
tenant farmers beginning in the 1930s and continuing for several decades
thereafter; and of course the southern civil rights movement, beginning with
the Montgomery bus boycott of 1955. Music from the latter can be found on
the Smithsonian/Folkways set "Voices from the Civil Rights Movement" and the
disc "Sing for Freedom".You might want to get in touch with people from the Highlander Center
(formerly the Highlander Folk School); they were involved in all three
movements in various ways. Some discussion of the tenant farmers' movement
can be found in the biography of Lee Hays, "Lonesome Traveller".Hope this helps a little.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:58:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(1 lines)


It seems to me that music-as-protest derives from rhyme-as-protest.  I was thinking of John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?"  The rhyme has a lot more power then a more complexly worded argument.  Although there have also been any number of political poems, which were also perhaps sung,  in the centuries prior to ours, John Ball's rhyme is the predecessor of themes later sounded by the IWW and others.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW and Music
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:28:22 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


The same phenomenon can be seen in the activities of KISZ, the youth
wing of the old Hungarian Socialist Workers Party (there is a party of
the same name today, but it is not the same party). They organized
everything in the name of the party, because the party was where there
were funds, but in actual fact they were young people with a penchant
for organization and music. An event like a jazz festival might bring in
thousands of jazz enthusiasts and two new signed up members of the
party. Many of the young organizers of fifteen years ago are now not
only older, but selling insurance policies and working for advertising
questionnaire agencies...Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Website
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:31:42 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Dear everyone,I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
entries to the guestbook before they appear.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Website
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:56:57 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


>Dear everyone,
>
>I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
>fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
>a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
>to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
>Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
>entries to the guestbook before they appear.
>
>Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Website
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:58:36 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(18 lines)


Sounds like Kilroy Was Here. Or was it Conrad?(oops, sorry about the last post, me finger slipped)JR>Dear everyone,
>
>I doubt if any of you have visited my Simply English website in the last
>fortnight, but if you have by chance gone to the visitor's book and seen
>a rather tasteless political slogan, please do not think that it refers
>to the political inclinations of either myself or my fellow-musician.
>Luckily it has now been deleted, and we are thinking of ways to vet
>entries to the guestbook before they appear.
>
>Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:13:31 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
then the gentleman?"....I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
digging and "span" to spinning?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Joseph C Fineman <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:58:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(15 lines)


On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> ...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
> then the gentleman?"....
>
> I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
> digging and "span" to spinning?Yes, indeed.  But, symbolically, those were typical male & female
acts, respectively.---  Joe Fineman    [unmask]||:  What's _done_ we partly may compute,  :||
||:  But know not what's _resisted_.       :||

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Lewis Becker <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:06:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(5 lines)


If my reference to John Ball was too obscure, I apologize.  Here's a brief bio I dug out elsewhere on the net (and slightly edited):            Ball, John, d. 1381, English priest and social reformer. He was one of the instigators of the Peasant's Revolt of 1381. He was an itinerant for many years, advocating               ecclesiastical poverty and social equality.  Excommunicated in 1376, he was in prison at Maidstone when the rebels released him in 1381. After the dispersal of the rebels, Ball was captured at Coventry. He was taken to St. Albans, where he was hanged, drawn, and quartered. He is perhaps best remembered for              giving currency to the couplet "When Adam delved and Eve span/Who was then the gentleman?" William Morris wrote one of his works on utopian socialism under the title The Dream of John Ball.Lew Becker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: IWW and Music
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:37:55 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(21 lines)


Ed Cray wrote:There is material on the IWW singing tradition in Lori Elaine Tayloer,
"Joe Hill Incorporated: We Own Our Past," in Jeff Ferrell, "The
Brotherhood of Timber Workers and the Culture of Conflict" and in Sam
Richards, "The Joe Hill Legend in Britain," all in Archie Green, ed.,
_Songs About Work_ (Bloomington: Indiana University Folklore Institute,
1993).Has anyone yet mentioned Archie's discussion in _Wobblies, Pile Butts, and
Other Heroes_?JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:02:44 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(16 lines)


Lewis Becker wrote:
>
> If my reference to John Ball was too obscure, I apologize.  Here's a brief bio I dug out elsewhere on the net (and slightly edited):
>
>
>
> Lew BeckerParson [John] Ball is made to speak the lines at his first appearance in
the play 'Jack Straw', 1593.Bruce Olson
--
Old English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:58:08 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(12 lines)


yup.On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, John Garst wrote:> ...John Ball (circa 1381) - "When Adam delved and Eve span, who was
> then the gentleman?"....
>
> I'm simple-minded.  What does the above mean?  Does "delve" refer to
> digging and "span" to spinning?
> --
> john garst    [unmask]
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:41:13 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Hi folks:Ummm...this discussion is very interesting, but I believe the student who
began it was primarily asking whether any *other* movements besides the IWW
used song as an organizing tool. I gather he has the IWW itself pretty well
covered.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: David Baron <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:36:38 +0200
Content-Type:multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
Parts/Attachments

text/plain(12 lines) , text/html(23 lines)


Sorry, your browser doesn't support iframes.


Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Fw: IWW and music
From: Judy McCulloh <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Judith McCulloh <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:53:14 -0500
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(40 lines)


Well, let me mention a book we'll have out in another two or three months,
Joe Glazer's memoir, _Labor's Troubadour_.  Joe tells about singing for
various labor and civil rights endeavors, starting in 1944 as assistant
education director of the former Textile Workers Union of America.  He
transferred to the United Rubber Workers and then joined the USIA in 1961
as a labor specialist.  He retired in 1987, though you wouldn't know it,
since he keeps performing at union meetings and rallies and keeps writing
and recording songs.  These include "The Mill Was Made of Marble"
(probably his best-known piece), "Jellybean Blues," "Automation," "Too Old
to Work, Too Young to Die," and "They've Moved My Job to Georgia (or Was
It Tennessee?)."  He has more than twenty albums out.  At the end of the
book he profiles a number of the younger labor singers and gives some of
their songs (texts) as well, a nice generous gesture.Another non-IWW book that might be of interest in this discussion is
Shelly Romalis's _"Pistol Packin' Mama": Aunt Molly Jackson and the
Politics of Folksong_.JudyJudith McCulloh
Assistant Director and Executive Editor
University of Illinois Press
1325 South Oak Street
Champaign, IL  61820-6975
(217) 244-4681
[unmask]On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Paul Stamler wrote:> Hi folks:
>
> Ummm...this discussion is very interesting, but I believe the student who
> began it was primarily asking whether any *other* movements besides the IWW
> used song as an organizing tool. I gather he has the IWW itself pretty well
> covered.
>
> Peace.
> Paul
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Tribute to Rounder -- Today on "No Time to Tarry Here"
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:27:03 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(17 lines)


Hi folks:Just a second heads-up: For the first of two membership specials this week,
I will be presenting a tribute to Rounder Records on "No Time To Tarry Here"
this afternoon from 2-4pm central time (1900-2100 GMT). I didn't know this
when I planned the program, but we're just a week short of Rounder's 30th
anniversary, so it's an appropriate time to pay tribute to the label that
ranks with Folkways as an astonishing resource for traditional music and its
offshoots. The program will air on KDHX-St. Louis, 88.1FM; more to the point
for many of you, it will be on the web at:http://www.kdhx.orgEnjoy!Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: New Address
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 15 Oct 2000 19:34:08 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


Dear all,This is just to let you know that due the renaming of my university my
e-mail has also changed. It is now [unmask] and NOT
[unmask], so please remove the 'j'. Both e-mail addresses will
continue to reach me a little longer, but fairly soon I shall be utterly
j-less.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Data Base
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:25:56 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(20 lines)


Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
George--
George Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Carolyn A. and Peter S. Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill, MA 02467
(617) 552-4521
[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:39:56 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 10/16/00, George Madaus wrote:>Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
>any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
>CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
>England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
>For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
>my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
>capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
>GeorgeYou need to specify a bit more. What do you want to do with this
thing? Do you want to be able to find all versions of, say,
"Barbara Allen" -- even if it's called "In Scarlet Town"? Or
is it enough to be able to search for the title on the recording?If the latter, I can make you a template (for FileMaker 3.0, but
I assume it will convert) in a couple of minutes.There are commercial databases around for this sort of thing, and
also shareware versions (in the $10 range, as I recall), but I
doubt they're worth it. Unless you need something fancy. In which
case they probably aren't *right* for what you need.Alternately I could tell you how to set up a text file for use with the
Ballad Index software. That way, you'd be able to do more complex
searches, assuming you can live with the user interface.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 19:50:01 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(9 lines)


George - e-mail me at [unmask], and we can get together and
I'll whip off something for you in Filemaker 4.1.  I do these for our
FSSGB (Folk Song Society of Greater Boston) library listings, and it
will only take a few minutes for a basic setup.  It's possible that by
doing it this way, you'll be able to take advantage of our listings as
we catalog our library and others.  And maybe you'd like to join our project...?-Don Duncan
 Cambridge, MA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:41:08 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(73 lines)


Dear RobertThanks for the reply. I won't get as complex as searching under alternative
names. What I have done is rate (subjectively) alternative version of a song
like Leave Her Johnny Leave  Her so I would like to be able to find all
version under that name across my collection and look at the rating. Further
I try to roughly classify song by genre e.g. songs of Mortality, navy
(construction), shanty, forebitter, coal mining, war, women's songs etc.. It
would of course be nice to have a filed that would be for alternative names
for the same song e.g., St. James Infirmary but that is just a wish.  I am
afraid of share ware or very specific software because of the possibility of
them being incompatible with new version of the system (I had this happen
with to me when I invested effort in a Hyper Card format only to find the
new system really didn't support this). Some one else suggested a soft ware
program for Windows called MySoftware which sounds great but again will it
work with System xx for the MAC?  I am leery about that.So I guess I am looking for something I hope will be ok for the MAC in the
future and lets me sort by Artist, country and song name rating and genre.I appreciate any help you can give me on this. All the best
George"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 10/16/00, George Madaus wrote:
>
> >Does anyone know of a template for File Maker Pro (for the MAC) -- or
> >any data based MAC program -- that would allow me to enter the name each
> >CD, Tape or Record, the artist, the country (US, Ireland, Scotland,
> >England Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc.), and then list each song.
> >For a very long time I wanted a better way to keep track of the songs in
> >my collection but designing a template from scratch is beyond my
> >capabilities.  Thanks for your consideration.
> >George
>
> You need to specify a bit more. What do you want to do with this
> thing? Do you want to be able to find all versions of, say,
> "Barbara Allen" -- even if it's called "In Scarlet Town"? Or
> is it enough to be able to search for the title on the recording?
>
> If the latter, I can make you a template (for FileMaker 3.0, but
> I assume it will convert) in a couple of minutes.
>
> There are commercial databases around for this sort of thing, and
> also shareware versions (in the $10 range, as I recall), but I
> doubt they're worth it. Unless you need something fancy. In which
> case they probably aren't *right* for what you need.
>
> Alternately I could tell you how to set up a text file for use with the
> Ballad Index software. That way, you'd be able to do more complex
> searches, assuming you can live with the user interface.
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Commission on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 22:45:54 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(7 lines)


I don't know of any MAC software that will doe what you want, but I'd
strongly suggest that you try to find a database with full text search
capabilities; this makes life much simpler when you decide to change your
search requirements halfway down the road.If yoyu'll settle for a PC, I can give you (legally) a nice program that
will do what you want, and a great deal more.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: IWW, Politics, and Music
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 16 Oct 2000 20:53:59 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(20 lines)


Lisa and Eavesdroppers:I would suggest that you instead subscribe to ballad-l.  Their interests
are catholic, they do not flame, and the members are rich with all sorts
of information.While they purportedly focus on ballads, in fact, they range widely.Ed
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 [unmask] wrote:> Hi everyone.  My name is Lisa Fishbein. I have a masters degree in music, and
> did my master's thesis on the music of the IWW.  Since we all have shared
> interests,  music history and the labor movement, I thought we could set up a
> mass mailings of discussions on related topics.  I now have you all in my
> e-mail address book under the heading IWW and Music.  Politics and music is
> such an appealing area of study, and I thought it may be nice, from time to
> time, if we all share perspectives.  Is this idea agreeable?
> Lisa Fishbein
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Rambling rover
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 02:25:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(10 lines)


Hi folks:Sorry to cross-post this, but I've got an obscure one. The title may
possibly "Rambling Rover"; it includes the line (possibly in the chorus)
"There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl". Anyone out
there recognize this? (Digital Tradition and the Traditional Ballad Index
both came up with nothing.)Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Rambling rover
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 07:58:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(30 lines)


On 10/17/00, Paul Stamler wrote:>Hi folks:
>
>Sorry to cross-post this, but I've got an obscure one. The title may
>possibly "Rambling Rover"; it includes the line (possibly in the chorus)
>"There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl". Anyone out
>there recognize this? (Digital Tradition and the Traditional Ballad Index
>both came up with nothing.)It's not a traditional song; Andy M. Stewart of Silly Wizard wrote it.
It's in his songbook, and on at least two Silly Wizard recordings.Chorus runs something likeOh there's sober men in plenty,
And drunkards barely twenty,
There are men of over ninety
Who have never yet kissed a girl,
But gie me the ramblin' rover
Frae Orkney down to Dover
We will roam the country over
And together we'll face the world.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: [Rambling rover]
From: Dell Stinnett <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:58:30 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(29 lines)


Hi Paul!I think this is a traditional Irish pub song called Ramblin' Rover (I've got a
friend who does is on a regular basis as part of an Irish set.)  I can't
remember all of the words, but this line is part of the chorus.  I'm sure
someone will come in with the whole thing, but here's what I remember of the
chorus:There are <??> aplenty
And <??> barely twenty
There are old men over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl.
So give me the Ramblin' Rover
From Cockney down to Dover
We'll roam the county over
And together we'll face the world.-Dell----------------
I haven't lost my mind - it's backed up on disk somewhere!
----------------
GaFilk - THE Georgia Filk Convention - January 5-7, 2001
http://www.gafilk.org____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://home.netscape.com/webmail

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Lost Reference
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 17 Oct 2000 22:39:04 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


Folks:I seek a book, or reference to be precise.  I lost it in a welter of web
pages turning before my eyes.The book is a (recently) published diary of a Revolutionary War seamen or
officer, captured by the British, and clapped in a prison hulk in NY
harbor.Does anyone know of the book, the title, the author, something?  It
apparently contains song texts of various songs current in the 1775-1781
era, including risque or bawdy texts.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: new book on "Frankie Silver"
From: "Bruce E. Baker" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:00:35 -0700
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(23 lines)


I thought list members might be interested in knowing that Dan Patterson's
new book, "A Tree Accurst: Bobby McMillon and Stories of Frankie Silver"
has just come out on UNC Press.  I went to a talk he gave this afternoon
about it, and it was very interesting.  I haven't read the book yet, but a
quick skim suggests that it talks about the 1831 murder itself, the trial
and execution of Frankie, the ballad, the legend cycle, and Bobby McMillon,
the traditional ballad singer and storyteller from the same community in
Western North Carolina.  Here's a URL:
http://uncpress.unc.edu/FMPro?-DB=pubtest.fmp&-Format=detail.html&-RecID=126
44288&-Script=visited&-Find(In the interest of full disclosure, I should mention that Dan was my
thesis director and that I transcribed a lot of the video footage that
became the documentary film by Tom Davenport that led to this book.  But no
financial involvement.)Cheers,
Bruce
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Bruce E. Baker
Chapel Hill, NC
[unmask]
http://members.tripod.com/~Bruce_E_Baker

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Thanks
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 01:04:44 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(7 lines)


Hi folks:Thanks to all for help in finding "Ramblin' Rover". I have the lyrics, and
have forwarded them to the enquiring friend.Peace.
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Lost Reference
From: John Roberts <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:00:56 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(39 lines)


Quite possibly not your book, as some of the facts are different. But
there is "A Sailor's Songbag: An American Rebel in an English Prison
1777-1779," edited with an introduction by George G. Carey (U. Mass.,
Amherst, 1976).This is a book of his songs rather than a diary; he was in Forton
Prison, England; and it was published 25 years ago. But it does have
a bawdy song or two in it. From the top -"Song No. 1... to kiss Susan Twas, loss of late and Cate
And as he walked up to London to pick up a lass
He showed them how well he could riggle his arse,"I have seen it remaindered. ( I might even be able to find a physical
copy - though I'd have a look on Bibliofind first if this is what
you're looking for).John Roberts.>Folks:
>
>I seek a book, or reference to be precise.  I lost it in a welter of web
>pages turning before my eyes.
>
>The book is a (recently) published diary of a Revolutionary War seamen or
>officer, captured by the British, and clapped in a prison hulk in NY
>harbor.
>
>Does anyone know of the book, the title, the author, something?  It
>apparently contains song texts of various songs current in the 1775-1781
>era, including risque or bawdy texts.
>
>Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Ballad Found on Scots-l
From: Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Dolores Nichols <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:32:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(100 lines)


A couple of days ago a subscriber to the scots-l mailing list posted
this ballad that he found in an old scrapbook. He is looking for
information/opinions about it.>From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
>To: [unmask]
>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:36:59 +0100
>Subject: Re: [scots-l] Little Jock Elliot II
>
>from a cutting in a scrapbook annotated: "Scotsman, 9 November 1892"
>........................................
>LITTLE JOCK ELLIOT II
>A Border Ballad
>(From the recital of Matthew Gotterson)
>
>There's freedom for me and my men
>Where the Liddel rins wild and free,
>Where my toor I'the heart o' the glen
>Is the pride o' my billies and me,
>And I keep my ain head wi' my hand
>And quell every enemie,
>For I kittle their ribs wi' my brand,
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Oh my name it is Little Jock Elliot
>        And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>I munt my gude nag wi' a will
>Whena fray's I'the wund, and he
>Cocks his lugs as he tugs for the hill
>That eneters the South countrie,
>Where pricking and spurring are rife,
>And the bluid boils up like a sea;
>But Southrons gang doon I'the strife!
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>In Liddesdale never a man
>Wad shrink frae the backing o' me,
>And Jed-forest gies me the van
>To strike 'gainst her enemie.
>In Coquetdale, Reed and Tyne
>We drive a prey wi' glee,
>And lounder the lubberts like swine,
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>Jock Ridley ance gaily rode doon
>To lift my ain horse frae the lea-
>A riever o' Tynedale renoun,
>A Ker-handed pricker was he.
>He made a fell dash I'the derk,
>But girnin I soon made him flee
>Wi' some weel-proggit holes in his serk;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>At Wheel-Kirk, within the Catrail,
>Priest David had thirty-and-three
>Gude nowt that were stown head and tail
>By Percy o' Keeldarstanelee.
>I chased up the unhallowed loon,
>Brought him and his horse to their knee,
>And wheeled back the nowt to their toun;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>In a raid I'the licht o' the moon
>The Bewcastle Cout sichted me,
>And swore he wad level my croon,
>And flaunted his sword michtilie.
>We met wi' a rush I'the pass,
>Wi' a clash made the steel-fire flee,
>But he fell like a stot on the grass;
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>
>I fear neither Warden not law,
>Nor the troopers o' Queen Marie;
>Grim Bothwell frae me got a claw
>He'll never forget till he dee.
>I'll keep my ain head wi' my hand
>And my neck frae the hanging tree
>As lang as I waiggle a brand -
>And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Wha daur meddle wi' me?
>        Oh my name it is Little Jock Elliot
>        And wha daur meddle wi' me?
>........................................
>
>
>--
>Nigel Gatherer, Crieff  <[unmask]>
>The Scottish Music Pages:
>http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/gatherer/scottish/index.html
>
>--
Dolores Nichols                 |
D&D Data                        | Voice :       (703) 938-4564
Disclaimer: from here - None    | Email:     <[unmask]>
        --- .sig? ----- .what?  Who me?

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 22:21:34 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
but nothing musical.Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:00:19 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(35 lines)


Donald:The song was credited to "Paul Campbell," the pseudonym for the Weavers,
and copyright in 1951 by Folkways Music Publishers.  It was included in
_Folksing,_ edited by Herbert Haufrecht (Hollis Publishing, 1959).  I have
not seen other printings.About the song's history, Pete Seeger in his _Incompleat Folksinger,_
p. 196 fn, states, "The drinking-gourd song, of course, originated long
before my time among the brave men and women of the pre-Civil War
Underground Railroad, and lived on in black folk tradition."It is not mentioned in Willens' biography of Lee Hays -- which is negative
evidence of a sort that suggests Hays did not bring the song to the
Weavers.  And I do not find it in the few collections of Negro spirituals
I have in my library.EdOn Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Donald A. Duncan wrote:> We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
> Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
> the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
>
> A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
> "drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
> search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
> but nothing musical.
>
> Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
> source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).
>
> -Don Duncan
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:11:57 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(34 lines)


On 10/18/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:>We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
>Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
>the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
>
>A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
>"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
>search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
>but nothing musical.
>
>Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
>source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was it?).Keep in mind that the Ballad Index goes by the earliest verifiable
date. I'll agree, of course, that 1953 is too late -- because the
song appears in the Lomax "American Ballads and Folk Songs" (1934).On the other hand, the Lomax volume does not list a source. Every other
book containing the song seems to derive from Lomax or from the Weavers
recording.And we're talking about the Lomaxes here. They steal, they rewrite,
they conceal facts. I suspect they were the source for the Weavers
recording. (At least, it doesn't sound very "Leadbelly-ish" to me,
and the Weavers don't seem to have many other Black sources.) So
I don't think we *know* the history of this song.--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:35:34 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(45 lines)


In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?> On 10/18/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:
>
> >We want to use this in a production, and would like some history on it.
> >Ballad Index lists earliest date as 1953(?), which can't be right, since
> >the Weavers recorded (and copyrighted) it a year or two earlier.
> >
> >A search of the Library of Congress collections turns up nothing for
> >"drinking gourd" (except one narrative reference to the real thing).  A
> >search for "underground railroad" turns up some interesting narratives,
> >but nothing musical.
> >
> >Does anyone know anything more about this, or can you recommend a
> >source?  Where does it come from?  When was it first collected (or was
it?).
>
> Keep in mind that the Ballad Index goes by the earliest verifiable
> date. I'll agree, of course, that 1953 is too late -- because the
> song appears in the Lomax "American Ballads and Folk Songs" (1934).
>
> On the other hand, the Lomax volume does not list a source. Every other
> book containing the song seems to derive from Lomax or from the Weavers
> recording.
>
> And we're talking about the Lomaxes here. They steal, they rewrite,
> they conceal facts. I suspect they were the source for the Weavers
> recording. (At least, it doesn't sound very "Leadbelly-ish" to me,
> and the Weavers don't seem to have many other Black sources.) So
> I don't think we *know* the history of this song.
>
> --
> Bob Waltz
> [unmask]
>
> "The one thing we learn from history --
>    is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:30:41 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


On 10/19/00, roud wrote:>In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
>Steve RoudIf there was a previous message, I never saw it. Are you sure it
went to the list and not the original poster?But I'm still not sanguine. The *text* preceding the song is
attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
*knew* that.If this were anyone other than the Lomaxes, I would consider
this sufficient evidence. But I've now been over three different
Lomax books with a fine-tooth comb, and the only thing I can
say is, "Never trust a Lomax." Don't believe *anything* until
you've checked their original source.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:18:35 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(60 lines)


Indeed, my message seems to have gone direct to the poster - apologies. It
was as follows (slightly amended):> There's a short piece by H.B. Parks on the song, including a text and tune
> collected about 1918, in 'Follow de Drinkin' Gou'd' (Publications of the
Texas
> Folklore Soc. Vol.7 1928 (reprinted 1965)) pp. 81-84 and also in Vol.26
(1954) of the
> same series.
> John Lomax included Parks' text and tune in his 'American Ballads & Folk
> Songs' (1934) pp.227-228, and this is probably where the Weavers'
generation picked it
> up from.
> Steve RoudThe article certainly exists. Parks says he collected fragments of the song
in 1912 and 1918, and the text he gives is from 'an old Negro at College
station, Texas'. Lomax's reference is a little sparse, but much better than
his usual standard.----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?> On 10/19/00, roud wrote:
>
> >In this case, Lomax does give a source - PTFLS - see previous message.
> >Steve Roud
>
> If there was a previous message, I never saw it. Are you sure it
> went to the list and not the original poster?
>
> But I'm still not sanguine. The *text* preceding the song is
> attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
> Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
> journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
> informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
> it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
> that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
> *knew* that.
>
> If this were anyone other than the Lomaxes, I would consider
> this sufficient evidence. But I've now been over three different
> Lomax books with a fine-tooth comb, and the only thing I can
> say is, "Never trust a Lomax." Don't believe *anything* until
> you've checked their original source.
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:04:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(13 lines)


>...The *text* preceding the song is
>attributed, vaguely, to the Publications of the Texas Folk-Lore
>Society. No bibliographic data other than the author and
>journal (e.g. no page number), and no real data on the
>informant. Nor is it clear that this is the source of the *song* --
>it's simply the source of the headnotes. This is enough to prove
>that the background of the song precedes the Lomaxes -- but we
>*knew* that."Follow the Drinking Gourd" is in one of the J. Frank Dobie Texas
Folklore books.
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Follow the Drinkin' Gourd?
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:04:03 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(14 lines)


H.B. Parks was an occasional contributor to the Proceedings of the Texas
Folklore Society in the 1920s.  His "Foller de Drinkin' Gou'd" [sic] was
printed in volume VII (which I do not have) of that series.The headnote in Lomax's _American Ballads and Folkssongs_ reprints Park's
quote from his informant.  It begins, "One of my great-uncles, who was
connected with the railroad movement, remembered that in the records of
the Anti-Slavery Society there was a story of a peg-leg sailor..."There was an Anti-Slavery Society, indeed, a number of them.
("Anti-Slavery Society" might be a generic description rather than a
formal name.)  I do not know where those records might now be.Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:34:38 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


Several people have expressed interest in this issue, so I thought I'd
forward some information to the list.Filemaker Pro runs on both PC (MS Office-compatible, full ODBC support)
and Mac, although swapping files may cause some differences in display
because of handling fonts differently, and there are some features for
the Mac which aren't done on the PC.  It's roughly comparable to MS
Access, but built by people who understand the "U" in "GUI"!FP started in the Mac World, and was developed further as a Claris (the
Apple software division which was spun off) program, during which time
it went cross-platform.  Recently Apple reabsorbed Claris, but left
Filemaker as its own company.  Their web site is at   http://www.filemaker.comThere are over 5 million copies of Filemaker around.  It's made in
various versions, including Filemaker Server which runs on Windows NT,
and a number of Fortune 500 companies are paying many thousands of
dollars for site licenses.  It can be run over an intranet, or serve the
internet (i.e. be accessed through a browser).  Filemaker Pro Developer
allows creation of run-time programs which can be distributed for
special applications.  There are companies around which make Filemaker
templates for a variety of applications, and consultants who specialize
in it.  In fact, a friend told me about a free download Filemaker Pro
run-time program which is used for CD libraries - if I remember
correctly, it was a companion to a program which read data from a CD in
the CD-ROM drive, dialed up a master web site, and downloaded the
appropriate song etc. information for the Filemaker Pro database.However, it's still a nice single-user relational database as well
($250); it shows its evolution as a Mac program which offers powerful
features to users who aren't programmers.  Its flexibility and user
interface features allow someone with little training to modify his
database (e.g. add additional fields, do additional or modified
screen/print layouts).  And as one becomes more familiar with it, one
can build in very powerful features - or you can just happily use it for
simple tasks.---For a project like indexing traditional or 'folk' songs, the best scheme
I've come up with is to list the actual title used on the record or in
the book, but also construct a table of "working titles" - i.e. single
designations for a given family of songs.  All the variations of a song
can be listed with a single working title - e.g. "Gambler's Blues" could
have a working title of "St. James Infirmary".  A good scheme would be
to look at the Ballad Index for help in designating a working title -
they've had to do it for the variants they've catalogued - but you can
develop your own scheme as well.  It's then trivial to simply pull up
all the members of that song family - i.e. that have the same working
title - and when scanning listings of titles, it's a convenient way to
remind yourself what each is.The use of categories is a little more interesting; there are a couple
of ways to handle these, but they're a standard way to index material.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Data Base
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:53:59 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(105 lines)


I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
that Version 5 has sorted them out:
a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
return to later.
c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
ones.For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).Hope this helps rather than confusesSteve Roud- Original Message -----
From: Donald A. Duncan <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 5:34 AM
Subject: Re: Data Base> Several people have expressed interest in this issue, so I thought I'd
> forward some information to the list.
>
> Filemaker Pro runs on both PC (MS Office-compatible, full ODBC support)
> and Mac, although swapping files may cause some differences in display
> because of handling fonts differently, and there are some features for
> the Mac which aren't done on the PC.  It's roughly comparable to MS
> Access, but built by people who understand the "U" in "GUI"!
>
> FP started in the Mac World, and was developed further as a Claris (the
> Apple software division which was spun off) program, during which time
> it went cross-platform.  Recently Apple reabsorbed Claris, but left
> Filemaker as its own company.  Their web site is at
>
>    http://www.filemaker.com
>
> There are over 5 million copies of Filemaker around.  It's made in
> various versions, including Filemaker Server which runs on Windows NT,
> and a number of Fortune 500 companies are paying many thousands of
> dollars for site licenses.  It can be run over an intranet, or serve the
> internet (i.e. be accessed through a browser).  Filemaker Pro Developer
> allows creation of run-time programs which can be distributed for
> special applications.  There are companies around which make Filemaker
> templates for a variety of applications, and consultants who specialize
> in it.  In fact, a friend told me about a free download Filemaker Pro
> run-time program which is used for CD libraries - if I remember
> correctly, it was a companion to a program which read data from a CD in
> the CD-ROM drive, dialed up a master web site, and downloaded the
> appropriate song etc. information for the Filemaker Pro database.
>
> However, it's still a nice single-user relational database as well
> ($250); it shows its evolution as a Mac program which offers powerful
> features to users who aren't programmers.  Its flexibility and user
> interface features allow someone with little training to modify his
> database (e.g. add additional fields, do additional or modified
> screen/print layouts).  And as one becomes more familiar with it, one
> can build in very powerful features - or you can just happily use it for
> simple tasks.
>
> ---
>
> For a project like indexing traditional or 'folk' songs, the best scheme
> I've come up with is to list the actual title used on the record or in
> the book, but also construct a table of "working titles" - i.e. single
> designations for a given family of songs.  All the variations of a song
> can be listed with a single working title - e.g. "Gambler's Blues" could
> have a working title of "St. James Infirmary".  A good scheme would be
> to look at the Ballad Index for help in designating a working title -
> they've had to do it for the variants they've catalogued - but you can
> develop your own scheme as well.  It's then trivial to simply pull up
> all the members of that song family - i.e. that have the same working
> title - and when scanning listings of titles, it's a convenient way to
> remind yourself what each is.
>
> The use of categories is a little more interesting; there are a couple
> of ways to handle these, but they're a standard way to index material.
>
> -Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 08:41:28 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(115 lines)


On 10/20/00, roud wrote:>I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
>Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
>it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
>can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
>All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
>understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
>with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
>that Version 5 has sorted them out:
>a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
>that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
>field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
>b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
>is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
>you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
>return to later.
>c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
>deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
>field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
>Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
>Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
>d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
>Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
>short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
>find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
>
>These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
>fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
>ones.
>
>For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
>expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
>searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
>(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).
>
>Hope this helps rather than confusesJust a few more clarifications (though we may have now gotten posts
from every Mac user on the list, so we're preaching to the choir :-).First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
but it's not a true relational database.Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
handicap for high-level work.Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
is far from obvious.The complaint about sorting is rather unfair, since it's universal. And
there is a cure: just use spaces or leading zeroes. E.g., instead of
Child 1
Child 10
Child 100
Child 2useChild 001
Child 002
Child 010
Child 100orChild   1
Child   2
Child  10
Child 100It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
probably be a very large TEXT field.I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
FileMaker.But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: George Madaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:23:17 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(133 lines)


I would only add one other caveat.  File maker 5.0 has a lot of problems that
hopefully will be corrected but right now  people I have talked with recommend
staying with 4.1."Robert B. Waltz" wrote:> On 10/20/00, roud wrote:
>
> >I agree that Filemaker is a very good entry-level database. I have only used
> >Filemaker Pro 4 (for PC) but I certainly recommend it for beginners and use
> >it myself. It's a hundred times easier to use than Microsoft Access, but
> >can't be developed by the amateur to the degree that Access can.
> >All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
> >understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
> >with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
> >that Version 5 has sorted them out:
> >a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
> >that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
> >field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
> >b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
> >is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
> >you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
> >return to later.
> >c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
> >deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
> >field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> >Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
> >Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
> >d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
> >Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
> >short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
> >find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
> >
> >These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
> >fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
> >ones.
> >
> >For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
> >expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
> >searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
> >(i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).
> >
> >Hope this helps rather than confuses
>
> Just a few more clarifications (though we may have now gotten posts
> from every Mac user on the list, so we're preaching to the choir :-).
>
> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
> but it's not a true relational database.
>
> Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
> handicap for high-level work.
>
> Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
> is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
> of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
> is far from obvious.
>
> The complaint about sorting is rather unfair, since it's universal. And
> there is a cure: just use spaces or leading zeroes. E.g., instead of
> Child 1
> Child 10
> Child 100
> Child 2
>
> use
>
> Child 001
> Child 002
> Child 010
> Child 100
>
> or
>
> Child   1
> Child   2
> Child  10
> Child 100
>
> It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
> features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
> I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
> hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.
>
> The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
> probably be a very large TEXT field.
>
> I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
> FileMaker.
>
> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
> For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
> Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
> quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).
>
> Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.
>
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html--
George F. Madaus
Boisi Professor of Education and Public Policy
Senior Research Fellow
National Commission on Educational Testing and Public Policy
Center for the Study of Testing Evaluation and Educational Policy
Lynch School of Education
Boston College
Chestnut Hill MA 02494
[unmask]
617. 552.4521
617 552 8649 FAX

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: John Garst <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:34:18 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(6 lines)


Perhaps I should write my own database program.Is this a huge job?
Or can it be done "simply"?
--
john garst    [unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: FileMaker Pro (Was: Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:30:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(35 lines)


On 10/20/00, John Garst wrote:>Perhaps I should write my own database program.
>
>Is this a huge job?
>Or can it be done "simply"?You need to specify more. :-) What do you want it to do? And what
tools do you have?If you mean writing from scratch, though -- yes, it *is* a big
job, particularly on the Mac. Especially if you want it to act
like a "real" Mac program.Your best tool for the job would probably be RealBASIC, but you're
still looking at several months of learning the program before
you can start coding the actual project.Let's put it this way: I've been writing code for 25 years. And
when I started writing Macintosh code, I'd been working on a Mac
for about eight years. It *still* took me two months to get a
program worth keeping, and it was on a smaller scale than a
database....But tell us more about what you want, and I may be able to make
a better guess at the magnitude of the problem.--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Banks of Green Willow
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:16:13 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(37 lines)


Dear All,My duo is in the throes of doing a version of Banks of Green Willow. The
source we have has a feel about it that there might be some more! Here
are the words. Does anyone know any more verses?Go and get your father's goodwill
And get your mother's money
And sail across the ocean
Along with young JohnnyThey had not been a-sailing
A-sailing many days-oh
Before she wants some woman's help
And cannot get anyGo and get me a silk napkin
To tie her head so easy
And I'll throw them overboard
Both she and her babyThey got him a silk napkin
To tie her head so easy
And they threw them overboard
Both she and her babySee how me love do tumble
See how me love do taver
See how me love do try to swim
It makes me heart quaverGo and get me love a coffin
Of the gold that shines yellow
And she shall be buried
By the banks of green willow.Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Banks of Green Willow
From: roud <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2000 22:29:40 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


There are dozens of versions. If you've got access to Bronson, Traditional
Tunes of the Child Ballads Vol.1, he gives 18 versions at Child 24. Your
text is particularly close to several collected by Sharp in Somerset, but
what you're clearly missing is the first verse, something on the lines of:It's of a sea captain
Lived near the seaside (oh)
And he courted a lady
Till she proved with child.There isn't much more to it.Steve Roud----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Rouse <[unmask]>
To: <[unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Banks of Green Willow> Dear All,
>
> My duo is in the throes of doing a version of Banks of Green Willow. The
> source we have has a feel about it that there might be some more! Here
> are the words. Does anyone know any more verses?
>
> Go and get your father's goodwill
> And get your mother's money
> And sail across the ocean
> Along with young Johnny
>
> They had not been a-sailing
> A-sailing many days-oh
> Before she wants some woman's help
> And cannot get any
>
> Go and get me a silk napkin
> To tie her head so easy
> And I'll throw them overboard
> Both she and her baby
>
> They got him a silk napkin
> To tie her head so easy
> And they threw them overboard
> Both she and her baby
>
> See how me love do tumble
> See how me love do taver
> See how me love do try to swim
> It makes me heart quaver
>
> Go and get me love a coffin
> Of the gold that shines yellow
> And she shall be buried
> By the banks of green willow.
>
> Andy

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 11:16:07 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(16 lines)


Good People:Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
Mary."  Etc., etc.Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
don't we as a group do so?Ed

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 13:34:12 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(41 lines)


On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:>Good People:
>
>Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
>curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
>clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
>
>Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
>know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
>is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
>texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
>Mary."  Etc., etc.
>
>Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
>don't we as a group do so?I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
dissatisfied.Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 17:52:39 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(43 lines)


Child himself never wrote down the criteria he used in selecting the "305",
but George Lyman Kittredge, who knew him well,  postulated what he though
were probably some of his criteria. He was interested in ballads -- songs
with a narrative (what D. K. Wilgus has described as the "And then,,,, and
then...." construction) that had been  collected from the mouths of "the
people."  (Child worked only from manuscripts and published sources;  he
wasn't a collector himself)  and available to him with a  minimum of
editorial "correction"  or  "improvement."   He deliberately omitted
broadsides as being the products of literate editors who had probably changed
the original words and moods of "the folk".  (In this same vein, much later,
Maude Carpools rejected Jean Ritchie as a valid  purveyor of folklore,
because Jean knew how to read and write and had been to college!)I think Child's omission of some ballads was due to their not having been
collected and published by any of his predecessors;  as you say, he just
hadn't encounered them.  But I'm sure he rejected some on purpose.  I can
imagine his rejection of "The Frog and the Mouse"  because of its extensive
record of publication and commercial usage;  the Queen's Stationers
registered it as early as 1580 as the work of Edward White, and Grimaldi the
famous clown (1779-1837) sang a version of it as part of his act.  Probably
any of the versions available to Child could be shown to have derived from a
printed source."The Seven Joys of Mary"  lacks the narrative quality that Child seems to
have demanded.Child never seems to have thought that his work included every known ballad.
He used Bishop Percy's original manuscripts, and was well aware that a large
number of Percy's ballads had come from an incomplete set of handwritten
pages in a Scottish castle.  The Lady of the Manor had collected them from
servants many years earlier,  and subsequent servants were known to have
started many a fire with pages from the collection, and it was heartbreaking
to think how many old ballads had been destroyed.In Child's day, it was believed that the old ballads were dying out,  as the
peasantry was becoming literate, and he was in a hurry to select those that
he thought were genuine according to his criteria.  (And by the way, when
Percy published his great three-volume collection way back in 1765, it was
under the title of "Reliques of Ancient English Poetry_.  For a long time,
the genre was thought to be dying!Sam
La Jolla, CA

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 02:17:50 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(226 lines)


On the assumption that the title change will steer away the
uninterested, I'll comment further:roud wrote:
>
> All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
> understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
> with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
> that Version 5 has sorted them out:
> a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
> that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
> field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.It's true you can't "find in any field".  But for searches in multiple
fields, you can do some logical ORs by stacking Find requests.  Go to
Find mode, enter your search criteria in Title; CTRL-N (Command-N on the
Mac) to get a second Find page, enter your criteria in First Line;
repeat for other relevant fields.  It will find all records in which the
criterion occurs in any of the indicated fields.  I haven't succeeded
yet in scripting this - i.e. letting the user put in one criterion, then
searching the 5 probable fields as above - but I haven't put much effort
into it because I don't really have a use for it in the DBs I'm working on.The same system is used for exclusionary searches - enter the criterion
you wish to find, CTRL-N for a new request, enter the criterion to be
excluded, and click the "Omit" box in the status bar on the left.  It
makes complex searches a heck of a lot easier than long
parentheses-critical "command line" search strings, although I have the
nagging feeling that there are some searches you can't set up this way.> b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
> is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
> you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
> return to later.I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
bookmarks"; run it before you start.  It's not much different from other
"bookmark" functions (although it's persistent and unlimited); it's just
that people don't usually think of using fields in the databases instead
of variables.  If you're doing research, you can add other "Mark" fields
related to topic, and keep your selections as long as you need them;
it's sort of a dynamic 'category' field you can retitle at will.  Disk
space is cheap, and they don't use much - particularly when most are empty.[Tech note:  Filemaker does not provide single-box True/False buttons.
I use a text field, set as a radio button (more visible on screen than
check boxes) which uses a value list with a single value (e.g. "Yes",
which needn't show if you set the field small enough).  Clicking on this
will check it, but clicking again will not uncheck it, since radio
buttons are intended to log a single value among several; they're
unchecked by clicking another.  However, every field also has button
behavior, so you can format the 'button' behavior of the field to run a
script which toggles the value when you click on it.  It then behaves as
a True/False or Yes/blank toggle.  This is exactly how a programmed
button works - you just do the programming yourself the Filemaker way.]> c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
> deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
> field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
> Child 120, Child 201, and so on.I sometimes use Bob's technique of filling out the numbers to a standard
length (which is an old solution, but works best with known number sets
- i.e. where you won't have to go from 999 to 1000 and suddenly have it
stop working!).  The solution I use is paired text and number fields.
The first is "Child" or "K" or "DT"; the second is the number.  Sort by
alpha, then numeric.  No problems, no special entry, simpler sorts.
Requires entering in two fields instead of one, but it's quick enough.> d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
> Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
> short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
> find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
contains the string anywhere in it - the most common search and very
useful, particularly for large text fields.  If you want to constrain
the search, you use standard criteria; e.g. =, >, <, etc. (see the
"Symbols" drop-down on the left panel when in Find mode).  For an exact
match in a text string, use the 'logical equals', i.e. '=='.  This is
covered in the documentation.> These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
> fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
> ones.Filemaker is pretty fast, and does most of what you've described, but
the larger the database, the more scripting and layouts you tend to
require to speed operations.> For my song indexes I use both Filemaker and Cardbox. The latter is more
> expensive and not quite so intuitive, but does allow tagging, 'any field'
> searching, 'exclude' searching, and most usefully, cumulative searching
> (i.e. refine the hitlist with new search criteria).Actually, Filemaker - when you approach it in the spirit of the
programmers, rather than the 'nuts & bolts' databases - does allow all
of this.  The last you do by modifying the previous search, and adding a
request; you then rerun the previous search with additional criteria.
This is actually superior to the sequential find, since at any time, in
Find mode, you can step through the previous criteria to see what you've
searched for, and modify any prior request if necessary to make a
subsequent request more appropriate."Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
> but it's not a true relational database.Perhaps, off-line, you could amplify on this?  It's not clear to me what
the difference is between cross-table lookups with specified
relationships vs. tables with primary and foreign keys.  It sounds like
a difference which isn't a difference.> Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
> handicap for high-level work.I agree; it's not designed for "high-level" work, and I have a problem
both with the way it prints out the scripts and the fact that you can't
copy and paste from the script window to put the contents of the script
- as seen by the programmer - into other documentation.  It's
occasionally irritating that it invisibly stores the "find" and "sort"
criteria; I title my scripts carefully.  It also bothers me that you
apparently can't run external functions in another language, although
that's supposed to be possible in 5.0.  I seriously miss "switch/case"
and "elseif" and a few other operators.That said, however, there's a lot to be said in favor of that scripting
environment for the non-professional user.  I keep scripts small and
informatively titled; complex scripts call internal scripts which
describe their function.  Substitute 'function' or 'procedure' for
'script', and it's exactly the way I write C programs.  The names of
environmental variables (e.g. "Status(CurrentUserName)" and script
functions make reading scripts a piece of cake; I don't have any trouble
debugging them.> Third is the lack of a "find in anything" field (noted above). This
> is a huge pain, and has no cure. Indeed, it's hard to create any sort
> of search other than an "AND" search. You can do it, but the procedure
> is far from obvious.It's true that the procedure is far from obvious, but that's what
documentation is for.  Although occasionally cumbersome, the find system
is actually pretty flexible and, as I mentioned above, has some
advantages over the conventional ways of doing things - as well as
providing the neophyte with a much better intuitive sense of what the
computer is doing than command-line 'find' strings.> It's also worth noting that FileMaker hasn't really added any useful
> features in a long time, unless you're publishing databases on the web.
> I never bought any of the 4.x versions; they did nothing for me. I'm
> hoping they'll do better with Version 5.1.
>
> The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
> probably be a very large TEXT field.I'm not sure what the concern with 5000 records is.  Our bug-tracking
database is over 4000 records now, with a lot of fields and 5 associated
files.  The longest standard operation - a record-by-record scripted
search of the entire database - takes slightly over 3 seconds [freeze
the window; video refresh for every record bogs it way down].
Unscripted searches are way faster; full-database sorts can take the
same length of time.  Hardly "go get a cup of coffee" operations -
although adding pictures or video can slow it down.> I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
> FileMaker.
>
> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?  In
bug-tracking, I have 8 global fields - four text and four numeric, for
'scratch' fields for scripts to use, some navigational fields (e.g. last
layout), some useability fields (e.g. user-specific starting layout or
preferred sort).  Fields are cheap and easy to add, and in Filemaker I
then just pick them from a list.  I used to have to do this manually,
with my own external documentation of variables.  Sure is easier in Filemaker.> For high-end jobs, you really need a serious database (Fourth
> Dimension would be my suggestion; Access is PC-only and has enough
> quirks to make it obvious that Bill Gates was involved :-).
>
> Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.Right - it would take a big library/collection operation to really
outgrow Filemaker.George Madaus wrote:
>
> I would only add one other caveat.  File maker 5.0 has a lot of problems that
> hopefully will be corrected but right now  people I have talked with recommend
> staying with 4.1.
>That's good to know; we're considering an upgrade.  Maybe when we get
together, you can give me some more detail.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sat, 21 Oct 2000 23:21:06 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(72 lines)


Bob asks for some criteria against which to measure the ballads Child
omitted but might have included had he known of them (pace, Sam Hinton),
or had he a more complete record.I think there are a few measures we might employ:1) The ballad probably pre-dates 1750, the approximate date of Bishop
Percy's _Reliques_ upon which Child relied.2) It exhibits the hallmarks of traditional ballad composition:
incremental repetition, "leaping and lingering," stock phrases, and so on.3) It need not have originated in England -- to answer one of Bob's
questions.4) Its first appearance may have been in print rather than in an
unpublished collection.  See, for example "John Dory," the A text of which
is reprinted from Thomas Ravenscroft.  (Which is why I think he did not
eliminate "The Frog and the Mouse" because it was registered with the
Stationer's Office.)  Further, there are versions of "Barbara Allen" that
owe their very existence to printing houses, yet Child included them in
the canon.EdOn Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:> On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:
>
> >Good People:
> >
> >Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> >curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> >clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
> >
> >Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> >know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> >is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> >texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> >Mary."  Etc., etc.
> >
> >Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> >don't we as a group do so?
>
> I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."
>
> There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
> fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
> definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
> ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
> in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
> which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?
>
> If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
> compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
> I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
> dissatisfied.
>
> Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
> What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
> --
> Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> 2095 Delaware Avenue
> Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
>
> The Ballad Index Web Site:
> http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 08:21:46 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


MJC Hodgart: The Ballads (London, 1950 rev 1962) discussed this in pp 19-25.He cites nine songs as being worth consideration for admission to the "canon"
on the basis that they substantially exhibit features included in those which
make up the 305.The bitter withy
Still growing
Corpus Christi
The seven virgins (not one for Ed)
The blind beggar
Bruton town
The shooting of his dear
Bold Fisherman(and with reservations) Six Dukes went a fishing.There is some discussion but the book is too brief a survey to do much more
than raise the question.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 10:50:42 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(253 lines)


On 10/22/00, Donald A. Duncan wrote:>On the assumption that the title change will steer away the
>uninterested,Good idea. :-)>I'll comment further:
>
>roud wrote:
>>
>> All databases have their annoying little faults, and these need to be
>> understood when you are designing your database. In my opinion the key ones
>> with Filemaker are as follows, but it's possible I have misunderstood or
>> that Version 5 has sorted them out:
>> a) You cannot do a 'Find in any field' search. In other words, if you know
>> that the word 'Brand' appears in the song title field, OR the first line
>> field, OR the synopsis field, etc., you have to search them all separately.
>
>It's true you can't "find in any field".  But for searches in multiple
>fields, you can do some logical ORs by stacking Find requests.  Go to
>Find mode, enter your search criteria in Title; CTRL-N (Command-N on the
>Mac) to get a second Find page, enter your criteria in First Line;
>repeat for other relevant fields.  It will find all records in which the
>criterion occurs in any of the indicated fields.  I haven't succeeded
>yet in scripting this - i.e. letting the user put in one criterion, then
>searching the 5 probable fields as above - but I haven't put much effort
>into it because I don't really have a use for it in the DBs I'm working on.
>
>The same system is used for exclusionary searches - enter the criterion
>you wish to find, CTRL-N for a new request, enter the criterion to be
>excluded, and click the "Omit" box in the status bar on the left.  It
>makes complex searches a heck of a lot easier than long
>parentheses-critical "command line" search strings, although I have the
>nagging feeling that there are some searches you can't set up this way.All of this works, but I for one find it extremely irritating and difficult.
If I'm constructing a complex search, I find it difficult to not be able
to see all my search requests at once. And if I'm combining positive
and negative searches, it gets really complex.It's a drawback. Fatal? No. Particularly in this context. But it's a
poor mechanism.Also, this sort of search is very slow if you don't have all your
fields indexed. And -- despite your comment below about disk space
being cheap -- having a lot of indices and doing a lot of complex
searches causes databases to grow. I, at least, have to compact
my databases a lot, for speed and for backup purposes.> > b) You cannot manually tag or mark and manipulate individual records. This
>> is very annoying if your search has brought up a mixed bag of hits, and as
>> you scroll through them you want to mark the ones you're interested in to
>> return to later.
>
>I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
>this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
>When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
>recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
>bookmarks"; run it before you start.A clever trick. Might be worth writing two scripts -- one to mark
and one to clear. That way you can simplify your find scripts by
doing your ORs and NOTs one at a time.Come to think of it, that argues for three scripts:
Mark Selected
Clear Selected
Clear All[ ... ]> > c) In common with other databases the designers have not sorted out how to
>> deal with numbers and letters in the same field. Thus, when you sort on a
>> field with, say, Child numbers in it, Child 101 will sort before Child 20.
> > Even worse, if you search for '20' in this field, it will find Child 20,
>> Child 120, Child 201, and so on.
>
>I sometimes use Bob's technique of filling out the numbers to a standard
>length (which is an old solution, but works best with known number sets
>- i.e. where you won't have to go from 999 to 1000 and suddenly have it
>stop working!).  The solution I use is paired text and number fields.
>The first is "Child" or "K" or "DT"; the second is the number.  Sort by
>alpha, then numeric.  No problems, no special entry, simpler sorts.
>Requires entering in two fields instead of one, but it's quick enough.And very possibly produces smaller and faster indices, too.Alternately, if you're not sure how much space to allow -- well, here
I think the rule "disk space is cheap" *does* apply. :-) If you think you
might have a thousand entries, leave room for 10,000 or 100,000.> > d) Searching seems to be fixed to 'part of word' with no option for change.
>> Most of the time this is sensible, but sometimes, when you want to find a
>> short word, you get an awful lot of false hits - searching for 'don' will
>> find London, Londonderry, abandon, donate, and so on.
>
>If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
>contains the string anywhere in itUm -- no. It will only find words starting with that string. (At least
in the version I've got.) But you *can* use wildcards such as *.[ ... ]> > These are not major faults in a small database (say, only 10 fields and
>> fewer than 5000 records), but do become increasingly irritating in larger
>> ones.
>
>Filemaker is pretty fast,Actually, the speed varies. I have the fascinating advantage of having
the Ballad Index in both text and FileMaker format, and being able to
compare. Searching an indexed field in FileMaker is faster than searching
an indexed field with my (really clunky) Ballad Index software. However,
when searching an unindexed field, FileMaker is slower -- *much* slower
(FileMaker takes about twice as long to search a single unindexed field
as the Ballad Index requires to search *the whole Ballad Index text
file). So it's a good idea to plan in advance which fields you do or
don't want to index.I suppose I should explain: An "indexed" field is a field which FileMaker
chops up somehow so it can search it faster. All databases use this
format in some form or other. Searches on indexed fields are very fast
(functionally instantaneous, even in large databases) -- but they
make the database larger. Sometimes *much* larger.[ ... ]>"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>>
>> First, FileMaker Pro is not relational. It has lookups across files,
>> but it's not a true relational database.
>
>Perhaps, off-line, you could amplify on this?  It's not clear to me what
>the difference is between cross-table lookups with specified
>relationships vs. tables with primary and foreign keys.  It sounds like
>a difference which isn't a difference.I realize you asked for an off-list answer, but I'm going to make a
stab at it so everyone can understand.In a lot of instances, it doesn't make a difference. Particularly if
you keep your data clean. But there are two problems with the FileMaker
approach. First, because the two files are *completely separate*,
you can make modifications in one file without the other noticing it.To take the LPs-and-songs example, you can delete an LP from the
recordings file, and the Songs file never knows. It just keeps those
orphan songs on file, unless you take care not to let this happen.With a true indexed database, deleting the one will cause it to ask
you about the others.The other problem is that the links simply don't have all the features
of true relational links. Having worked with true relational databases
(Fourth Dimension and Helix, plus brief experience with a couple of
others), I can say that there *is* a difference, though I don't know
how to describe it in terms of LPs-and-songs.> > Second, FileMaker Pro programming is a rather difficult experience.
>> The language is easy to "write" but impossible to document or debug.
>> It doesn't even tell you the parameters to a lot of the commands;
>> it just stores them away. For me at least, I've found it easier to
>> recreate functions rather than try to fix them. This is a serious
>> handicap for high-level work.
>
>I agree; it's not designed for "high-level" work, and I have a problem
>both with the way it prints out the scripts and the fact that you can't
>copy and paste from the script window to put the contents of the script
>- as seen by the programmer - into other documentation.  It's
>occasionally irritating that it invisibly stores the "find" and "sort"
>criteria; I title my scripts carefully.  It also bothers me that you
>apparently can't run external functions in another language, although
>that's supposed to be possible in 5.0.  I seriously miss "switch/case"
>and "elseif" and a few other operators.Of course, those are true programmers' constructs. :-) But the lack
of COMMENTS is *really* bad....>That said, however, there's a lot to be said in favor of that scripting
>environment for the non-professional user.Agreed. It's an easy scripting language. It's just not very powerful. :-)[ ... ]> > The complaint about large databases is valid, but needs to be kept in
>> context. Chances are that a database of recordings and songs will not
>> go over the limit. Not many people have 5,000 LPs, I don't think. :-)
> > And you won't use many fields -- it's just that one of the fields will
>> probably be a very large TEXT field.
>
>I'm not sure what the concern with 5000 records is.It's not a magic number. I suspect, in fact, that it has to do
with the size of the index files, and the number of sectors needed
for the file overall. I currently have a database of 11,000 records,
with about eight fields per record, which gives no trouble at all.
But it's a very small database overall -- those 11,000 records add
up to only a little over a megabyte. (The Ballad Index, by contrast,
needs 4.5M for 7,000 records.) The size of the whole database is
the real concern.[ ... ]> > I would describe FileMaker this way: It's a very easy database
>> for elementary work. Setting up a database is very simple. If your
>> task is straightforward enough and doesn't need relational attributes,
>> it's quite nice. So, for instance, I set up the Ballad Index in
>> FileMaker.
>>
>> But it's very difficult to do advanced work in FileMaker. It's not
>> truly relational, and the programming language is not very powerful.
>> The only way to create a variable, for instance, is a calculated
>> field. This can cause calculated fields to stack up *fast*. (I have
>> more calculated fields than data fields for the Ballad Index.)
>
>Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
>variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
>persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
>other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?A variable exists in *one* place. A field exists in all of however
many records you have. A variable crosses all records; a field applies
only to one.A task I would like to do in FileMaker is to be able to count exactly
how many references there are in the Ballad Index. The total space
needed for this is one short integer. But to do it, I have to create
a whole new field and cast a total. Very bad.[ ... ]> > Still, for the task of songs-and-LPs, FileMaker should be just fine.
>> Or even a text file with appropriate file searching software.
>
>Right - it would take a big library/collection operation to really
>outgrow Filemaker.The real point is not the amount of data, but the complexity of
the interrelationships. But that's the point: songs-and-LPs
does not require complex interrelationships. At most, a simple
link (and I'd argue against that; make it a flat file with the
song titles in a text field).
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Sun, 22 Oct 2000 16:08:20 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(31 lines)


A nice idea, Ed, definitional difficulties notwithstanding.  It might be
informative to give a try at a list, if for no other reason than to
distinguish those which were verifiably in existence at the turn of the
century.  Those who care could undertake it could debate the propriety
of including any given song, but a lists of candidates would be informative.I note that the 8-volume set of MacColl & Lloyd singing Child Ballads
(Folk Music of the World series, Washington 715-722) had a 9th album,
traditional songs not included in Child (although I don't believe they
called them 'ballads' necessarily).  They included:The Bitter Withy
Lang A-Growing
The Seven Virgins
The Bramble Briar
Down in Yon Forest
The Bold Fisherman
The Blind Beggar's Daughter of Bethnal Green
Six Dukes Went A-Fishing
The Holy Well
The Shooting of His DearDoes anyone know why these particular songs were chosen?  Who was the
architect of this collection?And while we're at it, can anyone provide any details on the subsequent
discography of the collection?  I saw a late '50s reference that
Riverside was planning to reissue the records - did that ever happen?
Did anyone else republish them?  Did any other record series borrow from them?-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 01:03:16 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(21 lines)


If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
. )The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic."The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
opposite.(Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
currency in tradition.")Cheers
Jamie

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 05:12:29 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(12 lines)


In a message dated 23/10/2000  05:07:34, you write:<< (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
 to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
 currency in tradition.") >>Or the ones, like the "Star of Belleisle" (definitely Irish on qualitative
grounds and on the evidence of its appearance on a leaf of an indisputably
Irish songster in the Royal Irish Academy) which he includes in Native
American Balladry.John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A second Croskeys CD
From: [unmask]
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 07:34:34 EDT
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(14 lines)


This is not strictly relevant to this forum but some may be interested. It
concerns a cd of stories produced to aid the rebuilding of a famous music
venue.Members may know that the Crosskeys Inn, in County Antrim, famous for music,
song and tale sessions, was destroyed by fire earlier this year. A CD of
music and song produced in aid of the rebuilding has already been issued; a
second has now been produced. Entitled "Tales Across the Ocean" it comprises
stories told by some of the most accomplished tellers of tales from Ireland,
north and south, and from North America.Further details may be obtained from me ([unmask])John Moulden

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Filemaker Pro (was Re: Data Base)
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:40:42 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(87 lines)


"Robert B. Waltz" wrote:
>
> >I use a "Mark" field.  View selected records in a layout which includes
> >this field (editable) and click on any you want to add to your 'bag'.
> >When you've done all the searches you want, find marked fields to
> >recover all you've selected.  You need a simple script to "Clear
> >bookmarks"; run it before you start.
>
> A clever trick. Might be worth writing two scripts -- one to mark
> and one to clear. That way you can simplify your find scripts by
> doing your ORs and NOTs one at a time.
>
> Come to think of it, that argues for three scripts:
> Mark Selected
> Clear Selected
> Clear AllCute!  My concern has been with the records which are insufficiently
differentiated for practical search criteria; I'm interested in flagging
a small number of records in a larger found set.   I hadn't though of
using it for compound searches.  Worth doing!> Alternately, if you're not sure how much space to allow -- well, here
> I think the rule "disk space is cheap" *does* apply. :-) If you think you
> might have a thousand entries, leave room for 10,000 or 100,000.Yeah, but that just proliferates leading zeroes and/or spaces, and you
always have to get the number right, or they'll sort wrong.  In those
instances, I tend to start numbering at 10000 or 100,000 so there's a
real number for all places.  I sometimes use other 'decades' for
categorization - e.g. 500,000-599,999 for a specific subset of records.> >If you just enter the text string, it will find any record which
> >contains the string anywhere in it
>
> Um -- no. It will only find words starting with that string. (At least
> in the version I've got.) But you *can* use wildcards such as *.I stand corrected!> To take the LPs-and-songs example, you can delete an LP from the
> recordings file, and the Songs file never knows. It just keeps those
> orphan songs on file, unless you take care not to let this happen.
>
> With a true indexed database, deleting the one will cause it to ask
> you about the others.A valid distinction for complex databases, although I should mention
that the process of deleting/modifying all related references is
sufficiently nasty that in our SQL 7 DB, we don't actually run the
procedure - just mark 'deleted' accounts as 'disabled'.  Someday, of
course, we'll have to bite the bullet....> >Perhaps I'm more simple-minded, but I don't have a problem with that.  A
> >variable is simply an assigned memory location, and if its value is
> >persistent it's written to disk.  How is that different from a field,
> >other than that its assigned location is on disk in the first place?
>
> A variable exists in *one* place. A field exists in all of however
> many records you have. A variable crosses all records; a field applies
> only to one.
>
> A task I would like to do in FileMaker is to be able to count exactly
> how many references there are in the Ballad Index. The total space
> needed for this is one short integer. But to do it, I have to create
> a whole new field and cast a total. Very bad.'Global' field types are a single value, record-independent;
theoretically they're written in a single location.  The difference
between a single floating point value on disk and a single integer in
memory is miniscule.  I'd scan the records and increment the value in
the global field, ending with my total.  Sure you have to create the
global field, but you also have to specify and initialize a variable.
Am I missing something?All my scratch and calculation fields are global variables.  Another way
to handle this was used by my predecessor; she used a separate file to
store the counts and calculations involved in statistical analysis,
since they're not record-specific.  One can overwrite a single record
each time a calculation is done, or create a new record each time
analysis is performed, providing a historical record.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:29:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(61 lines)


On 10/23/00, James Moreira wrote:>If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
>didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
>. )Although I should note that "Bitter Withy" is an English song, and
the Ballad Index is still much stronger on American than British
material. (Funny, considering that I prefer the British ballads --
but it's what I have access to.)[ ... ]>"The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
>ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
>tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
>opposite.I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)>(Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
>to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
>currency in tradition.")I think the last is because Laws isn't as widely known or accessible.
I get very irked with Laws, personally. He's indispensable to me
(so many of the songs he catalogued are so wide-spread and under so
many titles), but he's as quirky as Child.On the other hand, that proves the whole problem with this project:
Any particular person can make up a list, but no two will make the
same list. Child's list has manifest inaccuracies; Laws added a lot
of additional songs, but it's a dubious list in many ways; now we're
talking about adding more but have no adequate definition of what
we want.I find myself wondering what is the point? Just to get some sort
of number on the things, so that we can find all the versions?
The Ballad Index in effect provides that function, but with a very
(very, very, very) loose definition of a ballad. Sure, we throw in
things which aren't ballads, at least in the high and noble form
most of us detect in the Child Ballads. But let's face it -- not
all the Child Ballads are actually as good as we think. Consider
"The Whummil Bore." Or such degenerate forms as "Billy Magee Magaw."One of the points Ed mentioned was the "Ballad" form -- the 4343 abab
rhyme, the internal refrains, etc. And yet, another thing that
working over thousands of texts has demonstrated to me is that the
metrical form is not an integral part of a ballad; too many ("The
Twa Sisters" is a fine example) change form -- with or without
the refrain, in single or double stanzas, etc. When we first discussed
creating the Ballad Index, I asked about putting in a metrical form
indication. This was clearly not a workable idea (and people
rejected it) -- though it would have been really, really fascinating
to do it on a text-by-text basis.But it's yet another problem with our definitions.I just don't think we're in a position to do a comprehensive ballad
catalog. There is too much we need to do *first*.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:19:28 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(26 lines)


Glaring omissions are Bamboo Briar (Bruton Town), Shooting of his Dear
(Molly Vaughn), Long A-Growing, Frog's Courtship. The Digital Tradition
has assigned numbers (starting with 306)to Childles ballads, just to keep
them gouped for searching reasons.On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Good People:
>
> Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
>
> Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> Mary."  Etc., etc.
>
> Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> don't we as a group do so?
>
> Ed
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 10:31:10 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(83 lines)


The question really is: "WHat do we gain by numbering?" I find that it
helps to locate variants, and is very convenient for this. If you're
talking about somehow elevating a non-Child ballad's status, I'll leave;
Child included some pretty feeble ballads, and wasn't consistently clear
in specifying the basis for assigning numbers.On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Bob asks for some criteria against which to measure the ballads Child
> omitted but might have included had he known of them (pace, Sam Hinton),
> or had he a more complete record.
>
> I think there are a few measures we might employ:
>
> 1) The ballad probably pre-dates 1750, the approximate date of Bishop
> Percy's _Reliques_ upon which Child relied.
>
> 2) It exhibits the hallmarks of traditional ballad composition:
> incremental repetition, "leaping and lingering," stock phrases, and so on.
>
> 3) It need not have originated in England -- to answer one of Bob's
> questions.
>
> 4) Its first appearance may have been in print rather than in an
> unpublished collection.  See, for example "John Dory," the A text of which
> is reprinted from Thomas Ravenscroft.  (Which is why I think he did not
> eliminate "The Frog and the Mouse" because it was registered with the
> Stationer's Office.)  Further, there are versions of "Barbara Allen" that
> owe their very existence to printing houses, yet Child included them in
> the canon.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Robert B. Waltz wrote:
>
> > On 10/21/00, Ed Cray wrote:
> >
> > >Good People:
> > >
> > >Pardon me if I am reopening a subject already thrashed to death, but I am
> > >curious about those ballads Child omitted from the 305, for reasons not
> > >clear, or because he simply had not encountered them.
> > >
> > >Unless he had a rule that ballads could only be about people, I do not
> > >know why he omitted "The Frog and the Mouse."  "The Sea Crab," of course,
> > >is frankly bawdy, but then so too is "Our Goodman" (274) in a lot of
> > >texts.  We have "The Cherry Tree Carol" (54) but not "The Seven Joys of
> > >Mary."  Etc., etc.
> > >
> > >Has anyone compiled a list of these Childless ballads?  And if not, why
> > >don't we as a group do so?
> >
> > I have a problem with this, frankly. It's the "problem of criteria."
> >
> > There are thousands of traditional ballads known, even using a
> > fairly strict definition of "ballad." (And I don't like strict
> > definitions, but that's another issue. :-) How do we decide which
> > ones belong? What are your criteria? Must the songs be British
> > in origin? How do you deal with Child's oddball "popular" criterion,
> > which gave us so many non-traditional ballads?
> >
> > If you can specify things clearly enough, it might be possible to
> > compile a list just by doing the correct Ballad Index search. But
> > I suspect that any list of criteria we produce will leave someone
> > dissatisfied.
> >
> > Still, the fairest thing to do is ask, "What are your criteria?
> > What sort of ballads are you considering as 'Childless Ballads'?"
> > --
> > Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
> > 2095 Delaware Avenue
> > Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
> > 651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]
> >
> > The Ballad Index Web Site:
> > http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Ed Cray <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 08:20:11 -0700
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(30 lines)


Jamie:Laws is next.EdOn Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:> If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
> didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
> . )
>
> The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
> Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
> Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
> other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
> as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic.
>
> "The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
> ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
> tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
> opposite.
>
> (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
> to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
> currency in tradition.")
>
> Cheers
> Jamie
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Fw: Latest Discoveries (fwd)
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 12:13:38 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(59 lines)


Hi, folks:Richard Spottswood sent this, and I'm forwarding it. My finances aren't in
shape to buy more LPs at the moment (and neither are my shelves). Enjoy!
Peace,
PaulR Spottswood writesBrian is a local [Washington, DC] dealer.  Anyone interested should conact
him.  Dick---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2094 00:10:49 -0400
From: Brian McGuire <[unmask]>
To: [unmask]
Subject: Latest DiscoveriesHello Dick Spottswood:
I have found some items you might possibly be able to shed a little light
on.
There was an estate sale at a house on Massachussetts Ave. down in the
embassy neighborhood, right by Sheridan Circle, where there was an unusual
collection of folk music records, specifically concentrating on the old
Appalachian ballads.
I got a batch of LPs by folks such as Jean Ritchie, Bascom Lamar Lunsford,
Frank Warner, Cisco Houston, Eric Darling, etc., all original issues on
Elektra, Riverside, Vanguard, Folkways, etc. from the '50s and early '60s.
Generally in very good condition.  10" LP by Jean Ritchie which was
Elektra's first record.  If you know anybody who's hot for this stuff, send
them on.
But what I want to ask about is a bunch of apparantly home-recorded 78s of
various ballad singers.  There's 12 of them, Recordio Discs made by
Wilcox-Gay.
The singers are names such as Artus Moser, who I know has been recorded by
the Library of Congress, Virgil Sturgill, who I think may not be one of the
most authentic of folk artists, Joan Moser, Charlie LaCombe, Eva Russell,
Harry West (there's a Stinson 10-incher by him and his wife, also), Pleaz
Mobley, an old Kentucky geezer, I believe, J.R. Martin, who identifies
himself as being from such-and-such a place in North Carolina, Chester (or
Clester?) Houncell.
The sound quality is good, but the recordings are a little amateurish in
that as often as not the first or last half-second of a song is cut off.
Sometimes the singers pause in order to recollect the lyrics, apologizing.
Some of these pieces take up an entire side of a record, verse after verse
after verse!
Sometimes they have a few moments of comments and conversation before or
aft.  I wish they had more of that.
I really don't have any idea whose stuff this was--although the estate sale
people might surrender some information if pressed.
Does this sound like something folklorists would kill for?
Oh, here's another item I thought might be significant.  A Cisco Houston 78
album on Disc Records titled "Cowboy Songs."  Cover art by Ben Shahn, liner
notes by Woody Guthrie.  They spell his name "Huston" throughout.  One
record is cracked, unfortunately, but playable.  Dated 1947.
Do you have any observations, evaluations, or educated guesses regarding
this stuff?  Want to take a look/listen to it?
Sincerely,
Brian McGuire

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: James Moreira <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:03:54 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(32 lines)


[unmask],.Internet writes:
>I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
>a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
 Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
good examples of this style.But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
beginning.

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Amy Davis <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:34:03 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(49 lines)


I have read notes (somewhere...) about "Shooting of his Dear" that suggest
his mistaking his love for a swan and shooting may actually be because she
was a swan at the time of the shooting, and may have on occasion taken an
alternate form as a swan.  This sort of human/animal metamorphosis might
suggest an older, pre-modern worldview and belief system.Amy DavisJames Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
> beginning.--
Amy Davis
Folklife Assistant
Southern Folklife Collection
UNC-Chapel Hill
(919) 962-1345

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:28:40 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(85 lines)


On 10/23/00, James Moreira wrote:>[unmask],.Internet writes:
>>I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
>>a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
>Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
>Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
>natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
>."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
>either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
>and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
>side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
>guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
>depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
>belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
>older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
>commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
>especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
>link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
>Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
>Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
> Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
>the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
>in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
>some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
>good examples of this style.
>
>But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
>narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
>involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
>by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
>remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
>beginning.This is backwards. I could argue many of the points in the first
paragraph, but the latter one is where it all comes apart.The ghost demonstrates that the song is old. Look at the history
of the supernatural ballads. They are constantly being rationalized.
Most of them are very old. The current forms don't have supernatural
elements. Neither do the more recent ballads.For the ghost to exist at all, the song must be old. And it must
have circulated early, because the versions almost all retain the
ghost. That means it circulated before the days of rationalization.The fact that a song mentions a gun doesn't make it recent. Guns
have been around for half a millennium! And it's not inherently
clear that the original involved a gun anyway. If a fourteenth
century song claims that X shot Y, you'll assume it involves a bow.
Five centuries later, you'd assume a gun. But the word "shot" applies
to both, and could have influenced the name of the weapon used.I'm not saying it's a great ballad; I don't like it much either.
But it is widespread, it is firmly established in oral tradition,
it shows extreme variation, and it has every hallmark of age.The song may well have originated as a "popular" or a "literary" rather
than a folk piece. So what? If literary origin disqualifies something
from the Child canon, then you have to disqualify 80% of the Robin
Hood ballads, and quite a few of the pieces in the final volume
of the Child corpus.People seem to keep playing with ballad definitions. I guess I'm
just too simple-minded for that. A ballad is a traditional song with
a story. I don't care about form, about origin, about date, or
about how it achieved currency. Neither did Child, by our standards,
or he would have included a very different list of songs!I'm going to vote with Dick Greenhaus on this: There is value to
some sort of a cataloguing system to put all the various versions
of a song "under one roof." (That's one of the things the Ballad
Index attempts, though our linking element is a title -- a thing
someone might actually remember! -- rather than a number.) But any
other sort of cataloguing is inherently arbitrary. No two people
will produce the same results. So I don't see the point.
--
Robert B. Waltz  - - - - - - - - Ballad Index Editor
2095 Delaware Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4801
651-454-8994 - - - - - - - - - - e-mail: [unmask]The Ballad Index Web Site:
http://www.csufresno.edu/folklore/BalladIndexTOC.html

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: 16th and 17th century broadside ballad index
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:11:13 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(58 lines)


There have been some refinements added to the 16th and 17th
century broadside ballad index on my website. The file is a large
one in ASCII, not a database system. That means one can easily
search for a keyword or phrase anywhere in the file, as long as a
carriage return someplace in a line doesn't intervene. This is a
reasonable way to do things for a file that's of the order of a
megabyte or less, because it can usually be handled and rapidly
searched in a word processor program. Beyond about 3/4 of a
megabyte it becomes very time consuming to add in new items in proper
order, and I think a megabyte is probably a practical limit,
and beyond that a database system becomes mandatory.I've made a modification and slight extension of the index to
allow fast direct search on some serial numbers. I've extended
the 'Z' designation to act as a signal that a serial number
follows, and have concluded all serial numbers with the
terminator |, to eliminate accidental identities, e.g., so a
search for ZX20[|] won't turn up ZX200-209 and ZX2000-2099.ZNn is the same as previously; n being the arbitrary, but unique,
serial number of a ballad.New directly searchable serial numbers are as follows:ZBn denotes the serial number 'n' of a Stationers' Register
ballad entry in Hyder E. Rollins' 'An Analytical Index to the
Ballad Entries'.ZCn denotes Child ballad 'n' in 'The English and Scottish
Popular Ballads', sometimes with a letter, x, appended to
indicate which of Child's text the broadside refers to.ZLxn denotes the letter-number combination 'x n' in G. M. Laws,
Jr., 'American Balladry from British Broadsides'.ZRn denotes the number 'n' is Steve Roud's folk song and
broadside ballad indexes, but only for those known in traditional
versions. Roud has the same number for broadside and traditional
versions of a song, but the presence of a ZRn number does not
guarantee there is a known traditional text (even for some of the
Child ballads there is no known traditional text). Usually if
there is a ZRn noted there are more (and usually many more)
traditional texts noted in Steve's indexes than the few examples
I note in my broadside ballad index (and more than are in Laws'
two indexes or in 'The Traditional Ballad Index').Steve Roud, however, doesn't usually give a Roud number to
broadside ballads for which there is no known traditional
version, so there is no way to give a complete cross-referencing
of these broadside ballads in my index to those in his by a
simple ZRn serial number. For those interested only in folk songs
and their background, it would serve little purpose anyway.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:04:04 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(46 lines)


In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.        Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.Heresy provided by dick greenhausOn Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Ed Cray wrote:> Jamie:
>
> Laws is next.
>
> Ed
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:
>
> > If memory serves me right, "The Bitter Withy" is one that Child simply
> > didn't know about.  (Ballad Index gives 1905 as earliest date so . . .
> > . )
> >
> > The claim for including "The Bold Fisherman" seems to be based on Lucy
> > Broadwood's reading which ties it to gnostic Christian symbolism.
> > Roger Renwick, on the other hand, puts it quite comfortably along side
> > other examples of the lover returning in disguise theme, which, as far
> > as ballads go, seems primarily a broadside topic.
> >
> > "The Shooting of His Dear" was, I think, rightly omitted.  It has the
> > ghost motif but that doesn't necessarily mean the song has its roots in
> > tradition.  And the style of the versions I've seen suggests quite the
> > opposite.
> >
> > (Funny, no one ever gets upset about what Laws didn't include?  Or more
> > to the point, about the many items he described as "of doubtful
> > currency in tradition.")
> >
> > Cheers
> > Jamie
> >
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: dick greenhaus <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:06:46 -0400
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:

TEXT/PLAIN(39 lines)


While Child may have considered his ballads as being pre-literature, there
is a great deal of evidence that this simply wan't true. I hate the
thought of categorizing something based on our ignorance of its source.On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, James Moreira wrote:> [unmask],.Internet writes:
> >I would argue the reverse. The song is too widespread. It's clearly
> >a *popular* ballad, even if it isn't a good one. :-)
>
> Popular in the sense of "widely known or liked" isn't the issue.  For
> Child, the popular ballad implied pre-literature: "Its historical and
> natural place is anterior to the appearance of the poetry of art . . .
> ."   So essentially, ballads from Child's perspective have to point
> either stylistically or thematically to pre-modern society and culture,
> and from this standpoint it's generally agreed that he erred on the
> side of inclusion.  There are a few ways that he could make educated
> guesses about appropriate ballads: treatment of actual events;
> depiction of feudal society; indication of pre-modern worldview or
> belief systems; and the stylistic traits that appear to typify the
> older varieties of European balladry, i.e. patterns of repetition,
> commonplaces, and various kinds of parallelism.  The latter has become
> especially important in recent decades because of theories about the
> link between formulaic style and oral (non-literate) tradition.  (See,
> Buchan, The Ballad and The Folk and Andersen, Commonplace and
> Creativity for two different views on this style and what it suggests.)
>  Some in the International Ballad Commission have advocated reserving
> the term ballad -- or specifically classical ballad -- solely for songs
> in this style.  Personally I find that too limiting because there are
> some historical, religious and alleged minstrel ballads which are not
> good examples of this style.
>
> But as for "Shooting of his Dear," I still don't see how a tale,
> narrated in a completely prosaic style, about a hunting accident
> involving a gun, leading to a jury trial, in which the accused is freed
> by the testimony of a ghost (one of the few supernatural beings that
> remains rife in modern tradition) suggests anything but a fairly recent
> beginning.
>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Robert B. Waltz" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:55:34 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(48 lines)


On 10/23/00, dick greenhaus wrote:>In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
>basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
>distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
>and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
>examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.I think the number assignments are random. Hardly something we can
criticise in the context of Child. At least Laws's lettering system
gives approximate classification. It's a lot easier to find a
vaguely remembered ballad in Laws than in Child.I agree that he has a problem with separation criteria. (A useful
lesson for the Ballad Index; I'm trying to make those distinctions
in the notes.) But, again, Child didn't do it either. I'd love
to know how Child decided, in cases like "The Gaberlunzie Man" or
"The Twa Corbies," which were "valid" texts and which were
worthy of the appendices.It is unfortunate that Laws didn't give more and better examples,
but it's hard to blame him for producing an academic work in
the Sixties which doesn't have much value to us in the Nineties.
He could hardly know which books would be in or out of print.
And he was targeting college students anyway; they were supposed
to have access to better libraries.I don't mean to absolve Laws of all charges; his work does have
defects (and far too many typographical errors!). But his is the
only widespread classification scheme other than Child's; it's
extremely valuable simply for that.Would I like to start over again, going back even before Child,
and do the job right? Yes, of course I would! But it's not
going to happen. Laws is a lot better than nothing!>        Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
>and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
>I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.If it's any comfort, I have found the texts of several Laws Ballads
in the DT to be quite helpful.
--
Bob Waltz
[unmask]"The one thing we learn from history --
   is that no one ever learns from history."

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: "Donald A. Duncan" <[unmask]>
Reply-To:[unmask]
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 21:20:45 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


I'm generally in favor of indexing systems.  As Dick says, it's useful
if for no other reason than grouping songs apparently of the same
family.  I approve of Bob's BI policy of inclusivity; I've found the
Ballad Index particularly useful on songs like "Fare You Well, Mary Ann"
which are clearly not ballads but are from oral tradition at some level.My interest in a listing of this type is much less as an attempt to
extend Child's work, and more as a medium for a more widely-used system
for cataloguing.  Any widely-used system confers benefits in spite of
inadequacies and functional weakness - c.f. Microsoft for a conceptual
example) - but I think this group, with its extensive knowledge of both
the genre and definitions, is a better group than most to come up with
something, and to make clear its limitations, assumptions and exceptions.-Don Duncan

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Bruce Olson <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Mon, 23 Oct 2000 22:16:21 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(38 lines)


dick greenhaus wrote:
>
> In my experience, Laws is simply unworkable. . He never specified the
> basis for selection or number assignment; he doesn't define what
> distinguishes onee from another (there are at least 3 called "Waterloo"
> and another three called "Plains of Waterloo"); and the textx he uses for
> examples are neither provided nor readily accessible.
>
>         Susan Friedman and I made a valiant effort to dig out examples,
> and the Digital Tradition includes them with their Laws designations, but
> I'm not sure that these designations have been of much use to anyone.
>
> Heresy provided by dick greenhaus
>Dick, as Bob Waltz points out in another posting, Laws, despite some
deficiencies, is very useful. Where would we be without his two volumes?
As for usefulness on the Mudcat Forum, I've often used Laws designation.
For example, if someone requests a song and I recognized it as one in
Laws indexes, I don't try to guess what titles or keywords I should look
for it under in the Digital Tradition. I might never guess a correct
one. I thumb through the appropriate subject heading (or maybe two of
them) in Laws' indexes, and then post on the Mudcat Forum a 'search for
(Laws) 'Xn' in DT' as a quick way for someone to find all versions in
the DT.It is also becoming pretty much standard to give Laws designation in the
UK as well as in the US. As I pointed out in an earlier posting today,
I've made it easy to search for Laws Xn designation in the broadside
ballad index on my website; Steve Roud lists it in his broadside and
folk song indexes, and its given in the notes in 'The Greig-Duncan Folk
Song Collection'.Bruce OlsonOld English, Irish and, Scots: popular songs, tunes, broadside
ballads at my website (no advs-spam, etc)- www.erols.com/olsonw
or click below  <A href="http://www.erols.com/olsonw"> Click </a>

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: Re: Childless Ballads
From: Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Paul Stamler <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 01:17:01 -0500
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(15 lines)


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert B. Waltz <[unmask]><<The fact that a song mentions a gun doesn't make it recent. Guns
have been around for half a millennium! And it's not inherently
clear that the original involved a gun anyway. If a fourteenth
century song claims that X shot Y, you'll assume it involves a bow.
Five centuries later, you'd assume a gun. But the word "shot" applies
to both, and could have influenced the name of the weapon used.>>Not to mention a slingshot, used for hunting in times past -- and still
around, as stories from the West Bank make sadly clear.Peace,
Paul

Original Message:  

Permalink




--

LISTSERV 15.5 - BALLAD-L Archives

View:

Next Message | Previous Message


Options:

Reply


Subject: A Quick hello
From: Nigel Gatherer <[unmask]>
Reply-To:Forum for ballad scholars <[unmask]>
Date:Tue, 24 Oct 2000 12:06:39 +0100
Content-Type:text/plain
Parts/Attachments:

text/plain(8 lines)


A quick hello from new listmember Nigel Gatherer from not-so-sunny
Perthshire in Scotland. I'm an amateur enthusiast with a particular
interest in Scottish broadsides, and a general interest in old songs. I'll
enjoy lurking for a while to see what sort of discussions develop.--
Nigel Gatherer, Crieff
mailto:[unmask]

Original Message:  

Permalink




--